Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Histamine receptor 2 blockade selectively impacts B and T cells in healthy subjects

Abstract

Histamine receptor 2 (H2R) blockade is commonly used in patients with gastric, duodenal ulcers or gastroesophageal reflux disease. Beyond the gastrointestinal tract, H2R is expressed by multiple immune cells, yet little is known about the immunomodulatory effects of such treatment. Clinical reports have associated H2R blockade with leukopenia, neutropenia, and myelosuppression, and has been shown to provide clinical benefit in certain cancer settings. To systematically assess effects of H2R blockade on key immune parameters, a single-center, single-arm clinical study was conducted in 29 healthy subjects. Subjects received daily high dose ranitidine for 6 weeks. Peripheral blood immunophenotyping and mediator analysis were performed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks into treatment, and 12 weeks after treatment cessation. Ranitidine was well-tolerated, and no drug related adverse events were observed. Ranitidine had no effect on number of neutrophils, basophils or eosinophils. However, ranitidine decreased numbers of B cells and IL-2Rα (CD25) expressing T cells that remained lower even after treatment cessation. Reduced serum levels of IL-2 were also observed and remained low after treatment. These observations highlight a previously unrecognised immunomodulatory sustained impact of H2R blockade. Therefore, the immune impacts of H2R blockade may require greater consideration in the context of vaccination and immunotherapy.

Introduction

Histamine receptor 2 (H2R) antagonists are one of the most frequently used medications. They are administered long term for the treatment of gastric ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), non-ulcer dyspepsia and related conditions1. H2R antagonists decrease the volume and concentration of gastric acid produced by gastric parietal cells2. However, a wide variety of other cell types also express H2R including several immune cells3 such as neutrophils4, eosinophils5, monocytes6, dendritic cells7,8, NK cells9, T cells and B cells10. Despite the clinical importance of H2R blockade, the effects of H2R blockade on human immunity are not well defined. Several small clinical reports have suggested that ranitidine treatment can be associated with leukopenia, thrombocytopenia11, granulocytopenia12 and neutropenia12,13. It was also linked to a myelosuppressive effect in 5% of bone marrow transplant patients14 and shown to affect hematopoiesis via inhibition of bone marrow GM-CSF production15. In human NK cells, in vitro histamine treatment was also shown to enhance cytotoxicity via an H2R-dependent mechanism9.

Activation of leukocyte populations through H2R can impact immune responses. Indeed, mouse studies have shown that signaling through H2R plays an important role in shaping the immune response. In monocytes, H2R regulates the induction of inflammatory cytokines after LPS stimulation16. It also regulates dendritic cell and macrophage CXCL10 and CCL17 chemokine production18,19. H2R is also expressed on CD4+ T lymphocytes, most strongly in Th2 cells, where it negatively regulates the production of cytokines associated with allergic disease such as IL-13 and IL-417. Histamine was also shown to have a negative feed-back regulation through H2R in rat mast cells18. These effects would be predicted to be inhibited by H2R blockade19. At a physiological level, H2R is involved in the regulation and self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells20. Preclinical studies of breast cancer have demonstrated that oral treatment of mice with ranitidine inhibits both primary tumor development and metastasis, in three distinct murine breast tumor models21,22,23. This was associated with a reduction in myeloid derived suppressor cell (MDSC) populations following ranitidine treatment of mice. Furthermore, H2R-blockade was shown to inhibit the histamine-dependent increase in cyclooxygenase-2 in colorectal cancer cells24.

Clinically, a therapeutic role for H2R blockade has been indicated in advanced multiple myeloma patients. CD19 is expressed at low levels on these tumour cells and CD19 positive myeloma propagating cells have been implicated as having a key role in progression of this disease25,26. Ranitidine alone, or in combination with IL-2, was also shown to reduce tumor progression in advanced malignant melanoma patients27. Ranitidine treatment has also been shown to increase survival in head and neck squamous carcinoma28. Cimetidine, a less selective H2R blocker, was demonstrated to increase cellular and humoral immune responses during vaccination29,30. Recently famotidine, another H2R antagonist, was suggested to have beneficial effects in increasing survival following COVID-19 infections31,32. These impacts of H2R blockade could all be mediated through impacts on immune cell populations or function. Despite the widespread use of these drugs, their effects on normal human immune cell populations in vivo are still largely unexplored. We therefore determined the effect of ranitidine treatment on peripheral blood leukocyte populations and soluble immune mediators in healthy volunteers to better understand the immunomodulatory impacts of such H2R blockade.

Methods

Study population

Eligible participants were 20–50 years of age, with no medical requirement for H2R antagonist use and no use of ranitidine for greater than 1 week within 6 months of the study start date. Individuals were excluded from the study if they had a current or past diagnosis of porphyria, cancer, immune deficiency disorder, active infection at the time of screening, and known liver, hematologic, or renal diseases. Additional exclusion criteria included history of allergic reaction to any drug including ranitidine or to any ingredient in the formulation, weight in excess of 109 kg, pregnancy, or planned pregnancy or breastfeeding during the study period. Participants had no diagnosed clinically significant diseases or evidence of clinically significant findings on physical examination and/or clinical laboratory evaluations (hematology, biochemistry, electrocardiogram, urinalysis). Subjects with clinical laboratory values not within normal range were only included if such values were without clinical significance as defined by the clinical coinvestigators. All participants were required to have an estimated glomerular filtration rate > 90 mL/min/1.73m2. Female volunteers of childbearing potential agreed to self-reported use of contraceptive regimens.

Study design

A single-center, single-arm, prospective phase 4 study was conducted at the Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Halifax, Canada between 01/05/2018 and 01/12/2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03145012). The study was submitted on the 26/04/2017 and first posted on the 09/05/2017. Healthy volunteers were given daily weight-based oral ranitidine (Zantac, Sanofi Consumer Health Inc., Laval, Canada) at a maximum of 900 mg/day for 6 weeks. Study visits were at weeks 0, 3 and 6 on treatment, as well as 12-week post-treatment. A peripheral venous blood draw was collected at each visit. The study protocol was approved by the Nova Scotia Health Authority and Isaak Walton Killam Health Centre Research Ethics Boards. All study procedures were performed in compliance with the Tri-Council Policy Statement Guidelines, International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, and Health Canada Division 5 Food and Drug Regulations. All participants gave written informed consent prior to participation.

Complete blood counts

Complete blood counts (CBC) with white blood cell differentials were performed on whole blood samples collected in BD Vacutainer EDTA tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) using a Sysmex XN-9000 automated hematology system (Sysmex Canada Inc., Mississauga, Canada).

Immune phenotyping

Immune phenotyping for MDSC and lymphocyte populations was performed on whole blood cells collected in BD Vacutainer Lithium Heparin tubes (BD) by flow cytometry. Antibodies to CD11b, CD14, CD15, CD33, CD66b, HLA-DR, CD3, CD19, CD56, CD4, CD8, CD16, CD25, CD57, CD314 (NKG2D), CD159a (NKG2A), Fixable Viability Stain 780 and Brilliant Stain Buffer were obtained from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Antibody clones are indicated in Supplementary table S1. CD1d tetramers loaded with synthetic glycolipid PBS57 were obtained from the NIH tetramer core facility (Emory University, Atlanta, GA). For each donor, 150 µL of whole blood cells were incubated with fixable viability stain 780 (BD Bioscience) for 10 min on ice then washed in PBS supplemented with 2% FCS. The Fc receptors were blocked with 3% human immunoglobulin (Hizantra, CSL Behring Canada, Ottawa, Canada) for 10 min. Combinations of fluorescently tagged antibodies (Supplementary Table S1) were prepared in brilliant violet buffer and 50 µl were added to each sample for 30 min. After staining, cells were washed twice with PBS supplemented with 2% FCS (Gibco) and the RBC were lysed by adding 5 ml of ammonium chloride for 30–60 s then washed with PBS supplemented with 2% FCS. Cells were fixed with PBS containing 1% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C then washed and resuspended in PBS supplemented with 2% FCS before analysis on BD LSRFortessa™ (BD). The instrument was calibrated with BD Rainbow Calibration Particles (BD) before each acquisition to ensure consistent readings over time. Data were analyzed using FlowJo Version 10 software (BD). Sample gating strategies are depicted in Supplementary Figure S1. Gating was based on fluorescence minus one control. Absolute numbers of immune cell subsets were calculated from automated total white blood cell counts.

Multiplex immunoassays and ELISA

Soluble mediator levels were assessed in platelet poor plasma isolated from whole blood samples collected in BD Vacutainer EDTA tubes (BD). Plasma samples were assessed for IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, M-CSF, MMP-9, CCL2, CCL5, CXCL1, IFN-γ, TNF, VEGF-A, IgA, IgE, IgG1, IgG2, IgG4 and IgM via magnetic Luminex performance assays (ThermoFisher, Oakville, Canada) and G-CSF, (R&D Systems, Oakville, Canada). Samples were read using a Bio‐Plex 200 system (Bio-Rad, Mississauga, Canada) and analyzed with Bio‐Plex Manager 6.0 software (Bio-Rad). Plasma levels of B cell activating factor were measured by ELISA (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For both multiplex and ELISA assays a control plasma sample was included on all plates and used for normalization for detectable analytes that displayed > 10% inter-plate variability. For statistical analysis, values below the LOD were assigned the LOD value for the analyte, adjusted for sample dilution.

Statistical analysis

Data distribution was determined by the D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus k2 normality test. Depending on normality test results, paired statistical analysis was performed using repeated-measures one-way ANOVA or Friedman’s test with Dunnett's or Dunn's multiple comparison post-hoc tests, respectively, using T0 as control. Differences were considered significant at P = 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed on raw data using GraphPad Prism software version 8.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA).

Results

Study population

A total of 34 subjects were screened and 30 healthy volunteers were enrolled. One patient withdrew 2.6 weeks after study start. Data are presented on the remaining 29 healthy volunteers who completed the study. Participants received ranitidine twice daily at a dosage between 7.58 and 8.5 mg/kg/day, a high dose but lower than the one used in patients with Zollinger Ellison syndrome. The median age of the cohort was 31 years (range 23–47 years), all were Caucasian, and 17% were male (Supplementary Table S2). Self-reported ranitidine adherence was on average 97% adherence (range 89–100%). There were no study drug-related safety issues.

Ranitidine treatment did not affect the overall leukocyte profile or MDSC numbers

Ranitidine use has been associated with neutropenia, anemia, granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia in various clinical contexts13,33. Complete blood counts and differential white blood cell counts were assessed using automated hematology at baseline, during and following ranitidine treatment. Ranitidine treatment did not significantly alter whole blood hematologic counts (Table 1). Minor changes in the number of reticulocytes (RET), mean capsular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and Hematocrit (HCT) were observed over the trial but were within normal clinical ranges. Since ranitidine or famotidine treatment has been shown to regulate MDSCs in murine models21,34, MDSC subsets were examined in trial subjects by flow cytometry35 to identify early stage MDSC (e-MDSC), polymorphonuclear MDSC (PMN-MDSC) and monocytic MDSC (M-MDSC) (Supplementary Figure S1A). The level of MDSCs are normally low in healthy individuals but increase in cancer patients36. As expected, low numbers of circulating MDSCs were observed in these healthy subjects, and their overall numbers changed between some sampling times during the study (Table 1). However, ranitidine treatment did not affect the absolute numbers of MDSC subsets at T3, T6 and T18 when compared to T0 (Supplementary figure S2D–F). Analysis of the percentage of the three different populations showed that the percentage of PMN-MDSC were decreased at T18 (Supplementary Figure S2).

Table 1 Whole blood hematologic countsa before, during, and after ranitidine treatment.

Ranitidine treatment was associated with a decrease in B lymphocytes but not immunoglobulin levels

H2R is known to regulate B cell activation, antibody production and class switch in experimental models33. We examined the effects of ranitidine on B cells and T cells by flow cytometry (Supplementary Figure S1B). Ranitidine treatment decreased the absolute numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells at T6 and T18, respectively (Fig. 1A,B right panels). However, it did not significantly affect their percentages (Fig. 1A,B left panels). Interestingly, both the numbers and percentage of CD19+ B cells were profoundly altered by ranitidine treatment. The absolute number of B cells decreased after 3 and 6 weeks of ranitidine treatment and this decrease was maintained after treatment cessation (Fig. 1C) with a post-treatment T18 trend towards T0 baseline levels. Given the notable decrease in B cells observed following ranitidine treatment serum immunoglobulins were also assessed. No significant changes in immunoglobulin levels were observed within the time frame of this study (Supplementary Figure S3).

Figure 1
figure1

Ranitidine treatment was associated with a substantial decrease of CD19+ B cells: The percentage and number of peripheral blood CD4+ (A), CD8+ T cells (B) and CD19+ cells (C) were assessed before ranitidine treatment (T0), after 3- and 6-weeks treatment (T3 and T6), and 12 weeks after treatment cessation (T18) by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures Friedman’s test with Dunn's multiple comparison using T0 as control. Graphs depict median and IQR, n = 29. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001; ****P < .0001.

H2R blockade is associated with a modest decrease in NK cells in the blood

Ranitidine treatment did not initially affect the numbers of CD3-CD56+ NK cells but a modest but statistically significant decrease at T6 and T18 was observed compared to the baseline T0 (T6 P = 0.033; T18 P = 0.0034, Fig. 2A right panel). CD56brightCD16neg NK cells and CD56brightCD16dim NK cells are minor NK populations in the peripheral blood and are highly potent cytokine secreting cells37. CD56dimCD16bright NK cells represent the majority of NK cells in the blood and are highly cytotoxic38. Numbers of the predominant NK subsets CD56DimCD16Bright was decreased at T18. CD56BrightCD16neg NK cells were decreased at T6 and T18 and CD56BrightCD16Dim was reduced at T6 (Fig. 2B). This result indicated no evidence of a selective impact of H2R blockade on a specific NK cell subset.

Figure 2
figure2

Ranitidine treatment is associated with a decrease of NK cells: The percentage and number of peripheral blood total CD3-CD56 + NK cells (A) and their subsets CD56brightCD16neg, CD56brightCD16dim cells and CD56dimCD16bright NK cells subsets (B) were assessed before ranitidine treatment (T0), after 3- and 6-weeks treatment (T3 and T6), and 12 weeks after treatment cessation (T18) by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures Friedman’s test with Dunn's multiple comparison using T0 as control (A and B) and t-test to compare immunoglobulin level at T0 and T6. Graphs depict median and IQR, n = 29. *P < .05; **P < .01.

H2R blockade is associated with altered frequency of CD25 expressing CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes

Ranitidine has been shown to act synergistically with IL-2 to increase NK activity in vitro39 and increased the efficacy of IL-2 anti-tumor therapy in a clinical study27. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of ranitidine treatment on IL-2Rα (CD25) expression in T lymphocytes (Fig. 3). Interestingly, the percentage of CD25+CD4+ T cells initially increased at T3 before a decline at T6 and T18 (Fig. 3A left panel). Numbers of CD25 expressing CD4+ cells were decreased at the end of ranitidine treatment and this decrease was sustained following treatment cessation (Fig. 3B left panel). Numbers of CD25 expressing CD8+ cells were also decreased at the end of ranitidine treatment (T6; P = 0.0330) and this decrease was sustained at T18 (P = 0.0001, Fig. 3B right panel). Similar changes were observed for CD25+CD8+ percentages (Fig. 3A right panel).

Figure 3
figure3

Ranitidine treatment is associated with a substantial decrease in CD25 expressing T cells: The percentage (A) and number (B) of peripheral blood CD25 expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were assessed before ranitidine treatment (T0), after 3- and 6-weeks treatment (T3 and T6), and 12 weeks after treatment cessation (T18) by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures Friedman’s test with Dunn's multiple comparison using T0 as control. Graphs depict median and IQR, n = 29. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001; ****P < .0001.

Selective decrease in serum IL-2 levels associated with ranitidine treatment

Levels of selected soluble immune mediators associated with lymphocyte development and activation or hematopoiesis were assessed in plasma before, during and following ranitidine treatment (Table 2). Levels of immune mediators in subjects following ranitidine treatment were compared to baseline measures in individual subjects. Notably, ranitidine treatment was associated with a selective decrease in plasma IL-2 levels (Table 2). IL-2 was detectable in 25 of the 29 individuals at baseline but was decreased following ranitidine treatment (T3 and T6; P < 0.0001) and remained significantly lower following treatment cessation (T18; P = 0.0132) (Table 2). Interestingly, G-CSF was present at very low levels and detectable above the limit of detection in only 2 of the 29 individuals at T0. G-CSF levels increased following treatment up to 3.61 ± 1.03 pg/ml at T6 (end of treatment timepoint), at which time 31% (n = 9) of subjects had detectable G-CSF levels. At T18 62% (n = 18) of individuals had detectable G-CSF, which was further increased to 6.35 ± 1.02 pg/ml (T18; P < 0. 01) compared to T6 or baseline.

Table 2 Effects of ranitidine treatment on plasma soluble mediator levels.

Discussion

The effect of ranitidine on human immune cell populations has not been well defined, despite its very common clinical use, especially in the elderly. The present study demonstrates that ranitidine treatment was associated with sustained decreases in CD19+ B cells (Fig. 1) and CD25 expressing CD4+and CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3). However, even at a relatively high dose, ranitidine treatment did not alter total peripheral white blood cell, red cell and platelet parameters (Table 1). The percentage and the absolute number of circulating basophils, neutrophils and monocytes were also not altered by ranitidine (Table 1) although H2R blockade was associated with decreased percentages of PMN-MDSC (Supplementary Figure S1).

To our knowledge, this study defines, for the first-time, the effects of H2R blockade on immune cells in healthy individuals. While ranitidine has been associated with neutropenia in some clinical reports11,12, it did not induce neutropenia in healthy individuals over a six week time course (Table 1) even when used at a relatively high clinical dose. Ranitidine has also been associated clinically with thrombocytopenia40,41 but we did not observe such impact (Table 1). A sixfold increase in plasma G-CSF levels was observed after cessation of ranitidine treatment (Table 2). While we do not have a clear mechanistic explanation for this G-CSF increase, this change might suggest a compensatory effect for changes in granulocyte populations. We recognise that the dose of ranitidine used in this study was above the one used in a clinical setting and there remain some possibility for off target impacts of ranitidine contributing to our findings. Further clinical immunological studies with alternate H2 antagonists would be necessary to clarify this issue.

This study made the novel observation that ranitidine use was associated with decreased numbers of peripheral CD19+ B cells (Fig. 1C). Few studies have analysed the effects of ranitidine on B cells. Ranitidine was shown to modify T lymphocyte function when administered acutely to patients with head injury while having no effect on B cell frequencies42. Conversely, in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, ranitidine treatment increased the antibody response to tetanus-toxoid conjugated or unconjugated Haemophilus influenzae type-B vaccine51,52. Ranitidine also increased antibody responses in a murine tumor model23. In these studies, an increase in plasma cells following ranitidine treatment has been suggested. Differentiation of B cells during their developmental stages is supported by IL-743 while their differentiation to plasma cells can be regulated by alternate mediators such as BAFF44 and is accompanied by a down regulation of CD19 surface marker45,46. The analysis of soluble BAFF and IL-7 in our study (Table 2) did not support an elevation of these mediators in ranitidine treated subjects. Regardless of mechanism, ranitidine impacts on B cells are substantial and might have implications for the humoral immune responses.

H2R blockade has been demonstrated to have some beneficial impacts clinically in the context of multiple myeloma. Although the bulk of multiple myeloma cells do not express CD19 it has been suggested that a critical population of myeloma propagating cells is CD19 positive47,48. The notable impact of ranitidine treatment in decreasing CD19 positive cells in the blood could therefore be worthy of further investigation in the context of this disease, where ranitidine treatment has already been suggested to be beneficial39.

NK cells are known to express H4R and H2R49,50 and their activity can be regulated by histamine receptors antagonists such as ranitidine50,51,52. In this study, NK cells were decreased by ranitidine treatment (Fig. 2A), which was reflected in a decrease in CD56dimCD16bright, CD56brightCD16neg and CD56brightCD16dim (Fig. 2B) sub-populations. It was further observed that ranitidine treatment decreased NK cell surface expression of NKG2D (Supplementary Figure S4B). NKG2D is an activating receptor expressed by T cells and NK cells and is important in anti-tumor as well as anti-viral immune responses53. The observed effects on NKG2D expression could potentially lead to a decrease in NK and CD8+ T cell activation.

MDSCs are induced suppressor cells important in the regulation of immune responses to tumors, inflammation and infections54. Strategies targeting MDSCs in cancer have being extensively researched55. Although low levels of MDSCs are expected in healthy individuals, our analysis showed that the percentage (Supplementary Figure S2), but not the absolute number of PMN-MDSC was decreased in the peripheral blood after ranitidine treatment (Supplementary figure S2). This finding is similar in nature to the observed impact of ranitidine treatment on MDSC populations in mice34 and could contribute to the reported positive impact of ranitidine in some cancer settings.

Ranitidine treatment modulated CD25 expression on T lymphocytes and NK cells (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Figure S4A). A previous study of the postoperative effect of ranitidine on abdominal surgery patients showed an increased plasma level of CD25 in treated patients56, indicating a potential role of ranitidine in activation of CD4+ T cells and subsequent shedding of CD25. Ranitidine, in combination with IL-2, was also shown to increase NK cell cytotoxicity in vitro9 as well as having synergistic effects with anti-tumoral IL-2 therapy27. Indeed, frequencies of CD25 expressing cells were increased after 3 weeks of ranitidine treatment (Fig. 3A left panel) which can potentiate IL-2-induced T and NK cell activation. IL-2 itself is a key regulator of CD25 expression and was found to be decreased by three-fold in the plasma after ranitidine treatment. Overall, the effects of ranitidine on B cells as well as CD25 expressing cells and IL-2 plasma levels indicate that H2R blockade profoundly impacts several aspects of acquired immunity.

Ranitidine and other H2R antagonists such as cimetidine and famotidine have previously been shown to affect immune responses to viral infections or vaccination. Cimetidine had beneficial effects during several viral infections57,58,59 and increased immune responses during vaccination29,30. Recently, famotidine was associated with beneficial effects in COVID-1931 and its use correlated with a two-fold decrease in need for intubation or death32. The authors suggested a potential effect of famotidine via decreased cytokine levels32. Our results indicate that treatment with the related H2 antagonist ranitidine significantly decreased IL-2 compared to baseline and decreased IL-15 and IL-1β in individuals with higher baseline levels (Table 2). Furthermore, ranitidine has an immunosuppressive effect on NK and T cells demonstrated by a decreased in CD25 and NKG2D expressing cells (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Figure S4). These two phenomena might dampen the immune or inflammatory response to infection and help explain the effect of H2R blockade in COVID-19 infection.

Ranitidine is known to inhibit the constitutive activity of H2R67 Such blockade will have a direct effect on H2R expressing cells. Ranitidine can also act on bone marrow cells14. For example, hematopoietic stem cells treated with histamine exhibited anti-apoptotic effects on neutrophils and granulocytes60. Therefore, inhibiting histamine receptors can lead to altered immune populations in the periphery. The half-life of ranitidine is estimated to be three hours while some observed effects were maintained up to 12 weeks after treatment cessation and these impacts are more likely a result of a long-term effect on the bone marrow microenvironment.

Overall, this study demonstrates that H2R inhibition using ranitidine in healthy individuals induced substantial, prolonged, and multifaceted changes in immune cells to an extent that is likely to be important in immune response regulation. These changes were most notable in the CD19 positive B cell and CD25 positive T cell populations and were associated with decreased plasma IL-2. Our findings indicate that when clinically evaluating immunotherapeutic strategies and immunization responses, greater consideration should be given to histamine receptor antagonists as contributors to variable or modified immune responses.

References

  1. 1.

    Hey, E, editor. Ranitidine. In: Neonatal Formulary. Malden, Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2007. pages 215–5.

  2. 2.

    Mohammed, R. et al. Effects of eight weeks’ continuous treatment with oral ranitidine and cimetidine on gastric acid secretion, pepsin secretion, and fasting serum gastrin. Gut 24, 61–66 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Thangam, E. B. et al. The role of histamine and histamine receptors in mast cell-mediated allergy and inflammation: The hunt for new therapeutic targets. Front. Immunol. 9, 1873 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Traiffort, E. et al. The guinea pig histamine H2 receptor: gene cloning, tissue expression and chromosomal localization of its human counterpart. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 211, 570–577 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ezeamuzie, C. I. & Philips, E. Histamine H(2) receptors mediate the inhibitory effect of histamine on human eosinophil degranulation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 131, 482–488 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gutzmer, R. et al. Expression and function of histamine receptors 1 and 2 on human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 109, 524–531 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Idzko, M. et al. Expression and function of histamine receptors in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 109, 839–846 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ohtani, T. et al. H1 and H2 histamine receptors are absent on Langerhans cells and present on dermal dendritic cells. J. Invest. Dermatol. 121, 1073–1079 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hellstrand. K., 7 Hermodsson, S. Histamine H2-receptor-mediated regulation of human natural killer cell activity. JI 137, 656–660 (1986).

  10. 10.

    Kmiecik, T., Otocka-Kmiecik, A., Górska-Ciebiada, M. & Ciebiada, M. T lymphocytes as a target of histamine action. Arch. Med. Sci. 8, 154–161 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Aymard, J. P. et al. Haematological adverse effects of histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Med. Toxicol. Adverse Drug Exp. 3, 430–448 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    List, A. F., Beaird, D. H. & Kummet, T. Ranitidine-induced granulocytopenia: Recurrence with cimetidine administration. Ann. Intern. Med. 108, 566–567 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Takami, N., Yamamoto, Y., Matsuo, H., Ohtani, H. & Sawada, Y. Agranulocytosis possibly caused by ranitidine in a patient with renal failure. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 40, 520–523 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Agura, E. D., Vila, E., Petersen, F. B., Shields, A. F. & Thomas, E. D. The use of ranitidine in bone marrow transplantation: A review of 223 cases. Transplantation 46, 53–56 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Amos, R. J., Kirk, B., Amess, J. A., Jones, A. L. & Hinds, C. J. Bone marrow hypoplasia during intensive care: Bone marrow culture studies implicating ranitidine in the suppression of haemopoiesis. Hum. Toxicol. 6, 503–506 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Elenkov, I. J. et al. Histamine potently suppresses human IL-12 and stimulates IL-10 production via H2 receptors. JI 161, 2586–2593 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jutel, M., Akdis, M. & Akdis, C. A. Histamine, histamine receptors and their role in immune pathology. Clin. Exp. Allergy 39, 1786–1800 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Masini, E., Blandina, P., Brunelleschi, S. & Mannaioni, P. F. Evidence for H2-receptor-mediated inhibition of histamine release from isolated rat mast cells. Agents Actions 12, 85–88 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rivera, E. S. et al. Histamine as an autocrine growth factor: An unusual role for a widespread mediator. Semin. Cancer Biol. 10, 15–23 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen, X. et al. Bone marrow myeloid cells regulate myeloid-biased hematopoietic stem cells via a histamine-dependent feedback loop. Cell Stem Cell 21, 747–757 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Vila-Leahey, A., Rogers, D. & Marshall, J. S. The impact of ranitidine on monocyte responses in the context of solid tumors. Oncotarget 7, 10891–10904 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Vila-Leahey, A., Oldford, S. A., Marignani, P. A. & Marshall, J. S. Ranitidine modifies myeloid cell populations and inhibits breast tumor development and spread in mice. OncoImmunology 5, 1–13 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rogers, D. et al. Ranitidine inhibition of breast tumor growth is B cell dependent and associated with an enhanced antitumor antibody response. Front. Immunol. 9, 1925 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cianchi, F. et al. The role of cyclooxygenase-2 in mediating the effects of histamine on cell proliferation and vascular endothelial growth factor production in colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 6807–6815 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nerreter, T. et al. Super-resolution microscopy reveals ultra-low CD19 expression on myeloma cells that triggers elimination by CD19 CAR-T. Nat. Commun. 10, 3137–3211 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cannizzo, E. et al. The role of CD19 and CD27 in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma by flow cytometry: a new statistical model. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 137, 377–386 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mertens, W. C., Bramwell, V. H., Banerjee, D., Gwadry-Sridhar, F. & Lala, P. K. Sustained indomethacin and ranitidine with intermittent continuous infusion interleukin-2 in advanced malignant melanoma: a phase II study. Clin. Oncol. (R Coll Radiol) 5, 107–113 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Papagerakis, S. et al. Proton pump inhibitors and histamine 2 blockers are associated with improved overall survival in patients with head and neck squamous carcinoma. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila) 7, 1258–1269 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhang, W. et al. Cimetidine augments Th1/Th2 dual polarized immune responses to recombinant HBV antigens. Vaccine 29, 4862–4868 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Xie, X. et al. Cimetidine synergizes with Praziquantel to enhance the immune response of HBV DNA vaccine via activating cytotoxic CD8(+) T cell. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 10, 1688–1699 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rogosnitzky, M., Berkowitz, E., Jadad, A.R. Delivering benefits at speed through real-world repurposing of off-patent drugs: The COVID-19 pandemic as a case in point. JMIR Public Health Surveill (2020).

  32. 32.

    Freedberg, D.E., Conigliaro, J., Sobieszczyk, M.E., Markowitz, D. D., Gupta, A., O'Donnell, M. R., et al. Famotidine use is associated with improved clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A propensity score matched retrospective cohort study. 1–17 (2020).

  33. 33.

    Pixley, J. S., MacKintosh, F. R., Sahr, E. A. & Zanjani, E. D. Mechanism of ranitidine associated anemia. Am. J. Med. Sci. 297, 369–371 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Vila-Leahey, A. et al. Ranitidine modifies myeloid cell populations and inhibits breast tumor development and spread in mice. OncoImmunology 5, e1151591 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bronte, V. et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards. Nat. Commun. 7, 12150 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Brandau, S. et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–10 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Poli, A. et al. CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells: an important NK cell subset. Immunology 126, 458–465 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Stabile, H., Fionda, C., Gismondi, A. & Santoni, A. Role of distinct natural killer cell subsets in anticancer response. Front. Immunol. 8, 293 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nielsen, H. J. et al. The effect of ranitidine on cellular immunity in patients with multiple myeloma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 32, 201–205 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hoste, L. & George, I. Ranitidine-induced thrombocytopenia in a neonate: A case report and review of literature. J. Pediatr. Pharmacol. Ther. 24, 66–71 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bangia, A. V., Kamath, N. & Mohan, V. Ranitidine-induced thrombocytopenia: A rare drug reaction. Indian J. Pharmacol. 43, 76–77 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Rixen, D., Livingston, D. H., Loder, P. & Denny, T. N. Ranitidine improves lymphocyte function after severe head injury: Results of a randomized, double-blind study. Crit. Care Med. 24, 1787–1792 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Corfe, S. A. & Paige, C. J. The many roles of IL-7 in B cell development; mediator of survival, proliferation and differentiation. Semin. Immunol. 24, 198–208 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Smulski, C. R. & Eibel, H. BAFF and BAFF-receptor in B cell selection and survival. Front. Immunol. 9, 2285 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Halliley, J. L. et al. Long-lived plasma cells are contained within the CD19(-)CD38(hi)CD138(+) subset in human bone marrow. Immunity 43, 132–145 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Arumugakani, G. et al. Early emergence of CD19-negative human antibody-secreting cells at the plasmablast to plasma cell transition. J. Immunol. 198, 4618–4628 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mateo, G. et al. Prognostic value of immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma: A study by the PETHEMA/GEM cooperative study groups on patients uniformly treated with high-dose therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 2737–2744 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Garfall, A. L. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells against CD19 for multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1040–1047 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ehling, S., Rossbach, K., Dunston, S. M., Stark, H. & Bäumer, W. Allergic inflammation is augmented via histamine H4 receptor activation: The role of natural killer cells in vitro and in vivo. J. Dermatol. Sci. 83, 106–115 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Damaj, B. B., Becerra, C. B., Esber, H. J., Wen, Y. & Maghazachi, A. A. Functional expression of H4 histamine receptor in human natural killer cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells. JI 179, 7907 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hellstrand, K. & Hermodsson, S. Differential effects of histamine receptor antagonists on human natural killer cell activity. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 84, 247–255 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Romero, A. I., Thorén, F. B., Brune, M. & Hellstrand, K. NKp46 and NKG2D receptor expression in NK cells with CD56dim and CD56bright phenotype: Regulation by histamine and reactive oxygen species. Br. J. Haematol. 132, 91–98 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Sharma, P., Kumar, P. & Sharma, R. Natural killer cells: their role in tumour immunosurveillance. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 11, 5 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Saleem, S. J. et al. Cutting edge: Mast cells critically augment myeloid-derived suppressor cell activity. J. Immunol. 189, 511–515 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Law, A. M. K., Valdes-Mora, F. & Gallego-Ortega, D. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as a therapeutic target for cancer. Cells 9, 561 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Nielsen, H. J., Mynster, T., Jensen, S., Hammer, J. & Nielsen, H. Effect of ranitidine on soluble interleukin 2 receptors and CD8 molecules in surgical patients. Br. J. Surg. 81, 1747–1751 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kapińska-Mrowiecka, M. Turowski G [Efficacy of cimetidine in treatment of Herpes zoster in the first 5 days from the moment of disease manifestation]. Pol. Tyg. Lek 51, 338–339 (1996).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kurzrock, R., Auber, M. & Mavligit, G. M. Cimetidine therapy of herpes simplex virus infections in immunocompromised patients. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 12, 326–331 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Harcourt, J. P., Worley, G. & Leighton, S. E. Cimetidine treatment for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 51, 109–113 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Nemeth, K. et al. Characterization and function of histamine receptors in human bone marrow stromal cells. Stem Cells 30, 222–231 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Maria Vaci, Nong Xu and Alexander Edgar for their technical assistance in addition to the support of the staff of the Canadian Centre for Vaccinology, Halifax, NS, Canada. We also thank Dr. Thomas Issekutz for his constructive comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by a Canadian Cancer Society Grant generously supported by the Lotte and John Hecht Memorial Foundation (Grant #704444). DM is supported by Dr. David H. Hubel Postdoctoral Fellowship funded by the Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.M. contributed to the majority of the investigation, methodology, formal analysis and interpretation, visualization and manuscript writing. S.A.O. project planning, methodology, data interpretation, formal analysis, and manuscript writing; I.D.H. methodology, and constructive review and editing. L.B. study concept and design, funding acquisition, constructive review. J.S.M. study concept and design, funding acquisition, visualization, constructive review and editing. All authors approved the final manuscript. LB and JSM contributed equally to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean S. Marshall.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meghnem, D., Oldford, S.A., Haidl, I.D. et al. Histamine receptor 2 blockade selectively impacts B and T cells in healthy subjects. Sci Rep 11, 9405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88829-w

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing