Abstract
Upgrading the nutritive value of rice straw (RS) is necessary to increase its contribution to enhancing meat and milk production. Present work verified whether novel Crabtree negative yeast inoculant could promote RS utilization, rumen fermentation, and milk quality in tropical crossbred lactating Holstein cows. The new stain of Crabtree negative yeasts (Pichia kudriavzevii KKU20 and Candida tropicalis KKU20) was isolated from the rumen of dairy cattle. This study used 6 multiparous crossbreds between Holstein Frisian × Zebu dairy cows in their mid-lactation period. Dairy cows were randomly allocated to three ensiled RS with various yeast stains including Saccharomyces cerevisiae, P. kudriavzevii KKU20, and C. tropicalis KKU20 according to a 3 × 3 replicated Latin square design. Crabtree-negative yeast (P. kudriavzevii and C. tropicalis) increased the apparent digestibility of dry matter by about 6.9% when compared with Crabtree-positive yeast (S. cerevisiae). Bacterial populations were highest with ensiled RS by C. tropicalis KKU20. Ensiled RS with Crabtree-negative yeasts were significantly increased with total volatile fatty acids, but they did not affect volatile fatty acid profiles. Milk protein precentage was highest at 35.6 g/kg when C. tropicalis was fed, and lowest when applied with S. cerevisiae and P. kudriavzevii KKU20 in ensiled RS at 34.5 and 34.1 g/kg, respectively. Thus, feeding ensiled RS with novel Crabtree negative yeast could improve RS digestion, rumen fermentation, and milk protein content in dairy cows.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
As a result of rice production, million tons of rice straw (RS) are generated as a by-product; nevertheless, with low nutritional values1. Various approaches are applied to enhance the nutritional value and improve its utilization in dairy cow's nutrition2. The biological approaches are the most common with more harmless-treated RS3,4. For several years, yeast has become an innovative biological model organism for enhancing animal efficiency and is the traditional practice for ruminant feed additives5. Yeasts have been especially beneficial for single-cell protein creation and simply acceptable as their biomass has been used by ruminants in the form of fermented feed. In many studies, using yeast fermented with RS has been shown to enhance their nutritional value, silage quality, and nutrient digestibility6. S. cerevisiae, rapidly converts molasses and urea to provide biomass and greater nutrients from the whole-cell when added with oxygen (O2) during the proliferation process7. Wanapat et al.8 stated that S. cerevisiae significantly increases crude protein (CP) in feedstuff via cell proliferation during the fermentation process and it provides essential amino acids, particularly lysine and methionine, for dairy cattle. Previous studies explained the benefit of live yeast in that it could provide a positive effect on feed utilization and performance production in the ruminants9,10.
Although S. cerevisiae has many benefits, several limitations have been reported, particularly that it produces low cell biomass6. Under aerobic conditions, S. cerevisiae exhibits alcoholic fermentation more than producing biomass. The “Crabtree-positive yeasts” are those that represent this characteristic11. Under excessive glucose and even aerobic conditions, Van Urk et al.12 revealed that S. cerevisiae had a limited proliferation capacity. Similarly, Wardrop et al.13 revealed that when cultivated with excessive glucose in a media solution, S. cerevisiae provides 7 times lower biomass compared to other strains. This phenomenon restricts the chances of animals to receive highly nutritious from yeast biomasses such as protein, essential amino acids, and vitamins. Consequently, it is important to extend the scope of research, and studying other yeast strains should be further improved. Crabtree-negative yeasts might be the most interesting option, as they have the special characteristic of limited fermentative products, biomass and carbon dioxide are the sole products under excessive glucose and aerobic conditions11. Unlike Crabtree positive yeast, excessive glucose did not inhibit affected on ethanol production. The pyruvate has used another channel for converted to cytosolic-acetyl coA via acetaldehyde and acetate through pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) bypass channel into mitochondria14. Consequently, high yeast biomass production more than Crabtree positive yeast may supply essential rumen fermentation factors and be a greatly nutritious feed supplement for ruminants.
Up to now, there is no research available information about the use of Crabtree negative yeast isolate from the rumen to improve RS. It was hypothesized that the novel Crabtree negative yeast inoculant could promote RS utilization, rumen fermentation, and milk quality in dairy cows. This research aimed to determine the effects of novel Crabtree-negative yeast (Pichia kudriavzevii KKU20 and Candida tropicalis KKU20) from rumen ensiled with RS and study their effect on feed digestion, ruminal fermentation, milk production, and milk composition of tropical crossbred lactating Holstein cows.
Results
Chemical composition of feeds
According to the experiment of De Deken25 the P. kudriavzevii KKU20 and C. tropicalis KKU20 was considered as Crabtree negative yeast, while S. cerevisiae as Crabtree positive yeast. In Table 1, the ensiled RS with different yeast species contained crude protein (CP) at 58.9 to 71.2 g/kg dry matter (DM) and 8.4 to 8.5 MJ/kg DM of metabolizable energy (ME), while the concentrate diet contained CP at 178.0 g/kg DM and 12.3 MJ/kg DM of ME. The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content in ensiled RS with P. kudriavzevii KKU20 and C. tropicalis KKU20 were lower than in S. cerevisiae at 12.7% and 12.1%, respectively (Table 1). Fermentation quality of ensiled RS such as pH was ranged from 4.19 to 4.30, while lactic acid (LA), acetic acid (C2), butyric acid (C4), and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) were ranged from 19.8 to 21.9, 5.1 to 5.4, 0.81 to 0.82, and 1.8 to 2.0 g/kg DM, respectively.
Feed intake, nutrient intake, and nutrient apparent digestibility
The impacts of different yeast species ensiled RS on the effectiveness of feed utilization in dairy cattle is illustrated in Table 2. The yeast species did not change the RS intake, concentrate diet, and total intake (P > 0.05). Total intake ranged from 111.7 to 121.1 g/kg BW0.75. Organic matter (OM) and CP intake were 8.9 to 9.6 kg/day and 1.3 to 1.4 kg/day, respectively, which was not altered among treatments (P > 0.05). Crabtree-negative yeast (P. kudriavzevii KKU20 and C. tropicalis KKU20) increased the apparent digestibility of DM by about 6.9% when compared with Crabtree-positive yeast (S. cerevisiae). However, the data achieved in this study showed that apparent digestibility of OM (OMD), CP (CPD), NDF (NDFD), and acid detergent fiber (ADFD) were not altered among yeast species and ranged from 762.1 to 791.5, 752.0 to 791.5, 601.5 to 641.3, and 492.8 to 525.4 g/kg, respectively. Furthermore, the total digestible nutrients were the same among yeast species and ranged from 734.8 to 767.7 g/kg (P > 0.05).
Effect on rumen pH, NH3-N, blood metabolites, and microbial communities
Table 3 and Fig. 1 illustrate the influence of ensiled RS with various yeast species fed to crossbred lactating dairy cows on ruminal pH, NH3-N, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and microbial communities. Rumen pH was not changed among yeast species, and the pH values were 6.4 to 6.8 (P > 0.05). Ruminal NH3-N and BUN ranged from 16.5 to 22.1 mg/dL and 13.3 to 17.3 mg/dL, respectively (P > 0.05). The bacterial populations at both 0 h and 4 h after feeding and the mean value were highest (P < 0.05) with ensiled RS with C. tropicalis KKU20 by 9.9, 12.5, and 11.2 Log10 cell/mL, respectively. However, the fungal zoospore and protozoa populations were not affected by any treatments (P > 0.05).
Effect on ruminal volatile fatty acid
The TVFA, C2, C3, C4 proportions, and C2:C3 ratio are illustrated in Table 4 and Fig. 2. Ensiled RS with P. kudriavzevii KKU20 and C. tropicalis KKU20 were significantly increased with a total VFAs at 0 h (5.15 and 5.06%, respectively), and 4 h (5.07 and 8.83%, respectively) after feeding (P < 0.05) when compared with S. cerevisiae, whereas yeasts ensiled RS had no effect on the VFAs’ profile (P > 0.05). The mean value of C2, C3, and C4 were 67.4, 22.3, and 10.3 mol/100 mol, respectively.
Effect on milk production, milk composition, and feed efficiency
The effects of ensiled RS with various yeast species on milk production, composition of milk, and feed efficiency in dairy cows are shown in Table 5 and Fig. 3. The yeast strains’ effects were not observed (P > 0.05) on actual milk yields (8.5 to 8.8 kg/h/day), 4.0% fat corrected milk (FCM) (7.6 to 8.3 kg/h/day), and energy corrected milk (ECM) (7.7 to 8.3 kg/h/day). The treatments did not alter the milk composition (P > 0.05); except for when the protein in the milk was highest in the C. tropicalis KKU20 fed group at 35.6 g/kg (P < 0.01). Feed efficiency did not changed for any diets (P > 0.05).
Discussion
From NRC15, CP and ME requirements of our animal (BW 364 kg, milk yield 8.6 kg/day) increased by about 1,190 g/day and 60.9 MJ/day, respectively. The nutrient composition in feed, especially CP (provide 1,300–1,400 g CP/day) and ME (provide 79.05–84.14 MJ/day) values, were sufficient in our study for supporting dairy cows’ performance. Our study demonstrated that two yeasts were isolated from rumen fluids: P. kudriavzevii-KKU20 and C. tropicalis-KKU20. The name KKU refers to Khon Kaen University, where the strain was originally isolated, and the number “20” means the year of discovery, 2020. Presently, there are not many experiments has explored the impact of isolated yeasts on the mechanism of fermentation in the rumen. Intanoo et al.16 were isolated yeast from rumen fluids of three non-fistulated Thai-Holstein Friesian dairy cows and identified as Kluyveromyces marxianus and Pichia kudriavzevii for detoxifying aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and it can apply further to use in animal feed. Correspondingly, Sirisan et al.17 found that there are three effective yeasts that could isolate from rumen fluids of Thai-Holstein Friesian dairy cattle including Pichia kudriavzevii, Candida rugosa, and Kodamaea ohmeri which are used as preventing acidosis in dairy cattle diets. Although, these yeast species had previously been isolated and used for the ruminant animal18. However, the qualities of these strains on ensiled RS and animal production have not been studied. This is the first time that yeast has been used in animal feed for performance testing.
Ensiled RS with P. kudriavzevii KKU20 and C. tropicalis KKU20 (Crabtree-negative yeast) was established as having a low fiber content when compared with adding S. cerevisiae (Crabtree-positive yeast). The low fiber content can be clarified by the yeast’s ability to release cellulase enzymes and digest fiber during the fermentation process. Suntara et al.6 confirmed that C. tropicalis KKU20 and P. kudriavzevii KKU20 were more capable of releasing cellulase enzymes than S. cerevisiae by about 0.7 to 6.8 times, respectively. The experiment on in vitro gas production of ensiled RS at 14 days with the P. kudriavzevii KKU20 could decrease the NDF content by about 6.7% when compared with S. cerevisiae6. Ilmén et al.19 discovered yeast isolated from a plant named C. konsanensis species could excrete cellulase enzymes and digests fiber, and it is a new yeast strain that had not been reported previously. Similar to our study, C. tropicalis KKU20 and P. kudriavzevii KKU20 are great potential yeasts to improve feedstuffs and this study is the first report in ruminant nutrition feed research.
The fermentation quality of ensiled RS with different yeast species indicated that the silage was well preserved. The ensiled RS still maintained appropriate pH, high lactic acid content, and a low NH3-N level. Acceptable silage was defined by the pH value and the composition of their fermentation products20. The pH is the main indicator for evaluating silage quality and our study showed ensiled RS still has a satisfactory score of about 4.1 to 4.321. The pH is highly related to LA content, which in this study showed a consistent range of about 19.8 – 22.1 g/kg DM. LA content in silage should range between 21 to 25 g/kg DM to be considered of high quality, according to Flieg’s score22; This is close to the high quality of silage. Our result showed LA content similar to an earlier study by Suntara et al.6 who revealed that about 20.53 to 26.14 g/kg DM of LA was produced when ensiled RS with C. tropicalis KKU20 and P. kudriavzevii KKU20 at 14 days. NH3-N concentration in ensiled RS within the range of 1.80 to 2.00 g/kg DM indicated the normal standards for estimating silage. These results are similar to those of Li et al.23, who collected information on various types of RS parameters and concluded that RS silage has a NH3-N concentration of approximately 1.61 to 2.36 g/kg DM. Other parameters such as C2 show great value for preserved silage within the range of 20 to 25 g/kg DM21. After the fermentation process, the moisture content should range from 650 to 750 g/kg to be optimum24, which in our study showed an average of 722.1 g/kg. Hence, our study proposes that the nutrients in ensiled RS are still well preserved.
The Crabtree effect can be measure from ratio, fermented glucose/ respiration glucose and positive if this ratio is > 1 and negative if the ratio is < 1. According to the experiment of De Deken25. This experiment indicated that Candida tropicalis is a Crabtree negative yeast. Radecka et al.26 stated that Pichia kudriavzevii shows ability as a crabtree-negative yeast species. Another feature that shows the difference between Crabtree-positive and negative, with oxygen as the final electron acceptor, respiration is possible under aerobic conditions, but Crabtree-positive yeasts (such as S. cerevisiae) would inhibit PDH and produce ethanol instead of respiratory complete resulted in low cell growth27. In contrast, “Crabtree-negative” mean yeasts neglect fermentative products, and biomass and carbon dioxide are the primary products under aerobic conditions12. According to Suntara et al.6 reported that the rate of growth was revealed to be lower in S. cerevisiae (Crabtree-positive yeast) than in Candida tropicalis and Pichia kudriavzevii (Crabtree-negative yeast) (P < 0.01). All of the above reasons were ensured that both yeast strains including Candida tropicalis KKU20 and Pichia kudriavzevii KKU20 used in this experiment were Crabtree negative yeast.
Crabtree-negative or –positive yeast has no effect on the dry matter intake (DMI). Our results showed that the DMI (range from 2.6 to 2.8% BW) was similar to previous experiments, which is that feeding separate ensiled RS with a concentrate diet to dairy cows creates a DMI range from 2.5 to 3.2% BW28. Generally, the amount of RS that an animal intakes daily is limited to around 2.0% BW or less BW2,29. Because RS is rich in polysaccharides and has a high lignin and silica content, and thus it limits the voluntary intake30. However, Aquino et al.31 reported that the amount of RS that ruminants can consume can be as high as 1.2% BW, which is similar to our result of 0.8–1.0%BW. The intake of OM, EE, NDF, and ADF was similar to previous studies of lactating crossbred dairy cows32,33. The CP intake (CPI) in this study was also similar with Wanapat et al.2, which used lactating crossbred dairy cows (50% Holstein Frisian × 50% Thai native cows) and BW around 365.5 kg, and the CPI was about 1.0 to 1.2 kg/day. Typically, the CP found in tropical forage plants is often relatively low34. Especially in RS (%CP) when using a roughage source it can have an effect on the animal’s yield adequacy35. Our study showed that ensiled RS with yeast could support protein from yeast to low-quality roughage as RS, and the enhanced intake of protein was high enough to meet the requirement of tropical lactation dairy cows.
The DMD was increased when ensiled RS with Crabtree negative yeast was offered to animals. This strain is outstanding in terms of high proliferation ability and its high yield of cellulase enzymes6. The improved digestion may be due to the potential of how rumen microflora are promoted for better digestibility. Yeast is an important biological responder in rumen fermentation, live yeast cells improve microorganisms in rumen36 and stabilize pH in the rumen37. Habeeb38 stated that yeast could provide rumen with biological stimulants, which is necessary for microorganisms’ growth in the rumen and yeast contributes to establishing microbiota39 and is why the digestibility was apparently enhanced. This is consistent with Wang et al.9, who found that Crabtree-negative yeast as C. tropicalis could increase digestion in the in vitro technique and that it generated 3.03% more gas production than did S. cerevisiae.
Crabtree-negative yeast did not change the apparent OMD, CPD, NDFD, and ADFD. The NDFD and ADFD are similar among Cabtree-negative and positive yeast (601.50 vs 650.05 g/kg DM and 492.8 vs 518.15 g/kg DM, respectively). Noticeable changes occurred after the silage process was complete, but when the animal intakes the feed, its digestion was not altered. The reason for this is still not clear, but it is possible that yeast does not react directly on RS. Rather, digestion in the rumen occurred by the cooperation of microbes’ synergy until the resulting values were not statistically different. This is similar to an experiment by Suntara et al.6, who compared the effect of Crabtree-negative and -positive yeast on ensiled RS on the in vitro gas and confirmed that in the rumen, there was no difference among yeast species in NDFD and ADFD (705.2 vs 703.6 and 464.8 vs 464.4 g/kg DM).
Ensiled RS with the P. kudriavzevii KKU20 and C. tropicalis KKU20 (Crabtree-negative yeast) could increase bacterial populations when compared to S. cerevisiae (Crabtree-positive yeast) by about 4.76%. The ruminal bacterial populations depend on sufficient nutrients or stimulants supply38. Yeast is a great supply to stimulate bacteria because it is enriched in essential substances40. Previous studies have confirmed that yeast could supply essential amino acids, vitamins, and minerals to increase the ruminal bacteria more than without yeast41. The key explanation is that under aerobic conditions, Crabtree-negative yeast may proliferate more than Crabtree-positive yeast since the enzyme mechanism functions differently11,42. Suntara et al.6 found that at 72 h of incubation time, P. kudriavzevii KKU20, C. tropicalis KKU20, and S. cerevisiae had growth by about 10.02, 9.6, and 8.87 Log cells/mL, respectively. The high amount of Crabtree-negative yeast creates a greater supply of essential nutrients to the rumen bacteria6, thus the amount of rumen bacteria is increased in response to the Crabtree-negative yeast.
The ensiled RS with Crabtree-negative yeast has more effect on the total VFAs than with Crabtree-positive yeast by about 6.1% at the mean value. The high production of TVFAs in rumen fluids is related to the amount of ruminal bacteria43. The great bacterial population could enhance carbohydrate digestion and then the animal obtains the greater VFAs44. This is similar to Castillo-González et al.45, who stated that the expansion of rumen microorganisms could increase the quantity of rumen VFAs. Certainly, a high bacterial population in our experiment was related to the Crabtree-negative yeast’s effect. Nonetheless, the direct influence of the Crabtree-negative yeast on rumen bacterial populations was unclear and this hypothesis required further research to be conducted. Expanding the Crabtree-negative yeast population (during the fermentation process) may be more effective than expanding that of the Crabtree-positive yeast (S. cerevisiae). This suggests that animals have a greater chance of obtaining stimulants for activating rumen bacteria. In agreement with our results, Wang et al.9 compared the effect between Crabtree-negative yeast (C. tropicalis) and Crabtree-positive yeast (S. cerevisiae) for in vitro gas technique and found that the inclusion of 0.25 × 107 of Crabtree-negative yeast could enhance the total VFAs by 7.7%. Suntara et al.6 reported that Crabtree-negative yeast (P. kudriavzevii KKU20) increased the total VFAs by 2.3% for in vitro gas study more than Crabtree-positive yeast.
The milk yield and milk composition of ensiled RS with Crabtree-negative yeast did not have any impact. Our study showed that the actual milk yields are about 8.5 to 8.8 kg/h/day, which are slightly lower than previous trials using early to mid-lactation cows (12.6 kg/h/day according to Supapong and Cherdthong46; 11.1 kg/h/day according to Wanapat et al.2. To produce milk, cows must calve and split their lactation cycle into four phases (early, mid, late lactation, and dry period)47. The milk yield response was greater in the early lactation, and in the mid-lactation period, the milk yield begins to decline from its peak48. The lower actual milk yields in this study may be because dairy cows were in mid to late lactation (DIM 165.5 to 186.5). Our study indicated that daily protein yields in the milk of the C. tropicalis KKU20 group were highest at 35.6 g/kg and lowest when applied with S. cerevisiae and P. kudriavzevii KKU20 in ensiled RS at 34.5 and 34.1 g/kg, respectively. Milk protein is associated with the feed degradation energy supply as VFAs and microbial crude protein (MCP) synthesis49. High amounts of microorganisms in rumen could affect the MCP synthesis. This will be the supplied protein and amino acids (AA) in the small intestine and could enhance the milk protein yields50. Our result clearly demonstrated that C. tropicalis KKU20 was unique in the highest bacterial population (11.2 Log10 cell/mL), which is why the increase in milk protein yields occurred. Furthermore, there were no differences in milk proteins between S. cerevisiae and P. kudriavzevii KKU20. This suggests that the influence of Crabtree-negative yeast may play different roles in terms of milk quality. This thought is support by Intanoo et al.16, who compared different yeast strains that were in the same group of Crabtree-negative, and found that P. kudriavzevii KKU20 decreased daily protein yields in milk by 14.9% when compared with Kluyveromyces marxianus in crossbred lactating cows. This yeast species could provide high biomass, which possibly supplies more amino acid sources for milk protein synthesis. This is similar to Wardrop et al.13 who stated that K. marxianus has an outstanding ability to provide high biomass when compared with other strains. The explanation is limited in regard to P. kudriavzevii’s impact on daily protein yields in milk. A few studies have focused on applying non-S. cerevisiae to dairy cows and further research about the influence of each strain is required.
Based on this study, the addition of a novel C. tropicalis KKU20 inoculant could help enhance RS quality and could promote DMD, the ruminal bacterial population, TVFAs, and the milk protein when compared with other groups. The ultimate objective has been achieved and new knowledge would play an important role in facilitating the implementation of rumen isolated yeast as a feed additive. However, there are certain drawbacks associated with the high-producing lactating cows influenced by C. tropicalis KKU20 treated RS, which requires further investigation.
Methods
The animals participating in this study have been certified by the Khon Kaen University Animal Ethics Committee (Record No. IACUC-KKU 38/62), based on the Ethics of Animal Experimentation of the National Research Council of Thailand. Our study confirmed that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Isolation and identification procedure
Two fistulated–crossbred Holstein Friesian steers, averaging 350 ± 20 kg body weight, were used as rumen inocula donors. The animals were fed this diet to facilitate microorganism adaptation in the rumen, allowing this to occur for 7 days before the rumen fluid was obtained. According to Sirisan17, the ruminal fluid was collected only once on day 7 from each fistulated steer via a rumen cannula at 4 h after the morning feed. Rumen fluids from two steers were mixed well before being filtered through cheesecloth folded to form 4 layers, then into a bottle, and were placed immediately into ice bucket (4 °C). They were then transported to the laboratory within 15 min. In the laboratory, for the total plate count, 1 mL of ruminal fluid from each animal was diluted with 0.85% sodium chloride to 1:10, 1:100, and 1:1000. Each ruminal fluid dilution was spread over a yeast–malt extract (YM) agar plate (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, India), which was then incubated at 39 °C for 72 h. The inoculant plate was dissolved in distilled water and sterilized for 15 min at 121 ͦC by autoclaving. The YM agar consisted of malt extract (3 g/L), yeast extract (3 g/L), peptone (5 g/L), agar (20 g/L), and glucose (10 g/L).
According to Suntara et al.6 the isolated yeast has high potential to produce biomass and cellulase enzyme was selected to identification. DNA isolation from potential yeast was performed by boiling lysis buffer cells. The divergent D1/D2 domain of 26S rDNA was amplified with primers NL-1 (5′- GCA TAT CAA TAA GCG GAG GAA AAG-3′) and NL4 (5′-GGT CCG TGT TTC AAG ACG G-3′). Amplification was performed in 100 µl of reaction mixture conditioning 100 ng of 2.5 U of Taq polymerase, genomic DNA, 40 mM of each primer, 20 mM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM Tris–HCl. The nucleotide sequences of the 26S rDNA D1/D2 domain were determined directly using PCR products, with slight modifications. Cycle sequencing of the D1/D2 domain was carried out with the forward primer NL1 (5′-GCA TAT CAA TAA GCG GAG GAA AAG-3′) and reverse primer, NL4 (5′-GGT CCG TGT TTC AAG ACG G-3′), using an ABI PrismTM BigDyeTM Terminator Cycle Sequence Ready Reaction Kit (Applied Biosystems, Stafford, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Animals and experimental design
This study used 6 multiparous crossbreds between Holstein Frisian × Zebu dairy cows in their mid-lactation period (165.5 ± 44.0 DIM) with an initial body weight of 363.9 ± 55.80 kg (average milk yield 8.58 kg/day) and a mean age of 5 years. The milk yield reported was slightly higher than the previous studies, in which Holstein Frisian × Zebu cow’s milk yields were 2,897 kg/year or 8.05 kg/day51. Dairy cows were randomly allocated to three ensiled RS with various yeast species including S. cerevisiae, P. kudriavzevii KKU20, and C. tropicalis KKU20 according to a 3 × 3 replicated Latin square design.
Ensiling rice straw with yeast from rumen fluid
The ruminal yeasts were obtained by isolating, screening, and identifying the rumen of crossbred Thai-Holstein Friesian dairy cattle6. The P. kudriavzevii KKU20 and C. tropicalis KKU20 (considered as Crabtree negative yeast25) were tested for their high-potential on in vitro study, which has an outstanding benefit for feed digestion and in vitro gas production6. The S. cerevisiae (considered as Crabtree positive yeast25) was obtained from the commercial baker’s yeast (PERFECT YEAST Co., Ltd, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand). In Fig. 4, isolated homogenous yeast suspension from the rumen (about 106 cells/mL) was multiplied in media solution including 250 g molasses (Khon Kaen dairy cooperative Co., Ltd., Khon Kaen, Thailand) plus 10 g urea per 1000 mL of water. After that, the solution’s pH was then modified using formic acid (L.C. Industrial Co., Ltd, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand) to reach a final pH of 3.552. Media solution directly into electromagnetic air compressor (HAILEA ACO-318 oxygen pump, Sagar aquarium, Gujarat, India) flushed with oxygen to complete respiration for maximum cell growth at 72 h (final estimated yeast as 1 × 109 CFU/mL6. The media solution was mixed on the RS (2:1 ratio) and adjusted with a moisture content of 650–750 g/kg to provide sufficient ensilage conditions24. Fifteen kilograms of ensiled RS were put into plastic bags (size 24 × 42 inches, P.P Plastic Pagchong Co., Ltd, Nakhonrachasrima, Thailand), and sealed with a vacuum machine (IMAFLEX 1400 W VC-921, Imarflex Industrial Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand). To ensure an anaerobic environment, the bags were securely sealed and fermented at room temperature for 14 days6.
Feeding and samples collection
The feeding trial lasted for 63 days (21 days/period with 3 periods); dairy cows were held in independent pens and individually fed roughage and concentrate diets at 07:00 and 16:00. Ensiled RS offered ad libitum for all cows. The experimental diet was formulated by using the Khon Kaen Complete Feed (KCF) 2006 Program base on NRC15. The ingredients and nutrient composition of ensiled RS and concentrate diet were provided in Table 1. During the experiment, mineral blocks and fresh water were accessible. The experiment was performed over 3 periods with double squares. The period lasted for 21 days, the first 14 days for treatment adjustments and the last 7 days for sample intake and collection assessment.
At the time of the feeding trial, orts were obtained and weights were collected every day, and the feeding rate was adjusted daily to yield orts between 50 to 100 g/kg of intake. Individual voluntary feed determined consumption difference between the feed offered and orts. Around 5 g/kg of the overall fresh fecal samples were split into two parts; the first part of each day for DM analysis and the second part were pooled at the end of each period. The pooled fecal samples (500 g) were stored at − 20 °C until analysis. At 60 °C, composite samples were dried, pressed through a steel filter of 1 mm for grinding (WILEY MILL, Arthur H. Thomas Co., Ltd., Philadelphia, PA, USA), and then analyzed for DM (ID 967.03), ash (ID 492.05), ether extract (EE; ID 455.08), CP (ID 984.13) content53, NDF, ADF54, and acid-insoluble ash (AIA)55. Body weights were measured every period. The calculation of ME was based on the equation defined by Wachirapakorn et al.32,56:
where CP, EE, and OM are in g per kg of DM and IVOMD with the mean values received from our recent in vitro study with mean values of 682.5 g/kg DM6.
The 10 g of fresh silage was blended with 90 mL of sterilized water and stored at 4 °C57,58. The pH of the ensiled RS was measured by a pH meter using cold-water extracts (HANNA HI-8424 Portable pH/ORP Meter, Woonsocket, USA) according to Pholsen et al.59,60. Silage fluid subsamples were centrifuged for 15 min at 6,000 rpm and the liquid above the solid residue was filtered using a 0.45-micron syringe filter. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) devices (SHIMADZU LC-20A, Shimadzu Industrial Systems Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan) were used to conduct LA, C2, C3, and C4 analyses61. The NH3-N concentration was calculated according to the Kjeldahl process53. Jugular blood and rumen fluid samples were obtained at 0 and 4 h after feeding on the last day of each period. A blood sample (approximately 10 mL) was obtained in tubes containing 12 mg of ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) from the jugular vein. The plasma was isolated by centrifugation for 10 min at 500×g and preserved at − 20 °C until BUN analysis, according to Abdallah et al.62. Approximately 200 mL of rumen fluid was collected from the rumen by a stomach tube connected to a vacuum pump. Rumen fluid was assessed immediately by the pH meter for determining the pH and temperature. Rumen fluid samples were then filtered through 4 cheesecloth layers. A fluid sample containing 5 mL of 1 mol/L of H2SO4 applied to 45 mL of rumen fluid was put into the bottle. The rumen fluid mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 6000×g and used for analyzing the NH3-N53 and VFA (gas chromatography, MODEL HP6890-HEWLETT, NY, USA)63. Ruminal bacteria, protozoa, and fungal zoospores were numbered under a hemocytometer using the direct counting method64.
During the last 7 days of each experimental period, milk samples were taken according to the yield for morning and afternoon milking, preserved with 2-bromo-2 nitropropane-1, 3-dial, and stored at 4 °C until analysis by using Milko-Scan (FOSS ELECTRIC, Hillerod, Demark) for fat, true protein, lactose, total solids (TS), and solids-not-fat (SNF) content. Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was estimated by the diacetyl monoxime method using UV/Vis-spectrophotometer (PG Instruments Ltd., London, UK) according to Aguilar et al.65. Fat, protein, lactose, TS, and SNF concentrations were measured as weighted media depending on morning and afternoon milk yields per each test day by infrared methods using Milko-Scan 33.Yields of 4.0% FCM were calculated according to Rafferty et al.66:
while yields of ECM were calculated as described by Krause and Combs67:
For each cow and period, feed conversion efficiencies were determined by dividing the average yield of actual milk and ECM by the respective DMI and digestible protein per yield of actual milk65.
Statistical analysis
All data from the experiment were analyzed according to a 3 × 3 replicated Latin square design using the GLM procedure68 according to the model:
where Yijk, observation from cow j, receiving ensiled RS i, in period k; μ, the overall of mean, Sl, the effect of square (l = 1, 2); Mi, effect of yeast species in RS silage (i = 1, 2, 3); Aj, the effect of cows (j = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6); Pk, the effect of period (k = 1, 2, 3); and εijk, the residual effect. Significant differences between individual means were evaluated using Duncan’s multiple comparison tests when a significant (P < 0.05) effect was detected69. Standard errors of means were calculated from the residual mean squares in the analysis of variance.
Abbreviations
- AA:
-
Amino acids
- ADF:
-
Acid detergent fiber
- ADFD:
-
Acid detergent fiber digestibility
- ADL:
-
Acid detergent lignin
- AFB1:
-
Aflatoxin type B1
- AIA:
-
Acid-insoluble ash
- BUN:
-
Blood urea nitrogen
- C2 :
-
Acetic acid
- C3 :
-
Propionic acid
- C4 :
-
Butyric acid
- CEL:
-
Cellulose
- CP:
-
Crude protein
- CPD:
-
Crude protein digestibility
- CPI:
-
Crude protein intake
- DCP:
-
Digestible crude protein
- DIM:
-
Day in milk
- DM:
-
Dry matter
- DMD:
-
Dry matter digestibility
- DMI:
-
Dry matter intake
- ECM:
-
Energy corrected milk
- EDTA:
-
Ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid
- EE:
-
Ether extract
- FCM:
-
Fat corrected milk
- GE:
-
Gross energy
- HCEL:
-
Hemicelluose
- HPLC:
-
High-performance liquid chromatography
- IVOMD:
-
In vitro organic matter digestibility
- KCF:
-
Khon Kaen complete feed
- KKU:
-
Khon Kaen University
- LA:
-
Lactic acid
- ME:
-
Metabolizable energy
- MPC:
-
Microbial crude protein
- MUN:
-
Milk urea nitrogen
- NDF:
-
Neutral detergent fiber
- NDFD:
-
Neutral detergent fiber digestibility
- NH3-N:
-
Ammonia nitrogen
- NRC:
-
National Research Council
- OM:
-
Organic matter
- OMD:
-
Organic matter digestibility
- PDH:
-
Pyruvate dehydrogenase
- RS:
-
Rice straw
- SCC:
-
Somatic cell count
- SNF:
-
Solids-not-fat
- TDN:
-
Total digestible nutrient
- TS:
-
Total solids
- TVFA:
-
Total volatile fatty acid
- VFA:
-
Volatile fatty acid
References
Foiklang, S. et al. In vitro gas kinetics and digestibility as influenced by yeast media solution ratios and physical forms of rice straw. Khon Kaen Agr. J. 45, 74–79 (2017).
Wanapat, M., Kang, S., Hankla, N. & Phesatcha, K. Effect of rice straw treatment on feed intake, rumen fermentation and milk production in lactating dairy cows. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 8, 677–1687 (2013).
Rosli, S. S. et al. Optimum interaction of light intensity and CO2 concentration in bioremediating N-rich real wastewater via assimilation into attached microalgal biomass as the feedstock for biodiesel production. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 141, 355–365 (2020).
Nagarajan, D., Lee, D. J., Chen, C. Y. & Chang, J.-S. Resource recovery from wastewaters using microalgae-based approaches: a circular bioeconomy perspective. Bioresour. Technol. 302, 122817 (2020).
Mohammed, S. F., Mahmood, F. A. & Abas, E. R. A review on effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additives in ruminants performance. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 6, 629–635 (2018).
Suntara, C., Cherdthong, A., Uriyapongson, S., Wanapat, M. & Chanjula, P. Comparison effects of ruminal Crabtree-negative yeasts and Crabtree-positive yeasts for improving ensiled rice straw quality and ruminal digestion using in vitro gas production. J. Fungi 6, 1–20 (2020).
Promkot, C., Wanapat, M. & Mansathit, J. Effects of yeast fermented-cassava chip protein (YEFECAP) on dietary intake and milk production of Holstein crossbred heifers and cows during pre-and post-partum period. Livest. Sci. 154, 112–116 (2013).
Wanapat, M., Boonnop, K., Promkot, C. & Cherdthong, A. Effects of alternative protein sources on rumen microbes and productivity of dairy cows. Maejo Int. J. Sci. 5, 13–23 (2011).
Wang, Z. et al. Evaluation of different yeast species for improving in vitro fermentation of cereal straws. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 29, 230–240 (2016).
Holtshausen, L. & Beauchemin, K. Supplementing barley-based dairy cow diets with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Prof. Anim. Sci. 26, 285–289 (2010).
Dashko, S., Zhou, N., Compagno, C. & Piškur, J. Why, when, and how did yeast evolve alcoholic fermentation?. FEMS Yeast Res. 14, 826–832 (2014).
Van Urk, H., Voll, W. L., Scheffers, W. A. & Van Dijken, J. P. Transient-state analysis of metabolic fluxes in Crabtree-positive and Crabtree-negative yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 281–287 (1990).
Wardrop, F., Liti, G., Cardinali, G. & Walker, G. Physiological responses of Crabtree positive and Crabtree negative yeasts to glucose upshifts in a chemostat. Ann. Microbiol. 54, 103–114 (2004).
Pronk, J. T., Yde Steensma, H. & van Dijken, J. P. Pyruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 12, 1607–1633 (1996).
National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 7th edn. (National Academic Press, Washington, DC, 2001).
Intanoo, M. et al. Isolation and screening of aflatoxin-detoxifying yeast and bacteria from ruminal fluids to reduce aflatoxin B1 contamination in dairy cattle feed. J. Appl. Microbiol. 125, 1603–1613 (2018).
Sirisan, V., Pattarajinda, V., Vichitphan, K. & Leesing, R. Isolation, identification and growth determination of lactic acid-utilizing yeasts from the ruminal fluid of dairy cattle. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 57, 102–107 (2013).
Priji, P., Unni, K., Sajith, S. & Benjamin, S. Candida tropicalis BPU1, a novel isolate from the rumen of the Malabari goat, is a dual producer of bio-surfactant and polyhydroxybutyrate. Yeast 30, 103–110 (2013).
Ilmén, M. et al. High level secretion of cellobiohydrolases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 4, 30 (2011).
Ávila, C. & Carvalho, B. Silage fermentation—updates focusing on the performance of micro-organisms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 128, 966–984 (2020).
Jianxin, L. & Jun, G. Ensiling Crop Residues. (FAO Animal Production and Health Paper (FAO), 2002).
Kim, S. & Adesogan, A. Influence of ensiling temperature, simulated rainfall, and delayed sealing on fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 89, 3122–3132 (2006).
Li, J., Shen, Y. & Cai, Y. Improvement of fermentation quality of rice straw silage by application of a bacterial inoculant and glucose. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 901–906 (2010).
Yitbarek, M. B. & Tamir, B. Silage additives. Open J. Appl. Sci. 4, 258–274 (2014).
De Deken, R. The Crabtree effect: A regulatory system in yeast. Microbiology 44, 149–156 (1966).
Radecka, D. et al. Looking beyond Saccharomyces: The potential of non-conventional yeast species for desirable traits in bioethanol fermentation. FEMS Yeast. Res. 15, 1–13 (2015).
Verduyn, C., Zomerdijk, T. P., van Dijken, J. P. & Scheffers, W. A. Continuous measurement of ethanol production by aerobic yeast suspensions with an enzyme electrode. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19, 181–185 (1984).
Gunun, P., Wanapat, M. & Anantasook, N. Effects of physical form and urea treatment of rice straw on rumen fermentation, microbial protein synthesis and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 26, 1689–1697 (2013).
Jackson, M. Rice straw as livestock feed. World Anim. Rev. 23, 79–81 (1977).
Sarnklong, C., Cone, J., Pellikaan, W. & Hendriks, W. Utilization of rice straw and different treatments to improve its feed value for ruminants: A review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 680–692 (2010).
Aquino, D. et al. Sustainable Rice Straw Management 111–129 (Springer Publisher, Berlin, 2020).
Wachirapakorn, C., Pilachai, K., Wanapat, M., Pakdee, P. & Cherdthong, A. Effect of ground corn cobs as a fiber source in total mixed ration on feed intake, milk yield and milk composition in tropical lactating crossbred Holstein cows. Anim. Nutr. 2, 334–338 (2016).
Lunsin, R. Effect of oil palm meal on nutrient utilization and milk production in lactating dairy cows fed with urea-treated rice straw. Agric. Nat. Resour. 52, 285–289 (2018).
Dal Pizzol, J., Ribeiro-Filho, H., Quereuil, A., Le Morvan, A. & Niderkorn, V. Complementarities between grasses and forage legumes from temperate and subtropical areas on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 228, 178–185 (2017).
Polyorach, S. & Wanapat, M. Improving the quality of rice straw by urea and calcium hydroxide on rumen ecology, microbial protein synthesis in beef cattle. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 99, 449–456 (2015).
Khan, R. U. et al. Direct-fed microbial: Beneficial applications, modes of action and prospects as a safe tool for enhancing ruminant production and safeguarding health. Int. J. Pharmacol. 12, 220–231 (2016).
Rossi, F., Di Luccia, A., Vincenti, D. & Cocconcelli, P. S. Effects of peptidic fractions from Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on growth and metabolism of the ruminal bacteria Megasphaera elsdenii. Anim. Res. 53, 177–186 (2004).
Habeeb, A. A. M. Importance of yeast in ruminants feeding on production and reproduction. Ecol. Evol. 2, 49 (2017).
Galvão, K. N. et al. Effect of feeding live yeast products to calves with failure of passive transfer on performance and patterns of antibiotic resistance in fecal Escherichia coli. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 45, 427–440 (2005).
Arowolo, M. A. & He, J. Use of probiotics and botanical extracts to improve ruminant production in the tropics: A review. Anim. Nutr. 4, 241–249 (2018).
Koatdoke, U., Cherdthong, A. & Khampa, S. Supplementation levels of palm oil in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture fermented cassava pulp on rumen fermentation and average daily gain in crossbred native cattle. Pak. J. Nutr. 10, 1115–1120 (2011).
Piškur, J. & Compagno, C. Molecular Mechanisms in Yeast Carbon Metabolism 333 (Springer Publisher, Berlin, 2014).
Gang, G. et al. The effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculums on in vitro rumen fermentation, methane production, ruminal cellulolytic bacteria populations and cellulase activities of corn stover silage. J. Integr. Agric. 19, 838–847 (2020).
Matthews, C. et al. The rumen microbiome: A crucial consideration when optimising milk and meat production and nitrogen utilisation efficiency. Gut microbes. 10, 115–132 (2019).
Castillo-González, A., Burrola-Barraza, M., Domínguez-Viveros, J. & Chávez-Martínez, A. Rumen microorganisms and fermentation. Arch. Med. Vet. 46, 349–361 (2014).
Supapong, C. & Cherdthong, A. Effect of sulfur and urea fortification of fresh cassava root in fermented total mixed ration on the improvement milk quality of tropical lactating cows. Vet. Sci. 7, 98 (2020).
Dobson, H., Smith, R., Royal, M., Knight, C. & Sheldon, I. The high-producing dairy cow and its reproductive performance. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 42, 17–23 (2007).
Kirkland, R. & Gordon, F. The effects of milk yield and stage of lactation on the partitioning of nutrients in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 233–240 (2001).
Xie, Y., Wu, Z., Wang, D. & Liu, J. Nitrogen partitioning and microbial protein synthesis in lactating dairy cows with different phenotypic residual feed intake. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 10, 54 (2019).
Swanepoel, N., Robinson, P. & Erasmus, L. J. Rumen microbial protein flow and plasma amino acid concentrations in early lactation multiparity Holstein cows fed commercial rations, and some relationships with dietary nutrients. Livest. Sci. 190, 58–69 (2016).
Galukande, E. et al. Cross-breeding cattle for milk production in the tropics: achievements, challenges and opportunities. Rec. Gen. Anim. 52, 111–125 (2013).
Khampa, S., Chaowarat, P., Singhalert, R. & Wanapat, M. Supplementation of yeast fermented cassava chip as a replacement concentrate on rumen fermentation efficiency and digestibility on nutrients in cattle. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 3, 18–24 (2009).
Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC). The Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist, 16th ed. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA, 1998).
Van Soest, P., Robertson, J. & Lewis, B. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 3583–3597 (1991).
Lee, C. & Hristov, A. N. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash and indigestible neutral detergent fiber as total-tract digestibility markers in dairy cows fed corn silage-based diets. J. Dairy Sci. 96(8), 5295–5299 (2013).
Robinson, P., Givens, D. & Getachew, G. Evaluation of NRC, UC Davis and ADAS approaches to estimate the metabolizable energy values of feeds at maintenance energy intake from equations utilizing chemical assays and in vitro determinations. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 114, 75–90 (2004).
Khota, W., Pholsen, S., Higgs, D. & Cai, Y. Natural lactic acid bacteria population of tropical grasses and their fermentation factor analysis of silage prepared with cellulase and inoculant. J. Dairy Sci. 99, 9768–9781 (2016).
Cai, Y., Benno, Y., Ogawa, M. & Kumai, S. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 520–526 (1999).
Pholsen, S., Khota, W., Pang, H., Higgs, D. & Cai, Y. Characterization and application of lactic acid bacteria for tropical silage preparation. Anim. Sci. J. 87, 1202–1211 (2016).
Cai, Y. Analysis method for silage. Japanese Society of Grassland Science. Field and Laboratory Methods for Grassland Science 279 (Tosho Printing Co Ltd, Tokyo, 2004).
Prueksatrakul, T., Phoopra-in, P., Jaiyen, P., Vilairat, P. & Jantivas, R. The National and International Conference & Research Presentation 2015 “Create and Development to Approach ASEAN Community II 155–162.
Abdallah, A. et al. Reclamation of Astragalus by-product through dietary inclusion in ruminant diets: Effects on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation, blood biochemical parameters, and humoral immune response in sheep. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8530961 (2019).
Do HyungKim, S. J. L. et al. In vitro evaluation of Rhus succedanea extracts for ruminants. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 31, 1635–1642 (2018).
Hungate, R. E. The Rumen and its Microbes (Elsevier Academic Press, Cambridge, 2013).
Aguilar, M. et al. Cow and herd variation in milk urea nitrogen concentrations in lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 7261–7268 (2012).
Rafferty, D. et al. Feeding a marine-based rumen buffer increases milk production and decreases time of low reticulo-rumen pH in grazing dairy cows offered perennial ryegrass-based pasture. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 256, 114255 (2019).
Krause, K. M. & Combs, D. K. Effects of forage particle size, forage source, and grain fermentability on performance and ruminal pH in midlactation cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 1382–1397 (2003).
SAS. User’s Guide: Statistic, 12th ed.; Version 6. (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 1998).
Steel, R. G. & Torrie, J. H. Principles and Procedures of Statistics 633 (McGraw-Hill Book Co Inc., New York, 1980).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express our sincere thanks to the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Scholarship Program, Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) (Grant No. PHD/0132/2560), the Research Program on Toxic Substances, Microorganisms and Feed Additives in Livestock and Aquatic Animals for Food Safety, and the Increase Production Efficiency and Meat Quality of Native Beef and Buffalo Research Group, Khon Kaen University for their kind financial support. Thanks to the Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFEC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Khon Kaen University, KKU for the use of research facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.S., A.C., and S.U.: Investigation, Methodology; C.S., A.C.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, and Project administration, Conceptualization, Methodology, and Project administration, Funding acquisition; C.S., A.C., and S.U.: Resources, Supervision, Validation; Visualization; C.S.: Roles/Writing—original draft; C.S., A.C., M.W., and P.C.: Writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Suntara, C., Cherdthong, A., Uriyapongson, S. et al. Novel Crabtree negative yeast from rumen fluids can improve rumen fermentation and milk quality. Sci Rep 11, 6236 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85643-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85643-2
This article is cited by
-
Candida tropicalis as a novel dietary additive to reduce methane emissions and nitrogen excretion in sheep
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.