Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60532-2, published online 26 February 2020
In the original version of this Article errors were made during the conversion from rai to hectares. As a result, in the Introduction,
“In 2017, the maize harvested area in Thailand was 41 million hectares, which increased from year 2016 by 1.26%.”
now reads:
“In 2017, the maize production in Thailand was 41 million tonnes, which increased from year 2016 by 1.26%.”
In addition, in the Methodology section, under the subheading “Focus area”,
“Mae Chaem district is one of the most cultivated areas in northern region of Chiang Mai province with a cultivation area under maize of approximately 480,756 ha in 2015 while Chiang Dao district was about 207,213 ha2.”
now reads:
“Mae Chaem district is one of the most cultivated areas in northern region of Chiang Mai province with a cultivation area under maize of approximately 12,307 ha in 2015 while Chiang Dao district was about 5305 ha2.”
Furthermore, in Table 1, the “Quantity” for Focus area “Mae Chaem”; “Harvesting and Milling” was incorrect. The incorrect and correct value appears below.
Incorrect:
Focus area | Maize production stage | Input | Quantity | Unit |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mae Chaem | Harvesting and milling | Diesel | 5.21 | L ha−1 |
Correct:
Focus area | Maize production stage | Input | Quantity | Unit |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mae Chaem | Harvesting and milling | Diesel | 6.25 | L ha−1 |
In Table 2, the quantities for Focus area “Chiang Dao”; “Maize yield” and “Maize residue (leaves, and stalks)” were incorrect. The incorrect and correct values appear below.
Incorrect:
Focus area | Output | Quantity | Unit |
---|---|---|---|
Chiang Dao | Main product | ||
Maize yield | 3,420 | kg ha−1 | |
Co-product | |||
Maize residue (leaves, and stalks) | 6,290 | kg ha−1 |
Correct:
Focus area | Output | Quantity | Unit |
---|---|---|---|
Chiang Dao | Main product | ||
Maize yield | 3,419 | kg ha−1 | |
Co-product | |||
Maize residue (leaves, and stalks) | 6,288 | kg ha−1 |
Finally, in Figure 1 the number of harvested area (hectare) and production (tonne) was corrected. In addition, three different variables were plotted in Figure 1, but the axes did not reflect all three variables. As a result, “Yield per hectare (kg)” has been removed for clarity. In Figure 5, the number of planted area (hectare) and harvested area (hectare) was corrected.
The original Article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Supasri, T., Itsubo, N., Gheewala, S.H. et al. Author Correction: Life cycle assessment of maize cultivation and biomass utilization in northern Thailand. Sci Rep 11, 24393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03592-2
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03592-2
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.