Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Local injections of β-NGF accelerates endochondral fracture repair by promoting cartilage to bone conversion

Abstract

There are currently no pharmacological approaches in fracture healing designed to therapeutically stimulate endochondral ossification. In this study, we test nerve growth factor (NGF) as an understudied therapeutic for fracture repair. We first characterized endogenous expression of Ngf and its receptor tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA) during tibial fracture repair, finding that they peak during the cartilaginous phase. We then tested two injection regimens and found that local β-NGF injections during the endochondral/cartilaginous phase promoted osteogenic marker expression. Gene expression data from β-NGF stimulated cartilage callus explants show a promotion in markers associated with endochondral ossification such as Ihh, Alpl, and Sdf-1. Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed the promotion of genes associated with Wnt activation, PDGF- and integrin-binding. Subsequent histological analysis confirmed Wnt activation following local β-NGF injections. Finally, we demonstrate functional improvements to bone healing following local β-NGF injections which resulted in a decrease in cartilage and increase of bone volume. Moreover, the newly formed bone contained higher trabecular number, connective density, and bone mineral density. Collectively, we demonstrate β-NGF’s ability to promote endochondral repair in a murine model and uncover mechanisms that will serve to further understand the molecular switches that occur during cartilage to bone transformation.

Introduction

Worldwide, bone fractures are associated with significant disability and morbidity, while imposing substantial financial burden on injured individuals1. While bone has the capacity to fully regenerate, delayed healing or nonunion occurs in approximately 5–10% of cases2. However, delayed healing rates increase to almost 50% in patients with vascular damage or high co-morbidity burdens such as diabetes, increased age, smoking, and obesity3,4. Current standard of care for malunions is surgical intervention to increase stability or promote healing through the application of bone grafts. There are currently no pharmacological agents approved to accelerate fracture healing or treat nonunions. The development of novel orthobiologics to accelerate fracture repair could significantly improve patient outcomes.

Bone fractures heal primarily through endochondral ossification (EO), a process by which an avascular, aneural cartilage intermediate transforms into vascularized and innervated bone. Endochondral fracture repair is a dynamic regenerative process that proceeds through four overlapping phases5,6,7,8. First, following the fracture, a hematoma forms to stop the bleeding, contain debris, and activate a pro-inflammatory response that initiates repair within the first 3–5 days in a murine fracture model9,10. During this pro-inflammatory phase, osteoprogenitor cells along the bone surfaces undergo direct osteogenic differentiation (intramembranous ossification) to form new bone along the existing bone adjacent to the fracture site. Later, in the fracture gap, periosteal progenitor cells migrate across the fibrin matrix of the hematoma to differentiate into chondrocytes and generate a provisional cartilaginous matrix starting around 5 days post-fracture11,12. Chondrocytes then mature through hypertrophy to promote vascular invasion, mineralization, and transformation into the osteoblasts that form the new bone (7–21 days)13,14,15. The newly-formed trabecular bone continues remodeling in the subsequent weeks into a cortical bone indistinguishable from native bone in form and function6,7.

While the molecular pathways that regulate chondrogenesis and hypertrophy are well described16,17, the mechanisms regulating conversion of cartilage to bone are not completely understood. Initial chondrogenic differentiation is established through expression of transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), which stabilizes the transcription factor Sox9 required for cartilage formation18. Expression of Sox9 is critical for preventing osteogenic specification by suppressing Runx2 and canonical Wnt signaling19. The process of chondrocyte hypertrophy is pivotal in the endochondral conversion of cartilage to bone and is a process tightly regulated through a complex negative feedback loop between Indian hedgehog (Ihh) and parathyroid hormone related protein (PTHrP)20. Ihh is a key regulator of chondrocyte hypertrophy and bone formation21,22 with expression of Ihh observed in both hypertrophic chondrocytes and osteoblasts at the chondro-osseous transition zone (TZ) of fracture calluses23,24. Current evidence suggests that subsequent transformation of these hypertrophic chondrocytes into osteoblasts is regulated by the loss of Sox9 expression and activation of canonical Wnt signaling25,26,27,28,29.

Despite the importance of endochondral ossification to successful fracture repair, therapeutic approaches to bone regeneration have traditionally focused on promoting intramembranous ossification through the use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), which forms bone through direct osteoblast differentiation of osteochondroprogenitors30. BMP-2 is the only osteoinductive growth factor with FDA approval for treatment of problematic fractures with a very narrow indication window associated with surgical implantation within a carrier scaffold7,31. However, clinical application of BMP-2 in fracture healing has become very limited due to uncertain efficacy, high cost, and a growing profile of side effects that has forced the FDA to issue a warning of potential serious complications associated with BMP-232. As such, there remains an unmet clinical need for alternative biologics that stimulate fracture healing. Importantly, we believe there is an opportunity to develop novel therapeutic approaches to fracture repair that builds on the molecular and cellular foundations of endochondral ossification.

While it has long been understood that bone is a highly innervated organ system33,34 the functional role of innervation in bone development, homeostasis and fracture repair is complex and evolving. Nerve growth factor (NGF) was first discovered in the early 1950s and following decades of research it is now established for a role in regulating differentiation, growth, survival and plasticity of cholinergic neurons in the central and peripheral systems35,36. NGF exerts its trophic function primarily by binding to the high affinity tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA). During development, the NGF-TrkA pathway is essential for load-induced bone formation in mice and exogenous NGF delivery was shown to stimulate angiogenesis and activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling to promote osteogenic lineage progression37,38.

Recently, NGF-TrkA signaling was shown to be acutely upregulated following stress fracture, and required for triggering reinnervation, vascularization, and osteoblastic activity during repair39. Stress fractures, tiny cracks in the bone caused by repetitive stress over time, are unique in that they heal through intramembranous ossification, rather than through endochondral ossification described above. In this study, we aimed to understand endogenous signaling patterns of NGF-TrkA during endochondral ossification and test whether NGF could be used therapeutically to promote healing. We hypothesized that local injections of NGF, timed to endogenous expression patterns, would promote endochondral fracture repair. In testing our hypothesis, this study is the first to identify an array of molecular switches that NGF acts upon in hypertrophic cartilage. Importantly, our data suggest NGF acts mechanistically to promote cartilage to bone conversion thus improving fracture repair.

Results

NGF and TRKA are expressed at the chondro-osseous transition zone during endogenous endochondral fracture repair

We first sought to determine the spatiotemporal parameters of endogenous NGF and TrkA expression during endochondral fracture repair in a murine model of long bone healing. Tibia fractures were created using a three-point bending device to create closed, mid-shaft fractures in the right tibia of adult wild type mice (Fig. 1a). As demonstrated previously14,15, these non-stabilized fractures generate a robust cartilage callus, as visualized by Hall and Brunt Quadruple (HBQ)-stained sections (cartilage = blue, bone = red) of tibiae harvested 14 days post-fracture, (Fig. 1b). By utilizing NGF-eGFP reporter mice, we were able to visualize the expression domain of NGF within the chondro-osseous transition zone (TZ) of the fracture callus via fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1c). TrkA expression appeared in fewer cells but could also be found within cells at this transition zone utilizing TrkA-LacZ reporter mice (Fig. 1d–f).

Figure 1
figure1

Endogenous expression of Nerve growth factor (NGF) and its receptor Tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TRKA) within fracture callus during endochondral repair. (a) A gross fluoroscope image of the entire tibia with the red frame indicating the mid diaphyseal, unstabilized bone fracture. (b) Representative image of HBQ stained section of tibia fracture callus 14 days post-fracture (p.f.), (n = 4). Scale bar: 1 mm (c) Fluorescence image NGF-eGFP with DAPI of chondro-osseous transition zone (TZ) 14 days p.f. (n = 4). Scale bar: 200 μm. (d) Brightfield image of X-GAL stained callus 14 days p.f. (n = 4). Arrows indicate additional areas of LACZ + cells within callus. Scale bar: 500 μm (e) Higher magnification image of TZ within fracture callus. (f) Higher magnification image of cortical bone shows no staining. (e,f) Scale bars: 200 μm (g) Relative expression (2-ΔCT) normalized to Gapdh of Ngf and (h) TrkA harvested from fracture callus at 7, 10, and 14 days p.f. Error bars represent SEM. *p < 0.05; determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

After establishing the spatial expression patterns of NGF and TrkA at the TZ using histology, we aimed to define the temporal expression patterns of NGF and TrkA using gene expression. Fracture calluses were isolated 7, 10, and 14 days following fracture, mRNA isolated using TRIzol and RT-PCR used to quantify expression of Ngf and TrkA. Our data show similar temporal expression patterns of Ngf and TrkA with a peak 10 days post fracture (Fig. 1g,h).

Endochondral delivery of β-NGF is more osteogenic than early in fracture repair

We next aimed to test the therapeutic efficacy of exogenous β-NGF in long bone fracture healing. When developing novel therapies for fracture healing the majority of drugs are given immediately after fracture by default. However, based on the endogenous spatiotemporal expression patterns of NGF-TrkA correlating with the conversion of cartilage to bone, we wanted to understand if matching therapeutic delivery to the timing of this endogenous expression pattern would be more efficacious. Therefore, we tested two different time points of β-NGF injections: early, during the pro-inflammatory and intramembranous phase of repair (day 4–6, Fig. 2a), or later, during the endochondral phase of cartilage maturation (day 7–9, Fig. 2c). Local delivery was performed on isoflurane anesthetized animals by injecting 0.5 μg β-NGF, or basal media as a control. Early β-NGF injections, resulted in significantly increased relative expression of collagen 1 (Col1) (Fig. 2b). However, there were significant decreases in osteogenic markers osteocalcin (Oc) and osteopontin (Op); and the pro-angiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf) (Fig. 2b). Interestingly, later β-NGF injections, robustly stimulated expression of osteogenic markers Oc and Op (Fig. 2d). We observed non-significant changes in mRNA expression of Col1 (p = 0.06) and Vegf (p = 0.06) following β-NGF injections on the endochondral regimen (Fig. 2d).

Figure 2
figure2

Local β-NGF injections during hypertrophic cartilage phase promotes osteogenic marker expression. (a) Timeline schematic of fracture and three daily injections 0.5 μg β-NGF vs control (media injected) starting at 4 days post-fracture. (b) Expression levels of selected osteogenic and angiogenic markers from whole-callus tissue harvested 24 h after final injection. (c) Timeline of fracture and three daily injections 0.5 μg β-NGF vs control) starting at 7 days post-fracture. (d) Expression levels of osteogenic and angiogenic markers from whole-callus tissue harvested 24 h after final injection. All expression levels are relative to Gapdh; calculated by 2-ΔCT. Error bars represent SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; determined by 2-tailed t test.

β-NGF stimulation of fracture-callus derived cartilage explants promotes programs associated with endochondral ossification

The endogenous spatiotemporal expression patterns of NGF-TrkA in the TZ and enhanced osteogenic response of cartilage to β-NGF suggested to us that hypertrophic cartilage could be responsive to NGF. To test this, we isolated the cartilage from day 7 fracture calluses, as done previously14,15. Explants were cultured to hypertrophy in vitro and treated with or without 0.5 μg/mL recombinant human β-NGF, the biologically active form of NGF40, for 24 h followed by RNA-sequencing (RNAseq). Similar to the in vivo study we found that the osteogenic marker Oc was significantly upregulated in the cartilage explant study (p = 1.88E−24, Supplemental Table 1). Additional analysis revealed a number of other significantly upregulated genes established to play a role in endochondral ossification, such as, Indian hedgehog (Ihh), alkaline phosphatase (Alpl), parathyroid hormone 1 receptor (Pth1r), Wnt receptors (Lrp5, Frzd5) and angiogenic receptors (Pdgfrb) (Fig. 3a). Of the downregulated genes, the two of most interest were plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (Pvt1) and caspase 4 (Casp4) (Fig. 3a), both known to modulate apoptosis. A complete summary of differentially expressed genes is provided in Supplemental Table 2.

Figure 3
figure3

Recombinant human β-NGF (β-NGF) promotes gene expression profile for endochondral bone formation. (a) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in hypertrophic cartilage stimulated with β-NGF. Threshold set to ≥ 1 log2 fold change (equal to ≥ twofold change), endochondral ossification-associated markers are denoted (n = 3). (b) Upregulated molecular function categories generated by EnrichR (maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/), gene ontology terms are sorted by p values with corresponding adjusted p value and odds ratio (c) Heatmap depicting relative expression of genes associated with Wnt activation, PDGF binding, and integrin binding. p < 0.05, Benjamini–Hochberg method. Panel a was generated by the R package ggplot2 (version 3.2.1)84. Panel c was generated by Complexheatmap (version 2.0) on Bioconductor (Bioconductor.org).

Subsequent functional enrichment analysis using EnrichR showed multiple categories of molecular functions that were associated with endochondral ossification, fracture repair, and tissue remodeling. The three most significantly upregulated molecular function categories were: Wnt activation (p = 0.0067), Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) binding (p = 0.0051), and integrin binding (p = 0.013) (Fig. 3b). With additional enrichment analysis, we then created a heat cluster map of differentially expressed genes according to these molecular function categories (Fig. 3c).

To confirm our RNAseq data suggesting Wnt was the most significantly upregulated molecular function following β-NGF treatment of cartilage ex vivo (Fig. 3b,c), we utilized a murine Axin2-eGFP reporter model to compare Wnt expression in vivo in mice treated with β-NGF to those without. Tibia fractures were made in the Axin2-eGFP mouse as described previously and β-NGF was injected days 7–9 post-fracture (Fig. 4a). Visually, our control mice showed no major presence of Axin2-eGFP positive cells in the TZ (Fig. 4b,c). However, there was an induction of Axin2-eGFP in cells at the TZ of β-NGF treated mice (Fig. 4d,e). Quantification by Image-J confirmed the induction of Axin2-eGFP after β-NGF treatment compared with the lack of Axin2-eGFP presence in the control group (Fig. 4f).

Figure 4
figure4

Local injections of β-NGF induce Wnt activation in the TZ and nominal increase of endothelial cell infiltration of cartilage callous. (a) Timeline schematic of fracture and subsequent daily injections of β-NGF. (b) Representative image of HBQ stained section of the chondro-osseous transition zone (TZ) from control group (media injections) with (c) a corresponding fluorescent DAPI-stained image of adjacent slide. (d) Image of HBQ stained TZ from β-NGF treated mice with corresponding (e) fluorescent DAPI stained image of an adjacent slide (f) Quantification of Axin2-eGFP presence within TZ of fracture callus as percentage (%) of area. Images of (g) HBQ stained section of cartilage tissue within fracture callus from control group and corresponding image (h) of Anti-CD31 Diaminobenzidine (DAB) stained section. (i) HBQ stained section from β-NGF treated group and corresponding (j) CD31-DAB stained section. (k) Quantification of DAB stain within cartilaginous tissue as percentage (%) of area. All scale bars = 500 μm. Error bars represent SEM. **p < 0.01; determined by 2-tailed t test.

Given literature evidence that NGF signaling precedes and coordinates vascularization of bone tissue38, we wanted to measure if local β-NGF injections promoted the infiltration of endothelial cells into the cartilage callus. Therefore, angiogenesis was quantified using immunohistochemistry performed to the CD31 endothelial cell marker day 10 post-fracture in wild type mice that received the endochondral delivery of β-NGF. Vascular invasion to the cartilage callus is observed in both the controls (Fig. 4g,h), with slightly more intense staining in the β-NGF group (Fig. 4i,j). Quantification by Image-J indicates only a nominal increase in CD31-positive cells in cartilage tissue of β-NGF treated mice (p = 0.12) (Fig. 4k).

Local β-NGF injections accelerates endochondral bone formation by 14 days post-fracture

We next tested functional outcomes of fracture healing with the endochondral delivery of therapeutic β-NGF using histomorphometric and quantitative μCT analysis on treated and control tibias 14 days post fracture. Histology clearly shows the increased formation of trabecular bone (red) and decreased cartilage (blue) in fractures receiving β-NGF relative to control (Fig. 5a,b). Quantification of the cartilage tissue showed an almost 50% decrease in absolute volume (Fig. 5c) and percent composition (cartilage volume/total volume) within the callus of β-NGF treated mice (Fig. 5d). Conversely, quantification of trabecular bone confirmed a similar increase in absolute bone volume (Fig. 5e) and composition (bone volume/total volume) of the callus after β-NGF treatment (Fig. 5f). Importantly, there was no difference in volume of the callus as a whole between controls and β-NGF treated mice (Fig. 5g). There were also no differences in volume of bone marrow (p = 0.59) (Fig. 5h) or fibrous tissue (p = 0.40) between groups (Fig. 5i) suggesting that the conversion of cartilage to bone was accelerated in the experimental group.

Figure 5
figure5

Local injections of β-NGF results in less cartilage and more bone. Representative images of HBQ stained section of fracture callus from (a) control group and (b) β-NGF group, 14 days post fracture. Scale bar: 500 μm. Quantification of cartilage volume in both treatment groups, shown as (c) absolute volume and as (d) percent composition of the total callus volume. Quantification of bone volume in both treatment groups shown as (e) absolute volume and (f) percent composition. Quantification of (g) whole-callus volume (h) bone marrow and (i) fibrous tissue. All measured by stereology. Error bars represent SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 determined by 2-tailed t test.

μCT analysis was performed in parallel to histomorphometry on control and β-NGF treated mice 14 days post fracture. Gross examination of μCT images provide no obvious differences between treatment groups (Figs. 6a,b). However, quantitative assessment of structural indices showed a stark difference in bone architecture. β-NGF treated mice exhibited a 35% decrease in trabecular spacing compared to the controls (Fig. 6c), with trabecular number (Fig. 6d) and trabecular connective density showing dramatic increases of over 40% (Fig. 6e). Bone mineral density measurements also significantly increased, ~ 20%, in the fracture callus of β-NGF treated mice (Fig. 6f). Taken together, μCT data depict highly connected and structurally superior bone architecture in β-NGF treated mice indicative of a later stage of endochondral repair.

Figure 6
figure6

Local injections of β-NGF results in highly connected trabecular bone. μCT images of tibias from (a) control and (b) β-NGF treated mice, 14 days post fracture. Scale bar = 1 mm. Quantification of (c) trabecular spacing (d) trabecular number (e) trabecular connective density and (f) bone mineral density. Error bars represent SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 determined by 2-tailed t test.

Discussion

There is an unmet clinical need for novel therapeutic approaches to accelerate fracture repair as there currently are no pharmacologic agents approved for this indication. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) is the only US FDA approved biologic in fracture healing with a very narrow indication window: surgical implantation into acute open tibial shaft fractures stabilized with an intramedullary nail and treated within 14 days of the initial injury. Clinical use of BMP in fracture healing has significantly decreased and is now typically reserved to the most problematic fractures due to the high cost, limited evidence of clinical efficacy, and risk for severe off-target effects41,42,43,44. A number of new pharmacologic agents have been explored for application in fracture healing, but almost all have focused on promoting intramembranous bone repair by stimulating osteogenesis7.

This study aimed to test the therapeutic efficacy of locally administered β-NGF in accelerating long bone fracture repair. NGF is an understudied orthobiologic for bone regeneration. In the limited number of studies that have utilized recombinant NGF for promoting fracture repair, NGF was administered at very high doses, immediately following fractures and the osteogenic potential was attributed to increased neuroactivity with no comprehensive structural analysis of the newly-formed bone45,46. More recently, an elegant study utilized genetic models to show NGF-TrkA is required in stress fracture repair, stimulating intramembranous healing by promoting peripheral nerve innervation, angiogenesis, and osteogenesis39.

Uniquely, in our study we demonstrate that β-NGF was most efficacious in promoting long bone fracture healing when the drug was administered during the cartilaginous phase of repair, days 7 to 9 post fracture, reflecting the upregulation in endogenous Ngf and TrkA gene expression that we observed. Histological data utilizing NGF-eGFP and TrkA-LacZ reporter mice provide the first genetic labeling of the expression pattern within the callus of tibia fractures. Most notably, we find NGF and TrkA are localized predominantly at the chondro-osseous transition zone, where cartilage undergoes hypertrophy and transforms to bone adjacent to the invading vasculature6,15. Our genetic models of endogenous NGF and TrkA localization support previous studies observing peak expression of neurotrophins and their receptors during the hypertrophic cartilage phase of repair47,48,49. While our mRNA expression data show a peak at day 10, possible delays in mRNA-to-protein synthesis were considered when harvesting samples at day 14 for histological analysis. Histological visualization of NGF and TrkA expression at this timepoint demonstrate a broad and robust presence in the chondro-osseus transition zone of tibial fracture calluses.

Based on this endogenous spatiotemporal map of NGF-TrkA expression during long bone fracture healing, we hypothesized that hypertrophic cartilage was responsive to NGF stimulation. We tested this ex vivo by isolating the cartilaginous portion of day 7 fracture calluses, culturing the explants to hypertrophy, and treating with or without β-NGF. Utilizing RNAseq, we were able to detect over 3,000 differentially expressed genes in β-NGF stimulated cartilage. Of the significantly upregulated genes, many clumped into molecular pathways known to play a role in cartilage maturation, endochondral ossification, and tissue mineralization.

Within the pathways regulating cartilage maturation, those associated with Indian hedgehog signaling (Ihh) were strongly stimulated. Ihh is a known regulator of chondrocyte differentiation and the expression of Ihh has been observed at the transition zone of fracture calluses23,24. Within this cluster Ptch1, a receptor for Ihh, and Pth1r, the receptor for both parathyroid hormone (Pth) and parathyroid hormone-related peptide (Pthrp), were also significantly upregulated. Ptch1 and Pth/Pthrp are established transcriptional targets of Ihh23,50. Ihh signaling was shown to be required for the generation of the osteoblast lineage in endochondral ossification and disruption of the pathway produces abnormalities in bone development21,22. Sdf-1 expression, modulated by Pth, is also produced by osteoblasts and is known to influence stem cell homing, tissue repair, and tissue regeneration in various contexts including bone repair51,52. Furthermore, one of the earliest reports of a chondrocyte-derived cell associated with trabecular bone was identified by conditional ablation of Ihh signaling in chondrocytes53, emphasizing the importance of highly coordinated chondrocyte maturation to effective endochondral ossification. In this study we also found that β-NGF stimulated the expression of alkaline phosphatase (Alpl) which is associated with chondrocyte hypertrophy and essential for cartilage mineralization and endochondral bone formation54,55. Alpl is among the first functional genes expressed during tissue calcification and is a commonly screened marker of osteoblast differentiation56,57.

The osteogenic transformation of chondrocytes into osteoblasts during bone development and fracture repair is associated with the upregulation of traditional programs regulating osteogenesis and mineralization. In fact, we found that the canonical osteogenic marker osteocalcin was strongly upregulated by β-NGF when delivered both in vivo to the fracture site or to the cartilage callus explant. Through gene ontology enrichment analysis, we identified several molecular functions associated with osteogenesis were upregulated, with Wnt activation as the most significantly upregulated following β-NGF treatment. Importantly, we have recently shown that Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates cell fate decisions in hypertrophic chondrocytes at the transition zone and that Wnt signaling within the cartilage is required for endochondral fracture repair27. This corroborates numerous published reports on the requisite of Wnt signaling in endochondral bone formation during development, and specifically for chondrocyte-derived osteoblastogenesis25,28,29. NGF signaling has also been shown to modulate Wnt activation in several non-skeletal cell types58,59. However, this is the first study in which this relationship has been noted in cartilage after in vitro stimulation with β-NGF. We further confirmed Wnt activation in vivo by histological analysis using Axin2-eGFP mice following local c injections. Taken together these data suggests β-NGF treatment stimulates Wnt-mediated cartilage to bone conversion during endochondral fracture repair. Additional studies are needed to determine whether Wnt activation by NGF is direct or indirect, and if it is Wnt ligand dependent or independent58.

Additional gene ontology enrichment analysis resulted in PDGF binding as one of the most upregulated molecular function. In chondrocytes, PDGF stimulates proliferation but prevents endochondral maturation however, PDGF expression has principally been seen in osteoblasts during normal fracture repair60,61. Integrin binding activity was also observed to be upregulated in cartilage explants stimulated with β-NGF. Integrin interactions in chondrocytes are known to regulate chondrocyte proliferation and apoptosis however, integrin signaling events in osteoblasts regulate mineralization and has been a therapeutic target for bone regeneration62,63. Although we were able to determine that integrin binding as a molecular function was promoted in cartilage explants following β-NGF stimulation, we were unable to determine specific integrin subunits that were engaged. Future work consisting of blocking specific integrin subunits could prove useful in determining NGF-mediated activation of specific integrin subunits.

Of the downregulated genes Pvt1 and Casp4 drew our attention given that Pvt1 is known to modulate apoptosis and Casp4 is strongly implicated in an inflammatory form of apoptosis64,65. Historically, hypertrophic chondrocytes were considered terminally differentiated and believed to undergo apoptosis during endochondral bone formation. However, our group and others have demonstrated that chondrocytes re-enter the cell cycle and through lineage tracing show that chondrocytes survive and give rise to osteoblasts in the growth plate and bone regenerate14,15,20,22,66,67. Therefore, NGF-TrkA signaling in the fracture callus may play a role in promoting cell survival in the hypertrophic chondrocytes.

Our previous studies suggest that mineralization of the cartilage anlage and transformation of chondrocytes to osteoblasts during endochondral fracture healing is mediated by the invading vasculature17,18. Interestingly, NGF was found to be critical to promoting angiogenesis and tissue mineralization during long bone development38,45. Our RT-qPCR data of whole callus tissue show a decrease of VEGF following the earlier β-NGF injections versus no change in VEGF expression following the later regimen of β-NGF. However, when we measured changes to vascularization in β-NGF treated fractures, we did see an increase in endothelial cell presence within the cartilage callus, albeit nominal. The progression of fracture healing from the inflammatory phase to the cartilaginous phase involves many different cell types that are sensitive to a huge array of paracrine and autocrine factors6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Because NGF’s receptor is expressed in many cell types and the heterogenous composition of the fracture callus, it’s difficult to directly correlate VEGF expression and endothelial cell presence. Nonetheless, like fracture healing, angiogenesis is a highly complex process and there remains a number of angiogenic factors that could be measured for in future studies68. What we found most compelling is that β-NGF stimulation of cartilage explants significantly promoted endochondral ossification-associated pathways in the absence of a vasculature.

Given the molecular pathways modulated by β-NGF stimulation of cartilage explants, it is not surprising that timing of injections proved to be important in dictating the best therapeutic window of β-NGF. We found a stronger osteogenic effect of β-NGF when delivered during the endochondral phase of repair, as opposed to early, during the pro-inflammatory response and intramembranous healing. With endochondral delivery β-NGF, histomorphometric analyses of callus tissue resulted in a reduction in cartilage and increase in bone tissue compared to control. Furthermore, we did not see a change in the total volume of the fracture callus, therefore these data support the hypothesis that β-NGF accelerates cartilage to bone conversion. In addition to histomorphometry, μCT data further illustrates the high connectivity and high mineral density of the newly formed trabeculated bone.

Coincidentally, an increase in NGF and TrkA expression has also been observed in osteoarthritic cartilage69. This is an important observation considering many processes observed in osteoarthritis occur in endochondral ossification, such as, cartilage tissue vascularization, innervation, and cartilage matrix degradation70,71. The molecular pathways underlying these processes mirror those seen in our data, most notably the upregulation of Ihh, Alpl, Ptch1, and Pth1r72,73 with a recent study reporting on NGF-mediated upregulation of Ihh signaling and cartilage calcification of articular chondrocytes74. Wnt and NGF signaling have been major therapeutic targets to inhibit the progression and pain associated with osteoarthritis72,75,76. Our group has previously exploited these parallels by engineering osteoarthritic cartilage to promote endochondral bone repair77.

Discovering and validating novel therapeutic targets that stimulate bone regeneration has the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes in fracture healing. Gene expression analysis, histomorphometry and μCT data collectively demonstrate that β-NGF treatment during the endochondral phase of fracture repair stimulates osteogenesis to produce more bone tissue and that the newly formed bone is more connected and of higher architectural quality. A possible limitation on NGF’s clinical translation lies in its hyperalgesic effects. Yet, diverging from previous studies that administered NGF for 7 days45,46, our study was able to narrow NGF’s therapeutic window to 3 days, during the endochondral phase of repair, thus limiting the subjects’ exposure to exogenous NGF and ensuing hyperalgesia. Exogenous NGF’s hyperalgesic effects seems to peak within an hour of administration therefore, this could be further studied by simple co-injection of an analgesic such as lidocaine78. Very little work has been done on relevant cell types to optimize the therapeutic dosing of NGF while minimizing hyperalgesia. Preclinical studies in murine models have utilized up to 20 μg of exogenous NGF per day yet, in vivo work has demonstrated that hyperalgesia in mice can be experienced with daily injections of 100 ng79,80. Balancing the trophic benefit of NGF therapy and minimizing hyperalgesia in this context will prove to be another key area of research in the future.

Nevertheless, this study lays the foundation for utilizing recombinant β-NGF in endochondral fracture repair by providing comprehensive tissue analysis of tibial fracture calluses after therapeutic administration. Importantly, we add new mechanistic data that increases our understanding of the processes that regulate and promote cartilage to bone conversion during endochondral fracture repair, opening new avenues of mechanistic exploration.

Materials and methods

Study approval

Tibia fracture model

Approval was obtained from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) prior to performing the mouse studies, the methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Briefly, adult (10–16 weeks) male mice were anesthetized via inhalant isoflurane, and closed non-stable fractures were made mid-diaphysis of the tibia via three-point bending fracture device14. Fractures were not stabilized as this method promotes robust endochondral repair. After fractures are created, animals were provided with post-operative analgesics (buprenorphine sustained-release). Animals were socially housed and allowed to ambulate freely.

Mice

Studies involving wildtype mice were conducted on the C57BL/6J strain obtained from Jackson Labs (Stock #000664). NGF-eGFP, which express eGFP under the control of the mouse NGF promoter, were generously donated by the Dr. Ryan Tomlinson at Thomas Jefferson University81. TrkA-LacZ mice, which have a LacZ sequence inserted immediately following the ATG in exon 1 of the mouse Ntrk1 gene, were also kindly provided by Dr. Tomlinson and are commercially available from Jackson Labs (Stock #004837)82. Axin2-eGFP mice, which express eGFP under the Axin2 promoter/intron 1 sequences, were generously donated by the Dr. Jeremy Reiter at UCSF83.

β-NGF and control injections

Two time points were initially tested to compare osteogenic marker expression within fracture calluses. Injections were administered once daily for 3 days beginning either four days or seven days post-fracture, (Fig. 2c,d). Experimental groups consisted of 0.5 μg of recombinant human β-NGF in 20 μL of basal media versus control injections of basal media-only (DMEM basal media, Gibco cat #A1443001) using a Hamilton syringe guided by fluoroscopy. A dosage of 0.5 μg/day was derived from earlier protocols wherein our dose lies between the 0.1–1.4 μg/day previously used46,79.

mRNA isolation and RT-qPCR

After β-NGF administration, calluses were harvested 24 h following the final injection. After callus dissections, tissue samples were homogenized in Trizol then mRNA was extracted from tissue lysates by use of RNeasy Mini Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen cat# 74104). cDNA was reverse transcribed with Superscript III (Invitrogen cat# 18080), and RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR Green and primers as listed (Table 1). Relative gene expression was calculated by normalizing to Gapdh and are shown as 2-ΔCT(Fig. 2c,d).

Table 1 Primer list.

Histology

Fractured tibiae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) then decalcified in 19% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 14 days. Mice were processed for paraffin histology through a graded ethanol series and cleared in xylene prior to embedding in paraffin tissue blocks. Serial sections were cut at 8–10 μm for histological analysis. Every 10th slide was stained with standard histological protocols for Hall and Brunt’s Quadruple staining (HBQ) to visualize bone (red) and cartilage (blue) were used. Tissues from NGF-eGFP and Axin2-eGFP reporter strains were embedded in OCT and sectioned using a cryostat. Axin2-eGFP fluorescence was amplified by utilizing antibody conjugated to AlexaFluor488 (see section on IHC protocol). X-Gal staining was performed following an adapted protocol from previous work37: samples were fixed in 4% PFA and after washing in PBS, samples were incubated in fresh X-Gal staining solution for 36 h at 32 °C. After PBS washes, samples were post-fixed in 4% PFA at 4 °C for 16–24 h, decalcified, and embedded in OCT for cryosectioning and staining as previously described37.

In vitro cartilage explant culture

A method previously described that reliably yields tissue that is highly cartilaginous, with no evidence of bone of stem cell markers was employed14,15. Cartilage explants were isolated from the central portion of the day 7 fracture callus using a dissecting microscope to remove any adherent non-cartilaginous tissues. Explants were minced, pooled, then separated randomly into treatment groups. Explants were grown in vitro for one week in serum-free hypertrophic chondrogenic medium [high glucose DMEM, 1% penicillin–streptomycin, 1% ITS + Premix (BD Biosciences Cat #354352), 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 ng/ml ascorbate-2- phosphate and 10−7 M dexamethasone] to promote hypertrophic maturation14,15. Hypertrophic cartilage explants were then stimulated with or without 200 ng/mL recombinant human β-NGF (Peprotech cat# 450-01) for 24 h, collected in TRIzol, then mRNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen cat# 74104).

RNA sequencing and analysis

After mRNA extraction from hypertrophic cartilage, samples were then further purified by sodium acetate and isopropanol precipitation. 200 ng RNA input from each sample was used with Quantseq 3′ mRNA-seq Library Prep Kit FWD (Lexogen, SKU:015.24). Approximately 20 million single-end 50 bp reads were generated for each library on a HiSeq 4000. Reads were first trimmed for adapters with Cutadapt version 2.5 and then mapped to the mouse mm10 genome using STAR version 2.5.3a. Following alignment, reads were counted using featureCount version 1.6.4. We then performed differential gene expression analysis using the DESeq2 package version 1.24 and R version 3.6.1. Significantly upregulated or downregulated genes (P < 0.05, Benjamini–Hochberg corrected) upon treatment were entered into Enrichr (https://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/Enrichr/) for gene ontology classification. Differentially expressed genes and genes of interest were visualized using a combination of R, ggplot2 version 3.2.1, EnhancedVolcano, and Complexheatmap version 2.084.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

β-NGF or control injections were administered once daily for 3 days beginning 7 days post-fracture into Axin2-eGFP mice. Fractured tibias were harvested 24 h after the final injection (10 days post-fracture), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and decalcified in 19% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 5 days. Samples were OCT-embedded then cryosections were made at a width of 8–10 μm. Cryosections were carefully rinsed in PBS and blocked with 5% bone serum albumin for an hour. Primary antibodies were applied to sections overnight. Full antibody information is given below (Table 2). Species-specific secondary antibodies were detected using the VectaStain ABC Kit (Vector, PK-4000) and 3,3′- diaminobenzidine (DAB) colorimetric reaction was used to visualize CD31 + cells. Because of (d2)eGFP’s rapid degradation, Axin2-eGFP fluorescence was stabilized by using species-specific Alexa-Fluor-488 conjugated secondary antibody (Table 2).

Table 2 Antibody database.

Histomorphometry

β-NGF and control injections were administered once daily for 3 days beginning 7 days post-fracture. Tibias were harvested 14 days post-fracture, fixed in 4% PFA and decalcified in 19% EDTA for 5 days. Mice were processed for paraffin histology, serial sections were cut at 8–10 μm for histomorphometric analysis using stereological principles15. Quantification of callus composition (cartilage, bone, fibrous, marrow space) was determined using an Olympus CAST system (Center Valley, PA) and software by Visiopharm (Hørsholm, Denmark). For quantification of the tissues, 10 μm serial sections (three per slide) were taken through the entire leg. Tissue was stained with HBQ as described above, and the first section from every 10th slide analyzed such that sections were 300 μm apart. Volume of specific tissue types was determined in reference to the entire fracture callus by summing the individual compositions relative to the whole as previously described15.

micro-computed tomography (μCT)

μCT analysis was performed as previously described15,85. Fracture tibias were dissected free of attached muscle 14 days post-fracture, fixed in 4% PFA and stored in 70% ethanol. Fracture calluses were analyzed using the Scanco μCT50 scanner (Scanco Medical AG, Basserdorf, Switzerland) with 10 μm voxel size and X-ray energies of 55 kVp and 109 μA. A lower excluding threshold of 400 mg hydroxyapatite (HA)/mm3 was applied to segment total mineralized bone matrix from soft tissue in studies of control and β-NGF treated mice. Linear attenuation was calibrated using a Scanco hydroxyapatite phantom. The regions of interest (ROI) included the entire callus without existing cortical clearly distinguished by its anatomical location and much higher mineral density. μCT reconstruction and quantitative analyses were performed to obtain the following structural parameters: trabecular spacing (mm), trabecular number (#/mm), trabecular connective density as trabecular bifurcations (#/mm3), bone mineral density (mg HA/cm3), bone volume (as %), trabecular thickness (mm), and tissue mineral density (mg HA/cm3).

Statistical analysis

Individual dots on graphs represent biological replicates, error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM). Measurements were taken from distinct samples. All in vivo data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism (version 8, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). For RNAseq data please see section on RNAsequencing and analysis. Statistical tests used to compare between groups are specified in the corresponding figure legends, significant differences were defined at p < 0.05.

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions are present in the paper and/or Supplementary Materials. Additional information related to this paper may be requested from the authors. RNA-seq data has been deposited into NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession code GSE150092.

References

  1. 1.

    Baim, S. & Leslie, W. D. Assessment of fracture risk. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 10, 28–41 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Marsell, R. & Einhorn, T. A. Emerging bone healing therapies. J. Orthop. Trauma 24(Suppl 1), S4-8 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dickson, K. F., Katzman, S. & Paiement, G. The importance of the blood supply in the healing of tibial fractures. (1995).

  4. 4.

    Penn-Barwell, J. G. et al. Severe open tibial fractures in combat trauma: Management and preliminary outcomes. Bone Jt. J. 95, 101–105 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bahney, C. S. et al. Cellular biology of fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res. 37, 35–50 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wong, S. A. et al. Microenvironmental regulation of chondrocyte plasticity in endochondral repair—A new frontier for developmental engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6, 58 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kostenuik, P. & Mirza, F. M. Fracture healing physiology and the quest for therapies for delayed healing and nonunion. J. Orthop. Res. 35, 213–223 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bahney, C. S., Hu, D. P., Miclau, T. & Marcucio, R. S. The multifaceted role of the vasculature in endochondral fracture repair. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 6, 4 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xing, Z., Lu, C., Hu, D., Miclau, T. & Marcucio, R. S. Rejuvenation of the inflammatory system stimulates fracture repair in aged mice. J. Orthop. Res. 28, 1000–1006 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kolar, P. et al. The early fracture hematoma and its potential role in fracture healing. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 16, 427–434 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Colnot, C. Skeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone regeneration. J. Bone Miner. Res. 24, 274–282 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Murao, H., Yamamoto, K., Matsuda, S. & Akiyama, H. Periosteal cells are a major source of soft callus in bone fracture. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 31, 390–398 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Le, A. X., Miclau, T., Hu, D. & Helms, J. A. Molecular aspects of healing in stabilized and non-stabilized fractures. J. Orthop. Res. 19, 78–84 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bahney, C. S. et al. Stem cell-derived endochondral cartilage stimulates bone healing by tissue transformation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 29, 1269–1282 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hu, D. P. et al. Cartilage to bone transformation during fracture healing is coordinated by the invading vasculature and induction of the core pluripotency genes. Development 144, 221–234 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kronenberg, H. M. Developmental regulation of the growth plate. Nature 423, 332–336 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tsang, K. Y., Tsang, S. W., Chan, D. & Cheah, K. S. E. The chondrocytic journey in endochondral bone growth and skeletal dysplasia. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 102, 52–73 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang, W., Rigueur, D. & Lyons, K. M. TGFβ signaling in cartilage development and maintenance. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 102, 37–51 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cheng, A. & Genever, P. G. SOX9 determines RUNX2 transactivity by directing intracellular degradation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25, 2680–2689 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mak, K. K., Kronenberg, H. M., Chuang, P.-T., Mackem, S. & Yang, Y. Indian hedgehog signals independently of PTHrP to promote chondrocyte hypertrophy. Development 135, 1947–1956 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Long, F. et al. Ihh signaling is directly required for the osteoblast lineage in the endochondral skeleton. Development 131, 1309–1318 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lanske, B. et al. Ablation of the PTHrP gene or the PTH/PTHrP receptor gene leads to distinct abnormalities in bone development. J. Clin. Invest. 104, 399–407 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Murakami, S. & Noda, M. Expression of Indian hedgehog during fracture healing in adult rat femora. Calcif. Tissue Int. 66, 272–276 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vortkamp, A. et al. Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science 273, 613–622 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Baht, G. S. et al. Exposure to a youthful circulaton rejuvenates bone repair through modulation of β-catenin. Nat. Commun. 6, 7131 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Einhorn, T. A. The Wnt signaling pathway as a potential target for therapies to enhance bone repair. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 4236 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wong, S. A. et al. β-catenin signaling regulates cell fate decisions at the transition zone of the chondro-osseous junction during fracture healing. BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.11.986141 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bao, Q. et al. An appropriate Wnt/β-catenin expression level during the remodeling phase is required for improved bone fracture healing in mice. Sci. Rep. 7, 2695 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Houben, A. et al. β-catenin activity in late hypertrophic chondrocytes locally orchestrates osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. Development 143, 3826–3838 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wozney, J. M. The bone morphogenetic protein family and osteogenesis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 32, 160–167 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Virk, M. S. & Lieberman, J. R. Biologic adjuvants for fracture healing. Arthritis Res. Ther. 14, 225 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    James, A. W. et al. A review of the clinical side effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 22, 284–297 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Grässel, S. G. The role of peripheral nerve fibers and their neurotransmitters in cartilage and bone physiology and pathophysiology. Arthritis Res. Ther. 16, 485 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Serre, C. M., Farlay, D., Delmas, P. D. & Chenu, C. Evidence for a dense and intimate innervation of the bone tissue, including glutamate-containing fibers. Bone 25, 623–629 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Levi-Montalcini, R. The nerve growth factor and the neuroscience chess board. Arch. Ital. Biol. 141, 85–88 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Niewiadomska, G., Mietelska-Porowska, A. & Mazurkiewicz, M. The cholinergic system, nerve growth factor and the cytoskeleton. Behav. Brain Res. 221, 515–526 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tomlinson, R. E. et al. NGF-TrkA signaling in sensory nerves is required for skeletal adaptation to mechanical loads in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, E3632–E3641 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tomlinson, R. E. et al. NGF-TrkA signaling by sensory nerves coordinates the vascularization and ossification of developing endochondral bone. Cell Rep. 16, 2723–2735 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Li, Z. et al. Fracture repair requires TrkA signaling by skeletal sensory nerves. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 5137–5150 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Edwards, R. H., Selby, M. J., Garcia, P. D. & Rutter, W. J. Processing of the native nerve growth factor precursor to form biologically active nerve growth factor. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 6810–6815 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Benglis, D., Wang, M. Y. & Levi, A. D. A comprehensive review of the safety profile of bone morphogenetic protein in spine surgery. Neurosurgery 62, 423–31 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Carragee, E. J., Hurwitz, E. L. & Weiner, B. K. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: Emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 11, 471–491 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Tannoury, C. A. & An, H. S. Complications with the use of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) in spine surgery. Spine J. 14, 552–559 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Nauth, A., Ristiniemi, J., McKee, M. D. & Schemitsch, E. H. Bone morphogenetic proteins in open fractures: Past, present, and future. Injury 40, S27–S31 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chen, W.-H., Mao, C.-Q., Zhuo, L.-L. & Ong, J. L. Beta-nerve growth factor promotes neurogenesis and angiogenesis during the repair of bone defects. Neural Regen. Res. 10, 1159–1165 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Grills, B. L., Schuijers, J. A. & Ward, A. R. Topical application of nerve growth factor improves fracture healing in rats. J. Orthop. Res. 15, 235–242 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Asaumi, K., Nakanishi, T., Asahara, H., Inoue, H. & Takigawa, M. Expression of neurotrophins and their receptors (TRK) during fracture healing. Bone 26, 625–633 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sun, S. et al. No pain, no gain? The effects of pain-promoting neuropeptides and neurotrophins on fracture healing. Bone 131, 115109 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Grills, B. L. & Schuijers, J. A. Immunohistochemical localization of nerve growth factor in fractured and unfractured rat bone. Acta Orthop. Scand. 69, 415–419 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Veistinen, L. K. et al. Regulation of calvarial osteogenesis by concomitant de-repression of GLI3 and activation of IHH targets. Front. Physiol. 8, 1036 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kitaori, T. et al. Stromal cell-derived factor 1/CXCR4 signaling is critical for the recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells to the fracture site during skeletal repair in a mouse model. Arthritis Rheum. 60, 813–823 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Zhao, W., Jin, K., Li, J., Qiu, X. & Li, S. Delivery of stromal cell-derived factor 1α for in situ tissue regeneration. J. Biol. Eng. 11, 22 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hilton, M. J., Tu, X. & Long, F. Tamoxifen-inducible gene deletion reveals a distinct cell type associated with trabecular bone, and direct regulation of PTHrP expression and chondrocyte morphology by Ihh in growth region cartilage. Dev. Biol. 308, 93–105 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Mueller, M. B. et al. Hypertrophy in mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis: Effect of TGF-beta isoforms and chondrogenic conditioning. Cells Tissues Organs (Print) 192, 158–166 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Roach, H. I. Association of matrix acid and alkaline phosphatases with mineralization of cartilage and endochondral bone. Histochem. J. 31, 53–61 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Weinreb, M., Shinar, D. & Rodan, G. A. Different pattern of alkaline phosphatase, osteopontin, and osteocalcin expression in developing rat bone visualized by in situ hybridization. J. Bone Miner. Res. 5, 831–842 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Rutkovskiy, A., Stensløkken, K.-O. & Vaage, I. J. Osteoblast differentiation at a glance. Med. Sci. Monit. Basic Res. 22, 95–106 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Krejci, P. et al. Receptor tyrosine kinases activate canonical WNT/β-catenin signaling via MAP kinase/LRP6 pathway and direct β-catenin phosphorylation. PLoS ONE 7, e35826 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Li, B. et al. Nerve growth factor modulates the tumor cells migration in ovarian cancer through the WNT/β-catenin pathway. Oncotarget 7, 81026–81048 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kieswetter, K., Schwartz, Z., Alderete, M., Dean, D. D. & Boyan, B. D. Platelet derived growth factor stimulates chondrocyte proliferation but prevents endochondral maturation. Endocrine 6, 257–264 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Andrew, J. G., Hoyland, J. A., Freemont, A. J. & Marsh, D. R. Platelet-derived growth factor expression in normally healing human fractures. Bone 4, 455–460 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Schneider, G. B., Zaharias, R. & Stanford, C. Osteoblast integrin adhesion and signaling regulate mineralization. J. Dent. Res. 80, 1540–1544 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Marie, P. J., Haÿ, E. & Saidak, Z. Integrin and cadherin signaling in bone: Role and potential therapeutic targets. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 25, 567–575 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Du, P. et al. LncRNA PVT1 mediates antiapoptosis and 5-fluorouracil resistance via increasing Bcl2 expression in gastric cancer. J. Oncol. 2019, 9325407 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Viganò, E. et al. Human caspase-4 and caspase-5 regulate the one-step non-canonical inflammasome activation in monocytes. Nat. Commun. 6, 8761 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Yang, L., Tsang, K. Y., Tang, H. C., Chan, D. & Cheah, K. S. E. Hypertrophic chondrocytes can become osteoblasts and osteocytes in endochondral bone formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 12097–12102 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Zhou, X. et al. Chondrocytes transdifferentiate into osteoblasts in endochondral bone during development, postnatal growth and fracture healing in mice. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004820 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Shih, S.-C. et al. Molecular profiling of angiogenesis markers. Am. J. Pathol. 161, 35–41 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Iannone, F. et al. Increased expression of nerve growth factor (NGF) and high affinity NGF receptor (p140 TrkA) in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41, 1413–1418 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Mapp, P. I. & Walsh, D. A. Mechanisms and targets of angiogenesis and nerve growth in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 8, 390–398 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Zhu, S. et al. Subchondral bone osteoclasts induce sensory innervation and osteoarthritis pain. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 1076–1093 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Yang, H. et al. Inhibition of ihh reverses temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis via a PTH1R signaling dependent mechanism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Xiao, Z.-F., Su, G.-Y., Hou, Y., Chen, S.-D. & Lin, D.-K. Cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis: A process of osteochondral remodeling resembles the endochondral ossification in growth plate?. Med. Hypotheses 121, 183–187 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Jiang, Y. & Tuan, R. S. Role of NGF-TrkA signaling in calcification of articular chondrocytes. FASEB J. 33, 10231–10239 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Collison, J. Anti-NGF therapy improves osteoarthritis pain. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 15, 450 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wang, Y., Fan, X., Xing, L. & Tian, F. Wnt signaling: A promising target for osteoarthritis therapy. Cell Commun. Signal. 17, 97 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Bahney, C. S. et al. Promoting endochondral bone repair using human osteoarthritic articular chondrocytes. Tissue Eng. Part A 22, 427–435 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Sung, K. et al. Swedish nerve growth factor mutation (NGFR100W) defines a role for TrkA and p75NTR in nociception. J. Neurosci. 38, 3394–3413 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Shinoda, M. et al. Nerve growth factor contribution via transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 to ectopic orofacial pain. J. Neurosci. 31, 7145–7155 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Hopkins, W. G. & Slack, J. R. Effect of nerve growth factor on intramuscular axons of neonatal mice. Neuroscience 13, 951–956 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kawaja, M. D. et al. Nerve growth factor promoter activity revealed in mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein. J. Comp. Neurol. 519, 2522–2545 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Moqrich, A. et al. Expressing TrkC from the TrkA locus causes a subset of dorsal root ganglia neurons to switch fate. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 812–818 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Jho, E. et al. Wnt/beta-catenin/Tcf signaling induces the transcription of Axin2, a negative regulator of the signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 1172–1183 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Ginestet, C. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 174, 245–246 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Cheng, Z. et al. Calcium-sensing receptors in chondrocytes and osteoblasts are required for callus maturation and fracture healing in mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 35, 143–154 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

National Institutes of Health through NIGMS (R25-GM056847), NIAMS (R01-AR068934), and NIDCR (F31-DE028485, R03-DE028397), UCSF Academic Senate Committee on Research, and the Società Italiana di Orthopedia e Traumatologia (Italian Society of Orthopedics and Trauma). We would like to thank Nick Szeto, Dr. Christian Santa Maria, and Dr. Wenhan Chang at UCSF’s Core Center for Musculoskeletal Biology & Medicine for μCT analysis. We would also like to thank Anna Torrent at the Histology & Light Microscopy Core within the UCSF-Gladstone Institutes for executing histological techniques.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.O.R., F.R., R.E.T., T.M., R.S.M., T.A.D., and C.S.B. conceived the study and designed experiments. K.O.R. and F.R. conducted the experiments. K.O.R. and F.R. analyzed data generated from in vivo experiments. R.M.B. generated and analyzed RNAseq data. K.O.R. and C.S.B. interpreted data, wrote and revised the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chelsea S. Bahney.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

KOR, FR, RMB, RET, RSM, TAD, and CSB do not have any competing interests to disclose. TM discloses Board or committee positions for the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation. He is a paid consultant for Bone Therapeutics, Surrozen, and DePuy Synthes with stock or stock options at Arquos. None of the paid positions are related to the work presented in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rivera, K.O., Russo, F., Boileau, R.M. et al. Local injections of β-NGF accelerates endochondral fracture repair by promoting cartilage to bone conversion. Sci Rep 10, 22241 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78983-y

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing