Glycosphingolipid expression differs between human breast cancer stem cells (CSC) and cancer non-stem cells (non-CSC). We performed studies of viability, type of cell death, cancer stem cell percent and glycosphingolipid expression on CSC and non-CSC after treatment of MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 triple-negative breast cancer cells with a newly developed thienopyridine anticancer compound (3-amino-N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-5-oxo-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-b]quinoline-2-carboxamide, 1). Compound 1 was cytotoxic for both breast cancer cell lines and the majority of cells died by treatment-induced apoptosis. The percent of cancer stem cells and number of formed mammospheres was significantly lower. Glycosphingolipids IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer and GalNAc-GM1b (IV3Neu5Ac-Gg5Cer) not reported previously, were identified in both CSCs and non-CSCs. IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer had increased expression in both CSCs and non-CSCs of both cell lines after the treatment with 1, while GM3 (II3Neu5Ac-LacCer) had increased expression only on both cell subpopulations in MDA-MB-231 cell line. GalNAc-GM1b, Gb4Cer (GalNAcβ1-3Galα1-4Galβ1-4Glcβ1-1Cer) and GM2 (II3Neu5Ac-GalNAcβ1-4Galβ1-4Glcβ1-1Cer) were increased only in CSCs of both cell lines while GD3 was decreased in CSC of MDA-MB-231 cell line. Due to its effect in reducing the percentage of cancer stem cells and number of mammospheres, and its influence upon several glycosphingolipid expressions, it can be concluded that compound 1 deserves attention as a potential new drug for triple-negative breast cancer therapy.
The thieno[2,3-b]pyridines were initially discovered as potential inhibitors of phospholipase C (PLC) isoforms by virtual high throughput screen (vHTS)1. Recently, we described glycoconjugate GM3 and CD15s expression in MDA-MB-231 triple negative breast cancer stem cell subpopulation cultured with 3-amino-5-oxo-N-naphthyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-b]quinoline-2-carboxamide, which was developed as a putative PLC inhibitor. A close structural analogue of 3-amino-N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-5-oxo-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-b]quinoline-2-carboxamide, or compound 12 was chosen for this study due to its enhanced potency against the MDA-MB-231 cell line and its mechanism of action has been investigated3,4. Due to their ability to self-renew and to regenerate the primary tumour phenotypic heterogeneity, cancer stem cells are important therapeutical targets5. CSCs are defined with their CD44+/CD24− or CD133+ phenotype6. It is believed that CSCs are involved in therapy resistance in various cancers, including triple-negative breast cancers, i.e., breast cancers that do not express the genes for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and the human epidermal growth factor receptor-27.
Glycosphingolipids (GSLs), consisting of a hydrophobic ceramide and hydrophilic carbohydrate residues, are an important component of cell plasma membranes. They regulate numerous cellular processes like adhesion, proliferation, apoptosis, recognition, modulation of signal transduction pathways and cancer metastasizing8,9. GSLs are classified based on their structure. Gangliosides have been characterized by the presence of a common core structure Galβ1-4Glcβ1-1Cer and/or ganglio-N-tetraosyl core (Galβ1-3GalNAcβ1-4Galβ1-4Glcβ1-1Cer), and one or two α2-3NeuAc linked to internal or terminal Gal, or both10. Due to their sialic acid content (NeuAc), gangliosides are acidic GSLs. In addition to gangliosides with ganglio-N-tetraosyl core, neolacto-series gangliosides were described, with a Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4Glcβ1-1Cer core structure. They are terminally α2-3 or α2-6-sialylated, forming IV3Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer, and IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer gangliosides, respectively11,12. Globo-series GSLs are a major component of human erythrocytes, termed “globoside” since its representative, Gb4Cer was obtained as a globular precipitate10. Globotriaosylceramide, Gb3, was found to have the structure Galα1-4Galβ1-4Glcβ1-Cer, and this structure is the inner core of all globo-series GSLs13,14. Liang et al. described greatly reduced levels of Fuc(n)Lc4Cer and Gb3Cer, and much higher levels of GD2 (Galβ3GalNAcβ3Galα4Galβ4GlcβCer), GD3 (II3(Neu5Ac)2-LacCer), GM2, and GD1a in breast CSCs in comparison to cancer non-stem cells15. Approximately 50% of invasive ductal carcinomas overexpress GD3, 9-O-acetyl-GD3, and 9-O-acetyl-GT316. GD2+ subpopulation shows more mesenchymal stem cell features in breast phyllodes tumors17. Gb5 (GalNAcβ4Galβ4GlcβCer) is a potential marker of breast CSCs18. During induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition, Gg4 (gangliotetraosylceramide) and its synthase B3GALT4 are significantly reduced19.
Considering the role of CSCs in tumor relapse and resistance, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of newly synthesized thieno[2,3-b]pyridine anticancer agent 1 on CSC glycosphingolipid expression. Six gangliosides GM3, GD3, GM2, GalNacGM1b, IV3Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer, and IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer and three neutral GSLs (Gg3Cer, Gb4Cer, and nLc4Cer) were examined. GSL expression was compared between CSCs and non-CSCs. Cell metabolism and the type of cell death after administration of derivative 1 were assessed using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay and double cell staining (Annexin-V-Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and propidium iodide (PI)), respectively. The mammosphere formation assay has been used for determination of cancer stem cell activities in breast cancer cell lines20. According to Croker et al.21, MDA-MB-231 population consist of 80% CSCs (CD44+CD24−). In addition to this canonical lethal CSC-like MDA-MB-231, non-stem breast cancer MDA-MB-453 cells22 were studied in their response to new inhibitor.
Chemistry and cell line
3-Amino-N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-5-oxo-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-b]quinoline-2-carboxamide (compound 1) (Fig. 1) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 were grown in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibiotics.
Cytotoxic activity assay
Cell metabolism was measured with MTT to estimate cell viability23. Equal numbers of cells were plated in five replicates and allowed to attach overnight. Cells were then treated with complete media or individual solutions of 1 at 50 nM, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 5 µM in complete media, in five repetitions, for 4, 24, 48 and 72 h. Following treatment, cells were incubated with 0.5 mg/ml MTT in media for 1 h and then the media was removed and DMSO was added. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm24.
Flow cytometric analyses
Equal numbers of cells were seeded in 6-well plates and treated with 2 µM 1 and then analysed for apoptosis. After treatment with 1, the cells were trypsinized, washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in 100 µl of the binding buffer containing 5 µl Annexin-V-FITC and/or 5 µl of PI (Annexin-V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit I, BD Biosciences). The cells were incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark and thereafter analysed by flow cytometry (BD Accuri C6, BD Biosciences). The percentages of apoptotic cells (Annexin-V positive cells) were analysed using the FlowLogic Software (Inivai) and presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 1 for 48 h, as well as the controls, were stained with anti-CD44-FITC (BD Biosciences), anti-CD24-phycoerythrin (PE, eBioscience, Inc. San Diego, CA, USA) and anti-GSL antibodies. The primary antibodies against GM3 (mouse IgM) and GD3 (mouse IgG3) were from Cosmo Bio Co. (Tokyo, Japan) and produced by laboratory of Dr. J. Müthing, respectively25. All other anti-GSL antibodies (against Gb4Cer, nLc4Cer, IV3Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer, IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer, GM2, Gg3Cer (gangliotriaosylceramide, GalNAcβ1-4Galβ1-4Glcβ1-1Cer) and GalNAc-GM1b) were chicken polyclonal antibodies being produced and characterized by the laboratory of Dr. J. Müthing26. Binding of primary anti-GSL antibodies was detected with secondary antibodies conjugated with eFluor 660 fluorochrome (Abcam).
In addition to three antibodies used for MDA-MB-231 cells, MDA-MB-453 cells were stained with anti-CD133-PE/Cy7 (BioLegends, San Diego, USA).
Data acquisition of triple and fourfold stained samples was performed on a BD Accuri 6 cytometer and analysed using the FlowLogic Software. CD44+ cells and CD133+ were gated and CSC were determined. Glycosphingolipids Gb4Cer, nLc4Cer, IV3Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer, IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer, GM3, GD3, GM2, Gg3Cer and GalNAc-GM1b were determined on CSCs (CD44+CD24−) and non-CSCs (CD44−/CD24+, CD44+CD24+ and CD44−/CD24−) in the MDA-MB-231 and CSCs (CD133+) and non-CSCs (CD133−) in the MDA-MB-453 cell line.
Mammosphere forming assay
Cells derived from MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 cell lines were plated in 6-well low attachment suspension culture plates (Corning® Costar® Ultra-Low Attachment Multiple Well Plate, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a density of 3.5 × 104 viable cells/well. Cells were grown in 2 ml MammoCult Medium Human Kit, supplemented with Proliferation Supplement 0.1 mg/ml, Heparin Solution 4 µg/ml, Hydrocortisone Stock Solution 0.48 µg/ml (all StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) and antibiotics (1% penicillin/streptomycin, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). After 7 days of incubation, mammospheres larger than 50 μm were counted with an Motic AE31E Inverted Microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and pictured with Industrial Digital Camera (Lacerta GmbH, Austria).
For statistical analyses t-test with unequal variances, one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey test or Kruskal–Wallis followed by Dunn’s post-hoc test was performed using statistical software GraphPad Prism 7.0 (San Diego, CA, USA) with the significance set at P < 0.05.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
Cell viabilities, after 4, 24, 48 and 72 h treatment with 1, detected with the MTT assay are shown in Fig. 2. In the MDA-MB-231 cell line Compound 1 was shown to be cytotoxic in 0.5 µM concentration after only 4 h of treatment and ten times lower concentration (50 nM) resulted in cytotoxicity after 48 h. But maximal cytotoxicity was only achieved for 47% of the cells, 72 h after treatment with 5 µM of 1 (Fig. 2A). In the MDA-MB-453 cell line, concentration of 250 nM of 1 showed cytotoxicity after 48 h and the maximum of cytotoxic effect was after 72 h after treatment with 5 µM of 1 (Fig. 2B).
Compound 1—mechanism of cell death
To determine whether the MTT findings are due to cell death or cell cycle arrest, we subsequently determined the type of cell death induced by 48 h treatment with 2 µM of compound 1. The majority of cells died by treatment-induced apoptosis in both cell line as shown in Fig. 3. Compound 1 treated cells showed significant increase in early apoptosis (Annexin-V+PI− subpopulation) in MDA-MB-231 and in MDA-MB-453 cells compared with non-treated cells, as shown in Fig. 3A, B.
To determine whether the MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 cancer stem cells are sensitive to compound 1, the number of mammospheres was counted. After treatment with compound 1 the number of mammospheres was significantly decreased in both MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 4A) and MDA-MB-453 (Fig. 4B) cell line for 52% and 99%, respectively.
Cancer stem cells
In breast cancer cell lines, such as MDA-MB-231, a subset of markers, including CD44+/CD24− has been shown to enrich CSC27. Treatment with 1 resulted in a statistically significant decrease of the CD44+/CD24− subpopulation from 89.9% (untreated control) to 55.5% (Fig. 5A). In the MDA-MB-453 breast cancer cell line, expression of CD44 is very low and CD44+/CD24− subpopulation is not considered CSC subpopulation6, and this subpopulation significantly increases after treatment with 1 (Fig. 5C). Much more reliable marker of CSCs in the MDA-MB-453 cell line is CD133. After treatment with 1, a significant decrease of CD133+ subpopulation from 48.3% in untreated control to 19.4% was obtained (Fig. 5B).
Expression of terminally sialylated gangliosides at CSCs and non-CSCs
Glycosphingolipid expression was then studied in CSC (defined as CD44+/CD24− subpopulation in MDA-MB-231 cell line, and CD133+ in MDA-MB-453 cell line), with the aim of checking whether the cytotoxic effects of 1 are mediated via different GSL membrane content. In addition, GSL expression was determined in non-CSCs, being detected as three subpopulations CD44+/CD24+, CD44−/CD24− and CD44−/CD24+ in MDA-MB-231 cell line and CD133− in MDA-MB-453 cell line. Expression of each GSL per one cell is represented with geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMI). The portion of the cells that are GSL positive is an interesting parameter, however of less impact in comparison to GMI. The terminal sugar residue of gangliosides GM3, GD3, IV3Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer and IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer is sialic or N-acetyl-neuraminic and the last step of ganglioside GM2 and GalNAc-GM1b synthesis is transfer of GalNAc residue. Therefore, GM2 and GalNAc-GM1b expression was analysed (see next section) together with neutral GSLs Gg3Cer and Gb4Cer (globotetraosylceramide, GalNAcβ1-3Galα1-4Galβ1-4Glcβ1-1Cer), that also contain terminal GalNAc residue.
In MDA-MB-231 cell line, the percentage of GM3 positive cells was increased, whilst IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer positive cells decreased within both cell subpopulations, CSC and non-CSC (Fig. 6A, B, upper row). Only the CSC population showed an increased percentage of GD3 positive cells after treatment with compound 1 (Fig. 6A, upper row). Expression of IV3Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer was not affected by treatment with compound 1. Compound 1 increases expression of IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer in both CSC and non-CSC (Fig. 6C, upper row), while non-CSC GD3 was decreased (Fig. 6D, upper row).
In MDA-MB-453 cell line, the percentages of GM3, IV3Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer and IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer positive cells were significantly increased only in CSC subpopulation, whilst IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer positive cells decreased within non-CSC (Fig. 6A, B, lower row). Percentage of GD3 positive cells was not affected by treatment with compound 1 (Fig. 6A, B, lower row). Compound 1 increases expression of IV3Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer in both CSC and non-CSC cells, while expression of GD3 was increased only in CSC subpopulation, and expression of IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer in non-CSC cells (Fig. 6C, D, lower row).
Expression of gangliosides and neutral GSLs with terminal GalNAc residue at CSCs and non-CSCs
The percentage of GM2 positive cells was decreased within both cell subpopulations, CSC and non-CSC in MDA-MB-231 cell line (Fig. 7A, B, upper row), whilst only CSC populations showed an increased percentage of GalNAc-GM1b, Gg3Cer, and Gb4Cer positive cells after treatment with compound 1 (Fig. 7A, upper row). Compound 1 significantly increases the expression of GalNAc-GM1b, Gb4Cer and GM2 (Fig. 7C, upper row) in CSC and not significantly the expression of GM2 in non-CSC of MDA-MB-231 cell line (Fig. 7D, upper row).
In MDA-MB-453 cell line, percentages of GM2, GalNAc-GM1b, Gg3Cer, and Gb4Cer positive cells were significantly increased only in CSC subpopulation, whilst percentage of GM2 was slightly decreased in non-CSC subpopulation (Fig. 7A, B, lower row). Compound 1 significantly increases the expression of GM2, GalNAc-GM1b, Gg3Cer, and Gb4Cer in CSC subpopulation (Fig. 7D, lower row), while expression of these GSLs was not affected by treatment with compound 1 in CSC of MDA-MB-453 cell line (Fig. 7C, lower row).
Expression of neutral GSL with terminal Gal residue at CSCs and non-CSCs
There was no difference in the percentage of nLc4Cer positive cells in both CSC and non-CSC after treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with compound 1 (Fig. 8A, B, upper row). Also, the expression of nLc4Cer was not affected by compound 1, in both cell subpopulations of this cell line (Fig. 8C, D, upper row).
The percentage of nLc4Cer positive cells was significantly increased in CSC subpopulation in MDA-MB-453 cell line treated with compound 1 (Fig. 8A, lower row), and not affected in non-CSC− subpopulation (Fig. 8B, lower row). The expression of nLc4Cer was increased in non-CSC subpopulation treated with compound 1 (Fig. 8D, lower row), while expression of nLc4Cer was not affected by treatment with compound 1 in CSC of MDA-MB-453 cell line (Fig. 8C, lower row).
We found that newly developed anticancer compound, 3-amino-N-(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-5-oxo-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-b]quinoline-2-carboxamide (compound 1; Fig. 1) was cytotoxic for both breast MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 cancer cells. In comparison to related 3-amino-5-oxo-N-naphthyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrotieno[2,3-b]quinoline-2-carboxamide, reported earlier2, compound 1 was more cytotoxic. Halving of MDA-MB-231 cell viability was achieved with fivefold lower concentration after 4 h of treatment (5 µM compared to 25 µM). Both compounds are not lipophilic promiscuous inhibitors but target a specific receptor28. The molecular weight for compound 1 (385.867 g/mol) is in the so called ‘sweet spot’ for drug development29.
Determination of the type of cell death showed that 1-induced cell death of breast cancer cells occurred mainly by apoptosis and the percentage of CSC subpopulation was significantly lower after treatment with 1. For the first time, we report IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer and GalNAc-GM1b GSL expression, in both breast CSCs and non-CSCs. After treatment with compound 1, a significant increase in IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer expression in both cell subpopulations of both MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 cell lines was observed and increase of GM3 only on both cell subpopulations in MDA-MB-231 cell line. Increase of GalNAc-GM1b, Gb4Cer and GM2 was only observed in CSCs of both cell lines, whilst non-CSCs of MDA-MB-231 cell line expressed lower GD3 after compound 1 treatment. Expression of GD3 on non-CSCs of MDA-MB-453 cell line was not affected by compound 1 treatment.
Glycosphingolipids that were increased in both CSCs and non-CSCs after compound 1 treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells are acidic GSLs: gangliosides GM3 and IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer. Sialic or N-acetyl-neuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) is added in the last step of their synthesis (Fig. 9A). The last step of GalNAc-GM1b, Gb4Cer and GM2 synthesis, that were increased only at CSCs after compound 1 treatment, includes GalNAc addition. GalNAc residue must be activated by binding to UDP-GalNAc. That is achieved mostly by conversion of UDP-GlcNAc to UDP-GalNAc (Fig. 9B). Fructose-6-P is common metabolite of glycolysis and UDP-GalNAc synthesis. Neu5Ac, needed for acidic GSL synthesis, and UDP-GalNAc share UDP-GlcNAc as common precursor (Fig. 9B)30. In non-treated MDA-MB-231 cells, we found a 23-fold higher GalNAc-GM1b expression in non-CSCs compared to CSCs, together with increased Gb4Cer and IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer, all containing GalNAc as last sugar residue (Fig. 9A, C). In addition, gangliosides GM2 and GM3, were increased in non-treated non-CSCs, but not so dramatically as GalNAc-GM1b. These results indicate that glycolysis could be slower in non-treated non-CSCs in comparison to CSC, giving more precursors for UDP-GalNAc and Neu5Ac synthesis. Therefore, the findings at CSCs after compound 1 treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells, increased GM3, IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer, GalNAc-GM1b, Gb4Cer, and GM2, could indicate CSC glycolysis slowdown. Cancer stem cells of glioma are more glycolytic than non-CSCs due to a mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion channel that controls the phenotype transition between glioma stem cells and non-stem cells31. The channel is highly expressed in non-CSC relative to CSC and coupled to a glycolytic rate-limiting enzyme platelet-type of phosphofructokinase on mitochondrion to inhibit kinase-mediated glycolysis required for CSC maintenance.
During tumorigensis, distinct GalNAc transferases (GALNTs) can be differently expressed. Glycosylation of E-cadherin with GalNAc starts in the Golgi apparatus by glycosyltransferases called GALNTs32. E-cadherin combines mechanotransduction and EGFR signaling to regulate junctional tissue polarization and tight junction positioning33, GALNT3 preserves the epithelial state in trophoblast stem cells. The loss of GALNT3 expression diminishes O-GalNAc glycosylation and causes epithelial–mesenchymal transition32. Due to replacement of E-cadherin by N-cadherin in the mammary gland, fibrocystic changes and tumor formation occur34. N-cadherin causes FGFR upmodulation which results in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and stem/progenitor like properties35. We can speculate that GALNT responsible for GalNAc-GM1b synthesis is sensitive to similar effectors as GALNT3. There is no data in literature concerning GalNAc-GM1b expression in cancer stem cells. We found lower GalNAc-GM1b in CSCs compared to non-CSC MDA-MB231. This finding is in accordance with the results of Guan et al. During induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition of breast cells, there is significantly reduced Gg4 and its synthase B3GALT419. Neutral glycosphingolipid Gg4 is a direct precursor of GM1b. GM1b is further a direct precursor of GalNAc-GM1b, as it is presented in Fig. 9A. On the other hand, GALNT14 shows the opposite effects. It catalyzes O-glycosylation of EGF-containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 2. This significantly increases the invasion ability of breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MBA-MD-231)36,37. GALNT14 is related to the chemosensitivity of breast cancer. Osterix, a zinc finger-containing transcription factor, decreases chemosensitivity and enhances anti-apoptosis by upregulating GALNT1438. Osterix has also important roles in facilitating breast cancer invasion39.
In our study, treated CSCs acquired a phenotype closer to non-treated non-CSCs. Malignancy is not only defined by tumour-specific molecules, or their genes, but it can be caused by disorganization of cell membrane components40. Glycosphingolipids are important cell membrane components being able to influence final cell behaviour. Gb3Cer plays an essential role in the maintenance of epithelial cancer cell properties. Depletion of Gb3Cer by deletion of the key enzyme lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase (A4GALT) induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, enhances chemoresistance, and increases CD44+/CD24− cells41. The cholera toxin-induced mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition occurred only in cells with functional A4GALT. Cholera toxin is able to induce transition after binding to its receptor, Gb3Cer42. Liang et al. described greatly reduced levels of Gb3Cer in breast CSCs in comparison to cancer non-stem cells (non-CSCs)15. Whilst we did not determine Gb3Cer, the enzyme A4GALT was obviously active in our study because Gb3Cer is direct precursor of Gb4Cer and Gb4Cer was found elevated in CSCs after treatment with compound 142. We have not found elevated GM2 and GD3 in CSCs as was earlier reported15. Our study used MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 breast CSCs and non-CSCs while Liang et al. used a model of epithelial–mesenchymal transition induction of immortalized human mammary epithelial cell–Twist-estrogen receptor (HMLE-Twist-ER)15. They proved increased GM2 and GD3 in organic solvent extract of GSLs using methods of Orbitrap-Fourier transform (FT) mass spectrometry (MS) and high-performance liquid thin layer chromatography (HPTLC)-immunostaining. That means, GSLs from the plasma membrane and from Golgi are included in final findings. Their flow-cytometry results have not proved elevated GM2 and CSCs. The percentage of GD3 was reported as elevated, but due to their gating strategy, they had excluded the most GD3 positive cells from analyses of their CSC markers (CD44+/CD24−)15. Therefore, our final results are not comparable.
Sialylation is involved in cell fate decision during development, reprogramming and cancer progression43. Sialylated GM3 and IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer were increased in CSCs after compound 1 treatment of both MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 cell lines. Ganglioside GM3 is typically located in specialized membrane microdomains called lipid-rafts44. Enhanced GM3 lipid raft content disturbs insulin receptor function causing insulin resistance and finally diabetes type 245. In a similar manner, change of the GM3 content in cell membranes could influence co-localized fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor action, that is involved in cancer pathogenesis46: low level of GM3 activates and high level inhibits FGF signal transduction47. Therefore, we could assume that increased GM3 in CSCs, after treatment with compound 1, contributes to inhibition of FGF signaling and thereby reduces cancer progression. Sialylation of the nLc4Cer to form IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer is catalysed by enzyme sialyl transferase to nLc4Cer (ST6Gal). An increase in infiltrating lymphocytes is influenced by high expression of ST6Gal-II in triple negative breast cancers that correspond to our breast cancer model48. Triple negative breast cancer lymphocyte infiltration correlates with better overall survival and better chemotherapeutic responses49.
Concerning findings in MDA-MB-453 cells, only increased percent of both GalNAc-GM1b+CD44+/CD24− (data not shown) and GalNAc-GM1b+CD133+ cells after compound 1 treatment (Fig. 7A) corresponded to MDA-MB-231 GSL findings. Yang et al., detected 31 patients containing CSCs among 88 primary TNBCs, using CD44+/CD24−, aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member A1 (ALDH1A1) and CD133 markers. Eight cases were positive for both CD44+/CD24− and ALDH1A1, 10 cases were positive for both CD44+/CD24− and CD133, 9 cases were positive for both ALDH1A1 and CD133, while only 4 cases showed positivity of all the three CSC markers50. Correlation between CSC markers was weak, implying that most breast cancer cells do not express these markers concurrently. Knowing that CD133 phenotype is not significantly associated with worse progression-free survival, we can assume that CD133 is less reliable CSC marker compared to CD44+/CD24−50. Expression of MDA-MB-231 glycosphingolipids found in this study could have higher impact for clinical implications. Dramatically reduction of GalNAc glycosylation observed in MDA-MB-231 CSCs after compound 1 treatment, characterized earlier to be enrolled in either epithelial–mesenchymal transition or in its reversal, could indicate possible biochemical pathway of CSC reduction by compound 1.
The novel thieno[2,3-b]pyridine anticancer compound 1 was cytotoxic for the breast cancer cells, cell death being mediated by apoptosis. The percent of cancer stem cells was significantly lower. Glycosphingolipids IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer and GalNAc-GM1b, not reported previously, were identified in both breast cancer stem cells and cancer non-stem cells. IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4Cer had increased expression in both cancer stem cells and cancer non-stem cells of both MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 cell lines after treatment with compound 1, while GM3 had increased expression only on both cell subpopulations in MDA-MB-231 cell line. GalNAc-GM1b, Gb4Cer and GM2 were increased only in cancer stem cells of both cell lines while GD3 was decreased in cancer non-stem cells of MDA-MB-231 cell line, 48 h after treatment with 1.
Due to the demonstrated effect in reducing the percentage of cancer stem cells and number of mammospheres and the shift of CSC to non-CSC glycophenotype, the novel thieno[2,3-b]pyridine anticancer compound 1 deserves attention as a potential new drug for triple-negative breast cancer therapy.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Reynisson, J. et al. The identification of novel PLC-gamma inhibitors using virtual high throughput screening. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 17, 3169–3176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2009.02.049 (2009).
Mastelic, A. et al. Glycophenotype of breast and prostate cancer stem cells treated with thieno[2,3-b]pyridine anticancer compound. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 11, 759–769. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S121122 (2017).
Reynisson, J. et al. Evidence that phospholipase C is involved in the antitumour action of NSC768313, a new thieno[2,3-b]pyridine derivative. Cancer Cell Int. 16, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-016-0293-6 (2016).
Zafar, A. et al. GPCR modulation of thieno[2,3-b]pyridine anti-proliferative agents. Molecules https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22122254 (2017).
Bluemel, L., Wahlde, M. V., Tio, J., Kiesel, L. & Bernemann, C. Reverse engineering of triple-negative breast cancer cells for targeted treatment. Maturitas 108, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.11.010 (2018).
Jiao, X., Rizvanov, A. A., Cristofanilli, M., Miftakhova, R. R. & Pestell, R. G. Breast cancer stem cell isolation. In Breast Cancer 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3444-7_10 (2016).
Jiang, M. et al. KIF11 is required for proliferation and self-renewal of docetaxel resistant triple negative breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 8, 92106–92118. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20785 (2017).
Zhuo, D., Li, X. & Guan, F. Biological roles of aberrantly expressed glycosphingolipids and related enzymes in human cancer development and progression. Front. Physiol. 9, 466. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00466 (2018).
Su, Y. H., Lin, T. Y., Liu, H. J. & Chuang, C. K. A set of cancer stem cell homing peptides associating with the glycan moieties of glycosphingolipids. Oncotarget 9, 20490–20507. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24960 (2018).
Hakomori, S. I. Structure and function of glycosphingolipids and sphingolipids: Recollections and future trends. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1780, 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.08.015 (2008).
Muthing, J. et al. Preferential binding of the anticancer drug rViscumin (recombinant mistletoe lectin) to terminally alpha2-6-sialylated neolacto-series gangliosides. Glycobiology 12, 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwf062 (2002).
Duvar, S., Peter-Katalinic, J., Hanisch, F. G. & Muthing, J. Isolation and structural characterization of glycosphingolipids of in vitro propagated bovine aortic endothelial cells. Glycobiology 7, 1099–1109. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/7.8.1099 (1997).
Li, Y. T., Li, S. C. & Dawson, G. Anomeric structure of ceramide digalactoside isolated from the kidney of a patient with Fabry’s disease. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 260, 88–92 (1972).
Hakomori, S. I., Siddiqui, B., Li, Y. T., Li, S. C. & Hellerqvist, C. G. Anomeric structure of globoside and ceramide grihexoside of human erythrocytes and hamster fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 246, 2271–2277 (1971).
Liang, Y. J. et al. Differential expression profiles of glycosphingolipids in human breast cancer stem cells vs. cancer non-stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4968–4973. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302825110 (2013).
Marquina, G. et al. Gangliosides expressed in human breast cancer. Can. Res. 56, 5165–5171 (1996).
Lin, J. J. et al. Malignant phyllodes tumors display mesenchymal stem cell features and aldehyde dehydrogenase/disialoganglioside identify their tumor stem cells. Breast Cancer Res. 16, R29. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3631 (2014).
Cheung, S. K. et al. Stage-specific embryonic antigen-3 (SSEA-3) and beta3GalT5 are cancer specific and significant markers for breast cancer stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 960–965. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522602113 (2016).
Guan, F., Handa, K. & Hakomori, S. I. Specific glycosphingolipids mediate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of human and mouse epithelial cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7461–7466. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902368106 (2009).
Yousefnia, S., Ghaedi, K., Seyed Forootan, F. & Nasr Esfahani, M. H. Characterization of the stemness potency of mammospheres isolated from the breast cancer cell lines. Tumour Biol. 41, 1010428319869101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010428319869101 (2019).
Croker, A. K. et al. High aldehyde dehydrogenase and expression of cancer stem cell markers selects for breast cancer cells with enhanced malignant and metastatic ability. J. Cell Mol. Med. 13, 2236–2252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00455.x (2009).
Kim, S. Y. et al. Cancer stem cells protect non-stem cells from anoikis: Bystander effects. J. Cell. Biochem. 117, 2289–2301. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.25527 (2016).
Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 65, 55–63 (1983).
Ross, A. E. et al. Dimeric naphthoquinones, a novel class of compounds with prostate cancer cytotoxicity. BJU Int. 108, 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09907.x (2011).
Meisen, I., Peter-Katalinic, J. & Muthing, J. Direct analysis of silica gel extracts from immunostained glycosphingolipids by nanoelectrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 76, 2248–2255. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac035511t (2004).
Markotic, A. et al. Oxygenation alters ganglioside expression in rat liver following partial hepatectomy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 330, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.02.139 (2005).
May, C. D. et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells: A dangerously dynamic duo in breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res. 13, 202. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2789 (2011).
Hughes, J. D. et al. Physiochemical drug properties associated with in vivo toxicological outcomes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18, 4872–4875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.07.071 (2008).
Hann, M. M. & Keseru, G. M. Finding the sweet spot: The role of nature and nurture in medicinal chemistry. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3701 (2012).
Varki, A., Schnaar, R. L. & Schauer, R. In Essentials of Glycobiology (eds Varki, A., Cummings, R. D., Esko, J. D. et al.) 179–195 (Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2015).
Zhou, K. et al. VDAC2 interacts with PFKP to regulate glucose metabolism and phenotypic reprogramming of glioma stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 9, 988. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-1015-x (2018).
Rubsam, M. et al. E-cadherin integrates mechanotransduction and EGFR signaling to control junctional tissue polarization and tight junction positioning. Nat. Commun. 8, 1250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01170-7 (2017).
Raghu, D., Mobley, R. J., Shendy, N. A. M., Perry, C. H. & Abell, A. N. GALNT3 maintains the epithelial state in trophoblast stem cells. Cell Rep. 26, 3684–3697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.093 (2019).
Kotb, A. M., Hierholzer, A. & Kemler, R. Replacement of E-cadherin by N-cadherin in the mammary gland leads to fibrocystic changes and tumor formation. Breast Cancer Res. 13, R104. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3046 (2011).
Qian, X. et al. N-cadherin/FGFR promotes metastasis through epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem/progenitor cell-like properties. Oncogene 33, 3411–3421. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.310 (2014).
Lin, W. R. & Yeh, C. T. GALNT14: An emerging marker capable of predicting therapeutic outcomes in multiple cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041491 (2020).
Zuo, T. et al. EFEMP2 mediates GALNT14-dependent breast cancer cell invasion. Transl. Oncol. 11, 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.01.021 (2018).
Wu, J. et al. Osterix decreases the chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells by upregulating GALNT14. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 44, 998–1010. https://doi.org/10.1159/000485400 (2017).
Yao, B. et al. Upregulated osterix promotes invasion and bone metastasis and predicts for a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 10, 28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-1269-3 (2019).
Regina Todeschini, A. & Hakomori, S. I. Functional role of glycosphingolipids and gangliosides in control of cell adhesion, motility, and growth, through glycosynaptic microdomains. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1780, 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.10.008 (2008).
Jacob, F. et al. Transition of mesenchymal and epithelial cancer cells depends on alpha1–4 galactosyltransferase-mediated glycosphingolipids. Can. Res. 78, 2952–2965. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2223 (2018).
Legros, N., Pohlentz, G., Steil, D. & Muthing, J. Shiga toxin-glycosphingolipid interaction: Status quo of research with focus on primary human brain and kidney endothelial cells. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 308, 1073–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2018.09.003 (2018).
Li, F. & Ding, J. Sialylation is involved in cell fate decision during development, reprogramming and cancer progression. Protein Cell https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-018-0597-5 (2018).
Margheri, F. et al. Differential uPAR recruitment in caveolar-lipid rafts by GM1 and GM3 gangliosides regulates endothelial progenitor cells angiogenesis. J. Cell Mol. Med. 19, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12410 (2015).
Tagami, S. et al. Ganglioside GM3 participates in the pathological conditions of insulin resistance. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 3085–3092. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M103705200 (2002).
Hakomori, S. I. & Handa, K. GM3 and cancer. Glycoconj. J. 32, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10719-014-9572-4 (2015).
Toledo, M. S., Suzuki, E., Handa, K. & Hakomori, S. Cell growth regulation through GM3-enriched microdomain (glycosynapse) in human lung embryonal fibroblast WI38 and its oncogenic transformant VA13. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 34655–34664. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M403857200 (2004).
Garbar, C., Mascaux, C., Merrouche, Y. & Bensussan, A. Triple-negative and HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cell sialylation impacts tumor microenvironment T-lymphocyte subset recruitment: A possible mechanism of tumor escape. Cancer Manag. Res. 10, 1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S162932 (2018).
Miyan, M., Schmidt-Mende, J., Kiessling, R., Poschke, I. & de Boniface, J. Differential tumor infiltration by T-cells characterizes intrinsic molecular subtypes in breast cancer. J. Transl. Med. 14, 227. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-0983-9 (2016).
Yang, F. et al. Evaluation of breast cancer stem cells and intratumor stemness heterogeneity in triple-negative breast cancer as prognostic factors. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 12, 1568–1577. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.16874 (2016).
Chester, M. A. IUPAC-IUB joint commission on biochemical nomenclature (JCBN) nomenclature of glycolipids—Recommendations 1997. Eur. J. Biochem. 257, 293–298 (1998).
Svennerholm, L. Chromatographic separation of human brain gangliosides. J. Neurochem. 10, 613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1963.tb08933.x (1963).
We express our warmest thanks to Prof. Dr. J. Müthing, Institute for Hygiene, University of Münster, Germany, for his kind gift of all primary antibodies against different glycosphingolipids, except anti-GM3 antibody. We are thankful to Milena Vuica-Ross for her help in conceptualization and design of experiments, to Benjamin Benzon for his help in data analysis and David Barker for her help in design and synthesis of chemical compound. Data shown resulted from Institutional science financing (supported by Ministry of Science and Education, Republic of Croatia).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this Article was revised: The Author Contributions section in this Article was incomplete.
About this article
Cite this article
Marijan, S., Markotić, A., Mastelić, A. et al. Glycosphingolipid expression at breast cancer stem cells after novel thieno[2,3-b]pyridine anticancer compound treatment. Sci Rep 10, 11876 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68516-y
This article is cited by
Glycoconjugate Journal (2022)