Abstract
Pod dehiscence causes important yield losses in cultivated crops and therefore has been a key trait strongly selected against in crop domestication. In spite of the growing knowledge on the genetic basis of dehiscence in different crops, no information is available so far for faba bean. Here we conduct the first comprehensive study for faba bean pod dehiscence by combining, linkage mapping, comparative genomics, QTL analysis and histological examination of mature pods. Mapping of dehiscence-related genes revealed conservation of syntenic blocks among different legumes. Three QTLs were identified in faba bean chromosomes II, IV and VI, although none of them was stable across years. Histological analysis supports the convergent phenotypic evolution previously reported in cereals and related legume species but revealed a more complex pattern in faba bean. Contrary to common bean and soybean, the faba bean dehiscence zone appears to show functional equivalence to that described in crucifers. The lignified wall fiber layer, which is absent in the paucijuga primitive line Vf27, or less lignified and vacuolated in other dehiscent lines, appears to act as the major force triggering pod dehiscence in this species. While our findings, provide new insight into the mechanisms underlying faba bean dehiscence, full understanding of the molecular bases will require further studies combining precise phenotyping with genomic analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) is a world-wide cultivated grain legume, known for its high protein content and yield potential. Its ability to grow under a wide range of climates and soil types has made faba bean one of the preferred crops for agricultural production1, being the second most yielding feed grain legume after soybean (Glycine max L.)2. Besides diseases and pests, pod dehiscence is one of the major constraints on faba bean production in dry areas3. In some legumes such as common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) cultivars, dehiscence rate of mature pods can reach 40 to 60%4, 5. In soybean, Bhor6 reported 50 to 100% yield losses in susceptible cultivars under severe dry climate conditions. In faba bean, yield losses at harvest can be substantial as well, and according to GRDC7, pod dehiscence can reach 30% maturity.
Pod dehiscence refers to the shattering of the pod shell, which enables the successful shattering of seeds5. A crucial strategy for seed dispersal in wild species ranks among the main sources of yield loss in cultivated crops and likely was one of the first traits selected against during crop domestication. Valve aperture during dehiscence is mediated by environmental factors and physical forces in the tissue, which in turn are determined by the properties of the wall cells around the valve suture. Relative humidity and variations in temperature trigger hygroscopic tensions in the pod walls, which are mediated by the different mechanical properties of lignified and non-lignified tissues and by changes in turgor associated to fruit maturation5, 8.
Even after genetic selection against dehiscence, some degree of dehiscence remains in cultivated crops. Since the dominance of the trait difficult its efficient introgression into cultivated lines, dehiscence is still a key target trait in plant breeding programs. Genetic analysis of pod dehiscence has been conducted in different crop legumes, such as soybean, common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.), common vetch, lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus), azuki bean (Vigna angularis L.) and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.)9 but not faba bean. In these species, dehiscence is controlled by one or two dominant genes or by quantitative trait loci (QTL). A syntenic region, controlling the trait was identified in pea and lentil10, 11, suggesting that orthologous genes may be modified during the domestication of these two crops.
Extensive results on the genetic control of dehiscence have been reported in cereals and in the Brassicaceae model species Arabidopsis thaliana. In cereals seed dehiscence is controlled by genes encoding transcription factors, indicating that differences in seed dispersal are associated with changes in transcriptional regulation12. In Arabidopsis, forward genetic approaches identified several transcription factors as well13, although it is unclear whether they are conserved in legumes9.
The crucifer family produces siliques, a pod structure consisting of two fused valves (carpels), connected by a distinct edge or replum. In contrast, the legume pod has a single folded seed-bearing carpel lacking a replum. Another important structure delimiting the region between the valves and the replum is the dehiscence zone (DZ), which should be lignified in order to allow the separation of the valve from the replum. Differences in the DZ lead either to indehiscence or dehiscence of a plant. Ballester and Ferrándiz14 updated the genetic network directing morphogenesis of the DZ in Arabidopsis and reported the transcription factors and enzymatic functions with major roles in DZ formation. Thus, NAC SECONDARY WALL THICKENING PROMOTING FACTOR 1/3 (NST1/3) promotes lignification while ARABIDOPSIS DEHISCENCE ZONE POLYGALACTURONASE 1 (ADPG1/2) allows cell separation (Fig. 1). ADPG1/2 is controlled by the action of ALCATRAZ (ALC), a negative regulator of the INDEHISCENT (IND) gene, which in turn promotes the expression of NST1/3. Furthermore, both ALC and IND expression is both regulated by SHATTERPROOF 1 (SHP1). The shp and ind mutants lack lignification and are fully indehiscent, thus corroborating the importance of DZ lignification in pod dehiscence15,16,17.
Upstream of these genes, APETALA2 (AP2), represses the expression of SHP1. Adjacent to the DZ tissues, two important genes downregulate the expression of all dehiscence pathway-related genes: FRUITFULL (FUL) in the valve and REPLUMLESS (RPL) in the replum17, 18. Other transcription factors regulating the expression of valves, DZ and replum are FILAMENTOUS FLOWER (FIL), YABBY3 (YAB3), ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1/2 (AS1/2) or BREVIPEDICELLUS (BP) (Fig. 1).
Compared with model species, knowledge on the molecular control of dehiscence in legumes is limited. Despite the lack of a replum, the DZ is very similar showing a lignified separation layer along the pod between the two valves19, 20. This indicates that valve aperture is triggered by the same physical mechanism, although the lack of the replum tissue points towards a different anatomical basis.
In legumes, the molecular basis of indehiscence has been investigated in detail in soybean21, 22. A major QTL, PDH1 (QTL for Pod Dehiscence 1), encoding a dirigent-like protein involved in lignin biosynthesis, was reported as candidate for dehiscence regulation. The indehiscent genotype, pdh1, carries a premature stop codon and lacks lignin depositions along the valve. PDH1 was shown to promote pod dehiscence by increasing the twisting force in the pod wall, the driving force of pod dehiscence21. The transcription factor WRKY12 was also described to promote lignin biosynthesis and cell wall deposition in sorghum, Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis23, 24.
Besides lignin deposition, cellulose and hemicellulose content in cowpea was related to the ability to resist pod opening25. In common bean, high dehiscence levels were correlated with high carbon and lignin contents of the pod valves26, while a transcriptomic study in V. sativa revealed candidate genes involved in the biosynthesis of different cell wall components27. Recently, a candidate gene approach in Cicer arietinum, using a RIL population derived from an interspecific cross, identified a major QTL (PDH1) regulating pod dehiscence in combination with the regulatory genes FUL, ALC and AP2 previously described in Arabidopsis28. Pod morphology (e.g. pod length) also affects the degree of dehiscence. For example, short pods in Brassica and Sinapis provide an indehiscent phenotype by reducing physical stress on the dehiscence zone29, 30.
Here we conducted a comprehensive investigation of pod dehiscence in faba bean by combining linkage mapping of candidate genes, QTL analysis and histological analysis of pod valves. A set of orthologs of dehiscence related genes described in A. thaliana, M. truncatula, P. sativum and C. arietinum were tested for polymorphism and further mapped in a segregating population. The final objectives were to: (1) saturate the faba bean map with candidate genes controlling dehiscence, (2) compare the locations of the faba bean QTLs with those reported in related legumes species and (3) perform a comparative histological analysis in pods from contrasting lines. Our results add to the understanding of the genetic basis of dehiscence and will help to identify candidate genes responsible for indehiscence in this agronomically important crop.
Results
Phenotypic evaluation of dehiscence
Phenotypic trait analysis showed a continuous distribution of dehiscence (Fig. 2), suggesting that the character is controlled by multiple genes in this population. The frequency distribution of all variables did not fit the normal distribution (P < 0.05). In the four years, a positive skewness was observed (Fig. 2), indicating a transgressive segregation towards lower pod dehiscence values contributed by the female line Vf6.
Table 1 shows the mean phenotypic values and some basic descriptive statistics for the dehiscence traits recorded: opened pods (OP), fissured pods (FS) and dehiscent pods (DP). Parental lines showed significant differences (P < 0.05) for FS in 2017/18 and 2018/19, and DP in 2017/18 and 2018/19. Except in OP2017/18, line Vf27 exhibited higher phenotypic values than Vf6 for all the dehiscence traits. Evaluation in greenhouse (DPG) in 2016/17 showed no statistical differences between the parental lines. DP and FS showed a wider range of variation than OP. The range of OP in the different seasons varied from 0 to > 65% (Table 1).
Correlations among traits were evaluated across the four years at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01. As summarized in Table 2, the highest correlations were found between DP and FS in 2017/18 (0.98) and 2018/19 (0.88), followed by DP and OP in 2018/19 (0.58). Except for DP2019/20, DP values in the greenhouse showed moderate but significant correlations ranging from 0.25 to 0.37 with the rest of the DP field ratings. There were also significant correlations between 0.21 and 0.31 among the DP field values except between DP2018/19 with DPF2016/17 and DP2017/18. No correlation was detected among the OP field values in 2017/18 and the DP data collected in the other three years, except for DPG2016/17. A strong attack of aphids during the flowering and podding period in 2018/19 and the high incidence of broomrape (Orobanche crenata) in 2017/18 might be the main reasons for the lack of correlation between the traits recorded (Table 2).
ANOVA results for the genotype x environment (G x E) analyses of each evaluated trait are shown in Supplementary Table 1. For all traits, significant differences were obtained between Genotype (RILs) and Environment (years of evaluation). For OP and DP evaluations, significant differences were also obtained for the G x E interaction, suggesting that pod opening differed for a certain genotype across the years.
Dehiscence candidate genes and marker development
Fifty one dehiscence-related candidate genes (Supplementary Table 2) were selected on the basis of current knowledge of their roles in pod dehiscence control from different plant species, including Arabidopsis thaliana (27 genes), V. sativa (22), G. max (1) and Solanum lycopersicum (1). Gene sequences were subjected to BLAST searches to identify orthologs in other sequenced legume species closely related to faba bean (C. arietinum, M. truncatula and P. sativum) and positive blast matches for all of them were found (Supplementary Table 2).
Based on these sequences, primers were designed and used for amplification with DNA from V. faba. We obtained amplification products for 26 A. thaliana and 16 V. sativa gene markers. The gene marker from S. lycopersicum (Vf_TAGL1) also produced an amplification product, whereas attempts to amplify the Vf_PDH1 marker from G. max were unsuccessful. Primer sequences, size of the amplified DNA fragments and annealing temperatures for each candidate gene are shown in Supplementary Table 3.
The sequences of the amplified DNA fragments were aligned to identify possible Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) between the parental lines. A total of 38 amplified sequences (23 candidates from A. thaliana, 14 from V. sativa and one from S. lycopersicum) contained SNPs in restriction enzyme recognition sites and were thus transformed to Cleavage Amplified Polymorphisms (CAPs). Ten of the detected SNPs did not contain cleavage sites for available restriction enzymes and therefore internal primers were designed for these sequences. Where the internal primers failed, SNPs were genotyped using the MassArray iPLEX (Sequenom) platform (https://www.cegen.org). Only one of the amplified genes (Vf_TAGL1) could not be genotyped in the population.
Finally, 44 out of 163 genes genotyped using the KASPar technique, displayed polymorphisms between the parental lines and were included in the genetic map.
Genetic map and synteny analysis
To build a more saturated map in the RIL population, segregation data from 44 KASPar markers and 37 dehiscence-related markers were combined with a previous data set31. Four of the later markers deviated significantly (P < 0.05) from the expected Mendelian inheritance ratio of 1:1 (Table 3). Vf_AG1, Vf_SEP3 and Vf_SHP1 were skewed towards the Vf27 allele whereas Vf_c128596 was in favour of the Vf6 allele. The linkage map consists of six main linkage groups and 5 fragments, and spans nearly 4.421,1 cM (Fig. 3). The existence of common markers with previous consensus maps32, 33 allowed to assign all the LGs to the corresponding faba bean chromosomes (chrs.). All candidate-gene markers except Vf_YAB3 were included in the new genetic map. The number of candidate-gene markers in each LG ranged from one in LGI to nine in LGII, and the distorted markers Vf_AG1, Vf_SEP3 and Vf_SHP1 mapped together in the distal part of chr. VI.
In order to determine if these genes maintain their relative positions in the genomes of different legumes, we determined synteny between V. faba and the related species M. truncatula, P. sativum and C. arietinum (Table 3). The level of synteny was high (78%), with 29 out of 37 gene markers showing conservation in at least one other species. Twenty of markers were syntenic with C. arietinum, 21 with M. truncatula and 23 with P. sativum. Finally, thirteen markers (Vf_AP1, Vf_AS2, Vf_HEC2, Vf_JAG, Vf_PI, Vf_SEP3, Vf_c111669, Vf_c115918, Vf_c119513, Vf_c119843, Vf_c120857, Vf_c124154 and Vf_c128287), exhibited conserved synteny across all four species, preserving the co-localization in the homologous chromosomes.
QTL analysis
Three significant QTL regions (LOD threshold > 3.3) in chromosomes II, IV and VI were related to dehiscence resistance (Table 4, Fig. 3). Except for QTL DPG2016/17, the additive effects in most of the associated markers were negative, indicating that the resistance enhancing alleles originated from the dehiscence resistant parent Vf6. The QTL in chr. II (FS2017/18) close to marker Vf_Mtr3g104700 explained 20.7% of the phenotypic variation, whereas the QTL of DP2017/18 accounted for 18.5% of the phenotypic variation in the same region.
Another QTL for resistance to dehiscence (DPF2016/17) was detected in chr. IV, explaining 15.2% of the variation. The DPF2016/17 peak position corresponds to the marker Mtr4g100510. Finally, QTL DPG2016/17 was detected in chr. VI, flanked by the candidate gene for dehiscence SEP3, and for Mtr8g085280(81), explaining 18.6% of the phenotypic variation. The 2019/20 evaluation, although showing a moderate correlation with the dehiscence traits scored in the previous seasons, did not reveal any significant QTL region.
A BLASTp search was performed using Arabidopsis as a model, to identify the gene orthologs flanking each QTL and the results are shown in Supplementary Table 4.
Histological characterization
Samples obtained for histological analysis consisted of proximal and distal transverse cuts corresponding to the ventral and dorsal sutures of mature pods. The micrographs of the transverse sections revealed that the faba bean pod wall (pericarp) follows the common arrangement and structure described in legume crops (Fig. 4). The exocarp consist of a single-layered epidermis (EP) while the mesocarp (MS) is arranged in several layers of parenchyma. The endocarp (EN) is composed of a sclerenchyma which heavily thickened by lignin in dorsal and ventral sutures (or sheath), with two lateral branches extending into the seed coats and a vascular bundle (VB) containing the xylem and phloem tissues. Both exocarp and mesocarp are rich in pectins, as indicated by metachromatic staining with toluidine blue (Fig. 4). The DZ tissue between valves almost disappeared after the inclusion in paraffin, probably due to the maturity of the samples.
Histological staining revealed clear differences between parental lines, regarding both the area and the perimeter of the respective lignified cell layer (Table 5) and the proportion of lignin deposition within cells (Table 6). In all samples, the indehicent parent Vf6 showed a higher sheath lignified area (stained in light blue) than the dehiscent line Vf27 (Fig. 4, Table 5). In the proximal dorsal zone, this measurement was performed in total stained tissue since there was no clear distinction between left and right valves. In this case, the central zone in Vf6 also contained more cells than in Vf27 (Supplementary Fig. 1 ).
Cell walls in the sheath of the pods were heavily thickened (Fig. 4). Nevertheless, the lumen of the cells appeared to be almost occluded in the indehiscent Vf6 line as compared of the dehiscent pods in the Vf27 parent (Fig. 4b,e). Except for the proximal ventral zone, which is less relevant for dehiscence, the percentage of lignin deposition inside the cells was higher in Vf6 than in Vf27 (P < 0.01). Vf6 showed higher lignin deposition in the distal zone than in the proximal zones, both at ventral and dorsal sutures, whereas in the dehiscent line Vf27 lignin deposition was similar between the two zones (Table 6).
Interestingly, the two parental lines exhibited a marked difference in the geometrical arrangement and histological characteristics of the lateral cell wall (Fig. 4c,f). The three pericarp layers EP, MS and EN with a continuous ring of lignified cells, were clearly distinguishable in the dehiscent resistant Vf6 line, while in Vf27 only the EP could be distinguished and no lignin deposition was found in any of the other layers.
Discussion
Pod dehiscence causes important agronomic losses and regarded as a key trait in crop domestication22, 34. In legumes such as chickpea, soybean or pea, clear differences in dehiscence between wild (dehiscent) and cultivated (indehiscent) accessions were reported22, 35, 36, showing the results of many years of domestication. In faba bean, however, the wild progenitor is unknown, making it difficult the comparison between a wild dehiscent genotype and modern varieties.
Here we conducted the first comprehensive study of pod dehiscence in faba bean by combining comparative genomics, linkage mapping of candidates genes, QTL analysis and histological examination of pod valves from a segregating population. To this aim, we used a RIL population derived from the contrasting lines Vf6 (indehiscent) and Vf27 (dehiscent), the latter being a primitive paucijuga form found from Afghanistan to India, whose phenotype is similar to the hypothetical wild progenitor37.
Pod dehiscence in faba bean was characterized in four consecutive years under field and greenhouse conditions, based on previous data obtained from model plants and related legume species. Phenotypic evaluation of dehiscence showed a gradient similar to that described in P. vulgaris26, ranging from pods completely indehiscent and pods with valves separated to some degree, to fine fissured valves and completely open valves (twisted and non-twisted). Three QTLs were identified although none of them was significant across all seasons, as would be expected for a trait which is strongly influenced by environmental conditions such as humidity, temperature, duration of pod drying and biotic stresses38, 39.
The lack of significance for some QTLs in 2018/19 can be further attributed to a severe aphid attack leading to complete exploitation of the hosts plant. As a result, the pods failed to develop correctly and the phenotypic evaluation was somewhat distorted. Similarly, the QTL results obtained in 2017/18 could be explained by a severe broomrape (Orobanche crenata) attack. This parasitic plant is widespread in Mediterranean areas and west Asia, lacks chlorophyll and depends on the host plant for nutrition. The broomrape attack in 2017/18 affected plant and pod development in the critical phase of biomass accumulation, leading to abortions and a marked decrease in pod number. Thus, biotic stresses influencing the genetic effects could, together with the environmental conditions, represent the main reasons for the observed lack of strong correlation between dehiscence traits and growing seasons, corroborated by the G x E significance observed in some of the traits evaluated.
To identify candidate genes co-localizing with QTLs for faba bean dehiscence resistance, we selected a set of candidate marker genes involved in pod dehiscence in Arabidopsis and other relevant crop species, which were found to be conserved between mono and dicotyledonous plants38, 40. As a consequence, these shared domestication-related loci have become common targets for genetic studies and breeding programs. Here we surveyed 51 faba bean orthologs of dehiscence-related genes from A. thaliana, V. sativa, G. max and S. lycopersicum, in order to unveil the presence of homologous pathways and loci controlling dehiscence. BLAST searches and PCR analysis with designed primers identified 43 orthologs, which retained enough sequence similarity to be amplified in faba bean. Thirty eight of these contained SNPs and 37 were finally included in the new genetic map. The chromosomal positions of these markers among legume species was highly conserved, thus corroborating that collinearity allows to predict gene position across members of the same family.
QTL analysis revealed three significant QTLs for dehiscence, which were located in chromosomes II, IV and VI. The higher R2-value (20.7%) was obtained in the 2017/18 evaluation, when the dehiscence was evaluated as fissured pods. None of the major QTLs detected was stable across the environments, probably due to the biotic stresses mentioned above. This observation is supported by the lack of correlation between the respective dehiscence traits FS, OP and DP. Additional evaluations allowing more precise phenotyping in a controlled environment will be required to identify and validate QTLs consistent across different years.
Except for QTL DPG2016/17, which is flanked by Vf_SEP3 in chr. VI, none of the other QTLs showed a close relation with the dehiscence-related candidate gene markers. However, some of them exhibited synteny with previous QTLs detected in closely related species. For example, QTL DP2017/18 in chr. II, was syntenic with QTLs reported in L. culinaris41, P. sativum10, 11 and M. truncatula36. Similarly, QTLs in chr. IV and VI (DPF2016/17 and DPG2016/17) might correspond to syntenic blocks reported in L. culinaris41, P. sativum11, C. arietinum28 and G. max21, 22, 42 where other dehiscence related genes or QTLs were detected. As reported by Cannon43, most of the genes in papilionoid legume species are likely to be located in syntenic regions with respect to any other given papilionoid species. The results obtained here support these findings by confirming the conservation of large-scale synteny blocks for dehiscence regulation in orthologous chromosomal regions.
Important progress has been made in the characterization of the genetic basis of dehiscence in a number of model species and crops such as wheat, rice, soybean, beans, lentil, pea among others (reviewed by5, 14, 26, 34, 38). Collectively, these studies suggest that pathways and loci controlling pod dehiscence are broadly conserved across taxa, pointing towards homologous mechanisms underlying dehiscence. However, while a convergent phenotypic evolution was proposed across cereals, which might also have occurred at orthologous loci in closely related legume species, such evidence has not been obtained so far across more distant legume crops34. Comparative mapping between P. vulgaris and G. max suggested that the convergent evolution of the indehiscent phenotypes derived from mutations at different genes involved in pod cell wall biosynthesis and lignin deposition44, which suggested a more complex pattern in the genetic control of this trait in legumes.
In this study, a number of orthologs dehiscence-related genes from different species were genotyped and mapped to assess their role in faba bean indehiscence. Among these, only SEP3, encoding a MADS-box transcription factor, was found to flank a significant QTL for dehiscence resistance in 2016/17 (DP2016/17). MADS-box genes are known as key regulators of virtually every aspect of plant reproductive development and have served as important targets for selection during crop domestication45. SEP3 was described as part of the ABCDE complex of floral organ determination46,47,48,49. In Arabidopsis, the C + E complex specifies carpels, being the class C gene AGAMOUS (AG)50 and the class E SEPALLATA1/2/3/4 (SEP1/2/3/4)51. SEP3 interacts with genes regulated by auxin, gibberellic acid and brassinosteroids, including PID and PIN46. Immink47 described the interaction network of SEP3, showing the relation of this gene with the dehiscence pathway in A. thaliana14.
A SEPALLATA MADS-box protein from tomato was described as an activator of the abscission zone in the flower peduncle52. This protein forms a complex with JOINTLESS and MACROCALYX and activates other genes to transform meristem cells in a few layers of small cells (abscission zone). Auxin flow is also an important requisite for the formation of the dehiscence zone in A. thaliana14. Interestingly, our results revealed that QTL DPG2016/17 was also flanked by Mtr8g085280, an ortholog of the Arabidopsis NO VEIN gene that regulates PIN expression and auxin polarity53 thus suggesting that this process might also be involved in faba bean dehiscence resistance.
A recent transcriptomic analysis of dehiscence in V. sativa identified several genes related to cell wall modifications27, whose orthologs were analyzed in our study. However, none of these showed a significant correlation with dehiscence in V. faba. Moreover, some of the soybean and Arabidopsis pod dehiscence genes assayed here, such as SHAT1-5, pdh1, SHP1, SHP2, IND, and ALC, were not found to be differentially expressed in V. sativa. A similar lack of relation of IND, SHP1 and PDH1 with dehiscence, as observed in our study, was previously reported in a cross between yardlong bean and wild cowpea25.
Dehiscence in faba bean could be related with the expression level of certain genes. For example, fusion of the strong 35S promoter to the MADS-box gene FUL in A. thaliana resulted in overexpression of dehiscence-related genes ALC, IND and STK54. Similarity, overexpression of another MADS-box gene AGL1 caused abnormal flowers and short, yellowish-green and early dehiscent pods, indicating a possible relationship between pod length and dehiscence49. Interestingly, the faba bean parental line Vf27 has short dehiscent pods, although we found no correlation between pod length and dehiscence traits (data not shown). Previous QTL analysis in our group31, 32 detected QTLs for pod length in chromosomes I and V, but none of them colocalized with the QTLs for dehiscence found in this work. This lack of coincidence suggest that pod length and dehiscence may not be related in faba bean.
Histological characterization of the faba bean pod sutures in mature pods revealed anatomical structures analogous to those described in other legumes such as soybean, common bean, pea or common vetch22, 26, 30, 36, 55, 56. Pod dehiscence arises from fissures that initiate in the ventral sutures, as recently observed in chickpea by Aguilar-Benitez28. Our micrographs from the pod opening sutures, show the progression of the valve separation and the collapse of cells in the DZ. Clear differences in the lignification pattern were detected between contrasted faba bean lines. Thus, although the cell walls in the sheath were heavily thickened in both parental lines, the cell lumen appeared to be almost occluded in the indehiscent Vf6 compared to the primitive dehiscent line Vf27. A major lignification in the DZ was reported to confer dehiscence resistance to mature pods in soybean22, Brassica napus54 and P. vulgaris26, 55, 56. Moreover, observation of the anatomical structure of pod ventral sutures in common vetch (V. sativa) revealed that all dehiscent vetches have abscission layers in the DZ that are absent in the indehiscent plants57. However, this finding, could not be corroborated in our faba bean sections, due to the advanced stage of maturation of the pod samples used in the study.
Clear-cut differences were observed between the two faba bean lines concerning the degree of lignification in the sclerenchyma inner cells of the pod walls. A continuous ring of cells with high lignification was specifically detected in the indehiscent line Vf6, while in Vf27 this lignified wall fiber layer (LFL) was absent. This observation is similar to that described in Brassica species, where indehiscent species show a more lignified endocarp than dehiscent ones54. By contrast, our findings are opposed to those reported from histological studies in common bean and soybean, where pod valves of the wild dehiscent lines showed a strong lignified wall fiber layer contrasting with a complete absence of lignin deposition in the indehiscent lines21, 26, 34, 55, 56, 58.
Because not all anatomical or histological differences between the primitive dehiscent line Vf27 and Vf6 are necessarily correlated with dehiscent traits, we analyzed the new faba bean dehiscent lines, 335, 756, 1068. Histological staining revealed a ventral sheath pattern similar to Vf27 with lower deposition of lignin compared to Vf6. However, a lignified wall fiber layer (LFL), which is absent in Vf27, was detected in these three dehiscent lines (Supplementary Fig. 2 ), although it was thinner and had an empty lumen. These results suggest the development of an intermediate, but correlated cell pattern from the primitive dehiscent phenotype Vf27 to the new dehiscent lines tested.
Although the tissue sections at this stage were difficult to obtain due to the fragility of the pod valves, we clearly observed an increased mechanical resistance of Vf6 compared with Vf27. Therefore we propose that the dehiscence zone of faba bean is functionally equivalent to that described in crucifers, although the underlying molecular mechanisms may differ. At the late stage of maturity, once lignification is completed and the valve attachment becomes weakened, the increased size of the vacuolated cells in the lateral walls of the dehiscent lines promote dehiscence. Loss of turgor due to desiccation of these vacuolated cells, coupled with reduced resistance to deformation caused by a lower level of lignin deposition could be the major force triggering pod dehiscence in the dehiscent faba bean lines.
In other plant species, pod dehiscence has also been linked to differences in turgor of the inner sclerenchymatic cell layer, as a result of dehydration59,60,61. Murgia proposed that lignification of the internal valve layer (LFL) contributes to dehiscence in soybean26. By contrast, our results in faba bean indicate that the absence of LFL in line Vf27 and the lower level of lignification in other dehiscent lines could reduce the stability of the valve, triggering cell detachment and separation of the valves after desiccation.
Material and methods
Plant material
A recombinant inbred line (RIL) population was used to determine the genomic regions associated with dehiscence. The population consists on 124 F8-F9 inbred lines obtained from the cross between the parental lines Vf6, an indehiscent equina type; and Vf27, a pod dehiscent, small seeded type (paucijuga), supposedly close to the putative wild faba bean progenitor37, 62. This population was previously used by our group to identify and validate QTLs controlling flowering and yield related traits31. For the histological studies three additional dehiscent lines (335, 756 and 1068) from the IFAPA faba bean core collection were included in the analysis.
Phenotypic evaluation
The field evaluation was performed at Córdoba (Spain) along four agronomics seasons (2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2019/2020). Meteorological data recorded for each agrononomic season are summarized in Supplementary Table 5. The RIL population was sown in November using a complete randomized design, with three to five plants per genotype and two replications. Only in 2016/17 pods from each line were evaluated twice in both, controlled and field condition. Mature pods were harvested and dried for 10 days at 20–40% relative humidity and 25 °C10 and then led to the extreme drying in the greenhouse. For the field scoring, one stem per plant was covered in the field with an isolation holey bag until the pods were completely dry. In the remaining seasons, plants were evaluated for dehiscence in the field when pods were dry.
Four pod categories were established: (1) indehiscent, (2) “fissured,” referring to pods with a fine open line between their valves but yet closed, (3) dehiscent with non-twisting valves, and (4) dehiscent with twisting valves. Because of the presence of intermediate cases in the same plant, in seasons 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2019/20, pod dehiscence was evaluated using three phenotypic traits: (1) percentage of opened pods, OP = (opened pods / total number of pods) × 100, (2) percentage of fissured pods, FP = (fissured pods / the total number of pods closed and/or fissured) × 100, excluding open pods, in an attempt to evaluate the trait independently and (3) percentage of dehiscent pods, DP = (opened and fissured pods / total number of pods) × 100. In 2016/17 and 2019/20, dehiscence was only evaluated as the percentage of dehiscent pods, with no distinction between completely open and fissured pods. Mean values for each parental line and RIL were calculated for each trait and replicate. Normality tests were performed to evaluate whether the data were normally distributed. ANOVA tests for Genotype x Environment analyses were performed. All statistical data analyses were carried out using the R software version 3.6.163.
Dehiscence candidate genes and primer design
A candidate gene strategy64 was applied for map enrichment and identification of functional candidates co-localizing with QTLs for dehiscence. Fifty one dehiscence-related genes were selected from different species (Supplementary Table 2): Arabidopsis thaliana14, 38, 49, 65,66,67, G. max21, S. licopersicum68 and V. sativa27. Gene sequences were used as queries for BLAST searches within closely related legume species such as M. truncatula, C. arietinum and P. sativum. Positive results were used to identify homologous sequences in an in-house faba bean transcriptome database developed by Ocaña et al.69. Primer design was run using Geneious software (v. 7.1.9; Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand).
Orthologous gene sequences were aligned and when possible, primers were designed on V. faba sequences spanning an intron. Otherwise we used the sequence of related species to design primers with 20–25 nucleotides, GC content of 45–60%, and Tm of 60 ± 1 °C, yielding a PCR amplicon of 200–1000 bp. Markers developed in this study were named as the corresponding candidate gene preceded by the letters ‘Vf’ (Supplementary Table 3).
In addition to these markers, a set of 163 markers from the Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) developed by Webb33, were selected and genotyped in this population (Supplementary Table 6).
PCR amplification and polymorphism detection
Genomic DNA was isolated from young leaves using the CTAB procedure70. PCR amplification consisted of 25 μl reactions containing 4 ng template DNA, 1 × PCR buffer, 2 mM of MgCl2, 0.4 mM of dNTPs, 0.2 μM of each primer and 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Biotools B&M Labs, Madrid, Spain). Amplification conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 56–60 °C and 45 s at 72 °C, with a final extension step of 8 min at 72 °C. PCR products were separated using 2% agarose gels.
PCR amplification products lacking polymorphism between the parental lines were purified using a standard protocol (https://www.thermofisher.com) for DNA precipitation with sodium acetate and ethanol (1/10 3 M sodium acetate (pH 4.5), 2 v/v ethanol). Products were sequenced by Sanger at STABVIDA (Caparica, Portugal). Sequences were then aligned to detect SNPs using the Geneious software suite (v. 7.1.9; Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand). Amplicons with recognition sites for restriction site polymorphism were converted into CAPS markers (Cleaved Amplified Polymorphism Sequence) to genotype the whole RIL population. Restriction digestions were performed following the supplier’s instructions and visualized in 2% agarose gels. For SNPs lacking restriction enzymes in the polymorphic site, internal primers were designed using the Tetra-Primer ARMS–PCR technique described by Medrano and Oliveira71. In those cases where the internal primers did not yield amplification, the genotyping was carried out at CEGEN-PRB3-ISCIII (https://www.cegen.org) using the MassArray iPLEX (Sequenom) SNP typing platform from the Spanish National Genotyping Center facility of the University of Santiago de Compostela.
Genetic mapping and QTL analysis
Polymorphic markers genotyped in the RIL population were incorporated into a previous marker dataset31 to develop a new linkage map. Segregating data were analyzed for goodness of fit to the expected 1:1 ratio using the chi-squared tests. Linkage analysis was performed using JoinMap v4.072 with the maximum likelihood option. Markers were grouped at a minimum LOD score of 3 and a maximum recombination fraction of 0.25. Recombination fractions were converted to centimorgans (cM) using the Kosambi mapping function73.
QTL analysis was conducted using MapQTL v5.074. First, the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used to detect association between markers and traits. Then, interval mapping75, 76 was performed to identify putative QTLs in each linkage group (LG). Markers significant at P = 0.01 were used as cofactors in the multiple QTL analysis (MQM)77,78,79. QTL significance (P value) was determined by permutation analysis using 1000 replicates80, as implemented in MapQTL 5.0. Only QTLs with a LOD higher than the p-value were declared as significant. MapChart software81 was used to represent the QTLs confidence interval. The support intervals were defined as LOD-1 and LOD-2 around the maximum LOD of QTL.
Histological sample preparation
Plant material was prepared according to the protocol described by Pérez-de-Luque82. Mature pods (turning to brown) from parental lines were harvested and fixed in FAA (3.7% formaldehyde, 5% acetic acid and 50% alcohol). Proximal and distal edges were cut in transverse segments corresponding with the ventral and dorsal sutures of the pod (Fig. 5). Samples were dehydrated in an increasing series of ethanol/water solution from 50 to 100% of ethanol, 12 h each, then transferred to an embedding solvent through xylene-ethanol series (30, 50, 80, 100% twice, 12 h each) and finally samples were saturated with paraffin (Paraplast plus; Sigma, Switzerland). After saturation the solution was replaced with melted paraffin and the samples were kept at 56 °C for 24 h. This step was repeated twice in order to secure complete evaporation of xylene residues. Pod sections embedded in paraffin blocks were cut into 7 μm-thick sections using a Leica RM2245 rotary microtome (Leica Microsystems, Germany) and attached to adhesive treated microscope slides (polysine slides; Menzel GmbH and Co KG, Braunschweig, Germany).
Staining procedure
Histochemical staining of the sections was carried out according to Ruzin83 with slight modifications82. Each slide was stained with 0.1% TBO (0.1 M citric acid and 0.1 M sodium citrate) for 20 min and washed with distilled water. Samples were then deparaffinized twice, with 100% xylene for 20 min and sealed with mounting medium (Entellan; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The sections were observed using a Nikon Eclipse 50i light microscope and photographs were taken through a Nikon DS-Fi1 digital optical device connected to a PC through the Nikon DS-U2 control unity (Nikon Instruments). Image analysis was performed using the ImageJ software84.
The area and perimeter of the lignified cell layer was measured in the left and right DZ regions. The percentage of lignin inside the cells was calculated as (total cell area—inner non-colored area)/total cell area × 100, and was measured in 20 cells.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.
References
Singh, A. K., Bharati, C. N., Ra, M. & Pedpati, A. An assessment of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) current status and future prospect. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 8, 6634–6641 (2013).
Food and agriculture data, FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (2018, accessed 22 Feb 2019); https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
Erskine, W., Nassib, A. M. & Telaye, A. in World Crops: Cool Season Food Legumes (ed. Summerfield, R. J.), Vol. 5 117–127 (Springer Netherlands, 1988).
Sattell, R., Dick, R., Luna, J., McGrath, D., Peachey, E. Common Vetch (Vicia sativa L.). In: Oregon cover crops (Oregon State University Extension Service, Corvallis, 1998)
Dong, Y. & Wang, Y.-Z. Seed shattering: from models to crops. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 476 (2015).
Bhor, T., Chimote, V. & Deshmukh, M. Inheritance of pod shattering in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 5, 671–676 (2014).
Faba Bean section 12 harvest. In: GrowNotes. Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) (2018, accessed on 22 February 2019); https://grdc.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/366237/GrowNote-Faba-South-12-Harvest.pdf.
Hu, Z. et al. A large replum-valve joint area is associated with increased resistance to pod shattering in rapeseed. J. Plant Res. 128, 813–819 (2015).
Gao, M. & Zhu, H. Fine mapping of a major quantitative trait locus that regulates pod shattering in soybean. Mol. Breed. 32, 485–491 (2013).
Weeden, N. F., Brauner, S. & Przyborowski, J. A. Genetic analysis of pod dehiscence in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 7, 657–663 (2002).
Weeden, N. F. Genetic changes accompanying the domestication of Pisum sativum: is there a common genetic basis to the “domestication syndrome” for legumes?. Ann. Bot. 100, 1017–1025 (2007).
Doebley, J. F., Gaut, B. S. & Smith, B. D. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127, 1309–1321 (2006).
Lewis, M. W., Leslie, M. E. & Liljegren, S. J. Plant separation: 50 ways to leave your mother. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9, 59–65 (2006).
Ballester, P. & Ferrándiz, C. Shattering fruits: variations on a dehiscent theme. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 35, 68–75 (2017).
Liljegren, S. J. et al. Control of fruit patterning in Arabidopsis by INDEHISCENT. Cell 116, 843–853 (2004).
Rajani, S. & Sundaresan, V. The Arabidopsis myc/bHLH gene ALCATRAZ enables cell separation in fruit dehiscence. Curr. Biol. 11, 1914–1922 (2001).
Ferrándiz, C., Liljegren, S. J. & Yanofsky, M. F. Negative regulation of the SHATTERPROOF genes by FRUITFULL during Arabidopsis fruit development. Science 289, 436–438 (2000).
Roeder, A. H. K., Ferrándiz, C. & Yanofsky, M. F. The role of the REPLUMLESS homeodomain protein in patterning the Arabidopsis fruit. Curr. Biol. 13, 1630–1635 (2003).
Østergaard, L., Kempin, S. A., Bies, D., Klee, H. J. & Yanofsky, M. F. Pod shatter-resistant Brassica fruit produced by ectopic expression of the FRUITFULL gene. Plant Biotechnol. J. 4, 45–51 (2006).
Christiansen, L. C., Dal Degan, F., Ulvskov, P. & Borkhardt, B. Examination of the dehiscence zone in soybean pods and isolation of a dehiscence-related endopolygalacturonase gene. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 479–490 (2002).
Funatsuki, H. et al. Molecular basis of a shattering resistance boosting global dissemination of soybean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17797–17802 (2014).
Dong, Y. et al. Pod shattering resistance associated with domestication is mediated by a NAC gene in soybean. Nat. Commun. 5, 3352 (2014).
Tang, H. et al. Seed shattering in a wild sorghum is conferred by a locus unrelated to domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15824–15829 (2013).
Yoon, J., Choi, H. & An, G. Roles of lignin biosynthesis and regulatory genes in plant development. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 57, 902–912 (2015).
Suanum, W. et al. Co-localization of QTLs for pod fiber content and pod shattering in F2 and backcross populations between yardlong bean and wild cowpea. Mol. Breed. 36, 80 (2016).
Murgia, M. L. et al. A comprehensive phenotypic investigation of the “pod-shattering syndrome” in common bean. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 251 (2017).
Dong, R. et al. Transcriptome analyses reveal candidate pod shattering-associated genes involved in the pod ventral sutures of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Front. Plant Sci. 8, 649 (2017).
Aguilar-Benitez, D. et al. Genetic analysis reveals PDH1 as a candidate gene for control of pod dehiscence in chickpea. Mol. Breed. 40, 40 (2020).
Summers, J. E. et al. Pod shatter resistance in the resynthesized Brassica napus line DK142. J. Agric. Sci. 140, 43–52 (2003).
Wang, R., Ripley, V. L. & Rakow, G. Pod shatter resistance evaluation in cultivars and breeding lines of Brassica napus,B. juncea and Sinapis alba. Plant Breed. 126, 588–595 (2007).
Cruz-Izquierdo, S. et al. Comparative genomics to bridge Vicia faba with model and closely-related legume species: stability of QTLs for flowering and yield-related traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 125, 1767–1782 (2012).
Satovic, Z. et al. A reference consensus genetic map for molecular markers and economically important traits in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). BMC Genomics 14, 932 (2013).
Webb, A. et al. A SNP-based consensus genetic map for synteny-based trait targeting in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 177–185 (2016).
Di Vittori, V. et al. Convergent evolution of the seed shattering trait. Genes 10, 68 (2019).
Ladizinsky, G. Seed dispersal in relation to the domestication of Middle East Legumes. Econ. Bot. 33, 284–289 (1979).
Hradilová, I. et al. A combined comparative transcriptomic, metabolomic, and anatomical analyses of two key domestication traits: pod dehiscence and seed dormancy in pea (Pisum sp.). Front. Plant Sci. 8, 542 (2017).
Cubero, J. I. On the evolution of Vicia faba L.. Theor. Appl. Genet. 45, 47–51 (1974).
Ogutcen, E. et al. Pod shattering: a homologous series of variation underlying domestication and an avenue for crop improvement. Agronomy 8, 137 (2018).
Zhang, Q., Tu, B., Liu, C. & Liu, X. Pod anatomy, morphology and dehiscing forces in pod dehiscence of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Flora 248, 48–53 (2018).
Konishi, S. et al. An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 312, 1392–1396 (2006).
Fratini, R., Durán, Y., García, P. & Pérez de la Vega, M. Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for plant structure, growth habit and yield in lentil. Span. J. Agric. Res. 5, 348 (2007).
Suzuki, M., Fujino, K., Nakamoto, Y., Ishimoto, M. & Funatsuki, H. Fine mapping and development of DNA markers for the qPDH1 locus associated with pod dehiscence in soybean. Mol. Breed. 25, 407–418 (2010).
Cannon, S. B., May, G. D. & Jackson, S. A. Three sequenced legume genomes and many crop species: rich opportunities for translational genomics. Plant Physiol. 151, 970–977 (2009).
Rau, D. et al. Genomic dissection of pod shattering in common bean: mutations at non-orthologous loci at the basis of convergent phenotypic evolution under domestication of leguminous species. Plant J. 97, 693–714 (2019).
Schilling, S., Pan, S., Kennedy, A. & Melzer, R. MADS-box genes and crop domestication: the jack of all traits. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 1447–1469 (2018).
Kaufmann, K. et al. Target genes of the MADS transcription factor SEPALLATA3: integration of developmental and hormonal pathways in the Arabidopsis flower. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000090 (2009).
Immink, R. G. H. et al. SEPALLATA3: the “glue” for MADS box transcription factor complex formation. Genome Biol. 10, R24 (2009).
Shi, Q., Zhou, J., Wang, P., Lin, X. & Xu, Y. Protein expression and characterization of SEP3 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Genet. Mol. Res. 14, 12529–12536 (2015).
Chi, Y. et al. GmAGL1, a MADS-box gene from soybean, is involved in floral organ identity and fruit dehiscence. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 175 (2017).
Yanofsky, M. F. et al. The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature 346, 35–39 (1990).
Pelaz, S., Ditta, G. S., Baumann, E., Wisman, E. & Yanofsky, M. F. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 405, 200–203 (2000).
Liu, D. et al. The SEPALLATA MADS-box protein SLMBP21 forms protein complexes with JOINTLESS and MACROCALYX as a transcription activator for development of the tomato flower abscission zone. Plant J. 77, 284–296 (2014).
Tsugeki, R. et al. NO VEIN mediates auxin-dependent specification and patterning in the Arabidopsis embryo, shoot, and root. Plant Cell 21, 3133–3151 (2009).
Zhang, Y., Shen, Y. Y., Wu, X. M. & Wang, J. B. The basis of pod dehiscence: anatomical traits of the dehiscence zone and expression of eight pod shatter-related genes in four species of Brassicaceae. Biol. Plant. 60, 343–354 (2016).
Parker, T. A. et al. Pod indehiscence is a domestication and aridity resilience trait in common bean. New Phytol. 225, 558–570 (2020).
Di Vittori, V. et al. Pod indehiscence in common bean is associated to the fine regulation of PvMYB26 and a non-functional abscission layer. BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.02.021972 (2020).
Dong, D. et al. Evaluation and analysis of pod dehiscence factors in shatter-susceptible and shatter-resistant common vetch. Crop Sci. 57, 2770–2776 (2017).
Takahashi, Y. et al. Genetic factor for twisting legume pods identified by fine-mapping of shattering-related traits in azuki bean and yard-long bean. BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/774844 (2019).
Hofhuis, H. et al. Morphomechanical innovation drives explosive seed dispersal. Cell 166, 222–233 (2016).
Romkaew, J., Nagaya, Y., Goto, M., Suzuki, K. & Umezaki, T. Pod dehiscence in relation to chemical components of pod shell in soybean. Plant Prod. Sci. 11, 278–282 (2008).
Armon, S., Efrati, E., Kupferman, R. & Sharon, E. Geometry and mechanics in the opening of chiral seed pods. Science 333, 1726–1730 (2011).
Patto, M. C. V., Torres, A. M., Koblizkova, A., Macas, J. & Cubero, J. I. Development of a genetic composite map of Vicia faba using F2 populations derived from trisomic plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98, 736–743 (1999).
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).
Pflieger, S., Lefebvre, V. & Causse, M. The candidate gene approach in plant genetics: a review. Mol Breed. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011605013259 (2001).
Balanzà, V., Roig-Villanova, I., Di Marzo, M., Masiero, S. & Colombo, L. Seed abscission and fruit dehiscence required for seed dispersal rely on similar genetic networks. Development 143, 3372–3381 (2016).
Tao, Z. et al. BnLATE, a Cys2/His2-type zinc-finger protein, enhances silique shattering resistance by negatively regulating lignin accumulation in the silique walls of Brassica napus. PLoS ONE 12, e0168046 (2017).
Gubert, C. M., Christy, M. E., Ward, D. L., Groner, W. D. & Liljegren, S. J. ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 regulates abscission zone placement in Arabidopsis flowers. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 195 (2014).
Vrebalov, J. et al. Fleshy fruit expansion and ripening are regulated by the Tomato SHATTERPROOF gene TAGL1. Plant Cell 21, 3041–3062 (2009).
Ocaña, S. et al. Large-scale transcriptome analysis in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under Ascochyta fabae infection. PLoS ONE 10, e0135143 (2015).
Torres, A. M., Weeden, N. F. & Martín, A. Linkage among isozyme, RFLP and RAPD markers in Vicia faba. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85, 937–945 (1993).
Medrano, R. F. V. & de Oliveira, C. A. Guidelines for the tetra-primer ARMS-PCR technique development. Mol. Biotechnol. 56, 599–608 (2014).
Van Ooijen, J. W. JoinMap 4, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Kyazma BV, Wageningen 33, 4 (2006).
Kosambi, D. D. The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann. Eugen. 12, 172–175 (1943).
van Ooijen, J. W. MapQTL 5, Software for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations. Kyazma B.V.Wageningen (2004).
Lander, E. S. & Botstein, D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121, 185–199 (1989).
van Ooijen, J. W. Accuracy of mapping quantitative trait loci in autogamous species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84, 803–811 (1992).
Jansen, R. C. Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 135, 205–211 (1993).
Jansen, R. C. Controlling the type I and type II errors in mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics 138, 871–881 (1994).
Jansen, R. C. & Stam, P. High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping. Genetics 136, 1447–1455 (1994).
Churchill, G. A. & Doerge, R. W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138, 963–971 (1994).
Voorrips, R. E. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J. Hered. 93, 77–78 (2002).
Pérez-de-Luque, A. et al. Mucilage production during the incompatible interaction between Orobanche crenata and Vicia sativa. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 931–942 (2006).
Ruzin, S. E. Plant microtechnique and microscopy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1999).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by funding from projects RTA2017-00041 co-financed by ERDF and PP.AVA.AVA2019.030 by the Junta de Andalucía. DAB acknowledges his Ph.D. fellowship INIA-CCAA. The authors are grateful to Dr. A. Di Pietro for critical reading of the manuscript, Dr. A. Pérez de Luque for valuable assistance in the histological analysis and for helpful comments and suggestions and Dr. N. Gutierrez and R. Muñoz for help with the phenotypic data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.A.B., I.C.S. and A.M.T. conceived and designed the study and laboratory experiments. D.A.B. and I.C.S. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. D.A.B., I.C.S. and A.M.T. interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Aguilar-Benitez, D., Casimiro-Soriguer, I. & Torres, A.M. First approach to pod dehiscence in faba bean: genetic and histological analyses. Sci Rep 10, 17678 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74750-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74750-1
This article is cited by
-
Synergistic effect of Paclobutrazol and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) control the pod shattering in canola (Brassica napus L.) via physiological interferences: a mechanistic overview
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum (2024)
-
Comparative transcriptome and co-expression network analysis revealed the genes associated with senescence and polygalacturonase activity involved in pod shattering of rapeseed
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts (2023)
-
Study and QTL mapping of reproductive and morphological traits implicated in the autofertility of faba bean
BMC Plant Biology (2022)
-
Linkage mapping and QTL analysis of flowering time in faba bean
Scientific Reports (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.