Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Quantitative kinetics of intracellular singlet oxygen generation using a fluorescence probe

Abstract

Singlet oxygen (1O2) is a type of reactive oxygen species involved in numerous physiological activities. We previously reported that 1O2-specific oxidation products are increased in patients with prediabetes, suggesting that measurement of 1O2 may be an important indicator of physiological and pathological conditions. The turnover in the generation and quenching of 1O2 is extremely rapid during biological activities owing to it high reactivity and short lifetime in solution. However, the dynamic changes in 1O2 generation in living cells have not been fully explored. In this study, we investigated whether the kinetics of 1O2 generation can be quantified using a far-red fluorescent probe for mitochondrial 1O2, Si-DMA, following addition of the 1O2 generator, endoperoxide, to mammalian cells. The kinetics of Si-DMA fluorescence intensity dose-dependently increased following treatment of mammalian living cells with endoperoxide. Alternatively, treatment with 1O2 quenchers decreased the fluorescence intensities following endoperoxide treatment. Our results indicate that the kinetics of intracellular 1O2 can be readily obtained using Si-DMA and time-lapse imaging, which provides new insights into the mechanism of 1O2 generation in mammalian cells and the exploration of 1O2 generators and quenchers.

Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play critical roles in host defence and the production of biologically essential substances, as well as in the regulation of physiological functions as redox signalling messenger1. Singlet oxygen (1O2) is a type of ROS that is involved in numerous biological processes2 and has also been applied in water disinfection and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in cancer treatment. PDT can effectively kill cancer cells via the reaction between a photosensitiser and laser light, as 1O2 induces cytotoxicity due to the strong oxidation reaction3,4. Our previous studies demonstrated that the levels of 1O2-specific oxidation products 10- and 12-(Z,E)-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acids (HODEs) transiently increased in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)5, and that plasma levels of 10- and 12-(Z,E)-HODEs were positively correlated with glucose levels in patients with prediabetes6,7. In addition, the production of cytoplasmic 1O2 induces cell cycle progression in HeLa cells, whereas the nuclear production delays the cell cycle8. These findings suggest that 1O2 may contribute to the regulation of physiological and pathological conditions in mammals.

Singlet oxygen is produced by the energy transfer of triplet oxygen, which constitutively occurs in plant leaves during the reaction between light and chlorophyll pigments in cells9. In mammals, 1O2 is physiologically generated in the skin upon exposure to ultraviolet-A10 or as a product of the reaction between hypochlorous acid and hydrogen peroxide mediated by myeloperoxidase11,12. As 1O2 generation in mammalian cells is essential for biological activity, methods for its precise detection and quantification are needed to facilitate research for better understanding its roles in physiological and pathological conditions13,14. One of the primary methods for 1O2 detection is the measurement of near-infrared phosphorescence at 1270 nm15; however, this phosphorescence signal is narrow due to weak emission intensities. Further, this platform requires the use of sophisticated instruments16. Fluorescence probes with high sensitivity, fast response time, and high spatial resolution under microscopic imaging17 have also been developed for the detection of 1O2, several of which even enable 1O2 imaging in living cells18,19,20,21,22. Recently, a far-red fluorescent probe for 1O2 composed of 9,10-dimethylanthracene (DMA) and silicon-containing rhodamine (Si-rhodamine) moieties, namely Si-DMA, was developed for monitoring 1O2 at subcellular levels23. One of the main advantages of Si-DMA over other real-time probes is its increased sensitivity to specifically detect mitochondrial 1O2 at the subcellular level19,20,21,22. This probe can react with mitochondrial-originating 1O223 as the Si-rhodamine contained in Si-DMA accumulates in the mitochondria, and the diffusion distance of intracellular 1O2 reaches a maximum of approximately 300 nm in aqueous solution24. Although the turnover in the generation and quenching of 1O2 is predicted to be very rapid for the maintenance of cellular functions, the detailed dynamic changes in intracellular 1O2 generation levels in living cells remain largely unknown.

In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using the 1O2 fluorescence probe Si-DMA to obtain kinetic data on intracellular 1O2 generation and quenching following treatment of cells with an 1O2 generator, endoperoxide. Toward this end, we treated the mouse fibroblast cell line, NIH3T3, and the human hepatocarcinoma cell line, HepG2, with the 1O2 generator endoperoxide, or the oxygen quenchers, sodium azide (NaN3) and astaxanthin, at various concentrations, and measured the resulting fluorescence intensities of Si-DMA with fluorescence time-lapse imaging. HepG2 cells were used as a common in vitro liver model since 1O2 was reported to be produced in the liver25,26. Astaxanthin is a carotenoid pigment with high 1O2-quenching capacity in vitro27,28,29,30, and was therefore used as a model for evaluating the feasibility of detecting 1O2 quenching of food ingredients in living cells. This technique may offer a valuable tool to better understand the mechanism of 1O2 generation, while providing a practical method to rapidly and simply screen for candidate 1O2 generators or quenchers in mammalian cells.

Results

Dynamic changes in Si-DMA fluorescence after endoperoxide treatment

We first attempted to quantify the intracellular 1O2 concentration based on Si-DMA fluorescence intensities, which react exclusively with mitochondrial-originating 1O223 as the diffusion distance of intracellular 1O2 is less than 300 nm in aqueous solution24, using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Fig. 1a). We used an 1O2 generator endoperoxide, which is commercially available from WakenBtech Co., Ltd. (Osaka Japan), contains an epidioxy group crosslinked in the aromatic hydrocarbon, and generates 1O2 during thermolysis without photosensitiser (Equation 1). As this material produces 1O2 via thermal decomposition at temperatures greater than 25 °C27, we maintained the storage temperature of endoperoxide under 20 °C until just before use to avoid decomposition.

(1)
Figure 1
figure 1

Measurement of Si-DMA fluorescence using FACS analysis. (a) The difference in fluorescence intensities in NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts with and without Si-DMA. The intensity is indicated as the mean value of the M1 range. (b) Relationship between the number of cells and Si-DMA fluorescence intensity after 1% DMSO or 2 mM endoperoxide (EP) treatment. (c) Averages of Si-DMA fluorescence intensity after EP treatment. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 2).

The intensities were measured after the addition of endoperoxide at concentrations ≤2 mM because the use of higher concentrations resulted in insoluble endoperoxide in the culture medium at 37 °C. In FACS analysis, the fluorescence intensity in NIH3T3 cells clearly increased after treatment of 1 or 2 mM endoperoxide compared with that of the control cells treated with 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Fig. 1b,c). Increase in fluorescence intensity was observed for endoperoxide, with a dose-dependent increase up to 2.0 mM, at which point it reached a plateau (correlation coefficient = 0.983, Fig. 1c). Although the addition of hydrogen peroxide and hypochlorous acid to cells was attempted as a method for generation of 1O2 in the culture medium, reproducible results were not obtained (data not shown).

In addition, we observed alterations of fluorescence intensity in HepG2 cells by fluorescence microscopy before and after endoperoxide treatment (Fig. 2a). Time-lapse imaging showed that the Si-DMA fluorescence intensities markedly increased in an endoperoxide concentration-dependent manner from 0.2 to 0.6 mM, reaching a plateau at 0.7 mM endoperoxide within 10 min after treatment (Fig. 2b). The slope of relative fluorescence intensity after endoperoxide treatment showed a strong relationship between the inclination angle and endoperoxide concentration (p < 0.01, r = 0.9729, Fig. 2c).

Figure 2
figure 2

Dynamic changes in Si-DMA fluorescence intensity using time-lapse imaging. (a) Representative fluorescence microscopic images in HepG2 cells incorporating Si-DMA before and after endoperoxide (EP) treatment, respectively. Scale bars = 50 μm. (b) Kinetics of relative Si-DMA fluorescence intensities after EP treatment. The intensities were obtained from each sequence of images (movie) and relative intensities were normalised to the control values (1% DMSO treatment). (c) Correlations between the inclination angle of Si-DMA fluorescence and EP concentration. The inclination angle represents the degree of the slope for the linear regression of Si-DMA fluorescence intensity against the EP concentration. Results are indicated as mean ± SE (n = 3). The strength of the association between two parameters was evaluated on the basis of Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

These results indicate that the relative 1O2 yield in living cells could be quantitatively measured using Si-DMA after treatment of 0.5–2 mM endoperoxide with FACS or 0.2–0.7 mM endoperoxide with fluorescence microscopy. Singlet oxygen becomes rapidly quenched in culture medium and mammalian cells as the lifetime of 1O2 is less than 3 μs in cells cultured in a H2O-based medium2, and 15 μs in cells cultured in a D2O-based medium31. In addition, 1O2 generated by endoperoxide treatment readily reacts with mitochondrial molecules, such as membrane lipids32,33 and glutathione34. Thus, we considered that time-lapse imaging using fluorescence microscopy is an appropriate method for measurement of the dynamic changes in 1O2 yield in living cells.

Measurement of Si-DMA fluorescence intensity after treatment of 1O2 quenchers

To evaluate whether decreases in 1O2 generation can also be observed based on Si-DMA fluorescence, we treated HepG2 cells with the 1O2 quencher NaN3 after confirmation of the increase in fluorescence intensity with 0.5 mM endoperoxide treatment. As shown in Fig. 3a, the fluorescence intensity dose-dependently decreased immediately after NaN3 treatment. These decreases did not appear to be due to direct cellular damage, as the viability of HepG2 cells was not reduced at 24 h after 10 mM or 30 mM NaN3, whereas treatment with more than 60 mM NaN3 decreased the viability of HepG2 cells (Supplementary Fig. S1). In addition, the relative trough intensity after NaN3 treatment significantly decreased compared with that of the control group (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, the kinetics of fluorescence intensity after NaN3 treatment varied according to experimental conditions with a transient decrease in Si-DMA fluorescence intensity observed in NIH3T3 cells even after 0.1 mM endoperoxide and 100 mM NaN3 treatment (Fig. 3c,d). With treatment of 30 mM NaN3, the intensity tended to exceed the initial value after the transient reduction (Fig. 3c). These results indicate that quenching of 1O2 in living cells can be observed by time-lapse imaging with Si-DMA and fluorescence microscopy.

Figure 3
figure 3

Effect of the 1O2 quencher NaN3 on Si-DMA fluorescence intensity. (a,c) Kinetics of the intensity in HepG2 (a) and NIH3T3 (c) cells after NaN3 treatment. Relative fluorescence intensity is presented as the average values relative to those obtained during 1 min before NaN3 treatment, set to 1. (b,d) Comparison of trough intensity in Si-DMA fluorescence within the first 3 min after NaN3 treatment. Relative intensities were determined by the ratio of trough intensity to the average obtained during 1 min before NaN3 treatment. Results are indicated as mean ± SE (b: n = 3, d: n = 1). *p < 0.05 compared with the control.

As shown in Fig. 4a, the Si-DMA fluorescence in HepG2 cells clearly decreased after treatment with 50 μM astaxanthin (which was confirmed to have no cytotoxic effect in preliminary experiments; data not shown) following 0.5 mM endoperoxide treatment compared with that in the control cells treated with 1% DMSO. The peak values of the fluorescence intensity in the control and astaxanthin groups were 1.82 and 1.40, respectively (Fig. 4b). These results suggest that this method could be applied to investigate the 1O2-quenching capacity of various materials in living cells.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of astaxanthin on Si-DMA fluorescence intensity. (a) Kinetics of the fluorescent intensity in HepG2 cells after 0.5 mM endoperoxide (EP) treatment. At 24 h after 50 μM astaxanthin treatment, Si-DMA was added, and the fluorescence intensity was measured. Relative fluorescence intensity was calculated against the value under EP treatment, set to 1 (grey bar = SE, n = 3). (b) Comparison of peak intensity in Si-DMA fluorescence after 0.5 mM EP treatment. Relative intensities were determined by the ratio of peak intensity to the value obtained just after EP treatment. Results are indicated as mean ± SE (n = 3). *p < 0.05 compared with the control.

Discussion

Due to its short lifetime and low concentration in mammalian cells, it is difficult to quantify intracellular 1O2. Although some studies recently demonstrated that 1O2 in living cells could be detected using fluorescent probes18,19,20,21,22, the dynamic alterations in intracellular 1O2 generation have remained unclear. In the present study, we developed and verified a method for the quantitative measurement of 1O2 generation in living cells using the fluorescent probe Si-DMA.

Endoperoxide solution stably generated measurable amounts of 1O2 in the culture medium, whereas hydrogen peroxide and hypochlorous acid produced non-reproducible amounts of intracellular 1O2. Using the endoperoxide solution and Si-DMA, we observed an increase in 1O2 generation that positively correlated with the endoperoxide concentration. In contrast, the intracellular 1O2 generation decreased after 1O2 quencher treatment. In particular, the fluorescence intensities were detectable despite the rapid changes in the intracellular 1O2 generation and quenching, which occurred within a few minutes. These observations can be explained by the high selectively of the probe Si-DMA toward 1O2. The structure of Si-DMA allows photoinduced electron transfer (PET) between dimethylanthracene (DMA, electron donor) and Si-rhodamine (electron acceptor) by light excitation. Si-rhodamine is a fluorescence pigment, while DMA acts as a quencher. Hence, the fluorescence of excited Si-rhodamine becomes quenched by intramolecular PET from DMA, resulting in dim fluorescence (ϕfl = 0.01). The anthracene analogue specifically traps and reacts with 1O2, which introduces an endoperoxide group to the centre ring of the DMA unit in Si-DMA leading to the formation of Si-DMEP (Equation 2). As a result, PET from DMA to Si-rhodamine is inhibited due to the reduced electron-donating capacity of DMA, and the formed Si-DMEP exhibits an approximately 18-fold higher fluorescence than Si-DMA in methanol23. The DMA moiety in Si-DMA does not release 1O2 following endoperoxidation, which is in accordance with the endoperoxide form of Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green®, SOSG-EP35. In contrast, certain anthracene derivatives undergo a reversible reaction with 1O2; that is, endoperoxide formation is followed by the release of 1O236. As Si-DMA can selectively and stably react with 1O2, we could monitor intracellular 1O2 levels using time-lapse imaging.

(2)

Considering that the lifetime of 1O2 is approximately 3 μs in the nuclei of H2O-incubated cells24, the lifetime of 1O2 in this study was probably shorter since the culture medium contained high levels of amino acids that also react with 1O2. Moreover, since the diffusion distance of 1O2 is less than 300 nm in 6 μs24 and endoperoxides can diffuse to mitochondria, we speculated that only mitochondrial 1O2 was detected by Si-DMA in this study. This is also supported by the fact that Si-DMA selectively localizes in the mitochondria at a concentration of 100 nM23, which was used in this study. Hence, the results of this study deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the generation of mitochondrial 1O2. Furthermore, the half-life of endoperoxide is approximately 20 minutes in ethanol/chloroform/D2O (50:50:1, v/v/v) at 35 °C27; similarly, Si-DMA is considered to be photostable as it has been detected in HeLa cells in at least 15 minutes following treatment23. These previous findings suggest that endoperoxide and Si-DMA are likely stable in cells and culture media. Therefore, although 1O2 was rapidly quenched under the present experimental conditions, we were able to detect mitochondrial 1O2 using time-lapse fluorescence imaging.

Specific food ingredients, such as astaxanthin and lycopene, are known to exhibit high 1O2-quenching capacities under cell-free conditions28,37,38. It is believed that these ingredients can exert similar quenching effects in living cells, contributing to the prevention of human chronic diseases, including cardiovascular diseases and diabetes39,40. Although it was previously reported that the intracellular 1O2 quenching capacity of β-carotene could not be observed using laser-based time-resolved photosensitised methods41, we showed that the fluorescence intensities of Si-DMA in astaxanthin-treated cells significantly decreased, indicating that astaxanthin can quench 1O2 in mammalian cells. On the other hand, we sought to evaluate whether β-carotene quenches intracellular 1O2 generated by endoperoxide; however, reproducible results were not obtained, which might be because carotenoids preferentially accumulate in cell membranes. β-carotene is localized deep inside the hydrophobic core membranes and oriented parallel to the membrane surface, whereas astaxanthin, with two polar hydroxyl groups, is anchored across the cell membrane with the polar groups oriented outside the membrane42. While the β-carotene reaction sites for 1O2 are buried in the cell membrane, those of astaxanthin cross the membrane. We, therefore, speculate that astaxanthin localized in the mitochondrial membrane can quench mitochondrial 1O2 produced by endoperoxide. This further confirms that the 1O2-quenching capacity of various materials can be evaluated using Si-DMA in time-lapse imaging, offering a novel approach for exploring the modes of action of 1O2 quenchers in living cells. Furthermore, the present approach might clarify whether some ingredients prevent chronic diseases via 1O2-quenching.

As the biological function of 1O2 in mammals remains poorly understood, we expect that the application of the fluorescence probe Si-DMA will help to elucidate the detailed mechanism underlying intracellular 1O2 generation. Although the plasma levels of the 1O2-mediated oxidation products 10- and 12-(Z,E)-HODEs correlated with fasting glucose levels in patients with prediabetes6,7 and temporarily increased before the pathogenesis of T2DM in mice5, the precise mechanisms behind this increase in a prediabetic state remain elusive. Singlet oxygen itself or its oxidation products, 10- and 12-(Z,E)-HODEs, may induce an adaptative response to ROS exposure43, leading to enhanced cellular detoxification activities, against T2DM. Thus, it is important to elucidate the biological function of 1O2 and the underlying generation mechanism. We also observed Si-DMA-positive cells in primary murine hepatocytes (data not shown), suggesting that Si-DMA is also applicable for the detection of 1O2 in animals. Thus, the application of Si-DMA in patients and model mice with T2DM might contribute to a better understanding the role of 1O2 in the development of T2DM.

In conclusion, we developed a method to quantitatively measure of intracellular 1O2 levels using a fluorescence probe. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the dynamic changes in 1O2 generation in living cells. This technique may contribute toward understanding the mechanism of 1O2 generation and can offer a valuable tool for exploring the role of 1O2 quenchers in living mammalian cells.

Methods

Cell culture

Human hepatic carcinoma HepG2 cells and mouse NIH3T3 fibroblasts were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (ICN Biochemicals, CA, USA) in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

Measurement of Si-DMA fluorescence intensity

The cells (5 × 105 per well or dish) were seeded in a 6-well plate (Nunc, MA, USA) for flow cytometry or in a 35-mm glass-based dish (Nunc) for live cell imaging. One day after incubation, each concentration (0.5–1.0 mM) of endoperoxide [3-(1, 4-epidioxy-4-methyl-1, 4-dihydro-1-naphthyl) propionic acid; WakenBtech Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan] dissolved in DMSO was added to the cells and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2; control cells were treated with DMSO at the same concentrations. The endoperoxide solution was cooled below 20 °C just before use, as endoperoxide stably generates 1O2 above 35 °C. The cells were washed with serum-free DMEM and incubated in Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS) containing Si-DMA (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan), which is a suitable fluorescent dye for 1O2 imaging23, for 30 min. Si-DMA was dissolved in DMSO according to the manufacturer’s instruction and stored at –30 °C until used for the experiments. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline, the cells were harvested and analysed by flow cytometry with the FACSCalibur system (Becton Dickinson, NJ, USA). The laser amplitude was appropriately set to divide into two groups (with or without Si-DMA) and the median of the M1 marker was defined as the Si-DMA fluorescence intensity (Fig. 1a).

For live cell imaging, cells seeded onto the 35-mm glass-based dish were washed with HBSS after incubation in Si-DMA-containing solution. Subsequently, 1 ml HBSS was added to the cells and the dish was placed on the stand of the fluorescence microscope (BZ-X710 All-in-one, Keyence, Tokyo, Japan). Fluorescence images were obtained from snapshots of movies (around 1 s exposure) taken for 30 min. At 5 min after filming, endoperoxide or the negative control (1% DMSO) was added to the cell-seeded dish and the fluorescence intensities were continuously measured. The single oxygen quencher NaN3 was added to the dish at 5 min after endoperoxide or 1% DMSO treatment. Astaxanthin (Sigma Aldrich) was dissolved in DMSO and added to the cells 1 day before endoperoxide treatment. The fluorescence intensity was analysed using BZ-X Analyzer (Keyence), and the results are presented as the relative fluorescence intensity to that measured just prior to the addition of each material.

Measurement of cell viability

HepG2 cells were plated in the wells of a 96-well microplate (Nunc) and incubated overnight at 37 °C with 5% CO2. DMEM containing each concentration of NaN3 was prepared and added to the microplate at 100 μl/well. After 24 h of incubation, Premix WST-1 Cell Proliferation Assay reagent (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) was added to each well and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm. Cell viability was calculated relative to the absorbance of control cells set at 100%.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as means ± standard deviation or standard error. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons with Ekuseru-Toukei 2012 software (Social Survey Research Information Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The strength of correlation between two variables was analysed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Differences with a probability of 5% or less were considered statistically significant.

Data availability

The all data sets used and/or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Holmstrom, K. M. & Finkel, T. Cellular mechanisms and physiological consequences of redox-dependent signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15, 411–421, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3801 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogilby, P. R. Singlet oxygen: there is indeed something new under the sun. Chem Soc Rev 39, 3181–3209, https://doi.org/10.1039/b926014p (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lovell, J. F., Liu, T. W., Chen, J. & Zheng, G. Activatable photosensitizers for imaging and therapy. Chem Rev 110, 2839–2857, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900236h (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeRosa, M. C. & Crutchley, R. J. Photosensitized singlet oxygen and its applications. Coordin Chem Rev 233, 351-371, Pii S0010-8545(02)00034-6, Doi 10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00034-6 (2002).

  5. Murotomi, K. et al. Switching from singlet-oxygen-mediated oxidation to free-radical-mediated oxidation in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes in model mouse. Free Radic Res 49, 133–138, https://doi.org/10.3109/10715762.2014.985218 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Umeno, A. et al. Multi-Biomarkers for Early Detection of Type 2 Diabetes, Including 10- and 12-(Z,E)-Hydroxyoctadecadienoic Acids, Insulin, Leptin, and Adiponectin. PLoS One 10, e0130971, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130971 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Umeno, A. et al. Singlet oxygen induced products of linoleates, 10- and 12-(Z,E)-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acids (HODE), can be potential biomarkers for early detection of type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 8, e63542, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063542 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Blazquez-Castro, A., Breitenbach, T. & Ogilby, P. R. Cell cycle modulation through subcellular spatially resolved production of singlet oxygen via direct 765 nm irradiation: manipulating the onset of mitosis. Photoch Photobio Sci 17, 1310–1318, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8pp00338f (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krieger-Liszkay, A. Singlet oxygen production in photosynthesis. J Exp Bot 56, 337–346, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh237 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grether-Beck, S. et al. Activation of transcription factor AP-2 mediates UVA radiation- and singlet oxygen-induced expression of the human intercellular adhesion molecule 1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 14586–14591, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.25.14586 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Badwey, J. A. & Karnovsky, M. L. Active oxygen species and the functions of phagocytic leukocytes. Annu Rev Biochem 49, 695–726, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.49.070180.003403 (1980).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hampton, M. B., Kettle, A. J. & Winterbourn, C. C. Inside the neutrophil phagosome: oxidants, myeloperoxidase, and bacterial killing. Blood 92, 3007–3017 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Petrou, A. L. & Terzidaki, A. A meta-analysis and review examining a possible role for oxidative stress and singlet oxygen in diverse diseases. Biochem J 474, 2713–2731, https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20161058 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schweitzer, C. & Schmidt, R. Physical mechanisms of generation and deactivation of singlet oxygen. Chem Rev 103, 1685–1757, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr010371d (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker, A. & Kanofsky, J. R. Direct observation of singlet oxygen phosphorescence at 1270 nm from L1210 leukemia cells exposed to polyporphyrin and light. Arch Biochem Biophys 286, 70–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(91)90009-8 (1991).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. You, Y. Chemical tools for the generation and detection of singlet oxygen. Org Biomol Chem 16, 4044–4060, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ob00504d (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka, K. et al. Rational design of fluorescein-based fluorescence probes. Mechanism-based design of a maximum fluorescence probe for singlet oxygen. J Am Chem Soc 123, 2530–2536, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0035708 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pronin, D., Krishnakumar, S., Rychlik, M., Wu, H. & Huang, D. Development of a Fluorescent Probe for Measurement of Singlet Oxygen Scavenging Activity of Flavonoids. J Agric Food Chem 67, 10726–10733, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b04025 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Song, B., Wang, G., Tan, M. & Yuan, J. A europium(III) complex as an efficient singlet oxygen luminescence probe. J Am Chem Soc 128, 13442–13450, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja062990f (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dai, Z. et al. A cell-membrane-permeable europium complex as an efficient luminescent probe for singlet oxygen. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 1, 924–927, https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TB00350C (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, K. et al. A selective near-infrared fluorescent probe for singlet oxygen in living cells. Chemical Communications 47, 7386–7388, https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC12473K (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Song, D., Cho, S., Han, Y., You, Y. & Nam, W. Ratiometric Fluorescent Probes for Detection of Intracellular Singlet Oxygen. Organic Letters 15, 3582–3585, https://doi.org/10.1021/ol401421r (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, S., Tachikawa, T., Fujitsuka, M. & Majima, T. Far-red fluorescence probe for monitoring singlet oxygen during photodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc 136, 11707–11715, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja504279r (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Skovsen, E., Snyder, J. W., Lambert, J. D. & Ogilby, P. R. Lifetime and diffusion of singlet oxygen in a cell. J Phys Chem B 109, 8570–8573, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp051163i (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kerver, E. D. et al. In situ detection of spontaneous superoxide anion and singlet oxygen production by mitochondria in rat liver and small intestine. Histochem J 29, 229–237, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026453926517 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayashi, S., Yasui, H. & Sakurai, H. Essential role of singlet oxygen species in cytochrome P450-dependent substrate oxygenation by rat liver microsomes. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 20, 14–23, https://doi.org/10.2133/dmpk.20.14 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aizawa, K. et al. Development of singlet oxygen absorption capacity (SOAC) assay method. 2. Measurements of the SOAC values for carotenoids and food extracts. J Agric Food Chem 59, 3717–3729, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf104955a (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mukai, K. et al. Development of a Singlet Oxygen Absorption Capacity (SOAC) Assay Method. Measurements of the SOAC Values for Carotenoids and alpha-Tocopherol in an Aqueous Triton X-100 Micellar Solution. J Agric Food Chem 65, 784–792, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04329 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mukai, K., Ouchi, A. & Nakano, M. Kinetic study of the quenching reaction of singlet oxygen by Pyrroloquinolinequinol (PQQH(2), a reduced form of Pyrroloquinolinequinone) in micellar solution. J Agric Food Chem 59, 1705–1712, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf104420y (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mukai, K. et al. Development of singlet oxygen absorption capacity (SOAC) assay method. 3. Measurements of the SOAC values for phenolic antioxidants. J Agric Food Chem 60, 7905–7916, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf302021r (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. da Silva, E. F. et al. Irradiation- and sensitizer-dependent changes in the lifetime of intracellular singlet oxygen produced in a photosensitized process. J Phys Chem B 116, 445–461, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp206739y (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Frankel, E. N. Chemistry of free radical and singlet oxidation of lipids. Prog Lipid Res 23, 197–221, https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-7827(84)90011-0 (1984).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vever-Bizet, C., Dellinger, M., Brault, D., Rougee, M. & Bensasson, R. V. Singlet molecular oxygen quenching by saturated and unsaturated fatty-acids and by cholesterol. Photochem Photobiol 50, 321–325, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb04165.x (1989).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Devasagayam, T. P., Sundquist, A. R., Di Mascio, P., Kaiser, S. & Sies, H. Activity of thiols as singlet molecular oxygen quenchers. J Photochem Photobiol B 9, 105–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(91)80008-6 (1991).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gollmer, A. et al. Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green(R): photochemical behavior in solution and in a mammalian cell. Photochem Photobiol 87, 671–679, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00900.x (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fudickar, W. & Linker, T. Why triple bonds protect acenes from oxidation and decomposition. J Am Chem Soc 134, 15071–15082, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja306056x (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Conn, P. F., Schalch, W. & Truscott, T. G. The singlet oxygen and carotenoid interaction. J Photochem Photobiol B 11, 41–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(91)80266-k (1991).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wenli, Y. & Yaping, Z. Chemiluminescence evaluation of oxidative damage to biomolecules induced by singlet oxygen and the protective effects of antioxidants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1725, 30–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.05.002 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hussein, G., Sankawa, U., Goto, H., Matsumoto, K. & Watanabe, H. Astaxanthin, a carotenoid with potential in human health and nutrition. J Nat Prod 69, 443–449, https://doi.org/10.1021/np050354+ (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rao, A. V. & Rao, L. G. Carotenoids and human health. Pharmacol Res 55, 207–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2007.01.012 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bosio, G. N. et al. Antioxidant beta-carotene does not quench singlet oxygen in mammalian cells. J Am Chem Soc 135, 272–279, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja308930a (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jomova, K. & Valko, M. Health protective effects of carotenoids and their interactions with other biological antioxidants. Eur J Med Chem 70, 102–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.09.054 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Akazawa-Ogawa, Y. et al. Singlet-oxygen-derived products from linoleate activate Nrf2 signaling in skin cells. Free Radic Biol Med 79, 164–175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.12.004 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Grant no. 17H00881, 18K17951, 19K07057) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.M. and Y.Y. initiated the research project and designed the research. K.M., A.U. and S.S. performed the experiments, and they analysed research data. K.M., A.U. and Y.Y. drafted the manuscript and designed the Figures. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazutoshi Murotomi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murotomi, K., Umeno, A., Sugino, S. et al. Quantitative kinetics of intracellular singlet oxygen generation using a fluorescence probe. Sci Rep 10, 10616 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67155-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67155-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing