In vivo genetic manipulation is used to study the impact of gene deletion or re-expression on β-cell function and organism physiology. Cre-LoxP is a system wherein LoxP sites flanking a gene are recognized by Cre recombinase. Cre transgenic mice are the most prevalent technology used to deliver Cre but many models have caveats of off-target recombination, impaired β-cell function, and high cost of animal production. Inducible estrogen receptor conjugated Cre models face leaky recombination and confounding effects of tamoxifen. As an alternative, we characterize an adeno associated virus (AAV) with a rat insulin 1 promoter driving Cre recombinase (AAV8 Ins1-Cre) that is economical and rapid to implement, and has limited caveats. Intraperitoneal AAV8 Ins1-Cre produced efficient β-cell recombination, alongside some hepatic, exocrine pancreas, α-cell, δ-cell, and hypothalamic recombination. Delivery of lower doses via the pancreatic duct retained good rates of β-cell recombination and limited rates of off-target recombination. Unlike inducible Cre in transgenic mice, AAV8 Ins1-Cre required no tamoxifen and premature recombination was avoided. We demonstrate the utility of this technology by inducing hyperglycemia in inducible insulin knockout mice (Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f). AAV-mediated expression of Cre in β-cells provides an effective alternative to transgenic approaches for inducible knockout studies.
Diabetes is a chronic condition affecting over 400 million worldwide and is characterized by a relative or absolute insulin insufficiency associated with a loss of insulin secreting pancreatic β-cells. As such, the development and function of β-cells is a major focus of diabetes research. Specific in vivo genetic modification is a useful way to assess the impact of genes on relevant physiological processes and one of the most useful genetic tools to study the role of specific genes is the Cre-LoxP system. Cre recombinase is an enzyme that recognizes LoxP sites in the genome and based on orientation and location, can excise, flip, or translocate targets. By using a tissue specific promoter for Cre recombinase, LoxP flanked sites can be deleted in a tissue-specific manner1. Additionally, recombination can be temporally controlled by conjugating Cre to a modified estrogen receptor (ER). By fusing Cre to an ER, Cre is retained in the cytoplasm and is thus unable to bind DNA until the tamoxifen metabolic products endoxifen or 4-hydroxytamoxifen bind the ER and translocate Cre to the nucleus. Many Cre driver mouse lines have been generated, including dozens that are specific for the pancreas or certain pancreatic cell lineages2. These tools have been used extensively with great success, but this approach faces important caveats.
One of the earliest pancreatic Cre driver mice developed uses 668 bp of the rat insulin 2 (Ins2) promoter to drive Cre, often called the “RIP-Cre” mouse3. This mouse model has been used in many studies, but findings have been challenged because of a lack of appropriate controls in many studies. There may be developmental defects from lifelong Cre expression and there are potential impairments in insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in Ins2-Cre transgenic mice4. Moreover, β-cells of “RIP-CreER” (Ins2-cre/Esr1) mice have increased rates of apoptosis in response to glucagon-like peptide 1 stimulation5. Additionally, an important caveat faced by almost all Cre driver lines is imperfect tissue specificity of recombination. Cre and CreER driver lines using the Ins2 promoter have abundant recombination throughout the brain6,7. Alternative lines make use of a pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 gene (Pdx1) promoter to control Cre expression, but it has been reported to induce hypothalamic7, α-cell, and δ-cell recombination8. To address this issue, a more specific Ins1 promoter has been used and may limit these off-target confounding effects9,10. Further, inducible ER conjugated Cre models like the Ins2-cre/Esr1 mouse can have tamoxifen-independent recombination11 but this can be limited by use of the mutated ER in Cre-ERT212. However, it is notable that delivery of tamoxifen itself (to induce recombination) can alter glucose homeostasis and impair β-cell proliferation13. Additionally, inclusion of a growth hormone (GH) minigene in many Cre transgenic driver lines (including Ins2-Cre, Pdx1-CreLate, Ins1-Cre and others) is also a source of β-cell dysfunction via local activation of prolactin receptors14 that can induce β-cell proliferation15. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that DNA hypermethylation of the Ins1Cre and Ins1CreER knock-in alleles in some colonies can lead to very poor rates of recombination and it may be necessary to validate Cre efficiency regularly16. Finding a way to avoid caveats of developmental deletion of LoxP flanked genes, GH minigene-induced β-cell dysfunction, unintended recombination before tamoxifen administration, and tamoxifen toxicity would be useful. It is also worth noting the time and costs of crossing Cre driver mice with LoxP containing mice to generate mice with suitable genotypes. Finding ways to minimize these costs and delays could make complex genetic studies more accessible to laboratories that face time, labour, or financial challenges.
AAV is a well-known and simple vector that could be an alternative approach to deliver Cre to pancreatic β-cells in a specific and cost-effective way. AAVs have been used in many fields to deliver genes of interest to most tissues of the body including in hundreds of clinical trials17. AAV is considered non-pathogenic18 and infection does not cause any easily detected or common symptoms19. Gene expression is initiated less than 2 weeks after infection and there have been reports of residual expression up to four years after therapy in a patient20. Each AAV serotype has a distinct tropism for a variety of tissues21 and the eighth serotype (AAV8) has the highest affinity for the pancreas when delivered by intraperitoneal (IP) or intravenous injection22. AAV delivered via the pancreatic duct at ~1/10th the dose of IP delivery can infect β-cells at comparable efficiency23.
In the current study we characterize an AAV8 Ins1-Cre for delivery of Cre recombinase to pancreatic β-cells. We delivered variable doses of AAV8 Ins1-Cre and assessed β-cell function and maturity and demonstrate the utility of this AAV by inducing diabetes in Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f mice. Though off-target recombination events likely occurred throughout the liver and exocrine pancreas, we posit that this would have little to no impact because these cells do not normally produce insulin. We avoided months of crossing and genotyping, tamoxifen administration, and lifelong Cre expression. In addition, animals served as their own controls by comparing pre and post AAV injection, and there was no recombination prior to AAV8 Ins1-Cre injection.
Intraperitoneal administration of AAV8 Ins1-Cre up to a dose of 1 × 1012 VGP (viral genome particles) does not significantly alter glucose metabolism
To determine whether AAV8 Ins1-Cre (410 bp of the rat Ins1 promoter, intron, and the full Ins1 5′UTR sequence preceding the Cre open reading frame) leads to Cre expression and subsequently Cre recombination in β-cells, we administered AAV8 Ins1-Cre at doses of 1 × 1010, 1 × 1011, 1 × 1012, and 3 × 1012 VGP by a single IP injection to adult reporter mTmG mice. This double fluorescent reporter model contains a chicken β-actin core promoter with a CMV enhancer driving a loxP-flanked coding sequence of membrane-targeted tandem dimer Tomato (mT), resulting in tdTomato expression. Upon Cre recombination, the mT sequence is excised allowing expression of membrane-targeted EGFP (mG)24. A group of PBS-injected mTmG mice were used as controls. As several reports have already shown that transgenic Ins2-Cre mice may develop glucose intolerance4, we studied glucose metabolism over 8 weeks (−1 to 7 weeks relative to AAV administration). There were no significant changes to four hour fasting blood glucose and body weight between the AAV8 Ins1-Cre injected mice and controls (Fig. 1a). Seven weeks after administration, we performed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT, 2 g/kg body weight of a 30% dextrose solution) and found that delivery of AAV8 Ins1-Cre up to a dose of 1 × 1012 VGP did not alter glucose excursions; however, 3 × 1012 VGP caused glucose intolerance (Fig. 1b). Eight weeks after AAV injections, we assessed insulin secretion during a glucose challenge and there were no significant differences among groups (Fig. 1c). Basal plasma insulin levels were similar between the AAV8 Ins1-Cre and PBS injected groups (Fig. 1d). In addition, we measured serum levels of alanine transferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) pre- and post-virus administration (Supplemental Fig. 1) and did not detect elevated serum transaminases in AAV8 Ins1-Cre mice compared to controls.
Intraperitoneal administration of AAV8 Ins1-Cre (1 × 1012 VGP) does not significantly alter calcium nor insulin secretion dynamics in isolated islets
Cre-expressing β-cells may display altered intracellular Ca2+ responses when exposed to different stimuli including glucose and KCl25. We performed intracellular Ca2+ imaging experiments in islets from AAV8 Ins1-Cre- and PBS-treated wildtype C57BL/6 J mice using Fura 2-AM to determine if Cre expression mediated by AAV8 Ins1-Cre altered intracellular Ca2+ signalling. We used wild-type mice because we observed abnormal Ca2+ responses in untreated mTmG islets which is at least partially attributable to overlapping emission spectra of Fura 2-AM and the mTmG fluorescent proteins (data not shown). Using a dose of 1 × 1012 VGP, we carried out Ca2+ experiments three to four weeks post-injection of either PBS or 1 × 1012 VGP of AAV8 Ins1-Cre. Islets from AAV8 Ins1-Cre injected mice did not display obviously altered intracellular Ca2+ dynamics in response to elevated glucose concentrations (8 and 15 mM) or in response to depolarizing 30 mM KCl (Fig. 2a,b). In addition, we observed no significant differences in insulin secretion when comparing islets isolated from PBS and AAV8 Ins1-Cre injected mice (Fig. 2c,d). Similar to controls, β-cells of AAV8 Ins1-Cre injected mice had bright nuclear MAFA immunoreactivity (Fig. 2e). Additionally, β-cells in AAV8 Ins1-Cre injected mice had nuclear NKX6.1, and membranous GLUT-2 immunoreactivity (Fig. 2f), as expected based on observations of normal glucose responsive insulin secretion dynamics.
Intraperitoneal AAV8 Ins1-Cre produces robust β-cell recombination alongside off-target hypothalamic and exocrine pancreas recombination
We first demonstrated high recombination efficiency with AAV8 Ins1-Cre by infecting islets from mTmG mice in vitro. We observed bright GFP signal throughout the islet for 4 days post-infection (Supplemental Fig. 2). We next immunostained pancreas from AAV8 Ins1-Cre injected mice for insulin and GFP (Fig. 3a). There were high rates of β-cell recombination (81–93%) in 3/3 mice in the 3 × 1012 VGP and 2/3 mice in the 1 × 1012 VGP dosed mice. There were expected lower rates of β-cell recombination in lower-dosed mice with essentially zero recombination in the PBS-treated control that has never been exposed to any Cre recombinase (Fig. 3a). As there are hypothalamic cells that express Ins226 and AAV is known to infect the brain27, we immunostained sections of hypothalamus (Fig. 3b). Although there was rare recombination in low (1 × 1011) VGP-dosed mice, there was expansive recombination throughout the hypothalamus of 1 × 1012 VGP-dosed mice, particularly in neurons of the arcuate and dorsomedial nucleus but not the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus. Additionally, we observed abundant acinar cell recombination and occasional recombination in non-β cells within islets (Fig. 3c,d) that were immunoreactive for glucagon (α-cells) or somatostatin (δ-cells; Fig. 3e). Rates of recombination were dose-dependent with upwards of 10% of insulin-negative cells in pancreatic sections being GFP + . As a potential mechanism of activation of the Ins1 promoter fragment in the AAV8 Ins1-Cre, δ-cells express the insulin promoter binding transcription factor PDX1 (Pdx1)28 and others have reported detectable expression of Pdx1 in 5% of mouse acinar cells in the pancreas with 3/182 acinar cells having Pdx1 levels higher than the mean in β-cells29. Notably, GFP expression in this model functions on a binary system: present (Cre has recombined mTmG) or absent (no recombination event and cells continue to make tdTomato). A recombination event from a tiny amount of off-target Cre is sufficient to produce equivalent GFP signal to a cell with robust Cre expression, in contrast to other models (such as transduction with AAV8 Ins1-GFP) in which there can be a wide gradient of GFP expression and weak off-target expression may not be detectable.
Intraductal (ID) administration of AAV8 Ins1-Cre up to a dose of 1 × 1011 VGP does not significantly affect body weight, blood glucose levels or glucose tolerance
To minimize central recombination and other potential off-target sites observed following IP delivery, we delivered AAV8 Ins1-Cre via the common bile duct (ID). In this study, we used adult confetti reporter mice that express one of four fluorescent proteins upon Cre-mediated recombination events30. Body weight and fasting blood glucose measured over a period of 35 days were not significantly different among the sham group and the AAV8 Ins1-Cre injected animals (0.2 × 1011 VGP and 1 × 1011 VGP groups; Fig. 4a,b). Four weeks post-surgery, there were no significant differences in oral glucose tolerance (Fig. 4c). Pancreas was collected six weeks post-AAV and immunostained for insulin and fluorescent proteins. As the four fluorescent proteins of the confetti mouse have extremely high sequence similarities, we immunostained with a polyclonal GFP antibody or a monoclonal antibody to GFP and a polyclonal dsRed antibody to provide sufficient sensitivity to detect all recombination events (Supplemental Fig. 3). We detected three distinct immunostaining patterns that likely represent all fluorescent proteins with the exception of nuclear GFP, which is reported to be less common or absent in many tissues including pancreas of confetti mice30. Using the polyclonal GFP antibody, we quantified the rates of β-cell and non-β-cell recombination in the pancreas and found significant recombination in 1 × 1011 VGP injected mice (Fig. 4d). We immunostained brain and found no evidence of recombination in the hypothalamus (Fig. 4e), in contrast to our findings with IP delivery of AAV8 Ins1-Cre (Fig. 3b). Notably, histological experiments identified significant accumulation of DAPI + Ins- cells near islets that resembled insulitis. We immunostained for the T-cell co-receptor CD3 and pan-leukocyte protein CD45 and confirmed heterogeneous insulitis (Fig. 4f). We similarly observed insulitis in another different model that is naïve to fluorescent protein expression into adulthood until IP delivery of a high dose AAV8 Ins1-GFP (Fig. 4g). In AAV8 Ins1-GFP injected mice we noted bright GFP signal in targeted β-cells (Fig. 4g), but no detectable acinar GFP, in contrast to the widespread acinar, α-cell, and δ-cell GFP expression observed following IP administration of AAV8 Ins1-Cre (Fig. 3c). These findings reveal that ID delivery of AAV8 Ins1-Cre limits off-target recombination in the hypothalamus and again highlights the binary outcome in the mTmG or any other lineage trace model employing a Cre transgene.
Both IP and ID administration of AAV8 Ins1-Cre can cause recombination in the liver
As AAV8 has a high propensity to infect hepatocytes22, we looked for evidence of recombination in the liver. There was robust recombination in hepatocytes in the IP AAV8 Ins1-Cre injected mTmG mice (Fig. 5a). We also observed some less abundant recombination in transgenic Ins2-Cre;mTmG mice and based on nuclear and cell morphology, as well as published single cell RNA seq data sets29, these GFP + cells could be endothelial cells of the sinusoids or resident Kupffer cells, rather than hepatocytes. There were low rates of recombination in the liver of mice given AAV8 Ins1-Cre via the pancreatic duct (Fig. 5b). To further explore liver recombination, we delivered 1 × 1012 VGP AAV8 Ins1-Cre IP to Rosa26-LSL-luciferase mice. When Cre is present in Rosa26-LSL-luciferase mice, Cre removes the LSL (loxP-transcriptional stop site-LoxP) sequence to allow transcription of luciferase. We performed in vivo and ex vivo chemiluminescent experiments following luciferin injection (Fig. 5c). There was significant luminescence for five weeks post-AAV and by dissecting out organs quickly after luciferin injection, it was revealed that the majority of activity was coming from the liver and minority from the pancreas and adipose tissue. Though early reports using AAV8 chicken β-actin promoter-GFP22 would suggest the pancreas has the highest expression levels, these findings again highlight the binary outcome of a lineage tracing model like this luciferase mouse. Past work reveals that total expression of an AAV8 is likely highest in the pancreas (i.e. measuring GFP from an AAV actin-GFP)22 but the current work suggests that the IP infection rate is highest in the liver.
Deletion of a β-cell specific gene with AAV8 Ins1-Cre
To highlight the utility of the AAV8 Ins1-Cre as an alternative to Cre driver mouse lines for producing β-cell recombination, we delivered 1 × 1012 VGP IP to Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f mice at 6–8 weeks of age. Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f mice have deletions of the Ins1 open reading frame and have LoxP sites flanking the Ins2 gene thus making them inducible insulin knockouts31. This study is an ideal comparison to the transgenic mouse model approach carried out using Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f;Pdx1-CreER mice31 wherein following delivery of tamoxifen there was ~99% recombination efficiency, mice developed hyperglycemia two weeks post-tamoxifen, and had reduced circulating insulin four weeks post-tamoxifen. Delivery of IP AAV8 Ins1-Cre did not impact body weight (Fig. 6a) and there was induction of variable hyperglycemia in 3–6 weeks (Fig. 6b). We performed an IPGTT at 10 (Fig. 6c) and 28 days (Fig. 6d) post-AAV and detected severe glucose intolerance by day 28. Analysis of blood collected during the day 28 IPGTT revealed no significant changes in fasting insulin levels, but a blunted glucose-stimulated insulin release (Fig. 6e). Despite hyperglycemia, we were unable to detect significant changes in fasting insulin levels throughout the study (Fig. 6f). Six weeks post-AAV, we collected pancreas in PFA and immunostained for Cre and found heterogenous Cre immunoreactivity that was discordant with insulin immunoreactivity (Fig. 6g). We identified many cells in the core of the islet lacking not only insulin immunoreactivity, but also Cre. In addition, we observed cells with bright nuclear Cre but enduring bright insulin immunoreactivity. We next immunostained for insulin and islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP; Fig. 6h and Supplemental Fig. 4) and used IAPP as a marker of β-cells for subsequent analyses. Though a majority of β-cells retained some insulin immunoreactivity, there was an obviously fainter insulin immunoreactivity in many cells leading to a flattened distribution (Kurtosis: −0.28 to −1.60) and a trend towards a non-unimodal distribution (D = 0.00932, p = 0.2414)32 as shown in a violin plot of average intensity of insulin immunoreactivity in IAPP + cells. As AAV-injected animals had an altered distribution of insulin intensity, we defined a cut-off (black line) and there was a significant increase in percent IAPP + cells below the cut-off in AAV8 Ins1-Cre injected animals (35.3 ± 8.7%) compared to controls (6.3 ± 3.8%). There was no change to β-cell area (0.67 ± 0.13%) compared to controls (0.65 ± 0.07%) and no change to average β-cell area per islet (3224 ± 199 μm2) compared to controls (2634 ± 208 μm2). Next, given accumulation of DAPI + Ins- cells near islets (Supplemental Fig. 4) we immunostained for CD3 and detected heterogeneous immunoreactivity in AAV-treated animals (Fig. 6i).
Cre-LoxP technology has been used to great success to study the role of genes of interest in β-cell function, phenotype, and physiological outcomes2. To date, the field has relied on transgenic mouse lines to deliver Cre and inducible CreER proteins to cells of interest. Many Cre driver lines face caveats of off-target recombination6,7,8 and constitutive expression of Cre may have detrimental effects on β-cell development and function4,5,13,14,15. Additionally, inducible CreER lines are complicated by GH minigene inclusions within transgenes, leaky recombination before tamoxifen delivery, potential β-cell defects, and tamoxifen toxicity. As an alternative, we propose that the AAV could be used as a vector for delivery of Cre to β-cells.
AAV is non-pathogenic and simple IP delivery of AAV8 can infect tissues of interest, including the pancreas. We designed an AAV8 carrying Cre under control of a fragment of the rat Ins1 promoter. Use of AAV8 Ins1-Cre enabled efficient β-cell recombination via the insulin promoter and given that we observed 0% recombination rates in PBS treated control animals (Fig. 3a), delivery of AAV8 Ins1-Cre was necessary for recombination events thus enabling temporal control over target gene recombination with zero-leak prior to delivery of AAV8 Ins-Cre. Additionally, use of the AAV allowed us to avoid Cre driver mouse lines that include a GH minigene, we did not need to deliver tamoxifen, and there were no deleterious effects of AAV8 Ins1-Cre on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion nor Ca2+ dynamics in response to glucose and KCl. In contrast, islets from Ins2-Cre transgenic mice have defects in Ca2+ dynamics in response to glucose and tolbutamide stimulation25. Though we did not assess the impact of AAV8 Ins1-Cre on rates of β-cell replication and apoptosis, given that use of AAV8 Ins1-Cre did not require tamoxifen nor any transgenes containing a GH minigene, and also avoided constitutive Cre expression starting in development, it is likely that use of AAV8 Ins1-Cre avoids these caveats of working with some Cre driver mice and verification would be worthwhile in follow-up studies. Despite observations that higher dosese of AAV8 Ins1-Cre may cause some defects in β-cell function based on observations of impaired glucose tolerance, excellent recombination efficiency using 1 × 1012 VGP was feasible and avoided obvious β-cell defects.
The packaging limitations of a double stranded AAV precluded the use of a long insulin promoter like the 8.5 kb used in the Ins1-Cre/ERT transgene7. Thus, we used a 410 bp Ins1 promoter fragment because Ins1 is more β-cell specific than Ins2, which is also expressed in neurons of the hypothalamus33 and in other tissues including the thymus34. We justified using this length of promoter because most of the major insulin promoter regulatory elements are contained in the −400 to +100 position of the transcriptional start site, including principle A boxes and GG boxes for Pdx1 interaction, cAMP responsive elements, the C1 element for MafA binding, and others35. When AAV8 Ins1-Cre was delivered IP there was off-target recombination in the hypothalamus, specifically the arcuate nucleus and dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus, suggesting that the short Ins1 promoter used here was inadequate to provide β-cell selective expression. Delivery of AAV via the pancreatic duct resulted in undetectable hypothalamic recombination partially because a lower dose (1 × 1011 VGP) could be used to achieve β-cell recombination; however, the same dose produced hypothalamic recombination when delivered IP, suggesting that the magnitude of systemic spreading is lower when delivered via the pancreatic duct. Surprisingly, both IP and ID delivery resulted in abundant recombination in the exocrine pancreas, other islet cells, and liver. Though the infection of AAV8 appears highest in the pancreas22 and certainly use of an insulin promoter would lead to the highest expression in β-cells, recombination is not a linear assessment of expression but rather a binary outcome. As a comparison, when the AAV carried GFP under control of a rat Ins1 promoter (Fig. 4g), any leaky GFP in hepatocytes or exocrine pancreas remained undetectable. There is heterogeneity in expression level of Pdx1 in the mouse and human pancreas, including a small percentage (12/185) of acinar cells in human pancreas with PDX1 transcript levels higher than the median of the β-cell population36. Thus, it is possible that acinar cells or non-β cells within islets with higher PDX1 were more likely to activate the rat Ins1 promoter fragment and undergo a recombination event, despite such cells not expressing detectable GFP following transduction with AAV8 Ins1-GFP. In related studies, others have observed activity of the insulin promoter in mouse liver using a 760 bp fragment of the rat insulin 1 promoter37. With less sensitive, non-binary, histological assays, there is even detectable proinsulin in many tissues including liver and adipose in models of diabetes38.
After delivery of AAV8 Ins1-Cre IP to mTmG mice, extensive review of immunostained sections of pancreas from all AAV-treated mice in the study did not show any peri-islet DAPI + INS+ collections of cells suggestive of insulitis (Fig. 3). This contrasted with studies on confetti mice treated with ID AAV8 Ins1-Cre that have obvious insulitis as well as IP AAV8 Ins1-GFP treated mice. Based on these results we hypothesized that induction of fluorescent protein expression in islets during adulthood can initiate insulitis whereas mice that have fluorescent protein expression throughout their lifespan (mT before recombination) are not prone. An alternative hypothesis is that both ID delivery as well as high dose IP AAV (5 × 1012 VGP AAV8 Ins1-GFP) could lead to insulitis as a result of a greater viral accumulation in the pancreas. Based on a lack of insulitis when mTmG mice were treated with AAV8 Ins1-Cre IP, we did not expect to detect insulitis in the follow-up study treating Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f mice with AAV8 Ins1-Cre IP and thus did not include an AAV-treated Ins1−/−;Ins2+/+ group.
Though faced with the caveat of off-target recombination in the liver, exocrine pancreas, and hypothalamus, the AAV8 Ins1-Cre approach requires no tamoxifen, avoids use of Cre transgenes with a GH minigene, avoids developmental and functional defects of constitutive Cre expression, and precludes early recombination events prior to delivery. With an appreciation of both the benefits and caveats of using AAV8 Ins1-Cre, we demonstrate the utility of this tool by inducing hyperglycemia in Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f mice. Likely off-target recombination was not concerning because there are no other tissues that could reasonably cause hyperglycemia following loss of the insulin gene. Recombination events that delete Ins2 in tissues that do not express insulin (such as the liver) are inconsequential. Further, unlike the alternative approach using an inducible Pdx-CreER31 that would require extensive breeding and genotyping, we could generate these mice in a single round of breeding and proceed with our experiment in <3 months. As expected, Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f mice injected with AAV8 Ins1-Cre developed hyperglycemia and had reduced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Similar to the previous study on the Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f;mTmG;PdxCreER model31, we saw only a modest reduction in insulin immunoreactivity despite induction of diabetes and reduced glucose-stimulated circulating insulin levels. Given that a > 90% pancreatectomy is required to induce diabetes in rodents39, the loss of functional β-cell mass must be greater than the observed ~1/3 reduction in insulin immunoreactive β-cells to cause hyperglycemia. Unexpectedly, we observed some insulitis in AAV-treated mice but there was no reduction in IAPP immunoreactive cells which reduces the likelihood of immune destruction of β-cells. Given a lack of a AAV-treated Ins1−/−;Ins2+/+ group we cannot conclusively determine if the AAV itself caused insulitis or if a downstream effect of a loss of Ins2 led to immune invasion. Our inability to separate out these two interpretations demonstrates that despite not detecting a significant impact of AAV8 Ins1-Cre on body weight, blood glucose, glucose tolerance, or glucose-stimulated insulin secretion of mTmG animals (Figs. 1–3), it is possible that AAV8 Ins1-Cre caused unanticipated cases of islet inflammation in Ins1−/−Ins2f/f mice and perhaps AAV8 Ins1-Cre can produce confounding effects on other study outcomes depending on a multitude of factors including animal genotype. Therefore, in addition to PBS treated floxed controls, it is prudent to include AAV-treated unfloxed controls in the experimental design.
Given that AAV8 Ins1-Cre treated Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f mice had a normal β-cell area paired with the surprising presence of cells with bright nuclear Cre and cytoplasmic insulin, it is likely that some cells had persisting insulin immunoreactivity despite successful recombination. Barring unlikely explanations like insulin endocytosis40, presumably a Cre+INS+ cell should exist only for a few days after recombination because any stored insulin prior to recombination should be secreted in response to hyperglycemia. Enduring insulin immunoreactivity can be partially attributed to abundant insulin storage and high stability of insulin mRNA31, but assuming recombination occurred near the time of AAV injection, this seems inadequate to explain persistent near normal insulin storage (by comparing brightness of immunoreactivity to control cells) six weeks after recombination during a period of hyperglycemia. For example, mouse islet insulin secretion is ~3% of content per hour at 10 mM glucose41 and though highly stable, insulin mRNA has a half life of only one day at low glucose and three days in settings of hyperglycemia42. Thus, an alternative hypothesis to explain the presence of cells with likely recombination events but enduring insulin immunoreactivity for weeks, is that following recombination, β-cells may dedifferentiate thus leading to proliferation31 and a loss of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Triple-omics assessment of islets isolated 6 days post-tamoxifen from Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f;mTmG;PdxCreER mice31 found down-regulation of secretory pathways like “Golgi vesicle transport”. At the same time-point, β-cells were GFP + and had insulin immunoreactivity comparable to controls, suggesting a loss of secretory pathways even prior to loss of all secretory granules. Additionally, others have reported enduring insulin immunoreactivity in models of β-cell dedifferentiation43. Overall, the AAV8 Ins1-Cre was a useful tool to generate this model of diabetes and repeat investigations using the AAV8 Ins1-Cre to clarify these observations are worthwhile.
Generation of a suitable cohort of Cre driver mice with a floxed target gene can take over a year, require dozens of cages, hundreds of genotyping experiments, and hundreds of hours of labor. AAV8 Ins1-Cre can be readily manufactured for a few thousand dollars, the cost to treat each mouse can be < $50 (1 × 1011 VGP ID), and suitable mice can be ordered directly from a rodent breeding facility or can be bred within the lab from a handful of breeders. Additionally, although current AAV manufacturing techniques that require adherent cell cultures and serum supplemental media are costly44, some recent advances permit serum free suspension cultures that could improve production efficiency and perhaps lower cost45. That being said, we acknowledge that ID delivery is technically challenging and an invasive procedure thus presenting unique challenges. Another alternative to using a Cre driver mouse line may be using adenoviral constructs, though we are unaware of any such attempts. Adenoviruses are inexpensive and relatively simple, but there has been limited efficiency at targeting the endocrine pancreas and the adenovirus causes a significant leukocyte response in the pancreas46,47, a major drawback when attempting to study a disease with an autoimmune component. Other technologies including lipid nanoparticles are being investigated for delivering genes to pancreatic tumors48 but this approach is new and there may be challenges achieving adequate efficiency of delivery.
We propose that the AAV8 Ins1-Cre approach described here could be used as a tool for expedited generation of inducible zero leak knockout of β-cell specific genes. This approach avoids inclusion of transgenes and delivery of tamoxifen but faces the caveat of off-target recombination in the hypothalamus, liver, and exocrine and endocrine pancreas. Though these caveats may be problematic for some study designs, when deleting genes whose predominant function is in β-cells, the approach is faster and comparably efficient to Cre driver line models. We highlight this point by inducing diabetes in Ins1−/−;Ins2f/f mice. This approach has already been used successfully to study the role of a gene responsible for insulin exocytosis49 and we suggest that others consider using the AAV8 Ins1-Cre as a way to study the impact of gain or loss of function of β-cell specific genes on in vivo β-cell function.
The AAV8 Ins1-Cre plasmid was generated from the dsAAV mouse Ins2-EGFP plasmid, kindly provided by Dr. Paul Robbins22. First, the 1.1 kb Ins2 promoter (with 5′ UTR) was excised with BamHI and AgeI and replaced with 410-bp of the rat Ins1 promoter with the 5′ UTR (Ins1; primers: Ins1-F: 5′-CACTGGATCCTGAGCTAAGAATCCAGCTATCAATAGAA ACT; Ins1-R: 5′-CACACAACCCCGTGTTGGAACAATGACCTGGAAGATAG). Next, the EGFP open reading frame (ORF) was excised with AgeI and NotI and the 4.9 kb vector fragment was gel-purified. The Cre ORF was generated by PCR amplification from an Addgene CMV-Cre vector (pBS185) with a Kozak sequence and XmaI site added upstream and a NotI site downstream. (primers: CreORF-F: 5′-CACACGCCCGGGGCCGCCACCATGTCCAATTTACTG ACCGTACACCAA; CreORF-R: 5′-CACACGCGGCCGCCTAATCGCCATCTTCCAGCAGGC). The PCR product was digested with NotI and XmaI and ligated into the 4.9 kb vector to yield the final dsAAV8 Ins1-Cre plasmid. The plasmid was sent to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) for manufacturing of high titre recombinant dsAAV by triple transfection system and purified by CsCl gradient50. AAVs were administered IP or via the pancreatic duct (intraductally; ID), as previously described22,51,52.
All procedures with animals were approved by the University of British Columbia Animal Care Committee and carried out in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines. Eight-week-old C57BL/6 J mice were ordered from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, Maine). mTmG mice were generated in the lab of Dr. Liqun Luo24 (Stanford University, Stanford, CA) and ordered from Jackson Laboratories. Rosa26-LSL-Luciferase mice were generated in the lab of Dr. William Kaelin53 (Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) and ordered from Jackson Laboratories. Confetti mice were generated in the lab of Dr. Hans Clevers30 (Hubrecht Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands) and ordered from Jackson Laboratories. Ins1−/− mice were generated in the lab of Dr. J Jami54 (Institut Cochin, Paris, France) and Ins2f/f mice were generated in the lab of Dr. Massimo Trucco34 (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA). All mice employed in this study were housed with a 12 h light, 12 h dark cycle and had ad libitum access to chow diet (2918, Harlan Laboratories, Madison, WI). Adult (6–8 weeks old) male mice were used in all studies.
Physiological tests and plasma assays
To assess body weight and blood glucose mice were fasted for four hours during the morning (9:00–13:00) prior to measurements using a One Touch Ultra glucometer (Life Scan Inc., Burnaby, Canada). For glucose tolerance tests, mice were fasted for four (IP) or six hours (oral) and then given a glucose load (2 g/kg of body weight). Blood was sampled from the saphenous vein and measured for glucose and insulin before injection (t = 0 min) and at different time points. Plasma insulin levels were determined by a Mouse Insulin Ultrasensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; ALPCO Diagnostics, Salem, NH). Serum AST and ALT activities were measured using commercially available kits (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).
In vivo luciferase imaging
Rosa26-LSL-Luciferase mice were injected with XenoLight RediJect D-Luciferin Ultra Solution (150 mg/kg) and imaged under isoflurane anesthesia using the IVIS® Imaging System Lumina Series. At study termination animals were injected with the luciferin solution then euthanized before rapid dissection and imaging.
Islet isolation and cell culture
Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) containing type XI collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was employed to isolate pancreatic islets as previously described55. Briefly, collagenase solution (1000 U/mL) was injected into the common bile duct then the pancreas dissected out and digested at 37 °C for 11–14 min. Islets were then washed with iced-cold HBSS, filtered through a 70 μm cell strainer, handpicked, and cultured in RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). To infect islets in vitro, AAV was added to the culture medium at a specific multiplicity of infection (106 VGP/cell or 107 VGP/cell) and the medium was changed in 18–24 hours.
Following 48 h culture at 37 °C and 5% CO2 on glass coverslips, pancreatic islets from infected wild-type C57BL/6 J mice were loaded with 5 μM Fura 2-AM for 30 min and imaged on a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M inverted microscope equipped with temperature-controlled stage and a FLUAR 20X objective (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) as previously described25. During the experiments, islets were continuously perifused with Ringer’s solution containing 144 mM NaCl, 5.5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES (adjusted to pH 7.35 by NaOH).
Tissue harvest and immunohistochemical analysis
Tissues were harvested and fixed in paraformaldehyde (PFA) 4% overnight after transcardial perfusion with PBS for 2 min and ice-cold PFA 4% for 10 min. After fixation, tissues were washed in 70% ethanol and embedded in paraffin, for subsequent sectioning (5 µm thickness; Wax-It Histology Services, Vancouver, Canada). Brains were left in PBS containing 20% sucrose for 4 days and then frozen at −40 °C in 2-methylbutane prior to sectioning at 30 µm on a sliding microtome, in a one-in-six series through the rostrocaudal extent of the hypothalamus and immunostained by standard method56. For immunofluorescence of paraffin-embedded tissues, sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol before heat-induced epitope retrieval in an EZ Retriever microwave oven (BioGenes, Fremont, CA; 95 °C for 15 mins in 10 mM citrate buffer with 0.05% Tween-20). We blocked slides in DAKO Protein Block, Serum Free (Dako, Burlington, Canada) and incubated overnight in primary antibody diluted in DAKO Antibody Diluent followed by incubation in secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. Slides were mounted and counterstained with nuclear stain 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and VECTASHIELD® Hard Set Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), and images were captured and analyzed with an ImageXpress® Micro XLS System, controlled by MetaXpress® High-Content Image Acquisition & Analysis Software (Molecular Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA) with a scientific CMOS camera, a Nikon 20 × Plan Apo objective (NA = 0.75, 1-6300-0196; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and DAPI (DAPI-5060B), FITC (FITC-3540B), Cy3 (Cy3-4040B), Texas Red (TXRED-4040B), and Cy5 (Cy5-4040A) filter cubes. We performed quantification of histological images in the same software (MetaXpress®). We used an automated journal (multiwavelength cell scoring) that identifies all cells by DAPI fluorescence, then we defined parameters for cell diameter, total area, and intensity of IAPP or insulin immunoreactivity to identify IAPP + or insulin+ cells and IAPP + or insulin+ area. Finally we assessed the presence of fluorescent protein immunoreactivity in insulin+ or insulin- cells to assess recombination rate (Figs. 3a,d, and 4d), assessed the intensity of insulin immunoreactivity in IAPP + cells (Fig. 6h), and/or calculated the % IAPP + area relative to the total pancreas area using autofluorescence to detect the total pancreas area (Fig. 6h). All antibodies used are listed in Table S1.
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test, one-way ANOVA, or repeated measures two-way ANOVA as indicated (GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). p values <0.05 were considered significant. The dip test for unimodality was performed in R version 3.5.357 using the statistical package diptest.
Gu, H., Marth, J. D., Orban, P. C., Mossmann, H. & Rajewsky, K. Deletion of a DNA polymerase beta gene segment in T cells using cell type-specific gene targeting. Science 265, 103–106 (1994).
Magnuson, M. A. & Osipovich, A. B. Pancreas-specific Cre driver lines and considerations for their prudent use. Cell Metab 18, 9–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.06.011 (2013).
Postic, C. et al. Dual roles for glucokinase in glucose homeostasis as determined by liver and pancreatic beta cell-specific gene knock-outs using Cre recombinase. J Biol Chem 274, 305–315 (1999).
Lee, J. Y. et al. RIP-Cre revisited, evidence for impairments of pancreatic beta-cell function. J Biol Chem 281, 2649–2653, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M512373200 (2006).
Teitelman, G. & Kedees, M. Mouse insulin cells expressing an inducible RIPCre transgene are functionally impaired. J Biol Chem 290, 3647–3653, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.615484 (2015).
Gannon, M., Shiota, C., Postic, C., Wright, C. V. & Magnuson, M. Analysis of the Cre-mediated recombination driven by rat insulin promoter in embryonic and adult mouse pancreas. Genesis 26, 139–142 (2000).
Wicksteed, B. et al. Conditional gene targeting in mouse pancreatic beta-cells: analysis of ectopic Cre transgene expression in the brain. Diabetes 59, 3090–3098, https://doi.org/10.2337/db10-0624 (2010).
Sabatini, P. V. et al. Neuronal PAS domain protein 4 suppression of oxygen sensing optimizes metabolism during excitation of neuroendocrine cells. Cell reports 22, 163–174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.033 (2018).
Thorens, B. et al. Ins1(Cre) knock-in mice for beta cell-specific gene recombination. Diabetologia 58, 558–565, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-014-3468-5 (2015).
Cheng, Y. et al. Generation and characterization of transgenic mice expressing mouse Ins1 promoter for pancreatic beta-cell-specific gene overexpression and knockout. Endocrinology 156, 2724–2731, https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1104 (2015).
Liu, Y. et al. Tamoxifen-independent recombination in the RIP-CreER mouse. Plos One 5, e13533, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013533 (2010).
Feil, R., Wagner, J., Metzger, D. & Chambon, P. Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by mutated estrogen receptor ligand-binding domains. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 237, 752–757, https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1997.7124 (1997).
Carboneau, B. A., Le, T. D., Dunn, J. C. & Gannon, M. Unexpected effects of the MIP-CreER transgene and tamoxifen on beta-cell growth in C57Bl6/J male mice. Physiol Rep 4, https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12863 (2016).
Brouwers, B. et al. Impaired islet function in commonly used transgenic mouse lines due to human growth hormone minigene expression. Cell Metab 20, 979–990, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.11.004 (2014).
Baan, M. et al. Transgenic expression of the human growth hormone minigene promotes pancreatic beta-cell proliferation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 309, R788–794, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00244.2015 (2015).
Mosleh, E. et al. Ins1-Cre and Ins1-CreER gene replacement alleles are susceptible to silencing by DNA hypermethylation. Endocrinology https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqaa054 (2020).
Mingozzi, F. & High, K. A. Therapeutic in vivo gene transfer for genetic disease using AAV: progress and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 12, 341–355, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2988 (2011).
Kotin, R. M. et al. Site-specific integration by adeno-associated virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87, 2211–2215 (1990).
Mingozzi, F. & High, K. A. Immune responses to AAV in clinical trials. Curr Gene Ther 7, 316–324 (2007).
Jiang, H. et al. Evidence of multiyear factor IX expression by AAV-mediated gene transfer to skeletal muscle in an individual with severe hemophilia B. Mol Ther 14, 452–455, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.05.004 (2006).
Grieger, J. C. & Samulski, R. J. Adeno-associated virus vectorology, manufacturing, and clinical applications. Methods Enzymol 507, 229–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386509-0.00012-0 (2012).
Wang, Z. et al. Widespread and stable pancreatic gene transfer by adeno-associated virus vectors via different routes. Diabetes 55, 875–884 (2006).
Xiao, X. et al. Pancreatic cell tracing, lineage tagging and targeted genetic manipulations in multiple cell types using pancreatic ductal infusion of adeno-associated viral vectors and/or cell-tagging dyes. Nat Protoc 9, 2719–2724, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.183 (2014).
Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605, https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20335 (2007).
Tuduri, E. et al. Impaired Ca(2+) signaling in beta-cells lacking leptin receptors by Cre-loxP recombination. Plos One 8, e71075, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071075 (2013).
Mehran, A. E. et al. Hyperinsulinemia drives diet-induced obesity independently of brain insulin production. Cell Metab 16, 723–737, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.019 (2012).
Zincarelli, C., Soltys, S., Rengo, G. & Rabinowitz, J. E. Analysis of AAV serotypes 1-9 mediated gene expression and tropism in mice after systemic injection. Mol Ther 16, 1073–1080, https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2008.76 (2008).
Leonard, J. et al. Characterization of somatostatin transactivating factor-1, a novel homeobox factor that stimulates somatostatin expression in pancreatic islet cells. Mol Endocrinol 7, 1275–1283, https://doi.org/10.1210/mend.7.10.7505393 (1993).
Tabula Muris, C. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 562, 367–372, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0590-4 (2018).
Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.016 (2010).
Szabat, M. et al. Reduced insulin production relieves endoplasmic reticulum stress and induces beta cell proliferation. Cell Metab 23, 179–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.10.016 (2016).
Hartigan, J. A. & Hartigan, P. M. The dip test of unimodality. The Annals of Statistics 13, 70–84 (1985).
Johnson, J. D. A practical guide to genetic engineering of pancreatic beta-cells in vivo: getting a grip on RIP and MIP. Islets 6, e944439, https://doi.org/10.4161/19382014.2014.944439 (2014).
Fan, Y. et al. Thymus-specific deletion of insulin induces autoimmune diabetes. EMBO J 28, 2812–2824, https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.212 (2009).
Hay, C. W. & Docherty, K. Comparative analysis of insulin gene promoters: implications for diabetes research. Diabetes 55, 3201–3213, https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-0788 (2006).
Segerstolpe, A. et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of human pancreatic islets in health and type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab 24, 593–607, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.020 (2016).
Chen, X., Larson, C. S., West, J., Zhang, X. & Kaufman, D. B. In vivo detection of extrapancreatic insulin gene expression in diabetic mice by bioluminescence imaging. Plos One 5, e9397, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009397 (2010).
Kojima, H. et al. Extrapancreatic insulin-producing cells in multiple organs in diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 2458–2463 (2004).
Bouwens, L. Beta cell regeneration. Curr Diabetes Rev 2, 3–9 (2006).
Rorsman, P. & Renstrom, E. Insulin granule dynamics in pancreatic beta cells. Diabetologia 46, 1029–1045, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-003-1153-1 (2003).
Anello, M., Gilon, P. & Henquin, J. C. Alterations of insulin secretion from mouse islets treated with sulphonylureas: perturbations of Ca2+ regulation prevail over changes in insulin content. Br J Pharmacol 127, 1883–1891, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0702731 (1999).
Tillmar, L., Carlsson, C. & Welsh, N. Control of insulin mRNA stability in rat pancreatic islets. Regulatory role of a 3′-untranslated region pyrimidine-rich sequence. J Biol Chem 277, 1099–1106, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M108340200 (2002).
Talchai, C., Xuan, S., Lin, H. V., Sussel, L. & Accili, D. Pancreatic beta cell dedifferentiation as a mechanism of diabetic beta cell failure. Cell 150, 1223–1234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.029 (2012).
Ayuso, E. Manufacturing of recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors: new technologies are welcome. Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development 3, 15049, https://doi.org/10.1038/mtm.2015.49 (2016).
Grieger, J. C., Soltys, S. M. & Samulski, R. J. Production of recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors using suspension HEK293 cells and continuous harvest of vector from the culture media for GMP FIX and FLT1 clinical vector. Mol Ther 24, 287–297, https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2015.187 (2016).
Wang, A. Y., Peng, P. D., Ehrhardt, A., Storm, T. A. & Kay, M. A. Comparison of adenoviral and adeno-associated viral vectors for pancreatic gene delivery in vivo. Human Gene Therapy 15, 405–413, https://doi.org/10.1089/104303404322959551 (2004).
Morro, M. et al. Pancreatic transduction by helper-dependent adenoviral vectors via intraductal delivery. Hum Gene Ther 25, 824–836, https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2013.182 (2014).
Chen, J., Guo, Z., Tian, H. & Chen, X. Production and clinical development of nanoparticles for gene delivery. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 3, 16023, https://doi.org/10.1038/mtm.2016.23 (2016).
Liang, T. et al. SNAP23 depletion enables more SNAP25/calcium channel excitosome formation to increase insulin exocytosis in type 2 diabetes. JCI insight 5, https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.129694 (2020).
Xiao, X., Li, J. & Samulski, R. J. Production of high-titer recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors in the absence of helper adenovirus. J Virol 72, 2224–2232 (1998).
Montane, J. et al. Prevention of murine autoimmune diabetes by CCL22-mediated Treg recruitment to the pancreatic islets. J Clin Invest 121, 3024–3028, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI43048 (2011).
Tuduri, E. et al. AAV GCG-EGFP, a new tool to identify glucagon-secreting alpha-cells. Sci Rep 9, 10829, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46735-2 (2019).
Safran, M. et al. Mouse reporter strain for noninvasive bioluminescent imaging of cells that have undergone Cre-mediated recombination. Mol Imaging 2, 297–302 (2003).
Duvillie, B. et al. Phenotypic alterations in insulin-deficient mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 5137–5140 (1997).
Salvalaggio, P. R. et al. Islet filtration: a simple and rapid new purification procedure that avoids ficoll and improves islet mass and function. Transplantation 74, 877–879, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TP.0000028781.41729.5B (2002).
Denroche, H. C. et al. Disrupted leptin signaling in the lateral hypothalamus and ventral premammillary nucleus alters insulin and glucagon secretion and protects against diet-induced obesity. Endocrinology 157, 2671–2685, https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1998 (2016).
Team, R. C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://www.R-project.org/ (2014).
This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to TJK and CBV, and JDRF to CBV. AR gratefully acknowledges studentship support from the CIHR (Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship) and Vancouver Coastal Health (CIHR-UBC MD/PhD Studentship). ET received a fellowship from the CDA.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ramzy, A., Tudurí, E., Glavas, M.M. et al. AAV8 Ins1-Cre can produce efficient β-cell recombination but requires consideration of off-target effects. Sci Rep 10, 10518 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67136-w