Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Responses of AG1 and AG2 QTL introgression lines and seed pre-treatment on growth and physiological processes during anaerobic germination of rice under flooding

Abstract

Rice seeds germinating in flooded soils encounter hypoxia or even anoxia leading to poor seed germination and crop establishment. Introgression of AG1 and AG2 QTLs associated with tolerance of flooding during germination, together with seed pre-treatment via hydro-priming or presoaking can enhance germination and seedling growth in anaerobic soils. This study assessed the performance of elite lines incorporating AG1, AG2 and their combination when directly seeded in flooded soils using dry seeds. The QTLs were in the background of two popular varieties PSB Rc82 and Ciherang-Sub1, evaluated along with the donors Kho Hlan On (AG1) and Ma-Zhan Red (AG2) and recipient parents PSB Rc82 and Ciherang-Sub1. In one set of experiments conducted in the greenhouse, seedling emergence, growth, and carbohydrate mobilization from seeds were assessed. Metabolites associated with reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging including malondialdehyde (MDA) as a measure of lipid peroxidation, ascorbate, total phenolic concentration (TPC), and activities of ROS scavenging enzymes were quantified in seeds germinating under control (saturated) and flooded (10 cm) soils. In another set of experiments conducted in a natural field with 3–5 cm flooding depths, control and pretreated seeds of Ciherang-Sub1 introgression lines and checks were used. Flooding reduced seedling emergence of all genotypes, though emergence of AG1 + AG2 introgression lines was greater than the other AG lines. Soluble sugars increased, while starch concentration decreased gradually under flooding especially in the tolerant checks and in AG1 + AG2 introgression lines. Less lipid peroxidation and higher α-amylase activity, higher ascorbate (RAsA) and TPC were observed in the tolerant checks and in the AG1 + AG2 introgression lines. Lipid peroxidation correlated negatively with ascorbate, TPC, and with ROS scavengers. Seed hydro-priming or pre-soaking increased emergence by 7–10% over that of dry seeds. Introgression of AG2 and AG1 + AG2 QTLs with seed pretreatment showed 101–153% higher emergence over dry seeds of intolerant genotypes in the field. Lines carrying AG1 + AG2 QTLs showed higher α-amylase activity, leading to rapid starch degradation and increase in soluble sugars, ascorbate, and TPC, together leading to higher germination and seedling growth in flooded soils. Seed hydro-priming or pre-soaking for 24 h also improved traits associated with flooding tolerance. Combining tolerance with seed management could therefore, improve crop establishment in flooded soils and encourage large-scale adoption of direct seeded rice system.

Introduction

Farmers usually encounter flooding or waterlogging immediately after direct seeding of rice as a consequence of heavy rain after sowing in rainfed areas or poorly leveled fields even in irrigated areas. Flooding during seed germination and early seedling growth usually leads to poor crop establishment and low yield1. This is because of the high sensitivity of rice to anaerobic conditions during germination and early seedling growth1,2. Rice cultivars tolerant of anaerobic condition during germination are therefore required, when farmers are currently shifting from transplanting to direct-seeding methods of crop establishment3. Unlike other cereal crops like wheat and corn, once the crop is established, rice can grow in waterlogged and flooded soils because of its ability to develop aerenchyma tissue that facilitate aeration of roots and the rhizosphere4,5,6.

Seeds germinating in flooded soils may encounter hypoxia or even anoxia in severe cases, which could prevent germination and subsequent growth as most of the enzymes involved in the breakdown and mobilization of stored carbohydrates and/or in oxidative pathways to generate energy for growing embryos become non-functional7,8,9,10. Evolutionarily, germinating rice seeds acquired adaptive mechanisms to cope with oxygen deficiency in flooded soil, one of which is the ability of the coleoptile to emerge and grow quickly to keep contact with air1. It has been reported that coleoptiles elongate faster under low oxygen than in the air and that considerable genetic variation was observed in elongation ability within the cultivated rice gene pool11,12. As they come in direct contact with air, elongating coleoptiles act as snorkels to facilitate exchange of gases in waterlogged or flooded soils and maintain adequate aeration in the growing embryo. Another adaptive strategy for germinating seeds under anaerobic conditions is the primary shift from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism to generate the energy needed to sustain growth of the germinating embryo1,13.

In direct-seeded rice (DSR) systems, poor seedling establishment is a major constraint, where fast seed germination and seedling growth became key determinants of successful crop establishment14. Seed pre-treatment such as priming may enhance germination and seedling growth in DSR systems in flooded soils. Additionally, it may also improve the breakdown of stored carbohydrates by accelerating enzymatic activities of starch catabolic enzymes15. In such pre-treatment, seed pre-soaking could help improve germination rate, accelerate seedling growth, increase dry matter production, and improve grain yield16,17. Seed priming treatment resulted in better seed germination and establishment in rice (Oryza sativa)15,18,19, wheat (Triticum aestivum)20, maize (Zea mays)21, black pepper (Piper nigrum)22, and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)23. Seed hydro-priming involves soaking of seeds for a particular period, typically 24 hours with aeration and re-drying back to original moisture content (14%)15,16, was also reported to enhance amylase activity during germination, leading to faster seedling emergence and better vigor under stress17,24,25, which also help to improve weed competitiveness early in the season26,27.

Rice genotypes that are known for their tolerance of anaerobic conditions during germination (anaerobic germination, AG) can break down starch to soluble sugars under hypoxic conditions during germination by switching to anaerobic metabolism1,28, with the upregulation of anaerobic fermentation enzymes especially pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase. This pathway provides energy for successful seed germination and coleoptile elongation in flooded soils29,30,31,32. Under such condition, glucose supply from starch degradation, mainly through the action of starch catabolic enzymes like α-amylase, allows ATP production through fermentative metabolism1,33, providing energy for the germinating embryos to elongate its coleoptile and make contact with air or the better aerated upper water layers1.

Production of excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a hallmark of abiotic stresses34. However, various protective mechanisms have been reported to cope with abiotic stress condition. Among these are non-enzymatic antioxidants such as reduced-form glutathione (GSH), ascorbic acid and phenols. Enzymatic antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR) are important for maintaining the redox balance of stressed cells1 by scavenging excess ROS under stress conditions35,36,37.

Identification of novel QTLs for tolerance of anaerobic conditions during germination from diverse germplasm is essential to capture the genetic complexity of the trait, to unravel the biochemical, physiological and molecular basis of tolerance and to provide QTL targets for marker-assisted breeding12. Donors for AG tolerance during seed germination have been identified after screening approximately 8000 accessions at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), including landraces such as Khaiyan (Bangladesh), Khao Hlan On (aromatic tall Japonica upland landrace, Myanmar), and Ma-Zhan red (Indica, China)38,39,40. Later on, bi-parental crosses were made with popular varieties to develop breeding lines to enhance germination under AG as well as promising genotypes with improved phenotypic and yield traits38,39.

AG1 and AG2 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) identified before, had positive effects for increased flooding tolerance during seed germination stage and are being used to develop improved rice breeding lines1,10,12,40,41. Exploration of additional QTLs for tolerance of anaerobic conditions during germination from diverse germplasm is essential to unravel the biochemical, physiological and molecular basis of tolerance, and to simultaneously provide additional QTL targets for marker-assisted breeding12.

The AG1 QTL was mapped using a population developed from a cross of the tolerant landrace Khao Hlan On (KHO) and IR64, a non-aromatic semi-dwarf Indica lowland modern variety, which is sensitive to flooding during germination38,39. Subsequently, five QTLs were identified, with the large effect qAG-9-2 (AG1) on the long arm of chromosome 9, with a LOD score of 20.34, explaining 33.5% of the variation for this trait. AG1 was fine-mapped to a ~50 kb region on chromosome 9 and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase (OsTPP7) gene has been functionally validated as the gene underlying this QTL42.

Development of NILs for another major QTL, qAG7.1 (AG2), was initiated and reported that introgression lines harboring homozygous alleles of Ma-Zhan Red in the region of qAG7.1 have significantly higher emergence (48%) compared to the intolerant checks12. The two QTLs, AG1 and AG2 were later incorporated into different genetic backgrounds, showing no negative effects on seed physiology, while improving AG tolerance7.

The present study was conducted to assess the individual and interactive effects of incorporating AG1, AG2 and their combination in the background of two high yielding rice varieties, Ciherang-Sub1 and PSB Rc82, both in the field and under greenhouse conditions. The study attempted to elucidate the physiological and agronomical traits associated with flooding tolerance during germination under these conditions; and to evaluate the effectiveness of seed pre-treatment before seeding on enhancing germination and crop establishment, and subsequent grain yield in natural fields.

Results

Seedling emergence and growth of rice seedlings during germination under flooding

Seedling emergence of the tolerant and intolerant rice genotypes was similar under saturated (control) conditions, but significantly affected by flooding both in the greenhouse and under field conditions. However, emergence was lower (by over 50%) in the field than in the greenhouse (Fig. 1). In field experiments, seed soaking for 24 h significantly improved emergence of all genotypes under flooded condition compared to dry seeding (Fig. 1B,C). A significantly highest emergence (~70%) was found for Ciherang-Sub1-AG2 and Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2 (P < 0.001) and lowest for the sensitive genotype PSB Rc82 (~16%). Seed pre-treatment increased emergence by 7–10%; and the emergence of the lines containing AG2 and AG1-AG2 QTLs increased by 101–153% compared with the sensitive genotype Ciherang-Sub1, in 2016 WS, and by 128–211% in 2017 DS when seeds were not treated.

Figure 1
figure1

Seedling emergence (%) of AG introgression lines and checks at 21 days after seeding in greenhouse (A) under 10 cm water depth of flooding; and in the field (B,C) using pre-treated seeds under flooding depth of 3–5 cm during 2016 wet season (B) and 2017 dry season (C). Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE (n = 60 for the greenhouse trial; and n = 90 for field trial). Bars bearing different lower case letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.001. **significant at p < 0.01, *** significant at p < 0.001.

Among the ten genotypes evaluated in the greenhouse experiments, eight genotypes showed relatively higher seedling shoot length above water surface at 15 days after sowing (DAS), than PSB Rc82 and PSB Rc82-AG1 (Fig. 2). Under flooded conditions, shoot length of the tolerant introgression lines was almost double compared to that of the sensitive PSB Rc82 at 21 DAS (Fig. 2A). Under control conditions, all genotypes including Ciherang-Sub1 and PSB Rc82 showed similar shoot length, but the tolerant checks KHO and Ma-Zhan Red were relatively taller at 21 DAS (Fig. 2B). Similar trends were also observed during earlier stages (6, 10 and 15 DAS). Seedling shoot length was higher under flooding compared to the control except for PSB Rc82. Among the six-introgression lines, PSB Rc82-AG2 showed the highest shoot elongation, while the intolerant check PSB Rc82 showed the lowest elongation (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
figure2

Seedling shoots length within 21days after sowing under 10 cm water depth of flooding (A) and under control condition (B) in the greenhouse experiment. Vertical bars indicate HSD0.05 (n = 60).

In field experiments, across seed pretreatments, seedling emergence under flooding was significantly higher in AG-introgression lines (P < 0.001), and seed pre-treatment accelerated seedling emergence until 12 DAS (Fig. 3). Among the AG-lines, Ciherang-Sub1-AG2 and Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2, along with the positive check Ma-Zhan Red, showed higher emergence rates across the days, seed pre-treatments, and seasons. Introgression lines carrying AG2 and AG1-AG2 QTLs showed 56–147% and 104–294% increase in emergence rate in flooded soil, respectively, compared with the recurrent non-introgression line. Moreover, seeds soaking for 24 h or hydro-priming showed enhanced seedling emergence over dry seeds in early seedling establishment stage, especially at the first 8 DAS, though when using dry seeds emergence increased between 8–12 DAS under flooding (Fig. 3). Emergence was steady or decreased at 12 DAS in flooded condition and at 8 DAS under control conditions.

Figure 3
figure3

Seedling emergence rate of AG lines under field condition with pretreated seeds and flooding at 3–5 cm water depth, during the wet season of 2016 (A–C); (A) priming; (B) 24 h soaking; (C) dry seeds) and dry season 2017 (DE); (D) priming; (E) 24 h soaking; (F) dry seeds). Vertical bars indicate LSD 0.05 (n = 90).

Seedling height, plant dry-weight, and leaf area were significantly greater in AG-introgression lines (P < 0.05) compared to Ciherang-Sub1 under flooding (data not shown). However, 24 h pre-soaking and hydro-priming resulted in a better seedling emergence, seedling growth, and seedling height. Seedling emergence was higher in the dry season than the wet season. Correlations of emergence with seedling vigor index (SVI), leaf area, and plant dry-weight were strong and positive at 14 and 21 DAS (Table 1).

Table 1 Correlation coefficients for the association of emergence and different growth parameters, using pre-treated seeds sown and flooded with 3–5 cm for 21 DAS, in the dry season 2017 field experiment (n = 60; df = 9).

Physiological traits measurements from greenhouse experiments

Alpha amylase activity in seeds germinating under flooding

Alpha amylase activity was significantly higher in AG1 and AG2 introgressed lines along with their donor parents from 8 h to 7 DAS under flooded conditions (Fig. 4). Low α-amylase activity was observed in the dry seeds of all genotypes and no significant differences were found among genotypes. α-amylase activity increased progressively with time in seeds of tolerant genotypes germinating under flooded conditions until 7 DAS. The increase in activity was slower in the sensitive genotype PSB Rc82. In AG1, AG2 and AG1 + AG2 introgressed lines, α-amylase activity was almost 50% higher than in dry seeds, but remained unchanged in the sensitive checks within 0 to 8 hours from seeding. Activity of α-amylase increased substantially from 8 h to 3 DAS, in almost all genotypes. Ciherang-Sub1-AG2, PSB Rc82-AG1-AG2 and Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2 had relatively higher α-amylase activity at 7 DAS, while the lowest values were noted in the intolerant checks PSB Rc82 and Ciherang-Sub1 (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure4

Activity of α-amylase (units mg−1 protein) in germinating seeds under 10 cm flooding during the first 7 days after seeding in the greenhouse experiment. Vertical bars indicate HSD0.05 (n = 60).

Non-structural carbohydrate in seeds germinating in flooded soil

Soluble sugar concentration in germinating seeds under flooded and control conditions was assessed within the first 7 DAS (Fig. 5). Flooding considerably reduced soluble sugar concentrations in germinating seeds during the first 0–2 DAS, which then progressively increased afterwards until 7 DAS in AG-introgression lines along with KHO and MR. In contrast, soluble sugar concentration in the sensitive genotypes decreased steadily from 0 to 7 DAS under flooded conditions, and only slightly increased at 3 DAS in Ciherang-Sub1 (Fig. 5A). Under control condition, soluble sugars increased similarly in both tolerant and sensitive genotypes from 0 to 7 DAS (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5
figure5

Soluble sugars (A) Flood, (B) control), and starch (C) Flood, (D) control) concentrations in germinating seeds under 10 cm flooding and control during the first 7 d after seeding in the greenhouse experiment. Vertical bars indicate HSD0.05 (n = 60).

Starch degradation was slower in all genotypes under flooded conditions compared with the control, and was relatively faster in the tolerant AG lines (Fig. 5C,D). The tolerant checks as well as AG2 and AG1-AG2 introgression lines showed higher starch depletion during the period relative to the other rice genotypes. This reduction in starch concentration in germinating seeds was coupled with the increase in soluble sugars and subsequent faster seedling growth in the tolerant genotypes under flooded conditions.

Non-enzymatic antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in germinating seeds under flooding

Under flooded and control conditions, reduced ascorbate (AsA) decreased gradually from one DAS to 4 DAS, with proportionally greater reduction under flooded conditions (Fig. 6). A similar trend was observed for total ascorbate in both tolerant and sensitive rice genotypes (data not shown). At 3 DAS, reduced ascorbate concentration was higher in the AG lines compared with their respective intolerant parental lines, PSB Rc82 and Ciherang-Sub1 under flooded condition (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
figure6

Reduced ascorbate (A) Flood, (B) control), total phenolic content (C) Flood, (D) control) and reactive oxygen scanvenging (ROS) scavenging activity (E) Flood, (F) control) in seeds germinating under 10 cm flooding; and control during the first 4 days after sowing in the greenhouse experiment. Vertical bars indicate HSD0.05 (n = 60).

KHO and MR showed higher concentrations of TPC than all other genotypes regardless of dates of sampling, both under controlled and flooded conditions (Fig. 6C,D). Among the AG-introgression lines, Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2 and PSB Rc82-AG1-AG2 had higher TPC than their respective non-AG lines (Fig. 6C,D). Under controlled conditions, little change in TPC was observed with time within genotypes from 1 DAS to 4 DAS. In contrast, under flooded condition TPC declined progressively from 0 to 4 DAS, with the reduction rate relatively slower from 3 to 4 DAS (Fig. 6C,D). ROS scavenging activity substantially decreased with time under both control and flooded condition, with relatively faster rate under control conditions (Fig. 6E,F). Under flooded conditions, the highest activity was found in the tolerant checks and Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2 during 3–4 DAS (Fig. 6E,F). Lipid peroxidation negatively correlated with ascorbate, reactive oxygen species scavenging activity, and TPC, while ROS correlated positively with ascorbate and TPC concentrations (Table 2).

Table 2 Correlation coefficients for the associations of reduced ascorbate (RAsA), total ascorbate (TAsA), ratio of RAsA and TAsA, malondialdehyde (MDA), total phenolic content (TPC), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging activity(n = 60; df = 9).

Lipid peroxidation and reactive oxygen species scavenging activity

Lipid peroxidation was estimated as the concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) in germinating seeds during the first 4 days after seeding. MDA concentration progressively increased with time after sowing, under both flooded and control conditions. However, the increase was much more rapid under flooded conditions than the control (Fig. 7). Under flooding, the sensitive genotype PSB Rc82 had the highest amount of MDA at 3 and 4 DAS; whereas, Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2 and the tolerant check KHO had lower concentrations of MDA at 4 DAS.

Figure 7
figure7

Concentration of malondialdehyde in germinating seeds under 10 cm flooding (A) and control (B) during the first 4 days after sowing in the greenhouse experiment. Vertical bars indicate HSD0.05 (n = 60).

Discussion

Seedling emergence and seedling growth

Flooding impedes seed germination and early seedling growth especially when heavy rainfall occurs just after sowing or fields are not well leveled. Poor emergence and mortality of young seedlings caused by flooding result in poor crop establishment1,3. In this study, combining genetic tolerance with seed pre-treatments (hydro-priming or 24 hour soaking) increased seedling emergence (P < 0.001) and improved seedling growth under flooded condition15. The study further established the positive roles of combining AG1 and AG2 QTLs with proper seed treatments, which together had improved physiological process associated with seedling emergence and early seedling growth in flooded fields3,41.

Flooding after direct seeding negatively impacted seedling emergence with the consequent reduction in crop stand. Seedling emergence and biomass were higher in the AG introgression lines following flooding, with similar trends in both greenhouse and field trial. Stored starch was degraded and mobilized faster in the lines containing AG1 and AG2, (Fig. 5), providing required energy for germination and seedling growth under flooded conditions1,40,42,43,44,45,. Comparatively, seedling emergence and early growth were poor in the sensitive genotypes (Fig. 3), as we also observed in a parallel study7. Earlier our greenhouse studies showed consistently higher seedling emergence of the AG lines under deeper flooding of up to 10 cm imposed after dry direct seeding1,39.

In the field experiment, seed priming and pre-soaking improved the emergence of seedlings under flooding (Fig. 1B,C), which agreed with previous reports15,27. Previous studies showed that seed pre-treatments shorten the time for seedling emergence, enhanced the seedling number, and accelerated seedling growth16,46. Our study showed that seedling emergence had significant positive correlation with SVI (r = 0.96, P < 0.001), LAI (r = 0.90, P < 0.001), plant biomass (Pearson correlation, r = 0.59, P < 0.001). Previously researchers also reported that, seedling emergence correlated positively with SVI16,47, leaf area index (LAI)47,48 and plant biomass production15. This has also been observed in other crops, including sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)49 and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)23. Seed pretreatment also accelerates pre-germination metabolism thus enhancing germination and crop establishment under favorable or stress conditions17,50. Seed hydro-priming induces activation and de novo synthesis of hydrolases that catalyze the breakdown of starch to sugar for translocation to the growing embryo16. In general, the positive effect of AG QTLs and seed pre-treatment was clearly reflected in the seedling emergence, growth and establishment of Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2 and Ciherang-Sub1-AG2 (Fig. 1B,C). It has been shown that introgression of SUB1 and AG QTLs have a positive effect on improving tolerance of flooding41, wherein AG QTLs are expressed during germination and early growth stages in flooded soils, while SUB1 is expressed during vegetative stage and is effective up to heading stage12,41,51.

Amylase activity and starch breakdown

In germinating seeds amylase enzymes catalyzes the breakdown of starch into maltose, with further hydrolysis into glucose via the enzyme glucosidase. Glucose then enters into the glycolytic pathway where it is used for the production of ATP and carbon molecules used for the plumule and radicle growth. In the present study, lower α-amylase activity was observed in all rice genotypes under flooded soil compared with control conditions. Germination of rice seeds in flooded soils and subsequent elongation of roots and shoots, has been associated with the ability to breakdown stored starch in the endosperm and use it for the growing embryo under hypoxia1. Soluble sugar concentration in seeds, and its translocation from the endosperm to the embryo, are closely associated with coleoptile growth under low or absence of oxygen52,53. The capability for sugar translocation from the endosperm to the coleoptile varies between rice cultivars, depending on ability to breakdown stored carbohydrates in the endosperm and the signaling mechanisms for supplying energy42.

Faster coleoptile elongation observed in Ciherang-Sub1-AG2, Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2, and PSB Rc82-AG1-AG2, compared with Ciherang-Sub1and PSB Rc82, is due to the ability to maintain relatively higher soluble sugar concentrations as source of energy for coleoptile growth under hypoxic condition (Figs. 2, 4 and 5). AG introgression lines and the tolerant checks, KHO and MR, had higher emergence and higher α-amylase activity than the intolerant ones during flooding (Fig. 4). This result suggests a positive association between seedling emergence and α-amylase activity in germinating seeds under anaerobic conditions. This is further supported by the strong positive correlation between seedling emergence and α-amylase activity reported before26, with α-amylase gene (RAmy3D) found to have higher expression in germinating seeds of tolerant cultivars sown in flooded soil1. Here we observed that α-amylase activity was higher in Ciherang-Sub1-AG2, Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2, PSB Rc82-AG1-AG2, and in the AG QTL donors KHO and MR during germination in flooded soil. In contrast, PSB Rc82 (sensitive) showed lower α-amylases activity under flooded condition, and consequently lower germination and emergence.

Soluble sugar in germinating seeds of all rice genotypes increased progressively from day 1 until 7 DAS under control condition (Fig. 5B); however, this increase was delayed until day 3 under flooded conditions (Fig. 5A). Similar but opposite trend was observed in starch breakdown, with slower starch mobilization in the intolerant genotypes in flooded soils (Fig. 5C,D). Clearly, the AG lines maintained relatively higher starch mobilization rates and higher sugar concentrations in germinating seedlings under flooding, leading to faster germination and early seedling growth, unlike the sensitive rice genotypes. The reduced rate of carbohydrate catabolism in these sensitive cultivars agreed with their slower rate of germination and growth in flooded soils, as also reported before3,54. The capacity to catalyze starch breakdown under hypoxic stress was associated with tolerance of anaerobic conditions in rice52. Recently the gene underlying tolerance at the AG1 QTL locus was identified as OsTPP742. This gene increases the sink strength of the growing embryo by maintaining signaling for low sugar availability, sustaining starch mobilization and sugar supply for growth3,42.

Antioxidant properties and lipid peroxidation

Flooding leads to lipid peroxidation, which is one of the primary physiological processes indicative of the oxidative damage to cell structures where free radicals attack lipids containing carbon-carbon double bonds, ultimately leading to cell death55,56. Here we observed an association of physiological responses to early flooding with reduction in seedling emergence, increase in MDA concentration, and reduction in total phenolic content in rice seeds germinating in flooded soils. MDA concentration in germinating seeds increased substantially with the duration of flooding stress, with the highest concentration in the sensitive variety PSB Rc82 than in the AG-introgression lines and the tolerant checks KHO and MR (Fig. 7). Submergence stress was previously reported to be associated with the induction of oxidative stress in rice seedlings during the vegetative stage, with lower level of MDA content associated with submergence tolerance37,57.

A negative correlation was observed between MDA and total phenolic content in rice seeds germinating under flooded condition, suggesting the role of phenolic compounds in scavenging reactive oxygen species. The lower emergence of the sensitive genotypes is probably related in part, to the ROS induced lipid membrane damage as reflected in higher MDA content. Total phenolic content varied among the rice genotypes, with higher concentrations observed in Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2 and the tolerant checks KHO and MR. The negative association between MDA and TPC, as an evidence for the role of phenolic compounds in free radical scavenging activity under stress conditions was also reported before26. Phenolic compounds are natural antioxidants that act as protective agents during stress and as scavengers of free radicals58. In red, brown or pigmented rice, MDA content is generally lower compared with white rice because of their higher phenolic content59,60. In our study we observed that, the de-husked grain of Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2, Ciherang-Sub1-AG2, PSB Rc82-AG1-AG2, and the tolerant checks KHO and MR is brownish in color (Fig. S3), which is coupled with higher emergence and faster growth, as well as with other physiological traits positively associated with tolerance.

Ascorbate plays a vital role as an antioxidant in plant systems. Ascorbate can directly scavenge ROS through the ascorbate–glutathione cycle involving the enzyme ascorbate peroxidase; or non-enzymatically by reducing H2O2 directly to water35. Apart from its role as an antioxidant, ascorbate also acts as cofactor in some important enzymatic reactions for many metal-containing enzymes61,62. AsA is also induced during seed germination63,64 and if AsA concentration goes beyond 4 mM it inhibits seed germination65. Similarly, while AsA concentration in imbibed seeds in natural conditions is sufficient, its excess through internal production or exogenous application could aggravate the inhibitory effect of ABA on seed germination64. Apparently the AG-introgression lines and the tolerant checks maintained higher concentrations of total and reduced ascorbate compared with the sensitive checks (Fig. 6), and the correlation between ascorbate concentration and malondialdehyde content in germinating seeds under flooded condition is negative (Table 2). These results support the important role of ascorbate in reducing membrane damage during flooding stress, which is consistent with previous findings37.

Conclusions

Rice genotypes carrying AG1 and AG2 QTls showed higher seedling emergence and faster elongation when dry seeds are sown in flooded soils, reflecting the important functional role of these QTLs in improving crop establishment under direct seeding. The introgression lines Ciherang-Sub1-AG2 and Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2 had higher emergence and faster seedling growth than the other AG lines. Several traits were identified that are strongly associated with tolerance of anaerobic conditions during germination, including ability to degrade starch through maintenance of high α-amylase activity and subsequent increase in soluble sugars supply to the growing embryo; and maintaining lower MDA concentrations as an indication of cellular membrane integrity. The later was associated with higher concentration of reduced ascorbate, phenolic compounds, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging enzymes.

Seed hydro-priming as well as pre-soaking for 24 h further improved emergence and seedling growth of the AG introgression lines in flooded soils under field conditions. This suggests that combining genetic tolerance with proper seed management before sowing could effectively be used for direct seeding. Moreover, this approach can provide means for weed management, a major constraint for adoption of direct seeded systems in rice. Flooding the soil with 3–5 cm of water depth for the first 2–3 weeks after sowing can help control most of the weeds early in the season, as a cheap, effective and eco-friendly strategy for weed management in farmers’ fields51. The studies established the effectiveness of incorporating the AG QTLs in high yielding rice genotypes, and together with seed handling and pre-treatment, could ensure good crop establishment in flooded soils and encourage large-scale adoption of direct-seeded rice systems both in irrigated and rainfed ecosystems.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and experiments

Experiments were conducted in a greenhouse and research field of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine emergence percentage and physiological responses, while field experiments were conducted to assess agronomic performance of the contrasting genotypes.

Greenhouse experiments

Ten rice genotypes with anaerobic germination (AG) QTLs (quantitative trait loci), PSB Rc82-AG1, PSB Rc82-AG2, PSB Rc82-AG1-AG2, Ciherang-Sub1-AG1, Ciherang-Sub1-AG2, Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2, along with their donors Kho Hlan On (AG1), Ma-Zhan Red (AG2) and the intolerant recipients PSB Rc82 and Ciherang-Sub1 were used in this study7,41. The experiment was conducted under control (non-flooded) and flooded condition during June 2016 using seedling trays. Each seedling tray had 34 rows, and each row had 17 cells (1 cm × 1 cm × 1.5 cm), filled with finely ground soil. One dry seed was sown per each of the 578 (34×17) cells half-filled with sterilized dry garden soil, and covered with 1 cm of fine soil. Fifty-one seeds were used per genotype, sown in three rows representing each replication. The trays were then placed in a concrete bench and flooded with tap water to a depth of 10 cm. Another set of trays was maintained under control (non flooded) condition in an adjacent bench1,12. The trial was laid in a randomized complete block design with three replications.

Growth parameters (seedling root and shoot length) were measured at 6, 10, 15, and 21 days after sowing (DAS) on 12 seedlings48,66. Seedling emergence percentage was calculated at 21 days after sowing based on the number of seedlings that emerged above the surface of floodwater following the below formula1.

$$Seedling\,emergence( \% )=\frac{Number\,of\,seedling\,emerged}{Number\,of\,seeds\,used\,per\,unit\,area}\times 100$$

Physiological traits including non-structural carbohydrates (starch and soluble sugars), α-amylase activity, concentrations of ascorbate and total phenolic compound, ROS scavenging activity, and lipid peroxidation were analyzed1,12,48. The methods and techniques used to measure the physiological traits are all well established and widely used, and they are just briefly described here with reference to relevant papers for more details.

Measurement of alpha amylase activity

Alpha amylase activity was measured using Bernfeld’s method67, with slight modifications. About 200 mg of germinating seed sample was ground in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Two mL of extraction buffer (100 mM HEPES-KOH pH 8.0, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF, 20% v/v glycerol, and 5 mM thiourea) were added to the samples followed by vortexing and agitating (4 °C) for 10 minutes and centrifuging at 10,000×g (4 °C) for 10 minutes. Aliquots of 200 μL crude plant extract were transferred into a plate with 50 μL 100 mM CaCl2, then heated at 70 °C for 15 minutes to deactivate β-amylase, and the heated extract was assayed for α-amylase activity.

One mL of 1% starch solution was added to the 200 μL each of the heated and unheated extract, and each sample was incubated at 20 °C for 0, 3, and 5 min to allow the conversion of starch to maltose, catalyzed by α-amylase. After incubation, 100 μL of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid color reagent was added to the solution. The samples were incubated in a boiling water bath for 3 min, cooled immediately in an ice bath and 1.8 mL ultra-pure water was added to each sample, vortexed, and absorbance read at 540 nm using a Spectrostar-Nano (BMG-LABTECH) spectrophotometer. The absorption values were compared with a standard curve for increasing amounts of maltose. The total protein concentration was determined using Bradford method68 with the activity expressed in units per milligram protein, and one unit of α-amylase activity defined as μ moles of maltose produced per minute.

Measurements of soluble sugar and starch concentrations

Soluble sugars concentration was determined using the method of Fales69 with slight modifications. Approximately 30 mg of freeze-dried powdered sample was mixed with 1 mL of 80% ethanol, then vortexed and incubated in a water bath set at 75 °C for 10 minutes. Samples were then centrifuged at 5000×g for 10 minutes at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and a second extraction performed with the residue using 1 mL 80% ethanol following same procedure. An aliquot of 30 μL of the stock sample was taken and diluted 1:50 to make a working sample, with a 30 μl diluted sample transferred to a plate containing 300 μL of anthrone reagent (0.4 g anthrone, 200 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid, 15 mL 95% ethanol, 60 ml of reagent grade water). The solution was vortexed and heated at 95 °C for 10 minutes followed by immediate cooling at 4 °C for 15 minutes and then normalized to room temperature. Absorbance was read at 620 nm using a Spectrostar-Nano (BMG-LABTECH) spectrophotometer, with soluble sugar concentration determined based on a standard curve for glucose.

Soluble sugar concentration was expressed as percent by weight of glucose per unit dry weight of the sample. After assaying soluble sugar, the residue was dried at 70 °C for 2 d and used for starch analysis following Ismail et al.1 with slight modifications. Starch was solubilized at 95 °C in hot water bath for 3 h with further hydrolysis using amyloglucosidase (Sigma Chemicals, St Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h. Absorbance was read at 450 nm using a Spectrostar-Nano (BMG-LABTECH) spectrophotometer, with starch concentration expressed as percent per unit dry weight of the sample.

Ascorbate concentration

Ascorbic acid was determined following Shigeoka et al.70. Approximately 200 mg of fresh sample (germinating seeds) was ground to a fine powder with liquid nitrogen and extracted with 2 mL of 5% (w/v) metaphosphoric acid. The extract was clarified by centrifugation at 20 000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. Two aliquots (each of 200 μL supernatant) were separately assayed for total ascorbate (AsA + DHAsA) and oxidized ascorbate (DHAsA). While 100 μL aliquot of 3 mM DCIP (as sodium salt of 2,6-dichloroindophenol) was added into the supernatant in the assay for total ascorbate, same volume of distilled water was added for the assay for oxidized ascorbate. After keeping the mixtures of both assays at room temperature for 20 min, aliquots of 200 μL of 1% (w/v) thiourea in 5% metaphosphoric acid and 200 μL of 10 mM DNPH (2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine) was added. Mixtures were then incubated at 50 °C for 1 h, cooled in an ice bath for 15 min while adding 500 μL of ice-cold 85% (v/v) H2SO4. An aliquot of 200 μL of 20% (v/v) H2SO4 was added and absorbance was measured at 520 nm. Reduced Ascorbate concentration was calculated by subtracting oxidized ascorbate from total ascorbate.

Total phenolic concentration (TPC) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging activity

The same supernatant extracted for lipid peroxidation was used for assaying total phenolic content71 and ROS scavenging activity72. Total phenolic content was determined spectrophotometrically using Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenol regent (Sigma Aldrich, Singapore). An aliquot of 100 μL supernatant or gallic acid standard was transferred into a plate with 200 μL Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent and vortexed, then incubated at 25 °C in darkness for 6 min. An 800 μL of 700 mM sodium carbonate solution was added and the mixture kept at 25 °C for 2 h in the dark. Absorbance was read at 765 nm using a Spectrostar-Nano (BMG-LABTECH) spectrophotometer. A standard curve was prepared using standard gallic acid (Sigma Aldrich, Singapore) solution, and the results were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE g−1 fw).

To determine ROS scavenging activity, another aliquot of 100 μL supernatant or gallic acid standard was transferred to a plate with 6 μM 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and vortexed, then incubated at 25 °C for 30 min in the dark and absorbance read at 515 nm using a Spectrostar-Nano (BMG-LABTECH) spectrophotometer. A standard curve was prepared using standard gallic acid solution (Sigma Aldrich, Singapore), and the results were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE g−1 fw).

Determination of lipid peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was determined by measuring malondialdehyde (MDA) formation using the thiobarbituric acid method73. First, 200 mg of germinating seeds were ground to a fine powder using liquid nitrogen and extracted with 2 mL of 0.01% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The extracts were centrifuged at 4000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant used for the assay. One mL aliquots of diluted samples were added into two separate test tubes. One mL of TBA solution consisting of 50.0% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and 0.01% butylated hydroxytoluene was added to a test tube with 1 mL of aliquot. Another 1 mL of TBA solution composed of 50.0% (w/v) TCA and 0.65% TBA was added to the second test tube with 1 mL of aliquots. Samples were mixed thoroughly and heated at 95 °C for 25 min, then cooled and centrifuged at 4000×g for 10 min. Absorbance was read at 440, 532, and 600 nm using a Spectrostar-Nano (BMG-LABTECH) spectrophotometer. The malondialdehyde equivalent was calculated using the equations of Hodges et al.73.

Field experiment

Based on greenhouse screening experiments, we selected five genotypes—Ciherang-Sub1-AG1, Ciherang-Sub1-AG2, Ciherang-Sub1-AG1-AG2, Ma-Zhan Red (AG2) and Ciherang-Sub1 for field trial considering desired traits (anaerobic germination). Seeds of each genotype were subjected to three seed pre-treatments before sowing; (A) hydro-priming, (B) 24 h pre-soaking, and (C) dry seed (control seed). Following seeding, the field was flooded with 3–5 cm water depth or maintained saturated (control) using levees; laid in a split-plot design with three replications, where flood/control is main plot, and seed pretreatments are subplot. The trial was conducted twice, once each during the wet season (June-November) 2016, and the dry season (January-May) 2017.

For hydro-priming, seeds were soaked in aerated water for 24 h followed by air drying to 14% moisture (at room temperature, 25°C) and stored at 4 °C until use15,47. Seeds were hand-sown in a continuous line at 8 g m−2 in 10 cm × 10 cm spacing and 1 m ×1 m plots, then covered by 0.5 cm garden soil and flooded by 3–5 cm water depth for up to 21 d. Emerging seedlings were counted from a marked area of 0.25 m2 (5 rows of 0.5 m) at 4-d interval from seeding to 21 DAS. Seedling emergence (m2d−1) was calculated using the formula mentioned above in the  greenhouse experiment1,74. Seedling vigor index (SVI)75 was measured 21 DAS. Twelve seedlings/treatment from a marked area of 0.25 m2 at 14 and 21 DAS were uprooted (in flooded part where enough seedlings were absent adjusted to 12 seedlings) to measure leaf area, leaf number, root length, shoot length and dry weight (root + leaf+shoot). Area of detached green leaves was measured using leaf area meter (LiCor1 LI3100C). Leaf area index (LAI) was calculated as the total leaf area per unit land area48, and the specific leaf area (SLA)48 and specific stem biomass (SSB) were calculated, respectively, using the following formulae:

$${\rm{Specific}}\,{\rm{leaf}}\,{\rm{area}}(c{m}^{2}{g}^{-1})=\frac{Leaf\,area}{Leaf\,dry\,weight}$$
$${\rm{Specific}}\,{\rm{stem}}\,{\rm{biomass}}(mg\,c{m}^{-1})=\frac{Stem\,biomass\,}{Stem\,length\,}$$

Environmental condition of greenhouse and field

In the greenhouse experiment, temperature was determined in greenhouse and floodwater at 1 cm and 5 cm water depth using digital thermometer (Model-8500-40, Chicago, IL 60648). Temperature was measured two times in a day, at 8:30am ranging from 26.1-34.6, 27.3-35.0, and 27.3-34.3 °C, respectively, and from 30.0-36.8, 32.1–38.2, and 32.1–38.1 °C, respectively at 1:30 pm (Fig. S1). The pH of floodwater was measured using Oakton-pH meter (Oakton pH11), water pH increased slight with increase in temperature and water depth, with the ranges of 7.6–8.8 (8:30am) and 7.9–9.0 (1:30 pm) at 1 cm depth, and 8.0–8.9 (8:30am) and 8.1–9.1 (1:30 pm) at 5 cm water depth (Table S1).

In the field experiment, temperatures were higher during the wet season of 2016 compared to the dry season of 2017. During the first 14 days after seeding, air temperatures ranged from 26.6–37.7 (2016) and 23.1–32.5 (2017), while water temperature ranged from 27.4–42.3 (2016) to 21.0–34.4 (2017). Mean photon flux densities (μmol m−2 s−1) was measured by LI-COR Quantum/Radiation/Photometer (LI-COR LI-250A). Mean photon flux densities (μmol m−2 s−1) above the water surface and at 3 cm water depth were 126.86–1307.8 and 88.27–885.17, respectively, in 2016 and 64.1–1256.1 and 34.5-899.0, respectively, in 2017 (Fig. S2). Water pH showed little variation with time and water depth, from 7.2–8.3 (2016) and 6.5–8.6 (2017).

Statistical analysis

We conducted Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test to evaluate the effect of two factors genotypes (factor 1) and Flood and control conditions (factor 2) simultaneously on the target traits. Q-Q Plots were used to test the assumption of normality and Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variances was used. Analysis was conducted using STAR (Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research) for Windows version 2.0.1, which uses R package (IRRI, 2014). Sigma Plot 12.5 and Microsoft Excel 2016 were used for statistical computing and graphics analysis. Mean differences were compared by Tukey’s HSD (Honest Significant Difference) and LSD (Least Significant Difference) tests depending on the number of treatments in different experiments. Relationships between different attributes were determined using correlation analyses.

References

  1. 1.

    Ismail, A. M., Ella, E. S., Vergara, G. V. & Mackill, D. J. Mechanisms associated with tolerance to flooding during germination and early seedling growth in rice (Oryza sativa). Annals of Botany 103(2), 197–209, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn211 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yamauchi, M., Aguilar, A., Vaughan, D. & Seshu, D. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm suitable for direct sowing under flooded soil surface. Euphytica 67(3), 177–184, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040619 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lal, B. et al. Agronomic manipulations can enhance the productivity of anaerobic tolerant rice sown in flooded soils in rainfed areas. Field Crops Research 220, 105–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.026 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Setter T, et al. Physiology and genetics of submergence tolerance in rice. Annals of Botany, 79(suppl_1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010308 (1997).

  5. 5.

    Jackson, M. B. & Ram, P. C. Physiological and molecular basis of susceptibility and tolerance of rice plants to complete submergence. Annals of Botany 91(2), 227–241, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf242 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhang, Q. et al. Benefits of flooding-induced aquatic adventitious roots depend on the duration of submergence: linking plant performance to root functioning. Annals of Botany 120(1), 171–180, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx049 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mondal, S., Khan, M. I. R., Dixit, S., Cruz, P. C. S. & Ismail, A. M. Growth, productivity and grain quality of AG1 and AG2 QTLs introgression lines under flooding in direct-seeded rice system. Field Crop Research. 248, 1–12 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ghosal, S. et al. Deciphering genetics underlying stable anaerobic germination in rice:phenotyping, QTL identification, and interaction analysis. Rice 12, 50, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-019-0305-y (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Greenway H, Setter T. Is there anaerobic metabolism in submerged rice plants? A view point. In Singh V, Singh R, Singh B, Zeigler R (Eds.), Physiology of stress tolerance in rice. Proceedings of the International Conference on Stress Physiology in Rice, 28 February - 5 March 1994 (pp. 11–30). Los Bañow, Philippines: NDUAT, IRRI (1996).

  10. 10.

    Ismail, A. M., Platten, J. D. & Miro, B. Physiological bases of tolerance of abiotic stresses in rice and mechanisms of adaptation. ORYZA-An International Journal on Rice 50(2), 91–99 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Turner, F. T., Chen, C.-C. & McCauley, G. N. Morphological Development of Rice Seedlings in Water at Controlled Oxygen Levels 1. Agronomy Journal 73(3), 566–570, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300030037X (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Septiningsih, E. M. et al. QTL mapping and confirmation for tolerance of anaerobic conditions during germination derived from the rice landrace Ma-Zhan Red. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126(5), 1357–1366, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2057-1 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guglielminetti, L., Yamaguchi, J., Perata, P. & Alpi, A. Amylolytic activities in cereal seeds under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Plant Physiology 109(3), 1069–1076, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.3.1069 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sarangi, S. K. et al. Improved nursery management further enhances the productivity of stress-tolerant rice varieties in coastal rainfed lowlands. Field Crops Research 174, 61–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.01.011 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ella, E. S., Dionisio-Sese, M. L. & Ismail, A. M. Seed pre-treatment in rice reduces damage, enhances carbohydrate mobilization and improves emergence and seedling establishment under flooded conditions. AoB Plants 2011(2011), plr007, https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plr007 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Farooq, M., Barsa, S. M. & Wahid, A. Priming of field-sown rice seed enhances germination, seedling establishment, allometry and yield. Plant growth regulation 49(2-3), 285–294, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-006-9138-y (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang W, et al. Effects of pre-sowing seed treatments on establishment of dry direct-seeded early rice under chilling stress. AoB Plants, 8(2016), plw074. 10.1093/aobpla/plw074 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Basra, S. M. A., Farooq, M., Tabassam, R. & Ahmad, N. Physiological and biochemical aspects of pre-sowing seed treatments in fine rice (Oryza sativa L.). Seed Science and Technology 33(3), 623–628, https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2005.33.3.09 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hossain, M. A. & Shah, M. D. A study on the total phenols content and antioxidant activity of essential oil and different solvent extracts of endemic plant Merremia borneensis. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 8(1), 66–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.01.007 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Basra, S., Zia, M., Mehmood, T., Afzal, I. & Khaliq, A. Comparison of different invigoration techniques in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds. Pakistan Journal of Arid Agriculture (Pakistan) 5(2), 11–16 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rahman, M., Ahammad, K. & Ahmed, M. Effect of seed priming on maize (Zea mays L.) seedling emergence under different sowing dates. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 39(4), 694–707, https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v39i4.22549 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bradford, K. J., Steiner, J. J. & Trawatha, S. E. Seed priming influence on germination and emergence of pepper seed lots. Crop Science 30(3), 718–721, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030049X (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sadak, M. S. & Mostafa, H. A. Physiological role of pre-sowing seed with proline on some growth, biochemical aspects, yield quantity and quality of two sunflower cultivars grown under seawater salinity stress. Scientia Agriculturae 9(1), 60–69, https://doi.org/10.15192/PSCP.SA.2015.1.9.6069 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Saha, R., Mandal, A. & Basu, R. Physiology of seed invigoration treatments in soybean (Glycine max L.). Seed Science and Technology 18(2), 269–276 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jisha, K. C. & Puthur, J. T. Seed priming with beta-amino butyric acid improves abiotic stress tolerance in rice seedlings. Rice Science 23(5), 242–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2016.08.002 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Farooq M, Basra S, Wahid A, Khaliq A, Kobayashi N. Rice seed invigoration: A review. In Lichtfouse E (Ed.), Organic Farming, Pest Control and Remediation of Soil Pollutants. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews (Vol. 1) (pp. 137-175). Dordrecht, NL: Springer. (2009).

  27. 27.

    Herath S. Role of water management and seed treatments on the growth of rice and weeds. (PhD), UPLB Professional School for Agriculture and the Environment, Los Baños, Philippines. (2015).

  28. 28.

    Gibbs, J., Morrell, S., Valdez, A., Setter, T. & Greenway, H. Regulation of alcoholic fermentation in coleoptiles of two rice cultivars differing in tolerance to anoxia. Journal of Experimental Botany 51(345), 785–796, https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.785 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Matsumura, H., Takano, T., Takeda, G. & Uchimiya, H. Adh1 is transcriptionally active but its translational product is reduced in a rad mutant of rice (Oryza sativa L.), which is vulnerable to submergence stress. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97(8), 1197–1203, https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051010 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Saika, H., Matsumura, H., Takano, T., Tsutsumi, N. & Nakazono, M. A point mutation of Adh1 gene is involved in the repression of coleoptile elongation under submergence in rice. Breeding Science 56(1), 69–74, https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.56.69 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Shingaki-Wells, R. N. et al. Differential molecular responses of rice and wheat coleoptiles to anoxia reveal novel metabolic adaptations in amino acid metabolism for tissue tolerance. Plant Physiology 156(4), 1706–1724, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175570 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ram, P. et al. Submergence tolerance in rainfed lowland rice: Physiological basis and prospects for cultivar improvement through marker-aided breeding. Field Crops Research 76(2-3), 131–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00035-7 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Magneschi, L. & Perata, P. Rice germination and seedling growth in the absence of oxygen. Annals of Botany 103(2), 181–196, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn121 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Khan MIR, Khan NA. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Systems in Plants: Role and Regulation under Abiotic Stress. Springer ISBN 978-981-10-5254-5 (2017).

  35. 35.

    Gill, S. S. & Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 48(12), 909–930, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kawano, N., Ella, E., Ito, O., Yamauchi, Y. & Tanaka, K. Metabolic changes in rice seedlings with different submergence tolerance after desubmergence. Environmental and Experimental Botany 47(3), 195–203, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(01)00126-5 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ella, E. S., Kawano, N. & Ito, O. Importance of active oxygen-scavenging system in the recovery of rice seedlings after submergence. Plant Science 165(1), 85–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00146-8 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ismail A, et al. Physiological basis of tolerance of flash flooding during germination and early seedling establishment in rice. In Hardy B (Ed.), Improving productivity and livelihood for fragile environments (IRRI Technical Bulletin no. 13) (pp. 1-7). Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute (2008).

  39. 39.

    Angaji, S. A., Septiningsih, E. M., Mackill, D. & Ismail, A. M. QTLs associated with tolerance of flooding during germination in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 172(2), 159–168, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-0014-5 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Miro, B. & Ismail, A. M. Tolerance of anaerobic conditions caused by flooding during germination and early growth in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Frontiers in Plant Science 4(269), 1–18, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00269 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Toledo, A. M. U. et al. Development of improved Ciherang-Sub1 having tolerance to anaerobic germination conditions. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 3(2), 77–87, https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2015.3.2.077 (2015).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kretzschmar, T. et al. A trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase enhances anaerobic germination tolerance in rice. Nature Plants 1(9), 15124, https://doi.org/10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.124 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Miro, B., Longkumer, T., Entila, F. D., Kohli, A. & Ismail, A. M. Rice seed germination underwater: Morpho-physiological responses and the bases of differential expression of alcoholic fermentation enzymes. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1857 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Mondal S, Entila F, Dixit S, Sta. Cruz P, Ismail A. Effects of AG1 and AG2 QTLs on Rice Seedling Growth and Physiological Processes during Germination in Flooded Soils. Presented at the ICAPCS 2017:19th International Conference on Agronomy, Plant and Crop Sciences, Paris, FR, 20-21 July 2017 (2017).

  45. 45.

    Ismail, A. M., Johnson, D. E., Ella, E. S., Vergara, G. V. & Baltazar, A. M. Adaptation to flooding during emergence and seedling growth in rice and weeds, and implications for crop establishment. AoB Plants 2012, pls019, https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/pls019 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Vaz Mondo, V. H. & Nascente, A. S. Neves PdCF, Taillebois JE, Oliveira FHS. Seed hydropriming in upland rice improves germination and seed vigor and has no effects on crop cycle and grain yield. Australian Journal of Crop Science 11(11), 1534–1542, https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.11.PNE70 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hussain, M., Farooq, M. & Lee, D. J. Evaluating the role of seed priming in improving drought tolerance of pigmented and non‐pigmented rice. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 203(4), 269–276, https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12195 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Awan, T. H., Cruz, P. C. S. & Chauhan, B. S. Ecological significance of rice (Oryza sativa) planting density and nitrogen rates in managing the growth and competitive ability of itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) in direct-seeded rice systems. Journal of Pest Science 88(2), 427–438, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-014-0604-4 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tiryaki, I. & Buyukcingil, Y. Seed priming combined with plant hormones: Influence on germination and seedling emergence of sorghum at low temperature. Seed Science and Technology 37(2), 303–315, https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2009.37.2.05 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Farooq, M., Irfan, M., Aziz, T., Ahmad, I. & Cheema, S. Seed priming with ascorbic acid improves drought resistance of wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 199(1), 12–22, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037x.2012.00521.x (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Septiningsih, E. M. et al. Accelerating the development of new submergence tolerant rice varieties: The case of Ciherang-Sub1 and PSB Rc18-Sub1. Euphytica 202(2), 259–268, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1287-x (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Furuhata, M., Iwaki, Y. & Arima, S. Effects of the metabolites in the seeds and seedling emergence rate on the percentage of seedling emergence and establishment in rice direct-seeded under submerged conditions. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 75(2), 182–190, https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.75.182 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kato-Noguchi, H., Yasuda, Y. & Sasaki, R. Soluble sugar availability of aerobically germinated barley, oat and rice coleoptiles in anoxia. Journal of Plant Physiology 167(18), 1571–1576, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.06.017 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Estioko, L. P. et al. Differences in responses to flooding by germinating seeds of two contrasting rice cultivars and two species of economically important grass weeds. AoB Plants 6(2014), plu064, https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu064 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Dianzani M, Barrera G. Pathology and physiology of lipid peroxidation and its carbonyl products. In Álvarez S, Evelson P (Eds.), Free Radical Pathophysiology (pp. 19-38). Kerala, India: Transworld Research Network (2008).

  56. 56.

    Ayala, A., Muñoz, M. F. & Argüelles, S. Lipid peroxidation: Production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2014, 1–32, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/360438 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Damanik, R. I., Maziah, M., Ismail, M. R., Ahmad, S. & Zain, A. M. Responses of the antioxidative enzymes in Malaysian rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars under submergence condition. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 32(4), 739–747, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-009-0456-3 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zheng, W. & Wang, S. Y. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49(11), 5165–5170, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010697n (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Oki, T. et al. Polymeric procyanidins as radical-scavenging components in red-hulled rice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(26), 7524–7529, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf025841z (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Muntana, N. & Prasong, S. Study on total phenolic contents and their antioxidant activities of Thai white, red and black rice bran extracts. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 13(4), 170–174, https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2010.170.174 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Edreva, A. Generation and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts: A submolecular approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems &. Environment 106(2-3), 119–133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.10.022 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Gupta, B. & Huang, B. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. International Journal of Genomics 2014(701596), 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/701596 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    De Tullio, M. C. & Arrigoni, O. The ascorbic acid system in seeds: To protect and to serve. Seed Science Research 13(4), 249–260, https://doi.org/10.1079/SSR2003143 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    De Gara, L., Paciolla, C., De Tullio, M. C., Motto, M. & Arrigoni, O. Ascorbate‐dependent hydrogen peroxide detoxification and ascorbate regeneration during germination of a highly productive maize hybrid: Evidence of an improved detoxification mechanism against reactive oxygen species. Physiologia Plantarum 109(1), 7–13, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.100102.x (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ye, N. et al. Ascorbic acid and reactive oxygen species are involved in the inhibition of seed germination by abscisic acid in rice seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 63(5), 1809–1822, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err336 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Machado, S. et al. Spatial and temporal variability of corn growth and grain yield. Crop Science 42(5), 1564–1576, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1564 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Bernfeld P. Amylases, alpha and beta. In Colowick SP, Kaplan NO (Eds.), Methods in enzymology (Vol. 1, pp. 149-158). New York, NY: Academic Press (1955).

  68. 68.

    Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72(1-2), 248–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 (1976).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Fales, F. W. The assimilation and degradation of carbohydrates by yeast cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193(1), 113–124 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Shigeoka, S., Yokota, A., Nakano, Y. & Kitaoka, S. The effect of illumination on the L-ascorbic acid content in Euglena gracilis z. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 43(10), 2053–2058, https://doi.org/10.1080/00021369.1979.10863760 (1979).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ainsworth, E. A. & Gillespie, K. M. Estimation of total phenolic content and other oxidation substrates in plant tissues using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Nature Protocols 2(4), 875–877 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M.-E. & Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT - Food Science and Technology 28(1), 25–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Hodges, D. M., DeLong, J. M., Forney, C. F. & Prange, R. K. Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207(4), 604–611, https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050524 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Ella, E. S., Dionisio-Sese, M. L. & Ismail, A. M. Proper management improves seedling survival and growth during early flooding in contrasting rice genotypes. Crop Science 50(5), 1997–2008, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.09.0492 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Evangelista, G., Faronilo, J., Humphreys, E., Henry, A. & Fernandez, L. Establishment method effects on crop performance and water productivity of irrigated rice in the tropics. Field Crops Research 166, 112–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.001 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Melencio Apostol for his technical assistance. The authors also thank Dr. Evangelina Ella and Dr. Md. Rafiqul Islam for helpful suggestions during this study. We thank the Lee Foundation for providing financial support for this study through the International Rice Research Institute, Philippines.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.M. and A.M.I. conceived the ideas; S.M., A.M.I. and P.C.S.C wrote the original manuscript. S.M. and F.E. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. E.M.S. and S.D. helped to develop the near isogenic lines (NILs). S.M., A.M.I., M.I.R.K., M.P.A., B.P. and E.M.S. edit and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Satyen Mondal or Abdelbagi M. Ismail.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mondal, S., Khan, M.I.R., Entila, F. et al. Responses of AG1 and AG2 QTL introgression lines and seed pre-treatment on growth and physiological processes during anaerobic germination of rice under flooding. Sci Rep 10, 10214 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67240-x

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing