Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Multivariate spatio-temporal approach to identify vulnerable localities in dengue risk areas using Geographic Information System (GIS)


Dengue is one of the most important vector-borne infection in Sri Lanka currently leading to vast economic and social burden. Neither a vaccine nor drug is still not being practiced, vector controlling is the best approach to control disease transmission in the country. Therefore, early warning systems are imminent requirement. The aim of the study was to develop Geographic Information System (GIS)-based multivariate analysis model to detect risk hotspots of dengue in the Gampaha District, Sri Lanka to control diseases transmission. A risk model and spatial Poisson point process model were developed using separate layers for patient incidence locations, positive breeding containers, roads, total buildings, public places, land use maps and elevation in four high risk areas in the district. Spatial correlations of each study layer with patient incidences was identified using Kernel density and Euclidean distance functions with minimum allowed distance parameter. Output files of risk model indicate that high risk localities are in close proximity to roads and coincide with vegetation coverage while the Poisson model highlighted the proximity of high intensity localities to public places and possibility of artificial reservoirs of dengue. The latter model further indicate that clustering of dengue cases in a radius of approximately 150 m in high risk areas indicating areas need intensive attention in future vector surveillances.


Dengue is an arthropod-borne viral infection found the throughout tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Based on publish literatures, World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that about 390 million dengue virus infections occurs every year of which 96 million manifest clinically1,2. The infection has spread over 128 countries globally while 3.9 billion people are at risk and approximately 70% of the incidences are reported from Asia3.

Dengue is the most important vector-borne emerging and re-emerging infectious disease in Sri Lanka at present. The first serologically confirmed dengue incidence was reported in Sri Lanka in 1962 followed by an increase in the number of dengue incidences over the time4. The first dengue epidemic was reported in the country in 1989 and since then, dengue was considered to be endemic in the country and periodic dengue fever (DF) and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) epidemics progressively occurred with increased magnitude5. In Sri Lanka, more than 30,000 dengue cases have been reported to the Epidemiology Unit of Ministry of Health since 2010 while more than half of the cases reported in the Western Province. The second highest prevalence of dengue is observed in the Gampaha District in the Western province over 10 years6. The largest dengue epidemic in Sri Lanka was reported in 2017 with a total of 186,101 dengue incidences. Moreover, this is considered as the worst mosquito-borne virus infection in the South Asian countries7. During the peak of the epidemic in July, 2017, the highest number of incidences were reported from the Gampaha District6. In the absence of an effective drug or vaccine specific to the dengue virus (DENV), source reduction is the best method to control transmission of dengue. In addition to conventional vector surveys, chemical control methods such as selective indoor residual insecticide spraying and insecticide treated nets (ITNs) were currently using to control the disease transmission8. Recently, an autocidal gravid ovitrap have been developed using Novaluron as the active ingredient to control the dengue transmission in the district9. Thermal fogging is using in Sri Lanka as the last option in vector control methods with portable or vehicle mounted fog generators. Even though, ideally fogging should be implemented every 2–3 days for 10 days, fogging is repeated within 7–10 days after initial spraying in Sri Lanka10. Organophosphates and synthetic pyrethroid insecticides were using national-wide in fogging since Sri Lanka has history a history of extensive use of DDT which has already led higher resistance in dengue vector mosquito species11. Deltamethrin, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Malathion, Permathrin, and d,d,trans-cyphenothrin are currently using in aerosol applications and fogging Sri Lanka12.

In recent years, health authorities directed their attention toward development of early warning systems to reduce disease transmission rates in high risk areas. Predictive risk maps, developed using Geographical Information System (GIS)-based approaches and spatial statistical analysis, may provide an alternative approach to identify risk localities assessing and quantifying the distribution of risk factors to predict impending dengue epidemics13. Further, GIS-based risk maps can be used to understand the mosquito distribution, seasonal climatic variations and environmental factors affecting transmission of dengue14,15.

Currently, GIS-based risk predictive models are not available yet for the Gampaha District to assess to identify risk localities and these models are needs of the moment to control dengue transmission. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to analyse spatial and seasonal distribution of dengue incidence and ecological factors to develop GIS-based risk model for the identification of risk localities in high-risk areas in order to control dengue transmission. The outcome of the study will probably improve the effectiveness of dengue surveillance programmes, ultimately controlling impending dengue epidemics in the district.


Risk maps were prepared to identify both the risk areas in the Gampaha District and distribution of dengue incidences and risk factors in the selected dengue high risk study areas.

Identification of risk localities in areas with high risk using the developed GIS-based model

The WGS 84 / UTM zone 44 N georeferenced layers were used for the development of GIS-based model and the developed model was utilized to identify the risk localities in the dengue high risk study areas in the Gampaha District. The final outcomes of the model for each study area were depicted in Fig. 1. The comparisons of model outputs with the satellite images of respective high risk areas were illustrated in the Supplementary Figs. S1S4.

Figure 1

Generated risk map for the study areas. High risk localities were illustrated in the dark green colour while the low risk localities were illustrated in white. Road maps were overlapped in the respective area. Satellite imagery comparisons were illustrated in Supplementary Figures S1S4. Risk maps were composed using Esri ArcGIS 10.2.1.

Identifications of spatial correlations between different layers with patient locations in each dengue high risk study area in the Gampaha District

A random point layer was generated by introducing 100 random points for each study area separately. The generated random point layer was used to extract spatial distances for each study raster and spatial correlations were analysed using the Pearson's product correlation coefficient16. The results of the correlations were summarized in the Table 1.

Table 1 Spatial correlations between generated layers with dengue incident location layer in each dengue high risk study area in the multivariate Poisson point process model.

During the mathematical modelling of patient locations of dengue in the study areas using Poisson point pattern models, different point pattern intensities were predicted for dengue incidences in the study areas (Fig. 2). Further, coefficients obtained for the each variables in study areas were summarized in Table 2. The developed equations for each study area are available in Supplementary Table S1.

Figure 2

Predicted point pattern intensity for dengue incidences in the respective study areas. High risk localities were illustrated in the yellow colour while the low risk localities were illustrated in the blue. Variation of intensity levels are scaled adjacently to the intensity map of the study areas. (A) Eriyawetiya; (B) Akbar Town; (C) 3rd Kurana; (D) Welikadamulla.

Table 2 Coefficients obtained by the Poisson point process modelling for the variables in different high risk study areas.

During the modelling, base intensity (Intercept) and total building were significant in all areas. Further, land uses were significant in Eriyawetiya and Welikadamulla study areas while public places were significant in Akbar Town as well as Eriyawetiya study areas.

According to the observed Ripley’s K-functions (Fig. 3), in Eriyawetiya and 3rd Kurana study areas, dengue incidences were clustered at some scales and be dispersed at others. Significant clustering is detected within a radius of approximately 155 m and 125 m in Eriyawetiya and 3rd Kurana study areas, respectively and dispersion is observed afterwards.

Figure 3

Observed Ripley’s K-functions and simulated envelopes for Poisson point process models in the study areas. \(r\)—The vector of values of the argument r at which the function K has been estimated; \(\widehat{K}\)—The estimates of \(K(r)\); \(obs\)—Observed values of the summary function for the dengue patient location data pattern; \(lo\)—Lower envelope of simulations; \(hi\)—Higher envelope of simulations.

Identification of distribution of dengue incidences in the study high risk areas in different monsoon periods

In each study area, the dengue incidences were clustered depending on the monsoon periods and mapped separately to identify the distribution of dengue incidences in the study areas. In the study, the highest number of dengue incidences were reported during the south-west monsoon period. Figure 4 illustrated the heat maps of distribution of dengue incidences in the south-west monsoon period in the study areas. Distribution of dengue incidences in different monsoon periods in each study area were illustrated in the Supplementary Figs. S5S8.

Figure 4

Distribution of dengue incidences in south-west monsoon period in the study areas. (A) Eriyawetiya; (B) Akbar Town; (C) 3rd Kurana; (D) Welikadamulla. Distribution of dengue incidences in different monsoon periods in the study areas were illustrated in Supplementary Figs. S5S8. Figure was generated using Esri ArcGIS 10.2.1.


Present study aimed to develop a risk model to identify the risk localities in the dengue high risk areas. Kernel density and Euclidean distance based approaches are widely used in raster development of GIS modelling. Kernel density was used to fit a smoothly tapered surface to point layers while Euclidean distance was used to identify close exposures of polygon layers17. The risk values were ranked for each layer depending on their contribution to the transmission of dengue incidences. Based on the ILWIS Applications Guide18, the maximum risk value for the developed model was assigned as 10. Previous study conducted on mathematical modelling of dengue incidences in the Gampaha District have stated exponential influence of previous month cases on current month disease transmission in the district19. Further, investigation on adult and immature stages of dengue vector mosquitoes indicated that DENV are present in adult dengue vector mosquitoes and significant correlations of entomological indices with patient cases in the same district20,21. Therefore, patient locations and positive breeding container layers were selected as maximum risk variables and assigned the risk value of 10 as these variables are directly involved in disease transmission. In the modelling, dispersed risk distance patient cases and breeding places were selected less than average flight distance of dengue vector mosquitoes which is 400m22. Further, these study areas are considered to be highly congested areas and therefore, total building and home garden layers were given second highest ranking. Previous study conducted in Indonesia reported that consistent high number of dengue cases in larger areas of buildings even though the correlation is weak23. Further, higher dengue vector population densities were reported around home gardens from many countries24,25,26. Therefore, moderate risk level, risk value of 6, was assigned to total buildings and home garden layers. Recent study conducted in the Gampaha District demonstrated the contribution of daily commutes of people for transmission of dengue in the district27. When people visited to urban areas, there is higher probability of acquiring of dengue as these urban and suburban areas may act as dengue hot spots and artificial reservoirs which has been documented previously in Sri Lanka as well as other countries28,29,30,31. Therefore, land use layer for urban areas was given third highest ranking in the risk model. Another study conducted in Sri Lanka reported roads are important aspects for transmission of dengue25 and households in the present study areas located along main roads or have access roads. Further, previous study in Sri Lanka reported the potentials of public places play as artificial reservoirs dengue32 because of higher prevalence of breeding places around public places. It is a well-known fact that distribution of dengue vector mosquitoes varies with the elevation depending on geographical areas. Therefore, roads, public places and elevation layers were ranked in the third position with risk level of 4. However, the lower risk distances were assigned to road and contour layers as the layers are not related directly for transmission of the disease even though they play important role. Previous study conducted in Kenya and Uganda has reported higher dengue vector mosquito populations close to vegetation and marshy lands33 which may provide resting places of dengue vectors, especially for male mosquitos. When considering the study areas, with the exception of the 3rd Kurana study area, all other study areas have close proximity to marshy areas and therefore these areas were included as a variable in the present study. Since it is not directly involving in mosquito population increase or disease transmission, the lowest rank was assigned to marshy areas of land use layers.

When comparing the generated risk maps with satellite imageries, vegetation covers were observed in high risk localities in all study areas. The reason could be the vegetation covers make better resting places for dengue vector mosquitoes. Even though the Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, the main vector of DENV, rest indoors34, previous studies conducted in Malaysia and Kenya reported the preference of Ae. aegypti to rest and breed outdoors due to increased breeding opportunities without affecting lifespan or gonotrophic activity35,36. Meanwhile, it is well-known fact that Ae. albopictus, the subsidiary vector of DENV, prefers vegetation to rest and breeding in both natural and man-made containers37,38.

When comparing the intensity maps generated from the Poisson point process model with generated risk maps, differences in localization of intensities were observed specially in Eriyawetiya and Welikadamulla study areas. In the risk map of Eriyawetiya study area, risk localities were located mainly along the roads in the area and this observation was even statistically significant in Pearson correlation analysis. However, when considering the intensity map from the Poisson point process model, lower predicted intensity was observed in most of the locations in the study area and high intensities were observed around the southern border along the Devasumithrarama road and in central area. When considering the Welikadamulla study area, even though risk map indicates that dengue is high virtually all over the area, the predicted intensity map illustrates that dengue may high in central and northern border of the area along the Welikadamulla road. Interestingly, while the dengue high intensity localities in both Eriyawetiya and Welikadamulla study areas are mainly used as home gardens, these localities have close proximity to crowded public places, such as schools, temples, community halls, etc. Perhaps, these public places may have acted as artificial reservoirs of dengue. This is further observation in the high density localities in Akbar Town and 3rd Kurana study areas. In the Akbar Town area, high intensities were observed around mosques. In the 3rd Kurana study area, many public places, such as schools and churches, are located in the central and southern area where intensities were high. However, the lowest dengue intensities were observed from the 3rd Kurana study area.

In the Poisson point process model, highest intensity range was observed in the Eriyawetiya study area while the lowest was observed from 3rd Kurana. Eriyawetiya study area is located close to the northern border of Colombo, the commercial capital in Sri Lanka, where highest number of dengue cases are reported in the country39. Recent study reported that human commutes to risk areas in Colombo and transportations may play significant role transmission of dengue in the nearby areas, such as Eriyawetiya study area, leading to higher intensities21. However, the overall lowest intensities reported from 3rd Kurana study area may be due to continuous encouragement of dwellers in the area to remove dengue vector mosquito breeding places and use of protective measures by the churches and clergies.

The results of Pearson correlation analysis and Poisson multivariate point process model were also different especially with respect to positive breeding locations and roads layers. Positive correlation was observed between breeding places and patient locations in Pearson correlation analysis, which can be expected as dengue vector mosquitoes are anthropophilic mosquitoes with low flying ranges, were different from the results of Poisson point process model. In the model, no or negative correlation was observed between patient locations and breeding places. In a multivariate model, all explanatory variables are modelled to capture the true variation of the response variable while in Pearson correlation only one explanatory variable is considered at a time. The negative correlation in Poisson model with breeding places may be due to the hidden breeding places. These breeding places may be unidentified due to level of personal expertise, restrictions of accessibility to household, limitations due to inadequate resources, etc. which lead to differences between actual adult population and larval indices21. Further, even though road layers were shown similar behaviours for 3rd Kurana and Welikadamulla study areas both in Pearson correlations and Poisson modelling, differences were observed in Eriyawetiya and Akbar Town. The positive correlations observed between patient locations and road layers could probably be because of high congestion of households alongside the roads and therefore, even single DENV infected mosquitos can spread the disease to all households as these mosquitoes probe many humans during blood feeding. Similar observation has been reported in previous study conducted in West Indies40. The study further states that more dengue cases being found within 1–3 km away from various types of roads. This may be the reason for the observed negative estimates from multivariate Poisson model in Eriyawetiya and Akbar Town study areas as the patient locations are very close to access roads.

When analysing the observed \(K\) -functions of the developed Poisson multivariate models for the study areas, both clustering and dispersions were observed for Eriyawetiya and 3rd Kurana study areas while only clustering was observed in the Akbar Town and Welikadamulla areas. Interestingly, in Eriyawetiya and 3rd Kurana study areas, clustering was observed a radius of approximately 150 m. This is comparable to the general flying range of dengue vector mosquitoes, especially with regards to the Ae. aegypti41, the main dengue vector mosquito. Further, this may be an indicative of that patients in a small areal cluster are prompted due to a single infected dengue vector mosquito. During the analysis, both isotropic42 and translation43 edge correction methods were considered, therefore, edge effects arising from the unobserved patient locations outside study area can be hampered when estimating the \(K\)-functions. The estimations of \(K\)-functions were within the upper and lower envelopes of simulated functions in Akbar Town, 3rd Kurana and Welikadamulla study areas, that is, given particular distance, the data and simulated patterns were statistically equivalent. This indicates that dengue patient locations in the study areas were undergone a complete random pattern or CSR except for Eriyawetiya study area. This observation is further confirmed by the results of Maximum Absolute Deviation (MAD) and the Diggle-Cressie-Loosmore-Ford (DCLF) non-graphical tests44.

Among four monsoon seasons, the first inter-monsoon season occurs during March and April months. The Southwest monsoon period starts in May and it lasts till September. During the October and November, the second inter-monsoon period occurs and the Northeast monsoon lasts for three months from December to February. When analysing the distribution of dengue incidences in the monsoon periods, the highest number of dengue incidences were reported from the Southwest monsoon period in all study areas. The Gampaha District is located in the western part of Sri Lanka and during the monsoon period, the district experiences a rainfall of 750–2000 mm. In other monsoon periods, rainfall of the Gampaha District is less than 1000 mm45. The reason for higher precipitation in the Southwest monsoon period includes the presence of abundant water bodies, such as Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean, leading to higher accumulation of moisture in Southwest monsoon winds46. The higher rainfalls increase not only the availability of the breeding containers for dengue vector mosquitoes, but also favourable environmental conditions, viz. humidity and temperature, for its development. This will lead to increased disease transmission during the Southwest monsoon season compared to other monsoon seasons.

The developed models can be used to identify risk localities easily for healthcare workers and decision makers. The Poisson point process models can be developed using freely available software and packages. Further, road maps can be easily obtained for freely available sources and modified easily using freely available GIS software. With the advantages of technology, correct GPS locations of positive dengue vector mosquito breeding places and patients can be easily obtained using mobile devices with minimum wage during vector control programmes and export directly into GIS software. Since roads, land use, buildings and contour being not changing frequently in a particular area, with the aid of available data on patient locations as well as positive breeding places, it is possible to develop risk maps monthly or biannually to assess the risk levels of high risk areas. Further, when health authorities have risk map of particular area over few years, then it is possible to identify risk localities and transmission of dengue in an area in advance. This is particularly important in outbreaks and epidemic progression, so that they can have a better scenario of undergone situation to use scarce health resources effectively to control disease transmission. Meantime, the model can be further enhanced by incorporating serotype data which may lead identify index cases and initial clusters. A combined approach of predictive mathematical models19 and genetic approaches to identify the virulence of circulating dengue viruses21 will provide sufficient information for health authorities to take timely actions, such as intensive source reduction programmes, targeted intervention programmes or deploy vector reduction tools such as ovitraps9, to manage the situation to prevent propagation of outbreaks and epidemics.


The developed GIS-based model can be utilized easily to identify risk localities at early stage in high risk areas which is not available yet in the Gampaha District as well as in Sri Lanka. In the high risk areas of current study, clustering of dengue incidences were observed at a radius of 150 m. The output of the developed model can be used as an early warning tool to explore and identify the current situation of dengue in an area providing valuable insights for healthcare authorities to understand disease propagation patterns and allocate scarce public health resources effectively to prevent impending dengue outbreaks and epidemics. When the GIS-based model coupled with mathematical modelling and phologenetic approaches, it will probably illustrate better scenario of present situation dengue outbreaks in real-time in risk areas. When these model apply over a large area or at national level in time-series manner, transmission patterns of dengue may be identified easily.


Study area

The Gampaha District, expands over 1387 km2, is located near the Northern border of the District of Colombo. Gampaha District is the second most populated district in Sri Lanka. Fifteen Medical Officer of Health (MOH) areas, sectioned into 106 Public Health Inspector (PHI) areas and 1177 Grama Niladhari (GN) divisions with 1784 villages are located in the district47. Previous study conducted on the mathematical modelling of dengue incidences with meteorological variables reported that the Kelaniya, Wattala and Negombo MOH areas were being with highest dengue prevalence in the district19 and these MOH areas together with Mahara MOH area, where a moderate risk area which has close proximity to Kelaniya and Wattala MOH areas were selected for the current study. The highest number of dengue incidences reported GN division of each selected MOH area was selected as the study areas of the present study (Supplementary Fig. S9).

Data collection

The baseline map for Sri Lanka was obtained from the Survey Department of Sri Lanka as a shapefile. GIS-based models were prepared to develop risk maps with the aim of identification of risk areas in study sites. During the development of risk models, locations of patients and positive breeding containers were collected using consumer grade GPS receivers for all study areas from January, 2014 to June, 2018. The shapefile for GN division boundary maps for the Gampaha District were downloaded from the Survey Department of Sri Lanka and land use maps for the study areas were collected from the Land Use Policy Planning Department, Sri Lanka as separate shapefiles. The 1:10,000 digital elevation maps for the Gampaha District was obtained from the Survey Department.

Development of GIS-based model

Geographical information system-based models and risk maps were developed using entomological, environmental/ecological and social factors affecting transmission of dengue for the Gampaha District using ArcGIS 10.2 software (ESRI Inc., USA) and layer creations and transformations were performed using the QGIS 2.18-Long-term Release (LTR), QGIS Development Team).

GIS-based risk models were prepared to identify the risk areas and factors in the study areas in the Gampaha District. Separate layers were developed representing locations of dengue patients and positive breeding containers of Aedes dengue vector mosquitoes, roads, land use, total buildings, public places and elevations in each study area. The schematic structure of the underlined model is illustrated in Fig. 5.

Figure 5

Systematic flow chart of risk model development.

Georeferencing and projection transformations

An image of MOH areas in the Gampaha District was georeferenced to develop the MOH area map of the district and saved as separate shapefile and transformed into Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone 44 N (EPSG:32644) coordinate system48. The GPS readings on patient locations and positive breeding places were converted to UTM coordinate system (EPSG:32644) prior to saving as separate layers for each study area. Building and public places layers for each study area were created based on satellite imageries of USGS EarthExplorer49 and verified using Google Maps. Road maps for the study areas were developed based on the maps available at OpenStreetMap50 and verified using Google Earth. Separate shapefiles were created for urban areas, homesteads and marshy lands using the land use files for each study area. The digital elevation maps was clipped to extract the elevation levels of the study areas. All generated shapefiles for each study area were transformed into UTM zone 44 N coordinate system prior to model building.

Development of GIS-based model to generate risk maps to identify dengue risk in the study areas

The development process of the GIS-based model for study areas were summarized in the Supplementary Fig. S10. Raster layers were developed separately for patient data, breeding places and road maps layers using the kernel density function. The Euclidean Distance function was used to generate raster layers for different land uses, buildings and public places. Raster layers were developed for contour layer using the ‘Topo to Raster’ function. Based on previous literature51, risk values were assigned prior to assigned (Table 3).

Table 3 Risk values assigned for study layers during the development of the model in each dengue study area.

Identification of correlations between patient cases with developed layers in the study areas

Spatial correlations of each layer to patient cases were studied by introducing specified number of random point features to the study area layer. Minimum Allowed Distance parameter was then calculated to each raster using the random point layer. The distances calculated for ‘patient density’ raster was considered as the dependent variable and distances calculated for each layer were considered as explanatory variables. Pearson correlation was performed to identify significantly correlated layers.

Mathematical modelling of patient cases with developed layers in the study areas

Spatial Poisson point process model was fitted considering patient locations as a function of developed raster layers developed from breeding places, road maps, different land uses, buildings and public places layers. The analysis was performed in R statistical software52 using raster53 and spatstat54 packages for study areas. All the spatial objects were rescaled into kilometres prior to modelling. The equation for the model was:

$$\begin{aligned} \ln \lambda \left( i \right) &= \alpha + \beta_{1} \left( {Breeding\;Places} \right) + \beta_{2} \left( {Roads} \right) + \beta_{3} \left( {Total\;Buildings} \right) \\ & \quad + \beta_{4} \left( {Land\;Use_{Home\;Gardening} } \right) + \beta_{5} \left( {Land\;Use_{Marshi\;Lands} } \right) \\ & \quad + \beta_{6} \left( {Land\;Use_{Urban\;Areas} } \right) + \beta_{7} \left( {Public\;Places} \right) + \beta_{8} \left( {Contour} \right) \\ \end{aligned}$$

where \(\lambda (i)\) is the modelled point pattern intensity for dengue incidences at location \(i\) in the study area, \(\alpha\) is the base intensity derived from the multivariate model and \({\beta }_{1}\) to \({\beta }_{8}\) are the estimated coefficients for each respective variable.

Upon developing, model outputs were plotted as predicted intensity of dengue in the areas to identify high-risk localities. Further, clustering pattern was also estimated using \(K\)-functions (Eq. 2)55, for the developed models in each study area, of 1000 pointwise Monte Carlo simulated realisations of Complete Spatial Randomness (CSR) with both isotropic and translation edge corrections.

$$\hat{K}\left( r \right) = \frac{a}{{n\left( {n - 1} \right)}} \sum\limits_{i} {\mathop \sum \limits_{j} I \left( {d_{ij} \le r} \right)e_{ij} }$$

where \(a\) is the size of the study area, \(n\) is the number of data points, and the sum is taken over all ordered pairs of points \(i\) and \(j\) in X. Here \(d[i,j]\) is the distance between the two points, and \(I(d\left[i,j\right]\le r)\) is the indicator that equals \(I\) if the distance is less than or equal to \(r\). The term \(e[ij]\) is the edge correction weight.

Development of heat maps to identify the distribution of dengue incidences with climate seasons

Sri Lanka experiences four climate seasons annually. The distribution of dengue incidences in the study areas were mapped separately in order to identify the distribution patterns of dengue incidences for each climatic season in the study areas. Heat maps were developed using the density tool for point data in ArcGIS software with output cell size of 10 m56. The number of dengue incidences reported during different climatic seasons was used to identify seasonal variations of dengue incidences in the study areas during the study period.


  1. 1.

    Bhatt, S. et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496, 504–507. (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    WHO. Dengue and severe dengue, (2019).

  3. 3.

    Brady, O. J. et al. Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLOS Neglect. Trop. Dis. 6, e1760. (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vitarana, T., Jayakuru, W. & Withane, N. Historical account of dengue haemorrhagic fever in Sri Lanka. Dengue Bull. 21 (1997).

  5. 5.

    Tissera, H. A. et al. New dengue virus type 1 genotype in Colombo Sri Lanka. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17, 2053–2055. (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Epidemiology Unit, M. o. H., Sri Lanka. Dengue trends, (2019).

  7. 7.

    Ali, S. et al. The unprecedented magnitude of the 2017 dengue outbreak in Sri Lanka provides lessons for future mosquito-borne infection control and prevention. Infect. Dis. Health 23, 114–120. (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Epidemiology Unit, M. O. H., Sri Lanka. Fogging in Dengue Control (Part I). 4 (Epidemiology Unit, 2012).

  9. 9.

    Withanage, G. P., Viswakula, S. D., Gunawardene, Y. S. & Hapugoda, M. D. Use of novaluron-based autocidal gravid ovitraps to control aedes dengue vector mosquitoes in the district of Gampaha Sri Lanka. BioMed. Res. Int. 2020, 9567019. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Epidemiology Unit, M. O. H., Sri Lanka. Fogging in Dengue Control (Part II). 4 (Epidemiology Unit, 2012).

  11. 11.

    Karunaratne, S. H., Weeraratne, T. C., Perera, M. D. & Surendran, S. N. Insecticide resistance and efficacy of space spraying and larviciding in the control of dengue vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Sri Lanka. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 107, 98–105. (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    National Dengue Control Unit. Guidelines for Aedes Vector Surveillance and Control in Sri Lanka. (Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka, 2016).

  13. 13.

    Eisen, L. & Lozano-Fuentes, S. Use of mapping and spatial and space-time modeling approaches in operational control of aedes aegypti and dengue. PLOS Neglect. Trop. Dis. 3, e411. (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Panhwar, M., Pirzada, N., Abro, A. & Khahro, S. Spatial Risk Mapping for Dengue Fever Using GIS: A Case Study of Hyderabad. (2017).

  15. 15.

    Louis, V. R. et al. Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping—a systematic review. Int. J. Health Geogr. 13, 50. (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kramer-Schadt, S. Scenarios Assessing the Viability of a Lynx Population in Germany, (2002).

  17. 17.

    Neuhaus, F. Emergent Spatio-Temporal Dimensions of the City: Habitus and Urban Rhythms (Springer, Berlin, 2015).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    van Westen, C. J. in ILWIS Applications Guide Ch. 18, 219–238 (1997).

  19. 19.

    Withanage, G. P., Viswakula, S. D., Nilmini Silva Gunawardena, Y. I. & Hapugoda, M. D. A forecasting model for dengue incidence in the District of Gampaha, Sri Lanka. Parasit. Vect. 11, 262. (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Withanage, G. P., Hapuarachchi, H. C., Silva Gunawardena, Y. I. N. & Hapudoda, M. D. in International Postgraduate Research Conference 2018 26 (University of Kelaniya, 2018).

  21. 21.

    Withanage, G. P., Hapuarachchi, H. C., Viswakula, S. D., Gunawardena, Y. I. N. S. & Hapugoda, M. Entomological surveillance with viral tracking demonstrates a migrated viral strain caused dengue epidemic in July, 2017 in Sri Lanka. PLoS ONE 15, e0231408. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    WHO. The mosquito, (2019).

  23. 23.

    Kesetyaningsih, T. W., Andarini, S. & Sudarto Pramoedyo, H. Determination of environmental factors affecting dengue incidence in Sleman District, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Afr. J. Infect. Dis. 12, 13–25. (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Little, E., Barrera, R., Seto, K. C. & Diuk-Wasser, M. Co-occurrence patterns of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti and Aedes mediovitattus, a dengue competent mosquito in Puerto Rico. EcoHealth 8, 365–375. (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Udayanga, L. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of demographic, socio-economic and other associated risk factors affecting the occurrence of dengue incidence among Colombo and Kandy Districts of Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study. Parasit. Vect. 11, 478. (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Higa, Y., TsuDA, Y., Tuno, N. & Takagi, M. Preliminary field experiments on exophagy of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in peridomestic habitat. Med. Entomol. Zool. 52, 105–116 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Modeling the relative role of human mobility, land-use and climate factors on dengue outbreak emergence in Sri Lanka. bioRxiv (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    WHO. Dengue fever – Sri Lanka, (2017).

  29. 29.

    Sirisena, P. D. N. N. & Noordeen, F. Evolution of dengue in Sri Lanka—changes in the virus, vector, and climate. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 19, 6–12. (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    AK, M. A., Nazni, W. A. & Lee, H. L. Ovitrap surveillance of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in dengue endemic areas in Keramat and Shah Alam, Selangor in 2016. IIUM Med. J. Malaysia (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lara, R. J., Islam, M. S., Yamasaki, S., Neogi, S. B. & Nair, G. B. in Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science (eds Eric Wolanski & Donald McLusky) 263–299 (Academic Press, 2011).

  32. 32.

    Louis, V. R. et al. Characteristics of and factors associated with dengue vector breeding sites in the City of Colombo, Sri Lanka. Pathogens Global Health 110, 79–86. (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    McClelland, G. A. H. & Weitz, B. Serological identification of the natural hosts of Aedes Aegypti (L.) and some other mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae) caught resting in vegetation in Kenya and Uganda. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 57, 214–224. (1963).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Perich, M. J., Davila, G., Turner, A., Garcia, A. & Nelson, M. Behavior of resting Aedes aegypti (Culicidae: Diptera) and its relation to ultra-low volume adulticide efficacy in Panama City, Panama. J. Med. Entomol. 37, 541–546. (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Saifur, R. G. et al. Changing domesticity of Aedes aegypti in northern peninsular Malaysia: reproductive consequences and potential epidemiological implications. PLoS ONE 7, e30919. (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ngugi, H. N. et al. Characterization and productivity profiles of Aedes aegypti (L.) breeding habitats across rural and urban landscapes in western and coastal Kenya. Parasit. Vect. 10, 331. (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kamgang, B., Nchoutpouen, E., Simard, F. & Paupy, C. Notes on the blood-feeding behavior of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Cameroon. Parasit. Vect. 5, 57. (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Higa, Y. Dengue vectors and their spatial distribution. Trop. Med. Health 39, 17–27. (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Epidemiology Unit, M., Sri Lanka. Trends-Dengue (2019).

  40. 40.

    Mahabir, R. S., Severson, D. W. & Chadee, D. D. Impact of road networks on the distribution of dengue fever cases in Trinidad, West Indies. Acta Trop. 123, 178–183. (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Liew, C. & Curtis, C. F. Horizontal and vertical dispersal of dengue vector mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, Singapore. Med. Vet. Entomol. 18, 351–360. (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ripley, B. D. The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. J. Appl. Probab. 13, 255–266. (1976).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ohser, J. & Stoyan, D. On the second-order and orientation analysis of planar stationary point processes. Biomet. J. 23, 523–533. (1981).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Baddeley, A. et al. On tests of spatial pattern based on simulation envelopes. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 477–489. (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Department of Meteorology, S. L. Climate of Sri Lanka, (2018).

  46. 46.

    Ahrens, C. D. Meteorology Today: An Introduction to Weather, Climate, and the Environment. (Brooks/Cole Pub., 2000).

  47. 47.

    RDHS-Gampaha, S. L. Office Of The Regional Director Of Health Services-Gampaha, (2019).

  48. 48.

    Geomatic Solutions. WGS 84 / UTM zone 44N, (2017).

  49. 49.

    U.S. Geological Survey. EarthExplorer, (2019).

  50. 50.

    OpenStreetMap contributors. Planet dump retrieved from, (2017).

  51. 51.

    Dom, N. C., Ahmad, A. H., Latif, Z. A. & Ismail, R. Application of geographical information system-based analytical hierarchy process as a tool for dengue risk assessment. Asian Pacific J. Trop. Dis. 6, 928–935. (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2019).

  53. 53.

    Hijmans, R. & van Etten, J. Raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R Package Version 517, 2–12 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Baddeley, A. & Turner, R. spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J. Stat. Softw. (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ripley, B. D. Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Burghardt, R. Development of an ArcGIS Extension to Model Urban Climate Factors. Doctor of Engineering thesis, University of Kassel (2014).

Download references


We thank the National Research Council, Sri Lanka (TO-14/04) for funding and the International Atomic Energy Agency (SRL/TC-5/047) for technical cooperation. We also thank Regional Director of Health Services and Regional Epidemiologist at the Gampaha District, MOH officers and PHI officers in the study areas, colleagues at Molecular Medicine Unit, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. Map data copyrighted OpenStreetMap contributors and available from

Author information




G.P.W. and M.G. designed and performed analysis; G.P.W. and S.D.V. performed statistical analyses; G.P.W., M.G. and S.V.D. wrote initial manuscript; N.S.G., K.S. and M.D.H. supported data collection and reviewed the manuscript; M.D.H. supervised the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Menaka D. Hapugoda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Withanage, G.P., Gunawardana, M., Viswakula, S.D. et al. Multivariate spatio-temporal approach to identify vulnerable localities in dengue risk areas using Geographic Information System (GIS). Sci Rep 11, 4080 (2021).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing