Abstract
The management of intra-ocular pressure (IOP) is important for glaucoma treatment. IOP is recognized for showing seasonal fluctuation. Glaucoma patients can be at high risk of dry eye disease (DED). We thus evaluated seasonal variation of IOP with and without DED in glaucoma patients. This study enrolled 4,708 patients, with mean age of 55.2 years, who visited our clinics in Japan from Mar 2015 to Feb 2017. We compared the seasonal variation in IOP (mean ± SD) across spring (March–May), summer (June–August), fall (September–November), and winter (December–February). IOP was highest in winter and lowest in summer, at 14.2/13.7 for non-glaucoma without DED group (n = 2,853, P = 0.001), 14.5/13.6 for non-glaucoma with DED group (n = 1,500, P = 0.000), 14.0/13.0 for glaucoma without DED group (n = 240, P = 0.051), and 15.4/12.4 for glaucoma with DED group (n = 115, P = 0.015). Seasonal variation was largest across the seasons in the glaucoma with DED group. IOP was also inversely correlated with corneal staining score (P = 0.000). In conclusion, the seasonal variation was significant in most of study groups and IOP could tend to be low in summer.
Introduction
Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness worldwide1. Elevated intra-ocular pressure (IOP) is the only adaptable risk factor for glaucoma and the progression of visual field loss is strongly related to IOP. The management of glaucoma aims to reduce IOP2,3, which could be influenced by various factors including blood pressure, body posture, and diurnal and seasonal variations4,5,6. Mean IOPs are reportedly higher in winter and lower in summer in both normal7,8,9 and glaucoma10,11 subjects, and the magnitude of these fluctuations are larger in patients with glaucoma than in normal subjects. Clinically, it is important to control IOP since a large diurnal fluctuation in IOP is a known risk factor for the progression of glaucoma12. Seasonal and diurnal fluctuations could thus mislead a clinical decision regarding medication and surgery. Although this seasonal pattern was described two decades ago, the phenomenon is not completely characterised8.
Due to the chronic nature of glaucoma, many affected patients experience long-term exposure to commercial pharmaceutical components and preservatives that are known to cause corneal and conjunctival toxicity13,14,15. Previous studies have shown that up to 40% of glaucoma patients use more than one topical medication16, and benzalkonium chloride (BAK), the most common preservative in anti-glaucoma solutions, has been strongly implicated in inducing and/or exacerbating ocular toxicity such as corneal epithelial cell dysfunction and inflammatory and toxic side effects on the conjunctiva. Consequently, glaucoma-affected patients can be at high risk of also developing the commonly seen dry eye disease (DED)17,18,19.
DED also exhibits seasonal fluctuations in vulnerability against environmental conditions. DED signs and symptoms tend to vary throughout the year, and particularly with seasonal changes across summer to winter8. These findings corroborate the influential factors including climate, sunlight, temperature, humidity and light. The pathophysiology of DED is complicated since it is multifactorial, and there is dissociation between signs and symptoms in DED20. For instance, immunological, neurological, and psychological comorbidities could enhance the effect of seasonality on DED8.
We thus sought to understand the contribution of DED to seasonal variations in IOP, and herein we evaluated seasonal variation of IOP with and without DED in glaucoma patients.
Results
Table 1 details the 4,708 consecutive patients enrolled in this study, with 1,692 males and a mean age of 55.2 years. The patient ophthalmological results are also listed in Table 1. Prostaglandin analogues (PG) are a first-line medication that was prescribed for 80.5% of non-DED cases and 73.3% for DED cases in this study. The averaged numbers of glaucoma medications being administered in this study cohort were 1.4 ± 0.6 for those with DED and 1.4 ± 0.6 for non-DED group. There was no difference in the severity of glaucoma between non-DED and DED groups. IOP was highest in winter and lowest in summer in all groups (Fig. 1). The IOP (mmHg, mean ± SD) levels in winter/summer and the resulting seasonal variation (winter-summer) were 14.2 ± 3.1/13.7 ± 3.0 and 0.5 for the non-glaucoma non-DED group (P = 0.001) compared to 14.5 ± 3.2/13.6 ± 3.1 and 0.9 for the non-glaucoma with DED group (P = 0.000), and 14.0 ± 3.3/13.0 ± 3.1 and 1.0 for the glaucoma non-DED group (P = 0.051) compared to 15.4 ± 6.2/12.4 ± 2.7 and 3.0 for the glaucoma with DED group (P = 0.015).
Seasonal change in mean IOP for patients with and without DED. The non-glaucoma group showed small seasonal amplitudes in both the DED (open symbol) and non-DED (closed symbol) groups (left panel). Glaucoma patients showed apparently large seasonal amplitudes in both groups, but especially in the DED group (right panel). The amplitude of seasonal variation was significantly larger in glaucoma patients with DED than in those without DE (P = 0.002, two-factor mixed design with repeated measures on one factor) and the non-glaucoma group with DED (P = 0.020). IOP; intra-ocular pressure, DED; dry eye disease.
We conducted a two-way ANOVA for seasonal variation of IOP and found no significant difference between the non-glaucoma and non-DED group and the other three groups, and between the glaucoma and non-DED group and the other three groups (Table 2). The results of a one-way ANOVA indicated a significant seasonal variation in three groups. Regarding seasonal change of corneal staining score, the non-glaucoma group showed small seasonal amplitude changes with and without DED in both glaucoma groups, with the highest and lowest scores in fall and summer, respectively (Fig. 2). The glaucoma group showed apparently large seasonal amplitudes in both DED groups, with the peak of dry eye in summer and no dry eye in fall. Seasonal changes in BUT exhibited no obvious seasonal amplitude in any of the four groups (Fig. 3).
Seasonal change in SPK (superficial punctate keratitis) score for patients with and without DED. The non-glaucoma group showed small seasonal amplitudes in both the DED (open symbol) and non-DED (closed symbol) groups, with peaks in the fall and the lowest levels in summer (left panel). Glaucoma patients showed apparently large seasonal amplitudes in both groups, with the peak in summer for those with DED and in fall for those without DED (right panel). DED; dry eye disease.
Seasonal change in BUT for patients with and without DED. There was no obvious seasonal amplitude observed in the non-glaucoma (left panel) or glaucoma group (right panel), with DED (open symbol) and without DED (closed symbol). BUT; tear break up time, DED; dry eye disease.
The regression analysis of 2,311 patients examined in both summer and winter identified seasonality (P < 0.0001) as the factor most strongly correlated with IOP, compared with presence of DED and glaucoma, corneal staining score, frequency of glaucoma eye drop instillation, and number of medications (Table 3). It is notable that severe SPK (high corneal staining score) tended to occur with low IOP (P = 0.050). Multiple regression analysis revealed that age and seasonality most affected IOP in summer and winter (Table 4).
Discussion
Our results are compatible with previous studies of a seasonal fluctuation in IOP21,22 wherein IOP was higher during the winter than the summer by 0.5 mmHg for non-glaucoma patients without DED and by 1.0 mmHg for glaucoma patients without DED. Glaucoma medications might not contribute to this fluctuation since they tend to instead reduce the magnitude of diurnal fluctuations23,24. The advantage of the present study lies in the data being obtained from individual cases in a sufficiently large population covering all age groups without overlapping for 2 years. The status of DED varies across seasons if repeatedly examined so that this study design seems to work well to adequately classify the participants into groups with and without DED. We accordingly examined each patient once to immediately correlate IOP with DED, and future studies should be carried out in a standard method with repeated examinations on the same patients to adequately analyze seasonal variation.
We speculate a potential mechanism of seasonal fluctuations in IOP driven by three factors. The first is an autonomous nervous system (ANS) as conventionally hypothesized25,26 accounting for high IOP in winter. The second is SPK induced by BAK27, and the third is corneal thinning. The ANS regulates many systemic functions including body temperature, heart rate, and ocular function in the form of pupil diameter, accommodation, and IOP28.
Primary open-angle glaucoma is characterized by a large diurnal IOP change compared to controls and is typically induced by ANS dysregulation25,26. Koga and Tanihara suggested that ANS and/or cathecholamic tone could influence the IOP via vascular tone in blood pressure29. Furthermore, the high prevalence of comorbidity with abnormal ANS in DED patients might amplify the seasonal fluctuation in IOP30.
The severity of SPK was marginally correlated with IOP being lowest in summer, suggesting that increased drug permeability might enhance the pressure reduction effect. Tight junctions in the superficial cells of corneal epithelium are damaged by BAK contained in glaucoma medications31, which causes the junctions to degrade. As a consequence, the normal barrier function of the cornea suffers32. After exposure to BAK, the conjunctival epithelium can also directly undergo apoptosis. The corneal permeability generally corresponds to the concentration of BAK33 and also depends on the property of other ingredients34. However, the direct correlation between corneal permeability and actual pressure reduction effect has not been determined and some experimental results are contradictory with respect to SPK facilitating the intra-ocular penetration of anti-glaucoma solutions35. Thirdly, apparently low IOP in summer might be caused by corneal thinning36. The central corneal thickness decreases in DED37 and contributes to low IOP in summer, since measured IOP might be lower than the actual value. Ophthalmologists should be also aware that perimetric results could thus be overestimated in summer38 because the sensitivities in summer were 0.2 dB below those of winter/spring.
The limitations of our study include the regional and systemic background of participants, because both DED and IOP are closely associated with climate, temperature, humidity, ambient light, and various systemic parameters that should have been fully evaluated and adjusted for analysis. IOP shows normal diurnal variation and should therefore also be measured at a fixed schedule. We used a cross-sectional design, whereby each eye was tested only once, limiting the statistical power. A more powerful study design would involve measuring IOP in the same cohorts of glaucoma and non-glaucoma patients multiple times across the four seasons, so that the actual seasonal variation can be quantified and compared between groups. Our present study partially addressed such a limitation by including a large sample size. Diagnosis of glaucoma mostly depended on the clinical decision of each participating ophthalmologist rather than following strict diagnostic criteria, although classification of DED was clearly based on appropriate criteria and we were able to achieve reasonable results. Lastly, participants with ocular hypertension without medication would have better served as controls.
In conclusion, the seasonal variation was significant in most of study groups and IOP could tend to be low in summer. Possible explanations include ANS dysfunction, corneal thinning, and corneal change caused by DED and anti-glaucoma medication. We recommend noting to patients that IOP might be lowest in summer and highest in winter especially in patients with DED. We examined each patient once to correlate IOP with a timely onset of DED; however, standard practice also demands repeated examinations using the same patients to properly analyze seasonal variation.
Methods
Study participants and Institutional Review Board approval
We conducted a cross-sectional, case-control study in Komoro Kosei General Hospital (Nagano, Japan), Shinseikai Toyama Hospital (Toyama, Japan), Tsukuba Central Hospital (Ibaraki, Japan), Jiyugaoka Ekimae Eye Clinic (Tokyo, Japan), Todoroki Eye Clinic (Tokyo, Japan), and Takahashi-Hisashi Eye Clinic (Akita, Japan). We consecutively recruited participants visiting these eye clinics from March 2015 to February 2017. Exclusion criteria were visual impairment (< 20/25 in either eye), any ocular surgery within the last three months, or age under 20 years.
The latitude in the Tokyo area on mainland Japan is 35.68° North and day length varies by 4–6 h over the year according to averages for 1981–2010 reported by the Japan Meteorological Agency. Japan is characterized by four distinct seasons with marked variations in temperature, humidity, and daylight time. Generally, Japan is hot and humid in summer and cold and dry in winter. The Japan Meteorological Agency reported average temperatures and humidity from 5.2 °C and 52% in winter to 25.0 °C and 77% in summer in the Tokyo area in the years 1981–2010.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of Keio University School of Medicine, Komoro Kosei General Hospital, Tsukuba Central Hospital, and Jiyugaoka Ekimae Eye Clinic and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Ophthalmological examinations
All cases were diagnosed as bilateral open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma under slit lamp biomicroscopy. Glaucoma were diagnosed through routine examinations and a visual field test (Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer 30-2 standard program; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), measuring the thickness of ganglion cell complexes using optical coherent tomography (OCT; RC3000R) (Nidek, Gamagori, Japan and Cirrus® HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany)). Diagnostic criteria for glaucoma comprised glaucomatous visual field loss in the Glaucoma Hemifield Test, an ophthalmoscopic neurofiber layer defect, a cup/disc ratio > 0.6, or elevated IOP (> 21 mmHg) requiring topical medication for more than six months. Patients were excluded if they had retinal pathology, retinal surgery, photocoagulation affecting the visual field or coexisting cataract with significant lens opacity disturbing the optical axis that accounted for subjective visual disturbance or decreased visual function. Topical glaucoma medication included Xalatan® (Pfizer, Tokyo, Japan), Tapros® (Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan), Travatanz® (Alcon Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan), Lumigan® (Senjyu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan). Xalacom® (Pfizer), Tapcom® (Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd), Duotrav® (Alcon Laboratories), Aifagan (Senjyu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.), Detantol® (Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.), Nipradinol® (Kowa), Mikelan® LA (Otsuka), and 0.5% Timoptol® XE (MSD).
DED was diagnosed according to the criteria of the Asia Dry Eye Society39: presence of DED-related symptom(s) and a tear break-up time (BUT) shorter or equal to 5 s. We also conducted the Schirmer test40, and measured maximum blinking interval (≤ 9 s) and superficial punctate keratoepitheliopathy (staining score ≥ 3).
Ophthalmological examinations
BUT was measured using a wetted fluorescein filter paper (Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) applied at the lower lid margin. To ensure adequate mixing of the fluorescein dye with the tear film, subjects were instructed to blink three times. The interval between the third blink and appearance of the first dark spot in the cornea was measured three consecutive times using a stopwatch. For this study, we considered the means of the three measurements as the BUT. We scored the ocular surface in three sections (nasal conjunctiva, cornea, and temporal conjunctiva) on a scale of 0–3 for severity. Overall epithelial damage was graded on a scale of 0–941.
Statistical analysis
Participants were assigned to one of four groups based on the presence of glaucoma and/or DED. The season on the date of each patient’s visit was classified as follows: spring from March to May, summer from June to August, fall from September to November, and winter from December to February. The effect of season on IOP was assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the interaction was assessed using a two-way ANOVA. Regression analysis was performed to explore which parameters most affect seasonal difference in IOP. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as percentages where appropriate. All analyses were performed using StatFlexR (Atech, Osaka, Japan), with P < 0.05 considered significant.
References
Rosnikoff, S., Pascolini, D., Mariotti, S. P. & Pokharel, G. P. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull. World Health Organ. 82, 844–851 (2004).
Leske, M. C. et al. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago, Ill:1960) 12, 48–56 (2003).
Kass, M. A. et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago, Ill: 1960) 120, 701–713 (2002).
Buguet, A., Py, P. & Romanet, J. P. 24-Hour (nyctohemeral) and sleep-related variations of intraocular pressure in healthy white individuals. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 117, 342–347 (1994).
Liu, J. H. et al. Nocturnal elevation of intraocular pressure in young adults. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39, 2707–2712 (1998).
Lee, T. E., Yoo, C. & Kim, Y. Y. Effects of different sleeping postures on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure in healthy young subjects. Ophthalmology 120, 1565–1570 (2013).
Kitazawa, Y. & Horie, T. Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 79, 557–566 (1975).
Blumenthal, M., Blumenthal, R., Peritz, E. & Best, M. Seasonal variation in intraocular pressure. JAMA Ophthalmol. 69, 608–610 (1970).
Brody, S., Erb, C., Veit, R. & Rau, H. Intraocular pressure changes: the influence of psychological stress and the Valsalva maneuver. Biol. Psychol. 51, 43–57 (1999).
Ohta, H., Uji, Y., Hattori, Y., Sugimoto, M. & Higuchi, K. Seasonal variation of intraocular pressure after trabeculotomy. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 96, 1148–1153 (1992) (in Japanese).
Henmi, T., Yamabayashi, S., Furuta, H., Hosoda, M. & Fujimori, K. Seasonal variation in intraocular pressure. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 98, 782–786 (1994) (in Japanese).
Asrani, S. et al. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J. Glaucoma 9, 134–142 (2000).
Guenoun, J. M. et al. In vitro study of inflammatory potential and toxicity profile of latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost in conjunctiva-derived epithelial cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46, 2444–2450 (2005).
Cha, S. H. et al. Corneal epithelial cellular dysfunction from benzalkonium chloride (BAC) in vitro. Clin Exp. Ophthalmol. 32, 180–184 (2004).
Pisella, P. J. et al. Conjunctival proinflammatory and proapoptotic effects of latanoprost and preserved and unpreserved timolol: an ex vivo and in vitro study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 1360–1368 (2004).
Kass, M. A. et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 120, 701–713 (2002).
Hikichi, T. et al. Prevalence of dry eye in Japanese eye centers. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 233, 555–558 (1995).
Baudouin, C. et al. Preservatives in eyedrops: the good, the bad and the ugly. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 29, 312–334 (2010).
Li, C. et al. Research on the stability of a rabbit dry eye model induced by topical application of the preservative benzalkonium chloride. PLoS ONE 7, 1–9 (2012).
Sullivan, B. D. et al. Correlations between commonly used objective signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of dry eye disease: clinical implications. Acta Ophthalmol. 92, 161–166 (2014).
Qureshi, I. A. et al. Seasonal and diurnal variations of ocular pressure in ocular hypertensive subjects in Pakistan. Singap. Med. J. 40, 345–348 (1999).
Cheng, J. et al. Seasonal changes of 24-hour intraocular pressure rhythm in healthy Shanghai population. Medicine 95, e4453 (2016).
Larsson, L. I. et al. The effect of latanoprost on circadian intraocular pressure. Surv. Ophthalmol. 47, S90-96 (2002).
Orzalesi, N. et al. Effect of timolol, latanoprost, and dorzolamide on circadian IOP in glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41, 2566–2573 (2000).
Clark, C. V. & Mapstone, R. Autonomic neuropathy in ocular hypertension. Lancet 2, 185–187 (1985).
Mapstone, R. & Clark, C. V. The prevalence of autonomic neuropathy in glaucoma. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK 104, 265–269 (1985).
Rasmussen, C. A., Kaufman, P. L. & Kiland, J. A. Benzalkonium chloride and glaucoma. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 30, 163–169 (2014).
Bergmanson, J. P. Neural control of Intraocular pressure. Am. J. Optom. 59, 94–98 (1982).
Koga, T. & Tanihara, H. Seasonal variant of intraocular pressure in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Jpn. J. Clin. Ophthalmol. 55, 1519–1522 (2001) (in Japanese).
Lambiase, A. et al. Alterations of tear neuromediators in dry eye disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 129, 981–986 (2011).
Uematsu, M. et al. Acute corneal epithelial change after instillation of BAC evaluated using a newly developed in vivo cornea. Ophthalmic Res. 39, 308–314 (2007).
Wilson, G., Ren, H. & Laurent, J. Corneal epithelial fluorescein staining. J. Am. Optom. 66, 435–441 (1995).
Fukuda, M. et al. Cytotoxic effect of generic versions of latanoprost ophthalmic solution on corneal epithelial cells and ocular pharmacokinetics of ophthalmic solutions in rabbits. Igaku Yakugaku 68, 283–290 (2012) (in Japanese).
Baudouin, C. et al. Flow cytometry in impression cytology specimens: a new method for evaluation of conjunctival inflammation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38, 1458–1464 (1997).
Burstein, N. L. Preservative alteration of corneal permeability in humans and rabbits. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 25, 1453–1457 (1984).
Brandt, J. D. et al. Ocular hypertension treatment study (OHTS) group. Central corneal thickness and measured IOP response to topical ocular hypotensive medication in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 138, 717–722 (2004).
Ali, N. M., Hamied, F. M. & Farhood, Q. K. Corneal thickness in dry eyes in an Iraqi population. Clin. Ophthalmol. 11, 435–440 (2017).
Montolio, F. G., Wesselink, C., Gordijn, M. & Jansonius, N. M. Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day and season. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 7010–7017 (2012).
Tsubota, K. et al. Asia dry eye society. New perspectives on dry eye definition and diagnosis: a consensus report by the Asia dry eye society. Ocul. Surf. 15, 65–76 (2017).
Schirmer, O. Studien zur physiologie und pathologie der tranenabsonderung und tranenabfuhr. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 56, 197–291 (1903).
Uchino, M. et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease and its risk factors in visual display terminal users: the Osaka study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 156, 759–766 (2013).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Inter-Biotech (https://www.inter-biotech.com) with the English language editing of this manuscript.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
M.K. collected and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. M.K. and M.A. designed the study. M.K., M.A., K.Y., K.N., M.K., M.U. and K.T. reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kuze, M., Ayaki, M., Yuki, K. et al. Seasonal variation of intra-ocular pressure in glaucoma with and without dry eye. Sci Rep 10, 13949 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70606-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70606-w
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
