Comprehensive surveillance data suggest a prominent role of parvovirus B19 infection in Belarus and the presence of a third subtype within subgenotype 1a


Human parvovirus B19 (B19V) infection is not notifiable in Belarus and its most common clinical presentation erythema infectiosum (EI) is often difficult to distinguish from other exanthematous diseases. The objective of this study was to provide comprehensive data about EI epidemiology in Belarus based on the serological and molecular investigation of samples from measles and rubella discarded cases collected between 2005 and 2019. Overall, 4919 sera were investigated for IgM antibodies against B19V and the positive cases were analysed according to year, season and age. B19V DNA was amplified by PCR in a total of 238 sera from all over the country, and sequenced for phylogenetic analyses. B19V infection was confirmed in 1377 (27.8%) measles and rubella discarded cases. Two high incidence periods and a seasonal increase of EI between mid-February to mid-July were identified. Children from 4 to 6 and from 7 to 10 years of age represented the largest groups of patients (22.51% and 22.66% of all cases, respectively), followed by adults between 20 and 29 years of age (14.23%). Among the 238 B19Vs sequenced, one belonged to subgenotype 3b and 237 to subgenotype 1a with 81 (34.2%) clustering with subtypes 1a1 and 153 (64.6%) with 1a2. Three strains (1.2%) formed an additional, well-supported cluster suggesting the presence of another subtype of 1a, tentatively named 1a3. The epidemiological and molecular analyses highlighted not only the prominent role of B19V in exanthematous diseases in Belarus, but also suggested a previously underestimated diversity of subgenotype 1a sequences with a third subtype 1a3.


The main clinical presentation of human parvovirus B19 (B19V) infection is erythema infectiosum (EI) or “fifth disease”, which is common in childhood but may also be observed in adults1. The similarity of EI to other exanthematous diseases makes its clinical diagnosis difficult and requires laboratory confirmation2. The importance of laboratory diagnosis of EI increased after implementation of measles and rubella elimination programs, since these infections, especially rubella, can be suspected in case of EI3. Therefore, laboratory verification of B19V infection has been introduced in many countries4,5,6,7,8.

In Belarus, vaccination against measles and rubella led to a significant reduction in measles incidence and to elimination of rubella and prevention of congenital rubella syndrome cases9. Laboratory diagnosis of B19V infection was started in Belarus in 2005 at the National laboratory as an additional investigation of samples from suspected measles and rubella cases and continues to be carried out only in this laboratory for patients from all over the country. Introduction of B19V diagnosis allowed to confirm a large outbreak in 200610,11. Phylogenetic analysis of the strains collected between 2005 and 2008 showed the circulation of subgenotype 1a all over the country and allowed to discriminate two groups of sequences designated as clusters 1 and 210. The worldwide existence of two genetic variants of subgenotype 1a, named subtypes 1a1 and 1a2, has since been suggested12 and these subtypes correspond to our clusters 2 and 1, respectively. While current evidence does not suggest any difference between subtypes concerning the clinical symptoms caused12, such classifications have value for epidemiological tracing and analysis10,13.

Here we present the results of the serological and molecular investigation of B19V infection based on samples received between 2005 and 2019, thus providing comprehensive data about EI prevalence and epidemiology in Belarus.


Of the 6318 sera collected in the frame of the nationwide measles/rubella surveillance in Belarus between 2005 and 2019, 728 (11.5%) were positive for measles IgM and 640 (10.1%) for rubella IgM (Table 1). All rubella cases and 89% of measles cases were diagnosed in persons older than 10 years of age. For the remaining 4950 cases (78.4%), both infections were excluded. In total 4919 (99.4%) serum samples were available for further testing and B19V IgM antibodies were found in 1377 (27.8%) discarded cases. B19V DNA was amplified by PCR in a total of 238 sera from all over the country, and sequenced for phylogenetic analyses.

Table 1 Number of samples from measles/rubella suspected patients and number and percentage of measles, rubella and B19V IgM positives by year, Belarus, 2005–2019.

Long-term EI incidence and seasonal trends

The mean EI incidence during the 15-year study period was 0.96 per 100 000 inhabitants (95% CI 0.76–1.16). The lowest and highest incidence rates differed by a factor of 11.94 (0.17 in 2008 versus 2.03 in 2006) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1

Erythema infectiosum incidence per 100,000 population in Belarus between 2005 and 2019.

EI was registered throughout the year and the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the mean level of the year calculated over all 15 years was 0.08 (Fig. 2). The seasonal increase lasted 5 months (mid-February to mid-July), the incidence reached the maximal level of 0.14 per 100,000 inhabitants in May and the lowest rate, namely 0.03 per 100,000 inhabitants, in August. The slight increase during the autumn months did not exceed the upper limit of the annual mean (Fig. 2).

Figure 2

Seasonal trend of erythema infectiosum in Belarus calculated over the whole study period (2005–2019).

Age distribution

B19V infection was laboratory confirmed in patients from less than 1 to 64 years of age (median 13 years). In total, 62.8% (865/1377) of the patients were children up to 14 years of age, with the 4 to 6 and the 7 to 10 year-old representing the largest groups (22.51% and 22.66%, respectively). The third biggest group were adults between 20 and 29 years of age (14.23%) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3

Proportion of B19V IgM positive patients by age group in Belarus between 2005 and 2019.

The highest EI incidence rates per 100 000 people of each age group were also found in children between 4 and 6 years (6.86; 95% CI 3.90–9.82) and in 7 to 10 year-old (5.48; 95% CI 3.12–7.83) and were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in all other age groups (Fig. 4). The incidence rates in the age groups < 1–3, 11–14, 15–19, 20–29 and 30–39 years did not differ significantly from each other (P > 0.1). The lowest rates were found in 40–49 and 50–64 year-old adults with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01) to all other age groups (exception: there was no significant difference between the 40–49 and the 30–39 year-olds (P = 0.09)).

Figure 4

Erythema infectiosum incidence rates per 100,000 people of each age group, Belarus, 2005–2019.

Based on the EI incidence rates, the patients can be divided into three groups: 0–10 year-olds (4.67; 95% CI 3.39–5.94), 11–39 year-olds (0.95; 95% CI 0.64–1.26) and 40–64 year-old (0.13; 95% CI 0.01–0.25). The risk of contracting EI was 35.8 times higher in 0–10 year-old and 7.3 times higher in 11–39 year-old compared to adults of at least 40 years of age.

Genotype distribution

Of the 238 sequences obtained between 2005 and 2019, 237 belonged to subgenotype 1a with 81 (34.2%) of them clustering with 1a1 and 153 (64.6%) with 1a2 reference sequences (Fig. 5). Three strains (1.2%) formed an additional branch suggesting a third variant of 1a. One strain, obtained in 2006 from a child with aplastic anaemia who came from Kazakhstan, belonged to genotype 3b (Fig. 5).

Figure 5

Phylogenetic tree based on 994 nt of the NS1/VP1-unique region junction including the B19V sequences from Belarus. Only one representative strain is shown for identical sequences of subtypes 1a1 and 1a2, and the total number of sequences is added behind in brackets; all three sequences of the provisional subtype 1a3 are presented; the subgenotype 3b strain is marked with a black dot. The strains are named with location, epidemiological week and year or with country name and year/years for representative strains of identical sequences isolated at different time points and/or at different locations. The reference sequences are identified by GenBank accession number and name and are marked with an open circle. Only bootstrap values ≥ 70% (1000 replicates) are shown.

Both 1a1 and 1a2 subtypes circulated in Belarus with a different prevalence during individual years (Fig. 6).

Figure 6

Prevalence of B19V 1a subtypes in individual years, Belarus, 2005–2019.

At the time of the 2005/2006 epidemic, subtype 1a2 represented more than 75.0% of all strains and accounted for 100.0% and 75.0% in 2007 and 2008, when the lowest EI incidence rate was observed. Between 2009 and 2012, 1a1 dominated with 59–86% of the sequences. In 2013, the prevalence of subtype 1a2 increased again and 1a2 strains were dominant (75.0–100.0%) between 2014 and 2016, when another rise of incidence was registered, and in the two subsequent years. In the low EI incidence year 2019, 1a1 was the only subtype found.

Among the 237 sequences of 1a the mean distance was 1.02% (Table 2).

Table 2 Intra- and inter-group genetic diversity based on pairwise nucleotide substitution differences.

The 1a1 and 1a2 subtypes had a similar mean genetic diversity of 0.63% and 0.60%, respectively. Two predicted amino acid differences were found between 1a1 and 1a2 subtypes in the most antigenic region VP1u, namely 30 V/L and 107 D/N, both in the Belarusian and in reference strains.

The mean between group genetic distance was 1.39% for subtypes 1a1 and 1a2, and reached 1.93% and 2.09% between each of these subtypes and 1a3, respectively (Table 2). Phylogenetic analysis of all genotype 1a sequences covering the 994 nt NS1/VP1u region downloaded from GenBank (November 2019) showed that only few sequences from Osh (n = 3), Bishkek (n = 7), US (n = 1), Japan (n = 1) and Germany (n = 2) grouped with the 1a3 strains from Belarus, forming a clearly distinct cluster of genotype 1a (Fig. 7). The within group mean distance for this cluster was 0.53%.

Figure 7

Phylogenetic tree based on 994 nt of the NS1/VP1-unique region junction. All sequences closely related to the 1a3 strains from Belarus available on Genbank were included. The sequences from Belarus are marked with a black dot. Only bootstrap values ≥ 70% (1000 replicates) are shown.


Diagnosis of B19V infection was introduced in Belarus as an additional investigation of cases that previously would have been classified only as “neither measles nor rubella”. Surveillance sensitivity for measles and rubella is considered adequate if at least two clinically compatible cases per 100,000 population per year are rejected after laboratory examinations14. In all but three years (2007, 2008, 2010), this indicator exceeded the minimal level (Table 1), demonstrating the reliable detection of patients with acute exanthema. Thus, even in the absence of mandatory notification of B19V infection, comprehensive data concerning epidemiological and molecular characteristics of EI in Belarus were obtained.

B19V was constantly an important cause of exanthematous diseases representing overall 27.8% of the measles/rubella negative cases (Table 1). Some studies have shown a lower proportion of B19V infection (e.g. 2.5% in patients from Brazil5 and 4.5% in patients from Ireland15), which is most likely due to patient selection, study location and period (high or low incidence settings and years) and/or assays used. In our study, only clinically suspected measles or rubella cases were investigated, which led to a high confirmation rate of EI, similar to what was reported from Finland (20%4), Bulgaria (22%7) and Brazil (31.8%16). Our EI incidence values, obtained by investigating only measles and rubella negative samples, certainly underestimate B19V incidence, because we did not consider other clinical presentations of B19V infection, such as isolated arthropathy or hepatitis, which are, however, considered to be rare17,18. A previous study investigating 942 people between less than 1 and 68 years of age from the general population in Belarus found an overall seroprevalence of 51.2%. Seropositivity increased from 9.8% in up to 4 year old children to 85.1% in 40–45 year olds, with the highest increase in the age group 5–9 years19. Thus, the seroprevalence data largely agree with our EI incidence results, which provide an approximation of B19V infection in Belarus, despite the high number of subclinical infections20 and our disregard of the rare clinical presentations of B19V infection.

The long-term dynamics confirmed a cyclic course of EI in Belarus with significant variation in annual incidence rates (0.17 versus 2.03). The highest rates were observed in 2006 and in 2015–2016, suggesting a quite long epidemic cycle similar to some other studies21,22. However, a slight increase in incidence was detected in between the major epidemics, potentially pointing to the more frequently reported 4–6 years periodicity23,24.

As is typical for moderate climate countries15,23, EI in Belarus has a winter-spring-early summer seasonality. Although the data clearly showed that EI is predominantly a childhood disease in Belarus, the third most frequently affected age group were 20–29 year old people, suggesting a risk of infection during pregnancy, with all the potential sequelae this may entail24. This is also confirmed by our analysis of non-immune hydrops fetalis: the mothers of the 12 cases identified in Belarus during 7 years of follow-up were 20–38 years of age, with a median of 28.5 years25.

The molecular investigation of B19Vs confirmed the predominance of subgenotype 1a. The only subgenotype 3b strain was detected in 2006 in a patient from Kazakhstan and has never been found in Belarus again, suggesting importation as also reported from the UK, Greece and Brazil26,27,28.

Although 66.2% of the sequenced strains belonged to 1a2, this subtype was not dominant during all years but was associated with both periods of increased incidence (Fig. 6). Co-circulation of two subtypes has been reported from the Netherlands and Brazil12,27, but there was no clear connection to outbreaks. In Japan, however, B19V strains belonging to a group named IV circulated during an epidemic in 1981–1982, while group II strains, probably imported from the US or Europe, caused the next epidemic in 1986–198729. In Belarus, virus importation linked to an increased incidence was not detected, but interestingly, the prevalence of 1a1 was highest in the inter-epidemic period between 2009 and 2012. It cannot be excluded that the circulation of subtype 1a1 is quite stable and during the years of increased incidence (and high prevalence of subtype 1a2) is more difficult to detect than in low incidence years. There was no statistically significant difference concerning geographical regions, age of the patients, or seasonal distribution for the strains selected for sequencing during epidemic and inter-epidemic periods.

Like in other countries12,13,27, the average genetic distance between the subtypes 1a1 and 1a2 was small in Belarus (1.32%) with a similar within-group genetic distance of about 0.6%. These data and the lacking molecular information from before 2005, do not allow speculating that one of the subtypes is more ancient and/or has been circulating for a longer time-period in the country. At the same time, in the highly immunogenic N-terminus of VP1u there were two amino acid differences between the subtypes with one of them (30 V/L) located in the most significant neutralizing epitope. However, this change does not influence the structural conformation of this region and antibody binding30.

Analysis of three outlier strains detected in Belarus in 2017 within subgenotype 1a led to our suggestion that a third subtype, named in accordance with B19V nomenclature31 as subtype 1a3, exists. Although full genome sequencing will bring further clarity, the current data based on 994 bp of the NS1/VP1u region showed a high bootstrap support (93, Fig. 7) for the cluster containing the 1a3 sequences. The phylogenetic analysis done to determine subtypes 1a1 and 1a2 showed the same separation both for the full-genome sequences and for NS1 or VP1/2 sequences12. Current data suggest that 1a3 has only once been described as dominant, namely in Osaka in 1986–198732. Since, it has occasionally been detected in different parts of Europe and the US and further research is required to determine its geographical spread and prevalence.

The data presented here demonstrate that high-quality surveillance of measles and rubella can also provide comprehensive data on non-notifiable rash and fever diseases such as EI. Our findings did not only highlight the prominent role of B19V in Belarus, but also contributed to a better understanding of EI epidemiology in the country and likely in general in temperate zones. The molecular analyses suggested a previously underestimated diversity of subgenotype 1a sequences on a global level with a potential third subtype 1a3.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The research is not a clinical trial and therefore does not need to be registered. No humans or animals were treated for the study. The study protocol was approved by the Medical council of the Ministry of Health, Republic of Belarus. The authors had no contact to the patients. The serum samples were collected by medical staff in hospitals or outpatient clinics in accordance with “Requirements for the organization and conducting of anti-epidemic measures aimed at preventing the introduction and spread of measles and rubella” (# 130, December 26, 2013) based on the Law of the Republic of Belarus “Sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population” (January 7, 2012). Information regarding patient demographics was extracted from the medical records. Upon arrival at the National Measles and Rubella Reference Laboratory, a unique identifier number was attributed to each sample and was used for all data analyses. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.


In the frame of the nationwide measles/rubella surveillance in Belarus between 2005 and 2019, a total of 6318 serum samples from measles and rubella suspected cases between 0 and 70 years of age were collected. All samples found negative for both measles and rubella were tested for IgM antibodies against B19V with commercial ELISA kits (Biotrin (2005–2007), DRG (2008), Virion\Serion (2009–2017) or Euroimmun (2018–2019)). The kit used in a certain year depended on national procurement. All ELISA tests used had a sensitivity of at least 97.7% and a specificity of minimum 97.9% according to the kit manuals, suggesting that false-positive and false-negative results are very unlikely to occur. The assays were performed as recommended by the manufacturers and the results were interpreted qualitatively. For patients with multiple specimens, only the sample collected at the earliest time point was tested for B19V infection.

EI incidence rate determination

Nationwide overall EI incidence rates were calculated for each year from 2005 to 2019 by dividing the aggregated number of laboratory-confirmed cases by the aggregated population or age group population using National statistics data (

The long-term trend was determined using regression analysis and was estimated by the average incidence growth rate. The monthly dynamics were estimated by the average long-term monthly data. To identify the seasonal rise, the Poisson method was used. The age distribution was studied in 9 age groups: up to 3 years old, 4–6, 7–10, 11–14, 15–19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, and ≥ 50 years old. High-risk age groups were identified by comparing incidence rate ratios (IRR). The group with the lowest incidence rate was used as reference. Confidence intervals (CI) were determined by the Student's method.

DNA amplification and sequencing

Samples for genotyping were selected to represent all the different geographical regions of the country affected in a certain year. No other selection criteria such as age of the patients or sex were considered. DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol from 200 µl of serum with the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen). Viral DNA for sequencing was prepared by nested-PCR using previously described primers e1855f, e1863f, B19-R1 and B19-R2 for amplification of a 1,100-bp region spanning the NS1/VP1-unique region junction (NS1/VP1u)28,33. The PCR products were analysed in a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Products for sequencing were purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen).

PCR products were sequenced with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Life Technologies), using the nested PCR primers on a capillary sequencer (models 3130/3500 Avant, Applied Biosystems). Sequences were edited using SeqScape Software v3.0 (Applied Biosystems) and then aligned with references in ClustalW (integrated in MEGA version 5).

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic analysis using MEGA version 534 was based on the Neighbor Joining and Kimura 2-parameter methods and the 994 nt NS1/VP1u proposed for genotyping33. Genetic distances based on the Kimura 2-parameter model were calculated with MEGA version 5. The best fitting model (T92 + G) was used to confirm topology.

The new sequences are available under GenBank accession numbers MN737618-MN737621, MN817160-MN817227, MT371078 and MT371079.


  1. 1.

    Broliden, K., Tolfvenstam, T. & Norbeck, O. Clinical aspects of parvovirus B19 infection. J. Intern. Med. 260, 285–304 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dietz, V., Rota, J., Izurieta, H., Carrasco, P. & Bellini, W. The laboratory confirmation of suspected measles cases in settings of low measles transmission: Conclusions from the experience in the Americas. Bull. World Health Organ. 82, 852–857 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lambert, S. B. et al. Enhanced measles surveillance during an interepidemic period in Victoria. Med. J. Aust. 172, 114–118 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Davidkin, I. et al. Etiology of measles- and rubella-like illnesses in measles, mumps, and rubella-vaccinated children. J. Infect. Dis. 178, 1567–1570 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    de Moraes, J. C. et al. Etiologies of rash and fever illnesses in Campinas, Brazil. J. Infect. Dis. 204(Suppl 2), S627-636 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Siennicka, J., Stefanoff, P., Rogalska, J. & Trzcińska, A. Etiology of measles suspect cases reported in 2006–2007 in Poland. Przegl. Epidemiol. 65, 39–44 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ivanova, S. K. et al. Insights into epidemiology of human parvovirus B19 and detection of an unusual genotype 2 variant, Bulgaria, 2004 to 2013. Euro Surveill. 21, 2 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rezaei, F. et al. Prevalence and genotypic characterization of human parvovirus B19 in children with measles- and rubella-like illness in Iran. J. Med. Virol. 88, 947–953 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Samoilovich, E. O. Vaccine-preventable infections surveillance in Belarus: accordance with international standards. Zdravookhranenie. 6, 7–11 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yermalovich, M. A., Hübschen, J. M., Semeiko, G. V., Samoilovich, E. O. & Muller, C. P. Human parvovirus B19 surveillance in patients with rash and fever from Belarus. J. Med. Virol. 84, 973–978 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yermalovich, M. A. et al. Etiology of maculopapular rash in measles and rubella suspected patients from Belarus. PLoS ONE 9, e111541 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Molenaar-de Backer, M. W. A., Lukashov, V. V., van Binnendijk, R. S., Boot, H. J. & Zaaijer, H. L. Global co-existence of two evolutionary lineages of parvovirus B19 1a, different in genome-wide synonymous positions. PLoS ONE 7, e43206 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Slavov, S. N. et al. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of human parvovirus B19 isolated from Brazilian patients with sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia major and healthy blood donors. J. Med. Virol. 84, 1652–1665 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Eliminating measles and rubella. Framework for the verification process in the WHO European Region. (World Health Organization, Regional office for Europe, 2014).

  15. 15.

    Nicolay, N. & Cotter, S. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of parvovirus B19 infections in Ireland, January 1996-June 2008. Euro Surveill. 14, 19249 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Oliveira, S. A. et al. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of human parvovirus B19 infection in an urban area in Brazil (Niterói city area, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 97, 965–970 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Koliou, M. et al. Acute hepatitis and myositis associated with erythema infectiosum by Parvovirus B19 in an adolescent. BMC Pediatr. 14, 6 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Barah, F., Whiteside, S., Batista, S. & Morris, J. Neurological aspects of human parvovirus B19 infection: A systematic review. Rev. Med. Virol. 24, 154–168 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yermalovich, M. A., Dronina, A. M. & Samoilovich, E. O. Prevalence of IgG antibodies to parvovirus B19 in population of Belarus. Epidemiol. Vacc. Prevent. 2, 27–32 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Landry, M. L. Parvovirus B19. Microbiol. Spectr. 4(3), 2015 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Naides, S. J. Erythema infectiosum (fifth disease) occurrence in Iowa. Am. J. Public Health. 78, 1230–1231 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Aherfi, S. et al. Increased incidence of acute parvovirus B19 infections in Marseille, France, in 2012 compared with the 2002–2011 period. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, O176-181 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Enders, M., Weidner, A. & Enders, G. Current epidemiological aspects of human parvovirus B19 infection during pregnancy and childhood in the western part of Germany. Epidemiol. Infect. 135, 563–569 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Xiong, Y. Q. et al. The risk of maternal parvovirus B19 infection during pregnancy on fetal loss and fetal hydrops: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Virol. 114, 12–20 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yermalovich, M. A. et al. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis and outcomes of parvovirus-induced nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Epidemiol. Infect. Dis. Curr. Items. 3, 57–64 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cohen, B. J., Gandhi, J. & Clewley, J. P. Genetic variants of parvovirus B19 identified in the United Kingdom: Implications for diagnostic testing. J. Clin. Virol. 36, 152–155 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cubel Garcia, R. C. et al. Molecular diversity of human parvovirus B19 during two outbreaks of erythema infectiosum in Brazil. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 21, 102–106 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Servant, A. et al. Genetic diversity within human erythroviruses: Identification of three genotypes. J. Virol. 76, 9124–9134 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Umene, K. & Nunoue, T. Current molecular epidemiology and human parvovirus B19 infection. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 50, 285–294 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Dorsch, S. et al. The VP1-unique region of parvovirus B19: Amino acid variability and antigenic stability. J. Gen. Virol. 82(Pt 1), 191–199 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Toan, N. L. et al. Phylogenetic analysis of human parvovirus B19, indicating two subgroups of genotype 1 in Vietnamese patients. J. Gen. Virol. 87(Pt 10), 2941–2949 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Suzuki, M., Yoto, Y., Ishikawa, A. & Tsutsumi, H. Analysis of nucleotide sequences of human parvovirus B19 genome reveals two different modes of evolution, a gradual alteration and a sudden replacement: A retrospective study in Sapporo, Japan, from 1980 to 2008. J. Virol. 83, 10975–10980 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hübschen, J. M. et al. Phylogenetic analysis of human parvovirus b19 sequences from eleven different countries confirms the predominance of genotype 1 and suggests the spread of genotype 3b. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47, 3735–3738 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tamura, K. et al. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The study was supported by a Belarus State Scientific and Technical Program “Infectious Diseases and Microbiological Biotechnologies”, state registration numbers 19974335, 20115325, 20142772.

Author information




M.Y. was involved in study coordination and contributed to serological and molecular testing, to data analysis and interpretation and to writing the first draft of the manuscript; A.D. was involved in the analysis and interpretation of epidemiological data; G.S. contributed to the molecular testing and data analysis; E.S. contributed to study coordination, data interpretation and revised the manuscript; V.K. was involved in the molecular data analysis and interpretation; A.S. was involved in the molecular testing; J.H. characterised the B19 viruses, was involved in data analysis and result interpretation as well as the writing of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina A. Yermalovich.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yermalovich, M.A., Dronina, A.M., Semeiko, G.V. et al. Comprehensive surveillance data suggest a prominent role of parvovirus B19 infection in Belarus and the presence of a third subtype within subgenotype 1a. Sci Rep 11, 1225 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing