Staphylococcus aureus is the cause of serious vascular infections such as sepsis and endocarditis. These infections are notoriously difficult to treat, and it is believed that the ability of S. aureus to invade endothelial cells and persist intracellularly is a key mechanism for persistence despite ongoing antibiotic treatment. Here, we used dual RNA sequencing to study the simultaneous transcriptional response of S. aureus and human endothelial cells during in vitro infections. We revealed discrete and shared differentially expressed genes for both host and pathogen at the different stages of infection. While the endothelial cells upregulated genes involved in interferon signalling and antigen presentation during late infection, S. aureus downregulated toxin expression while upregulating genes related to iron scavenging. In conclusion, the presented data provide an important resource to facilitate functional investigations into host–pathogen interaction during S. aureus invasive infection and a basis for identifying novel drug target sites.
Staphylococcus aureus is a major pathogen in human bloodstream infections. The bacterium is able to spread from an initial site of entry such as an indwelling central venous catheter to various organs including the lungs, bones, and heart valves. To establish itself on these sites, S. aureus expresses virulence factors involved in e.g. adhesion, immune evasion, and toxin production1,2. Historically, S. aureus has been viewed solely as an extracellular pathogen, but research conducted during the past decades has demonstrated a pronounced ability for this bacterium to invade and colonize both professional and non-professional phagocytes such as endothelial cells. This behaviour has since been linked to the pathogenesis of S. aureus, in particular its ability to spread via the blood to organs3 and its resilience against host response and antibiotic treatment e.g. in bloodstream infections such as endocarditis4. Though the role of cellular invasion has not been completely clarified, it is believed to entail immune or antibiotic escape leading to subsequent relapse of infection from the intracellular reservoir4,5,6. How the bacterium reemerges from the invaded endothelial cell or penetrates deeper into target tissues, however, remains to be revealed6.
Bacterial mutagenesis studies have shown which genes are utilized by the bacterium to facilitate endothelial adhesion, invasion, and intracellular survival2,6,7,8. To this date, however, a global genetic analysis is lacking which maps the expression of genes, essential as well as non-essential, for both the bacterium and the human cell simultaneously during invasive endothelial infection. This is important not only to understand the fundamental interactions between host and pathogen, but also from a treatment perspective, to identify new targets for intervention. To achieve such data, new research tools such as RNA-Seq have been employed, which quantify the global gene expression of an organism at a given sample timepoint. An expanded version of this technique is dual RNA-Seq, which has recently been employed to study the transcriptional response of both the host and the pathogen simultaneously hereby revealing new knowledge on disease pathogenesis and potential treatment targets9,10.
In this study, we used dual RNA-Seq to study the complex transcriptional response of primary human endothelial cells and S. aureus during in vitro invasive infection. Our results show both discrete and shared differentially expressed genes during the different stages of endothelial infection. Functional enrichment analysis furthermore revealed that during the late stage of the infection, an enrichment of endothelial genes involved in interferon signalling, antigen presentation, and apoptosis were upregulated, and on the other hand for S. aureus, genes for toxins and quorum sensing were downregulated whereas genes for iron scavenging were upregulated after infection. These data could indicate the importance of toxin repression and improved iron scavenging for intracellular survival of S. aureus during infection.
Cell infection, sequence depth, and sequence mapping
To assess the bacteria-host transcriptional response during invasive endothelial infection, an infection protocol using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and S. aureus ATCC strain 29213 was used as outlined in Fig. 1. Bacteria from an exponential phase broth culture was used at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 16 to infect the HUVECs, and bacteria-HUVEC contact synchronized by centrifugation.
After 1 h post infection (hpi), the first samples were collected by washing, trypsinization, and snap-freezing total material from the wells, containing HUVECs, external and invading bacteria. Examining the amount of internal vs. external bacteria at this time point by agar plating of untreated samples and samples treated with gentamicin and lysostaphin showed that around 67.0% ± 10.2% (mean ± SD, n = 4) of the bacteria appeared to be located internally compared to the untreated samples, which indicates that most of the bacteria are already internalized at 1 hpi.
At 1½ hpi onwards, the remaining wells were supplemented with lysostaphin and gentamicin to kill and lyse the extracellular bacteria to facilitate later harvest of intracellular bacteria alone. After 16 hpi, these final samples were collected by washing, trypsinization, and snap-freezing.
Bacterial infection/invasion efficiency was examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, Fig. 2A–C, Supplementary Fig. S1) and quantitatively assessed by agar plating (Fig. 2D). We experienced that agar plating yielded incongruent low numbers of colony forming units that did not agree well with the parallel microscopy examination of viability-stained bacterial specimens. This discrepancy most likely results in part from S. aureus aggregation and in part from the formation of dormant, non-dividing bacteria (small colony variants) in the intracellular state, both of which renders CFU enumeration on agar plates difficult and prone to underestimation11,12. From the CLSM analysis we found that the majority of the HUVEC were invaded at both 1 (Fig. 2A) and 16 hpi (Fig. 2B), with the bacteria appearing inside intracellular vacuoles (marked with white arrowheads in Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. S1). From this we assess that the RNA-Seq data generated from HUVECs reflect a genetic response almost exclusively from cells which are infected/invaded by S. aureus. Given that the infected human cells most likely contain much more human RNA than bacterial RNA (often more than 100-fold13), the number of bacterial reads that could be mapped from our data to the S. aureus ATCC 29213 genome from infected cultures were as expected relatively low (< 2 × 106 reads) compared to the reads that could be mapped to the human hg38 genome (> 1 × 107 reads), whereas the inoculum containing pure bacterial samples with approx. 6 × 107 CFU resulted in a comparable number of reads (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Overall transcriptional response during in vitro infection
To assess the overall differences in gene expression during the 3 chosen time-points reflecting before infection, early stage infection, and late stage infection (uninfected, 1 hpi, and 16 hpi), we performed a dimensionality reduction using the principal component analysis (PCA). Here we saw a clear clustering of each triplicate into 3 distinct groups comprising each time-point for both HUVECs (Fig. 3A) and S. aureus (Fig. 3B) indicating a marked temporal gene regulation during infection.
To identify the shared differentially expressed genes between each timepoint, a pairwise comparison was conducted for both S. aureus and HUVECs using the DESeq2 workflow and the Wald test between 1 hpi and the inoculum/uninfected cells and between 1 and 16 hpi. For completeness, comparisons between the inoculum/uninfected cells and 16 hpi are included in the Supplementary Table S2. However, given that low expressed genes tend to have high coverage variability, we adjusted for false-positive differential genes by penalizing low coverage through logFC shrinkage14. Before logFC shrinkage, we identified 1460 and 577 differentially expressed genes for S. aureus, respectively, in the two time-point comparisons and 2362 and 3662 for HUVECs (Supplementary Fig. 3 and 4), respectively, at the two timepoint comparisons whereas after logFC shrinkage, this was reduced to 458 and 85, and 78 and 279, respectively (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4).
Differentially expressed genes for S. aureus
Looking at the overlap in differentially expressed genes for S. aureus between the two comparisons, 22 genes were commonly regulated (Fig. 4A), whereas 436 and 63 genes were differentially regulated between the two comparisons. The total 521 differentially expressed genes could furthermore be grouped into 6 discrete clusters (Cluster 1 to 6, Fig. 4B) that each represent a distinctive temporal expression profile. Cluster 1 to 3 consists of 196, 12, and 26 genes, respectively, that all have a significant upregulation of the grouped genes in the inoculum, but then takes 3 different expression routes. The largest cluster, cluster 1, follows an initial high expression of the assigned genes with a downregulation at both 1 and 16 hpi. In cluster 2, we see a continuous upregulation as in the inoculum at 1 hpi followed by a downregulation, and vice versa in cluster 3.
Cluster 4 to 6 consists of 62, 108, and 117 genes, respectively, that initially have a low expression, but then diverges into three regulation pathways. Cluster 4 is only upregulated at 16 hpi, whereas cluster 5 and 6 are upregulated at 1 hpi, but then diverge leading to either a continuous upregulation or a downregulation, respectively.
To identify if known virulence factors could be mapped to specific temporal expression clusters, a virulence ontology enrichment analysis was performed using a predefined list of known virulence factors (Supplementary Table S1). In cluster 1, a significant enrichment of genes related to toxins (i.e. the genes for γ-hemolysin; hlgA, hlgB, hlgC) and quorum sensing (agrA, agrC) was identified, whereas an enrichment of iron scavenging genes (isdA, isdB, isdC, isdD, isdE, isdF, isdG, srtB) could be observed in cluster 5 and 6 (Fig. 4C, Supplementary Fig. S5). This indicates that toxin and quorum sensing genes are downregulated post inoculation, whereas iron scavenging genes are upregulated post inoculation.
Differentially expressed genes for HUVECs
For HUVECs, an overlap of differentially expressed genes was also evident with 62 genes commonly regulated between the two comparisons (Fig. 5A), whereas 217 and 16 genes were differentially regulated in each of the two comparisons, respectively. The differentially expressed genes could be further grouped into 2 distinctive temporal expression clusters with cluster 1 and cluster 2 showing high expression only at 1 hpi or 16 hpi, respectively (Fig. 5B).
By performing functional enrichment analysis, expression cluster 1 was enriched with 5 reactome pathways, whereas cluster 2 was enriched with 33 reactome pathways (of these, 5 and 10, respectively, of the most significant pathways are displayed in Fig. 5C). While the enriched reactome pathways of cluster 1 can be linked to various cellular signalling pathways, the pathways of cluster 2 are mostly related to intracellular infection such as interferon signalling, MHC Class I presentation, and phagocytosis, which in cluster 2 is upregulated at 16 hpi and thus correlates with the cells harbouring intracellular bacteria. Of interest, the human leukocyte antigen B and C (HLA-B and HLA-C) were induced by infection at 16 hpi, and HLA-A was not found differentially expressed (Fig. 6B). Furthermore, the inducible proteasomal subunits increased expression from 1 to 16hpi, whereas the constitutive subunits remained unchanged (Fig. 6C). The cytokine IL-15 was found to be increased by more than four-fold at 16hpi compared to 1hpi (*p < 0.05, see Supplementary Table S2). In cluster 1, four genes related to TGF-beta signalling—JUNB, SKIL, SMAD6, and SMAD7 - were transiently upregulated at 1 hpi compared to the two other time-points, indicating the involvement of these genes in the initial host response to bacterial colonization (Fig. 6A).
Validation of RNA-Seq data using qPCR
Finally, by performing qPCR on independent samples, we quantified 4 genes that in the RNA-Seq data were shown to have significant differential expression between the time points and normalized these to a housekeeping gene followed by comparison to the RNA-Seq data using Pearson correlation. This analysis showed a good correlation (R2 = 0.91, p = 0.002, Supplementary Fig. S6) between the two methods for the human genes (JUNB, SMAD6, PSMB10, HLA-B). It was not possible to retrieve data of high enough quality and with adequate signal from the bacterial gene analysis to enable a meaningful validation of the RNA-Seq results for the expression of the bacterial genes, possibly due to overwhelming amount of human genomic material compared to bacterial in the co-culture samples.
S. aureus has inhabited humans for presumably millions of years, and is still found associated with the anterior nares in around 37% of the human population15. Consequently, the bacterium has evolved an extensive array of metabolic and defence pathways to survive in close association with humans. There are several examples of specific interaction with human cells and proteins, which have required long evolutionary development16,17,18.
Once S. aureus finds itself on the “wrong” side on our bodily surfaces, invasive infections may develop that can be extremely hard to treat19. A behaviour believed to contribute significantly to the resilience of S. aureus when causing serious infections such as infective endocarditis, is cellular invasion20. This invasion is thought to be primarily mediated by the S. aureus fibronectin-binding protein A (FnBPA) together with other virulence factors such as clumping factor A (ClfA)21. Once inside the human cell, the bacterium may form dormant, resilient colonies22 that can persist even during antibiotic treatment. It may also undergo intracellular proliferation and ultimately escape the endothelial cell in large numbers causing local tissue damage. Release of intracellular bacteria into the bloodstream could then lead to metastatic dispersal and infection of other organ sites23.
Understanding the invasive and intracellular pathogenesis of S. aureus during intravascular infections is therefore key to improving treatment of S. aureus bloodstream infections. By identifying specific virulence factors critical for establishment and persistence of infection, it would thus be possible to precisely target these pathogen pathways during treatment. Furthermore, more knowledge on the host response during infection will enable strategies to be devised that can reduce the severity of the symptoms or enhance specific host immune pathways using targeting treatments.
In this study, we conducted controlled in vitro infection and invasion of primary human endothelial cells and employed dual RNA-Seq to examine both the bacterial and host response during colonization and infection.
For both the bacterial and endothelial cell, we saw distinct temporal expression profiles with 521 and 295 differentially expressed genes after logFC shrinkage for S. aureus and HUVECs, respectively, when comparing pre-infection, 1 hpi, and 16 hpi. For S. aureus in general, we saw an upregulation in the expression of genes related to iron scavenging and a downregulation of genes related to quorum sensing and toxins after infection. Specifically, for the agr quorum sensing system, we saw a significant downregulation in the agrA and agrC at 1 hpi. The quorum sensing agr system is known to be upregulated during high cell densities such as in broth cultures, and would thus be highly expressed in the inoculum, but downregulated after infection possibly due to a reduction in bacterial cell density. Furthermore, in vivo sequestering of the signal molecule (autoinducing peptide, AIP) by the human apolipoprotein B24 potentially also contributes to agr downregulation during bloodstream infections. Due to cellular invasion at 16 hpi, the upregulation of agrA and agrC at this timepoint could potentially be explained by a response to intracellular confinement leading to accumulation of AIP25. The agr quorum sensing system is moreover known to upregulate various toxins such as the γ-hemolysins, which could explain the observed co-expression pattern at 1 hpi26, though this did not result in a corresponding shift in γ-hemolysin toxin expression at 16 hpi.
We also observed an upregulation in several factors of the iron-regulated surface determinant (Isd) system at 16 hpi. The iron scavenging genes are primarily important for the bacterium in iron-limited environments, and would thus ideally be downregulated in iron-rich medium such as TSB27 and upregulated in iron-limited medium such as serum-based basal medium or during vascular infections. Given that accessible iron is limited in the blood and hence an important limiting factor for S. aureus growth and survival in the bloodstream27,28, it might be that the bacterium utilizes cellular invasion as a means to gain access to intracellular storages of iron, which accounts for over 90% of the total iron content in humans28. Alternatively, IsdB has also been linked to both adherence and invasion of host cells29, and thus the transcriptional upregulation of at least isdB could alternatively imply an increased dependence on this virulence factor during vascular infection.
In the endothelial cells, an upregulation of a large cluster of genes was seen at 16 hpi compared to the other time-points. Many of these genes are related to responses to invasive infection such as interferon signalling genes and antigen processing genes. Specifically, we saw an upregulation of both HLA-B, HLA-C, and the inducible proteasome subunits (PSMB8, PSMB9, PSMB10) at 16 hpi, whereas HLA-A was not found differentially expressed. Since HLA class I is involved in presentation and thus detection of intracellular pathogens30, whereas PSMB8, PSMB9, and PSMB10 are induced upon cellular stress and becomes integral components of the 20S proteasome31 that degrades intracellular antigens for presentation32, this indicates an activation of intracellular defence systems to combat the invading pathogen employed by the HUVECs or a bacteria-induced response that enables immune evasion. Our results are furthermore comparable to what was reported by Matussek and co-workers, who too saw an upregulation of HLA-C and PSMBs at 18 hpi using microarray analysis with a clinical S. aureus isolate33. Furthermore, we observe an increase of IL-15 expression, which promote T-cell proliferation and migration34. IL-15 has also been shown to increase angiogenesis35 hereby preventing hypoxic damage to tissue36, which could be a mechanism elicited to cope with infection-induced ischemia.
In the endothelial cells, we additionally identified a cluster with upregulation at 1 hpi and then downregulation at 16 hpi. This cluster was enriched for TGF-beta signalling, which through a complex regulatory network in a context-dependent manner controls various cell functions related to cell proliferation, survival, and apoptosis37. Thus, it may be inferred that the initial response of the endothelial cells to infection is induction of apoptosis followed later at 16 hpi by a response to the intracellular presence of bacteria by upregulation of genes related to antigen presentation to CD8 + T cells. Indeed, others have seen apoptotic changes in endothelial cells at 1 hpi as a result of S. aureus cell invasion38. However, cluster 2, where the genes were only upregulated after 16 hpi, was also enriched for genes related to apoptosis, and thus apoptosis could conversely be a late response to infection. This is somewhat in line with what Moreilhon et al. saw using microarray analysis on infected human airway epithelial cells with another S. aureus strain, where an initial anti-apoptotic response was seen at 3 hpi followed by an apoptotic phase at 9 hpi39. The same study together with another microarray study on Hep-2 cells furthermore found JUNB upregulated at early time points similar to our data39,40. In regard to the role of JUNB, others have found this gene to be involved in inhibiting colonization of ketanocytes of the skin41, and thus could be a host response towards bacterial colonization.
In the present study a focus was placed on infection by one specific reference S. aureus strain. It would be interesting to utilize the methodology to investigate the genetic expression in S. aureus strains with different virulence profiles during endothelial infection and compare with the host response to these strains. Bielecki et al. for example, used single RNA-Seq to investigate both similarities and marked differences in bacterial RNA-Seq profiles during growth in patient urine samples containing different uropathogenic E. coli strains from various phylogenetic groups42. In this regard, others have observed an upregulation of PSMB8 in HUVEC cultures at ≈ 8 hpi or 18 hpi using microarray analysis with different S. aureus isolates22,33 indicating that at least upregulation of some genes could be similar between strains. Thänert et al. on the other hand used dual RNA-Seq to investigate the difference in transcriptional response, when infecting two different mouse strains with the same S. aureus SH1000 strain, and found differences in both the host and bacterial response10. In the current study, we used HUVEC cells that have been pooled from multiple donors to even out these potential differences of each donor, but in future studies it would be interesting to investigate possible individual differences in separate donor samples. Such studies may help explain why certain individuals are more susceptible to severe S. aureus BSI and more difficult to treat than others. To study the transcriptional response of individual HUVECs to invasion by single or multiple bacteria, future interesting experiments could use RNA-Seq analysis of sorted infected cells (e.g. by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS))43. Furthermore, it could also be relevant to include the analysis of non-infected cells to look at potential “bystander” effects. Lastly, though HUVECs are often used in modelling of vascular infections with S. aureus, the use of other endothelial cells is also possible such as human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMEC) or human pulmonary artery endothelial cells (HPAEC) or immortalized cell lines derived hereof. Infection in different types of cells would likely portray both similarities and differences in the transcriptional response as seen by others44.
In conclusion, we present to our knowledge the first global simultaneous genetic expression analysis of host and pathogen during S. aureus endothelial intracellular infection. The findings include for S. aureus the identification of an upregulation of iron scavenging genes and a downregulation of toxin genes during these infections, which could thus be potential targets for future treatments. Overall, the data material should provide an important basis for interpretation of both previous studies in a broader context, assist the design and data interpretation in future studies on specific pathogenic pathways, and overall assist in creating a more complete picture of the stepwise process of invasion and S. aureus intracellular infection and survival. This knowledge is critical to help overcome the current challenge of treating S. aureus bloodstream infections.
Bacteria, cells, and culture conditions
The Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213 reference strain and primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC from pooled donors, passage 2–3, PromoCell GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) were used for all experiments. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was performed with a GFP-producing ATCC29213 strain as previously described11. Prior to experiments, the bacteria were grown until exponential growth phase in tryptic soy broth (2½h at 37 °C), and bacterial stock solution could then be prepared by centrifugation and resuspension of pellet in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by adjustment to OD600 = 0.1. HUVECs were cultured in basal medium (Endothelial Cell Growth Medium 2, PromoCell) with fetal bovine serum (FBS, PromoCell) and penicillin–streptomycin (PS, Gibco), liberated by trypsination and seeded into microtiter plates. Prior to experiments, the confluent HUVEC 24-well microtiter plate cultures were washed 3 times in PBS and filled with 0.5 ml basal medium + FBS without PS.
Endothelial invasion assay
Microtiter plates were inoculated with 20 μl of bacterial stock suspension corresponding to a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 16, followed by centrifugation at 300 g for 5 min to sediment the bacteria. After 1½ hours post-infection (hpi), wells were supplemented with lysostaphin (10 μg/ml) + gentamicin (100 μg/ml) and were thus present for the rest of the experiment. HUVEC samples were collected by washing 3 times in PBS followed by trypsinization for 10 min, centrifugation, and washing the pellet followed by centrifugation and resuspension of the pellet in 100 μl PBS. Samples were then snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at -80 °C until RNA isolation.
RNA isolation, rRNA depletion, and RNA sequencing
Pellets were resuspended in 700 μl acetate buffer (20 mM NaOAc, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, pH 4.5) and transferred to FastPrep tubes containing lysing matrix B. Cells were lysed in a Thermo Savant FastPrep FP120 Cell Homogenizer at 6.0 m/sec for 3 × 40 s with 1 min pause on ice in between runs, and then centrifuged for 5 min at 20,000 g. Lysate was transferred to tubes containing 500 μl phenol solution (2:1 phenol in water adjusted to pH 4.5 with NaOAc) and 100 μl chloroform followed by incubation at 65 °C at 1100 rpm in a thermomixer for 15 min with vortexing every 2 min. After centrifugation, the aqueous phase was transferred into tubes containing 500 μl chloroform followed by vortexing, centrifugation, and transferring to new tubes. The RNA was precipitated using 96% EtOH and 10vol% 3 M NaOAc on ice for ≥ 1 h. Tubes were centrifuged for 60 min at 4 °C, and pellets were washed in ice cold 70% EtOH followed by centrifugation for 10 min. Supernatant was removed and pellets were then air-dried and dissolved in sterile ddH2O. RNA quantity was measured using Nanodrop spectrophotometer, and RNA quality was then verified by fragment analysis using a Fragment Analyzer (Agilent), followed by Ribo-Zero Gold Kit (MRZE724, Epidemiology/Illumina) treatment on the 3 samples from each group to remove both human and bacterial rRNA. After DNase treatment, library preparation was performed using the NEBNext Ultra Library Prep Kit (NEB) followed by quality assessment by the Fragment Analyzer and sequencing on the NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina).
The RNA-Seq data has been archived at NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus that can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ under accession number GSE151135.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
Confocal laser scanning microscopy was performed directly into 6-well microtiter plates using an Olympus FV1000MPE microscope and Olympus FV10‐ASW software. Prior to microscopy, cells were stained with either LIVE/DEAD cell viability kit (L7012, Thermofisher) or Acti-stain 670 phalloidin (Cytoskeleton Inc.) according to manufacturer’s protocol.
Data processing, statistics, and bioinformatic analysis
The raw reads were preprocessed using cutadapt45 on default settings and base qualities assessed using FastQC46. Samples with HUVEC cells were mapped to the human reference genome GRCh38.84 using STAR47. Samples with S. aureus cells were mapped to the NC_007795.1 reference genome using bwa mem48. Read duplicates were removed using Picard49 and gene coverages computed using featureCounts50. Differential expression analysis was conducted using the DESeq2 workflow with Benjamini–Hochberg corrected Wald tests coupled to logFC shrinkage14. Differential expression was considered significant for genes with adjusted p-values below 0.05 and adjusted log fold change magnitudes above 1.0. Gene expression trajectories of differentially expressed genes were generated using complete-linkage hierarchical clustering with Euclidean distance on the log2 fold change transformed expression values relative to the average of the given gene. Genes were not enforced to have a significant differential expression in both comparisons to be included in the analysis.
Enrichment for S. aureus virulence factor classes was done with the Fisher’s exact test with contingency matrices of the design (gene cluster vs virulence factor class). Human pathway enrichment analysis was conducted on the gene clusters using the clusterProfiler package51 and the Reactome Pathway annotation database52. A pathway was considered significantly enriched when its adjusted p-value was < 0.05. All data processing and figure generation was done using the R software version 3.6.253.
Otto, M. Staphylococcus aureus toxins. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 17, 32–37 (2014).
Foster, T. J., Geoghegan, J. A., Ganesh, V. K. & Höök, M. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12(1), 49–62 (2014).
Edwards, A. M. & Massey, R. C. How does Staphylococcus aureus escape the bloodstream?. Trends Microbiol. 19(4), 184–190 (2011).
Fraunholz, M. & Sinha, B. Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus: live-in and let die. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2, 43 (2012).
Garzoni, C. & Kelley, W. L. Staphylococcus aureus: new evidence for intracellular persistence. Trends Microbiol. 17(2), 59–65 (2009).
Rollin, G. et al. Intracellular survival of Staphylococcus aureus in endothelial cells: a matter of growth or persistence. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1354 (2017).
Claes, J. et al. Assessment of the dual role of clumping factor a in S. Aureus adhesion to endothelium in absence and presence of plasma. Thromb. Haemost. 118(7), 1230–1241 (2018).
Edwards, A. M., Potts, J. R., Josefsson, E. & Massey, R. C. Staphylococcus aureus host cell invasion and virulence in sepsis is facilitated by the multiple repeats within FnBPA. PLoS Pathog. 6(6), e1000964 (2010).
Szafranska, A. K. et al. High-resolution transcriptomic analysis of the adaptive response of Staphylococcus aureus during acute and chronic phases of osteomyelitis. mBio. 5(6), e01775-e1814 (2014).
Thänert, R., Goldmann, O., Beineke, A. & Medina, E. Host-inherent variability influences the transcriptional response of Staphylococcus aureus during in vivo infection. Nat. Commun. 8, 14268 (2017).
Grønnemose, R. B. et al. A novel in vitro model for haematogenous spreading of S. aureus device biofilms demonstrating clumping dispersal as an advantageous dissemination mechanism. Cell Microbiol. 19(12), e12785 (2017).
Proctor, R. A. et al. Small colony variants: a pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4(4), 295–305 (2006).
Marsh, J. W., Humphrys, M. S. & Myers, G. S. A. A laboratory methodology for dual RNA-sequencing of bacteria and their host cells in vitro. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1830 (2017).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Kluytmans, J., van Belkum, A. & Verbrugh, H. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10(3), 505–520 (1997).
Boguslawski, K. M. et al. Exploiting species specificity to understand the tropism of a human-specific toxin. Sci. Adv. 6(11), 7515 (2020).
Buchan, K. D. et al. Humanisation of the zebrafish C5a receptor confers targeting by human-specific staphylococcal virulence factors. bioRxiv 2020.02.18.955021 (2020).
Parker, D. Humanized mouse models of Staphylococcus aureus infection. Front. Immunol. 8, 512 (2017).
Lowy, F. D. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 339(8), 520–532 (1998).
Sinha, B. & Herrmann, M. Mechanism and consequences of invasion of endothelial cells by Staphylococcus aureus. Thromb. Haemost. 94(2), 266–277 (2005).
Que, Y. A. et al. Fibrinogen and fibronectin binding cooperate for valve infection and invasion in Staphylococcus aureus experimental endocarditis. J. Exp. Med. 201(10), 1627–1635 (2005).
Tuchscherr, L. et al. Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants are adapted phenotypes for intracellular persistence. J. Infect. 202(7), 1031–1040 (2010).
Moreillon, P., Que, Y. A. & Bayer, A. S. Pathogenesis of streptococcal and staphylococcal endocarditis. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 16(2), 297–318 (2002).
Painter, K. L., Krishna, A., Wigneshweraraj, S. & Edwards, A. M. What role does the quorum-sensing accessory gene regulator system play during Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia?. Trends Microbiol. 22(12), 676–685 (2014).
Carnes, E. C. et al. Confinement-induced quorum sensing of individual Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 41–45 (2010).
Novick, R. P. Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48(6), 1429–1449 (2003).
Ledala, N., Zhang, B., Seravalli, J., Powers, R. & Somerville, G. A. Influence of iron and aeration on Staphylococcus aureus growth, metabolism, and transcription. J. Bacteriol. 196(12), 2178–2189 (2014).
Hammer, N. D. & Skaar, E. P. Molecular mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus iron acquisition. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 65, 129–147 (2011).
Zapotoczna, M., Jevnikar, Z., Miajlovic, H., Kos, J. & Foster, T. J. Iron-regulated surface determinant B (IsdB) promotes Staphylococcus aureus adherence to and internalization by non-phagocytic human cells. Cell Microbiol. 15(6), 1026–1041 (2013).
Blanchard, N. & Shastri, N. Cross-presentation of peptides from intracellular pathogens by MHC class I molecules. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1183(1), 237–250 (2010).
Rouette, A. et al. Expression of immunoproteasome genes is regulated by cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors in human cancers. Sci. Rep. 6, 34019 (2016).
Rock, K. L. et al. Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell 78(5), 761–771 (1994).
Matussek, A. et al. Infection of human endothelial cells with Staphylococcus aureus induces transcription of genes encoding an innate immunity response. Scand. J. Immunol. 61(6), 536–544 (2005).
Oppenheimer-Marks, N., Brezinschek, R. I., Mohamadzadeh, M., Vita, R. & Lipsky, P. E. Interleukin 15 is produced by endothelial cells and increases the transendothelial migration of T cells In vitro and in the SCID mouse-human rheumatoid arthritis model In vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 101(6), 1261–1272 (1998).
Angiolillo, A. L., Kanegane, H., Sgadari, C., Reaman, G. H. & Tosato, G. Interleukin-15 promotes angiogenesis in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 233(1), 231–237 (1997).
Ameri, K. et al. Administration of interleukin-15 peptide improves cardiac function in a mouse model of myocardial infarction. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 75(1), 98–102 (2020).
Zhang, Y., Alexander, P. B. & Wang, X. F. TGF-β family signaling in the control of cell proliferation and survival. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9(4), a022145 (2017).
Menzies, B. E. & Kourteva, I. Internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by endothelial cells induces apoptosis. Infect. Immun. 66(12), 5994–5998 (1998).
Moreilhon, C. et al. Live Staphylococcus aureus and bacterial soluble factors induce different transcriptional responses in human airway cells. Physiol. Genomics 20(3), 244–255 (2005).
Li, X. et al. Epithelial cell gene expression induced by intracellular Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Microbiol. 2009, 753278 (2009).
Uluçkan, Ö. et al. Cutaneous immune cell-microbiota interactions are controlled by epidermal JunB/AP-1. Cell Rep. 29(4), 844–859 (2019).
Bielecki, P. et al. In vivo mRNA profiling of uropathogenic Escherichia coli from diverse phylogroups reveals common and group-specific gene expression profiles. mBio 5(4), e01075-e1114 (2014).
Westermann, A. J. & Vogel, J. Host-pathogen transcriptomics by dual RNA-seq. Methods Mol. Biol. 1737, 59–75 (2018).
Seidl, K. et al. Divergent responses of different endothelial cell types to infection with candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE 7(6), e39633 (2012).
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17(1), 10–12 (2011).
Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2010).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29(1), 15–21 (2013).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14), 1754–1760 (2009).
Broad Institute. Picard Tools. http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/ (2020).
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30(7), 923–930 (2014).
Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 16(5), 284–287 (2012).
Jassal, B. et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 498–503 (2020).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2019).
Part of this work was funded by the Danish 3R-Center (grant number 33010-NIFA-18-689).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Grønnemose, R.B., Garde, C., Wassmann, C.S. et al. Bacteria-host transcriptional response during endothelial invasion by Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep 11, 6037 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84050-x
This article is cited by
Staphylococcal virulence factor HlgB targets the endoplasmic-reticulum-resident E3 ubiquitin ligase AMFR to promote pneumonia
Nature Microbiology (2023)
Comparative- and network-based proteomic analysis of bacterial chondronecrosis with osteomyelitis lesions in broiler’s proximal tibiae identifies new molecular signatures of lameness
Scientific Reports (2023)