Abstract
Dental biofilm present on the tooth surface is associated with oral diseases, such as dental caries and periodontal disease. Because bacterial numbers rapidly increase in saliva during sleep, oral care before sleeping is recommended for the prevention of chronic oral diseases. However, temporal circadian changes in the quantity and quality of dental biofilms are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the impacts of sleeping on dental biofilm amounts and compositions by using an in situ model. The use of this in situ model enabled us to investigate dental biofilm formed in the oral cavity and to perform a quantitative analysis. Subjects began wearing oral splints in the morning or before sleeping, and biofilm samples were collected at 8, 16, and 24 h after the subjects began wearing oral splints; these samples were then used in various experiments. No significant changes in the numbers of biofilm-forming bacteria were caused by sleep. However, the relative abundances of genera related to periodontitis (i.e., Fusobacterium and Prevotella) increased after awakening. In conclusion, the numbers of biofilm-forming bacteria were not affected by sleep, and the abundances of obligate anaerobes increased after sleep. This research may aid in defining efficacious preventive oral care.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The human body is inhabited by an enormous number of bacteria, which form a structure known as a biofilm in habitats such as the skin, airways, gut, vagina, and oral cavity1. More than 700 species of bacteria inhabit the human oral cavity2,3; they form biofilms on various locations, including the tooth surface, hard and soft palate, buccal mucosa, and gingiva. The Human Microbiome Project (HMP, 2007–2017) was established to investigate the characteristics of the human microbiome and its relationship to disease. In this project, the microbiomes of various habitats in the human body were comprehensively investigated by performing a 16S rRNA sequence analysis1. The oral cavity is reportedly one of the most microbiologically diverse sites within the human body4. Most bacteria detected in the oral cavity belong to one of the following five phyla: Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria5,6. The diversity of the salivary and dental plaque microbiome differs widely among individuals. Because the oral cavity acts as the primary entrance to the human digestive tract, it tends to be influenced by host behaviors, such as toothbrushing and mouth washing7. In addition, the microbiome in the oral cavity is also affected by many other factors, including saliva pH, enzymes, host immunity, and antibacterial agents8.
Dental biofilm that forms on the tooth surface is thought to be associated with oral diseases, such as dental caries and periodontal diseases9,10, which are chronic infectious diseases found in many patients worldwide11. An imbalance of the microbiome (dysbiosis) contributes to some diseases, e.g. intestinal diseases, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic disease12,13,14. Recently, the dysbiosis of microbial communities in the oral cavity was found to be associated with oral infections15,16. For example, dental caries were found to result from a dysbiosis with acidogenic and aciduric bacteria, whereas periodontitis is triggered by dysbiosis with proteolytic, obligate anaerobic, and alkaliphilic bacteria17. Therefore, the prevention of these oral diseases requires monitoring and control of the microbial communities within dental biofilm. Biofilms, including dental biofilm, are composed of bacterial cells and exopolysaccharide (EPS)8. Importantly, biofilm-forming bacteria exhibit gene expression patterns that differ from those of planktonic bacteria18,19; moreover, a subset of bacteria in biofilms behave as persister cells, characterized by slow growth20,21. These mechanisms enable biofilms to tolerate exposure to typical antibiotics22,23,24. Therefore, the most effective mechanical approach is daily toothbrushing to remove the dental biofilm, which prevents dental caries, periodontitis, and other oral diseases.
Salivary flow is reportedly lower during sleep than during the daytime25; additionally, because the number of bacteria in saliva increases rapidly at night, it is highest upon awakening26. Accordingly, it is generally recommended that oral care (including toothbrushing) should be performed before sleeping. Patients and clinicians generally agree on the need for oral care before sleep. However, this practice is recommended solely based on the number of bacteria in saliva, and it does not consider the role of dental biofilm in the onset of oral disease. The salivary microbiome is reportedly associated with circadian oscillation27; however, there remains a lack of information regarding the relationship between dental biofilm and the circadian rhythm, as well as regarding the roles of changes in the abilities of dental biofilms to cause oral disease between waking and sleeping hours. Unfortunately, the effects of sleep on the characteristics of dental biofilm have not been sufficiently investigated owing to the difficulty of such experiments.
The concept of dental biofilm was originally reported by Costerton et al.28; various experiments have since been performed to investigate and control biofilm formation29,30. Moreover, many kinds of biofilm models have been developed to investigate human dental biofilm, including in vitro static models and flow cell models31,32,33,34. However, these in vitro models can neither simulate the environment of the oral cavity nor reflect the influence of host factors. Although these problems could potentially be solved by collecting dental biofilm directly from the tooth surface, the structure of collected biofilm would be disturbed by the instruments used for their collection. In previous studies, the growth rate and growth patterns of dental biofilm formed during the daytime and nighttime were recorded by taking photos, which subsequently were used to calculate the area covered by dental biofilm35,36. However, these experiments did not provide an accurate assessment of the amount of dental biofilm.
In our previous work, we developed an in situ dental biofilm model37 that enables the formation of experimental dental biofilm on hydroxyapatite (HA) disks in the oral cavity, which facilitates quantitative analysis. The use of this in situ dental biofilm model enables the collection of samples of dental biofilm formed in oral cavity without disturbing the biofilm structure and investigations of the amount of biofilm per unit area. We previously studied the temporal dynamics of experimental dental biofilm by using this in situ dental biofilm model for 96 h. We observed that, 48 h after the biofilm began to form, the bacterial number and biofilm thickness significantly increased; concurrently, the composition of the microbiota changed. Using a 16S rRNA sequence analysis, we found that mature dental biofilm (after 48 h of growth) had a high abundance of anaerobic bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas genera.
The purpose of the present study was to use our in situ model to investigate the impact of sleeping on the bacterial microbiota within dental biofilm. The findings of this study will contribute to improvements in preventive oral care based on an improved understanding of dental biofilms.
Methods
Selection of study subjects
Ten healthy volunteers (seven men and three women, 27–32 years old) were recruited from among the students and staff of Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry. Healthy subjects were defined as previously reported38. No clinical signs of caries, gingivitis, or periodontitis were detected, and no systemic disease was observed in any of the subjects. The total number of decayed, missing, or filled teeth (DMF) of each participant was recorded as an index of dental caries, and the Community Periodontal Index (CPI) of each participant was recorded as an index of periodontal disease. A summary of the subject characteristics is shown in Table 1. The subjects were asked to avoid using antibiotics for 3 months before beginning this study.
Ethics declarations
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The study design was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry (H29-E17). The experiments were performed in accordance with ethics guidelines concerning medical science studies of humans.
Biofilm formation
The in situ dental biofilm model that we developed previously37 was modified and used to form biofilms. Briefly, individual upper jaw splints as in situ oral devices were vacuum-formed with 1.5-mm-thick thermoplastic resin sheets (Erkodule, Erkodent, Pfalzgrafenweiler, Germany) and divided into left and right pieces. HA disks (Olympus Terumo Biomaterials, Tokyo, Japan) simulating the enamel surface of teeth were inserted into the buccal side of the appliances (Fig. 1). All subjects brushed their teeth, without using toothpaste or mouthwash, before they inserted the oral appliance.
The experimental schedule is shown in Fig. 2. All ten subjects participated in both experimental schedules (waking and sleeping). A rest period of least 2 weeks was implemented between participation in the waking and sleeping schedules. Subjects began to wear the oral appliance in the morning for the waking schedule and directly before sleeping for the sleeping schedule. For both schedules, subjects wore the oral appliance continuously for 24 h, except for during meals and toothbrushing. When the subjects removed their oral appliances for eating and toothbrushing, they placed the appliances in cases with wet paper to avoid desiccation of the biofilms on the HA disks. After meals, the subjects brushed their teeth before resuming appliance wear, and they recorded the time of the meal in experimental time. For both schedules, the subjects slept for 8 h (from 24:00 to 8:00) and recorded their wake-up time and bedtime. Biofilm samples were collected at 8, 16, and 24 h after insertion of the oral appliances. Because eight HA disks were inserted in the appliance, and the number of biofilm samples formed at a single time was limited, each schedule was repeated twice (first and second phases, respectively), such that each participant wore the appliance for 4 days in total. The subjects participated in the different schedules in a randomly assigned order. In the first phase, two disks were collected at three sample collection times. One disk was used for viable bacterial cell counts, and the other disk was used for DNA extraction for real-time PCR and 16S rRNA sequence analysis. In the second phase, two disks were collected at each sample collection time for use in confocal laser scanning microscopy observations.
Viable bacterial cell counts
Biofilm samples were sonicated for 5 min in sterile distilled water. The resulting bacterial suspension was diluted and spread onto Colombia blood agar plates (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and incubated in aerobic conditions for 24 h or anaerobic conditions using Anaero Pack Kenki (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. Tokyo, Japan) for 48 h. Three plates were used for each concentration and each condition. The numbers of biofilm-forming bacteria were calculated by counting colonies.
Quantification of total biofilm-forming bacteria by real-time PCR
Bacterial DNA was extracted with a DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Real-time PCR was performed in a total volume of 20 µl, composed of 10 µl of Power SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 1 µl of DNA, and the following universal bacterial 16S rRNA primers: 27F (AGRGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG39,40) and 338R (TGCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT41). The final concentration of forward and reverse primers was 900 nM. The Applied Biosystems 7500 fast real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA) was used to estimate the numbers of biofilm-forming bacteria via a calibration curve method. The calibration curve was prepared using Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 genomic DNA.
16S rRNA gene sequencing
The V1–V2 region of 16S rRNA was amplified by using the primer set 27F and 338R. The Illumina library was prepared with the tailed PCR method, in accordance with the instructions of the “Illumina 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation Guide”. Sequencing was performed with a MiSeq instrument (Illumina Inc.). The sequences were processed and clustered into operative taxonomic units (OTUs) with a 97% similarity cutoff using the Green Gene database. The results of sequences were analyzed using the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy observations
A modified biofilm staining method was used as previously described42. To analyze the structure of the biofilms, bacterial cells were stained with 4ʹ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and EPS was stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled concanavalin (Con A; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and FITC-wheat germ agglutinin (WGA; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The final concentrations of fluorescent labeling reagents were 125 ng/ml (FITC-ConA and FITC-WGA) and 105 ng/ml (DAPI). Biofilm samples on HA disks were immersed in aliquots of fluorescent labeling reagent for 30 min. A confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 700, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to observe the biofilms, and Imaris software (Imaris 5. 0. 1, Bitplane AG, Zürich, Switzerland) was used for image analysis.
Statistical analysis
Friedman’s test was used to compare the numbers of living bacteria and total bacteria, as well as the volumes of total bacteria and EPS. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the relative abundances of each genus. Differences among schedules with a p-value of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses and graphical outputs were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics (version 22.0, IBM SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
Numbers of biofilm-forming bacteria
Viable cell counts under aerobic and anaerobic conditions increased over time in both the waking and sleeping schedules (Fig. 3). Statistically significant increases were observed from 8 to 16 h, as well as from 16 to 24 h, under aerobic conditions in both the waking and sleeping schedules (Fig. 3a). The population of viable cells increased significantly from 16 to 24 h under anaerobic conditions (Fig. 3b). Similarly, a real-time PCR analysis revealed that the numbers of total bacteria increased over time in both schedules (Fig. 4). However, no significant differences were observed between the waking and sleeping schedules at each sample collection time (8 h, 16 h, 24 h) in terms of the viable cell count and real-time PCR analysis (Friedman’s test, p > 0.05).
16S rRNA gene sequencing
The microbial composition according to bacterial taxa is shown in Fig. 5. There were individual differences in the composition of bacterial taxa, but common tendencies were observed. Biofilm-forming bacteria on the hydroxyapatite (HA) disks mostly belonged to one of the following five phyla: Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria (Fig. 5a). The relative abundance of Bacteroidetes was higher in the sleeping schedule than in the waking schedule at 8 h. Moreover, the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes increased over time in the waking schedule (7.2% of biofilm-forming bacteria at 8 h, 13.1% at 16 h, and 26.1% at 24 h), whereas there was almost no change over time in the sleeping schedule. The relative abundance of Firmicutes decreased over time in both the waking and sleeping schedules. The relative abundances at the genus level are shown in Fig. 5b. The relative abundance of Neisseria was lowest at 8 h in the sleeping schedule. The relative abundance of Streptococcus decreased over time in both schedules, especially from 16 to 24 h in the waking schedule. Genera with significant differences in relative abundance between the two schedules at each sample collection time are shown in Fig. 6. At 8 h, the relative abundance of Neisseria was significantly higher in the waking schedule than in the sleeping schedule; in contrast, the relative abundances of Corynebacterium, Prevotella, Capnocytophaga, and Fusobacterium were higher in the sleeping schedule (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.05). At 16 h, the relative abundances of Corynebacterium and Granulicatella were higher in the sleeping schedule than in the waking schedule. In contrast with the result at 8 h, the relative abundances of Prevotella and Fusobacterium at 24 h were significantly higher in the waking schedule than in the sleeping schedule (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.05). Biofilm samples collected upon awakening showed high abundances of obligate anaerobes, such as members of the Prevotella and Fusobacterium genera.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy observations
Representative images of experimental biofilms on the HA disks are shown in Fig. 7a. In EPS–bacteria staining, blue-stained bacteria were observed surrounded by green-stained EPS (Fig. 7a). Small numbers of microcolonies were observed at 8 h in both schedules; however, the microcolonies in the sleeping schedule tended to be small and sparse (Fig. 7a). The numbers of EPS-enmeshed microcolonies increased over time and the biofilms covered nearly the entire HA disk surface at 16 h (Fig. 7a). The volume of EPS did not change from 8 to 16 h in the waking schedule (Fig. 7b), whereas the volumes of total bacteria gradually increased in both the waking and sleeping schedules (Fig. 7c). The volume of EPS was significantly greater at 8 h in the waking schedule than in the sleeping schedule (Fig. 5b, Friedman test, p < 0.05); it increased more rapidly from 8 to 16 h, as well as from 16 to 24 h, in the sleeping schedule than in the waking schedule.
Discussion
The objective of this study was to investigate whether, and if so, how the characteristics of in situ dental biofilm are influenced by sleeping. Understanding changes in such characteristics may lead to the development of methods to effectively control dental biofilm, thereby preventing biofilm-associated oral diseases such as dental caries and periodontitis. The results obtained will have important implications for planning optimal oral hygiene, especially in providing scientific evidence for establishing effective timing for oral care. Because people typically brush their teeth every day, this study investigated the change in in situ biofilm characteristics on a daily basis. The applied study design has an important advantage for investigating the influence of sleeping. To research the impacts of sleeping, sample collection before and after sleeping would seem to be a reasonable method; however, a biofilm collected after sleeping would typically be older than a biofilm collected before sleeping, thus precluding an accurate investigation of the impact of sleeping. Here, we employed two schedules so that biofilms of the same age could be obtained, thus allowing the specific effects of sleeping to be investigated.
Viable cell counts and real-time PCR analyses revealed that the numbers of biofilm-forming bacteria increased over time under both the waking and sleeping schedules. We previously reported that the population of biofilm-forming bacteria increased in two steps: from the onset of biofilm formation to 48 h, and from 48 h onwards37. The findings of the present study are consistent with the findings of our previous study, in that the bacterial number increased over time. The number of bacteria in saliva was previously reported to increase rapidly during the night, and it was higher upon awakening in the morning26. The number of biofilm-forming bacteria was expected to increase along with an increase of the bacteria in saliva. Notably, no significant differences were observed in the populations of biofilm-forming bacteria between the waking and sleeping schedules at each sample collection time; this result suggests that the number of biofilm-forming bacteria is not affected by sleeping, although methodological limitations remain. The number of dental biofilm-forming bacteria is not closely related to the number of bacteria in saliva, although saliva is always present in the oral cavity, and the tooth surface is continuously in contact with saliva. The main reason for the increase in bacterial number within saliva during sleep is thought to be the decrease in salivary flow during this period. Furthermore, a decrease in salivary flow could reduce the level of salivary antibacterial agents, thus leading to bacterial growth in saliva. However, because bacteria within a biofilm are resistant to antibacterial agents, the population of biofilm-forming bacteria may be less affected than the planktonic cells in saliva by a reduction in the level of salivary antibacterial agents. The volumes of living bacteria (Supplemental data) and total bacteria obtained by CLSM observation correspond to the viable cell count and real-time PCR results, in that both the volume and the number of bacteria increased over time.
In the present study, changes in bacterial composition after sleep were observed via a 16S rRNA sequence analysis. The bacteria contained in the in situ dental biofilm belonged to one of the following five phyla: Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria. These results are consistent with those of some previous reports5,6. At the genus level, the relative abundances of the genera Prevotella and Fusobacterium increased in 8-h- and 24-h-old biofilms after sleeping. A previous study revealed that the abundances of Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Fusobacterium increased rapidly at 48 h after the onset of formation of an in situ dental biofilm37. In the report by Socransky et al.43, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia, and Prevotella nigrescens were included in the orange complex, which was closely associated with periodontitis. The abundance of Porphyromonas increased over time under both the waking and sleeping schedules, and no significant difference was observed between these two schedules at any sample collection timepoint. In a previous study, we reported that the relative abundance of Porphyromonas also increased at 24 h after biofilm formation, compared with that at 8 h post-biofilm formation, with a less remarkable change as observed after 48 h post-biofilm formation37. Thus, the increase in the abundance of Porphyromonas observed here may be simply related to the process of biofilm maturation; unlike Fusobacterium and Prevotella, for Porphyromonas, abundance may not be affected by sleep.
Saliva plays an important role in the host defense system44. Saliva contains various antibacterial agents, such as mucins, lysozyme, lactoferrin, statherin, cystatins, histatins, and immunoglobulins (especially sIgA). Salivary flow and swallowing contribute to the removal of bacteria and are important for balancing the oral microbiome. The environment of the oral cavity, including the saliva components, oxygen concentration, and salivary flow, is presumed to affect the dental biofilm microbiota.
The relative abundance of Neisseria was significantly higher in the waking schedule than in the sleeping schedule at the 8 h timepoint. Bacteria belonging to the genus Neisseria are considered indigenous bacteria. Neisseria reportedly comprises 10% of dental plaque from 1 to 3 days, but its population decreases after 5 days45. In the present study, the population of Neisseria was lower in 8-h-old dental biofilm formed during sleep than in 8-h-old dental biofilm formed during the daytime; it increased rapidly from 8 to 16 h during the sleeping schedule. In contrast, during the waking schedule, its abundance was nearly constant from 8 to 24 h. The abundance of Neisseria is presumably dependent on the environment in the early stages of biofilm formation but is not affected 8 h after the start of biofilm formation.
In the present study, the relative abundance of Corynebacterium remained higher in the sleeping schedule than in the waking schedule from 8 to 24 h. Corynebacterium matruchotii is considered important for the mineralization of dental biofilm and the formation of dental calculus46. In addition to being a risk factor related to periodontitis, dental calculus encourages the accumulation of oral bacteria on dental surfaces. The relative abundance of Corynebacterium is reportedly 1% in 3-day-old dental plaque, and this abundance increases after 3 days45. Therefore, in situ dental biofilm that begins to form at night maintains a high abundance of Corynebacterium and may be closely associated with periodontal disease.
The volume of EPS was significantly greater for the waking schedule than for the sleeping schedule at 8 h. The microbial composition of 8-h-old biofilm differed between the sleeping and waking schedules. As previously reported, saliva is the main source of nutrition for dental biofilm during sleep47. Notably, the composition of saliva during sleep differs from its composition during wakefulness25,48; for example, the amounts of sugar and proteins in saliva are lower during sleep. This is potentially because sleeping time serves as a “famine period”49. Some proteins in saliva assist bacterial cells in adhering to the tooth surface as a pellicle50. During sleep, the lower concentrations of proteins and different pellicle characteristics may affect the structure of the resulting biofilm. Therefore, changes in the bacterial composition of in situ dental biofilm and the oral environment during sleep can result in reduced EPS production by biofilm-forming bacteria.
There have been multiple investigations of the ideal timing and frequency of oral care (including toothbrushing). Lang et al.51 reported that oral hygiene procedures at 48-h intervals could prevent gingivitis in healthy volunteers. However, for caries prevention, toothbrushing is recommended after every meal because the main cause of dental caries is the acidic environment created by dental bacteria52,53; notably, the enamel surface pH significantly decreases after exposure to sucrose54.
The results of the present study suggest that the number of biofilm-forming bacteria is not affected by sleep, whereas the relative abundances of obligates anaerobes (e.g., Fusobacterium and Prevotella) are higher after waking than during the daytime. Importantly, obligate anaerobes in dental biofilm are associated with periodontitis30. Therefore, effective periodontitis prevention may involve the removal of dental biofilm that contains more obligate anaerobes upon awakening. However, the pathogenic characteristics of obligate anaerobes in dental biofilm were not investigated in this study, so further analysis is required.
There are some limitations in this study. First, this research focused on only healthy subjects without dental caries or periodontitis. For establishing methods of controlling such oral diseases in individuals suffering from them, additional investigations into the characteristics of dental biofilm in patients with oral diseases are needed. Second, this study used 16S rRNA sequencing to examine the bacterial composition in dental biofilm at the genus level. To better clarify the differences in biofilm properties between periods of sleep and wakefulness, future work will need to evaluate function, especially pathogenic properties or metabolic activity, and conduct a species-level analysis. Third, sleep was self-reported and was not monitored because it is difficult to accurately monitor sleeping. The biofilm composition may be different in individuals with sleep disorders, such as insomnia and sleep apnea, or who breath through their mouths rather than their noses during sleep; if these issues can be clarified by sleep monitoring, it could allow for oral care to be tailored to individual patients.
In conclusion, dental biofilm containing obligate anaerobes was formed, and the dental biofilm structure changed during sleep, whereas the numbers of biofilm-forming bacteria did not change during sleep. The findings of this study will aid in the establishment of evidence-based methods for improved oral care.
Data availability
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Human Microbiome Project Consortium. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 486, 215–221 (2012).
Kroes, I., Lepp, P. W. & Relman, D. A. Bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 14547–14552 (1999).
Aas, J. A., Paster, B. J., Stokes, L. N., Olsen, I. & Dewhirst, F. E. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 5721–5732 (2005).
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2013).
Zaura, E., Keijser, B. F. J., Huse, S. M. & Crielaard, W. Defining the healthy “core microbiome” of oral microbial communities. BMC Microbiol. 9, 259 (2009).
Takeshita, T. et al. Bacterial diversity in saliva and oral health-related conditions: The Hisayama Study. Sci. Rep. 6, 22164 (2016).
Hall, M. W. et al. Inter-personal diversity and temporal dynamics of dental, tongue, and salivary microbiota in the healthy oral cavity. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 3, 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-016-0011-0 (2017).
Stewart, P. S. & Costerton, J. W. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358, 135–138 (2001).
Clarke, J. K. On the bacterial factor in the etiology of dental caries. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 5, 141–147 (1924).
Asikainen, S., Chen, C. & Slots, J. Likelihood of transmitting Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in families with periodontitis. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 11, 387–394 (1995).
Peres, M. A. et al. Oral diseases: A global public health challenge. Lancet 394, 249–260 (2019).
Prakash, S., Rodes, L., Coussa-Charley, M. & Tomaro-Duchesneau, C. Gut microbiota: Next frontier in understanding human health and development of biotherapeutics. Biologics 5, 71–86 (2011).
Giongo, A. et al. Toward defining the autoimmune microbiome for type 1 diabetes. ISME J. 5, 82–91 (2011).
Lynch, S. V. & Pedersen, O. The human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2369–2379 (2016).
Simón-Soro, A. & Mira, A. Solving the etiology of dental caries. Trends Microbiol. 23, 76–82 (2015).
Hajishengallis, G. & Lamont, R. J. Beyond the red complex and into more complexity: The polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis (PSD) model of periodontal disease etiology. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 27, 409–419 (2012).
Rosier, B. T., Marsh, P. D. & Mira, A. Resilience of the oral microbiota in health: Mechanisms that prevent dysbiosis. J. Dent. Res. 97, 371–380 (2018).
Prigent-Combaret, C., Vidal, O., Dorel, C. & Lejeune, P. Abiotic surface sensing and biofilm-dependent regulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 181, 5993–6002 (1999).
Kuchma, S. L. & O’Toole, G. A. Surface-induced and biofilm-induced changes in gene expression. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11, 429–433 (2000).
Costerton, J. W. et al. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 41, 435–464 (1987).
Ma, L. et al. Assembly and development of thePseudomonas aeruginosabiofilm matrix. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000354 (2009).
Mah, T. F. & O’Toole, G. A. Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol. 9, 34–39 (2001).
Spoering, A. L. & Lewis, K. Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials. J. Bacteriol. 183, 6746–6751 (2001).
Stewart, P. S. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 292, 107–113 (2002).
Dawes, C. Circadian rhythms in human salivary flow rate and composition. J. Physiol. 220, 529–545 (1972).
Nolte, W. A. Oral Microbiology with Basic Microbiology and Immunology 2nd edn, 3–44 (Mosby Press, St. Louis, 1982).
Takayasu, L. et al. Circadian oscillations of microbial and functional composition in the human salivary microbiome. DNA Res. 24, 261–270 (2017).
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S. & Greenberg, E. P. Science. Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science 284, 1318–1322 (1999).
Kolenbrander, P. E. et al. Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development. Periodontology 2000(42), 47–79 (2006).
Marsh, P. D., Moter, A. & Devine, D. A. Dental plaque biofilms: Communities, conflict and control. Periodontology 2000(55), 16–35 (2011).
Asahi, Y. et al. Effects of N-acyl homoserine lactone analogues on Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm formation. J. Periodontal. Res. 45, 255–261 (2010).
Yamaguchi, M. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis mutant defective in a putative glycosyltransferase exhibits defective biosynthesis of the polysaccharide portions of lipopolysaccharide, decreased gingipain activities, strong autoaggregation, and increased biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 78, 3801–3812 (2010).
Maezono, H. et al. Antibiofilm effects of azithromycin and erythromycin on Porphyromonas gingivalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 5887–5892 (2011).
Yamamoto, R. et al. Time course of gene expression during Porphyromonas gingivalis strain ATCC 33277 biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 6733–6736 (2011).
Quirynen, M., Dekeyser, C. & van Steenberghe, D. The influence of gingival inflammation, tooth type, and timing on the rate of plaque formation. J. Periodontol. 62, 219–222 (1991).
Quirynen, M. & van Steenberghe, D. Is early plaque growth rate constant with time?. J. Clin. Periodontol. 16, 278–283 (1989).
Wake, N. et al. Temporal dynamics of bacterial microbiota in the human oral cavity determined using anin situmodel of dental biofilms. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 10, 16018. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjbiofilms.2016.18 (2016).
Aagaard, K. et al. The Human Microbiome Project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters. FASEB J. 27, 1012–1022 (2013).
Lane, D. J. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics (eds Stackebrandt, E. & Goodfellow, M.) (Wiley, Chichester, 1991).
Weisburg, W. G., Barns, S. M., Pelletier, D. A. & Lane, D. J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 173, 697–703 (1991).
Suzuki, M. T. & Giovannoni, S. J. Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 625–630 (1996).
Yamamoto, R. et al. The sinR ortholog PGN_0088 encodes a transcriptional regulator that inhibits polysaccharide synthesis in Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 33277 biofilm. PLoS ONE 8, e56107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056017 (2013).
Socransky, S. S., Haffajee, A. D., Cugini, M. A., Smith, C. & Kent, R. L. Jr. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J. Clin. Periodontol. 25, 134–144 (1998).
Pedersen, A. M. L. & Belstrøm, D. The role of natural salivary defences in maintaining a healthy oral microbiota. J. Dent. 80(Suppl 1), S3–S12 (2019).
Ritz, H. L. Microbial population shifts in developing human dental plaque. Arch. Oral Biol. 12, 1561–1568 (1967).
Ooi, S. W., Smillie, A. C., Kardos, T. B. & Shepherd, M. G. Intracellular mineralization of Bacterionema matruchotii. Can. J. Microbiol. 27, 267–270 (1981).
Marsh, P. D., Do, T., Beighton, D. & Devine, D. A. Influence of saliva on the oral microbiota. Periodontology 2000(70), 80–92 (2016).
Sashikumar, R. & Kannan, R. Salivary glucose levels and oral candidal carriage in type II diabetics. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 109, 706–711 (2010).
Lingström, P., Imfeld, T. & Birkhed, D. Comparison of three different methods for measurement of plaque-pH in humans after consumption of soft bread and potato chips. J. Dent. Res. 72, 865–870 (1993).
Lendenmann, U., Grogan, J. & Oppenheim, F. G. Saliva and dental pellicle—A review. Adv. Dent. Res. 14, 22–28 (2000).
Lang, N. P., Cumming, B. R. & Löe, H. Toothbrushing frequency as it relates to plaque development and gingival health. J. Periodontol. 44, 396–405 (1973).
Williams, J. L. A contribution to the study of pathology of enamel. Dent. Cosmos 39, 269–301 (1897).
Black, G. V. Operative Dentistry 6th edn, Vol. 1 (Medico-Dental Pub. Co. Press, South Milwaukee, 1936).
Robert, M. S. & Benjamin, F. M. A quantitative method for evaluating physical and chemical agents which modify production of acids in bacterial plaques on human teeth. J. Dent. Res. 22, 4–51 (1943).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number JP17H04384. A portion of this study was supported by the Initiative for Realizing Diversity in the Research Environment and SECOM Science and Technology Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.S., N.K., Y.A., Y.N., and S.E. designed the research. H.M. made the oral appliances for the in situ dental biofilm model. M.S. and N.K. contributed to the sample collection. M.S., N.K., and D.M. performed experiments and acquired data. M.S., N.K., Y.A., M.H., D.M., and S.N. analyzed data. M.S., N.K., Y.A., Y.N., D.M., S.N., T.I., and S.E. interpreted the data. Y.N., T.I., and S.E. advised on data analysis. M.S. wrote the manuscript. N.K., Y.A., D.M., S.N., and Y.N. revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sotozono, M., Kuriki, N., Asahi, Y. et al. Impacts of sleep on the characteristics of dental biofilm. Sci Rep 11, 138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80541-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80541-5
This article is cited by
-
An extensive description of the microbiological effects of silver diamine fluoride on dental biofilms using an oral in situ model
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Establishment of novel in vitro culture system with the ability to reproduce oral biofilm formation on dental materials
Scientific Reports (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.