Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Equilibrium in soil respiration across a climosequence indicates its resilience to climate change in a glaciated valley, western Himalaya

Abstract

Soil respiration (SR), a natural phenomenon, emits ten times more CO2 from land than anthropogenic sources. It is predicted that climate warming would increase SR in most ecosystems and give rise to positive feedback. However, there are uncertainties associated with this prediction primarily due to variability in the relationship of SR with its two significant drivers, soil temperature and moisture. Accounting for the variabilities, we use a climosequence in Himalaya with a temperature gradient of ~ 2.1 °C to understand the variations in the response of SR and its temperature sensitivity to climate change. Results indicate an equilibrium in SR ranging from 1.92 to 2.42 µmol m−2 s−1 across an elevation gradient (3300–3900 m) despite its increased sensitivity to temperature (Q10) from 0.47 to 4.97. Additionally, moisture reduction towards lower elevation weakens the temperature-SR relationship. Finally, soil organic carbon shows similarities at all the elevations, indicating a net-zero CO2 flux across the climosequence. The findings suggest that as the climate warms in this region, the temperature sensitivity of SR reduces drastically due to moisture reduction, limiting any change in SR and soil organic carbon to rising temperature. We introduce an equilibrium mechanism in this study which indicates the resilient nature of SR to climate change and will aid in enhancing the accuracy of climate change impact projections.

Introduction

Soil respiration (SR) is the process of CO2 emission from soil that originates mainly from microbial and root respiration. This emission is approximately tenfold higher than fossil fuel combustion1 and accounts for about ~ 90 PtG C emissions per year2,3. Variations in atmospheric CO2 are linked with climate-induced changes in SR, and even a tiny shift in the latter may have a profound impact on the global carbon balance4. Climate warming is likely to increase SR and give rise to positive feedback as studies report an exponential relationship between SR and temperature5,6,7. However, the strength of the temperature-SR relationship is variable across different habitats and is often decided by moisture availability8. High soil moisture impedes soil organic carbon decomposition and CO2 production by limiting aeration and thus O2 diffusivity into the soil9. In contrast, low water availability stresses microbial activities and translocation of nutrients to root, constraining respiration10. Moisture may also regulate the sensitivity of SR to temperature changes7.

An exponential temperature-SR relationship or Q10 generally indicates the temperature sensitivity of SR. Q10 refers to the response magnitude of SR to a 10 °C increase in temperature and is an index to forecast the feedback intensity of SR to the rising temperature11. Q10 of SR has been used as a constant of 2 in several biogeochemical models despite its high variability across different ecosystems. For instance, Chen et al.12 reported a wide range of Q10 from 1.1 to 13.5 across various biomes. In addition, studies from Nyaiqentanglha Mountains and the eastern Daba mountains observe an increasing Q10 with an increase in elevation7,13.

Elevation gradients in the mountains show substantial shifts in climatic (climosequence) and biotic characteristics over short geographic distances. Thus, these gradients are considered "natural experiments" to understand the environmental change impacts on ecosystem functioning over a considerable time scale and may be used to proxy for climate change14. However, limited studies have taken advantage of these gradients to understand the fate of SR response to climate change. Therefore, we aimed to (i) assess the response of SR and its temperature sensitivity across a climosequence; (ii) examine the dynamics in temperature-SR and moisture-SR relationships across the climate gradient; and (iii) quantify soil organic carbon in these gradients to assess shifts in the carbon pool under climate change.

We selected six elevations from 3300 to 3900 m encompassing subalpine forest, alpine scrub, and alpine meadow with a temperature gradient of ~ 2.1 °C. The sites were situated in a protected area in the western part of Himalaya where livestock grazing is banned, and human interference is minimal (Supplementary Fig. S1 & Supplementary Table S1 online). We periodically measured SR, temperature, moisture, and organic carbon during the growing season of 2019. We then constructed exponential and linear regression models to assess the relationship strength of SR and Q10 of SR with temperature and moisture at each of the elevations. Finally, we propose a theoretical framework to account for the observed trends in our results. This is the first elevational study on SR from the higher elevations of Himalaya, which will refine our understanding of how the SR will respond to changing climate.

Results and discussion

Seasonal patterns in SR at different elevations

SR followed a non-linear hump-shaped curve across the sampling period, showing peaks during July–September and a decrease in October at all the elevations, overlapping with variations in soil temperature and moisture (Fig. 1). High SR during peak growing season was probably a cumulative effect of increased microbial respiration, due to temperature-induced enhanced enzymatic activity under high labile substrate availability (from plant-photosynthetic C allocates) and adequate moisture (from rainfall), and increased root respiration15,16,17. Our earlier study from the alpine meadow of this region (~ 4000 m a.s.l.) showed similar seasonal patterns in SR18 and is also in accord with studies from the central and north-eastern Tibetan Plateau5,7.

Figure 1
figure1

Soil temperature, moisture and, respiration at different elevations. Each triangle represents the mean environmental parameter (ST: soil temperature at 5 cm depth, SWC: volumetric soil water content at 5 cm depth, and SR: soil respiration; n = 12) ± standard error of mean during four months in 2019.

Relationships of SR with temperature and moisture

We observed that soil temperature had no significant relation with SR in the lower elevations (3300–3400 m), but their relationships strengthened in mid (3600–3700) and higher elevations (3800–3900 m) (Fig. 2 & Supplementary Table S2 online). It is worth noting that soil moisture showed an increasing trend across elevation (Table 1) and was significantly related to SR at all the elevations (Fig. 2). Low moisture-induced drier conditions at lower elevations caused temperature insensitivity in microbes and eventually in SR19. In comparison, moisture at the higher elevations was adequate for the activities of both microbes and roots and, therefore, positively affected the temperature-SR relationship.

Figure 2
figure2

Effect of soil temperature and moisture on SR. Exponential and linear models between SR and soil temperature (ST) and SR and volumetric soil water content (SWC) at different elevations. r2 depicts the strength of the model significant at *** p < 0.001 and ** p < 0.01 while ns represents non-significant relationship with total data points = 48. See also Supplementary Table S2 online for intercepts, slope, and exact p values in the model.

Table 1 Comparison of the environmental parameter at different elevations.

Temperature sensitivity (Q10) of SR across elevation

The strong and significant temperature-SR relationship at the higher elevations suggested an increase in SR under climate warming. This was also indicated by the high Q10 of SR at the higher elevations (Fig. 3). Contrarily,

Figure 3
figure3

Effect of elevation, soil temperature, and moisture on the temperature sensitivity of SR. Linear models to show the significant and robust relationship (r2 < 0.76, p < 0.05) between Q10 (temperature sensitivity) of SR and elevation, soil temperature, and volumetric soil water content.

Q10 decreased towards lower elevation being highest in alpine meadow at 3800–3900 m (4.64 ± 0.34) followed by alpine scrub at 3600–3700 m (3.13 ± 0.44) and subalpine forest at 3300–3400 m (0.95 ± 0.48). Soil temperature and moisture are considered the main controllers of Q1012. In our study, Q10 values correlated negatively with soil temperature but positively with soil moisture (Fig. 3), similar to the previous studies7,20. Analyzing both the observations, we can say that a consecutive rise in 2.1 °C temperature across the elevation ranges decreased the temperature sensitivity by 33% and 47%, respectively. The relationship suggests that relatively low temperature and high moisture at higher elevations made them more sensitive to climate warming than their lower counterparts. A decrease in temperature sensitivity with rising temperature has been reported in both alpine7,21 and sub-tropical regions13 and is believed to be mainly caused by a reduction in sensitivity of microbial-derived-heterotrophic respiration21 and partially due to reduced growth of fine roots and their respiration at lower elevations (not measured in this study)7,13,22. In contrast, evidences of rising heterotrophic respiration over the recent decades have also been reported23.

SR, organic carbon, and the equilibrium mechanism

Since the higher elevations were more sensitive, we expected SR to increase with an increased temperature towards lower elevations. Surprisingly, we found no significant differences in SR at any elevation (Table 1). Also, the soil organic carbon was similar across the elevation gradient (Table 1). To account for the neutrality in both SR and organic carbon with increasing temperature (decreasing elevation), we present a theoretical framework using vegetation succession across climosequence as a premise (Fig. 4). On a geological time-scale, alpine meadow comprising herbaceous and graminoid species (Supplementary Table S1 online) originated first among the three habitats24.

Figure 4
figure4

Equilibrium in SR and organic carbon across climosequence. Diagrammatic representation of a theoretical framework showing similar mean SR and soil organic carbon (SOC) at different elevations across climosequence and vegetation succession with n = 48. Note that vegetation changes from the subalpine forest (3300–3600 m) to alpine scrub (3600–3800 m) and alpine meadow (3800–4000 m) (Supplementary Table S1 online). Microsoft Excel 2019 (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/microsoft-office) and Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (https://www.adobe.com/in/products/photoshop.html) were used to prepare the graph and drawing, respectively.

Warming-induced snow-melt and soil exposure led to forming a microclimate suitable for microbial and plant growth, eventually initiating respiration. At this point, soil moisture was adequate for their metabolic activities; however, temperature limited exponential growth25,26. Also, nutrient availability, both in quality and quantity, allowed only specialized microbial and plant communities27. Initial warming increased SR in alpine meadow and may or may not have caused soil carbon loss depending on carbon input from photosynthesis18,28. However, a high temperature-induced decrease in moisture and substrate availability limited SR and, in turn, carbon loss18. As SR acclimatized, the soil started to regain its carbon with high photosynthetic activity from increased plant growth29. The increasing trend in soil organic carbon is evident from 3900 to 3700 m (Table 1).

Over centuries, continued warming and soil mineralization allowed colonization by shrubs like Artemisia spp., Juniperus spp., Rosa sericea, Lonicera spp. (Supplementary Table S1 online) and transformation of alpine meadow to scrub (3500–3800 m)30,31. High temperature-induced low moisture in the scrub further limited the increase in SR, resulting in similar SR rates than that in the meadow32. Photosynthetic activity of shrubs was probably lower than that of herbs which reduced carbon input into the soil as seen from 3700 to 3400 m however was non-significant. As a result, organic carbon was similar in both alpine meadow and scrub.

Furthermore, soil mineralization and warmer climate facilitated forest succession with trees such as Cedrus deodara, Pinus wallichiana, Populus ciliate, and Betula utilis in the subalpine zone (3300–3500 m)33,34. At this stage, the temperature was sufficient for major microbial and plant communities to carry their metabolic activities. However, soil moisture continued to decrease in the forest due to high temperature and low precipitation conditions (Table 1). The dense tree canopy restricted sunlight from reaching the ground and affected the growth of ground vegetation and, in turn, below-ground fine roots (in the upper soil layer)35. Thus, low moisture and reduced root biomass continued to limit SR. At the same time, high litter input from forest vegetation balanced any significant soil carbon loss, eventually resulting in similar SR and organic carbon at all the elevations (Table 1). Neutrality in soil organic carbon towards lower elevations in our study (except at 3300 m) indicates a net-zero CO2 flux with rising temperature compared to previously stated increasing and decreasing carbon trends from other regions suggesting net-gain and net-loss in CO2 flux, respectively7,13. Though reported for the first time in our study, the equilibrium in SR across elevation gradient is evident in other studies also. For instance, Zhao et al. displayed comparable SR rates across most of their sites in an alpine meadow (4400–5200 m)7. Similarly, Ma et al. showed relatively stable SR and its components (autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration) across 3 out of 4 habitats in a sub-tropical forest, namely evergreen broad-leaved (780 m), mixed evergreen (1670 m), and deciduous broad-leaved (1970 m) forests13. We hypothesize that certain ecosystems may limit the warming-induced increase in SR by altering their edaphic factors, especially moisture, limiting soil carbon loss under sustained plant carbon inputs.

Conclusion

The temperature-sensitive elevation gradient in our study demonstrate an equilibrium mechanism in CO2 emissions, making it resilient to rising temperatures and preventing soil carbon loss. Across the four-month sampling period, we find that SR response depends on the strength of the temperature-SR relationship, which depends on moisture availability in the soil. Higher temperatures and low soil moisture towards lower elevations reduced temperature sensitivity of SR causing a neutral response of SR to warming. Positive SR responses to increasing temperature, if observed, are primarily short-lived and limited by either moisture or substrate deficiency36,37. The equilibrium mechanism, suggesting net zero SR rates under climate change in this region, is vital in enhancing the climate change impact projections as it accounts for both SR and its governing factors simultaneously at different spatial and temporal scales. Moreover, climosequence can be used as a surrogate to capture the climate change triggered responses of SR and its sensitivity to rising temperature. A limitation of our study is the short SR measurement period which may have effects on its temperature sensitivity range.

Methods

Study site characteristics

The study was conducted across a 700 m elevation gradient (3300–4000 m) along the south-west facing slope of a glaciated valley in western Himalaya in Gangotri National Park, India (30° 56'–30° 59' N, 78° 58'–79° 3' E) (Supplementary Fig. S1 online). Vegetation along this elevation gradient can be broadly classified as subalpine forest (3300–3500 ± 200 m), alpine scrub (3500–3800 ± 200 m), and alpine meadow (3800 m and above) (Supplementary Table S1 online). Mean annual air temperature, recorded by data loggers during 2017–18, were 5.9 ± 0.4 °C, 3.7 ± 0.2 °C, and 1.6 ± 0.1 °C at 3300–3400 m, 3600–3700 m and 3800–3900 m elevation ranges, respectively. The elevation ranges hence provide a ~ 2.1 °C gradient in temperature, forming a climosequence. Mean annual precipitation is 1500 mm, occurring as rainfall from July to September and snowfall from December to May38. The soil in this region is relatively dry and poorly formed, with a thin upper organic layer mixed with gravel. Six elevations were selected across a 700 m elevation gradient (3300–4000 m), and six plots (0.5 × 0.5 m) were marked at each elevation at a distance of 3–5 m away from the trekking route. Study sites were relatively uniform in terms of aspect, slope, and soil taxonomy.

Evaluating soil respiration at different elevations

At each plot, hollow cylindrical PVC collars (diameter: 20 cm and height = 12 cm) were inserted 2–3 cm inside soil. Plants inside the collars were clipped from above 1 mm ground without disturbing the soil. SR was measured from the collars using LI-8100A Automated Soil CO2 Flux System (LICOR, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) with an opaque survey chamber. Measurements were taken during the 2019 growing season twice each month from June to October (except August due to excess rainfall) on clear days during 0800–1600 h. The measurement dates were 19th and 23rd June, 13th and 17th July, 4th and 8th September, and 23rd and 27th October. The observation time was kept at 120 s with a dead band of 15 s.

Soil temperature, moisture, and organic carbon measurements

Soil temperature and volumetric soil water content (SWC) at 5 cm depth were measured using a hand-held soil temperature probe (6000-09TC, LICOR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) and a GS1 soil moisture sensor (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA) attached to the LI-8100A instrument. Soil samples were collected at 5 cm depth from each collar post-SR measurement using a soil auger (diameter 5 cm) and pooled in plastic zip-lock bags. The soil was homogenized, air-dried, sieved through a 1 mm sieve, and stored under 4 °C. Soil organic carbon was estimated in duplicates from 0.1 g soil using the potassium dichromate oxidation method39.

Statistical analyses

The data's normal distribution and homogeneity of variance were determined through Shapiro–Wilk and Levene's test, respectively. Since the data did not meet the assumption of normality and homogeneity even after log transformation, we conducted Welch's analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess differences in parameters among different elevations40. Where differences existed, we used the post-hoc Games-Howell test for pairwise comparisons. All means and differences were reported in terms of monthly mean ± standard error. The relationship between SR and soil temperature at different elevations was examined by fitting an exponential regression model

$${\text{SR}}\, = \,\alpha {\text{e}}^{{\beta {\text{t}}}}$$
(1)

where t is the soil temperature at 5 cm depth, the coefficient α is the intercept of respiration at 0 °C, and β represents the temperature sensitivity of SR.

Q10 of SR was calculated based on coefficient β as.

$${\text{Q}}_{{{1}0}} \, = \,{\text{e}}^{{{1}0}} \beta$$
(2)

Simple linear regression was conducted to determine the probable effect of SWC on SR at each elevation. In addition, linear relationships between Q10 of SR and soil temperature and moisture were also assessed. All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 23.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA), and significant differences were assessed at the level p < 0.05.

References

  1. 1.

    Jian, J., Steele, M. K., Thomas, R. Q., Day, S. D. & Hodges, S. C. Constraining estimates of global soil respiration by quantifying sources of variability. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 4143–4159 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hashimoto, S. et al. Global spatiotemporal distribution of soil respiration modeled using a global database. Biogeosciences 12, 4121–4132 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bond-Lamberty, B. New techniques and data for understanding the global soil respiration flux. Earth’s Futur. 6, 1176–1180 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Friedlingstein, P. et al. Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Clim. 19, 3337–3353 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wang, J. et al. Effects of grazing exclusion on soil respiration components in an alpine meadow on the north-eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. CATENA 194, 104750 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yu, L. et al. Temporal variation in soil respiration and its sensitivity to temperature along a hydrological gradient in an alpine wetland of the Tibetan Plateau. Agric. For. Meteorol. 282–283, 107854 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhao, J., Li, R., Li, X. & Tian, L. Environmental controls on soil respiration in alpine meadow along a large altitudinal gradient on the central Tibetan Plateau. CATENA 159, 84–92 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cook, F. J. & Orchard, V. A. Relationships between soil respiration and soil moisture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 1013–1018 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Linn, D. M. & Doran, J. W. Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and nontilled soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48, 1267–1272 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Schimel, J., Balser, T. C. & Wallenstein, M. Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88, 1386–1394 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Davidson, E. A., Janssens, I. A. & Lou, Y. On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: Moving beyond Q10. Glob. Chang. Biol. 12, 154–164 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chen, S., Wang, J., Zhang, T. & Hu, Z. Climatic, soil, and vegetation controls of the temperature sensitivity (Q10) of soil respiration across terrestrial biomes. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 22, e00955 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ma, M. et al. Soil respiration of four forests along elevation gradient in northern subtropical China. Ecol. Evol. 9, 12846–12857 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Margesin, R. & Niklinska, M. A. Editorial: Elevation gradients: Microbial indicators of climate change?. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2–5 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lloyd, J. & Taylor, J. A. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct. Ecol. 8, 315 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ma, Z., Zhao, W., Liu, M. & Liu, Q. Responses of soil respiration and its components to experimental warming in an alpine scrub ecosystem on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 643, 1427–1435 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Romero-Olivares, A. L., Allison, S. D. & Treseder, K. K. Soil microbes and their response to experimental warming over time: A meta-analysis of field studies. Soil Biol. Biochem. 107, 32–40 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tiwari, P., Bhattacharya, P., Rawat, G. S., Rai, I. D. & Talukdar, G. Experimental warming increases ecosystem respiration by increasing above-ground respiration in alpine meadows of Western Himalaya. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–10 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang, Y. et al. Responses of soil respiration and its components to drought stress. J. Soils Sediments 14, 99–109 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Peng, S., Piao, S., Wang, T., Sun, J. & Shen, Z. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in different ecosystems in China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1008–1014 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dong, L. et al. Response of soil respiration and its components to warming and dominant species removal along an elevation gradient in alpine meadow of the Qinghai–Tibetan plateau. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 10472–10482 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Geng, Y. et al. Soil respiration in tibetan alpine grasslands: Belowground biomass and soil moisture, but not soil temperature, best explain the large-scale patterns. PLoS ONE 7, 2 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bond-Lamberty, B., Bailey, V. L., Chen, M., Gough, C. M. & Vargas, R. Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades. Nature 560, 80–83 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pornaro, C., Schneider, M. K. & Macolino, S. Plant species loss due to forest succession in Alpine pastures depends on site conditions and observation scale. Biol. Conserv. 161, 213–222 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nagelmüller, S., Hiltbrunner, E. & Körner, C. Low temperature limits for root growth in alpine species are set by cell differentiation. AoB Plants 9, 1–16 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nedwell, D. B. Effect of low temperature on microbial growth: Lowered affinity for substrates limits growth at low temperature. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 30, 101–111 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Haugwitz, M. S., Michelsen, A. & Schmidt, I. K. Long-term microbial control of nutrient availability and plant biomass in a subarctic-alpine heath after addition of carbon, fertilizer and fungicide. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 179–187 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Evrendilek, F., Celik, I. & Kilic, S. Changes in soil organic carbon and other physical soil properties along adjacent Mediterranean forest, grassland, and cropland ecosystems in Turkey. J. Arid Environ. 59, 743–752 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lange, M. et al. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nat. Commun. 6, 6707 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Aartsma, P., Asplund, J., Odland, A., Reinhardt, S. & Renssen, H. Microclimatic comparison of lichen heaths and shrubs: shrubification generates atmospheric heating but subsurface cooling during the growing season. Biogeosciences 18, 1577–1599 (2021).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Buhrmann, R. D., Ramdhani, S., Pammenter, N. W. & Naidoo, S. Grasslands feeling the heat: The effects of elevated temperatures on a subtropical grassland. Bothalia 46, 2 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wang, B. et al. Soil moisture modifies the response of soil respiration to temperature in a desert shrub ecosystem. Biogeosciences 11, 259–268 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Normand, S. et al. A greener Greenland? Climatic potential and long-term constraints on future expansions of trees and shrubs. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 368, 20120479 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Frost, G. V. & Epstein, H. E. Tall shrub and tree expansion in Siberian tundra ecotones since the 1960s. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 1264–1277 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kolari, P. et al. Forest floor vegetation plays an important role in photosynthetic production of boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 221, 241–248 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Carey, J. C. et al. Temperature response of soil respiration largely unaltered with experimental warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 13797–13802 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Walker, T. W. N. et al. Microbial temperature sensitivity and biomass change explain soil carbon loss with warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 885–889 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sanyal, A. K., Uniyal, V. P., Chandra, K. & Bhardwaj, M. Diversity, distribution pattern and seasonal variation in moth assemblages along altitudinal gradient in Gangotri landscape area, Western Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. J. Threat. Taxa 5, 3646–3653 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38 (1934).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Farthing, T. S., Muir, J. P. & Brady, J. A. Three Bermudagrass-suppression techniques have little effect on soil-nutrient availability and microbial communities 200 days after application. Appl. Soil Ecol. 145, 1 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the United Nations Development Programme (Grant no. 7/2/2015-CC) and supported by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, and Global Environment Facility through the Third National Communication project. Uttarakhand Forest Department provided necessary permissions to conduct fieldwork inside Gangotri National Park. The authors thank Debanjan Sarkar and Shiv Narayan Yadav for their help in preparing figures and Umed Singh Rana for field assistance.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.T. conceptualized the study with inputs from all co-authors. G.T. and G.S.R. obtained the grant and supervised the study. All co-authors carried out fieldwork. P.T. and P.B. conducted lab experiments. P.T. analyzed the data, prepared figures, and wrote the manuscript. Finally, all co-authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gautam Talukdar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tiwari, P., Bhattacharya, P., Rawat, G.S. et al. Equilibrium in soil respiration across a climosequence indicates its resilience to climate change in a glaciated valley, western Himalaya. Sci Rep 11, 23038 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02199-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02199-x

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing