Abstract
To assess the predictive and prognostic aim of interim and end-treatment 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT (FCH-PET/CT) and 99mTc-methilen diphosphonate bone scintigraphy (BS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases (CRPC-BM) treated with Radium 223 dichloride (223Ra). Prospective and multicentre ChoPET-Rad study including 82 patients with CRPC-BM. Baseline, after 3 (interim) and 6 doses (end-treatment) BS and FCH PET/CT were performed in patients who meet the study criteria. Clinical variables, imaging and clinical progression were obtained and their association with progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was studied. Agreement between BS and FCH PET/CT response was assessed using Kappa (K) analysis. Median of PFS and OS was 3 and 16 months, respectively. Agreement between interim BS and FCH PET/CT was weak (K: 0.28; p = 0.004). No agreement was observed between end-treatment diagnostic studies. Interim and end-treatment FCH PET/CT were related to PFS (p = 0.011 and p < 0.001, respectively). Therapeutic failure and interim BS and FCH PET/CT showed association with OS (p < 0.001, p = 0.037 and p = 0.008, respectively). Interim and end-treatment FCH PET/CT were good predictors of biochemical progression in patients treated with 223Ra. Therapeutic failure and progression in interim BS or FCH PET/CT were adverse factors for OS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Radium 223 dichloride (223Ra) is a targeted alpha therapy introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of patients with castration resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases (CRPC-BM)1,2,3,4.
In patients with CRPC-BM the lack of suitable biologic and imaging markers, able to guide in patient selection and response assessment, is a potential and challenging drawback for 223Ra as well as for other therapies. In clinical practice, monitoring of treatment with 223Ra is based on clinical and biochemical markers, being the role of imaging not well documented, with few works regarding to bone scintigraphy (BS) and computed tomography (CT), and only case reports for positron emission tomography/computed tomography using radiolabeled choline analogues (choline-PET/CT)5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. This “evidence of absence” explains that most current guidelines [e.g. European Society of Medical Oncology, European Association of Urology and the American Urological Association] do not provide clear recommendations about diagnostic imaging assessment in clinical practice or only focused on clinical trials3,4,13,14,15.
Based on the higher sensitivity and specificity of choline-PET/CT, respect to standard BS, in detecting bone metastases and the potential for diagnosing extraosseous disease in the same exploration, some advantages respect to the BS in the response assessment should be expected16,17,18,19. However although the Prostate Cancer Radiographic Assessments for Detection of Advanced Recurrence II (RADAR II) group and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recognize the use of choline-PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence, no recommendations are given regarding the response assessment20,21,22.
Based on: (1) the limited experience about the use of 18F-Fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT, BS and CT in patients treated with 223Ra and (2) the reduced accuracy of BS and CT in the response assessment in patients with CRPC-BM a prospective and multicentre study was designed to assess the value of FCH PET/CT and BS in the response and prognosis assessment of patients treated with 223Ra, aiming to validate and introduce FCH PET/CT into the diagnostic management of patients with 223Ra indication.
Material and methods
The present study (FCH PET/CT in the assessment of 223Ra treatment response, ChoPET-Rad) was designed as a prospective, multicentre (six hospitals) and non-randomized.
Ethical Committee of the coordinator centre (University General Hospital, Ciudad Real, Spain) where all the FCH PET/CT were performed approved the study (code: C/52/2016). Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Patients
Patients with CRPC-BM who fulfill all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria for 223Ra treatment were consecutively included between January 2015 and January 2020.
The inclusion criteria for initiating 223Ra treatment were: (a) patients with CRPC with symptomatic bone metastases and a negative or inconclusive CT for visceral metastatic disease performed in the previous 6 weeks to request 223Ra treatment; (b) patients with a good bone marrow reserve that fulfills the hematologic criteria necessary to administer 223Ra and (c) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–1 (life expectancy greater than 6 months).
The exclusion criteria were: (a) patients who denied participating in the study or (b) who not fulfill any of the inclusion criteria or (c) were diagnosed of visceral or diffuse bone marrow involvement on baseline FCH PET/CT and/or BS23.
Patients scheduled to be treated with of 223Ra (55 KBq/kg, intravenously) in a 4-week cycle, for six cycles and maintained on androgen deprivation therapy.
Clinical assessment
Each patient was clinically, hematological and biochemically evaluated before each 223Ra administration and bimonthly or monthly, after the last 223Ra administration, depending on the patient clinical status and the subsequent therapeutic lines. The clinical and biochemical variables were: Gleason, prostate specific antigen (PSA), alkaline phosphatase (AP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), time of evolution of prostate cancer, time of evolution of bone metastases and therapeutic line that 223Ra represented.
LDH and AP were considered as pathological when the values were higher than 333 U/L and 147 U/L, respectively.
The percent of change in PSA of each month determination during 223Ra administration with respect to baseline value was calculated in order to obtain the progression free survival (PFS).
Clinical progression was assessed following the RADAR II group recommendation22 using at least two of the following indicators: (1) convincing and consistent rise in PSA (defined as three consecutive rises, resulting in two 50% increases over the basal PSA value), (2) evidence of radiographic progression, or (3) worsening of the status performance or clinical symptoms while the patient is on therapy.
Thus at least two of three criteria (PSA progression, radiographic progression and clinical deterioration) should be fulfilled to stop 223Ra treatment. Finally the decision to stop treatment was addressed in multidisciplinary evaluation (oncologist and nuclear medicine physician) mostly after the third or fourth 223Ra treatment, based on early progression. Last follow-up was performed in June 2020.
Clinical end-points were: (a) treatment failure, defined as an incomplete 223Ra administration (less than six cycles) because of clinical progression of the disease or hematological toxicity and/or clinical impairment, (b) PFS, attending to PSA evolution, defined as three consecutive rises in PSA, resulting in two ≥ 50% increases over the basal PSA value and (c) overall survival (OS), defined as the elapsed time between the date of the start of 223Ra and the date of either death or the last follow-up.
For PSA, response was considered if a decrease in absolute PSA value of ≥ 30% between baseline PSA and interim (1 month later the third dose) or end-treatment (1 month later the sixth dose) was observed, defined as early of delayed response, respectively. Stability was considered for the rest of biochemical changes.
For AP and LDH, progression was defined as an increase of ≥ 25% from last available determination during treatment respect to baseline observed. Response was defined as a reduction of ≥ 30% from the baseline value. The rest of conditions were considered as stability.
Imaging acquisition
FCH PET/CT and BS were performed, within a time interval of 4 weeks, before the first administration (baseline), before the fourth (interim) and after the sixth (end-treatment) 223Ra doses.
Bone scan was acquired 3 h after injection of 740 MBq of 99mTc-methilen diphosphonate (MDP) in three reference centres. FCH PET/CT was performed in a unique reference hospital, 5–15 min after intravenous administration of 2–4 MBq/kg, in three-dimensional acquisition mode for 3 min per bed position, from skull to proximal legs. Low dose CT (120 kV, 80 mA) without contrast was performed for attenuation correction and as an anatomical map. The emission data was corrected for scatter, random coincidence events, and system dead time using the provided software23.
Imaging evaluation
Two independent observers evaluated FCH PET/CT and BS. In case of discordances, a third observed reviewed the studies to reach a consensus.
Baseline FCH PET/CT and BS were visually evaluated establishing the BM extension following the criteria defined in a previous publication23.
Interim and end-treatment BS and FCH PET/CT were compared with respect to the previous one, assessing all the included anatomical areas (preferable axial and proximal third of extremities), in order to establish response (baseline and interim, respectively). The appearance of at least two new areas of increased uptake, osseous on BS and osseous and/or extraosseous on FCH PET/CT or a new lesion associated to an increase of the extent of BS or FCH uptake (at least 20% in the longest direction) in another one bone was considered as progression following the criteria for response formulated by the National Prostatic Cancer Treatment Group, formerly called the National Prostatic Cancer Project (NPCP)24.
In BS, complete response, lesion stability or partial response with a reduction by 50% in the number of increased areas of uptake were joined for statistical purposes and considered no progressive disease. In FCH PET/CT no progression was considered in cases of stability, partial response or complete response according to criteria of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)25.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (v. 22). Quantitative variables were represented by mean and standard deviation and qualitative variables by frequency and percentage. Relation between qualitative variables was studied using Chi-squared Pearson test.
Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used to report the concordance regarding the response results between BS and FCH PET/CT, classifying the results as poor (< 0.20), weak (0.21–0.40), moderate (0.41–0.60), good (0.61–0.80) and very good (0.81–1.00).
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were considered to study the prognostic factors of the overall survival (OS) and the progression free survival (PFS). The median follow-up was estimated using reverse Kaplan–Meier method.
The significance level was established at p < 0.05.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Results
223Ra treatment was requested in 98 patients. Evaluation of the clinical and hematological conditions dismissed 16 cases: four for hematological constraints, five attending to FCH PET/CT results consisted on metastatic disease in three patients (lung, liver and brain involvement, respectively) and two with locorregional invasiveness (seminal vesicle invasion and bladder involvement, respectively), three for diffuse bone marrow involvement defined by BS and/or FCH PET/CT, one for a probably second primary tumor (hypernephroma) without a definite diagnosis, two for clinical deterioration with ECOG > 2 and one for medullar compression days previous to 223Ra initiation. Thus 82 patients were finally enrolled in the present study.
The median follow-up was 39 months with a median PFS and OS of 3 and 16 months, respectively.
Sixty-one out of 82 (74.4%) patients had received docetaxel treatment before study enrollment. 223Ra was considered as the first or second therapeutic line in only 23 patients (28%). Tables 1 and 2 show the patient and disease characteristics.
Two thirds of patients biochemically progress during 223Ra treatment (54, 65.9%). 40/54 (74.1%) of these progressions were during the first 3 months after 223Ra initiation (early progression). 48 out of 82 (58.5%) patients did not complete the six administrations of 223Ra (therapeutic failure), 43 for clinical progression (RADAR criteria) and five cases for other clinical reasons (one pulmonary thromboembolism, two hematological constraints and two clinical deterioration). On the other hand, three patients with clinical progression (RADAR criteria) completed the six doses of 223Ra treatment based on their limited therapeutic options and/or “low burden” progression on imaging, less than five small new lesions in non-visceral locations.
Only 13 patients experienced PSA response during 223Ra treatment, nine of them early responses that kept during treatment and the rest delayed ones.
Regarding the binary response (progression vs no progression) on imaging, progression was detected more frequently on interim and end-treatment FCH PET/CT, compared to BS (Tables 2 and 3). Regarding the pattern of progression on FCH PET/CT, all the cases were bone progression except in three cases with exclusively lymph node progression in interim and end-treatment evaluations. Visceral involvement (liver metastases on CT portion of FCH PET/CT with absent or minimal FCH uptake) was observed in six patients, five on interim evaluation and one on end-treatment FCH PET/CT. All the cases associated bone progression.
Agreement between interim BS and FCH PET/CT was weak (K: 0.28; p = 0.004). No agreement was observed between end-treatment diagnostic studies (K: 0.13; p = 0.247). The distribution of the results is showed in Table 3.
Progression of AP and LDH was observed in 14/64 and 19/59 cases, respectively. Response of AP and LDH was detected in 18/64 and 9/59 cases, respectively. Stability was observed in the rest of cases, especially for LDH.
Baseline PSA and AP showed significant association with OS. For every 100 units or 10 units that PSA or AP increases, the risk of death raises by 2% (HR = 1.024; p = 0.025 and HR = 1.026; p < 0.001, respectively).
LDH progression showed significant association with PFS in Cox-analysis (HR: 2.126; p = 0.020).
Significant association of therapeutic failure with PFS and OS were found using Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis. Interim and end-treatment FCH PET/CT results showed significant association with PFS whereas interim BS and FCH PET/CT results showed significant association with OS. The results are detailed on Tables 4 and 5. Figure 1 shows graphically the most relevant results.
In multivariate analysis, only therapeutic failure and interim FCH PET/CT showed association with PFS (p = 0.047 and p = 0.078, respectively). Thus, a patient with therapeutic failure or progression in interim FCH PET/CT had 1.938 (1.008, 3.727) or 1.789 (0.938, 3.413) times more risk of PSA progression than patients without the cited conditions. On the other hand, the independent and significant variables associated with OS were therapeutic failure (p = 0.034) and baseline AP (p = 0.001).
Some representative cases are showed on Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Discussion
Regular monitoring of bone metastases for men with CRPC, using conventional imaging (CT and/or BS), although recommended, is notoriously difficult, that explains the use of “clinical benefit”, in common daily practice, as the best evidence of response. However the combined use of clinical, biochemical and imaging assessment is of paramount importance to a correct monitoring for treatments with survival impact as 223Ra, as we considered in the present work.
Prostatic specific antigen behavior during 223Ra treatment is not well known based on the limited experience. Reductions of PSA levels up to 18% have been associated to the cytotoxic effect of 223Ra inhibiting tumor-induced osteoblastic bone growth and suppressing bone metabolic activity7,26,27,28,29. On the other hand, PSA rise during treatment with 223Ra has been reported and attributed to various reasons: (a) progression of metastatic soft tissue injuries no involved in the treatment, (b) bone tumor lysis, (c) bone progression, (d) non androgen dependent mechanism of action of 223Ra or (e) flare21,22,30,31,32,33,34,35,36.
Based on the previously referred limitations we decided to use a very “restrictive” criterion for PSA progression, just only to use it as reference to compare with our imaging results in response assessment (BS and FCH PET/CT). This criterion practically rules out the misinterpretation of progressive disease as “flare” based on a steadily rising of PSA during 223Ra treatment less likely represented a flare phenomenon37.
On the other hand, AP and LDH can be useful in cases of discordant results between PSA values and clinical evaluation during 223Ra treatment38. A stability of AP and LDH was found in 32/64 and 31/59 cases, respectively. However LDH, contrary to AP, showed association with PFS. Thus, patients with LDH progression had a double risk to progress compared to the rest of patients (p = 0.020).
Previous works and current clinical guidelines are pragmatic about needing to assess response using diagnostic imaging, explaining the poorly defined use and interpretation criteria5,6,21,39. However guidelines, focused on imaging, state that imaging should be used when therapeutic selection could be affected by results [i.e., (1) when considering starting therapy, (2) before changing therapy to establish a new baseline, and (3) when significant deterioration of the general condition of the patient or consistent and convincing biochemical progression is identified22,40,41.
Regarding to the election of imaging technique, radiological evaluation using CT has recently been suggested by the European Expert Consensus Panel as the ideal method for predicting response to treatment in patients with CRPC-BM, even with a proven poor sensitivity and specificity42,43,44.
In the 223Ra setting, interim evaluation is recommended in patients with aggressive disease (high Gleason score at diagnosis or PSA doubling time < 6 months before starting 223Ra) in order to rule out visceral metastases, using the same technique as baseline assessment. In addition, in patients presenting worsening pain after the first three cycles, increase in AP level or low PSA doubling time revealing a suspicion of progression of disease, imaging evaluation should be repeated45. However, with BS, there are not specific criteria for the positive identification of benefit or response apart from its inherent limitations on the response evaluation of diffuse metastatic bone disease or malignant “superscan” and flare phenomenon11,44,46,47,48.
The scarcely literature has reported variable imaging features after 223Ra treatment. In relation to BS, paradoxical response has been documented with a decrease in osteoblastic activity in existing lesions joined to the appearance of new metastatic lesions30,46,49. On the other hand, Keizman et al.11, reported stable disease using BS at 3 and 6 months in 74% and 94%, respectively.
Despite the most recent evidence that support the choice of choline analogues PET/CT as the preferred Nuclear Medicine imaging modality for treatment monitoring of metastatic CRPC, rather than BS, 18NaF or 18F-fluorodeoxiglucose-(18F-FDG) PET/CT, the proper use of choline PET/CT is not yet established by guidelines4,50,51.
In the present study, imaging data from BS and FCH PET/CT before, during and after therapy were used to monitor response in patients treated with 223Ra. For the establishment of metabolic progressive disease using FCH PET/CT, in order to exclude the possibility of flare response, we used the same criteria that BS instead of semiquantitative EORTC criteria. We observed a weak and null agreement between interim and end-treatment BS and FCH PET/CT, respectively. Thus interim and end-treatment FCH PET/CT was superior to BS in the PFS definition, and thus more valid to monitor 223Ra treatment response.
Other authors described, using FCH, 18NaF or 68 Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (68 Ga-PSMA) PET/CT, acute metabolic changes in large metastatic deposits after 223Ra treatment, with a dramatic drop of uptake in responders accompanied by a reduction of PSA and AP8,9,46,52,53. These results can be explained based on FCH and 68Ga-PSMA represents the tumoricidal effect of 223Ra.
Recognizing the progression is crucial to move to other more effective therapies and to avoid toxicities. Thus, the only possible purpose of performing an imaging technique is to monitor progression. In this setting, choline-PET/CT can evaluate disease progression when discordances between biochemical, clinical and imaging response, using more recognized techniques as BS and CT, exist9,15.
In patients treated with 223Ra, progression has been reported using BS in up to 28%, and soft-tissue progression on CT, including visceral disease, in up to 50% of cases5,10,11,12. Our median PFS (3 months) was lower than the previously described using other therapies in earlier lines54,55,56,57,58. This fact might be explained, first by the cross-resistance phenomenon (more of 2/3 of our patients underwent previous docetaxel and unless other line previous to 223Ra), and second, by our close and exhaustive follow-up performed using the triple assessment (clinical, BS plus FCH PET/CT and PSA)59. Keizman et al.11 found similar results, with a median radiological PFS of 4.8 months, documenting extraskeletal radiological progression on CT scans in 46% with an uncommon bone progression (6%).
In our opinion, a significant deterioration of the general condition of the patient, as main criteria to perform imaging and check biomarkers as current guidelines recommend32,39,40, is a restrictive criteria that limits the early detection of progression.
Guidelines and consensus state that treatments with a proven survival benefit should not be stopped for PSA progression alone (in the absence of radiographic or clinical progression) and although symptomatic or radiographic progression is a more reliable trigger for either therapeutic layering or change, the use of at least two of three criteria (PSA progression, radiographic progression and clinical deterioration) should be fulfilled to stop treatment15,21,22. Based on that, in the present work, clinical and/or radiological progression was required, in association with PSA progression, to stop 223Ra treatment, although all the cases were discussed on multidisciplinary team. In fact, the strong association of therapeutic failure with PFS was due to the direct dependence between these two variables, explained by progression determined stopping 223Ra treatment.
The present study has some drawbacks. The relatively small population in end-treatment evaluation by imaging, based on the high rate of progressive disease that promoted stopping 223Ra treatment, probably limited the statistical capability of our results. In addition the multicentre nature limited obtaining some biochemical parameters.
Regarding the strengths, this is the first documented evidence of 223Ra response and prognostic assessment using FCH PET/CT and BS in a prospective and parallel evaluation, showing the usefulness of interim FCH PET/CT and baseline AP, as independent predictors of PFS and OS in multivariate analysis, apart from therapeutic failure.
Conclusion
In patients treated with 223Ra, interim and end-treatment FCH PET/CT were good predictors of biochemical and clinical progression. Moreover interim FCH PET/CT and BS, joined to therapeutic failure, offered prognostic information.
The obtained results define the potential value of FCH PET/CT, with respect to BS, to monitor 223Ra response and guide treatment discontinuation in a safe and effective way.
References
Basch, E. et al. Systemic therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 3436–3448 (2014).
Cornford, P. et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 71, 630–642 (2017).
Parker, C., Gillessen, S., Heidenreich, A. & Horwich, A. Cancer of the prostate: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 26(Suppl 5), 69–77 (2015).
Mohler, J. L. et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in prostate cancer. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 14, 19–30 (2016).
Modi, D. et al. Radium-223 in heavily pretreated metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer. 14, 373–380 (2016).
Kairemo, K. & Joensuu, T. Radium-223-dichloride in castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer-preliminary results of the response evaluation using F-18- fluoride PET/CT. Diagnostics (Basel) 5, 413–427 (2015).
Parker, C. et al. Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 213–223 (2013).
Miyazaki, K. S., Kuang, Y. & Kwee, S. A. Changes in skeletal tumor activity on (18)Fcholine PET/CT in patients receiving (223)Radium radionuclide therapy for metastatic prostate cancer. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 49, 160–164 (2015).
Vicente, A. M. G., Castrejón, A. S., Cabellos, R. Á., Gil, B. S. & Mohedano, N. M. Response assessment of radium-223 treatment. Should a fluorocholine PET/CT be performed?. Clin. Nucl. Med. 42, 761–765 (2017).
Omlin, A. et al. Imaging response during therapy with radium-223 for castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases: A multicenter analysis. J Clin Oncol. 34(suppl 15), 5057 (2016).
Keizman, D. et al. Imaging response during therapy with radium-223 (Ra-223) for castrate resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases. J. Clin. Oncol. 34(suppl 2), 282 (2016).
Jadvar, H., Challa, S., Quinn, D. I. & Conti, P. S. One-year post approval clinical experience with radium-223 dichloride in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 30, 195–199 (2015).
Heidenreich, A. et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 53, 68–80 (2008).
Cookson, M. S. et al. Castration-resistant prostate cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol. 190, 429–438 (2013).
Scher, H. I. et al. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 1148–1159 (2008).
Fuccio, C. et al. Role of 11C-choline PET/CT in the re-staging of prostate cancer patients with biochemical relapse and negative results at bone scintigraphy. Eur. J. Radiol. 81, e893–e896 (2012).
Beheshti, M. et al. Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 35, 1766–1774 (2008).
Fuccio, C. et al. Role of 11C-choline PET/CT in the restaging of prostate cancer patients showing a single lesion on bone scintigraphy. Ann. Nucl. Med. 24, 485–492 (2010).
Rodado, M. S. et al. Clinical utility of 18F-fluorocholine PET-CT in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer after radical treatment: results of a multicentre study. BJU Int. 115, 874–883 (2015).
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2017). Prostate cancer (version 2). http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf. (Accessed 27 June 2017).
Gillessen, S. et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: The Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017. Eur. Urol. 73, 178–211 (2018).
Crawford, E. D. et al. The role of therapeutic layering in optimizing treatment for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (Prostate Cancer Radiographic Assessments for Detection of Advanced Recurrence II). Urology 104, 150–159 (2017).
García Vicente, A. M. et al. Baseline 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT and bone scan in the outcome prediction of patients treated with 223Ra. Clin. Trans. Oncol. 21, 289–297 (2019).
Slack, N. H., Karr, J. P., Chu, T. M. & Murphy, G. P. An assessment of bone scans for monitoring osseous metastases in patients being treated for prostate carcinoma. Prostare. I, 259–270 (1980).
Young, H. et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur. J. Cancer. 35, 1773–1782 (1999).
Matsubara, N. et al. Phase II study of radium-223 dichloride in Japanese patients with symptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 173–180 (2018).
Henriksen, G., Fisher, D. R., Roeske, J. C., Bruland, O. S. & Larsen, R. H. Targeting of osseous sites with alpha-emitting 223Ra: Comparison with the beta-emitter 89Sr in mice. J. Nucl. Med. 44, 252–259 (2003).
Henriksen, G., Breistol, K., Bruland, O. S., Fodstad, O. & Larsen, R. H. Significant antitumor effect from bone-seeking, alpha-particle-emitting 223Ra demonstrated in an experimental skeletal metastases model. Cancer Res. 62, 3120–3125 (2002).
European Medicines Agency. Xofigo (radium-223) summary of product characteristics. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002653/WC500156172.pdf. (Accessed 5 June 2016).
Croke, J., Leung, E., Segal, R. & Malone, S. Clinical benefits of alpharadin in castrate-chemotherapy-resistant prostate cancer: Case report and literature review. BMJ Case Rep. 1, 1–4 (2012).
Thuret, R. et al. The postchemotherapy PSA surge syndrome. Ann. Oncol. 19, 1308–1311 (2008).
Scher, H. I. et al. Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: Updated recommendations from the prostate cancer clinical trials working group 3. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 1402–1418 (2016).
Mulders, P. F. & Schalken, J. A. Measuring therapeutic efficacy in the changing paradigm of castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic. Dis. 12, 241–246 (2009).
Ryan, C. J. et al. Phase II study of abiraterone acetate in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer displaying bone flare discordant with serologic response. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 4854–4861 (2011).
Armstrong, A. J., Garrett-Mayer, E., de Wit, R., Tannock, I. & Eisenberger, M. Prediction of survival following first-line chemotherapy in men with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 203–211 (2010).
Halabi, S. et al. Prostate-specific antigen changes as surrogate for overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with second-line chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 3944–3950 (2013).
Wang, J., Kuker, R. & Serafini, A. 223Ra-Dichloride response evaluation using 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in a patient with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 45, e486–e488 (2020).
Mori, K. et al. Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase in metastatic prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer. 17, 409–418 (2019).
Gillessen, S. et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: recommendations of the St Gallen Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2015. Ann. Oncol. 26, 1589–1604 (2015).
Poeppel, T. D. et al. EANM guideline for radionuclide therapy with radium-223 of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Molec. Imag. 45, 824–845 (2018).
Crawford, E. D. et al. Challenges and recommendations for early identification of metastatic disease in prostate cancer. Urology 83, 664–669 (2014).
Fitzpatrick, J. M. et al. Optimal management of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: Highlights from a European Expert Consensus Panel. Eur. J. Cancer. 50, 1617–1627 (2014).
Eisenhauer, E. A. et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur. J. Cancer. 45, 228 (2009).
Morris, M. J. et al. Monitoring the clinical outcomes in advanced prostate cancer: What imaging modalities and other markers are reliable?. Semin. Oncol. 40, 375–392 (2013).
Baldari, S. et al. Management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A focus on radium-223: Opinions and suggestions from an expert multidisciplinary panel. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 113, 43–51 (2017).
Nome, R., Hernes, E., Bogsrud, T. V., Bjøro, T. & Fosså, S. D. Changes in prostate-specific antigen, markers of bone metabolism and bone scans after treatment with radium-223. Scand. J. Urol. 49, 211e7 (2015).
Keizman, D. et al. Imaging response during therapy with radium-223 for castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases-analysis of an international multicenter database. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 20, 289–293 (2017).
Etchebehere, E., Brito, A. E., Rezaee, A., Langsteger, W. & Beheshti, M. Therapy assessment of bone metastatic disease in the era of 223 radium. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 44(Suppl 1), 84–96 (2017).
McNamara, M. A. & George, D. J. Pain, PSA flare, and bone scan response in a patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with radium-223. BMC Cancer 15, 371 (2015).
Lecouvet, F. E. et al. Monitoring the response of bone metastases to treatment with magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine techniques: A review and position statement by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer imaging group. Eur. J. Cancer. 50, 2519–2531 (2014).
Mottet, N. et al. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer (European Association of Urology, 2015).
Cook, G. et al. 18F-fluoride PET: Changes in uptake as a method to assess response in bone metastases from castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with 223Ra-chloride (Alpharadin). Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Molec. Imag. Res. 1, 4 (2011).
Ahmadzadehfar, H., Schlenkhoff, C. D., Rogenhofer, S., Yordanova, A. & Essler, M. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET represents the tumoricidal effect of 223Ra in a patient with castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 41, 695–696 (2016).
de Bono, J. S. et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 1995–2005 (2011).
Scher, H. I. et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 1187–1197 (2012).
Ryan, C. J. et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 138–148 (2013).
Ryan, C. J. et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (COU-AA-302): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled phase 3 study. Lan. Oncol. 16, 152–160 (2015).
Beer, T. M. et al. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 424–433 (2014).
van Soest, R. J. et al. Cross-resistance between taxanes and new hormonal agents abiraterone and enzalutamide may affect drug sequence choices in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 49, 3821–3830 (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.M.G.V.: designed and directed the study, obtained the figures and wrote the main manuscript; M.A.S.: performed the statistical analysis and wrote the results; R.G.D. and J.C.E. collected and processed data; Á.S.C. proposed the hypothesis and designed research. All the authors read and reviewed the manuscript. All the authors have participated in the writing and revision of this article and take public responsibility for its content. The present publication is approved by all authors and by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out. All the authors confirm the fact that the article is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
García Vicente, A.M., Amo-Salas, M., Cassinello Espinosa, J. et al. Interim and end-treatment 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT and bone scan in prostate cancer patients treated with Radium 223 dichloride. Sci Rep 11, 7389 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86759-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86759-1
This article is cited by
-
The Curies’ element: state of the art and perspectives on the use of radium in nuclear medicine
EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.