Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Tailoring interfacial effect in multilayers with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction by helium ion irradiation


We show a method to control magnetic interfacial effects in multilayers with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI) using helium (He\(^{+}\)) ion irradiation. We report results from SQUID magnetometry, ferromagnetic resonance as well as Brillouin light scattering results on multilayers with DMI as a function of irradiation fluence to study the effect of irradiation on the magnetic properties of the multilayers. Our results show clear evidence of the He\(^{+}\) irradiation effects on the magnetic properties which is consistent with interface modification due to the effects of the He\(^{+}\) irradiation. This external degree of freedom offers promising perspectives to further improve the control of magnetic skyrmions in multilayers, that could push them towards integration in future technologies.


Logic devices based on nano-magnetism show the capability to couple ultrafast reversal of the magnetic state (or bit) with a non-volatile nature due to high thermal stability. A promising magnetic memory architecture is domain-wall based racetrack memory where the bit is encoded in the form of magnetic domain-walls and moved by spin currents, is still struggling in its technological implementation. One of the main reasons is related to the pinning effects introduced by defects, limiting the dynamics and thus the energy cost to store the information1,2. Spintronic storage or logic based on magnetic skyrmions are anticipated to be more efficient and to have a higher storage capacities3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. In fact, the small size of skyrmions allow for a significant reduction of the spacing between the bits and improves the ratio between the information flowing and the current density employed for the motion. The skyrmion topology, characterized by an integer whirling number5, makes them particularly robust to the external environment and notably defects. Specifically, a multi-bit storage device using skyrmions as information carriers (bits), where the state of the device is modulated by an electric current that shifts the skyrmions in and out of the device. Such a behaviour, in which the state of the system (“weight”) can be dynamically adapted to the environment, is analogous to a biological synapse and their synaptic plasticity14. This also opens a way for utilising such devices in novel applications, such as skyrmion-based artificial synapses and neuron type devices in low-power neuromorphic computing, or brain-inspired architectures for deep machine learning applications15,16,17,18,19,20.

Indeed, materials lacking an inversion symmetry centre and with high spin-orbit coupling, can in general possess an additional term in the exchange energy, which is anti-symmetric; the Dyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI)21,22. This type of interaction favours the perpendicular alignment of adjacent spins and can lead to the formation of topological structures, such as skyrmions, possessing a particular chirality. When interfacial DMI in thin films is utilized for the formation of skyrmions, it is possible to tailor nucleation processes and skyrmion properties using a variety of approaches23. In this way, relevant magnetic properties, such as perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) or the DMI strength can be strongly modified. However, a method to reliably control the stability of skyrmions and their motion is still missing. One possible tool is the irradiation of magnetic multilayers by light irradiation using helium (He\(^{+}\)) ions24.

In particular, it is possible to fine tune the PMA and DMI in ultrathin films and multilayers, which are dominated by interfacial effects, by appropriately adjusting the irradiation fluence25,26,27,28,29. Light He\(^{+}\) ions, with energy of approximately 10 keV, are able to penetrate the stack, disturbing the atomic arrangement in their path and causing atoms to be slightly displaced, as He\(^{+}\) ions end up deep inside the substrate30. This series of short-range interactions leads to a mild alteration of the magnetic properties of the material, without suffering from damage that would be caused by more aggressive techniques such as surface sputtering25 or cascade collisions. This method has been shown to modify the magnetic properties of ultrathin trilayers through soft intermixing26,31,32. Masked irradiation31 or focused ion beams33 are techniques that can be utilised to generate spatial modulation of magnetic properties in ultrathin films. He\(^{+}\) ion irradiation can thus be employed as a method to pattern the magnetic properties without physical etching that would introduce defects at boundary edges of the nanostructures. Such techniques have been used to nucleate isolated skyrmions in dot geometries34,35 and reduce pinning centers via interfacial smoothing32,36,37.

Here, we present a way of controlling magnetic interfacial effects in multilayers exhibing DMI using He\(^{+}\) ion irradiation. We report SQUID magnetometry, ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) and Brillouin light scattering (BLS) results on a set of Ta(4.5 nm)/[Pt(4.5 nm)/Co(1.2 nm)/Ta(2.5 nm)]\(_{20}\) multilayers as a function of He\(^{+}\) irradiation fluence (IR), ranging from \(2\times 10^{\mathrm{14}} {\mathrm{cm}} ^{\mathrm{-2}}\) to \(20\times 10^{\mathrm{14}} {\mathrm{cm}} ^{\mathrm{-2}}\). We study the effect of the irradiation on the magnetic properties of multilayers such as magnetic anisotropy, Gilbert damping and DMI strength. Our results show clear evidence of the effect of He\(^{+}\) irradiation on the magnetic properties which is consistent with a controllable interface modification. The ability to precisely tailor the magnetic properties by externally adjusting the properties of thin-films offers a promising way to control magnetic skyrmions, making them a viable option for future technological applications.


SQUID magnetometry measurements

In order to investigate the magnetic properties such as the saturation magnetization \(M_{\mathrm{s}}\) of the multilayers, we performed SQUID magnetometry at room temperature, applying an external field along the in-plane and out-of-plane directions with respect to the sample surface. In Fig. 1a and b, we show the magnetization M as a function of the magnetic field \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H\) in both orientations for different IR, which indicates that the easy axis lies along the normal to the sample. In addition, we found that the saturation magnetization maintains a constant value \(M_{\mathrm{s}}\)= 700 ±70 kA/m within the experimental error as a function of IR.

Figure 1
figure 1

(a,b) Normalized magnetization measurements M/\(M_{s}\) while sweeping the external magnetic field \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H\) in the direction perpendicular (out-of-plane) and parallel (in-plane) to the multilayers with different IR at room temperature. Inset: Low field region for the out-of plane direction.

Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurements

In order to understand the changes to the magnetic properties due to IR, FMR was employed (Fig. 2a) to determine the effective magnetisation \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}M_{\mathrm{eff}}\), the effective anisotropy field \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H_{\mathrm{K}}\) and the Gilbert damping factor \(\alpha\) of the multilayers. Figure 2b shows the typical FMR absorption spectra for the multilayers. The absorption peaks are fitted with symmetric and anti-symmetric Lorentzian functions at each frequency respectively. The fitting formula used to extract the parameters is given in Eq. S1 (see Supplementary information). By analysing these absorption peaks, the resonance position and the linewidth can be determined from which it is possible to obtain the dynamic properties for a given magnetic sample. The frequency dependent FMR results, (8–20 GHz), are shown in Fig. 3a–d where the external field applied along the film normal for each IR sample.

Figure 2
figure 2

(a) Schematic illustration of FMR setup. (b) The FMR absorption spectras for the sample IR with \(2\times 10^{14}{\mathrm{cm}}^{-2}\) at various frequencies.

Figure 3
figure 3

(ad) Microwave transmission as a function of frequency for different IR with the magnetic field perpendicular to the film plane. The black hollow markers depict the resonance field obtained by fitting FMR spectra using the Eq. S1 and solid lines are fitting curve. (e, f) The effective magnetisation \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}M_{\mathrm{eff}}\) (e) and the effective uniaxial anisotropy field \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H_{\mathrm{K}}\) (f) as a function of IR.

The solid lines in Fig. 3a–d, are defined by least square fitting of the resonance condition: \(f=\gamma \mu _{\mathrm{0}}(H_{\mathrm{{res}}}- M_{\mathrm{{eff}}})/2\pi\) where \(\gamma\) is the gyromagnetic ratio, \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}M_{\mathrm{{eff}}} = \mu _{\mathrm{0}}M_{\mathrm{s}}-\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H_{\mathrm{K}}\) the effective magnetization, respectively, and \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H_{\mathrm{K}} = 2K_{\mathrm{u}}/M_{\mathrm{s}} = 2(K_{\mathrm{{u1}}}+K_{\mathrm{{u2}}})/M_{\mathrm{s}}\) is the effective uniaxial anisotropy field. Note that in the present FMR configuration, where the external field is applied perpendicular to the sample plane, the measured anisotropy constant \(K_{\mathrm{u}}\) includes both the first-order \(K_{\mathrm{u1}}\) and the second-order \(K_{\mathrm{u2}}\) contributions, as discussed in Ref.38. We show that \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}M_{\mathrm{eff}}\) is negative (Fig. 3e), confirming that the demagnetizing energy is less than \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H_{\mathrm{K}}\) giving rise to an easy-axis along the film normal (perpendicular easy-axis). The \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}M_{\mathrm{eff}}\) value increases compared to non-irradiated sample as shown in Fig. 3e. Figure 3f details the evolution of both \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H_{K}\) and \(K_{\mathrm{u}}\) as a function of increasing IR. As shown \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H_{K}\) and \(K_{\mathrm{u}}\) rapidly decrease upon increasing the IR up to a saturation value occurring at a IR value of \(\approx\) \(8\times 10^{\mathrm{14}}{\mathrm{cm}}^{\mathrm{-2}}\). We attribute this change to the interfacial modification caused by the IR. When the sample is irradiated with He\(^{+}\), atomic displacements are induced which affect the related magnetic properties39. By increasing the IR, the PMA is reduced due to induced intermixing at the interface40,41,42.

Figure 4
figure 4

(ad) Dependence of the linewidth, \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}\Delta H\), on the microwave frequency, f, with in the out-of-plane external magnetic field \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H\) for different IR. The solid lines are linear fits. (e) Plot of damping constant \(\alpha\) and (f) Inhomogeneous broadening component \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}\Delta H_{\mathrm{0}}\) for different IR.

Analysis of the FMR linewidth \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}\Delta H\) is a generalized method for extracting \(\alpha\), which characterises the frequency dependent contribution to the Gilbert damping, as well as the inhomogeneous frequency independent contributions to the linewidth. Figure 4a–d shows the frequency dependence of linewidth \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}\Delta H\) for different IR. The extrinsic contributions to linewidth: magnetic inhomogeneity and two-magnon scattering can broaden the linewidth and cause a non-linear frequency dependence. The two-magnon contribution as a cause of linewidth broadening is ruled out since the measurements were performed along the out-of-plane direction where two-magnon processes are forbidden, according to Arias-Mills theory. The data is fitted using Gilbert damping contribution and frequency independent inhomogeneous contribution using the relation, \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}} \Delta H = \mu _{\mathrm{0}}\Delta H_{\mathrm{0}}+2\pi \alpha f/\gamma\) where \(\alpha\) is the Gilbert damping contribution and \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}\Delta H_{\mathrm{0}}\) is the extrinsic contribution present due to inhomogeneities. It can be seen from Fig. 4e that the \(\alpha\) value gradually increases as the IR is increased and saturates at a certain level. This shows that the presence of radiation affects the relaxation rate, but the inhomogeneous contribution is almost constant for all the samples within the error bars (Fig. 4f).

Brillouin light scattering (BLS) measurements

Figure 5
figure 5

(a) Schematic of Brillouin light scattering (BLS) experiment. The sample is saturated in-plane by an external field \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H\) = 1.5 T, applied along the z-axis. Stokes and anti-Stokes events in the scattering process correspond to spin waves propagating with +k and −k, respectively. (b) BLS spectra measured on the as-grown sample at an angle of incidence \(45^{\circ }\), applying an in-plane field \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H = \pm 1.5\hbox { T}\).

As a final step in our investigation of the modifications of the magnetic properties of our multilayers induced by ion irradiation, we exploited Brillouin light scattering (BLS) with in-plane saturated samples. BLS analysis permitted us to achieve a complementary estimation of the out-of-plane anisotropy constant, and also to obtain a quantitative evaluation of the DMI strength. An in-plane magnetic field \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H\) = 1.5 T, sufficiently large to saturate the magnetization in the film plane, was applied along the z axis, while the in-plane k was swept along the perpendicular direction (x-axis), corresponding to the Damon-Eshbach (DE) geometry (Fig. 5a). Due to the conservation of momentum in the light scattering process, the magnitude of the spin wave wavevector k is related to the incidence angle of light \(\theta\), by the relation \(k = 4\pi \sin \theta {/}\lambda\). Interfacial DMI induces a frequency asymmetry between DE modes propagating in opposite in-plane directions, corresponding to either Stokes or anti-Stokes peaks in BLS spectra (Fig. 5b), perpendicular to the sample magnetization, following the relation \(\Delta f = 2\gamma D/(\pi M_{\mathrm{s}}) k\), where D is the effective DMI constant, k is the spin wave vector, and \(\gamma\) is the gyromagnetic ratio. In order to estimate the effective DMI constant D, the spin wave frequency \(\Delta f\) was measured at \(k = 1.67\times 10^7\) rad/m (corresponding to \(\theta = 45^\circ\)) on reversing the direction of the applied magnetic field, that is equivalent to the reversal of the propagation direction of the DE spin wave mode. Figure 5b shows BLS spectra measured for the as-grown sample. One can observe that the Stokes and anti-Stokes peaks are characterized by a sizeable frequency asymmetry, which reverses upon reversing the direction of the applied magnetic field.

Figure 6
figure 6

(a) Evolution of the absolute values of the Stokes (full dots) and anti-Stokes (open dots) frequencies measured for positive applied field \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H\) = 1.5 T, as a function of the IR. (b) The first order out-of-plane uniaxial anisotropy constant (\(K_{u1}\)) as a function of the IR. Inset: The second order uniaxial anisotropy constant \(K_{\mathrm{u2}}\) obtained from the difference of the effective constant obtained by FMR and the first-order constant obtained by BLS. (c) Values of the DMI constant \(D = (\pi M_{\mathrm{{s}}} \Delta f)/2\gamma k\) derived from the frequency asymmetry between the anti-Stokes and Stokes peaks \(\Delta f\) of the Fig. 6a.

In Fig. 6a we show the evolution of the absolute values of the Stokes and anti-Stokes frequencies measured for positive applied field \(\mu _{\mathrm{0}}H\) = 1.5 T, as a function of the IR. It is evident that there is an increase of the frequencies with the IR, reflecting an increase of the effective magnetization of the stacks due to a reduction of the out-of-plane anisotropy. Figure 6b shows the values of the first order uniaxial anisotropy constant \(K_{\mathrm{u1}}\) obtained from the fit of the BLS frequency performed using the following expression that is valid for in-plane magnetized films of thickness t:

$$\begin{aligned} f(k)&= f_{\mathrm{0}}(k)\pm f_{\mathrm{DMI}}(k)\nonumber \\&= \frac{\gamma \mu _{\mathrm{0}}}{2\pi }\sqrt{H+Jk^{\mathrm{2}}+P(kt)M_{\mathrm{s}}\left( H-\frac{2K_{\mathrm{u1}}}{M_{\mathrm{s}}}+Jk^{\mathrm{2}}+M_{\mathrm{s}}-P(kt)M_{\mathrm{s}}\right) }\pm \frac{\gamma }{\pi M_{\mathrm{s}}}Dk \end{aligned}$$

Where J is the effective exchange constant and the dipolar term P(kt), in the present case of an ultrathin film, becomes \(\frac{\vert kt\vert }{2}\).


He\(^{+}\) irradiation shows a profound effect on the relaxation properties as demonstrated by a non-monotonic increase in damping value \(\alpha\) (Fig. 4e). The large damping parameter in these films can be attributed to an increase in surface magnon-electron interaction due to a large number of interfaces causing subsequent spin relaxation of conduction electrons that leave the Co layer at the various interfaces43,44. Furthermore, the effect of irradiation on damping in our multilayers indicates that the change in damping with IR can be correlated to a change in resistivity of the multilayers (see Supplementary information, S2). The dominant magnetization relaxation in our films involves electron scattering. To quantify the effect of scattering as the dominant mechanism, we measure the resistivity \(\rho\) of the samples (Fig. S1). We find a correlation between resistivity and damping values, both showing an increase with increasing IR. The changes in \(\rho\) reflect the corresponding changes in \(\alpha\). The results signify a large contribution of electron scattering on the relaxation properties of He\(^{+}\) irradiated multilayers.

In agreement with the FMR results, \(K_{\mathrm{u1}}\) from BLS is observed to rapidly decrease on increasing IR (Fig. 6b). One can note that for low IR values the \(K_{\mathrm{u1}}\) from BLS is larger than the effective uniaxial anisotropy constant obtained from FMR measurements (Fig. 3f). As seen in the inset of Fig. 6b, the second order uniaxial anisotropy term is negative and its modulus decreases reaching an almost zero value at high IR. This suppression of the second order term could be related to the modification of the interfaces induced by IR, such as the possible modification of the interface intermixing40,41,42. In fact, in previous investigations, the presence of second order anisotropy term was related to the modification of either physical properties, such as spatial fluctuations of the film thickness45,46 or chemical reactions and oxidation at the interfaces47. In Fig. 6c we show the values of the DMI constant \(D = (\pi M_{\mathrm{{s}}} \Delta f)/2\gamma k\) derived from the frequency asymmetry \(\Delta f\) of the Fig. 6a. The positive value of D indicates that the right-handed chirality is favored by the DMI. As IR increases, a reduction of the DMI is observed at intermediate IR with minimum at IR = \(6\times 10^{\mathrm{14}} {\mathrm{cm}} ^{\mathrm{-2}}\) which then stabilizes at a constant value, slightly lower than the initial one, at high IR. Such a behavior could be ascribed to the intermixing caused by IR, consistently with the results of recent ab initio calculations that predict a reduction of the DMI strength exactly because of intermixing at the Pt/Co interface48. A similar decrease with the He\(^{+}\) irradiation was experimentally observed in Pt/Co/MgO24 and W/CoFeB/MgO32 ultrathin films, although an increase was reported in Ta/CoFeB/Pt29 and Ta/CoFeB/MgO27,49. Different materials used can lead to very different interfacial structures due to robustness to intermixing, spin-orbit coupling and therefore different DMI behaviour. Finally, we recall that interfacial effects have a crucial role in determining the magnetic properties of ultra-thin films50 and it was previously shown that the interfacial term provides the main contribution to the anisotropy constant for ferromagnetic film thicknesses below about 2 nm51. In the present case, we cannot determine the interfacial and bulk contributions separately since we analyse only a single value of the ferromagnetic film thicknesses. However, it seems reasonable to assume that also in this case the interfacial contribution is the dominant one, being the Co layer thickness as low as \(\approx\) 1.2 nm. A similar conclusion could also be drawn for the damping, since it has been shown that the interfacial damping (e.g. spin pumping) is the primary contributor of damping in ultra-thin ferromagnetic heterostructures with high spin-orbit coupling materials52. To this respect, we are confident that the present results will stimulate further investigations on films of different thicknesses aimed at clarifying the role of ion-irradiation and possible modification of bulk and interfacial contributions to the anisotropy and damping.

In summary, we have demonstrated the control of the interfacial properties in Ta(4.5 nm)/[Pt(4.5 nm)/Co(1.2 nm)/Ta(2.5 nm)]\(_{20}\) multilayers with DMI caused to the sample by the He\(^{+}\) irradiation using SQUID magnetometry, FMR and BLS. Our results show clear evidence of (i) tailoring of interface (ii) different magnetic properties in multilayers with different IR. As the IR increases, we observe that the PMA decreases significantly but after the IR reaches a certain level, it approaches saturation, while a reduction of the DMI is observed at intermediate IR which then stabilises at a constant value, slightly lower than the initial one, at high IR. The He\(^{+}\) irradiation induces short range atomic displacements, of the order of a few interatomic distances, leading to interface intermixing and hence altering the interface-driven PMA and DMI31,53. He\(^{+}\) irradiation also shows a profound effect on the relaxation properties as demonstrated by a non-monotonic increase in damping value \(\alpha\). We see a correlation between resistivity and damping values. The results signify a large contribution of electron scattering on the relaxation properties He\(^{+}\) irradiated multilayers. Moreover, He\(^{+}\) irradiation can be used virtually in any kind of ultra-thin materials, including ferrimagnets54,55,56 and synthetic antiferromagnets57. Finally, we should underline that we can control the magnetic properties of the thin films with DMI via He\(^{+}\) ion irradiation. This has consequences for the behaviour of skyrmions. For example, their nucleation, stabilisation, size, velocity and skyrmion Hall effect. The irradiation also opens up the possibility of new writing techniques which could be used to fabricate racetracks or logic devices without physically confining skyrmions via sample edges24. Traditional lithographic techniques suffer from defects at boundary edges and skyrmions can be attracted to physical edges preventing efficient transport along the racetrack. This could provide a flexible way of designing countless possible structures for studying skyrmion behaviour or technological applications. The technique might be leveraged to generate a gradient of DMI, anisotropy or damping across the sample which could drive skyrmions from one side to the other with no external driving force, essentially creating a ramp for skyrmions.


Sample preparation

The multilayers Ta(4.5 nm)/[Pt(4.5 nm)/Co(1.2 nm)/Ta(2.5 nm)]\(_{20}\) were deposited simultaneously on oxidized Si substrates by DC magnetron sputtering at room temperature. They were then uniformly irradiated at room temperature using a He\(^{+}\)-S system from Spin-Ion Technologies with a 25 keV He\(^{+}\) beam at different IR.

Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR)

The measurements were performed by placing the magnetic multilayers on a co-planar wave-guide that generates the microwave magnetic fields at various frequencies and allows for the measurement of the absorbed power in the multilayers whilst sweeping the external field. The external field was modulated with an amplitude of a few mT at 12 Hz and phase-sensitive detection was used to increase the signal to noise ratio.

Brillouin light scattering (BLS)

BLS measurements were performed by focusing 150 mW of monochromatic light onto the sample surface. This was achieved using a single-mode diode-pumped solid state laser operating at \(\lambda\) = 532 nm, using a camera objective of f-number 1.8 and focal length 50 mm. The backscattered light was analyzed by a Sandercock-type (3-3)-pass tandem Fabry–Perot interferometer.


  1. Parkin, S. S., Hayashi, M. & Thomas, L. Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory. Science 320, 190–194 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parkin, S. & Yang, S.-H. Memory on the racetrack. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 195–198 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rößler, U. K., Bogdanov, A. N. & Pfleiderer, C. Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals. Nature 442, 797–801 (2006).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915–919 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899–911 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fert, A., Cros, V. & Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 152–156 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moreau-Luchaire, C. et al. Additive interfacial chiral interaction in multilayers for stabilization of small individual skyrmions at room temperature. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 444–448 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boulle, O. et al. Room-temperature chiral magnetic skyrmions in ultrathin magnetic nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 449–454 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Woo, S. et al. Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 15, 501–506 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Das, S. et al. Observation of room-temperature polar skyrmions. Nature 568, 368–372 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Srivastava, T. et al. Large-voltage tuning of Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions: A route toward dynamic control of skyrmion chirality. Nano Lett. 18, 4871–4877 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schott, M. et al. The skyrmion switch: Turning magnetic skyrmion bubbles on and off with an electric field. Nano Lett. 17, 3006–3012 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cubukcu, M. et al. Electrical nucleation and detection of single \(360^{\circ }\) homochiral néel domain walls measured using the anomalous nernst effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 262409 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, Y., Kang, W., Zhang, X., Zhou, Y. & Zhao, W. Magnetic skyrmion-based synaptic devices. Nanotechnology 28, 08LT02 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, S. et al. Magnetic skyrmion-based artificial neuron device. Nanotechnology 28, 31LT01 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grollier, J., Querlioz, D. & Stiles, M. D. Spintronic nanodevices for bioinspired computing. Proc. IEEE 104, 2024–2039 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, Y. et al. Interface control of domain wall depinning field. AIP Adv. 8, 056314 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, X., Zhou, Y. & Ezawa, M. Magnetic bilayer-skyrmions without skyrmion hall effect. Nat. Commun. 7, 10293 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, X. et al. A compact skyrmionic leaky-integrate-fire spiking neuron device. Nanoscale 10, 6139–6146 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, M., Sengupta, A. & Roy, K. Magnetic skyrmion as a spintronic deep learning spiking neuron processor. IEEE Trans. Magn. 54, 1–7 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moriya, T. Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. 120, 91–98 (1960).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dzyaloshinsky, I. A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241–255 (1958).

  23. Cubukcu, M. et al. Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya anisotropy in nanomagnets with in-plane magnetization. Phys. Rev. B 93, 020401 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Juge, R. et al. Helium ions put magnetic skyrmions on the track. Nano Lett. 21, 2989–2996 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Balk, A. L. et al. Simultaneous control of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction and magnetic anisotropy in nanomagnetic trilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 077205 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Herrera Diez, L. et al. Controlling magnetic domain wall motion in the creep regime in He\(^{+}\)-irradiated CoFeB/MgO films with perpendicular anisotropy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 032401 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Diez, L. H. et al. Enhancement of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction and domain wall velocity through interface intermixing in Ta/CoFeB/MgO. Phys. Rev. B 99, 054431 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Devolder, T. et al. Irradiation-induced tailoring of the magnetism of CoFeB/MgO ultrathin films. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 203912 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nembach, H. T. et al. Tuning of the dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction by He\(^{+}\) ion irradiation. arXiv:2008.06762 (2020).

  30. Rettner, C. T., Anders, S., Baglin, J. E. E., Thomson, T. & Terris, B. D. Characterization of the magnetic modification of Co/Pt multilayer films by He\(^{+}\), Ar\(^{+}\), and Ga\(^{+}\) ion irradiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 279–281 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chappert, C. et al. Planar patterned magnetic media obtained by ion irradiation. Science 280, 1919–1922 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao, X. et al. Enhancing domain wall velocity through interface intermixing in W-CoFeB-MgO films with perpendicular anisotropy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 122404 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fassbender, J. & McCord, J. Magnetic patterning by means of ion irradiation and implantation. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 579–596 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fallon, K. et al. Controlled individual skyrmion nucleation at artificial defects formed by ion irradiation. Small 16, 1907450 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sapozhnikov, M. et al. Artificial dense lattices of magnetic skyrmions. Materials 13, 99 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Devolder, T. et al. Magnetic properties of He\(^{+}\)-irradiated Pt/Co/Pt ultrathin films. Phys. Rev. B 64, 064415 (2001).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cayssol, F. et al. Enhancing domain wall motion in magnetic wires by ion irradiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 022503 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mokhtari, I.B.-E. et al. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in as grown and annealed X/Co/Y ultrathin systems. J. Phys. Condensed Matter. 32, 495802 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. King, J. et al. Local control of magnetic damping in ferromagnetic/non-magnetic bilayers by interfacial intermixing induced by focused ion-beam irradiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 242410 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Devolder, T. Light ion irradiation of Co/Pt systems: Structural origin of the decrease in magnetic anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 62, 5794–5802 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ravelosona, D. et al. Magnetic properties of irradiated highly anisotropic materials. IEEE Trans. Magn. 37, 1643–1645 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hauet, T. et al. Influence of ion irradiation on switching field and switching field distribution in arrays of Co/Pd-based bit pattern media. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 172506 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ingvarsson, S. et al. Role of electron scattering in the magnetization relaxation of thin \({\rm Ni}_{81}{\rm Fe}_{19}\) films. Phys. Rev. B 66, 214416 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Berger, L. Effect of interfaces on gilbert damping and ferromagnetic resonance linewidth in magnetic multilayers. J. Appl. Phys. 90, 4632–4638 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Dieny, B. & Vedyayev, A. Crossover from easy-plane to perpendicular anisotropy in magnetic thin films: Canted anisotropy due to partial coverage or interfacial roughness. Europhys. Lett. 25, 723 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Timopheev, A., Sousa, R., Chshiev, M., Nguyen, H. & Dieny, B. Second order anisotropy contribution in perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–12 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gweon, H. K. & Lim, S. H. Evolution of strong second-order magnetic anisotropy in Pt/Co/MgO trilayers by post-annealing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 082403 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zimmermann, B. et al. Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction at disordered interfaces from ab initio theory: Robustness against intermixing and tunability through dusting. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 232403 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Casiraghi, A. et al. Bloch-to-Néel domain wall transition evinced through morphology of magnetic bubble expansion in Ta/CoFeB/MgO layers. arXiv:1907.03708 (2019).

  50. Hellman, F. et al. Interface-induced phenomena in magnetism. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025006 (2017).

    ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Gubbiotti, G. et al. Structural and magnetic properties of epitaxial cu/fe/cu/si (111) ultrathin films. Phys. Rev. B 60, 17150 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Lourembam, J. et al. Thickness-dependent perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and gilbert damping in hf/cofeb/mgo heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044057 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Fassbender, J., Ravelosona, D. & Samson, Y. Tailoring magnetism by light-ion irradiation. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 37, R179 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Woo, S. et al. Current-driven dynamics and inhibition of the skyrmion hall effect of ferrimagnetic skyrmions in GdFeCo films. Nat. Commun. 9, 959 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Caretta, L. et al. Fast current-driven domain walls and small skyrmions in a compensated ferrimagnet. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 1154–1160 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hirata, Y. et al. Vanishing skyrmion hall effect at the angular momentum compensation temperature of a ferrimagnet. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 232–236 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Legrand, W. et al. Room-temperature stabilization of antiferromagnetic skyrmions in synthetic antiferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 19, 34–42 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This project 17FUN08 TOPS has received funding from the EMPIR programme co-financed by the Participating States and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. This project was also supported by the UK government department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy through NMS funding (Low Loss Electronics) and the UK national Quantum Technologies programme. A. S. and D. S. thanks EPSRC for their supports through NPIF EPSRC Doctoral studentship (EP/R512400/1) and Centre for Doctoral Training in Advanced Characterisation of Materials (EP/L015277/1) respectively. We would like to thank P. Zubko for fruitful discussions on the X-ray reflectivity measurements as well as T. Dion for general discussion of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



A.S. performed FMR measurements and A.S., M.C. analysed the results. S.T. and G.C. performed BLS measurements and analysed the results. M.C. performed SQUID magnetometry measurements and D.S., M.C. analysed the results. S.Z. and X.Z. fabricated, M.S., L.H.D. and D.R. irradiated samples. E.S. performed X-ray reflectivity measurements and analysed the results. C.B. performed MFM measurements and C.B., N.S., L.W. analysed the results. H.K. and O.K. contributed to the interpretation of the results. M.C., A.S., S.T., and G.C. wrote the manuscript with inputs from the other authors. M.C. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Cubukcu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sud, A., Tacchi, S., Sagkovits, D. et al. Tailoring interfacial effect in multilayers with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction by helium ion irradiation. Sci Rep 11, 23626 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing