Comparative lipidomic analysis of mammalian retinal ganglion cells and Müller glia in situ and in vitro using High-Resolution Imaging Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

In order to better understand retinal physiology, alterations to which underlie some ocular diseases, we set out to establish the lipid signature of two fundamental cell types in the retina, Müller Glia and Retinal Ganglion Cells (RGCs). Moreover, we compared the lipid signature of these cells in sections (in situ), as well as after culturing the cells and isolating their cell membranes (in vitro). The lipidome of Müller glia and RGCs was analyzed in porcine retinal sections using Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Imaging Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-IMS). Isolated membranes, as well as whole cells from primary cell cultures of RGCs and Müller glia, were printed onto glass slides using a non-contact microarrayer (Nano Plotter), and a LTQ-Orbitrap XL analyzer was used to scan the samples in negative ion mode, thereafter identifying the RGCs and Müller cells immunohistochemically. The spectra acquired were aligned and normalized against the total ion current, and a statistical analysis was carried out to select the lipids specific to each cell type in the retinal sections and microarrays. The peaks of interest were identified by MS/MS analysis. A cluster analysis of the MS spectra obtained from the retinal sections identified regions containing RGCs and Müller glia, as confirmed by immunohistochemistry in the same sections. The relative density of certain lipids differed significantly (p-value ≤ 0.05) between the areas containing Müller glia and RGCs. Likewise, different densities of lipids were evident between the RGC and Müller glia cultures in vitro. Finally, a comparative analysis of the lipid profiles in the retinal sections and microarrays identified six peaks that corresponded to a collection of 10 lipids characteristic of retinal cells. These lipids were identified by MS/MS. The analyses performed on the RGC layer of the retina, on RGCs in culture and using cell membrane microarrays of RGCs indicate that the lipid composition of the retina detected in sections is preserved in primary cell cultures. Specific lipid species were found in RGCs and Müller glia, allowing both cell types to be identified by a lipid fingerprint. Further studies into these specific lipids and of their behavior in pathological conditions may well help identify novel therapeutic targets for ocular diseases.

Introduction

The retina is a light-sensitive multi-layered tissue that lines the back of the eye and that is responsible for converting light into an electrical signal. Interactions between retinal glial cells and the neurons that communicate between the eye and the brain, the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), are essential for the retina to function correctly. Müller glia are the most abundant glia in the retina, constituting 90% of the retinal glia. They are radially oriented cells that extend from the inner (vitreal) border of the retina to the distal end of the outer nuclear layer (ONL). These are specialized radial glial cells that establish a physical and functional link between the neurons and their environment, a milieu that contains blood vessels, the vitreous humor and the sub-retinal space. These glia play a role in maintaining the structural integrity of the retina and they sustain retinal homeostasis by participating in essential processes like glucose metabolism, substrate exchange and vascular regulation. RGCs are the output neurons in the retina and it is their axons that form the optic nerve that carries the electrical signals from the retina to the visual centers in the brain1,2.

Lipids are fundamental constituents of the central nervous system (CNS), and defective lipid metabolism is related to a number of diseases of the brain and peripheral nervous system (PNS)3. The activity of cells throughout the body is regulated by their plasma membrane, in which planar lipid microdomains known as “lipid rafts”4 constitute dynamic platforms for multiple cell signaling events5, including the signaling that controls cell adhesion, cell migration, inflammation or immune reactions6. There are many unique lipids in the retina that play a fundamental role in retinal function and disease. For example, Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs) with Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6, 22 carbons with 6 double bonds) are representative of the retina, accounting for approximately 50% of the fatty acids in photoreceptors7. This accumulation of such large amounts of DHA in retinal membranes makes them very fluid, favoring efficient conformational changes during phototransduction. Moreover, the DHA-derived mediator neuroprotectin D1, is also involved in protective, anti-inflammatory and pro-survival reparative signaling8,9,10,11,12.

Cholesterol is another important retinal lipid and indeed, it is the second most abundant lipid in the neuroretina behind phospholipids13. Free cholesterol plays key roles in the modulation of vesicle cycling, ion channels and dendritic spine development6,14,15, and the Müller glia in the retina represent the principal hub for the de novo production and transport of cholesterol16,17. The access of Müller glia to all the neurons and other glial cells in the retina that form the neurogliovascular unit enables them to control the transport of ions, water, lipids and protein across the inner blood-retina barrier18,19. Thus, manipulating the lipid microenvironment affects the interpretation of different retinal stimuli by these glia (chemical, osmotic and temperature), potentially contributing to retinal pathologies20. In fact, altered cholesterol levels underlie debilitating, blinding neurodegenerative diseases like Smith-Lemli-Opitz and Niemann-Pick Syndromes21. It has also been shown that over and underexposure to cholesterol can contribute to the progression of several multifactorial diseases like glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy and macular edema, modulating Müller glial sensing and the transduction of ambient information in the retina. Significantly, animals fed cholesterol-deprived or cholesterol-enriched diets suffer a loss of neurons6,16,19,22. A lipid shuttle has been identified from Müller glia to neurons that covers the neurons’ lipid demands, especially those related to the maintenance/renewal of the long projection axons of RGCs and to synaptogenesis18,23. Hence, it is clearly important to understand the behavior of lipids in the retina, and specifically in relation to the Müller glia and RGC dynamics.

Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Imaging Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-IMS) is a technique that combines mass spectrometry with histology. MALDI-IMS technology has progressed rapidly over the past decade, with significant improvements in instrumentation24,25, laser technology26, sample preparation27,28 and bioinformatics analysis. These advances have enhanced the sensitivity of the technique, lowering the acquisition time and providing greater spatial resolution, together broadening the type of tissue, samples and features that can be analyzed29. The distribution of retinal lipids has been studied previously by MALDI-IMS in mouse30, salamander31 and pig tissues32, and in human33 tissue sections. Retinal lipids from rat and human retinal tissue have been studied in negative ion mode by combining chloroform/methanol extraction of homogenized tissue with liquid chromatography (LC)–MS34. However, no information on the spatial distribution of these lipids could be gained in this way, nor of their cell type specificity in the retina. The spatial distribution and identity of lipid and retinoid metabolites are characteristic of specific retinal cell layers31,33,35,36, as seen in Abca4–/– mice (a model of Stargardt disease) when analyzed using high spatial resolution MALDI-IMS. However, these studies mainly focused on the lipids in the photoreceptor cell layers (the Outer segment and ONL) and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)36.

Thus, and despite their importance as causative and diagnostic molecules for retinal disease, there is little known about the lipid profiles in the normal retina and the differences in the lipid composition of the cells that make up the retina. To address this issue, we set out here to identify the lipid signature of Müller glia and RGCs in sections of the porcine retina, and in primary cell cultures, using MALDI-IMS. We also generated whole cell and cell membrane microarrays36 from cultures of RGCs and Müller glia, comparing the results obtained to the lipids observed in retinal sections. The reproducibility of these microarrays is associated with reduced noise and their sensitivity provides an accurate measure of the relative intensity of the lipids analyzed37. We used the porcine retina due to its similarity in size and structure to the human retina38,39,40. Indeed, our model of glaucoma in pig displays a same pattern of neuron degeneration as that seen in humans41.

Results

In order to identify a lipid signature for RGCs and Müller cells, a strategy was developed that integrates in situ and in vitro experiments within a lipidomics workflow (Fig. 1). Prior to performing the lipidomic analysis, the purity and quality of the cultures established was verified by immunocytochemistry using antibodies that specifically recognized RGCs and Müller glia. After 7 days in vitro (div), RGCs had grown and on the whole, regenerated their neurites (Fig. 2A), while Müller cell cultures were confluent (Fig. 2B). Moreover, the Müller cells maintained their viability and normal function, expressing specific markers like p75NTR, CRALBP and Glutamine synthetase (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Lipidomics work flow. Scheme followed to identify the lipid signature in retinal sections, that of RGC and Müller cell cultures, and that of the cell membranes isolated from both these cultures.

Figure 2
figure2

Representative images of pig retinal cultures. (A) RGC stained with Beta III tubulin antibody (red), (B) pure Müller cells culture stained with the vimentin antibody (green) and DAPI used as nuclear marker in blue. (C) Immunohistochemical analysis of cells, with RGCs stained with the Beta III tubulin antibody (red). (D) Membranes from Müller cells culture stained with a p75 antibody (green). Scale bars: 50 μm.

The data from the MS spectral analysis of the microarrays established from the Müller cell and RGC cultures were compared, highlighting significant differences in the relative lipid densities between these two cell types. Two different microarrays were prepared from the cultures for the MS spectral analysis, one from whole cells and the other from membrane preparations. The MS spectral analysis highlighted the differential negative ions (m/z) and the normalized relative intensities in whole cells or membrane preparations of the cultured RGCs and Müller cells (Table 1). Similar results were obtained for the whole cell and membrane preparations for each cell type, highlighting the consistency of the data.

Table 1 Summary of the differential negative ions (m/z), and the normalized relative intensity obtained after MS spectral analysis of the microarrays prepared from whole cell or membrane preparations of RGC and Müller cell cultures.

Following the MALDI-IMS analysis of retinal sections, a cluster analysis of the MS spectra identified regions that corresponded to areas of RGCs and Müller glia, as confirmed by immunohistochemistry of these previously scanned sections (Fig. 3). The cluster analysis successfully identified the area that corresponded to RGCs (the ganglion cell layer, GCL) and the rest of the layers in the retina. Müller cells span the entire thickness of the retina, sharing their space with other cells and with RGCs. Therefore, the GCL area that corresponded to the RGC population (red) was compared with the area where Müller cells overlap with other cell bodies, the area that mostly corresponds to the inner plexiform layer (IPL, green). The raw spectra obtained from both these clusters or areas can be seen in the supplementary information (Supplementary Data 1). There was a significant difference in the relative density of certain lipids identified in the MS/MS analysis between areas containing RGCs and those of Müller glia (p-value ≤ 0.05, Table 2).

Figure 3
figure3

IMS-MALDI analysis of retinal sections. (A) Divisive Hierarchical Clustering based on the correlation distance, the colors of the clusters in the bar indicate the distance (1-correlation) between the average spectra of the clusters. (B) Two examples of peaks m/z 764.52 and 772.58 that correspond to areas containing RGCs (GCL and IPL) or Müller cells (INL and OPL). (C) Immunohistochemical analysis of the retinal section previously analyzed by MALDI-IMS, with the RGCs labeled with the Beta III tubulin antibody (red), Müller cells labeled with the vimentin antibody (green) and nuclei stained in blue (DAPI) in a previously scanned retinal section. (D) Scheme showing the layer arrangement of the retinal sections. Nerve fiber layer (NFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL).

Table 2 Summary of the differential negative ions (m/z) and the corresponding lipid species, together with the relative intensity, determined in a MALDI-IMS analysis of the Müller glia and RGC domains of retinal sections.

To compare the results obtained from the Müller cells and RGCs in situ and in vitro, a correlation was made between the intensity of selected peaks obtained from retinal sections and their intensity in microarrays of membrane preparations. These data confirm that the results obtained in the sections were significantly correlated with those from the in vitro experiments (p < 0.0001, Fig. 4). A linear regression between the spectra from the RGC (Supplementary Fig. 2A) and Müller cells (Supplementary Fig. 2B) in the sections, and the in vitro spectra of RGCs and Müller cells always showed a stronger correlation between the spectra of the same cell type, irrespective of its origin (i.e.: sections or in vitro cultures). It was notable that the membrane correlation coefficient was stronger than that of the whole cells for both RGCs and Müller cells, such that the peaks obtained from the membrane preparations were more similar to the peaks obtained from the retinal sections (Supplementary Fig. 3). The distribution from the membranes in the microarrays was far more homogenous than that from the whole cells. This explained the weaker sensitivity and weaker signal/noise ratio in cells, due to the presence of fewer lipids per unit area.

Figure 4
figure4

Correlation between the cell membranes and the tissue cluster spectra for RGC cells and Müller cells. (RGC Spearman r = 0.6992, p = 0.0001; Muller Spearman r = 0.7756, p < 0.0001).

Finally, a comparison of the lipid profiles obtained from the retinal sections and microarrays suggested a collection of six peaks (Table 3) that were characteristic of RGCs or Müller glia in both retinal sections and cultures. These lipids were identified by MS/MS, detecting characteristic fragmentation spectra for all the peaks (an example of the MALDI MS/MS assignment procedure is presented in Supplementary Fig. 4).

Table 3 Summary of the differential negative ions (m/z) selected and the corresponding lipid species, together with the relative intensity determined by MALDI-IMS analysis of retinal sections and cultures.

Discussion

Lipid biochemistry in the vertebrate retina is remarkable from many points of view, not least due to the specific accumulation of DHA (22:6) that is then esterified to different phospholipids and molecular species within the retina. The lipids of retinal membranes have been studied extensively and much information has been obtained7, however, this is the first time that in situ and in vitro techniques have been combined to evaluate the specific lipids accumulated by Müller glia and RGCs. There is evidence that certain lipids are distributed specifically in different retinal layers33,36. Given the importance of each of the different cell types in the retina, defining the lipids that might be specific to these individual cell types may provide unique information regarding the homeostatic state of this organ and the development of diseased states. This may be particularly true of the RGCs and Müller glia studied here, given their fundamental roles in preserving the homeostasis of the retina and in the transmission of visual information to the brain. After a successful correlation analysis whereby the results of in vitro experiments could be readily extrapolated to in situ results, a group of lipids were identified in which four peaks were more strongly represented in RGCs and two were more prevalent in Müller cells, both in sections and in microarrays.

The principal families of lipids in the rat retina are phosphatidylcholine (PC, ca. 40–50%), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE, ca. 30–35%), phosphatidylserine (PS, ca. 5–10%) and phosphatidylinositol (PI, ca. 3–6%), accounting for 85–90% of the total retinal phospholipids42. Therefore, it is not surprising that the peaks selected from the retinal samples were PCs, PEs and PIs. PCs, are usually the most abundant glycerophospholipids (GPLs) and the key building blocks of membrane bilayers. They have a small head group that can form hydrogen bonds through their ionizable amine group, which acts as a “chaperone” during membrane protein assembly and guides the folding of associated proteins. Four PCs were previously characterized in three distinct layers of a mouse retina section using MALDI-IMS, although none of them were specific to only one retinal layer: PC 16:0/16:0, PC 16:0/18:1, PC 16:0/22:6, and PC 18:0/22:630. Here, one mass channel (794.5754 Da) was identified by MS/MS and MS3 that is contributed to by three PCs significantly more abundant in Müller cells than in RGCs, both in sections and cultures (PC 18:0/20:4; PC 16:0/22:4 and PC 20:3/18:1).

PEs are the second most abundant phospholipids in mammalian cells43, enriched in the inner side of membranes and particularly in the inner mitochondrial membrane. PEs are also enriched in arachidonic acid44 and they have quite notable activities: as a chaperone aiding membrane protein folding; in respiratory complexes; and in the initiation of autophagy45. Our results confirm that certain PEs are more abundant in RGCs than in Müller cells (PE P-16:0/20:4, PE 18:1/20:4 and PE 16:0/22:5). PE P-16:0/20:4 has been found in the mouse, rat and human brain46 and significantly, GPL signatures of retinal cells are similar to those of brain tissue47. Here, the PE P-16:0/20:4 was found in the retina and specifically, it was more abundant in RGCs than in Müller cells. PE 18:1/20:4 was previously seen to be present in both the optic nerve and retina, although the specific retinal cell type was not defined33. Moreover, with a high PE peak at 764 m/z corresponding to PE 18:1/20:4, this lipid might distinguish neural cells from non-neural cells48. According to our data and as found previously, PE 18:0/22:6 is more abundant in Müller glia and it is specifically located in the outer retinal layers where Müller cells may be found33,49.

PIs participate in essential metabolic processes, and they are primary sources of arachidonic acid and diacylglycerol. These second messengers serve as signaling molecules that regulate the activity of a group of related enzymes, known as protein kinase C, which regulates many crucial cell functions like proliferation, differentiation, metabolism and apoptosis. We detected two peaks (m/z 885.55 and 909.55) that correspond to three PIs more abundant in RGCs than in Müller cells, both in sections and microarrays. It is known that PIs are also main regulators of many ion channels and transporters, which are involved in neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission50. Thus, the more common representation of these lipids in RGCs than in Müller cells could be related to their neuronal activity. The basal peak at m/z 885.5 corresponded to PI 18:0/20:4, found in the nerve fiber/GC layer (by MALDI-IMS) and in the inner nuclear layer (INL) of the mouse and human retina49, and spreading into the outer plexiform layer (OPL)36 as well as the optic nerve, retina and sclera33. The m/z 909.5504 peak was identified as PI 18:0/22:6 and PI 20:2/20:4, PIs that are more commonly found in RGCs than Müller cells. However, in literature these lipids are not as common as PI 18:0/20:4 and to date, PI 18:0/22:6 has been found only in the cod retina51.

In summary, negative ion-mode imaging can be used to define the spatial distribution of a number of lipid species, including PEs, PCs and PIs, enabling us to carry out the first comparative study between in situ and in vitro assays. Combining different techniques that provided sufficiently high spatial resolution, distinguishing specific retinal cell layers, enabled the distributions of specific lipid to be defined. The fact that some lipids from the most relevant lipid families are more characteristic of RGCs or Müller cells suggests that they could fulfill roles in different cell activities. Interestingly, this technology could be used to compare healthy retinal tissue with pathological tissue in order to identify disease-related lipidomic changes in specific regions, such as advanced glycation and lipoxidation end products (AGEs and ALEs). Thus, further studies will provide more information on the implications of lipids in retinal diseases, identifying new therapeutic targets to slow or prevent disease progression.

Methods

Animals

Adult porcine eyes were obtained from a local abattoir and transported to the laboratory in cold CO2-independent Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM-CO2: Gibco-Life Technologies). The time between sacrifice and processing the eyes was 1 h. This study was carried out in strict accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals from National Research Council (US). Moreover, all the experimental protocols complied with the European (2010/63/UE) and Spanish (RD53/2013) regulations regarding the protection of experimental animals, and they were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Welfare at the University of the Basque Country.

Retinal cultures

RGCs and Müller glia were isolated from adult pig eyes to establish two types of culture: (1) RGC and (2) Müller cell cultures. The retinas were dissected out and dissociated enzymatically for 90 min with papain (Worthington Papain Dissociation kit, Worthington Biochemical Lakewood, NJ, USA) to obtain RGCs, or for 30 min to obtain Müller cells, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The dissociated cells were recovered by centrifugation and the RGC cultures were prepared as described previously52,53,54,55. Briefly, the dissociated cells were passed through an ovomucoid inhibitor-albumin gradient, where more RGCs than Müller cells pass due to their smaller size (this step was excluded when preparing the Müller glia cultures). While this gradient does not purify RGCs to homogeneity, there is only minimal contamination of other cells. After purification, the cells were seeded in poly-l-lysine (10 µg/ml: Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and laminin (10 µg/ml: Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) coated 6 well plates. The RGCs were seeded at 4 × 105 viable cells per well and the pure Müller cell cultures were established at 1.2 × 107 viable cells per well (as determined by trypan blue staining).

Different media were used for each culture type, yet both contained 1% l-glutamine (2 mM: Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 0.1% gentamicin (50 mg/ml: Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA): Neurobasal-A medium supplemented with 2% B27 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for the RGC cultures; and DMEM with 10% FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum: Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for the pure Müller cell cultures. The different conditions were employed from the start of the culture and the medium was changed every 48 h. After 7 days in culture, the cells were trypsinized for 5 min at 37 °C, centrifuged, resuspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) and left at 4 °C until use. At least 4 replicates of each culture type were performed in triplicate.

Immunocytochemistry of cultures

In order to check the quality of the cultures, at least 3 wells of each culture were fixed in cold methanol and washed with PBS. After blocking non-specific antigens with blocking buffer (3% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS), the cells were incubated with the following primary antibodies at a dilution of 1:2000: a mouse anti-βIII-tubulin antibody as a specific RGC marker (RRID: AB_430874, Promega Madison, WI, USA); and as specific markers of Müller glia, a rabbit anti-Vimentin antiserum (RRID: AB_1524552, Abcam, Cambridge, England), a rabbit anti-p75NTR antiserum (RRID: AB_2728801, Abcam, Cambridge, England), a rabbit anti-CRALBP antiserum (RRID: AB_1658655, Abcam, Cambridge, England) and a rabbit anti-Glutamine synthetase antiserum (RRID: AB_302521, Abcam, Cambridge, England). After washing the cells, antibody binding was detected with an anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 or an anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 555 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, AC, USA) secondary antibody, diluted 1:1000. In addition, the cell nuclei were labeled with DAPI (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, AC, USA) at a dilution of 1:10,000.

Cell membrane isolation

The cells isolated from pig Müller glia or RGC cultures were homogenized using a Teflon-glass grinder (Heidolph RZR 2020) and a disperser (Ultra-Turrax® T10 basic, IKA) in 50 mM Tris buffer (TB) supplemented with 1 mM EGTA, 3 mM MgCl2 and 250 mM sucrose. The crude homogenates were centrifuged at 40 × g for 5 min and the resulting supernatants were centrifuged again at 18,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C (Microfuge® 22R centrifuge, Beckman Coulter). The pellets were washed in 20 volumes of 50 mM TB and re-centrifuged under the same conditions. The protein concentration of each sample was measured using the Bradford method and aliquots of the homogenate were stored at − 80 °C until use.

Microarray development

Microarrays were established from whole cells or membrane preparations printed onto glass slides using a non-contact microarrayer (Nano_plotter NP 2.1) and a printing solution55. The piezoelectric tips dispense 4 nl per spot, printing each sample in triplicate. These microarrays were stored at − 20 °C until use.

Tissue collection for retinal sections

Adult eyes were enucleated, removing the cornea, crystalline lens and vitreous humor. The retina was then carefully separated from the rest of the eye, cut into small rectangular pieces and folded back over itself like a closed book or “sandwich” to maintain the RGCs internally when the tissue was then frozen at – 20 °C. The use of this “sandwich” aimed to protect the layer of ganglion cells at the edge of the section and to avoid interactions of the OCT with the matrix used. In this way, we could also visualize a duplicate image of the retina in each section (Fig. 3). The retinal “sandwich” was then partially embedded in OCT medium to obtain cryosections of the retinal aspect and not of the OCT embedded tissue (14 μm thick). These sections were then stored at − 80 °C in an atmosphere of N2 to protect them from oxygen and moisture degradation.

Sample preparation for IMS

Retinal sections and microarrays were thawed, and DAN (1,5-Diaminonaphthalene)57 was deposited on them using a glass sublimator (Ace Glass 8023)58. The matrix formed a uniform thin layer that enables retinal sections and microarrays to be scanned in negative ion mode for several hours. Only negative-ion mode was employed in this study as a wider variety of lipid species can be detected in this way, whereas PC species are those predominantly detected in positive-ion mode. For example, plasmalogens are usually obscured by PCs in positive-ion mode. Likewise, sulfatides are detected in negative-ion mode, and any interference between PC and PE is avoided. This analysis was performed as described previously59, whereby a LTQ-Orbitrap XL analyzer (ThermoFisher, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with an N2 laser (100 µJ max power, elliptical spot, 60 Hz repetition rate) scanned the material in negative ion mode at a spatial resolution between 15 and 25 µm. A mass resolution of 60,000 and 100,000 was used to record the data from the full scan spectra, and that of around 2000 for MS/MS and MS3 due to the higher sensitivity of the Ion Trap (IT). The scanning range in full scan spectra was 550–1200.

Immunohistochemistry of retinal sections

After the sections were scanned they were washed with methanol at room temperature (RT) for 5 min to remove the DAN and they were then fixed with 4% PFA (paraformaldehyde) at RT for 2 min. The sections were immunostained as described previously38 and after washing twice in PBS-Triton X-100 for 10 min, they were incubated overnight with the primary antibodies (diluted 1:2000): a mouse anti-βIII-tubulin antibody (Promega Madison, WI, USA) as a specific RGC marker; and a rabbit anti-Vimentin antiserum (Abcam, Cambridge, England) as a specific marker of Müller glia. After washing twice in PBS, antibody binding was detected for 1 h with an Alexa Fluor 555 conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Invitrogen, Eugene, Oregon, USA) and an Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Invitrogen, Eugene, Oregon, USA), both diluted 1:1000 in PBS-BSA (1%). Finally, the sections were washed twice with PBS for 10 min and mounted with a coverslip in PBS-Glycerol (1:1).

Data and statistical analysis

The spectra acquired were aligned to maximize the correlation with the overall averaged spectrum and normalized using dedicated software (MSI Analyst, Noray Bioinformatics S.L.). During parsing, the size of the data was reduced to eliminate all the peaks whose intensity was lower than 0.5% of the strongest peak on the spectrum and the spectra were normalized using a total ion current algorithm60. The spectra were also aligned using the Xiong method61 assuming a maximum misalignment of 0.02 a.m.u., very conservative for an orbitrap analyzer. For graphical representation, no interpolation or smoothing algorithms and no de-noising procedures were used, always trying to maintain the original aspect of the data. Re-scaling was required for some images reflecting the distribution of the very weak peaks.

Statistical analysis to identify the different areas in the sections was carried out using MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, USA), employing divisive hierarchical clustering with Rank Compete62 and k-means63. After determining the cluster of Müller cells and RGCs, a principal component analysis (PCA)64 and ANOVA were used to identify the specific lipids for each cell type in the retinal sections and microarrays.

Peak assignment

The peaks of interest were identified directly by MALDI-MS/MS and MS3 on the tissue samples in order to discriminate chemical variants of the lipids with identical numbers of acyclic carbons and double bonds. To perform fragmentation we used collision-induced dissociation (CID) and an ion trap to detect the fragments, a set-up that improves the sensitivity for the fragments with little cost of losing mass resolution. The mass window of the ion trap allows is approximately one Da wide and thus, we could identify fragments that belonged to our parent masses and those belonging to other species close to the parent masses (see Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 1). The assignment of lipid species was facilitated by a database created using tissue-dependent lipid compositions. The database was calculated in silico by combining fatty acids and head groups, and with the aid of the Lipid Maps database (https://www.lipidmaps.org/). The experimental values of the precursor molecules, and of the fragments after MS/MS and MS3 analysis were compared with this database, and with the Lipid MAPS and Madison Metabolomics Consortium (https://mmcd.nmrfam.wisc.edu/) databases, using 0.005 Da as a window of tolerance for the full scan precursors in order to identify each mass channel.

References

  1. 1.

    Newman, E. & Reichenbach, A. The Muller cell: A functional element of the retina. Trends Neurosci. 19, 307–312 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vecino, E., Rodriguez, F. D., Ruzafa, N., Pereiro, X. & Sharma, S. C. Glia-neuron interactions in the mammalian retina. Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 51, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.06.003 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Trim, P. J. et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging of lipids in rat brain tissue with integrated unsupervised and supervised multivariant statistical analysis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. RCM 22, 1503–1509. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3498 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Singer, S. J. & Nicolson, G. L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 175, 720–731 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bevers, E. M., Comfurius, P., Dekkers, D. W. & Zwaal, R. F. Lipid translocation across the plasma membrane of mammalian cells. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1439, 317–330 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gambert, S. et al. Cholesterol metabolism and glaucoma: Modulation of Muller cell membrane organization by 24S-hydroxycholesterol. Chem. Phys. Lipid. 207, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2017.05.007 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fliesler, S. J. & Anderson, R. E. Chemistry and metabolism of lipids in the vertebrate retina. Prog. Lipid Res. 22, 79–131 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jastrzebska, B., Debinski, A., Filipek, S. & Palczewski, K. Role of membrane integrity on G protein-coupled receptors: Rhodopsin stability and function. Prog. Lipid Res. 50, 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2011.03.002 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bazan, N. G., Molina, M. F. & Gordon, W. C. Docosahexaenoic acid signalolipidomics in nutrition: Significance in aging, neuroinflammation, macular degeneration, Alzheimer’s, and other neurodegenerative diseases. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 31, 321–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.012809.104635 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bazan, N. G., Calandria, J. M. & Serhan, C. N. Rescue and repair during photoreceptor cell renewal mediated by docosahexaenoic acid-derived neuroprotectin D1. J. Lipid Res. 51, 2018–2031. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R001131 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bazan, N. G. Neuroprotectin D1 (NPD1): A DHA-derived mediator that protects brain and retina against cell injury-induced oxidative stress. Brain Pathol. 15, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2005.tb00513.x (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bazan, N. G. Neuroprotectin D1-mediated anti-inflammatory and survival signaling in stroke, retinal degenerations, and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Lipid Res. 50(Suppl), S400-405. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R800068-JLR200 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bretillon, L. et al. Lipid and fatty acid profile of the retina, retinal pigment epithelium/choroid, and the lacrimal gland, and associations with adipose tissue fatty acids in human subjects. Exp. Eye Res. 87, 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2008.08.010 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dietschy, J. M. & Turley, S. D. Thematic review series: brain Lipids. Cholesterol metabolism in the central nervous system during early development and in the mature animal. J. Lipid Res. 45, 1375–1397. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R400004-JLR200 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Marquer, C. et al. Local cholesterol increase triggers amyloid precursor protein-Bace1 clustering in lipid rafts and rapid endocytosis. FASEB J. 25, 1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.10-168633 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fliesler, S. J. & Bretillon, L. The ins and outs of cholesterol in the vertebrate retina. J. Lipid Res. 51, 3399–3413. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R010538 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jo, A. O. et al. TRPV4 and AQP4 channels synergistically regulate cell volume and calcium homeostasis in retinal muller glia. J. Neurosci. 35, 13525–13537. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1987-15.2015 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Reichenbach, A. & Bringmann, A. Müller Cells in the Healthy and Diseased Retina (Springer, New York, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lakk, M., Vazquez-Chona, F., Yarishkin, O. & Krizaj, D. Dyslipidemia modulates Muller glial sensing and transduction of ambient information. Neural Regener. Res. 13, 207–210. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.226383 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lakk, M., Yarishkin, O., Baumann, J. M., Iuso, A. & Krizaj, D. Cholesterol regulates polymodal sensory transduction in Muller glia. Glia 65, 2038–2050. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23213 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fliesler, S. J. et al. Partial rescue of retinal function and sterol steady-state in a rat model of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. Pediatr. Res. 61, 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1203/pdr.0b013e318030d1cf (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Omarova, S. et al. Abnormal vascularization in mouse retina with dysregulated retinal cholesterol homeostasis. J. Clin. Investig. 122, 3012–3023. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI63816 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mauch, D. H. et al. CNS synaptogenesis promoted by glia-derived cholesterol. Science 294, 1354–1357. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.294.5545.1354 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chaurand, P., Schriver, K. E. & Caprioli, R. M. Instrument design and characterization for high resolution MALDI-MS imaging of tissue sections. J. Mass Spectrom. JMS 42, 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1180 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jungmann, J. H. et al. Fast, high resolution mass spectrometry imaging using a Medipix pixelated detector. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21, 2023–2030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2010.08.014 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Holle, A., Haase, A., Kayser, M. & Hohndorf, J. Optimizing UV laser focus profiles for improved MALDI performance. J. Mass Spectrom. JMS 41, 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1041 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Seeley, E. H., Oppenheimer, S. R., Mi, D., Chaurand, P. & Caprioli, R. M. Enhancement of protein sensitivity for MALDI imaging mass spectrometry after chemical treatment of tissue sections. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 19, 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2008.03.016 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yang, J. & Caprioli, R. M. Matrix sublimation/recrystallization for imaging proteins by mass spectrometry at high spatial resolution. Anal. Chem. 83, 5728–5734. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac200998a (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zavalin, A. et al. Direct imaging of single cells and tissue at sub-cellular spatial resolution using transmission geometry MALDI MS. J. Mass Spectrom. JMS 47, 1473–1481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.3108 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hayasaka, T. et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization quadrupole ion trap time-of-flight (MALDI-QIT-TOF)-based imaging mass spectrometry reveals a layered distribution of phospholipid molecular species in the mouse retina. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. RCM 22, 3415–3426. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3751 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Roy, M. C. et al. Salamander retina phospholipids and their localization by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry at cellular size resolution. J. Lipid Res. 52, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M010546 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Palmer, A. D. et al. Sucrose cryo-protection facilitates imaging of whole eye sections by MALDI mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. JMS 47, 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.2049 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zemski Berry, K. A., Gordon, W. C., Murphy, R. C. & Bazan, N. G. Spatial organization of lipids in the human retina and optic nerve by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 55, 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M044990 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ford, D. A. et al. Lipidomic analysis of the retina in a rat model of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: Alterations in docosahexaenoic acid content of phospholipid molecular species. J. Neurochem. 105, 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05203.x (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hirahara, Y., Wakabayashi, T., Koike, T., Gamo, K. & Yamada, H. Change in phospholipid species of retinal layer in traumatic optic neuropathy model. J. Neurosci. Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24500 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Anderson, D. M. et al. High resolution MALDI imaging mass spectrometry of retinal tissue lipids. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 25, 1394–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-014-0883-2 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Manuel, I. et al. Neurotransmitter receptor localization: From autoradiography to imaging mass spectrometry. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 6, 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn500281t (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Garcia, M., Forster, V., Hicks, D. & Vecino, E. Effects of muller glia on cell survival and neuritogenesis in adult porcine retina in vitro. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43, 3735–3743 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Garca, M., Ruiz-Ederra, J., Hernandez-Barbachano, H. & Vecino, E. Topography of pig retinal ganglion cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 486, 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20516 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Veiga-Crespo, P. et al. Phenotypic map of porcine retinal ganglion cells. Mol. Vis. 19, 904–916 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ruiz-Ederra, J. et al. The pig eye as a novel model of glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 81, 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2005.03.014 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Stinson, A. M., Wiegand, R. D. & Anderson, R. E. Fatty acid and molecular species compositions of phospholipids and diacylglycerols from rat retinal membranes. Exp. Eye Res. 52, 213–218 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gugiu, B. G. et al. Identification of oxidatively truncated ethanolamine phospholipids in retina and their generation from polyunsaturated phosphatidylethanolamines. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19, 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx050247f (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Martinez, M. & Mougan, I. Fatty acid composition of human brain phospholipids during normal development. J. Neurochem. 71, 2528–2533 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Patel, D. & Witt, S. N. Ethanolamine and phosphatidylethanolamine: Partners in health and disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 4829180. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4829180 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Han, X., Holtzman, D. M. & McKeel, D. W. Jr. Plasmalogen deficiency in early Alzheimer’s disease subjects and in animal models: Molecular characterization using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Neurochem. 77, 1168–1180 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hicks, A. M., DeLong, C. J., Thomas, M. J., Samuel, M. & Cui, Z. Unique molecular signatures of glycerophospholipid species in different rat tissues analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1761, 1022–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.05.010 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Li, J., Cui, Z., Zhao, S. & Sidman, R. L. Unique glycerophospholipid signature in retinal stem cells correlates with enzymatic functions of diverse long-chain acyl-CoA synthetases. Stem Cells 25, 2864–2873. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0308 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Anderson, D. M. G. et al. The molecular landscape of the human retina and supporting tissues by high resolution imaging mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.0c00119,10.1021/jasms.0c00119 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Frere, S. G., Chang-Ileto, B. & Di Paolo, G. Role of phosphoinositides at the neuronal synapse. Sub-Cell. Biochem. 59, 131–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3015-1_5 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bell, M. V. & Dick, J. R. Molecular species composition of phosphatidylinositol from the brain, retina, liver and muscle of cod (Gadus morhua). Lipids 25, 691–694 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ruzafa, N. & Vecino, E. Effect of Muller cells on the survival and neuritogenesis in retinal ganglion cells. Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia 90, 522–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2015.03.009 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Pereiro, X. et al. Dexamethasone protects retinal ganglion cells but not Muller glia against hyperglycemia in vitro. PLoS ONE 13, e0207913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207913 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ruzafa, N., Pereiro, X., Lepper, M. F., Hauck, S. M. & Vecino, E. A Proteomics approach to identify candidate proteins secreted by Muller glia that protect ganglion cells in the retina. Proteomics 18, e1700321. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700321 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Vecino, E., Heller, J. P., Veiga-Crespo, P., Martin, K. R. & Fawcett, J. W. Influence of extracellular matrix components on the expression of integrins and regeneration of adult retinal ganglion cells. PLoS ONE 10, e0125250. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125250 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Rodriguez-Puertas, R. & Barreda-Gomez, G. Development of new drugs that act through membrane receptors and involve an action of inverse agonism. Recent Pat. CNS Drug Discov. 1, 207–217 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Thomas, A., Charbonneau, J. L., Fournaise, E. & Chaurand, P. Sublimation of new matrix candidates for high spatial resolution imaging mass spectrometry of lipids: Enhanced information in both positive and negative polarities after 1,5-diaminonapthalene deposition. Anal. Chem. 84, 2048–2054. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac2033547 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Fernandez, R. et al. Analysis of the lipidome of xenografts using MALDI-IMS and UHPLC-ESI-QTOF. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 25, 1237–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-014-0882-3 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Fernandez, R. A. et al. Microarray and mass spectrometry-based methodology for lipid profiling of tissues and cell cultures. Anal. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04529 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Deininger, S. O., Ebert, M. P., Futterer, A., Gerhard, M. & Rocken, C. MALDI imaging combined with hierarchical clustering as a new tool for the interpretation of complex human cancers. J. Proteome Res. 7, 5230–5236. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr8005777 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Xiong, X. et al. Data processing for 3D mass spectrometry imaging. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 23, 1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-012-0361-7 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Cao, L. et al. RankCompete: Simultaneous ranking and clustering of information networks. Neurocomputing 95, 98–104 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Arthur, D. & Vassilvitskii, S. k-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1027–1035 (2007).

  64. 64.

    Wold, S., Esbensen, K. & Geladi, P. Principal component analysis. Chemometr. Intellig. Lab. Syst. 2, 37–52 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the grants RETOS MINECO FEDER (RTC-2016-48231), PUE 2018-1-0004, UPV/EHU PPGA 18/18 and Elkartek KK-2019/00086 to E.V.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.P., E.V., R.F. and G.B. conceived and designed the experiments, and participated in the data analysis. N.R. contributed to the imaging tools, and with X.P. and E.V. to the writing of the manuscript. E.V., A.A., J.A. and E.A. contributed to the manuscript revisions, reading and approving the final version submitted.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xandra Pereiro or Elena Vecino.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pereiro, X., Fernández, R., Barreda-Gómez, G. et al. Comparative lipidomic analysis of mammalian retinal ganglion cells and Müller glia in situ and in vitro using High-Resolution Imaging Mass Spectrometry. Sci Rep 10, 20053 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77087-x

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing