Downregulation of the CCL2/CCR2 and CXCL10/CXCR3 axes contributes to antitumor effects in a mouse model of malignant glioma


Glioblastoma multiforme involves glioma stem cells (GSCs) that are resistant to various therapeutic approaches. Here, we studied the importance of paracrine signaling in the glioma microenvironment by focusing on the celecoxib-mediated role of chemokines C–C motif ligand 2 (CCL2), C-X-C ligand 10 (CXCL10), and their receptors, CCR2 and CXCR3, in GSCs and a GSC-bearing malignant glioma model. C57BL/6 mice were injected with orthotopic GSCs intracranially and divided into groups administered either 10 or 30 mg/kg celecoxib, or saline to examine the antitumor effects associated with chemokine expression. In GSCs, we analyzed cell viability and expression of chemokines and their receptors in the presence/absence of celecoxib. In the malignant glioma model, celecoxib exhibited antitumor effects in a dose dependent manner and decreased protein and mRNA levels of Ccl2 and CxcL10 and Cxcr3 but not of Ccr2. CCL2 and CXCL10 co-localized with Nestin+ stem cells, CD16+ or CD163+ macrophages and Iba-1+ microglia. In GSCs, celecoxib inhibited Ccl2 and Cxcr3 expression in a nuclear factor-kappa B-dependent manner but not Ccr2 and CxcL10. Moreover, Ccl2 silencing resulted in decreased GSC viability. These results suggest that celecoxib-mediated regulation of the CCL2/CCR2 and CXCL10/ CXCR3 axes may partially contribute to glioma-specific antitumor effects.


Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most malignant type of astrocytic glioma and has the highest mortality rate among intracranial tumors. Despite the availability of many therapeutic approaches including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, patient prognosis remains poor1. GBM involves glioma stem cells (GSCs) that exhibit self-renewal capacity and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Although they affect infiltration and proliferation of cancer cells, there are few studies on the pathophysiology of and therapeutic approaches for GSCs.

Recently, increasing attention has been focused on the importance of paracrine-signaling networks within the microenvironment on GSC growth and maintenance2,3. Chemokines recruit monocytes to tumor sites, where monocytes are differentiated into tumor-associated macrophages and promote tumor growth, with interactions between chemokines and chemokine receptors proposed as important to cancer initiation and progression4,5,6,7,8. C–C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) are associated with macrophage infiltration and cell proliferation. CCL2 bound to C–C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) is involved in promoting cancer angiogenesis, proliferation, and metastasis4,5, whereas chemokine CXCL10 binds to C-X-C chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) and exhibits dual functions on tumorigenesis depending on the spliced variant: CXCR3-A promotes cell proliferation and CXCR-B exerts growth inhibition6,7. A previous study suggested that the expression of chemokine receptor/ligand pairs such as CXCR3/CXCL10 plays an important role in the proliferation of glioma cells8. Therefore, we focused on the paracrine-signaling networks involved in the growth microenvironment and maintenance of GSCs related to antitumor effects.

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 levels increase in response to various stimuli, and COX-2 increases the malignant potential of human glioma cells9,10. A new generation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (celecoxib) selectively inhibit COX-2 activity, which exerts COX-2-dependent and -independent antitumor effects11. We recently demonstrated that celecoxib treatment of low-grade glioma cells induces apoptosis and inhibits their proliferation via the Akt/survivin and Akt/inhibitor of differentiation (Id)-3 pathways12. Additionally, Kurtova et al.13 reported that blocking prostaglandin E2-induced tumor re-population abrogates bladder cancer chemoresistance. Furthermore, Fujita et al.14 demonstrated that COX-2 blockade suppresses gliomagenesis by inhibiting myeloid-derived suppressor cells accompanied by chemokine regulation. Moreover, the nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB)-dependent cytokine pathway is reportedly associated with mesenchymal glioblastoma15.

Based on these findings, we hypothesized that in GSCs and a GSC-bearing malignant glioma model, modulation of the CCL2/CCR2 and CXCL10/CXCR3 axes by celecoxib might contribute to antitumor effects. Therefore, we examined the relationships between celecoxib-specific antitumor effects and regulation of chemokines in a mouse GSC-bearing glioma model that closely resembled human GBM16. Furthermore, we studied the mechanisms underlying regulation of the expression of chemokines and their receptors in GSCs. Here, we show that suppression of the CCL2/CCR2 and CXCL10/CXCR3 axes by celecoxib in the tumor and the tumor microenvironment might contribute to antitumor effects.


Celecoxib-mediated induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell proliferation in mouse GSCs

We first examined the effects of celecoxib on apoptosis-related molecules and cell proliferation. In GSCs exposed to celecoxib for 24 h, cell viability was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner, and the 50% inhibition concentration of celecoxib was 60 μM (Fig. 1a). Additionally, in GSCs treated with 60 μM celecoxib for 24 h, the number and area of colony formation decreased (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, celecoxib increased levels of cleaved caspase-8, -9, and -3 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) compared with those in the vehicle control (Fig. 1c). The increased PARP cleavage and the number of celecoxib-induced Annexin-V+ cells were attenuated after the administration of 40 μM Boc-D-FMK, a pan-caspase inhibitor (Fig. 1d). These results indicated the induction of both intrinsic and extrinsic caspase-dependent apoptosis by celecoxib.

Figure 1

Effects of celecoxib on GSC viability, colony formation, and apoptosis. (a) GSC viability evaluated at 24-h post-treatment with celecoxib using water-soluble tetrazolium (WST-8 assay) (n = 8). (b) Representative images of GSCs 24-h post-treatment with 60 μM celecoxib (50% inhibition concentration; IC50) or vehicle control (VC). The number of colony (≥ 2000 μm2) and the colony area (mm2) per mm2 were determined (n = 5). (c) Representative western blot (WB) images of cleaved caspase (cCasp)-8, -9, and -3 and PARP levels in GSCs treated with 60 μM celecoxib or VC for 6 h (n = 4). (d) Representative images of WB and Annexin-V (red) staining in GSCs treated with 60 μM celecoxib for 12 h in the presence or absence of 40 μM of the pan-caspase inhibitor Boc-D-FMK (n = 3). Scale bar, 50 µm. (e) Representative WB images of c-Myc, β-catenin, and cyclin D1 levels in GSCs after treatment with 60 μM celecoxib or VC for 24 h (n = 4). (f) Ki-67 positive cells (Ki-67+, red) detected by immunohistochemistry in GSCs. The number of Ki-67+ cells and DAPI+ (blue) nuclei was calculated (n = 4). Data represent the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. VC by Student’s t test.

The transcription factor β-catenin and c-Myc play an important role in stem cell renewal and organ regeneration17. Additionally, a cell cycle regulator cyclin D1 is linked to cancer development and progression, and acts as a transcription co-regulator18. Treatment with 60 μM celecoxib for 24 h reduced levels of β-catenin and cyclin D1 but not of c-Myc (Fig. 1e), and lowered the number of 4′,6-amino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI)+ nuclei and Ki-67+ cells as a cell-proliferation marker (Fig. 1f). Collectively, these findings suggest that celecoxib might not only induce apoptosis but also inhibit GSC proliferation.

Chemokine regulation associated with antitumor effects by celecoxib in a mouse malignant glioma model

To evaluate the antitumor effects of celecoxib, we administered celecoxib at 10 mg/kg/day or 30 mg/kg/day for 14 days to GSC-bearing glioma models, and found that celecoxib suppressed the tumor volume in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2a). Another set of mice treated with 30 mg/kg/day celecoxib or vehicle followed by a 35-day observation period revealed that celecoxib significantly extended the survival period without affecting body weight, whereas all mice in the vehicle control died at day ~ 28 accompanied by a decrease in body weight (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2

Antitumor effects of celecoxib in the mouse glioma model. (a) GFP+ tumor areas (green) measured in mice treated with 10 mg/kg/day or 30 mg/kg/day celecoxib or vehicle for 7 days (n = 6). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. VC by Tukey–Kramer test. (b) Survival curves estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method and changes in body weight for 35 days (n = 8). **p < 0.01 (log-rank test). (c) Ccl2, Cxcl10 and Cxcr3 mRNA levels determined in mice treated with 30 mg/kg/day celecoxib or VC for 7 days and compared with the normal tissue obtained from age-matched C57BL/6 J mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. normal by Student’s t-test. (n = 6). (d) Representative immunohistochemistry stained with DAB in mice treated with 30 mg/kg/day celecoxib or VC for 7 days. Dashed line, tumor border. The positive areas of CCL2 and CXCL10 in tumor and peri-tumor were analyzed by BZ-X710 microscope equipped analyzing system. Scale bar, 50 µm. Each column data indicates mean ± SD (n = 6). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by student’s t-test.

To address the mechanisms underlying the antitumor effects of celecoxib, we focused on the tumor microenvironment and examined the levels of chemokines CCL2 and CXCL10 and their receptors, CCR2 and CXCR3, respectively. Treatment with celecoxib notably decreased the mRNA levels of Ccl2 and Cxcl10 and Cxcr3 (Fig. 2c) but not of Ccr2 (data not shown). Immunohistochemically, the expression of CCL2+ cells and CXCL10+ cells in tumor and peri-tumor were higher than in normal brain tissues, and celecoxib decreased the number of these cells (Fig. 2d).

Localization of CCL2+ cells and CXCL10+ cells in a malignant glioma model

Annovazzi et al.19 reported that glioma-associated microglia macrophages (GAMs) assimilated to peripheral macrophages are polarized and have two functional profiles: pro-inflammatory M1-type- and immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory M2-type macrophages. The phenotype of GAMs overlaps only partially with M1 and M2 phenotypes. To identify GAMs, 4 antibodies are currently used: Iba1, CD16, CD68, and CD16320. To analyze which cells co-localized with CCL2+ or CXL10+ cells in the glioma model, we used the stem cell marker Nestin, a microglia marker Iba-1, and the M1- and M2-type monocyte macrophage markers CD16 and CD163, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3a,b, we found that in the tumor and the tumor microenvironment, CCL2 and CXCL10 localized in Nestin+, Iba-1+, CD16+ and CD163+ cells.

Figure 3

Localization of CCL2+ and CXCL10+ cells in the mouse glioma model. (a) Representative immunohistochemical images of CCL2+ cells (green) localized among Nestin+, Iba-1+. CD16+ or CD163+ cells (red). (b) Representative immunohistochemical images of CXCL10+ cells (green) localized with Nestin+, Iba-1+. CD16+ or CD163+ cells (red). (c) Representative image of western blot analysis of CCL2 in GSCs and the culture medium. The experiment was repeated 3 times. The cell image was taken by BZ-X710 microscope. Each culture medium was centrifuged using Microcon Centrifugal Filters for protein concentration.

Since CCL2 is secreted by necrotic and endothelial cells21, we analyzed CCL2 expression during culture for 48–96 h. (Fig. 3C). GSCs proliferated in a time-dependent manner. In the presence of dead cells, CCL2 expression increased in the culture medium as well as in GSCs. The expression of CCL2 in the culture medium increased in the presence of dead cells may suggest the secretion of CCL2 from necrotic GSCs.

Downregulation of CCL2 and CXCR3 via the NF-κB pathway by celecoxib inhibits GSC viability

We addressed the regulation of chemokines (CCL2 and CXCL10) and their receptors CCR2 and CXCR3) in GSCs treated with 60 µM celecoxib for 24 h in GSCs. In GSCs, celecoxib revealed significant decrease in mRNA levels of Ccl2 and Cxcr3 but not of Ccr2 and Cxcl10 (Fig. 4a), which was consistent with the high mRNA levels of Ccl2 in the glioma model and GSCs but none of Cxcl10 in GSCs (Fig. 4b). The protein expression of pNFkB, Ccl2, and Cxcr3 was decreased (Fig. 4c) without affecting CCR2 and CXCL10 (data not shown). Then, using caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), which is a potent NF-κB inhibitor that suppresses the translocation of NF-κB p65 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, we confirmed that the levels of pIκB, pNF-kB, CCL2, and CXCR3 were significantly decreased in GSCs (Fig. 4d). The proteasomal degradation of IkBa is a key step in the regulation of the NF-kB pathway and liberates the NF-kB proteins from IkBa, leading to their nuclear translocation and increasing their interaction with NF-kB DNA-binding properties to result in the activation of gene expression22. These results suggested NF-kB-dependent transcriptional regulation of CCL2 and CXCR3 levels by celecoxib (Fig. 4d).

Figure 4

Effect of celecoxib treatment on Ccl2, Cxcl10, Ccr2, and Cxcr3 expression in mouse GSCs. (a) mRNA levels of Ccl2, Cxcl10, Ccr2, and Cxcr3 determined in mouse GSCs treated with 60 µM celecoxib or vehicle control (VC) for 24 h (n = 6). (b) Comparison of mRNA levels of Ccl2 and Cxcl10 in the mouse glioma model and GSCs (n = 6). (c) Representative images of western blot analysis and the expression levels of phosphorylated NF-κB (pNF-κB), CCL2 and CXCR3 in mouse GSCs treated with VC or celecoxib (n = 4). (d) Representative images of western blot analysis and the expression levels of phosphorylated IκBα (pIκBα), pNF-κB, CCL2, and CXCR3 in mouse GSCs treated with VC, and CAPE (n = 4). Data represent the mean ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. VC by Student’s t test.

Finally, we assessed the functional relevance of CCL2 in GSCs. Ccl2 silencing by small-interfering (si)RNA decreased CCL2 mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 5a,b) 24 h after transfection. Additionally, 48 h after transfection, cyclin D1 levels decreased (Fig. 5c) accompanied by decreased GSC viability (Fig. 5d), suggesting that reduced CCL2 level might be partly associated with GSC growth inhibition.

Figure 5

GSC viability following Ccl2 silencing. (a) Ccl2 mRNA levels in GSCs transfected with 10 nM Ccl2 siRNA (siCcl2) or negative control siRNA (siCon) for 24 h (n = 6). (b) Representative western blot results for CCL2 (n = 4). (c) Representative western blot results for cyclin D1 from GSCs at 48-h post-transfection with siCcl2 or siCon (n = 4). (d) Representative images of GSCs and cell viability evaluated by WST-8 assay at 48-h post-transfection with siCcl2 or siCon (n = 4). Scale bar, 50 µm. (e) Schematic illustration of the antitumor effects of celecoxib in the mouse glioma model. Data represent the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. siCon by Student’s t test.


This is the first study showing that the suppression of the CCL2/CCR2 and CXCL10/CXCR3 axes by celecoxib may attribute to antitumor effects in a mouse malignant glioma model, in addition to intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic induction by celecoxib in GSCs (Fig. 5e). We newly found that in the mouse glioma model, celecoxib decreased mRNA levels of Ccl2, CxcL10 and Cxcr3 but not of Ccr2 and protein expression of CCL2 and CXCL10 in the tumor and peri-tumor. Moreover, we demonstrated that in GSCs, celecoxib treatment decreased protein and mRNA level of Ccl2 and Cxcr3 levels without affecting Ccr2 and CxcL10, which were associated with the inhibition of NF-κB signaling, and that Ccl2 silencing by siRNA inhibited cell proliferation. These results showed that celecoxib-induced the modulation of chemokine and chemokine-receptor levels in GSCs and the tumor microenvironment may be at least partly attributable to its antitumor effects in a mouse malignant glioma model. GBM comprises a heterogeneous cell population that includes tumor and immune cells, with interactions among these different cell types and chemokines/cytokines promoting tumor development and progression20. CCL2 is a major chemokine involved in attracting bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal cells to the tumor microenvironment, and CCL2 loss decreases accumulation of these cells21. In the present study, we identified CCL2 in GSCs, the mouse glioma model, and in the culture medium in the presence of a large number of dead cells. Moreover, CCL2 and CXCL10 was present in the tumor and the tumor microenvironment and co-localized with almost all Nestin+, Iba-1+, CD163+ or CD16+ cells, suggesting the same distribution and localization. However, in GSCs, the high protein and mRNA levels of Ccl2 and Cxcr3 were decreased by celecoxib, whereas the low protein and mRNA level of Ccr2, Cxcl10 were not affected by celecoxib in our in vitro study. On the other hand, in the mouse glioma model, the high protein and mRNA level of Ccl2, Cxcl10 and Cxcr3 were decreased by celecoxib. These findings suggest that CCL2 and CXCL10 and their receptors may be generated from different cell types and have distinct crucial role (Fig. 5e) in tumor growth. The downregulation of these chemokines and receptors by celecoxib might contribute to antitumor effects in both tumor and peri-tumor areas.

Jung et al.23 reported that CCL2/MCP1 is secreted by necrotic glioma cells and endothelial cells in glioblastoma. We found high expression levels of CCL2 in GSCs and GSCs-derived glioma model. To demonstrate the secretion of CCL2 by glioma cells, we extended the culture period as shown in Fig. 3c. In the presence of dead cells, the GSCs proliferated in a time-dependent manner, and we observed the increase in CCL2 expression in the culture medium as well as in GSCs. Takeshima et al.24 reported that the degree of macrophage infiltration found among the glioma cells was grossly correlated with the level of CCL2/MCP1 expression, suggesting that CCL2/MCP1 produced by the glioma cells may mediate macrophage infiltration into glioma tissues. These findings support our results and a potential therapeutic approach to reduce glioma growth through promoting M1-polarized macrophages and inhibiting M2-phenotypic macrophages25,26.

Continuous treatment with CCL2-neutralizing antibodies inhibits tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma27. CCL2 binds the cognate receptor CCR2, and together this signaling pair has been shown to have multiple pro-tumorigenic roles28. Because Ccl2 mRNA levels are not reduced by treatment with a CCL2 antibody, the recovery of CCL2 level after cessation of CCL2 antibody treatment is suggested. In the present study, NF-κB signaling mediated by celecoxib decreased mRNA and protein levels of CCL2, suggesting greater therapeutic potential than therapy involving the CCL2 antibody. However, celecoxib treatment did not alter CCR2 in the glioma model, we could not clarify the role of CCR2.

Although CXCL10 mediates the chemotaxis of tumor-promoting cells29 and exerts dual effects depending on the splicing variant of its receptors7, CXCL10 induces DNA synthesis and might promote proliferation of anaplastic astrocytoma (grade III) and GBM8. Although CXCL10-specific effects against glioma associated with celecoxib treatment might differ depending on the circumstances7, we observed that increased levels of CXCL10+ cells in the tumor and peri-tumor, and that CXCL10 levels decreased following treatment with celecoxib in our glioma model. These findings in the glioma model are similar to a previous study showing that CXCL10 is produced in bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells induced by hypoxia30. Therefore, we were unable to address its regulatory mechanisms in GSCs. In contrast, we observed reduced CXCR3 levels associated with attenuated NFκB signaling in GSCs. Because increased CXCR3 levels are indicative of poor survival rates, and targeted silencing of Cxcr3 inhibits the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells31, these findings support the present results showing that celecoxib-specific inhibition of growth and/or proliferation might partially contribute to suppression of the CXCL10/CXCR3 axis in GSCs.

The tumorigenic potential of increased COX-2 levels is linked to apoptosis resistance in some cell types, and celecoxib-induced apoptosis involves the extrinsic/death receptor- and/or intrinsic/mitochondria-mediated pathways32. In agreement with these findings, we found that celecoxib treatment increased caspase-8, -9, and -3 levels, as well as those of PARP levels in GSCs, indicating that apoptosis occurred via both pathways. Moreover, β-catenin and cyclin D1 levels were decreased, and Ki-67 level were reduced by celecoxib treatment, which agreed with a study of human glioma cell lines treated with celecoxib33. Therefore, the antitumorigenic effects of celecoxib might include not only induced apoptosis but also suppressed cell proliferation (Fig. 5e).

We initiated celecoxib treatment on day 1 following intracranial GSC injection, which is akin to celecoxib administration after surgical resection of human gliomas. Our results suggest the possibility that glioma patients having undergone tumor resection might benefit from celecoxib treatment to reduce the risk of GSC-driven tumor growth.

There are some limitations to this study. First, our GSCs were established from mouse neural stem cells, and this animal model exhibited pathological similarities to human GBM.16 with a more accurate reflection of its features and malignant behavior. However, the glioma in the mouse model might differ from that of human gliomas, which are heterogeneous, unlike the homogeneous GSCs derived from oncogene knock-in mice. Second, we analyzed the effects of celecoxib treatment using only one cell line derived from mice and one animal model. Further studies using GSCs derived from humans are required. Moreover, a number of distinct molecular pathways might play a role in the antitumor effects of celecoxib in a COX-2-dependent and/or -independent manner11. Because previous studies suggested alternative targets implicated in the tumor-inhibitory effects of celecoxib, we cannot rule out other targets associated with its antitumor effects.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that downregulation of the CCL2/CCR2 and CXCL10/CXCR3 axes via inhibition of the NF-κB pathway in the tumor and the tumor microenvironment might have contributed to the antitumor effects of celecoxib observed in the mouse glioma model. These results warrant further investigation to clarify the therapeutic benefits of celecoxib in humans.

Materials and methods

All experiments and protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University (Tokushima, Japan).

Cell line

GSCs were established by Saya et al.16 and comprised H-RasV12 overexpressed in Ink4a/Arf-null neural stem cells and the progenies of GSCs were maintained as a sphere culture in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium F-12 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 20 ng/mL recombinant human epidermal growth factor (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), 20 ng/mL recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor (PeproTech), B-27 supplement without vitamin A (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 200 ng/mL heparin sulfate, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% humidified air.

Cell viability and colony formation assays

GSCs were seeded in 96-well culture plates (1 × 104 cells/well). Celecoxib was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Tokyo, Japan) which was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and diluted to 0.1% with culture medium for use as the vehicle control. The number of viable cells was determined using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) and measured on an Infinite F200 Pro microplate reader (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland) at 450 nm. Cell viability following celecoxib treatment was calculated as the percentage of the vehicle control. For the colony-formation assay, GSCs were seeded in 96-well plates (5 × 103 cells/well) and treated with celecoxib or vehicle for 24 h. The number of colonies with size > 2000 μm2 and the area of colony were analyzed using a BZ-X710 microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) equipped image analysis system.

Animal experiments

Experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The GSC-bearing glioma model, which resemble human malignant glioma, was previously established by Saya et al.16 and used according to their protocol.

Male C57BL/6 J mice (6-weeks old) were obtained from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan). Animals were anesthetized and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus, and a small hole was bored into the skull of each mouse (2.0-mm lateral to bregma) using a dental drill. Viable cells (1 × 103) resuspended in 2 μl of Hank’s balanced salt solution were injected into the right hemisphere 3-mm below the brain surface using a 10-μL Hamilton syringe with an unbeveled 30-gauge needle. The injection was performed over 5 min, and the needle was left in the brain for an additional 5 min before it was gradually withdrawn and the hole sealed. Celecoxib was dissolved in DMSO and diluted four-fold with sterile water immediately before injection. Celecoxib doses were established based on our previous study12. Treatment with 10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg celecoxib or vehicle (control) by intraperitoneal injection was initiated on the first day of GSC injection. To determine tumor size, fixed brain tissue was sliced on a brain-slicer matrix at 1.0-mm intervals. Based on the tumor area, represented by the green fluorescent protein (GFP)+ area in the slice, the tumor volume was calculated using a microscope equipped with an image analysis system (BZ-X710; Keyence).

Western blot analysis

Protein samples were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) that was incubated in blocking solution. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 1), followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Immunoreactivity was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence prime western blot detection reagent and visualized with an Image Quant LAS4000 mini (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ software (v.1.49; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) and normalized to β-actin. To detect extracellular CCL2 in the culture medium, we collected the medium containing proliferated GSCs at 48, 72, and 96 h after cell culture. The medium was fractionated according to molecular weight using Microcon centrifugal filters (Merk, Tokyo, Japan) for protein concentration. An inhibitor of NF-κB (Caffeic acid phenethyl ester; CAPE; R&D System, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was dissolved in DMSO.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was purified using a MagNA Pure compact RNA isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Burgess Hill, UK) according to manufacturer instructions. cDNA was synthesized using Transcriptor Universal cDNA master mix (Roche Diagnostics), and qRT-PCR was performed using FastStart DNA MasterPLUS SYBR Green I (Roche Diagnostics) on a Light Cycler 2.0 instrument (Roche Diagnostics) under conditions recommended by the manufacturer. The forward and reverse primer sequences were as follows: mouse Ccl2, 5′-AGCAAGATGATCCCAATGAGT-3′ and 5′-GAGCTTGGTGACAAAAACTACAG-3′; mouse Cxcl10, 5′-CCCACGTGTTGAGATCATTG-3′ and 5′-CAGTTAAGGAGCCCTTTTAGACC-3′; mouse Ccr2, 5′-CAAAATGGATGCCTTAGCACTG-3′ and 5′-CCAGGTTTTCATGTTTGGCTATTC-3′; mouse Cxcr3, 5′-CCAAGCCATGTACCTTGAGGTTAG-3′ and 5′-GCTCTCGTTTTCCCCATAATCGTAG-3′; mouse glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh), 5′-CAGAACATCATCCCTGCATC-3′ and 5′-CTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTGA-3′. mRNA levels were normalized to that of Gapdh.

Small-interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection

Transfections were conducted using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer instructions. Briefly, siRNA and transfection reagent were diluted in OPTI-MEM medium (Life Technologies), and transfection reagent/siRNA complexes were allowed to form for 20 min. The complexes were added to each well, and GSCs were seeded into 6-well culture plates (2 × 105 cells/well) or 96-well culture plates (4 × 103 cells/well) and incubated for 24 h or 48 h. The target sequence for mouse Ccl2 siRNA (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) was as follows: 5′-ACCCGTAAATCTGAAGCTAAT-3′. Non-targeting siRNA was used as a negative control.

Annexin-V assay

Apoptotic cells were labeled with the Annexin-V-PE assay kit (BioVision, Milpitas, CA, USA) according to manufacturer instructions. Briefly, cells were treated with 0.2% DMSO or 60 μM celecoxib and the pan-caspase inhibitor boc-aspartyl-(OMe)-fluoromethyl-ketone (Boc-D-FMK) (40 μM; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) to confirm caspase-dependent apoptosis.

Immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry

GSCs were collected and smeared using Smear Gel (GenoStaff, Tokyo, Japan) according to manufacturer instructions and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After permeabilization with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS, cells were labeled with antibody of Ki-67 as a cell proliferation marker (Abcam), the antigen was detected with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated donkey antirabbit IgG (Life Technologies), and nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) solution (Dojindo Laboratories).

Tissue samples were fixed with 4% PFA in PBS, and 10-µm-thick frozen sections were mounted on glass slides. For immunoperoxidase staining, sections were blocked and then incubated overnight with primary antibodies. Antibodies were visualized using a VECTASTAIN Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), H2O2/diaminobenzidine (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), and Mayer’s hematoxylin solution according to manufacturer instructions. For double-immunofluorescence staining, sections were immunoreacted with an antibody for nestin-, IBA-1-, CD163 and CD16 positive cells followed by incubation with anti-CCL2 and anti-CXCL10 antibodies. To visualize each marker, sections were incubated with green fluorescence and chemokines with red fluorescence, and sections were incubated with an Alexa 488- or Alexa 594-conjugated secondary antibody (Life Technologies), respectively. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI solution (Dojindo Laboratories). The detailed information for each antibody is provided in Supplementary Table 2. All images were obtained using BZ-X710 microscope (Keyence).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were analyzed with a Student’s t test for two-group comparisons and analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey–Kramer test for multiple comparisons. A survival curve was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and statistical significance was tested with the log-rank test. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.


  1. 1.

    Stupp, R. et al. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 987–996 (2009).

  2. 2.

    Wei, Z., Kale, S., El Fatimy, R., Rabinovsky, R. & Krichevsky, A. M. Co-cultures of glioma stem cells and primary neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and endothelial cells for investigation of intercellular communication in the brain. Front. Neurosci. 13, 361 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Thomas, T. M. & Yu, J. S. Metabolic regulation of glioma stem-like cells in the tumor micro-environment. Cancer Lett. 408, 174–181 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chang, A. L. et al. CCL2 produced by the glioma microenvironment is essential for the recruitment of regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 76, 5671–5682 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Huang, B. et al. CCL2/CCR2 pathway mediates recruitment of myeloid suppressor cells to cancers. Cancer Lett. 252, 86–92 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Honeth, G., Staflin, K., Kalliomaki, S., Lindvall, M. & Kjellman, C. Chemokine-directed migration of tumor-inhibitory neural progenitor cells towards an intracranially growing glioma. Exp. Cell. Res. 312, 1265–1276 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Urra, S. et al. Differential expression profile of CXCR3 splicing variants is associated with thyroid neoplasia. Potential role in papillary thyroid carcinoma oncogenesis? Oncotarget. 9, 2445–2467 (2018).

  8. 8.

    Maru, S. V. et al. Chemokine production and chemokine receptor expression by human glioma cells: role of CXCL10 in tumour cell proliferation. J. Neuroimmunol. 199, 35–45 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Shono, T., Tofilon, P. J., Bruner, J. M., Owolabi, O. & Lang, F. F. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human gliomas: prognostic significance and molecular correlations. Cancer Res. 61, 4375–4381 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xu, K., Wang, L. & Shu, H. K. COX-2 overexpression increases malignant potential of human glioma cells through Id1. Oncotarget. 5, 1241–1252 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Grosch, S., Maier, T. J., Schiffmann, S. & Geisslinger, G. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-independent anticarcinogenic effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 98, 736–747 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sato, A. et al. Blocking COX-2 induces apoptosis and inhibits cell proliferation via the Akt/survivin- and Akt/ID3 pathway in low-grade-glioma. J. Neurooncol. 132, 231–238 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kurtova, A. V. et al. Chan KS Blocking PGE2-induced tumour repopulation abrogates bladder cancer chemoresistance. Nature 517, 209–213 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fujita, M. et al. COX-2 blockade suppresses gliomagenesis by inhibiting myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 71, 2664–2674 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zanotto-Filho, A. et al. Inflammatory landscape of human brain tumors reveals an NFkappaB dependent cytokine pathway associated with mesenchymal glioblastoma. Cancer Lett. 390, 176–187 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sampetrean, O. et al. Invasion precedes tumor mass formation in a malignant brain tumor model of genetically modified neural stem cells. Neoplasia. 13, 784–791 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhang, K. et al. WNT/β-Catenin directs self-renewal symmetric cell division of hTERThigh prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 77, 2534–3254 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jagadeesh, S. & Banerjee, P. P. Telomerase reverse transcriptase regulates the expression of a key cell cycle regulator, cyclin D1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 347, 774–780 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Annovazzi, L. et al. Microglia immunophenotyping in gliomas. Oncol. Lett. 15, 998–1006 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jordan, J. T. et al. Preferential migration of regulatory T cells mediated by glioma-secreted chemokines can be blocked with chemotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 57, 123–131 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bonapace, L. et al. Cessation of CCL2 inhibition accelerates breast cancer metastasis by promoting angiogenesis. Nature 515, 130–133 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ushio, A. & Eto, K. RBM3 expression is upregulated by NF-κB p65 activity, protecting cells from apoptosis, during mild hypothermia. J. Cell. Biochem. 119, 5734–5749 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jung, Y. et al. MCP-1 and MIP-3α secreted from necrotic cell-treated glioblastoma cells promote migration/infiltration of microglia. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 48, 1332–1346 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Takeshima, H., Kuratsu, J., Takeya, M., Yoshimura, T. & Ushio, Y. Expression and localization of messenger RNA and protein for monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human malignant glioma. J. Neurosurg. 80, 1056–1062 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Xue, N. et al. Chlorogenic acid inhibits glioblastoma growth through repolarizating macrophage from M2 to M1 phenotype. Sci Rep. 7, 39011. (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Szulzewsky, F. et al. Glioma-associated microglia/macrophages display an expression profile different from M1 and M2 polarization and highly express Gpnmb and Spp1. PLoS ONE 10, e0116644 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Teng, K. Y. et al. Blocking the CCL2-CCR2 axis using CCL2-neutralizing antibody is an effective therapy for hepatocellular cancer in a mouse model. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 312–322 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lim, S. Y., Yuzhalin, A. E., Gordon-Weeks, A. N. & Muschel, R. J. Targeting the CCL2-CCR2 signaling axis in cancer metastasis. Oncotarget. 7, 28697–28710 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Liu, M., Guo, S. & Stiles JK. The emerging role of CXCL10 in cancer (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2, 583–589 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Xia, J. B. et al. Hypoxia/ischemia promotes CXCL10 expression in cardiac microvascular endothelial cells by NFkB activation. Cytokine 81, 63–70 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ren, Y., Kan, Y. Z. & Kong, L. F. Study on the effects of target-silencing CXCR3 expression on malignant proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 26, 508–512 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kern, M. A. et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition induces apoptosis signaling via death receptors and mitochondria in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 66, 7059–7066 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sareddy, G. R., Kesanakurti, D., Kirti, P. B. & Babu, P. P. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs diclofenac and celecoxib attenuates Wnt/beta-catenin/Tcf signaling pathway in human glioblastoma cells. Neurochem. Res. 38, 2313–2322 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Emiko Nishikawa for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research [Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Grant number JP25462264] and a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (JSPS KAKENHI Grant number JP26861153).

Author information




K.S. and I.Y. performed the in vivo and in vitro experiments, and H.K. revised immunohistochemistry; A.S., T.F., K.N. and K.M. performed the in vitro experiments; H.S. provided transgenic cell; Y.M. and K.T.K. contributed at the revision stage of the paper; Y.T. designed and organized the work; all of the authors contributed to the final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshifumi Mizobuchi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shono, K., Yamaguchi, I., Mizobuchi, Y. et al. Downregulation of the CCL2/CCR2 and CXCL10/CXCR3 axes contributes to antitumor effects in a mouse model of malignant glioma. Sci Rep 10, 15286 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing