Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Drum training induces  long-term plasticity in the cerebellum and connected cortical thickness

Abstract

It is unclear to what extent cerebellar networks show long-term plasticity and accompanied changes in cortical structures. Using drumming as a demanding multimodal motor training, we compared cerebellar lobular volume and white matter microstructure, as well as cortical thickness of 15 healthy non-musicians before and after learning to drum, and 16 age matched novice control participants. After 8 weeks of group drumming instruction, 3 ×30 minutes per week, we observed the cerebellum significantly changing its grey (volume increase of left VIIIa, relative decrease of VIIIb and vermis Crus I volume) and white matter microstructure in the inferior cerebellar peduncle. These plastic cerebellar changes were complemented by changes in cortical thickness (increase in left paracentral, right precuneus and right but not left superior frontal thickness), suggesting an interplay of cerebellar learning with cortical structures enabled through cerebellar pathways.

Introduction

Early lesion studies by Rolando and Flourens1 in the eighteenth century revealed the importance of the cerebellum in motor action and movement coordination, leading Flourens to suggest the cerebellum as a seat for motor learning. Since then, several studies have shown that intense and prolonged motor activity induces significant changes in cerebellar structures. Specifically, motor training in rodent models increases cerebellar glial volume per purkinje cell2, volume of the molecular layer3, number of synapses3 and dendrites of stellate cells4. In humans, cerebellar networks show long-term plasticity even into adulthood5, indicating experience-dependent adaptive and learning processes to be a salient feature of cerebellar function6.

In order for the cerebellum to use plastic processes for skill development, studies suggest that the cerebellum integrates multisensory information in the somatosensory posterior cerebellar lobe to calculate a ‘state estimate’ in order to accurately plan and optimise actions5,7, which can be divided into its involvement in sensorimotor and cognitive control functions. This is reached through its broadly distributed system of cortical connections enabled by its three white matter pathways, the cerebellar peduncles8. Changes in white matter microstructure in these pathways are indeed often paralleled by alterations in grey matter volume9,10. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides measures to study such changes in white matter pathway microstructure (for specifics11) and long-term motor training has been shown to increase white matter fractional anisotropy (FA) of the inferior cerebellar peduncles (ICP12). Furthermore, motor training has been shown to increase posterior cerebellar volume and plastic changes in connected cortical regions such as parietal and frontal regions in humans8 and animals13. Monkey rabies tracer studies revealed that the motor cortex and prefrontal cortex are not only cerebellar output targets. In fact, regions of the cerebellar cortex receiving input from these neocortical areas are the same as those projecting to it and involve different cerebellar regions, with the anterior cerebellum being connected to motor cortices and posterior lateral cerebellar regions to the frontal neocortex14. Human functional connectivity resting state analyses support the existence of different, topographically organised loops with sensorimotor or association cortices15,16,17. Specifically, lobule VII has been shown to be functionally connected with frontal and parietal cortices, which are not directly involved in sensorimotor processing17, whereas the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has displayed functional connectivity with lobule VII including Crus I/II, the medial prefrontal cortex with Crus I, and the anterior prefrontal cortex with lobules VI and Crus I/II16. These closed-loop circuits represent a fundamental architectural feature of cerebro-cerebellar interactions, which have led many to speculate on whether these neuroanatomic connections in turn impact cerebellar functioning and connectivity. Cerebellar inhibition, by using transcranial brain stimulation, has been shown to abolish plasticity in motor and frontal cortices8, enabling its contribution to a broad range of functions from sensorimotor action to higher cognitive function18. In order to take this array of cerebellar functions into account, we have used drumming as a coordinated exercise combining musicality, cardiovascular exercise, bilateral arm and leg movements, plus sensory motor integration processes19. Moreover, drumming is a unique activity that challenges the brain to synchronize multiple limbs within the constraints of timing, tempo, precision and volume. Here, we chose to use a variety of multimodal MRI measures and analyses: from structural cerebellar segmentation, DTI to cortical thickness.

Using this holistic approach, we expected that drum training would affect cerebellar volume and cortical thickness of both sensorimotor and cognitive control systems in order to meet the high rhythm perception and motor coordination demands to play in time with the music. Due to previous cerebellar findings of decreased functional connectivity in the same group20, we specifically expected a decrease in Crus I volume. Finally, we expected that these longer-term plastic changes alter white matter peduncle microstructure as well, as they are the only connection between cerebellar and neocortical structures.

Materials and Methods

Participants

Thirty-one right-handed healthy volunteers (16–19 years) with no prior drumming experience and no psychiatric or neurological disorders participated in the study. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects or, if subjects were under 18, consent was obtained from a parent and/or legal guardian. All participants were recruited from the same geographical area and engaged in full time education. To further control for outside influences, we excluded participants engaged in music and dance performance, and asked all participants to continue with their outside school activities as usual. The participants were assigned to one of two groups: the drum group and the control group (Table 1). In order to keep experiences outside the study similar, our volunteers were fellow students matched on age, biological sex and attendance at same education establishment. The King’s College London Research Ethics Committee approved the experimental protocol. All study related procedures were carried out in accordance with the research ethics guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Table 1 Participant demographics displaying participant number, gender and age distribution for both groups (mean and standard deviation; SD).

Assessment

All participants attended two scanning sessions at the Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN) at King’s College London. At the first scanning session (T1) the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory Short Form1 was used to assess participant hand dominance. To assess the baseline drumming ability and musical experience, a self-report measure was created. Participants were asked to report their level of skill and length of involvement in playing of another musical instrument and (ii) involvement in dance or singing in order to provide a measure of general musical experience to control for skill novelty. Responses were coded on an ordinal scale (0, no experience; 1, some experience but no formal instruction; 2, limited formal instruction but not recent; 3, formal instruction of less than 4 years but not current; 4, formal instruction, exams achieved, greater than 5 years involvement and current).

Drumming measures

Following the first drumming assessment and scanning session the drum group took part in three 30-minute low intensity group drumming sessions per week for 8 weeks. Each session was delivered by the same professional drum tutor and comprised of 4 integrated parts: (i) a warm up, focused on playing the drums with a relaxed and consistent motion of the drum sticks; (ii) snare drum ‘rudimental’ exercises, played on a single drum surface, adopting a ‘flow sticking’ approach to sequences of left and right hands21; (iii) coordinated ‘groove’ patterns, incorporating the interplay of bass drum (right foot) and the hi-hat pedal (left foot) with rock/pop back beat ostinato patterns played on the hi-hat or ride cymbal and snare drum; including eighth note (quaver), quarter note (crotchet), sixteenth note (semiquaver), syncopated quarter note and shuffle continuously repeated rhythm; and (iv) performance of learned ‘grooves’ and ‘fill-ins’ to accompany well-known popular music songs. The complexity of drumming tuition was increased on a weekly basis in line with participant’s demonstration of improved drumming coordination and technique. The control participants were asked to not take part in any musical activities for the duration of the study. After the 8 weeks (T2) participants came back to the IoPPN for a second drumming assessment and scanning session.

All of the drumming was performed on electronic drum sets for both drumming training (HD3, Roland, Nakagawa, Japan) and assessment (TD9, Roland, Nakagawa Japan)21. Drumming proficiency was assessed following a 5 minute instruction period by the participants’ ability to play a simple 4 quarter note pattern to the song “Green Onions” (Booker T and the MGs, Stax/Atlantic, 1962) and a simple 8 eighth note pattern, consisting of regular eighth note hi-hats with alternating kick and snare on the main beats of the bar, to the song “Billy Jean” (Michael Jackson, EPIC, 1982). Versions without tempo fluctuations were used, created using the software “Live” (V9.1, Ableton, Berlin), creating a precise sample for each beat location, accurately placed on the transient of each audible click20 (see supplementary material for more details). Timing data were exported from the drum set using the musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) signal. A comparison with a piezo microphone placed on the snare indicated that the recorded MIDI events were a maximum of 4 ms from the detected onset using audio-based methods, and generally much closer. Drumming ability was assessed objectively as the percentage of bars of both patterns that were completed during two 2-min periods of data capture (1–3 min of each song). To record a completed bar all elements had to be present in each pattern and within half a beat (250 ms for 4 quarter note pattern and 125 ms for an 8 eighth note pattern) of the perfect timing. To evaluate the error in events that should have been synchronous (flamming), a flam error per bar was measured (in milliseconds). The time between the two events was measured for each note of the bar. When 3 limbs were involved, the difference between the first and last event was measured. This was only evaluated in completed bars to avoid exaggeration of this error when the pattern was breaking down or incomplete. While a drum flam can be a sought-after stylistic feature of a pattern, flams were not part of the stylistically correct performance for the two chosen patterns.

For both patterns each limb played a single part of the kit. To perform Green Onions the right hand played ride cymbal, left hand snare drum, right foot kick drum and left foot high-hat pedal. A bar was made up of right hand and right foot striking together followed by right hand, left hand and left foot striking together (repeated to make the four notes of the bar). The Hi-hat, Ride and Snare (HRS) condition required the participants to use their left foot, right hand and left hand. The flam error for this condition was calculated as the time difference (ms) between the first and last action at each point in the bar. The flam error (ms) from the second and fourth beats of the bar was used as a measure of coordination since this involved the coordination of both hands with the left foot. Changes in bars completed across both the more complex eighth note pattern (Billy Jean) and the less complex quarter note pattern (Green Onions) was used to assess whether the participants had learned to drum (% bars completed), whereas the HRS measure determined how precise their drumming was. No practice of either song used in the assessment was included in the 8 weeks drumming training.

MRI acquisition

All participants were scanned at the Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK, using a 3-T GE MR750 Dicovery System (General-Electric, Milwaukee, WI). High-resolution structural T1-weighted volumetric images were acquired with full-head coverage, 196 contiguous slices (1.2 mm slice thickness), a 256×256 matrix, and a repetition time/echo time (TR/TE) of 7.3/3 ms (FA = 11°, FOV = 270 mm²). Diffusion Tensor Imaging data was acquired using a spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) sequence providing whole head coverage with the following parameters: TE = 78.5 ms, TR equivalent to 12 RR interval, FOV = 256×256, matrix size of 128×128, 72 slices with a thickness of 2 mm (no gap) making an isotropic voxel of 2.0×2.0×2.0 mm. Diffusion weighting was applied along 60 uniformly distributed directions and with a b-value of 1500 s/mm2. Six non-diffusion weighted volumes were also acquired. The acquisition was gated to the cardiac cycle using a peripheral gating device placed on the participants’ forefinger and with a total scan time of approximately 14 minutes. Consistent image quality was ensured by visually inspecting all datasets.

Cerebellar Segmentation

Prior to analysis, each T1 MP-RAGE was visually inspected to ensure inclusion of only minimal movement artefacts. No scans were discarded. Regional volume of the cerebellum was calculated using the SUIT toolbox (http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/motorcontrol/imaging/suit.htm) of the SPM12 software (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/)21. This toolbox provides a high-resolution atlas template of the human cerebellum and brainstem that preserves the anatomical detail of cerebellar structures, as well as dedicated procedures to automatically isolate cerebellar structures from the cerebral cortex and to accurately normalise cerebellar structures to this template. Prior to normalisation, the individually created isolation maps were loaded into FSLView (www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) where they were visually inspected against the cropped image and hand corrected if necessary. Using the inverse of the resulting normalisation transform, a parcellation of the cerebellum was obtained, based on the probabilistic magnetic resonance atlas of the human cerebellum22 provided within the SUIT toolbox. Volumes of interest were then overlaid onto each individual participant’s structural scan and inspected to ensure accurate registration. Parallel to whole brain analyses23, how each lobular volume relates to the rest of the cerebellum throughout development may be conceptualised as each volume’s proportion of the total cerebellar volume (TCV). TCV was calculated as the sum of all cerebellar lobules (I-IV, V, VI, Crus I, Crus II, VIIb, VIIIa, VIIIb, IX, X) and regressed out of all lobular volumes. All used cerebellar volumes from hereon were TCV corrected.

Cortical Thickness Analysis

The FreeSurfer analysis suite version 5.3.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) was used to derive models of the cortical surface in each T1-weighted image. These well-validated and fully automated procedures have been extensively described elsewhere24,25,26,27,28,29. In brief, a single filled white matter volume was generated for each hemisphere after intensity normalisation, skull stripping, and image segmentation using a connected components algorithm24. Then, measures of cortical thickness were computed as the closest distance from the grey and white matter boundary to the grey matter and cerebrospinal fluid boundary at each vertex on the tessellated surface. The results were inspected and checked for quality following the ENIGMA protocol (www.enigma.ini.usc.edu).

Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Diffusion data was pre-processed for motion and geometrical distortion correction using ExploreDTI30. For each participant the b-matrix was then reoriented to provide a more accurate estimate of diffusion tensor orientations31. Diffusion tensor estimation was performed using a non-linear least square fitting method32. FA and Mean Diffusivity (MD) maps were generated. Whole brain tractography was performed using all brain voxels with FA ≤ 0.2 as seed region. Streamlines were propagated using an Euler integration33 tractography algorithm with a step size of 0.5 mm and with an angular and anisotropy threshold of 45 degrees and FA ≤ 0.2 respectively. Finally, diffusion tensor maps and whole brain tractography were exported to TrackVis version 0.5.2.234 for manual dissection and quantification fibre tracts of the cerebellar tracts.

Cerebellar Tract Dissections

To define the cerebellar peduncles, a manual two regions-of-interest (ROI) selection method was used35,36. First, inclusion and exclusion ROIs were defined on FA maps to define the three cerebellar tracts: the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP), as well as the left and right ICP and superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP). To extract clean diffusion measurements avoiding crossing and complex white matter regions, each cerebellar peduncle was cut so that only the tract segment between the two ROI was used for quantification. Inclusion ROIs for the ICP were drawn at the medulla oblongata until the level of the dentate; for the MCP a single tract was dissected by selecting the pontine nucleus and before entering the two cerebellar hemispheres; from above the dentate nucleus to the entrance of the tegmentum in the mesencephalon as landmarks for the SCP. Remaining spurious streamlines were removed.

All ROIs were drawn manually on anatomically defined areas on the mean diffusion map for each subject. Manual labelling of ROIs has been the traditional method of analysis for functional and diffusion MRI1. This method has been the default first step for many developmental studies despite potentially large inter-rater variability due to a bias in ROI selection. Given the variability of size and shape of the deep brain areas defining the cerebellar peduncles (i.e. entrance of the tegmentum in the mesencephalon as landmarks for the SCP), manual labelling is advantageous in that it allows placement of regions specific to each individual. In addition, labelling was performed in native space so it requires minimal processing of the original data.

Statistical analysis

Analyses were performed using SPSS (Version 22, IBM, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. As drumming performance data were not normally distributed, Mann-Whitney U tests, were used to determine any baseline differences. Baseline differences for sex were analysed using the chi-squared test. Drumming improvements were assessed by performing a Mann-Whitney U test on the delta score (post-pre) for % bars completed and HRS error.

As gender may be a factor modulating musical training37 and possibly cerebellar volume38, all analyses included gender as a covariate. A two-tailed Spearman’s Rho correlation analysis between left VIIIa, VIIIb and vermis Crus I volume and the increase in HRS precision following 8 weeks of drum training (T2) as well as individual ANCOVAs run on cerebellar volumes between groups with gender as a covariate were performed. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Changes in drumming performance

Based on a self-report measure, the drum group and the control group presented with no prior drumming experience (all scores ≤2). Moreover, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of self-reported proficiency in other musical modalities (p = 0.530) or dancing and singing (p = 0.310) and both groups were matched for gender (p = 0.724) and age (p = 0.105). The drum group improved drumming performance more than controls, (median (1QR) bars completed (47 (34) vs. 13 (23)%, p = 0.002). There was no difference between the group for bars completed at baseline (p = 0.098). (A before/after video is available for illustration (see https://vimeo.com/141911618).

In assessing the HRS (flam) error, the drum group showed a trend to increased precision (median delta change 18%), whilst the control group showed a decreased precision (−12%). However, since this measure was highly variable in novice drummers this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.202). There was no difference in HRS error between the groups at baseline (p = 0.983).

Changes in regional cerebellar volume

In the drum group, vermis Crus I decreased significantly (corrected model: F(2,59)=4.103, p = 0.039; group: F(1,59)=9.250, p = 0.012) and lobule VIIIb (left VIIIb: F(2,59)=6.368, p = 0.009; right VIIIb: F(2,59)=5.199, p = 0.012), whereas the left VIIIa (corrected model: F(2,59)=5.980, p = 0.012) increased in volume (Table 2 and Figs. 1, 2). The increase and decrease pattern of the drum group contrasted with the control group can be seen in Table 2, Fig. 1 with scatterplots of differences for each group after drum training in Fig. S1.

Table 2 Changes in cerebellar lobular volume (mL) and diffusion measures as well as cortical thickness (mm) after 8 weeks of drum intervention (drum group) and with no intervention (control group), Lobular cerebellar volume of vermis Crus I, left VIIIa, left and right VIIIb were corrected for total cerebellar volume and all analyses included gender and age as covariates.
Figure 1
figure1

Changes in cerebellar lobule volume and cortical thickness before vs after drum training. Decreasing cerebellar lobules (vermis Crus I, VIIIb) and areas of cortical thickness (left superior frontal cortex, lSFG) in red. Increasing cerebellar lobules (left VIIIa) and areas of cortical thickness (left paracentral lobule, lPCL; right precuneus, rPCun; and right superior frontal gyrus, rSFG) in green. Percentage of bars completed with standard error bars before and after 8 weeks of drum intervention (drum group) and with no intervention (control group) on the right side.

Figure 2
figure2

Changes in cerebellar volume increase after drumming. On the left, the increased cerebellar volume is shown in green (left VIIIa), and decreased volume in red (vermis Crus I, left and right VIIIb). On the right, the percentage increase of the vermis Crus I, left VIIIa and VIIIb corrected for total cerebellar volume with standard error bars for the drum and control group are shown (vermis Crus I: drum = −7.4%, control=9.5%; left VIIIa: drum = 0.65%, control = −0.42%; averaged VIIIb: drum = −0.42%, control = −0.03%).

HRS precision following 8 weeks of drum training (T2) was positively correlated with left VIIIa volume (τ = 0.390, p = 0.042) after training in the drum group. No significant correlation was evident before drum training (T1) (see Fig. 3).

Figure 3
figure3

Distribution of drum precision improvement as measured by the High-hat, Ride and Snare (HRS) condition for the drum (blue) and control (green) group on the left and its correlation with left VIIIa volume on the right for each group at the second scanning time point. Confidence intervals are displayed shadowed, individual values as scatterplots (dots) and regression correlation as a continuous line with kernel density fits for each variable on the top and right side.

Changes in cortical thickness

ANCOVAs were calculated for cortical thickness measures between groups with gender as a covariate revealed a significant volume increase of the left paracentral lobule (lPCL F(2,59)=5.103, p = 0.026), the right precuneus (rPCun; F(2,59)=4.264, p = 0.050), and the right superior frontal gyrus (RSFG; F(2,59)=3.561, p = 0.042), but a decrease of the left superior frontal gyrus (LSFG; F(2,59)=3.385, p = 0.049) in the drum group (Table 2, scatterplots of differences for each group after drum training in Fig. S2).

Changes in white matter microstructure

Individual ANCOVAs were determined for FA and MD in the middle of both hemispheres of the ICP and SCP between groups with gender as a covariate. While FA significantly increased in the right ICP (F(2,59)=4.466, p = 0.032) accompanied by decrease in MD (F(2,59)=4.539, p = 0.030), the left ICP significantly decreased in FA (F(2,59)=5.583, p = 0.012; Table 2, scatterplots of differences for each group after drum training in Fig. S3). Other cerebellar tracts did not show significant differences.

Discussion

In this longitudinal neuroimaging study, we demonstrate that drum training leads to changes in sensorimotor systems and regions enabling higher cognitive control. Specifically, we show cerebellar volume increases in left VIIIa volume combined with decreases in lobule VIIIb and vermis Crus I. These changes were paralleled with white matter microstructure alterations in the inferior cerebellar peduncle and complemented by increases in prefrontal cortical thickness, suggesting an interplay of cerebellar learning with cortical structures enabled through cerebellar pathways.

Changes in Sensorimotor Systems

Both clinical observations, cerebellar neuroanatomic connections39 and an activation likelihood estimation model40 have revealed a dual system of cerebello-cortico interaction and function. This system consists of the ‘sensorimotor cerebellum’ (anterior lobe, lobules VI and VIII) relating to cortical sensorimotor systems and functions, and the ‘cognitive control cerebellum’ (vermis of VI and VII, the hemispheres of lobule VI, Crus I/II and VIIb) connected to prefrontal regions and brain areas involved in higher cognitive functions.

In our plasticity study20, we documented changes in several cerebello-cortico sensorimotor regions, including cerebellar lobule VIII, as well as the precentral and paracentral cerebral cortex. A recent meta-analysis of cerebellar functional connectivity clustering cerebellar lobules by behaviour revealed that lobule VIIIa together with VIIb comprise a cluster specialised in action and motor execution41. Clinical and behaviour studies have shown that this cluster is further associated with motor processes requiring perceptive feedback and strong attentional control42.

Drumming requires both of these functions to help drummers use their arms and legs independently or simultaneously while keeping time with the music, just as in our HRS measure. Here, participants were required to use their left foot, as well as right and left hand to produce a continuous rhythmic pattern. The increase in left VIIIa volume and its positive correlation with error reduction in the HRS measure supports the notion that our training has led to these plastic changes (Fig. 3).

In addition to this volume increase in the cerebellar sensorimotor system, cortical thickness increased in two sensorimotor regions of the neocortex: the precuneus (PCun) and the paracentral lobule (PCL). The precuneus is specialised in translating visuospatial and temporal information into motor coordinates, especially that of sequential movements with reference to memorised patterns43. It is further activated during music processing44 and can access multiple cerebellar circuits43. Functional and structural network studies have described the precuneus as a network hub between parietal and prefrontal regions45. Being part of both the prefrontal and parietal cortex, the paracentral lobule innervates motor and sensory modules of the contralateral extremities and its anterior portion is connected to the cerebellum46. Cortical thickness has been described as a sensitive measure for plastic changes in the brain47 and the action and motor execution cluster including the VIIIa has been previously shown to be co-activated with the precuneus41.

Changes in Cognitive Control Systems

In addition to sensorimotor systems, we also documented changes in cerebello-cortico cognitive control systems, specifically reduced cerebellar vermis Crus I volume and prefrontal thickness in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG). The SFG is important for working memory and executive processing48 and it has been suggested that in musicians, deconstructing and organising a rhythm’s temporal structure relates to greater involvement of the prefrontal cortex mediating working memory49. Indeed, when participants are required to attend to a motor sequence that they can otherwise perform automatically, an increase in prefrontal cortex activity is observed50. Furthermore, lateral posterior regions such as the Crus I have been associated with prefrontal cortical networks51, which might suggest a possible connection between the volume decrease of lobule Crus I and LSFG thickness. Paralleling our previous finding of decreased Crus I/ II functional connectivity in the same group20, we detected a volume reduction of the vermis Crus I. The cerebellar vermis has been shown to be involved in the production of timed motor responses, and is particularly active when the response is novel52 but reduces its activation when a skill has been learned53. Furthermore, we suggest that the changes in cortical thickness that we observed cannot be attributed to ongoing neurodevelopmental processes, as pruning reaches its peak in cortical thickness at age twelve in the parietal and prefrontal lobe54. Thus, we propose that the improved performance after drum training indicates that a new skill has been learned, with the complex task of drumming creating a need for changes in both sensorimotor and cognitive control systems, as our vast cerebello-cortico volume and thickness changes indicate.

Microstructural white matter changes in the inferior cerebellar peduncle

To further investigate the linkage between the here documented cerebellar and cortical differences after drum learning, we used diffusion tensor imaging to probe changes in microstructure of the white matter pathways linking the cerebellum to the neocortex. One major white matter pathway highly implicated in plastic changes after skill learning is the inferior cerebellar peduncle12.

While the superior cerebellar peduncle represents the main efferent cerebellar output, the middle cerebellar peduncle carries incoming fibres that arise from the pontine nucleus to the opposite hemisphere of the cerebellar cortex, thus enabling communication between both hemispheres55. However, the inferior cerebellar peduncle contains mainly afferent pathways carrying sensory information about the body parts to the cerebellum via fibres from the spinocerebellar tract21. This enables it to mediate and store a spectrum of motor behaviour56, all functions highly necessary for successful drumming. While we documented differences in the main afferent cerebellar pathway, we were unable to show significant differences in white matter microstructure of the superior cerebellar peduncle, its main efferent pathway. Predominant projections to the cerebellum arise from the motor cortex in addition to numerous polysynaptic climbing fibre projections originating from sensory, motor and association areas of the cerebral cortex and are directed to the paravermal and hemispheral cerebellum (see57 for review). Thus, our results could indicate that instead of motor cortical-cerebellar modulation, cerebellar multimodal sensory, motor and association projections increasingly influence motor behaviour after being able to drum. As the task has been learned and automatized, it has become implicit, no longer needing explicit neocortical input.

Previous reports have indicated a strong link between changes in structure and diffusion properties, and several studies investigating training effects and brain plasticity have reported increased grey matter volume paired with increased white matter FA10 and/or with decreased MD9. Interestingly, we were also able to detect such an increase in both FA along with a decrease of MD in the right ICP. These changes in diffusion were accompanied by an increase of left VIIIa volume and a decrease in VIIIb and vermis Crus I volume after training. Interestingly, both the VIIIb and the reticulo-cerebellar tract have been implicated in memory storage related to motor control58 and FA and VIIIb volume showed a similar increase-decrease pattern for both hemispheres after drum training (Table 2). However the exact tissue properties of these white matter microstructure changes cannot be determined, as increases in FA can be attributed to several underlying changes in tissue characteristics including an increase in the extent of myelination11.

It should be noted, that only the right and not the left SFG increased in cortical thickness after drumming. As drumming is a multi-limb activity, drummers are required to use their four limbs independently or simultaneously when they play, leading to complex inter-hemispheric interactions. It is well known that musical ability is reflected in such left-right differences in brain structure and function59, and we were able to display hemispheric differences in functional connectivity in the same group previously20. As all of our participants were right-handed, we propose that the MD decrease in the left but not the right ICP paired with the opposite increase-decrease pattern in cortical SFG thickness indicates that left body motor functions have been preferentially strengthened in order to match the high demands of equal velocity needed in drumming. This is further in line with neuroanatomic connections, where the ipsilateral site of the cerebellum has been documented to be active to the body part being moved40.

Future Studies

The complex interplay between the left-right hemispheres, as demonstrated by the results from this and our previous study20, should be specifically investigated, for example by using multimodal neuroimaging. Moreover, adding an active control group participating in non-musical motor activities would help distinguish motor action and higher functions involved in music training. Such an active control condition could consist of learning a new physically demanding multi-limb sport (such as playing basketball) or a complex non-rhythmic finger tapping task. To fully understand the extent of the cerebellar learning involved, additional measures that are functionally connected to our results should be applied and more intensive longitudinal scanning comparing both short (e.g. 1 hr, 1 day, 3 days, 1 week) and long-term effects (4, 8 and 16 week) is suggested. Such tasks could be tasks for working memory and emotion regulation, as they have previously been implicated in cerebellar function18.

Conclusion

Drum training acted as a potent stimulus that lead to structural changes in both sensorimotor and cognitive cerebello-cortico systems, possibly leading to the creation of an internal model of drumming patterns. In order to succumb to the high demands of drumming, we propose that the internal model developed in concordance with cortical structures through cerebellar white matter pathways. This way, the brain is able to maintain sustained attention, multi-limb coordination and integrate signals from multiple sensory modalities in order to achieve optimal drum performance. We propose that the increase of cortical thickness reflects an adaptation to the novel demand drumming posits on the brain, namely better temporal accuracy, spatial organisation of movements and strong attentional control enabled by the accumulation of the SFG, PCun and PCL. These structures are further tightly interlinked with each other and the cerebellum, making them an extension of the cerebellar internal model of the drumming rhythms practiced.

References

  1. 1.

    Flourens, P. (1794-1867) A. du texte. Expériences sur le système nerveux par P. Flourens, faisant suite aux ‘Recherches expérimentales sur les propriétés et les fonctions du système nerveux dans les animaux vertébrés’ du même auteur. (1825).

  2. 2.

    Anderson, B. J. et al. Glial hypertrophy is associated with synaptogenesis following motor-skill learning, but not with angiogenesis following exercise. Glia 11, 73–80 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Black, J. E., Isaacs, K. R., Anderson, B. J., Alcantara, A. A. & Greenough, W. T. Learning causes synaptogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 5568–5572 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kleim, J. A. et al. Learning-dependent dendritic hypertrophy of cerebellar stellate cells: plasticity of local circuit neurons. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 67, 29–33 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Imamizu, H. et al. Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature 403, 192–195 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hansel, C., Linden, D. J. & D’Angelo, E. Beyond parallel fiber LTD: the diversity of synaptic and non-synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 467–475 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bhanpuri, N. H., Okamura, A. M. & Bastian, A. J. Predictive modeling by the cerebellum improves proprioception. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 33, 14301–14306 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Popa, T. et al. Cerebellar processing of sensory inputs primes motor cortex plasticity. Cereb. Cortex N. Y. N 1991(23), 305–314 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sagi, Y. et al. Learning in the fast lane: new insights into neuroplasticity. Neuron 73, 1195–1203 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Taubert, M. et al. Dynamic properties of human brain structure: learning-related changes in cortical areas and associated fiber connections. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 30, 11670–11677 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Jones, D. K., Knösche, T. R. & Turner, R. White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do’s and don’ts of diffusion MRI. NeuroImage 73, 239–254 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Drijkoningen, D. et al. Training-induced improvements in postural control are accompanied by alterations in cerebellar white matter in brain injured patients. NeuroImage Clin. 7, 240–251 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lalonde, R. & Botez, M. I. The cerebellum and learning processes in animals. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 15, 325–332 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kelly, R. M. & Strick, P. L. Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 23, 8432–8444 (2003).

  15. 15.

    Habas, C. et al. Distinct cerebellar contributions to intrinsic connectivity networks. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 29, 8586–8594 (2009).

  16. 16.

    Krienen, F. M. & Buckner, R. L. Segregated fronto-cerebellar circuits revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. Cereb. Cortex N. Y. N 1991(19), 2485–2497 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    O’Reilly, J. X., Beckmann, C. F., Tomassini, V., Ramnani, N. & Johansen-Berg, H. Distinct and overlapping functional zones in the cerebellum defined by resting state functional connectivity. Cereb. Cortex N. Y. N 1991(20), 953–965 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ito, M. The Cerebellum: Brain for an Implicit Self. (FT Press, 2011).

  19. 19.

    Rue, D. L., Draper, S. E., Potter, S. B. & Smith, C. R. M. S. Energy expenditure in rock/pop drumming. Int. J. Sports Med. 34, 868–872 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Amad, A. et al. Motor Learning Induces Plasticity in the Resting Brain—Drumming Up a Connection. Cereb. Cortex 27, 2010–2021 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Naidich, T. P. et al. Duvernoy’s Atlas of the Human Brain Stem and Cerebellum: High-Field MRI, Surface Anatomy, Internal Structure, Vascularization and 3 D Sectional Anatomy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-73971-6 (Springer-Verlag, 2009).

  22. 22.

    Diedrichsen, J., Balsters, J. H., Flavell, J., Cussans, E. & Ramnani, N. A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum. NeuroImage 46, 39–46 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sowell, E. R., Trauner, D. A., Gamst, A. & Jernigan, T. L. Development of cortical and subcortical brain structures in childhood and adolescence: a structural MRI study. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 44, 4–16 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dale, A. M., Fischl, B. & Sereno, M. I. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage 9, 179–194 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I. & Dale, A. M. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage 9, 195–207 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fischl, B. et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex N. Y. N 1991(14), 11–22 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fischl, B. & Dale, A. M. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11050–11055 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jovicich, J. et al. Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data. NeuroImage 30, 436–443 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ségonne, F. et al. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. NeuroImage 22, 1060–1075 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Leemans, A. et al. ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data. (2009).

  31. 31.

    Leemans, A. & Jones, D. K. The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magn. Reson. Med. 61, 1336–1349 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jones, D. K. & Basser, P. J. ‘Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins’: how noise distorts diffusion-weighted MR data. Magn. Reson. Med. 52, 979–993 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Basser, P. J., Pajevic, S., Pierpaoli, C., Duda, J. & Aldroubi, A. In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn. Reson. Med. 44, 625–632 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wang, R. P. & Wedeen, V. J. Diffusion Toolkit and TrackVis. Proc. Intl. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. (2007).

  35. 35.

    Catani, M. et al. Altered cerebellar feedback projections in Asperger syndrome. NeuroImage 41, 1184–1191 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Dell’Acqua, F., Bodi, I., Slater, D., Catani, M. & Modo, M. MR diffusion histology and micro-tractography reveal mesoscale features of the human cerebellum. Cerebellum Lond. Engl. 12, 923–931 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Koelsch, S., Maess, B., Grossmann, T. & Friederici, A. D. Electric brain responses reveal gender differences in music processing. Neuroreport 14, 709–713 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Llorente, R. et al. Early maternal deprivation in rats induces gender-dependent effects on developing hippocampal and cerebellar cells. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. Off. J. Int. Soc. Dev. Neurosci. 27, 233–241 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ramnani, N. The primate cortico-cerebellar system: anatomy and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 511–522 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Stoodley, C. J. & Schmahmann, J. D. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage 44, 489–501 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Riedel, M. C. et al. Meta-analytic connectivity and behavioral parcellation of the human cerebellum. NeuroImage 117, 327–342 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Townsend, J. D. et al. Frontal-amygdala connectivity alterations during emotion downregulation in bipolar I disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 73, 127–135 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cavanna, A. E. & Trimble, M. R. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129, 564–583 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Platel, H., Baron, J.-C., Desgranges, B., Bernard, F. & Eustache, F. Semantic and episodic memory of music are subserved by distinct neural networks. NeuroImage 20, 244–256 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bullmore, E. & Sporns, O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186–198 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wiesendanger, R. & Wiesendanger, M. Cerebello-cortical linkage in the monkey as revealed by transcellular labeling with the lectin wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to the marker horseradish peroxidase. Exp. Brain Res. 59, 105–117 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bhanpuri, N. H., Okamura, A. M. & Bastian, A. J. Predicting and correcting ataxia using a model of cerebellar function. Brain J. Neurol. 137, 1931–1944 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    du Boisgueheneuc, F. et al. Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans: a lesion study. Brain J. Neurol. 129, 3315–3328 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Chen, J. L., Penhune, V. B. & Zatorre, R. J. Moving on time: brain network for auditory-motor synchronization is modulated by rhythm complexity and musical training. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 226–239 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jueptner, M. et al. Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 1313–1324 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bernard, J. A., Orr, J. M. & Mittal, V. A. Differential motor and prefrontal cerebello-cortical network development: Evidence from multimodal neuroimaging. NeuroImage 124, 591–601 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Penhune, V. B., Zattore, R. J. & Evans, A. C. Cerebellar contributions to motor timing: a PET study of auditory and visual rhythm reproduction. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 752–765 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Haslinger, B. et al. Reduced recruitment of motor association areas during bimanual coordination in concert pianists. Hum. Brain Mapp. 22, 206–215 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kostovic, I. & Rakic, P. Developmental history of the transient subplate zone in the visual and somatosensory cortex of the macaque monkey and human brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 297, 441–470 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Leitner, Y., Travis, K. E., Ben-Shachar, M., Yeom, K. W. & Feldman, H. M. Tract profiles of the cerebellar white matter pathways in children and adolescents. Cerebellum Lond. Engl. 14, 613–623 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Riddle, C. N., Edgley, S. A. & Baker, S. N. Direct and indirect connections with upper limb motoneurons from the primate reticulospinal tract. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 29, 4993–4999 (2009).

  57. 57.

    Apps, R. & Garwicz, M. Anatomical and physiological foundations of cerebellar information processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 297–311 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Spencer, R. M. C. & Ivry, R. B. Cerebellum and Timing. in Handbook of the Cerebellum and Cerebellar Disorders (eds. Manto, M., Schmahmann, J. D., Rossi, F., Gruol, D. L. & Koibuchi, N.) 1201–1219 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1333-8_52 (Springer Netherlands, 2013).

  59. 59.

    Schlaug, G. The brain of musicians. A model for functional and structural adaptation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 930, 281–299 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank The Waterloo Foundation for their financial support, guidance and enthusiasm during the course of this project. We also would like to express our deepest gratitude to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London for their on-going support of our translational imaging research programme. M. B. has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework (FP7/2007–2013) TACTICS. A. A held a postdoctoral fellowship from the “Fondation Thérèse et René Planiol”. A.R. was funded by a Royal academy of Engineering/EPSRC Fellowship. We acknowledge Clem Burke and Mark Richardson from the Clem Burke Drumming Project for their continued support and enthusiasm for our drumming related research. We also want to acknowledge Mrs J. McKeown (Chichester High School 6th Form, West Sussex, UK), Becky Gell (Chichester College, West Sussex, UK) and Mr R. West (Bishop Luffa 6th Form, West Sussex, UK) for their help with participant recruitment. F. d. A. received funding from Wellcome Trust. In addition, we would like to thank Prof. Narender Ramnani for his valuable comments to this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.L., S.D., J.W., A.R., M.S., S.W. participated in the conception and design of the study; M.B., J.S., R.L., S.D., M.S. and S.W. participated in the acquisition of data; M.B., A.A., L.L., P.L., F.D. performed the analyses; M.B., A.A. and S.W. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors participated in the writing and revision of the successive drafts of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven C. R. Williams.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruchhage, M.M.K., Amad, A., Draper, S.B. et al. Drum training induces  long-term plasticity in the cerebellum and connected cortical thickness. Sci Rep 10, 10116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65877-2

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing