Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Plasmonic enhancement of betanin-lawsone co-sensitized solar cells via tailored bimodal size distribution of silver nanoparticles

## Abstract

Natural pigment-based photosensitizers are an attractive pathway for realizing low cost and environmentally friendly solar cells. Here, broadband light-harvesting is achieved using two natural pigments, betanin and lawsone, absorbing in the green and blue region of the solar spectrum respectively. The use of bimodal size distribution of AgNPs tailored for each of the pigments to further increase their efficiency is the key feature of this work. This study demonstrates a significant enhancement in current-density, voltage, and efficiency by 20.1%, 5.5%, and 28.6% respectively, in a betanin-lawsone co-sensitized solar cell, via plasmonic enhancement using silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). The optimum sizes of the nanoparticles have been calculated by studying their optical response and electric field profiles using Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) simulations, aimed at matching their resonant wavelengths with the absorption bands of the dyes. Simulations show that AgNPs of diameters 20 nm and 60 nm are optimum for enhanced absorption by lawsone and betanin respectively. The FDTD simulations of the plasmonic photoelectrodes demonstrated 30% and 15% enhancement in the power absorption by betanin and lawsone at the LSPR peaks of the 60 nm and 20 nm AgNPs respectively. An optimum overall concentration of 2% (v/v) and a ratio of 4:1 (20 nm:60 nm) of the bimodal distribution of the AgNPs, was determined for incorporation in the photoanodes. An average efficiency of 1.02 ± 0.006% was achieved by the betanin-lawsone co-sensitized solar cell with the bimodal distribution of AgNPs, compared to 0.793 ± 0.006% achieved by the non-plasmonic solar cell of otherwise identical configuration. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy confirmed that the incorporation of the bimodal distribution of AgNPs in the solar cells also enabled enhanced electron lifetime and reduced recombination compared to the non-plasmonic counterpart, thereby improving the charge transfer. The plasmonic enhancement methodology presented here can be applied to further improve the efficiency of other natural dye-sensitized solar cells.

## Introduction

Since the seminal work in 1991 by O’Regan and Gratzel on Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs)1, immense interest has been directed towards their development in the last two decades. Owing to their inexpensive and facile processing requirements, DSSCs are becoming increasingly popular as an emerging photovoltaic technology2,3,4. State-of-the-art DSSCs, which have achieved maximum efficiencies of 11.9%5, widely use metal-based dyes as the photosensitizer. Although these dyes are highly efficient sensitizers that effectively capture the entire visible spectrum, they employ rare metals such as ruthenium or osmium which require elaborate synthetic procedures. Moreover, they are expensive and toxic to the environment, making their disposal a problem. Therefore, natural pigments derived from plant sources, which are environment-friendly and inexpensive6,7, have come to the forefront as alternative photosensitizers. Several groups8,9 have been investigating anthocyanins10,11, betalains12,13, carotenes14, and chlorophylls15,16 for their application in DSSCs. To date, average efficiencies achieved for natural DSSCs are ~ 0.4%, with the highest being ~ 1.5 – 2%8,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Despite their several advantages, natural dye-sensitized solar cells (NDSSCs) exhibit low efficiencies and stabilities due to insufficient charge separation and limited light-harvesting. Improving the efficiencies of NDSSCs would render them an appealing technological innovation for application in low-light harvesting applications18, portable, disposable electronics19. Several groups have worked on various aspects of the design of photoanodes and its constituent materials for developing high-efficiency DSSCs20,21,22,23,24. Prior studies have demonstrated the co-sensitization of natural pigments for improved light harvesting and better photoelectric conversion efficiencies25,26,27,28,29,30,31. The present study examines the efficiency enhancement of a betanin-lawsone co-sensitized solar cell by the plasmonic route. The plasmonic route of efficiency enhancement has been explored in various solar cells32,33, hydrogen splitting34 but not extensively explored for augmenting the efficiency of NDSSCs. The solar cell uses a blend of two natural plant-based dyes: betanin and lawsone, harvesting electromagnetic radiation in the green and blue wavelength range respectively, of the solar spectrum. Betanin is a purplish-red pigment obtained from Beta vulgaris (beetroot). It is a glycoside of betacyanin, consisting of a betaine moiety (indole-2-carboxylic acid) N-linked to betalamic acid (pyridine dicarboxylic acid), via an acetyl group35, absorbing in light the wavelength range of 450 nm – 600 nm, covering most of the green region. A considerable segment of the incident solar spectrum36. The absorption peak of betanin, which is 535 nm in water12 and 545 nm in TiO237, results from the electron transitions that occur within its conjugated systems. It also has favorable functional groups, i.e. carboxylic groups (-COOH), that facilitate strong anchoring with the TiO2 surface through bi-dentate chelation32 thereby enhancing the charge transfer efficiencies to the TiO2 anode. Lawsone, chosen as the dye complementary to betanin in this study, absorbs both in the UV (280 nm – 400 nm) and visible region (between 400 nm – 550 nm) of the solar spectrum38. It is a reddish-orange colored dye (2-hydroxy-1, 4 naphthoquinone), present in the leaves of Lawsonia inermis (henna). The absorption of this dye in the visible region is mainly due to the electronic transitions occurring in the quinoid ring. Theoretically, it has been established that there is an appreciable percolation of electron density in lawsone molecules through intermolecular hydrogen bonding38. This suggests that lawsone molecules can efficiently transfer electrons upon photo-excitation and therefore are a good potential candidate as a photosensitizer for application in solar cells. The dye in DSSCs plays the vital role of absorbing light to photo-excite electrons into the conduction band of the semiconductor39, significantly influencing the performance of the device. An emerging transformational pathway to enhance light harvesting by the dyes is the utilization of the plasmonic effect of metal nanoparticles33,40,41,42,43.

At specific wavelengths of incident electromagnetic radiation, a cumulative oscillation of electrons is excited within the metal nanoparticles. This phenomenon, known as Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) is due to the constructive interference of the incident electromagnetic field with the surface plasmons of the metals44,45. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR), exhibited by bounded metals such as metal nanoparticles, results in enhanced extinction of light and also enhances the electromagnetic field around the metal nanoparticle. This is strongly determined by the size, shape or structure and electric permittivity of the metal nanoparticle and the proximal environment44, therefore by tailoring these properties appropriately, they can potentially be used for improved light harvesting, carrier generation and enhancement of photoelectric conversion efficiency of DSSCs46,47,48,49,50. Noble metals such as gold and silver exhibit plasmon resonances in the visible and infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum and have been explored by several groups for its application in photovoltaics33,46,48,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60. The plasmonic enhancement of efficiency in a solar cell is ascribed to one or more of the following: (i) far-field scattering of incident light by the metal nanoparticles44, (ii) near-field coupling of electromagnetic fields, wherein the metal nanoparticles generate intense electric fields at the surface that are greater than the incident light by several orders of magnitude. These couple with sensitizers that are in the immediate vicinity, resulting in enhanced light absorption44, (iii) Plasmon Induced Resonance Energy Transfer (PIRET), wherein the energy from the metal nanoparticles from the LSPR oscillations is relayed to the semiconductor or proximal dye, thereby promoting the generation of electron-hole pairs and separation of charges61,62,63. Persistent efforts are currently underway by several groups to quantify the relative contribution of each mechanism45,64,65,66,67 in enhancing the efficiency of the device.

Enhancing the light absorption by the dye by harnessing the plasmonic effect of metal nanoparticles is an effective approach for augmenting the photo-electric efficiency of NDSSCs. Silver (Ag) nanoparticles (NPs) that exhibit SPR in the wavelength range of 400 nm − 800 nm68 have been chosen for this study due to their comparatively lower cost, easy availability and facile synthesis procedures. The use of tailored bimodal size distribution of AgNPs for the plasmonic enhancement of absorption by both the dyes is the key feature of this work. The optimum dimensions of AgNPs required for their extinction band to match the absorption band of the dyes were determined using Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) simulations, aimed at matching their resonant wavelengths with the absorption bands of the dyes. The simulations demonstrated that to enhance light harvesting by betanin and lawsone, a bimodal distribution of AgNPs of diameters ~ 60 nm and ~ 20 nm needs to be incorporated in the photoanode. This will result in two LSPR peaks that coincide with the absorption peaks of betanin (λmax = 535 nm) and lawsone (λmax = 410 nm) in the co-sensitized photoanode, thereby enhancing the light absorption by these dyes. AgNPs of the optimized dimensions were synthesized by the standard citrate reduction methodology and their spectral properties were systematically investigated using confocal microscopy and spectroscopic methods to match the results from the FDTD simulations. To capture the essential physics demonstrating the plasmonic enhancement in the NDSSCs, a simplified layered structure comprising of NPs embedded in the dye on a TiO2 substrate was simulated. The AgNPs were incorporated into the photoanodes at optimized total concentrations and the performance of the solar cells was evaluated. The change in the electron lifetime and the internal resistances of the solar cells upon plasmonic enhancement was assessed through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) studies of the solar cells. A study on the effect of incorporation of AgNPs on the degradation of dyes and the lifetime of the solar cells has also been carried out.

## Results and discussion

### Design of the solar cell

Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of the betanin-lawsone co-sensitized solar cell with a bimodal distribution of 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs incorporated in the photoanode. The structure of the solar cell follows a standard DSSC model2. A mesoporous TiO2 film which is coated on to the FTO substrate and sensitized with pigments, functions as the photoanode and a Pt-coated FTO substrate as the counter electrode with iodide/tri-iodide redox electrolyte filled in between.

For augmenting the solar cell efficiency by plasmonic means, the AgNPs should have a high extinction cross-section coinciding with the absorption bands of the pigments. The optimal dimensions of AgNPs required for this were determined from FDTD simulations by studying the spectral response and the intensity profiles of their electric fields. AgNPs of the desired sizes were synthesized, characterized, incorporated and tested in various solar configurations.

### Absorption studies of the dyes

To determine the absorption peaks of interest for the plasmonically augmenting the light absorption by the dyes, their absorption spectra were studied over a wavelength range of 300 nm to 800 nm. Betanin was extracted from beetroot (Beta vulgaris) using ethanol as the solvent and its peak absorbance was detected at 535 nm (Fig. 2a), which is typical of betanin69. The absorption peak is a result of HOMO → LUMO transitions between the betaine moiety and betalamic acid of the betanin molecule. The pair of nonbonding electrons located on the N-atom of the betaine moiety undergoes delocalization with the electrons located on the conjugated π systems. The subsequent n→π* transitions result in the absorption of electromagnetic radiation in the green wavelength range. Lawsone was extracted from Lawsonia inermis using acetone as the solvent and its peak absorbance was determined to be at 338 nm and 410 nm (Fig. 2b), characteristic of lawsone, confirmed with the studies reported in the literature38. The n→π* transitions in the C=O (and the π → π* transitions in the C=C regions present in the quinoidal ring of lawsone correspond to the HOMO → LUMO transitions which result in the absorption in the UV region i.e. 338 nm. The n→π* transitions are localized around non-bonding electrons of the O-atom and the quinoid ring resulting in the absorption peak in the blue region i.e. 410 nm. As observed in Fig. 2c, when sensitized onto TiO2, the absorption peak of betanin shifts to 544 nm. The red-shift of the absorption peaks of the pigment in TiO2 as compared to that in water is due to the higher refractive index of TiO270. When lawsone is sensitized onto TiO2, its absorption peak shifts to 430 nm (Fig. 2c), due to the change in the surrounding medium70 (as observed previously, in the case of betanin as well). Figure 2d shows the 3D molecular structures of (1) betanin and (2) lawsone. Prior studies of the relative NHE (Normal Hydrogen Electrode) levels have confirmed that the LUMO level of both betanin and lawsone, lies above the conduction band of TiO227,71,72, necessary for the ideal functioning of the DSSC.

In the present study, both betanin and lawsone are co-sensitized together for broadband absorption. To verify this, both the pigments were coated on TiO2 and the absorption spectrum of the co-sensitized photoanode was also characterized, shown in Fig. 2c. As expected, the peak around 430 nm results from absorption by lawsone and the peak at 544 nm results from absorption by betanin (Fig. 2c). The absorption spectrum of the co-sensitized photoanode is broadband overlapping well with the visible portion of the incident solar radiation36. For augmenting the efficiency of the solar cell, the absorption peaks of the pigments in the photoanode must match the plasmonic scattering peaks of the incorporated AgNPs. To deduce the optimum size of AgNPs that exhibits LSPR at the wavelengths of 430 nm and 544 nm, FDTD simulations have been performed, discussed in the next section.

### Determination of optimum dimensions of AgNPs through FDTD simulations

#### Study of the spectral response of AgNPs in the betanin-lawsone environment

Lumerical v8.6.2 simulation software was used for performing Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) simulations of AgNPs in water, betanin-TiO2 environment, lawsone-TiO2 environment, and the betanin-lawsone-TiO2 environment. The spectral response of the AgNPs of sizes ranging from 20 nm – 100 nm was examined under the visible wavelength range (300 nm – 800 nm). From the simulation results, it could be deduced that the 20 nm AgNPs exhibits strong LSPR peak at 429 nm in the lawsone-TiO2 environment and the 60 nm AgNP exhibits a strong LSPR peak at 540 nm in the betanin-TiO2 environment73. These peak wavelengths from the simulation results coincide well with the experimentally obtained absorption peaks of betanin on TiO2, at 542 nm, and that of lawsone on TiO2 at 430 nm (discussed in the previous section), and hence AgNPs of 20 nm and 60 nm are suitable for the plasmonic enhancement of lawsone and betanin, respectively. Figure 3a,b show the extinction, absorption and scattering cross-section plots of the 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs respectively, in the betanin-lawsone-TiO2 environment obtained from the simulations. Figure 3c shows the combined graph of the scattering spectra of the AgNPs of sizes 20 nm – 100 nm, in the betanin-lawsone-TiO2 environment. It is observed that the scattering cross-section increases with the increasing diameter of the AgNPs and it is higher than the absorption cross-section for sizes larger than 40 nm. This follows the Mie’s theory44, which describes the dependence of the absorption cross-section and scattering cross-section with the 3rd power and 6th power of the diameter, respectively. The red-shift of the resonance peaks observed on altering the surrounding medium from water to betanin-lawsone-TiO2 which is due to the greater RI of the latter medium74,75. For AgNPs of diameters greater than 50 nm, a second peak of lower intensity occurs at a lower wavelength region as a result of quadrupole resonance, whose oscillation pattern is different from that of the dipole resonance76. Qs (normalized scattering cross-section) i.e. the scattering cross-section to the geometric cross-section of the nano-sphere is described as;

$${{\rm{Q}}}_{{\rm{s}}}=\frac{{\sigma }_{s}}{{\rm{\alpha }}},$$
(1)

where σs represents the scattering cross-section and

$$\alpha =\frac{{\rm{\pi }}}{4}{d}^{2},$$
(2)

where ‘d’ is the diameter of the nanosphere. At resonance, AgNPs exhibit scattering cross-sections much larger than absorption cross-sections demonstrating the benefit of plasmonic enhancements. Qs increases with an increase in diameter till diameter 60 nm, however, it decreases beyond this size with the LSPR peaks becoming less intense and broad. Moreover, AgNPs of larger sizes tend to agglomerate making them unsuitable for this application. Figure 3d, which shows the normalized scattering cross-section with respect to the wavelength of the incident light, demonstrates that maximum scattering occurs for the 60 nm AgNPs and the wavelength of scattering concurs with the absorption maximum of betanin (when sensitized onto TiO2). AgNPs of size 20 nm displays peak absorption and scattering at a wavelength coinciding with the absorption maximum of lawsone (when in TiO2). The intensity profiles of the electric field exhibited by the 20 nm AgNPs and 60 nm AgNPs were studied over the visible spectrum to verify the enhancement at its plasmon resonant wavelength.

#### Electric field enhancement by the 20nm and 60nm AgNPs

From the scattering plots, it is understood that the AgNP of 20 nm size shows an extinction peak at 430 nm, optimum for enhancing the absorption by lawsone in the photoanode, and AgNPs of 60 nm size shows an extinction peak at 540 nm, optimum for enhancing the absorption by betanin in the photoanode. The electric field profiles around the 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs are investigated in the betanin-lawsone-TiO2 environment at various wavelengths of incident light, ranging from 300 nm to 800 nm.

Figure 4a shows the FDTD layout used for simulation of the 20 nm AgNP in the betanin-lawsone-TiO2 environment. The ON resonance wavelength, i.e. the wavelength at which the electron oscillations are maximum and the intensity of electric field the highest, was found to be at 431 nm (Fig. 4b) for the 20 nm AgNP. Figure 4c shows low electric field intensity profiles around the 20 nm AgNP at 300 nm, which is an OFF resonance wavelength. Figure 4d shows the FDTD layout used for simulation of the 60 nm AgNP in the betanin-lawsone-TiO2 environment. The ON resonance wavelength for the 60 nm AgNP was found to be at 544 nm (Fig. 4e). The electric field intensity profile of the nanoparticle at an OFF resonant wavelength of 300 nm has been shown in Fig. 4f. At ON resonance, the magnitude of electric field intensity is enhanced than the incident field by a factor of 14, exhibiting an intense plasmonic effect.

In the case of the 20 nm AgNPs, the electric field observed inside the metal nanoparticle is because the size of the particle is of the order of skin depth of silver at this wavelength of incident light44. It may also be observed that the dipole observed around the 20 nm AgNP is less distinct. This may be explained by the following: The applied field induces a dipole moment;

$${\rm{p}}={\varepsilon }_{{\rm{m}}}\alpha {{\rm{E}}}_{0,}$$
(3)

where εm is the complex permittivity of the metal, E0 is the amplitude of the electric field and α is the polarizability, which the measure of how easily charge within a particle may be displaced on the application of electric field44,77,78,79. The polarizability of a particle is proportional to the 3rd power of its diameter77,78,79. Since the 20 nm AgNP is very small, it shows low polarization and low dipole moment. Also, they are highly absorbing and have low scattered fields, as explained by Mie’s theory44.

The ON resonance wavelengths of both 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs are close to the absorption peaks of lawsone and betanin, respectively. These studies demonstrate that AgNPs of diameters 20 nm and 60 nm show enhanced absorption, scattering at the desired wavelength ranges and can be used to enhance the light-harvesting by lawsone and betanin, respectively. AgNPs of the optimized sizes of 20 nm and 60 nm were synthesized in-house and characterized before testing in the solar cells.

### Experimental studies of the synthesized AgNPs

The absorption spectrum of the colloidal suspensions of the synthesized 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs were measured across a 300 nm – 800 nm wavelength range and compared with the data determined from the simulations. Figure 5a shows the combined absorption plots of AgNPs in water for diameters ranging from 20 nm – 100 nm derived from the FDTD simulations73. This matches experimental data available in the literature80,81,82, hence validating the simulation set-up used in this study. To verify the size and optical properties of the synthesized AgNPs, they were observed using confocal microscopy and their measured absorption curves were matched against the simulated curves.

The synthesized AgNPs were studied using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (LSM-880). The system employed a 405 nm laser and a 458 nm laser for studying the 20 nm AgNPs and 60 nm AgNPs, respectively. The confocal laser scanning micrographs of a single 20 nm and 60 nm AgNP are shown in Fig. 5b. From the image, it can be observed that the AgNPs appear slightly bigger than their expected sizes (determined from the absorbance curves). This size difference is due to the scattering by the nanoparticles occupying more pixels in the image than the nanoparticle itself83. This is particularly helpful in the detection of nanoparticles of extremely small sizes such as the 20 nm AgNPs. Image analysis to determine the nanoparticle size was performed using ImageJ/Fiji84 using the thresholding methodology83,85,86 of the pixel brightness across the diameter of the scattered cross-section observed in the image. Since the array of pixels image a single nanoparticle, counting of the pixels and scaling it with respect to the scale bar of the image would provide an accurate estimation of the total diameter of the observed scattering cross-section of the nanoparticle83. The histogram of the pixel brightness across the selected cross-section showed a sudden drop in brightness close to the edges of the cross-section (Fig. 5b). The section of the particle up to which the pixel brightness remains relatively constant is the approximate diameter of the nanoparticle (this excludes the pixels showing scattered light around the nanoparticle). Three AgNPs from the 20 nm and 60 nm sample sets showed sizes of 21.7 ± 2.62 nm and 60.7 ± 1.89 nm respectively. For example, Fig. 5b shows that the measured sizes of one of the nanoparticles from each sample set to be 23 nm and 62 nm respectively.

Figures 5c,d show the measured absorption spectra of the colloidal suspension of the synthesized 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs (in water), showing absorption maxima at 408 nm and 445 nm, respectively. By matching the experimental and simulated absorption spectra, that the sizes of the prepared AgNPs were deduced to be 20 nm and 60 nm, which is also verified by the highly controlled methodology used to synthesize them80. It is observed that although the absorption peaks from the theoretical and experimental results show a good match, the curves do not entirely coincide. This deviation could be because, under experimental conditions, an additional influence of multiple neighboring AgNPs in the chosen environment is expected to have on each other whereas in the simulations only a single AgNP in the chosen environment has been considered. Besides, the simulations use Ag material parameters for the bulk model, though in the nano-scale, the material specifications for AgNPs prepared via solution-processed methods, may slightly differ87. The capping agent used for the synthesis could cause result in the broadening of the peaks88. Despite adequate precautions followed to guarantee the creation of extremely monodisperse AgNPs according to the prescribed methods80, AgNPs of slightly varied sizes may be formed, which could result in the measured absorption curve to be slightly broader compared to the simulated curve.

### Study of the photoelectrodes for plasmonic enhancement

Plasmonic dye-sensitized photoelectrodes were fabricated from the synthesized AgNPs and characterized via absorption and diffuse reflectance studies (see Supplementary Information).

Figure 6a–c show the betanin-lawsone co-sensitized photoanodes incorporated with monomodal and bimodal distributions of the 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs. The plasmonic enhancement resulting in increased absorption by the dyes is observed at their corresponding absorption peaks due to the LSPR effect of the AgNPs.

The plasmonic and non-plasmonic dye-sensitized photo-electrodes were simulated to understand the enhancement in power absorbed in the pigments due to the AgNP incorporation. Figure 6d shows the simulation layout used for the FDTD simulations. The power absorbed within the dye layer was calculated using appropriate script functions in Lumerical® for the betanin and lawsone photoelectrodes with and without the incorporation of AgNPs. Figures 6e,f show the intensity profiles of the optical absorption per unit volume at a selected cross-section of the plasmon-enhanced dye-sensitized photoelectrodes at the SPR wavelengths of the AgNPs incorporated. The absorption density is plotted on a logarithmic scale using the same color scale to facilitate the comparison. Figure 6e shows enhanced absorption into the betanin dye around the 60 nm AgNP at its SPR wavelength (i.e. 544 nm). Likewise, Fig. 6f shows enhanced absorption into the lawsone dye close to the 20 nm AgNP at its SPR wavelengths (i.e. 431 nm). The results indicate that the presence of the 60 nm and 20 nm AgNPs increases absorption by the dyes due to the enhanced scattering and absorption due to the LSPR of the AgNPs in the betanin and lawsone photoelectrodes. It may also be observed that the enhancement in the absorption by the dye due to scattering is higher in the plasmonic betanin photoelectrode compared to the plasmonic lawsone photoelectrode, whereas in the case of the plasmonic lawsone photoelectrode although some enhancement upon absorption by the dye due to scattering by the nanoparticle is seen, the absorption by the 20 nm AgNP itself is higher. This is because the 60 nm AgNP scatters more than it absorbs whereas the 20 nm AgNP absorbs more than it scatters (as mentioned previously).

Figures 6g,h show the power absorption density across the visible wavelength range, by the plasmonic betanin-sensitized photoelectrode and the plasmonic lawsone-sensitized photoelectrode respectively compared against their corresponding non-plasmonic configurations. About 30% absorption enhancement can be observed at the LSPR peak of the plasmonic betanin photoelectrode and about 15% absorption enhancement can be observed at the LSPR peak of the lawsone-TiO2 photoelectrode. The absorption enhancement g(λ) for the plasmonic dye-sensitized photoelectrodes calculated with respect to the corresponding non-plasmonic dye-sensitized photoelectrodes (shown in Fig. 6i. g(λ)) compares the efficiency of the plasmonic photoelectrode with a non-plasmonic photoelectrode and is defined as89,90;

$${\rm{g}}(\lambda )=\frac{QE{(\lambda )}_{plasmonic}}{QE{(\lambda )}_{bare}},$$
(4)

where QE (λ) or quantum efficiency is defined as89,90;

$${\rm{QE}}(\lambda )=\frac{P{(\lambda )}_{abs}}{P{(\lambda )}_{in}},$$
(5)

where P(λ)abs and P(λ)in are the power of absorbed light by the photoelectrode and the power of the incident light on the photoelectrode, respectively, at a wavelength λ89,90.

The simulation results approximately indicate an enhancement in the dye absorption in the presence of the AgNPs in both cases. It should be noted that the representation of the dye-sensitized photo-electrodes used in the simulations is not the most accurate representation of the mesoporous nature of the TiO2 layer and the chemical interaction of the dyes with it. Nevertheless, the demonstrated absorption enhancement will translate to an increase in current density in the plasmonic solar cells, and a combined increase is expected with the bimodal distribution of 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs in the betanin-lawsone co-sensitized plasmonic solar cell.

### Performance characteristics of the plasmonic solar cells

#### Current density-voltage measurements

To test the effect of plasmon enhancement in the photoelectric conversion efficiency, the plasmonic solar cells of various configurations were assembled and their J-V characteristics were evaluated under a standard AM 1.5 G illumination condition of 1000 W.cm−2. The performance and the conversion efficiency the solar cells were evaluated and compared by determining the short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), fill factor (FF), and conversion efficiency (η), which are determined from the J–V characteristic curves of the cells. First, the optimum order for sensitization of the pigments was determined by coating the pigments in the below-described sequences: (i) betanin-lawsone, (ii) lawsone-betanin (iii) pre-mixed blend of betanin and lawsone at 1:1 ratio (v/v). It was observed that the pre-mixed solution gave better results (average η of 0.793%) in comparison with the solar cells prepared by sensitizing the pigments sequentially (average efficiencies of 0.791% and 0.773% obtained for configuration (i) and (ii) respectively). Each configuration was prepared in quintuplicates and their efficiencies were assessed (Fig. 7a). Next, the optimal concentration of the AgNPs required for the best functioning of the solar cell was determined. The colloidal suspensions of 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs were mixed with the TiO2 paste at (v/v) concentrations varying from 1–5%. It was found that 1% and 4% were the optimum concentrations of 60 nm AgNPs and 20 nm AgNPs to be incorporated with betanin and lawsone, individually. Next, the optimum overall concentration for the incorporation of both sets of nanoparticles was determined by fabricating betanin-lawsone co-sensitized photoanodes with the bimodal distribution of 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs at a ratio of 1:1. The overall concentration of the nanoparticles was varied from 1% to 5% (v/v) and the efficiencies of the solar cells were evaluated. The best performance was observed with the bimodal distribution of AgNPs at an overall concentration of 2%, clearly evident from Fig. 7b. The photoelectric conversion efficiencies of 3 samples prepared with each concentration are shown in Fig. 7b. Finally, the ratio of the distribution of the 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs was optimized for the betanin-lawsone co-sensitized solar cell. Here, the overall concentration (v/v) was kept constant at 2% and the ratio of the 60 nm to the 20 nm AgNPs was varied as 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5 (as it was previously determined that the 20 nm nanoparticles were required to be at higher concentration compared to the 60 nm AgNPs). The optimum ratio of the 60 nm AgNPs to the 20 nm AgNPs, was found to be 1:4. The photoelectric conversion efficiencies of 5 samples fabricated with each ratio are shown in Fig. 7c. Figures 7a–c show the distribution of the solar cell efficiencies of quintuplicate samples of each configuration. Following the optimization, the various solar cell configurations (described subsequently) were prepared and tested: (i) betanin-lawsone solar cell, (ii) betanin-lawsone solar cell with 20 nm AgNPs (iii) betanin-lawsone solar cell with 60 nm AgNPs and (iv) betanin-lawsone solar cell with 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs. (The performance of solar cells individually sensitized with only betanin and lawsone pigments has been described in our earlier publications27,72) The J-V and P-V curves of the highest performing sample in each type of solar cell are shown in Fig. 7d,e. Figure 7f illustrates the distribution of the solar cell efficiencies of quintuplicate samples of the various solar cells investigated. Table 1 lists the average photovoltaic performance parameters of these solar cell configurations.

The enhancement in Jsc in the plasmon-enhanced DSSCs, clearly evident from Fig. 7d can be attributed to the enhanced light absorption of betanin and lawsone due to localized surface plasmons by the bimodal distribution of AgNPs. This demonstrates a significant improvement in current density by ~ 20.1%, a slight increase in voltage by ~ 5.5% and an enhancement in photoelectric conversion efficiency by ~ 28.6% in the bimodal plasmonic betanin-lawsone solar cell. The performance enhancement in the plasmonic solar cells is attributed to the LSPR effect of the AgNPs enabling enhanced absorption by the pigments thereby increasing the current generation. A 5.6% increase in Voc and a 5.5% increase in Vmax was observed for the bimodal plasmonic solar cell configurations with respect to the non-plasmonic solar cell. The increase of Voc could be ascribed to the more negative level of the quasi-Fermi energy of AgNP TiO2 photo-electrode driven by the added AgNPs91,92 (the potential difference between the Fermi energy level of the photo-electrode and the redox potential of the electrolyte determines the Voc). It has been understood from the literature that better photoelectron production also increases the photovoltage capacity of the solar cells93,94. The increase in Voc has been attributed to the photo charging effect, produced by the electron storage in metal nanoparticles, thus driving the Fermi level to more negative potentials93,94. Other factors such as greater impedance to recombination, longer electron lifetime and facile charge separation could also drive a negative shift of the Fermi level in turn benefiting Voc. However, the exact mechanism contributing to the Voc enhancement needs further investigation. It has been reported in the literature that the incorporation of metal nanoparticles at optimum concentrations in metal-oxide-semiconductor electrodes (such as TiO2) can result in an upward shift of its valence band edge, reduce the bandgap energy of the material and enhance the short-circuit current in DSSCs91.

#### Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) enables an in-depth understanding of the various physical processes that occur in DSSCs. The quintessential Nyquist plots of DSSCs exhibit 2 semicircles of which, the semicircle having the greater real part is correlated with the electron recombination processes occurring at the interface between the photoelectrode and the electrolyte, and the semicircle with the lesser real part is correlated with the electron transfer activities at the interface between Pt counter electrode and the electrolyte95,96,97. The EIS parameters are extracted by fitting the measured Nyquist plots into an equivalent circuit model96,98 (shown in Fig. 7g) that mimics the physical processes occurring in a DSSC. Fitting of the measured data into the model for each solar cell configuration was performed model using the Z-Fit function in the E-C Lab® software. χ2 (Chi-Square) values of less than ~ 10−4 (with an error of less than 1%) were maintained to ensure the best fitting. The impedance Z(f) of the equivalent circuit model used for describing DSSCs is expressed as96:

$$Z(f)={R}_{s}+\frac{{R}_{Pt}}{{R}_{Pt}{Q}_{Pt}{(j2\pi f)}^{{\alpha }_{1}}+1}+\frac{{R}_{Ti{O}_{2}}}{{R}_{Ti{O}_{2}}{Q}_{Ti{O}_{2}}{(j2\pi f)}^{{\alpha }_{2}}+1},$$
(6)

where Rs is the series ohmic resistance of the FTO including the transport loss in the electrolyte layer; RPt and QPt are the electron transport resistance and the capacitance respectively, at the Pt electrode/electrolyte interface; RTiO2 is the resistance to recombination and QTiO2 is the chemical capacitance of the double layer at the dye-TiO2 photoanode/electrolyte interface. Q denotes the Constant Phase Element (CPE), which describes non-ideal capacitive processes that are typically observed in systems such as DSSCs96, where the CPE index represented by α deviates from the ideal value i.e 198. The time constant distributions arising from the heterogeneity of the surface roughness and the surface energy at the interfaces result in this type of behavior. α1 and α2 in (6) are the CPE indices correlated with non-ideal processes occurring interfaces between the Pt-electrode and the and the dye/TiO2-photoelectrode and the electrolyte respectively. The extracted EIS parameters are summarized in Table 2. Figure 7h shows the comparison of the Nyquist plots of the 4 configurations of solar cells. Figure 7i shows the bimodal plasmonic and non-plasmonic photo-electrodes fabricated.

In this study, the photoanode is being modified and hence is of primary interest, therefore, the second arc in the Nyquist plots, which corresponds to the electron transport and recombination process within dye-TiO2 photoanode/electrolyte interface is analyzed (moreover, from the observed results the first arc correlated with the Pt-electrode/electrolyte interface does not change significantly in the all the solar cell configurations as the composition of the counter electrode is the same in all). One of the major limiting factors for the performance of DSSCs is the electron-recombination during their transport across the photoelectrode99. Previous studies have reported the minimization of recombination processes in DSSCs due to the “electron-sink effect” caused by metal nanoparticles100. This phenomenon occurs by the formation of a Schottky barrier at the interface of the metal nanoparticle and the semiconductor (in this case, the Ag/TiO2 interface). The Schottky barrier results in the storage of electrons which are subjected to charge-equilibration with the photo-excited semiconductor, thereby driving the Fermi level towards increasingly negative potentials101. This results in an electron sink that inhibits recombination processes in the dye-sensitized photoanode102,103,104.

For the ideal performance of a solar cell, high impedance to electron-recombination is a requirement. The lifetime of electrons (τ) in the photoelectrode is proportionate to the impedance to recombination at the dye-TiO2 photoanode/electrolyte interface. Higher impedance to recombination and capacitance implies higher electron lifetimes and a reduced possibility of electron-recombination activities at the dye-TiO2 photoanode/electrolyte interface105. The efficiency of the cell will reduce if the recombination of electrons takes place in the dye-TiO2 photoanode/electrolyte interface. Therefore, a higher value of τ is favorable. Table 2 lists the electron lifetimes of the various solar cells determined by the following relationship96:

$$\tau ={(Q\ast R)}^{1/{\alpha }_{2}}.$$
(7)

The betanin-lawsone solar cell with the bimodal distribution of 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs shows the higher value of recombination resistance (RTiO2 = 75.67 Ω) in comparison to that observed in the non-plasmonic solar cell (RTiO2 = 57.83 Ω). The higher value in the plasmonic configuration is attributed to the lower charge recombination and improved charge transfer due to the presence of AgNPs. The electron lifetime determined for the plasmonic solar cell is 612.79 ms, which is higher than the lifetime of 313.79 ms calculated for the non-plasmonic solar cell. Lower recombination rate of electrons occurs when their lifetime is longer thereby resulting in a higher current. This can also be observed from the higher photovoltaic conversion efficiency of the plasmonic solar cell with the bimodal distribution of the AgNPs. The Nyquist plots of the solar cell assemblies with only a monomodal distribution of either 20 nm or 60 nm AgNPs, were also studied for comparison. As expected, the RTiO2 values and the electron lifetime values were found to be intermediate to those of the above-discussed configurations.

The betanin-lawsone solar cells comprising the bimodal distribution of the 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs demonstrate the longest electron lifetime of 612.78 ms. The longer electron lifetime exhibited by the plasmonic solar cells implies that by incorporating AgNPs in the photoanode, the electron transfer mechanism at the dye-TiO2 photoanode/electrolyte interface has also been improved. This can be attributed to more conducting pathways created by the presence of metal nanoparticles within the TiO2 mesoporous structure confirmed by the higher current densities and better solar cell efficiencies observed in the bimodal plasmonic betanin-lawsone solar cell.

A brief study was carried out to understand the effect of AgNPs incorporation on the photocatalytic degradation kinetics of the pigments betanin and lawsone and the lifetime of the solar cells (see Supplementary Information). The results showed that the efficiency decrease that is normally observed in NDSSCs due to PCA of TiO2 is further accelerated due to the incorporation of the AgNPs, slightly negating the positive effect of the nanoparticles on efficiency enhancement. The photodegradation of the pigments from the photocatalytic action of AgNP-TiO2 is found to be larger compared to that of TiO2, due to the accelerated formation of reactive species by TiO2 in the presence of moisture and oxygen. These studies emphasize that to effectively harness the plasmonic effect of nanoparticles for efficiency enhancement of natural dyes in solar cells, the lifetime and stability of the NDSSCs need to be significantly improved. Hence, it is necessary to develop and optimize robust no-heat sealing techniques that suit the fabrication process of NDSSCs. Most of the presently used components in DSSCs are designed for synthetic dyes and hence are not optimal for their use in NDSSCs. The breakthrough for further augmenting the performance and efficiencies of NDSSCs would be to develop alternative materials to render them more compatible with natural dyes. The photocatalytic-degradation of natural dyes can be controlled by using adequate stabilizers and by adopting effective encapsulation techniques similar to that being used in OLED fabrication, which prevent permeation of oxygen or water molecules (such as glass-lid encapsulation with desiccants, Barix multilayer encapsulation using low-temperature deposition methods, photocurable silica nanoparticle embedded nanocomposites for encapsulation106,107).

The results of these studies are promising enough to drive future research on improving the stability of such solar cells and further enhancing their efficiency using stacked/mixed configurations involving multiple dyes and nanoparticles tailored to enhance the absorption of each dye. The optimization framework for the plasmonic enhancement of the sensitizers described here can be easily adapted for augmenting the efficiencies of several reported DSSCs.

## Methods

### FDTD simulations of the silver nanoparticle

The optimal sizes of AgNPs for the desired LSPR effect were deduced using Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) simulations, performed on Lumerical® v8.6.2 software, (Lumerical Solutions, Inc.)108. This a computational tool that employs the discretization of Maxwell’s equations in a three-dimensional space grid to simulate the interaction of electromagnetic waves with materials based on Yee’s algorithm109. Ag parameters from Palik material database110 were used to perform the 3D simulations. The surrounding environment was set as water, betanin-TiO2, lawsone-TiO2, and betanin-lawsone-TiO2 as required for each simulation. For simulating the water environment, the refractive index (RI) was set as 1.33111, for the betanin-TiO2 environment an average refractive of 1.76 (average RI of anatase TiO2 and betanin), and for the lawsone-TiO2 environment, an average refractive index of 1.76 (average RI of anatase TiO2 and lawsone) was set. Likewise, for the betanin-lawsone-TiO2 environment, an average refractive index (RI) of 1.74 (average RI of anatase TiO2, betanin, and lawsone) was set. The RI of anatase TiO2 (annealed at 400–500 °C) = 1.82112, RI of betanin = 1.7113 and the RI of lawsone = 1.7114). Perfectly Matched Layer (PML) boundary conditions, designed to absorb all the outgoing waves, were applied on all the boundaries of the simulation region. The mesh size of the simulation volume was set at 0.3 nm. A Total Field Scattered Field (TFSF) light source of wavelength range 300 nm to 800 nm was used. By using the TFSF source, the simulation region can be demarcated into two distinct regions – one region with the total field (total of the incident and scattered fields), and the other region with only the scattered field. The incident light was injected along the forward direction of the y-axis at a polarization angle of 0°. The analysis groups “power monitors” were positioned in the scattered field region and the total field region to determine the scattering and absorption cross-sections. To observe the electric field intensity profiles of the AgNPs, “frequency profile monitors” were positioned in the total field region. The extinction, absorption and scattering spectra of AgNPs with sizes ranging from 20 nm – 100 nm (varied in steps of 10 nm) were derived through the simulations to determine the optimum dimensions required for plasmonic scattering to coincide with the absorption maxima of the pigments. Optimal dimensions of 60 nm AgNPs for plasmon enhancement of betanin and 20 nm for the plasmon enhancement of lawsone was determined. To quantify electric field enhancement due to LSPR, the intensity profiles of the electric field around the AgNPs of optimized dimensions were observed under incident light of the wavelength range 300 nm – 800 nm to determine their ON and OFF resonant wavelengths.

### FDTD simulations of the non-plasmonic and plasmonic photoelectrodes

The simulation setup for one unit cell of the structure consists of a TiO2 substrate of 2 µm * 2 µm * 2 µm coated uniformly with a 0.1 µm dye layer embedded with the AgNPs, in contact with the TiO2 layer (Fig. 6d). The n, k material data for TiO2 from Devore et. al. (1951)115 was used to describe the substrate and the parameters for the AgNPs were chosen from the Palik database110. n, k optical constants for betanin and lawsone were calculated (using the Swanepoole methodology116) from the reflectance and transmittance data (available in literature117,118) and was used to describe the dye layer in the betanin and lawsone solar cells. PML boundary conditions were applied as boundary conditions on all sides to absorb the transmitted and reflected fields and a mesh size of 0.25 nm was set. A plane wave light source was used with a wavelength range of 380 nm to 780 nm. To calculate the power absorbed/scattered into the dye, two power monitors were placed one on top of the dye, and the other at a distance of 0.01 µm above the dye-TiO2 interface. The “power absorbed” analysis group was used to determine the power absorption density (W.µm−3). The absorption enhancement was calculated using appropriate script functions for the simulation setups with and without the bimodal distribution of AgNPs. Configurations of photoelectrodes studied here are: (i) 60 nm AgNPs on betanin-TiO2 photoelectrode and (ii) 20 nm AgNPs on lawsone-TiO2 photoelectrode.

### Synthesis of silver nanoparticles

AgNPs of optimized dimensions were prepared using the citrate reduction method optimized by Bastus. et al.80. The procedure uses silver nitrate and trisodium citrate as the precursors. The chemical reaction of the synthesis can be expressed as follows: 4Ag+ + C6H5O7Na3 + 2H2O → 4Ag° + C6H5O7H3 + 3Na+ + H+ + O2119. 50 mL of an aqueous solution (de-ionized (DI) water was used to prepare the aqueous solutions) with 5 mM sodium citrate and 0.1 mM tannic acid, which was prepared in a three-necked round-bottomed flask and heated to 110 °C in a rota-mantle for 15 min with continuous stirring. A reflux was used to run cooling water and prevent the evaporation of the solvent. To prepare Ag seeds of the appropriate size required for the synthesis of the 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs, the tannic acid of 0.1 mM concentration was used80. 625 μL of AgNO3 (20 mM) was fed into the solution after it began boiling, turning the solution yellow. Following this, the seed solution was diluted by removing 10 mL of sample and adding 8.5 mL of DI water. Subsequently, the temperature of the solution was brought down to 90 °C and 250 μL of sodium citrate (25 mM), 750 μL of tannic acid (2.5 mM), and 625 μL of AgNO3 (20 mM) were sequentially dropped using a micropipette with a time delay ~ 1 min. This methodology optimized by Bastus et al.80 results in monodisperse AgNPs with < 10% standard deviation in their size distributions80. The repetition 3 times and 9 times respectively, at intervals of 30 min between each step results in a step-by-step pre-calculated increase in the diameter of the AgNPs80 forming AgNPs of the desired sizes: 20 nm and 60 nm. The optical properties of the colloidal solution of the synthesized 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs were characterized using spectroscopic methods and later incorporated into the photo-anodes of the solar cells.

### Preparation of the solar cell

Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates (15 mm × 15 mm × 2 mm; resistivity <10 Ω.cm−1 and transmittance >83%, from Solaronix (Solaronix®, Switzerland) were thoroughly cleaned and the TiO2 paste was prepared according to methods optimized by Ito et al.120. The 20 nm and 60 nm AgNPs were homogeneously mixed with the TiO2 paste at optimized concentrations through ultra-sonication. The photoanodes for the four different solar cell configurations were prepared by dispensing the homogeneous suspension of the TiO2 paste mixed with 20 nm and 60 nm AgNP suspensions at appropriate concentrations on to the FTO substrates by the doctor blading technique and subsequently annealed at 450 °C for 1 h120. The concentration of nanoparticles and their ratios were optimized based on solar cell performances and has been described in the section Performance characteristics of the plasmonic solar cells. Before the TiO2 coating, the prepared 20 nm and 60 nm AgNP suspensions of optimized dimensions were spin-coated for 5 s at a rotational speed of ~ 2000 rpm upon the FTO substrates to enable better light harvesting. For the control solar cell, the photoanode was prepared by coating pristine TiO2 (without AgNPs) and annealed simultaneously at identical conditions. The thickness of the coating was verified to be an optimal 20–25 µm120 observed via the Z-stacking method of imaging using an optical microscope (Carl Zeiss SteREO Discovery V20. Betanin and lawsone pigments were extracted and purified from Beta vulgaris slices and Lawsonia inermis leaves respectively, by following procedures described in the literature12,121. The factors such as solvent, temperature, time and pH were optimized72. The photo-anodes were left immersed in the purified pigment extracts for 24 h in the dark for proper adsorption, following which they were gently rinsed with ethanol to remove debris and dried. For optimum performance, pre-and-post TiCl4 treatment of the photo-anodes was done to ensure the best efficiencies of the solar cells (according to optimized methods described in the literature12,120). Pt-coated FTO substrates, (Solaronix®) were used as the counter electrodes. A solution of LiI/I2 (1.0 M/0.1 M), in NMP (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone), was mixed with 6% (w/w) PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) to make the gel-electrolyte122, which was used in all the solar cells. A spacer with a thickness of 35 µm was attached around the coated portion of the photo-electrodes. This will facilitate the electrolyte to fill up to the optimum thickness (35 µm) required for the electrolyte and also will protect the TiO2-coating-free portion of the FTO substrate from short-circuiting on contacting the counter electrode. The Pt-FTO counter electrode is assembled over this (Pt coating positioned to face the inside of the assembly) to build a standard DSSC sandwiched–configuration. Subsequently, the electrolyte is injected into the solar cell assembly via a 0.5 mm diameter hole drilled in the counter electrode and sealed. A photo-active area of 0.25 cm2 was defined using a black mask for all the prepared solar cells. The samples were prepared in quintuplicates to confirm the repeatability and reproducibility of the performance realized. The NDSSC fabrication described above was performed at room temperature and ambient laboratory conditions.

### Characterization and measurement

A solar simulator (Newport Corporation, Oriel® Class AAA) and a Keithley® 2440 5 A (Keithley, Inc.) source-meter were employed to determine the current density-voltage characteristics of the solar cells. The performance characteristics of the solar cells were evaluated under 1 sun illumination (AM 1.5 G standard test conditions at 1000 W.cm−2). A UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu® UV-2400 PC Series) was employed to study the absorption spectra of the liquid and solid samples and the diffuse reflectance of the solid samples across a wavelength range of 300 nm – 800 nm at a sampling interval of 0.5 nm and the slit width set at 5 nm. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM-880, Axio observer; Carl Zeiss®, Germany) was employed to observe the plasmonic scattering/fluorescence by the nanoparticles at their resonant wavelengths. These have a high degree of magnification and resolution. The system employed a 405 nm laser and a 458 nm laser for studying the 20 nm AgNPs and 60 nm AgNPs, respectively. A drop of the colloidal nanoparticle suspensions was placed on a glass slide, covered with a cover-slip, and the edges were sealed. The scattering/fluorescence signals of the fixed samples were observed using the Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.4 Oil DIC M27 objective. An electrochemical workstation (Bio-Logic® VMP3B-20) was employed to perform electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies of the solar cells. A constant DC voltage bias set at 0.5 V (~ Voc of the DSSC) was applied to the solar cells and their impedance parameters were recorded over a frequency range of 100 kHz–10 mHz. The measured Nyquist plots were fitted into an appropriate equivalent circuit using the Z Fit function in EC-Lab® software and the corresponding EIS parameters such as electron- electron-transport resistance, chemical capacitance and the impedance to electron-hole recombination, were extracted. Multiple measurements were recorded to ensure repeatability and reproducibility and they were performed in ambient laboratory conditions.

## References

1. 1.

O’Regan, B. & Graetzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nat. (ISSN 0028-0836) 353, 737–740 (1991).

2. 2.

Hardin, B. E., Snaith, H. J. & McGehee, M. D. The renaissance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat. Photonics 6, 162 (2012).

3. 3.

Shalini, S. et al. Status and outlook of sensitizers/dyes used in dye sensitized solar cells (DSSC): a review. Int. J. Energy Res. 40, 1303–1320 (2016).

4. 4.

Sharma, K., Sharma, V. & Sharma, S. S. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Fundamentals and Current Status. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13, 381 (2018).

5. 5.

Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 53). Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 27, 3–12 (2019).

6. 6.

S. Shalini, R., Balasundaraprabhu, T., Satish Kumar, N., Prabavathy, S. S. & Prasanna, S. Status and outlook of sensitizers/dyes used in dye sensitized solar cells (DSSC): a review. Int. J. ENERGY Res. 40, 1303–1320 (2016).

7. 7.

Calogero, G. et al. Synthetic analogues of anthocyanins as sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 12, 883–94 (2013).

8. 8.

Richhariya, G., Kumar, A., Tekasakul, P. & Gupta, B. Natural dyes for dye sensitized solar cell: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69, 705–718 (2017).

9. 9.

Narayan, M. R. Review: Dye sensitized solar cells based on natural photosensitizers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 208–215 (2012).

10. 10.

Chaiamornnugool, P. et al. Performance and stability of low-cost dye-sensitized solar cell based crude and pre-concentrated anthocyanins: Combined experimental and DFT/TDDFT study. J. Mol. Struct. 1127, 145–155 (2017).

11. 11.

Talip, L. F. A. et al. Hybrid TiO2-Gigantochloa Albociliata Charcoal in Dye Sensitized Solar Cell. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 209, 012086 (2017).

12. 12.

Sandquist, C. & McHale, J. L. Improved efficiency of betanin-based dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 221, 90–97 (2011).

13. 13.

Ramamoorthy, R. et al. Betalain and anthocyanin dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Appl. Electrochem. 46, 929–941 (2016).

14. 14.

Orona-Navar, A. et al. Astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis as a natural photosensitizer for dye-sensitized solar cell. Algal Res. 26, 15–24 (2017).

15. 15.

Al-Alwani, M. A. M., Ludin, N. A., Mohamad, A. B., Kadhum, A. A. H. & Sopian, K. Extraction, preparation and application of pigments from Cordyline fruticosa and Hylocereus polyrhizus as sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells. Spectrochim. Acta - Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 179, 23–31 (2017).

16. 16.

Nan, H. et al. Studies on the optical and photoelectric properties of anthocyanin and chlorophyll as natural co-sensitizers in dye sensitized solar cell. Opt. Mater. (Amst). 73, 172–178 (2017).

17. 17.

Al-Bat’hi, S. A. M., Alaei, I. & Sopyan, I. Natural photosensitizers for dye sensitized solar cells. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 3, 138–143 (2013).

18. 18.

Kim, S., Jahandar, M., Jeong, J. H. & Lim, D. C. Recent Progress in Solar Cell Technology for Low-Light Indoor Applications. 3–17 https://doi.org/10.2174/1570180816666190112141857 (2019).

19. 19.

Research and Markets. Global Dye Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSC/DSC) Report: Technologies, Markets, Players - 2013–2023. (2013).

20. 20.

Rho, W.-Y. et al. Ag Nanoparticle–Functionalized Open-Ended Freestanding TiO2 Nanotube Arrays with a Scattering Layer for Improved Energy Conversion Efficiency in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 6, 117 (2016).

21. 21.

Yun, M. J., Sim, Y. H., Cha, S. I., Seo, S. H. & Lee, D. Y. High Energy Conversion Efficiency with 3-D Micro-Patterned Photoanode for Enhancement Diffusivity and Modification of Photon Distribution in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10 (2017).

22. 22.

Guo, X., Lu, G. & Chen, J. Graphene-Based Materials for Photoanodes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Front. Energy Res. 3, 1–15 (2015).

23. 23.

Chen, X., Tang, Y. & Liu, W. efficient dye-sensitized solar cells based on nanoflower-like ZnO photoelectrode. Molecules 22, 1–6 (2017).

24. 24.

Dawoud, B., Amer, E. & Gross, D. Experimental investigation of an adsorptive thermal energy storage. Int. J. energy Res. 31, 135–147 (2007).

25. 25.

Lim, A. et al. Higher performance of DSSC with dyes from cladophora sp. As mixed cosensitizer through synergistic effect. J. Biophys. 2015, (2015).

26. 26.

Colonna, D. et al. Efficient Cosensitization Strategy for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Appl. Phys. Express 5, 22303 (2012).

27. 27.

Sreeja, S. & Pesala, B. Co-sensitization aided efficiency enhancement in betanin-chlorophyll solar cell. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 7, 25 (2018).

28. 28.

Sreeja, S. & Pesala, B. Efficiency Enhancement of Betanin Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Using Plasmon-Enhanced Silver Nanoparticles. in Advances in Energy Research, Vol 1: Selected Papers from ICAER (International Conference on Advances in Energy Research) 2017 (Springer Proceedings in Energy) (eds. Singh, S. & Ramadesigan, V.) 978–981 (Springer, 2020).

29. 29.

Sreeja, S. & Pesala, B. Efficiency Enhancement of Betanin Dye Sensitized Solar Cells Using Plasmon Enhanced Silver Nanoparticles. in Presented at the International Conference on Advances in Energy Research, IIT Bombay (2017).

30. 30.

Sreeja, S. & Pesala, B. Green solar cells using natural pigments having complementary absorption spectrum. In SPIE Photonics West 2016, International Society for Optics and Photonics, The Moscone Center, San Francisco, CA, United States 9743–55 (2016).

31. 31.

Sreeja, S. Green Solar Cells of Enhanced Efficiency. (Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), 2018).

32. 32.

Park, K. et al. Dyes and Pigments Adsorption characteristics of gardenia yellow as natural photosensitizer for dye-sensitized solar cells. Dye. Pigment. 96, 595–601 (2013).

33. 33.

Berginc, M. & Krašovec, U. O. & I, M. T. Solution Processed Silver Nanoparticles in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Nanomater. 2014, 49–56 (2014).

34. 34.

Pawar, G. S. et al. Enhanced Photoactivity and Hydrogen Generation of LaFeO 3 Photocathode by Plasmonic Silver Nanoparticle Incorporation. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1, 3449–3456 (2018).

35. 35.

Slimen, I. B., Najar, T. & Abderrabba, M. Chemical and Antioxidant Properties of Betalains. J. Agric. Chem. Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04208 (2017).

36. 36.

(ASTM), A. S. for T. and M. Reference Solar Spectral Irradiance: Air Mass 1.5. Terrestrial Reference Spectra for Photovoltaic Performance Evaluation. (2003).

37. 37.

Zhang, D. et al. Betalain pigments for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 195, 72–80 (2008).

38. 38.

S S. Khadtare, et al. Dye Sensitized Solar Cell with Lawsone Dye Using ZnO Photoanode: Experimental and TD-DFT Study. RSC Adv. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA14620D

39. 39.

Nazeeruddin, M. K., Liska, P., Moser, J., Vlachopoulos, N. & Grätzel, M. Conversion of Light into Electricity with Trinuclear Ruthenium Complexes Adsorbed on Textured TiO2Films. Helv. Chim. Acta 73, 1788–1803 (1990).

40. 40.

Stratakis, E. & Kymakis, E. Nanoparticle-based plasmonic organic photovoltaic devices. Mater. Today 16, 133–146 (2013).

41. 41.

Akimov, Y. A., Koh, W. S., Sian, S. Y. & Ren, S. Nanoparticle-enhanced thin film solar cells: Metallic or dielectric nanoparticles? Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, (2010).

42. 42.

Schade, M. et al. Regular arrays of Al nanoparticles for plasmonic applications. J. Appl. Phys. 115, (2014).

43. 43.

Pfeiffer, T. V. et al. Plasmonic nanoparticle films for solar cell applications fabricated by size-selective aerosol deposition. Energy Procedia 60, 3–12 (2014).

44. 44.

Maier, S. A. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications. (Springer Science+Business Media LLC, 2007).

45. 45.

Atwater, H. A. & Polman, A. Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices. Nat. Mater. 9, 205–213 (2010).

46. 46.

Dissanayake, M. A. K. L., Kumari, J. M. K. W., Senadeera, G. K. R. & Thotawatthage, C. A. Efficiency enhancement in plasmonic dye-sensitized solar cells with TiO2 photoanodes incorporating gold and silver nanoparticles. J. Appl. Electrochem. 46, 47–58 (2016).

47. 47.

Mazzoni, M. et al. P-DSSC Plasmonic enhancement in Dye sensitized solar cell. 5–7 (2012).

48. 48.

Jun, H. K., Careem, M. A. & Arof, A. K. Plasmonic Effects of Quantum Size Gold Nanoparticles on Dye-sensitized Solar. Cell. Mater. Today Proc. 3, S73–S79 (2016).

49. 49.

Peh, C. K. N., KE, L. & Ho, G. W. Modification of ZnO nanorods through Au nanoparticles surface coating for dye-sensitized solar cells applications. Mater. Lett. 64, 1372–1375 (2010).

50. 50.

Song, D. H., Kim, H.-S., Suh, J. S., Jun, B.-H. & Rho, W.-Y. Multi-Shaped Ag Nanoparticles in the Plasmonic Layer of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells for Increased Power Conversion Efficiency. Nanomaterials 7, 136 (2017).

51. 51.

Tan, H., Santbergen, R., Smets, A. H. & Zeman, M. Plasmonic light trapping in thin-film silicon solar cells with improved self-assembled silver nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 12, 4070–4076 (2012).

52. 52.

Gangishetty, M. K., Lee, K. E., Scott, R. W. J. & Kelly, T. L. Plasmonic Enhancement of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells in the Red-to-near-Infrared Region using Triangular Core–Shell Ag@SiO 2 Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 11044–11051 (2013).

53. 53.

Duche, D. et al. Improving light absorption in organic solar cells by plasmonic contribution. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93, 1377–1382 (2009).

54. 54.

Su, Y. H., Ke, Y. F., Cai, S. L. & Yao, Q. Y. Surface plasmon resonance of layer-by-layer gold nanoparticles induced photoelectric current in environmentally-friendly plasmon-sensitized solar cell. Light Sci. Appl. 1, 2–6 (2012).

55. 55.

Temple, T. L. & Bagnall, D. M. Optical properties of gold and aluminium nanoparticles for silicon solar cell applications. J. Appl. Phys. 109, (2011).

56. 56.

Lai, W. H., Su, Y. H., Teoh, L. G. & Hon, M. H. Commercial and natural dyes as photosensitizers for a water-based dye-sensitized solar cell loaded with gold nanoparticles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 195, 307–313 (2008).

57. 57.

Lu, L., Luo, Z., Xu, T. & Yu, L. Cooperative Plasmonic Effect of Ag and Au Nanoparticles on Enhancing Performance of Polymer Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 13, 59–64 (2012).

58. 58.

Omelyanovich, M., Makarov, S., Milichko, V. & Simovski, C. Enhancement of perovskite solar cells by plasmonic nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Appl. 7, 836–847 (2016).

59. 59.

Eli, D., Owolabi, J. A., Olowomofe, G. O. & Jonathan, E. Plasmon-Enhanced Efficiency in Dye Sensitized Solar Cells Decorated with Size- Controlled Silver Nanoparticles Based on…. Plasmon-Enhanced Efficiency in Dye Sensitized Solar Cells Decorated with Size-Controlled Silver Nanoparticles Based on Anthocyanin. J. Photonic Mater. Technol. 2, 6–13 (2016).

60. 60.

Omelyanovich, M., Ra’Di, Y. & Simovski, C. Perfect plasmonic absorbers for photovoltaic applications. J. Opt. (United Kingdom) 17, (2015).

61. 61.

Zhang, X. et al. Significant Broadband Photocurrent Enhancement by Au-CZTS Core-Shell Nanostructured Photocathodes. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–8 (2016).

62. 62.

Erwin, W. R., Zarick, H. F., Talbert, E. M. & Bardhan, R. Light trapping in mesoporous solar cells with plasmonic nanostructures. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1577–1601 (2016).

63. 63.

Zheng, X. & Zhang, L. Photonic nanostructures for solar energy conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 2511–2532 (2016).

64. 64.

Tian, Y. & Tatsuma, T. Mechanisms and Applications of Plasmon-Induced Charge Separation at TiO2 Films Loaded with Gold Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 7632–7637 (2005).

65. 65.

Tian, Y. & Tatsuma, T. Plasmon-induced photoelectrochemistry at metal nanoparticles supported on nanoporous TiO2. Chem. Commun. 1810–1811, https://doi.org/10.1039/B405061D (2004).

66. 66.

Furube, A., Du, L., Hara, K., Katoh, R. & Tachiya, M. Ultrafast Plasmon-Induced Electron Transfer from Gold Nanodots into TiO2 Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 14852–14853 (2007).

67. 67.

Mubeen, S., Hernandez-Sosa, G., Moses, D., Lee, J. & Moskovits, M. Plasmonic Photosensitization of a Wide Band Gap Semiconductor: Converting Plasmons to Charge Carriers. Nano Lett. 11, 5548–5552 (2011).

68. 68.

Chen, F. & Johnston, R. L. Plasmonic Properties of Silver Nanoparticles on Two Substrates. Plasmonics 4, 147–152 (2009).

69. 69.

Dumbravǎ, A., Enache, I., Oprea, C. I., Georgescu, A. & Gîrţu, M. A. Toward a more efficient utilisation of betalains as pigments for Dye-Sensitized solar cells. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostructures 7, 339–351 (2012).

70. 70.

Popova, A. V. Spectral characteristics and solubility of beta-carotene and zeaxanthin in different solvents. (2017).

71. 71.

Kavitha, S., Praveena, K. & Lakshmi, M. A new method to evaluate the feasibility of a dye in DSSC application. Int. J. Energy Res. 41, 2173–2183 (2017).

72. 72.

Sreeja, S. & Pesala, B. Performance enhancement of betanin solar cells co-sensitized with indigo and lawsone: A Comparative Study. ACS Omega 4, 18023–18034 (2019).

73. 73.

Sreeja, S. & Pesala, B. Efficiency Enhancement of Betanin – Chlorophyll Cosensitized Natural Pigment Solar Cells Using Plasmonic Effect of Silver Nanoparticles. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 10, 124–134 (2020).

74. 74.

Li, X., Choy, W. C. H., Lu, H., Sha, W. E. I. & Ho, A. H. P. Efficiency Enhancement of Organic Solar Cells by Using Shape-Dependent Broadband Plasmonic Absorption in Metallic Nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 2728–2735 (2013).

75. 75.

Li, X. et al. Dual Plasmonic Nanostructures for High Performance Inverted Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 24, 3046–3052 (2012).

76. 76.

M. Shopa, K., Kolwas, A. & Derkachova, G. D. Organic field-effect transistors. Opto-Electronics Rev. 18, 121–136 (2010).

77. 77.

Rivera, V. A. G., Ferri, F. A. & Marega, E. Jr. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonances: Noble Metal Nanoparticle Interaction with Rare-Earth Ions. In Plasmonics – Principles and Applications 283–303 (2012).

78. 78.

Persson, B. N. J. Polarizability of small spherical metal particles: influence of the matrix environment. Surf. Sci. 281, 153–162 (1993).

79. 79.

Barnes, W. L. Particle Plasmons: Why Shape Matters. Plasmonics 1–10.

80. 80.

Bastús, N. G., Merkoçi, F., Piella, J. & Puntes, V. Synthesis of Highly Monodisperse Citrate- Stabilized Silver Nanoparticles of up to 200 nm: Kinetic Control and Catalytic Properties. Chem. Mater. 26, 2836–2846 (2014).

81. 81.

Joshi, D. N., Ilaiyaraja, P., Sudakar, C. & Prasath, R. A. Facile one-pot synthesis of multi-shaped silver nanoparticles with tunable ultra-broadband absorption for efficient light harvesting in dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 185, 104–110 (2018).

82. 82.

Evanoff, D. et al. Size-Controlled Synthesis of Nanoparticles. 2. Measurement of Extinction, Scattering, and Absorption Cross Sections. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 13957–13962 (2004).

83. 83.

Klein, S. Quantitative visualization of colloidal and intracellular gold nanoparticles by confocal microscopy. 15, 1–11 (2010).

84. 84.

Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

85. 85.

Moallem, P. & Razmjooy, N. Optimal Threshold Computing in Automatic Image Thresholding using Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization Optimal Threshold Computing in Automatic Image Thresholding using Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization. https://doi.org/10.22201/icat.16656423.2012.10.5.361 (2012).

86. 86.

Sezgin, M. Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. 13, 146–165 (2004).

87. 87.

Chouhan, N. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications. In Silver Nanoparticles - Fabrication, Characterization and Applications 21–56 https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75611 (IntechOpen, 2018).

88. 88.

Daniels, J. L., Crawford, T. M., Andreev, O. A. & Reshetnyak, Y. K. Synthesis and characterization of pHLIP ® coated gold nanoparticles. Biochem. Biophys. Reports 10, 62–69 (2017).

89. 89.

Markvart, T. & Castañer, L. Chapter IA-1-Principles of Solar Cell Operation. Sol. Cells (Second Ed. A. McEvoy, L. Castañer, T. Markvart, Eds., Second Edi, Elsevier 3–25 (2013).

90. 90.

Lumerical FDTD. Solar cell methodology. Lumerical Support (2020). Available at: https://support.lumerical.com/hc/en-us/articles/360042165634-Solar-cell-methodology. (Accessed: 8th March 2020).

91. 91.

Villanueva-Cab, J. et al. Photocharging and Band Gap Narrowing Effects on the Performance of Plasmonic Photoelectrodes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 31374–31383 (2018).

92. 92.

Deepa, K. G., Lekha, P. & Sindhu, S. Efficiency enhancement in DSSC using metal nanoparticles: A size dependent study. Sol. Energy 86, 326–330 (2012).

93. 93.

Sardar, S. et al. Enhanced photovoltage in DSSCs: synergistic combination of a silver modified TiO 2 photoanode and a low cost counter electrode. RSC Adv. 6, 33433–33442 (2016).

94. 94.

Yan, L., Wang, H., Quanyou, F. & Gang, Z. Gold nanoparticles inlaid TiO2 photoanodes: a superior candidate for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 2156 (2013).

95. 95.

Fabregat-Santiago, F., Bisquert, J., Palomares, E., Haque, S. A. & Durrant, J. R. Impedance spectroscopy study of dye-sensitized solar cells with undoped spiro-OMeTAD as hole conductor. J. Appl. Phys. 100, (2006).

96. 96.

Bisquert, J. & Fabregat-Santiago, F. Impedance spectroscopy: a general introduction and application to dye-sensitized solar cells. Dye. Sol. Cells 604 (2010).

97. 97.

Fabregat-Santiago, F. et al. Correlation between Photovoltaic Performance and Impedance Spectroscopy of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Ionic Liquids. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 6550–6560 (2007).

98. 98.

Liberatore, M. et al. Using EIS for diagnosis of dye-sensitized solar cells performance. J. Appl. Electrochem. 39, 2291–2295 (2009).

99. 99.

Haque, S. A. et al. Charge Separation versus Recombination in Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline Solar Cells. The Minimization of Kinetic Redundancy. 13, 3456–3462 (2005).

100. 100.

Wu, J. L. et al. Surface plasmonic effects of metallic nanoparticles on the performance of polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells. ACS Nano 5, 959–967 (2011).

101. 101.

Link, S. & El-Sayed, M. A. Shape and size dependence of radiative, non-radiative and photothermal properties of gold nanocrystals. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 19, 409–453 (2000).

102. 102.

Lim, S. P., Pandikumar, A., Lim, H. N., Ramaraj, R. & Huang, N. M. Boosting Photovoltaic Performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Using Silver Nanoparticle-Decorated N,S-Co-Doped-TiO2 Photoanode. Sci. Rep. 5, 11922 (2015).

103. 103.

Buda, S., Shafie, S., Rashid, S. A., Jaafar, H. & Sharif, N. F. M. Enhanced visible light absorption and reduced charge recombination in AgNP plasmonic photoelectrochemical cell. Results Phys. 7, 2311–2316 (2017).

104. 104.

Chien, T. et al. Study of the Plasmon Energy Transfer Processes in Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. 2015 (2015).

105. 105.

Wang, M., Chen, P., Humphry-baker, R., Zakeeruddin, S. M. & Grätzel, M. The Influence of Charge Transport and Recombination on the Performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. 290–299, https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200800708 (2009).

106. 106.

Lee, S.-M. A Review of Flexible OLEDs Toward Highly Durable Unusual Displays. XX, 1–10 (2017).

107. 107.

Rui-Peng, X., Yan.-Q., L. & Jian.-X., T. Recent advances in flexible organic light-emitting diodes. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 9116 (2016).

108. 108.

FDTD Solutions (8.6.2), Lumerical Solutions, Inc. (2013).

109. 109.

Yee, K. S. Numerical Solution of Initial Boundary Value Problems Involving Maxwell’s Equations in Isotropic Media. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 14, 302–307 (1966).

110. 110.

D. Palik, E. Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids. (Academic Press, 1998).

111. 111.

Hale, G. M. & Querry, M. R. Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-microm Wavelength Region. Appl. Opt. 12, 555–563 (1973).

112. 112.

Yarmand, B. & Sadrnezhaad, S. K. Influence of annealing temperature on structural and optical properties of mesoporous TiO 2 thin films prepared by sol-gel templating technique. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 12, 1490–1497 (2010).

113. 113.

PubChem Identifier CID 6540685. Available at: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/6540685. (Accessed: 18th June 2018).

114. 114.

PubChem Identifier CID 6755. Available at: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Lawsone#section=CAS. (Accessed: 14th July 2018)

115. 115.

DeVore, J. R. Refractive Indices of Rutile and Sphalerite. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 41, 416–419 (1951).

116. 116.

Shaaban, E. R. & Yahia, I. S. Validity of Swanepoel’ s Method for Calculating the Optical Constants of Thick Films. 121, 628–635 (2012).

117. 117.

Pallipurath, A. et al. Crystalline adducts of the Lawsone molecule (2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthaquinone): optical properties and computational modelling. CrystEngComm 17, 7684–7692 (2015).

118. 118.

De, D., Sinha, D. & Ayaz, A. Performance Evaluation of Beetroot Sensitized Solar Cell Device. in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Communication, Devices and Computing 223–228 (Springer, 2020).

119. 119.

Pacioni, N. L., Borsarelli, C. D., Rey, V. & Veglia, A. V. Silver Nanoparticle Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11262-6 (2015).

120. 120.

Ito, S. et al. Fabrication of Screen-Printing Pastes From TiO 2 Powders for Dye-Sensitised Solar Cells. 10.1002/pip (2007).

121. 121.

Tan, M. C. & Ho, C. W. Effect of Extraction Solvent System, Time, and Temperature on Total Phenolic Content of Henna Stems. Int. Food Res. J. 20, 3117–3123 (2013).

122. 122.

Man-Gu, K, Park, N.-G, Kim, K.-M & Chang, S.-H. Dye Sensitized Solar Cells Including Polymer Electrolyte Gel Containg Poly(Vinyldene Fluoride) Patent No. US 6,756,537 B2. (2004).

## Acknowledgements

The first author thanks CSIR for the award of Senior Research Fellowship (Award No. 31/57(002)/2015-EMRI) to pursue research at CSIR-CEERI. The authors thank Dr. K. Ramesha, Principal Scientist, CSIR-CECRI for the kind support and facilities provided to carry out the work. The authors acknowledge the facilities and the scientific-technical assistance of Advanced Microscopy Facility at the National Cancer Tissue Biobank (NCTB), Department of Biotechnology, IIT Madras, Chennai.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

S.S. carried out the experiments pertaining to this research work as part of her doctoral thesis work and wrote the manuscript. B.P. supervised the research work and contributed to multiple revisions of the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bala Pesala.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Sreeja, S., Pesala, B. Plasmonic enhancement of betanin-lawsone co-sensitized solar cells via tailored bimodal size distribution of silver nanoparticles. Sci Rep 10, 8240 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65236-1

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Doping effects on catechol functionalized anatase TiO2(101) surface for dye-sensitized solar cells

• Jin-Hua Luo
• , Yun-Fei Mo
• , Ze-Sheng Li
•  & Fu-You Du

Materials Research Express (2021)

• ### Betanidin isomerisation and decarboxylation, thermodynamic and charge transfer dye properties towards dye sensitised solar cells application

• Rene Costa
• , Alexander Pogrebnoi
•  & Tatiana Pogrebnaya

Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry (2021)

• ### 2-Hydroxy-1, 4-napthoquinone solubilization, thermodynamics and adsorption kinetics with surfactant

• Zoya Zaheer
• , Ekram Yousif Danish
•  & Samia A. Kosa

Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering (2020)