Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Effects of weaning age and housing conditions on phenotypic differences in mice


Poor reproducibility is considered a serious problem in laboratory animal research, with important scientific, economic, and ethical implications. One possible source of conflicting findings in laboratory animal research are environmental differences between animal facilities combined with rigorous environmental standardization within studies. Due to phenotypic plasticity, study-specific differences in environmental conditions during development can induce differences in the animals’ responsiveness to experimental treatments, thereby contributing to poor reproducibility of experimental results. Here, we studied how variation in weaning age (14–30 days) and housing conditions (single versus group housing) affects the phenotype of SWISS mice as measured by a range of behavioral and physiological outcome variables. Weaning age, housing conditions, and their interaction had little effect on the development of stereotypies, as well as on body weight, glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations, and behavior in the elevated plus-maze and open field test. These results are surprising and partly in conflict with previously published findings, especially with respect to the effects of early weaning. Our results thus question the external validity of previous findings and call for further research to identify the sources of variation between replicate studies and study designs that produce robust and reproducible experimental results.


Over the last years, concerns have been raised that reproducibility of experimental results in laboratory animal research may be at stake1,2,3. These concerns may in part be due to the limited external validity of individual studies4,5,6, which in combination with binary criteria of statistical significance and publication bias may produce conflicting findings7. Both, experimental studies and meta-analyses suggest that the laboratory environment is an important factor contributing to variation in behavioral and physiological measures between studies5,6,8,9,10,11,12. Differences in environmental parameters between laboratories might affect animals during testing (through variation in test paradigms), or they might produce variation in the animals’ phenotypes (through variation in early experiences and housing conditions). If common variation in early experiences and housing conditions shapes the animals' phenotypes in such a way that it substantially affects behavioral and physiological outcome variables, then phenotypic plasticity can be an important factor contributing to conflicting findings in laboratory animal research13.

Two aspects of early experience and housing conditions that commonly vary between studies on laboratory mice are weaning age and single versus group housing. Weaning, the detachment of the offspring from the mother, as part of the transition to nutritional and behavioral independence, represents a major challenge during early development. It is, therefore, not surprising that weaning plays an important role in shaping the development of various structural, neurological, physiological, and behavioral traits14,15,16,17. Moreover, the disruption of the mother–offspring relationship prior to weaning has been shown to have persistent effects on offspring phenotype in mice and rats18,19,20,21,22.

Under naturalistic conditions, physiological and behavioral changes related to weaning in mice occur between postnatal days 14 and 17, with decreases in food intake and pup-directed behavior by the dam, and a transition to the eating of solid food by the pups23,24,25. Weaning typically ends around postnatal day 2323,24,25, but depending on the litter size can extend until postnatal day 30–3526,27,28,29.

In commercial breeding facilities, weaning occurs usually in the third week after birth. If dams are checked for parturition twice weekly—which according to personal communication with various commercial breeders seems to be common practice—newly weaned animals may range in age from 17 to 25 days of age. In addition to the timing of weaning, the process of weaning itself differs between the natural condition and the routine in breeding facilities. Under natural conditions, weaning is a gradual transitionary process occurring over several days to weeks, while weaning in breeding facilities is characterized by the instant and permanent separation of the offspring from the mother at a pre-set day; usually around postnatal day 2129.

Due to its potential effects on the adult phenotype, including its contribution to variability in behavioral and neurophysiological tests, the effects of early weaning have been the subject of several studies. In those studies, the response of early weaned animals—where early usually refers to weaning between postnatal day 14 and 17—was contrasted to responses of standard weaned mice—i.e., mice weaned around day 2130. Early weaning has been reported to lead to concomitant increases in measures of anxiety and aggressive behavior18,31,32,33, an increased incidence of stereotypic behavior34,35, and higher hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis reactivity in response to novelty and stress18. Additionally, early weaned male mice showed neurological and neurophysiological changes, including decreased BDNF levels in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus36, precocious myelination in the amygdala, and reduced bromodeoxyuridine immunoreactivity in the dentate gyrus31. At the proximate level, these changes seem to be mediated by the consequential elevation of corticosterone levels at and subsequent to weaning18,36. Finally, recent research has also provided evidence for epigenetic changes in the germline at promoter sites of several candidate genes associated with early weaning37.

Few studies have investigated the effects of late weaning (> 21 days of age), but there is some evidence that the effects of late weaning are opposite to early weaning—leading to reduced anxiety and more social behavior27,28. Terranova and colleagues studied the effect of weaning age and its consequences for mouse social and non-social behavior when treated with a delta-opioid antagonist, SNC8014. For this purpose, they weaned SWISS CD-1 mice at 15, 20, and 25 days. Importantly, they found treatment × sex × weaning age interactions, with all three weaning ages having different effects on some of the outcome measures. Together with observational evidence of maternal mouse behavior under naturalistic or semi-naturalistic conditions, the results of the existing literature indicate that weaning age may interact with other aspects of the early environment to exert complex effects on the developing animal.

Single housing as opposed to group housing has also been reported to affect the phenotype of mice38,39. Numerous studies found that singly housed mice have alterations in corticosterone levels, neurochemistry, metabolism, growth, reproduction and dopaminergic hyperactivity in shared neural regions implicated with the performance of stereotypy21,34,35,40,41,42,43,44,45. Additionally, several studies comparing group housed and singly housed male rodents suggest that single housing leads to diminished coping with stressors, immunodeficiency, and a higher incidence of pathology46.

Given the sensitivity of the effect of single housing to life history characteristics, we hypothesized that weaning age should modulate phenotypic responsivity to housing conditions. In this study, we therefore investigated how weaning age, varied across five ages (14, 18, 22, 26 and 30 days), and housing conditions (single versus group housing) affected the phenotype of male and female mice.



This study employed a 5 (weaning age) × 2 (housing condition) × 2 (sex) full factorial design (Table 1). The unit of measurement was a focal animal within each cage.

Table 1 Distribution of subjects by treatment and sex.


Dams: ordering, delivery, sorting and allocation to treatment

Two batches, each containing 22 primiparous RjORL:SWISS (hereafter SWISS) dams in their second week of gestation, were ordered from Janvier Labs, France. Batch 2 was delivered 14 weeks after batch 1. Each batch of mice was delivered in 2 boxes, 11 dams per box. All dams gave birth within 5–7 days after arrival to the laboratory and successfully reared pups. Litter sizes ranged from 9–18 pups.

The number of pups born to each litter was counted, and the sex of each pup ascertained 7–10 days after birth. Fifteen of the 22 litters per batch were selected based on the criteria that the number of males and females per litter was greater than four and where the sex ratio was ≥ 0.5 and ≤ 2.5. These fifteen litters were then allocated to weaning treatments using stratified random sampling of sex ratio and litter size (see Supplementary Table 1). A subset of the remaining litters was used to generate stimulus animals for use in the social odor test (see “Anxiety in the elevated plus-maze, open field, and social odor tests”; 15 males and 15 females per batch); the remaining animals were euthanized.

Pups: weaning, monitoring and isolation housing

Litters were weaned according to their treatment allocation and pups were housed in same-sex groups of four animals per cage. Pups were considered for inclusion at weaning if their weight was within one standard deviation of the mean litter weight—experimental subjects were randomly selected from this pool of animals within litter. At weaning, pups were assigned a permanent intradermal ear-tattoo for identification and were given food pellets within the cage twice daily. Additionally, in experimental week 6, all animals were assigned a unique fur mark using a non-toxic animal paint marker (Stoelting Co, Illinois, USA) for individual identification during video recording (see Fig. 1). During routine weekly husbandry, one randomly selected focal animal, between ages 49–52, was removed from each cage of four animals and singly housed for the remainder of the experiment (Fig. 1). The age of single housing was selected because it is typically associated with dispersal from the natal nest and sexual maturity47,48,49.

Figure 1

Experimental timeline until isolation housing of focal animal.

Husbandry procedures

Animals were kept on a reversed 12:12 light/dark cycle with lights on at 19:00. Red light emitting diodes (LED) remained on throughout the entire cycle. Temperature was maintained at 22 ± 1 °C with an average humidity of 40%. All animals were provided wood shavings (Lignocel® select), 10 g of Sizzle Pet® nesting material, and had ad libitum access to rodent chow (Kliba Nafag Switzerland, #3800 dams; #3430 weaned animals) and tap water.

Dams and weaned pups were housed in conditions above Switzerland’s minimum standards (c.f., Supplementary Table 2 for details). Dams were left undisturbed for the first 2 weeks after arrival to the laboratory to permit for acclimatization to the new environment and to enhance the chances of pup survival after parturition. Husbandry procedures were otherwise performed weekly for all animals.

Outcome variables

Data were collected across a range of measures, including: (i) measures of behavior in the home-cage (transition to feeding from solid food in pups and stereotypy behavior performance as adults); (ii) an index of growth (body weight); (iii) indices of anxiety in three behavioral tests (elevated plus-maze behavior, open field behavior and a social odor test); and (iv) endocrine stress responses (glucocorticoid metabolites in feces) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2

Timeline for assessment of outcome variables for a single batch of animals. Behavioral tests were conducted in the following order: elevated plus-maze, open field, and social odor test. Figure 1 indicates when maternal behavior was recorded.

Home-cage behavior

Transition to feeding from solid food

Under naturalistic conditions, weaning in mice is, in part, associated with a transition to the feeding from solid food23,24,25. Pups were therefore recorded when feeding from the food hopper using instantaneous sampling at 1-min intervals, yielding 180 data points per cage per time-point (see Supplementary Table 3 for ethogram). Each cage of mice was video recorded for 24 h prior to each weaning time-point (see Fig. 2). Mice were observed for 30 min, within 6 1-h time windows for each 24 h video recording; three time-windows within the light phase (7:00–7:30; 11:00–11:30; 15:00–15:30) and three within the dark phase (19:00–19:30; 23:00–23:30; 3:00–3:30). Video–recordings were scored using Noldus Observer XT (version 11.5) by JN and by JDB for inter-rater reliability assessment only. Five percent of all videos were rescored for assessment of intra- and inter-rater reliabilities which were high throughout50, with κ > 0.85.

Stereotypic behavior

We predicted that earlier weaning followed by single housing should either increase the probability of or potentiate the expression of stereotypic behavior. To investigate this prediction, all cages were recorded for 24 h each prior to the end of the experiment. Video-recordings were then scored for stereotypic behavior using Solomon coder (version 17.03.22) by JN and by MR for inter-rater reliability assessment only. For each cage, all animals were observed and the duration of stereotypic behavior scored using continuous sampling (see Supplementary Table 4 for ethogram). Mice were observed for 15 min within five 1-h time windows (09:00–10:00, 10:00–11:00, 12:00–13:00, 13:00–14:00 and 14:00–15:00). These time windows had been determined by pilot observations to represent intervals of high activity. This method yielded 75 min of coding per animal for each treatment. Ten percent of all videos were rescored for assessment of intra- and inter-rater reliabilities, which were high throughout50, with κ > 0.84.

Growth: body weight

Experimental animals were weighed at weaning and every 4 days thereafter, until 34 days of age. Subsequently, animals were weighed weekly during routine animal husbandry.

Anxiety in the elevated plus-maze, open field, and social odor tests

We used four elevated plus-mazes and four open field arenas; the social odor test was also performed in the open field arena. Elevated plus-mazes were made of polycarbonate with infrared (850 nm) backlit floors. Each maze consisted of four arms, each 30 cm in length and 6 cm wide with a center square measuring 6 × 6 cm. Two arms, opposite to each other, were open with a small lip around the perimeter, 0.5 cm high, while the remaining two arms were enclosed with walls 15 cm high. The open field arenas were made of polycarbonate with dimensions 45 × 45 × 45 cm with infrared (850 nm) backlit floors. The social odor test was a modification of a commonly used social interaction test, as described by Seth and File51,52. Instead of using a behaving conspecific, we instead used an ethologically relevant source of anxiety (soiled bedding from an unfamiliar conspecific). This modification permitted behavioral differences to be solely attributable to exposure to a novel olfactory stimulus as opposed to the dyadic interaction of two individuals. Similar to the social interaction test, we predicted that an increase in odor investigation without an increase in motor activity would be indicative of an anxiolytic effect, whereas a decrease in odor investigation with an increase in general exploration would be indicative of an anxiogenic effect.

For the three tests, mice from each cage were randomly assigned to one of two experimenters (JN and JDB). Subjects were counterbalanced across three blocks, with each block containing five animals of each sex and weaning age within a housing condition (single or group housed). Animals were tested in the same order across all three tests.

Behavior on the elevated plus-maze and the open field was assessed in single 5-min sessions, and all tests were conducted between 900 and 1,200 h on separate days. Animals were always tested first in the elevated plus-maze, and then in the open-field because behavior in the open-field was used as a baseline in the social odor test. Additionally, this order permitted some degree of habituation to the open-field arena where the social odor test was consequently performed. Animals were placed into the center of the elevated plus-maze and the open-field, with the head facing a closed arm in the former. The outcome variables of interest in the elevated plus-maze test were: (1) distance traveled and (2) time spent in the open arms. In the open field test, we measured: (1) distance traveled; (2) time spent in the center of the arena; and (3) time spent in the corners of the arena.

The social odor test was performed on the day following the open field test, which served as our baseline comparison for exploratory behavior. A plastic container (10 × 7 × 7 cm; L × W × H) containing approximately 15 g of soiled bedding from a novel same-sexed conspecific within a mesh “potpourri” bag was placed in the center of the open field arena. Three stimulus cages for each sex were used for the provision of soiled bedding and were allocated to our treatments such that soiled bedding from a single stimulus cage was presented only once to each weaning age and housing condition. Holes, 0.5 cm in diameter and spaced approximately 3 cm apart, were located on the top and sides of the plastic container to allow for diffusion of odor cues. The container occupied approximately one half of the center area of the open field and allowed for exploration within the center area of the open field from any angle, including the top of the plastic container. The outcome variables of interest were: (1) the change in distance traveled compared to the open field test and (2) time spent-in-the center where the odor stimulus was located.

For each test session, the cage to be tested was brought to the test room and the overhead lights (120 lx) were turned on. The four animals were then each removed from their cage and placed into the apparatus by the assigned experimenter. At the end of the test, the animals were replaced into the home-cage, and the cage was returned to the housing room. Between test sessions, the arenas were cleaned with 70% isopropanol. Outcome measures were scored live by Noldus EthoVision XT (version 11.5). The accuracy of video tracking was subsequently evaluated by JDB from video recordings to ensure that issues associated with automated tracking were eliminated53. The detection settings for tracking were selected so that both the percentage of samples in which the subject was not found and the percentage of samples skipped were less than 1% per trial.

Adrenocortical activity: fecal glucocorticoid metabolite analysis

Non-invasive methods of quantifying circulating levels of glucocorticoids, a primary product of the activation of the HPA stress system, are preferable to invasive methods such as blood sampling because they do not elicit a stress response54. In mammals, glucocorticoids are metabolized by the liver and are excreted in both urine and feces55. A method of analyzing these metabolized by-products has been developed and validated55,56 and was used as a measure of stress-induced adrenocortical activity of the mice.

Fecal boli were collected in the dark phase under red light approximately 24 h after cage changes. A minimum of 6 boli per animal per cage was collected. Samples were immediately frozen at − 20 °C and later processed blinded to experimental treatment (JN and RP) for measurement of corticosterone metabolites (ng/0.05 g feces) according to the method described by Touma et al.57,58. In total, 120 samples were processed.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM™ SPSS Statistics (version 25). For parametric models, assumptions of normally distributed errors and homogeneity of variance were examined graphically. Based on these inspections, only one transformation was necessary—the proportion of time where animals performed stereotypic behavior was cube-root transformed. Sex was analyzed separately for each model. If both sexes showed converging trends, combined probabilities were calculated. Batch was included in all models as a fixed effect—no significant differences were observed and batch is not discussed further. The full model, including all fixed effects and their interaction, was always run. p-values are presented as actual values rounded to three decimal places. Due to multiple testing, we recommend interpreting p-values against Bonferroni corrected threshold levels of α′ = 0.0125 for body weight prior to weaning, α′ = 0.0035 for body weight after weaning, α′ = 0.0041 for behavior in the elevated plus maze, α′ = 0.0027 for behavior in the open field test, α′ = 0.0025 for behavior in the social odor test and α′ = 0.0083 for glucocorticoid metabolite concentration. This correction controls for the family wise error rate associated with each outcome measure. Raw data for all outcome measures will be made available upon request.

Transition to feeding from solid food was analyzed using Kruskall–Wallis independent sample tests due to the high degree of skewness observed in the data. Data were summed across all observation intervals and expressed as proportions. Kruskall–Wallis pairwise comparisons with a Dunn–Bonferroni correction were planned to delineate the pattern of significant differences among more than two groups.

Stereotypic behavior was analyzed using the MIXED procedure. Weaning age, and housing condition (single or group) were treated as categorical fixed effects. Data were summed across all observation intervals and expressed as proportions of active time. Overall stereotypy level, rather than stereotypy type, was used as the primary outcome measure given the high degree of heterogeneity in stereotypy type that was observed.

Body weight was analyzed using the MIXED procedure and separate analyses were run before and after the single housing of a focal animal. Prior to single housing, weaning age was treated as a categorical fixed effect, with week as a continuous covariate. Subsequent to single housing, weaning age and housing condition (single or group) were treated as categorical fixed effects, with week as a continuous covariate.

Measures of anxiety—elevated plus-maze, open field behavior and the social interaction tests—were analyzed using the MIXED procedure. Weaning age, and housing condition (single or group) were treated as categorical fixed effects. For the social interaction test only, day of testing was included as a categorical fixed effect.

Fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations were analyzed using the MIXED procedure. Weaning age and housing condition (single or group) were treated as categorical fixed effects.

Ethical statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Swiss Animal Welfare Ordinance (TSchV 455.1) and was approved by the Cantonal Veterinary Office in Bern, Switzerland (permit number: BE36/17).


Transition to feeding from solid food

In general, the proportion of intervals in which prior to weaning at least one pup was observed feeding from the food hopper increased with age (H = 291.87, p < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons indicated that feeding from the hopper varied between all age groups, except between those aged 23–24 and 27–28 (Fig. 3).

Figure 3

Proportion of intervals when at least one pup was observed feeding from the food hopper. The sample size, n, refers to the number of cages observed.

Stereotypic behavior

The proportion of time in which animals performed stereotypic behavior varied only in relation to housing condition—animals that were singly housed performed more stereotypic behavior compared to those that were group housed (Fig. 4; Table 2).

Figure 4

Proportion of active time (median an IQR) where animals were engaged in stereotypic behavior in relation to weaning age and housing condition.

Table 2 Summary of results by outcome measure.

Growth: body weight

The effects of weaning age on body weight, up to 52 days of age, were restricted to animals weaned at age 14—in both male and female mice, animals weaned at 14 days of age weighed less than animals weaned at 18, 22, and 26 days of age, but only until the age of 26 days (Fig. 5; Table 2).

Figure 5

Change in body weight (mean ± SE) across time (ages 14–52) and in relation to age of weaning.

During the period of differential housing conditions between 59 to 101 days of age, body weight continued to increase in both sexes; however, body weight did neither vary by weaning age, housing condition, as an interaction between these two or variables, nor as an interaction with age (Fig. 6, Table 2).

Figure 6

Change in body weight (mean ± SE) across time (ages 59–101) and in relation to age of weaning and housing condition.

Anxiety in the elevated plus-maze, open field, and social interaction tests

Total distance travelled in the elevated-plus maze did not significantly vary with housing condition in both sexes after correction for multiple testing. However, we found a trend in both sexes and after calculating a combined probability we do find an indication that, overall, singly housed mice travelled greater distances than group housed mice (males and females combined: Χ2 = 16.094, p = 0.003). There is a tentative interaction of weaning age and housing condition in male mice, though after correcting for multiple testing, this effect is no longer statistically significant. For the time-in-open arms, we did not observe any differences (Fig. 7, Table 2).

Figure 7

Variation in distance traveled and time-in-open arms (mean ± SE) in relation to weaning age and housing condition in the elevated-plus maze.

Behavior in the open field did not vary due to weaning age or housing condition after correction for multiple testing (Fig. 8, Table 2).

Figure 8

Variation in distance traveled, time-in-center and time-in-corners (mean ± SE) in relation to weaning age and housing condition in the open field.

Behavior in the social odor test varied by housing condition and day of testing, but not as an interaction between any of these variables. Regardless of sex, singly housed mice spent less time in proximity to the social odor cue (time-in-center) and males traveled a greater distance in the open field arena. Additionally, all mice displayed a classic habituation response to the open field arena, traveling smaller distances when exposed to the arena for a second time (Fig. 9, Table 2).

Figure 9

Variation in change in distance traveled (mean ± SE) across two days of testing and time-in-center (i.e., in proximity to the odor stimulus) in relation to weaning age and housing condition in the social odor test.

Adrenocortical activity: glucocorticoid metabolites in feces

Glucocorticoid levels did not vary with weaning age or housing condition (Fig. 10, Table 2).

Figure 10

Variation in glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations (mean ± SE) in relation to weaning age and housing condition.


To study the effects of variation in weaning age and housing condition on phenotypic differences in mice, we weaned SWISS mice at five different weaning ages, ranging from 14–30 days of age, into same-sex littermate groups of four, and split them into single housing and group housing cohorts at the age of 7 weeks. Both weaning age and housing condition had surprisingly small effects on the animals’ phenotype.

Directly after weaning, we found an effect of weaning age on body weight that was, however, short-lived and from 26 days of age onwards—neither weaning age nor housing condition or a combination of the two had any consistent effects on body weight. As predicted, levels of stereotypic behavior were increased by single housing in both male and female mice, but contrary to our predictions were unaffected be weaning age. Compared to group housed animals, singly housed animals also travelled a greater distance in the elevated plus-maze and in the open field. Additionally, singly housed animals spent less time near the odor stimulus in the social odor test. In contrast, weaning age did not affect behavior in the elevated plus-maze or in the open field—neither in group housed nor in singly housed mice. Only in the social odor test did we find an effect of weaning age on the distance travelled, but only in males. Finally, glucocorticoid metabolite concentration as an indicator of stress was affected neither by weaning age, nor by housing condition.

These findings differ substantially from our predictions and are surprising in light of the published literature, which describes persistent effects of early weaning (day 14) compared to standard weaning age (day 21) on several of the outcomes measured here. By far the most consistently reported effect of early weaning in mice relates to differences in behavioral and neuroendocrine measures of anxiety—with early weaned mice being more anxious compared to standard weaned mice18,31,59,60. Similar to the present study, other studies have not reported persistent changes in body weight when comparing early to standard weaned animals18,31,33,34. While the effects of early weaning compared to standard weaning are reasonably well described, far fewer studies have compared the effects of late weaning (up to day 35) to standard weaning27,28,29. Mice weaned on day 28 or 35 were behaviorally less anxious in the open-field and elevated plus maze, with concordantly lower levels of corticosterone secretion, and displayed less social behavior in social interaction tests27,28,29.

In contrast to the effects of weaning age, our results on the effects of single housing compared to group housing are reasonably consistent with other studies35,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68. Overall, there seem to be no strong and consistent effects of single housing on measures of anxiety in the open-field and elevated plus maze, on social behavior, and on neuroendocrine responses, and similar to the present study, reported effects are partly sex-specific40.

Taken together, our results corroborate the finding that the effects of weaning age and/or single housing may vary due to heterogeneity in conditions and procedures between replicate studies. For example, in a review on the effects of individual housing, Krohn and colleagues highlighted that the method of individual housing, the strain and sex of the mice, cage sizes, flooring conditions, outcomes measured, and data analysis all varied between studies, and attributed differences in the results to such differences in study protocols40.

Although similar variation in results exist among studies on early weaning, these have not been discussed in terms of differences in conditions and procedures between studies30,69. For example, in their initial work in 2006, Kikusui et al. reported that corticosterone levels were increased for as much as 8 weeks after early weaning, while in 2009 they found a much more limited increase for only 48 h after weaning18,36.

In the present study, several procedural aspects may have contributed to the observed results. For example, dams were shipped from the breeder to our laboratory during the second week of pregnancy and had to adapt to a new environment, while in other studies the animals were bred in-house17,31,59,70. Potentially, gestational stress due to transport and acclimatization to a new environment may have overridden the effects of early weaning and single housing71,72. At weaning, we provided moistened food twice daily to facilitate the transition to feeding from solid food, and 10 g of nesting material to attenuate thermal stress, while other studies weaned the pups into standard laboratory cages without any supporting measures17,18,36. Thus, the method of early weaning used here may have been less stressful for the pups compared to other studies.

In light of growing concerns over poor reproducibility in animal research, the heterogeneity in both the results and study protocols among replicate studies questions the external validity of results from individual studies. In particular, differences between study protocols in combination with rigorous within-study standardization may cause conflicting findings between replicate studies4,5,6,13. However, the two procedural factors systematically varied here, weaning age and housing conditions, introduced relatively little variation in the results across a broad range of phenotypic measures. This suggests that other factors that normally vary between laboratories (e.g. strain of mouse, microbiome, and experimenter to name but a few) may account for the observed differences between replicate studies. This calls for further research into the sources of variation in the results between replicate studies, as well as effective ways of designing studies to produce robust and reproducible results.


  1. 1.

    Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Begley, C. G. & Ellis, L. M. Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483, 531–533 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Prinz, F., Schlange, T. & Asadullah, K. Believe it or not: How much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 712 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bailoo, J. D., Reichlin, T. S. & Würbel, H. Refinement of experimental design and conduct in laboratory animal research. ILAR J. 55, 383–391 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Richter, S. H., Garner, J. P. & Würbel, H. Environmental standardization: Cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments?. Nat. Methods 6, 257–261 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Voelkl, B., Vogt, L., Sena, E. S. & Würbel, H. Reproducibility of preclinical animal research improves with heterogeneity of study samples. PLoS Biol. 16, e2003693 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Amrhein, V., Trafimow, D. & Greenland, S. Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics: There is no replication crisis if we don’t expect replication. Am. Stat. 73(sup1), 262–270 (2019).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bohlen, M. et al. Experimenter effects on behavioral test scores of eight inbred mouse strains under the influence of ethanol. Behav. Brain Res. 272, 46–54 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Corrigan, J. K. et al. A big-data approach to understanding metabolic rate and response to obesity in laboratory mice. bioRxiv (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, D. L. & Dudek, B. C. Genetics of mouse behavior: Interactions with laboratory environment. Science (80-). 284, 1670–1672 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wahlsten, D. et al. Different data from different labs: Lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction. J. Neurobiol. 54, 283–311 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Richter, S. H. et al. Effect of population heterogenization on the reproducibility of mouse behavior: A multi-laboratory study. PLoS ONE 6, e16461 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Voelkl, B. & Würbel, H. Reproducibility crisis: Are we ignoring reaction norms?. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 37(7), 509–510 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Terranova, M. L. & Laviola, G. Delta opioid modulation of social interactions in juvenile mice weaned at different ages. Physiol. Behav. 73, 393–400 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ladd, C. O., Owens, M. J. & Nemeroff, C. B. Persistent changes in corticotropin-releasing factor neuronal systems induced by maternal deprivation. Endocrinology 137, 1212–1218 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Berry, A. et al. Social deprivation stress is a triggering factor for the emergence of anxiety- and depression-like behaviours and leads to reduced brain BDNF levels in C57BL/6J mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37, 762–772 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kanari, K., Kikusui, T., Takeuchi, Y. & Mori, Y. Multidimensional structure of anxiety-related behavior in early-weaned rats. Behav. Brain Res. 156, 45–52 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kikusui, T., Nakamura, K., Kakuma, Y. & Mori, Y. Early weaning augments neuroendocrine stress responses in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 175, 96–103 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Francis, D. D., Champagne, F. A., Liu, D. & Meaney, M. J. Maternal care, gene expression, and the development of individual differences in stress reactivity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 896, 66–84 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bailoo, J. D., Jordan, R. L., Garza, X. J. & Tyler, A. N. Brief and long periods of maternal separation affect maternal behavior and offspring behavioral development in C57BL/6 mice. Dev. Psychobiol. 56, 674–685 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bailoo, J. D., Varholick, J. A., Garza, X. J., Jordan, R. L. & Hintze, S. Maternal separation followed by isolation-housing differentially affects prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response in C57BL/6 mice. Dev. Psychobiol. 58, 937–944 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Macrí, S., Mason, G. J. & Würbel, H. Dissociation in the effects of neonatal maternal separations on maternal care and the offspring’s HPA and fear responses in rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 20, 1017–1024 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Krackow, S. & Hoeck, H. N. Sex ratio manipulation, maternal investment and behaviour during concurrent pregnancy and lactation in house mice. Anim. Behav. 37, 177–186 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    König, B. & Markl, H. Maternal care in house mice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20, 1–9 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    König, B. Components of lifetime reproductive success in communally and solitarily nursing house mice: A laboratory study. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34, 275–283 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hall, F. S. Social deprivation of neonatal, adolescent, and adult rats has distinct neurochemical and behavioral consequences. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 12, 129–162 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Richter, S. H. et al. A time to wean? Impact of weaning age on anxiety-like behaviour and stability of behavioural traits in full adulthood. PLoS ONE 11, e0167652 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Curley, J. P. et al. The meaning of weaning: Influence of the weaning period on behavioral development in mice. Dev. Neurosci. 31, 318–331 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bechard, A. & Mason, G. Leaving home: A study of laboratory mouse pup independence. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 125, 181–188 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kikusui, T. & Mori, Y. Behavioural and neurochemical consequences of early weaning in rodents. J. Neuroendocrinol. 21, 427–431 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kikusui, T., Kiyokawa, Y. & Mori, Y. Deprivation of mother-pup interaction by early weaning alters myelin formation in male, but not female, ICR mice. Brain Res. 1133, 115–122 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nakamura, K., Kikusui, T., Takeuchi, Y. & Mori, Y. Changes in social instigation- and food restriction-induced aggressive behaviors and hippocampal 5HT1B mRNA receptor expression in male mice from early weaning. Behav. Brain Res. 187, 442–448 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Nakamura, K., Kikusui, T., Takeuchi, Y. & Mori, Y. The influence of early weaning on aggressive behavior in mice. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 65, 1347–1349 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Würbel, H. & Stauffacher, M. Age and weight at weaning affect corticosterone level and development of stereotypies in ICR-mice. Anim. Behav. 53, 891–900 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Latham, N. R. & Mason, G. J. Maternal deprivation and the development of stereotypic behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 110, 84–108 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kikusui, T., Ichikawa, S. & Mori, Y. Maternal deprivation by early weaning increases corticosterone and decreases hippocampal BDNF and neurogenesis in mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34, 762–772 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Franklin, T. B. et al. Epigenetic transmission of the impact of early stress across generations. Biol. Psychiatry 68, 408–415 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Olsson, I. A. S. & Westlund, K. More than numbers matter: The effect of social factors on behaviour and welfare of laboratory rodents and non-human primates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103, 229–254 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cacioppo, S., Capitanio, J. P. & Cacioppo, J. T. Toward a neurology of loneliness. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1464–1504 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Krohn, T. C., Sorensen, D. B., Ottesen, J. L. & Hansen, A. K. The effects of individual housing on mice and rats: A review. Anim. Welf. 15, 343–352 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Brain, P. What does individual housing mean to a mouse?. Life Sci. 16, 187–200 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Valzelli, L. The ‘isolation syndrome’ in mice. Psychopharmacologia 31, 305–320 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Albin, R. L., Young, A. B. & Penney, J. B. The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends Neurosci. 12, 366–375 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Deroche, V., Piazza, P. V., Moal, M. L. & Simon, H. Social isolation-induced enhancement of the psychomotor effects of morphine depends on corticosterone secretion. Brain Res. 640, 136–139 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Piazza, P. V. et al. Suppression of glucocorticoid secretion and antipsychotic drugs have similar effects on the mesolimbic dopaminergic transmission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 15445–15450 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Van Loo, P. L. P. P., Van Zutphen, L. F. M. M. & Baumans, V. Male management: Coping with aggression problems in male laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. 37, 300–313 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Gerlach, G. Dispersal mechanisms in a captive wild house mouse population (Mus domesticus Rutty). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41, 271–277 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Gerlach, G. Emigration mechanisms in fetal house mice: A laboratory investigation of the influence of social structure, population density, and aggression. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39, 159–170 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Berry, R. J. & Bronson, F. H. Life history and bioeconomy of the house mouse. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 67, 519–550 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jansen, R. G., Wiertz, L., Meyer, E. S. & Noldus, L. P. J. J. Reliability analysis of observational data: Problems, solutions, and software implementation. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 35, 391–399 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pellow, S., Chopin, P., File, S. & Briley, M. Validation of open: Closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J. Neurosci. Methods 14, 149–167 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    File, S. E. & Seth, P. A review of 25 years of the social interaction test. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 463, 35–53 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bailoo, J. D., Bohlen, M. O. & Wahlsten, D. L. The precision of video and photocell tracking systems and the elimination of tracking errors with infrared backlighting. J. Neurosci. Methods 188, 45–52 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Möstl, E. & Palme, R. Hormones as indicators of stress. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 23, 67–74 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Touma, C. & Palme, R. Measuring Fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in mammals and birds: The importance of validation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1046, 54–74 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Palme, R. Non-invasive measurement of glucocorticoids: Advances and problems. Physiol. Behav. 199, 229–243 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Touma, C., Sachser, N., Möstl, E. & Palme, R. Effects of sex and time of day on metabolism and excretion of corticosterone in urine and feces of mice. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 130, 267–278 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Touma, C., Palme, R. & Sachser, N. Analyzing corticosterone metabolites in fecal samples of mice: A noninvasive technique to monitor stress hormones. Horm. Behav. 45, 10–22 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kikusui, T., Takeuchi, Y. & Mori, Y. Early weaning induces anxiety and aggression in adult mice. Physiol. Behav. 81, 37–42 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Iwata, E., Kikusui, T., Takeuchi, Y. & Mori, Y. Fostering and environmental enrichment ameliorate anxious behavior induced by early weaning in Balb/c mice. Physiol. Behav. 91, 318–324 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Benton, D. & Brain, P. F. Behavioral and adrenocortical reactivity in female mice following individual or group housing. Dev. Psychobiol. 14, 101–107 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Goldsmith, J. F., Brain, P. F. & Benton, D. Effects of the duration of individual or group housing on behavioural and adrenocortical reactivity in male mice. Physiol. Behav. 21, 757–760 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Faggin, B. M. & Palermo-Neto, J. Differential alterations in brain sensitivity to amphetamine and pentylenetetrazol in socially deprived mice. Gen. Pharmacol. 16, 299–302 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Cairns, R. B., Hood, K. E. & Midlam, J. On fighting in mice: Is there a sensitive period for isolation effects?. Anim. Behav. 33, 166–180 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    de Catanzaro, D. & Gorzalka, B. B. Sexual arousal in male mice: Effects of brief periods of isolation or grouping. Behav. Neural Biol. 28, 442–453 (1980).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Einon, D. F., Humphreys, A. P., Chivers, S. M., Field, S. & Naylor, V. Isolation has permanent effects upon the behavior of the rat, but not the mouse, gerbil, or guinea pig. Dev. Psychobiol. 14, 343–355 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Misslin, R., Herzog, F., Koch, B. & Ropartz, P. Effects of isolation, handling and novelty on the pituitary-adrenal response in the mouse. Psychoneuroendocrinology 7, 217–221 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Rodgers, R. J. & Cole, J. C. Influence of social isolation, gender, strain, and prior novelty on plus-maze behaviour in mice. Physiol. Behav. 54, 729–736 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Kikusui, T., Nakamura, K. & Mori, Y. A review of the behavioral and neurochemical consequences of early weaning in rodents. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 110, 73–83 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Kikusui, T. et al. Early weaning increases anxiety via brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in the mouse prefrontal cortex. Sci. Rep. 9, 3991 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Weinstock, M. The long-term behavioural consequences of prenatal stress. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 32, 1073–1086 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Archer, J. E. & Blackman, D. E. Prenatal psychological stress and offspring behavior in rats and mice. Dev. Psychobiol. 4, 193–248 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Funding was provided by EC | EC Seventh Framework Programm | FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (FP7-IDEAS-ERC - Specific Programme: "Ideas" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013)) (Grant no. 322576).

Author information




J.B., J.N., J.V., M.R. and R.P. conducted the experiments, J.B. analyzed the data and prepared the figures and tables, J.B., B.V. and H.W. wrote the first draft, and all authors contributed to the writing and editing of the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jeremy D. Bailoo or Hanno Würbel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bailoo, J.D., Voelkl, B., Varholick, J. et al. Effects of weaning age and housing conditions on phenotypic differences in mice. Sci Rep 10, 11684 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing