Low-dose exposure of glyphosate-based herbicides disrupt the urine metabolome and its interaction with gut microbiota


Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) can disrupt the host microbiota and influence human health. In this study, we explored the potential effects of GBHs on urinary metabolites and their interactions with gut microbiome using a rodent model. Glyphosate and Roundup (equal molar for glyphosate) were administered at the USA glyphosate ADI guideline (1.75 mg/kg bw/day) to the dams and their pups. The urine metabolites were profiled using non-targeted liquid chromatography—high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). Our results found that overall urine metabolite profiles significantly differed between dams and pups and between female and male pups. Specifically, we identified a significant increase of homocysteine, a known risk factor of cardiovascular disease in both Roundup and glyphosate exposed pups, but in males only. Correlation network analysis between gut microbiome and urine metabolome pointed to Prevotella to be negatively correlated with the level of homocysteine. Our study provides initial evidence that exposures to commonly used GBH, at a currently acceptable human exposure dose, is capable of modifying urine metabolites in both rat adults and pups. The link between Prevotella-homocysteine suggests the potential role of GBHs in modifying the susceptibility of homocysteine, which is a metabolite that has been dysregulated in related diseases like cardiovascular disease or inflammation, through commensal microbiome.


Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs), such as Roundup, are currently the most widely used herbicides in the world. GBHs are complex proprietary mixtures, with glyphosate as the main active ingredient. Since glyphosate was first produced in 1974 approximately 9.4 million tons of GBHs have been sprayed globally, nearly half a pound of glyphosate on every cultivated acre of land1. After the introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in 1996, in particular, glyphosate resistant crops, the global usage of GBHs has been increasing exponentially with about two-thirds of the total GBHs (by mass) sprayed in just the last decade. Besides GMO application, GBHs are also applied on non-GMO crops as desiccant in order to dry down crops and accelerate the harvest2. This practice further increases dietary exposure to glyphosate and its major metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA)3. Glyphosate mode of action is the inhibition of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), involved in the synthesis of three aromatic amino acids: tyrosine, tryptophan, and phenylalanine4. As this shikimate pathway only exists in bacteria, fungi, and plants, but not in vertebrates, glyphosate was thought to impose minimal risks to mammals including humans. However, current emerging evidence suggests that glyphosate or GBH such as Roundup, can adversely affect mammalian biology via multiple mechanisms5,6,7,8. Several studies have also suggested the possible link between GBHs exposure and abnormality in neurodevelopment9,10. Among those mechanisms, it has been reported that GBHs exposure can alter the microbiota in honeybees, rats and other animals11,12 and recently a shotgun metagenomic approach revealed that glyphosate alters the gut microbiome of Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats by inhibiting the shikimate pathway13. The gut microbiome is known to be a key player in modulating host metabolism; with multiple studies describing strong correlations between gut microbiome (microbial composition and metabolic function) and host metabolites14,15,16,17. Several microbial species and microbial metabolic functions have also been suggested to play a leading role in gut-systemic metabolic interplays16,18. Therefore, we speculate that GBHs exposure may have the potential to modify the human microbiota, and which, in turn, to influence host metabolic functions.

Metabolomics is a promising approach to study the associations between environmental exposures and health effects19,20. Application of metabolomics profiling can potentially yield novel biomarkers, and inform molecular alterations underlying the toxicities. Over the last few years, many toxicological studies have demonstrated that metabolomics is a highly sensitive method in detecting effects associated with environmental exposures, where metabolite perturbations often happened prior to the histopathological changes18,21,22. However, to date, few studies have been carried out on the effect of glyphosate exposure on host metabolomics profiles. In particular, urinary metabolomics has not been used to investigate the biological perturbations of glyphosate exposure and interactions between GBH altered microbiome during early life, a critical period of susceptibility as denoted in the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) paradigm. Therefore, in this pilot study, we performed untargeted metabolomics profiling in Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats to examine whether exposure to GBH at low doses comparable to those ubiquitously exposed to humans, can affect urinary metabolomics profiles during early development. The animals in this study have been previously investigated for microbiome changes by glyphosate or Roundup exposures11, providing initial evidence that exposures to commonly used GBHs, at doses considered safe, are capable of modifying the gut microbiota in early development, particularly before the onset of puberty. Combining with existing gut microbiome data, we further test whether the GBH altered metabolites in paired urine correlate with changes in the gut microbiome.



The animal study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines. All animal study procedures were performed at the Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Centre/Ramazzini Institute (CMCRC/RI) (Bentivoglio, Italy), where the animal experiments were conducted with strict adherence to the Italian law regulating the use and treatment of animals for scientific purposes (Decreto legislativo N. 26, 2014. Attuazione della direttiva n. 2010/63/UE in materia di protezione degli animali utilizzati a fini scientifici.—G.U. Serie Generale, n. 61 del 14 Marzo 2014). Before starting, the protocol was examined by the Internal Ethical Committee for approval. The protocol of the experiment was also approved and formally authorized by the ad hoc commission of the Italian Ministry of Health (ministerial approval n. 710/ 2015-PR). As previously described23, female breeders SD rats were placed individually with a single unrelated male until evidence of copulation was observed. After mating, females were housed separately during gestation and delivery. Newborns were housed with their mothers until weaning. Up to 2 pups per litter were randomly selected for the study in order to have minimal differences in body weight among the treatment groups, with a standard deviation of no more than 10% from the average. This ensured comparable dosing of glyphosate or Roundup though drinking water. The Weaned pups were housed by treatment group and sex in Makrolon cages (cm 41 × 25 × 15) at two or three pups per cage. The metabolic cages had a stainless-steel wire top and a shallow layer of white firewood shavings as bedding. All animals were kept in a single room at 23 ± 3 °C and at 40–60% relative humidity with light/dark cycles at 12 h each using artificial light. The animals were given the same standard “Corticella” pellet diet (Piccioni Laboratory, Milan, Italy) for both breeders and offspring; both feed and tap water were available ad libitum. Feed and tap water were routinely analyzed to exclude biological and chemical contamination (mycotoxins, pesticides, arsenic, lead, mercury, selenium).


The timeline of the experimental animal treatment and sample collection has been described previously11,23. As illustrated in Fig. 1, we selected 14 dams (N = 5 controls, N = 5 glyphosate and N = 4 Roundup) and 30 F1 pups (15 female and 15 male). The F0 dams received the treatment through drinking water from gestation day (GD) 6 to the end of lactation (totally they were exposed for 49 ± 2 days). The F1 pups received the treatment from their dams starting from in utero (GD 6) and mainly through milk during lactation. After weaning, F1 pups were treated through drinking water until sacrifice (PND 70 or PND 125).

Figure 1

Study design. Test compounds including pure glyphosate and Roundup are administered ad libitum in drinking water. Fourteen dams are treated through drinking water starting from the gestation day 6th (GD 6). Thirty pups are treated from embryonic life (GD 6) indirectly from dams milk following birth (GD20) until the end of lactation, then directly through drinking water for 90 days after weaning (until PND 125). Urine samples are collected after lactation from dams and PND70 and PND 125 from pups. Fecal samples are collected at PND 125 from pups.

Urine and fecal sample collection

Urine samples were collected using a metabolic cage, specifically designed for separate collection of urine and feces. Urine samples were collected at the end of lactation for dams and at PND70 and PND125 for pups. The urine samples were centrifuged to remove any debris (50,000 × g at 10 °C for 15 min) then transferred to 1.5 ml cryovials. Fecal samples (2–3 droppings) were freshly collected from the anus of each animal, limiting potential contamination. About 2–3 fecal droppings from each pup were collected as described previously11. Briefly, forceps used for collecting droppings were washed and cleaned using sterile water and 1% sodium bicarbonate between each sampling to avoid cross contamination. The urine and fecal cryovials were stored at − 20 °C until shipment on dry ice to the testing laboratories at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Metabolomics analysis

Urine samples were thawed on ice, vortexed and diluted with water down to a specific gravity of 1.002 for pre-acquisition normalization24. A 20 µL aliquot of the diluted sample was prepared and stored at − 80 °C until metabolomics analysis. Immediately prior to liquid chromatography—high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) analysis, urine samples were combined with 180 µL of acetonitrile, containing internal standards, to precipitate proteins. The supernatant was transferred to LC vials.

Sample extracts were analyzed in ZIC HILIC positive (ZHP) and RP negative (RPN) modes separately using established methods25. Samples were maintained at 5 °C in the autosampler module. For polar metabolites separation, 2 µL of sample was injected onto a HILIC SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 100 Å, 3.5 µm particle size, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) maintained at 25 °C. While for nonpolar metabolites separation, 2 µL of sample sandwiched between 10 µL of water was injected onto a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18, RRHD column (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 µm particle size, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) coupled to a guard column (5 mm × 2 mm, 1.8 µm Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) maintained at 50 °C. Samples were analyzed in randomized order. To monitor system stability, a pooled QC sample prepared by combining aliquots of all samples was injected routinely throughout the run.

LC–MS pre-processing

Suspect screening was performed using an in-house database of over 600 authentic standards analyzed under the same conditions. For untargeted data analysis, the raw data files were first converted into mzxml26 format and a peak table generated using [XCMS]27 with parameters optimized by [IPO]28. Metabolite features with a CV < 30% in the pooled-QC injections and with a mean fold change > 3 or > 1.5 compared to blank extracts for untargeted analysis or suspect screening, respectively, were retained for further analysis. The metabolomics data was further imputed by k-nearest neighbor imputation using [knn_impute] with a cutoff = 0.4 (40% missing values) and normalized by [normalize_met] with default settings using the R package [MetaboDiff]29. After imputation, 3 out of 154 metabolites were removed due to > 40% missing values.

Statistical analysis

Differential metabolomic analysis was performed using R package [MetaboDiff]29. Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to compare overall metabolomic profiles by age, sex and exposure types. Tests for statistical significance were performed with the PERMANOVA test (adonis function in the vegan R package)30. Supervised partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was performed using the mixOmics R package31 to select the major contributing metabolomic features that differentiate between study groups. A PLS-DA Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) score > 2.0 was used as the cutoff value to identify top features contributing to metabolic differences. For each selected feature, we also compared the mean by non-parametric two-sample Mann–Whitney test and p values were FDR adjusted for multiple comparisons. Alternatively, we used the random forests (RF) algorithm, a supervised machine learning approach, using R package [Boruta]32 to identify significant differential metabolites associated with exposures. The microbiome data of pups at PND125 was obtained from our previous study11. Briefly, the rat gut microbiome was surveyed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the phylogenetically informative V3–V4 region as previously described33. The QIIME 2.0 pipeline34 combined with DADA235 was used to process the sequencing data. The microbiome composition was further analyzed using R package [phyloseq]36. Correlation analysis was performed to investigate relationships between selected metabolites and gut microbiota. For each microbiota and metabolite with FDR adjusted p value < 0.05, an edge was added between the corresponding nodes and visualized as a network with the edge color as the direction of the correlation and the edge width as the absolute values of the log10 (FDR adjusted p values). The spearman correlation networks between microbiome and metabolites were constructed using R package [igraph]37 and FDR adjusted p values were obtained using R package [qvalue]38.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The animal protocol was examined by the Internal Ethical Committee for approval. The protocol of the experiment was also approved and formally authorized by the ad hoc commission of the Italian Ministry of Health (ministerial Approval No. 710/ 2015-PR).


Metabolomic profile between sex and adulthood groups

After filtering, untargeted metabolomic profiling resulted in 4637 peaks in RPN and 5346 peaks in ZHP for further statistical analysis. An unsupervised principal components analysis was initially employed to compare the overall metabolomic profiles and detect outliers. We found the overall metabolomic profiles differed significantly between dams and pups, and between male and female pups, but not by exposure group (glyphosate, Roundup or control) (P values = 0.001, 0.001 and 0.17, respectively by multivariate PERMANOVA test, Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S1).

Figure 2

Differential metabolomic profiles by glyphosate exposure in rat female and male pups. (A) Unsupervised PCA analysis shows the metabolomic profiles were differentiated by adulthood and sex. (B) Supervised Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) shows distinct metabolome clusters that are strongly associated with the exposure chemicals among groups by adulthood and sex.

Metabolomic features by exposure group and sex

For the discrimination of the exposure types, the Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), a supervised clustering method was used (Fig. 2B) using the 151 metabolites identified through suspect screening. We used the function perf to evaluate the PLS-DA model using fivefold cross-validation repeated 50 times and decided the optimal number of components = 3 based on the error rate changes (Fig. S2). Metabolites identified in sets with different exposure groups (Glyphosate, Roundup or non-exposed control) in dams and female or male pups were selected by using the cutoff of PLS-DA Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) score > 2.0 and a p value < 0.05 in the metabolite fold change level. The full list of metabolites with VIP scores, median expression values and the interquartile ranges are listed in Tables S1S3, while the selected metabolites are shown in Tables 1, 2, 3 and Fig. S3. Distinct differential metabolites by exposure types were found in both dams and pups. In dams (Table 1, Fig. S4), glyphosate-exposed animals had significantly reduced methionine levels compared to controls. Glyphosate-exposed dams also showed significant reduced 2-methylglutarate, dimethylglycine and beta-alanine methyl ester and increased pipecolate and riboflavin compared to Roundup. In female pups (Table 2 and Fig. S4), sebacic acid, suberate, 10-hydroxydecanoate and adenine were significantly increased while n-methylglutamate and aminocaproate were reduced in glyphosate-exposed compared to controls; whereas adenine was significantly increased in Roundup exposed animals compared to controls. Of note, there was a trend of increased urinary adenine in both glyphosate and Roundup exposed female pups. However, the VIP score was > 2 only in the Roundup versus control comparison. In male pups (Table 3 and Fig. S4), glyphosate exposure resulted in significantly increased 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylate and homocysteine and significantly reduced mevalolactone compared to controls; whereas Roundup exposure resulted in significantly increased homocysteine and significantly reduced phenylethanolamine, 2-oxobutanoate and biopterin compared to controls. Importantly, compared to non-exposed male controls, both glyphosate and Roundup exposed animals displayed a significant increase in urinary homocysteine levels. We did not observe overlapping significant features shared between dams and pups or between female and male pups.

Table 1 The VIP score and fold change of metabolites significantly differentially measured between exposure groups in dams.
Table 2 The VIP score and fold change of metabolites significantly differentially measured between exposure groups in female pups.
Table 3 The VIP score and fold change of metabolites significantly differentially measured between exposure groups in male pups.

In addition to PLS-DA, we also performed the metabolomic feature selection using RF machine learning feature selection method with the Boruta algorithm. Among the metabolites selected by RF (Table S2, Fig. S5), we found many selected features were consistent with the results from the PLS-DA.

Correlations between metabolomics and microbiota

To test whether top metabolites selected by PLS-DA in this study are linked to gut microbiota, we performed a correlation-based network analysis between differential metabolites (VIP > 2) in pups at PND125 and paired gut microbial composition from the same animal at PND125. Overall results from the metabolite-microbial correlation analyses are presented in Fig. 3A. We found the Prevotella genus was strongly correlated with 10-hydroxydecanoate (rho = 0.57, FDR adjusted p value = 0.015), dodecanedioic acid (rho = − 0.58, FDR adjusted p value = 0.012) and homocysteine (rho = − 0.64, FDR adjusted p value = 0.0028). It should be noted that urinary homocysteine levels are also negatively correlated with not only Prevotella genus, but also with its phylum, class, order and family. Similarly, the level of 10-hydroxydecanoate is positively correlated with not only Prevotella genus but also its taxonomic hierarchy Bacteroidetes phylum, Bacteroidia class, Bacteroidales order and Prevotellaceae family. In sex-stratified analyses (Fig. 3B,C), male pups showed a clear inverse relationship between the levels of homocysteine and relative abundance of Prevotella. Female pups showed a similar trend; however, the changes did not reach statistical significance. Since Prevotella has been correlated with microbial alpha-diversity39, we conducted additional regression analysis and found that the abundance of Prevotella is significantly associated with the level of homocysteine with or without adjustment to alpha-diversity Shannon index (p value = 0.0024, or 0.0085, respectively).

Figure 3

The urine homocysteine levels in pups are associated with sex and glyphosate or Roundup exposure and are strongly correlated with Prevotella abundance in gut microbiota. (A) Correlation network between exposure associated metabolic features and gut microbiota. Prevotella and its belonged Bacteroidetes phylum to Prevotellaceae family all show strong negative correlation with the urine homocysteine. The links with FDR adjusted p value < 0.05 are colored with red (positive correlation) and blue (negative correlation). (B,C) Boxplots showed that Prevotella abundances were lower in female pups than male pups. Prevotella was reduced in exposed male pups. In contrast, the female pups have higher homocysteine than the male pups and the homocysteine levels were significantly increased by exposure in male pups.


GBHs are the most applied herbicides worldwide and humans are commonly exposed to these environmental chemicals at various doses. Environmental GBHs are ubiquitous and GBHs residues can be found in food40, drinking-water41, crops42, animal feed43, groundwater3, rain44 and even in air45. Although the effects of GBHs on human health are under intense public debate, evidence is emerging that they impact many health outcomes, including developmental and reproductive toxicity46,47,48, endocrine disruption49,50, host immunity51,52,53, obesity and diabetes7,54, gastrointestinal disorders 55, cardiovascular disorders 56,57 and central nervous system dysfunction such as learning and memory impairment58, anxiety, depression59 and autism8. These chronic health outcomes may occur even at doses lower than established risk safety guidelines, in particular during critical development windows as denoted in the DOHaD paradigm60. Environmental exposures may lead to changes in metabolism20,61. Comprehensive, unbiased metabolite profiling using untargeted metabolomics is a promising approach to study the associations between environmental exposures and health effects. Although our sample size was small, our results showed that gestational and early-life low-dose exposure to glyphosate or Roundup significantly altered multiple urine metabolomic biomarkers, in both dams and offspring.

The one-carbon metabolism is a metabolic process that serves to activate and transfer 1C units for biosynthetic processes including purine and thymidine synthesis and homocysteine remethylation62. Folate is the essential cofactor in the one-carbon cycle. Animals and humans cannot biosynthesize folate, thus requiring dietary intake or absorption of folate biosynthesized by gut microbiota63. In this study, we observed that low-dose GBH exposure can influence multiple metabolites involved in one-carbon metabolism. One key metabolite induced by GBHs exposure in male pups is homocysteine, a non-proteinogenic α-amino acid, biosynthesized from methionine that can be remethylated back into methionine or converted into cysteine with the aid of certain B-vitamins. Homocysteine metabolism is highly dependent on vitamin derived cofactors; deficiencies in vitamin B12, folic acid and vitamin B6 are associated with higher levels of homocysteine in blood (hyperhomocysteinemia). In addition to homocysteine, we also observed GBH-induced changes in methionine and N-methylglutamate also involved in one carbon metabolism. Interestingly, probiotic bacteria, including Prevotella using products of the shikimate pathway, which is inhibited by GBHs, can biosynthesize B vitamins including folate64. Thus, it is plausible that the increased urine homocysteine we observed in male pups exposed to low-dosage GBHs results from reduced production of folic acid by Prevotella bacteria, paralleling the increase in homocysteine in dietary vitamin deficiencies.

Although the potential mechanism is still not clear, studies found that children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) lack microbial diversity and have a decreased abundance in probiotics including Prevotella65,66, potentially leading to reduced folate production by microbiota in individuals with ASD67. As ASD as well as brain damage, cognitive and memory decline have been linked with higher levels of homocysteine68,69,70,71,72, we hypothesize that induced homocysteine by environmental exposure to GBHs during early life may contribute to the development of ASD or other neurodevelopmental disorders.

To be noted is that distinct metabolites were not only found between exposed and non-exposed, but also found between glyphosate and Roundup exposed animals. Previous experimental evidence73,74,75 supports that the glyphosate formulations like Roundup are more toxic than glyphosate alone; however, the underlying mechanisms are still not clear. Our results suggested that metabolite profiling might be useful to identify possible metabolic pathways and to explain the excessive toxicity in those formulations.

This study has its limitations, mainly due to its small sample size, thus statistical power was limited in subgroup analyses. Secondly, glyphosate and its hydroxylated metabolites could not be detected in the metabolomics method. Furthermore, the microbial survey using 16S rRNA gene amplicons-sequencing techniques in our study cannot capture the full metabolic activity of the microbial features correlated with host metabolomics. A more comprehensive whole genome metagenomic sequencing approach may be required for a full spectrum microbial metabolic function profiling to find underlying mechanistic links between gut microbiome and the host metabolism.

In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first study on GBH-induced urinary metabolomic changes at doses currently considered safe in humans. Metabolomic analyses revealed differences in urinary metabolite levels associated with GBH exposure. The link between Prevotella-homocysteine suggests a potential role of commensal microbiome in modulating the metabolic alteration by GBH exposure. Limitations of this study include sample size and analysis of only a single urine sample. Therefore, further studies should include a larger sample size, especially for subgroup analysis, as well as longitudinal samples to investigate underlying mechanistic associations and windows of susceptibility more comprehensively.

Data availability

16S rRNA gene sequencing information has been deposited into EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database (ENA) and can be publicly accessed at www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/PRJEB12306.


  1. 1.

    Benbrook, C. M. Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally. Environ. Sci. Eur. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mills, P. J. et al. Excretion of the herbicide glyphosate in older adults between 1993 and 2016. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.11726 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Battaglin, W. A., Meyer, M. T., Kuivila, K. M. & Dietze, J. E. Glyphosate and its degradation product AMPA occur frequently and widely in US soils, surface water, groundwater, and precipitation. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12159 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Steinrücken, H. C. & Amrhein, N. 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase of Klebsiella pneumoniae 2. Inhibition by glyphosate [N-(phosphononmethyl)glycine]. Eur. J. Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1984.tb08379.x (1984).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cattani, D. et al. Mechanisms underlying the neurotoxicity induced by glyphosate-based herbicide in immature rat hippocampus: Involvement of glutamate excitotoxicity. Toxicology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2014.03.001 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tarazona, J. V. et al. Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. Arch. Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Samsel, A. & Seneff, S. Glyphosate’s suppression of cytochrome P450 enzymes and amino acid biosynthesis by the gut microbiome: pathways to modern diseases. Entropy https://doi.org/10.3390/e15041416 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Beecham, J. E. & Seneff, S. Is there a link between autism and glyphosate-formulated herbicides?. J. Autism https://doi.org/10.7243/2054-992x-3-1 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Seneff, S. & Nigh, G. L. Evidence that glyphosate disrupts neurodevelopment glyphosate and anencephaly: death by a thousand cuts. J Neurol Neurobiol https://doi.org/10.16966/2379 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    McVey, K. A. et al. Exposure of C. elegans eggs to a glyphosate-containing herbicide leads to abnormal neuronal morphology. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2016.03.002 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mao, Q. et al. The Ramazzini Institute 13-week pilot study on glyphosate and Roundup administered at human-equivalent dose to Sprague Dawley rats: Effects on the microbiome. Environ. Heal. A Glob. Access Sci. Source 17 (2018).

  12. 12.

    Motta, E. V. S., Raymann, K. & Moran, N. A. Glyphosate perturbs the gut microbiota of honey bees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803880115 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mesnage, R. et al. Shotgun metagenomics and metabolomics reveal glyphosate alters the gut microbiome of Sprague-Dawley rats by inhibiting the shikimate pathway. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/870105 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cani, P. & Delzenne, N. The role of the gut microbiota in energy metabolism and metabolic disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161209788168164 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nieuwdorp, M., Gilijamse, P. W., Pai, N. & Kaplan, L. M. Role of the microbiome in energy regulation and metabolism. Gastroenterology https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.008 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kovatcheva-Datchary, P. et al. Dietary fiber-induced improvement in glucose metabolism is associated with increased abundance of prevotella. Cell Metab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.10.001 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fabbiano, S. et al. Functional gut microbiota remodeling contributes to the caloric restriction-induced metabolic improvements. Cell Metab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.08.005 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhao, Y. Y. et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals the association between lipid abnormalities and oxidative stress, inflammation, fibrosis, and Nrf2 dysfunction in aristolochic acid-induced nephropathy. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12936 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bundy, J. G., Davey, M. P. & Viant, M. R. Environmental metabolomics: a critical review and future perspectives. Metabolomics https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-008-0152-0 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lankadurai, B. P., Nagato, E. G. & Simpson, M. J. Environmental metabolomics: an emerging approach to study organism responses to environmental stressors. Environ. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2013-0011 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Johnson, C. H., Ivanisevic, J. & Siuzdak, G. Metabolomics: beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.25 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chang, H. et al. Identification of key metabolic changes during liver fibrosis progression in rats using a urine and serum metabolomics approach. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11759-z (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Panzacchi, S. et al. The Ramazzini Institute 13-week study on glyphosate-based herbicides at human-equivalent dose in Sprague Dawley rats: Study design and first in-life endpoints evaluation. Environ. Heal. A Glob. Access Sci. Source https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0393-y (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Edmands, W. M. B., Ferrari, P. & Scalbert, A. Normalization to specific gravity prior to analysis improves information recovery from high resolution mass spectrometry metabolomic profiles of human urine. Anal. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac503190m (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yu, M. et al. Untargeted metabolomics profiling and hemoglobin normalization for archived newborn dried blood spots from a refrigerated biorepository. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113574 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chambers, M. C. et al. A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2377 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Smith, C. A., Want, E. J., O’Maille, G., Abagyan, R. & Siuzdak, G. XCMS: Processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac051437y (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Libiseller, G. et al. IPO: A tool for automated optimization of XCMS parameters. BMC Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0562-8 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mock, A. et al. MetaboDiff: An R package for differential metabolomic analysis. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty344 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Oksanen, J. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial. R Doc. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(88)90124-3 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rohart, F., Gautier, B., Singh, A. & Lê Cao, K. A. mixOmics: an R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kursa, M. B. & Rudnicki, W. R. Feature selection with the boruta package. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i11 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Torres, J. et al. The features of mucosa-associated microbiota in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 43, 790–801 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible Interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Csárdi, G. & Nepusz, T. The igraph software package for complex network research. Int. J. Complex Syst. 1695, 1–9 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Storey, J., Bass, A., Dabney, A. & Robinson, D. qvalue: Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control. R Packag. version 2.12.0 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Pinto-Cardoso, S. et al. Fecal bacterial communities in treated HIV infected individuals on two antiretroviral regimens. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43741 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Granby, K., Johannesen, S. & Vahl, M. Analysis of glyphosate residues in cereals using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Food Addit. Contam. https://doi.org/10.1080/0265203031000109477 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Quality, D. Glyphosate and AMPA in Drinking-water. America (NY) (2005).

  42. 42.

    Duke, S. O. Glyphosate degradation in glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible crops and weeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102704x (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Zhao, J. et al. Detection of glyphosate residues in companion animal feeds. Environ. Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.100 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Majewski, M. S., Coupe, R. H., Foreman, W. T. & Capel, P. D. Pesticides in mississippi air and rain: a comparison between 1995 and 2007. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2550 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chang, F., Simcik, M. F. & Capel, P. D. Occurrence and fate of the herbicide glyphosate and its degradate aminomethylphosphonic acid in the atmosphere. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.431 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Dai, P., Hu, P., Tang, J., Li, Y. & Li, C. Effect of glyphosate on reproductive organs in male rat. Acta Histochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acthis.2016.05.009 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Uren Webster, T. M., Laing, L. V., Florance, H. & Santos, E. M. Effects of glyphosate and its formulation, roundup, on reproduction in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404258h (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    De Liz Oliveira Cavalli, V. L. et al. Roundup disrupts male reproductive functions by triggering calcium-mediated cell death in rat testis and Sertoli cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.06.043 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Drašar, P., Poc, P. & Stárka, L. Glyphosate, an important endocrine disruptor. Diabetol. Metab. Endokrinol. Vyziv. (2018).

  50. 50.

    Varayoud, J. et al. Effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide on the uterus of adult ovariectomized rats. Environ. Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.22316 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ma, J. & Li, X. Alteration in the cytokine levels and histopathological damage in common carp induced by glyphosate. Chemosphere https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.017 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kreutz, L. C. et al. Altered hematological and immunological parameters in silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) following short term exposure to sublethal concentration of glyphosate. Fish Shellfish Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2010.09.012 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hong, Y. et al. Effects of glyphosate on immune responses and haemocyte DNA damage of Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2017.09.062 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    De Long, N. E. & Holloway, A. C. Early-life chemical exposures and risk of metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metabol. Syndrome Obesity Targets Therapy https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S95296 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    D’Brant, J. GMOs , Gut Flora , the Shíkimate Pathway and Cytochrome Dysregulation. Nutr. Perspect. J. Counc. Nutr. (2014).

  56. 56.

    Paumgartten, F. J. R. Glyphosate exposure, cardiovascular diseases and cancer risks. J. Public Heal. Emerg. https://doi.org/10.21037/jphe.2016.12.17 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gress, S., Lemoine, S., Séralini, G. E. & Puddu, P. E. Glyphosate-based herbicides potently affect cardiovascular system in mammals: review of the literature. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12012-014-9282-y (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Gallegos, C. E. et al. Perinatal glyphosate-based herbicide exposure in rats alters brain antioxidant status, glutamate and acetylcholine metabolism and affects recognition memory. Neurotox. Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-018-9894-2 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Aitbali, Y. et al. Glyphosate based- herbicide exposure affects gut microbiota, anxiety and depression-like behaviors in mice. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2018.04.002 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Heindel, J. J. et al. Developmental origins of health and disease: Integrating environmental influences. Endocrinology https://doi.org/10.1210/EN.2015-1394 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Noecker, C., Chiu, H.-C., McNally, C. P. & Borenstein, E. Defining and Evaluating Microbial Contributions to Metabolite Variation in Microbiome-Metabolome Association Studies. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/402040 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ducker, G. S. & Rabinowitz, J. D. One-carbon metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.009 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Engevik, M. A. et al. Microbial metabolic capacity for intestinal folate production and modulation of host folate receptors. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02305 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Yoshii, K., Hosomi, K., Sawane, K. & Kunisawa, J. Metabolism of dietary and microbial vitamin b family in the regulation of host immunity. Front. Nutri. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00048 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kang, D.-W.W. et al. Reduced incidence of prevotella and other fermenters in intestinal microflora of autistic children. PLoS ONE 8, e68322 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    De Angelis, M. et al. Fecal microbiota and metabolome of children with autism and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076993 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Slattery, J., Macfabe, D. F. & Frye, R. E. The significance of the enteric microbiome on the development of childhood disease: a review of prebiotic and probiotic therapies in disorders of childhood. Clin. Med. Insights Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.4137/cmped.s38338 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Seshadri, S. Elevated plasma homocysteine levels: risk factor or risk marker for the development of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease?. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2006-9404 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Chigurupati, S. et al. The homocysteine-inducible endoplasmic reticulum stress protein counteracts calcium store depletion and induction of CCAAT enhancer-binding protein homologous protein in a neurotoxin model of Parkinson Disease. J. Biol. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.020891 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Tjiattas, L. et al. Folate deficiency and homocysteine induce toxicity in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons via cytosolic calcium accumulation. Aging Cell https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00086.x (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Seshadri, S. & Wolf, P. A. Homocysteine and the brain: vascular risk factor or neurotoxin?. Lancet Neurology https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00258-8 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Fuentes-Albero, M. & Cauli, O. Homocysteine levels in autism spectrum disorder: a clinical update. Endocrine Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530318666180213110815 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Mesnage, R., Defarge, N., Spiroux De Vendômois, J. & Séralini, G. E. Major pesticides are more toxic to human cells than their declared active principles. Biomed Res. Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/179691 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Vanlaeys, A., Dubuisson, F., Seralini, G. E. & Travert, C. Formulants of glyphosate-based herbicides have more deleterious impact than glyphosate on TM4 Sertoli cells. Toxicol. Vitr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2018.01.002 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Lee, H. L., Kan, C. D., Tsai, C. L., Liou, M. J. & Guo, H. R. Comparative effects of the formulation of glyphosate-surfactant herbicides on hemodynamics in swine. Clin. Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650903158862 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Georgia Dolios from the Senator Frank R. Lautenberg Environmental Health Sciences Laboratory at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai for her assistance with the untargeted metabolomics data acquisition.


This work was funded by Institution fund of Ramazzini Institute, Bologna, Italy (FB), MSSM seed fund (JH). NIEHS funded P30ES023515 (JC, LP) and R01 ES029212 (JC).

Author information




J.H., C.L., J.C., and F.B. conceived and designed the study. J.H., C.L., F.M., S.P., D.M., F.B. and J.C. managed data and sample collection and sample processing. F.M., S.P., D.M. and F.B. designed and conducted animal experiments. C.L., M.Y., L.P. and J.C. designed and conducted metabolomic-profiling experiments. J.H., C.L., M.Y., L.P. and J.C. generated and analyzed data. J.H., C.L., M.Y. and J.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors read the manuscript and provided critical comments.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianzhong Hu or Lauren Petrick.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, J., Lesseur, C., Miao, Y. et al. Low-dose exposure of glyphosate-based herbicides disrupt the urine metabolome and its interaction with gut microbiota. Sci Rep 11, 3265 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82552-2

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing