Abstract
The zoonotic enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157: H7 bacterium causes diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in humans. Cattle are primary reservoirs and EHEC O157: H7; the bacteria predominately inhabit the colon and recto-anal junctions (RAJ). The early innate immune reactions in the infected gut are critical in the pathogenesis of EHEC O157: H7. In this study, calves orally inoculated with EHEC O157: H7 showed infiltration of neutrophils in the lamina propria of ileum and RAJ at 7 and 14 days post-infection. Infected calves had altered mucin layer and mast cell populations across small and large intestines. There were differential transcription expressions of key bovine β defensins, tracheal antimicrobial peptide (TAP) in the ileum, and lingual antimicrobial peptide (LAP) in RAJ. The main Gram-negative bacterial/LPS signaling Toll-Like receptor 4 (TLR4) was downregulated in RAJ. Intestinal infection with EHEC O157: H7 impacted the gut bacterial communities and influenced the relative abundance of Negativibacillus and Erysipelotrichaceae in mucosa-associated bacteria in the rectum. Thus, innate immunity in the gut of calves showed unique characteristics during infection with EHEC O157: H7, which occurred in the absence of major clinical manifestations but denoted an active immunological niche.
Introduction
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), a subset of Shiga toxin-producing E coli (STEC), are zoonotic foodborne pathogens responsible for uncomplicated diarrheal syndromes1,2 to severe manifestations, including hemorrhagic colitis (HC), hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and occasionally, death mostly in children2,3,4. EHEC O157: H7 is globally important because it is the most commonly isolated serotype from various outbreaks worldwide3. Ingested through contaminated food, EHEC inhabits the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and other homeothermic animals3. In cattle, it colonizes the colon and persists in the rectum5. Remarkably, this bacterium does not cause systemic diseases in animals6,7 as it does in humans2,4. However, from a zoonotic perspective, cattle are the principal reservoir of this bacterium8 and the ingestion of raw meat is the riskiest route of infection.
Early in the pathogenesis, EHEC O157: H7 interacts with the apical surface of intestinal epithelial cells and releases virulence factors, including Shiga toxins (Stx), LPS, H7 flagellin, long polar fimbriae (Lpf1/Lpf2), hemorrhagic coli pili, and effector proteins that are injected into host cells through a type 3 secretion system (T3SS)9,10,11. The intestinal innate immune response to EHEC O157: H7 is critical during gut colonization and pathogen control. One aspect is the evolutionarily conserved host defense peptides cathelicidins and β-defensins, with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial and immunomodulatory properties12−14. While a single cathelicidin is expressed in humans (cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide; CAMP) and mice (cathelicidin-related-antimicrobial-peptide; CRAMP), cattle express multiple cathelicidin genes (at least seven). Cathelicidins are mostly found in granules of granulocytes and epithelial cells12,13,15,16. Bovine cathelicidins include cysteine-rich bactenecin (Bac) 117, proline-rich peptides Bac5 and Bac718, tryptophan-rich indolicidin19, and α-helical bovine myeloid antimicrobial peptides (BMAP)-27, BMAP-2820, and BMAP-3421,22. Cattle also produce several types of β-defensins, including tracheal antimicrobial peptide (TAP)23 and lingual antimicrobial peptide (LAP), which are abundant in the gut24,25. Reported functions of cathelicidins and β-defensins include bacterial killing and immunomodulatory functions such as chemotaxis of leukocytes, epithelial wound repair, and activation of chemokine secretion12,14, infer their potential role in the innate immune defense against EHEC O157: H7. However, the extent to which these peptides occur in the gut and their relevance in EHEC colonization in cattle is unknown.
Other incompletely explored innate defenses during EHEC O157: H7 infection are the colonic mucus layer composed of gel-forming glycoprotein mucins MUC2 and MUC5AC, which are secreted by goblet cells26,27,28. Adherence of EHEC to colonic epithelial cells largely depends on the O-glycosylation status of the mucus (eg., α-GalNAc)29, although early intestinal mucin responses and glycosylation patterns during EHEC O157: H7 infection are unknown. Additionally, mast cells are strategically abundant in the lamina propria of the mucosa and submucosa of the intestines30. These cells can rapidly sense pathogenic microbes and release preformed inflammatory mediators31. Whereas mast cell populations in the rectums of EHEC O157: H7 colonized calves were not different after 2 weeks of infection32, how mast cells respond earlier during the infection onset is undetermined. These innate gut defenses must coexist with the gut microbiota, which has implications on the exclusion of enteric pathogens33 and livestock productivity34. Thus, to gain insights into the interactions between the gut innate immunity, microbiome, and EHEC O157: H7, this study aimed to explore early innate immune responses and bacterial communities in the intestinal tract of infected calves.
Results
EHEC O157: H7 colonized early the intestine of calves
To determine gut colonization of EHEC O157: H7 in cattle, calves (n = 8) were inoculated into the rumen with a Shiga toxin-producing strain of EHEC O157: H7 (438/99; Stx2+, eae+, and pO157+; 1010 colony-forming unit, CFU) and terminated at 7 d (n = 4; group 1) and 14 d (n = 4; group 2) post-challenge. Of all challenged calves (n = 8), six (6 of 8) shed EHEC O157: H7 at 2 d, and seven (7 of 8) shed EHEC O157: H7 at 6 d post-challenge, as determined by rectal swabs positive to culture and confirmed by multiplex (stx1, stx2, eae, and rbfO157) PCR35. Most of the calves from group 2 (3 of 4) were still shedding bacteria by 14 d post-challenge (Fig. 1). Uninfected calves did not shed EHEC O157: H7 during the 14-d experimental period (Fig. 1).
Fecal shedding of EHEC O157: H7 after experimental infection of calves. Circles indicate calves terminated at 7 d post-challenge (Group 1) and squares indicate calves terminated at 14 d post-challenge (Group 2).
Ileitis with early increased Il-8 gene expression in EHEC O157: H7 infected calves
Ileum of calves infected with EHEC O157: H7 at 7 d post-challenge had inflammation with disrupted epithelium and atrophic villi (Fig. 2A), neutrophils present in the crypt lumen (Fig. 2B), and pronounced hyperplasia of B and T zones in Peyer ́s patches. Occasionally, layers of bacteria intimately attached to irregular epithelial surfaces and hemorrhages formed below the epithelium in infected calves. Uninfected calves showed no histological alterations in the ileal epithelium and crypts (Fig. 2C,D). At 14 d post-challenge, infected calves still showed diffuse atrophy and epithelial degeneration of ileal villi, often associated with congestion and prominent neutrophil infiltration.
(A-D) Microphotographs (hematoxylin and eosin) of ileum from a calf infected with EHEC O157: H7 at 7 d post-challenge showing (A) inflammatory infiltrates and disrupted epithelium and atrophic villi (40x, bar = 100 µm) and (B) neutrophils accumulated into the lumen of crypts of the ileum (white arrow) (400x, bar = 20 µm). Ileum from an uninfected calf with an intact epithelium (C) and crypt without any inflammatory cells (D). (E–G) Transcriptional gene expression of the TLR4 (E), IL8, IL10 and TNFɑ (F), and β-defensins TAP and LAP and cathelicidin BMAP28 (G) in the ileum of calves challenged by EHEC O157: H7. RT-qPCR expression of mRNA genes in each sample was conducted in triplicate and the mean + the standard error (SEM) shown. The expression of mRNA is relative to the uninfected controls. Only significant comparisons (P < 0.05) are noted (one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s post hoc test). A (*) denotes significant differences (p < 0.05) between one infected group and uninfected group and (#) denotes differences (p < 0.05) between infected groups (7 versus 14 d post-challenge). BMAP: bone marrow antimicrobial peptide. TAP: tracheal antimicrobial peptide. LAP: lingual antimicrobial peptide.
In terms of innate effectors during EHEC O157: H7 infection, expression of TLR4 mRNA did not change in the ileum of infected calves (Fig. 2E). Levels of IL-8 mRNA were higher in infected calves at 7 d post-challenge compared to the levels found in uninfected calves and calves at 14 d post-challenge; no differences were observed between uninfected calves and calves at 14 d post-challenge (Fig. 2F). No change in gene expression was observed for IL10 and TNF α between infected and uninfected calves (Fig. 2F). Transcriptional mRNA expression of β-defensin TAP was upregulated in the ileum of infected calves at 7 d post-challenge compared to the levels found in calves at 14 d post-challenge and in uninfected controls (Fig. 2G). LAP mRNA expression levels were similar between uninfected calves although LAP mRNA decreased in calves at 14 d post-challenge compared with uninfected calves (Fig. 2G). Cathelicidin BMAP28 was similarly expressed in infected and uninfected calves (Fig. 2G).
Colitis associated with the β-defensins synthesis in EHEC O157: H7 infected calves
Mild typhlitis was observed in infected calves at 7 d post-challenge with diffuse inflammatory cell infiltration in lamina propria of the cecum (Fig. 3A) while the cecum of uninfected calves showed no alterations (Fig. 3B). Colitis was also evident in EHEC O157: H7 infected calves, displaying disrupted epithelium in colons at 7 d post-challenge (Fig. 3C) while uninfected calves showed no alteration (Fig. 3D). Moreover, infected calves showed neutrophils infiltrated in the subepithelium of colons at 14 d post-challenge (Fig. 3E) while uninfected calves had no lesions (Fig. 3F). Mesenteric lymph nodes in EHEC O157: H7 infected calves presented moderate hyperplasia of B and T zones, edema, and inflammatory cells infiltrating the subcapsular sinus (Fig. 3G) compared with unaltered mesenteric lymph nodes in uninfected calves (Fig. 3H).
(A-H) Microphotographs (hematoxylin and eosin stain) of the cecum, colon, and mesenteric lymph node from calves infected by EHEC O157: H7 (EHEC) (A, C, E, G) and uninfected control calves (B, D, F, H). (A) Microphotograph of cecum from an infected calf with mild inflammation and disrupted epithelium and (B) from an uninfected calf (40x, bar = 100 µm). (C) Microphotograph of the colon with disrupted epithelium and subjacent cellular infiltrates (white arrow) at 7 d post-challenge (40x, bar = 100 µm) and (D) the corresponding uninfected control colon. (E) Microphotograph of colons of an EHEC O157: H7 infected calf at 14 d post-challenge with sub-epithelial congestion (400x, bar = 15 µm) and (F) from an infected calf. (G) Mesenteric lymph node with inflammatory cells infiltrating the subcapsular sinus (white arrow) in an EHEC O157: H7 infected calf at 7 d post-challenge and (H) mesenteric lymph node from a healthy uninfected calf (400x, bar = 15 µm).
Inflammation in EHEC O157: H7 infected calves extended until RAJs, where the epithelium was detached with sloughing epithelial cells and neutrophil microabscess appeared under the epithelium at 7 d post-challenge (Fig. 4A). Uninfected calves displayed an intact RAJ epithelium (Fig. 4B). Levels of TLR4 mRNA in RAJ from infected calves at 7 and 14 d post-challenge were higher compared to the levels observed in uninfected calves, but with no difference between infected groups (7 versus 14 d) (Fig. 4C). Gene expression of IL8, IL10, and TNF α did not vary in RAJs of infected and uninfected calves (Fig. 4D). β-defensin LAP mRNA increased in RAJ of infected calves at 7 d post-challenge compared with uninfected calves and LAP mRNA levels decreased in infected calves at 14 d compared with 7 d post-challenge (Fig. 4E). Expression of cathelicidin BMAP28 and β-defensin TAP did not differ in RAJs of infected and uninfected calves (Fig. 4E).
(A-B) Microphotographs (hematoxylin and eosin stain) of rectoanal junctions (RAJs) of (A) calves infected by EHEC O157: H7 (EHEC) 7 d post-challenge showing detached and sloughing epithelial cells (black arrow) and intraepithelial neutrophils (white arrow), and (B) uninfected calves with intact epithelium (400x, bar = 100 µm). Transcriptional gene expression of (C) TLR4, (D) IL8, IL10 and TNFɑ, and (E) cathelicidin BMAP28, and β-defensins TAP and LAP in RAJs of calves challenged by EHEC O157: H7. RT-qPCR expression of mRNA genes in each sample was conducted in triplicate and the mean + the standard error (SEM) shown. The expression of mRNA is relative to the uninfected controls. Only significant comparisons (P < 0.05) are noted (one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s post hoc test). A (*) denotes significant differences (p < 0.05) between one infected group and uninfected group and (#) denotes differences (p < 0.05) between infected groups (7 versus 14 d post-challenge). BMAP: bone marrow antimicrobial peptide. TAP: tracheal antimicrobial peptide. LAP: lingual antimicrobial peptide.
Early depletion in goblet cell and mast cell populations in colons of EHEC O157: H7 infected calves
Mucus producing goblet cells restricted to the bottom of the crypts in the colon of EHEC O157: H7 infected calves at 7 d post-challenge and they appeared in less number and poorly filled with mucus (Fig. 5A, Alcian blue) compared with uninfected colons (Fig. 5B) though the cell counting was not statistically different (Fig. 5C). Goblet cells in the cecum and RAJs were similarly present in number and distribution among the groups. (data not shown).
Microphotographs (alcian blue/hematoxylin stain) of goblet cells producing mucopolysaccharides and sialomucins (mucus) in (A) colons of calves challenged by EHEC O157: H7 (7 d post-challenge) and (B) colons of uninfected calves, and (C) their respective quantification. Bar = 100 µm.
WGA lectin can bind oligosaccharides containing terminal N-acetylglucosamine (α-D-GlcNAc and NeuNAc) present in all cell membranes although these carbohydrates are abundantly expressed in mucus-producing goblet cells. These WGA+ glycans were abundant in the intestinal mucin layer of uninfected calves, showing filled round shape like- goblet cells and a continuous thin layer in ileum, cecum, colon, and RAJ (Fig. 6A). In EHEC O157: H7 infected calves, a discontinuous mucin layer pattern was observed where WGA lectin+ mucin containing goblet cells were dispersed in numbers and had a variable grade of filling across ileum, cecum, colon, and RAJ (Fig. 6B). In stark contrast, RAJs in calves at a later time of EHEC O157: H7 infection (14 d post-challenge) had exaggerated WGA mucin expression with filled goblet cells and a thick mucin layer (Fig. 6B).
Microphotographs (lectin immunofluorescence with lectin wheat germ agglutinin; WGA) of cells producing N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and sialic acid (mucin) in the ileum, cecum, colon, and rectal anal junction (RAJ) of calves (A) uninfected and (B) challenged by EHEC O157: H7 (7 d and 14 d post-challenge). Infected small and large intestine displayed altered production of mucin glycoproteins with disparate production in the ileum, cecum, and colon and increased synthesis of mucin in RAJ at 14 d post-infection.
The number of mast cells reduced in ileal and cecal mucosal lamina propria of EHEC O157: H7 infected calves at 7 and 14 d post-challenge, although no difference was observed in the number of submucosal mast cells (Fig. 7, Sup Fig. 1). In RAJs, the number of submucosal mast cells decreased at 7 d post-challenge compared with the number of those cells in uninfected calves (Fig. 7, Sup Fig. 1). We observed the number of mast cells in the submucosa of colons in EHEC O157: H7 infected calves at 14 d post-challenge was higher compared with the number of those cells in calves infected at 7 post-challengee (Fig. 7, Sup Fig. 1).
Quantification of mast cells in the mucosa and submucosa of ileum, cecum, colon, and rectal anal junction (RAJ) of calves challenged by EHEC O157: H7 (7 d and 14 d post-challenge). Mast cells were identified by toluidin blue staining (see Sup Fig. 1).
Analysis of diversity, richness and taxonomic composition of bacterial microbiota after EHEC O157: H7 infection
The sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene of all samples resulted in 908,059 total reads, with 33,631 ± 1,573 (average ± SE) reads per sample. After quality control and removal of potential contaminations, the remaining 228,703 reads were collapsed into 3,112 ASVs, with an average of 8,470 ± 457 reads and 206 ± 15 ASVs per sample, based on a 99% nucleotide sequence similarity. Both Chao1 and Shannon indexes were similar between uninfected and EHEC O157: H7 infected calves in ileum digesta, ileum mucosa, rectum digesta, and rectum mucosa at 14 d post-challenge (Fig. 8A, Sup Fig. 2 with rarefaction analysis). Similarly, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distance showed no cluster of digesta and mucosa-associated bacterial profiles between uninfected and EHEC O157: H7 infected groups in ileum and rectum, as indicated by the PERMANOVA analysis (P = 0.238) (Fig. 8B).
(A) Alpha diversity (Chao1 and Shannon index) in the ileum (mucosa-associated bacteria) and rectum (digesta and mucosa-associated bacteria) of calves uninfected (UI) or challenged by EHEC O157: H7 (EHEC). (B) Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distance in ileum and rectum (digest and mucosa-associated bacterial profiles) of calves uninfected (UI) or challenged by EHEC O157: H7 (EHEC). (C) The relative abundance of (Negativibacillus and Erysipelotrichaceae UCG 004 (%) in the rectum (mucosa-associated bacteria) of calves uninfected (UI) or challenged by EHEC O157: H7 (EHEC).
In terms of ileal bacterial composition, we revealed a total of 7/28/46, 7/15/26, 6/15/24, and 3/8/15 bacterial phyla/families/genera (relative abundance > 0.1% and present in more than half samples) in ileum mucosa (uninfected), ileum mucosa (EHEC O157: H7), ileum digesta (uninfected), and ileum digesta (EHEC O157: H7) associated bacteria, respectively (Sup Fig. 3). No difference was observed in the relative abundance of any phylum, family, or genus in the infected and uninfected calves in either ileum digesta or mucosa. We observed that Firmicutes was the predominant phylum in both ileum digesta (63.7%) and mucosa (74.0%). Clostridiaceae 1 (23.2%) and Ruminococcaceae (24.8%) were the predominant families in ileum mucosa and digesta, respectively. Candidatus arthromitus was the predominant mucosa-associated bacteria, representing 13.7% and 28.2% of total bacterial genera in uninfected and EHEC O157: H7 infected groups, respectively. The second most abundant genus was Escherichia-Shigella (Enterobacteriaceae family) in uninfected calves (9.84%) and Eimeria praecox (Cyanobacteria family) in infected calves (8.13%) (Table 1). Romboutsia (17.5%) and Escherichia-Shigella (11.7%), as well as Turicibacter (9.9%) and Escherichia-Shigella (9.2%), were the predominant bacterial genera in digesta-associated bacteria in uninfected and EHEC O157: H7 infected group, respectively (Table 1).
In the rectum, a total of 7/19/39, 6/21/52, 5/20/49, and 5/20/48 bacterial phyla/families/genera (relative abundance > 0.1% and present in more than half samples) were observed in rectum mucosa (uninfected), rectum mucosa (EHEC O157: H7), rectum digesta (uninfected), and rectum digesta (EHEC O157: H7) associated bacteria, respectively (Sup Fig. 3). No difference was observed in the relative abundance of any phylum or family in the infected and uninfected calves in either ileum digesta or mucosa. Firmicutes (63.3% and 72.5%) was the predominant bacterial phylum, and Ruminococcaceae (32.4% and 41.4%) was the predominant bacterial family in both rectal mucosa and digesta, respectively. Unclassified Lachnospiraceae (12.8%) and Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 (12.8%) were the predominant genera in mucosa-associated bacteria in the uninfected group. Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 was also the predominant bacterial genus in rectal mucosa-associated bacteria (EHEC O157: H7, 19.2%), digesta associated bacteria (uninfected, 17.0%), and digesta associated bacteria (EHEC O157: H7, 23.6%), respectively (Table 1). The genus Escherichia-Shigella belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae was only detected in the rectal digesta of the EHEC O157: H7 group (0.33%), but not in the uninfected group. The mean value of the relative abundance of Negativibacillus (P = 0.057; Fig. 8C) and Erysipelotrichaceae UCG 004 (P = 0.057; Fig. 8C) in rectum mucosa was higher but not statistically significant in EHEC O157: H7 infected calves at 14 d post-challenge compared to uninfected calves.
Discussion
This study describes modifications in the gut innate immune defenses, including β-defensins TAP and LAP, IL8, and TLR4 expression, the mucus layer, and the number of mast cells, in calves infected with and shedding EHEC O157: H7. The use of an EHEC O157: H7 (438/99) strain containing enterohemolysin, γ-intimin, T3SS, Stx, and pO157 plasmid virulence factors may have contributed to its colonization36,37,38,39,40 and the innate immune hallmarks, including the increased transcription of IL8 in the ileum and TLR4 in RAJs in infected calves in the early infection (7 d post-challenge). For instance, EHEC O157: H7 lacking Stx (Stx−) developed lower inflammatory responses with decreased IL6 and IL8 release in RAJ and Peyer´s patches in infected calves41. Likewise, H7 flagellin10,42, and long polar fimbriae43 and FliC flagellin44 induced IL-8 expression, while LPS from EHEC O157: H7 is an inducer of TLR442,45. The intestinal epithelium could be particularly key in these initial gut responses; it produces early IL8 via transcription factor NF-kβ (Berin et al. 2002) and TLR4 is highly expressed in the distal colon46. E. coli signaling into intestinal epithelium through TLR4 is likely activating MAP kinase (p38-ERK 1/2)/NF-kβ and producing IL8 (Berin et al. 2002). CXCL-8/IL8 chemo attracts neutrophils to the gut and eventually across the epithelial layer towards the intestinal lumen47,48. Thus, the early expression of IL8 in the gut of EHEC O157: H7 infected calves might contribute to the accumulations of neutrophils in the lamina propria and lumen observed previously32 and in our study.
The intestinal mucus layer is responsible for preventing E. coli adherence to the epithelial cells and the formation of attaching/effacing lesions. We observed that EHEC O157: H7 disrupted the intestinal mucin barrier during early infection (7 d post-challenge); a mechanism that is likely favoring EHEC O157: H7 colonization. An impaired mucin layer could affect sentinel goblet cells, which sense LPS from invading pathogens and stimulate goblet cells in the crypts to secrete MUC2 via surface TLR4 and downstream NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 6 (Nlrp6) inflammasome activation49. Such alterations of the mucin layers could be attributed to metalloproteases (StcE) produced by EHEC, which cleave mucin-type glycoproteins50, reduce MUC2 levels in goblet like (LS174T) cells and increase bacterial binding and pedestal formations51.
We detected a later increase of WGA lectin (that binds N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and sialic acid) in infected RAJs (14 d post-challenge). RAJ is the preferred site of EHEC O157: H7 colonization in cattle52 and this mucin production may be an attempt by the host to eliminate the pathogen. N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylneuraminic acid sugars derived from mucin can inhibit EHEC adhesion to epithelial cells53. Moreover, in a host counter-attack, pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokines (TNFα, IL8) enhanced mucin MUC2 production and reduced adhesion of EHEC O157: H7 in colonic epithelial (HT-29) cells and in cattle colonic explants (Xue et al. 2014). Taken together, EHEC O157: H7 may first reduce the mucus synthesis in ileum and cecum as denoted by the discontinued mucin layer and less full goblet cells. An ongoing inflammation with IL8 synthesis and TLR4 activation could promote mucin production and re-establish the mucin layer, mostly in areas where the bacteria inhabit, such as RAJs. However, the relationship between mucin glycosylation and susceptibility to E. coli is complex. For instance, O-acetylated sialic acids (e.g., neuraminic acid Neu5Ac) linked to glycan chains of mucin can be used by EHEC as carbon sources54. Further studies with multiple lectins could decipher the mucin glycan dysregulation during EHEC O157: H7 infection.
The role of host defense peptides is of particular interest in cattle, which are rich in cathelicidins and β-defensin13,55. We determined increased transcription of β-defensin TAP in ileum and LAP in RAJs of calves infected with EHEC O157: H7. The prevalence of LAP in bovine gut defenses agrees with studies showing LAP mRNA expression all along the digestive tract in calves25. An early synthesis of β-defensins could contribute to the neutrophil responses observed in the gut of EHEC O157: H7 infected calves. Previous studies in monogastric animal species showed β-defensins suppressed neutrophil apoptosis56, thus extending neutrophil life span. Additionally, β-defensins may aid in recruiting neutrophils to injury sites. Human β-defensins 2/3 and their mouse orthologues (β-defensins 4/14), interacted with CCR2, a chemokine receptor expressed on monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils57. On the other hand, BMAP28, a key bovine cathelicidin in mammary epithelial cells58, was unaltered during EHEC O157: H7 infection. Since BMAP28 is mostly derived from myeloid leukocytes, this cathelicidin could appear later when leukocytes arrive and massively infiltrate the gut. In that case, cathelicidins could promote further neutrophil influx to injury sites; as cathelicidin was chemoattractant in the skin12 and induced the expression of CXCL8 in keratinocytes59 and colonocytes60.
Intestinal mast cells are particularly responsive to E. coli61 and its virulent factors (e.g., α-hemolysin)62. Indeed, mast cells conferred protection in mice with colitis caused by the related attaching/effacing enterobacteria, Citrobacter rodentium, reducing the bacterial load, and preventing dissemination63. We showed that the number of mast cells decreased in the lamina propria of ileum and cecum but increased in the RAJ submucosa in calves infected with EHEC O157: H7. Mast cells in the lamina propria predominantly contain high levels of tryptase64 whereas submucosal mast cells are rich in tryptase, chymase, and carboxypeptidase30,65. The increased number of submucosa mast cells in RAJs (the most active site in terms of infection) infers the release of multiple pre-formed products, including leukotrienes66, chemokines CXCL1/267 and a variety of proteases. Mast cells and their products could also promote neutrophil infiltration as they showed affinity to FimH-expressing E. coli68 and killed microbes by producing antimicrobial cathelicidins69. Thus, mast cell defense is afflicted and/or exhausted at the mucosa during early EHEC O157: H7 infection but submucosal mast cells in the colon could fight infection after its onset.
The intestinal microbiota is expected to reflect the pathogen colonization or furthermore, protect from EHEC O157: H7 infection. Commensal bacteria that degrade mucin can change the concentration of O-glycans affecting the colonization of EHEC53. We observed no differences in ileum digesta or mucosa-associated bacterial genera between uninfected and EHEC O157: H7 infected (14 d post-challenge) calves although the latter had a lower number of bacterial genera for both ileum mucosa (26 vs. 46) and digesta associated (15 vs. 24) microbiota. Specifically, the ileum mucosa of infected calves lacked Butyrivibrio70 and Roseburia71, two butyrate-producing genera beneficial in the early life of calves. On the other hand, EHEC O157: H7 infected calves lacked Turicibacter in the ileum mucosa, a genus commonly found in the intestines of humans and animals72 and increased in feces of mice infected with E. coli73. These differences in the ileal microbiota indicate an impaired ability of infected calves to maintain homeostasis. In the rectum, a higher relative abundance of Negativibacillus and Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-004 genera were observed in mucosa-associated bacteria of EHEC O157: H7 infected calves; presumptive of a distal gut dysbiosis. Negativibacillus genus was higher in cecal contents of mice with obesity-related disorders74 and Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-004 prevailed in feces of piglets with diarrhea75. On the other hand, the Erysipelotrichaceae family was reported to be involved in IgA production in humans76 and it could contribute to the immune response against EHEC in cattle. In comparison with previous studies, we did not observe abundant Campylobacter spp. and Sutterella spp.77, likely due to individual and environment particularities. Of note, despite high dose infective inoculum (1010 CFU), the abundance of the Escherichia-Shigella taxon did not increase in challenged calves; a phenomenon that was previously reported77,78.
In summary, we defined innate immune responses in the early pathogenesis of EHEC O157: H7 in cattle. Those innate hallmarks included an altered gut mucin layer and depletion of mast cells in conjunction with an activated innate response in RAJs, perhaps due to higher bacterial colonization. Moreover, we showed increased gene expression of β-defensins TAP and LAP in the gut of calves against EHEC O157: H7, that together with chemoattractant IL8, likely promote the arrival of leukocytes. Such information on innate mucosal defenses aids in understanding survival mechanisms of EHEC O157: H7 in the reservoir and are potential therapeutic targets for controlling infectious diseases in livestock.
Methods
Ethics statement
All the experimental protocol for using animals in the study was approved by the ethics committees along with the University of Calgary Animal Care Committee (AC18-0034) and the Institutional Animal Care and Use of Experimentation Animals Committee (CICUAE) of Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular IABIMO, INTA-CONICET and was followed according to the Canadian Guidelines for Animal Welfare (CGAW).
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157: H7
EHEC O157: H7 bacteria (strain 438/99; enterohemolysin, γ-intimin, EspA, EspB, Stx2c, pO157 plasmid positive and nalidixic acid-resistant) was isolated from a healthy cow and used in previous studies79. For infecting calves, EHEC O157: H7 was cultivated in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth containing nalidixic acid antibiotic (20 µg/mL, Sigma) (200 rpm, 18 h, 37 °C). Overnight cultures were diluted (1/30) in LB broth with nalidixic acid (20 µg/mL) and grown until 1.1 OD600nm (5 h), centrifuged (6,000 rpm, 4 °C; 5 min) and the bacterial pellet was resuspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Calves were challenged with an inoculum containing 1010 CFU in 10 mL. The amount and viability of CFU were confirmed by plating on serial dilutions on Sorbitol MacConkey agar (Oxoid) containing nalidixic acid (20 µg/mL), potassium tellurite (2.5 µg/mL), and cefixime (0.05 µg/mL) (CT-SMAC-NAL)80.
Experimental EHEC O157: H7 infection in cattle
Male (70 d-old) Holstein Friesian calves (n = 13) with similar weight and free of STEC (as determined by enrichment of recto-anal mucosal swabs streaked onto sorbitol Mac Conkey agar) were selected from a local dairy farm (Buenos Aires, Argentina). At the farm, neonatal calves stayed with their dams for 3 d and drank colostrum directly from them. Then, calves were weaned and consumed bottled colostrum (two daily intakes) for up to 1 wk. After this first wk of age, calves received commercial milk replacer (twice a day), containing powdered milk, corn, soy, fiber and minerals, and vitamins. When calves were 70 d-old, they were transported and housed in biosafety level 2 (BSL2) pens where they received the same diet during the first 2 d of acclimatization and ivermectin (1%, Ivomec Merck) to control intestinal nematodes. During the experiment, calves fed increasing amounts of alfalfa pellets for up to 50% of the diet with ad libitum access to hay and water. Calves were orally inoculated into the rumen with EHEC O157: H7 (1010 colony-forming unit, CFU, in sterile phosphate-buffered saline, PBS) using an esophageal tube feeder and euthanized at 7 d (n = 4; group 1) or 14 d post-challenge (n = 4; group 2). The remaining calves (n = 5 calves, group 3) received orally inert buffer only and were euthanized 14 d post-challenge.
Clinical signs and fecal consistency were monitored twice every day in each animal. At the necropsy, tissue Sects. (5 cm2) were systemically taken in each calf from the same anatomical sites of the ileum, cecum, colon, RAJ, and mesenteric lymph nodes. Each tissue sample, aseptically and individually collected, was rinsed with PBS, cut into 3 portions (1 × 2 cm each), and placed for bacterial isolation in trypticase soy broth (TSB, Oxoid), histopathology in 10% neutral buffered formalin, and gene expression analysis in RNAlater stabilization solution (AM7021; Thermo Fisher).
EHEC O157: H7 shedding in calves
The burden of EHEC O157: H7 was quantified in RAJ swabs at 1, 6, and 14 d post-challenge. Swabs were vortexed in TSB and plated on serial dilutions on Sorbitol MacConkey agar (Oxoid) containing nalidixic acid (20 µg/mL), potassium tellurite (2.5 µg/mL), and cefixime (0.05 µg/mL) (CT-SMAC-NAL). When direct cultures were negative, swabs were enriched (37 °C, 18 h) and an aliquot (1 mL) was subjected to E. coli O157 immunomagnetic separation (IMS, Dynabeads anti-E. coli O157, Invitrogen Dynal AS) before platting them on CT-SMAC-NAL. Culture-positive samples by IMS were considered positive (value of 10 CFU) whereas culture-negative samples by IMS were deemed negative (value of 1 CFU). Non-sorbitol-fermenting colonies were tested for E. coli O157 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by latex agglutination (Oxoid) and confirmed by multiplex PCR for the stx1, stx2, eae, and rbfO157 genes35,81. RAJ segments obtained from terminated calves were immediately enriched on TSB (overnight), aliquoted (3 mL), and subjected to IMS as described for E. coli O157: H7 determination.
Histological and lectin histochemistry
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were cut (7 μm) and stained using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or toluidine blue for histological examination.
The mucin layer and goblet cells in the intestines were characterized using Alcian blue (Periodic acid-Schiff; PAS) and highly glycosylated proteins in mucin were labeled with lectin82,83,84. For lectin histochemistry, paraffin wax-embedded Sects. (5 μm) were dewaxed and treated with hydrogen peroxide (0.3% in methanol, 30 min, room temperature) to inhibit endogenous peroxidase. Sections were rinsed several times in PBS (0.01 M, pH 7.2), blocked with bovine serum albumin (0.1% in PBS, 15 min) and incubated with biotinylated WGA lectins (Triticum vulgaris Lectin Kit BK 1000; Vector,) specific α-D-GlcNAc and NeuNAc highly present in the colonic mucin (30 μg/mL in PBS, 1 h, room temperature). Slides were incubated with avidin–biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) (Vector; 45 min) and horseradish peroxidase activated by a diaminobenzidine commercial kit (Dak, 1–2 min). Specimens were rinsed in distilled water, dehydrated with graded ethanol solutions, cleared in xylene, and mounted in Permount (Fisher Scientific).
Images of gut sections were captured using a digital video camera (Nikon Y-TV 55) attached to a microscope (Nikon Eclipse E200). Captured images (TIFF format) were analyzed using an image analyzer (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ; https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997–2018). For calculating the mucin area (positive for Alcian blue), digital photographs of 3 randomly selected areas were subjected to thresholding detection and automatic measurement to avoid the inclusion of empty areas into the measured area. The color picture was converted to 8-bit greyscale and the threshold was manually adjusted to detect any region containing tissue sections (grey to black) and exclude the empty areas (white). The area of interest was automatically measured by the software and the percentage of the stained area compared among groups. Mast cells stained by toluidine blue were quantified by manual counting of labeled cells at 40 × magnifications in at least 10 field-digitalized images85. For the quantifying analysis (H&E, counting mast cells), slides were examined independently by two veterinary pathologists and scored blindly86.
Transcriptional expression of TLRs, pro/anti-inflammatory cytokine, and host defense peptides in the bovine intestine
Relative messenger RNA (mRNA) level of TLR4, cytokines IL8, IL10 and TNFα, cathelicidin BMAP28, and β-defensins LAP and TAP were determined in the ileum and RAJ by real-time reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Total cellular RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher), followed by polytron tissue homogenization87. Each sample was treated twice with chloroform and centrifuged (10 min, 12,000×g, 4 °C). Nucleic acids were precipitated by isopropanol and incubated (overnight, − 80 °C). The pellets were then washed with ice-cold 70% ethanol and resuspended in RNAse-free water. RNA samples were treated with DNAse (DNAseI Ambion, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1 volume of LiCl (10 M). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was obtained by SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). qPCR reactions were carried out with Taq Platinum DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) and SYBR reagent (Thermo Fisher) and performed using standard cycling conditions (Applied Biosystems StepOne plus SDS). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPD) was used as the housekeeping gene88 after confirming its gene expression stability in control bovine tissues and correlation with other housekeeping genes (β-actin and UBQ). All primer sequences are listed in Table 2 and checked for efficiency. Negative controls for cDNA synthesis and PCR procedures were included in all cases. Each reaction was performed in duplicate and the target mRNA values were corrected relative to GAPDH. The generated qPCR curves were analyzed using LinReg tool89 and ratio calculation and statistical analysis with Fg software90. The results were reported as mean fold changes of target gene transcription levels in infected vs. uninfected (control) groups or at 7 d vs 14 d post-infection.
Gut microbiota profiling using amplicon sequencing
Mucosal tissue and digesta samples were collected from the ileum and rectum of uninfected and E. coli O157: H7 infected calves (14 d post-challenge). Mucosal tissue samples were rinsed with sterile PBS (pH 7.0) to remove the digesta and immediately snap-frozen. Samples of ileum and rectums were physically disrupted by a bead-beating step (FastPrep-24, MP Biomedicals). Total DNA was extracted from mucosal tissue and digesta samples of each gut region (220 mg wet weight) (QIAMP DNA stool kit, Qiagen), quantified (Qubit fluorometer, Qiagen) and stored (−80 °C) until further processing. The V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified from the extracted DNA using universal primers 515F (50-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-30)91 and 806R (50-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-30)92. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq (2 × 300 bp) and sequence data were analyzed using Quantitative Insight into Microbial Ecology 2 (QIIME2) platform (version 2019.7; Bolyen et al., 2019). Paired sequences were demultiplexed with ‘demux’ plugin before subjecting to quality control using the ‘dada2′ plugin93. Dada2-based denoising identified features as amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). Taxonomy was assigned to ASVs using a pre-trained QIIME2-compatible SILVA database (released in July 2019, available at https://docs.qiime2.org/2019.7/data-resources/) with 99% identity for bacteria. Alpha diversity indexes, including Chao1 and Shannon indexes, were calculated with a sample depth of 4875 using QiIIME2 ‘diversity’ plugin. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the bacterial profiles based on Bray–Curtis distance was conducted using MicrobiomeAnalyst (https://www.microbiomeanalyst.ca)94. Permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was used to compare the difference in bacterial profiles between treatments. Identified nucleotide sequence accession numbers were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (# SRR11547334- SRR11547362).
Statistical analyses
Normality was assessed using D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality or Shapiro–Wilk (Royston) tests. Normally distributed (parametric) results are graphed as means, and bars represent standard errors (SEM) of the mean. All comparisons were performed by one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s post hoc test with Graph Pad Prism (5.0). For non-parametric microbial results, Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the difference in the relative abundance of bacterial genus between infected and uninfected calves using R (version 3.6.1). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant whereas 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10 as tendency.
References
Narvaez-Bravo, C. et al. Virulence characterization and molecular subtyping of typical and atypical Escherichia coli O157:H7 and O157:H(-) isolated from fecal samples and beef carcasses in Mexico. J. Food. Prot. 78, 264–272 (2015).
Karmali, M. A. Emerging public health challenges of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli related to changes in the pathogen, the population, and the environment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 64, 371–376 (2017).
Ferens, W. A. & Hovde, C. J. Escherichia coli O157:H7: animal reservoir and sources of human infection. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 8, 465–487 (2011).
Caprioli, A., Scavia, G. & Morabito, S. Public health microbiology of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Spectr. 2, EHEC-0014-2013 (2014).
Naylor, S. W. et al. Lymphoid follicle-dense mucosa at the terminal rectum is the principal site of colonization of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the bovine host. Infect. Immun. 71, 1505–1512 (2003).
Hussein, H. S. Prevalence and pathogenicity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle and their products. J. Anim. Sci. 85, E63-72 (2007).
Hussein, H. S. & Bollinger, L. M. Prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle. J. Food Prot. 68, 2224–2241 (2005).
Borie, C. F., Monreal, Z., Martinez, J., Arellano, C. & Prado, V. Detection and characterization of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli in slaughtered cattle. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 44, 273–279 (1997).
Vergara, A. F., Vidal, R. M., Torres, A. G. & Farfan, M. J. Long polar fimbriae participates in the induction of neutrophils transepithelial migration across intestinal cells infected with enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 4, 185 (2014).
Berin, M. C., Darfeuille-Michaud, A., Egan, L. J., Miyamoto, Y. & Kagnoff, M. F. Role of EHEC O157:H7 virulence factors in the activation of intestinal epithelial cell NF-kappaB and MAP kinase pathways and the upregulated expression of interleukin 8. Cell Microbiol. 4, 635–648 (2002).
Kaper, J. B., Nataro, J. P. & Mobley, H. L. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 123–140 (2004).
Kosciuczuk, E. M. et al. Cathelicidins: family of antimicrobial peptides. A review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39, 10957–10970 (2012).
Young-Speirs, M., Drouin, D., Cavalcante, P. A., Barkema, H. W. & Cobo, E. R. Host defense cathelicidins in cattle: types, production, bioactive functions and potential therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 51, 813–821 (2018).
Zanetti, M. The role of cathelicidins in the innate host defenses of mammals. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 7, 179–196 (2005).
Kosciuczuk, E. M. et al. Expression patterns of beta-defensin and cathelicidin genes in parenchyma of bovine mammary gland infected with coagulase-positive or coagulase-negative Staphylococci. BMC Vet. Res. 10, 246 (2014).
Whelehan, C. J. et al. Characterisation and expression profile of the bovine cathelicidin gene repertoire in mammary tissue. BMC Genom. 15, 128 (2014).
Romeo, D., Skerlavaj, B., Bolognesi, M. & Gennaro, R. Structure and bactericidal activity of an antibiotic dodecapeptide purified from bovine neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 9573–9575 (1988).
Gennaro, R., Skerlavaj, B. & Romeo, D. Purification, composition, and activity of two bactenecins, antibacterial peptides of bovine neutrophils. Infect. Immun. 57, 3142–3146 (1989).
Selsted, M. E. et al. Indolicidin, a novel bactericidal tridecapeptide amide from neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4292–4295 (1992).
Skerlavaj, B. et al. Biological characterization of two novel cathelicidin-derived peptides and identification of structural requirements for their antimicrobial and cell lytic activities. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28375–28381 (1996).
Gennaro, R., Scocchi, M., Merluzzi, L. & Zanetti, M. Biological characterization of a novel mammalian antimicrobial peptide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1425, 361–368 (1998).
Scocchi, M., Wang, S. & Zanetti, M. Structural organization of the bovine cathelicidin gene family and identification of a novel member. FEBS Lett. 417, 311–315 (1997).
Diamond, G. et al. Tracheal antimicrobial peptide, a cysteine-rich peptide from mammalian tracheal mucosa: peptide isolation and cloning of a cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 3952–3956 (1991).
Schonwetter, B. S., Stolzenberg, E. D. & Zasloff, M. A. Epithelial antibiotics induced at sites of inflammation. Science 267, 1645–1648 (1995).
Isobe, N. et al. Differential localization of lingual antimicrobial peptide in the digestive tract mucosal epithelium of calves. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 142, 87–94 (2011).
Linden, S. K., Florin, T. H. & McGuckin, M. A. Mucin dynamics in intestinal bacterial infection. PLoS ONE 3, e3952 (2008).
McGuckin, M. A., Linden, S. K., Sutton, P. & Florin, T. H. Mucin dynamics and enteric pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 265–278 (2011).
Pelaseyed, T. et al. The mucus and mucins of the goblet cells and enterocytes provide the first defense line of the gastrointestinal tract and interact with the immune system. Immunol. Rev. 260, 8–20 (2014).
Ye, J. et al. Core 2 mucin-type O-glycan is related to EPEC and EHEC O157:H7 adherence to human colon carcinoma HT-29 epithelial cells. Dig. Dis. Sci. 60, 1977–1990 (2015).
Irani, A. A., Schechter, N. M., Craig, S. S., DeBlois, G. & Schwartz, L. B. Two types of human mast cells that have distinct neutral protease compositions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 4464–4468 (1986).
Johnzon, C. F., Ronnberg, E. & Pejler, G. The role of mast cells in bacterial infection. Am. J. Pathol. 186, 4–14 (2016).
Nart, P. et al. Responses of cattle to gastrointestinal colonization by Escherichia coli O157:H7. Infect. Immun. 76, 5366–5372 (2008).
Guarner, F. & Malagelada, J. R. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet 361, 512–519 (2003).
Callaway, T. R., Carr, M. A., Edrington, T. S., Anderson, R. C. & Nisbet, D. J. Diet, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and cattle: a review after 10 years. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 11, 67–79 (2009).
Rhades, L. C. et al. A one-year longitudinal study of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 fecal shedding in a beef cattle herd. Res. Vet. Sci. 127, 27–32 (2019).
Stamm, I. et al. Epithelial and mesenchymal cells in the bovine colonic mucosa differ in their responsiveness to Escherichia coli Shiga toxin 1. Infect. Immun. 76, 5381–5391 (2008).
Menge, C. et al. Phenotypic and functional characterization of intraepithelial lymphocytes in a bovine ligated intestinal loop model of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 53, 573–579 (2004).
Menge, C., Wieler, L. H., Schlapp, T. & Baljer, G. Shiga toxin 1 from Escherichia coli blocks activation and proliferation of bovine lymphocyte subpopulations in vitro. Infect. Immun. 67, 2209–2217 (1999).
Moussay, E., Stamm, I., Taubert, A., Baljer, G. & Menge, C. Escherichia coli Shiga toxin 1 enhances il-4 transcripts in bovine ileal intraepithelial lymphocytes. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 113, 367–382 (2006).
Sanchez-Villamil, J. & Navarro-Garcia, F. Role of virulence factors on host inflammatory response induced by diarrheagenic Escherichia coli pathotypes. Future Microbiol. 10, 1009–1033 (2015).
Kieckens, E., Rybarczyk, J., Li, R. W., Vanrompay, D. & Cox, E. Potential immunosuppressive effects of Escherichia coli O157:H7 experimental infection on the bovine host. BMC Genom. 17, 1049 (2016).
Bielaszewska, M. et al. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 outer membrane vesicles induce interleukin 8 production in human intestinal epithelial cells by signaling via Toll-like receptors TLR4 and TLR5 and activation of the nuclear factor NF-kappaB. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 308, 882–889 (2018).
Farfan, M. J., Cantero, L., Vergara, A., Vidal, R. & Torres, A. G. The long polar fimbriae of STEC O157:H7 induce expression of pro-inflammatory markers by intestinal epithelial cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 152, 126–131 (2013).
Lewis, S. B. et al. Flagellin induces beta-defensin 2 in human colonic ex vivo infection with enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 6, 68 (2016).
Stahl, A. L. et al. Lipopolysaccharide from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli binds to platelets through TLR4 and CD62 and is detected on circulating platelets in patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome. Blood 108, 167–176 (2006).
Price, A. E. et al. A map of Toll-like receptor expression in the intestinal epithelium reveals distinct spatial, cell type-specific, and temporal patterns. Immunity 49, 560–575 (2018).
Kolaczkowska, E. & Kubes, P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 159–175 (2013).
Brazil, J. C. & Parkos, C. A. Pathobiology of neutrophil-epithelial interactions. Immunol. Rev. 273, 94–111 (2016).
Birchenough, G. M., Nystrom, E. E., Johansson, M. E. & Hansson, G. C. A sentinel goblet cell guards the colonic crypt by triggering Nlrp6-dependent Muc2 secretion. Science 352, 1535–1542 (2016).
Szabady, R. L., Lokuta, M. A., Walters, K. B., Huttenlocher, A. & Welch, R. A. Modulation of neutrophil function by a secreted mucinase of Escherichia coli O157:H7. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000320 (2009).
Hews, C. L. et al. The StcE metalloprotease of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli reduces the inner mucus layer and promotes adherence to human colonic epithelium ex vivo. Cell Microbiol. 19, 12717 (2017).
Nagaoka, I. et al. Cathelicidin family of antibacterial peptides CAP18 and CAP11 inhibit the expression of TNF-alpha by blocking the binding of LPS to CD14(+) cells. J. Immunol. 167, 3329–3338 (2001).
Le Bihan, G. et al. The NAG sensor NagC regulates LEE gene expression and contributes to gut colonization by Escherichia coli O157:H7. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 7, 134 (2017).
Feuerbaum, S., Saile, N., Pohlentz, G., Muthing, J. & Schmidt, H. De-O-Acetylation of mucin-derived sialic acids by recombinant NanS-p esterases of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain EDL933. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 308, 1113–1120 (2018).
Meade, K. G. & O’Farrelly, C. beta-Defensins: Farming the microbiome for homeostasis and health. Front Immunol. 9, 3072 (2018).
Nagaoka, I., Niyonsaba, F., Tsutsumi-Ishii, Y., Tamura, H. & Hirata, M. Evaluation of the effect of human beta-defensins on neutrophil apoptosis. Int. Immunol. 20, 543–553 (2008).
Rohrl, J., Yang, D., Oppenheim, J. J. & Hehlgans, T. Human beta-defensin 2 and 3 and their mouse orthologs induce chemotaxis through interaction with CCR2. J. Immunol. 184, 6688–6694 (2010).
Tomasinsig, L. et al. Broad-spectrum activity against bacterial mastitis pathogens and activation of mammary epithelial cells support a protective role of neutrophil cathelicidins in bovine mastitis. Infect. Immun. 78, 1781–1788 (2010).
Tjabringa, G. S. et al. The antimicrobial peptide LL-37 activates innate immunity at the airway epithelial surface by transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Immunol. 171, 6690–6696 (2003).
Holani, R. et al. Cathelicidin-mediated lipopolysaccharide signaling via intracellular TLR4 in colonic epithelial cells evokes CXCL8 production. Gut Microbes 12, 1785802 (2020).
Shelburne, C. P. et al. Mast cells augment adaptive immunity by orchestrating dendritic cell trafficking through infected tissues. Cell Host Microbe 6, 331–342 (2009).
Kramer, S. et al. Selective activation of human intestinal mast cells by Escherichia coli hemolysin. J. Immunol. 181, 1438–1445 (2008).
Wei, O. L., Hilliard, A., Kalman, D. & Sherman, M. Mast cells limit systemic bacterial dissemination but not colitis in response to Citrobacter rodentium. Infect. Immun. 73, 1978–1985 (2005).
Irani, A. M., Bradford, T. R., Kepley, C. L., Schechter, N. M. & Schwartz, L. B. Detection of MCT and MCTC types of human mast cells by immunohistochemistry using new monoclonal anti-tryptase and anti-chymase antibodies. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 37, 1509–1515 (1989).
Weidner, N. & Austen, K. F. Heterogeneity of mast cells at multiple body sites. Fluorescent determination of avidin binding and immunofluorescent determination of chymase, tryptase, and carboxypeptidase content. Pathol. Res. Pract. 189, 156–162 (1993).
Malaviya, R. & Abraham, S. N. Role of mast cell leukotrienes in neutrophil recruitment and bacterial clearance in infectious peritonitis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 67, 841–846 (2000).
De Filippo, K. et al. Mast cell and macrophage chemokines CXCL1/CXCL2 control the early stage of neutrophil recruitment during tissue inflammation. Blood 121, 4930–4937 (2013).
Malaviya, R. et al. Mast cell phagocytosis of FimH-expressing enterobacteria. J. Immunol. 152, 1907–1914 (1994).
Di Nardo, A., Vitiello, A. & Gallo, R. L. Cutting edge: mast cell antimicrobial activity is mediated by expression of cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide. J. Immunol. 170, 2274–2278 (2003).
O’Hara, E. et al. Investigating temporal microbial dynamics in the rumen of beef calves raised on two farms during early life. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 96, fiz203 (2020).
Xie, G. et al. Alteration of digestive tract microbiome in neonatal Holstein bull calves by bacitracin methylene disalicylate treatment and scours. J. Anim. Sci. 91, 4984–4990 (2013).
Auchtung, T. A. et al. Complete genome sequence of Turicibacter sp. strain H121, isolated from the feces of a contaminated germ-free mouse. Genome Announc. 4, e00114–e00116 (2016).
Bretin, A. et al. AIEC infection triggers modification of gut microbiota composition in genetically predisposed mice, contributing to intestinal inflammation. Sci. Rep. 8, 12301 (2018).
Wang, W. et al. Optimal dietary ferulic acid for suppressing the obesity-related disorders in leptin-deficient obese C57BL/6J -ob/ob mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67, 4250–4258 (2019).
Cheng, C. et al. Maternal soluble fiber diet during pregnancy changes the intestinal microbiota, improves growth performance, and reduces intestinal permeability in piglets. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e01047-e11018 (2018).
Kaakoush, N. O. Insights into the role of Erysipelotrichaceae in the human host. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 5, 84 (2015).
Mir, R. A. et al. Cattle intestinal microbiota shifts following Escherichia coli O157:H7 vaccination and colonization. PLoS ONE 14, e0226099 (2019).
Mir, R. A. et al. Recto-anal junction (RAJ) and fecal microbiomes of cattle experimentally challenged with Escherichia coli O157:H7. Front Microbiol. 11, 693 (2020).
Vilte, D. A. et al. Reduced faecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle following systemic vaccination with gamma-intimin C(2)(8)(0) and EspB proteins. Vaccine 29, 3962–3968 (2011).
Martorelli, L. et al. Efficacy of a recombinant Intimin, EspB and Shiga toxin 2B vaccine in calves experimentally challenged with Escherichia coli O157:H7. Vaccine 36, 3949–3959 (2018).
Blanco, M. et al. Virulence genes and intimin types of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and beef products in Argentina. Int. Microbiol. 7, 269–276 (2004).
Belote, B. L. et al. Histological parameters to evaluate intestinal health on broilers challenged with Eimeria and Clostridium perfringens with or without enramycin as growth promoter. Poult. Sci. 97, 2287–2294 (2018).
Cobo, E. R., Campero, C. M., Gimeno, E. J. & Barbeito, C. G. Lectin binding patterns and immunohistochemical antigen detection in the genitalia of Tritrichomonas foetus-infected heifers. J. Comp. Pathol. 131, 127–134 (2004).
Colombatti Olivieri, M. A. et al. Protection efficacy of Argentinian isolates of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis with different genotypes and virulence in a murine model. Res. Vet. Sci. 121, 4–11 (2018).
Cobo, E. R., Corbeil, L. B., Gershwin, L. J. & BonDurant, R. H. Preputial cellular and antibody responses of bulls vaccinated and/or challenged with Tritrichomonas foetus. Vaccine 28, 361–370 (2009).
Erben, U. et al. A guide to histomorphological evaluation of intestinal inflammation in mouse models. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 7, 4557–4576 (2014).
Blanco, F. C. et al. Assessment of the immune responses induced in cattle after inoculation of a Mycobacterium bovis strain deleted in two mce2 genes. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 258353 (2012).
Pfaffl, M. W., Tichopad, A., Prgomet, C. & Neuvians, T. P. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper–Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol. Lett. 26, 509–515 (2004).
Ramakers, C., Ruijter, J. M., Deprez, R. H. & Moorman, A. F. Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci. Lett. 339, 62–66 (2003).
Di Rienzo, J.A. fgStatistics. (http://sites.google.com/site/fgstatistics, 2009).
Turner, S., Pryer, K. M., Miao, V. P. & Palmer, J. D. Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J. Eukaryot Microbiol. 46, 327–338 (1999).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 6, 1621–1624 (2012).
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).
Dhariwal, A. et al. MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W180–W188 (2017).
Refaai, W. et al. Digital dermatitis in cattle is associated with an excessive innate immune response triggered by the keratinocytes. BMC Vet. Res. 9, 193 (2013).
Herath, S. et al. Expression and function of Toll-like receptor 4 in the endometrial cells of the uterus. Endocrinology 147, 562–570 (2006).
Ye, J. et al. Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinf. 13, 134 (2012).
Alva-Murillo, N., Tellez-Perez, A. D., Sagrero-Cisneros, E., Lopez-Meza, J. E. & Ochoa-Zarzosa, A. Expression of antimicrobial peptides by bovine endothelial cells. Cell Immunol. 280, 108–112 (2012).
Taha-Abdelaziz, K. et al. Bactericidal activity of tracheal antimicrobial peptide against respiratory pathogens of cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 152, 289–294 (2013).
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant (RGPAS-2017- 507827), the Eyes High International Collaborative Grant for Young Researchers (10014539) the University of Calgary, the Major Innovation Fund Program for the AMR – One Health Consortium (Alberta Ministry of Jobs, Economy, and Innovation), and Alberta Agriculture and Forestry project (2019F041R) for EC. This work was also supported by PICT (0211 FONCYT, Argentina) for AC. ML, WMdS, DPM, MSM, PT, and AC are CONICET career research members. NAR and MRV are tenants of CONICET fellowships.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.L., W.M.D.S., A.C. and E.R.C. planned and designed the study. M.L. and W.M.D.S. performed bacterial culture and sampling. A.M. conducted special tissue staining and assisted with the interpretation of results. L.E.V., M.S.M., D.A.V., and M.R.V. conducted calves experiments. D.P.M. and F.O.D. assisted with the pathology assessment. N.A.R. and P.T. and T.M. and L.L.G. conducted the microbiome analysis. A.C. and E.R.C. took the lead in writing the manuscript in consultation with M.L. and W.M.D.S. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Larzábal, M., Da Silva, W.M., Multani, A. et al. Early immune innate hallmarks and microbiome changes across the gut during Escherichia coli O157: H7 infection in cattle. Sci Rep 10, 21535 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78752-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78752-x
This article is cited by
-
Feeding hempseed cake alters the bovine gut, respiratory and reproductive microbiota
Scientific Reports (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
