Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Physical properties of epilithic river biofilm as a new lead to perform pollution bioassessments in overseas territories

Abstract

Chlordecone (CLD) levels measured in the rivers of the French West Indies were among the highest values detected worldwide in freshwater ecosystems, and its contamination is recognised as a severe health, environmental, agricultural, economic, and social issue. In these tropical volcanic islands, rivers show strong originalities as simplified food webs, or numerous amphidromous migrating species, making the bioindication of contaminations a difficult issue. The objective of this study was to search for biological responses to CLD pollution in a spatially fixed and long-lasting component of the rivers in the West Indies: the epilithic biofilm. Physical properties were investigated through complementary analyses: friction, viscosity as well as surface adhesion were analyzed and coupled with measures of biofilm carbon content and exopolymeric substance (EPS) production. Our results have pointed out a mesoscale chemical and physical reactivity of the biofilm that can be correlated with CLD contamination. We were able to demonstrate that epilithic biofilm physical properties can effectively be used to infer freshwater environmental quality of French Antilles rivers. The friction coefficient is reactive to contamination and well correlated to carbon content and EPS production. Monitoring biofilm physical properties could offer many advantages to potential users in terms of effectiveness and ease of use, rather than more complex or time-consuming analyses.

Introduction

Out of the 11,435 French water bodies analysed for quality compliance according to regulations imposed by European legislation, 10% are located between the tropics and the equator, thousands of kilometres away from European shores1. In the outermost tropical territories, climatic characteristics often result in highly turbulent tropical streams2 that support simplified ecosystems with very few primary producers. Due to high river flow, perennial phytoplankton, zooplankton and macroalgae are scarce or missing and the epilithic biofilm deserves here, even more than elsewhere, the comparison with a real productive and contributive “microbial skin”3. The epilithic biofilm is the only endogenous long-lasting primary producer that grows on submersed river stones and is largely exploited as a food source by all diadromous fish or crustaceans4,5. In these countries, the simplified food webs and the massive flows of post-larvae and juveniles regularly re-entering the rivers and migrating upstream—typical of the diadromous life-cycle6,7,8—weaken the ability to correlate macrofaunal abundances with measures of environmental quality9.

Meanwhile, many rivers are contaminated by pesticides10 due to a tropical agronomy struggling with strong pest pressures. Chlordecone (CLD, Kepone®, Curlone®)11, the main pollutant of concern, was formerly used in banana tree plantations and remains strongly persistent. This molecule, banned from use in the 1990s, continues to be present in aquatic ecosystems and contaminates fish and crustaceans consumed by local populations with health-endangering consequences12. The effects of this molecule have been documented since the 1976 accident at the Hopewell Life Sciences Products Co. chemical factory, where the insecticide Kepone® was manufactured (Hopewell, Virginia, US) (for a detailed synopsis of the incident, see13). The maximum acceptable toxicant concentration in water was assessed to be between 1 and 2 μg/L for amphipods based on reproduction, growth, emergence, and survival14, making this pollutant an active molecule at a very low concentration. Previous research conducted in the Chesapeake Bay also showed significant impact of CLD on natural bacterial communities composition and growth at concentrations of 20 μg/L, both in the sediments and the water column15,16,17. In literature, bacteria have long been considered a precursor in the construction of epilithic biofilms, with the ability to facilitate the later establishment of more vulnerable and photosynthetic cells. The role of biotic interactions during very early biofilm is crucial for its construction18. One of the most important aspects of the relationship between bacteria and subsequent colonisers occurs through the production of EPS that not only plays a protective key role for bacteria19,20, but also in the attachment of colonies to the substrate21,22,23,24 with compounds that can either be activators or inhibitors of subsequent microalgal fixation25,26.

Among the methods used to study biofilms, hydraulic27,28 or mechanical properties have been a subject of interest since classical imaging techniques such as Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) require the use of stains altering the structural and chemical properties of biofilms29. Most of this research pertains to conditions affecting the human body30,31,32 or biocorrosion processes33,34, but friction measurements in natural biofilms were also used to investigate its ecological significance35. Demonstrated positive correlation was established between friction and the size of bacterial microcolonies30 whose size and spatial distribution were shown strongly modulated by environmental conditions36.To qualify other physical properties, the Magnetic Particle Induction technique (MagPI), developed by Larson et al.37 provides precise determinations of biofilm adhesiveness at high temporal and mesoscale spatial resolution38 and has been applied successfully by several research groups working on aquatic biofilms39,40,41,42. Nanoindentation techniques, used in a dynamic mode, were successfully used to investigate the mechanical properties of the biofilms at a nanometric scale43,44,45 with a high spatial resolution46.

All these elements form the basis of the two hypotheses for this work: the epilithic biofilm, in its biological components, could serve as a bioindicator of CLD loads in Caribbean rivers and the biofilm’s general physical properties could reflect the modifications in contamination. In order to search for CLD bioindicators metrics in biofilms, we have integrated two levels of approaches: (a) an in situ study of diatomic assemblages in mature biofilms combined with chemical and physical analyses of the primo colonisation of artificial substrates located at stations different by their CLD loads and (b) a microcosm-based experiment to infer the effects of CLD contamination alone.

Results

Chlordecone quantification characterises three pollution contexts

In the rivers studied (Fig. 1a), the concentration of CLD in water ranged from undetectable to elevated (2.76 µg/L, see Table 1), with the highest values noted downstream of the Grande Anse River (RGAdo).

Figure 1
figure 1

(a) Map of the sampling stations on the Basse-Terre region (French West Indies). Localisation of the upstream (lightblue) and downstream (darkblue) sampling sites in 6 different rivers. Grande rivière à Goyaves River: GRG, Moustique River: RMO, Grande rivière de Capesterre River: GRC, Pérou River: RPE, Carbet River: RCA, Grande Anse River: RGA. (b) Pictures showing the general configuration of the "upstream" and "downstream" stations, with values of temperature, O2 (mg/l), pH, conductivity, (s.d., N = 4) (c) Mean CLD contamination on the 12 stations.

Table 1 Chlordecone (CLD) concentrations in the water at each station are based on four samples taken in February 2013. Downstream and upstream refer to the location of the sampling stations in relation to the banana plantations. T0 = slide immersion, T07, T14, T21 =  + 7, + 14, and + 21 days.

All stations upstream from the banana plantations indicated a faint CLD pollution, except for the Moustique River (RMOup). In contrast, all stations downstream from the banana plantations were polluted by CLD, except for the Grande Goyaves River (GRGdo). Mean contamination values revealed three pollution contexts: a very limited or unpolluted context (between undetectable to 0.1 µg/L, Fig. 1b), a medium polluted context where values are compatible with those currently observed in the rivers of Guadeloupe and Martinique (from 0.1 to 1 µg/L), and one extreme situation at the RGA station (> 1 µg/L and up to 2.76 µg/L), downstream from the banana plantations.

Epilithic diatom assemblages in mature biofilm did not reveal CLD contamination

Ninety-nine epilithic diatom taxa were identified (Supp. dataset). Sixty-six percent of these were fully identified with a valid taxonomic appellation (those composed of a four-letter code), while other taxa were identified with a four-character code and a number. The specific richness was between 17 and 35 taxa per station, which is generally quite low, but common for the region. Only 2 to 8 species per station constitute each more than 5% of the abundance. All of the species are very common except one species inventoried at the RCA downstream station, which could be an indicator of organic or nutrient pollution: Nitschia amphibia (NAMP). Among the 23 dominant species, only 3 pioneer taxa belonging to the Achnanthidium minutissimum complex were inventoried. Three species were adnate (patched on substrate), 10 were pedunculate (pad or stalk to substrate) and 2 species were both pedunculate or able to form ribbon colonies: Achnanthidium catenatum and Fragilaria fonticola. None of the 23 dominant species were planktonic, 7 belong to the high-profile guild, 7 belong to the low profile guild and the other 9 belong to the motile guild. Diatoms inventoried at the GRGdo station were mainly attached to the substrate (adnate or pedunculate) and belong to the high or low profile guilds, while in contrast, the majority of diatoms at the RGAdo station were free moving cells (e.g., Nitzschia inconspicua [NINC], which was dominant) belonging to the motile guild (Fig. 2a). However, these two stations showed a proliferation of common species such as Cocconeis euglypta (CEUG) and Gomphonema designatum (GDES).

Figure 2
figure 2

(a) Diatom species repartition in the two downstream stations (GRG and RGA) according to life form or guilds (relative abundance), (b) results of agglomerative hierarchical clustering of stations on the basis of their diatom assemblages, u: upstream (blue) and d: downstream (pink). The inset shows the Mean Split Silhouette (MSS) criterion for identification of optimal number of groups. ° and °° are respectively the less contaminated and the most contaminated stations. For abbreviations, see Table 1.

Clustering based on diatomic assemblages revealed a loose tree structure, with scattered singletons (Fig. 2b). The two closest stations from a taxonomic perspective were paradoxically the two most distant stations from a contamination perspective: GRG as the least polluted, and RGA, the pollution of which represents a world record. The Mean Split Silhouette (MSS) did not reveal any improvement based on the number of groups, confirming the extreme heterogeneity of these assemblages. There was no visible aggregation between upstream or downstream stations or related to geographical proximity (such as stations located on the same river), except for the RPE river.

Differences observed in EPS carbohydrates and proteins

In both upstream and downstream sites, EPS measurements revealed differences in carbohydrate concentrations (Fig. 3a) (upstream: 2-way ANOVA; time effect F = 95.99, df = 2, p < 0.001; station effect F = 454.31, df = 5, p < 0.001; interaction F = 62.97, df = 10, p < 0.001; downstream: 2-way ANOVA; time effect F = 67.6, df = 2, p < 0.001; station effect F = 58.48, df = 5, p < 0.001; interaction F = 10.32, df = 9, p < 0.001) and in protein concentrations (Fig. 3b) based on the date and the station (upstream: 2-way ANOVA; time effect F = 21.43, df = 2, p < 0.001; station effect F = 107.93, df = 5, p < 0.001; interaction F = 14.95, df = 10, p < 0.001; downstream: 2-way ANOVA; time effect F = 14.68, df = 2, p < 0.001; station effect F = 33.65, df = 5, p < 0.001; interaction F = 2.99, df = 9, p < 0.001).

Figure 3
figure 3

(a) Extracellular carbohydrates of upstream (left panel) and downstream (right panel) epilithic biofilms measured by colorimetry (mgEq Glucose/cm2). Sampling sites where ordered from the least polluted to the most polluted according to the order given in Fig. 1b for downstream sites, (b) extracellular proteins of upstream (left panel) and downstream (right panel) epilithic biofilms measured by colorimetry (mgEq BSA/cm2). Sampling sites were ordered from the least polluted to the most polluted according to the order given in Fig. 1b for downstream sites.

Within each river, upstream stations showed significantly lower concentrations of proteins and carbohydrates than in the corresponding downstream stations (permutational Welch t test, p < 0.05 for all stations) except for the RMO (t = 0.83456, p value = 0.432 for carbohydrates and t = 1.9518, p value = 0.078 for proteins) and RGA (t = − 2.3655, p value = 0.094 for proteins) rivers. In downstream sites, when EPS concentrations were significantly different between sampling times within each station (such as the GRG, RMO and RPE stations; one-way ANOVA, p < 0.01 for all), carbohydrate concentrations were always significantly higher at T14 than at T07 and T21.

The friction coefficient showed differences with CLD concentration

Friction coefficients revealed clear differences between biofilms growing in contaminated areas where friction was minimal, and in non-contaminated stations, where friction was at its highest (Fig. 4a). For reference, 0.57 (± 0.029) is the friction coefficient of a non-immersed rock. Four groups were therefore defined: #1 is a group of unpolluted stations, except for the Grande Goyaves River downstream from the banana plantations (GRGdo, #2), while groups #3 and #4 include polluted stations, #4 containing the heavily polluted station. The RMOup station friction coefficient, polluted by CLD in fine (see Table 1), places it in group #3 for polluted stations. The GRGdo station, unpolluted but submerged by leaf litter during the experiment, showed a low friction coefficient.

Figure 4
figure 4

(a) The friction coefficient related to the CLD contamination, the same color codes as Fig. 1b are employed, identifying the three contexts of pollution, (b) Surface adhesiveness of upstream (left panel) and downstream (right panel) epilithic biofilms measured by Magnetic Particle Induction (MagPI). Sampling sites were ordered from the least polluted to the most polluted according to the order given in Fig. 1b for downstream sites.

Surface adhesiveness showed no significant difference between polluted and non-polluted sites

Both in upstream and downstream sites, MagPI measurements (Fig. 4b) revealed variations in epilithic biofilm adhesiveness according to the date and the station but there were no significant differences in biofilm adhesiveness between upstream and downstream sites (three-way ANOVA: time effect F = 79.55, df = 2, p < 0.001; station effect F = 5.74, df = 5, p < 0.001; site effect F = 1.35, p = 0.25; all interactions p < 0.01 or 0.001). In downstream sites where MagPI varied significantly between sampling times within each station (e.g., RGA, RCA, GRC, RPE and RMO, one-way ANOVA, p < 0.01 for all), biofilm adhesiveness was always significantly lower at T14 than at T07 and T21.

Viscoelasticity identified three layers in the biofilm

A Young’s modulus that immediately reaches a value near 70 GPa with a phase angle close to zero degrees—which corresponds to the mechanical parameters of a glass substrate—indicates the absence of biofilm in this area. In contrast, modulus and phase angles that vary significantly in terms of indentation depths and from one curve to the next indicate that the indentations were performed on biofilm matter. For reference, typical test curves are shown in supp. mat. S1. At 21 days, measurements revealed a biofilm optimal for indentation analyses (Fig. 5a). In the non-polluted station (GRGdo), 60% of the measurements provided modulus values near 70 GPa with a phase angle of 0 degrees. The remaining 40% measurements qualified a matter for which Young’s modulus values ranged between 0 and 15 GPa (very low values indicative of high elasticity) with a phase angle exceeding 50 degrees (indicative of high viscosity): these values matched those of the biofilm. In the highly polluted station (RGAdo) at T21, 20.5% of the measurements showed a Young’s modulus less than 15 GPa and 79.5% of the indentations were touching the glass. The Fisher and Cripps rule was used to estimate the biofilm’s thickness. Three biofilm layers were identified at the surface of the substrate: a first layer, with a mean thickness of 4 µm and a low viscosity, was very dominant on substrates immersed in the polluted river (RGAdo); a second layer with a mean value of 15–16 µm and a high viscoelasticity was very abundant in the non-polluted station and much less developed in the polluted station; a third thicker layer, with a mean depth of 28–31 µm, was a minority in both environments.

Figure 5
figure 5

(a) biofilm grown in a contaminated (GRG), or non-contaminated (RGA) environments during 21 days, combination of viscoelasticity information upon thickness (histogram) results, (b) Correlogram of the main physico-chemical parameters of epilithic biofilms, (c) Carbon content (in percent) detected by Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXs) analysis applied on samples obtained from the microcosm experiment.

Correlating biofilm descriptors and CLD pollution

We investigated cross-correlations between the chemical and physical descriptors of the biofilm and the CLD, and their respective levels of significance (Fig. 5b). Within the physical measures, only friction properties showed a significant correlation with CLD levels (r = 0.40, p < 0.05), the surface adhesiveness being nonsignificant (r = 0.06, p > 0.05). These two ways of measuring the physical properties of the biofilm were not correlated (r = -0.16, p > 0.05). The chemical analyses of bacterial EPS showed a strong intercorrelation between carbohydrates and protein fractions, each being positively correlated with the CLD level (r = -0.41, p < 0.05 for carbohydrates, r = -0.41, p < 0.05 for proteins). The carbohydrates and proteins in the EPS matrix were highly correlated with friction properties with r = -0.65 (p < 0.001) and -0.68 (p < 0.001) respectively.

Carbon content in the microcosm experiment impacted by CLD

All slides colonised with biofilm and incubated in the microcosms for 14 days showed a higher carbon content than the abiotic control, exemplifying biofilm growth in microcosms (Fig. 5c). In contaminated conditions (4 µg/L of CDL), the increase was moderate and of the same order of magnitude for both rivers (mean increase of 2%). In contrast, carbon content indicated a better growth (from 6 to 11%) in non-contaminated conditions; the highest increase was observed in the non-polluted river (i.e., GRG). Using analysis of variance, the difference in carbon content between rivers was not significant (F = 2.3463, p = 0.1495), whereas the difference between treatments was strongly significant (F = 14.4077, p = 0.0022) and interaction was not significant (F = 0.8754, p = 0.3679), the differences between shelf position (p = 0.6128) and placement on the shelves (p = 0.8546) being not significant.

Discussion

The study we present took place in the unusual context of small islands of the French West Indies. In consequence small distances (2.6 to 7.5 km) between "upstream" and "downstream" stations, consequence of the spatial constraint on the island (Fig. 1a), introduced strong homogeneity between pairs of stations. The sampling sites were therefore situated in water blades of similar temperatures, oxygenation, pH ranges (Fig. 1b), located in identical calm facies (sensus Malavoi 47) and differed mainly by agronomic situations conducted on their riverbanks. A difference in the total mineral load observed for the RCAR and RGA rivers justified a pair-wise reasoning between upstream and downstream sites to ensure maximum similarity between sites, excluding the pollutant. To place CLD contamination values obtained in this study in a broader context, we’ve summarised the 2069 pesticides analyses of the mandatory State environmental surveys obtained at the same samplings sites and during the same period (i.e., between May 2012 and May 2013) (supplementary material S2). No heavy metal or organic pollution was diagnosed in the rivers. These results reveal the fugitive presence of 7 out of a total of 247 compounds among which four belong to the PAH group and one compound which shows multiple biogenic origins: indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene which occurs naturally in the ground and in vegetation. The most significant and regularly found compound is confirmed to be CLD, which can accumulate in the food chain in concentrations as low as 0.023 µg/L48 and is shown to have a strong effect even at low concentrations. These data confirm the wide prevalence of the CLD molecule in the rivers sampled and its strong putative effects on the aquatic environment.

Considering the effects of this pollution on the components of the epilithic biofilm, diatoms were intensively studied for purposes of ecological evaluation of the pollution levels due to their excellent ability to serve as indicators for nutrients and organic matter pollution49,50,51. Direct effects of insecticides or acaricides on diatom species have been demonstrated by recent studies showing their altered photosynthetic capacity in presence of pyrethroids52 and a reduced cell count in presence of organochlorinated pesticides53 or organophosphates54. An indirect effect of insecticides on diatom assemblages has also been demonstrated through the inhibition of bacterial signaling molecules in studies conducted on biofouling mechanisms55. Quorum-sensing signals originating specifically in gram-negative bacteria were involved in the alteration of the diatom-biofilm relationship, accompanied with changes in chlorophyll a and EPS content56. When seeking variations in diatomic taxonomic assemblages in situ, our results have shown that the heterogeneity of communities is such that the data is not suitable to serve as a contamination indicator. The length of time and the difficulties necessary to acquire taxonomic information from tropical countries actually favours other metrics, such as life forms, cell sizes (or biovolumes) and ecological guilds which are all possibilities for purposes of ecological studies and bioassessments57,58,59. We thus prospect for alternative indicators. Diatom motility has been directly linked to water pollution58,60 and this guild is described as more tolerant, with a proposed hypothesis of a protective effect of the EPS matrix61. The 3D structure of the first layer of the biofilm during its construction has been demonstrated as a result of the ability of primo-colonizing microbes to elaborate self-produced matrix modifying complex interstitial flow velocities, concavities and solutes repartition28. It has been also shown that under adverse environmental conditions, bacteria secrete EPS rather than proliferate in order to provide mechanical stability to their surroundings27. Our results are consistent with these studies, which show that taxonomic information is not indicative of the level of pollution but that the prevalence of motile diatoms in contaminated rivers was a more reliable indicator that suggests an indirect effect of EPS production during bacterial primocolonization on subsequent diatom installation.

We also use chemical element mapping via Energy Dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) technique to investigate biofilm response to CLD contamination. This technique was employed to monitor changes in cell wall chemical composition in biofilm cultures62, loss of biomass and biodiversity in biofilms polluted by nanoparticles63, micro-structural characterisation of exolithobiontic microbial biofilms64, or biofilm colonisation quantification on porous composite membranes65. In the present study, the carbon content measured on glass slides incubated in the microcosm experiment clearly indicated that CLD altered the epilithic biofilms irrespective of its origin. Importantly, this result indicates that CLD disrupted RGA biofilm development and growth even though the native microorganisms are recurrently exposed to CLD in their natural context. This indicates that, when looking at a structural descriptor such as growth, an RGA community faced with a high, albeit realistic, concentration of CLD, has not better adapted than the less exposed biofilm community. The effects of CLD on the survival and growth of freshwater microorganisms—demonstrated since the 1980s15,16 pointed out a strong decrease in aerobic bacterial growth caused by the undermining of their oxidative functions17. This pioneering work showed that NADH oxidase and succino-oxidase activity was depleted by 51% and 25% respectively upon the addition of 1 µM of CLD to the bacterial cultures, and a modulation of the NADH oxidase gene has also been demonstrated as reducing bacterial growth rate with a higher carbon source being saved to be used for EPS biosynthesis66. In our study, the analyses of the EPS matrix showed significant differences in carbohydrate and protein concentrations, with upstream stations having significantly lower concentrations than in the corresponding downstream contaminated stations. In addition and as evidenced by the decrease in carbon content on CLD impacted biofilms, we may hypothesise that protein and carbohydrate secretions were also affected in terms of composition.

The EPS matrix controls the cell surface charge and hydrophobicity in biofilms and deoxy sugars such as fucose, rhamnose, and pentose are known to enhance the hydrophobicity of biofilms67. Within the physical properties of biofilms, the friction coefficient is highly sensitive to the hydrophobic nature of the test substratum and it is significantly higher on hydrophobized silica than on a flat reference hydrophilic silica68. Any changes in the hydrophobic nature of epilithic biofilms (likely induced by the modification of the extracellular metabolite pool) is thereby expected to have a significant impact on friction properties. Our results (Figs. 4a, 5b) showed that the friction is globally minimized in contaminated situations and our results have pointed out a mesoscale chemical and physical reactivity of the biofilm that can be correlated with CLD contamination in polluted and unpolluted stations. Not all physical variables tested were reactive to CLD due to a lack of significant MagPI measures (adhesiveness) in this case, whereas friction properties have proven to show a very good correlation with CLD concentration as well as EPS carbohydrates and proteins concentrations.

Less practicable for routine testing, the microindentation technique used to infer the visco-elastic properties of the biofilm has proven in our study to be a useful tool to build hypotheses on the mechanisms underlying CLD impact during the primary phase of colonisation, mechanisms responsible of the demonstrated changes in its EPS composition and growth. Our results identified three layers as structurally characteristic of early biofilm: (1) a group defined by a 4 µm thick layer (G1) which could be suggested as consisting of bacteria embedded in a thin layer of EPS, (2) a group with a mean thickness of 16 µm (G2) which could be suggested as containing the first stages of other organism colonisations (Fig. 6a), and (3) the group containing big diatoms and/or more complex or mature EPS network (G3), with high superficial viscosity. When studying the proportion variations of these groups in biofilm growing in contaminated and non-contaminated stations, the G1 → G2 → G3 succession appears to have been mitigated in the contaminated area (with G1 representing 77% in the polluted station versus 24% in the non-polluted station), tempting to suggest a delay in the construction of the epilithic biofilm in contaminated situation. This data confirms the often observed “vitrified aspect” of epilithic biofilm in CLD-contaminated waters and the differences observed in EPS and friction properties in our study.

Figure 6
figure 6

The images in this figure were taken by the authors.

(a) Image showing the two first superimposed layers (bacterial G1 and bacteria + small diatoms in G2) during colonization process, (b) experimental alternative tribometer sphere/plane under ambient atmosphere (upper panel, conception and realisation GTSI team), and XP nanoindenter (lower panel).

Conclusion

The epilithic biofilm is the main indigenous primary producer in Caribbean rivers. In this context, the reduction of biofilm biomass due to CLD pollution, as attested in the microcosms experiment, is of concern when transposed at the ecosystem level because it would limit resource availability to higher consumers. Our results have also shown modifications in the secretion of extracellular carbohydrates and proteins due to pollution that could modulate the energy support provided by the consumption of biofilm, especially among juveniles of aquatic species, large consumers of this source of organic carbon69 which is easier to assimilate. This work has also revealed interesting relationships between the physical characteristics of epilithic biofilms and the exopolymer secretions in relation to CLD pollution. These results give rise to a new area of research in the fields of bioindication and freshwater environmental assessment in rivers polluted by pesticides. Lubrication is particularly promising in this context as this is straightforward, a time-saving measure in comparison to usual diatoms inventories.

Methods

Sampling

Two different approaches were used in this study, one in situ in the rivers of the Basse-Terre region of Guadeloupe, whereas the second used microcosms that were set up in the laboratory. Two sampling campaigns were conducted. For the first campaign, six rivers were chosen and sampled in February 2013 (Supplementary material S2b) on the basis of their content in CLD and their ability to both contain pristine waters upstream from the banana plantations and contaminated waters downstream from the banana fields. The stations were chosen to cover a range of situations between the lowest levels of CLD in the Grande Goyaves River (GRG), to the highest levels in the Grande Anse River (RGA)70. The usual parameters collected from national surveys are provided in Fig. 1a and Supp. mat. S2d. For each of the twelve stations, water samples (n = 4) were collected at T0 day (time of immersion), T7 (7 days later), T14 (14 days later) and T21 (21 days later) in glass bottles sterilised beforehand at 450 °C. Samples were kept with freeze packs during transportation and stored at -20 °C until analysis. At T21, the mature epilithic biofilm was scraped from the surface of submerged rocks in the river bed with a knife and a brush according to the national standard (20 cm under the surface and at least 100 cm2 collected on at least five stones). Each sample was fixed in formaldehyde at a final concentration of 10%. A series of andesitic rocks collected in the river and cut into 35 cm2 slices were used as artificial substrates for immersion and investigation by means of tribological analyses.. These were located in the same calm hydro-morphodynamic facies (pools) in order to avoid the effects of a putative blurring factor such as turbulence. Ten replicates of microscope glass slides were also immersed in baskets specially designed, some of which were collected at T7, T14 and T21 (Supp. mat. S2c).

The second sampling campaign was undertaken in April 2015 in stations where the two extremes of the river CLD contamination described above had been observed, i.e., downstream of the banana plantations in the Grande Goyaves River (GRG) and downstream of the banana plantations in the Grande Anse River (RGA). The objectives aimed to reinforce previously observed results by taking advantage of a microcosm experiment where only the level of CLD varied while other physicochemical parameters71 were being controlled. Batches of 10 microscope glass slides were immersed for 28 days, the glass slides for the microcosm experiment were pulled out of the water at 10 days while those for the microindentation analyses were removed at T14, T21 and T28. The slides were transported immersed in the water of their respective river station and kept at 5 °C to avoid any degradation and processed the day of collection.

Samples processing

Chlordecone concentration

The samples were thawed before extraction and processed without a filtration step because of the low quantity of suspended matter present in the samples. Water samples of 100 mL were spiked with an internal standard solution (chlordecone C13) and were extracted three times with 10 mL of dichloromethane. The final extract was transferred into 100 µL of acetonitrile for injection. The extracts were analysed by HPLC–ESI–MS-MS (UPLC-Quattro premier Waters). Separation was achieved using a BEH-C18 column (50 mm x 2.1 mm; 1.7 µm) at a temperature of 35 °C. Acetonitrile and water (ultrapure deionised water) were used as the mobile phases. Quantification was performed in accordance to internal standards. The analytical method was validated in terms of calibration linearity, specificity, extraction recoveries (93 ± 8%), and limits of quantification (2 pg injected or 1 ng/L). All solvents for the chemical analyses, dichloromethane (DCM) and acetonitrile (ACN) (HPLC reagent grade, Scharlau) were purchased from ICS (Belin Beliet, France). Analytical standards of chlordecone were purchased from LGC Standards (Molsheim, France). The analytic methodology consisted of a liquid/liquid extraction (LLE) followed by an analysis in liquid-phase chromatography (LC) coupled with a mass spectrometry in tandem (MS/MS). The analytical performances obtained in terms of limit of quantification and reproducibility were LQ from 1 to 5 ng/L and variability lower than 15%. For details on the techniques, see72,73.

Exopolymeric substances (EPS)

Colloidal and bound EPS from the biofilms were extracted by rotating the glass slides in a mixture of distilled water and ion-exchange resin (Dowex Marathon C, sodium, Sigma) for 1.5 h at 4 °C. Practically, glass slides were placed in 50 mL tubes filled with the mixture in order to be immersed during the agitation procedure. The exopolymer solution was then retrieved and freeze-dried. Carbohydrate and protein analyses were performed following the phenol assay protocol74 and the modified Lowry procedure75, respectively. For colloidal carbohydrate analyses, 200 μl phenol (5%) and 1 mL sulphuric acid (98%) were added to 200 μl of subsamples. They were then incubated for 35 min at 30 °C and the carbohydrate concentration was measured with a spectrophotometer at 488 nm (Milton Roy Spectronic Genesys 2). For colloidal protein analyses, 250 μl subsamples were incubated for 15 min at 30 °C with 250 μl of 2% sodium dodecyl sulphate salt (SDS) and 700 μl of a chemical cocktail prepared as described in Dubois et al. (1956)75. The subsamples were then incubated for another 45 min at 30 °C with 100 μl of Folin reagent (diluted with distilled water 5:6 v/v). The protein concentration was measured by spectrophotometry at 750 nm. Calibration curves were prepared using glucose and bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standards for carbohydrates and proteins, respectively.

Diatoms

Samples were treated with hot concentrated hydrogen peroxide (H2O2 30%) to eliminate protoplasms and, when appropriate, with hydrochloric acid (removal of carbonates). After drying, the diatoms were mounted in refractive resin, Naphrax (Northern Biological Supplies Ltd., England—Refractive index = 1.74) and identified through microscopic examination. The counting protocol and identification of diatom valves is defined by the European Standard EN 14407 2004 and Stoermer et al. (1996)76. Four hundred diatom valves were counted and identified to the species level for each sample.

Tribological analysis

The analyses were performed with a tribometer using an alternative ball-on-plane tribometer consisting of an AISI 52100 steel ball rubbing against an AISI 52100 steel plane, on which the tested material is deposited (Fig. 6b).

Magnetic particle induction

Ferrous particles (diameter > 425 μm) were added in a single layer to the biofilm surface and subjected to an increasing magnetic field produced by an incremental increase in the current supplied to the electromagnet. The electromagnet was set 3 mm away from sediment surface and connected to a variable voltage power supply (HY3005 DC Power Supply, Mastech). Voltage was increased from 0 V by increments of 0.1 V until all particles detached from the sediment. The voltage (i.e., strongly correlated to the magnetic force) at which the particles are recaptured is determined as a measure of surface adhesion. This final voltage was recorded and the associated magnetic force was determined using a calibration curve previously established with a gaussmeter (410-HCAT, Lake- Shore). This magnetic flux (mT) was used as a measure of surface adhesiveness.

Nanoindentation analyses

The measurements were achieved with a nanoindentor XP from MTS (Agilent Corp.) equipped with a CSM module (Continuous Stiffness Measurement) (Fig. 6c). In CSM mode, a sinusoidal force is superimposed to the quasi-static loading allowing for the measurement of mechanical parameters as a function of the indentation depth. The phase angle represents the phase shift between force and displacement during a dynamic test and is essential to reveal the viscosity properties of a material. The quasi-static load was applied with a strain rate of 0.05 s−1 and the tests were carried out using a Berkovicth diamond tip. The glass slides were pulled out of the water at T14, T21 and T28. The Young’s modulus and hardness were deduced from the load–displacement curves using the Oliver and Pharr method77. Seventy-five indents were randomly performed on each slide in order to study the homogeneity of the film grown on the glass substrates. The thickness of the biofilm was estimated by Fisher and Cripps’s “rule of thumb” 78.

Microcosm experiment

Two treatments were considered (control and chlordecone) for each river (GRG and RGA) along with one abiotic control that contained non-colonised slides. Each condition was performed in quadruplicates (four independent microcosms) in a phytotron (MLR351H Sanyo Electric Co. Ltd. Japan): assays with CLD (n = 4 × 2), biotic controls without CLD (n = 4 × 2), abiotic controls (n = 4). Once in the laboratory, two slides were immediately stored at -20 °C while the other slides were transferred to rectangular sterile glass containers (around 1 L volume) filled with 920 mL of exposure solutions. Exposure solutions were prepared with pesticide-free water collected from the Pérou River (Capesterre, Guadeloupe), the reference of a pristine river for studies conducted on the subject of water contamination by chlordecone in Guadeloupe79. The water from this river was filtered through 0.22 µm cellulose nitrate filters (Sartorius Goettingen, Germany) in order to exclude the input of foreign microorganisms from the experiment. Spiked microcosms were prepared with the realistic environmental nominal chlordecone concentration of 4 µg/L, in accordance with the highest concentrations encountered in the RGA river, whereas the control did not contain additional chlordecone but only the same quantity of methanol used to prepare the chlordecone solution. The abiotic control was set up with a solution spiked with chlordecone at 4 µg/L. Every container was randomly placed in a growth chamber MLR351H (Sanyo Electric Co. Ltd. Japan). The photoperiod was set to follow local tropical day/night rhythms with respect to natural river shaded environments (light programmed from 0 to 5000 lx depending on the hour), and temperature was set at 25 °C. The 5000 lx represents 10% of the maximum incident illumination measured on an uncanopied epilithic biofilm in a tropical river (95 μmol/m2/s versus 1000 μmol/m2/s80) and was chosen to avoid over-lighting the samples originating from canopied environments. All microcosms were aerated with aquarium pumps through rubber pipes fitted with 0.22 µm polyethersulfone (PES) syringe driven filters (Millex Carrigtwohill, Ireland) and a 1 mL polypropylene sterile syringe (Terumo, Leuven, Belgium). Containers were covered with plastic wrap to avoid CLD concentration due to evaporation, as well as to preclude contamination across containers. The water level was checked over the duration of the experiment by using a gauge line as a point of reference. Slides were collected at 14 days and immediately stored at -20 °C.

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXs) analysis

Taking into account the elemental composition of the glass support (exempt of C), the carbon was used as a “proxy” of the biofilm colonisation. In order to detect carbon on the surface of the glass slides colonised by biofilm, frozen slides collected in the microcosms were thawed, kept hydrated and quickly placed in an Environmental Scanning Electronic Microscope (FEI Quanta 250) operating at 15 kV under an environmental pressure of 70 Pa (Low vacuum mode). Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) measurements were conducted with an M-max 50 mm2 Oxford detector. Elemental mappings were obtained on uncoated samples after 400 s of acquisition time through each slide observed from 4 different areas randomly selected.

Statistical analyses

These were performed in an R statistical framework (R version 3.2.3 for Windows) and the RStudio interface version 0.99.486. Hierarchical clustering was used to determine similarities between diatom assemblages81 using the “stats” package and the Ward method82 on squared Euclidean distances. The Mean Split Silhouette (MSS) criterion83 was used to evaluate clustering relevance. Analyses of microindentation data were performed using the “mixdist” package. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test differences between sampling sites and time for EPS proteins and carbohydrates as well as for surface adhesiveness. Homoscedasticity was tested using Levene’s Test of Equality of Variances (“lawstat” package) and normality was tested using Shapiro–Wilk Normality Test on model residuals. Simple Correlation was calculated between the physicochemical descriptors of the biofilm using the Pearson coefficient and the correlogram was designed using the “corrplot” package.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the supplementary materials. Material related to this paper may be requested from Dominique Monti (dominique.monti@univ-antilles.fr), Cédric Hubas (cedric.hubas@mnhn.fr) and Béatrice Lauga (beatrice.lauga@univ-pau.fr).

References

  1. Monnier, O., Basilico, L., Reyjol, Y. et al. La bioindication en outre-mer: Situation et perspectives dans le contexte de la directive cadre sur l’eau. Synthèse du séminaire ONEMA «Méthodes de bioindication adaptées aux départements d’outre-mer » Paris, France (2016). https://www.seminaire-evaluation-outremer.oieau.fr/.

  2. Jackson, D. A., Peres-Neto, P. R. & Olden, J. D. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities: the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 157–170 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Battin, T. et al. The ecology and biogeochemistry of stream biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 251–263 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abreu, P. C. et al. Importance of biofilm as food source for shrimp (Farfantepenaeus paulensis) evaluated by stable isotopes (d13C and d15N). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 347, 88–96 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lefrançois, E. et al. Epilithic biofilm as a key factor for small-scale river fisheries on Caribbean islands. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 18, 211–220 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, W. E. Reproductive ecology of Caribbean amphidromous fishes. Ph. D. North Carolina State University (2012).

  7. Mc Dowall, R. M. Diadromy: origins and definitions of terminology. Copeia 1, 248–251 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Keith, P. Biology and ecology of amphidromous Gobiidae of the Indo-Pacific and the Caribbean regions. J. Fish Biol. 63, 831–847 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coat, S. & Monti, D. Lack of significance of usual ecological indicators in predicting pesticides contamination: specificities of tropical islands freshwaters. In: Proceedings of the 15th meeting of the Caribbean academy of sciences, May 21–23, 79–80 (2006).

  10. Bertrand, J. A., Abarnou, A., Bocquené, G. et al. Diagnostic de la contamination chimique de la faune halieutique des littoraux des Antilles françaises. Campagnes 2008 en Martinique et en Guadeloupe. Ifremer, Martinique. https://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/doc/2009/rapport-6896.pdf (2009).

  11. Coat, S. Identification du réseau trophique de rivière et étude de sa contamination par les pesticides organochlorés (Chlordécone et ß-HCH) en Guadeloupe. Thèse de Doctorat de l’Université des Antilles et de la Guyane, UFR SEN, Campus de Fouillole (2009).

  12. Multigner, L. et al. Chlordecone exposure and risk of prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 3457–3462 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foster, R. Kepone: the ‘Flour’ factory. In Richmondmag (2005). https://richmondmagazine.com/news/kepone-disaster-pesticide.

  14. Sanders, H. O. et al. Biological effects of Kepone and mirex in freshwater invertebrates. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 10, 531–539 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Orndorff, S. A. & Colwell, R. R. Distribution and degradation potential of Kepone resistant bacteria in the James River and Upper Chesapeake Bay. In Workshop: Microbial Degradation of Pollutants in Marine Environments, EPA-600/9-79-012 (eds. Bourquin, A. W. & Pritchard, P. H.) 396–407. EPA Environmental Research Information Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (1979).

  16. Orndorff, S. A. & Colwell, R. R. Distribution and characterization of kepone-resistant bacteria in the aquatic environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39, 611–622 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahaffey, W. R., Pritchard, P. H. & Bourquin, A. W. Effects of kepone on growth and respiration of several estuarine bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43, 1419–1424 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hödl, I. et al. Voronoi tessellation captures very early clustering of single primary cells as induced by interactions in nascent biofilms. PLoS ONE 6(10), e26368 (2011).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamaru, Y. et al. Crucial role of extracellular polysaccharides in desiccation and freezing tolerance in the terrestrial cyanobacterium. Nostoc Commune Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 7327–7333 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Or, D., Phutane, S. & Dechesne, A. Extracellular polymeric substances affecting pore-scale hydrologic conditions for bacterial activity in unsaturated soils. Vadose Zone J. 6, 298–305 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Battin, T. J. et al. Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms. Nature 426, 439–442 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lawrence, J.R., Neu, T.R., Paule, A. et al. Aquatic biofilms: development, cultivation, analyses, and applications. In Manual of Environmental Microbiology (ed. Yates, M., Nakatsu, C., Miller, R., Pillai, S., 4th edn, 4.2.3-1–4.2.3-33 (ASM, Washington, 2016).

  23. Flemming, H. C. et al. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 563–575 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mora-Gómez, J., Freixa, A., & Perujo, N. et al. Limits of the biofilm concept and types of aquatic biofilms. Aquat. Biofilms. Ecol. Water Qual. Wastewater Treat. 229, 3-27 (2016).

  25. Holmström, C. et al. Inhibition of common fouling organisms by marine bacterial isolates with special reference to the role of pigmented bacteria. Biofouling 10, 251–259 (1996).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Callow, J. A. et al. Cellular and molecular approaches to understanding primary adhesion in Enteromorpha: an overview. Biofouling 16, 141–150 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bozorg, A., Gates, I. D. & Sen, A. Real time monitoring of biofilm development under flow conditions in porous media. Biofouling 28, 937–951 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubol, S. et al. Seeing through porous media: an experimental study for unveiling interstitial flows. Hydrol. Process. 32, 402–407 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kundukad, B. et al. Mechanical properties of the superficial biofilm layer determine the architecture of biofilms. Soft Matter 12, 5718 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Morita, Y. et al. Frictional properties of regenerated cartilage in vitro. J. Biomech. 39, 103–109 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Grad, S. et al. Sliding motion modulates stiffness and friction coefficient at the surface of tissue engineered cartilage. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 20, 288–295 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Souza, J. C. et al. Biofilms inducing ultra-low friction on titanium. J. Dent. Res. 89, 1470–1475 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Garrett, T. R., Bhakoo, M. & Zhang, Z. Bacterial adhesion and biofilms on surfaces. Prog. Nat. Sci. 18, 1049–1056 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schultz, M. P. et al. Impact of diatomaceous biofilms on the frictional drag of fouling-release coatings. Biofouling 31, 759–773 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ditsche, P. et al. More than just slippery: the impact of biofilm on the attachment of non-sessile freshwater mayfly larvae. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20130989 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rubol, S. et al. Linking biofilm spatial structure to real-time microscopic oxygen decay imaging. Biofouling 34, 200–211 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Larson, F. et al. Surface adhesion measurements in aquatic biofilms using magnetic particle induction: MagPI. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 7, 490–497 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gerbersdorf, S. U. et al. New insights into MagPI: a promising tool to determine the adhesive capacity of biofilm on the mesoscale. Biofouling 34, 618–629 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Passarelli, C. et al. Surface adhesion of microphytobenthic biofilms is enhanced under Hediste diversicolor (O.F. Muller) trophic pressure. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 438, 52–60 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thom, M. et al. Seasonal biostabilization and erosion behavior of fluvial biofilms under different hydrodynamic and light conditions. Int. J. Sediment Res. 30, 273–284 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schmidt, H. et al. The effect of seasonality upon the development of lotic biofilms and microbial biostabilisation. Freshw. Biol. 61, 963–978 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schmidt, H. et al. Exposure to silver nanoparticles affects biofilm structure and adhesiveness. J. Aquatic Pollut. Toxicol. 1, 1–9 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Oliver, W. & Pharr, G. M. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564–1583 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cense, A. W. et al. Mechanical properties and failure of Streptococcus mutans biofilms, studied using a microindentation device. J. Microbiol. Methods 67, 463–472 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Minatchy, G. et al. Influence of the volume structure on the tribological properties of lamellar tribofilms. Tribol. Lett. 61, 1–15 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gloag, E. S. et al. Biofilm mechanics: implications in infection and survival. Biofilm 2, 100017 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Malavoi, J. R. Typologie des faciès d’écoulement ou unités morphodynamiques des cours d’eau à haute énergie. Bull. fr. pêche piscic. 315, 189–210 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bahner, L. H. et al. Kepone bioconcentration, accumulation, loss, and transfer through estuarine food chains. Chesapeake Sci. 18, 299–308 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lange-Bertalot, H. Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwigia 64, 285–304 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Smol, J. P. & Stoermer, E. F. The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Lobo, E. et al. Diatoms as Bioindicators in Rivers. In River Algae (ed. Orlando Necchi, J. R.) 245–271 (Springer, Berlin, 2016).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Shoaib, N. et al. Toxicity of pesticides on photosynthesis of diatoms. Pak. J. Bot. 43, 2067–2069 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ebenezer, V. & Ki, J. S. Quantification of toxic effects of the organochlorine insecticide endosulfan on marine green algae, diatom and dinoflagellate. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 43, 393–399 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Karthikeyan, P., Mohan, D. & Jaikumar, M. Growth inhibition effect of organophosphate pesticide monocrotophos on marine diatoms. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 44, 1516–1520 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bruckner, C. G. et al. Growth and release of extracellular organic compounds by benthic diatoms depend on interactions with bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 13, 1052–1063 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yang, C. et al. The possible role of bacterial signal molecules N-acyl homoserine lactones in the formation of diatom-biofilm (Cylindrotheca sp.). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 107, 118–124 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tapolczai, K. et al. Trait-based ecological classifications for benthic algae: review and perspectives. Hydrobiologia 776, 117 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pandey, L. K. & Bergey, E. A. Exploring the status of motility, lipid bodies, deformities and size reduction in periphytic diatom community from chronically metal (Cu, Zn) polluted waterbodies as a biomonitoring tool. Sci. Total Environ. 550, 372–381 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wu, N. et al. Using river microalgae as indicators for freshwater biomonitoring: review of published research and future directions. Ecol. Indic. 81, 124–131 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Coquillé, N. et al. Use of diatom motility features as endpoints of metolachlor toxicity. Aquat. Toxicol. 158, 202–210 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Rimet, F. & Bouchez, A. Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in European rivers. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 406, 1–12 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sedki, M. et al. Online-monitoring of biofilm formation using nanostructured electrode surfaces. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 100, 178–185 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Gómez-Gómez, B. et al. Fate and effect of in-house synthesized tellurium based nanoparticles on bacterial biofilm biomass and architecture. Challenges for nanoparticles characterization in living systems. Sci. Total Environ. 719, 137501 (2020).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang, X. et al. Manganese/polymetallic nodules: Micro-structural characterization of exolithobiontic- and endolithobiontic microbial biofilms by scanning electron microscopy. Micron 40, 350–358 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Rabiller-Baudry, M. et al. Coupling of SEM-EDX and FTIR-ATR to (quantitatively) investigate organic fouling on porous organic composite membranes. Curr. Microsc. Contrib. Adv. Sci. Technol. 10, 1066–1076 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Li, N. et al. Improvement of exopolysaccharide production in Lactobacillus casei LC2W by overexpression of NADH oxidase gene. Microbiol. Res. 171, 73–77 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhou, J., Mopper, K. & Passow, U. The role of surface-active carbohydrates in the formation of transparent exopolymer particles by bubble adsorption of seawater. Limnol. Oceanogr. 43, 1860–1871 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hansson, P. M. et al. Frictional forces between hydrophilic and hydrophobic particle coated nanostructured surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 17893–17902 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Thorp, J. H. & Delong, M. D. Dominance of autochtonous autotrophic carbon in food webs of heterotrophic rivers. Oikos 96, 543–550 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. ODE971. Database Office de l’Eau Guadeloupe. https://www.observatoire-eau-guadeloupe.fr/outils/base-de-donnees/cours-deau/physico-chimie-et-chimie.

  71. Cravo-Laureau, C. et al. Microbial responses to pollution-ecotoxicology: introducing the different biological levels. In Microbial Ecotoxicology (eds Cravo-Laureau, C. et al.) (Springer, New York, 2017).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  72. Tapie, N., Kanan, R., Pardon, P. et al. Utilisation d’échantillonneurs passifs de type POCIS pour le suivi de la contamination Chlordécone des eaux de la Guadeloupe. 44ème congrès du Groupe Français des Pesticides (GFP), 26–29 mai 2014, Schœlcher, Martinique (2014).

  73. Tapie, N., Risser, T., Pardon, P. et al. Calibration d’échantillonneurs passifs de type POCIS pour le suivi de la contamination des eaux en Chlordécone. 46ème congrès du Groupe Français des Pesticides (GFP), 17–19 mai 2016, Bordeaux, France (2016).

  74. Dubois, M. et al. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28, 350–356 (1956).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Raunkjaer, K., Hvitved-Jacobsen, T. & Nielsen, P. H. Measurement of pools of protein, carbohydrate and lipid in domestic wastewater. Water Res. 28, 251–262 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Stoermer, E. F. et al. Paleolimnological evidence of rapid recent change in Lake Erie’s trophic status. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53, 1451–1458 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Oliver, W. C. & Pharr, G. M. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumental indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3–20 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Fischer-Cripps, A. C. Nanoindentation (2nd ed. Softcover of orig. ed. 2004). Collection: Mechanical Engineering Series (Springer, New York, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Cattan, P., Berns, A.E., Cabidoche, Y.-M. et al.Quel devenir pour la Chlordécone? CHLORDEXCO, La contamination d'écosystèmes antillais 20 ans après l'application de l'organochloré. In Journée ANR Huit ans de recherche en environnement, dernières découvertes et innovations, Paris, France, 11 décembre 2012. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/569760/.

  80. Tonetto, A. F., Branco, C. C. Z. & Peres, C. K. The effects of irradiance and spectral composition on the establishment of macroalgae in streams. Annales de Limnologie-Int. J. Limnol. 48, 363–370 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2017).

  82. Ward, J. H. Jr. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 236–244 (1963).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Pollard, K. & van der Laan, M. A method to identify significant clusters in gene expression data Sixth World Multiconference on Systemics. Cybern. Inf. 6, 318–325 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by grants from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (CHLORINDIC project, ANR CESA 01902) to the coordinator D. Monti and the teams cited in the front page as well as the Excellence Initiative of Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour – I-Site E2S UPPA, a French “Investissements d’Avenir” programme. The authors thank the Office de l'Eau de la Guadeloupe for the communication of their database of pesticides contamination, C. Barbeyron, Y. Bercion, F. Busson, S. Cordonnier, R. Duran, R. Kanan, C. Lord-Daunay, J.-M. Mortillaro and J.-L. Pernollet for assistance in field work, experiments, and helpful comments, N. Henry and P. Thomen (Émergence @ Sorbonne Universités program—project MicroBE) for the fruitful exchanges around the physics of biofilms, and the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.M., C.H., J.-L.M., L.R., B.L. wrote the manuscript; D.M., C.H., B.L. and E.L. revised the manuscript. X.L. and L.R. were in charge of the microindentation measures of the biofilm. C.H. performed biochemical analyses on epilithic biofilm. F.B. and J.-L.M.were in charge of tribologic analyses of the biofilm. B.L. designed the microcosm experiment. A.H., T.R set-up and fine-tuned the microcosm experiment and A.H. performed the experimental work. E.L. performed the identification of the freshwater Caribbean diatoms. A.J., C.H. and D.M. contributed to statistical data analyses. H.B., N.T. and T.R. were in charge of the chemical analyses of the chlordecone (kepone). P. K. was in charge of the logistic organisation of the field missions with P.-J. L. assistance. O. G. contributed to the electronic microscopy analyses.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique Monti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monti, D., Hubas, C., Lourenço, X. et al. Physical properties of epilithic river biofilm as a new lead to perform pollution bioassessments in overseas territories. Sci Rep 10, 17309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73948-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73948-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing