The subgingival microbial communities of domestic cats remain incompletely characterized and it is unknown whether their functional profiles are associated with disease. In this study, we used a shotgun metagenomic approach to explore the functional potential of subgingival microbial communities in client-owned cats, comparing findings between periodontally healthy cats and cats with naturally occurring chronic periodontitis, aggressive periodontitis, and feline chronic gingivostomatitis. Subgingival samples were subjected to shotgun sequencing and the metagenomic datasets were analyzed using the MG-RAST metagenomic analysis server and STAMP v2.1.3 (Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles) software. The microbial composition was also described to better understand the predicted features of the communities. The Respiration category in the level 1 Subsystems database varied significantly among groups. In this category, the abundance of V-Type ATP-synthase and Biogenesis of cytochrome c oxidases were significantly enriched in the diseased and in the healthy groups, respectively. Both features have been previously described in periodontal studies in people and are in consonance with the microbial composition of feline subgingival sites. In addition, the narH (nitrate reductase) gene frequency, identified using the KEGG Orthology database, was significantly increased in the healthy group. The results of this study provide preliminary functional insights of the microbial communities associated with periodontitis in domestic cats and suggest that the ATP-synthase and nitrate-nitrite-NO pathways may represent appropriate targets for the treatment of this common disease.
Periodontal disease is a multifactorial inflammatory disease that naturally occurs in domestic cats and other mammalian species, including humans1,2,3,4. In general, the etiology of periodontal disease involves complex interactions between the microbial communities present in subgingival plaque and the host’s immunological response5,6,7.
Periodontal disease is clinically relevant because of its local and systemic effects and its high incidence4,8. The disease is characterized by local tissue inflammation and, in many cases, gradual destruction of the attachment apparatus of teeth (i.e. gingiva, periodontal ligament, alveolar bone and cementum)1,9,10. Two stages of disease are generally recognized: gingivitis and periodontitis2,10. Gingivitis is the initial and purely inflammatory stage and is considered reversible if the causative factors are controlled; periodontitis represents a more advanced and irreversible stage of the disease and is marked by loss of periodontal attachment2. Additionally, multiple systemic diseases and conditions have been associated with periodontal disease in people including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cognitive dysfunction7,11.
Like in people, two clinical forms of periodontitis are recognized in cats: chronic periodontitis (CP), characterized by slow and often silent progression until reaching an advanced stage in relatively older animals, and aggressive periodontitis (AP), characterized by earlier onset and much faster progression2,8,9,12. The reported prevalence of periodontal disease in cats is as high as 98% with no apparent sex or breed predisposition1,8. Common clinical signs in cats include tooth mobility and tooth loss, oral pain and discomfort, difficulty prehending food, ptyalism, halitosis, and weight loss2,13. Extensive and severe forms of periodontitis also occur in cats with feline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS)14. Feline chronic gingivostomatitis is a poorly understood inflammatory disease of unknown etiology characterized by severe inflammation and ulceration of oral mucosal surfaces15,16, and it is unknown whether the disease mechanisms that result in periodontal destruction are comparable to CP and AP.
Even though the microbial and immunological pathogenesis of periodontal disease in cats has not been fully elucidated, recent molecular studies have revealed some of the microbial features of the disease12,17,18,19,20. For example, we previously used 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology to show that the subgingival microbial taxonomical profile of periodontally healthy cats significantly differs to that of periodontally diseased cats12. Additionally, we showed that taxonomical differences underlie the different clinical presentations of the disease (i.e. CP, AP and FCGS). Furthermore, when comparing the relative abundance of prevalent taxa, and alpha and beta-diversity among cohorts, our findings were consistent with the ecological plaque and dysbiosis hypotheses of disease previously described in people21,22, suggesting conserved mechanisms of disease. Others have shown that the microbial composition in cats change as the periodontium transitions from health to the early stages of disease17, underscoring that the subgingival microenvironment is closely related to disease initiation and progression.
As remarkable as microbial composition studies are, they do not offer mechanistic insights because they do not take into consideration the functional characteristics of the microbial communities involved22. Indeed, it has been shown that the functional characteristics of subgingival microbial communities are more important drivers of the host’s immunological response in people than their actual taxonomical composition22,23. Contrasting with humans, subgingival microbial functional studies in domestic cats are lacking and it is unknown whether comparable pathogenic mechanisms and underlying microbial patterns occur. Understanding the pathogenesis of periodontal disease from a microbial functional perspective is important for veterinary medical applications and may serve as a basis for future development of novel preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions that can complement or replace decades-old traditional approaches that lack a rationale. Additionally, understanding the disease mechanisms in this species will be relevant from a comparative perspective and may support leveraging client-owned cats as pre-clinical models for translational research applications. Herein, we used a shotgun metagenomic approach to explore the functional potential of subgingival microbial communities in client-owned cats, comparing findings between periodontally healthy cats and cats with naturally occurring CP, AP and FCGS.
Forty subgingival samples from different client-owned cats were sequenced, with only one failing quality control by the MG-Rast server. The other 39 metagenomic samples were distributed as follows based on periodontal status as determined by standard-of-care clinical and radiographic findings: 10 independent samples from cats diagnosed with AP, 14 independent samples from cats diagnosed with CP, 9 independent samples from cats diagnosed with in the FCGS, and 6 independent samples from periodontally healthy cats. Notably a total of 55 cats were initially sampled; however, the total genomic DNA concentration obtained was insufficient for sequencing in 15 cases, many of which corresponded to periodontally healthy cats. Shotgun sequencing requires a minimum input of 1 ng DNA and a large number of samples had too low concentration (< 0.010 ng/µL). Furthermore, only one site per cat was sampled to minimize potential bias associated with site-specific microbiome variation, which may have influenced DNA concentration. Also, given that the amount of host DNA present in each sample remains undetermined during sample preparation, it is possible that the number of detected functional features was impacted. These technical limitations are reflective of some of the challenges encountered when conducting metagenome-based research using clinical samples. Given these technical limitations, the data presented here should be considered preliminary but may be used to guide future studies focused on the microbial pathogenesis of periodontal disease in cats.
A summary of sample identification and sequences data post quality control is presented in Table 1. The analyzed dataset contained 10,697,668 sequences, with a median of 285,686 sequences per sample (101,709 to 438,659 sequences per sample). The median of 167,839 (62,991 to 243,166 features per sample) processed predicted protein features and a median of 22,217 (5503 to 64,544 features per sample) identified protein features. All sequences were deposited in the MG-Rast server and more information can be found under the sample identification.
Microbial community composition
Hits were observed in all domains with a predominance of Bacteria (Fig. 1). The most abundant phyla (minimum of 1% of abundance) are shown in Fig. 2A, including seven Bacteria taxa (Bacteriodetes, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Spirochaetes, Fusobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Synergistetes), and two Eukaryota taxa (Chordata and Arthropoda). These observations were unsurprising given the eating habits and hunting behavior of cats. However, we did not investigate the Eukaryota taxa further. Among Bacteria, statistical analysis showed that the relative abundance of Actinobacteria significantly differed among groups (corrected P-value 0.014). Subgingival samples from healthy cats (Fig. 2B) showed a significantly higher abundance of Actinobacteria (2.79% ± 1.08%) compared to cats in the CP (1.40% ± 0.7%; P-value < 0.01), AP (1.06% ± 0.55%; P-value < 0.001) and FCGS (1.11% ± 0.36%; P-value < 0.001) groups (Fig. 2C). Among all taxa, twenty-two families varied significantly (corrected P-value < 0.05) among groups (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, all these families were found to be significantly more abundant in healthy cats (P-value < 0.05) compared to diseased cats. The most abundant family was Pasteurellaceae, the proportion was higher (corrected P-value = 0.005) in healthy cats (2.17% ± 1.58) compared to cats with AP (0.35% ± 0.20%), CP (0.59% ± 0.40) and FCGS (0.33% ± 0.17%). In addition, the thirty most abundant bacterial genera identified in the present metagenomic datasets are shown in Fig. 3B. Among the most abundant genera, the relative abundance of Moraxella and Actinomyces were statistically different among groups; both genera were significantly more abundant (corrected P-value 0.019; corrected P-value 0.036, respectively) in healthy cats compared to diseased cats (Fig. 3B).
Predicted functional analysis of subgingival metagenomes
Functional roles and gene function
Considering the significance and abundance of Bacteria in the present metagenomic datasets and based on previous knowledge of periodontal biofilm composition, subsequent functional analyses using SEED Subsystems were performed filtering hits for the Bacteria domain. The abundance of functional categories at Subsystems level 1 is shown in Fig. 4A. Surprisingly, samples were not clustered together according to periodontal status, and Respiration was the only category found to be significantly different among the healthy and the diseased groups (Fig. 4B). Namely, using a P-value filter of 0.05, a higher relative abundance of the Respiration category was found in healthy group compared to diseased groups (Fig. 4B). We then focused on the following analysis at a deeper level in this category: at Subsystems level 3, V-Type ATP-synthase, Biogenesis of cytochrome c oxidases and Biogenesis of cbb3 type cytochrome c oxidases differed significantly among groups corrected (P-value equal to 0.025, 0.025 and 0.019, respectively) (Fig. 4C). Abundance of V-Type ATP-synthase was significantly higher in AP (17.43% ± 4.41%; P-value < 0.001), CP (14.79% ± 3.52%; P-value < 0.01) and FCGS (16.85% ± 4.84%; P-value < 0.01) compared to the healthy group (7.48% ± 4.41%). The abundance of Biogenesis of cytochrome c oxidases and Biogenesis of cbb3 type cytochrome c oxidases were higher in the healthy group (mean of 0.87% and 0.44%, respectively; P-value < 0.01) compared to the diseased groups (mean of 0.0–0.08% and 0.0–0.07%, respectively). At Subsystems function, Succinate dehydrogenase hydrophobic membrane anchor protein (corrected P-value 0.049) and Type cbb3 cytochrome oxidase biogenesis protein Ccol (corrected P-value 0.042) were statistically different among groups, both with significantly higher abundance in healthy cats (mean of 0.21% and 0.38%, respectively) compared to the diseased groups (mean < 0.03%) (Fig. 4D).
We analyzed genes from level 1 to function category using KEGG Orthology (KO) database and P-value filter for categories in STAMP v2.1.3. One gene was significantly different among groups: narH, nitrate reductase 1, beta subunit (Gene: b1225 narH; nitrate reductase A subunit beta [KO: K00371] [EC:18.104.22.168 1.7.99.-]) was found with a corrected P-value = 0.00225 (Fig. 5). Interestingly, this function is related to respiration and was present at a significantly higher abundance in healthy cats compared to AP, CP and FCGS (P-value < 0.001) (Fig. 5). The use of the KO database, molecular functions represented in functional orthologs, allows accessing the function pathway. The pathway that includes the narH gene is part of the NarL family from the Two-Component System (Pathway map: eco02020 Two-component system; class: Environmental Information Processing; Signal transduction). This was identified using the KEGG Mapper plugin for KEGG pathway mapping.
To our knowledge, this is the first study that uses shotgun metagenomics to investigate the compositional and functional profile of subgingival microbial communities associated with periodontal health and spontaneous periodontal disease in domestic cats. The microbiome composition reported here was consistent with previous studies and further highlights the importance of subgingival bacteria in periodontal health and disease. Importantly, significant functional features were observed in periodontally healthy and diseased cats, providing mechanistic insights of potential veterinary, comparative, and translational relevance.
Bacteria was the most abundant domain observed in the subgingival microbial communities analyzed in this study. This was expected based on bacterial colonization patterns of oral biofilms previously described in people24,25,26. The most abundant phyla were Bacteriodetes and Proteobacteria with higher abundance in the diseased and healthy groups, respectively, in accordance with previous studies12,19. The phylum Actinobacteria was significantly enriched in the healthy group compared to the diseased groups. This finding was consistent with a study in people which found higher proportions of Actinobacteria in subgingival communities in healthy individuals compared to those with periodontitis, in particular the genus Actinomyces27. Zaura et al.28 also identified Actinobacteria in the healthy core microbiome of oral microbial communities; and Actinomyces, especially, have been described as initial colonizers and compatible with periodontal health29. The higher relative abundance of Actinobacteria in healthy individuals might be associated with ecological succession, in which the emergence of newly dominant members occurs as biomass accumulates27. The presence of Actinobacteria has also been described in the oral microbiota of healthy cats12,17,19,20,30 and a relative abundance < 10% has been found in feline subgingival plaque samples regardless of periodontal status17, which is in agreement with the present study. Also, Older et al.31 identified lower relative abundances of Actinobacteria in FIV (feline immunodeficiency virus) positive cats with gingivitis compared to cats without gingivitis.
Unsurprisingly, the most abundant family identified in this study was Pasteurellacea. Indeed, unclassified Pasteurellaceae and Pasteurella spp. have previously been described as the most prevalent taxa in the oral cavity of healthy cats20. Some of the most abundant genera observed in this study had been previously associated with feline periodontitis and FCGS, including Treponema12,17, Bacteroides18, Porphyromonas32, Filifactor12,17, and Peptostreptococcus12,17, and with the oral and subgingival microbiota of healthy cats, including Enhydrobacter12, Moraxella12,17,20, Capnocytophaga12,17,18. In the present study, among the most abundant genera, the relative abundance of Moraxella and Actinomyces were significantly higher in healthy cats.
Recently, the present research group published an extensive study characterizing and comparing the subgingival microbial communities of cats affected by CP, AP, and FCGS, and healthy cats, using a 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach12, in which the most abundant operational taxonomic units and alpha and beta diversity were explored. Targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing is the major tool used for bacteria and archaea identification; it is important to emphasize that the Bacteria domain was the most abundant identified in this study using whole metagenome sequencing. Whole metagenome sequencing is based on untargeted DNA sequencing of all genomes within a sample; thus, an important technical challenge is the predominance of host DNA33. Some samples can harbor up to 90% of host DNA, and these type of samples demand a high quantity of sequences to obtain a reasonable coverage of microbial genomes33.
Regarding the functional profiles, it was interesting to observe that samples from healthy cats did not cluster using the SEED database and the Bacteria domain. This fact might be related to the small sample size of healthy cats or to the quantity and quality of the sequences. Similarly, diseased cats did not cluster based on clinical phenotype (i.e. CP, AP, FCGS). In our previous study12, focused on microbiota composition using the same periodontal categories, with 139 samples from 44 cats, the phylogenetic beta diversity analysis showed that the microbiota of periodontally healthy cats were distinguishable from diseased cats. One possible explanation for the lack of noticeable differences among diseased groups is that the spectrum of clinical manifestations of periodontitis in cats is determined by the host’s response and not necessarily by differences in the compositional or functional characteristics of the subgingival microbial communities. Future studies in which more animals are enrolled in each category, and in which deeper sequencing depth is achieved, will help elucidate whether functional differences of microbial communities underlie the different clinical presentations of periodontitis in cats.
Respiration was found to be significantly enriched in periodontally healthy cats, and V-Type ATP synthase was significantly more abundant among the diseased groups. ATP synthase, a highly conserved enzyme, is the principal means of energy production in microorganisms34,35. A higher abundance of a molecule involved with energy production in the diseased groups was not surprising considering the high bacterial load and microbial biofilm formation in periodontal disease. The relationship between bacterial adhesion, which is a required first stage during biofilm formation, and ATP levels has been previously described36. Indeed, enhanced metabolic activity was observed when Escherichia coli and Bacillus brevis adhered onto a surface, with ATP levels increasing up to five-fold upon adhesion compared to ATP levels in planktonic cells36, suggesting that increased metabolic activity may help cells colonize surfaces and that decreased metabolic activity may promote cell inactivation or death36.
The production of ATP by bacteria can occur by substrate-level phosphorylation of fermentable carbon sources or by oxidative phosphorylation through the respiratory chain and ATP synthase37. ATP synthase molecules are membrane-bound transporters that have evolved for different cells34. However, synthesis and hydrolysis of ATP is the only function of all forms of ATP synthases34. Importantly, drug-resistant mutations have been mapped to the ATP synthase enzyme37 and studies have revealed that ATP synthase is an appropriate target for antimicrobials34,35,37. Moreover, Schulz et al.38 characterized a type of Na+-driven ATP synthase from the opportunistic human pathogen Fusobacterium nucleatum, which is also noticeably present in dental plaque biofilms. They discovered that the c-ring of the F. nucleatum ATP synthase is Na+-coupled and its structure is different from mitochondrial c-rings, which shows an opportunity for new drug discovery against this pathogen38. Thus, targeting energy metabolic pathways may represent a promising approach for the development of novel antibacterial substances37, and might be of interest for the treatment of periodontal disease in cats.
Biogenesis of cytochrome c oxidases, biogenesis of cbb3 type cytochrome c oxidases, succinate dehydrogenase hydrophobic membrane anchor protein, and type cbb3 cytochrome oxidase biogenesis protein Ccol were all significantly enriched in the periodontally healthy group described in this study. In agreement with these findings, the predicted microbial feature aerobic respiration I (cytochrome c) was previously identified as significant for cats without gingivitis compared to cats with gingivitis using PICRUSt2 based on the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene31. The cytochrome c oxidases are terminal oxidases that accept electrons from cytochrome c and transfer in reactions to produce H2O39. Castresana et al.40 stated that “Cytochrome oxidase is a key enzyme in aerobic metabolism”, and more specifically, ccb3 oxidases have high affinity for oxygen and low proton-translocation efficiency41. The cbb3 oxidase is induced under low oxygen conditions and also in microaerophilic conditions; therefore, it is recognized as an important player in low oxygen environments41. Accordingly, the higher abundance of these enzymes in healthy cats is consistent with biofilm progression, which leads to a change in the microflora from aerobic to anaerobic42. Unsurprisingly, the majority of genera described in our previous study as significantly increased in periodontally diseased cats were gram-negative and anaerobic12.
Also, we identified that the abundance of the gene narH (nitrate reductase) was significantly higher in healthy cats when compared to periodontally diseased cats. This gene belongs to the NarL family from the two-component signal transduction systems, which enable cells to sense and respond to stimuli by changes in their environment or in their intracellular state (https://www.genome.jp/dbget-bin/www_bget?eco02020). The protective effect that microbial nitrate reductases might have on dental diseases that involve microbial-host interactions has been previously documented43,44. For example, it has been shown that the production of nitrite by commensal nitrate-reducing bacteria limits cariogenic/acidogenic bacteria growth due the antimicrobial oxides of nitrogen presence43,44, including nitric oxide (NO). Additionally, a previous study showed that Actinomycetales includes effective nitrate reducing species on the tongue of healthy individuals, specifically Actinomyces spp.43,45. This finding is consistent with the higher abundance of Actinobacteria and enrichment of the nitrate reductase gene found in the periodontally healthy group of cats described in this study. On the other hand, we did not find a correlation between the narH gene and Actinobacteria in this study; additional studies will help elucidate which groups of subgingival bacteria underlie the enrichment of nitrate reductases in periodontally healthy cats.
Importantly, the reduction of nitrate to nitrite by oral bacteria has also emerged as a key pathway in systemic NO homeostasis in mammals, and its selective antimicrobial activity prevents dietary nitrate-dependent lowering of blood pressure, inhibition of platelet aggregation and ischemic injury46. According to Hyde et al.45, the potential of the entero-salivary nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway to regulate NO bioavailability maintenance by nitrate reductase of specific bacteria may unveil new paradigms on the regulation and production of endogenous NO, which may show new targets for therapeutic interventions.
In conclusion, we have confirmed taxonomic features described in previous feline and human studies that have explored the subgingival microbiome associated with periodontal health and disease. Additionally, relevant functional features were identified and compared to published metagenome data. Importantly, we identified a higher abundance of the ATP synthase gene in diseased cats, and a higher abundance of the narH (nitrate reductase) gene in healthy cats. These two predicted functional annotations may represent important targets for the treatment of periodontal disease in cats. Although this study revealed important aspects related to the functional potential of subgingival communities associated with periodontal health and disease in cats, future functional metagenomic analyses will be required to corroborate and complement these findings, and to reveal whether the predicted functional features vary across the different clinical presentations of periodontitis in cats.
Material and methods
The research protocol was reviewed and approved by Cornell University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol number 2015-0117). Cat owners voluntarily agreed to enroll their cats in the present study and signed informed consent was obtained prior to experimental sampling. The methods were performed according to approved guidelines.
Study animals and sample collection
The sampled animal population consisted of 40 client-owned domestic cats originally presented to the Dentistry and Oral Surgery Service at Cornell University’s Hospital for Animals for periodontal treatment or for treatment of FCGS. The sex distribution was 20 females and 20 males. The breed distribution was 33 domestic and 7 purebred cats (2 Bengals, 2 Siamese, 1 Manx, 1 Himalayan and 1 Persian). The median age was 5 years (range = 2 to 17 years). None of the animals had received systemic antibiotics, immunosuppressive medications, or oral antiseptics during the previous 4 weeks. None of the cats had evidence of chronic debilitating systemic disease (i.e. chronic kidney insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, endocrinopathies, etc.). Periodontal evaluation and sampling were performed by a board-certified veterinary dentist using standard-of-care periodontal probing and full-mouth intraoral radiographs while animals were under general anesthesia; general anesthesia was supervised by a board-certified veterinary anesthesiologist. Each cat was assigned to one of four groups according to periodontal status (i.e. healthy, CP, AP, FCGS) following previously described clinical and radiographic criteria12.
Subgingival samples were obtained after radiographic evaluation but prior to any periodontal instrumentation or disinfection, or systemic antibiotic administration. Samples were collected using the endodontic paper point technique, as previously described12,47,48. Briefly, a sterile endodontic paper point (absorbent paper points—Coarse, Meta Dental Corp., Glendale, NY) was carefully inserted into the sulcus and gently rubbed along at least half of the circumference of individual teeth. Only one tooth was sampled per enrolled cat; only canine and carnassial teeth (maxillary fourth premolar and/or mandibular first molar teeth) were sampled. The sampled tooth was selected randomly in healthy animals. In the disease groups (i.e. AP, CP and FCGS), only samples from teeth with more than 50% attachment loss based on standard clinical parameters were included for analysis; the most severely affected tooth was sampled in each cat. Samples were aseptically collected, labeled, and stored individually in 1.5 ml sterile polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes, placed on ice, transported to the laboratory within 4 h, and then frozen at − 80 °C.
For DNA extraction, we added 1.0 mL of UltraPure distilled water (DNAse and RNAse Free) (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, USA) in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes containing the paper point. The tubes were then placed in a vortex (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) and mixed for 10 min at maximum speed. Paper points were discarded, and the remaining liquid was centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 rpm at room temperature. The pellet obtained was used for extracting DNA, which was performed using DNeasy PowerFood Microbial Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. DNA concentration was determined using Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Singapore) and Qubit dsDNA BR assay kit (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, USA). DNA samples were normalized to 0.2 ng/µL with UltraPure distilled water (DNAse and RNAse Free) (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, USA) before DNA sequencing.
Shotgun metagenomic sequencing
Normalized DNA samples were processed using the Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina Inc., USA). The gDNA tagmentation, libraries amplification (amplification with unique combination of indexes adapters (Nextera XT Index Kit, Set A, Illumina Inc., USA)), clean up, normalization, and pool of libraries were performed following the Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit Reference Guide (Illumina Inc., USA). The library obtained and PhiX sequencing control v3 (Illumina Inc., USA) were diluted and denatured according to MiSeq System Denature and Dilute Libraries Guide (Illumina Inc., USA). The final library was prepared using 95% of denatured library and 5% of denatured PhiX 20 pM in a final volume of 600 µL. The combination of library and PhiX control was loaded in MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 600 cycles (Illumina Inc., USA). Lastly, the pair-end sequencing was performed through the Illumina MiSeq Plataform (Illumina Inc., USA).
Bioinformatics and statistical analysis
The raw data files were demultiplexed based on index information (Casava v.1.8.2, Illumina Inc.). The reorganized fastq files (read 1 and read 2) were merged using “join paired-ends” in MG-Rast metagenomics analysis server v. 22.214.171.124; in this server the reads were also annotated and binned. In MG-Rast, sequences were submitted to data hygiene (quality control and removal of artifacts), feature extraction, feature annotation, and profile generation. The M5nr, a non-redundant database, analyzed the results against different reference databases and the number of hits distributed in these databases were displayed in the shotgun metagenomes profiles. Considering the number of annotated reads, RefSeq (NCBI Reference Sequence Database)50 was selected for taxonomic annotation and SEED Subsystems51 and KEGG52,53 Orthology (KO) databases for functional annotation. To better understand the functional features analyzed, a brief analysis of the microbial community of these metagenomes was performed. Maximum e-value of 1 × 10−5, 60% minimum identity, minimum alignment length cut-off of 15, minimum abundance of 1, and representative hit were applied for all analyses. The representative hits approach creates counts additive across functional and taxonomic levels allowing the comparison of functional and taxonomic profiles of different metagenomes. Also, the MG-Rast server the plugin-hub KEGG mapper52 was used to illustrate the predicted metabolic pathway in metagenomic samples.
The data obtained from the MG-Rast server was uploaded into STAMP v2.1.3 (Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles) software package54. Calculation of abundance of features, statistical analysis of the metagenomes, heatmap dendrograms, extended error bar plots, and box and whiskers plots were performed using STAMP v2.1.3 software. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey–Kramer post hoc test and multiple test correction Benjamin- Hochberg FDR (P-value < 0.05) were used to compare taxonomic and functional features among groups. Features were filtered based on P-value to created plots using only relevant features. Heatmap dendrograms were built using mean abundance (%), average neighbor (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean, UPGMA) and dendrogram clustering threshold of 0.75. Cell plots and bar graphs using mean relative frequency (%) of taxa were fitted using JMP 15 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software LLC, La Jolla, CA), respectively. Unclassified reads were removed from analysis.
Lommer, M. J. & Verstraete, F. J. Radiographic patterns of periodontitis in cats: 147 cases (1998–1999). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 218, 230–234 (2001).
Perry, R. & Tutt, C. Periodontal disease in cats: Back to basics—with an eye on the future. J. Feline Med. Surg. 17, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x14560099 (2015).
Hennet, P. R. & Harvey, C. E. Natural development of periodontal disease in the dog: a review of clinical, anatomical and histological features. J. Vet. Dent. 9, 13–19 (1992).
Marcenes, W. et al. Global burden of oral conditions in 1990–2010: a systematic analysis. J. Dent. Res. 92, 592–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513490168 (2013).
Costalonga, M. & Herzberg, M. C. The oral microbiome and the immunobiology of periodontal disease and caries. Immunol. Lett. 162, 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2014.08.017 (2014).
Pan, W., Wang, Q. & Chen, Q. The cytokine network involved in the host immune response to periodontitis. Int. J. Oral Sci. 11, 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-019-0064-z (2019).
Silva, N. et al. Host response mechanisms in periodontal diseases. J. Appl. Oral. Sci. 23, 329–355. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140259 (2015).
Girard, N., Servet, E., Biourge, V. & Hennet, P. Periodontal health status in a colony of 109 cats. J. Vet. Dent. 26, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/089875640902600301 (2009).
Armitage, G. C. & Cullinan, M. P. Comparison of the clinical features of chronic and aggressive periodontitis. Periodontol 2000(53), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00353.x (2010).
Reichart, P. A., Durr, U. M., Triadan, H. & Vickendey, G. Periodontal disease in the domestic cat. A histopathologic study. J. Periodontal. Res. 19, 67–75 (1984).
Cullinan, M. P. & Seymour, G. J. Periodontal disease and systemic illness: will the evidence ever be enough?. Periodontol 2000(62), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12007 (2013).
Rodrigues, M. X., Bicalho, R. C., Fiani, N., Lima, S. F. & Peralta, S. The subgingival microbial community of feline periodontitis and gingivostomatitis: characterization and comparison between diseased and healthy cats. Sci. Rep. 9, 12340. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48852-4 (2019).
Marretta, S. M. The common and uncommon clinical presentations and treatment of periodontal disease in the dog and cat. Semin. Vet. Med. Surg. (Small Anim.) 2, 230–240 (1987).
Farcas, N., Lommer, M. J., Kass, P. H. & Verstraete, F. J. Dental radiographic findings in cats with chronic gingivostomatitis (2002–2012). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 244, 339–345. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.244.3.339 (2014).
Winer, J. N., Arzi, B. & Verstraete, F. J. M. Therapeutic management of feline chronic gingivostomatitis: a systematic review of the literature. Front. Vet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00054 (2016).
Peralta, S. & Carney, P. C. Feline chronic gingivostomatitis is more prevalent in shared households and its risk correlates with the number of cohabiting cats. J. Feline Med. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x18823584 (2019).
Harris, S. et al. A pyrosequencing investigation of differences in the feline subgingival microbiota in health, Gingivitis and Mild Periodontitis. PLoS ONE 10, e0136986. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136986 (2015).
Dolieslager, S. M. et al. Identification of bacteria associated with feline chronic gingivostomatitis using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Vet. Microbiol. 148, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.08.002 (2011).
Dewhirst, F. E. et al. The feline oral microbiome: a provisional 16S rRNA gene based taxonomy with full-length reference sequences. Vet. Microbiol. 175, 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.11.019 (2015).
Sturgeon, A., Pinder, S. L., Costa, M. C. & Weese, J. S. Characterization of the oral microbiota of healthy cats using next-generation sequencing. Vet. J. 201, 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.01.024 (2014).
Belizário, J. E. & Napolitano, M. Human microbiomes and their roles in dysbiosis, common diseases, and novel therapeutic approaches. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01050 (2015).
Yost, S., Duran-Pinedo, A. E., Teles, R., Krishnan, K. & Frias-Lopez, J. Functional signatures of oral dysbiosis during periodontitis progression revealed by microbial metatranscriptome analysis. Genome Med. 7, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-015-0153-3 (2015).
Duran-Pinedo, A. E. & Frias-Lopez, J. Beyond microbial community composition: functional activities of the oral microbiome in health and disease. Microbes Infect. Institut Pasteur 17, 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2015.03.014 (2015).
Benitez-Paez, A., Belda-Ferre, P., Simon-Soro, A. & Mira, A. Microbiota diversity and gene expression dynamics in human oral biofilms. BMC Genom. 15, 311. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-311 (2014).
Vieira Colombo, A. P., Magalhaes, C. B., Hartenbach, F. A., Martins do Souto, R. & Maciel da Silva-Boghossian, C. Periodontal-disease-associated biofilm: a reservoir for pathogens of medical importance. Microb. Pathog. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2015.09.009 (2015).
Mason, M. R., Chambers, S., Dabdoub, S. M., Thikkurissy, S. & Kumar, P. S. Characterizing oral microbial communities across dentition states and colonization niches. Microbiome 6, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0443-2 (2018).
Abusleme, L. et al. The subgingival microbiome in health and periodontitis and its relationship with community biomass and inflammation. ISME J. 7, 1016–1025. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.174 (2013).
Zaura, E., Keijser, B. J., Huse, S. M. & Crielaard, W. Defining the healthy “core microbiome” of oral microbial communities. BMC Microbiol. 9, 259. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-259 (2009).
Chen, C. et al. Oral microbiota of periodontal health and disease and their changes after nonsurgical periodontal therapy. ISME J. 12, 1210–1224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-017-0037-1 (2018).
Older, C. E. et al. The feline cutaneous and oral microbiota are influenced by breed and environment. PLoS ONE 14, e0220463. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220463 (2019).
Older, C. E. et al. Influence of the FIV status and chronic gingivitis on feline oral microbiota. Pathogens https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050383 (2020).
Perez-Salcedo, L. et al. Isolation and identification of Porphyromonas spp. and other putative pathogens from cats with periodontal disease. J. Vet. Dent. 30, 208–213 (2013).
Pereira-Marques, J. et al. Impact of host DNA and sequencing depth on the taxonomic resolution of whole metagenome sequencing for microbiome analysis. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01277 (2019).
Ahmad, Z., Okafor, F., Azim, S. & Laughlin, T. F. ATP synthase: a molecular therapeutic drug target for antimicrobial and antitumor peptides. Curr. Med. Chem. 20, 1956–1973. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867311320150003 (2013).
Ahmad, Z., Laughlin, T. F. & Kady, I. O. Thymoquinone inhibits Escherichia coli ATP synthase and cell growth. PLoS ONE 10, e0127802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127802 (2015).
Hong, Y. & Brown, D. G. Variation in bacterial ATP level and proton motive force due to adhesion to a solid surface. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 2346–2353. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02671-08 (2009).
Balemans, W. et al. Novel antibiotics targeting respiratory ATP synthesis in Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 4131–4139. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00273-12 (2012).
Schulz, S. et al. A new type of Na(+)-driven ATP synthase membrane rotor with a two-carboxylate ion-coupling motif. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001596 (2013).
Thony-Meyer, L. Biogenesis of respiratory cytochromes in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61, 337–376 (1997).
Castresana, J., Lubben, M., Saraste, M. & Higgins, D. G. Evolution of cytochrome oxidase, an enzyme older than atmospheric oxygen. EMBO J. 13, 2516–2525 (1994).
Arai, H. Regulation and function of versatile aerobic and anaerobic respiratory metabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2, 103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00103 (2011).
Aruni, A. W., Dou, Y., Mishra, A. & Fletcher, H. M. The biofilm community-rebels with a cause. Curr. Oral. Health Rep. 2, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-014-0044-5 (2015).
Doel, J. J., Benjamin, N., Hector, M. P., Rogers, M. & Allaker, R. P. Evaluation of bacterial nitrate reduction in the human oral cavity. Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 113, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00184.x (2005).
Doel, J. J. et al. Protective effect of salivary nitrate and microbial nitrate reductase activity against caries. Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 112, 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00153.x (2004).
Hyde, E. R. et al. Metagenomic analysis of nitrate-reducing bacteria in the oral cavity: implications for nitric oxide homeostasis. PLoS ONE 9, e88645. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088645 (2014).
Ahmed, K. A. et al. Measuring nitrate reductase activity from human and rodent tongues. Nitric Oxide 66, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2017.04.001 (2017).
Perez-Salcedo, L. et al. Comparison of two sampling methods for microbiological evaluation of periodontal disease in cats. Vet. Microbiol. 149, 500–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.11.021 (2011).
Rodrigues, M. X., Nemec, A., Fiani, N., Bicalho, R. C. & Peralta, S. Endodontic microbiome of fractured non-vital teeth in dogs determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Front. Vet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00348 (2019).
Meyer, F. et al. The metagenomics RAST server—a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinform. 9, 386. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-386 (2008).
Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T. & Maglott, D. R. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D61-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl842 (2007).
Overbeek, R. et al. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 5691–5702. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki866 (2005).
Kanehisa, M. The KEGG database. Novartis Found. Symp 247, 91–101; discussion 101–103, 119–128, 244–152 (2002).
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.27 (2000).
Parks, D. H., Tyson, G. W., Hugenholtz, P. & Beiko, R. G. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 30, 3123–3124. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494 (2014).
This work was financially supported by the Cornell University’s Feline Health Center.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rodrigues, M.X., Fiani, N., Bicalho, R.C. et al. Preliminary functional analysis of the subgingival microbiota of cats with periodontitis and feline chronic gingivostomatitis. Sci Rep 11, 6896 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86466-x
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.