Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Microvesicles released from pneumolysin-stimulated lung epithelial cells carry mitochondrial cargo and suppress neutrophil oxidative burst

Abstract

Microvesicles (MVs) are cell-derived extracellular vesicles that have emerged as markers and mediators of acute lung injury (ALI). One of the most common pathogens in pneumonia-induced ALI is Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn), but the role of MVs during Spn lung infection is largely unknown. In the first line of defense against Spn and its major virulence factor, pneumolysin (PLY), are the alveolar epithelial cells (AEC). In this study, we aim to characterize MVs shed from PLY-stimulated AEC and explore their contribution in mediating crosstalk with neutrophils. Using in vitro cell and ex vivo (human lung tissue) models, we demonstrated that Spn in a PLY-dependent manner stimulates AEC to release increased numbers of MVs. Spn infected mice also had higher levels of epithelial-derived MVs in their alveolar compartment compared to control. Furthermore, MVs released from PLY-stimulated AEC contain mitochondrial content and can be taken up by neutrophils. These MVs then suppress the ability of neutrophils to produce reactive oxygen species, a critical host-defense mechanism. Taken together, our results demonstrate that AEC in response to pneumococcal PLY release MVs that carry mitochondrial cargo and suggest that these MVs regulate innate immune responses during lung injury.

Introduction

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) causes considerable morbidity and mortality despite existing antibiotic therapies and preventive vaccination strategies1. The most prevalent bacterial pathogen causing CAP is the Gram-positive bacterium, Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn). Patients with pneumococcal pneumonia are at high risk for progression to life-threatening conditions such as sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) despite antibiotic therapy2. Notwithstanding decades of investigations on host–pathogen interactions, further research is needed in order to identify new approaches against the development of ARDS in pneumonia.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that Spn mediates its damaging effects by releasing the pore-forming toxin, pneumolysin (PLY), during bacterial autolysis3. PLY monomers bind to cholesterol on cellular membranes and subsequently oligomerize to form large pores. PLY-induced pore formation results in intracellular calcium increase and induction of multiple cellular responses, including cell lysis and death at high doses4. PLY has a direct role in pneumonia pathogenesis and CAP complications, such as acute lung injury (ALI)/ARDS3,5. It causes lung endothelial and epithelial barrier disruption, immune system dysregulation, and facilitation of Spn colonization6,7,8, but the cellular mechanisms underlying these PLY-induced events are incompletely understood.

Upon release into the airspace, PLY targets alveolar cells including the epithelium. Previous studies from our group and others have demonstrated that PLY initiates numerous inflammatory responses in alveolar epithelial cells (AEC) leading to cellular dysfunction, such as mitochondrial injury, necroptosis and DNA damage9,10,11, inflammatory cytokine release12, and dysfunction of the epithelial sodium channels8. Recently it was shown that PLY could also serve as a strong stimulant for extracellular vesicle (EV) production13,14,15.

EVs are small membrane-derived vesicles released from cells under normal conditions, or upon activation and cell death (e.g. apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis)16,17. Depending on their physical characteristics, EVs are classified into different categories including microvesicles (MVs), which are medium/large vesicles (size range of 0.1–1 μm), and exosomes, which are small vesicles (~ 30–150 nm). Recent studies by our group and others have identified MVs as important mediators of ALI18,19,20,21,22,23. MVs consist of lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids, and their content depends on the cellular origin as well as the conditions that stimulated their biogenesis and release17. They play a major role in mediating cellular cross-talk, which is primarily attributed to their capacity to transfer their specific molecular cargo to recipient cells. Despite the increasing number of studies exploring MVs in the field of lung diseases24, the role of MVs of alveolar epithelial origin in the context of pneumococcal pneumonia-induced ALI is poorly understood. Interestingly, our previous studies showed that AEC exposed to PLY release mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) extracellularly, within the MV fraction9. Based on these previous observations and existing literature, we hypothesized that lung alveolar epithelial cells in response to PLY release increased amounts of MVs carrying mitochondrial cargo that can be transferred to recipient neutrophils to regulate their immune functions. To test this hypothesis, we performed studies to (a) determine the effects of PLY on MV release from lung epithelial cells, (b) explore the mitochondrial content of PLY-induced MVs, and (c) examine the functional role of PLY-induced MVs on neutrophils, which are relevant immune cells that transmigrate to the alveolar space rapidly upon infection.

Results

Characterization of microvesicles released by PLY-treated alveolar epithelial cells

A549 were treated with PLY and MVs were isolated from the conditioned media after 4 h. Using FACS, we observed that the majority of isolated vesicles are < 1 μm (Fig. 1A,B), annexin V positive (annexin V +) (Fig. 1C), and sensitive to detergents (Fig. 1D). As seen in Fig. 1E (and Suppl. Fig. S1a), MVs can be visualized by confocal microscopy after labeling with cell permeable CFSE, demonstrating that they are heterogeneous in size. Finally, MVs are positive not only for CFSE, but also for CellMask, a plasma membrane dye (Fig. 1F). As expected, CFSE-labeled MVs are also annexin V positive (Suppl. Fig. S1b). These staining combinations provide further evidence for the vesicular nature of these isolated particles.

Figure 1
figure1

Characterization of microvesicles (MVs) produced from pneumolysin (PLY)-treated alveolar epithelial cells. A549 cells were treated with PLY (100 ng/ml). After 4 h, conditioned media was collected and MVs were isolated and characterized. (A,B) Representative FACS analysis (overlay dot blots) of isolated vesicles (blue dots), and of (A) 1 μm beads (red dots) or (B) human platelets (green dots). (C) MVs were stained with annexin V-APC in the presence or absence of calcium and analyzed by FACS. (D) MVs were treated with Triton-X 100 and analyzed by FACS. (E) CFSE-labeled MVs (green) were visualized using confocal microscopy. (F) MVs were labeled with CFSE (FITC) and CellMask (APC) and analyzed by FACS. In the representative dot blot, MVs labeled with CFSE and CellMask are shown in green. Grey dots represent unstained vesicles (background staining).

Quantification of microvesicles released by PLY-treated alveolar epithelial cells

Next, we compared the production of MVs from control and PLY-treated cells. As depicted in Fig. 2A, at these experimental conditions (PLY 100 ng/ml 4 h), cells remain attached to the culture dish. Higher concentrations (> 200 ng/ml, 4 h) caused considerable cell detachment. For this reason, and consistent with concentrations used in other studies in the field9,11, we used 100 ng/ml of PLY to stimulate the cells. We then quantified the MV production by measuring the number of annexin V-positive MVs by FACS and observed a tremendous increase in MV release from PLY-treated cells compared to control (Fig. 2B). Consistent with this, high protein levels of pan-cytokeratin (epithelial marker) and Cav-1 (common MV protein) were detected by immunoblotting in MVs from PLY-treated cells (Fig. 2C). Similarly, a large amount of CFSE-MVs were detected in the media of PLY-treated cells compared to untreated cells, in which the CFSE signal was considerable lower (Fig. 2D). Isolated MVs from PLY-treated cells have much higher total protein amount than control, further confirming an increased production of MVs after PLY treatment (Fig. 2E).

Figure 2
figure2

Pneumolysin (PLY) induces the release of alveolar epithelial microvesicles (MVs). A549 cells were treated with PLY (100 ng/ml) or PBS (Ctr) for 4 h. (A) Bright field images of cells 4 h after treatment. (B) Annexin V-positive ( +) MVs were quantified using FACS. N = 9, p < 0.0001 (upaired t-test). (C) MV lysates were probed with pan-cytokeratin and caveolin-1 antibodies. Depicted are representative blots (cropped images). (D) CFSE-MVs from Ctr or PLY-treated cells were visualized using confocal microscopy. (E) Protein amount in MVs derived from Ctr or PLY-treated cells. N = 9, *p < 0.0001 (unpaired t-test).

Epithelial MV production in a human lung tissue model

To examine whether lung epithelial cells can produce MVs when they are embedded in their original 3D tissue architecture, additional experiments were performed in human lung tissue explants9,25. Figure 3A depicts the gating strategy to identify epithelial MVs (annexin V/EPCAM double positive) in human lung tissue supernatant. Similar to the in vitro findings, we demonstrate a significant increase in ex vivo production of MVs of epithelial source after PLY challenge (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3
figure3

Ex vivo production of lung epithelial microvesicles (MVs). Human lung specimens (pieces from the same lung) were stimulated with PLY (5 μg/ml) or PBS (Ctr). MVs were isolated from the conditioned media 8 h later and analyzed by FACS. (A) Representative overlay dot blot of MVs from PLY-treated human lungs. Blue dots represent MVs double stained with isotype and annexin V in the presence of EDTA (negative staining). Red dots represent MVs double stained with annexin V-APC and EPCAM-Alexa488. Epithelial MVs (double positive events) are gated by the ellipse gate (green). (B) Graph depicts the quantification of annexin V/EPCAM double positive MVs. Each line represents data derived from different lung specimens (differentially treated) from the same patient. N = 7, *p < 0.05 (paired t-test).

Spn induces MV release via PLY

To explore the potential contribution of other pneumococcal virulence factors on MV release, A549 were challenged with live bacteria (Spn WT vs Δply). Spn WT caused a significant release of annexin V-positive MVs (p < 0.01), however, the production of MVs after treatment with the PLY-deficient strain (Δply) was minimal (Fig. 4A). Human lung tissue in response to Spn WT produced an increased amount of epithelial MVs (double positive annexin V/EPCAM MVs) compared to untreated lung (Fig. 4B). However, MV production was significantly decreased in lung tissues stimulated with the PLY-deficient Spn strain (Fig. 4B). Consistent with this, MVs derived from Spn WT-stimulated human lung had increased levels of pan-cytokeratin compared to untreated or Spn Δply-treated (Fig. 4C). Taken together, these data indicate that pneumococcus stimulates the host to produce MVs via PLY-dependent mechanisms.

Figure 4
figure4

Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) induces epithelial microvesicle (MV) production via pneumolysin. (A) A549 cells were treated with Spn WT, Spn Δply (MOI 50), or PBS (Ctr) for 4 h and MVs were isolated from conditioned media. Annexin V + MVs were quantified by FACS. N = 4 *p < 0.01 vs Ctr, #p < 0.01 vs Spn Δply (One-way Anova). (B,C) Human lung specimens (pieces from the same lung) were treated with Spn WT, Spn Δply (1 × 106 CFU/ml), or PBS. (B) Graph depicts the relative amount of annexin V/EPCAM double positive MVs (normalized to Ctr). N = 6, *p < 0.05 vs Ctr, #p < 0.05 vs Spn ΔPly (One-way Anova). (C) MV lysates from human lung tissue supernatants probed for pan-cytokeratin (epithelial marker). Depicted is a representative blot (cropped image). (D) MVs of epithelial origin (annexin V/EPCAM double positive) were quantified in BAL of mice treated intranasally with Spn or PBS (Ctr). Each mouse is represented by a dot. N = 4–6, *p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test).

Spn induces epithelial MV release into the alveolar space

48 h post Spn infection in vivo, a time point at which there is severe lung injury26,27, we observed a significant increase of annexin V/EPCAM + MVs by almost two-fold in the BAL of infected mice compared to controls (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4D).

MV release is mediated by pore formation and calcium influx induced by PLY

To explore the mechanisms by which PLY induces MV release, we employed a non-lytic (NL) PLY mutant that binds to cells but does not cause pores28. Our data demonstrate that annexin V + MV production is diminished in cells treated with NL-PLY compared to PLY (Fig. 5A). Next, we determined the role of calcium in MV production. Intracellular calcium release is a major stimulant for MV release. As expected, reducing the intracellular calcium concentration with a well-known calcium chelator, BAPTA-AM, caused a significant decrease by 47% in MV production after PLY treatment (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5
figure5

Pneumolysin (PLY) induces alveolar epithelial microvesicle (MV) release through pore formation and calcium influx. (A) A549 cells were treated with PLY or non-lytic (NL)-PLY (100 ng/ml) for 4 h and isolated MVs were analyzed by FACS. Depicted are representative dot blots of MVs after staining with annexin V. Positive events are indicated in the blue border gate. (B) A549 cells were pre-treated with BAPTA-AM (30 μΜ) for 1 h and then treated with PLY (100 ng/ml, 1 h). MVs were quantified by FACS after staining with annexin V. N = 3, *p < 0.001 vs Ctr, #p < 0.05 vs PLY (One-way Anova).

PLY-stimulated alveolar epithelial cells release MVs enriched in mitochondrial cargo

We have recently shown that Spn and PLY induce mitochondrial dysfunction in AEC, as evidenced by the increased mitochondrial calcium influx and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial fragmentation, reduction of cytosolic and mitochondrial ATP levels, and mtDNA release within MVs9. In addition, recent studies suggest that EVs can be carriers of mitochondria29,30,31. Based on these observations, we next examined whether PLY-induced MVs carry mitochondria. Initially, we aimed to confirm that PLY induces mitochondrial dysfunction in our experimental settings. A549 were co-stained with the mitochondrial dyes MitoTracker- Green (localizes to mitochondria independent of mitochondrial membrane potential) and -Deep Red (mitochondrial stain that is more sensitive to polarization) before PLY treatment, and mitochondrial membrane depolarization was assessed as described before32. As depicted in Fig. 6A, in response to PLY, a portion of cells (gated) depolarize as indicated by the reduction in the MitoTracker Deep Red signal (Fig. 6A).

Figure 6
figure6

Pneumolysin (PLY) triggers the release of microvesicles (MVs) carrying mitochondrial cargo. (A) MitoTracker Deep Red and Green staining of A549 cells after treatment with PLY (100 ng/ml, 4 h) or PBS (Ctr). Gated cells stain less brightly with Mitotracker Deep Red after PLY indicative of loss of membrane potential. (B,C) MitoTracker Deep Red-labeled A549 were challenged with PLY (100 ng/ml, 4 h) or PBS. MVs were analyzed by FACS (B) or after staining with (C) CFSE or annexin V-PE. (D–F) A549 were challenged with (D) PLY (100 ng/ml, 4 h), (E) Spn WT vs Δply (MOI 50, 4 h), or (F) pre-treated with MitoTempo (50 μM) or DMSO prior to PLY (100 ng/ml, 4 h). MVs were isolated from the conditioned media and analyzed by immunoblotting. Depicted are representative blots of Tom20 (mitochondrial protein) and pan-cytokeratin (cropped images). Experiments were performed 3 or more independent times.

To explore the mitochondrial cargo within the MVs, MVs from MitoTracker Deep Red-labeled A549 (PLY treated) were isolated and analyzed (Fig. 6B) or co-stained with CFSE or annexin V-PE (Fig. 6C). As depicted in Fig. 6B, PLY-triggered AEC-MVs were enriched in mitochondrial dye. Importantly, MitoTracker Deep Red-positive MVs were also CFSE or annexin V positive, indicating the presence of mitochondria within the MVs (Fig. 6C). Note, that unstained and single stained populations were processed in parallel to establish the gating strategies (draw of quadrants), and the upper right gates indicate MVs double positive for MitoTracker Deep Red and CFSE or annexin V. Consistent with this, PLY-MVs were enriched in Tom20, a specific mitochondrial protein (Fig. 6D). Moreover, substantial higher levels of Tom20 were detected in MVs from Spn-treated cells compared to control or Spn Δply-treated (Fig. 6E). Interestingly, A549 cells (PLY stimulated) pretreated with MitoTempo, a mitochondrial-specific ROS scavenger that inhibits mitochondrial dysfunction33,34, produce MVs that express less Tom20 compared to MVs from vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 6F). MV pan-cytokeratin levels that reflect the total vesicle levels are unchanged after MitoTempo treatment of the parent cells. These data suggest that mitochondrial ROS scavenging in the parent cell results in the production of MVs with reduced mitochondrial content.

PLY-induced alveolar epithelial MVs are taken up by human neutrophils and alter their function

Having demonstrated that epithelial MVs released after PLY exposure carry mitochondrial cargo, we next assessed whether these MVs have a biological role. Towards this, we explored the interaction of alveolar epithelial MVs with neutrophils. During bacterial lung infection, neutrophils are recruited into the lungs to fight the invading pathogens and become the prominent cell type in the alveolar space. Therefore, neutrophils represent host target candidates for the MVs released from the alveolar epithelium. To investigate their interaction, MVs derived from MitoTracker Deep Red- labeled A549 untreated or PLY-treated were incubated with neutrophils, and their uptake was assessed by FACS. As seen in Fig. 7A,B, a significant portion of PMNs (CD11b positive/7-AAD negative gated) are positive for MitoTracker Deep Red after incubation with PLY-MVs but not Ctr or unlabeled MVs, suggesting that PMNs and MVs interact (p < 0.0001). We next assessed whether the MVs are taken up by PMNs or are surface-bound. For this, PMNs were incubated with PLY-MVs at 37 or 4 °C, as it has been previously shown that at 4 °C, MVs bind to cells but cannot be internalized35. We observed that MV uptake was temperature dependent, as PMNs were fluorescent only at 37 °C and not at 4 °C (Fig. 7C), suggesting that MVs-carrying mitochondrial cargo are internalized by PMNs.

Figure 7
figure7

Microvesicles (MVs) released from pneumolysin (PLY)-treated lung alveolar epithelial cells are taken up by neutrophils. Human neutrophils (PMNs) were incubated with Ctr- or PLY-MitoTracker Deep Red- MVs [MVs were isolated from MitoTracker Deep Red-labeled A549 cells after treatment with PLY (100 ng/ml) or PBS- control (Ctr) at 37 °C or 4 °C for 1 h. PMNs were then analyzed by FACS for MitoTracker Deep Red signal. (A) Representative histogram of live PMNs (CD11b positive/7-AAD negative) treated with unlabeled MVs, Ctr- or PLY- MVs, at 37 °C. (B) Quantification of the percentage of MitoTracker Deep Red positive PMNs, n = 4, *p < 0.0001 (Mann–Whitney test, unpaired). (C) Representative histogram of live PMNs (CD11b positive/7-AAD negative) treated with PLY-MVs at 37 °C or 4 °C.

We then examined whether PLY-induced MVs can affect PMN functions. It is well known that neutrophils upon recruitment into the alveolar space produce ROS, as a defensive mechanism against pathogens. Therefore, we examined the effects of MVs on ROS production. Interestingly, we found that PMNs treated with MVs from PLY-derived lung epithelial cells had impaired ability to produce ROS after PMA challenge, while Ctr-MVs had no effect (Fig. 8A,B).

Figure 8
figure8

Effect of microvesicles (MVs) on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production from neutrophils. ROS production was measured in neutrophils (PMNs) primed with PMA (0.5 nM) and after stimulation with MVs isolated from control or PLY-treated A549 cells. ROS production was also measured in Ctr and PMA only treated PMNs (A) Representative kinetics of ROS production over a period of 1 h. (B) Quantification of ROS production. N = 7, *p < 0.001 vs PMA and PMA/Ctr-MVs (One-way Anova).

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate a new mechanism of host–pathogen interaction upon Streptococcus pneumoniae lung infection. We have found that Spn stimulates lung epithelial cells to release high amounts of MVs, a response dependent on the pneumococcal virulence factor PLY. Interestingly, MVs produced from PLY-stimulated alveolar epithelial cells contain mitochondrial cargo, which is taken up by neutrophils. This pathogen-stimulated interaction results in suppressed ROS production from activated neutrophils. Our study is novel in several important ways. First, this is the first study to perform a careful analysis of MV production from AEC in response to Spn and its major exotoxin PLY. Second, to our knowledge this is the only study showing that cells injured by bacteria and their products secrete MVs that carry mitochondrial cargo. Finally, this study demonstrates for the first time a PLY- stimulated cross-talk between AEC and neutrophils through MVs.

Emerging evidence suggests that extracellular vesicles are critical contributors to the pathogenesis of multiple disease processes, including pulmonary-related diseases23,24. Both the numbers and composition of EVs increase in the circulation and biological fluids during inflammatory states, reflecting specific pathophysiological mechanisms triggering their production and release. In the current study, we explored the production and role of lung epithelial MVs released upon Spn lung infection. Pulmonary pneumococcal infections are associated with severe complications such as the development of ALI/ARDS. PLY, an Spn exotoxin, is responsible for many of the deleterious effects of Spn3,5. We found that Spn in a PLY-dependent manner causes a significant production of MVs in alveolar epithelial cells, and we confirmed these data using a human lung tissue ex vivo model. Our data agree with recent reports demonstrating that PLY causes EV release. Wolfmeier et al. reported that HEK 293 cells exposed to PLY release vesicles of less than 1 μm13. Interestingly, the same study showed that these vesicles carry pneumolysin pores, and that this serves as a cell repair mechanism since it can eliminate PLY-induced pores from the affected cells. A more recent study demonstrated a PLY-dependent release of MVs from immune cells14. Similar to PLY, other bacterial toxins and bacteria have been found to trigger MV release in multiple cell types36,37,38.

Using a murine pneumococcal infection-induced ALI model, we demonstrated an increased epithelial MV release in the alveolar compartment. An elevation in the number of epithelial-derived MVs in BAL of ALI mice has been previously suggested by different groups. Lee et al. detected increased levels of MVs of epithelial source in BAL from mice challenged with hyperoxia and acid20. In contrast, exposure of mice to Pseudomonas did not result in epithelial MV production20. In mice treated with bacterial LPS, a common ALI model, data regarding epithelial MV production are contradictory19,20. Therefore, whether lung epithelial MV production is specific to Gram-positive or negative pulmonary infections warrants further investigation. Interestingly, increased alveolar epithelial EVs were observed in the edema fluid of ARDS patients39, although the cause of ARDS in these patients was not specified.

Regarding the mechanisms underlying MV production during Spn infection, our data demonstrate that PLY is the critical pneumococcal virulence factor that is responsible. WT Spn resulted in a significant release of MVs from AEC (Fig. 4); however, MV production was significantly diminished after exposure to an Spn mutant strain that does not express PLY. These data strongly suggest that PLY is the major Spn virulence factor involved in MV release. Furthermore, we observed that a PLY mutant protein that binds to cells but does not form pores failed to stimulate MV production from AEC (Fig. 5A). One explanation for this observation is that MV release is a calcium-dependent process40,41, consistent with the fact that PLY causes a significant calcium influx due to its pore-formation activity9. In the presence of a calcium chelator, PLY-induced MV production is significantly decreased in our model, although it was not completely inhibited (Fig. 5B), as other studies have shown42. Therefore, although these data suggest that PLY-induced MV release is at least partially dependent on calcium, calcium independent mechanisms cannot be excluded, as suggested elsewhere43.

In our previous study, we demonstrated that in response to PLY, AEC undergo increased mitochondrial fragmentation, reduction in ATP release, and increase of extracellular mtDNA, all signs of mitochondrial dysfunction9. Moreover, we found mtDNA within the MV fraction. Here, we expand these findings to demonstrate that MVs triggered by PLY are also carriers of mitochondria. Consistent with this, the presence of mitochondria in EVs generated under stressed conditions has been described by others. Platelets, astrocytes, and monocytes upon activation, macrophages that undergo necroptosis, airway exosomes, and apoptotic neuronal and glial cells, have all been reported to release EVs containing mitochondria29,30,31,44,45,46.

In agreement with our prior study showing mitochondrial dysfunction in PLY-treated cells9, other recent studies have demonstrated increased mitochondrial ROS (mtROS) production in PLY-treated lung endothelial cells and macrophages47,48. Increased mtROS levels can negatively affect mitochondrial function by opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pores, which in turn induce mitochondrial depolarization and swelling and impaired mitochondrial activities49. An mtROS scavenger, MitoTempo, inhibits mitochondrial dysfunction and protects against injury after PLY and other stimuli in several cell types33,34,48,50. In our study, we demonstrated that mtROS inhibition in PLY-stimulated A549 cells results in the release of MVs that carry less mitochondrial content compared to MVs derived from control cells (Fig. 6F). These data suggest that scavenging mtROS interferes with the packaging of mitochondria within the MVs. This is consistent with a recent study showing reduced pro-inflammatory mitochondrial cargo in extracellular vesicles released from MitoTempo-treated monocytes30. One possible explanation is that mitochondrial dysfunction leads to accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria, which in addition to internal elimination (e.g. through mitophagy), can also be eliminated by secretion within EVs. This hypothesis is supported by a recent study showing that mesenchymal cells undergoing oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction secrete depolarized mitochondria within EVs and outsource mitophagy to macrophages51. In this process, mitochondrial protective agents (such as mtROS inhibitors) can reduce the accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria, and therefore less mitochondrial cargo is present within the secreted vesicles.

Mitochondrial cargo not only is released extracellularly within EVs but can be transferred to target cells to alter their functions. For example, mitochondria from airway myeloid-derived regulatory cells are transferred via exosomes to T cells where they co-localize with the mitochondrial network of T cells and generate reactive oxygen species29. In another study, LPS-treated monocytes produced MVs rich in mitochondrial content that activated proinflammatory signaling in endothelial cells30. Consistent with these studies, we found that AEC-MVs can transfer their mitochondrial cargo to neutrophils. Moreover, we demonstrate that these MVs can suppress ROS production from primed neutrophils, consistent with a prior report50. Generation of ROS is critical for effective microbial immunity but also plays a significant role in modulating inflammatory responses. The potential consequences of the observed effect on ROS in vivo as well as whether PLY-MVs alter other neutrophil functions are unknown and will require further study. Nonetheless, these findings strongly suggest that AEC can transfer cargo to neutrophils through MVs. Interestingly, a recent study showed that neutrophils can communicate with lung epithelial cells through EVs containing miR-22351. This and our current study together introduce a new mechanism of cross-talk between AEC and PMNs via EVs.

Our study has some important limitations. Although we demonstrate that MVs can transfer their mitochondrial cargo to neutrophils, we did not explore the significance of the MV-mitochondrial components on neutrophil functions. Recent studies however, strongly suggest that the mitochondrial content contributes to the biological activity of extracellular vesicles52. Puhm et al. recently demonstrated that extracellular vesicles derived from LPS-activated monocytes carry mitochondrial cargo and induce pro-inflammatory signaling in endothelial cells30. Vesicles derived from monocytes that were pretreated with inhibitors of mitochondrial stress or mtROS, or from cells with non-respiring mitochondria, had a reduced pro-inflammatory potential30. Moreover, mitochondria are important sources of DAMPs, such as mtDNA, cardiolipin, ATP, mROS, N-formyl-peptides53. These mitochondrial DAMPs, when released extracellularly target the immune system, including the neutrophils. For example, extracellular mtDNA is a highly inflammatory mediator and a potent stimulus for innate immune activation54,55. Importantly, recent studies also suggest that extracellular intact mitochondria can act as danger signals by activating pro-inflammatory signaling in macrophages56, interacting with neutrophils to stimulate their adherence to endothelium31, and activating neutrophils to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines57. Based on these studies, it is reasonable to speculate that the mitochondrial cargo of PLY-induced MVs could play a significant role in their biological effects, a hypothesis that will be the focus of follow-up studies. Another limitation of our current study is that we primarily employed a cancer cell line. Although A549 have been used extensively as a model for alveolar epithelial cells II and to study the effects of pneumolysin5,10,11,58, future studies on primary epithelial cells will be needed to confirm these findings.

In the context of acute lung injury, it has been demonstrated that healthy mitochondria from mesenchymal cells can be transferred through EVs to recipient cells (alveolar epithelial cells and macrophages) to promote cytoprotective effects and ameliorate lung injury59,60. An intriguing hypothesis is that mitochondria may also be transferred from injured cells to promote pneumonia progression and ALI. Our data support the possibility of this novel injury mechanism. In this study we provide evidence of increased release of MVs from AEC injured with PLY. We also demonstrate that these PLY-induced MVs (a) are rich in mitochondrial cargo that they transfer to neutrophils, and (b) alter neutrophil immune functions. In conclusion, our data indicate that injured alveolar epithelial cells have the potential to regulate innate immune functions through the release of microvesicles.

Material and methods

Ethics

Human lung tissues were obtained from adult patients primarily suffering from bronchial carcinoma and undergoing lung resection at thoracic surgery centers. Blood for isolating neutrophils was obtained from healthy volunteers. Written informed consent was received from all patients and volunteers. Ethics approval has been obtained by the local institutional review board (Ethics committee of the Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany, EA2/079/13 and EA4/032/17, respectively). All animal experiments were approved by institutional (Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin) and governmental authorities [State Office for Health and Social Affairs (Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales) Berlin, Germany]. The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

S. pneumoniae strains and pneumolysin

For in vitro studies, D39 wildtype (Spn WT) and PLY-deficient D39Δply (Spn Δply) strains were used. Bacteria were cultivated in Todd-Hewitt broth (BD, Heidelberg, Germany) supplemented with 0.5% yeast extract (BD, Heidelberg, Germany) to mid-log phase (A600 = 0.3–0.4) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 or grown on Columbia blood agar plates (BD, Heidelberg, Germany). PLY [wild type and non-lytic (NL) PLY] was produced and purified as described61.

Cell culture and treatments

Human alveolar epithelial cells type II (A549 cells, ATCC CCL-185) were cultured in RPMI medium (2 mM glutamine), supplemented with fetal calf serum (FCS; Capricorn Scientific GmbH, Ebsdorfergrund, Germany) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Before experiments, full media (containing FCS) was replaced with plain media, and cells were treated as indicated (PLY, NL-PLY, Spn WT, Spn Δply) in the Results section. For a set of experiments, cells were pre-treated with inhibitors (BAPTA-AM, Calbiochem) or MitoTempo (Santa Cruz Biotech, USA) prior to PLY treatment. In other experiments, cells were incubated with MitoTracker Deep Red and/or Green (ThermoFisher, Darmstadt, Germany) for 30 min at 37 °C to label mitochondria. Following washing with full media, PBS, and plain media, cells were then incubated with PLY (100 ng/ml, 4 h). After treatments, pictures of cells were captured using the EVOS FLoid cell imaging station (ThermoFisher).

Ex vivo human lung tissue model

Tumor-free lung tissue was divided into small specimens of the same weight, and incubated for 16–20 h in RPMI 1640 in 12-well dishes9,62,63,64,65. Prior to treatment, the specimens were transferred to new 12-well dishes and injected with Spn (WT and Δply) (1 × 106 cfu/ml) or PLY (5 μg/ml) (in plain RPMI, 2 ml volume) as indicated. Conditioned media from each lung specimen was collected and processed.

Murine model of Spn infection

C57BL/6N female mice (Charles River) were anesthetized with 3 ml/kg of ketamine/xylazine and were intranasally inoculated with 5 × 106 cfu of Spn serotype 3 (PN36) or PBS (controls), as we have described previously27. 48 h post-infection, BAL (bronchoalveolar lavage) was obtained by lavaging the lungs with 0.8 ml PBS containing protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany). BAL fluid (BALF) was obtained after centrifugation at 300 × g for 10 min and stored at − 80 °C until analysis.

Isolation of microvesicles (MVs)

MVs were isolated as we previously described with some modifications18. Briefly, cell and human lung tissue supernatant collected after the indicated treatments was subjected to subsequent centrifugations (500 × g,  5 min and 2,500 × g,  15 min) to eliminate dead cells, apoptotic bodies, and large debris. The final supernatant was centrifuged at 20,500×g for 45 min at 4 °C to pellet the MVs. MVs were then washed in PBS (double filtered), and after careful removal of supernatant, were resuspended in PBS for characterization, quantification, and functional studies. For in vitro experiments, MVs were isolated from dishes containing the same number of cells in the same volume of media. For lung tissue experiments, MVs were isolated from lungs of the same weight in the same volume of media. MVs were also analyzed in BALF after it was further centrifuged at 2,500×g × 10 min.

Flow cytometry analysis (FACS)

Cells and MVs were analyzed by flow cytometry using a BD FACSCanto II and the BD FACSDiva software to acquire data. For cell analysis, A549 stained with MitoTracker dyes and challenged with PLY as described above, were collected by trypsinization, washed, resuspended in HBSS, and analyzed by FACS. For MV analysis, forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) were set at logarithmic gain. No threshold was applied. To set the MV gate (events less than 1 μm), we used 1 μm sizing calibration beads (Sigma-Aldrich). BD CS&T beads consisting of 3-μm bright beads, 3-μm mid, and 2-μm dim polystyrene beads were also run in parallel. In addition, to confirm the gating strategy, fresh human platelets, which are known to have a size of 2–4 μm, were analyzed.

For MV staining, all antibodies/dyes used were from Biolegend unless specified. MVs derived from A549 were stained with annexin V-APC in HBSS+/+(with Ca2 + /Mg2 +). As a negative control, MVs were stained with annexin V-APC in PBS containing 5 mM EDTA (annexin V binding to MVs requires calcium, which is removed by the addition of EDTA). To confirm the vesicular nature of the isolated vesicles, MVs were treated with Triton X-100 and analyzed by FACS. A549-MVs were also analyzed after staining with CFSE (Carboxyfluoresceinsuccinimidyl ester) and CellMask Deep Red plasma membrane stain (ThermoFisher). For this, MVs were incubated at 37 °C with CFSE or CellMask dyes for 20 min, and washed in PBS before analysis. CSFE and CellMask solutions were centrifuged at high-speed for 5 min before added to MVs. As a negative control, samples (PBS) that contain the dyes but not MVs were processed in parallel. For MVs from MitoTracker-labeled cells, MVs were isolated, resuspended in PBS and analyzed by FACS. MVs from human lung tissue or in BALF were analyzed after double staining with annexin V and anti-human or anti-mouse EPCAM-Alexa 488, respectively, in HBSS+/+. As a negative control, MVs were stained with annexin V-APC in PBS containing 5 mM EDTA and the corresponding isotype control antibody. All buffers used for MV analysis were double filtered (0.22 μm). For MV quantification, 5 μl of CountBright absolute counting beads (ThermoFisher) were added in each tube before analysis. To assess background signals, several negative controls were used (a) buffers with antibodies alone were analyzed to evaluate the background fluorescence of antibodies, (b) plain media after staining with antibodies to detect artifacts in the media, (c) single-stained MVs, (d) buffers containing only CFSE, CellMask, or MitoTracker dyes. FACS data were analyzed using the FCS Express 6 Flow cytometry software (Denovo Software, Glendale, CA).

Protein measurement

Quantification of isolated MVs was also done using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher). MV suspensions were measured at 280 nm for protein quantification.

Immunoblotting

MV lysates (MVs isolated from the same number of cells) prepared in Laemmli buffer were subjected to SDS-electrophoresis using 4–20% precast gels (Genscript, Piscataway, NJ). After protein transfer, membranes were incubated overnight with indicated antibodies, previously characterized (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)66,67,68. After incubation with secondary antibodies-HRP conjugated (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), proteins were detected with the Pierce ECL (ThermoFisher) or Amersham ECL Prime (Sigma) western blotting reagents. Films were scanned and pictures were processed using Image J (NIH). Brightness and contrast were adjusted at the same levels for samples in the sample blot. There was no grouping of blots cropped from different parts of the same blot. Unedited blots are presented in Supplementary Figure S2.

Confocal microscopy

CFSE-labeled MVs were added in 8 well μ-slides, ibiTreat (Ibidi, Martinsried, Germany). Following a short centrifuge of the slide, MVs were immediately visualized using an LSM 780 confocal laser-scanning microscope driven by Zen 2012 software. 1 μm latex beads were also visualized for comparison. Images were processed using the software Zen2.3SP1 (Carl Zeiss).

Neutrophil isolation

Human neutrophils were isolated from whole blood by a 3% dextran sedimentation step (Dextran T500, Carl Roth GmbH, Germany) followed by centrifugation over a 1.077 g/ml Pancoll solution (PAN-Biotech). Cell viability was evaluated by trypan blue exclusion, and purity (> 95%) was verified by flow cytometry. After isolation, neutrophils were resuspended in HBSS +/+, quantified, and used for experiments as indicated.

MitoTracker-positive microvesicle uptake by neutrophils

Neutrophils were incubated with MVs isolated from PLY-or PBS (Control; Ctr)- treated MitoTracker Deep Red (APC)-labeled A549 (4 × 106 cells) at 37 °C or 4 °C. After 1 h of incubation, neutrophils were washed, stained with CD11b (Brilliant Violet 510, Biolegend) and 7-AAD (Biolegend), and analyzed by FACS. For each sample, an average of 5000 cells was analyzed and the percentage of CD11b + /7-AAD−/APC + cells was recorded.

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) production

Neutrophils were incubated in a 96-well plate before luminol reagents were added to each well (50 μM luminol and 1.2 U/ml HRP substrate). After a short incubation, neutrophils were primed with low doses of PMA (0.5 nM) and 5 min later, PLY-MVs (5 μg of protein isolated from 4 × 106 cells) were added. MVs from control cells were also tested in parallel. Luminescence was recorded [SpectraMax L (Molecular Devices, USA)] over a period of 1 h (1 min interval). Area under the curve was calculated for each condition.

Statistical analyses

Results are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. Statistical analysis was performed using the Graphpad Prism 8 software. Data were tested for normal distribution by Shapiro–Wilk test. T-test (paired or un-paired) and one-way ANOVA were used to compare means between groups. Mann–Whitney test was used to compare non-parametric data sets (specified in the respective figure legend). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Cilloniz, C., Martin-Loeches, I., Garcia-Vidal, C., San Jose, A. & Torres, A. Microbial etiology of pneumonia: Epidemiology, diagnosis and resistance patterns. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17122120 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bauer, T. T., Ewig, S., Rodloff, A. C. & Muller, E. E. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia: A comprehensive review of clinical data. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43, 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1086/506430 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Anderson, R. & Feldman, C. Pneumolysin as a potential therapeutic target in severe pneumococcal disease. J. Infect. 74, 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2017.03.005 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mitchell, T. J. & Dalziel, C. E. The biology of pneumolysin. Subcell Biochem. 80, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8881-6_8 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Witzenrath, M. et al. Role of pneumolysin for the development of acute lung injury in pneumococcal pneumonia. Crit. Care Med. 34, 1947–1954. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000220496.48295.A9 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lucas, R. et al. Mini-review: Novel therapeutic strategies to blunt actions of pneumolysin in the lungs. Toxins (Basel) 5, 1244–1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins5071244 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hotomi, M., Yuasa, J., Briles, D. E. & Yamanaka, N. Pneumolysin plays a key role at the initial step of establishing pneumococcal nasal colonization. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 61, 375–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-016-0445-z (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lucas, R. et al. Agonist of growth hormone-releasing hormone reduces pneumolysin-induced pulmonary permeability edema. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 109, 2084–2089. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121075109 (2012).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Nerlich, A. et al. Pneumolysin induced mitochondrial dysfunction leads to release of mitochondrial DNA. Sci. Rep. 8, 182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18468-7 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gonzalez-Juarbe, N. et al. Pore-forming toxin-mediated ion dysregulation leads to death receptor-independent necroptosis of lung epithelial cells during bacterial pneumonia. Cell Death Differ. 24, 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2017.49 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rai, P., He, F., Kwang, J., Engelward, B. P. & Chow, V. T. Pneumococcal pneumolysin induces DNA damage and cell cycle arrest. Sci. Rep. 6, 22972. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22972 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yoo, I. H. et al. Role of pneumococcal pneumolysin in the induction of an inflammatory response in human epithelial cells. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 60, 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00699.x (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wolfmeier, H. et al. Active release of pneumolysin prepores and pores by mammalian cells undergoing a Streptococcus pneumoniae attack. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1860, 2498–2509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.07.022 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Larpin, Y. et al. Bacterial pore-forming toxin pneumolysin: Cell membrane structure and microvesicle shedding capacity determines differential survival of cell types. FASEB J. 34, 1665–1678. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201901737RR (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Koffel, R. et al. Host-derived microvesicles carrying bacterial pore-forming toxins deliver signals to macrophages: A novel mechanism of shaping immune responses. Front. Immunol. 9, 1688. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01688 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shah, R., Patel, T. & Freedman, J. E. Circulating extracellular vesicles in human disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 958–966. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1704286 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Letsiou, E. & Bauer, N. Endothelial extracellular vesicles in pulmonary function and disease. Curr. Top. Membr. 82, 197–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctm.2018.09.002 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Letsiou, E. et al. Pathologic mechanical stress and endotoxin exposure increases lung endothelial microparticle shedding. Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 52, 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2013-0347OC (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Soni, S. et al. Alveolar macrophage-derived microvesicles mediate acute lung injury. Thorax 71, 1020–1029. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208032 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee, H., Zhang, D., Laskin, D. L. & Jin, Y. Functional evidence of pulmonary extracellular vesicles in infectious and noninfectious lung inflammation. J. Immunol. 201, 1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800264 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lee, H., Zhang, D., Minhas, J. & Jin, Y. Extracellular vesicles facilitate the intercellular communications in the pathogenesis of lung injury. Cell Dev. Biol. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9296.1000175 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liu, A. et al. Therapeutic effects of hyaluronic acid in bacterial pneumonia in the ex vivo perfused human lungs. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201812-2296OC (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mahida, R. Y., Matsumoto, S. & Matthay, M. A. Extracellular vesicles: A new frontier for research in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2019-0447TR (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    McVey, M. J., Maishan, M., Blokland, K. E. C., Bartlett, N. & Kuebler, W. M. Extracellular vesicles in lung health, disease, and therapy. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 316, L977–L989. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00546.2018 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hocke, A. C., Suttorp, N. & Hippenstiel, S. Human lung ex vivo infection models. Cell Tissue Res. 367, 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-016-2546-z (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gutbier, B. et al. Sphingosine kinase 1 regulates inflammation and contributes to acute lung injury in pneumococcal pneumonia via the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2. Crit. Care Med. 46, e258–e267. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002916 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Berger, S. et al. Delay in antibiotic therapy results in fatal disease outcome in murine pneumococcal pneumonia. Crit. Care 22, 287. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2224-5 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kirkham, L. A. et al. Construction and immunological characterization of a novel nontoxic protective pneumolysin mutant for use in future pneumococcal vaccines. Infect. Immunity 74, 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.74.1.586-593.2006 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hough, K. P. et al. Exosomal transfer of mitochondria from airway myeloid-derived regulatory cells to T cells. Redox Biol. 18, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.06.009 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Puhm, F. et al. Mitochondria are a subset of extracellular vesicles released by activated monocytes and induce type I IFN and TNF responses in endothelial cells. Circ. Res. 125, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314601 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Boudreau, L. H. et al. Platelets release mitochondria serving as substrate for bactericidal group IIA-secreted phospholipase A2 to promote inflammation. Blood 124, 2173–2183. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-05-573543 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yu, J. et al. Inflammasome activation leads to Caspase-1-dependent mitochondrial damage and block of mitophagy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 111, 15514–15519. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414859111 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hu, H. & Li, M. Mitochondria-targeted antioxidant mitotempo protects mitochondrial function against amyloid beta toxicity in primary cultured mouse neurons. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 478, 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.07.071 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhang, J. et al. MitoTEMPO prevents oxalate induced injury in NRK-52E cells via inhibiting mitochondrial dysfunction and modulating oxidative stress. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 7528090. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7528090 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schneider, D. J. et al. Mechanisms and modulation of microvesicle uptake in a model of alveolar cell communication. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 20897–20910. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M117.792416 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bei, J. J. et al. Staphylococcal SSL5-induced platelet microparticles provoke proinflammatory responses via the CD40/TRAF6/NFkappaB signalling pathway in monocytes. Thromb. Haemost. 115, 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH15-04-0322 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Oehmcke, S. et al. Stimulation of blood mononuclear cells with bacterial virulence factors leads to the release of pro-coagulant and pro-inflammatory microparticles. Cell. Microbiol. 14, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01705.x (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    DeWalt, R. I., Petkovich, D. A., Zahrt, A. N., Bruns, H. A. & McDowell, S. A. Host cell invasion by Staphylococcus aureus stimulates the shedding of microvesicles. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 432, 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.01.122 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bastarache, J. A., Fremont, R. D., Kropski, J. A., Bossert, F. R. & Ware, L. B. Procoagulant alveolar microparticles in the lungs of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 297, L1035-1041 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hugel, B., Martínez, M. C., Kunzelmann, C. & Freyssinet, J. M. Membrane microparticles: Two sides of the coin. Physiology (Bethesda) 20, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00029.2004 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Catalano, M. & O’Driscoll, L. Inhibiting extracellular vesicles formation and release: A review of EV inhibitors. J. Extracell. Vesicles 9, 1703244. https://doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2019.1703244 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bianco, F. et al. Acid sphingomyelinase activity triggers microparticle release from glial cells. Embo J. 28, 1043–1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.45 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chen, P., Douglas, S. D., Meshki, J. & Tuluc, F. Neurokinin 1 receptor mediates membrane blebbing and sheer stress-induced microparticle formation in HEK293 cells. PLoS ONE 7, e45322. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045322 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Spencer, D. M., Dye, J. R., Piantadosi, C. A. & Pisetsky, D. S. The release of microparticles and mitochondria from RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cells undergoing necroptotic cell death in vitro. Exp. Cell. Res. 363, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.12.024 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Falchi, A. M. et al. Astrocytes shed large membrane vesicles that contain mitochondria, lipid droplets and ATP. Histochem. Cell Biol. 139, 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-012-1045-x (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhao, Z. et al. Cardiolipin-mediated procoagulant activity of mitochondria contributes to traumatic brain injury-associated coagulopathy in mice. Blood 127, 2763–2772. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-12-688838 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Li, X. et al. Hsp70 suppresses mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and preserves pulmonary microvascular barrier integrity following exposure to bacterial toxins. Front Immunol. 9, 1309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01309 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Li, X. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in fibrotic diseases. Cell Death Discov. 6, 80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-020-00316-9 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Cheng, M. H. et al. Piscidin-1 induces apoptosis via mitochondrial reactive oxygen species-regulated mitochondrial dysfunction in human osteosarcoma cells. Sci. Rep. 10, 5045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61876-5 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Yao, J. et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate rat hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury by suppressing oxidative stress and neutrophil inflammatory response. Faseb J. 33, 1695–1710. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201800131RR (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Neudecker, V. et al. Neutrophil transfer of miR-223 to lung epithelial cells dampens acute lung injury in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aah5360 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Liu, D. et al. The existence and function of mitochondrial component in extracellular vesicles. Mitochondrion 54, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2020.08.005 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    West, A. P. Mitochondrial dysfunction as a trigger of innate immune responses and inflammation. Toxicology 391, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2017.07.016 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Itagaki, K. et al. Mitochondrial DNA released by trauma induces neutrophil extracellular traps. PLoS ONE 10, e0120549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120549 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zhang, Q. et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature 464, 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08780 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Maeda, A. & Fadeel, B. Mitochondria released by cells undergoing TNF-alpha-induced necroptosis act as danger signals. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1312. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2014.277 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Unuma, K., Aki, T., Funakoshi, T., Hashimoto, K. & Uemura, K. Extrusion of mitochondrial contents from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated cells: Involvement of autophagy. Autophagy 11, 1520–1536. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2015.1063765 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Klein, S. et al. Post-correlation on-lamella cryo-CLEM reveals the membrane architecture of lamellar bodies. Commun. Biol. 4, 137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01567-z (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Morrison, T. J. et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells modulate macrophages in clinically relevant lung injury models by extracellular vesicle mitochondrial transfer. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. 196, 1275–1286. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201701-0170OC (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Islam, M. N. et al. Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury. Nat. Med. 18, 759–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2736 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Mitchell, T. J., Walker, J. A., Saunders, F. K., Andrew, P. W. & Boulnois, G. J. Expression of the pneumolysin gene in Escherichia coli: rapid purification and biological properties. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1007, 67–72 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Peter, A. et al. Localization and pneumococcal alteration of junction proteins in the human alveolar-capillary compartment. Histochem. Cell Biol. 147, 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-017-1551-y (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Fatykhova, D. et al. Serotype 1 and 8 pneumococci evade sensing by inflammasomes in human lung tissue. PLoS ONE 10, e0137108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137108 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Szymanski, K. V. et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae-induced regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 in human lung tissue. Eur. Respir. J. 40, 1458–1467. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00186911 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Weinheimer, V. K. et al. Influenza A viruses target type II pneumocytes in the human lung. J. Infect. Dis. 206, 1685–1694. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis455 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Bru-Tari, E. et al. Pancreatic alpha-cell mass in the early-onset and advanced stage of a mouse model of experimental autoimmune diabetes. Sci. Rep. 9, 9515. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45853-1 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Shi, X. Y. et al. Downregulation of caveolin-1 upregulates the expression of growth factors and regulators in co-culture of fibroblasts with cancer cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 13, 744–752. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4610 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Rossin, F. et al. Transglutaminase 2 ablation leads to mitophagy impairment associated with a metabolic shift towards aerobic glycolysis. Cell Death Differ. 22, 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2014.106 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Eleftheria Letsiou is a recipient of an ERS-EU RESPIRE2 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research Fellowship—Number MCF 9019-2015. M.W. is supported by grants from the German Research Foundation, SFB-TR84 C6 and C9 and by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of the CAPSyS (01ZX1304B), SYMPATH (FKZ 01ZX1906A) and PROVID project (FKZ 01KI20160A). We would like to thank Dr. Andreas Nerlich for offering his expertise and assistance in imaging the microvesicles using confocal microscopy, Drs. Sandra Wienhold and Geraldine Nouailles for human blood protocol support and administrative assistance, and Mrs. Ulrike Behrendt, a technical assistant, for bacterial culture assistance. Finally, we thank Dr. Steven Dudek for helpful suggestions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.L. conceived and designed the research, performed experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures, and wrote the manuscript, L.G.T, D.F, M.F performed experiments, edited the manuscript, and provided discussion of data, T.M provided reagents and scientific discussion of the data/findings, H.M. interpreted data and edited the manuscript, A.H. provided reagents, designed experiments, interpreted data, and edited the manuscript, M.W. supervised the study, interpreted data, and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Letsiou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Letsiou, E., Teixeira Alves, L.G., Fatykhova, D. et al. Microvesicles released from pneumolysin-stimulated lung epithelial cells carry mitochondrial cargo and suppress neutrophil oxidative burst. Sci Rep 11, 9529 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88897-y

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing