Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Intraspecific differences in the invasion success of the Argentine ant Linepithema humile Mayr are associated with diet breadth


The Argentine ant, Linepithema humile Mayr, has spread to almost all continents. In each introduced region, L. humile often forms a single large colony (supercolony), the members of which share the haplotype “LH1”, despite the presence of other supercolonies with different genetic structures. However, the mechanisms underlying the successful invasion of LH1 ants are unclear. Here, we examined whether diet breadth differs between more successful (LH1) and less successful (LH2, LH3, LH4) L. humile supercolonies in Japan to better understand the processes responsible for invasion success. The standard ellipse areas (SEAs) of δ13C and δ15N and their ranges (CR and NR) were used as diet breadth indices. The SEAs of LH1 were much larger than those of the less successful supercolonies despite no differences in the baseline SEAs of arthropods within the supercolony habitats, indicating that the invasion success of a supercolony is associated with its diet breadth. Furthermore, LH1 had a broader CR than the other supercolonies, suggesting that which might be derived from superior resource exploitation ability. Our study highlights the importance of focusing on intraspecific differences in diet breadth among supercolonies when assessing organisms that can potentially invade and become dominant in new habitats.

Biological invasions have increased with the increases in world tourism and trade. However, not all introduced species become successful invaders. To predict invasion success (i.e., successful post-invasion colonization), many researchers have attempted to identify the key traits of biological invaders that facilitate invasion success in new environments and habitats, such as aggressiveness1,2, thermal tolerance3, and diet breadth4,5,6. A typical approach for determining such key traits is to investigate differences between more- and less-successful populations of widespread, dominant species7,8. However, since studies employing this approach have often focused on interspecific differences in biological traits3,5, the roles of intraspecific differences in invasiveness and/or biological traits within conspecifics with different genotypes have been largely overlooked. Given that whether the ability of introduced organisms to successfully expand their distributions after invasion may have a genetic basis9, there must also be intraspecific differences (i.e., differences among haplotypes) in invasion success.

The Argentine ant, Linepithema humile Mayr, is a suitable invasive species for the exploration of intraspecific differences in traits between more- and less-successful haplotypes. Linepithema humile, native to South America, is one of the 100 most hazardous invasive species in the world10 and has been unintentionally introduced into almost all countries but not in Antarctica and oceanic islands11,12. In general, most ant species are multicolonial, with ant individuals being frequently hostile against non-nestmate conspecifics13,14. However, L. humile forms unique social structures called “supercolonies”, in which workers and reproductive castes (queens) move freely among interconnected nests within the same supercolony15,16, but show hostile behaviours towards individuals from different supercolonies, similar to the aggressive behaviour that occurs between colonies of multicolonial ants17. Moreover, recent studies based on a 1700-bp sequence of the mitochondrial COI-COII gene and a 524-bp sequence of Cyt b gene18 have shown that each L. humile supercolony has a single unique mitochondrial haplotype and functions as an independent reproductive unit19. As a result, the lack of hostility between L. humile workers within the same supercolony is maintained even at the transcontinental scale20. Importantly, the invasion success of L. humile is known to differ among supercolonies with different haplotypes16,21. In Europe, the United States (e.g., California), New Zealand, and Japan, a single L. humile supercolony having the same haplotype, “LH1”, extends its distribution range from tens to thousands of kilometres16,18,20,22,23 (Fig. 1). In contrast, invasions by other supercolonies with different haplotypes tend to be much less successful than LH1 in each introduced range16,18,20,22,23 (Fig. 1). However, the mechanisms and processes underlying the high invasion success of the LH1 supercolony have not been adequately explained. Although some hypotheses have been proposed to explain why the LH1 supercolony has been most successful (e.g., genetic drift resulting from bottlenecks22 and new selection pressures16), they do not consider trait variations among supercolonies (i.e., haplotypes). Previous studies have shown that the aggressiveness and insecticidal susceptibility of L. humile are significantly different among supercolonies1,2,24. Such trait variations of L. humile supercolonies can be expected to result in supercolony differences in invasion success; if the LH1 supercolony is superior with respect to some traits to other supercolonies, it may promote the dominance of LH1 in its introduced ranges.

Figure 1
figure 1

Distribution of Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) supercolonies of different haplotypes in each introduced region (partially modified by Tsutsui et al.22; Giraud et al.16; Corin et al.23; Inoue et al.18) and the locations of the sampling sites in this study. The name of each supercolony follows Inoue et al.18. The world map was plotted by R25 using 1: 50 m million scale vector data (ver. 4.0.0) provided by Natural Earth (

To understand the mechanisms and processes underlying the high invasion success of the L. humile LH1 supercolony compared with other supercolonies, we focused on differences in trait levels among L. humile supercolonies. In particular, we investigated whether diet breadth differs among supercolonies. In general, diet breadth is an effective driver of invasion success5. Therefore, we hypothesized that the LH1 supercolony has greater diet breadth than other supercolonies, which results in the superior invasion success of LH1 and its subsequent dominance worldwide. Some researchers have attempted to describe the diet breadth of invasive species based on the range of the carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) stable isotope ratio26,27 and reported that the range of δ13C and δ15N in species with high invasiveness are broader than those of less-invasive species in various taxonomic groups5. In addition, diet breadth differs between more- and less-invasive species5. However, most of these studies are only “interspecific” comparisons between closely related species (i.e., same genus, same family). Thus, we applied this technique to measure the diet breadth of individual L. humile supercolonies (to identify intraspecific variation).

In Japan, four L. humile supercolonies with different mitochondrial haplotypes (LH1 (main supercolony), LH2, LH3, and LH4) have been found as of 201718,28,29,30. The distribution ranges of the LH2, LH3, and LH4 supercolonies in Japan are narrower (representing less successful invasion) than the range of LH118,19 (representing more successful invasion) (Fig. 1). Remarkably, all of the L. humile supercolonies have been detected in only Kobe City, Hyogo Prefecture, among the introduced prefectural regions and cities in Japan (see Sunamura et al.28 for details on the distribution of each L. humile supercolony). Furthermore, each of their ranges is limited to several square kilometres. Therefore, Kobe City (Japan) is one of the most suitable areas for a comparative study of the diet breadth of L. humile supercolonies.

Here, we investigated the ranges of δ13C and δ15N among the four L. humile supercolonies in Kobe Port, Kobe City, Japan, to measure diet breadth, which might be associated with the worldwide invasion success of LH1 (the main supercolony). Ranges of δ13C and δ15N were compared between the LH1 supercolony and the other supercolonies (LH2, LH3, LH4). If the working hypothesis is correct, LH1 should have broader δ13C and δ15N values than the other supercolonies. The findings of this research would lead to a better understanding of the process behind the invasion success of species introduced to new environments/habitats and their subsequent rapid population expansions.


In total, 155 L. humile and 99 baseline organism (arthropod) samples from 2496 and 132 individuals, respectively, were obtained throughout the sampling period (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Although there were no clear differences in baseline δ13C among taxonomic groups sampled at the sites of LH1/LH4, lower δ13C values were found for Hemiptera than for other taxa within the sites of LH2 and LH3 (Fig. 2a). Additionally, there were no significant differences in the baseline δ13C of the arthropod community (i.e., whole arthropods) between sites LH1/LH4 and LH2 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 542, p = 0.394) and/or LH3 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 342, p = 0.128) (Fig. 2c). Clear differences in the baseline δ15N were not found among taxonomic groups within sampling sites, excluding the LH2 site, where Hemipterans had a lower δ15N value than other taxa, especially Coleopterans (Fig. 2b). The baseline δ15N of the arthropod community within the sampling site of LH1/LH4 was significantly higher than that of LH2 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 1170, p < 0.001) and LH3 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 576, p = 0.010) (Fig. 2d). Although haplotype LH3 had a statistically lower δ13C value than LH1 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 1019, p = 0.037), differences in the δ13C of L. humile were not found between the LH1 supercolony and either the LH2 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 860, p = 0.052) or LH4 supercolony (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 848, p = 0.510) (Fig. 2e). In contrast, the δ15N value of the LH1 supercolony was significantly higher than the corresponding values of the other supercolonies [versus LH2 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 1158, p < 0.001), versus LH3 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 1337, p < 0.001), versus LH4 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 1208, p < 0.001)] (Fig. 2f). There were no significant differences in the trophic position (TP) of L. humile between LH1 and any of the other supercolonies [versus LH2 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 396, p = 0.157), versus LH3 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 542, p = 0.394), versus LH4 (Mann–Whitney U test, W = 868, p = 0.516)] (Fig. 3).

Figure 2
figure 2

Comparisons of δ13C values of baseline organisms (arthropods) within the same sampling site of supercolonies LH1 and LH4 of L. humile and within sampling sites of other supercolonies (LH2, LH3) at the (a) taxonomic group and (c) community levels. The δ15N values of baseline organisms at taxonomic group and community levels within each L. humile sampling site are shown in (b) and (d), respectively. Comparisons of δ13C and δ15N among the four Japanese L. humile supercolonies are shown in (e) and (f), respectively. Differences in the δ13C and δ15N of baseline organisms at the community level among sampling sites (c, d) and of the four L. humile supercolonies (e, f) were analysed by Mann–Whitney U test. Asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) denote significant differences.

Figure 3
figure 3

Differences in the trophic position (TP) of L. humile between the LH1 supercolony (main supercolony) and the other supercolonies (LH2, LH3, LH4) in Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, determined using Mann–Whitney U tests.

Although there were no differences in the Bayesian-estimated standard ellipse areas (SEAb; an indicator of diet breadth) of baseline organisms between the sampling sites of LH1/LH4 and LH2 (Probability values5: P < 0.6) and/or LH3 (P < 0.6), the SEAb of L. humile LH1 was significantly larger than those of the other supercolonies (P > 0.9) (Figs. 4, 5). The breadth of SEAb increasing in the following order: LH1 > LH3 > LH4 ≥ LH2 (Fig. 5b). Additionally, the ratio of the SEAb of L. humile LH1 (10.87%) to the baseline SEAb of organisms collected at the LH1/LH4 sampling site tended to be higher than those of LH3 (6.77%), LH2 (5.28%), and LH4 supercolonies (4.58%) to each baseline SEAb within the sampling site of each supercolony (Fig. 4). The baseline δ13C range (CR: an indicator of the diversity of the baseline in the food web31) within the sites of LH2 (P > 0.9) and LH3 (P > 0.9) was significantly broader than that in the site of LH1/LH4 (Fig. 6a). The CR of L. humile LH1 was significantly broader than those of all the other supercolonies [versus LH2 (P > 0.9), versus LH3 (P > 0.9), versus LH4 (P > 0.9)] (Fig. 6b). There were no clear differences in the δ15N range (NR: an indicator of trophic diversity31) of baseline organisms between the sampling sites of LH1/LH4 and either LH2 (P < 0.6) or LH3 (P < 0.6) (Fig. 6c). Similarly, the NR values of L. humile did not significantly differ between LH1 and the other supercolonies except LH4 (P > 0.7) [versus LH2 (P < 0.6), versus LH3 (P < 0.6)] (Fig. 6d). The SEAb of the L. humile supercolonies showed a strong positive correlation with the dominance ranks of the supercolonies worldwide (r = 0.985, P = 0.051) reported by previous studies12,16,19 (Fig. 7).

Figure 4
figure 4

Differences in the standard ellipse areas (SEAs) among the four supercolonies of L. humile (solid line ellipses and open dots) established in Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, and among baseline organisms (arthropods) (dashed line ellipses and filled dots) collected within the sampling site of each supercolony (LH1/LH4, LH2, and LH3), calculated from the δ13C and δ15N biplot data using the R package “SIBER”32.

Figure 5
figure 5

Comparisons of Bayesian standard ellipse area (, SEAb: 105 Bayesian iterations of SEA) among (a) baseline organisms collected within the sampling site of each supercolony (LH1/LH4, LH2, and LH3) and among (b) the four Japanese L. humile supercolonies, with 50%, 75%, and 95% credible intervals (CIs) shown, using the R package “SIBER”32. Asterisks indicate the significance of the pairwise differences between LH1 and the other supercolonies [*0.6 ≤ P < 0.69, **0.7 ≤ P < 0.79, ***0.8 ≤ P < 0.89, ****0.9 ≤ P ≤ 1; P is the likelihood of a difference between LH1 and the other supercolonies (or LH1/LH4 and the other sampling sites)]32.

Figure 6
figure 6

Differences in the range of δ13C (CR) among (a) baseline organisms collected within the sampling site of each supercolony (LH1/LH4, LH2, and LH3) and among (b) the four L. humile supercolonies, with 50%, 75%, and 95% credible intervals (CIs) shown, using the R package “SIBER”32. Differences in the range of δ15N (NR) among L. humile supercolonies and baseline organisms are shown in (c) and (d), respectively. Asterisks indicate the significance of the pairwise differences between LH1 and the other supercolonies [*0.6 ≤ P < 0.69, **0.7 ≤ P < 0.79, ***0.8 ≤ P < 0.89, ****0.9 ≤ P ≤ 1; P is the likelihood of a difference between LH1 and the other supercolonies (or LH1/LH4 and the other sampling sites)]5.

Figure 7
figure 7

Relationship between the SEAb [105 Bayesian iterations of SEAc (unbiased correction for differences in sample size of SEA)] values of the four supercolonies of Linepithema humile established in Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, and their dominance ranks in their introduced ranges. Dominance ranks were calculated using the number of introduced countries and regions in the world (see Inoue et al.18 for details on the distribution range of each L. humile supercolony).


Our results supported the hypothesis that the diet breadth of the LH1 supercolony is larger than those of the other supercolonies (LH2, LH3, LH4) and is associated with LH1′s superior invasion success.

The LH1 supercolony and baseline arthropods collected at the LH1/LH4 site had a higher δ15N than all other supercolonies (Fig. 2f,d). On the other hand, no differences in TP were found among the supercolonies (Fig. 3). These results suggest a higher baseline δ15N of arthropods within the LH1/LH4 sampling site (Fig. 2d), given that the δ15N (trophic levels) of L. humile differ little among supercolonies33,34. In addition, the δ13C of each L. humile supercolony overlapped with the baseline δ13C variations, whereas the δ15N of each supercolony was approximately 3–4% higher than the δ15N of the baseline organisms (Fig. 2). In general, although δ15N increases by approximately 3.4‰ with each increase in trophic level33, the carbon isotope ratio changes little increase (approximately 0–1%) with trophic level31, implying that the baseline organisms sampled in this study are likely available substrate for each L. humile supercolony.

The significantly broader CR of L. humile LH1 (Fig. 6b) is related to the high δ13C values of this supercolony (Figs. 2e, 4). The presence of C4 plants might explain the high δ13C values of consumers (i.e., L. humile) in our study area. In general, vascular plants are broadly classified into C3 or C4 plants according to their photosynthetic cycles, and they show characteristic δ13C distributions35,36. Specifically, C3 plants tend to exhibit a wide CR, from − 20 to − 35%, whereas the CR of C4 plants is narrower (− 10 to − 14%)35,36. Furthermore, since C4 plants usually have higher tolerance to drought, high temperatures, and human disturbance than C3 plants, they can more easily grow in areas such as port areas37. In fact, based on our field observations, C4 plants mostly representing Poaceae species were very dominant compared to C3 plants in sites paved with concrete of the study areas. Based on the above, the high δ13C for the LH1 supercolony is expected to be derived from C4 plants. Another potential cause of high δ13C in terrestrial organisms is corrosion38, which would be expected to lead to increases in δ15N and NR (an indicator of trophic diversity)38,39. However, in this study, the lack of clear, concurrent increases in δ15N and δ13C for L. humile (Fig. 2e) suggests that the high δ13C of the LH1 supercolony was not derived from a carrion diet. In light of the above, the members of the LH1 supercolony might be expected to have higher δ13C than those of the other supercolonies through the ingestion of C4 plant-derived resources, which would lead to the broader CR. The baseline δ13C of arthropods also indicates that LH1 supercolony can use the high-δ13C resource, which might be derived from C4 plant-based resources (Fig. 4).

Although the CR of baseline organisms within the sampling site of LH1/LH4 was significantly narrower than those of the others (Fig. 6a), the CR of L. humile LH1 showed opposite trend (Fig. 6b). These results suggest the possibility that L. humile LH1 consumed more diverse baseline resources than the other supercolonies, despite the relatively limited δ13C variation of baseline resources. In addition, such a broader range of CR in LH1 supercolony suggests that LH1 has a superior foraging (i.e., resource exploitation) ability27,31 to other supercolonies. A higher CR value implies the use of a diverse resource base27,31, Given that variations in δ13C occur in association with changes in the microenvironment, an increase in CR can lead to a greater range of resource exploration (i.e., more extensive resource acquisition). This is likely to reflect strong foraging ability, as mentioned by Jackson et al.27. Additionally, given that LH1 supercolony is more aggressive than other supercolonies1,2 and superior to other supercolonies in food acquisition due to its behavioural characteristics, the ability of workers to explore resources in a broad range of sites/environments might also be the greatest in LH1 supercolony. To validate this possibility, the behavioural characteristics of L. humile workers for food exploitation should be compared among supercolonies.

We found a clear intraspecific variation in the SEA of L. humile, which is an index of diet breadth, among the four supercolonies in Kobe, Hyogo, Japan (Fig. 4). Specifically, LH1 supercolony (the most successful supercolony) showed a significantly larger SEAb than the others (less-successful supercolonies) (Fig. 5b). On the other hand, there were no differences in the baseline SEAb of arthropods among the sampling sites (Fig. 5a). These results highlighted that the LH1 supercolony had more diet breadth than the other supercolonies when the diversities of the available baselines (arthropods) did not differ. Although the NR of L. humile did not differ among supercolonies other than LH4 (Fig. 6d), the CR of the LH1 supercolony was significantly broader than the CRs the other supercolonies (Fig. 6b), indicating that the larger SEAb for L. humile LH1 than for the other supercolonies (Fig. 5b) might be due to the broader CR of LH1. We thought that the broader CR of LH1 might be caused by its strong foraging resource exploitation (foraging) ability. Furthermore, the positive correlation between L. humile supercolony SEAb and the degree of their invasion success (i.e., distribution ranges in the world)16,18,22 (Fig. 7) support our hypothesis that an association between the diet breadth of the targeted species and its invasion success can be implied, even within species (between supercolonies). However, it should be noted that these results did not reveal a causal relationship between the dietary breadth of each L. humile supercolony and its invasion success. Monitoring future population dynamics of each L. humile supercolony with different diet breadth would be a promising approach to test the effects of diet breadth on invasion success. Additionally, while the present study showed that the diet breadth of L. humile differs among supercolonies, this result may have been due to the interaction between the different L. humile supercolonies and the surrounding environment. Although we attempted to minimize the effect of surrounding environment on the isotope ratios (i.e., diet breadth) by limiting sampling to the local scale (i.e., Kobe Port) and by performing baseline corrections of δ15N values, the possibility of a supercolony-environment interaction effect cannot be completely eliminated. To enable more robust comparisons among supercolonies, the effects of differences in landscape structures around sampling sites should be accounted for in future studies.

Previous studies on the mechanisms and processes of biological invasions have mainly emphasized interspecific differences in biological traits and invasion success rather than intraspecific differences7,8. For example, even indigenous species that are not dominant in their native ranges can easily become species with invasiveness when invading new environments/areas, which may be due to their flexible diet changes40. In this context, our study highlights the importance of trait–invasion success relationships, especially at the within-species level rather than at the among-species level, which are well known. Therefore, focusing on the intraspecific variation in addition to the interspecific variation in trait levels should be helpful for assessing potential biological invaders that successfully invade new habitats and then become dominant.

Materials and methods

Sampling of L. humile and other arthropods

This study was performed at Kobe Port (34°41′–34°40′ N and 135°13′–135°12′ E) in Kobe City, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan, on sunny days from August 2017 to April 2018. As mentioned above, four L. humile supercolonies with different haplotypes (LH1, LH2, LH3, LH4) had previously been detected adjacent to Kobe Port18,28, all of which structured their nests mainly in roadside cracks adjacent to parks, street trees, and factory premises. We collected 5–10 L. humile samples consisting of 10–20 workers of each supercolony per sample and samples for baseline organisms (i.e., primary consumers, including aphids, mealybugs, and grasshoppers) in each sampling site once a season (see Fig. 3, Supplementary Table S1). Baseline organisms were used to estimate the TP of each L. humile supercolony (see Stable isotope analysis). However, when calculating the TP of LH4, we used the same baseline δ13C and δ15N as for LH1 because LH4 and LH1 were found in very close proximity (ca. 150 m) to each other. Otherwise, the distance between sampling sites was at least 200 m. L. humile workers and other arthropods were sampled by sucking with a fluke tube and using a 68 × 68 cm beating net (N-type, Mushi-sha Ltd., Tokyo).

Stable isotope analysis

All samples collected were immediately frozen (− 40 °C) and then oven dried at 60 °C for 24 h. After drying, we removed the gaster or abdomen of each L. humile individual and other arthropods as much as possible because it can contain residual food particles and thus potentially affect the detected isotopic signature41,42. In addition, some samples that contained lipids were excluded before stable isotope analysis because their δ13C values were lower than those of muscle43. Then, analytical samples were homogeneously crushed using an agate mortar and pestle. These samples and in-house standards [i.e., L-alanine (δ13C: − 19.0‰, δ15N: 22.7‰), glycine (δ13C: − 34.9‰, δ15N: 2.2‰), and L-threonine (δ13C: − 9.45‰, δ15N: − 2.9‰)]44 were weighed to approximately 0.5 mg (approximately 6–7 individuals per analytical sample) into 5 × 8 mm tin cups and then analysed with a Delta V isotope mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) equipped with an elemental analyser. If a sample of a given species weighed less than 0.5 mg, other individuals of this species were added until a total of 0.5 mg was reached.

The relative abundances of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) stable isotopes within each sample are expressed in delta notation and were calculated using the following equation:

$$\delta R(\permil) = \left( {\frac{{R_{sample} }}{{R_{standard} }} - 1} \right) \times 1000$$

where R is the ratio of 13C/12C and 15N/14N for samples and the standard reference materials Pee Dee belemnite (for CO2) and atmospheric nitrogen (for N2).

TP was corrected as is common practice with the following equation:

$${\text{TP}} = 2 + \frac{{\left( {\delta^{15} {\text{N}}_{ants} - \delta^{15} {\text{N}}_{base} } \right)}}{3.4}$$

where 2 is the baseline TP33, δ15Nant is the L. humile isotope value, δ15Nbase is the baseline mean δ15N, and 3.4 represents the fractionation between trophic levels33.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted with the free statistical software R ver. 3.6.125. We compared δ13C, δ15N, and TP between L. humile LH1 and each of the other supercolonies. Since the distributions of δ13C, δ15N, and TP were significantly different from a normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test, p < 0.05) and showed unequal variance among the four L. humile supercolonies (Levene's test, p < 0.05), differences in the isotopic ratio among supercolonies were assessed by Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05).

To compare CR and NR among the four L. humile supercolonies, SEAs were calculated from the δ13C and δ15N data. The SEA is a measure of variability in δ13C and δ15N and represents approximately 40% of the spread of these data, which is expected to express the core range of δ13C and δ15N32. This analysis was performed using the package “SIBER” (Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses) in R32. The following equation was used to correct the SEAs for the use of δ13C and δ15N bivariate data32:

$${\text{SEAc}} = {\text{SEA}} \times \frac{n - 1}{{n - 2}}$$

The SEAc correction (SEAc: unbiased correction for differences in sample sizes of SEAs) accounts for loss of a second degree of freedom. In addition, a Bayesian-estimated SEAc (SEAb: 105 Bayesian iterations of SEAc), its credible intervals (105 posterior draws), CR (maximum δ13C–minimum δ13C), and NR (maximum δ15N–minimum δ15N) from multiple Bayesian iterations (105) were calculated by a bootstrapping procedure, which allowed a robust comparison among the four L. humile supercolonies that had different sample sizes. Probability (P) values ranging from zero to one were calculated as the likelihood of the differences in SEAb, CR and NR; zero indicated no difference, and P > 0.6 was considered significant5. Then, we calculated Spearman's rank correlation coefficients to confirm the relationship between SEAb and dominance rank (number of introduced countries in the world) as an indicator of the degree of invasion success for each supercolony. The number of introduced countries was determined from Inoue et al.18.

A larger SEA indicates greater diet breadth, as reported by previous studies5,45. A larger CR is expected in food webs containing multiple basal resources with varying δ13C values, implying a broad total range of exploited resources27,31. On the other hand, a larger NR suggests that the focal organism belongs to various trophic levels and thus shows a high degree of trophic diversity31. These analyses were conducted on baseline organisms (arthropods) collected at sampling sites of each L. humile supercolony in the same way as on L. humile.


  1. Abril, S. & Gómez, C. Aggressive behaviour of the two European Argentine ant supercolonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) towards displaced native ant species of the northeastern Iberian Peninsula. Myrmecol. News 14, 99–106 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blight, O. et al. Differences in behavioural traits among native and introduced colonies of an invasive ant. Biol. Invasions 19, 1389–1398 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jun, G., Wei, D., Qiong, W. & Hong-liang, L. Thermal tolerance for two cohorts of a native and an invasive freshwater turtle species. Acta Herpetol. 13, 83–88 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson, M. C. & Britton, J. R. Divergence in the trophic niche of sympatric freshwater invaders. Biol. Invasions 16, 1095–1103 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pettitt-Wade, H., Wellband, K. W., Heath, D. D. & Fisk, A. T. Niche plasticity in invasive fishes in the Great Lakes. Biol. Invasions 17, 2565–2580 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 25–55 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cadotte, M. W., Murray, B. R. & Lovett-Doust, J. Ecological patterns and biological invasions: Using regional species inventories in macroecology. Biol. Invasions 8, 809–821 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: Where do we stand?. Biol. Invasions 193, 97–125 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Longman Group, London, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lowe, S., Browne, S., Boudjelas, M. S. & De Poorter, M. 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species: A Selection From The Global Invasive Species Database. Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions vol. 12 (Invasive Species Specialist Group, 2000).

  11. Suarez, A. V., Holway, D. A. & Case, T. J. Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: Insights from Argentine ants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 1095–1100 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roura-Pascual, N. et al. Relative roles of climatic suitability and anthropogenic influence in determining the pattern of spread in a global invader. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 220–225 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Holway, D. A., Lach, L., Suarez, A. V., Tsutsui, N. D. & Case, T. J. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 181–233 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Suarez, A. V., Tsutsui, N. D., Holway, D. A. & Case, T. J. Behavioral and genetic differentiation between native and introduced populations of the Argentine ant. Biol. Invasions 1, 43–53 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giraud, T., Pedersen, J. S. & Keller, L. Evolution of supercolonies: The Argentine ants of southern Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 6075–6079 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pedersen, J. S., Krieger, M. J. B., Vogel, V., Giraud, T. & Keller, L. Native supercolonies of unrelated individuals in the invasive Argentine ant. Evolution 60, 782–791 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Inoue, M. N. et al. Recent range expansion of the Argentine ant in Japan. Divers. Distrib. 19, 29–37 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sunamura, E. et al. Four mutually incompatible Argentine ant supercolonies in Japan: inferring invasion history of introduced Argentine ants from their social structure. Biol. Invasions 11, 2329–2339 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sunamura, E. et al. Intercontinental union of Argentine ants: behavioral relationships among introduced populations in Europe, North America, and Asia. Insectes Soc. 56, 143–147 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas, M. L., Payne-Makrisâ, C. M., Suarez, A. V., Tsutsui, N. D. & Holway, D. A. When supercolonies collide: Territorial aggression in an invasive and unicolonial social insect. Mol. Ecol. 15, 4303–4315 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsutsui, N. D., Suarez, A. V., Holway, D. A. & Case, T. J. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97, 5948–5953 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Corin, S. E., Abbott, K. L., Ritchie, P. A. & Lester, P. J. Large scale unicoloniality: The population and colony structure of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in New Zealand. Insectes Soc. 54, 275–282 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hayasaka, D. et al. Different acute toxicity of fipronil baits on invasive Linepithema humile supercolonies and some non-target ground arthropods. Ecotoxicology 24, 1221–1228 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (2019).

  26. Rudnick, D. & Resh, V. Stable isotopes, mesocosms and gut content analysis demonstrate trophic differences in two invasive decapod crustacea. Freshw. Biol. 50, 1323–1336 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jackson, M. C. et al. Population-level metrics of trophic structure based on stable isotopes and their application to invasion ecology. PLoS ONE 7, 1–12 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sunamura, E., Nishisue, K., Terayama, M. & Tatsuki, S. Invasion of four Argentine ant supercolonies into Kobe Port, Japan: Their distributions and effects on indigenous ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 50, 659–674 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nakahama, N. et al. Identification of the mitochondrial DNA haplotype of an invasive Linepithema humile (Mayr, 1868) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) population of a new location in Japan for its effective eradication. Entomol. News 128, 217–225 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sato, K., Sakamoto, H., Hirata, M., Ozaki, M. & Higashi, S. Household and Structural Insects Relationship Among Establishment Durations , Kin Relatedness , Aggressiveness , and Distance Between Populations of Eight Invasive Argentine Ant (Hymenoptera : Formicidae) Supercolonies in Japan. 110, 1676–1684 (2017).

  31. Layman, C. A., Arrington, D. A., Montana, C. G. & Post, D. M. Can stable isotope ratios provide for community-wide measures of trophic structure?. Ecol. Soc. Am. 89, 2358–2359 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jackson, A. L., Inger, R., Parnell, A. C. & Bearhop, S. Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER—Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 595–602 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Post, D. M. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: Models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83, 703–718 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. VanderZanden, M. J. & Rasmussen, J. B. Primary consumer δ13C and δ15N and the trophic position of aquatic consumers. Ecology 80, 1395–1404 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cerling, T. E., Harris, J. M. & Leakey, M. G. Browsing and grazing in elephants: The isotope record of modern and fossil proboscideans. Oecologia 120, 364–374 (1999).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tipple, B. J. & Pagani, M. The early origins of terrestrial C4 photosynthesis. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences (2007).

  37. Takeda, T., Ueno, O., Samejima, M. & Ohtani, T. An investigation for the occurrence of C4 photosynthesis in the Cyperaceae from Australia. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 98, 393–411 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hyodo, F., Kohzu, A. & Tayasu, I. Linking aboveground and belowground food webs through carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses. Ecol. Res. 25, 745–756 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hishi, T., Hyodo, F., Saitoh, S. & Takeda, H. The feeding habits of collembola along decomposition gradients using stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 1820–1823 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Suehiro, W. et al. Radiocarbon analysis reveals expanded diet breadth associates with the invasion of a predatory ant. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tillberg, C. V., Holway, D. A., LeBrun, E. G. & Suarez, A. V. Trophic ecology of invasive Argentine ants in their native and introduced ranges. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. Am. 104, 20856–20861 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Roeder, K. A. & Kaspari, M. From cryptic herbivore to predator: Stable isotopes reveal consistent variability in trophic levels in an ant population. Ecology 98, 297–303 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Post, D. M. et al. Getting to the fat of the matter: models, methods and assumptions for dealing with lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia 152, 179–189 (2007).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tayasu, I., Hirasawa, R., Ogawa, N. O., Ohkouchi, N. & Yamada, K. New organic reference materials for carbon- and nitrogen-stable isotope ratio measurements provided by Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, and Institute of Biogeosciences, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. Limnology 12, 261–266 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pettitt-Wade, H., Wellband, K. W. & Fisk, A. T. Inconsistency for the niche breadth invasion success hypothesis in aquatic invertebrates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, 144–159 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Kyohei Iida, Ryu Ikeda, Yuji Eguchi, and Yoshinori Taruma (Kindai University) for helping our field sampling and survey. We would like to thank Riyo Hirasawa (Center for Ecological Research (CER), Kyoto University), Dr. Tadao Kitagawa, Dr. Kaori Kochi, Tatsunari Yamaguchi, and Makoto Kobayashi (Kindai University) for valuable technical advice in carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses. We are grateful to Dr. Jean Beran Tanangonan for the helpful suggestions and supports regarding this manuscript. The present study was conducted using the Cooperative Research Facilities (isotope ratio mass spectrometer) of the Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University. Part of this study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), KAKENHI Grant Nos. JP16K15080, JP19K06098, and JP20J12743.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Y. S., D. H. and T. S. designed and coordinated the research. Y. S., D. H. and T. S. collected samples. Y. S., K. H. and K. K. analysed the data. Y. S. and D. H. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yugo Seko or Daisuke Hayasaka.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seko, Y., Hashimoto, K., Koba, K. et al. Intraspecific differences in the invasion success of the Argentine ant Linepithema humile Mayr are associated with diet breadth. Sci Rep 11, 2874 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing