Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and the abnormal differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells. An increasing number of researches have demonstrated that microRNAs play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes. Herein, we aimed to identify novel potential microRNAs bound up with the diagnosis and prognosis of MDS. MiRNA microarray analysis was used to screen deregulated microRNAs in the bone marrow of MDS patients. qRT-PCR was employed to confirm the microarray results. All members of miR-320 family (miR-320a, miR-320b, miR-320c, miR-320d, and miR-320e) were significantly increased in MDS patients compared to normal control. Although we found no correlation between miR-320 family and most clinical characteristics, high miR-320c and miR-320d expression seemed to be associated with high numbers of bone marrow (BM) blasts and worse karyotype. High expression of all the members of the miR-320 family seemed to be associated with a high prognostic score based on International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). The areas under the miR-320 family member ROC curves were 0.9037 (P < 0.0001), 0.7515 (P = 0.0002), 0.9647 (P < 0.0001), 0.8064 (P < 0.0001) and 0.9019 (P < 0.0001). Regarding Kaplan–Meier analysis, high miR-320c and miR-320d expression were related to shorter overall survival (OS). Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed the independent prognostic value of miR-320d for OS in MDS. The expression of miR-320 family members was up-regulated in MDS, and miR-320 family members could serve as candidate diagnostic biomarkers for MDS. High expression of miR-320d was an independent prognostic factor for OS in MDS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and a high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML)1. MDS mainly occurs in adults over the age of 60, and the morbidity increases with age. Despite the use of chemotherapy and supportive treatment for MDS patients, the median survival time of MDS patients after diagnosis is still only 2.5 years2, and the natural clinical courses and prognosis are extraordinarily heterogeneous. To date, the only way to cure MDS is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, few MDS patients can tolerate HSCT due to the old age of patients3. Therefore, it is particularly important to identify pertinent molecular targets for the effective treatment of MDS, especially specific biomarkers involved in MDS pathogenesis that are relevant to the diagnosis and prognosis of MDS.
MicroRNAs are endogenous small non-coding RNAs that are completely or incompletely complementary to the 3′-UTR of the target gene to regulate gene expression4. An increasing number of researches have indicated that microRNAs might participate in hematopoiesis5,6,7. Furthermore, microRNAs have been demonstrated to be promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and are considered as therapeutic molecular targets in MDS8. A variety of studies have indicated that numerous microRNAs such as miR-451a9, miR-12410, and miR-15511, are relevant to the prognosis of MDS and might participate in MDS pathogenesis. Recently, a few studies showed that miR-320 family was able to act as tumor suppressors by targeting CDK6 and inhibiting proliferation of colon cancer cell12. On the other hand, miR-320a was reported to promote tumorigenesis via targeting TUSC3 in retinoblastoma13. Regarding on hematological malignances, miR-320a could inhibit the malignancy of multiple myeloma by targeting PBX314. However, the role of the miR-320 family in MDS is still unclear. Herein, we investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of the miR-320 family in MDS patients.
Results
MiRNA expression profiles of MDS patients
Eight MDS patients whose samples were used for microarray analysis were divided into lower risk group (low and intermediate-1 risk, n = 4) and higher risk group (intermediate-2 and high risk, n = 4) based on the IPSS definition. Microarray results showed that the expression of each member of the miR-320 family was close to statistical significance (P < 0.05) and the fold change was higher or slightly lower than 2 between the lower risk group and normal control group. However, the expression of each member of the miR-320 family reached statistical significance (P < 0.05) in the higher risk group, and the fold change was higher than 5 between the higher risk group and normal control (Table 1). Part of microarray results were shown in Fig. 1. Subsequently, miR-320 family members expression was validated by qRT-PCR in a large sample size.
Validation of miR-320 family members
miR-320 family members expression was validated in BM from 82 MDS patients and 24 normal controls using qRT-PCR. As displayed in Fig. 2, the expression of miR-320 family members was significantly up-regulated in each group of MDS compared with that in normal controls.
Association of miR-320 family members with clinical characteristics of MDS
To evaluate the clinical implications of miR-320 family member expression, we divided MDS patients into two groups based on the median level of each member of the miR-320 family. The relationship between miR-320 family expression and clinical characteristics was evaluated. As displayed in Table 2, no correlation was found between miR-320 family members and most clinical characteristics. However, high miR-320c and miR-320d expression were associated with a high number of BM blasts (P = 0.003 and P = 0.047), advanced WHO type (P = 0.006 and P = 0.016), and worse karyotype (P < 0.001 and P = 0.024). Additionally, the high expression of all members of the miR-320 family was significantly related to advanced IPSS risk stratification.
Diagnostic accuracy of miR-320 family members in MDS
We used ROC curve analysis to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of miR-320 family members. The AUC for miR-320 family members was as follows: miR-320a, 0.9037 (95% CI 0.8297–0.9777, P < 0.0001); miR-320b, 0.7515 (95% CI 0.6496–0.8535, P = 0.0002); miR-320c, 0.9647 (95% CI 0.9345–0.9949, P < 0.0001); miR-320d, 0.8064 (95% CI 0.7075–0.9053, P < 0.0001); and miR-320e, 0.9019 (95% CI 0.8407–0.9632, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3). These results indicated that miR-320 family members could discriminate MDS patients from normal subjects.
Prognostic implications of miR‑320 family in MDS
To investigate prognostic implications of miR‑320 family members in MDS, we estimated the relationship between each member of miR-320 family and OS. Regarding on Kaplan–Meier analysis, we discovered that high miR-320c and miR-320d expression were related to shorter OS (P = 0.002 and P = 0.032) (Fig. 4). Additionally, multivariate analysis showed that high expression of miR-320d was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.020, Table 3).
Discussion
In present study, we determined the expression of miR-320 family members in the bone marrow of de novo MDS patients. We discovered that miR-320 family members were markedly up-regulated in MDS patients compared with normal control. Additionally, miR-320 family members have been reported to play crucial roles in various cancers. For instance, miR-320a is obviously down-regulated in gastric cancer15, breast cancer16, lung adenocarcinoma17, and osteosarcoma18. Furthermore, down-regulation of miR-320a promoted growth and metastasis of cancer cell. However, in pancreatic cancer, miR-320a was evidently up-regulated and enhanced the drug-resistance and proliferation of pancreatic cancer cell19. Similarly, miR-320b downregulated in various cancers, including colorectal cancer20, nasopharyngeal carcinoma21, osteosarcoma22 and glioma23, indicating that miR-320b might inhibit the progression of these cancers. Moreover, miR-320b was reported to inhibit tumorigenesis by targeting BMI1 in non-small cell lung cancer24. Similar with miR-320a/320b, miR-320d acts as an antioncogene in various cancers, such as glioma25, prostate cancer26, and breast cancer27. However, miR-320d was upregulated in pancreatic cancer28 and rectal cancer29, and high expression of miR-320d was bound up with poor prognosis of rectal cancer. Regarding miR-320c, Iwagami et al. discovered that miR-320c enhanced gemcitabine-resistance by targeting SMARCC1 in pancreatic cancer30. Wang et al. demonstrated that miR-320c was significantly elevated in colon cancer and could be regarded as a diagnostic biomarker of early-stage colon cancer31. Another study found that miR-320c was decreased in bladder cancer and inhibited tumorous behaviors by targeting CDK632. In regard to miR-320e, Perez-Carbonell et al. demonstrated that miR-320e was significantly elevated in colorectal cancer patients with recurrence compared with colorectal cancer patients without recurrence33, indicating that miR-320e expression was associated with the progression of colorectal cancer. Drahos demonstrated that miR-320e was up-regulated in esophageal adenocarcinoma compared to Barrett’s esophagus34. In summary, miR-320 family members play anti-tumor roles in most solid tumors except miR-320a, miR-320c and miR-320d, which are increased in pancreatic cancer.
In regard to hematological malignancies, the role of miR-320 family is complex. Circulating miR-320d was confirmed to be markedly increased in AML and has been regarded as a novel diagnostic biomarker for AML35. However, miR-320d was significantly decreased in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)36. Low expression of miR-320d was associated with poor prognosis of DLBCL. miR-320a was found to be markedly elevated with a 17.502-fold change in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) compared with reactive lymphadenopathy37. miR-320e was increased with a 3.91-fold change in leukemia stem cells (LSCs) after ponatinib treatment38. In multiple myeloma, miR-320 family members acted as tumor suppressors. For instance, miR-320a inhibits tumor growth and increases apoptosis by targeting PBX3 in multiple myeloma14. The oncogene EZH2 was able to directly inhibit the expression of miR-320c to promote tumorigenesis in multiple myeloma39. Additionally, Mittal et al. reported that miR-320a inhibited erythroid differentiation by targeting SMAR1 in K562 cells (chronic myelocytic leukemia cell lineage)40. In our study, the expression of each member of miR-320 family was significantly elevated in MDS patients compared to normal control and showed diagnostic value for MDS. Additionally, high miR-320c and miR-320d expression were associated with poor prognosis of MDS. The exact mechanism and function of miR-320 family members in MDS needed to be study further.
In the present study, we identified miR-320 family members as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for myelodysplastic syndromes. We demonstrated the that expression of miR-320 family members was up-regulated in MDS, and multivariate analysis showed that high expression of miR-320d was an independent prognostic factor for OS. It was suggested that miR-320 family members might serve as oncogenes in MDS. Targeting miR-320 family members may provide a new strategy for MDS therapy in the future.
Methods
Patients
Bone marrow samples were collected from 82 patients with newly diagnosed MDS and AML that transformed from MDS in the Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, China between 2012 and 2017. MDS was diagnosed on the basis of WHO Recommended Criteria (2008). The diagnosis of patients were as follows: 5q-syndrome (n = 3), RA (n = 2), RARS (n = 2), RCMD (n = 24), RAEB-1 (n = 15), RAEB-2 (n = 20) and AML that transformed from MDS (n = 16). The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) was used to calculate the prognostic score of every patient. Clinical parameters of MDS patients were shown in Table 4. All the participants had been given informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Human Ethics Committees Review Board at Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China (Approval Number: 2017(KY-E-098)).
RNA isolation
We separated bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) using density gradient centrifugation. Total RNA was isolated from BM-MNCs of 82 patients and 24 controls by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
MiRNA microarray analysis
Samples from 8 MDS patients and 6 normal controls were analyzed by the miRCURY LNA Array (v.18.0) (Exiqon) technology41. Clinical parameters of 8 MDS patients and 6 normal controls were shown in Table 5. The microarray data was generated as previously reported (PMID: 32629683)42. Significant differentially expressed microRNAs between the two groups were defined as P < 0.05 and |logFC|> 1.
qRT-PCR verification
The microarray results were verified by qRT-PCR in 82 patients (MDS and AML that transformed from MDS) and 24 healthy controls. Total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA. qRT-PCR was performed as previously reported14. Relative quantification was calculated using the 2−△△ct method and U6 was used for normalization. The primers were as follows: U6 forward: 5′GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT3′ and reverse: 5′CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT3′;miR-320a forward:5′AGCTGGGTTGAGAGGGCG3′ and reverse: 5′GTCGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGTT3′; miR-320b forward: 5′AAGCTGGGTTGAGAGGGCA3′ and reverse: 5′GTCGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGTT3′; miR-320c forward: 5′AAAGGCTGGGTTGAGAGGGT3′ and reverse: 5′GTCGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGTT3′; miR-320d forward: 5′GGAAAAGCTGGGTTGAGAGGA3′ and reverse: 5′GTCGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGTT3′; miR-320e forward: 5′GGGAAAGCTGGGTTGAGAA3′ and reverse: 5′GTCGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGTT3’.
Statistical analysis
Microarray analysis is based on Student’s t test (8 MDS patients vs. 6 controls), whereas qRT-PCR validation is based on Mann–Whitney’s U test (82 MDS patients vs. 24 controls). Mann–Whitney’s U test and Pearson Chi square test were used to evaluate relationship between miR-320 family members and clinical parameters. Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to detect sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) for miR-320 family members. Kaplan–Meier method used in univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model in multivariate analysis were used to determine the prognostic value of miR-320 family expression. P < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
References
Montalban-Bravo, G. & Garcia-Manero, G. Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am. J. Hematol. 93, 129–147 (2018).
Pfeilstocker, M. et al. Time-dependent changes in mortality and transformation risk in MDS. Blood 128, 902–910 (2016).
Bejar, R. & Steensma, D. P. Recent developments in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 124, 2793–2803 (2014).
Krol, J., Loedige, I. & Filipowicz, W. The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 597–610 (2010).
Wang, H., Wang, Q., Kleiman, K., Guo, C. & Eitzman, D. T. Hematopoietic deficiency of miR-223 attenuates thrombosis in response to photochemical injury in mice. Sci. Rep. 7, 1606 (2017).
Rasko, J. E. J. et al. miR-9 upregulation leads to inhibition of erythropoiesis by repressing FoxO3. Sci. Rep. 8, 6519 (2018).
Rasko, J. E. J. et al. MiR-125a enhances self-renewal, lifespan, and migration of murine hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell clones. Sci. Rep. 9, 4785 (2019).
Choi, J. S., Nam, M. H., Yoon, S. Y. & Kang, S. H. MicroRNA-194-5p could serve as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk. Res. 39, 763–768 (2015).
Dostalova Merkerova, M. et al. Microarray profiling defines circulating microRNAs associated with myelodysplastic syndromes. Neoplasma 64, 571–578 (2017).
Wang, H. et al. Pyrosequencing quantified methylation level of miR-124 predicts shorter survival for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Clin. Epigenet. 9, 91 (2017).
Choi, Y. et al. Expression and prognostic significance of microRNAs in Korean patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Korean J. Intern. Med. 34, 390–400 (2019).
Tadano, T. et al. MicroRNA-320 family is downregulated in colorectal adenoma and affects tumor proliferation by targeting CDK6. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 8, 532–542 (2016).
Kong, L., Sun, Y., Chen, M., Dai, Y. & Liu, Z. Downregulation of microRNA-320a inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of retinoblastoma cells via targeting TUSC3. Exp. Ther. Med. 20, 9 (2020).
Lu, Y. et al. miR-320a regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis in multiple myeloma by targeting pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 3. Biochem. Biophys. Res Commun. 473, 1315–1320 (2016).
Li, Y. S., Zou, Y. & Dai, D. Q. MicroRNA-320a suppresses tumor progression by targeting PBX3 in gastric cancer and is downregulated by DNA methylation. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 11, 842–856 (2019).
Liu, J. et al. The long non-coding RNA SUMO1P3 facilitates breast cancer progression by negatively regulating miR-320a. Am. J. Transl. Res. 9, 5594–5602 (2017).
Lv, Q. et al. MiR-320a effectively suppresses lung adenocarcinoma cell proliferation and metastasis by regulating STAT3 signals. Cancer Biol. Ther. 18, 142–151 (2017).
Li, C. et al. Upregulation of long non-coding RNA NNT-AS1 promotes osteosarcoma progression by inhibiting the tumor suppressive miR-320a. Cancer Biol. Ther. 20, 413–422 (2019).
Wang, W. et al. MicroRNA-320a promotes 5-FU resistance in human pancreatic cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 27641 (2016).
Wang, H. et al. miR-320b suppresses cell proliferation by targeting c-Myc in human colorectal cancer cells. BMC Cancer 15, 748 (2015).
Li, Y. et al. Overexpression of mitochondria mediator gene TRIAP1 by miR-320b loss is associated with progression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006183 (2016).
Lv, G. Y., Miao, J. & Zhang, X. L. Long noncoding RNA XIST promotes osteosarcoma progression by targeting Ras-related protein RAP2B via miR-320b. Oncol. Res. 26, 837–846 (2018).
Lv, Q. L. et al. Low expression of microRNA-320b correlates with tumorigenesis and unfavorable prognosis in glioma. Oncol. Rep. 38, 959–966 (2017).
Zhang, S. et al. LncRNA NR2F2-AS1 promotes tumourigenesis through modulating BMI1 expression by targeting miR-320b in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 23, 2001–2011 (2019).
Qin, C. Z. et al. Downregulation of microRNA-320d predicts poor overall survival and promotes the growth and invasive abilities in glioma. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 89, 806–814 (2017).
Lin, C. L. et al. Norcantharidin induces mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis through Mcl-1 inhibition in human prostate cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1864, 1867–1876 (2017).
Cava, C. et al. Integration of mRNA expression profile, copy number alterations, and microRNA expression levels in breast cancer to improve grade definition. PLoS One 9, e97681 (2014).
Ye, S. et al. Bioinformatics method to predict two regulation mechanism: TF-miRNA-mRNA and lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA in pancreatic cancer. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 70, 1849–1858 (2014).
Mjelle, R. et al. Identification of metastasis-associated microRNAs in serum from rectal cancer patients. Oncotarget 8, 90077–90089 (2017).
Iwagami, Y. et al. miR-320c regulates gemcitabine-resistance in pancreatic cancer via SMARCC1. Br. J. Cancer 109, 502–511 (2013).
Wang, J. et al. Circulating exosomal miR-125a-3p as a novel biomarker for early-stage colon cancer. Sci. Rep. 7, 4150 (2017).
Wang, X. et al. MicroRNA-320c inhibits tumorous behaviors of bladder cancer by targeting Cyclin-dependent kinase 6. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 33, 69 (2014).
Perez-Carbonell, L. et al. MiR-320e is a novel prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 113, 83–90 (2015).
Drahos, J. et al. MicroRNA profiles of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: Differences in glandular non-native epithelium. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 25, 429–437 (2016).
Zhi, F. et al. Identification of circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for detecting acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS One 8, e56718 (2013).
Wu, P. Y., Zhang, X. D., Zhu, J., Guo, X. Y. & Wang, J. F. Low expression of microRNA-146b-5p and microRNA-320d predicts poor outcome of large B-cell lymphoma treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. Hum. Pathol. 45, 1664–1673 (2014).
Paydas, S. et al. Micro-RNA (miRNA) profile in Hodgkin lymphoma: Association between clinical and pathological variables. Med. Oncol. 33, 34 (2016).
Kayabasi, C. et al. Comparative effect of imatinib and ponatinib on autophagy and miRNome in chronic myeloid leukemia. Gene 637, 173–180 (2017).
Alzrigat, M. et al. EZH2 inhibition in multiple myeloma downregulates myeloma associated oncogenes and upregulates microRNAs with potential tumor suppressor functions. Oncotarget 8, 10213–10224 (2017).
Mittal, S. P., Mathai, J., Kulkarni, A. P., Pal, J. K. & Chattopadhyay, S. miR-320a regulates erythroid differentiation through MAR binding protein SMAR1. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol 45, 2519–2529 (2013).
Castoldi, M. et al. A sensitive array for microRNA expression profiling (miChip) based on locked nucleic acids (LNA). RNA 12, 913–920 (2006).
Wan, C. et al. Microarray analysis of differentially expressed microRNAs in myelodysplastic syndromes. Medicine (Baltimore) 99, e20904 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants of National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81560028, 81160072, and 81700172), Guangxi Natural Science Foundations (no. 2016GXNSFBA380059).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.W., Z.L. conceived the project. J.W., X.L. performed the experiment. Q.X., W.W., and M.W. provided patient samples and clinical data. All authors carefully proof-read the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wan, C., Wen, J., Liang, X. et al. Identification of miR-320 family members as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in myelodysplastic syndromes. Sci Rep 11, 183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80571-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80571-z
This article is cited by
-
MicroRNAs influence and longevity
Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.