Abstract
Worldwide, maize (Zea mays L.) is considered an important food and fodder crop. Compost as a soil amendment and potassium (K) could enhance the maize yield. Therefore, two field experiments were carried out in the two seasons 2017 and 2018 to study the effects of compost at three levels and four forms of potassium fertilization on the yellow maize hybrid ‘Pioneer SC 30N11’ yield components. To conduct the field trials, a split plot system in three replications was established. Three compost levels (0, 5 and 10 ton/ha) were in the main plots, and four potassium forms (untreated, nano-potassium fertilizer, humic acid and potassium sulfate) were in the subplots. Plot size was 10.50 m2, with 5 ridges with 3 m length and 0.7 m width. The results indicated that the application of compost (as organic manure) and the potassium forms significantly affected the plant height, ear length, grains number/rows, grains number/ear, 100- grain weight, straw and biological yields, grain protein and K contents in both seasons. Increasing the compost from 5 to 10 ton/ha increased the yield, its components, protein and K contents. The foliar application of nano-potassium followed by humic acid increased all the studied characteristics. The interaction between compost manure (10 ton/ha) and nano-potassium (500 cm3/ha) or humic acid (10 ton/ha) recorded the highest mean values for all parameters during both harvest seasons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Maize is considered one of the three most vital cereal crops worldwide, come after wheat and rice. Maize is consumed as food and feed and used in several industries. The cultivated area in Egypt occupies approximately 935778 ha, producing up to 7.10 million tons of grains with an average yield of 7.60 ton/ha1.
Potassium fertilization plays a significant role in enhancing the yield, water use efficiency and nutrients use by maize plants. All recoverable soil potassium pools greatly affect the potassium availability, uptake and yield of maize that receives suitable irrigation, while water soluble and exchangeable potassium have developed as significant factors influencing the yields and potassium uptake by corn that is exposed to moisture stress when irrigation is inadequate2. In this respect, it is known that potassium has a main role in photosynthesis, water storage control and stomata opening in leaves3. Potassium deficiency significantly reduces the number of leaves and leaf size and, as a result, affects the photosynthetic activity of the plant4. Grain yields increase with increased potassium uptake under arid conditions5. Modern corn hybrid respond to potassium differently due to variations in their uptake, growth and utilization6. Potassium element is the highly abundant cation in plants and act main role in osmotic modification. When plant water capacity declines under drought condition, K can affect plants to accumulate solutes, lower their osmotic potential and enhance water inflow to maintain turgor pressure7. The absorption of sufficient amounts of potassium before drought helps plants maintain growth under abiotic 60 stress8.
Compost considers an effective element management strategy for keeping nitrogen (N) uptake and maize yields, reducing nitrogen loss and enhancing soil fertility. A considerable development in invertase activity in compost as organic fertilizer highlights the critical position of integrating the control of carbon and nitrogen for the sustainability of highly intensive agricultural production9. Furthermore, compost is an excellent soil amendment that adds a balance of nutrients while contributing valuable organic material to the soil. It has been well recognised that the incorporation of organic fertilizer into soil is more and more vital, as this practice increases soil fertility and crop yields10. The soil application of compost manure has a positive impact on basic soil characters. The composition of input substrates has a major effect on compost quality11. Organic fertilizers such as biofertilizers and humic substances are used to reduce the risks of salts, and the interaction between salinity and mineral fertilization with nitrogen and potassium12,13. Different works towards method innovations in soil fertility managing and incentive development for crop straw combined with natural fertilizer applications are required14. The application of compost manure significantly improved the grain yield of maize15. Combination with mineral and organic fertilization increased yield as compared with using mineral fertilization alone16. Maize growth and yield more than doubled over two crop cycles when compost manure and biochar were applied in combination on a calcareous soil17. There were positive responses of growth and yield of maize to the application of organic amendments, with smaller differences found between different organic amendments. Moreover, compost treatment significantly increased grain yield comparing with the control treatments18.
Application of humic acid (HA) resulted in high yields by developing physical and chemical characteristics of soil19. Furthermore, humic acid can significantly reduce water evaporation, increase yield/yield components, enhances the water retention and increases the water holding capacity in soil20. The addition of humic acid at 14.4 kg/ha was increased growth and grain yield of maize under water stress21. Application of humic substance (HS) significantly increased the soil fertility and micronutrient uptake22. Additionally, Hatami23 reported that applications of zinc and humic acid enhanced the yield under drought stress conditions, and cation exchange capacity of soil was significantly maximum when 100% NPK was used in combination with biochar at 7.5 ton /ha and humic acid. Humic acid caused a significant increase in organic carbon when applied at 7.5 t/ha24.
Nano-fertilizers postpone the release of nutrients and extended the period of fertilizer effects. Obviously, there was an opportunity for nanotechnology to significantly affect energy and the environment by enhancing fertilizers25,26. Applying nanoparticles (NPs) to plants is beneficial for plant growth and development due to their relatively greater absorbance and high reactivity27. Using nano-fertilizers as foliar applications at vegetative, flowering or grain- filling stage increased the yield and yield components21,28. A soil application of mineral fertilizer with a foliar application of nano- fertilizer showed the highest values for plant height, ear length, number of rows/ear, grains number/row, grains number/ear, 100- grain weight, and biological, straw and grain yields. Fertilizing the maize hybrid SC 168 with a foliar application of nano- fertilizer (K and P) and a soil application of mineral fertilizer (K and P) increased maize yield29. The plant height yield and yield components of wheat crop increased after the application of nano-fertilizer30. The application of nano-fertilizer promoted growth, development and antioxidant activity in sugar beet plants and improved crop production and plant nutrition. Moreover, nano-fertilizers have a great effect on the soil and can reduce fertilizer application frequencies31. Using nanoparticles with NPK nutrients increased the yield and its components of wheat compared with fertilization of mineral NPK in both seasons19,32,33 also26 indicated that using nanofertilizer increased the yield and quality characters of onion plants.
This investigation aimed to study the response of maize to compost and different potassium sources in addition study the gross income, net profit and cost benefit ratio of maize.
Materials and methods
Experimental setup
Two field experiments were carried out at Al- Huriya village, north of the El- Tahrir region, El- Behira Governorate, Egypt, during the seasons of 2017 & 2018 to study the effect of three levels (0, 5 and 10 ton/ha) of compost and four forms of potassium fertilization (control, nano- potassium fertilizer, HA and potassium sulfate) on the yield and yield components of a maize hybrid (Pioneer SC 30N11). The preceding filed crop was Berseem (Egyptian clover) during both seasons in the study. Some physical and chemical soil properties in the layer (0 to 30 cm depth) at the experimental site were analysed before sowing according to the method described by34; the summary can be found in Table (1). The analyses were conducted at the Soil Chemistry and Water Department, the Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha. The planting date was 10 May in the 2017 and 2018 seasons. The field was hand-thinned before the first irrigation to one plant per hill.
Experimental design
A split plot design with three replications was used. The three compost levels (0, 5 and 10 ton/ha) (Table 2) were assigned in the main plots, and the four forms of potassium fertilization, (untreated, nano-potassium fertilizer, humic acid and potassium sulfate) were allocated in the sub-plots. Each sub-plot consisted of 5 ridges with 3 m length and 70 cm in width, and the plot area was 10.5 m2 in both seasons.
Application of fertilizers
Potassium sulfate (K2SO4) (120 kg/ha) and humic acid from K- humate (10 kg/ha) were applied at sowing time during both seasons. Phosphorus fertilizer (60 kg P2O5/ha) was added before sowing in the form of (15.5% P2O5, calcium super phosphate). Ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3 – 33.50 N %) (288 kg N/ha) was used as the nitrogen source and was applied equally on two doses. The first dose was applied before the first irrigation, and the second dose was added before the second irrigation during both seasons. A nano-compound (Potacrystal, 500 cm/500 litter water/ha) was used as foliar application twice, (45 and 65 days after sowing) (Table 3). The Potacrystal K NPs morphology was confirmed with a transmission electron microscope (TEM, Hitachi, Japan) at the Electron Microscopic Unit, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University. The shape and size of the Potacrystal K NPs were determined from the obtained TEM micrographs35 and are shown in Fig. (1).
Data collection
At harvest, the three inner rows were used for the grain yield estimation. The following data were recorded:
Yield and its components
Plant height (cm), ear length (cm), grains number/rows, grains number/ear, 100-grain weight (g), grain yield (ton/ha), straw yield (ton/ha) and biological yield (ton/ha) were measured. Where, biological yield (ton/ha) = Grain yield + straw yield.
Grain characteristics
The grain protein content
Was calculated as the following formula Protein content (%) = Total nitrogen (%) x 6.25 to obtain the grain protein content (%) according to the method described by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists36:
The grain K content
Was determined by the vanadomolybdate yellow method as described by37, and the colour intensity that developed was read in a spectrophotometer at 405 nm.
Economic attributes
Economic analysis for current results were used to determine the variances between different factors levels to obtaining the greatest profitability of compost levels and potassium forms as compared with control. In the economic analysis, some economic criteria such as production costs, gross income, net profit and benefit cost ratio (BCR) were included. Economic criteria were estimated from the following formulas: gross income = grain yield (t) plus straw yield (t); net profit = gross income – production costs and benefit costs ratio (BCR) = \(\frac{{\rm{Gros}}\,{\rm{income}}}{{\rm{Cost}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{cultivation}}}\) . It was calculated based on the basis of local market price prevailing the harvest time of the produce, the price of maize grain yield was in range from 231.01 to 243.59 $/t and the straw yield (silage) was in range from 24.05 to 25.64 $/t (Dollar exchange (1$) was = 15.80 and 15.60 L.E. in both seasons, respectively). The production costs were calculated in Egyptian pounds at the local market price then transferred to dollars ($) (see Table 4).
Statistics analysis
Analysis of variance was used according38. All statistical analyses were done by the CoStat computer software package39 CoStat (2005). The least significant difference test (LSD) at the 0.05 level of probability was used to compare the treatment means. Pearson’s correlation was used to analyze the relationship between yield parameters and soil amendments.
Results and discussion
The results, as shown in Tables (5) and (6), indicated that the plant height, yield and its components during both seasons were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected by the compost levels, potassium sources and their interaction in the 2017 and 2018 seasons.
Effects of organic manure (compost) on the growth and yield of maize
The results as shown in Table (5), revealed that increasing compost rate from 0 up to 10 ton/ha increased plant height, ear length, grains number/row grains number/ear and 100- grain weight, furthermore, the lowest mean values of these traits were found in the control treatment during the two growing seasons. The results in Table (6) reported that the application of compost manure at either 5 or 10 ton/ha presented in the maximum biological yield, straw yield and grain yield. However, the grain protein content and grain K content differed and were affected significantly (p ≤ 0.05) by 10 tons/ha of compost. Application of compost at the rate of 10 ton/ha gave the highest mean values of yield characters of maize followed by 5 ton/ha of compost which gave the same results as compared with the control treatments in the two seasons. The lowest values of the plant attributes were obtained in the control treatment during both growing seasons. Using of organic manure into soil is more and more important, as this practice improves the soil fertility with increasing the crop yields10. These findings results agree with those recorded by18,19,40 who reported that compost (5 ton/ha) increased crop productivity in terms of the yield and yield component of maize. Compost is an effective nutrient management strategy to maintain N uptake and maize yields, decrease N loss and increase soil fertility9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. Additionally, organic fertilizer modifications, such as green manure and crop straw return, have been widely recommended as practices for improving yields of crop, while increasing the soil quality33,41,42. Organic amendments can directly enhance crop growth by improving soil nutrient availability42.
Regarding to correlation between soil amendments in growth and yield characters, the results in Tables (7 and 8) revealed that there was strong positive correlation between soil amendment (compost) and plant height, ear length, grains number/row, grains number/row, 100- grain weight, biological yield, straw yield, grain yield, protein content, and potassium content (K) during 2017 and 2018 seasons. The results showed that the plant height, ear length, grains number/row, grains number/row, 100- grain weight, biological yield, straw yield, grain yield, protein content, and potassium content (K) are positively correlated with each other under application of soil amendments except the correlation between soil amendments and number of grains/ear which had no significant correlation with plant height and ear length. On the other hand, 100- grain weight had no significant correlation between number of grains/ear. This results could be due to the vital role of the compost application for improving soil properties and increasing availability of nutrients to maize plants. On the other study, compost treatment increased soil fertility and nutrient up take of plants which caused enhancing growth, yield and yield components9,43. The current study in a line with44,45,46 who pointed to the important of soil amendments in recent years in agriculture and their role in improve the soil quality and increase crop yield. Other studies for Doan et al.47, reported that there are significant differences in crop yields because of the organic amendments which can be clearly shown in water stress conditions, thus will increase the yield in crops and48,49 showed that there are correlation between the high application rates of organic amendments and better performance of maize yield.
Effects of the potassium forms on the growth and yield of maize
Respecting to the potassium form effects on the plant height (cm), ear length (cm), grains number/row, grains number/ear, 100-grain weight (g), biological yield (ton/ha), straw yield (ton/ha), grain yield (ton/ha), protein content and K content (%) in both seasons are shown in Tables (5 and 6). The results in Table (5) demonstrate that, the potassium forms significantly influenced (p ≤ 0.05) the maize yield and their components compared to control. Generally, nano-potassium significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected the numerous tested attributes during two seasons. However, the lowest values were recorded in the treatment without amendments (No- K) during both seasons. These results agree with those obtained by19,27,29,31,50, they indicated that nano- particles applications to plants had beneficial effects on the growth and yield for most tested crops. On the other hand,15,19,20,23 revealed that applied HA levels significantly increased yield of examined crops.
Regarding the potassium forms, as shown in Table (6), significant (p ≤ 0.05) effects on the biological, straw and grain yield; protein and K contents were found during the two growing seasons. The highest biological and straw yield (ton/ha) were recorded with nano-potassium in the 1st season, while in the in the 2nd season were with nano-potassium (K NPs) and HA. However, the highest grain protein and K contents were observed with the foliar applications of nano-potassium in the 2017 and 2018 seasons, respectively, while the lowest percentages were recorded in the treatments with no amendments (No- K) in both seasons. Increasing of the grain yield due to the increase in the yield components of maize. These findings are in the same line with those obtained by27,31, who indicated that applications of K NPs on plants had positive and supportive functions for the growth and yield of crops. Nano- potassium (K NPs) increased yield followed by application of HA under the study conditions. On the other hand, application of humic acid (HA) enhanced growth, yield and yield components and protein content (%) of maize, in addition, application of humic acid be able to as a growth regulator, increasing stress tolerance, improving soil characteristics and enhancing nutrients availability51,52,53,54,55.
Effect of the interaction between organic manure (compost) and potassium forms on growth and yield of maize
The results found in Table (5) showed that the interaction between compost and the forms of potassium significantly affected growth and yield characters during the two seasons. The application of compost at the rate of 10 ton/ha plus potassium sulfate resulted in the tallest plants and heaviest 100-grain weight; however, compost plus HA resulted in the highest grains number/row and grains number/ear in the two seasons. Moreover, the lowest values of this traits were obtained in the untreated plants for the two studied independent variables during both seasons. The data in Table (6) shows the interaction between compost and the forms of potassium significantly affected the maize yield and grain characteristics (protein and K contents) during both seasons. The application of compost at 10 ton/ha with nano-potassium (K NPs) resulted in the largest biological yield, straw yield (ton/ha) and protein content in the 1st season 2017 and the highest K content in the 2nd season 2018. However, in the second seasons, the largest biological yield (ton/ha), straw yield and protein content were recorded with the application of 10 ton/ha of compost and a foliar application of HA. On the other hand, the highest K content (2.0%) was obtained with the application of compost at 5 ton/ha and nano-K in 2017 season. The heaviest grain yield (7.2 ton/ha) was recorded with 5 ton/ha of compost plus nano-K fertilizer in the first season. However, in the second season 2018, the maximum grain yield (7.3 ton/ha) was obtained with the application of 10 ton/ha of compost with HA. Moreover, the minimum values were obtained in the control treatment during both seasons. Results showed that there is significant interaction between the compost (ton/ha) and potassium forms in both seasons.
The increase of grain yield of maize crop may be due to mainly it was attributed to plant height, ear length, number of grains/ear, number of rows/ear, and 100- grain weight. Amongst the treatments, the application of compost, K NPs and HA recorded the highest plant height, ear length, number of grains/ear, number of rows/ear, and 100- grain weight. Based on other study, the application of bio-organic fertilizer improved soil fertility as well as the growth and yield characters56. In that context, combination of organic manure with inorganic fertilizer resulted in a high growth and yield of maize and wheat9,57. On the other hand, organic fertilizer increases yield if it is applied to provide additional nutrients based on inorganic fertilizer application i.e. NPK58,59. Additionally60 revealed that NPK fertilizers plus organic manure enhanced crop yields higher than NPK fertilizers alone or NPK fertilizers plus straw. However61, showed that using NPK NPs with organic manure increased growth, yield of maize. In addition, combination between foliar application KP NPS with soil application of mineral NP increased growth and yield of maize29.
Effects of compost and the potassium forms and their interaction on the gross income, net profit and benefit- cost ratio (BCR) of maize
Gross income is an important economic index that determines the profit or benefit that a farmer can obtain. On the other hand, net return reflects the actual income of farmer. While benefit cost ratio (BCR) is an index that shows the comparative explanation about the investment by a farmer. The results in Table (9) revealed that there was a significant difference in gross income, net profit and benefit cost ratio among tested treatments. The results revealed that increasing compost rates from 5 to 10 ton/ha increased gross income, net profit and BCR as comparing with control treatments (untreated). Also, using K forms increased gross income, net profit and BCR as comparing with control treatments (untreated). Where the highest values were obtained with application of 5-ton compost/ha, while least value was given by control (0 compost). Also, using nano K or humic acid achieved the highest values, while the lowest one recorded with control (No- K) during the two seasons. Application of compost at the rate of 5 ton/ha with humic acid recorded the highest values of gross income, net profit and benefit cost ratio, meanwhile the lowest ones gave with control treatment in the two seasons (Table 9). These results are in harmony with those obtained by62,63,64 which showed that incorporation of soil fertility improvement measures make soil moisture conservation more profitable. On the other hand, production of healthy and good quality crop will help the farmers to maximize net profit based on gross income65.
Conclusion
On average, grain yield and quality of maize crop was significantly increased by application of compost, K- forms and their interactions. The highest increase was found with application of compost at the rate of 5 or 10 ton/ha with K NPs or humic acid (HA) which resulted in maximum plant height, ear length, 100- grain weight, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, grain protein concentration (%) and grain K content (%) of maize varieties. However, these treatments recorded the highest gross income, net profit and benefit costs ratio (BCR). Therefore, using combination with compost (5 ton/ha) and K NPs (500 cm/ha) or humic acid (10 kg/ha) for getting higher yield, its components and quality of maize crop under the study conditions. With this combination, it will be possible for farmer to improve the growth, yield and quality of maize hybrid ‘Pioneer SC 30N11’ with the gross income, net profit and benefit costs ratio (BCR). Therefore, the best treatments were 5 ton/ha of compost + 0.5 l/ha of K NPs or + 10 kg/ha of HA which achieved the highest net profit under the study conditions. However, additional study is needed to investigate the effect of higher levels of K- NPs with humic acids and compost manure as soil amendments on maize yield and quality and its effects on soil properties and elements availability.
References
Faostat, F. Available online, http://www. fao. org/faostat/en/# data. QC (accessed on January 2018) (2017).
Bhattacharyya, K. et al. Yield of and nutrient-water use by maize exposed to moisture stress and K fertilizers in an inceptisol of West Bengal, India. Agricultural Water Management 206, 31–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.038 (2018).
Zhang, Q.-c & Wang, G.-h Studies on nutrient uptake of rice and characteristics of soil microorganisms in a long-term fertilization experiments for irrigated rice. Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 6, 147 (2005).
Pettigrew, W. T. Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton. Physiologia plantarum 133, 670–681 (2008).
Rengel, Z. & Damon, P. M. Crops and genotypes differ in efficiency of potassium uptake and use. Physiologia Plantarum 133, 624–636 (2008).
Minjian, C., Haiqiu, Y., Hongkui, Y. & Chunji, J. Difference in tolerance to potassium deficiency between two maize inbred lines. Plant Production Science 10, 42–46 (2007).
Oosterhuis, D. M. & Wullschleger, S. D. Osmotic adjustment in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaves and roots in response to water stress. Plant Physiology 84, 1154–1157 (1987).
Wang, M., Zheng, Q., Shen, Q. & Guo, S. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. International journal of molecular sciences 14, 7370–7390 (2013).
Zhang, X. et al. Effects of enhancing soil organic carbon sequestration in the topsoil by fertilization on crop productivity and stability: Evidence from long-term experiments with wheat-maize cropping systems in China. Science of the Total Environment 562, 247–259 (2016).
Singh, B. Effect of lac mud, farm yard manure and inorganic fertilizers on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sattva L.). Agricultural Science Digest 21, 21–24 (2001).
De Bertoldi, M., Diaz, L. F., Bidlingmaier, W. & Stentiford, E. Compost Science and Technology. (Elsevier, 2007).
Ould Ahmed, B. A., Inoue, M. & Moritani, S. Effect of saline water irrigation and manure application on the available water content, soil salinity, and growth of wheat. Agricultural Water Management 97, 165–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.09.001 (2010).
Prazeres, S. et al. Growth and gas exchange of cowpea plants under saline irrigation and potassium. Magaz. Agro@ e 9, 111–118 (2015).
Song, Z. et al. Organic amendments increase corn yield by enhancing soil resilience to climate change. The Crop. Journal 3, 110–117 (2015).
Gomaa, M., Kandil, E., Zeid, A. A. & Salim, B. M. Response of Some Faba Bean to Fertilizers Manufactured by Nanotechnology. Journal of The Advances in Agricultural Researches 21, 384–399 (2016).
Körschens, M. et al. Effect of mineral and organic fertilization on crop yield, nitrogen uptake, carbon and nitrogen balances, as well as soil organic carbon content and dynamics: results from 20 European long-term field experiments of the twenty-first century. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 59, 1017–1040 (2013).
Nur, M., Islami, T., Handayanto, E., Nugroho, W. & Utomo, W. The use of biochar fortified compost on calcareous soil of East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: 2. Effect on the yield of maize (Zea mays L) and phosphate absorption. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 105–112 (2014).
Agegnehu, G., Bass, A. M., Nelson, P. N. & Bird, M. I. Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar–compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil. Science of The Total Environment 543, 295–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.054 (2016).
Abdelsalam, N. R. et al. Effect of foliar application of NPK nanoparticle fertilization on yield and genotoxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Science of The Total Environment 653, 1128–1139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.023 (2019).
Kamran, A. et al. Phenology, yield and yield components of maize as affected by humic acid and nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto) 6, 286–293 (2014).
Gomaa, M., Radwan, F., Rehab, I., Kandil, E. & El-Kowy, A. A. Response of Maize to Compost and A-mycorrhizal under Condition of Water Stress. InternationalJournalofEnvironment 4, 271–277 (2015).
Kazemi, R., Karimian, N., Ronaghi, A. & Yasrebi, J. The effect of two humic substances on the growth and lead uptake of corn in calcareous soil. Iran Agricultural Research 35, 39–48 (2016).
Hatami, H. The Effect of Zinc and Humic Acid Applications on Yield and Yield Components of Sunflower in Drought Stress. Journal of Advanced Agricultural Technologies Vol 4 (2017).
Madhavi, P., Sailaja, V., Prakash, T. R. & Hussain, S. Effect of Fertilizers, Biochar and Humic acid on Seed Yield and Nutrient content of Maize (Zea mays L.) Grown on Alfisols of Telangana. International. Journal of Economic Plants 4, 76–79 (2017).
Naderi, M. & Danesh-Shahraki, A. Nanofertilizers and their roles in sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5, 2229 (2013).
Fouda, M. M. et al. Impact of high throughput green synthesized silver nanoparticles on agronomic traits of onion. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (2020).
Liu, R. & Lal, R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of the Total Environment 514, 131–139 (2015).
Gomaa, M., Kandil, E., Zeid, A. A. & Salim, B. Response of some faba bean varieties to fertilizers manufactured by nanotechnology. J. Advan. Agric. Resh 21(384), 399 (2016).
Gomaa, M., Radwan, F., Kandil, E. & Al-Challabi, D. Comparison of some New Maize Hybrids Response to Mineral Fertilization and some Nanofertilizers. Alex. Sci. Exch. J. 38, 506–514 (2017).
Kandil, E. & Marie, E. A. Response of some wheat cultivars to nano-, mineral fertilizers and amino acids foliar application. Alex. Sci. Exch. J 38, 53–68 (2017).
Dewdar, M., Abbas, M., Hassanin, A. & Aleem, H. Effect of Nano Micronutrients and Nitrogen Foliar Applications on Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) of Quantity and Quality Traits in Marginal Soils in Egypt. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7, 4490–4498, https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.475 (2018).
Ali, M. & Mindari, W. In MATEC Web of Conferences. 01028 (EDP Sciences).
Abdelsalam, N. R. et al. Effect of foliar application of NPK nanoparticle fertilization on yield and genotoxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Science of The Total Environment 653, 1128–1139 (2019).
Chapman, H. D. & Pratt, P. F. Methods of Analysis for soils, plants and waters. Division of Agric. Sci. Univ. California, Berkeley, USA 309 (1978).
Elavazhagan, T. & Arunachalam, K. D. Memecylon edule leaf extract mediated green synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles. International Journal of Nanomedicine 6, 1265 (2011).
Chemists, A. O. O. A. Official methods of analysis. (1990).
Jackosn, M. Soil Chemical Analysis Prentice Halla of India Private Limited. New Delhi, Indian (1973).
Gomez, K. A. & Gomez, A. A. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. (John Wiley & Sons, 1984).
Ver, C. Cohort software798 light house Ave. PMB320, Monterey, CA93940, and USA. email: info@ cohort. com and Website, http://www. cohort. com/DownloadCoStatPart2. html. (2005).
Ali, S. et al. Yield and Yield Components of Maize Response To compost and Fertilizer-Nitrogen. Food Science and Quality Management 38, 39–44 (2015).
Shisanya, C. A., Mucheru, M. W., Mugendi, D. N. & Kung’u, J. B. Effect of organic and inorganic nutrient sources on soil mineral nitrogen and maize yields in central highlands of Kenya. Soil and Tillage Research 103, 239–246 (2009).
Huang, S., Zhang, W., Yu, X. & Huang, Q. Effects of long-term fertilization on corn productivity and its sustainability in an Ultisol of southern China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 138, 44–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.03.015 (2010).
Halim, A. et al. Influence of soil amendments on the growth and yield of rice in acidic soil. Agronomy 8, 165 (2018).
Chan, K. Y., Van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A. & Joseph, S. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Soil Research 45, 629–634 (2008).
Zhou, L., Liu, J., Zhao, B., Xue, A. & Hao, G. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 012005 (IOP Publishing).
Dorraji, S. S., Golchin, A. & Ahmadi, S. The effects of hydrophilic polymer and soil salinity on corn growth in sandy and loamy soils. Clean–Soil, Air, Water 38, 584–591 (2010).
Doan, T. T., Henry-des-Tureaux, T., Rumpel, C., Janeau, J.-L. & Jouquet, P. Impact of compost, vermicompost and biochar on soil fertility, maize yield and soil erosion in Northern Vietnam: a three year mesocosm experiment. Science of the Total Environment 514, 147–154 (2015).
Mahmood, F. et al. Effects of organic and inorganic manures on maize and their residual impact on soil physico-chemical properties. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition 17, 22–32 (2017).
Mukta, S., Rahman, M. & Mortuza, M. Yield and nutrient content of tomato as influenced by the application of vermicompost and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources 8, 115–122 (2015).
Abdelsalam, N. R. et al. Assessment of silver nanoparticles decorated starch and commercial zinc nanoparticles with respect to their genotoxicity on onion. International journal of biological macromolecules 133, 1008–1018 (2019).
Daur, I. & Bakhashwain, A. A. Effect of humic acid on growth and quality of maize fodder production. Pak. J. Bot 45, 21–25 (2013).
Azeem, K. et al. Phenology, yield and yield components of maize as affected by humic acid and nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural Science 6, 286 (2014).
El-Mekser, H. K. A., Mohamed, Z. & Ali, M. Influence of humic acid and some micronutrients on yellow corn yield and quality. World Applied Sciences Journal 32, 1–11 (2014).
Khan, S. et al. Integration of Humic acid with nitrogen wields an auxiliary impact on physiological traits, growth and yield of maize (zea mays l.) varieties. applied ecology and. environmental research 17, 6783–6799 (2019).
Wulandari, P., Sulistyaningsih, E., Handayani, S. & Purwanto, B. H. Growth and Yield Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) on Acid Soil to Different Rates of Humic Acid and NPK Fertilizer. Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science) 4, 76–84 (2019).
Farhana, A., Shamshuddin, J., Fauziah, C. & Panhwar, Q. Enhancing the fertility of an acid sulfate soil for rice cultivation using lime in combination with bio-organic fertilizer. Pakistan Journal of Botany 49, 1867–1875 (2017).
Chen, H. et al. Long-term inorganic plus organic fertilization increases yield and yield stability of winter wheat. The Crop. Journal 6, 589–599, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2018.06.002 (2018).
Jiang, D., Hengsdijk, H., Ting-Bo, D., Qi, J. & Wei-Xing, C. Long-term effects of manure and inorganic fertilizers on yield and soil fertility for a winter wheat-maize system in Jiangsu, China. Pedosphere 16, 25–32 (2006).
Yan, X. & Gong, W. The role of chemical and organic fertilizers on yield, yield variability and carbon sequestration—results of a 19-year experiment. Plant and soil 331, 471–480 (2010).
Qin, W., Wang, D., Guo, X., Yang, T. & Oenema, O. Productivity and sustainability of rainfed wheat-soybean system in the North China Plain: results from a long-term experiment and crop modelling. Scientific reports 5, 17514 (2015).
Rop, K., Karuku, G. N., Mbui, D., Njomo, N. & Michira, I. Evaluating the effects of formulated nano-NPK slow release fertilizer composite on the performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 64, 9–19 (2019).
Fofana, B., Wopereis, M., Zougmore, R., Breman, H. & Mando, A. In Symposium and Workshop. 109–117.
Snyman, P. In Proceedings of the Symposium and Workshop on Water Conservation Technologies for Sustainable Dryland Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa (WCT), Bloemfontein, South Africa. 191–196.
Barron, J. & Okwach, G. Run-off water harvesting for dry spell mitigation in maize (Zea mays L.): results from on-farm research in semi-arid Kenya. Agricultural water management 74, 1–21 (2005).
Barut, Z. B., Ertekin, C. & Karaagac, H. A. Tillage effects on energy use for corn silage in Mediterranean Coastal of Turkey. Energy 36, 5466–5475 (2011).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2019/123), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Essam E. Kandil and Nader R. Abdelsalam: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, write the paper and suggest the idea, write manuscript; Mansour A. Mansour: Data curation, Methodology; Hayssam M. Ali and Manzer H. Siddiqui, revised the manuscript and Funding acquisition
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kandil, E.E., Abdelsalam, N.R., Mansour, M.A. et al. Potentials of organic manure and potassium forms on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and production. Sci Rep 10, 8752 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65749-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65749-9
This article is cited by
-
Investigating the effect of Aspergillus niger inoculated press mud (biofertilizer) on the potential of enhancing maize (Zea mays. L) yield, potassium use efficiency and potassium agronomic efficiency
Cereal Research Communications (2022)
-
Increase maize productivity and water use efficiency through application of potassium silicate under water stress
Scientific Reports (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.