Abstract
Resonant scattering of electromagnetic waves is a widely studied phenomenon with a vast range of applications that span completely different fields, from astronomy or meteorology to spectroscopy and optical circuitry. Despite being subject of intensive research for many decades, new fundamental aspects are still being uncovered, in connection with emerging areas, such as metamaterials and metasurfaces or quantum and topological optics, to mention some. In this work, we demonstrate yet one more novel phenomenon arising in the scattered near field of medium sized objects comprising high refractive index materials, which allows the generation of colossal local magnetic fields. In particular, we show that GHz radiation illuminating a high refractive index ceramic sphere creates instant magnetic nearfields comparable to those in neutron stars, opening up a new paradigm for creation of giant magnetic fields on the millimeter's scale.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Among the diverse forms of energy, a special place is given to the magnetic energy of an electromagnetic wave, associated with the strength of the magnetic field H. As it is known, a magnetic field arises as a result of a timevarying electric field (for example, in an electromagnetic wave) or it is generated by the movement of electric charges (for example, by a current in a solenoid). The idea of the energy of the light field follows from the Maxwell equations, according to which the volumetric energy density of an electromagnetic wave for nondispersive, nonabsorbing media is the sum of the energies of the electric, \(\varepsilon \varepsilon_{0} E^{2} /2\), and magnetic, \(\mu \mu_{0} H^{2} /2\), fields. In a vacuum, these two energies are equal to each other and, accordingly, 50% of the light intensity, \(I\) , in a plane electromagnetic wave is presented in the form of magnetic energy. Therefore, highfrequency fields with large amplitudes of the magnetic field strength can be realized in intense light beams (from a physical point of view, it is better to speak not about the magnetic field \(H\), but about the magnetic induction, \(B = \mu \mu_{0} H).\) Accordingly, \(B = \sqrt {{{2\mu_{0} I} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{2\mu_{0} I} c}} \right. \kern\nulldelimiterspace} c}}\), where c is the speed of light. At present, the record intensities achieved at the focus of the laser beam are I ~ 10^{21} ÷ 10^{22} W/cm^{2}. When a substance is heated by such pulses, temperatures of tens and hundreds of millions of degrees are reached, which corresponds to the temperatures of initiation of nuclear reactions. Therefore, one of the most important promising applications of ultrahighpower petawatt lasers is laser controlled thermonuclear fusion^{1}. The amplitude of the magnetic induction which can be reached in such beams is over 10^{9} Tesla (see Fig. 1). Note that the magnetic fields in magnetar neutron stars reach 10^{11} Tesla^{2}, and the Planck limit for magnetic induction is 10^{53} Tesla^{3}. For comparison, the Earth's magnetic field consists of an average strength of about 30 μT, which is also the typical magnitude of magnetic fields in the interstellar medium^{4}. Astronomical objects such as white dwarfs consist of about 100 T.
There is a long staying problem of generation of high magnetic fields with field strength above 3000 T which presents a human record for pulsed magnetic fields^{5,6}. To obtain super strong magnetic fields under laboratory conditions is a difficult task (the interested reader can find a historical perspective in, e.g., in Ref.^{7}). The strongest continuous magnetic fields, of 45 T, have been produced using a Bitter magnet inside a superconducting magnet^{7}. Magnetic fields above this level were created just in pulsed modes when strong electric currents were transmitted through solenoids of various designs, or when a magnetic flux inside a closed conducting coil (liner) was compressed by external forces. In this regard, the first system was created in 1924 by Peter Kapitsa^{8}, who measured magnetic fields up to 10^{6} Gauss (100 T)^{9}. In 1951, Andrei Sakharov suggested the idea of magnetoimplosive generators, which allows to obtain fields around 3000 T^{5,6}. It should be noted that there are some physical limitations as to the maximal magnetic fields which can be reached using this principle, mainly related to the dissipation associated with the current flowing in the metals^{8,9}, as well as with instabilities arising during the compression of the liner, caused by magnetic pressure effects^{5,6}.
New physical principles are necessary to generate magnetic fields above 10^{4} T. In this sense, one possibility is, e.g., using magnetic field generation in laserdriven, colliding ultrarelativistic plasma pairs^{10}. At extremely high laser wave intensities, the absorption of radiation can be effectively provided by radiation friction, instead of electron collisions. This permits generation of a superstrong magnetic field on the basis of inverse Faraday effect, with field strengths on the level of 10^{5} T at laser intensities above 10^{23} W/cm^{2} ^{11}. For comparison, the amplitude of the magnetic component of light in a plane wave with such intensities exceeds 10^{9} T, and the electrical component of light reaches 3 × 10^{12} V/cm, which is steel three orders of magnitude lower than the vacuum breakdown threshold (10^{16} V/cm).
Returning to the fundamentals, the amplitude of the magnetic field at the center of a circular current loop can be written, on the basis of the BioSavart formula given by \(B = \mu_{0} I/2R\), where B is the magnetic flux density in the center of the loop (measured in tesla in SI units), I is the electric current, R is the radius of the loop and μ_{0} = 4π × 10^{−7} H/m is the magnetic permeability of vacuum. From this equation one can see that an increase in the amplitude of the magnetic field can be obtained either by increasing the current, or by reducing the size of the coil. Thus, under simple, focused laser irradiation, the minimum size of the equivalent coil will be of the order of the wavelength, \(\lambda\). This limit, which is related to the diffraction limit and how tightly an electromagnetic wave can be focused, applies only to propagating waves and can, therefore, be broken if one includes in the picture the nonpropagating, evanescent components of the wave. These components are present, e.g., in the nearfield of any scattering object, are at the very core of the present work and have been previously exploited to concentrate electromagnetic energy beyond diffraction limit and to enhance the radiation intensity in a variety of situations.
Among the first fields in which evanescent components of electromagnetic waves played a pivotal role is plasmonics. In this regard, the scattering of light by plasmonic nanoparticles allows creating optical nanovortices around the singularities where the Poynting vector tends to zero^{12,13,14}. These vortices have characteristic scales \(R \ll \lambda\) and, therefore, open the possibility for high magnetic fields. One possible way to reach a high localization of the vortices is via Fano resonances^{15,16}, for which increasing localization is possible by considering increasingly higher multipolar orders^{17,18,19}. Examples of these are those quadrupolar, octupolar, hexadecapolar, and even triacontadipolar resonances that can be excited in optimized diskring silver plasmonic nanostructure^{20}. In plasmonic systems, however, higher order resonances are limited by the large dissipation associated with metals, a problem that is particularly acute in the visible range.
One possibility to avoid large dissipative losses is replacing metals by transparent dielectrics. In this regard, it was first theoretically shown^{21,22} and then experimentally demonstrated^{23,24} that high refractive index particles of subwavelength sizes can present a strong magnetic response to an incident electromagnetic wave. The presence of the magnetic family of multipoles on top of the usual electric ones, and the ability to control their amplitudes and phases, yields a wealth of unique optical properties to this type of particles, including strong directionality effects^{25,26,27}, creation of magnetic hotspots^{28}, realization of nonradiating modes^{29,30,31,32,33}, low loss transmission lines^{34} and generalized Brewster’s effects^{35}, among others^{36,37,38}. As a consequence, alldielectric resonant nanostructures have emerged as a promising platform for a number of nanophotonics applications, see e.g.^{39,40,41}.
Beyond particles of subwavelength sizes, the ability of a large transparent sphere (as compared to wavelength) to focus light has been known for thousands of years. In modern photonics, this effect has come under the name of photonic nanojet. Interestingly, it has been recently shown that the magnetic component of light in nanojets can be amplified more than the electric component, i.e., that a magnetic nanojet can be “brighter” than an electric one^{42}.
Even larger magnetic fields can be created inside the dielectric sphere^{43}, due to the possibility of creating small optical vortices stemming from superoscillation effects^{44}, with large phase gradients in the vicinity of singularities leading to equally large local values of the wave vector^{45,46}. However, in this situation, dissipation plays a key role, and even the smallest values can greatly suppress these effects. As an example, it was recently shown^{43} that magnetic super resonances excited in a large particle with refractive index \(n = 4\), which in the absence of dissipation lead to magnetic field enhancements \(H^{2} \simeq 10^{7}\), can be reduced by two orders of magnitude with dissipation levels as low as \(\tan \delta \approx 10^{  5}\) and completely disappear for values \(\tan \delta \approx 10^{  3}\). For comparison, the best electrical insulation materials in engineering have \(\tan \delta \approx 10^{  5}  10^{  4}\). In this regard, it is interesting to analyse the generation of high magnetic fields in GHz region, where there are a number of ceramic materials with high dielectric constant and low loss (see e.g.^{47,48}). This is what we do in the following, and demonstratre experimentally the generation of ultrastrong magnetic fields in the nearfield of particles made of these materials.
Results
First, we analyze theoretically the behavior of a nonmagnetic,\(\mu = 1\), nondissipative, \({\text{Im}} \varepsilon = 0,\) ceramic spherical particle with permittivity \(\varepsilon = 150\). This value of the dielectric constant in the microwave region is typical for a number of highvoltage ceramics, for example, standard titanatebased ceramics (TiO_{2}, CaTiO_{3}, SrTiO_{3}), such as the ones used in our experiments^{47}. According to the Mie theory^{49} the scattering efficiency of the sphere, when illuminated by a plane wave, can be written as \(Q_{sca} = {{\sigma_{sca} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\sigma_{sca} } {(\pi R^{2} )}}} \right. \kern\nulldelimiterspace} {(\pi R^{2} )}}\) (\(\sigma_{sca}\) is the scattering cross section, \(\pi R^{2}\) is the geometrical cross section of the particle). It also can be expressed as a sum of electric, \(Q_{\ell }^{\left( e \right)} ,\) and magnetic, \(Q_{\ell }^{\left( m \right)}\), partial scattering efficiencies, associated with the multipolar moment of \(\ell\) th order multipoles:
where the electric \(a_{\ell }\) and magnetic \(b_{\ell }\) scattering amplitudes are defined by formulas
with \(\Re_{\ell }^{{\left( {a,b} \right)}}\) and \(\Im_{\ell }^{{\left( {a,b} \right)}}\) coefficients expressed by
Here the functions \(\psi_{\ell } \left( z \right) = \sqrt {\frac{\pi z}{2}} J_{{\ell + \frac{1}{2}}} \left( z \right)\) and \(\chi_{\ell } \left( z \right) = \sqrt {\frac{\pi z}{2}} N_{{\ell + \frac{1}{2}}} \left( z \right)\) are expressed through the Bessel and Neumann functions^{49}. We use the subscripts m and p to denote the values referring to the external media and the particle, with refractive indices \(n_{m}\) and \(n_{p}\), respectively. In the expressions above, \(q_{m} = q\,n_{m}\) and \(q_{p} = q\,n_{p}\). The symbol \(q\) represents the socalled size parameter, defined as \(q = {{\omega R} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\omega R} c}} \right. \kern\nulldelimiterspace} c} = {{2\pi R} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{2\pi R} \lambda }} \right. \kern\nulldelimiterspace} \lambda }\). The power of Mie theory is that it allows identifying the spectral position, as well as the (electric or magnetic) multipolar origin of all resonances and the directional scattering effects^{25}^{27} (see Fig. S1 in Supplementary) observed in the scattering.
Beyond the farfield scattering characteristics, it is interesting to look at the electric and magnetic fields inside the particle. These, within the context of Mie theory, can be also computed through closed expression for the socalled, internal scattering amplitudes \(c_{\ell }\) and \(d_{\ell }\), given by^{49}:
Although the denominators of these amplitudes are the same as in amplitudes \(a_{\ell }\) and \(b_{\ell }\) in (2), which means that the position of these resonances are close, the numerators of (5) never tends to zero. As a result, the values of amplitudes \(\left {c_{\ell } } \right^{2}\) and \(\left {d_{\ell } } \right^{2}\) are not restricted to unity as \(\left {a_{\ell } } \right^{2}\) and \(\left {b_{\ell } } \right^{2}\), but increase with values of size parameter and refractive index. To compare both type of resonances it is convenient to introduce the partial internal scattering efficiencies, in a way similar to those in Eq. (1):
It should be noted that the maximal efficiencies \(Q_{\ell }^{{\left( {e,m} \right)}}\) and \(F_{\ell }^{{\left( {e,m} \right)}}\) have different behaviour versus the order of mode: while \(\max Q_{\ell }^{{\left( {e,m} \right)}}\) monotonously decreases when increasing the \(\ell\) number, \(\max F_{\ell }^{{\left( {e,m} \right)}}\) is extremely fast growing with \(\ell\)^{43}.
In Fig. 2a, we plot the total scattering efficiency and the different partial contributions for a sphere with \(q \le 0.8\). In the plot, all the different resonances observed are identified and labelled correspondingly. One can see two interesting phenomena when looking at this plot. The first, is the periodic repetitions of the observed resonances, which start from the lowestorder, magnetic dipole one. The second is some kind of interplay between resonances, that tend to bunch together^{50}. See, e.g., the electric dipole (ed) resonance, which is excited always in close proximity to the magnetic quadrupole (mq) one. The same happens for the electric quadrupole (eq) and the magnetic octupole (mo), the electric octupole (eo) and the magnetic hexadecapole (mh), etc. As expected, the quality (Q) factor of the resonances increases with their order, i.e., the linewidth of high order resonances become increasingly narrow, a situation that happens both for plasmonic^{15} and high refractive index dielectric particles^{20}. In Fig. 2b, we show a comparison between the evolution of the partial scattering efficiencies associated to the magnetic multipoles \(Q_{\ell }^{\left( m \right)}\) and the evolution of the corresponding partial internal scattering efficiencies \(F_{\ell }^{\left( m \right)}\). As can be seen, while the scattering efficiencies do not significantly change with the increase in order, there is a very pronounced effect in \(F_{\ell }^{\left( m \right)}\) increasing up to ten orders of magnitude when \(\ell\) varies from 1 to 5. From Fig. 2b follows that the fields inside the particle can be much higher than in the far field region. A comparison between the electric and magnetic field distributions inside the particle for the magnetic dipole and magnetic quadrupole modes is shown in Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3.
The maximum intensities of the electric and magnetic fields are plotted in Fig. 3 as a function of the size parameter, corroborating the expected rapid increase of the intensity with the mode number. It can be seen from the figure that the magnetic intensity enhancement for the first magnetic dipole resonance exceeds 10^{5} and further increases by almost an order of magnitude with each subsequent multipole resonance. High resonances become very narrow. As already mentioned, the reason for the formation of high magnetic fields in dielectrics is associated with the formation of highly localized optical vortices in the material. These vortices can be seen from the electric field streams in Fig. 4, as well as in the distribution of the Poynting vector, both around and inside the particle, as seen in Fig. 5.
The main limiting factor when trying to generate high magnetic fields are dissipation effects. As one can see in Fig. 5, even if low dissipation levels (\(\tan \delta = 10^{  3}\)) do not influence the maximal magnetic fields associated to the magnetic dipole resonance, it can strongly affect the values obtained with higher order resonances, since they are more sensitive to dissipation^{43}.
Fortunately, there are many materials with high dielectric constant and low loss in the GHz spectral range^{51,52}. In this regard, some ceramics in that range might even have what is usually called a "colossal" dielectric constant, reaching extremely high values of \(\varepsilon > 10^{4}\)^{53}. In our experiments, we use more standard, titanatebased ceramics (TiO2, CaTiO3, SrTiO3). These are commonly used for the production of highvoltage capacitors K15U2, with dielectric constant varying in the range \(\varepsilon = 130  180\) and with an associated loss tangent in the range \(\tan \delta = 10^{  4}  10^{  3}\) ^{51}. For the sample used in our experiments, we measured a loss tangent of our ceramics was only \(\tan \delta = 3 \times 10^{  4}\) at a frequency of 1 kHz. According to Ref.^{51}, this loss tangent practically does not change up to a frequency of 1 GHz and increases significantly only at a frequency of 10 GHz.
Methods
Studies of the magnetic field distribution can be performed on the basis of spectroscopic data, which allows defining both \({\text{Re}} \varepsilon\) and \(\tan \delta\) and, in turn, finding the electric and magnetic fields. This technique is used in astronomy for measuring magnetic fields in stars and galaxies^{2,4}. If one is interested in measuring the nearfields, a local probe is necessary. In the case of nanostructures, this probe is typically the tip of a near field scanning optical microscope (NSOM). Metalcoated, aperturetype NSOM tips are particularly sensitive to the magnetic fields and have indeed been used to measure hotspots in the near magnetic field of silicon dimers at visible wavelengths^{28}. In the case of GHz waves, the millimeter—centimeter scale structures with high dielectric constant allows measuring the spectrum of scattering using a local magnetic field sensor^{54,55,56}. In our case, this sensor takes the form of a small metallic loop, which can efficiently measure the magnetic field component parallel to its axis (i.e., perpendicular to the loop plane). When the plane of the sensor loop is placed near the sphere and oriented perpendicular to the incident wave vector k (i.e., parallel to the plane containing the incident H and E fields), we do not measure the magnetic field H of the incident wave. Since the scattered fields may have all different directions, using this configuration its value at this position can be registered, while the signal from a plane EM wave in this position is greatly weakened. In our experiments (see Supplementary Information for details), the spectrum analyzer measures the power attenuation coefficient \(a\) in decibels (dB) unit. Coefficient \(a\) is defined by the expression \(a = 10\;\log \,\,\left( {{{P_{1} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{P_{1} } {P_{0} }}} \right. \kern\nulldelimiterspace} {P_{0} }}} \right)\), where \(P_{0}\) and \(P_{1}\) are the measured signal powers without ceramic sphere and with ceramic sphere, respectively.
Using this technique, we measured the scattering spectrum of a ceramic sphere with a diameter 10.95 mm. Figure 6 shows the results in the vicinity of reference frequency values used to calibrate the measurement of permittivity. As seen from the plots, we were able to see all resonances depicted in Fig. 2, which gave us the ability to precisely specify the dielectric function of the ceramic material. This is done through a simple fitting to Mie theory predictions. Since we know the size of the particle, a diameter 10.95 mm, and the experimentally measured resonant frequencies, we can find a suitable dielectric function by just a fitting, whose results yields the value \(\varepsilon = 144.68\) for the dielectric constant. Moreover, the experiment shows equidistantlyspaced resonant frequencies for the magnetic and electrical vibrations for various modes, in good correspondence with the repeated electric and magnetic dipole resonances predicted by theory. Incidentally, we also confirmed experimentally the scattering directivity effect associated with the realization of the socalled Kerker’s conditions, as seen in Supplementary Fig. S1. At 2.2 GHz one can see almost zero back scattering due to first Kerker condition while, at 2.36 GHz the realization of the second Kerker condition is met, translated in this realization as minima in the forward scattering.
The collected spectroscopic data provides evidence of a huge enhancement of the magnetic intensity H^{2} of about 5 orders of magnitude for the magnetic dipole resonance at 2.26 GHz and up to 8 orders of magnitude for the electric quadrupole resonance near 4.2 GHz. These values,which correlate well with previously predicted results^{43}, are achieved in a situation in which the length of the exciting plane EM wave is larger than the element size and in which the size of the electric and magnetic field probes is much smaller. Such an experimental setup allows not only measuring resonant frequencies, but also measuring the EM field distributions, as well as exploring the interaction of several elements. In particular, using sufficiently small probes and drilling a narrow channel in the sphere, it could be possible even to “travel to its center” as to measure the internal fields of the particle. This fields might get even slightly enhanced in this situation as compared to those of the solid sphere^{57} (see Supplementary Fig. S5 for the theoretical prediction when a small channel of 150 μm diameter drilled in the ceramic particles is considered). According to Mie theory, we can see strong magnetic fields in the vicinity of the particle surface. In Fig. 7, we show that this is indeed the case by plotting the magnetic intensity distribution around the ceramic particle with diameter 10.95 mm and \(\varepsilon = 144.68\) at a frequency of 2.26 GHz (corresponding to the magnetic dipole resonance). In this plot, the yellow region indicates the region inside the particle, the blue solid lines show the magnetic intensity computed using Mie theory and the red dots present the experimental points measured by our magnetic probe sensor. As can be seen, the agreement is remarkable; the small deviation from the Mie theory being related to the finite probe size. These data yields clear indication that, even for the lowest order, magnetic dipole resonance, extremely large enhancement values of up to four orders of magnetic intensity can be achieved. It is easy to estimate from the Mie theory the maximum magnetic intensity inside the particle at the magnetic octupole resonance (this resonance is well recognized in experimental data Fig. 6). It consists field enhancement of above \(H^{2} = \;5 \times 10^{7}\). In fact further increase in magnetic field depends on a dissipation parameter \(\tan \delta\)—how small it can be for higher order resonances at GHz frequency.
Conclusion
To summarize, we have confirmed experimentally and numerically the emergence of huge magnetic field enhancements within and around high refractive index particles. This is achieved in connection with the creation of optical vortices in their nearfield when highorder resonances are excited in these particles. While prone to disappear when even mild dissipation is present, which might make difficult its observation at optical frequencies, these huge magnetic field enhancements are readily available in the GHz range, where one could even potentially benefit from those material systems exhibiting “colossal” permittivities. In this manuscript we verified experimentally a key point relate to magnetic field enhancement 10^{5} compared to magnetic field in plane electromagnetic wave. Theoretically the incident magnetic field can be enhanced by 10^{6}–10^{10} times inside the microwave materials with \(\varepsilon \approx 140  150\). There are many possible applications for magnetic nanojets, including enhancement of radiation emission from magnetic emitters, magnetic absorption, and magnetic nonlinear optical effects. Other possible applications are: spectroscopy, diagnostics based on the Zeeman effect, electron paramagnetic resonance, investigation of the effect of strong magnetic fields on materials (semiconductors) and microchips; devices based on superconductors in a magnetic field, for example, creating current interrupters in a thin superconducting filament.
References
J.L. Bobin, Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion (World Scientific, 2014).
Beskin, V. S., Balog, A., Falanga, M. & Treumann, R. A. Magnetic fields at largest universal strengths: overview. Space Sci. Rev. 191, 1–12 (2015).
Planck units, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units
Beck, R. Magnetic fields in spiral galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 24, 4 (2016).
Kolm, U. & Freeman, A. Intense magnetic fields. Sci. Am. 212, 66 (1965).
Sakharov, A. D. Magnetoimplosive generators. Phys. Uspekhi 9, 294–304 (1966).
K. Coyne, Magnets from Mini to Mighty, Magnet Lab U (2008).
Kapitza, P. L. A method of producing strong magnetic fields. Proc. R. Soc. A 105, 691–710 (1924).
Kapitza, P. L. The study of the magnetic properties of matter strong magnetic fields.—I.—The balance and its properties. Proc. R. Soc. A 131, 224–243 (1931).
Lobet, M. et al. Ultrafast synchrotronenhanced thermalization of laserdriven colliding pair plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 215003 (2015).
Liseykina, T. V., Popruzhenko, S. V. & Macchi, A. Inverse Faraday effect driven by radiation friction. New J. Phys. 18, 072001 (2016).
Wang, Z. B., Luk’yanchuk, B. S., Hong, M. H., Lin, Y. & Chong, T. C. Energy flow around a small particle investigated by classical Mie theory. Phys. Rev. B 70, 035418 (2004).
Bashevoy, M. V., Fedotov, V. A. & Zheludev, N. I. Optical whirlpool on an absorbing metallic nanoparticle. Opt. Express 13, 8372–8379 (2005).
Luk`yanchuk, B. S. & Ternovsky, V. Light scattering by thin wire with surface plasmon resonance: bifurcations of the Poynting vector field. Phys. Rev. B 73, 235432 (2006).
Luk`yanchuk, B. et al. The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Na. Mat. 9, 707–715 (2010).
Luk`yanchuk, B. S., Miroshnichenko, A. E. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonances and topological optics: an interplay of far and nearfield interference phenomena. J. Opt. 15, 073001 (2013).
Hao, F., Nordlander, P., Sonnefraud, Y., Van Dorpe, P. & Maier, S. A. Tunability of subradiant dipolar and Fano type plasmon resonances in metallic ring/disk cavities: implications for nanoscale optical sensing. ACS Nano 3, 643–652 (2009).
Sonnefraud, Y. et al. Experimental realization of subradiant, superradiant, and Fano resonances in ring/disk plasmonic nanocavities. ACS Nano 4, 1664–1670 (2010).
Dregely, D., Hentschel, M. & Giessen, H. Excitation and tuning of higherorder Fano resonances in plasmonic oligomer clusters. ACS Nano 5, 8202–8211 (2011).
Fu, Y. H., Zhang, J. B., Yu, Y. F. & Luk`yanchuk, B. Generating and manipulating higher order Fano resonances in dualdisk ring plasmonic nanostructures. ACS Nano 6, 5130–5137 (2012).
Evlyukhin, A. B., Reinhardt, C., Seidel, A., Luk`yanchuk, B. & Chichkov, B. N. Optical response features of Sinanoparticle arrays. Phys. Rev. B. 82, 045404 (2010).
GarciaEtxarri, A. et al. Strong magnetic response of submicron silicon particles in the infrared. Opt. Express 19, 4815–4826 (2011).
Kuznetsov, A. I., Miroshnichenko, A. E., Fu, Y. H., Zhang, J. B. & Luk`yanchuk, B. Magnetic light. Sci. Rep. 2, 492 (2012).
Evlyukhin, A. B. et al. Demonstration of magnetic dipole resonances of dielectric nanospheres in the visible region. Nano Lett. 12, 3749–3755 (2012).
Geffrin, J. M. et al. Magnetic and electric coherence in forwardand backscattered electromagnetic waves by a single dielectric subwavelength sphere. Nat. Commun. 3, 1171 (2012).
Fu, Y. H., Kuznetsov, A. I., Miroshnichenko, A. E., Yu, Y. F. & Luk`yanchuk, B. Directional visible light scattering by silicon nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 4, 1527 (2013).
Person, S. et al. Demonstration of zero optical backscattering from single nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 13, 1806–1809 (2013).
Bakker, R. M. et al. Magnetic and electric hotspots with silicon nanodimers. Nano Lett. 15, 2137–2142 (2015).
Miroshnichenko, A. E. et al. Nonradiating anapole modes in dielectric nanoparticles. Nat. Comm. 6, 8069 (2015).
Papasimakis, N., Fedotov, V. A., Savinov, V., Raybould, T. A. & Zheludev, N. I. Electromagnetic toroidal excitations in matter and free space. Nat. Materials 15, 263–271 (2016).
Basharin, A. A., Chuguevsky, V., Volsky, N., Kafesaki, M. & Economou, E. N. Extremely high Qfactor metamaterials due to anapole excitation. Phys. Rev. B 95, 035104 (2017).
Luk`yanchuk, B., PaniaguaDomínguez, R., Kuznetsov, A. I., Miroshnichenko, A. E. & Kivshar, Y. S. Suppression of scattering for small dielectric particles: anapole mode and invisibility. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20160069 (2017).
Baryshnikova, K. V., Smirnova, D. A., Luk’yanchuk, B. S. & Kivshar, Y. S. Optical anapoles: concepts and applications. Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1801350 (2019).
Bakker, R. M., Yu, Y. F., PaniaguaDomínguez, R., Luk`yanchuk, B. & Kuznetsov, A. I. Resonant light guiding along a chain of silicon nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 17, 3458–3464 (2017).
PaniaguaDominguez, R. et al. Generalized Brewster effect in dielectric metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 7, 10362 (2016).
Miroshnichenko, A. E. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonances in alldielectric oligomers. Nano Lett. 12, 6459–6463 (2012).
Zhu, A. Y., Kuznetsov, A. I., Luk`yanchuk, B., Engheta, N. & Genevet, P. Traditional and emerging materials for optical metasurfaces. Nanophotonics 6, 452–471 (2017).
Wu, P. C. et al. Optical anapole metamaterial. ACS Nano 12, 1920–1927 (2018).
Kuznetsov, A. I., Miroshnichenko, A. E., Brongersma, M. L., Kivshar, Y. S. & Luk`yanchuk, B. Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures. Science 354, 2472 (2016).
PaniaguaDomínguez, R., Luk`yanchuk, B., Miroshnichenko, A. & SánchezGil, J. A. Dielectric nanoresonators and metamaterials. J. Appl. Phys. 126, 150401 (2019).
PaniaguaDominguez, R., Luk’yanchuk, B., Kuznetsov, A. I. Control of scattering by isolated dielectric nanoantennas. in Dielectric Metamaterials 73–108 (Woodhead Publishing, 2020).
Luk`yanchuk, B., PaniaguaDomınguez, R., Minin, I., Minin, O. & Wang, Z. B. Refractive index less than two: Photonic nanojets yesterday, today and tomorrow. Opt. Mater. Express 7, 1820–1847 (2017).
Wang, Z. B. et al. High order Fano resonances and giant magnetic fields in dielectric microspheres. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–7 (2019).
Aharonov, Y., Colombo, F., Sabadini, I. R., Struppa, D. C. & Tollaksen, J. Some mathematical properties of superoscillations. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 44, 365304 (2011).
Berry, M. V. & Moiseyev, N. Superoscillations and supershifts in phase space: Wigner and Husimi function interpretations. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 47, 315203 (2014).
Berry, M. et al. Roadmap on superoscillations. J. Opt. 21, 053002 (2019).
Wu, S., Wang, G., Zhao, Y. & Su, H. BaOTiO2 microwave ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 23, 2565–2568 (2003).
Naidu, K. C. B., Sarmash, T. S., Maddaiah, M., Reddy, V. N., & Subbarao, T. Structural and Dielectric Properties of CuODoped SrTiO_{3} Ceramics, in AIP Conference Proceedings 1665, 040001 (2015).
Bohren, C. F. & Huffman, D. R. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (WileyInterscience, 2004).
Luk`yanchuk, B., PaniaguaDomınguez, R., Kuznetsov, A. I., Miroshnichenko, A. E. & Kivshar, Y. S. Hybrid anapole modes of highindex dielectric nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. A 95, 063820 (2017).
Skanavi, G. I. Dielectric Polarization and Loss in Glasses and Ceramic Materials with High Dielectric Permeability (Gosénergoizdat, 1952).
Gonzalez, M., Pozuelo, J. & Baselga, J. Electromagnetic shielding materials in GHz range. Chem. Rec. 18, 1–11 (2018).
Krohns, S. et al. Colossal dielectric constant up to gigahertz at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 122903 (2009).
Shvartsburg, A. B., Pecherkin, V. Y., Vasilyak, L. M., Vetchinin, S. P. & Fortov, V. E. Resonant microwave fields and negative magnetic response, induced by displacement currents in dielectric rings: theory and the first experiments. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9 (2017).
Shvartsburg, A. B. et al. Sub wavelength dielectric elliptical element as an anisotropic magnetic dipole for inversions of magnetic field. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 51, 475001 (2018).
Shvartsburg, A. B., Pecherkin, V. Y., Vasilyak, L. M., Vetchinin, S. P. & Fortov, V. E. Dielectric resonant magnetic dipoles: paradoxes, prospects, the first experiments. Phys. Usp. 61, 698–707 (2018).
Kuznetsov, A. I. et al. Splitball resonator as a threedimensional analogue of planar splitrings. Nat. Commun. 5, 3104 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant 14.W03.31.0008). This work was partially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (No. 201200389). The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 200200715. R. P.D. acknowledges support from A*STAR SERC Pharos program, Grant No. 152 73 00025 406 (Singapore) and the AME Programmatic Grant, Singapore, under Grant A18A7b0058. In part of measuring the magnetic intensity distribution this research was partially supported by The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Agreement with Joint Institute for High Temperatures RAS No. 075152020785). In part of measuring spectra and the magnetic intensity distribution this work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (State Assignment No. 075004602100). Z.W. acknowledges European ERDF grants (CPE 81400 and SPARCII c81133) through WEFO, and Royal society grants (IEC\NSFC\181378 and IEC\R2\202178).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors participate in preparing manuscript text. Experimental part of the work is done by L.M.V., V.Ya.P., S.P.V., and V.E.F. Theoretical calculations are done by B.S.L., Z.B.W., R.P.D., and A.A.F.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Luk`yanchuk, B., Vasilyak, L.M., Pecherkin, V.Y. et al. Colossal magnetic fields in high refractive index materials at microwave frequencies. Sci Rep 11, 23453 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598021016441
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598021016441
This article is cited by

Transverse Kerker effect in alldielectric spheroidal particles
Scientific Reports (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.