Table 3 Comparison of computation times of AQGA and CGA approaches (unit: seconds).

From: Improved adaptive impedance matching for RF front-end systems of wireless transceivers

Frequency band Algorithm Shortest Longest Average Compared to CGA the proposed AQGA is faster on average by (%)
1.4 GHz (military & satellite services) CGA 5.3528 49.3091 26.1073 75
1.4 GHz (military & satellite services) Proposed AQGA 3.2850 10.8324 6.5049
2.3 GHz (LTE networks) CGA 2.9841 52.1520 27.6302 49.2
2.3 GHz (LTE networks) Proposed AQGA 1.7536 28.9173 14.0371
3.4 GHz (radar systems) CGA 6.8453 65.7329 35.2961 64.9
3.4 GHz (radar systems) Proposed AQGA 4.2740 21.6510 12.3874
4.0 GHz (satellite earth stations) CGA 4.9560 42.0845 22.0351 54.7
4.0 GHz (satellite earth stations) Proposed AQGA 2.0352 17.3842 9.9835
5.0 GHz (Wi-Fi band) CGA 3.1271 31.0653 17.9350 52.5
5.0 GHz (Wi-Fi band) Proposed AQGA 1.0735 15.0252 8.5193