New AMS 14C dates track the arrival and spread of broomcorn millet cultivation and agricultural change in prehistoric Europe

Abstract

Broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) is not one of the founder crops domesticated in Southwest Asia in the early Holocene, but was domesticated in northeast China by 6000 bc. In Europe, millet was reported in Early Neolithic contexts formed by 6000 bc, but recent radiocarbon dating of a dozen 'early' grains cast doubt on these claims. Archaeobotanical evidence reveals that millet was common in Europe from the 2nd millennium bc, when major societal and economic transformations took place in the Bronze Age. We conducted an extensive programme of AMS-dating of charred broomcorn millet grains from 75 prehistoric sites in Europe. Our Bayesian model reveals that millet cultivation began in Europe at the earliest during the sixteenth century bc, and spread rapidly during the fifteenth/fourteenth centuries bc. Broomcorn millet succeeds in exceptionally wide range of growing conditions and completes its lifecycle in less than three summer months. Offering an additional harvest and thus surplus food/fodder, it likely was a transformative innovation in European prehistoric agriculture previously based mainly on (winter) cropping of wheat and barley. We provide a new, high-resolution chronological framework for this key agricultural development that likely contributed to far-reaching changes in lifestyle in late 2nd millennium bc Europe.

Introduction

Broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L., Poaceae family) is a resilient, fast-growing, water-efficient, drought-tolerant plant that copes well on poor soils, is successful in both low and high altitudes and across a wide latitudinal range, produces many nutrient-rich grains and abundant biomass, and serves as food, fodder, raw material and perhaps as symbol in rituals1,2 [131, 153],3,4,5,6,7. The agrarian methods used in growing and processing of wheat and barley are applicable to this crop8,9,10, save for, perhaps, more intensive weeding required by millet, especially early in the growing cycle cf.11. In particular, the short growing season of up to three months, which can be completed during the summer, makes broomcorn millet highly attractive to different agrarian systems. In cultivation regimes focused on winter crops, it offers an additional harvest, increasing annual grain production and preventing famine in years when winter crops fail. It is also aptly suited to economic systems where cultivation is practiced only during a short time-window, such as may have been the case with pastoral groups of Bronze Age Central Asia12, or where the availability of cropping areas was seasonally restricted (e.g. in floodplains13). It offers lush and abundant forage for animals, indispensable in the dry season. In cuisine, it adds to taste and texture, and diversifies the food options7. These qualities appeal to modern-day millet farmers in Europe9; they were at least part of the reason why broomcorn millet became a staple crop in Asia and Europe. In some regions nowadays, broomcorn millet is a cornerstone of food economy and a guarantee of food security14.

Early millet in Europe: the question of ‘when?'

Broomcorn millet grains are common at later prehistoric sites in Europe15,16,17,18. These finds testify to the far-reaching dispersal of the crop that was first domesticated in modern-day China. Its spread and adoption across central and western Asia and Europe is one of the most clear-cut examples of 'food globalisation' or ‘trans-Eurasian exchange’ of technologies and inventions between the distant parts of the "Eurasian dyad"19,20,21,22,23,24. The earliest recorded finds of broomcorn millet in China in the form of charred grains derived from Early Neolithic sites in the north/north-east of the country and have been dated to the early-mid 6th millennium bc4,25,26. In Europe, archaeobotanical finds of broomcorn millet were previously reported for Neolithic sites whose occupation started as early as the late 7th millennium bc (e.g. in the southern and eastern Balkans), as well as a number of later pre-2nd millennium bc sites17. However, radiocarbon dating of ten charred grains from Neolithic (6–5th millennium bc) layers demonstrated their (much) later date, not earlier than the very end of the seventeenth century bc27. This discovery cast doubt on any reported 'Neolithic' broomcorn millet in Europe, and hinted that the east-to-west transfer of this crop might have taken place later than thought. The earliest so far directly dated broomcorn millet grains in Central Asia date to the mid–late 3rd millennium cal bc (Begash, Kazakhstan: 2470–2190 cal bc at 94.7% confidence (Beta-266458, 3840 ± 40 BP28,29); Adji Kui 1, Turkmenistan: 2210–1960 cal bc at 94.0% confidence (3708 ± 45 BP, no laboratory code30); southeast from this region, in the Kashmir Valley, millet from the site of Pethpuran Teng, Kashmir, is equally early (2580–2450 cal bc at 92.3% confidence [D-AMS 033182, 3981 ± 34 BP]31). Nevertheless, persistent reports of European finds of pre-2nd millennium bc broomcorn millet grains have kept open the question of when broomcorn millet arrived in Europe.

The precise chronology and character of the spread of broomcorn millet is the key to understanding the processes by which it entered Europe and the mechanisms for its uptake and final incorporation within food production, diet, cuisine, and the wider socio-economy. We therefore conducted a large radiocarbon-dating programme, targeting 'early' millet finds in eastern, central and northern Europe, and obtaining over 100 AMS-dates on charred grains from c. 70 sites (Figs. 1, 2). This paper presents the results and, in combination with the published data, uses them to address the questions of When and Where broomcorn millet arrived in several large regions of Europe, which we refer to as North Pontic, Carpathian Basin, Po Basin, central Europe and North-central Europe. We do this by (a) modelling the spread of the crop within the selected parts of Europe using a Bayesian approach, and (b) weaving together radiocarbon dating evidence and relevant archaeobotanical and stable isotope data.

Figure 1
figure1

The location of sites in Europe with published and new broomcorn millet dates: (1) Rykan; (2) Guamsky Grot; (3) Zanovskoe; (4) Dikiy Sad; (5) Olbia; (6) Vinogradnyi Sad; (7) Maidanetske; (8) Zalissya; (9) Ivane-Puste; (10) Măgura-Buduiasca; (11) Teleac; (12) Miercurea-Sibiului; (13) Debrecen; (14) Cornești; (15) Kalakača; (16) Gomolava; (17) Pécel; (18) Bosut; (19) Fajsz; (20) Százhalombatta; (21) Vráble; (22) Crišnjevi; (23) Oštrovi; (24) Gasteil; (25) Lasinja; (26) Orehova Vas; (27) Neudorf; (28) Retznei; (29) Dragomelj; (30) Tribuna; (31) Custoza; (32) Santa Giulia; (33) Lavagnone; (34) Binningen; (35) Hagnau; (36) Ansfelden; (37) Meidling; (38) Stillfried; (39) Ipf; (40) Knittlingen; (41) Pisek-Sever; (42) Maszkowice; (43) Königshofen; (44) Goddelau; (45) Lipnik; (46) Velim; (47) Fechenheim; (48) Witów; (49) Roztoky; (50) Bruchenbrücken; (51) Miechów; (52) Zahájí; (53) Valečov; (54) Soví převis; (55) Jülich-Güsten; (56) Schafstädt; (57) Niederröblingen; (58) Bösenburg; (59) Quenstedt; (60) Großbahren; (61) Radis; (62) Lutomiersk; (63) Borken; (64) Warendorf; (65) Watenstedt; (66) Szczepidło; (67) Hundisburg; (68) Olbetal; (69) Altenrheine; (70) Potsdam; (71) Möthlow; (72) Lüdelsen; (73) Rathsdorf; (74) Walsleben; (75) Smuszewo; (76) Rullstorf; (77) Hittfeld; (78) Pasewalk; (79) Badegow; (80) Schwerin; (81) Flögeln; (82) Vogelsang; (83) Butzow; (84) Wismar; (85) Wahlstedt; (86) Zweedorf; (87) Depenau; (88) Flintbek; (89) Borgstedt; (90) Brekendorf; (91) Risinge; (92) Starčevo; (93) Okolište; (94) Donje Moštre; (95) Hisar; (96) Yabalkovo; (97) Assiros.[Map generated using the software: QGIS 3.10.5—A Coruña (https://qgis.org); copyright by OpenStreetMap contributors, terrestris GmbH & Co KG (https://www.terrestris.de), and Natural Earth Data (https://www.naturalearthdata.com)].

Figure 2
figure2

Examples of the dated loose and fused broomcorn millet grains from sites in Europe: (1) Altenrheine; (2) Vráble; (3) Pécel; (4) Teleac; (5) Ipf; (6) Binningen; (7) Königshofen; (8) Oštrovi; (9) Maszkowice; (10) Lavagnone; (11) Santa Giulia; (12) Soví převis; (13) Meidling-im-Thale; (14) Stillfried; (15) Wismar; (16) Custoza; (17) Hagnau; (18) Kalakača.

Results

New AMS measurements

Given the size of charred broomcorn millet grains (e.g. 1.7–2.0 mm in length, 1.4–1.7 mm in breadth2 [131]; 0.78–1.53 mg per grain32 [Table 31]), the dry mass prior to chemical pretreatment was sometimes very low (0.4–0.9 mg for 19 specimens, Supplementary Dataset). Extraction yields varied, due to differences in grain preservation conditions. We disregarded results from samples yielding < 100 μg (0.1 mg) of carbon, as their 14C ages are too imprecise to be informative. For most samples, the AMS δ13C value (which is used to correct the measured 14C concentration for fractionation) is lower than the expected δ13C value for charred broomcorn millet (c. − 11.1 ± 0.5‰33 [319]). The low AMS δ13C values may be partly due to fractionation during sample preparation (oxidation and graphitisation), but is more likely due to fractionation in the AMS (most probably at the ion source), which is pronounced with small graphite targets (Goslar, T. personal communication via email, 4 May 2020). Indeed, an exponential regression of AMS δ13C against graphite weight predicts an average δ13C value of c. − 10‰ for normal-size targets (1 mg), which falls in the range expected for C4 plants, with increasing fractionation (more negative δ13C values) as the dating targets get smaller (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Radiocarbon dates on broomcorn millet grains in Europe: the dataset

Table 1 summarizes the available AMS-dates on broomcorn millet in the study region and in South-east Europe. They include 52 legacy dates (31%; including 17 previously unpublished dates) and 116 dates (69%) from this study (see Supplementary Dataset). One is on abundant uncharred broomcorn millet remains preserved in a bog at the site of Zahájí (Czech Republic)34; all others are on charred grain. The previously obtained dates were examined for δ13C values, sample weight and the material submitted for dating, as recorded in the laboratory database or published report. We established that seven published dates from seven sites and three unpublished dates from two sites were not from, or not only from, broomcorn millet grains (Supplementary Dataset). The combined remains of broomcorn millet and free-threshing wheat dated at Begash in Central Asia were clearly from the same context28 [1004]. Although there are similar examples in Europe, we disregarded such cases and focused on dates exclusively from broomcorn millet grains.

Table 1 The number of published, unpublished and newly produced AMS-dates reported as obtained on broomcorn millet from Europe.

Modelling the chronology of spread of broomcorn millet in Europe

Our preferred Bayesian chronological model (Supplementary Fig. 2; Supplementary Model Code; Supplementary Text 1) uses 136 dates from 80 sites, out of the 153 apparently accurate dates available on broomcorn millet from 90 sites. Nineteen dates clearly falling after 1 cal bc (six published dates from four sites and 13 fresh dates from eight sites) were omitted. Multiple iterations of the preferred model revealed two early ‘misfits’, from Lavagnone in northern Italy and Ipf in southern Germany (Supplementary Dataset). Both results were too early for their positions in the overall model (individual index of agreement  6035) and inconsistent with other millet 14C dates from the same sites and the region. These results were excluded from the preferred model.

We subdivided the study region (Fig. 3) into sub-regions, based on the comparison of model outputs from various permutations of the dataset (Supplementary Text 2; Supplementary Fig. 4). The calibrated 14C results provide termini ante quos for the earliest occurrence of millet in a subregion, whose date can be estimated from the scatter of sample dates. Given the uneven spatial coverage in the data, which is an inevitable consequence of research history, we cannot standardize the number of sites and samples in each region (Table 2). The uncertainty in start-date varies regionally, depending primarily on data density (the number of samples, the number of dated sites and the proportion of these dating close to the beginning of millet cultivation), but also on measurement precision and the shape of the calibration curve (we expect the next iteration of the international 14C calibration curve, due to be released in 2020, will shift the oldest dates in our study slightly later, based on the new data36,37). Thus the estimated date of the start of broomcorn millet cultivation is fairly precise in three regions (Carpathian Basin, central Europe, North-central Europe), each represented by over 30 samples from at least 19 sites (Supplementary Dataset). The Po Basin includes only three dated sites, but their six dates are tightly clustered, whereas only one of the seven sites included in the North Pontic region is particularly early, and the others span a wide date range. The South-east Europe region includes only three dates from two sites, and the estimated start date is correspondingly vague.

Figure 3
figure3

Location of the 80 sites, with small and/or large millet deposits, included in the model and assigned to broad geographical regions within which the results are discussed; see Fig. 1 caption for site names (site #4, Dikiy Sad, which yielded both small and large millet deposit, is here classified as large).[Map generated using the software: QGIS 3.10.5—A Coruña (https://qgis.org); copyright by OpenStreetMap contributors, terrestris GmbH & Co KG (https://www.terrestris.de), and Natural Earth Data (https://www.naturalearthdata.com)].

Table 2 Estimated dates for the start of millet cultivation in each subregion, given by the Bayesian chronological model (Supplementary Text 1, 2) and shown in Figs. 4, 5.

Figure 4 maps the modelled dates, in 100-year time-slices. The only millet in Europe directly dated to the sixteenth century cal bc comes from Vinogradnyi Sad in southwestern Ukraine. By the mid-fifteenth century bc, however, broomcorn millet was apparently present in the Middle Danube region—in the territory of modern-day Romania (Corneşti-Iarcuri), Hungary (Fajsz 18) and perhaps Croatia (Mačkovac-Crišnjevi)—and in northern Italy (Lavagnone). By the mid-fourteenth century bc, it spread across central Europe and as far south as the Aegean (Assiros in Greece). There is little evidence that millet spread north of Bohemia during the thirteenth century bc, but by the mid-twelfth century bc it was common in northern Germany and Poland. By this date, broomcorn millet was probably cultivated throughout the study region. The ostensible gap in the western Balkans reflects the state of research, as few sites here have been analysed archaeobotanically. That broomcorn millet was present here at least from the mid-thirteenth century bc onwards is demonstrated by dates on the grains from Hisar (southern Serbia). Eastern and southern parts of the peninsula (Albania, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, Greece) were not included in this dating programme as the material from some of these regions is a part of a different study. However, the only so-far published direct-dated millet find from Greece—that from Assiros—is included in the model. A charred food crust in a pot from the Late Bronze Age site of Kush Kaya in southern Thrace (Bulgaria) contained fragments of broomcorn millet grain, along with barley and flax; the crust was directly dated to the mid-fourteenth century bc38 (the date is not used in our model).

Figure 4
figure4

Time-slices of modelled dates of broomcorn millet grains, at 100-year intervals. Symbol size corresponds to the relative probability that a sample is of the date shown. Symbol colour corresponds to the median date of the sample (see legend).

Previous radiocarbon dating of broomcorn millet called into question the reported pre-2nd millennium bc occurrences of the crop in Europe27. Our study shows that it is highly unlikely that broomcorn millet reached central Europe prior to the mid-2nd millennium bc.

The age of ‘small’ and ‘large’ broomcorn millet deposits

Archaeobotanical assessments of the early distribution of broomcorn millet in Europe suggested its widespread presence prior to and during the Early and Middle Bronze Age (before mid-2nd millennium bc), but as a minor crop18,39,40. This was inferred from the overall number per site of millet grains or of contexts in which they were found. The finds attributed to the Neolithic, Copper and Early Bronze Ages usually occur in the form of one to several grains per deposit and were interpreted as indicating that broomcorn millet initially was a tolerated accidental inclusion in the harvests of major crops. In contrast, dense, concentrated deposits (with grains often fused into ‘porridge’) of the Middle and Late Bronze Age were taken as reflecting a higher degree of use and/or greater importance of this crop relative to others. It was, therefore, concluded that “…the transformation of millets from minor to major (or even main) crops took place in the transition from Middle to Late Bronze Age in Europe”18 [361].

Based on the published archaeobotanical records of broomcorn millet finds in Europe, our expectation was that the number of obvious large deposits per subregion will be small for the earlier part of the covered period (Neolithic-Copper Age), moreover—that there may be none. Rather than seeing this as a 'proof' that millet first appeared in the respective subregion as a contaminant of other crops, we acknowledged that this can be a result of taphonomy (such as e.g. the possibility that small deposits represent re-deposited material from larger deposits) and the state of research. The radiocarbon dates presented here allow us to evaluate this notion at a macro-regional (sub-continental) level. The chronological distribution of small and large deposits of dated pre-Roman millet grains included in the model is summarised in Supplementary Fig. 3, their number in Table 2, and their geographical distribution in Fig. 3. Supplementary Fig. 3 shows that the overall temporal distribution of small deposits is skewed towards early dates, as predicted. In all but one subregion (North Pontic, with lowest data density), at least one of the early dates comes from a large deposit. Therefore, we would suggest that among the dated deposits in the study region, there is no real difference in the temporal distribution of large and small millet deposits, and that our results therefore do not support the impression that millet began as a minor crop and only became a major (or the main) crop later. Earlier deposits are not necessarily small, and there are both early and late large deposits. Small deposits also occur throughout the period of interest. There is a higher relative incidence of small deposits in the late 2nd–early 1st millennium cal bc, but many of these samples are clearly intrusive (in Neolithic contexts), and this pattern does not necessarily mean that the importance of millet declined over time.

The northern German dataset forms a useful case-study because of its size and good regional coverage. Here, the earliest large deposits of broomcorn millet grain are as old as the first small deposits (isolated grains). This suggests that broomcorn millet was established and cultivated on a larger scale and more evenly from the outset. Regular cultivation of a crop should produce both large and small deposits, but the visibility of both will depend on their preservation and discovery. Regional differences in fieldwork methods and sampling priorities may also produce misleading patterns.

This study confirms the previous finding from radiocarbon dating of broomcorn millet grains—that small deposits can be (much) younger than the archaeological layers in which they are found. Our programme also included sites where broomcorn millet was more frequent than just one or few grains per context (see Supplementary Dataset). Even in some of these cases, however, archaeological dating proved to be misleading. This particularly concerns the much-cited Late Neolithic (late 4th/early 3rd millennium bc) site of Meidling-im-Thale (Kleiner Anzingerberg), where 83 millet grains were found in several features within a burnt house41 [67], but radiocarbon dating placed the grains from four features no earlier than the eighth century bc. Likewise, over 670 millet grains were extracted from 31 samples from Late Neolithic and Copper Age layers (5th–4th millennium bc) at Gomolava42 [Table 2]. Three of these ‘millet-rich’ samples were dated directly, and none is older than tenth/ninth century bc. In both cases, the number of broomcorn millet grains per site was relatively high, but the millet-containing deposits were of low density (one or few millet grains per L/kg of soil).

Discussion

Routes and timing of broomcorn millet diffusion in Europe

The results of the radiocarbon dating program are here discussed in conjunction with the selected archaeobotanical (including grain imprints) and stable isotopic evidence. Adding a C4 plant, such as broomcorn millet, to diets otherwise based on plants using the C3 photosynthetic pathway increases δ13C values of bones and teeth, because δ13C values of C4 plants are typically 10–15‰ higher than those of C3 plants. There are wild C4 plants in Asia and some also occur in Europe (e.g. certain chenopods and grasses, especially halophytes) in salt marshes or in steppe environments, where they can be seasonally more abundant than C3 plants42, but higher δ13C values in prehistoric humans and domestic animals in Europe are more plausibly related to regular consumption of domesticated millets than to increasing amounts of wild C4 plants in graze or fodder43,44. Human bone collagen δ13C values are especially sensitive to the quantity of protein-rich freshwater or marine foods consumed, as well as the consumption of meat and milk from domestic herbivores which consumed C4 plants, whereas tooth enamel or bone apatite δ13C values reflect δ13C values in the overall diet, including carbohydrates. Appropriate threshold δ13C values identifying the input of C4 foodstuffs will therefore depend on the tissues analysed, the carbon contribution of aquatic species, and the δ13C values of local C3 and C4 plants. In Europe, for fully terrestrial diets, human bone collagen δ13C values ≥ c. − 18‰ may signify inclusion of C4 plants ("mixed C3/C4 diet"); δ13C values ≥ c. − 12‰ reflect a "predominantly C4 diet"45,46.

The modelled date of introduction of the new crop in each of the sub-regions enables us to chart a relatively clear spatiotemporal sequence of the east–west spread (Figs. 4, 5). Our 'early millet regions' correspond well with the areas associated with distinct material culture or 'cultural groups' and their 'influences', most prominently the Sabatinovka (Caбaтинiвcькa кyльтypa) in the North Pontic area, Tumulus and Trzciniec cultures in eastern, central and western parts of the study region, and the Late Nordic Bronze Age in the north. This re-iterates the previously underlined necessity to tie agricultural/food innovations into material culture and socio-economic change15,19, for which a solid temporal frame is instrumental. One of the unexpected discoveries is that, whereas there is almost no measurable difference in the modelled dates of millet appearing in the Carpathian Basin, the Po Basin and central Europe, there was a significant delay (probably > 200 years) before millet spread from central Europe to the north European plain (Figs. 5, 6). A topic for future research is whether this time lag was due to ecological or cultural barriers.

Figure 5
figure5

Modelled start date of millet cultivation (OxCal function Boundary) and temporal distribution of dated samples (OxCal function KDE_Plot) in each region. The crosses represent median dates of these distributions and of individual samples (gray: calibrated individually; black: modelled dates), providing an impression of differences in data density between regions.

Figure 6
figure6

Differences between the estimated start dates of millet cultivation (Fig. 4) in various regions. Positive values indicate that millet cultivation began earlier in the first-named region. The large uncertainty in the North Pontic start date (due to low data density in this region) is responsible for the uncertainty in the time lag between the North Pontic and the Carpathian Basin.

North Caucasus and North Pontic

The two regions are currently represented by dates from only seven sites, spanning about a millennium. Our preferred model dates the start of millet cultivation in the North Pontic region to the second quarter of the 2nd millennium cal bc (1650–1500 calbc [68.2% probability] or 1780–1450 calbc [95.4% probability]), and depends on the earliest dates from the Late Bronze Age settlement of Vinogradnyi Sad on the Southern Bug River, occupied c. sixteenth to thirteenth century bc and associated with the Sabatinovka culture, which stretched across the Ukrainian steppe zone47 [237, Fig. 79].

Reports of much earlier occurrences (6th–early 3rd millennium bc, Neolithic-Early Bronze Age) of Panicum miliaceum in the North Pontic were almost entirely based on millet-like impressions in pottery, daub and figurines17,48,49. A recent morphological re-examination of many of these impressions, found on mid–4th or early 3rd millennium bc (Usatovo culture) clay materials from the northwestern Black Sea coast, excluded millet grains as a source for some of the imprints (e.g. those on figurines). Other millet imprints on potsherds and daub were confirmed, along with impressions of wheat and barley grain and few other species50. The chronological attribution of this material, however, is insecure and it may in fact date to the 2nd millennium bc50 [3209–3210]. Another recent high-resolution assessment of some alleged millet grain impressions in Neolithic, Eneolithic and later pottery from sites in Ukraine has confirmed the origin of the imprints only in the sherds from the Sabatinovka culture sites (1600–1300/1200 bc)51.

In the north/northwestern Caucasus, the previously dated large deposit of broomcorn millet grain in Guamsky Grot rock shelter southeast of the Azov Sea confirms the presence of millet here at the very end of the 2nd/beginning of the 1st millennium cal bc52. The growing stable isotope evidence from pre- and Early–Middle Bronze and Early Iron Age sites (4th–1st millennium bc) in the region indicates that the local pastoralist groups likely adopted millet into their diet at the end of the 2nd millennium bc (the regional turn from the Late Bronze to the Early Iron Age). This is the time when the high-altitude settlement system was relocated to the valleys and the economic focus shifted towards agriculture53,54,55.

Impressions on the base of a pot in a Kurgan-grave from the second half of the 4th millennium bc (Maykop culture) near Stavropol were described as possibly deriving from millet grains, but closer examination was not carried out56 [160]. The dates from Guamsky Grot and the presence of broomcorn millet at some Late Bronze Age sites in the northwest Caucasus (Adygea57 [Table 2]) and the Don River delta (Safyanovo58 [73]) have been used to suggest that the northward diffusion of the northwest Caucasian Kobyakovo culture (1400/1300–1000 bc) brought the crop into this region. These communities built permanent domestic structures and cultivated crops52,53 [256],58.

The earliest date on broomcorn millet from Vinogradnyi Sad gives the impression that the crop reached southwestern Ukraine earlier than the northwestern Caucasus. The few early grain-dates from Ukraine cannot clarify this. Potentially earlier dates for the first millet occurrences in the southern Caucasus—late first half, or middle of the 2nd millennium bc59,60—leaves a possibility of broomcorn millet appearing at a similar time in the southern and northern Caucasus. The intensive interaction that "crisscrossed the whole of the Caucasus and extended well beyond its boundaries"61 [380] would have facilitated this, especially from the mid-2nd millennium bc onwards (Late Bronze–Early Iron Age) when it was promoted by increasing production and circulation of metal objects and metalworking skill61 [378–379, 422].

Kobyakovo communities occupied the area along the Kuban and the lower reaches of the Don rivers, neighboured by the Sabatinovka culture area to the west. To the northeast and east, the upper Don and the middle and lower Volga and Ural basins were occupied by the Srubnaya culture (1900–1200 bc)47,62. To the east spread the Andronovo cultural complex. The Srubnaya-Andronovo horizon was "a bridge of related cultures [that] extended across the Eurasian steppes from the borders of China and Central Asia to the eastern edge of Europe"62 [5]. The cultural borders were porous and the interactions diverse across this vast region used by mobile pastoralists and agriculturalists62,63,64. Perhaps millet took this 'northerly' route from the Inner Asian Mountain Corridor to Ukraine, across northern central Asia46 [Fig. 6] and following the latitudinal steppe–forest steppe gradient in northern Kazakhstan (southwestern Siberia). For the latter region, however, archaeobotanical and stable isotope data do not indicate broomcorn millet cultivation and/or consumption before the very end of the 2nd millennium bc or later65,66. From current evidence, therefore, millet appears to have arrived in Europe via the "Caucasus corridor", amidst strengthened connections between the two sides of the mountain in the Late Bronze Age67 [20, 21]. The early dates of broomcorn millet from southwestern Ukraine are consistent with the several-centuries earlier direct-dates from southern Central Asia (Adji Kui 1 and Ojakly30,68) and the Inner Asian Mountain Corridor (Begash28).

The stable isotope picture for humans and animals of the 3rd and 2nd millennium bc (Early–Middle Bronze Age) in the North Pontic and the lower Don and Volga region displays isotopic variability attributed to seasonal movements between pastures, diversity of dietary sources, and changing climatic conditions that shaped the local vegetation69. Modern steppe vegetation in this area comprises of C3, mixed C3/C4 and C4 pastures, whose extent and composition vary depending on the season and climatic characteristics70,71. In the second half of the 3rd millennium bc, there seems to have been a period of increased aridity here, which would have favoured C4 flora72. Elevated δ13C values in human and animal bone collagen were explained by the seasonal consumption of C4 plants naturally growing in the area,70,71,72,73. In the Yampil region on the Middle Dniester river (in the steppe zone), several individuals from the Early–Middle Bronze Age graves (late 3rd-first quarter of the 2nd millennium bc) had collagen δ13C values of c. − 19.5‰ and were interpreted as possible millet consumers74. However, δ13C values more negative than − 18‰ do not indicate inclusion of C4 plants in the diet46.

The now dated presence of millet from the mid-2nd millennium bc onwards in southern Ukraine shows that, from this point on, consumption of this crop could have represented the main source of C4 forage and/or food both in coastal areas and, especially, inland. Indeed, in central and eastern Ukraine, a systematic increase in δ13C values is seen from the Bronze to the Iron Age, and significantly in the Early Iron Age and the Scythian period69 [266, 273],75,76. Broomcorn millet grains from several Iron Age sites have been radiocarbon-dated in this and a previous study77. Along with the coeval evidence of soil biomarker (miliacin) indicating millet cultivation13, they confirm that that the Iron Age isotope data most probably reflect consumption of P. miliaceum.

Carpathian Basin, eastern Alps and Po Basin

Sabatinovka culture communities (1600–1300/1200 bc) in the Pontic steppes and along the Black Sea coast cultivated and consumed millet. At the time, the transect from the upper Dniester to the lower Danube and Transylvania, and further into southeastern Romania and northeastern Bulgaria, was the area of the Noua-Sabatinovka-Coslogeni cultural complex, a tradition seen as an "eastern intrusion"78 [889] that maintained trade in metal objects with much of central-eastern Europe79 [228–232]. Broomcorn millet grains were recorded at the sites occupied by these groups80, which could have served as a medium for the transmission of broomcorn millet further to the west and south. The westward spread could have proceeded up the Danube, through long-established communication and exchange networks via which a number of other goods were distributed, such as metals, amber, and decorative objects79 [45–57],81,82 [164–196],83.

The assumed Danube route may have started already in the late sixteenth/early fifteenth century cal bc, as our preferred model dates the start of millet cultivation in the Carpathian Basin to the early–mid fifteenth century cal bc (1480–1420 calbc [68.2% probability] or 1510–1400 calbc [95.4% probability]) (Figs. 4, 5). This was the beginning of the Late Bronze Age (eastern Carpathian Basin) or the end of the Middle Bronze Age/transition to the Late Bronze Age (western Carpathian Basin). In both cases, this is the time of the Tumulus culture, characterized by intensive cross-regional (east–west) connectivity and marked socio-economic change84 [125],85,86. Here the human stable isotope studies showed a significant increase in δ13C values, relative to the previous periods, in the second half of the 2nd millennium bc87. Early and Middle Bronze Age archaeobotanical assemblages from the wider region include rare finds of millet88, but these have not been dated. In contrast, the assemblages from the second half of the 2nd millennium bc, particularly the tail-end of the Late, and the Final Bronze Age (last quarter of the 2nd millennium bc85), frequently contain remains of broomcorn millet32,39,88,89 [74,75]. Sometimes these are concentrated grains, such as in one of the ceramic vessels hoarded in a pit at the Tumulus culture site of Lozorno, north of Bratislava in Slovakia3.

In the southwestern part of the Carpathian Basin, up the Sava river, the possible early occurrence of broomcorn millet at Mačkovac-Crišnjevi corresponds well with the early dates from the Po Basin to the west. Our model dates the start of millet cultivation in the Po Basin to the early-mid fifteenth century cal bc (1500–1430 calbc [68.2% probability] or 1570–1410 cal bc [95.4% probability]), which coincides with the start of the fully developed Terramare culture (1550–1150 bc90). The stable isotopic ratios of humans point to the mid-2nd millennium bc for the start of millet consumption in northern Italy; by the mid-fifteenth century bc, the Terramare communities consumed considerable amounts of millet44,91,92. The grains and chaff (glumes) of broomcorn millet are frequent and abundant in the archaeobotanical assemblages from this period onwards93,94 [42,114,115]. The transfer of goods (e.g. swords, amber) between the Carpathian Basin and the Po Basin/northern Italy (through lowland Austria and Slovenia) during the Bronze Age has long been recognized79 [77],84 [127],95,96. It seems that the Carpathian Basin acted as a broomcorn millet 'hub' from where the crop radiated in different directions, including south across the central/western Balkans and into northern Greece40,97.

The increased socio-political and economic connectivity across the Mediterranean in the second half of the 2nd millennium bc81,82,84,96,98 perhaps facilitated a 'southerly' route of transfer of millet into peninsular Italy and the Balkans, with the city of Mycenae as the potential "power node"94 [87]. However, the majority of Late Bronze Age (1600–1100 bc) archaeobotanical finds of broomcorn millet in Greece are located in the north, including several large deposits40, of which the one at Assiros was direct-dated to the fourteenth century cal bc (1405–1305 cal bc [95.4% confidence], refined to 1374–1339 calbc [95.4% probability] according to the published site chronological model)99. In contrast, only one broomcorn millet find has so far been reported in the south, consisting of ten (undated) grains from the Mycenaean palace of Tiryns100. A C4 signal was detected in the stable isotopic composition of human and animal bones from mid-2nd millennium bc Greece, with millet and other C4 plants stated as possible contributors101,102,103. The presence of broomcorn millet grains in the mid-late 2nd millennium bc layers of Troy104 [9] perhaps point to Anatolia as a source area for the introduction of the crop in the Aegean. On the other hand, the archaeological evidence (e.g. amber and metal objects) documents earlier interactions between the Tumulus culture societies of the Carpathian Basin and the Aegean city-states84,105 [361]. Further radiocarbon dates on broomcorn millet from the southeast corner of Europe will elucidate its diffusion into this region.

Central Europe (north of the Carpathians and the Alps)

According to our preferred model, broomcorn millet was probably first cultivated in central Europe in the mid-fifteenth century cal bc (1470–1400 calbc [68.2% probability] or 1490–1330 calbc [95.4% probability]), soon after its appearance in the Carpathian Basin. It seems to have appeared almost simultaneously in southern Poland, the Czech Republic and southern Germany. A 'northerly' route of its arrival into southern Poland is possible, through the forest steppe of northern Ukraine, up the rivers flowing into the Black Sea. For much of the 2nd millennium bc, the middle and upper courses of the Prut, Dniester, Southern Bug and Dnieper were characterized by the Middle–Late Bronze Age Trzciniec culture (1800–1100 bc106,107,108). The fourteenth/thirteenth century bc Trzciniec sites east of the northern Carpathian foothills show similarities in pottery and metal objects with the Noua and Sabatinovka cultures. These intercultural contacts107,109 [272–278] may have incorporated crop exchange. The regions north of the Alps (the upper Danube and the upper Rhine, including southern Germany, Bohemia and parts of Austria) were identified as the area from which the Tumulus culture spread eastwards to the Tisza and the upper-middle Oder and Vistula rivers82 [97],84 [125],106,108. Perhaps rather than arriving from the 'east' into southern Poland, broomcorn millet moved west-to-east, along the northern Carpathian foothills and onto the loess plateaus, such as the one on which the millet-rich site of Lipnik was located (1400–1100 cal bc).

There are striking similarities in the mid-2nd millennium bc pottery shapes and styles in the "communication corridor" running along the Tisza river, crossing the Carpathians and connecting their southern basin and northern slopes108. We dated broomcorn millet from the site of Maszkowice in the western part of the northern Carpathian foothills, where the characteristics of pottery and metal finds correspond to those seen in the south of the Tisza valley, within the Otomani-Füzesabony cultural tradition of the Carpathian Basin108. These contacts hint at the potential south-north direction of the crop dispersal. The Vistula river tributaries flowing down the northern Carpathian foothills, and the Morava and Oder river valleys were recognized as the communication channels through which goods and/or people moved between the Carpathian Basin and southern Poland, and further to the north107 [199]. We may be seeing several different, possibly synchronous, dispersal routes of millet within and beyond the matrix of individual cultural entities.

Our estimated start date for millet cultivation in central Europe is consistent with archaeobotanical data from sites in Bohemia, which place the first occurrence of broomcorn millet here at the start of the regional Middle Bronze Age (1600–1250 bc110 [267],111). Stable isotope results from animals and humans from sites in Bohemia and Moravia suggest a striking change in diet between the early and late 2nd millennium bc, with Late Bronze Age diets having a significant contribution of millet112. The age of the recently reported miliacin in soil from a fissured ceramic vessel found in a Corded Ware culture (3rd millennium bc) grave at Držovice, central Moravia113 is highly questionable. The soil in the pot contained traces of miliacin, but the soil around the pot was not tested and so the possibility of contamination cannot be excluded, particularly since the grave was damaged by modern digging of a drainage system113 [4222],114 [188]. Without an absolute date for the miliacin itself, it is possible that the association is coincidental and that the miliacin is more recent than the pot. There are as yet no direct dates on broomcorn millet from sites in Moravia but, assuming the east–west transfer through the Danube Basin, it could have reached southern Moravia some time before it is found in Bohemia, the Alpine Foreland and the upper reaches of the Rhine.

The broomcorn millet grain from the Corded Ware site of Binningen, located in the northern foothills of the Jura mountains north of the Western Alps, gave a twelfth century cal bc date (Supplementary Dataset). The isotopic investigations of animals and humans from three sites in southwestern Switzerland revealed 13C enrichment at the end of the 2nd or start of the 1st millennium bc (Final Bronze Age, 1300–800 bc115). Earlier dates (fifteenth/fourteenth century cal bc) on broomcorn millet from Lauda-Königshofen in the upper Danube basin and Bruchenbrücken on the upper-middle Rhine show that millet had already been cultivated in adjacent regions for some time. Lauda-Königshofen was the location of a Corded Ware culture cemetery, where the remains of later (metal-age) settlements were also found. The broomcorn millet grains originate from the Corded Ware layers, but are obviously intrusive. Stable isotope results from humans buried here in the mid-3rd millennium BC gave no indication of consumption of C4 plants116.

North-central Europe (northern Germany and northern Poland)

There are now forty radiocarbon dates on broomcorn millet from twenty-five sites in northern parts of Germany, and this is the best-covered region so far. Additional sites in north-central Poland add to the regional picture. The beginning of broomcorn millet cultivation in this region is dated to 1230–1160 calbc (68.2% probability) or 1260–1140 calbc (95.4% probability). Considering the number of relatively early sites and samples dated (Supplementary Dataset), it is unlikely that dating more sites will produce significantly earlier dates. By the mid-twelfth century bc, broomcorn millet was present in the entire region, suggesting a rapid spread over the lowlands (Figs. 4, 5, 6). The coupled biomolecular and isotopic analyses on food remains from a Late Bronze Age (1100–800 cal bc) horizon at the site of Bruszczewo in northern Poland testify to its consumption117.

The thirteenth century bc was the time of appearance of the Urnfield culture in central Europe, which, in the twelfth century bc spread to the south and the north79 [31],82 [Fig. 1.2],118. Within this general phenomenon, many regional cultural groups have been differentiated, such as the Lausitz/Lusatian culture in central Europe whose influence spread to the north79 [346],119. Northern European communities maintained communication with the Carpathian Basin and Tumulus culture groups throughout the 2nd millennium bc, particularly during its first half120. In the second half of the millennium, the interaction extended beyond (and via) the Tumulus culture zone, to the Aegean city-states and was likely centered on amber commerce, along with trade in metals and other goods96,105 [365],120 [614]. Agricultural products could have been transmitted through any or all of these trans-regional networks. It has been suggested that broomcorn millet arrived into North-central Europe through the trade routes following major rivers – the Oder, Elbe and Weser121. Smaller waterways were probably also part of this network, such as the Tollense in northeastern Germany, where palaeodietary isotopic evidence (seldom available from the region and period due to the prevalent cremation ritual) shows that victims of a Late Bronze Age battle were millet consumers122,123 (Supplementary Text 2, Supplementary Fig. 5].

Millet beyond When and Where

Archaeological scholarship on the origin of domesticated broomcorn millet and its journey along the c. 8,000 km east–west Eurasian route(s), as well as the environmental and social circumstances at different stages of these process, has grown at an incredible pace, with the major focus on the evidence from Asia. In Europe, research on millet has not taken place at a similar scale, although some authors suggested possible routes and mechanisms of its introduction40. In the wider context of the long-lasting 'trans-Eurasian exchange20 of many different elements, including raw materials, technologies, objects, animals and diseases64,124, broomcorn millet documents the process of 'food globalisation' in the Old World17,21,22,23,26,125. Reconstructing the When and Where of broomcorn millet in Europe helps us to understand whether the crop arrived “with a bang”126 or if it ‘trickled in’ over the millennia of archaeologically well-documented communication between the east and the west. Europe in the Middle and Late Bronze Age is a paragon of connectivity and intercultural influences, which were particularly intensive in the second half of the 2nd millennium bc. Without doubt, the amplified cross-regional interaction for the purpose of trade/exchange served as a catalyst for the transmission of agricultural innovations, including broomcorn millet, which perhaps was one of the traded goods.

Perhaps the knowledge of millet's agro-ecological requirements and related culinary traditions travelled along with it and contributed to its relatively swift transmission between distant regions. Thanks to its versatility and ecological and functional ‘plasticity’, broomcorn millet may have become highly valued asset, especially in changing or challenging environmental and social settings. There are, however, indications of ‘non-adoption’ or, more precisely, non-consumption of millet among some communities at the time when their neighbours consumed notable amounts of it. This was seen in the human stable isotopes from the Bronze and Iron Age Trans-Urals66, the Terramare culture zone91 and Iron Age coastal Croatia116. Thus, at a more local scale, the introduction and use of the new crop may not have been indiscriminate43. Various cultural reasons may have been at play, determining the (degree of) acceptance or rejection of broomcorn millet. To explore this further, it is important to understand the economic, technological and social environments into which broomcorn millet arrived in Europe, alongside the ones it may have created.

Conclusions

This study produced and evaluated over 100 radiocarbon dates directly on charred broomcorn millet grains from over 90 sites in Europe. The main aim was to test a substantial number of grains recovered from a range of archaeological deposits in Europe attributed to the Neolithic, Copper and Bronze Ages and, in particular, high-density millet deposits (grain concentrations) attributed to the Bronze Age. This dataset decisively pinpoints the middle of the 2nd millennium bc (Middle/Late Bronze Age) as the time of the earliest occurrence of broomcorn millet in the studied regions of Europe. The crop emerged at only slightly different times in different parts of Europe, earliest in Ukraine, as expected given its eastern origin. Within about a century of its appearance in the Carpathian Basin and northern Italy, broomcorn millet was found throughout central Europe. It was not immediately diffused into lowland northern Germany, however, and it is only in the late thirteenth/early twelfth century cal bc that it spread rapidly through this region.

The radiocarbon dates show that the new crop spread fast and was found in large quantities immediately or soon after its introduction in different parts of Europe. The abundance of millet has been taken as a reflection of its cultivation. The period for which the stable isotope evidence first hints at the consumption of broomcorn millet overlaps with the earliest radiocarbon-dates on both small and large archaeobotanical records of the crop. Whereas inter-and intra-regional variations in this pattern can be expected, a general impression is one of a relatively swift and potentially comprehensive adoption of the new crop at the continental level.

Broomcorn millet transfer epitomises the process of 'food globalisation' in the Old World. Not just the routes and pace of this process have been of interest. A host of additional questions have been brought forward concerning the mechanisms, cultural and environmental context of the spread, as well as the impact of the new crop on agrarian production, animal husbandry and food consumption in the source, transit and receiving regions. Sweeping changes in economy, social relations and ideology have been archaeologically documented in mid-late 2nd millennium bc Europe. Against this backdrop, can we now talk about a 'millet effect'? Some of the characteristics of this crop, principally its short growth-cycle and surplus potential, would have had wide ramifications in aspects such as intensity and scale of agricultural production, labour organisation, land tenure, food storage, culinary practices and, ultimately, social and political power. With the time of the arrival of the crop to the western end of the “Eurasian dyad” now determined, we can address the transformative power of millet from a solid chronological ground.

Materials

Published archaeobotanical and radiocarbon studies17,18,27,39,40,48,127 provided an overview of the material potentially available for dating. The study period and regions—Neolithic and Bronze Age periods in eastern, central and North-central Europe—were defined in line with the aims and scope of the Collaborative Research Centre SFB 1266: Scales of Transformation at Kiel University, the time and funding available through this initiative in 2017–2019, and the working assumptions that broomcorn millet arrived in the Neolithic and that its full-fledged cultivation started in the Middle/Late Bronze Age. The dating programme had two objectives: (1) radiocarbon dating of ‘early’ finds of broomcorn millet reported from Neolithic and Copper Age sites and typically consisting of one-few grains, in order to date the first introduction of the crop in different parts of the study region; (2) radiocarbon dating of Bronze Age finds of millet, specifically grain concentrations, in order to temporally correlate this agricultural innovation with developments in lifestyle, economy and social relations characteristic of the period.

Based on their research focus and publications, archaeobotanists working in the parts of Europe targeted by the programme were informed about the initiative. They were sent guidelines for the selection and submission of the specimens for dating, along with a questionnaire (Supplementary Sample form). The material was received in Kiel, where the specimens for dating were selected and photographed (see examples in Fig. 2) and the relevant information entered in the 'Millet Dating Programme' data repository.

Methods

Sampling and AMS-dating

We dated charred grains from 'small' and 'large' broomcorn millet deposits (Supplementary Dataset) from relatively or absolutely dated Neolithic through Bronze Age layers. We did not intentionally sample grains from contexts/sites dated to later periods. Small deposits comprise one to several dozen grains, usually dispersed throughout an excavation unit/flotation sample. Many of these contexts (feature/layer) were stratigraphically dated to the late 7th to mid-3rd millennium bc (broadly the Neolithic and Copper Age in Europe). Large deposits comprise tens to thousands of grains from a discrete context (e.g. burnt layer or lens, pit/oven/hearth fill, pot content), often high-density concentrations of macro-plant remains predominantly or entirely composed of broomcorn millet, sometimes agglutinated (fused together) during charring.

Where more than one grain was available, we selected the two largest and best-preserved grains for dating (the second as a reserve). We normally dated single grains, but in several cases we dated two or more agglutinated grains, because these grains cannot have been significantly different in date, since they were uncharred before they were fused together. This study also includes a few 14C dates on bulk samples of two to several millet grains from small deposits, homogenized by pulverisation (see Supplementary Dataset). If these samples consisted of grains of different dates, the calibrated 14C result must be more recent than the earliest millet grain present; such results are therefore still informative in terms of dating the first appearance of millet. We dated samples at the Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) laboratories in Poznań (Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory, Poland) and Kiel (Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Stable Isotope Research, Germany), following standard laboratory protocols for charred plant macrofossils (Poznań128 [ZR]; Kiel129). This facilitated the incorporation of previously obtained (un)published dates on charred broomcorn millet grains (Supplementary Text 1).

Chronological modelling

We used Bayesian chronological modelling to visualize spatial patterns in the earliest dates130. This approach is based on the premise that while the dates of our samples are constrained by when millet cultivation began in any region, it is highly unlikely that our samples include the first grains of broomcorn millet grown at any site, or even that they come from the earliest millet-growing site in each region (Supplementary Text 2; Supplementary Fig. 2). We used OxCal v.4.335 and the IntCal13 calibration curve131 to convert 14C ages to calendar dates, and the OxCal Bayesian chronological modelling functions. The model’s posterior density estimates of the dates of samples and events, and of intervals between these dates, are reported in italics, to distinguish them from independently calibrated individual dates. The OxCal CQL model code is provided as Supplementary Model code, allowing readers to reproduce our models and improve them with new data (the OxCal software required to run this model is freely available132).

References

  1. 1.

    Marinval, P. Archaeobotanical data on millets (Panicum miliaceum and Setaria italica) in France. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.73, 259–270 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kohler-Schneider, M. Verkohlte Kultur- und Wildpflanzenreste aus Stillfried and der March als Spiegel bronzezeitlicher Landwirtschaft im Weinviertel, Niederösterreich (Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2001).

  3. 3.

    Bartík, J. & Hajnalová, M. Hromadný nález keramiky z Lozorna. Zborník Slovenského Národného Múzea XCVIII. Archeológia14, 9–42 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Miller, N. F., Spengler, R. N. & Frachetti, M. Millet cultivation across Eurasia: Origins, spread, and the influence of seasonal climate. Holocene26, 1566–1575 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Murphy, C. Finding millet in the Roman world. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci.8, 65–78 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gomashe, S.S. Proso Millet, Panicum miliaceum (L.): Genetic improvement and research needs. In Millets and Sorghum: Biology and Genetic Improvement (ed. Patil, J.V.) 150–169 (Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, 2017).

  7. 7.

    Taylor, J. & Duodu, K. Traditional sorghum and millet food and beverage products and their technologies. In Sorghum and Millets. Chemistry, Technology, and Nutritional Attributes (eds. Taylor, J. & Duodu, K.) 259–292 (AACCI Press/Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2019).

  8. 8.

    Lundström-Baudais, K., Rachoud-Schneider, A.-M., Baudais, D. & Poissonnier, B. Le broyage dans la chaîne de transformation du millet (Panicum miliaceum): outils, gestes et écofacts. In Moudre et broyer: L’interprétation fonctionnelle de l’outillage de mouture et de broyage dans la Préhistoire et l’Antiquité. I. Méthodes (eds. Procopiou, H. & Treuil, R.) 180–208 (CTHS, 2002).

  9. 9.

    Moreno-Larrazabal, A., Teira-Brión, A., Sopelana-Salcedo, I., Arranz-Otaegui, A. & Zapata, L. Ethnobotany of millet cultivation in the north of the Iberian Peninsula. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot.24, 541–554 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Beta, T. & Ndolo, V.U. Postharvest Technologies. In Sorghum and Millets. Chemistry, Technology, and Nutritional Attributes (eds. Taylor, J. & Duodu, K.) 69–84 (AACCI Press/Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2018)

  11. 11.

    Mishra, J. S. Weed management in millets: Retrospect and prospects. Indian J. Weed Sci.47, 246–253 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hermes, T. R. et al. Early integration of pastoralism and millet cultivation in Bronze Age Eurasia. Proc. R. Soc. B286, 20191273 (2019).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute, G., Jacob, J., Telizhenko, S. & Jones, M. K. Miliacin in palaeosols from an Early Iron Age in Ukraine reveal in situ cultivation of broomcorn millet. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci.8, 43–50 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Patil, J.V. (Ed.) Millets and Sorghum: Biology and Genetic Improvement (Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, 2017).

  15. 15.

    Harding, A.F. Interpreting the evidence for agricultural change in the Late Bronze Age. In Northern Europe in Bronze Age Studies. Transactions of the British-Scandinavian Colloquium in Stockholm (eds. Nordström, H.-A. & Knape, A.) 173–181 (Museum of National Antiquities Studies, Pennsylvania, 1989).

  16. 16.

    Behre, K.E. Landwirtschaftliche Entwicklungslinien und die Veränderung der Kulturlandschaft in der Bronzezeit Europas. In Mensch und Umwelt in der Bronzezeit Europas (ed. Hänsel B.) 91–109 (Oetker-Voges Verlag, Kiel, 1998).

  17. 17.

    Hunt, H. V. et al. Millet across Eurasia: Chronology and context of early records of the genera Panicum and Setaria from archaeological sites in the Old World. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot.17, 5–18 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Stika H.-P. & Heiss, A.G. Plant cultivation in the bronze age. In The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age (eds. Fokkens, H. & Harding, A.) 384–369 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013).

  19. 19.

    Sherratt, A. Cash-crops before cash: Organic consumables and trade. In The Prehistory of Food Appetites for Change (eds Gosden, C. & Hather, J.) 13–34 (Routledge, Abingdon, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sherratt, A. The trans-Eurasian exchange: The prehistory of Chinese relations with the west. In Contact and Exchange in the Ancient World (ed. Mair, V. H.) 30–61 (University of Hawai’i Press, Hawaii, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jones, M. K. Between fertile crescents: Minor grain crops and agricultural origins. In Traces of Ancestry: Studies in Honour of Colin Renfrew (ed. Jones, M. K.) 126–135 (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jones, M. et al. Food globalization in prehistory. World Archaeol.43, 665–675 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jones, M. et al. Food globalisation in prehistory: The agrarian foundations of an interconnected continent. J. Br. Acad.4, 73–87 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Boivin, N., Fuller, D. Q. & Crowther, A. Old World globalization and the Columbian exchange: Comparison and contrast. World Archaeol.44, 452–469 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhao, Z. New archaeobotanic data for the study of the origins of agriculture in China. Curr. Anthropol.52, 295–306 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Stevens, C. J. et al. Between China and South Asia: A Middle Asian corridor of crop dispersal and agricultural innovation in the Bronze Age. Holocene26, 1541–1555 (2016).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute, G., Staff, R. A., Hunt, H. V., Liu, X. & Jones, M. K. The early chronology of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) in Europe. Antiquity87, 1073–1085 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Frachetti, M. D., Spengler, R. S., Fritz, G. Y. & Mar’yashev, A. N. Earliest evidence of broomcorn millet and wheat in the central Eurasian steppe region. Antiquity84, 993–1010 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Spengler, R. N. Agriculture in the Central Asian Bronze Age. J. World Prehist.28, 215–253 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Spengler, R. N., de Nigris, I., Cerasetti, B., Carra, M. & Rouse, L. M. The breadth of dietary economy in Bronze Age Central Asia: Case study from Adji Kui 1 in the Murghab region of Turkmenistan. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep.22, 372–381 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yatoo, M. A., Spate, M., Betts, A., Pokharia, A. K. & Shah, M. A. New evidence from the Kashmir Valley indicates the adoption of East and West Asian crops in the western Himalayas by 4400 years ago. Quat. Sci. Adv.2, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qsa.2020.100011 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kroll, H. Die Pflanzenfunde von Feudvar. In Feudvar III. Die Archäobotanik. Würzburger Studien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichtlichen Archäologie 1 (eds Kroll, H. & Reed, K.) 37–194 (Würzburg University Press, Würzburg, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    An, C.-B. et al. Variability of the stable carbon isotope ration in modern and archaeological millets: evidence from northern China. J. Archaeol. Sci.53, 316–322 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Pokorný, P. et al. Mid-Holocene bottleneck for central European dry grasslands: Did steppe survive the forest optimum in northern Bohemia, Czech Republic. Holocene25, 716–726 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bronk Ramsey, C. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon51, 337–360 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pearson, C. et al. Annual variation in atmospheric 14C between 1700 BC and 1480 BC. Radiocarbon, 62, 1–14 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kuitems, M., van der Plicht, J. & Jansma, E. Wood from the Netherlands around the time of the Santorini eruption dated by dendrochronology and radiocarbon. Radiocarbon, 62, 1–5 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Popov, H., Marinova, E., Hristova, I. & Iliev, S. Plant food from the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age hilltop site Kush Kaya, Eastern Rhodope Mountains, Bulgaria: Insights on the cooking practices. In Social Dimensions of Food in the Prehistoric Balkans (eds Ivanova, M. et al.) 263–277 (Oxbow, Oxford, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Gyulai, F. The history of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in the Carpathian-Basin in the mirror of archaeobotanical remains I. From the beginning until the Roman Age. Columella J. Agric. Environ. Sci.1, 29–38 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Valamoti, S. M. Millet, the late comer: On the tracks of Panicum miliaceum in prehistoric Greece. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci.8, 51–63 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kohler-Schneider, M. & Caneppele, A. Late Neolithic agriculture in eastern Austria: Archaeobotanical results from sites of the Baden and Jevišovice culture (3600–2800 B.C.). Veg. Hist. Archaeobot.18, 61–74 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    van Zeist, W. Plant husbandry and vegetation of tell Gomolava, Vojvodina, Yugoslavia. Palaeohistoria43(44), 87–115 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lightfoot, E., Šlaus, M., Rajić Šikanjić, P. & O’Connell, T. Metals and Millets: Bronze and Iron Age diet in inland and coastal Croatia seen through stable isotope analysis. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci.7, 375–386 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Tafuri, M. A. et al. Estimating C4 plant consumption in Bronze Age Northeastern Italy through stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in bone collagen. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol.28, 131–142 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lightfoot, E., Liu, X. & Jones, M. K. Why move starchy cereals? A review of the isotopic evidence for prehistoric millet consumption across Eurasia. World Archaeol.45, 574–623 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wang, T. et al. Tianshanbeilu and the isotopic Millet Road: Reviewing the late Neolithic/Bronze Age radiation of human millet consumption from north China to Europe. Natl. Sci. Rev.6, 1024–1039 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chernykh, E. N. Ancient metallurgy in the USSR: The early metal age (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Pashkevych, G. Environment and economic activities of Neolithic and Bronze Age populations of the Northern Pontic area. Quat. Int.261, 176–182 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Monah, F. The spread of cultivated plants in the region between the Carpathians and Dniester, 6th–4th millennia cal BC. In The Origins and Spread of Domestic Plants in Southwest Asia and Europe (eds Colledge, S. & Conolly, J.) 111–123 (Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    An, T., Pashkevich, G. & Jones, M. Re-examining millet impressions in Usatovo clay materials from NW Black Sea region, Ukraine. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci.11, 3201–3211 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Endo, E. Chasing Chinese millets in Ukraine using seed impressions in pottery. In Paper presented at the international workshop ‘Millet and what else? The wider context of the adoption of millet cultivation in Europe’. http://www.sfb1266.uni-kiel.de/de/veranstaltungen/tagungen-workshops/endo.pdf (2019).

  52. 52.

    Trifonov, V. A., Shishlina, N. I., Lebedeva, EYu., van der Plicht, J. & Rishko, S. A. Directly dated broomcorn millet from northwestern Caucasus: Tracing the Late Bronze Age route into the Russian steppe. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep.12, 288–294 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Reinhold, S. Spätbronzezeitliche Architektur zwischen Schwarzmeerraum, Kaukasien und Nordostanatolien. In Landschaftsarchäologie im Nordkaukasus (eds Reinhold, S. et al.) 246–262 (Rudolf Habelt, Bonn, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hollund, H. I., Higham, T., Belinskij, A. & Korenovskij, S. Investigation of palaeodiet in the North Caucasus (South Russia) Bronze Age using stable isotope analysis and AMS dating of human and animal bones. J. Archaeol. Sci.37, 2971–2983 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Knipper, C., Reinhold, S., Gresky, J., Belinskiy, A. & Alt, K. W. Economic strategies at Bronze Age and Early Iron Age upland sites in the North Caucasus. In Isotopic Investigations of Pastoralism in Prehistory (eds Ventresca Miller, A. R. & Makarewicz, C. A.) 123–140 (Routledge, Abingdon, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kantorovič, A. R. & Maslov, V. E. Eine reiche Bestattung der Majkop-Kultur im Kurgan nahe der stanica Mar’inskaja, rajon Kirov, Kraj Stavropol. Eurasia Antiqua34, 151–165 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Лeбeдeвa, E. Ю. Пepвыe peзyльтaты apxeoбoтaничecкиx иccлeдoвaний нa apxeoлoгичecкиx пaмятникax Aдыгeи. Aнaлитичecкиe иccлeдoвaниь лaбopaтopии ecтecтвeннoнayчныx мeтoдoв2, 244–257 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    van Hoof, L., Dally, O. & Schlöffel, M. Staying home or staying with your cattle? Different reactions to environmental changes in the late bronze age of the lower don area (Southern Russia). J. Anc. Stud. Spec.3, 71–75 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Herrscher, E. et al. The origins of millet cultivation in the Caucasus: Archaeological and archaeometric approaches. Préhistoires Méditerranéennes6, 1–27 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Herrscher, E. et al. Dietary inferences through stable isotope analysis at the Neolithic and Bronze Age in the southern Caucasus (sixth to first millennium BC, Azerbaijan): From environmental adaptation to social impacts. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.167, 1–20 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sagona, A. The Archaeology of the Caucasus (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Anthony, D. W. The Samara Valley project and the Evolution of Pastoral Economies in the Western Eurasian Steppes. In A Bronze Age Landscape in the Russian Steppes: The Samara Valley Project (eds Anthony, D. W. et al.) 3–36 (UCLA Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, Los Angeles, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Frachetti, M. D. Multiregional Emergence of Mobile Pastoralism and Nonuniform Institutional Complexity across Eurasia. Curr. Anthropol.53, 2–38 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Cunliffe, B. By Steppe, Desert, and Ocean. The Birth of Eurasia (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Motuzaite Matuzeviciute, G. et al. The extent of cereal cultivation among the Bronze Age to Turkic period societies of Kazakhstan determined using stable isotope analysis on bone collagen. J. Archaeol. Sci.59, 23–34 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Ventresca Miller, A. R. & Makarewicz, C. A. Intensification in pastoralist cereal use coincides with the expansion of trans-regional networks in the Eurasian Steppe. Sci. Rep.9, 8363 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    69Kohl, P.L. The Early Integration of the Eurasian Steppe with the Ancient Near East: Movements and Transformations in the Caucasus and Central Asia. In Beyond the Steppe and the Sown. Proceedings of the 2002 University of Chicago Conference on Eurasian Archaeology (eds. Peterson, D.L., Popova, L.M. & Smith, A.T.) 3–39 (Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden, 2006).

  68. 68.

    Rouse, L. M. & Cerasetti, B. Ojakly: A Late Bronze Age mobile pastoralist site in the Murghab region, Turkmenistan. J. Field Archaeol.39, 32–50 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    71Gerling, C. Prehistoric Mobility and Diet in the West Eurasian Steppes 3500 to 300 BC: An Isotopic Approach. Topoi—Berlin Studies of the Ancient World 25 (Walter De Gruyter, Berlin, 2015).

  70. 70.

    Shishlina, N., Sevastyanov, V. & Kuznetsova, O. Seasonal practices of prehistoric pastoralists from the south of the Russian plain based on the isotope data of modern and archaeological animal bones and plants. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep.21, 1247–1258 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Shishlina, N. I. et al. Plant food subsistence in the human diet of the Bronze Age Caspian and Low Don steppe pastoralists: Archaeobotanical, isotope and 14C data. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot.27, 833–842 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Shishlina, N. I. et al. Paleoecology, subsistence, and 14C chronology of the Eurasian Caspian Steppe Bronze Age. Radiocarbon51, 481–499 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Schulting, R. J. & Richards, M. P. Stable isotope analysis of neolithic to late bronze age populations in the samara valley. In A Bronze Age Landscape in the Russian Steppes: The Samara Valley Project (eds Anthony, D. W. et al.) 127–148 (UCLA Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, Los Angeles, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Goslar, T. et al. Builders and users of ritual centres, Yampil Barrow Complex: Studies of diet based on stable carbon and nitrogen isotope composition. Baltic-Pontic Stud.22, 91–125 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Wentz, R. K. & de Grummond, N. T. Life on horseback: Palaeopathology of two scythian skeletons from alexandropol, Ukraine. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol.19, 107–115 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Ventresca Miller, A. R. et al. Mobility and diet in the Iron Age Pontic forest-steppe: A multi-isotopic study of urban populations at Bel’sk. Archaeometry61, 1399–1416 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute, G., Telizhenko, S. & Jones, M. K. Archaeobotanical investigation of two Scythian-Sarmatian period pits in eastern Ukraine: Implications for floodplain cereal cultivation. J. Field Archaeol.37, 51–60 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Boroffka, N. Romania, Moldova, and Bulgaria. In The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age (eds Fokkens, H. & Harding, A.) 877–897 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Gimbutas, M. Bronze Age Cultures in Central and Eastern Europe (Mouton & Co., The Hague, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Sava, E., Kaiser, E. Poselenie s „zolnicami” u cela Odaia-Miciurin, Republica Moldova/Die Siedlung mit “Aschehügeln” beim Dorf Odaia-Miciurin, Republik Moldova (Biblioteca Tyragetia XIX, 2011).

  81. 81.

    Sherratt, A. & Sherratt, S. Small worlds: Interaction and identity in the ancient Mediterranean. In The Aegean and the Orient in the Second Millennium (eds Cline, E. H. & Harris-Cline, D.) 329–342 (University of Texas, Austin, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Harding, A. F. European Societies in the Bronze Age (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Kristiansen, K. Interpreting bronze age trade and migration. In Human Mobility and Technological Transfer in the Prehistoric Mediterranean (eds Kiriatzi, E. & Knappett, C.) 154–180 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Kristiansen, K. & Larsson, T. B. The Rise of Bronze Age Society: Travels, Transmission and Transformations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Fischl, K. P., Kiss, V., Kulcsár, G. & Szeverényi, V. Transformations in the Carpathian Basin around 1600 B.C. In 1600—Kultureller Umbruch im Schatten des Thera-Ausbruchs? 1600—Cultural change in the Shadow of the Thera-Eruption? Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 9 (eds Meller, H. et al.) 355–371 (Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle, Halle, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Kiss, V. et al. 2015. Contribution to the Relative and Absolute Chronology of the Early and Middle Bronze Age in western Hungary Based on Radiocarbon Dating of Human Bones. In Bronze Age Chronology in the Carpathian Basin. Proceesings of the International Colloquium from Târgu Mureş (eds. Németh, R.E. & Rezi, B.) 23–36 (Târgu Mureş, 2015).

  87. 87.

    Gamarra, B. et al. 5000 years of dietary variations of prehistoric farmers in the Great Hungarian Plain. PLoS ONE13, e0197214 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    90Gyulai, F. Archaeobotany in Hungary. Seed, Fruit, Food and Beverage Remains in the Carpathian Basin: An Archaeobotanical Investigation of Plant Cultivation and Ecology from the Neolithic to the late Middle Ages (Archaeolingua, 2010).

  89. 89.

    Hajnalová, M. Archaeobotanika. Doby Bronzovey na Slovensku. Univerzita Konštantina Filozofa v Nitre, Filozofická fakulta (Nitra, 2012).

  90. 90.

    Cardarelli, A. The collapse of the Terramare culture and growth of new economic and social systems during the Late Bronze Age in Italy. Scienze dell’Antichità. Storia archeologia antropologia15, 449–520 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Cavazzuti, C. et al. Flows of people in villages and large centres in Bronze Age Italy through strontium and oxygen isotopes. PLoS ONE14, e0209693 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Massoti, S., Varalli, A., Goude, G., Moggi-Cecchi, J. & Gualdi-Russo, E. A combined analysis of dietary habits in the Bronze Age site of Ballabio (northern Italy). Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci.11, 1029–1047 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Mercuri, A. M. et al. Economy and environment of Bronze Age settlements—Terramaras—on the Po Plain (Northern Italy); first results from the archaeobotanical research at the Terramara di Montale. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot.16, 43–60 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    96Perego, R. Contribution to the development of the Bronze Age plant economy in the surrounding of the Alps: An archaeobotanical case study of two Early and Middle Bronze Age sites in northern Italy (Lake Garda region) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Basel, 2017).

  95. 95.

    Foltiny, S. Flange-hilted Cutting Swords of Bronze in Central Europe, Northeast Italy and Greece. Am. J. Archaeol.68, 247–257 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Sherratt, A. What would a Bronze Age world system look like? Relations between temperate Europe and the Mediterranean in later prehistory. J. Eur. Archaeol.1, 1–58 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Nesbitt, M. & Summers, G. D. Some recent discoveries of millet (Panicum miliaceum L. and Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.) at excavations in Turkey and Iran. Anatol. Stud.38, 85–97 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Vianello, A. Late Bronze Age Aegean trade routes in the Western Mediterranean. In The Aegean Bronze Age in Relation to the Wider European Context (ed. Whittaker, H.) 7–34 (Archaeopress, Oxford, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Wardle, K., Higham, T. & Kromer, B. Dating the end of the Greek bronze age: A robust radiocarbon-based chronology from Assiros Toumba. PLoS ONE9, e106672 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Kroll, H. Kulturpflanzen von Tyrins. Archäol. Anz.1982, 467–485 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Petroutsa, E. I. & Manolis, S. K. Reconstructing Late Bronze Age diet in mainland Greece using stable isotope analysis. J. Archaeol. Sci.37, 614–620 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Triantaphyllou, S. Stable isotope analysis of skeletal assemblages from prehistoric Northern Greece. In Archaeodiet in the Greek World: Dietary Reconstruction from Stable Isotope Analysis (eds Papathanasiou, A. et al.) 57–75 (The American School of Classical Studies, Athens, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Nitsch, E. et al. A bottom-up view of food surplus: using stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis to investigate agricultural strategies and diet at Bronze Age Archontiko and Thessaloniki Toumba, northern Greece. World Archaeol.49, 105–137 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Riehl, S. Bronze Age Environment and Economy in the Troad. The Archaeobotany of Kumtepe and Troy (Mo Vince Verlag, 1999).

  105. 105.

    Kristiansen, K. & Suchowska-Ducke, P. Connected Histories: The dynamics of bronze age interaction and trade 1500–1100 BC. Proc. Prehist. Soc.81, 361–392 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Makarowicz, P. The birth of a new world. Barrows, warriors, and metallurgists (1600–1200/1100 BC). In The Past Societies 3: 2000–500 BC. (eds. Urbanczyk P. & Bugaj U.) 129–186 (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2017).

  107. 107.

    Makarowicz, P., Górski, J. & Lysenko, S. D. Pontic and Transcarpathian cultural patterns in the Trzciniec Circle between the Prosna and Dnieper. Baltic-Pontic Stud.18, 162–202 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Przybyła, M. S. Middle Bronze Age social networks in the Carpathian Basin. Recherches Archéologiques8, 47–84 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Przybyła, M. S. Intercultural Contacts in the Western Carpathian Area at the Turn of the 2nd and 1st Millennia BC (Narodowe Centrum Kultury, Warsaw, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Dreslerová, D. & Kočár, P. Trends in cereal cultivation in the Czech Republic from the Neolithic to the Migration period (5500 B.C.–A.D. 580). Veg. Hist. Archaeobot.22, 257–268 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Šálková, T. et al. Crops along the trade routes? Archaeobotany of the Bronze Age in the region of South Bohemia (Czech Republic) in context with longer distance trade and exchange networks. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci.11, 5569–5590 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Kaupová, S., Param, D., Salaš, M., Unger, J. & Jarošová, I. Dietary variability during the Bronze Age in the area of present-day Czech Republic. Poster presentation (24th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists, Barcelona, Spain, 2018).

  113. 113.

    Kučera, L. et al. First direct evidence of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) in Central Europe. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci.11, 4221–4227 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Fojtík, P. Držovice (k.u. Držovice na Moravě, okr. Prostějov). Přehled vyzkumů57, 186–187 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Varalli, A., Desideri, J., Goude, G., David-Elbiali, M., Honegger, M. & Besse, M. Changing times, changing diet? Isotopic investigation of adult and childhood feeding practices in Switzerland in late prehistory. Poster presentation (20th Annual Conference of the British Association of Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology, Cranfield, UK, 2018).

  116. 116.

    Sjögren, K.-G., Price, T. D. & Kristiansen, K. Diet and Mobility in the corded ware of Central Europe. PLoS ONE11, e0155083 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Heron, C. et al. First molecular and isotopic evidence of millet processing in prehistoric pottery vessels. Sci. Rep.6, 1–9 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    120Falkenstein, F. The Development of Burial Rites from the Tumulus to the Urnfield Culture in Southern Central Europe. In Ancestral Landscape. Burial mounds in the Copper and Bronze Ages (Central and Eastern Europe—Balkans—Adriatic—Aegean, 4th–2nd millennium B.C.) (eds. Borgna E., Müller Celka S.) 329–340 (Travaux de la Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée, 2012).

  119. 119.

    Childe, V. G. The Lausitz culture. Antiquity2, 37–42 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Vandkilde, H. Breakthrough of the Nordic Bronze Age: Transcultural warriorhood and a Carpathian crossroad in the sixteenth century BC. Eur. J. Archaeol.17, 602–633 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Effenberger, H. The plant economy of the Northern European Bronze Age—more diversity through increased trade with southern regions. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot.27, 65–74 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Jantzen, D. et al. A Bronze Age battlefield? Weapons and trauma in the Tollense Valley, north-eastern Germany. Antiquity85, 417–433 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Price, T. D. et al. Multi-isotope proveniencing of human remains from a Bronze Age battlefield in the Tollense Valley in northeast Germany. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci.11, 33–49 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Anthony, D. W. Prehistoric migration as social process. In Migrations and Invasions in Archaeological Explanation (eds Chapman, J. & Hamerow, H.) 21–32 (Archaeopress, Oxford, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Liu, X. et al. From ecological opportunism to multi-cropping: Mapping food globalisation in prehistory. Quat. Sci. Rev.206, 21–28 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Brite, E. B., Kidd, F. J., Betts, A. & Negus Cleary, M. Millet cultivation in Central Asia: A response to Miller et al.. Holocene27, 1415–1422 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Hellmund, M. Frühneolitischer Anbau von Rispenhirse in Mitteldeutschland? – Der eisenzeitliche Rispenhirsefund von Hundisburg, Lkr. Börde. In: Archäologie in Sachsen-Anhalt 6 (eds. Meller H., Weber T.) 297–303 (Landesamt f. Denkmalpflege u. Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt, 2012).

  128. 128.

    Brock, F., Higham, T., Ditchfield, P. & Bronk Ramsey, C. Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon52, 103–112 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Grootes, P. M., Nadeau, M.-J. & Rieck, A. 14C-AMS at the Leibniz-Labor: Radiometric dating and isotope research. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B223, 55–61 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Blackwell, P. G. & Buck, C. E. The Late Glacial human reoccupation of north-western Europe: New approaches to space-time modelling. Antiquity77, 232–240 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Reimer, P. J. et al. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon55, 1869–1887 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/oxcal/OxCal.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

The radiocarbon dating of broomcorn millet grains from sites in Europe (‘Millet Dating Programme’) was carried out 2017–2019 within the Collaborative Research Centre SFB 1266: Scales of Transformation at Kiel University. The following colleagues and institutions (in alphabetical order) supplied some relevant information and help, or conducted excavations through which the study materials became available: Akademie der Wissenschaften und Literatur Mainz (Germany); Jaqueline Balen (Archaeological Museum Zagreb, Croatia); Lars Beckel (Tandem Laboratory, Uppsala University, Sweden); Wojciech Blajer (Institute of Archaeology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland); René Cappers (Institute for Pre- and Protohistory, Groningen University, the Netherlands); Andrea Cardarelli (La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy); Sofia Filatova, Anna Carina Lange, Ralf Opitz, Carsten Reckweg and Tanja Reiser (Institute for Pre- and Protohistory, Kiel University, Germany); Tomasz Goslar (Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory, Poznań, Poland); Lucija Grahek (ZRC SAZU, Institute of Archaeology, Ljubljana, Slovenia); Monika Griebl (OREA–Institute for Oriental and European Archaeology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria); Christian Hamann (Leibniz-Laboratory for AMS Dating and Stable Isotope Research, Kiel University, Germany); Immo Heske (Department of Pre- and Protohistory, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany); Hrvoje Kalafatić (Institute of Archaeology, Zagreb, Croatia); Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Jan Kolář (Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic); Marija Mihaljević (Gradski muzej Nova Gradiška, Croatia); Giedrė Motuzaitė Matuzevičiūtė (Bioarchaeology Research Centre, Vilnius University, Lithuania); Ludvig Papmehl-Dufay (Department of Cultural Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden); Michaela Popovtschak (Vienna, Austria); Lars Saalow and Jens-Peter Schmidt (Landesamt für Kultur und Denkmalpflege Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (LaKD M-V), Schwerin, Germany); Jürg Sedlmeier (Archäologie Baselland, Switzerland); Peter Turk (National Museum of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia). The study was funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Project number 2901391021-SFB 1266), including 117 radiocarbon dates from 70 sites. Four further radiocarbon dates from three sites (Lüdelsen 6, Olbetal-Hundisburg and Rathsdorf 5) were also funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)), some within the Priority Programme 1400. The unpublished dates from Ansfelden were funded by the Austrian Archaeological Institute (ÖAI) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW) and the Austrian Science Fund (Project code FWF I-1693). The unpublished date from Smuszewo 3 was funded by the Polish National Science Centre (Grant No. 2014/15/D/HS3/01304), and so was the one from Szczepidło 17 (Grant No. 2015/17/B/HS3/00114). The unpublished date from Radis was funded by the Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt—Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte Halle (Saale) (LDA ST—LV Halle). The unpublished dates from Cornești-Iarcuri, six of which are included here, were funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Project code Sto 720/4-2, 3). Two unpublished dates from Badegow were funded by the Landesamt für Kultur und Denkmalpflege Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (LaKD M-V).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.F., J.M., M.D.C. and W.K. initiated and designed the study. W.K. supervised the project. D.F. coordinated the dating programme. All authors contributed the materials and/or data. D.F. and J.M compiled and validated the materials and data. J.M. conducted formal analysis, developed and tested the model and visualised the results. D.F. and J.M. wrote the main manuscript and prepared the supplementary materials. J.M. wrote the supplementary text and prepared the supplementary figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dragana Filipović or John Meadows.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filipović, D., Meadows, J., Corso, M.D. et al. New AMS 14C dates track the arrival and spread of broomcorn millet cultivation and agricultural change in prehistoric Europe. Sci Rep 10, 13698 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70495-z

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing