Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The discovery of a novel knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation A1007G on Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Malaysia


The usage of insecticide rendered the successful vector control program with the high usage of the pyrethroid. However, the intensive and extensive use of pyrethroid, causing resistance in Aedes aegypti and hampered the control program. Knockdown resistance (kdr) resulting from the Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel (VGSC) is one of the mechanisms of resistance in pyrethroid group insecticide. Investigating the phenotypic status of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes is a lead in knowing the current resistance status and as an indicator of the genotypic resistance. In this study, we investigate the resistance in phenotypic and genotypic of Ae. aegypti with a new kdr mutation point A1007G was detected. Using the adult bioassay, we tested the phenotypic resistance from the Selangor state against 0.75% permethrin, 0.05% deltamethrin with and without the addition of PBO synergist. Permethrin-resistant and deltamethrin-resistant, including susceptible samples, were subjected to genotyping analysis on mutation point in domain II and domain III of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel (VGSC). Adult bioassay revealed that the Ae. aegypti was highly resistance toward 0.75% permethrin and 0.05% deltamethrin. The bioassay with the presence of PBO synergist showed an increment of mortality rate, but Ae. aegypti status is still resistance towards both insecticides. Genotyping result showed that three common kdr mutations (S989P, V1016G, and F1534C) have existed in the Ae. aegypti population. A new novel mutation on A1007G was also detected in this population, which is the first time reported. This study has brought a piece of information on the current resistance status in Ae. aegypti in Malaysia. The detection of new mutation point of A1007G has added the knowledge on the resistance in mosquitoes. Thus, this study will aid with the decision making in the usage of insecticides in the vector control program; before this invaluable insecticide rendered ineffective in killing mosquitoes.


Dengue is the most important arboviral infections of humans transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes1. Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) is extensively known as the primary vectors of dengue viruses (DENVs), with Aedes albopictus (Skuse) regarded as a secondary vector2. DENV in humans is often life-threatening and can lead to a range of clinical manifestations from mild fever to potential dengue shock syndrome in its most severity3. In Malaysia, by November 2020, 83,972 cases have been reported with 120 deaths with the highest recorded in Selangor state4.

The use of chemical insecticides is still a key component of Aedes vector control method by targeting the adult mosquitoes, either through an indoor residual spray, treated bed nets or space spraying once larval source reduction fails to reduce the population of adult mosquitoes or adults become a serious nuisance5,6. The heavy reliance on using residual insecticides such as through intensive and prolonged use have caused insecticide resistance in Aedes mosquitoes, and reduce the effectiveness of adulticide-based control programs around the world, including Malaysia7,8,9.

Organochlorines, organophosphate, carbamates and pyrethroids are four major categories of insecticides used in vector control programmes. Though, pyrethroid insecticide is extensively used on insect pests in vector control or agriculture sectors worldwide due to its fast-acting and relatively low mammalian toxicity10,11. In Malaysia, insecticides from the pyrethroid class such as permethrin and deltamethrin are mainly used for adulticiding purpose in the vector control programme by the Ministry of Health. Thus, the intense usage of these insecticides has been reported to cause insecticide resistance of Ae. aegypti populations in Malaysia.

Insecticide resistance can derive from different mechanisms, the main ones being modifications in the target sites, known as target site resistance. In general, pyrethroids function as neurotoxins that target voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC) and interfere electronic signalling in the nervous system, which results in paralysis and death of the mosquito, an effect often referred to as “knockdown”12,13. Target site resistance in mosquitoes is related to either single or multiple mutations in target genes; for example, the VGSC gene leads to knockdown resistance (kdr), mutations in the acetylcholinesterase (Ace-1) gene and GABA receptors14. However, kdr is the most well-studied target-site pyrethroid resistance mechanisms in insects, including disease vectors such as against Ae. aegypti mosquitoes15 and a good predictor of the efficacy of pyrethroids is through genotyping of kdr mutant alleles16.

Mutations at three codon positions of the VGSC gene (S989P, I1011M/V and V1016G/I) have been primarily reported in domain II17 while mutation at the position of F1534C was reported in domain III18 of the pyrethroid-resistant Aedes populations worldwide. In South-East Asia, the mutation in the position of F1534C and V1016G of the VSGC was reported in the pyrethroid-resistant Ae. aegypti in Malaysia17. Some of these mutations, such as the F1534C, have also been reported in neighbouring countries such as in Singapore15,18 and Thailand19. Whereas, mutations at I1011V and V1016I were identified in Latin American countries20. Whereas, four novel mutant alleles at F1269C, T1520I, F1534S, and F1534L on domain III has been found in Vietnam21, India22, and China23 respectively. Besides, a new pyrethroid mutation (V410L) in domain I have been recently detected in Brazil24.

Thus, it is very likely for the emergence of new kdr mutations when pyrethroids remained the primary insecticide-based interventions in the control of Ae. aegypti. These detections act as a crucial role in resistance management of Ae. aegypti by observing the occurrence of pyrethroid resistance. By understanding the mechanisms of resistance, appropriate insecticides can be used for effective control of target vector species. In this study, we investigated the susceptibility of Ae. aegypti on the pyrethroid resistance and examined the kdr mutations in this mosquito species at dengue-endemic areas in Selangor, Malaysia. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report the presence of a new novel mutation A1007G in Ae. aegypti Selangor strain.

Materials and methods

Mosquito strains

The sampling site was conducted in Selangor, which is at the centre of Peninsular Malaysia. Mosquito samples were collected from the urban area located at Puncak Perdana (3° 07′ 57.3 ″N 101° 29′ 35.0″ E) UiTM campus consisted of a university student hostel. This hostel at Puncak Perdana, Selangor is surrounded by greenery with plenty of undeveloped lands and on-going developments. These sampling sites were chosen because the number of dengue cases is highly reported by a previous study25.

Collection and maintenance of Aedes mosquitoes

Sample collection was done by using ovitraps to collect eggs and larvae of mosquitoes. The traps were placed close to students’ residential premise, and near vegetation to collect both Aedes species. Approximately 50 ovitraps were randomly set up for each sampling locations and were collected after 5 days introduced to the field. All water containing larvae and wooden paddles with eggs were brought back to Medical Entomology Laboratory, Universiti Sains Malaysia to be rear as parent generation, F0. Mosquito populations were maintained at a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C and relative humidity (RH) of 52 ± 2%.

Permethrin and deltamethrin adult bioassay on insecticide susceptibility test

Adult bioassays were carried out according to the standard WHO protocol26. All strains were tested against pyrethroid insecticides in four replicates of 25 non-blood fed female mosquito ranging from 3 to 5 days old. The insecticides used were; (1) 0.75% permethrin (type I), (2) 0.05% deltamethrin (type II), (3) PBO + 0.75% permethrin, and (4) PBO + 0.05% permethrin. Due to high resistance usually occurred in Aedes mosquito in Malaysia, Anopheles diagnostic dose was used in this study. Furthermore, the Aedes diagnostic dose is still tentative dose currently27. Controls were done in two replicates for each insecticide using silicone oil for pyrethroid control. While the Vector Control Research Unit (VCRU), Universiti Sains Malaysia susceptible strain was used as a reference for baseline susceptible study towards permethrin and deltamethrin insecticides.

Mosquitoes in the holding tubes were given 1-h acclimation time. Any damaged, injured, and dead mosquitoes were replaced with the healthy ones after the acclimation time. The mosquitoes from the holding tube were then transferred into the test tube containing treated impregnated paper. Knockdown data were then recorded every 5 min for an interval of 1 h once exposed to insecticides. After the exposure period, mosquitoes were immediately transferred back into the holding tubes with 10% sucrose solution soaked cotton wools as a food source. The mortality rate was determined after 24 h. Percentage of mortality after 24 h exposure to insecticides in the adult bioassay test was characterized for the susceptibility status using WHO criteria where mosquitoes are considered as: (1) susceptible, if the percentage mortality is between 98 and 100%, (2) incipient resistant if mortality is between 90 and 97% and (3) resistant if mortality is < 90%26.

Mosquito strains that were highly resistant to all insecticide treatments were also tested using insecticide synergist, PBO to assess the involvement of cytochrome P450s in the insecticide resistance mechanisms. In this case, both permethrin and deltamethrin were found highly resistance. Mosquitoes were pre-exposed to 4% PBO for 1 h before directly exposed to the mentioned insecticides. In parallel, controls were done using bioassays with PBO 4% and exposing the mosquitoes to control papers before transferring to insecticide tubes. All treatments were replicated four times with two sets of control for each insecticide, with and without synergist associated. Overall, alive and dead Ae. aegypti samples from Selangor strain (of each insecticide treatment with and without synergist) from the 24 h recovery period was kept in 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube and immediately stored in -20 °C until DNA extraction.

Genomic DNA extraction

Homogenate and mosquito DNA isolation from individual mosquitoes were prepared following GENEzol Reagent of Geneaid protocol, with slight modification during the extraction method on the amount of reagent used. A total of 100 µl of GENEzol reagent was inserted into 1.5 ml of microcentrifuge tube and homogenized using a sterile plastic grinder until disintegrated. The sample was then incubated for 5 min at room temperature, and transfer to a new microcentrifuge tube. Following the phase separation step, 20 µl of chloroform was added into the sample, shake vigorously for 10 s and centrifuged at 14,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C to separate the phases. The upper aqueous phase was then transferred to a new 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube. Briefly, during the DNA precipitation, 30 µl of absolute ethanol was added into the sample, mixed by inverting the tube several times, incubated for 5 min at room temperature then centrifuged at 2000×g for 5 min at 4 °C. Subsequently, the supernatant was then carefully removed. Afterwards, 100 µl of 0.1 M sodium citrate in 10% ethanol was added into the sample and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The tube was occasionally inverted during incubation. The sample was then centrifuged at 2000×g for 5 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was removed. The above wash step was repeated once more. Then, 150 µl of 70% ethanol was added into the sample and was incubated for 15 min at room temperature, while the tube was gently inverted occasionally. The sample was centrifuged at 2000×g for 5 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was carefully removed. The DNA pellet was then air-dried for 10 min at room temperature. During DNA resuspension step, 30 µl of TE Buffer was added to the DNA pellet. The DNA sample was then incubated at 60 °C for 15 min and centrifuged at 14,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C. 30 µl of the supernatant containing DNA was then transferred to a new 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube and stored at − 20 °C until PCR analysis.

Detection of knockdown resistance mutation (kdr) in domain II and domain III of VGSC gene in Aedes aegypti

To identify potential kdr mutations, two fragments of the coding region of the VGSC gene spanning exon 19 to exon 31 (covering the 989, 1011, 1016, 1007 and 1534 coding positions) were amplified from DNA samples and directly sequenced. PCR mix of total 25 μl was prepared using 12.5 μl of EconoTaq Plus Green 2X Master mix, 0.25 μl of Forward primer, 0.25 μl of Reverse primer, 1 μl of DNA template and lastly 11 μl of dH2O on ice. To ensure even mixture of the PCR mix, the PCR mix was centrifuged for 10 s using a mini centrifuge machine before subjected to PCR analysis.

A total of two sets of PCR mix were prepared for each DNA sample, (1) for domain II (mutations at S989P, I1011M/V, L1014F, V1016G/I, and A1007G) the initial fragment amplification was performed by using primers AaSCF1 (AGACAATGTGGATCGCTTCC) and AaSCR4 (GGACGCAATCTGGCTTGTTA)28, while (2) for domain III primers AaSCF7 (GAGAACTCGCCGATGAACTT) and AaSCR7 (GACGACGAAATCGAACAGGT) were used in the polymerase chain reaction to detect F1534C mutation28. The PCR parameters were set at 94 °C for 5 min for initial denaturation, 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s for denaturation, 57 °C for 30 s for annealing and 72 °C for 1 min extension, followed by final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min and was set to hold at 4 °C for ∞ 18,28.

The PCR products were size separated on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with nucleic acid (Healthview). The gel containing size separated PCR products were visualized by using a gel documentation system by BioRad (Gel Doc XR + System). The PCR products were prepared and sent for purification and sequencing to MyTACG DNA Sequencing Services. The DNA sequencing was carried out by using primers AaSCF3 (GTGGAACTTCACCGACTTCA) and AaSCR6 (CGACTTGATCCAGTTTGGAGA) for domain II and AaSCR8 (TAGCTTTCAGCGGCTTCTTC) for domain III of Ae. aegypti28.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was done using probit analysis from IBM SPSS Statistic Version 24 to find the knockdown time of 50% and 95% of the tested population (KdT50 and KdT95). Based on the KdT50 and KdT95 values, the resistance ratio (RR) was calculated as in the formula below:

$$RR=\frac{KdT50/95\, of\, the \,field\, strain}{{KdT50/95}\,of\, the\, susceptible \, strain}$$

Based on the RR value, the field population is considered as susceptible when the RR < 5, mosquitoes are considered to have a moderate resistance when RR is between 5 and 10, and the mosquitoes are highly resistant when RR > 10 26.

In contrast, the percentage of mortality of the tested population was recorded after 24 h by using the formula as follows:

$$Observed\, mortality=\frac{Total\, number\, of\, dead\, mosquitoes}{Total\, sample\, size}\times 100$$

Abbott`s formula is used as the corrective formula if the mortality rate of control replicates ranged between 10 and 20%. However, the test was discarded and repeated if the percentage in control mortality was more than ≥ 20%. Abbott’s formula was not applied in this study.

$$Corrected\, mortality= \frac{\% Observed\, mortality-\% Control\, mortality}{100-\% Control\, mortality} \times 100$$

The sequences obtained from the sequencing company (My TAGC DNA Sequencing Services) were aligned using ClustalW and translated into a protein sequence by using protein translation tool from Mega v7.0 software29.

Ethic declarations

The authors declare no competing interests. Each author has approved the submitted version (and any substantially modified version that involves the author's contribution to the study) and have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions. The funders did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Susceptibility status and resistance pattern of Aedes aegypti in Selangor, Malaysia

The results of the adult insecticide bioassays conducted on the WHO lethal dose of 0.75% permethrin for Ae. aegypti population after the 1-h test indicated that Selangor strain exhibited the highest \({\mathrm{KdT}}_{50}\) (932.97 min) and \({\mathrm{KdT}}_{95}\) (87,871.68 min) when exposed to permethrin with the RR50 at 58.93 fold and RR95 at 4045.66 fold respectively compared to 0.05% deltamethrin. The exposure of Ae. aegypti towards 0.05% deltamethrin showed significantly lower \({\mathrm{KdT}}_{50}\) (252.21 min) and \({\mathrm{KdT}}_{95}\) (2305.89 min) with RR50 value of 13.64 fold and RR95 90.00 fold, respectively. Thus suggested that Ae. aegypti Selangor strain has developed significantly higher resistance towards 0.75% permethrin in comparison to 0.05% deltamethrin (Table 1).

Table 1 Knockdown time (min) \({\mathrm{KdT}}_{50}\) and \({\mathrm{KdT}}_{95}\) of 1-h exposure time towards two different types of WHO insecticide treatments (permethrin 0.75% and deltamethrin 0.05%) and PBO synergist against Aedes aegypti female adults for susceptible VCRU lab strain and Selangor field strain.

Interestingly, the exposure of Ae. aegypti with insecticide and PBO is significantly lower compared to treatment without PBO (Table 1). The 0.75% permethrin + PBO treatment indicates significantly lower \({\mathrm{KdT}}_{50}\) (129.11 min) and \({\mathrm{KdT}}_{95}\) (888.93) with RR values of 8.15 fold and 40.93 fold respectively as compared to 0.75% permethrin treatment only. While the RR of Ae. aegypti with 0.05% deltamethrin + PBO was with RR50 value of 2.82 fold and RR95 4.44 fold. This suggested that PBO might play a role in the resistance status of Ae. aegypti population in Selangor.

The 24 h mortality results had confirmed that the susceptible VCRU lab strain as reference strain is still fully susceptible to both 0.75% permethrin and 0.05% deltamethrin insecticides with 100% mortality (Table 2). On the other hand, Selangor strain is strongly resistant towards both type I and type II pyrethroids as defined by WHO; < 90% mortality indicates resistance (WHO 2016). Surprisingly, a high resistance level could be observed for Ae. aegypti towards deltamethrin 0.05% with only 13% mortality after 24 h exposure period. In contrast, 27% mortality was observed on Ae. aegypti, when exposed to permethrin 0.75% 24 h post-exposure mortality, indicates resistance (Table 2).

Table 2 Resistance status of Aedes aegypti female adults after 24 h exposure period towards two different types of WHO insecticide treatments (permethrin 0.75% and deltamethrin 0.05%) and PBO synergist for susceptible VCRU lab strain and Selangor field strain.

For the synergist assay, pre-exposure to PBO induced a partial recovery of susceptibility for both deltamethrin and permethrin insecticides with 49% and 41% mortality in Ae. aegypti but still within the resistance range (Table 2). Overall, an increase in mortality was observed towards both insecticides with synergist compared between assays without synergist suggested that cytochrome P450 monooxygenases play a predominant role in the resistance of Ae. aegypti population.

Searching for potential kdr mutation in Ae. aegypti associated with pyrethroid resistance

DNA sequenced of the partial domain II and domain III of the VGSC gene of Ae. aegypti Selangor population revealed the presence of four mutations at segment 6 of domain II and domain III. Three mutations were present in domain II particularly at the position of S989P and V1016G which were due to the substitution on the first codon (TCC to CCC) and second codon at (GTA to GGA), respectively. A new mutation was also detected at the position of A1007G due to substitute of the second codon (GCC to GGC). The mutation A1007G is the first reported novel mutation of domain II found in Ae. aegypti mosquito population in this study that resistance toward pyrethroid represents by Alanine (GCC) to Glycine (GGC) (Fig. 1). Other than domain II, mutation F1534C present at domain III was due to T > G substitution on the second substitution of the codon, leading to Phenylalanine (TTC) to Cysteine (TGC) mutation also found in this study. The location of kdr mutations and primers are illustrated in Fig. 2.

Figure 1
figure 1

Chromatograph of sequences at a position of homozygous kdr resistance in VGSC domain II regions of (A) S989P, (B) A1007G (a new novel mutation), (C) V1016G, and domain III region of (D) F1534C which related to pyrethroid-resistance. A red box indicated the position of the amino acids.

Figure 2
figure 2

The kdr mutations (red lines) and primers (arrows) are indicated in the partial genomic region encoding Voltage-gated Sodium Channel (VGSC). Primer AaSCF1 and AaSCR4 were used to amplify VGSC domain II, meanwhile primers AaSCF7 and AaSCR7 for domain III. The four kdr mutations of S989P, A1007G (a new novel mutation), V1016G dan F1534C were found in the Selangor, Malaysia strain marked by red asterisks.

In the course of study, a total of 26 selected Ae. aegypti samples that confirmed resistance in bioassay study were sequenced for partial domain II and domain III. A total of none individuals were homozygous susceptible S989 (encoded as S/S), 17 were homozygous resistant P989 (encoded as P/P), nine were homozygous susceptible V1016 (encoded as V/V), 17 were homozygous resistant G1016 (encoded as G/G), four were heterozygous A1007G (encoded as A/G), one was homozygous resistant G1007 (encoded as G/G), 17 were homozygous susceptible F1534 (encoded as F/F), and nine were homozygous resistant C1534 (encoded as C/C) which were found present in the sequences (Table 3).

Table 3 Frequencies of S989P, V1016G, A1007G and F1534C substitution in parental of the VSGC gene in Aedes aegypti Selangor strain.

Overall, we detected three patterns of co-occurrence of point mutations; S989P/V1016G, A1007G/F1534C, and V1016G/A1007G/F1534C in Ae. aegypti strain. Based on Table 3, the frequency of the mutation S989P for permethrin-resistant individuals was the highest with 0.8. Besides, the permethrin-resistant individual has the lowest frequency of 0.2 mutant alleles 1534C. Meanwhile, deltamethrin-resistant individuals had similar frequencies of one for the mutant allele 989P and 1016G. No kdr resistance alleles in positions 1007 and 1534 were detected in deltamethrin-resistant individuals (Fig. 3). Besides, permethrin-susceptible and deltamethrin-susceptible individuals were not selected for analysis due to the low sample size and poor DNA quality of the extracted individuals. Hence, only the best PCR product and the best sequence quality were used for the analysis.

Figure 3
figure 3

The resistance allelic frequency of Aedes aegypti Selangor strain identified with amino acid substitution in domain II and domain III of VGSC.

Permethrin-resistant strains with PBO synergist showed the highest frequencies of 0.6 for 1016G and 1534C mutant alleles, while with the lowest frequency of 0.2 mutant allele 1534C for deltamethrin-resistant with PBO synergist. For the susceptible strains with PBO synergist, zero frequencies of mutant 989P and 1016G were detected for permethrin. Meanwhile, similar frequencies of 0.67 mutant alleles 989P and 1016G were found for the deltamethrin with PBO synergist individuals (Table 3).


The development of pyrethroid resistance in the Ae. aegypti population has a potential in the failure of mosquito vector management. Although the insecticide is a primary component for the mosquito management, the unplanned and excessive use of it had led to the development of insecticide resistance30,31. A recent study has mapped the existence of resistance in Ae. aegypti on the main hotspot area in Selangor, Malaysia, highlighted the role of target site mutation profile in response to pyrethroid class (permethrin and deltamethrin).

Aedes aegypti in this study was found highly resistance towards both permethrin and deltamethrin. Eventhough, in the presence of synergist, which is Piperonyl butoxide (PBO) does not help reduce resistance status in Ae. aegypti in this study. Synergist PBO is used to suppresses the activity of detoxifying enzymes such as P450s and non-specific esterases that were found in pyrethroid resistance. Even after the suppression of the detoxifying enzyme, our results still exhibited resistance on pyrethroid. Five years back, the study showed the closest area to the study sites, Kuala Lumpur was moderate resistance towards permethrin and deltamethrin (87% and 89% mortality)17. Since the Ae. aegypti in Selangor was collected in the urban setting area, the selection pressure to insecticides is higher due to the high case of dengue via fogging32 or using household insecticides such as aerosol spray33. A pyrethroid is known as a “knockdown” insecticide that paralyzed the insect which responsible for the rection of sensitivity in the insect’s nervous system, and the confirmed mortality can be observed after 24 h. With the mortality of 27% (permethrin) and 13% (deltamethrin), the alive individual has developed resistance.

Generally, the four main insecticides have been used in vector management: organophosphate (OP), Organochlorine (OC), Carbamates (C) and pyrethroid (PY). Currently, OP and PY were applied for the residual spraying and space spraying, and only a limited number of insecticides can be targeted the adult stage of mosquitoes34. No new other insecticide has been approved since the last 15 years34, and more resistance has been recorded recently either on the kdr mutation or resistance enzyme.

Genotyping the kdr mutation in domain II (S989, I1011, L1014 and V1016) and domain III (F1534) were highly reported in Ae. aegypti worldwide16,19. Other than these common resistance mutations, V1023G has previously reported in Indonesia and Malaysia and has played a role in reducing sensitivity in VGSC31. Finding from this recent study, it clearly demonstrated a new detected mutation at the position A1007G in Ae. aegypti. The increase of the resistance frequencies, including this new mutation point in Ae. aegypti population might reduce the vector control program efficiency, which mostly relies on the pyrethroid insecticides.

In this study, we also detected the presence up to two to three mutations in one individual. The 1016G mutation is usually found with a 989P mutation as found by Srisawat et al.35. There are no proven to associate the S989P alone with the relation to pyrethroid resistance but coupling with other mutation sites can cause slightly synergistic effects and increase the resistance effects36. The study by Ishak17 stated that the increased resistance revealed the role of the V1016G mutation in Malaysia in the Ae. aegypti that possess the 1534C allele. However, the presence of A1007G coupling with F1534C resistance, or triple mutations (V1016G/A1007G/F1534C) were found in both deltamethrin and permethrin resistance samples. This mutation believed to reduce the VGSC sensitivity to both type I and type II pyrethroid due to the resistance phenotype represented in the study. The mutational effect of A1007G is only apparent if coupled with other mutation points. Thus, we are unable to conclude that this A1007G alone has caused the actual resistance to Ae. aegypti. However, this A1007G mutation can possibly increase the resistance effects on Ae. aegypti mosquitoes against pyrethroid. In addition, only A1007G was found heterozygous, but the rest of the mutations were detected as homozygous resistance. The homozygous resistance is associated with the fitness cost of haplotypic, which survived at a higher rate than heterozygous mosquitoes37.

According to Ahbi et al.38, high detection of F1534C mutation in Ae. aegypti was found closely related to pyrethroid resistance found in Malaysia, and her study concludes that domain III is the major point of mutations in Kelantan, Malaysia. The predominance of a resistance haplotype of F1534C in the spawning of Ae. aegypti supported the resistance of pyrethroid. This mutation point was also detected in Ae. albopictus in Singapore18. Thus, pyrethroid resistance might occur due to the presence of kdr mutation or the P450 monooxygenase metabolic resistance39.

The existence of a new kdr mutation gene in dengue vector may work as a warning sign of overused pyrethroid in the vector control program. It is crucial to screen the current susceptibility status of Aedes mosquitoes, especially the population in the dengue areas before this invaluable insecticide is rendered ineffective in killing the Ae. aegypti. Monitoring on mosquitoes' resistance status will aid in the decision of insecticide usage in the vector control program.


  1. 1.

    Cameron, P. S., Jeremy, J. F., Nguyen, V. & Bridget, W. Dengue. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(1), 1423–1432 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Whitehorn, J. et al. Comparative susceptibility of Aedesalbopictus and Aedesaegypti to dengue virus infection after feeding on blood of viremic humans: Implications for public health. J. Infect. Dis. 212, 1182–1190 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    World Health Organization. Dengue: Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control 2019; WHO/HTM/NTD/DEN/2009.1.

  4. 4.

    Idengue. Accessed on 15 Nov 2020.

  5. 5.

    Farajollahi, A., Healy, S. P., Unlu, I., Gaugler, R. & Fonseca, D. M. Effectiveness of ultra-low volume nighttime applications of an adulticide against diurnal Aedes albopictus, a critical vector of dengue and chikungunya viruses. PLoS ONE 7, e49181 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Karunamoorthi, K., Sabesan, S., Jegajeevanram, K. & Vijayalakshmi, J. Role of traditional antimalarial plants in the battle against the global malaria burden. Vector Borne Zoon. Dis. 13(8), 521–544 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chen, X. B., Liu, X. C., Zhou, L. & Liu, Z. L. Essential oil composition and larvicidal activity of Clinopodiumgracile(Benth) Matsum (Labiatae) aerial parts against the Aedesalbopictus mosquito. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 12(5), 799–804 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Maciel-De-Freitas, R., Marques, W. A., Peres, R. C., Cunha, S. P. & Lourenço De Oliveira, R. Variation in Aedesaegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) container productivity in a slum and a suburban district of Rio de Janeiro during dry and wet seasons. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro 20, 102 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Othman, W. N. et al. Detection of permethrin resistance in Aedesalbopictus Skuse, collected from Titiwang Zone, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Proc. ASEAN Congr. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 3, 69–77 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Housset, P. & Dickmann, R. A promise fulfilled-pyrethroid development and the benefits for agriculture and human health. Bayer Crop Sci. 62, 135–144 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ranson, H. et al. Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: What are the implications for malaria control?. Trends Parasitol. 27(2), 91–98 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Narahashi, T. Neuronal ion channels as the target sites of insecticides. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 79(1), 1–14 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Brito, L. P. et al. Assessing the effects of Aedesaegypti kdr mutations on pyrethroid resistance and its fitness cost. PLoS ONE 8(4), 60878 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hemingway, J. & Ranson, H. Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45, 371–391 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kawada, H. et al. Widespread distribution of a newly found point mutation in voltage-gated sodium channel in pyrethroid-resistant Aedesaegypti populations in Vietnam. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3(10), e0000527 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li, C. X. et al. Relationship between insecticide resistance and kdr mutations in the dengue vector Aedesaegypti in Southern China. Parasit. Vectors 8, 325 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ishak, I. H., Jaal, Z., Ranson, H. & Wondji, C. S. Contrasting patterns of insecticide resistance and knockdown resistance (kdr) in the dengue vectors Aedesaegypti and Aedesalbopictus from Malaysia. Parasit. Vectors 8, 181 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kasai, S. et al. First detection of a putative knockdown resistance gene in major mosquito vector, Aedesalbopictus. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 64(3), 217–221 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yanola, J. et al. High-throughput assays for detection of the F1534C mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene in permethrin-resistant Aedesaegypti and the distribution of this mutation throughout Thailand. Trop. Med. Int. Health 16, 501–509 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Saavedra-Rodriguez, K. et al. A mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene associated with pyrethroid resistance in Latin American Aedesaegypti. Insect Mol. Biol. 16, 785–798 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kawada, H. et al. Widespread distribution of a newly found point mutation in voltage-gated sodium channel in pyrethroid-resistant Aedesaegypti populations in Vietnam. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3(10), e527 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kushwah, R. B., Dykes, C. L., Kapoor, N., Adak, T. & Singh, O. P. Pyrethroid-resistance and presence of two knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations, F1534C and a novel mutation T1520I, in Indian Aedesaegypti. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e3332 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chen, H. et al. First identification of kdr allele F1534S in VGSC gene and its association with resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Aedesalbopictus populations. Infect. Dis. Poverty 5, 31 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Haddi, K. et al. Detection of a new pyrethroid resistance mutation (V410L) in the sodium channel of Aedesaegypti: A potential challenge for mosquito control. Sci. Rep. 19(7), 46549 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Madzlan, F. et al. Profiling of dengue vectors breeding habitat at urban residential areas in Shah Alam, Malaysia. Serangga 22(2), 185–216 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    World Health Organization. Test Procedures for Insecticide Resistance Monitoring in Malaria Vector Mosquitoes 2nd edn, 56 (World Health Organization, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    World Health Organization. Monitoring and managing insecticide resistance in Aedes mosquito populations. WHO/ZIKV/VC/16.1. p. 13 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Kawada, H. et al. Discovery of point mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel from African Aedesaegypti populations: Potential phylogenetic reasons for gene introgression. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 10, e0004780 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger dataset. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33(7), 1870–1874 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Rosilawati, R. et al. Pyrethroid resistance status of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linneaus) from dengue endemic areas in Peninsular Malaysia. Int. Med. J. Malays. 16, 73–78 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wuliandari, J. R. et al. Association between three mutations, F1565C, V1023G and S996P, in the voltage-sensitive sodium channel gene and knockdown resistance in Aedesaegypti from Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Insects 6(3), 658–685 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ang, K. T. & Satwant, S. Epidemiology and new Initiatives in the prevention and control of dengue in Malaysia. Dengue Bullet 25, 7–14 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chen, C. D., Nazni, W. A., Lee, H. L. & Sofian-Azirun, M. Susceptibility of Aedesaegypti and Aedesalbopictus to temephos in four study sites in Kuala Lumpur City Center and Selangor State, Malaysia. Trop. Biomed. 22(2), 207–216 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    World Health Organization. Global Insecticide Use for Vector-Borne Disease Control—A 10-Year Assessment (2000–2009) 5th edn. (World Health Organization, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Srisawat, R. et al. Point mutations in domain II of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene in deltamethrin-resistant Aedesaegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 45, 275–282 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hirata, K. et al. A single crossing-over event in voltage-gated sodium channel gene may cause critical failure of dengue mosquito control by insecticide. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e3085 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Stenhouse, S. A. et al. Detection of the V1016G mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) by allele-specific PCR assay, and its distribution and effect on deltamethrin resistance in Thailand. Parasit. Vectors. 6(1), 253 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    AhbiRami, R., Ishak, I. H., Yahya, Z. S. & Zuharah, W. F. Knockdown resistance (kdr) in dengue vectors, Aedesaegypti and Aedesalbopictus from Malaysia: A post-flood risk assessment. Gen. Mol. Biol. 19(2), gmr18604 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Smith, L. B., Kasai, S. & Scott, J. G. Pyrethroid resistance in Aedesaegypti and Aedesalbopictus: Important mosquito vectors of human diseases. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 133, 1–12 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This project was funded under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, The Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (203/PBIOLOGI/6711629) and Research University Grant under Universiti Sains Malaysia (1001/PBIOLOGI/8011066). We would like to acknowledge Assoc. Prof. Nazri Che Dom, Dr. Erni Rozaini Sulaiman and COMBI Team UiTM Puncak Alam, Selangor for their help during sampling. Furthermore, special thanks to Dr. OP Singh from NIMR New Delhi for confirming the nucleotide sequences.

Author information




W.F.Z.—funding, design framework, conception, supervision, interpretation of data, writing—review and editing. M.S.—conception, design of the work, analysis, interpretation of data, writing—original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan Fatma Zuharah.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuharah, W.F., Sufian, M. The discovery of a novel knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation A1007G on Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Malaysia. Sci Rep 11, 5180 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing