Molecular genetic and geochemical assays reveal severe contamination of drinking water reservoirs at the ancient Maya city of Tikal

Abstract

Understanding civilizations of the past and how they emerge and eventually falter is a primary research focus of archaeological investigations because these provocative data sets offer critical insights into long-term human behavior patterns, especially in regard to land use practices and sustainable environmental interactions. The ancient Maya serve as an intriguing example of this research focus, yet the details of their spectacular emergence in a tropical forest environment followed by their eventual demise have remained enigmatic. Tikal, one of the foremost of the ancient Maya cities, plays a central role in this discussion because of its sharp population decline followed by abandonment during the late 9th century CE. Our results, based on geochemical and molecular genetic assays on sediments from four of the main reservoirs, reveal that two of the largest reservoirs at Tikal, essential for the survival of the city during the dry seasons, were contaminated with high levels of mercury, phosphate and cyanobacteria known to produce deadly toxins. Our observations demonstrate severe pollution problems at a time when episodes of climatic aridity were prevalent. This combination of catastrophic events clearly threatened the sustainability of the city and likely contributed to its abandonment.

Introduction

The ancient Maya abandoned the major center of Tikal in the mid-ninth century CE and although scholars have studied this site intensively for the past 60 years, exactly how and why the city met its ill-fated ending have remained unanswered questions. Our investigations, combining novel aDNA and soil geochemistry assays, however, shed significant new light on the abandonment of this once-powerful political, ceremonial and commercial hub. Recent explanations for the downfall of Tikal have centered on population expansion1,2 coupled with extensive landscape degradation3,4 and a period of multidecadal droughts from 820 to 870 CE5,6,7,8,9,10,11. Extended episodes of climatic aridity made the city especially vulnerable because it lacked access to permanent bodies of water such as lakes or rivers, and the groundwater table, approximately 200 m below the surface, was inaccessible using existing technology12. Inhabitants relied on reservoirs that ringed the city and filled during the rainy season to provide water during the dry season13,14,15. To enhance this water collection process, numerous large paved plazas in the site core of Tikal, e.g., the Great Plaza, the Plaza of the Seven Temples and the West Plaza14,15,16 were canted to drain water into the reservoirs, particularly the Temple and Palace Reservoirs, during the rainy season for storage14.

In this study, we seek to bring about a greater understanding of the reservoir system at Tikal and how it played a crucial role in sustaining the inhabitants. In particular, we were interested in how the reservoirs were used and how they were maintained as sources of potable drinking water and water for irrigation. Towards this end, we collected sediment samples during excavations in 2009 and 2010 from deep strata from within four Tikal reservoirs, viz., Palace, Temple, Perdido and Corriental (Fig. 1). The first two reservoirs were located in the site core of the city while the latter two were more peripheral. Strata in each reservoir were dated through a combination of accelerator mass spectroscopy (AMS) radiocarbon (14C) dates (Supplementary Table S1) and ceramic seriation. Samples from 35 different strata from four reservoirs were analyzed.

Figure 1
figure1

Watershed map of the site core of Tikal. The red area in the middle of the map represents the portion of the site core that drains into the Temple and Palace Reservoirs. Redrawn by Cory Perfetta and David Lentz using Photoshop CS6, Vers. 13.0.1 × 64 (https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/pricing-info.html). Modified from a source map (Fig. 2) in Scarborough and Gallopin15Reprinted with permission from AAAS.

Results

Geochemical assays, using atomic absorption spectrophotometry following catalytic decomposition and gold amalgamation17, revealed high levels of mercury (Hg) in sediments associated with Late (600–830 CE) and Terminal Classic (830–900 CE) time periods (Supplementary Fig. S1) in both the Temple and Palace Reservoirs. Of the samples analyzed, 25 showed Hg levels that exceeded the toxic effect threshold (TET), the level above which the sediments are deemed to be heavily polluted18. Ten samples had levels below the TET (1.0 µg/g). One sample from the Temple Reservoir and four samples from the Palace Reservoir (Fig. 2) had Hg levels exceeding ten times the TET concentrations for sediments in freshwater ecosystems18. Four of the five samples with extremely high Hg readings were from strata associated with the Late or Terminal Classic periods, the time just before the abandonment of the site.

Figure 2
figure2

Mercury readings from four major reservoirs with the Tikal population curve2 in the background. Peak mercury levels coincide with the Late Classic/Terminal Classic period population apogee just prior to the abandonment of Tikal. Sample numbers are listed above each bar. Supporting data can be found in Supplementary Table S2.

Hg was targeted for analysis because of its deleterious health effects. Also, the ancient Maya are known to have used mercury compounds, especially cinnabar (HgS) which has a blood-red color, in their dyes and paints for artifact decoration, architectural ornamentation19 and in ritual activities20. Virtually all of the elite burials at Tikal contained copious amounts of cinnabar21. For example, elite Burial 160 was enveloped by approximately 10 kg of powdered cinnabar22. In addition, liquid Hg has been discovered at numerous Maya sites, usually in vessels associated with ceremonial caches and burials22,23.

Mercury used in these ways by the ancient Maya likely was the source of the elevated readings observed at Tikal. Numerous buildings and plazas, mostly built during the Late Classic period, including the ceremonial burial zone of the North Acropolis, two ball courts, four major temples and two huge palace complexes (the Central and South Acropoli) all shed runoff into the Temple and Palace Reservoirs (Fig. 1). Because these reservoirs were located at the epicenter of the ceremonial and elite residential complex of Tikal, there were ample opportunities for Hg to wash into them. This circumstance created a huge potential health hazard for anyone who consumed their waters. Another possible source of mercury would have come from particulate matter from volcanic eruptions24. If this was the only source of mercury in the reservoirs at Tikal, however, we would expect a more random distribution of the metal at least spatially if not chronologically.

Phosphate (PO43−) concentrations also increased in the Temple and Palace Reservoirs during the Late and Terminal Classic periods. Phosphate readings are often used as a proxy for increased organic deposition at archaeological sites because it is associated with human activities such as food waste discard and fecal contamination. Phosphate binds with soil and remains stable for many centuries25. In the Palace Reservoir, phosphate readings for the Late Classic period (0.80–0.92 µg/g) revealed a fourfold increase from the earlier Preclassic period (0.20 µg/g) (Fig. 3). Organic contamination likely came from the kitchen built on the water’s edge of the Palace Reservoir21 where meals were prepared for the elite residents of the Central Acropolis which is located just north of the Palace Reservoir. Hundreds of years of smoky cooking fires and ceramic plates washed in the reservoir added organic material to the waters. To make matters worse, the Maya cooks apparently dumped food wastes right outside of the kitchen, as evidenced by the presence of an adjacent midden26. During the rainy seasons, effluent from this trash pile would have washed directly into the reservoir.

Figure 3
figure3

Phosphate readings, a proxy indicator for organic pollution, from four reservoirs at Tikal, viz., (a). Palace, (b). Temple, (c). Perdido, and (d). Corriental. Abbreviation key: Pre-Maya = Pre-Maya period; E Pre-C = Early Preclassic period; Pre-C = Preclassic period; EC = Early Classic period; LC = Late Classic period; TC = Terminal Classic period; PC = Postclassic period; M = modern. Supporting data can be found in Supplementary Table S3.

Temple Reservoir also had a high phosphate peak in Late Classic sediments (0.72 µg/g) compared to earlier deposits (0.11–0.14 µg/g). Phosphate readings from Perdido were mostly quite low except for an Early Classic period spike (0.77 µg/g) in a sub-floor level that served as the foundation for the Early Classic plaster floor of the reservoir (Fig. 3). All of the Maya era phosphate readings were relatively low in the Corriental Reservoir. This is consistent with this reservoir being more distant from of the site core and evidence that it was likely kept clean by a set of sand and zeolite-containing boxes that served to filter the incoming water13,14,27. All of the reservoirs have high phosphate readings on the surface due to the formation of modern, organic-rich top-soils, enriched by dust and ash trapped by the forest regrowth3,28 since Tikal was abandoned.

16S rRNA amplicon sequencing from sediment samples indicated large populations of problematic cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) in the Temple and Palace Reservoirs29 (Fig. 4). Planktothrix NIVA-CYA15 was the dominant cyanobacterium in Late Preclassic (300 BCE-200 CE) and Late Classic deposits recovered from the Temple Reservoir as well as Terminal Classic deposits from the Palace reservoir. In slightly earlier Late Classic strata from the Palace Reservoir, a Microcystis PCC-7914 proliferation was observed. Planktothrix and Microcystis, both planktonic cyanobacteria, are known to produce deadly toxins29. Therefore, our results indicate toxigenic blue-green algal blooms in two of the main reservoirs just prior to the time of abandonment in the mid-9th century CE as a period of severe dryness set in. Similarly, a Planktothrix bloom occurred in the Temple Reservoir during the Late Preclassic, an earlier time period that also was plagued by droughts30,31,32. Microcystin toxins produced by Planktothrix and Microcystis can cause detrimental health effects even at extremely low concentrations (~ 2 nM), and are resistant to boiling33. With the presence of microcystins in Tikal’s reservoirs, the water could not have been safely consumed.

Figure 4
figure4

Cyanobacteria molecular genetic results from four reservoirs at Tikal. Evidence of cyanobacteria, or blue-green algae, blooms of Planktothrix and Microcysitis (both known to produce highly toxic microcystins) were found in the Temple and Palace Reservoirs. Taxa marked with an “*” denote unclassified strains. Supporting data can be found in Supplementary Table S4.

A third strain of cyanobacteria, Cylindrospermum NQAIF30834, was identified in high percentages in pre-Maya basal soil under the Perdido reservoir and in post-abandonment sediments in Temple Reservoir. Cylindrospermum NQAIF308 is common in terrestrial ecosystems, especially in soil35. Cylindrospermum likely was present before the reservoirs were built and after sediment filled the abandoned reservoirs as they dried up and the process of soil formation ensued.

Discussion

Several key points emerge that provide a fine-grained picture of the end of the Maya occupation of Tikal. First, the main water sources for the site core of Tikal, especially the Temple and Palace Reservoirs, were seriously compromised as sources of drinking water by the end of the Late Classic period. This period of reduced rainfall co-occurred with expanded Tikal populations2 when they were most reliant on water reserves.

The drinking and cooking water for the Tikal rulers and their elite entourage almost certainly came from the Palace and Temple Reservoirs. As a result, the leading families of Tikal likely were fed foods laced with mercury at every meal. Contaminated waters would have had a negative impact on the health of the community, especially the ruling elite, and may have compromised their ability to lead effectively. Although the physiological mechanisms are not clear, there is a significant interrelation between chronic mercury exposure and aspects of metabolic syndrome, obesity in particular36. “Dark Sun”, a Terminal Classic Tikal ruler who was notably obese (Supplementary Fig. S2), may have suffered from this syndrome.

In the droughts of the 9th century, the eutrophic, stagnant and receding waters of the Palace and Temple Reservoirs, with high levels of phosphate, would have been a perfect medium for the proliferation of cyanobacteria. The other reservoirs, especially Corriental and to a lesser extent Perdido, seem to have had fewer contamination problems. Corriental didn’t have drainage coming directly from the large temples, palaces, ballcourts or their surrounding plazas, and water flowing into the reservoir was probably filtered13,14. We have no evidence that Perdido Reservoir experienced cyanobacteria contamination although there was some influx of mercury. This reservoir was supplied by water through a series of canals from the “Lost World,” a ceremonial complex dating to the Preclassic and Early Classic periods37, but it was over 0.5 km from the source of possible mercury contaminants. Previous studies indicate that this reservoir was likely used for crop irrigation4,14 in addition to its possible use as a source of drinking water.

The authority of Classic Maya rulers was strongly linked to the provision of clean water38 among other things. There may well have been those who saw the events described above and the concomitant droughts as a failure of their leaders to adequately appease the Maya gods. Indeed, these events coming together must have resulted in a demoralized populace who, in the face of dwindling water and food supplies, became more willing to abandon their homes.

The final demise of Tikal was a complex tapestry of interwoven calamities. The results presented herein are complementary to hypotheses of climatic aridification and environmental degradation. Our findings provide synchronous, compounding factors occurring during the Late/Terminal Classic period, such as the contamination by mercury, organic pollutants and blue-green algal blooms. What has been observed at Tikal was a deadly combination of factors that worked together during the Terminal Classic period to make a continued existence at the city unsustainable. Furthermore, this scenario likely played out at other Maya cities dependent on reservoirs and this study presents new methodologies that can be used to test this hypothesis elsewhere.

The conditions described in this paper help to explain why Tikal, and possibly other sites in the Maya Lowlands were abandoned and why the sites were not re-occupied after the droughts of the 9th century came to an end. The conversion of Tikal’s central reservoirs from life-sustaining to sickness-inducing places would have both practically and symbolically helped to bring about the abandonment of this magnificent city.

Methods

Sediment samples were collected during excavations in 2009 and 2010 from strata within four Tikal reservoirs. To avoid modern contamination, as well as cross contamination from one sample to the next and from one stratum to the next, we took a column of samples39 from a characteristic side wall in each excavation unit or pit. This was completed by shaving the wall with a clean, sharp trowel where the sample was to be extracted. Sample collection was accomplished by starting at the bottom of the pit and working upwards in 10 cm increments. Sediment for the pollen, molecular and geochemical samples were removed with a clean trowel from the freshly shaved wall surface and placed in sterile plastic bags (Whirl-Packs) and labeled. Separate flotation samples (2 litres each) were collected at the same time giving us the benefit of micro-remain and macro-remain plant data from each context. The macro-remain samples were processed by water flotation39 and the pollen samples were sent to a laboratory in the US for pollen extraction. At the pollen lab, 2 g of sediment was removed from each sample with a sterile spatula then the bags were immediately resealed. Results of the pollen and macrobotanical analyses have been published previously4,13,40,41.

After arrival at the University of Cincinnati Paleoethnobotanical Laboratory, three 5-gram aliquots were removed from each sediment sample bag and inserted into sterile containers using sterile spatulas. Samples designated for molecular genetic analysis were placed in a −80 °C freezer until processing could begin. Just prior to DNA extraction, samples were thawed to −4 °C then inserted, under sterile conditions, into tubes with glass beads then sealed prior to homogenization in a bead-beating machine. Samples designated for phosphate tests were stored at room temperature then air dried and sieved using a clean 2 mm mesh sieve prior to analysis. Samples scheduled for mercury tests also were stored at room temperature then air dried and thermally and chemically decomposed within a decomposition furnace prior to analysis.

Geochemical analyses

Total mercury in sediment samples was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry following catalytic decomposition and gold amalgamation using a Milestone Direct Mercury Analyzer (DMA-80, Shelton, CT, USA). This procedure follows standard protocols established by the US Environmental Protection Agency for the measurement of mercury in freshwater ecosystems17. The detection limit for the instrument is approximately 1 microgram per kilogram of sample material. The relative precision determined from triplicate analysis of a 10 ng g−1 and 100 µg g−1 reference was less than 10%. The method detection limit (MDL), defined as 3.143 times the standard deviation of seven blanks, was 0.013 ng g−1. The method reporting limit (MRL) defined as 3.143 times the standard deviation of seven reference samples was 0.099 ng g−1. Approximately 0.02 g of sediment was weighed out into a nickel plate quartz sample cell using a 0.1 mg balance and the mass was recorded. Samples were initially heated to 200 °C for 70 minutes and then heated at 650 °C for 3 minutes for thermal decomposition. Samples were amalgamated for 12 seconds and analyzed by atomic absorption for 30 seconds. Analyses of each sample were conducted in triplicate and results are presented in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S2.

Phosphate tests were conducted on Tikal reservoir sediment samples at the Service Testing and Research (STAR) Laboratory of the Ohio State University (Wooster, OH, USA). Sediment samples (2 g each) were analyzed using the Bray P1 procedure. Because the Tikal sediment samples all had pH values between 7 and 8, we determined that the Bray P1 procedure would be appropriate for phosphate analysis. The initial test extractant was a 0.025 normal hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution followed by an ammonium fluoride solution (0.03 normal NH4F). The extracted results were analyzed by a calibrated probe colorimeter set at 880 nm. Available phosphorus was determined by measuring the blue color intensity in solution when treated with reagent grade molybdate-ascorbic acid according to methods described by Kuo42. Results were reported in the form of available P or PO43− in μg/g and are presented in Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table S3.

Molecular genetic studies

16S rRNA genes were sequenced using the paired-end Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform to characterize the community composition across temporal and spatial gradients throughout four Tikal reservoirs. Our preliminary characterization of the samples resulted in the extraction of DNA of sufficient quality for Illumina MiSeq sequencing and our data indicated that surface and subsurface assemblages were distinct (Supplementary Fig. S3).

DNA was extracted from sediment samples (n = 35) as described previously43. Each extract was sequenced using primers for amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA (515F/805R) gene using the paired-end Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform. Sequence analysis and community ecology analysis were carried out using methods published previously31. This method has been employed to successfully extract high quality DNA from a subset (n = 12) of samples from Tikal and characterize the community composition of those samples. In addition, since ancient DNA tends to be fragmented and could pose a challenge for this study, several techniques to isolate ancient DNA were evaluated44,45,46.

The DNA samples also were subjected to taxa-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR). A recently developed suite of methods aimed at determining fecal pollution in environment samples has been developed and we followed those protocols47. To guide these studies, we searched for specific taxa in the community composition data acquired and analyzed as described above. In samples that contained taxa of interest, we employed taxa-specific primers to determine changes in abundance of specific taxa across the temporal and spatial gradients throughout the Tikal landscape. For instance, our targets included (but were not limited to) toxin producing cyanobacteria. qPCR was performed and assayed on a StepOne Plus real-time PCR instrument from Invitrogen.

All reactions were completed in triplicate using the optimal conditions determined above. Specificity of the qPCR assays were verified by melt curve analysis. For qPCR, we performed qPCR analysis on a subset of samples (n = 50). Each run of the assays included positive and negative controls resulting in ~500 total assays. Following quality control, merging of contigs, and removal of chimeras and singletons, we recovered 663,817 16S rRNA sequences with an average length of 253 bp. The libraries ranged in size from 9,421 to 49,863 total sequences following quality control. At a sequence identity of 97%, we recovered 354 Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) affiliated with archaea and 20,212 OTUs affiliated with bacteria.

In the Temple Reservoir we recovered cyanobacterial OTUs (Fig. 4) from a Late Preclassic period sample (sample #45), an Early Late Classic (#30), a Late Classic (#28), and a Postclassic sample (#26). Sequences recovered from the Postclassic horizon were affiliated with the Nostocaceae (Cylindrospermum sp.). OTUs recovered from the Early Classic and Late Classic were affiliated with uncultured Leptolyngbyaceae, and Nostocaceae. Phormidiaceae (Plankothrix sp.) were abundant in the Late Classic and Late Preclassic samples where these OTUs accounted for >60% of the total Oxyphotobacteria sequences. We also recovered OTUs affiliated with Cyanobiaceae, Nostocaceae, and Leptolyngbyaceae from the Late Classic and Late Preclassic samples.

In the Palace Reservoir, we recovered cyanobacterial OTUs from Late Preclassic (#14), Late Classic (#12), and the Late/Terminal Classic period (#13). OTUs affiliated with Cyanobiaceae were recovered from all three samples. OTUs affiliated with Microcystaceae (Microcystis sp.) were abundant in the Late Classic samples. OTUs affiliated with Phormidiaceae (Plankothrix sp.) were the most abundant cyanobacterial sequences recovered from the Late Classic/Terminal Classic samples.

From the Perdido Reservoir we recovered cyanobacterial OTUs from pre-Maya bajo samples (#23, 170 cm below surface) and the A1 horizon (#15, 10 cm below surface). All OTUs recovered from the pre-Maya bajo sample were affiliated with Nostocaceae. OTUs affiliated with Nostocaceae (Cylindrospermosum sp.) were also recovered from the A1 sample along with Nodosilineaceae, Cyanobiaceae, Microcystaceae (Microcystis sp.), Phormidiaceae, Prochlorotrichaceae, and Pseudanabaenaceae. In the Corriental Reservoir, only a surface sample (#1) with cyanobacterial OTUs contained gene sequences affiliated with uncultured Leptolyngbyaceae (Oscillatoria sp.). Results of the molecular genetic assays involving cyanobacteria are illustrated in Fig. 4 and additional details are provided in the Supplementary Information section and the Supplementary Table S4.

Data availability

Raw sequence reads for the genetic analyses are available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Short Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject number PRJNA579387. All other data are available in the manuscript or in the Supplementary Information section.

References

  1. 1.

    Haviland, W. A. Settlement, society, and demography at Tikal. In Tikal: Dynasties, Foreigners & Affairs of State: Advancing Maya Archaeology (ed. Sabloff, J. A.) 111–142, (School of American Research Press, 2003).

  2. 2.

    Culbert, T. P. et al. The population of Tikal, Guatemala. In Precolumbian Population History in the Maya Lowlands, (eds. Culbert, T. P. & Rice, D.) 103–121, (University of New Mexico Press, 1990).

  3. 3.

    Turner, B. L. II & Sabloff, J. A. Classic period collapse of the Central Maya Lowlands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 13908–13914 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lentz, D. L. et al. Forests, fields, and the edge of sustainability at the ancient Maya city of Tikal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 18513–18518 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hodell, D., Curtis, J. & Brenner, M. Possible role of climate in the collapse of classic Maya civilization. Nature 375, 391–394 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Haug, G. et al. Climate and the collapse of Maya civilization. Science 299, 1731–1735 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Aimers, J. & Hodell, D. Drought and the Maya. Nature 479, 44–45 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Stahle, D. W. et al. Major Mesoamerican droughts of the past millennium. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, 2–5 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kennett, D. J. et al. Development and disintegration of Maya political systems in response to climate change. Science 338, 788–791 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Medina-Elizalde, M. & Rohling, E. J. Collapse of Classic Maya civilization related to modest reduction in precipitation. Science 335, 956–959 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wu, H. C. et al. Changes to Yucatán Peninsula precipitation associated with salinity and temperature extremes of the Caribbean Sea during the Maya civilization collapse. Scientific Reports 7, 1–12 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dunning, N. P., Beach, T. P. & Luzzadder-Beach, S. Kax and kol: collapse and resilience in lowland Maya civilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 3652–3657 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Scarborough, V. L. et al. Water and sustainable land use in an ancient tropical city: Tikal, Guatemala. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 12408–12413 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Scarborough, V. L. & Grazioso, L. The evolution of an ancient waterworks system at Tikal. In Tikal: Paleoecology of an Ancient Maya City (eds. Lentz, D. L., Dunning, N. P. & Scarborough, V. L.) 16–45 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).

  15. 15.

    Scarborough, V. L. & Gallopin, G. G. A water storage adaptation in the Maya lowlands. Science 251, 658–662 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Haviland, W. A. Excavations in the West Plaza of Tikal: Tikal Report 17. (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019).

  17. 17.

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Determination of Mercury in Solids and Solutions by Thermal Decomposition, Amalgamation, and Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2015).

  18. 18.

    MacDonald, D. D. et al. Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch. Env. Cont. & Tox 29, 20–31 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Vazquez, L., Vidal, C. & Munoz, G. Archaeometrical studies of Classic Maya mural painting at Petén: La Blanca and Chilonche. Mater. Res Soc. Symp. Proc. 1618, 45–62 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cook, D. E. et al. Deciphering the inorganic chemical record of ancient human activity using ICP-MS: a reconnaissance study of late classic soil floors at Cancuén, Guatemala. J. Archaeol. Sci. 33, 628–640 (2006).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Harrison, P. D. The Lords of Tikal (Thames and Hudson, 1999).

  22. 22.

    Haviland, W. A. Excavations in Residential Areas of Tikal-Group 7F-1: Tikal Report 22. (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015).

  23. 23.

    Pendergast, D. M. Ancient Maya mercury. Science 217, 533–535 (1982).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hansell, A. L., Horwell, C. J. & Oppenheimer, C. The health hazards of volcanoes and geothermal areas. Occup. Environ. Med. 63, 149–125 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Holliday, V. T. & Gartner, W. G. Soil phosphorus and archaeology: a review and comparison of methods. J. Archeol. Sci. 34, 301–333 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Harrison, P. D. A marvel of Maya engineering: water management at Tikal. Expedition 54, 19–26 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tankersley, K. B. et al. Fire and water: the archaeological significance of Tikal’s Quaternary sediments, In Tikal: Paleoecology of an Ancient Maya City (eds. Lentz D.L., Dunning, N.P. & Scarborough, V. L.) 152–185 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).

  28. 28.

    Das, R. D. et al. Impact of land use change on atmospheric P inputs in a tropical dry forest. J. Geophys. Res. 116, G01027 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hitzfeld, B. C., Hoger, S. J. & Dietrich, D. R. Cyanobacterial toxins: removal during drinking water treatment, and human risk assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 108(Suppl. 1), 113–122 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Medina-Elizalde, M. et al. High-resolution speleothem record of precipitation from the Yucatan Peninsula spanning the Maya Preclassic period. Glob. Planet. Change 138, 93–102 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dunning, N. P. et al. The end of the beginning: environmental instability and human response in the Late Preclassic East-Central Yucatan Peninsula, In The Great Maya Droughts in Cultural Context (ed. G. Iannone) 107–126 (University of Colorado Press, 2014).

  32. 32.

    Webster, J. W. et al. (2007) Stalagmite evidence from Belize indicating significant droughts at the time of Preclassic abandonment, the Maya hiatus, and the Classic Maya collapse. Palaeogeogr, Palaeoclimatol, & Palaeoecol. 250, 1–17 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    World Health Organization, Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 3rd edition, Volume 1: Recommendations (World Health Organization, 2004).

  34. 34.

    Johansen, J. R. Morphological and molecular characterization within 26 strains of the genus Cylindrospermum (Nostocaceae, Cyanobacteria), with descriptions of three new species. J. Phycol. 50(1), 187–202 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Carr, N. G. & Whitton, B. A. The Biology of Blue-Green Algae (University of California Press, 1973).

  36. 36.

    Tinkov, A. A. et al. Mercury and metabolic syndrome: a review of experimental and clinical observations. Biometals 28, 231–254 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Laporte, J. P. Thirty years later: some results of recent investigations in Tikal. In Tikal: Dynasties, Foreigners, and Affairs of State (ed. Sabloff J. A.) 281–318 (School of American Research, 2003).

  38. 38.

    Lucero, L. J. Water and Ritual: The Rise and Fall of Classic Maya Rulers (University of Texas Press, 2006).

  39. 39.

    Pearsall, D. M. Paleoethnobotany: A Handbook of Procedures (Routledge, 2015)

  40. 40.

    Lentz, D. L. et al. Agroforestry and Agricultural Practices of the Ancient Maya at Tikal. In Tikal: Paleoecology of an Ancient Maya City (eds. Lentz, D. L., Dunning, N. P. & Scarborough, V. L.) 152–185 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).

  41. 41.

    Lentz, D. L., Dunning, N. P. & Scarborough, V. L. (eds.) Tikal: Paleoecology of an Ancient Maya City (Cambridge University Press, 2015).

  42. 42.

    Kuo, S. Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3—Chemical Methods (ed. Sparks D.L.) 894–895 (Soil Science Society of America, 1996)

  43. 43.

    Hamilton, T. L., Peters, J. W., Skidmore, M. L. & Boyd, E. S. Molecular evidence for an active endogenous microbiome beneath glacial ice. The ISME Journal 7, 1402–1412 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bouwman, A. S. et al. Genotype of a historic strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 18511–18516 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Meyer, M. et al. A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual. Science 338, 222–226 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Poinar, H. N. et al. Metagenomics to paleogenomics: large-scale sequencing of mammoth DNA. Science 311, 392–394 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Harwood, ValerieJ. et al. Microbial source tracking markers for detection of fecal contamination in environmental waters: relationships between pathogens and human health outcomes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 38, 1–40 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Eric Ponciano of the Guatemalan Ministry of Culture and Sports, Juan Carlos Pérez Calderón, Director General of the Institute of Anthropology and History of Guatemala (IDAEH), Mónica Urquizú, Head of the Department of Prehispanic and Colonial Monuments at IDAEH and the administrators of Tikal National Park, i.e., Armando Guillén, Elmer Tun and Fredy Sosa, for their support and guidance during our two field seasons (2009 and 2010) at Tikal. We also thank Jeff Havig, Rachel Wright, Jane Rosenthal, Sherman Bradley and Suman Pradhan for their preliminary chemical and microbiological efforts. Cory Perfetta and Linnea Lentz prepared the figures. This research was supported by grants from the U.S. National Science Foundation (BCS-0810118 and BCS-1642547), the Wenner-Gren Foundation (7799), the Alphawood Foundation and the University of Cincinnati. The views expressed in this article are those of the author[s] and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Any mention of trade names, products, or services does not imply an endorsement by the U.S. Government or the EPA. The EPA does not endorse any commercial products, services, or enterprises.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.L.L., T.L.H., N.P.D., V.L.S., T.P.L., E.J.T. and A.A.W. designed research, performed research, analyzed research and wrote the paper. F.V., L.G., J.B., C.J.P., K.B.T. and A.V. performed and analyzed research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Lentz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lentz, D.L., Hamilton, T.L., Dunning, N.P. et al. Molecular genetic and geochemical assays reveal severe contamination of drinking water reservoirs at the ancient Maya city of Tikal. Sci Rep 10, 10316 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67044-z

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.