Abstract
Agricultural management techniques such as mulching with crop straw can impact soil properties and may in turn change the structure and function of the soil food web. We investigated different straw mulching types and straw mulching coverage levels on soil nematodes community structure in walnut orchards. We set up a randomized experimental design with three straw mulch types, and three straw mulch distance treatments in a walnut plantation. The results indicated that the number of soil nematodes after straw mulching was lower than that found in the control (CK). However, the metabolic and structure footprints of the omnivore-predator nematodes showed higher values as compared to CK. The abundances of plant parasite and omnivore-predator nematodes were negatively correlated with ammonium nitrogen (NH4+–N) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), whereas soil moisture content (SM) had a negative correlation with the abundance of total nematodes. High structure index (SI), maturity index (MI) and low enrichment index (EI) values revealed a structured soil food web, medium soil enrichment, and fungal decomposition channel under the mix straw mulching treatments. Soil nematodes should be used as an indicator of soil functional changes resulting from straw mulching.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Crop straw has become an effective way to supplement soil nutrients and increase crop yield in modern agriculture because it is rich in various nutrients and physiologically active substances1. Straw mulching has important ecological significance for maintaining farmland fertility, reducing the use of chemical fertilizers, improving the carbon sink capacity of terrestrial soil, promoting the soil nitrogen cycle2,3, and reducing or avoiding environmental pollution caused by burning4.
In recent years, most studies of straw mulching have mainly focused on the physical, chemical and biological effects of soil and the physiological and ecological responses of mulched tree species to yield5,6,7. However, there is little research on straw mulching technology, and it has generally been performed on areas with extensive tree cover or in gardens; fine straw mulching technology has not been studied. In addition, straw mulching is mainly concentrated on food crops, and there are few studies of straw mulching in orchards. For walnut orchards, traditional management practices such as clean tillage cause serious soil erosion and reduced soil fertility, resulting in slow growth of walnut trees and reduced yield8. Therefore, it is necessary to consider using straw mulching to improve the sustainable development of walnut orchards.
With the growth of young walnut trees, the canopy width increases each year, so it is reasonable to designate the canopy radius at the coverage distance, considering the effect of canopy shading. In addition, we have previously reported that suitable straw mulching materials can promote the growth of walnut trees and increase the potential yield9. Therefore, it is an important step for the sustainable management of walnut orchards to determine suitable materials for straw mulch and location for straw mulch placement.
Soil nematodes are one of the most abundant metazoans on the earth. They exist widely in various habitats and play an important role in maintaining the stability of soil ecosystems, promoting material circulation and energy flow10. Nematodes are simple to extract and identify, and feed on diverse nutrient resources, making them very sensitive to agricultural management measures and environmental changes; thus, they can be used as indicators of soil quality and health11,12. Previous experiments showed that the application of straw and other organic fertilizers could increase the number of beneficial soil nematodes and decrease the number of phytophagous soil nematodes13,14. However, little information is available about whether and how the microenvironment soil conditions under straw mulching affect the structure of soil nematode communities, biodiversity and function in walnut orchards.
The major objectives of this study were to explore whether and how straw mulching affects the soil nematode community. Because straw is rich in nutrients and active substances, nutrients such as C and N can be released into the soil by a degradation pathway after straw mulching a walnut orchard, which provides a rich source of food for soil nematodes, thereby increasing soil nematode numbers and improving soil nematode community structure15. Therefore, we hypothesized that different straw mulching treatments could increase the number of nematodes and improve the community structure of soil nematodes. We also hypothesized that mixed-straw mulching would increase nutrient availability and improve soil fertility compared with rice straw mulching and rapeseed straw mulching because it would have a more suitable C/N ratio and faster degradation rate.
Results
Soil environmental conditions
Mix straw mulching treatments significantly correlated dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (p < 0.05) and NO3–N content (p < 0.05) (Table 1). In general, mix straw mulching and a cover distance of n (Mix-n) had a higher content of DOC and NO3–N than the other treatments (i.e., single-straw mulching). Meanwhile, the soil DOC content of the Mix-n treatment was significantly higher than that of the CK treatment. Though the content of NO3–N was higher in the Mix-n treatment than in the CK treatment, this difference was not significant. However, the soil pH, SMC and NH4+–N responses to different straw mulching treatments were not significant (p > 0.05).
Soil nematode communities
The number of nematode genera in Rice-n, Rice-1.5n, Rice-all n, Rape-n, Rape-1.5n, Rape-all n, Mix-n, Mix-1.5n, Mix-all n and CK were 34, 37, 34, 31, 30, 26, 31, 30, 31 and 29, respectively (Appendix 1). Compared with those in other straw mulching treatments (rice straw, rapeseed straw, and mix straw), the total nematode genera were found to be significantly (p < 0.05) more numerous in the control treatment (CK) (Table 2). The control treatment (CK) and mix-all n treatment had significantly (p < 0.05) higher abundances of fungivores than the Rapeseed -n and Rapeseed-1.5 n treatments. Two Rice straw treatments (those with cover distances of n and all n) and one Rapeseed straw treatment (cover distance of 1.5n) had significantly (p < 0.05) lower abundances of plant parasites than the CK treatment. However, there were no significant differences among the different treatments in the abundance of omnivore-predator nematodes (Table 2).
The Rapeseed-1.5n and Mix-1.5n treatments had significantly higher omnivore-predator footprints and structure footprints than the Rice-n and Mix-all n treatments (p < 0.05) (Table 3). The metabolic footprints of fungivores were higher under Rapeseed-all n and Mix-all n than under the other treatments, while the metabolic footprint of bacterivores had greater values in the Rapeseed-1.5n treatment than in other treatments. There was no obvious change in the plant parasite footprint or the enrichment footprint among different treatments.
Soil nematode faunal profile
The soil food webs of the straw mulching treatments were plotted along their respective SI and EI trajectories in Fig. 1. A discernible pattern was found in the nematode faunal profile of different straw mulching treatments. The nematode fauna analysis showed that the all different coverage distance of the rice straw treatment and the coverage distances were n and 1.5n of the rapeseed straw treatment was distributed in the B quadrant (Fig. 1A,B). While, when the coverage distance was increased to cover the whole plot (all n) of the rapeseed straw treatment, it was distributed in the C quadrant. For the mix straw treatment, all coverage distances were distributed in the C quadrant. The variation in SI value increasing coverage distance is not obvious. EI value tends to decrease with increasing coverage distance, and the distribution of the straw mulching treatments gradually approaches the C quadrant level from the B quadrants (Fig. 1).
Distribution map of soil nematode flora under different straw mulching treatments (A representing rice straw pattern; B representing rape straw pattern; C representing mixed straw pattern).
Nematode diversity
Significant differences were observed in the basal index (BI), channel index (CI), and maturity index (MI) between the different straw mulching treatments. MI and CI were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the mix straw mulching treatment than in the CK treatment, especially in the mixed treatment with straw mulching distance at 1.5n (Fig. 2a–c). For all straw treatments, BI and CI were higher for the whole plot mulching (all n) than for the other mulching distances (n, 1.5n). Moreover, there were no fluctuations among different treatments in terms of the Shannon–Weaver index (H’), Species richness index (SR), Trophic diversity index (TD) or Pielou’s evenness index (J’) (Fig. 2d–g).
Changes of soil nematode ecological index under different straw. (a) Effect of straw mulching on Basal index, (b) channel index, (c) maturity index, (d) nematode channel ratio, (e) Shannon–Weaver index, (f) Pielou’s evenness, (g) species richness index, (h) trophic diversity index; means ± S. (p < 0.05).
Environmental factors affecting soil nematode community variability
Under different straw mulching treatments, DON had a significant (p < 0.05) negative correlation with plant parasite nematodes (Table 4). NH4+–N was significantly (p < 0.05) negatively correlated with omnivore-predator nematodes. SM had a significant (p < 0.05) negative correlation with the total nematode abundance. However, DOC, NO3–N, and pH had no significant correlations with the soil nematode communities (Table 4).
Discussion
Soil environmental conditions
It is clear that the Mix-n treatment had higher DOC and NO3–N than the other treatments under all soil environmental conditions. Due to the different C/N ratios of the different straw types, N degradation and mineralization were also different. The change in soil nutrients caused by straw mulching is mainly due to the role of soil organisms. Therefore, we can explain the difference in soil nutrients by the soil biological composition of different straw mulching treatments. In general, the specific genus of soil nematode in the mix treatment can characterize the particular soil nutrient status. Previous studies have shown that some nematodes are found more often in areas with similar environmental variables and that nematode genera within the same trophic group responded differently to environmental variables16. We found that the higher abundances of Prismatolaimus, Cephalobus and Eucephalobus corresponded to the higher soil NO3–N (Appendix 1). Our results are consistent with the observations of Song et al.17. Moreover, the Mix-n treatment had a higher density of Mesodorylaimus, Aphelenchoides and Thonus where the DOC was higher. This result is in agreement with the findings of Olatunji et al.18, in which Thonus, Aporcelaimus, Mesodorylaimus, Aphelenchoides, Criconemoides, Tylenchus, and Rhabditidae were positively associated with DOC.
Soil nematode communities
From the data in Table 2, it is apparent that the CK treatment had a higher total number of soil nematodes and a higher abundance of soil nematodes in different nutritional groups than any straw mulch treatment; that is, the number of soil nematodes after straw mulching was lower than that in the control. Blankinship et al.19 used a meta-analysis method to study the response of soil nematodes to temperature increase under different ecosystem types. It was found that soil nematodes were mainly affected by annual precipitation. When annual precipitation exceeded 626 mm, the increase in temperature had a positive effect on the number of soil nematodes19. In this study, the annual precipitation in this area (1033.9 mm) exceeded 626 mm, and straw mulching had a cooling effect during the growth period of young walnut trees. This could be a possible reason of higher abundance of soil nematodes in the CK treatment than that in any straw mulching treatment. Moreover, this finding is also contrary to our first hypothesis that different straw mulching treatments would increase the number of soil nematodes. The reasons are as follows: on the one hand, phenolic acids enter the soil through the secretions of walnut roots and the decomposition of a large amount of straw residues, which results in an increase in phenolic acids in the soil and a decrease in the total number of soil nematodes and other nematodes20. On the other hand, straw mulching returns pathogenic bacteria and parasite eggs to the field directly. At the same time, the nutrients released from straw in the soil provide a favorable environment for pathogenic bacteria and parasite eggs to increase in number, which significantly inhibits soil nematodes21.
In addition, a key finding was that fungal nematodes were more common than bacterial nematodes in the treatments with complete mulch coverage than in the n and 1.5n coverage treatments. When rice straw, rapeseed straw and mix straw were applied at n and 1.5n distances, the decomposition pathway was a bacterial channel; when the coverage distance increased to all n, the decomposition pathway gradually changed to decomposition equally distributed between bacterial and fungal decomposition pathways. In contrast, the CK treatment was dominated by the number of bacterivorous nematodes, suggesting that the bacterial channel was the main pathway of decomposition, which was consistent with the result of the distribution map of nematode fauna in Fig. 1. At the same time, this result indicates that the coverage distance changed the dominant community of nematode trophic groups.
The footprints of different nematode trophic groups are proxies for the carbon or energy flow entering the soil food web through their respective channels22. In our study, we found that the footprint and the carbon biomass of the omnivore-predator nematodes and all structure metabolic footprints showed higher values under all straw mulching treatments compared with those of the other soil nematode trophic groups (Table 3). This observation may be explained by the predator–prey trophic cascade effect: straw mulching stimulates higher carbon and nutrient inputs first to microorganisms and then to microbivorous nematodes, which stimulate the metabolic activity and abundance of omnivore-predator nematodes; omnivore-predator nematodes consume more prey and thus inhibit the abundance of soil nematodes at lower trophic levels23.
Nematode diversity
The maturity index of nematodes is one of the key indices of soil health. In our study, the MI values for rice straw and rapeseed straw treatment alone were not significantly higher than those for the CK treatment (Fig. 2c). However, the MI values for the mix straw treatments were significantly higher than those for the CK treatment, indicating that the structure of the nematode community is stable and that the complexity of the soil food web could increase under the mix straw treatment.
Combined with the ecological indices BI, which is related to soil properties and decomposition pathways24, we found that higher CI value for the three straw mulching treatments appeared in the whole-plot coverage treatments (all n). Our results contrast with those of other studies, which found that bacterial-dominated decomposition pathways were the most common pathways20. This discrepancy could be explained mainly by the observed variations in the abundances of bacterivores and fungivores among the different coverage distances. Specifically, bacterivore nematodes predominate in different soil nematode trophic groups when the coverage distance is n, while bacterivore nematodes and fungivore nematodes predominate in different soil nematode trophic groups when the coverage distance is increased to all n (Table 2). In addition, soil nematode decomposition pathway changed with the increase in coverage distance in the three straw mulching treatments, which may have been caused by the increase in contact area between straw and soil. The specific mechanism needs to be further studied in our next work.
Soil nematode faunal profile
The SI is considered to indicate the structure of the soil food web response to disturbance and during remediation, while the EI reflects soil food web responses to available resources and the resource response to the primary decomposers17,25.
In the present study, the rice straw mulching treatments and rapeseed straw mulching treatments with high EI and SI values at different straw mulching distances were in quadrant B, indicating that the structure of the food web was fairly mature, the N concentration was high, the C:N ratio was low, the decomposition pathways of fungi and bacteria was balanced, and the disturbance level of the soil environment was low to moderate. These conditions occurred is mainly because of the large amounts of dissolved organic carbon and dissolved organic nitrogen in the soil due to straw degradation and the straw mulching water retention effect making the soil moisture content higher than that found in the CK treatment (Table 1).
However, the mix straw mulching treatments with high SI and low EI values at different straw mulching distances were in quadrant C, which indicates a structured food web, medium soil enrichment, a moderately high C/N ratio, fungal decomposition channels, and no disturbance. Our previous research suggested that the mix straw mulching treatment had a moderate carbon nitrogen ratio (C:N) and that mix straw degrades more quickly than rice straw or rapeseed straw9. In addition, the mix straw may have provided stable moisture content and higher dissolved organic carbon and dissolved organic nitrogen than rice straw or rapeseed straw (Table 1), thus increasing nutrient availability and soil fertility levels. This result is supported by other agricultural management practices20,26,27. This evidence supported our hypothesis that the mix straw mulching treatment led to a more stable soil food web and higher soil fertility levels.
Environmental factors affecting soil nematode community variability
Straw mulching directly increases the mineral nitrogen and DON contents in the soil through decomposition, which significantly increases the content of nitrogen in the soil, thus increasing the amount of soil nutrients and soil organisms. Plant parasite and omnivore-predator nematode abundances were negatively correlated with NH4+–N and DON contents, but there was no significant correlation between the nematode community and soil DOC content. This finding indicates that nitrogen in the soil of the agroforestry ecosystem had a more significant impact on the nematode community than carbon. This result is also consistent with previous results28,29. Another possible explanation was that ammonium toxicity may occur when soil nematodes feed on root fluid, resulting in a negative correlation between omnivore-predator nematodes and NH4+–N30. Compared with the control condition, straw mulching significantly increased soil moisture content and soil anoxia, while soil total nematodes were negatively correlated with SM value. The results showed that the increase in soil moisture changed the soil environment, inhibited the growth of soil microorganisms, and inhibited the growth of total nematodes through changes in nutrient levels and the environment in the food chain.
In terms of straw coverage distance, our results showed that the decomposition pathway gradually changed from the bacterial decomposition channel to the bacterial/fungal decomposition channel when the coverage distance increased from a narrow coverage distance (n) to a wide coverage distance (all n) in the three straw mulching treatment groups. In terms of straw mulch types, the mix straw mulching treatment had a higher maturity index, a more stable soil food web and higher soil fertility levels than the rice straw or rapeseed straw mulching treatments. There was a significant negative correlation between plant parasite and omnivore-predator nematodes and NH4+–N and DON, but there was no significant correlation between the nematode community and the soil DOC content. This finding was unexpected and suggests that nitrogen in the soil of agroforestry ecosystems had a more significant impact than soil carbon on the nematode community. Recommendations for sustainable walnut orchard management based on the complexity and stability of nematode food webs should advocate the use of mix straw mulching (mix) covering the whole plot (all n) and thus promote the accumulation of soil dissolved organic nitrogen and carbon nutrients.
Materials and methods
Experimental site
The study was conducted in a large walnut orchard field in Langzhong (31° 57′ 82″ N, 105° 96′ 65″ E; 712.5 m above sea level), which is the hilly area of the central Sichuan Basin, southwestern China. The area has a humid mid-subtropical monsoon climate, with an average annual precipitation of 1033.9 mm and an annual temperature of 18.7 °C. This site has purple soil, classified as Pup-Orthic Entisol in the Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST) and Entisol in the USDA Soil Taxonomy31. The specific soil in this study was a loam soil with the following nutrient profile (0–15 cm depth): total nitrogen (2.4 g kg−1), available phosphorus (0.96 g kg−1), available potassium (86.57 mg kg−1) and total carbon (5.95 g kg−1)32.
Experimental design
The walnut sapling (Juglans regia) plantation covered a 30 m × 90 m area, with a southerly slope of c. 2.5 degrees. The walnut saplings were planted in April 2010 and then grafted in May 2015.
In July 2016, we established a straw mulching experiment with a randomized block design in a walnut plantation with 3 m × 3 m spacing to investigate the potential effect of straw mulching on nematode community abundance and diversity and the associated agroecosystem function. We selected three different straw mulch types, rice straw, rapeseed straw, and mix straw (of equal quality, mixed 1:1), as the main plot. Then, under different main plots, we set up three different straw mulching distances (covering the mean radius of the crown width (n), covering 1.5 times the mean radius of the crown width (1.5 n) and covering the whole experimental plot (all n)) as sub-plots. Plots with no straw mulching were used as the CK plots. The quantity of straw mulch in each treatment was 3 kg/m2, selected based on previous research results33,34. There were a total of 10 treatments, based on the three straw mulching types, the three different straw mulching distances and CK, and each treatment had three replicates. All treatments were subjected to random permutations.
Soil sampling and property analysis
Soil samples were collected on 19 October 2016. Five soil samples from the 0–20 cm soil layer were taken with a soil auger (Φ = 2.5 cm) by using the five-spot method. The samples were combined to form one composite sample per plot location. Each composite sample was sieved (2 mm) and stored in individual plastic bags, immediately transferred to a cold room with a temperature of 4 °C, and then processed within a week. The samples used to analyze pH, SMC, NH4+–N, NO3–N, DON and DOC were air-dried at room temperature.
Analysis of soil physicochemical properties
Soil moisture content was estimated gravimetrically by oven drying 20 g of each field composite soil sample at 105 °C for 24 h. Soil pH was determined with deionized water and an air-dried and fine-ground sample at a ratio of 1:2.5 (weight to volume, w/v) with an electronic pH meter. Soils were extracted with 2 M KCl, and the filtrate was analyzed for NH4+–N and NO3–N content (with an Acquity Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatograph, AA3, Bran + Luebbe, Germany). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrogen (DON) were estimated using a TOC/TN analyzer (Multi N/C 2100(S), Analytik Jena AG, Germany).
Nematode extraction and identification
Soil nematodes were extracted from 50 g of fresh soil using a modified cotton-wool filter method35. The extractions were used for identification (at least 100 nematodes) at the genus level using a microscope (OLYMPUS BX51) at 100 × magnification (resolution: 0.25 μm) according to Ahmad et al.36. If fewer than 100 nematodes were observed in one sample, all specimens were identified. Nematode abundance was adjusted according to soil moisture and was expressed as the number of nematodes per 100 g dry soil. After identification (within one week), based on their feeding habits, nematodes were classified into four trophic groups: (1) bacterivores (Ba), (2) fungivores (Fu), (3) omnivores-predators (OP) and (4) plant parasites (PP)12.
The assumed effects of straw mulching on soil nematodes were examined with the following variables: (1) total nematode abundance; (2) abundance of individual trophic groups including PP, Ba,Fu,OP;(3)Shannon–Weaver index (H’)37; (4) Pielou’s evenness index (J’)38; (5) maturity index (MI); (6) trophic diversity index (TD)39; (7) species richness index (SR)11, and (8) basal index (BI)40.
The metabolic footprint approach uses existing data on nematode biovolumes and growth rates, and the weightings used in the enrichment index (EI), structure index (SI), and channel index (CI) calculations41 to estimate the C metabolism of the nematode community22. The nematode metabolic footprints (NMF) was also divided into the enrichment footprint (efootprint), representing lower trophic levels (c-p 1–2), and the structure footprint (sfootprint), representing higher trophic levels (c-p 3–5). The above data were calculated using the online Nematode Indicator Joint Analysis (NINJA) tool42.
Data analysis
The nematode abundances were ln (x + 1) transformed prior to statistical analysis for the normality of data. One-way ANOVA was used to test the effect of straw mulching on soil properties, nematode abundance, and nematode ecological index under each treatment. Correlation analyses between abiotic and biotic drivers, including pH, SMC, NH4+–N, NO3–N, DON, DOC and nematode community data, were conducted. Statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05. Differences between data means were analyzed with t-tests using SPSS v. 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) statistical software. Least significant difference (LSD) was used to test for differences among treatment means.
References
Zheng, Y. et al. Effects of biochar and straw application on the physicochemical and biological properties of paddy soils in Northeast China. Sci. Rep. 9, 16531 (2019).
Arcand, M. M., Knight, J. D. & Farrell, R. E. Differentiating between the supply of N to wheat from above and belowground residues of preceding crops of pea and canola. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 50, 563–570 (2014).
Gale, W. J. & Cambardella, C. A. Carbon dynamics of surface residue- and root-derived organic matter under simulated no-till. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66, 190 (2000).
Ibrahim, M., Cao, C. G., Zhan, M., Li, C. F. & Iqbal, J. Changes of CO2 emission and labile organic carbon as influenced by rice straw and different water regimes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 263–274 (2015).
Barreiro, A., Bååth, E. & Díaz-Raviña, M. Bacterial and fungal growth in burnt acid soils amended with different high C/N mulch materials. Soil Biol. Biochem. 97, 102–111 (2016).
Chen, S. The influence of the type of crop residue on soil organic carbon fractions: an 11-year field study of rice-based cropping systems in southeast China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 223, 261–269 (2016).
Ramakrishna, A., Tam, H. M., Wani, S. P. & Long, T. D. Effect of mulch on soil temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield of groundnut in northern Vietnam. Field Crops Res. 95, 115–125 (2006).
Song, D. et al. Influence of planting distance and density on the yield and photosynthetic traits of sweet potato (Ipomoea balatas L.) under an intercropping system with walnut (Juglans regia) saplings. Soil Till. Res. 196, 1–8 (2020).
Song, D. et al. Optimization of growth and production parameters of walnut (Juglans regia) saplings with response surface methodology. Sci. Rep. 8, 9992 (2018).
Liang, W. et al. Nematode faunal response to long-term application of nitrogen fertilizer and organic manure in northeast china. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 883–890 (2009).
Ferris, H., Bongers, T. & Goede, R. G. M. Nematode faunal indicators of soil food web condition. J. Nematol. 31, 534–535 (1999).
Yeates, G. W. & King, K. L. Soil nematodes as indicators of the effect of management on grasslands in the New England Tables (NSW): comparison of native and improved grasslands. Pedobiologia 41, 526–536 (1997).
Iii, L. R. B., Barker, K. R. & Ristaino, J. B. Influences of organic and synthetic soil fertility amendments on nematode trophic groups and community dynamics under tomatoes. Appl. Soil Ecol. 21, 233–250 (2002).
Zhang, X., Ferris, H., Mitchell, J. & Liang, W. Ecosystem services of the soil food web after long-term application of agricultural management practices. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 111, 36–43 (2017).
Mcsorley, R. & Frederick, J. J. Nematode population fluctuations during decomposition of specific organic amendments. J. Nematol. 31, 37 (1999).
Sun, F. et al. The response of the soil microbial food web to extreme rainfall under different plant systems. Sci. Rep. 6, 37662 (2016).
Song, M. et al. Responses of soil nematodes to water and nitrogen additions in an old-field grassland. Appl. Soil Ecol. 102, 53–60 (2016).
Olatunji, A. O. et al. The effect of phosphorus addition, soil moisture, and plant type on soil nematode abundance and community composition. J. Soils Sediments 19, 1139–1150 (2019).
Blankinship, J. C., Niklaus, P. A. & Hungate, B. A. A meta-analysis of responses of soil biota to global change. Oecologia 165, 553–565 (2011).
Li, X. et al. Effects of organic and other management practices on soil nematode communities in tea plantation: a case study in southern China. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 177, 604–612 (2014).
Qiao, Y. Q. et al. Effects of straw-returning and N-fertilizer application on yield, quality and occurrence of fusarium head blight of wheat(In Chinese). J. Triticeae Crops 33, 727–731 (2013).
Ferris, H. et al. Form and function: metabolic footprints of nematodes in the soil food web. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 46, 97–104 (2010).
Guan, P. et al. Soil microbial food web channels associated with biological soil crusts in desertification restoration: the carbon flow from microbes to nematodes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 116, 82–90 (2018).
Lu, Z. B. et al. Effects of crop species richness on the community of soil nematodes in an experimental agro-ecosystem. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 73, 26–33 (2016).
Loria, B. & Thomasw, B. Biodiversity and trophic structure of soil nematode communities are altered following woody plant invasion of grassland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1943–1950 (2009).
Ferris, H. & Bongers, T. Nematode indicators of organic enrichment. J. Nematol. 38, 3 (2006).
Leroy, B., Sutter, N. D., Neve, S. D., Reheul, D. & Moens, M. Nematode population dynamics as influenced by the quality of exogenous organic matter. Pedobiologia 52, 139–150 (2009).
Qi, S., Zhao, X. R., Zheng, H. X. & Lin, Q. M. Changes of soil biodiversity in Inner Mongolia steppe after 5 years of N and P fertilizer applications. Acta Ecol. Sin. 31, 3745–3757 (2010).
Zhang, A. L. et al. Effects of nitrogen addition on soil nematode community characteristics in Stipa baicalensis steppe. Acta. Ecol. Sin. 38, 3616–3627 (2018).
Wei, C. et al. Nitrogen addition regulates soil nematode community composition through ammonium suppression. PLoS ONE 7, e43384 (2012).
Gong, Z. T. Chinese Soil Taxonomy (In Chinese). Science Press (1999).
Rui, W. et al. Soil respiration characteristics of 3 types of agroforestry system in the Sichuan hilly basin (In Chinese). Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 22, 793–799 (2016).
Gao, F. Efects of diferent straw mulching amounts on soil water and nutrient and crop yield of dryland feld in Southern Ningxia. PHD thesis. Yangling:Northwest A & F University (2011).
Wang, Q. Study on straw mulching model and straw mechanized mulching technology in apple orchard. PHD thesis. Yangling:Northwest A & F University (2017).
Townshend, J. L. A modification and evaluation of the apparatus for the oostenbrink direct cottonwool filter extraction method. Nematologica. 9, 106–110 (1963).
Ahmad, W., & Jairajpuri, M. S. Mononchida: The predatory soil nematodes. In D. J. Hunt, & R. N. Perry (Eds.), Nematology monographs and perspectives (pp. 21–298). Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden, the Netherlands. (2010).
Shannon, C. E. The mathematical theory of communication (1950). Bell. Labs. Tech. J. 3, 31–32 (1963).
Pielou, E. C. Ecological diversity (Wiley, New York, NY, 1975).
Yeates, G. W. Nematodes as soil indicators: functional and biodiversity aspects. Biol. Fert. Soils 37(4), 199–210 (2003).
Heip, C., Herman, M. & Soetaert, K. Data Processing, Evaluation, and Analysis (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA, 1988).
Ferris, H., Bongers, T. & Goede, R. G. M. D. A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Appl. Soil Ecol. 18, 13–29 (2001).
Sieriebriennikov, B., Ferris, H. & Goede, R. G. M. D. NINJA: an automated calculation system for nematode-based biological monitoring. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 61, 90–93 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31370632 and 31500517), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (Grant Nos. 2019QZKK0303), Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-2019-BIOMA), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Scientific research institutes (Grant Nos. 1610012020007_03104). This research was also supported by Science and Technology Poverty Alleviation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (No. KFJ-FP-201903) and "Beautiful China" Ecological Civilization Construction Science and Technology project, Strategic Pilot Science and Technology Project of CAS, Category A (No. XDA23060303).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.D. and K.P. designed the study including experimental design. S.D., A.T. and W.C. carried out field and laboratory work. S.D. and A.T. analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. K.P., Y.R., A.T., F.Z. and X.S contributed to revise the draft. A.Z. and W.C. contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Song, D., Tariq, A., Pan, K. et al. Effects of straw mulching practices on soil nematode communities under walnut plantation. Sci Rep 10, 15351 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72530-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72530-5
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
