Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Efficient genome editing of an extreme thermophile, Thermus thermophilus, using a thermostable Cas9 variant


Thermophilic organisms are extensively studied in industrial biotechnology, for exploration of the limits of life, and in other contexts. Their optimal growth at high temperatures presents a challenge for the development of genetic tools for their genome editing, since genetic markers and selection substrates are often thermolabile. We sought to develop a thermostable CRISPR-Cas9 based system for genome editing of thermophiles. We identified CaldoCas9 and designed an associated guide RNA and showed that the pair have targetable nuclease activity in vitro at temperatures up to 65 °C. We performed a detailed characterization of the protospacer adjacent motif specificity of CaldoCas9, which revealed a preference for 5′-NNNNGNMA. We constructed a plasmid vector for the delivery and use of the CaldoCas9 based genome editing system in the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus at 65 °C. Using the vector, we generated gene knock-out mutants of T. thermophilus, targeting genes on the bacterial chromosome and megaplasmid. Mutants were obtained at a frequency of about 90%. We demonstrated that the vector can be cured from mutants for a subsequent round of genome editing. CRISPR-Cas9 based genome editing has not been reported previously in the extreme thermophile T. thermophilus. These results may facilitate development of genome editing tools for other extreme thermophiles and to that end, the vector has been made available via the plasmid repository Addgene.


CRISPR-Cas systems are adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea that defend against invading genetic materials such as viruses and plasmids1,2. They are composed of a CRISPR array and cas genes. The CRISPR array contains a collection of short sequences called spacers, that are complimentary to foreign DNA/RNA sequences called protospacers. A repeat sequence separates the spacers3,4. The CRISPR array is transcribed into RNA and processed into smaller fragments, mature crRNAs, each containing a single spacer5. Upon invasion of foreign nucleic acid into a prokaryotic cell, Cas nucleases are guided by crRNAs to a complimentary protospacer where they cleave the DNA or RNA2. CRISPR-Cas systems are classified into types I–VI on basis of the effector proteins involved6,7. In type II systems (CRISPR-Cas9), Cas9 mediates crRNA:protospacer interactions and nuclease activity, causing DNA double strand breaks8. An RNA transcript emanating from type II CRISPR loci, termed trans-activating RNA (tracrRNA) forms a duplex with crRNA to guide Cas99. In addition to crRNA:protospacer base pairing, Cas9 nuclease activity is dependent on a sequence motif directly adjacent to the targeted protospacer—a protospacer adjacent motif, PAM10,11,12.

Type II CRISPR-Cas systems have been adapted as genome editing tools for a wide variety of organisms. The most widely used system originates from Streptococcus pyogenes and consists of its Cas9 enzyme (SpyCas9), crRNA and tracrRNA—or more frequently a fused variant of the latter two called guide RNA (gRNA)8. The spacer sequence of crRNA or gRNA can be engineered to target any genomic sequence, but SpyCas9 only cleaves DNA adjacent to the PAM sequence 5′-NGG8. Engineered variants of SpyCas9 and other Cas9 enzymes have different PAM specificities13, allowing further targeting possibilities. After delivery of the system into a cell the Cas9:gRNA complex binds to the targeted sequence and causes a double strand break in the DNA. If left unrepaired, the double strand break is lethal to cells. In mammalian cells the resulting DNA ends can be ‘fused’ together by an error-prone DNA repair mechanism called non-homologous end joining, which frequently results in insertion/deletion mutations. As a result, generation of knock-out mutations in mammalian cells can be achieved by introducing only Cas9 and gRNA into the cells. Non-homologous end joining repair pathways are not universally present in prokaryotes14. When the system is utilized for genome editing in bacteria a homologous recombination (HR) construct—which can be designed to achieve genomic deletions, insertions or substitutions—is therefore generally supplied with the system for directing genetic modifications via homology directed repair15 and Cas9:gRNA acts as a selection system by eliminating non-edited clones16 (supplementary file 1). The success of Cas9 based genome editing in bacteria is therefore dependent on the activity of Cas9; the activity of DNA repair mechanisms in the host; and on properties of the DNA repair template (its size, whether it is linear or circular, etc.). High Cas9 activity contributes to low transformation efficiency (high lethality) and high genome editing efficiency, while high activity of DNA repair contributes to increased transformation efficiency and increased genome editing efficiency. To achieve the right balance between editing and transformation efficiencies, it may be necessary to modulate the activity of Cas9 by choosing a weak, strong or inducible promoter, as appropriate, and to increase the activity of DNA repair by supplying exogenous recombinases.

SpyCas9 is not stable in vivo beyond 42 °C, and therefore not applicable for genome editing in extreme thermophiles17. Recently, thermostable Cas9 enzymes—designated GeoCas9, ThermoCas9, AceCas9, IgnaviCas9 and NsaCas9—have been identified and characterized18,19,20,21,22. In vitro assays suggest they are active at temperatures of at least 60–70 °C. Knock-out of two genes was attempted separately with ThermoCas9 in the moderate thermophile Bacillus smithii at 55 °C18. Application of the system resulted in complete lethality for one of the targeted genes, and predominantly in generation of clones of a mixed WT/KO (wild-type/knock-out) genotype for the other. Perhaps inclusion of an exogenous recombinase would facilitate more efficient genome editing with ThermoCas9 in B. smithii. Expression of ThermoCas9 and AceCas9 in combination with gRNAs targeting genomic loci in the moderate thermophile Clostridium thermocellum resulted in no or limited cell death, and therefore neither was applicable for genome editing applications23. The underlying reason for the observed lack of Cas9 activity was however not explored and it therefore cannot be ruled out that ThermoCas9 and/or AceCas9 could be utilized in C. thermocellum genome editing, e.g., if controlled with a suitable promoter. In C. thermocellum GeoCas9 was however successfully used for genome editing, yielding a high proportion of desired KO clones when used in combination with a recombinase and grown at 50–55 °C23. CRISPR-Cas9 based genome editing was recently achieved in cells growing at 65 °C in the extreme thermophile Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus at very low efficiency24, i.e., yielding predominantly WT or mixed genotype clones rather than the desired KO clones. Efficient genome editing using thermostable CRISPR-Cas9 systems has not been demonstrated in extreme thermophiles. Where tested, it remains unclear whether inefficiency of the system is the result of instability of Cas9 at high temperatures, if it is the result of inefficient genome repair in the cellular system tested, or for other reasons.

Today, the favoured model chassis species for systems and synthetic biology efforts, e.g. Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Bacillus spp., are derived from a narrow environmental range regarding temperature and pH. They are the organisms of choice as chassis species for metabolic engineering due to their genetic tractability and experimentally supported vast knowledge on various aspects of their biology25. However, they are not always the best potential species for industrial applications. Their substrate range may be limited relative to feedstock, and key properties may be missing for coping with physico-chemical conditions favourable e.g. for exploiting raw and recalcitrant 2nd and 3rd generation feedstocks26. Still, the work on these organisms is generating the important fundamental groundwork in the field of metabolic engineering and paving the way for other organisms.

Extreme thermophilic heterotrophic bacteria are highly interesting from an industrial processing perspective. The ability to grow at high temperatures in bioreactors reduces costs of cooling and prevents contamination by mesophilic spoilage bacteria. High temperature also increases solubility of polysaccharides and consequently leads to reduced viscosity of fermentation broths. This may alleviate, to significant extent, scale up problems of mixing and aeration and enable greater substrate loadings. Elevated temperatures can also enable more cost-effective recovery of volatile products by distillation (preferably continuous) or gas stripping that would reduce inhibition of products, therefore, prolonging the fermenting life of cultures and resulting in increased yields26,27. Despite their potential, no examples of industrial microbial production using thermophilic organisms exist on a commercial scale. Industrial bioprocessing using mesophilic microorganisms have however been a reality for decades, of which ethanol production from starch rich feedstocks using yeast is by far the most commercially successful28.

Genetic tools for genome editing are well established for many mesophiles, but to a much lesser degree for thermophiles28. Depending on species, this may include lack of genetic transfer systems, genomes being poorly/not sequenced, and particularly due to a lack of selectable markers. When recyclable marker systems are available, their application for genome engineering is generally time consuming. More efficient genome editing tools may therefore contribute to increased practical application of thermophilic microorganisms. In this paper we describe the development of a CRISPR-Cas9 system for genome editing of extremely thermophilic bacteria. We utilized a Cas9 enzyme closely related to ThermoCas9 and GeoCas9 that exhibited activity at high temperatures in vitro; we characterized its PAM sequence in detail; and demonstrated its function as a genome editing tool in vivo at 65 °C in the model extreme thermophilic species Thermus thermophilus. These results may facilitate development of genome editing tools for other extreme thermophiles and to that end we have made a vector carrying the system available to other researchers through the plasmid repository Addgene (plasmid #164264).


Identification of CaldoCas9

We sought to identify and test a thermostable CRISPR-Cas9 system in vitro for subsequent adaptation as an in vivo genome editing tool. At the time, characterization of thermostable Cas9 enzymes had not been reported and we therefore aimed to identify a previously uncharacterized Cas9 enzyme, crRNA and tracrRNA in a genome of a thermophilic prokaryote. Makarova et al. reported a gene encoding Cas9 in the genome of the thermophile Geobacillus sp. strain JF8 (ref 6). Since many species of the Geobacillus genus are thermophilic we downloaded sequences of all publicly available Geobacillus genomes and identified homologs of the Cas9 gene from Geobacillus sp. strain JF8 by nucleotide BLAST. At the time of initial analysis, we identified a total of 16 Cas9 genes in Geobacillus genomes, including strain JF8 (supplementary file 2). Currently, using blastp and searching NCBI’s databases restricted to Geobacillus genomes, 23 full length Cas9 enzymes can be identified (supplementary file 3), including ThermoCas9 and GeoCas9 (Fig. 1A). For each of the 16 Cas9 genes initially identified, we extracted all CRISPR spacers from the respective bacterial strain genome. Most genomes contained a single CRISPR array, the number of spacers ranged between 4 and 54 per array, and in total 300 spacers were identified (data not shown). We performed a BLAST search for protospacers matching the 300 spacers in all publicly available viral genomes (n = 7807, NCBI). We identified 10 protospacers complimentary to spacers from 6 different Geobacillus spp. strains (Fig. 1B), all from CRISPR arrays proximal to Cas9 genes. Three of the ten protospacers were complimentary to spacers in the genome of Geobacillus sp. strain LC300. The number of identified protospacers allowed us to define a putative PAM specificity for the Geobacillus sp. LC300 Cas9 enzyme: 5′-NNNNGNAA (Fig. 1B). Geobacillus sp. LC300 optimal growth temperature is 72 °C29 and thus its CRISPR-Cas9 system presented a good candidate for adaptation to a thermostable CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing tool. The CRISPR-Cas locus in Geobacillus sp. LC300 (Fig. 1C) contains genes cas9, cas2 and cas1, and a CRISPR array with 32 spacers separated by the repeat sequence 5′-GTCATAGTTCCCCTGAGATTATCGCTGTGGTATAAT29. Signature genes csn2 and cas4 are not present in the locus, and the system is therefore of CRISPR-Cas type IIC6. The Cas9 enzyme of Geobacillus sp. LC300, which we refer to as CaldoCas9, is composed of 1087 amino acids and is therefore considerably shorter than SpyCas9 (1368 amino acids). CaldoCas9 shares a very high sequence similarity with GeoCas9 (98% identical sites) but is more distantly related to ThermoCas9 (Fig. 1A,D and supplementary file 3). CaldoCas9 and GeoCas9 sequences differ primarily in their PAM interacting domains (PID). A fusion protein has previously been reported where the GeoCas9 PID was substituted with that of CaldoCas919. A preliminary investigation of the PAM sequence specificity of the fusion protein suggested preference for G and A in the fifth and eight nucleotides downstream of a target sequence, respectively. Characterization of the native CaldoCas9 enzyme has not been previously reported in vitro or in vivo.

Figure 1

Identification of CaldoCas9 and design of gRNA. (A) Phylogeny of Cas9 enzymes identified in publicly available genomes of Geobacillus strains. Respective strain names are indicated. Scale bar indicates average number of amino acid residue substitutions per site. (B) A list of protospacers identified in viral genomes that are complimentary to spacers extracted from Geobacillus strains. Protospacer sequences and 9 bases downstream of the protospacer are shown. (C) A schematic illustrating organization of the CRISPR-Cas9 genomic region of Geobacillus strain LC300. The putative location of the tracrRNA is indicated, and of genes encoding Cas1, Cas2, and CaldoCas9. (D) Alignment of amino acid residue sequence of CaldoCas9 with the previously characterized enzymes GeoCas9 and ThermoCas9. Scale indicates polypeptide length. Each residue per enzyme is indicated in gray or black color, where gray indicates sequence consensus in all three enzymes, and black indicates non-consensus. At the bottom of the schematic, locations of Cas9 domains are indicated. (E) Genome sequence alignment of five Geobacillus strains, showing an approximately 0.3 kb region upstream of the caldocas9 open reading frame. Each nucleotide is indicated in gray or black color, where gray indicates consensus between sequences and black indicates non-consensus. Location of an CRISPR anti-repeat sequence, a poly-A sequence, and putative tracrRNA are indicated. (F) A schematic illustration of the designed gRNA. Predicted base-pairing is indicated with vertical black bars. The gRNA spans the entire sequence indicated in blue and red.

Identification of CaldoCas9 associated tracrRNA and gRNA design

Transcription data from Geobacillus sp. LC300 was not available, and we therefore assumed that the mature crRNA contains a full-length repeat and spacer sequence, 36 and 30 nt respectively. Using a method based on Briner et al.30, we identified a putative tracrRNA (Fig. 1C). First, an anti-repeat sequence, partially homologous to the CRISPR repeat, was identified in a non-coding region close to the cas9 transcription start site (Fig. 1E) with a local nucleotide blast search within the CRISPR locus. Then we predicted the length of the tracrRNA molecule by a combination of genomic sequence conservation between different Geobacillus strains, identification of a potential Rho-independent transcription terminator, and in silico prediction of the RNA folding of putative tracrRNA molecules of different lengths at 72 °C. A stable crRNA:tracrRNA duplex was predicted when the tracrRNA was 158 nt (transcribed from position 2.247.840–2.247.997 in Geobacillus LC300 genome assembly CP008903). The predicted structure contained conserved modules of crRNA:tracrRNA duplexes30, i.e., a stem, nexus and two hairpins (supplementary file 4). Further it is contained within a conserved genomic region flanked by more divergent sequences, suggesting functional importance (Fig. 1E). Finally, the putative gene terminates with a poly-A sequence (Fig. 1E) following a hairpin (supplementary file 4), which are hallmarks of rho independent terminators31. To facilitate its use as a genome editing tool in combination with CaldoCas9, we designed a single guide RNA (gRNA, Fig. 1F). The predicted structure of the crRNA:tracrRNA suggested that the 3′ end of the crRNA and 5′ end of the tracrRNA contained three non-complimentary base-pairs (supplementary file 4). In designing the gRNA, we therefore reasoned that addition of non-complimentary bases (as described for spyCas9 by Jinek et al.8) was unnecessary and instead we fused the crRNA 3′-end and the tracrRNA 5′-end without addition of bases (Fig. 1F). Spacers in the genome of Geobacillus sp. LC300 are generally 30 bp (data not shown). Though they are presumably shortened during crRNA maturation, as observed in Geobacillus stearothermophilus19 and other prokaryotes, we chose the full length 30 nt spacer as a starting point for characterization of CaldoCas9. The gRNA we designed is therefore composed of a 30 nt spacer, 36 nt CRISPR repeat and 158 nt tracrRNA sequences, totaling 224 nt (Fig. 1F). Harrington et al. recently reported that varying stem length in the gRNA for GeoCas9 between 16 and 36 nt, and tracrRNA length between 91 and 157 nt had no effect on enzymatic activity19.

CaldoCas9 is a targetable nuclease and is thermostable in vitro

We tested nuclease activity of CaldoCas9 and the gRNA we designed with an in vitro DNA cleavage assay. A synthesized, codon optimized gene encoding CaldoCas9 was cloned into an expression vector in frame with additional sequences to generate a fusion protein, MBP-SMT3-CaldoCas9, (MBP is maltose/maltodextrin-binding periplasmic protein and SMT3 is Ubiquitin-like protein SMT3), expressed in E. coli and the protein affinity column-purified. The fusion protein was used for in vitro characterization of CaldoCas9, without removal of the MBP-SMT3 sequences. We used a linearized plasmid as a target for Cas9 mediated cleavage and targeted a 30 bp sequence upstream of 5′-CAGAGAAA, consistent with the putative PAM 5′-NNNNGNAA. A gRNA containing a 30 nt spacer complimentary to this target was transcribed in vitro. We mixed CaldoCas9, gRNA and target DNA in different combinations and incubated at 55 °C for an hour. Combination of all three components resulted in DNA cleavage (Fig. 2A). The sizes of the DNA fragments were consistent with cleavage at the targeted site, suggesting targeted/specific endonuclease activity, a hallmark of Cas9 enzymes. We repeated the experiment using a gRNA containing a spacer that was not complimentary to the target DNA (a non-target gRNA), and observed no nuclease activity, as expected (supplementary file 5).

Figure 2

In vitro characterization of CaldoCas9 activity, thermostability and PAM specificity. (A) CaldoCas9, a DNA ‘target’ and gRNA containing a spacer complimentary to the target DNA were incubated in various combinations (top, +  = with, – = without) at 55 °C and the products separated on an agarose gel. Scale on left corresponds to the DNA ladder in the first well of the gel. On far right are indicated the expected band sizes of the uncut (7386 bp) and cut (5479 and 1907 bp) DNA. (B) CaldoCas9, a DNA ‘target’ and gRNA containing a spacer complimentary to the target DNA were incubated together at various temperatures (top) and the products separated on an agarose gel. (C) Top-left: three DNA libraries were prepared that contained a ‘target sequence’ that was common to all three libraries (red font) and a partially randomized sequence (3′- sequence, in blue font, randomized bases indicated as N) downstream of the target sequence. Bottom-left: the DNA libraries (carried on a circular plasmid backbone) were separately PCR amplified (primers indicated as P1 and P2) and incubated with CaldoCas9 and gRNA. The products of each were adapter ligated, PCR enriched and sequenced. Right: PAM sequences permissible for CaldoCas9 cleavage, as revealed by the experiment. The agarose gel images (A,B) have been digitally manipulated for clarity. The original images are provided in supplementary file 5.

To investigate the thermostability of CaldoCas9 we performed further DNA cleavage assays at a range of temperatures. We used the same linearized plasmid and gRNA as before. Components of the reaction were pre-incubated separately at temperatures between 35 and 70 °C, with one mix containing CaldoCas9 and gRNA and the other containing the target DNA. After pre-incubation the components were mixed and incubation continued for 1 h. We observed cleavage of DNA at temperatures between 35 and 65 °C (Fig. 2B). No activity was detected at 70 °C and the activity was considerably reduced at 35 °C. Similarly, GeoCas9 and ThermoCas9 showed upper activity limits around 65 °C18,19. These data suggest that CaldoCas9 is thermostable and active in vitro at a wide temperature range, approximately between 35 and 65 °C. It is therefore a good candidate for adaptation for in vivo genome editing in thermophiles and could potentially be used for the same purpose in mesophiles.

CaldoCas9 has a unique PAM sequence

To maximize the application potential of Cas9 enzymes for genome editing, it is important to characterize their PAM preferences in detail. We sought to achieve this for CaldoCas9 by assaying its nuclease activity against DNA libraries containing randomized protospacer adjacent sequences, a method described by Karvelis et al.32. Three plasmid libraries were constructed containing the same target sequence for Cas9 cleavage. Bases 1–4, 5–8 or 9–12 downstream of the target were randomized such that the sequence following (3′-sequence) was 5′-NNNNGAAACAAC for library N1-4, 5′-CAGANNNNCAAC for library N5-8, and 5´-CAGAGAAANNNN for library N9-12 (Fig. 2C, top-left). A gRNA was synthesized containing a 30 nt spacer complimentary to the target sequence. The gRNA and CaldoCas9 were incubated with each of the libraries. PAM sequences permissible for Cas9 DNA double strand break were distinguished from the rest of the respective plasmid libraries by their linearization by CaldoCas9:gRNA. Linear DNA was ‘fished’ out of the reaction by adapter ligation and subsequent PCR enrichment. MiSeq sequencing was used to reveal the sequence composition of the linearized libraries. To confirm random distribution of bases in the 3′-sequence of undigested libraries, they were PCR amplified (primers P1 and P2, Fig. 2C) and sequenced. The frequency of each base in the digested library was normalized to the frequency in the undigested library (supplementary file 6). The analysis revealed that CaldoCas9 has a strong preference for G in position 5, and for A in positions 7 and 8, downstream of the target (Fig. 2C, right). In position 7, a C base is also ‘permissible’ for DNA cleavage. These data suggest that the PAM sequence of CaldoCas9 is 5′-NNNNGNMA. This adds more detail, but is otherwise consistent with the putative PAM sequence, as suggested by protospacer search in viral genomes observed here (Fig. 1B) and reported previously19. The sequencing data additionally suggested that CaldoCas9 nuclease activity causes DNA double strand break between the 3rd and 4th bases in the protospacer at its 3′ end (data not shown).

pTTCC allows for simple construction and delivery of CaldoCas9 based genome editing system

We sought to test the applicability of CaldoCas9 and its associated gRNA for genome editing in thermophilic bacteria. As a proof of concept, we sought to edit genes in the genome of the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus. T. thermophilus is a Gram negative, aerobic bacterium that grows at temperatures up to 85 °C33,34. It can be easily grown under laboratory conditions, readily takes up DNA from the environment35,36 and its genome sequence is published37. Combined with an efficient homologous recombination machinery35,38, these properties make for a good candidate to test the CaldoCas9 based genome editing system in vivo.

We constructed a plasmid delivery system for CaldoCas9 based genome editing in T. thermophilus strain HB27, and have made it available through Addgene (plasmid # #164264). The plasmid, called pTTCC (plasmid Thermus thermophilus CRISPR-Cas9) contains (Fig. 3): a high-GC codon optimized gene encoding CaldoCas9 (supplementary file 7) under control of a cellobiose inducible promoter Pcel and a transcription terminator sequence; origins of replication for maintenance in T. thermophilus and E. coli (Thermus-ori, pUCori); a gene conferring kanamycin resistance (kanR) under control of the constitutive promoter PslpA; and a gRNA construct downstream of the Ptrc promoter39. The plasmid was designed such that spacer sequences can be cloned as annealed oligonucleotides containing unique 4-bp overhangs on each end, into BbsI restricted pTTCC (Fig. 3). Selection of clones containing the desired spacer can be selected by blue-white screening in E. coli strains of appropriate genotype, as the BbsI sites flank a gene encoding the lacZα fragment of β-galactosidase. A unique KpnI restriction site can be used for insertion of HR constructs by DNA assembly or restriction-ligation (Fig. 3).

Figure 3

Composition of pTTCC, a CaldoCas9 genome editing system delivery vector. Left: a plasmid map illustrating the composition of pTTCC. The vector contains a gene encoding CaldoCas9 regulated by a cellobiose inducible promoter, Pcel, and a transcription terminator; a gene encoding a thermostable enzyme conferring kanamycin resistance under regulation of a constitutive promoter PslpA; T. Thermophilus and E. coli specific origins of replication; and a construct for cloning gRNA spacers and homology arms for directing gene editing—shown in detail in right panel. Right: pTTCC is constructed such that the vector can be digested by BbsI restriction endonuclease and spacer sequences inserted as annealed oligos via DNA ligation. The BbsI restriction sites flank a gene encoding the LacZα fragment of β-galactosidase and spacer cloning can therefore be combined with blue-white screening. A unique KpnI restriction site can be used for cloning of homologous recombination constructs.

CaldoCas9 genome editing is highly efficient in vivo at 65 °C

We aimed to test the CaldoCas9 genome editing system, and the associated plasmid delivery system pTTCC, by knocking out genes crtI and purA in T. thermophilus. The genome of T. thermophilus strain HB2740 is composed of a 1.9 Mb chromosome and a 0.2 Mb megaplasmid with a GC content of 69%37. The bacterium is polyploid, containing an estimated 4–5 copies of the chromosome and megaplasmid each41,42. Genes encoding enzymes of a carotenoid biosynthesis pathway are located on the megaplasmid, making the cells yellow-pigmented. The crtI gene, which encodes a phytoene desaturase, converts colorless phytoene to lycopene early in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway, and crtI knock-out mutants therefore appear white43. Cells are viable without the megaplasmid, but considerably growth retarded41. The purA gene, which encodes adenylosuccinate synthase, is located on the chromosome and is essential in adenine biosynthesis. purA knock-out mutants are therefore expected to require adenine supplementation for growth. The crtI and purA genes are convenient targets for testing the genome editing system, as their knock-out results in striking phenotypes that can be readily identified: WT cells are yellow and crtI KO mutants white; WT cells grow in media without adenine, while purA KO mutants do not.

For generation of a T. thermophilus crtI knock-out mutant, a 30 bp spacer complimentary to a sequence in the crtI open reading frame was designed and cloned into pTTCC, generating pTTCC_crtI_s. The targeted sequence is followed by 5′-CCTGGAAA consistent with the 5′-NNNNGNMA PAM specificity of CaldoCas9. Subsequently, 0.5 kb sequences flanking the crtI open reading frame were amplified and assembled into the plasmid to generate a homologous recombination (HR) construct. The resulting plasmid, pTTCC_crtI, was used for transformation of T. thermophilus strain HB27 in three independent experiments. pTTCC (without spacer and HR construct) was used as a control. T. thermophilus is naturally competent, and transformation was carried out by mixing the plasmids with the bacterium at 70 °C. After transformation, cells were plated on solid medium with kanamycin and incubated at 65 °C for 24 h for selection of clones carrying the plasmids. For genome editing to occur via the action of CaldoCas9 under these circumstances, the system must therefore be stable in vivo at a minimum of 65 °C. In the three experiments, we obtained 25, 3, and 50 colonies after transformation with pTTCC_crtI and 336, 392 and 166 colonies after transformation with the control plasmid pTTCC, containing neither gRNA spacer or HR construct (average 1490 colonies/µg control plasmid DNA). Induction of Cas9 expression was not performed (the culture medium did not contain cellobiose) and therefore the apparent Cas9 activity was the result of basal level expression from the Pcel promoter. Clones that grew on plates after transformation with pTTCC_crtI appeared white, suggesting successful genome editing (Fig. 4A). Since stochastic mutations could possibly occur, e.g., resulting in loss of the megaplasmid with concomitant white phenotype, it was necessary to assess the fidelity and efficiency of potential genome editing in the clones on a molecular level. A PCR based assay was used for this purpose, where the crtI gene locus was amplified using primers that bind upstream of the 5′ flanking sequence and downstream of the 3′ flanking sequence used for construction of the HR construct. The primers therefore do not amplify the HR construct in the pTTCC_crtI plasmid. Amplification in the WT locus was expected to yield a 2891 bp amplicon, whereas in the KO locus amplification was expected to yield a 1351 bp amplicon due to deletion of 1540 bp sequence containing the crtI open reading frame. Colony PCR was carried out on 22 colonies selected from all three experiments. The smaller amplicon corresponding to the KO allele was observed in 19 cases and no amplification, neither WT or KO allele, was observed from 3 cases (Fig. 4B). Amplification of a different locus on the megaplasmid, approximately 75 kb upstream of crtI, and of a chromosomal locus (purA), were tested for these three clones (data not shown). No amplification was observed for one clone, suggesting DNA isolation had been unsuccessful in this one instance, and data relating to this clone therefore not informative. Amplification of both loci, on the megaplasmid and on the chromosome, was successful in the other two clones, suggesting that failure to amplify the crtI locus in these two instances may result from stochastic deletions on the megaplasmid, encompassing crtI and adjacent sequences, but not loss of the megaplasmid altogether. Taken together, these data suggested that in 21 clones, the desired mutation was acquired in 19, whereas two clones contained undesired, stochastic mutations. The observed efficiency of the CaldoCas9 genome editing system in this instance was therefore 90%. The crtI locus of two apparent crtI KO clones were sequenced. In both cases the desired crtI KO mutation was observed (supplementary file 8).

Figure 4

CaldoCas9 based genome editing of T. thermophilus at 65 °C. (A) pTTCC_crtI transformants streaked out on fresh media and grown overnight to reveal pigmentation difference in the transformants and WT cells. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of products from colony PCR amplification of the genomic locus containing crtI in T. thermophilus pTTCC_crtI transformants. Expected band size of the KO allele was 1351 bp and of WT allele 2891 bp. (C) pTTCC_purA transformants streaked out on minimal media with and without adenine supplementation (+ Ade − Ade, respectively) to reveal the adenine auxotrophic phenotype. (D) Agarose gel electrophoresis of products from colony PCR amplification of genomic locus containing purA in T. thermophilus pTTCC_purA transformants. Expected band size of the KO allele was 1094 bp and the WT allele 2320 bp. (E) After growth of pTTCC_purA and pTTCC_crtI transformants in media without antibiotic selection, individual colonies were streaked out on media with and without kanamycin (+ Kan, − Kan, respectively) to reveal the presence or absence of the plasmid. The agarose gel images (B,D) have been digitally manipulated for clarity. The original images are provided in supplementary file 5.

The generation at low frequency of mutants harboring stochastic mutations suggest that DNA repair and survival occurs in a fraction of cells after DNA DSB that is independent of HDR involving the homologous sequences supplied on pTTCC_crtI. Therefore, it would be expected that such stochastic mutants could be generated by transformation of pTTCC_crtI_s (in which CaldoCas9 and crtI targeting gRNA are expressed, but no HR sequences are included). In two independent experiments, T. thermophilus HB27 was transformed with pTTCC_crtI_s and pTTCC, plated and grown as described previously. After incubation for 48 h, cells were counted. In the two experiments we obtained 9 and 12 colonies after transformation with pTTCC_crtI_s and 115 and 273 colonies after transformation with the control plasmid pTTCC. In total, 18 clones transformed with pTTCC_crtI3 were white and 3 were yellow. The lack of pigmentation suggested genetic mutations had occurred in at least 18 clones. We cultured two white clones transformed with pTTCC_crtI_s in liquid media overnight, isolated DNA and performed PCR assays to investigate the nature of the mutations. Using the primer pair flanking crtI, expected to yield a 2891 bp amplicon in WT cells, no amplification was observed (supplementary file 9). The primers bind approximately 0.7 kb upstream and 0.5 kb downstream of the crtI start and stop codons, respectively. Therefore, the lack of amplification suggests large-scale genetic deletions had occurred in these mutants. To investigate the extent of the deletion further, we performed PCR with two additional primer pairs. Using a primer pair that amplifies a locus approximately 12 kb upstream of crtI, the expected amplicon was observed for one clone and no amplicon for the other. Using a primer pair that amplifies a locus spanning a sequence 0.7–1.7 kb downstream of crtI, no amplification was observed for either clone (supplementary file 9). Taken together, these data suggest that following targeted DNA DSB by CaldoCas9 and gRNA in T. thermophilus, stochastic mutations may occur, perhaps mediated by HDR with distant sequences in the T. thermophilus genome.

We sought to test whether the CaldoCas9 based genome editing system and pTTCC delivery system could be utilized for genome editing on the bacterial chromosome with similar fidelity and efficiency as that observed for editing of the megaplasmid. To that end we aimed to knock out purA. We constructed pTTCC_purA containing a gRNA with a 30 bp spacer complimentary to a sequence in purA and a HR construct containing 0.5 kb sequences flanking the purA open reading frame. In this instance the targeted sequence was followed by 5′-GGAGGACA, again consistent with the PAM specificity of CaldoCas9. T. thermophilus was transformed with the plasmid at 70 °C, plated on solid media with kanamycin and grown for 24 h at 65 °C, as before. Again, Cas9 expression was not induced in these experiments. In two separate experiments, 6 and 5 colonies were obtained after transformation of pTTCC_purA. Two colonies were streaked out on minimal media and neither grew without the supplementation of adenine (Fig. 4C), suggesting purA knock-out had occurred. Colony PCR was performed on all 11 colonies to assess the fidelity and efficiency of the genetic mutation using primers that bind upstream of the 5′ flanking sequence and downstream of the 3′ flanking sequence used for the HR construct. In total, out of the 11 colonies tested, the PCR based assay suggested that 10 carried the expected KO allele and 1 the WT allele (Fig. 4D). The apparent efficiency of the system in this instance was therefore 91%. The purA locus of two clones containing apparent purA KO alleles were sequenced. In both cases the desired KO mutation was observed (supplementary file 8).

Taken together, the observed genome editing efficiency was comparable when a gene was deleted on the chromosome (purA) and on the megaplasmid (crtI). The transformation efficiency was however considerably higher when the CaldoCas9 system was used for deletion on the megaplasmid compared to the chromosome. This may potentially be coincidental, for example related to relative efficiency of the gRNA spacers. Alternatively, it may be associated with the polyploid nature of T. thermophilus which possibly results in copy number difference between the megaplasmid and chromosome.

pTTCC can be used for multiple consecutive genome modifications

For the application of the CaldoCas9 genome editing system for more than a single genome modification, the pTTCC plasmid would need to be introduced and cured in turn to recycle the kanamycin resistance marker. To investigate the feasibility of curing the pTTCC plasmids used for genome editing (pTTCC_crtI and pTTCC_purA), their stability in cells grown without selection pressure was assessed. Two clones, one crtI KO and one purA KO, were grown separately in liquid media without antibiotic selection overnight at 70 °C. It was assumed that in the absence of antibiotic selection pressure, plasmid curing would occur, at least in a considerable proportion of the cells. They were diluted the next day and plated on solid media without antibiotic and grown for 24 h at 70 °C. Individual colonies were assayed for the presence of the pTTCC_crtI and pTTCC_purA plasmids, by re-streaking on plates with and without kanamycin. Clones retaining the plasmids would be expected to grow on both plates, whereas in clones where plasmid curing had occurred no growth would be expected on plates with kanamycin. For crtI KO clones, we observed apparent plasmid curing in all 4 colonies tested, and for purA KO clones, we observed plasmid curing in half (2/4) of the colonies tested (Fig. 4E). This suggests that in the absence of selective pressure, pTTCC is not stable and is cured in a majority of cells after an overnight growth in liquid media. As a result, multiple consecutive rounds of genome editing can be achieved with the thermostable CRISPR-Cas9 system carried on pTTCC.


Thermophiles are studied for elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying life at elevated temperatures; for exploration of limits of life, e.g., in the context of life on other planets and the origin of life; and for their potential in the field of industrial microbiology, as whole cell catalysts for conversion of feedstocks to diverse, useful and valuable chemicals. Genetic tools enabling insertion, deletion and substitution of genetic material are necessary to achieve the full potential of these research fields. However, tools for genome editing of thermophilic organisms, where available, are largely immature28. At elevated temperatures, as well as at high salt concentrations, extremes of pH, or absence of oxygen, frequently required for growth of thermophiles, many of the molecular components of genetic tools used in mesophilic species lose their activity. This includes some antibiotics, antibiotic resistance enzymes, and fluorescent proteins. As a result, development of genetic tools for thermophiles is limited to a smaller number of molecular components compared to mesophiles.

In the past decade considerable progress has nevertheless been made in the development of genome editing tools for thermophiles. Tools are available that allow multiple consecutive rounds of genome editing in thermophiles of genera Thermus, Sulfolobus, Thermococcus and Pyrococcus, and progress towards this end has been reported for thermophiles of genera Rhodothermus, Thermoanaerobacter, Caldicellulosiruptor, and Thermotoga28. The majority of these systems rely on selection of antibiotic resistant/sensitive strains using thermostable antibiotics (kanamycin, hygromycin, bleomycin, and simvastatin) and thermo-adapted variants of their respective resistance enzymes and/or on selection of nutrient auxotrophic/heterotrophic strains (uracil, tryptophan, agmatine) using minimal media, the respective nutrient, toxic nutrient derivatives (5-fluoroorotic acid, 6-Methyl purine), and metabolic enzymes28. Where possible, recycling of selectable markers for a consecutive round of genome editing is however generally time consuming as it can involve screening of many clones for the desired mutation, repeated re-streaking to obtain pure clones, and/or it may require specific genetic mutant background strains, or specialized media components.

The aerobic thermophilic species belonging to the genus Thermus grow at circumneutral to alkaline pH, at temperatures ranging approximately from 60 to 85 °C. This is one of the most widespread genera of thermophilic bacteria and is found in natural geothermal areas as well as in man-made thermal environments44. The genus is a rich source of catabolic genes and gene clusters encoding enzymes for utilization, of diverse carbohydrates and their cellular import. It also has important precursor pools for terpenoid and carotenoid synthesis45, hydroxyalkonates, rhamnolipids46 and compatible solutes47. The high growth rates and cell yields of the Thermus spp. cultures, the small genome size, and the constitutive expression of an impressively efficient natural competence apparatus, make strains of the genus excellent laboratory models to study the molecular basis of life at elevated temperatures, genetic manipulation, structural genomics, systems biology and synthetic biorefinery potential48. T. thermophilus strains contain a number of polymer degrading enzymes, α-amylases, xylanases, esterases, lipases, proteases and pullulanases and are therefore able to grow on different organic sources such as various proteinaceous and carbohydrates substrates. The genetic tractability and the number of genetic tools that have already developed for strain HB27 makes it an ideal thermophilic chassis species to study and subsequently develop for biorefinery usage using tools of system and synthetic biology.

Many genome editing systems that use selection-counterselection strategies have been developed for T. thermophilus: in a ΔpyrE strain, a gene targeted for deletion was replaced by pyrE and uracil prototrophs selected in minimal medium, followed by counterselection to remove pyrE using 5-fluoroorotic acid49; A construct containing rpsL1a, a dominant allele which confers a streptomycin (Str) dependence phenotype, was integrated into a target locus and Str resistant clones selected, followed by counterselection in Str-free media to remove the rpsL1 construct along with the target gene50; In a Δbgl strain, a construct containing bgl and a kanamycin resistance allele was integrated into a target locus and kanamycin resistant clones selected, followed by counterselection using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-glucoside to remove the integrated construct and target gene51; A construct containing pheS2 (which causes sensitivity to a phenylalanine analog) and a kanamycin resistance allele was used to replace a target gene and kanamycin resistant clones selected, followed by counterselection to remove the construct using p-chlorophenylalanine52; A construct containing codA (which causes sensitivity to 5-fluorocytocine) and a kanamycin resistance gene was integrated into a target locus and kanamycin resistant clones selected, followed by counterselection using 5-fluorocytocine to remove the construct and target gene43. Other genome editing systems that have been developed for T. thermophilus and involve recycling of selection markers do not rely on counterselection: In strains carrying mutations in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway, white and orange colony color was used in turn to identify edited clones53; genes were deleted using a Cre/lox based site-specific recombination54; and genes were deleted using double crossover homologous recombination constructs without selection markers, and edited clones identified via mass screening PCR55. Taken together, there exist a wealth of diverse methods that enable metabolic engineering of T. thermophilus. Their use however presents some challenges that can be time consuming to address. In particular: some of these methods require specific genetic mutant strains49,51,52,53; spontaneous mutants can arise that are resistant to counter-selection or harbor otherwise unwanted mutations50,52,54; where necessary, growth in minimal media or specialized growth conditions requires cultivation for several days43,54; where a single ‘pop-in / pop-out’ genetic recombination construct is used, theoretical yield of mutants cannot surpass 50%43,50,51 and some methods require design and construction of two separate genetic recombination constructs49,52,53.

In contrast, the thermostable CRISPR-Cas9 based genome editing system presented herein can be used in WT or mutant strains, transformants are grown rapidly in rich media, pTTCC enables simple construction and delivery of the genome editing system, and the apparent yield of desired mutations is very high. We nevertheless observed a low frequency of unwanted mutations and apparent background of WT cells. Using more stringent selection (higher kanamycin concentration) may potentially reduce the growth of WT background colonies, but in our hands this comes at the cost of considerably fewer transformants (data not shown). We hypothesize that the observed undesired mutations arose following Cas9 induced double strand break and is the result of an inaccurate DNA repair mechanism, perhaps utilizing homologous recombination of somewhat divergent genomic sequences.

Various conditions relating to the use of pTTCC for genome editing of T. thermophilus remain to be tested that could potentially affect the genome editing efficiency, transformation efficiency, or both. These conditions include induction of CaldoCas9 and varying gRNA spacer length. pTTCC includes an inducible promoter regulating the transcription of CaldoCas9. In our experiments using pTTCC we did not test induction of CaldoCas9, since basal level expression proved sufficient for the function of the system. We reasoned that increasing CaldoCas9 activity by induction would potentially increase the risk of off-target effects, which would decrease transformation efficiency or increase the incidence of unwanted off-target mutations. Increasing the activity of CaldoCas9 by induction could however increase genome editing efficiency since it would increase mortality among non-recombined cells. In our experiments, genome editing efficiency was however very high, and it is therefore not obvious that induction is beneficial. In our experiments we used CaldoCas9 in combination with a gRNA containing an unconventionally long spacer, 30 bp. RNA sequencing data from G. stearothermophilus suggests spacer length of crRNAs in the bacterium is most commonly 22–24 bp and the in vitro activity of GeoCas9 is highest in combination with gRNAs with 21–22 bp spacers19. Using shorter gRNA spacers with CaldoCas9 may therefore possibly increase the enzyme’s activity. In relation to use of the system for genome editing, this could result in increased genome editing efficiency. Again, the observed high efficiency in our experiments suggest that CaldoCas9 with gRNAs containing 30 bp spacers is however sufficiently active to eliminate unedited clones, and it may therefore be unnecessary to increase its activity in this context.

The use of CRISPR-Cas9 systems for efficient genome editing of extreme thermophiles at temperatures above 55 °C has to our knowledge not been reported previously. In vivo activity of GeoCas9 and ThermoCas9 has been reported at a maximum temperature of 50–55 °C18,23, and in an extreme thermophile CRISPR-Cas9 based genome editing was inefficient24. We showed that application of the CaldoCas9 genome editing system is possible in organisms grown at temperatures of at least 65 °C. The CaldoCas9 genome editing system could in theory be adapted for use in any organism, given that the enzyme and associated gRNA can be delivered or expressed in the cells, and that they are active at the organism’s growth temperature. The CaldoCas9 genome editing system may therefore facilitate genome editing of other thermophilic organisms, including those for which limited tools exist to date. Adaptation of the system for plasmid-based delivery in other organisms would require availability of an appropriate replication plasmid, a positive selection marker and promoters for regulation of CaldoCas9, gRNA and selection marker expression. The applicability of CaldoCas9 based genome editing in different species will in part depend on the activity of endogenous repair mechanisms, like other CRISPR-Cas genome editing systems. It may therefore in some instances be facilitated by co-expression of recombinases16. CaldoCas9, like other Cas9 enzymes is a large polypeptide, which could potentially be difficult to express in some cells. CaldoCas9 and other Cas9 enzymes have however been successfully expressed in diverse bacterial species56 and other organisms. Adaptation of the CaldoCas9 genome editing system in other thermophilic bacteria that are closely related to T. themophilus may be relatively simple, involving limited or no modifications where activity/sequence of promoters, origins of replication, etc., are well conserved. In this context, it is notable that T. thermophilus strain HB8 is widely studied, similar to HB27. We hypothesize that the CaldoCas9 genome editing system and pTTCC plasmid can be used without modification in other T. thermohilus strains, including HB8, but this remains to be investigated.

A large proportion of prokaryotic species express endogenous CRISPR-Cas systems, in particular of types I and III6,57,58. Endogenous CRISPR-Cas systems have been exploited for genome editing in bacteria and archaea, including in extreme thermophiles59,60,61,62,63. Development of such systems may further facilitate genome engineering of thermophiles, and could be used in conjunction with Cas9 genome editing systems such as Caldocas9 to increase the number of targetable genomic loci beyond those containing the respective Cas9 PAM. The T. thermophilus HB27 genome encodes both type I and type III CRISPR-Cas systems37. An alternative genome editing system to that presented herein could therefore potentially be designed for T. thermophilus that utilizes these endogenous systems. As endogenous CRISPR based genome editing systems do not require exogenous expression of a nuclease they can be delivered on much smaller plasmids (or other delivery vectors). This may have benefits over the CaldoCas9 based system in that it could facilitate delivery of larger homologous recombination constructs, thus enabling larger genomic insertions.

Thermostable Cas9 enzymes may have applications other than for genome editing of thermophilic organisms. Their stability in human plasma, and potential therapeutic use in humans has been noted previously19. Cas nucleases are used for a wide range of applications, including in diagnostic tests64. Thermostability to increase shelf life of Cas9 based detection kits may be desirable in some instances. Finally, to achieve the full potential of Cas9 applications, it is important to further increase targetable nucleic acid sequences. In that context, previously identified Cas9 enzymes can be engineered or new enzymes identified that carry novel PAM specificities. The PAM specificity of CaldoCas9, 5′-NNNNGNMA, has not been described in other Cas9 enzymes to our knowledge.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, culture conditions and transformation

E. coli, NEB Stable (NEB C3040) and NEB 5-alpha (NEB C2987), were grown in L media at 37 °C, with 30 µg/ml kanamycin when appropriate. Transformation of E. coli was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions. T. thermophilus strain HB27 was grown in Thermus broth (TB): 8 g/L tryptone (Accumedia MC005), 4 g/L yeast extract (Bacto, 212750), 3 g/L NaCl (Fluca, 31,434), pH 7.5, with 23 µg/ml kanamycin when appropriate. Transformation of T. thermophilus was performed as described previously35,65,66: a single colony of T. thermophilus from a fresh culture plate was suspended in 10 ml TB and grown overnight at 70 °C with shaking. The following day, the culture was diluted by mixing 200 µl of the overnight culture in 10 ml fresh TB. The diluted culture was incubated at 70 °C with shaking until optical density at 550 nm reached 0.8 (approximately 4 h). A 500 µl aliquot of the culture was mixed with 200 ng of plasmid and culture continued at 70 °C with shaking for 2 h. The cells were plated on TB agar plates with kanamycin and incubated at 65 °C for 16–24 h.

CaldoCas9 expression and purification

The Geobacillus sp. strain LC300 cas9 gene (genome and protein reference numbers: NZ_CP008903, WP_050368141) was ordered synthesized, codon optimized for high %GC (supplementary file 7). It was synthesized by Eurofins genomics and supplied on a replication plasmid pEX-K4. The gene was cloned into an in-house plasmid, pHWG1106, under the control of a rhamnose inducible promoter to generate pHWG1106_MBP-SMT3-CaldoCas9 (supplementary file 10). It was cloned in frame with additional sequences such that CaldoCas9 was expressed as a fusion protein MBP-SMT3-CaldoCas9 (N- to C- terminus), where MBP is maltose/maltodextrin-binding periplasmic protein and SMT3 is Ubiquitin-like protein SMT3. The fusion protein was 1561 residues and 179.2 kDa. MBP facilitates protein folding and affinity purification; SMT3 enables removal of the MBP fusion via Ulp1 protease cleavage67. Cloning of the CaldoCas9 gene into pHWG1106 was performed by Gibson assembly. The gene was amplified from pEX-K4 with primers F_GA_gbCas9Ropt_malE_pHWH1106 and R_GA_gbCas9Ropt_malE_pHWH1106 (supplementary file 11) with a high-fidelity polymerase, and the amplicon assembled into BamHI, SfoI (NEB, R0136 and R0606) digested pHWG1106 vector, according to manufacturer’s instructions (NEB, E2611). The pHWG1106_MBP-SMT3-CaldoCas9 plasmid was introduced into E. coli strain BL21 C43 by transformation, gene expression induced with rhamnose and cells harvested. Cells were sonicated in a mild buffer (20 mM HEPES, 10 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01 mM EDTA, pH 6.5, 5 ml per gram cell pellet) and spun to remove cell debris. The supernatant was purified on an amylose column under control of Äkta purifier with UNICORN software: with sample binding in 20 mM Tris, 200 mM NaCl, pH 7.6 buffer; elution with a linear gradient 0–100% at 0.8 ml/min of elution buffer composed of 20 mM Tris, 200 mM NaCl and 10 mM maltose, pH 7.6. The purity of the eluted protein was assessed with SDS-PAGE and eluted fraction EF4 was used for in vitro experiments (supplementary file 12).

gRNA transcription and purification

The gRNA for CaldoCas9 was synthesized by PCR amplification using a scaffold DNA and two primers. A 194 bp gRNA scaffold was ordered synthesized, containing the whole gRNA sequence excluding the spacer (supplementary file 13). A forward ‘spacer primer’ was designed that contained a T7 RNA polymerase promoter, a gRNA spacer sequence, and a part of the gRNA stem and was thus partially complimentary to the scaffold. A PCR using the ‘spacer primer’ and a reverse primer (R_sgRNA_scaffold, supplementary file 11) and the gRNA scaffold as template generated the full-size gRNA DNA amplicon. The spacer sequence of the ‘spacer primer’ could be changed to generate gRNAs targeting any desired sequence. gRNAs were synthesized for in vitro cleavage assays using primers MM_gbsgRNA_rtTA_2 and crtI_TT_s3_F (non-target gRNA), and for PAM library targeting using primer GBsgRNAs6 (supplementary file 11). RNA was generated by in vitro transcription of the amplicons using T7 polymerase and purified as described in the Guide-it IVT RNA Clean-Up Kit (Takara, 632638).

In vitro DNA cleavage assays

In vitro DNA cleavage assays were performed in a Cas9 reaction buffer (20 mM HEPES, 10 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01 mM EDTA, pH 6.5). The reaction mixture contained 1 µl gRNA (50 ng/µl), 1 µl CaldoCas9 EF4, 1.5 µl Cas9 reaction buffer (10×), 100 ng target DNA and water to 15 µl final volume. The reactions were incubated for 1 h at a desired temperature. Before removal from the heating-blocks, gel loading dye containing SDS and EDTA (NEB, B7024) was added to quench the reactions. The reaction products were separated on agarose gels, visualized with SYBR safe (ThermoFisher, S33102), using a DNA ladder for reference (NEB N3232), and imaged on a UV dock (BIO-RAD GelDoc XR +). The original images (supplementary file 5) were processed for enhanced contrast and clarity.

Determination of Cas9 PAM specificity

Determination of CaldoCas9 PAM specificity was conducted as described by Karvelis et al.32. The methodology involves creating plasmid libraries containing a target sequence for Cas9 mediated DNA double strand break and a randomized PAM sequence; digestion of the libraries with Cas9; isolation and amplification of the linearized DNA strands; and sequencing. As only linearized fragments are sequenced, their sequences reveal the PAM specificity of Cas9.

Three oligonucleotides were constructed, gbS6_PAMseq_pos1to4_R, gbS6_PAMseq_pos5to8_R, gbS6_PAMseq_pos8to12_R (supplementary file 11) each containing the same target sequence followed by randomized downstream nucleotides in positions 1–4, 5–8 or 9–12 (Fig. 2C). To generate a double stranded DNA fragment containing the target and randomized PAM, the three oligonucleotides were mixed with the partially complimentary gbS6_PAMseq_F (supplementary file 11) and non-complimentary sequences filled-in with Taq polymerase (NEB M0273). The reaction was composed of 0.2 µM each oligonucleotide, 0.6 U Taq polymerase, and 0.2 mM dNTPs in a total volume of 25 µl with 1 × standard Taq reaction buffer. It was heated to 95 °C for 30 s, cycled 20 × (at 95 °C, 52 °C and 68 °C for 30 s each), and finally extended at 68 °C for 20 min. Amplicons and vector pTZ57R/T (CloneJet PCR cloning kit, ThermoFischer, K1231) were digested with BamHI and purified and the amplicons ligated into the vector using T4 DNA ligase (NEB M0202) at a molar ratio of 3:1 (approximately 0.06 pmol vector and 0.2 pmol insert), respectively. E. coli NEB Stable competent cells (NEB C3040) were transformed with 5 µl of the ligation product, plated on L-media with agar and ampicillin, 100 µg/ml, and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The libraries contained four randomized bases each, and therefore consisted of 256 different molecules. We aimed to obtain at least 2500 transformant colonies to ensure a theoretical 10 × representation of each molecule. For each of the three libraries transformed, we obtained 3000–4000 colonies. They were resuspended in 3 ml L media and miniprepped, and referred to as libraries N1-4, N5-8 and N9-12 (Fig. 2C).

The miniprepped libraries were digested by CaldoCas9. For each of the three libraries, two mixtures were prepared: one containing 2 µl of CaldoCas9 EF4 and 1 µl gRNA (50 ng/µl), and a second containing 500 ng library DNA, 1 × Cas9 reaction buffer and water to a final volume of 12 µl. The two mixtures were incubated separately for 5 min before they were combined and incubated for 4 h, both at 57 °C. Finally, the reactions were quenched by heating to 80 °C for 5 min. The linearized (and thus PAM containing) DNA molecules were captured from the reactions by A-tailing with Taq, followed by adapter ligation. A-tailing was performed by incubating the 15 µl Cas9 reactions with 2.5U Taq polymerase and 0.5 µl 10 mM dATP for 30 min at 72 °C. Adapters were generated by annealing of two oligonucleotides, TK-117 and TK-111 (supplementary file 11). They were then ligated to the A-tailed linearized libraries with T4 ligase using 100 ng of each reactant. The linearized, A-tailed and adapter ligated libraries were enriched by PCR amplification using Q5 polymerase (NEB, M0491) and primers pUC-dir and TK-117 (supplementary file 11). The amplicons were purified, MiSeq barcodes added by Q5 amplification with primers pUCdir-seq and TK-117-seq (supplementary file 11) and sequenced on Illumina MiSeq instrument. The resulting reads were analyzed with Geneious 9.1.8 software to reveal the PAM specificity of CaldoCas9. Reads containing 100% identity across nucleotides comprising the target sequence and 12 downstream bases were ‘filtered’ from the remaining data and analyzed. They were 389 for library N1–4, 510 for library N5–8 and 645 for library N9–12. The coverage per base was therefore around 100-fold or over for all libraries. To measure frequency of each nucleotide in the 3′-sequence of libraries prior to Cas9 digestion, they were PCR amplified with primers pUC-dir and R_gblib_PAMverif (supplementary file 11; indicated as P1 and P2 in Fig. 2C) and subsequently A-tailed, adapter ligated and sequenced as described for the Cas9 digested libraries. The frequency of each base in the digested library was normalized to the frequency in the undigested library to correct for bias in the latter (supplementary file 6). The normalized frequency was used to generate graphical representations of the PAM preference using WebLogo68.

Construction of pTTCC

pTTCC was constructed using an E. coli, T. thermophilus shuttle-expression vector, pLEI250.269, as a backbone (5371 bp). The vector backbone contained: origins of replication for maintenance (ORI) in E. coli and T. thermophilus; a kanamycin resistance gene; and bglT under regulation of a cellobiose inducible promoter and a transcription terminator sequence. bglT was flanked by HindIII and NdeI restriction sites. We removed a BbsI restriction site located in the T. thermophilus ORI in pLEI250.2 using site-directed mutagenesis as described in70 with primers F_pLEI250delBbsI and R_pLEI250delBbsI (supplementary file 11) and high-fidelity polymerase to create pLEI250.2-BbsI. The primers contained a single nucleotide mismatch with the template, located in the BbsI recognition site. Methylated template DNA was removed after the reaction by restriction using DpnI (R0176, NEB) and NEB5-alpha competent E. coli (C2987, NEB) transformed with the amplicons. Transformants were grown in liquid media, plasmids miniprepped, and removal of the restriction site confirmed with BbsI digestion. The gene encoding CaldoCas9 was amplified from pEX-K2 with primers F_gbCas9R_NdeI and R_gbCas9R_HindIII with Q5 polymerase and ligated into NdeI and HindIII restricted pLEI250.2-BbsI with T4 ligase, to create pLEI251. NEB Stable competent E. coli were transformed with the ligation mixture. Transformants carrying the desired insert were identified with colony PCR. A BbsI restriction site in the gene expressing CaldoCas9 was removed on pLEI251 to create pLEI252, using Q5 site-directed mutagenesis (NEB, E0554) with primers Q5SDM_4/13_F and Q5SDM_4/13_R following manufacturer’s instructions. Transformants were grown in liquid media, plasmids miniprepped and elimination of the restriction site confirmed by BbsI digestion. To create pTTCC, vector pLEI252 was digested with KpnI and a 477 bp DNA fragment (synthesized by Eurofins) inserted with HiFi assembly (E2621, NEB) according to manufacturer’s instructions and transformed in E. coli NEB Stable cells. The DNA fragment (supplementary file 14) contained a construct for gRNA spacer cloning and expression under regulation of Ptrc. Two BbsI restriction sites flank a gene encoding a lacZα fragment, an approach similar to (Altenbuchner 2016)71. Transformants carrying pTTCC were identified with colony PCR (pLEIseqR_trcgRNA and R_sgRNA_scaffold, supplementary file 11) and cultured in liquid media overnight. Plasmids were miniprepped and sequenced across the inserted fragment (pLEIseqR_trcgRNA, supplementary file 11).

Genome editing of Thermus thermophilus with pTTCC

Spacers were cloned into pTTCC using restriction ligation of oligonucleotides into restriction digested pTTCC (details in supplementary file 15). Briefly, oligonucleotides were designed containing the desired spacer sequence. They were phosphorylated and annealed to generate an oligo duplex. pTTCC was digested with BbsI-HF (NEB, R3539) and the duplex ligated into the vector with T4 DNA ligase. NEB Stable cells were transformed with the ligation mixture according to manufacturer’s instructions (C3040) and plated on L agar media with 30 µg/ml kanamycin and cultured overnight at 37 °C. A few clones were cultured in liquid media overnight at 37 °C and miniprepped (NEB T1010). Insertion of the desired spacer sequence was confirmed by Sanger sequencing using pLEIseqR-trcgRNA. In this manner, oligonucleotides crtI_TT_s3_F and crtI_TT_s3_R2 (supplementary file 11) were inserted into BbsI restricted pTTCC to generate pTTCC_crtI_s; and to generate pTTCC_purA_s the oligonucleotides were PurA_Spacer_2_F and PurA_Spacer_2_R (supplementary file 11).

A construct for directing homologous recombination resulting in gene knock-out was composed of two approximately 500 bp DNA sequences homologous to genomic regions flanking the target genes. The two sequences were amplified separately with Q5 DNA polymerase according to manufacturer’s instructions, using T. thermophilus strain HB27 genomic DNA as template. Genomic DNA was isolated from an overnight liquid culture of strain HB27 using Masterpure Complete DNA and RNA Purification kit (MC85200, Epicentre). For amplification of sequences flanking crtI, primers F2_GA_crtI3end, R2_GA_crtI3end, F2_GA_crtI5end and F2_GA_crtI5end were used, and for amplification of sequences flanking purA, primers were PurA_5F, PurA_5R, PurA_3F, PurA_3R (supplementary file 11). Plasmids pTTCC_crtI_s and pTTCC_purA_s were restricted with KpnI-HF (NEB, R3142) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The restricted vector and amplicons were each separated from their respective reagent mixtures by agarose gel electrophoresis; cut from the gels and purified using Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit (T1020, NEB). The purified amplicons and vector were assembled (HiFi, NEB) using two-fold molar excess of amplicons to generate pTTCC_crtI and pTTCC_purA. NEB 5-alpha Competent E. coli (NEB, C2987) were transformed with the assembly mixture, plated on L media with agar and kanamycin (30 µg/ml) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. To identify clones containing the insert, colony PCR was performed with primers pTTCC_HR_ampF and pTTCC_HR_ampR. A few clones were cultured overnight in liquid L media with kanamycin (30 µg/ml) and plasmids miniprepped (NEB, T1010). The miniprepped plasmids were restricted with BspHI (NEB, R0517) and separated on agarose gel to confirm presence of inserts.

Plasmids pTTCC_purA and pTTCC_crtI were used to generate T. thermophilus KO mutants. To confirm successful genome editing, a colony PCR based assay was used. To isolate DNA, T. thermophilus transformant colonies were: picked into 20 µl 10% chelex solution (BT Chelex 100, Bio-Rad 143-2832) and suspended by vortexing; incubated at 55 °C for 15 min; vortexed again and incubated at 100 °C for 10 min; placed on ice for 3 min; spun at 11,000×g for 7 min and the supernatant containing DNA collected. PCR was performed using the isolated DNA to determine allele size in the crtI and purA genome loci. For putative crtI KO mutants primers F_Tthp_60 and R_Tthp_60 were used and for putative purA KO mutants primers PurA_Verify_F and PurA_Verify_R were used (supplement file 11). To confirm the presence of the megaplasmid in mutants where amplification of the crtI locus was not observed, primers bgal_amp_F and bgal_amp_R were used. The reaction products were separated on agarose gels, visualized with SYBR safe (ThermoFisher, S33102), using a DNA ladder for reference (NEB N3232), and imaged on a UV dock (BIO-RAD GelDoc XR +). The original images (supplementary file 5) were processed for enhanced contrast and clarity.

Culture in minimal media and plasmid curing

To determine whether purA knock-out was successful, resulting in adenine auxotrophy, T. thermophilus was cultured in minimal medium with and without adenine supplementation. Colonies were streaked on agar plates containing 10% medium 16272 with modifications (2 mM MgSO4 and 0.2 mM CaCl2 in final volume), with addition of 0.3% NaCl, 8 mM phosphate buffer (KH2PO4, Na2HPO4, pH = 7.2), 10 mM NH4Cl, 0.2% casamino acids, 0.4% glucose and 0.001% Wolfe´s vitamin solution73. Agar plates were supplemented with 100 µl of 0.5% adenine solution before spreading cells, when applicable.

To cure plasmids pTTCC_crtI and pTTCC_purA from transformants, colonies were placed in 10 ml TB media and cultured overnight at 70 °C and shaking at 200 rpm. The cultures were diluted 100- and 1000-fold in fresh TB medium, 50 µl plated on TB agar plates and cultured for 24 h at 70 °C. To test whether plasmid curing was successful, single colonies were finally streaked on TB agar media with and without supplementation of 23 µg/ml kanamycin and cultured for 24 h at 70 °C.

Digital image processing

Figures were compiled using GIMP 2.8.22 ( Drawn schematics (Figs. 1F, 2C, supplementary file 1) were created by author BTA using GIMP. Agarose gels were processed using ImageJ 1.51j8 ( Schematics in Fig. 1A,C–E were created in Geneious 9.1.8 ( Plasmid maps (Fig. 3) were created using Snapgene 5.0 ( A sequence logo (Fig. 2C) was created with weblogo 2.8.2 (

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Barrangou, R. et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315, 1709–1712 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Garneau, J. E. et al. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 468, 67–71 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mojica, F. J. M., Díez-Villaseñor, C., Soria, E. & Juez, G. Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of Archaea, Bacteria and mitochondria. Mol. Microbiol. 36, 244–246 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jansen, R., van Embden, J. D. A., Gaastra, W. & Schouls, L. M. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol. Microbiol. 43, 1565–1575 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Brouns, S. J. J. et al. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science 321, 960–964 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Makarova, K. S. et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 722–736 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Klompe, S. E. & Sternberg, S. H. Harnessing, “A Billion Years of Experimentation”: The ongoing exploration and exploitation of CRISPR–Cas immune systems. CRISPR J. 1, 141–158 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).

  9. 9.

    Deltcheva, E. et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471, 602–607 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Deveau, H. et al. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 190, 1390–1400 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Horvath, P. et al. Diversity, activity, and evolution of CRISPR loci in Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 190, 1401–1412 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mojica, F. J. M., Díez-Villaseñor, C., García-Martínez, J. & Almendros, C. Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology 155, 733–740 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481–485 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bowater, R. & Doherty, A. J. Making ends meet: Repairing breaks in bacterial DNA by non-homologous end-joining. PLoS Genet. 2, e8 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Choi, K. R. & Lee, S. Y. CRISPR technologies for bacterial systems: current achievements and future directions. Biotechnol. Adv. 34, 1180–1209 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F. & Marraffini, L. A. CRISPR-assisted editing of bacterial genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 233 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mougiakos, I. et al. Efficient genome editing of a facultative thermophile using mesophilic spCas9. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 849–861 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mougiakos, I. et al. Characterizing a thermostable Cas9 for bacterial genome editing and silencing. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–11 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Harrington, L. B. et al. A thermostable Cas9 with increased lifetime in human plasma. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–8 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tsui, T. K. M., Hand, T. H., Duboy, E. C. & Li, H. The impact of DNA topology and guide length on target selection by a cytosine-specific Cas9. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 1103–1113 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Schmidt, S. T., Yu, F. B., Blainey, P. C., May, A. P. & Quake, S. R. Nucleic acid cleavage with a hyperthermophilic Cas9 from an uncultured Ignavibacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 23100–23105 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gasiunas, G. et al. Biochemically diverse CRISPR-Cas9 orthologs. bioRxiv (2020).

  23. 23.

    Walker, J. E. et al. Development of both type I-B and type II CRISPR/Cas genome editing systems in the cellulolytic bacterium Clostridium thermocellum. Metab. Eng. Commun. 10, e00116 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Le, Y., Fu, Y. & Sun, J. Genome editing of the anaerobic thermophile Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus using thermostable Cas9. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (2020).

  25. 25.

    Calero, P. & Nikel, P. I. Chasing bacterial chassis for metabolic engineering: a perspective review from classical to non-traditional microorganisms. Microb. Biotechnol. 12, 98–124 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Karlsson, E. N. et al. Biotechnological Applications of Extremophilic Microorganisms. in 3 Metabolic engineering of thermophilic bacteria for production of biotechnologically interesting compounds 73 (De Gruyter, 2020).

  27. 27.

    Zhu, D. et al. Recent development of extremophilic bacteria and their application in biorefinery. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, (2020).

  28. 28.

    Zeldes, B. M. et al. Extremely thermophilic microorganisms as metabolic engineering platforms for production of fuels and industrial chemicals. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1209 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cordova, L. T., Long, C. P., Venkataramanan, K. P. & Antoniewicz, M. R. Complete genome sequence, metabolic model construction and phenotypic characterization of Geobacillus LC300, an extremely thermophilic, fast growing, xylose-utilizing bacterium. Metab. Eng. 32, 74–81 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Briner, A. E., Henriksen, E. D. & Barrangou, R. Prediction and validation of native and engineered Cas9 guide sequences. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2016, pdb. prot086785 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Wilson, K. S. & von Hippel, P. H. Transcription termination at intrinsic terminators: The role of the RNA hairpin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92, 8793–8797 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Karvelis, T. et al. Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements. Genome Biol. 16, 1–13 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Oshima, T. & Imahori, K. Isolation of an extreme thermophile and thermostability of its transfer ribonucleic acid and ribosomes. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 17, 513–517 (1971).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Oshima, T. & Imahori, K. Description of Thermus thermophilus (Yoshida and Oshima) comb. nov., a nonsporulating thermophilic bacterium from a Japanese thermal spa. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 24, 102–112 (1974).

  35. 35.

    Koyama, Y., Hoshino, T., Tomizuka, N. & Furukawa, K. Genetic transformation of the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus and of other Thermus spp. J. Bacteriol. 166, 338–340 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hidaka, Y., Hasegawa, M., Nakahara, T. & Hoshino, T. The entire population of Thermus thermophilus cells is always competent at any growth phase. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 58, 1338–1339 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Henne, A. et al. The genome sequence of the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 547–553 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hashimoto, Y., Yano, T., Kuramitsu, S. & Kagamiyama, H. Disruption of Thermus thermophilus genes by homologous recombination using a thermostable kanamycin-resistant marker. FEBS Lett. 506, 231–234 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Brosius, J., Erfle, M. & Storella, J. Spacing of the -10 and -35 regions in the tac promoter. Effect on its in vivo activity. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3539–3541 (1985).

  40. 40.

    Sakaki, Y. & Oshima, T. Isolation and characterization of a bacteriophage infectious to an Extreme Thermophile, Thermus thermophilus HB8. J. Virol. 15, 1449–1453 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ohtani, N., Tomita, M. & Itaya, M. Curing the megaplasmid pTT27 from Thermus thermophilus HB27 and maintaining exogenous plasmids in the plasmid-free strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 1537–1548 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ohtani, N., Tomita, M. & Itaya, M. An extreme thermophile, Thermus thermophilus, is a polyploid bacterium. J. Bacteriol. 192, 5499–5505 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wang, L., Hoffmann, J., Watzlawick, H. & Altenbuchner, J. Markerless gene deletion with cytosine deaminase in Thermus thermophilus strain HB27. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 1249–1255 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hreggvidsson, G. O., Petursdottir, S. K., Stefansson, S. K., Björnsdottir, S. H. & Fridjonsson, O. H. Divergence of Species in the Geothermal Environment. in Adaption of Microbial Life to Environmental Extremes: Novel Research Results and Application (eds. Stan-Lotter, H. & Fendrihan, S.) 41–74 (Springer International Publishing, 2017).

  45. 45.

    Hoshino, T., Fujii, R. & Nakahara, T. Overproduction of carotenoids in Thermus thermophilus. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 77, 423–424 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pantazaki, A. A., Papaneophytou, C. P. & Lambropoulou, D. A. Simultaneous polyhydroxyalkanoates and rhamnolipids production by Thermus thermophilus HB8. AMB Express 1, 17 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Alarico, S. et al. Distribution of genes for synthesis of trehalose and mannosylglycerate in Thermus spp. and direct correlation of these genes with halotolerance. Applied and environmental microbiology 71, 2460–2466 (2005).

  48. 48.

    Cava, F., Hidalgo, A. & Berenguer, J. Thermus thermophilus as biological model. Extremophiles 13, 213 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tamakoshi, M., Yaoi, T., Oshima, T. & Yamagishi, A. An efficient gene replacement and deletion system for an extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 173, 431–437 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Blas-Galindo, E., Cava, F., López-Viñas, E., Mendieta, J. & Berenguer, J. Use of a dominant rpsL allele conferring streptomycin dependence for positive and negative selection in Thermus thermophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5138–5145 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Angelov, A., Li, H., Geissler, A., Leis, B. & Liebl, W. Toxicity of indoxyl derivative accumulation in bacteria and its use as a new counterselection principle. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 36, 585–592 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Carr, J. F., Danziger, M. E., Huang, A. L., Dahlberg, A. E. & Gregory, S. T. Engineering the genome of Thermus thermophilus using a counterselectable marker. J. Bacteriol. 197, 1135–1144 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Fujita, A., Sato, T., Koyama, Y. & Misumi, Y. A reporter gene system for the precise measurement of promoter activity in Thermus thermophilus HB27. Extremophiles 19, 1193–1201 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Togawa, Y., Nunoshiba, T. & Hiratsu, K. Cre/lox-based multiple markerless gene disruption in the genome of the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus. Mol. Genet. Genomics 293, 277–291 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Li, H. Selection-free markerless genome manipulations in the polyploid bacterium Thermus thermophilus. 3 Biotech 9, 148 (2019).

  56. 56.

    Vento, J. M., Crook, N. & Beisel, C. L. Barriers to genome editing with CRISPR in bacteria. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 46, 1327–1341 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Koonin, E. C & Makarova, K. S. CRISPR-Cas: an adaptive immunity system in prokaryotes. F1000 Biol. Rep. 1, (2009).

  58. 58.

    Makarova, K. S. et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 467–477 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Li, Y. et al. Harnessing Type I and Type III CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e34–e34 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Pyne, M. E., Bruder, M. R., Moo-Young, M., Chung, D. A. & Chou, C. P. Harnessing heterologous and endogenous CRISPR-Cas machineries for efficient markerless genome editing in Clostridium. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–15 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Cheng, F. et al. Harnessing the native type IB CRISPR-Cas for genome editing in a polyploid archaeon. J. Genet. Genomics 44, 541–548 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Stachler, A.-E. et al. High tolerance to self-targeting of the genome by the endogenous CRISPR-Cas system in an archaeon. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 5208–5216 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Zhang, J., Zong, W., Hong, W., Zhang, Z.-T. & Wang, Y. Exploiting endogenous CRISPR-Cas system for multiplex genome editing in Clostridium tyrobutyricum and engineer the strain for high-level butanol production. Metab. Eng. 47, 49–59 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Li, Y., Li, S., Wang, J. & Liu, G. CRISPR/Cas systems towards next-generation biosensing. Trends Biotechnol. 37, 730–743 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Lasa, I., Castón, J. R., Fernandez-Herrero, L. A., de Pedro, M. A. & Berenguer, J. Insertional mutagenesis in the extreme thermophilic eubacteria Thermus thermophilus HB8. Mol. Microbiol. 6, 1555–1564 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    de Grado, M., Castán, P. & Berenguer, J. A high-transformation-efficiency cloning vector for Thermus thermophilus. Plasmid 42, 241–245 (1999).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Li, S.-J. & Hochstrasser, M. A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature 398, 246–251 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J.-M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188–1190 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Wang, L., Watzlawick, H. & Altenbuchner, J. Development of a cellobiose-inducible expression System for Thermus thermophilus HB27. (manuscript in preparation) (2020).

  70. 70.

    Zheng, L., Baumann, U. & Reymond, J.-L. An efficient one-step site-directed and site-saturation mutagenesis protocol. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e115–e115 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Altenbuchner, J. Editing of the Bacillus subtilis genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 5421–5427 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Degryse, E., Glansdorff, N. & Piérard, A. A comparative analysis of extreme thermophilic bacteria belonging to the genus Thermus. Arch. Microbiol. 117, 189–196 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Wolin, E. A., Wolin, M. & Wolfe, R. S. Formation of methane by bacterial extracts. J. Biol. Chem. 238, 2882–2886 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Vectors pHWG1106 and pLEI250.2 were gifts from Hildegard Watzlawick, Josef Altenbuchner and Lei Wang (University of Stuttgart). We thank Josef Altenbuchner for advice on plasmid design for pTTCC, and Lei Wang for advice on T. thermophilus culture and manipulation. This work was funded by Rannsóknasjóður Rannís, The Icelandic Research Fund (projects Thermotools, ID 195721-051, and Macroalgal biorefinery, ID 152490-051) and by the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No. 685778, project Virus-X).

Author information




B.T.A., O.H.F. and G.O.H. conceived, and designed, the experiments; B.T.A., T.K., W.M., A.H., J.D. and M.T. performed the experiments; B.T.A. prepared figures and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bjorn Thor Adalsteinsson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adalsteinsson, B.T., Kristjansdottir, T., Merre, W. et al. Efficient genome editing of an extreme thermophile, Thermus thermophilus, using a thermostable Cas9 variant. Sci Rep 11, 9586 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing