Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Invasive paper wasp turns urban pollinator gardens into ecological traps for monarch butterfly larvae



Invasive species can be particularly disruptive when they intersect with organisms of conservation concern. Stabilizing the declining eastern migratory population of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) is projected to require extensive habitat restoration across multiple land use sectors including metropolitan areas. Numerous conservation programs encourage urban citizens to plant gardens with milkweeds, the obligate larval host plants of the monarch. Here, we show that predation by Polistes dominula, an invasive paper wasp that is particularly abundant in urban settings, can turn such sites into ecological traps for monarch larvae. Polistes dominula was the predominant paper wasp seen foraging in central Kentucky pollinator gardens. In 120 observed encounters with monarch larvae on milkweeds in gardens, most second to fourth instars were killed, whereas most fifth instars escaped by thrashing or dropping. The wasps bit and carried off second instars whole, whereas third and fourth instar kills were first gutted, then processed and carried away piecemeal. Predation on sentinel larvae was much higher in urban gardens than in rural settings. The wasps exploited ornamental butterfly “hibernation boxes” in pollinator gardens as nesting habitat. Polistes dominula is an under-recognized predator that may diminish the urban sector’s contributions to monarch habitat restoration.


Invasive species can be particularly disruptive when they intersect with organisms of conservation concern1. Urban ecological restoration can sometimes create ecological traps by attracting native species to colonize patches of semi-natural habitat where they incur inordinately high mortality from exotic natural enemies2,3. For example, songbirds drawn to naturalized suburban habitat for nesting may suffer heavy predation by (non-native) domestic cats4,5. Urbanization itself can magnify such interactions by providing nesting sites or other resources for synanthropic invasive predators6,7,8. As urban citizens increasingly plant gardens to support native pollinators and other biodiversity3,9, it is important those efforts do not inadvertently create ecological traps for species they are intended to benefit.

Populations of the monarch (Danaus plexippus), an iconic migratory North American butterfly, are declining10,11. To help offset this decline, conservationists are encouraging planting milkweeds (Asclepias spp.), the monarch’s obligate larval host plants, across the breeding range12. Despite the public’s enthusiasm for monarch-friendly gardening13,14, and projections that restoring enough milkweed to ensure a stable monarch population will require participation by the urban sector12,15, the conservation value of urban milkweed gardens remains uncertain. Such gardens attract ovipositing adults, often with higher egg-loading per plant than occurs in natural milkweed stands16,17,18,19,20, but they could also be ecological traps if they expose monarchs to increased risk of predation, disease, or abiotic mortality factors.

Polistes dominula, the so-called European paper wasp, was first reported in North America in the 1970s where it has since become widespread21,22. Its strong proclivity to nest in sheltered places associated with buildings and other man-made structures contributes to its invasion success in urban settings23. In addition, its strategy of forming nests with multiple, often unrelated, foundresses results in high nest survival and a competitive edge over sympatric native Polistes species21,22. Paper wasps find arthropod prey by hovering or walking on plants24,25. Prey are killed by biting, masticated to manageable size, flown to the nest either whole or piecemeal, and fed to the wasps’ developing larvae24,25. Although P. dominula are opportunistic, generalist predators, individuals often return to hunt at sites of previous success24. Although the wasps do not actively recruit nest mates, they are attracted to other individuals’ processing of prey25, authors’ observations.

While conducting research in urban pollinator gardens18,19 we observed P. dominula attacking monarch larvae. Paper wasp predation has not previously been studied in the context of butterfly gardens, but given P. dominula’s synathropy22, we hypothesized it may pose particular danger to monarch larvae in urban settings. Here, we show that P. dominula is the predominant paper wasp foraging in urban gardens in central Kentucky, document higher Polistes predation on monarchs in urban gardens compared to more rural settings, and describe the behavior and fate of monarchs attacked by P. dominula in gardens. We also show that so-called butterfly “hibernation boxes”26 may be exploited by P. dominula as nesting habitat. Our findings highlight P. dominula as an under-recognized predator that could potentially diminish the urban sector’s contributions to monarch conservation.


Assessing P. dominula prevalence in urban gardens

Polistes dominula foragers (n = 45) were observed in 10 of the 16 urban pollinator gardens surveyed for paper wasps during July. Two native paper wasp species, Polistes fuscatus (n = 14) and Polistes exclamans (n = 1) were also observed in some gardens, but in fewer numbers overall (F2,15 = 7.98, P = < 0.01; Fig. 1). No wasps were observed in three of the 16 gardens, and in three others only P. fuscatus was seen.

Figure 1

Prevalence of Polistes dominula, P. fuscatus, and P. exclamans foragers based on 60 min observations in each of 16 urban pollinator gardens.

Polistes dominula encounters with monarch larvae in gardens

Polistes dominula attacked second to fifth instar monarch larvae placed on swamp milkweed in urban pollinator gardens (Fig. 2a,b; Table 1). Relative proportions preyed upon or escaping such encounters differed among instars, as did the behavior of wasps and larvae (Table 1). Second to fourth instars were more likely than fifth instars to be killed. Wasps encountering second instars mostly struck, bit, and carried off their prey intact, whereas in nearly all predation on third instars, the wasp first excised the larval gut, which was left on the leaf, and then macerated the remains into a ball and flew off with them. Some second and third instars escaped by dropping, with or without silk, but on one occasion we saw a wasp follow the strand down and carry off the larva. Fourth instars were gutted as above, macerated, and processed into manageable pieces, the wasp often taking multiple trips to carry them back to the nest (Table 1). We observed other wasps trying to steal prey pieces while the original wasp was still processing its kill, or to take pieces left behind. Fourth instars escaping predation either dropped or thrashed in response to the wasp’s attack. Nearly all (28/30) fifth instars escaped, either by violently thrashing or dropping. Both observed fifth instar kills were processed by multiple wasps (Fig. 2b). In >52 h of observation, we saw no predation by natural enemies other than P. dominula.

Figure 2

Polistes dominula predation on monarch larvae: (a) attack on free-feeding 2nd instar, (b) second wasp attracted to another’s kill of free-feeding fifth instar, (c) wasp gutting pinned sentinel third instar, (d) excised gut and head capsule indicative of P. dominula attack on third instar.

Table 1 Outcome of 120 encounters (30 per instar) between Polistes dominula and sentinel monarch butterfly larvae feeding on swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata) plants in urban pollinator gardens.

Predation on monarch larvae in urban and rural settings

Sentinel third and fourth instar monarch larvae on swamp milkweeds placed in 10 urban pollinator gardens sustained significantly more predation than did cohorts on milkweeds placed in rural meadow habitat bordered by woodlots (Fig. 3). In many cases, the larva’s excised digestive tract was left on the plant near the pin that had secured it (Fig. 2c,d), indicative of predation by Polistes. Urban garden sites were close to buildings (mean distance 6.5 ± 1.3 m; range 3–16 m), whereas rural exposure sites were significantly farther away from the nearest building or other structure (257 ± 15 m; range 184–340 m; t18 = 16.8, P < 0.001).

Figure 3

Predation of sentinel third and fourth instar monarch larvae on swamp milkweeds placed in urban pollinator gardens or rural meadow habitat (n = 10 sites of each type). Data are mean (SE) number of larvae (out of 10) per site taken after 8 h of diurnal exposure.

Wasp exploitation of butterfly boxes in pollinator gardens

Sixteen of 22 butterfly “hibernation boxes” (Fig. 4a) in six pollinator conservation gardens on University of Kentucky’s campus contained Polistes wasp nests. Thirteen boxes were occupied by P. dominula, two by P. fuscatus, and one by P. exclamans. We saw no evidence of butterflies using the boxes, although some did contain spiders or mantis oothecae.

Figure 4

(a) Butterfly “hibernation boxes” in urban pollinator gardens; (b) Thirteen of 22 boxes in six urban pollinator gardens contained active P. dominula nests.


Paper wasps are abundant in most temperate ecosystems where they exert strong selective pressure on lepidopteran larvae24. When invasive Polistes spp. are introduced to new areas they compete with native species for niche availability21,22,27 and may elevate predation pressure, putting prey species at risk of population decline28. Since being introduced into the eastern United States in the late 1970s, P. dominula has become widely established in North America29, especially in urbanized settings where the types of sheltered nesting sites it prefers are plentiful21,23. Although Polistes spp. can be efficient biocontrol agents for lepidopteran pests of urban agriculture [e.g.30,31], this study highlights the potential for P. dominula, in particular, to cause substantial mortality of second to fourth instar monarchs in urban butterfly gardens.

Monarchs typically incur high (90–95% or more) mortality from egg to fifth instar32,33,34,35,36. Host plant defenses cause some, especially of early instars37, but invertebrate natural enemies probably account for more34. Monarch larvae are preyed upon by ants, spiders, predatory bugs, mantids, lady beetles, vespid wasps, or other arthropods32,34,38 and parasitized by tachinid flies39. While numerous studies have inferred causes of predation by tracking stage-specific disappearance of monarch eggs and larvae in the field (e.g.32,33,34,35,36], few have observed and quantified predation events directly. In the literature, P. dominula has received scant, mainly anecdotal, mention as predator of monarch larvae in field settings.

Besides killing them outright, encounters with P. dominula might indirectly reduce fitness of monarch larvae by interrupting their feeding, thus reducing rate of growth, or by causing them to drop from the plant where they might be exposed to ground-dwelling predators. Survivors would then need to invest additional time crawling back up to preferred sites that might otherwise be spent feeding. Such indirect effects of harassment by Polistes spp. have been shown to significantly amplify direct impacts of predation in other plant-caterpillar systems40. We did not track fate of monarch larvae that escaped encounters with wasps, but such indirect effects warrant further study.

The one previous published study of P. dominula predation on monarchs deployed active wasp nests transplanted to a greenhouse to test the hypothesis that monarch larvae raised on different Asclepias species present a spectrum of palatability25. In it, captive free-flying wasps took monarch larvae regardless of the cardenolide content of the milkweed species upon which they had been reared, although overall, ones that had fed on milkweeds with relatively low cardenolide content were preferred25. That study also concluded, based on trials in which small, medium-sized, or large larvae were all presented simultaneously, that second through early third instars are largely ignored, whereas we observed P. dominula to quickly find and attack individuals of all sizes in gardens. Notably, larvae reared on A. incarnata, A. syriaca, and A. tuberosa, three species commonly planted in butterfly gardens18,19, all were palatable25.

When processing lepidopteran prey, Polistes spp. may use their mandibles to excise guts that contain plant material from the balled masses of tissue they carry back to their nests24,25. Such behavior may be selective, depending on what plant the prey had fed upon25. We witnessed gutting behavior in >95% of the P. dominula processing of kills of third and fourth instars in gardens. Similarly-excised digestive tracts left on milkweed leaves where sentinel third and fourth instars had been removed strongly implicates paper wasps, especially P. dominula, as the most likely factor accounting for the greater mortality of monarchs in urban gardens compared to rural sites. While it is possible that securing the sentinel larvae to the milkweeds in that trial may have overestimated predation by preventing larval escape (e.g., by dropping from the plant), it is unlikely to have had a major influence because in our direct observations, the majority (73%) of encounters between P. dominula and non-secured monarch larvae of that size resulted in predation. Chinese mantids, Tenodera sinensis, the only other invertebrate predator reported to gut larvae before consuming them41, were not observed feeding on monarchs in our gardens.

Butterfly “hibernation boxes” are typically made of wood with vertical slits intended for entry and bark lining the inside wall. Gardeners may add such structures to pollinator habitat with the intent of providing shelter for butterflies that overwinter as adults, or for ornamental interest26,42. Although there is little or no evidence that butterflies use such boxes, they are promoted in some gardening blogs and extension publications [e.g.43]. As shown herein, however, such boxes are good nesting sites for P. dominula. Their presence in urban butterfly gardens is likely to increase predation of the larvae those gardens are meant benefit. Similar wooden structures such as bird houses may also provide attractive nesting sites for Polistes wasps (authors’ observations).

Although our study was done in one metropolitan area, P. dominula is likely to impact monarchs wherever the two species’ distributions overlap. Indeed, we found online anecdotal accounts of P. dominula preying on monarchs in urban settings throughout the butterfly’s breeding range [e.g.44]. Although our exposing multiple sentinel larvae per plant may have overestimated typical field predation rates by evoking wasps’ functional response45, egg-loading tends to be greater in urban gardens compared to natural stands16,17 so it is common to find multiple larvae on a given milkweed plant18. Our trials were in mid-summer when P. dominula colonies had many workers, so they might have less impact on monarchs early in the growing season. The wasps can be managed by limiting access to preferred nest sites (e.g., repairing holes in walls, soffits and eaves; screening vents and louvers), treating exposed nests with a wasp and hornet spray, or applying insecticidal dust to cavities with nests46. Managing P. dominula may be necessary to prevent urban milkweed gardens from becoming ecological traps.

Conclusion and Implications

Metropolitan areas provide a substantial canvas for monarch habitat restoration26 and their contribution may be essential to meet existing goals to increase milkweed abundance by 1.8 billion stems to support monarch butterflies12. Although numerous programs encourage urban and suburban citizens to plant gardens with milkweeds13,14, the assumption that such efforts will help reverse declining monarch abundance caused by habitat loss is largely untested. Urban gardens, which generally resemble small habitat patches, may be prone to repeated depredation in areas with high densities of P. dominula and other native paper wasps. Indeed, there is evidence that urban gardens may act as ecological traps for certain butterfly species (e.g., the pipevine swallowtail, Battus philenor) by attracting adults away from better quality habitat47.

Several previous authors cautioned that compared to natural habitat, urban milkweed gardens might expose monarchs to increased risk from pesticide exposure, disease, parasitism or predation19,20,48. Studies to date, however, are equivocal, some finding no difference in the overall low survival of monarch eggs and larvae between urban residential or natural sites16,20, and another suggesting higher mortality in gardens48. None of those papers identified particular predators contributing to larval attrition. Our study highlights P. dominula as an under-recognized threat to monarch larvae in urban gardens. The probable impact of this wasp should be considered in estimates of the current and potential contribution of milkweed in urban areas to monarch conservation, and in recommendations about where best to focus future restoration efforts.


Assessing P. dominula prevalence in urban gardens

Sixteen pre-existing urban pollinator gardens at residences, campuses, and businesses within the Lexington, Kentucky city limits were monitored for presence of foraging paper wasps. Observations took place throughout July 2019, on afternoons (1200–1700 h) of clear warm (>25 °C) days. Each garden was visited once by two independent observers who observed different portions of the garden for 30 min, recording numbers of independent wasp visits. Wasps exhibiting predatory searching behavior were counted; those nectaring at flowers were not. Observers stood on the perimeter of the gardens and tracked wasps from the time they entered the garden until they left. Each garden had unique features, but they were of similar size (mean 64.8 m2; range 42.8–80.3 m2), close to buildings, and contained a mixture of milkweeds and other flowering plants.

Polistes dominula encounters with monarch larvae in gardens

We recorded outcomes of 120 encounters (30 each for second to fifth instars) between wild P. dominula foragers and monarch larvae feeding on mature swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata) in urban gardens. The milkweeds were grown from 2-yr old rootstock in a soil/bark mix in 5.7 liter pots and about 90 cm tall when used. Observations took place from 7–31 July at three pre-existing urban pollinator gardens, two of them (>300 m apart) on the University of Kentucky Lexington campus and the third at a residence about 3 km away. All gardens contained a similar mix of flowering nectar and butterfly host-plants; e.g., milkweeds (Asclepias spp.), spicebush (Lindera benzoin), asters (Aster spp.), cone flowers (Echinacea spp.) and others. Before each observation period, 10 monarch larvae (generally a mix of two successive instars, as available) were placed on separate leaves of an undamaged swamp milkweed, distributed throughout the plant, and allowed to establish for about 1 h. The plant was then placed in a garden and watched continuously for 90 min. All observations were on clear warm (>25 °C) sunny days between 1100–1700 h. Monarch larvae taken during a given observation period were not replaced. Fresh plants and larvae were used for each observation period.

Predation on monarch larvae in urban and rural settings

Cohorts of ten monarch larvae (five each of third and fourth instars) were placed on each of twenty mature swamp milkweeds as above, and secured in place by inserting a fine (#00 insect pin) through the anal prolegs and leaf into a bit of cork on the opposite side which allowed them to feed but prevented their escape or loss from causes other than predation. On each plant, five larvae were pinned to the abaxial side of leaves and the remainder to adaxial surfaces. As a check for possible escapes, 30 larvae were similarly affixed to plants in the greenhouse, where 100% were still in place after 8 h.

On 4–5 August 2019, the aforementioned plants with sentinel larvae were placed in 10 urban gardens, and at 10 rural sites, left in the field for 8 h (1100–1900 h), and then inspected for signs of predation. Rural sites (mostly in nature parks and farm edges) were open meadow with pasture grasses and wild flowering plants, including milkweed, bordered by woodlots, whereas garden sites were all within the Lexington city limits. We used satellite images and the Measure Tool feature of Google Earth Pro geospatial software (Microsoft, Palo Alto CA) to measure distance from where each plant with larvae was placed to the nearest structure.

Wasp exploitation of butterfly boxes in pollinator gardens

We observed P. dominula entering and exiting butterfly “hibernation boxes” that a student organization had placed in six, widely-spaced pollinator gardens on the University of Kentucky Campus (Fig. 4). To verify extent of colonization by paper wasps, we opened the 22 boxes in October 2019 to verify if they had been occupied, and by what species. Failed nests (<10 cells) were not counted. Wasps were still present on nests during the survey.

Statistical analyses

Numbers of foragers of different Polistes spp. observed in urban gardens, relative proportions of monarch instars killed during or escaping encounters with P. dominula, and predation on sentinel larvae in urban gardens versus rural settings were compared by one-way analysis of variance, χ2 test for independence, and two-sample t-tests, respectively, using Statistix 10 (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL).

Data availability

All data are presented as totals or means ± SE in the main text. Raw data are available from the authors upon request.


  1. 1.

    Dueñas, M. A. et al. The role played by invasive species in interactions with endangered and threatened species in the United States: a systematic review. Biodivers. Conserv. 27, 3171–3183 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Robertson, B. A., Rehage, J. S. & Sih, A. Ecological novelty and the emergence of evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 552–560 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lepczyk, C. A. et al. Biodiversity in the city: Fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. BioScience 67, 799–807 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Loss, S. R., Will, T. & Marr, P. P. The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nat. Commun. 4(1), 2041–1723 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shipley, A. A., Murphy, M. T. & Elzinga, A. H. Residential edges as ecological traps: Postfledging survival of a ground-nesting passerine in a forested urban park. The Auk 130, 501–511 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Schlaepfer, M. A., Sherman, P. W., Blossey, B. & Runge, M. C. Introduced species as evolutionary traps. Ecol. Lett. 8, 241–246 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shochat, E. et al. Invasion, competition, and biodiversity loss in urban ecosystems. BioScience 60, 199–208 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fletcher, R. J., Orrock, J. L. & Robertson, B. A. How the type of anthropogenic change alters consequences of ecological traps. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 279, 2546–2552 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Goddard, M. A., Dougill, A. J. & Benton, T. G. Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 90–98 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Brower, L. P. et al. Decline of monarch butterflies overwintering in Mexico: Is the migratory phenomenon at risk? Insect Conserv. Diver. 5, 95–100 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vidal, O. & Rendón-Salinas, E. Dynamics and trends of overwintering colonies of the monarch butterfly in Mexico. Biol. Conserv. 180, 165–175 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Thogmartin, W. E. et al. Restoring monarch butterfly habitat in the Midwestern US: ‘all hands on deck’. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 074005 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Monarch Watch. Monarch Waystation program, (2020).

  14. 14.

    Monarch Joint Venture. Create habitat for monarchs, (2020).

  15. 15.

    Johnston, M. K. et al. Estimating milkweed abundance in metropolitan areas under existing and user-defined scenarios. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 210 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cutting, B. T. & Tallamy, D. W. An evaluation of butterfly gardens for restoring habitat for the monarch butterfly (Lepidoptera: Danaidae). Environ. Entomol. 44, 1328–1335 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Stenoien, C., Nail, K. R. & Oberhauser, K. S. Habitat productivity and temporal patterns of monarch butterfly egg densities in the eastern United States. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 108, 670–679 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Baker, A. M. & Potter, D. A. Colonization and usage of eight milkweed (Asclepias) species by monarch butterflies and bees in urban garden settings. J. Insect Conserv. 22, 405–418 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Baker, A. M. & Potter, D. A. Configuration and location of small urban gardens affect colonization by monarch butterflies. Front Ecol. Evol. 7, 474 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Geest, E. A., Wolfenbarger, L. L. & McCarty, J. R. Recruitment, survival, and parasitism of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in milkweed gardens and conservation areas. J. Insect Conserv. 23, 211–224 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cervo, R., Zacchi, F. & Turillazzi, S. Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) invading North America: some hypotheses for its rapid spread. Insectes Soc. 47, 155–157 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liebert, A. E. et al. Genetics, behavior and ecology of a paper wasp invasion: Polistes dominulus in North America. Ann. Zool. Fenneci 43, 595–624 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Höcherl, N. & Tautz, J. Nesting behavior of paper wasp Polistes dominula in Central Europe – a flexible system for expanding into new areas. Ecosphere 6(12), 262 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Raveret Ritcher, M. Social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) foraging behavior. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45, 121–150 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rayor, L. S. Effects of monarch larval host plant chemistry and body size on Polistes wasp predation in The monarch butterfly: Biology and conservation (eds. Oberhauser, K., & Solensky, M.) 39–46 (Cornell University Press, 2004).

  26. 26.

    Johnson, T. W. Out my back door: Do butterfly boxes work? Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources, (2019).

  27. 27.

    Gamboa, G. J. et al. The comparative biology of two sympatric paper wasps in Michigan, the native Polistes fuscatus and the invasive Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insect. Soc. 51, 153–157 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Clapperton, B. K. Abundance of wasps and prey consumption of paper wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae: Polistinae) in Northland, New Zealand. N.Z. J. Ecol. 23, 11–19 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    CABI Invasive Species Compendium. Polistes dominula (European paper wasp), (2019).

  30. 30.

    Gould, W. P. & Jeanne, R. L. Polistes wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) as control agents for lepidopterous cabbage pests. Environ. Entomol. 13, 150–156 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Prezoto, F., Maciel, T. T., Detoni, M., Mayorquin, A. Z. & Barbosa, B. C. Pest control potential of social wasps in small farms and urban gardens. Insects 10, 192 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zalucki, M. P. & Kitching, R. L. Temporal and spatial variation of mortality in field populations of Danaus plexippus L. and D. chrysippus L. larvae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Oecologia 53, 201–207 (1982).

  33. 33.

    Prysby, M. D. Natural enemies and survival of monarch eggs and larvae in The monarch butterfly: Biology and conservation (eds. Oberhauser, K. & Solensky, M.) 27–37 (Cornell University Press, 2004).

  34. 34.

    Oberhauser, K. S. et al. Lacewings, wasps, and flies – Oh my in Monarchs in a changing world: Biology and conservation of an iconic butterfly (eds. Oberhauser, K. S., Nail, K. R. & Alitzer, S.) 71–82 (Cornell University Press, 2015).

  35. 35.

    De Anda, A. & Oberhauser, K. S. Invertebrate natural enemies and stage-specific natural mortality rates of monarch eggs and larvae in Monarchs in a changing world: Biology and conservation of an iconic butterfly (eds. Oberhauser, K. S., Nail, K. R. & Alitzer, S.) 60–70 (Cornell University Press, 2015).

  36. 36.

    Nail, K. R., Stenoien, C. & Oberhauser, K. S. Immature monarch survival: effects of site characteristics, density, and time. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 108, 680–690 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zalucki, M. P. & Malcolm, S. B. Plant latex and first-instar monarch larval growth and survival on three North American milkweed species. J. Chem. Ecol. 25, 1827–1842 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hermann, S. L., Blackledge, C., Haan, N. L., Myers, A. T. & Landis, D. A. Predators of monarch butterfly eggs and neonate larvae are more diverse than previously recognized. Sci. Rep. 9, 14304 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Oberhauser, K. et al. Tachinid fly (Diptera: Tachinidae) parasitoids of Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 110, 536–543 (2017).

  40. 40.

    Stamp, N. E. & Bowers, M. D. Indirect effect on survivorship of caterpillars due to presence of invertebrate predators. Oecologia 88, 325–330 (1991).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rafter, J. L., Agrawal, A. A. & Preisser, E. L. Chinese mantids gut toxic monarch caterpillars: avoidance of prey defense? Ecol. Entomol. 38, 76–78 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Snetsinger, R. J. Who lives in a butterfly hibernation house? Penn. State Extension. (1997).

  43. 43.

    Purdue University Extension. 2019. Butterfly house, (2019).

  44. 44.

    Lewis, D. European paper wasps are widespread, (2016).

  45. 45.

    Schenk, D. & Bacher, S. Functional response of a generalist insect predator to one of its prey species in the field. J. Insect Ecol. 71, 524–531 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Jacobs, S. European paper wasp, (2015).

  47. 47.

    Levy, J. M. & Connor, E. F. Are gardens effective in butterfly conservation? A case study with the pipevine swallowtail, Battus philenor. J. Insect Conserv. 8, 323–330 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Majewska, A. A., Sims, S., Wenger, S. J., Davis, A. K. & Altizer, S. Do characteristics of pollinator-friendly gardens predict the diversity, abundance, and reproduction of butterflies? Insect Conserv. Divers. 11, 370–382 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank H. Cybriwsky and C.T. Redmond for help with field work, T.J. Neary for advice on working with P. dominula, C. Agouridis, S. Dutton, and P. Moore for access to garden sites, and C.T. Redmond for helpful comments on the manuscript. Funding sources: USDA-NIFA-SCRI grant 2016-51181-235399 in collaboration with the IR-4 Project (USDA-NIFA grant 2015-34383-23710), BASF Corporation Living Acres Program, Horticultural Research Institute, and University of Kentucky Nursery Research Endowment Fund.

Author information




A.B. and D.P. conceived the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. A.B. led the field work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel A. Potter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baker, A.M., Potter, D.A. Invasive paper wasp turns urban pollinator gardens into ecological traps for monarch butterfly larvae. Sci Rep 10, 9553 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing