Abstract
Echinoderms exhibit remarkable powers of autotomy. For instance, crinoids can shed arm and stalk portions when attacked by predators. In some species, it has been reported that the autotomized arms display vigorous movements, which are thought to divert the attention of predators. This phenomenon, however, has not been well explored. Here we present results of experiments using the shallowest water species of living stalked crinoid (Metacrinus rotundus) collected at 140 m depth. A wide range of movements of detached arms, from sluggish writhing to violent flicks, was observed. Interestingly, autotomized arms produce distinct traces on the sediment surface. They are composed of straight or arched grooves usually arranged in radiating groups and shallow furrows. Similar traces were found associated with detached arms of the oldest (Early Triassic) stem-group isocrinid (Holocrinus). This finding may suggest that the origins of autotomy-related thrashing behaviour in crinoids could be traced back to at least the Early Triassic, underscoring the magnitude of anti-predatory traits that occurred during the Mesozoic Marine Revolution. A new ethological category, autotomichnia, is proposed for the traces produced by thrashing movements of shed appendages.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Many animals, including echinoderms, are able to autotomize parts of their body usually as a defense strategy against predators1. It has been argued that shed appendages, which sometimes display vigorous post-autotomy movements, reduce the animal’s mortality in two major ways: (1) they enable the animal to break away from predators that have grasped it, and (2) divert the attention of the predators away from the vulnerable body parts2.
Crinoids commonly referred to as sea lilies, a group of echinoderms that is subject to a high predation pressure, have remarkable ability to autotomize and regenerate their appendages3,4,5,6. It has been shown that arm autotomy in these echinoderms is achieved through the nervously mediated (L-Glutamate invoked) destabilisation of collagenous ligamentary fibres at specialized autotomy planes, namely (crypto)syzygial articulations7. Although considerable effort has been devoted to study autotomy in crinoids8,9,10,11, little attention has been paid to post-autotomy thrashing behaviour. Wilkie et al.7 in their study on living stalkless comatulids (feather stars) only briefly reported that: “after autotomy induced in both intact animals and isolated arms, the detached distal portion of the arm showed rhythmical cycles of flexion and extension in the oro–aboral plane”.
To further examine thrashing behaviour in extant sea lilies, and explore its ichnological potential we conducted neoichnological aquarium experiments using the stalked crinoid Metacrinus rotundus Carpenter, 1884. We then analyzed samples with articulated arm fragments of the oldest (Early Triassic) stem-group isocrinids (holocrinids) in order to identify evidence of this behaviour in the fossil record.
Aquarium experiment
Specimens of living stalked crinoids of Metacrinus rotundus were used in this study. Sampling and handling of these specimens followed described procedure12,13,14. Crinoids were dredged from Suruga Bay (near the town of Numazu, Shizuoka Prefecture; Japan; ~ 35° 3′ N, ~ 138° 48′ E, ~ 140 m depth) from the sea bottom using a 90-cm-wide naturalist dredge with a net. Then, the living specimens were transferred to an experimental seawater tank in the Nagoya University Museum. The aquarium was maintained at a constant seawater temperature (~ 16 °C) in darkness and under circulation provided by a water pump. After few weeks of acclimatizing the crinoids, a box (~ 40 × 30 cm) floored with fine-grained sand was placed, which was smoothed before an autotomized arm was introduced. Autotomy of crinoid arm was induced following described procedure15,16. Neoichnological experiments were repeated several times using different arms from different individuals (electronic supplementary movies S1–S4).
For comparison purposes, a series of aquarium experiments was made on production of transport-induced sole markings left on the sediment surface (fine-grained sand) by isolated dead arms being dragged (with the pinnules facing upstream or downstream; electronic supplementary movies S5, S6) by a current (0.35 cm/s) adjusted by a water pump that was placed at the bottom of the aquarium. At the lower or higher velocity, the arms (which were placed at a distance of ~ 25 cm from the pump) were not moving or were lifted above the sediment surface, respectively, leaving no traces. These experiments were conducted at the Laboratory of Experimental Taphonomy at the Faculty of Natural Sciences of the University of Silesia in Katowice, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Gypsum casts from both experiments are deposited at the Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences (ZPALV.42ICH).
Fossil samples
A Lower Triassic (lowest Spathian) slab of thin-bedded silty limestone of the Thaynes Group (west of Paris, Idaho, USA) preserving five isolated fragments of arms belonging to one of the oldest (if not the oldest) post-Paleozoic holocrinid taxon (Holocrinus sp.) deposited in the collection of the Université de Bourgogne, Géologie Dijon, France (UBGD 30564) was investigated17. These arm fragments are of different lengths and lack distal arm tips and some distal pinnules (see figs. 2 and 3 in17).
Results
Traces of recent crinoid arms
Following autotomy of the arm, within a few seconds, its activity increased, i.e., it started to thrash mostly in the oral–aboral plane. Both frequency and style of flexions (sluggish writhing and violent flicks; electronic supplementary movies S1–S4) and the duration of movement varied (~ several hours to up to about 7 days). However, only in the first hours after autotomy, detached arms showed the highest activity. The frequency and amplitude of motions decreased with time; i.e., after several hours autotomized arms remained in place; their activity could still be recorded but they did not produce any traces. In the first hours after autotomy, each autotomized arm produced two major types of traces on the sediment surface, which can be closely associated with each other (Fig. 1):
-
1.
straight to slightly arched grooves [1.5–3 cm long (mean: 2.1 cm); 0.2–0.6 cm wide (mean: 0.3 cm); ~ 0.1 cm deep) usually arranged in radiating groups (Fig. 1a–c, g–i); the grooves may be inclined at different angles to each other (the angles between adjacent grooves ranging from 9° to 28°) and are separated from each other by a distance of 0.9–2.8 cm (measured in the widest distance between two ends of neighbouring grooves). The length-to-width ratio of these grooves ranges from 3.8 to 10.9 (mean: 6.8). These traces were left by a rotating and more or less rhythmic movement of the flicking arm that placed the most pressure on the substrate with its median-distal arm part.
-
2.
sets of thin and parallel (locally curving) furrows [0.3–1.7 cm long (mean: 1.1 cm), 0.04–0.17 cm wide (mean: 0.1 cm), ~ 0.03 cm deep) (Fig. 1d–f, j–l)]; these sets may be inclined at different angles to each other, locally forming a herringbone pattern. The length-to-width ratio of these furrows ranges from 4.1 to 33.6 (mean: 11.4). These traces were made by pulling the pinnules along the substrate.
Current-produced sole markings, resulting from the more or less continuous contact of the arm with the sediment surface (electronic supplementary movies S5, S6), display a very different morphology (Fig. 2). These grooves are continuous, long (4–6 cm), generally linear, deep (~ 0.2 to 0.4 cm) and run parallel to the flow direction.
Trace fossils
Close examination of Lower Triassic slabs from the Thaynes Group (Spathian, west of the city of Paris, Idaho, USA18) revealed similar traces associated with isolated articulated fragment of arm of Holocrinus sp. (Fig. 3). Given their size, morphology and close association with the crinoid arm, it appears that these traces could have been produced by thrashing movements of shed arm. However, the scarcity and imperfect state of preservation make the erection of the new ichnospecies impossible.
Description
One arm fragment is associated with slightly arched grooves [~ 1.9 to 3.2 mm long (mean: 2.3), ~ 0.5 to 0.8 mm wide (mean: 0.55)] arranged in a radiating group (the angles between adjacent grooves range from 12° to 24°). These grooves are separated from each other by a distance of 1.9–2.6 mm (measured in the widest distance between two ends of neighbouring grooves). Dimensionally, the mean length-to-width ratio of these grooves (4.3) falls well within the range of this ratio for the grooves produced by the median-distal arm part during our neoichnological experiments. These grooves are associated with a few sets of indistinct thin and parallel (locally slightly curving) furrows [1.8–3.2 mm long (mean: 2.4), 0.07–0.13 mm wide (mean: 0.1)] of uncertain origin. Notably, however, the mean length-to-width ratio of these furrows (25.5) falls within the range of this ratio reported in our neoichnological experiments.
Remarks
As no ethological term exists for the trace fossils produced by post-autotomy thrashing movements of shed appendages we herein propose a new ethological category, autotomichnia (from the Greek auto- "self-" and tome "severing", αὐτοτομία). Although thrashing behaviour occurs in a wide range of vertebrate and invertebrate taxa1,2,19,20,21,22, autotomichnia are probably rare in the fossil record, and its identification is difficult if the traces are not found in association with the “producer”. Such cases, however, are not likely to be common given that shed appendages displaying movements attract attention of the predators which attempt to consume them. The only ichnospecies ascribed to activity of crinoids described so far is Krinodromos bentou23. This ichnotaxon, however, in contrast to the presently described traces, refers to unusual locomotion trail, and shows different morphology in the form of two bordering grooves combined with pushed sediment piles, and a central flat area or a narrow winding furrow. Possible explanation for the fossil traces reported herein is that they simply represent sole markings produced by a dead arm moved along by a current. However, these Triassic traces bear no morphological resemblance to the experimentally induced abiotic sedimentary structures (Fig. 1 vs Fig. 2).
Discussion
It has been argued that ichnology can provide valuable insights on the evolutionary origins of behaviors and on many of their functional and adaptive aspects24,25,26. Our experiments showed that autotomized arms of stalked crinoids (isocrinids) display vigorous movements similar to that observed in shed arms of brittlestars21. They produce distinct traces on the sediment surface, which may have some potential to be preserved as trace fossils. This finding opened new perspectives for tracing the origin of thrashing behaviour in crinoids. Indeed, our examination of fossil material from the Thaynes Group suggests that similar traces are associated with isolated articulated fragment of arm of the oldest (~ 250.6 Ma) stem-group isocrinids (Holocrinus). The fact that this arm fragment lacks distal arm tip and some distal pinnules is suggestive that it was autotomized due to predatory attack prior to rapid burial rather than another type of disturbance (e.g., storm). It must be emphasized that although abiotic factors (such as high current velocities induced by storms or other environmental trauma) may lead to arm loss, most autotomy in natural settings results from biotic interactions27. This is consistent with recent data28 which showed that the thruster-produced extreme flow or suction force did not lead to arm loss or any other type of injury in deep-water, stalked crinoid Democrinus sp.
Trace fossils described herein suggest that the origin of thrashing behaviour in crinoids could be traced back to at least the Early Triassic. The question of whether this behaviour could have appeared in the Paleozoic crinoids (independently in several clades or in one lineage and was then inherited by the post-Paleozoic descendants) is presently unclear. However, it should be emphasized that, in contrast to the highly flexible muscular arms of recent and post-Paleozoic crinoids in which syzygial or cryptosyzygial ligamentary articulations specifically designed for autotomy are localized, many Paleozoic crinoids possessed primitive arms with limited flexibility6. Although regeneration is frequently documented in Paleozoic crinoids29, most of them, if not all, have not yet developed autotomy planes6,11,30. This suggests that they lacked autotomy abilities, or at least that they were less specialized in that regard30.
The end-Permian mass extinction profoundly influenced the evolutionary history of crinoids, not only through the demise of major Paleozoic crinoid groups but also through changes in their functional morphology31,32. Notably, post-Paleozoic crinoids are considered to have descended from only a single survivor (i.e., a cladid ancestor—ampelocrinids)33,34. In the Middle Triassic, however, they rebounded and underwent a major radiation resulting in the appearance of several motile taxa showing many anti-predatory morphological and behavioral innovations to increased predation pressure during the Mesozoic Marine Revolution35,36,37,38,39. Holocrinids are among the first crinoids to appear in the aftermath of the end-Permian mass extinction40. These crinoids display many adaptations to benthic and nektonic predators. For instance, they developed specialized rupture points at the distal nodal facets in their stalk, allowing them to free themselves of the sea bottom, crawl with the aid of highly flexible muscular arms and re-attach41,42,43. Furthermore, they elaborated localized autotomy planes (cryptosyzygies) in the arms38,44, which in Recent isocrinid descendants greatly reduce mortality and arm damage16. Herein it is suggested that holocrinids might have also displayed post-autotomy arm thrashing. Interestingly, in some lizards, it has been observed that their wildly thrashing autotomized tails (in contrast to taxa having a much lower rate of tail thrashing) consistently distract attention of predator away from the escaping lizard45,46 and increase predator-handling time, providing additional opportunity to escape47,48. Intriguingly, however, in some lacertid lizards, duration of thrashing between different species, shows little variation, either because it is less costly, or because the underlying physiological pathways are evolutionary conservative49. Notwithstanding, the high numbers of shed lizard tails are commonly found in predator stomachs50,51. All these indicate that caudal autotomy and thrashing behaviour in these vertebrates is an effective antipredatory strategy. Accordingly, Wilkie21 argued that thrashing behaviour in ophiuroids is also likely to be an effective decoy against fish predators. Consequently, we hypothesize that this behaviour in crinoids also probably acts as a defense strategy to distract predator attention, and/or to increase predator handling time, providing additional getaway chances to crinoids. A moving autotomized arm might itself be sufficient attraction as a food source. Accordingly, acquisition of thrashing behaviour in the Early Triassic crinoids may underscore the magnitude of the anti-predatory traits that occurred during the Mesozoic Marine Revolution, which had already started soon after the end-Permian extinction52,53. The thrashing behaviour along with the specific arm construction consisting of two types of articulations (muscular ones playing a great role in locomotion and postural changes by maximizing arm flexibility, and strictly ligamentary (crypto-)syzygial ones, specifically designed for autotomy) have been maintained in isocrinid/comatulid descendants up to the present.
Given the scarcity and imperfect state of preservation of the trace fossils described herein, further ichnological findings are needed to fully test the above hypotheses. Results of neoichnological experiment presented herein highlight the preservation potential of thrashing behaviour of crinoid arms, thus rock slabs preserving detached crinoid arms are worthy of in-depth investigation.
Methods
Movements of the autotomized arms of crinoids were observed using a self-made underwater camera that was placed into a small transparent container with a power bank. A camera was constructed on the basis of small single-board computer—Raspberry Pi 3 device with connected V2 Camera Module and combined with the source of red LED light. Both continuous (~ 30 to 35 min) and time-lapse movies (~ 10 to 11 h; at the frequency: one photograph taken per 1 min) were captured (electronic supplementary movies S1–S4). The traces on the sediment were photographed under different light conditions, and then gypsum casts were made. 3D models were acquired with Shining 3D EinScan Pro 2X 3D scanner fixed on a tripod, EXScan Pro 3.2.0.2 software, and then processed with Meshlab 1.3.3, Blender 2.82 and ParaView 5.80 to obtain the false-color depth maps.
Two sets of photographs of the trace fossils associated with of the holocrinid arm fragment were taken under different light conditions [by mean of a camera fixed to a tripod (Fig. 3a) and with a camera attached to an optical microscope (Fig. 3b)]. Two 3D models and false-color depth maps for each set were acquired by means of photogrammetric technique using Visual SFM 0.5.26 and the MeshLab 1.3.3 or Agisoft Photoscan 1.2.0.
Ethics
All experiments on live stalked crinoids were performed and approved by the University of Nagoya, where no special ethics approval is required for the maintenance and handling of this particular species. Nevertheless, our research conformed to the ethical principles of replacement, reduction, refinement and minimization of animal suffering following the guidelines reported in the European Directive 2010/63/EU.
Data availability
The source files (3D models) of Recent and fossil traces are openly available in the Open Science Framework, project „3D models of crinoid traces”, at https://osf.io/b8zu2/.
References
Maginnis, T. L. The cost of autotomy and regeneration in animals: a review and framework for future research. Behav. Ecol. 17, 857–872. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl010 (2006).
Arnold, E. N. Evolutionary aspects of tail shedding in lizards and their relatives. J. Nat. Hist. 18, 127–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938400770131 (2007).
Oji, T. Is predation intensity reduced with increasing depth? Evidence from the west Atlantic stalked crinoids Endoxocrinus parrae (Gervais) and implications for the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology 22, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300016328 (1996).
Donovan, S. K. & Pawson, D. L. Proximal growth of the column in bathycrinid crinoids (Echinodermata) following decapitation. Bull. Mar. Sci. 61, 571–579 (1997).
Wilkie, I. C. Autotomy as a prelude to regeneration in echinoderms. Microsc. Res. Tech. 55, 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1185 (2001).
Baumiller, T. K. Crinoid ecological morphology. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124116 (2008).
Wilkie, I. C., Barbaglio, A., Maclaren, W. M. & Candia Carnevali, M. D. Physiological and immunocytochemical evidence that glutamatergic neurotransmission is involved in the activation of arm autotomy in the featherstar Antedon mediterranea (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). J. Exp. Biol. 213, 2104–2115. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.039578 (2010).
Meyer, D. L. Crinoids as renewable resources: rapid regeneration of the visceral mass in a tropical reef-dwelling crinoid from Australia. In Echinoderm biology (eds Burke, D. R., Mladenov, D. P., Lambert, P. & Parsley, L. R.) 519–522 (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1998).
Shibata, T. F. & Oji, T. Autotomy and arm number increase in Oxycomanthus japonicus (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). Invertebr. Biol. 122, 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2003.tb00101.x (2005).
Mozzi, D., Dolmatov, I. Y., Bonasoro, F. & Candia Carnevali, M. D. Visceral regeneration in the crinoid Antedon mediterranea: basic mechanisms, tissues and cells involved in gutre growth. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 1, 609–635 (2006).
Gahn, F. J. & Baumiller, T. K. Arm regeneration in Mississippian crinoids: evidence of intense predation pressure in the Paleozoic? Paleobiology 31, 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031<0151:ARIMCE>2.0.CO;2 (2005).
Kitazawa, K. & Oji, T. Particle selection by the sea lily Metacrinus rotundus Carpenter 1884 (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 395, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2010.08.018 (2010).
Kitazawa, K. & Oji, T. Active feeding behavior of and current modification by the sealily Metacrinus rotundus Carpenter 1884 (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 453, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.12.017 (2014).
Brom, K. R., Oguri, K., Oji, T., Salamon, M. A. & Gorzelak, P. Experimental neoichnology of crawling stalked crinoids. Swiss J. Palaeontol. 137, 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-018-0158-9 (2018).
Holland, N. D. & Grimmer, J. C. Fine structure of syzygia articulations before and after arm autotomy in Florometra serratissima (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Zoomorphology 98, 169–183 (1981).
Oji, T. & Okamoto, T. Arm autotomy and arm branching pattern as anti-predatory adaptations in stalked and stalkless crinoids. Paleobiology 20, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300011118 (1994).
Saucède, T., Vennin, F., Fara, E., Olivier, N. & The Paris Biota Team. A new holocrinid (Articulata) from the Paris Biota (Bear Lake County, Idaho, USA) highlights the high diversity of Early Triassic crinoids. Geobios 54, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2019.04.003 (2019).
Brayard, A. et al. Unexpected Early Triassic marine ecosystem and the rise of the Modern evolutionary fauna. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602159 (2017).
Bassler, U. A movement generated in the peripheral nervous system: rhythmic flexion by autotomized legs of the stick insect Cunicuuna impigra. J. Exp. Biol. 111, 191–199 (1984).
Dial, B. E. & Fitzpatrick, L. C. The energetic costs of tail autotomy to reproduction in the lizard Coleonyx brevis (Sauria: Gekkonidae). Oecologia 51, 310–317 (1981).
Wilkie, C. Arm autotomy in brittlestars (Echinodermata : Ophiuroidea). J. Zool. Lond. 186, 311–330 (1978).
Norman, M. D. & Finn, J. Revision of the Octopus horridus species-group, including erection of a new subgenus and description of two member species from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Invertebr. Tax. 15, 13–35 (2001).
Neto de Carvalho, C. et al. Running crabs, walking crinoids, grazing gastropods: behavioral diversity and evolutionary implications of the Cabeço da Ladeira Lagerstätte (Middle Jurassic, Portugal). Comun. Geol. 103, 39–54 (2016).
Dzik, J. Behavioral and anatomical unity of the earliest burrowing animals and the cause of the ‘Cambrian explosion’. Paleobiology 31, 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373 (2005).
Niedźwiedzki, G., Szrek, P., Narkiewicz, K., Narkiewicz, M. & Ahlberg, P. E. Tetrapod trackways from the early Middle Devonian of Poland. Nature 463, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08623 (2010).
Plotnick, R. E. Behavioral biology of trace fossils. Paleobiology 38, 459–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/41684612 (2012).
Gahn, F. J. & Baumiller, T. K. Evolutionary History of regeneration in crinoids (Echinodermata). Integr. Comp. Biol. 50, 514a–514m (2010).
Veitch, M. A. & Baumiller, T. K. Low predation intensity on the stalked crinoid Democrinus sp. (Echinodermata) in Roatán, Honduras reveals deep water as likely predation refuge. Bull. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2020.0024 (2020).
Baumiller, T. K. & Gahn, F. J. Testing predation-driven evolution using Mid-Paleozoic crinoid arm regeneration. Science 305, 1453–1455. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1101009 (2004).
Oji, T. Fossil record of echinoderm regeneration with special regard to crinoids. Microsc. Res. Tech. 55, 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1186 (2001).
Foote, M. Morphological diversification of Paleozoic crinoids. Paleobiology 21, 272–299 (1995).
Twitchett, R. J. & Oji, T. Early Triassic recovery of echinoderms. C. R. Palevol 4, 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2005.02.006 (2005).
Simms, M. J. Systematics, phylogeny and evolutionary history. In Fossil crinoids (eds Hess, H., Ausich, W. I., Brett, E. C. & Simms, J. M.) 31–40 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
Simms, M. J. & Sevastopulo, G. D. The origin of articulate crinoids. Palaeontology 36, 91–109 (1993).
Baumiller, T. K. & Messing, C. G. Stalked crinoid locomotion and its ecological and evolutionary implications. Palaeontol. Electron. 10, 2A (2007).
Baumiller, T. K., Mooi, R. & Messing, C. G. Urchins in a meadow: paleobiologial and evolutionaryimplications of cidaroidpredation on crinoids. Paleobiology 34, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1666/07031.1 (2008).
Baumiller, T. K. et al. Post-Paleozoic crinoid radiation in response to benthic predation preceded the Mesozoic marine revolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5893–5896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914199107 (2010).
Hagdorn, H. Triassic: the crucial period of post Palaeozoic crinoid diversification. Swiss J. Palaeontol. 130, 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-010-0009-9 (2011).
Salamon, M. A., Niedźwiedzki, R., Gorzelak, P., Lach, R. & Surmik, D. Bromalites from the Middle Triassic of Poland and the rise of the Mesozoic marine revolution. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 321–322, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.01.029 (2012).
Salamon, M. A., Gorzelak, P., Hanken, N. M., Riise, H. E. & Ferré, B. Crinoids from Svalbard in the aftermath of the end−Permian mass extinction. Pol. Polar Res. 36, 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/popore−2015−0015 (2015).
Baumiller, T. K. & Hagdorn, H. Taphonomy as a guide to functional morphology of Holocrinus, the first post-Paleozoic crinoid. Lethaia 28, 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1995.tb01425.x (1995).
Gorzelak, P. Microstructural evidence for stalk autotomy in Holocrinus—the oldest stem-group isocrinid. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 506, 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.12.012 (2018).
Gorzelak, P. & Salamon, M. A. Holocrinus—The oldest stem-group isocrinid with stalk shedding and crawling abilities: evidence from taphonomy, microstructure and trace fossils. In 11th North American Paleontological Conference Program with Abstracts (eds Droser, M., Hughes, N., Bonuso, N., Bottjer, D., Eernisse, D., Gaines, R., Hendy, A., et al.) 153–154 (2019).
Rasmussen, H. W. Articulata (eds Moore, C. R. & Teichert, C.) T813–T928 (Boulder and Lawrence, 1978).
Vitt, L. J., Congdom, J. D. & Dickson, N. A. Adaptive strategies and energetics of tail autotomy in lizards. Ecology 58, 326–337 (1977).
Daniels, C. B., Flaherty, S. P. & Simbotwe, M. P. Tail size and effectiveness of autotomy in a lizard. J. Herpetol. 20, 93–96 (1986).
Dial, B. E. & Fitzpatrick, L. C. Lizard tail autotomy: Function and energetics of postautotomy tail movement in Scincella lateralis. Science 219, 391–393 (1983).
Medel, R. G., Jiminez, J. E., Fox, S. F. & Jaksic, F. M. Experimental evidence that high-population frequencies of lizard tail autotomy indicates inefficient predation. Oikos 53, 321–324 (1988).
Pafilis, P., Foufopoulos, J., Poulakakis, N., Lymberakis, P. & Valakos, E. D. Tail shedding in island lizards [Lacertidae, Reptilia]: decline of antipredator defenses in relaxed predation environments. Evolution 63, 1262–1278 (2009).
Pianka, E. R. Notes on the biology of Varanus caudolineatus and Varanus gilleni. West. Aust. Nat. 11, 76–82 (1969).
Arnold, E. N. Caudal autotomy as a defense. In Biology of the Reptilia Vol. 16 (eds Gans, C. & Huey, R. B.) 236–273 (Alan Liss, New York, 1988).
Scheyer, T. M., Romano, C., Jenks, J. & Bucher, H. Early Triassic marine biotic recovery: the predators perspective. PLoS ONE 9, e88987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088987 (2014).
Brachaniec, T. et al. Coprolites of marine vertebrate predators from the Lower Triassic of southern Poland. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 435, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.06.005 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This paper was completed while M.A.S. was arecipient of a grant from the National Science Centre (Grant Number UMO-2018/31/B/ST10/00387). Research was also supported by National Science Centre Grant No. 2015/17/N/ST10/03069 (K.B.) and PROM programme 2018/2019 – International scholarship exhange of PhD candidates and academic staff, Project No. POWR.03.03.00-IP.08-00-P13/18 (K.B.). Sampling of specimens of Metacrinus rotundus was conducted with the support from Nagoya University Grant to T.O. The underwater camera was constructed thanks to the support from Japan Society of the Promotion of Science (Kakenhi, Grant Number 15K12197). We thank Alfred Uchman (Jagiellonian University) for useful advice. Dawid Dróżdż and Tomasz Szczygielski (both from Institute of Paleobiology, PAS) are acknowledged for help in gathering 3D models. We are very grateful to the handling editor (Luis Buatois from the University of Saskatchewan) and three referees (Samuel Zamora from the Instituto Geológico y Minero de España and Universidad de Zaragoza, Alfred Uchman from the Jagiellonian University and an anonymous reviewer) for their constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.G. designed research. K.B., T.O. and K.O. were involved in performing a neoichnological experiment. M.A.S. and T.B. performed the experiment on transport-induced sole markings. D.K. and M.D. collected 3D data. T.S. provided documentation on fossil material. P.G., M.A.S., and K.B. contributed to writing the paper, all authors edited the final version of MS.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Video 1.
Supplementary Video 2.
Supplementary Video 3.
Supplementary Video 4.
Supplementary Video 5.
Supplementary Video 6.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gorzelak, P., Salamon, M.A., Brom, K. et al. Experimental neoichnology of post-autotomy arm movements of sea lilies and possible evidence of thrashing behaviour in Triassic holocrinids. Sci Rep 10, 15147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72116-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72116-1
This article is cited by
-
The latest shallow-sea isocrinids from the Miocene of Paratethys and implications to the Mesozoic marine revolution
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
A new holocrinid sea lily from the Anisian (Middle Triassic) of Qingyan, south-western China, and the morphological variability of the distal nodal facets in the genus Holocrinus
PalZ (2024)
-
Eckicrinidae: a new lineage of Triassic crinoids and the diversification of attachment strategies in the Early and Middle Triassic
PalZ (2021)
-
Bromalites from the Upper Triassic Polzberg section (Austria); insights into trophic interactions and food chains of the Polzberg palaeobiota
Scientific Reports (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.