Abstract
Reckless use of herbicides like butachlor (Buta) in the fields represents a serious threat to crop plants, and hence to their productivity. Silicon (Si) is well known for its implication in the alleviation of the effects of abiotic stresses; however, its role in mitigating Buta toxicity is not yet known. Therefore, this study was carried out to explore the role of Si (10 µM) in regulating Buta (4 µM) toxicity in rice seedlings. Buta reduced growth and photosynthesis, altered nitric oxide (NO) level and leaf and root anatomy, inhibited enzyme activities of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle (while transcripts of associated enzymes, increased except OsMDHAR), as well as its metabolites (ascorbate and glutathione) and uptake of nutrients (Mg, P, K, S, Ca, Fe, etc. except Na), while addition of Si reversed Buta-induced alterations. Buta stimulated the expression of Si channel and efflux transporter genes- Lsi1 and Lsi2 while the addition of Si further greatly induced their expression under Buta toxicity. Buta increased free proline accumulation by inducing the activity of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) and decreasing proline dehydrogenase (PDH) activity, while Si reversed these effects caused by Buta. Our results suggest that Si-governed mitigation of Buta toxicity is linked with favorable modifications in energy flux parameters of photosynthesis and leaf and root anatomy, up-regulation of Si channel and transporter genes, ascorbate-glutathione cycle and nutrient uptake, and lowering in oxidative stress. We additionally demonstrate that NO might have a crucial role in these responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Rice is a major cereal crop of the world. However, the invasion invasion of weeds is one of the major issues in the rice cultivated areas. To control weeds in the rice fields, several herbicides are being used at larger scale. Among the different herbicides, butachlor (hereafter referred to as Buta) has been extensively used in India for the control of weeds1,2. Butachlor, a chloroacetanilide herbicide, (N-[butoxymethyl]-2-chloro-2, 6′-diethylacetanilide), is commonly used in rice fields3. In water, the half-life of Buta ranges from 1.65–2.48 days while in soil 2.67–5.33 days4. Approximately 6.75 ×106 kg Buta are used annually in India5. Besides controlling weeds, the extensive use of herbicides may also affect other crop plants and thus may negatively impact their productivity. Herbicides indeed negatively affect seed germination, hormone synthesis, cell division, cell permeability, nutrient uptake and their assimilation, as well as lipid and protein metabolism1,6,7,8,9,10,11. García-Garijoet al.12 have observed that imazamox, a herbicide, drastically decreased root nodule biomass in Phaseolus vulgaris and Vicia sativa, thereby affecting their nitrogen balance. Herbicides including Buta generally inhibit growth of weeds by affecting the biosynthesis of photosynthetic pigments13,14 and either electron carriers or enzymes partaking in photosynthesis15,16,17. Due to their negative interactions with metabolic processes, herbicides including Buta have been reported to cause oxidative stress by inducing the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that enhanced lipid peroxidation, and thus, disturbed the fluidity of membranes2,18,19,20. In response to herbicide-created oxidative stress, challenged plants respond by differential activation of antioxidant defense system, and sometimes the magnitude of their activation is not synchronized with oxidative stress, consequently leading to declined biomass production. Further, Burns et al.21 reported that in Avena fatua L. glutathione-related proteins are essential for herbicide resistance. Wang et al.22 have noticed severe negative impact of nicosulfuron herbicide in the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in Zea mays L. Herbicides being persistent and toxic in nature pose serious consequences on plant anatomy, physiology and biochemistry and they can impact, via the food chains, human health too. Therefore, investigations on their ecotoxicology and management strategies are currently highly sought-after.
Silicon (Si) is the 8th most abundant element in nature and the 2nd most abundant element in the earth crust after oxygen23,24. The application of Si shows many beneficial effects in grasses, among which an increased mechanical strength25. Previous studies showed that Si could improve plant growth and yield by promoting photosynthesis, mineral uptake and antioxidant capacities against environmental constraints26,27,28. Besides, Si also increases the resistance against diseases and pathogens, metal toxicity, salinity, drought, etc.29,30,31,32,33. Therefore, over the past years; a clear role of Si in plant biology has emerged. Si is a quasi-essential element controlling growth and development of crops: its effects are latent in the absence of (a)biotic stresses. Indeed, its prophylactic properties are visible upon exogenous constraints. However, the role of Si in mitigating herbicide toxicity like Buta is, to the best of our knowledge, still not elucidated.
Therefore, this study was aimed to explore the role of Si in regulating Buta toxicity in rice seedlings by evaluating growth, photosynthesis, leaf and root anatomical characteristics, oxidative stress, the ascorbate-glutathione cycle, proline metabolism and the regulation of nutrients. Our study has important physiological and ecotoxicological implications and paves the way to follow-up studies on the role of Si under herbicide toxicity in important crops.
Material and methods
Plant material and growth conditions
Rice (Oryza sativa L.var. Narendra) seeds were bought from the market. Rice seedlings were grown in Petri dishes in a growth chamber23 (Impact model IIC 129D, New Delhi) at 28 °C with a daylength of 12 h, relative humidity of 60–70% under 300 µmol photons m−2 s−1 PFD (photon flux density) for 25 days. Half-strength Hoagland solution was provided regularly to the growing seedlings.
Preparation of Silicon and Buta combination
After 25 days of growth (seedlings having three well developed leaves), uniformly sized seedlings were selected. Thereafter, treatments of Si (10 µM) and butachlor (Buta, 4 µM) alone and in combinations were given. Our previous study showed that 10 µM of silicon stimulates maximum growth of rice seedlings33. However, the selection of Buta dose (4 µM) is based on its dose response curve. It significantly reduced growth (in the terms of fresh weight) of rice seedlings and represents LC18. Further, it is an environmentally relevant dose. Sodium silicate salt was used as source of silicon while Buta (EC 50%) was purchased from the market. The samples prepared were: control (only half-strength Hoagland solution), Si (10 µM), Buta (4 µM) and Si (10 µM) + Buta (4 µM). In the case of Si and Buta combination, seedlings were pretreated with Si for 24 h. Separate treatments of 60 ml each were carried out in plastic pots. Five homogeneously-sized rice seedlings were placed in each plastic pot. Then these plastic pots containing the rice seedlings were again kept in the growth chamber for 7 days. Finally, seedlings were harvested from each pot and used for the analysis of various parameters. The experiment was performed in triplicates.
Determination of growth, protein, photosynthetic pigments, and chlorophyll a fluorescence
Length, fresh and dry weights of both shoot and root were measured as explained in Tripathi et al.33. Fresh leaves (25 mg) from each sample were extracted in 5 ml of 80% (v/v) acetone for measurement of total chlorophyll and carotenoids content. Lichtenthaler34 protocol was used to calculate total chlorophyll and carotenoids in each sample. The amount of protein in each sample was estimated as per the protocol given by Bradford35.
FluorPen FP 100, Photon System Instruments, Czech Republic was used to study chlorophyll a fluorescence transient in dark-adapted leaves. The following parameters of PS II photochemistry were calculated as per the given formulae of Strasser et al.36. Subsequently different parameters like yields or flux ratios-Phi_P0 (maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry equivalent to the Fv/Fm), Phi_E0 (quantum yield of electron transport) and Psi_0 (probability that a trapped exciton moves an electron into the electron transport chain beyond QA), specific energy fluxes per reaction center (RC) i.e. ABS/RC, electron transport flux/RC, TR0/RC, trapped energy flux per RC, absorbance flux per RC ET0/RC, and DI0/RC, dissipated energy flux per RC and performance index (PIABS) were determined.
Measurement of anatomical parameters
Anatomical changes in root and leaf were studied as described in detail in Tripathi et al.33.
Estimation of oxidative markers and lipid peroxidation
The amount of NO2¯ formed from hydroxylamine in the presence of superoxide radical (SOR; O2•¯) was used for measurement of O2•¯ in each sample as explained by Elstner and Heupel37. The absorbance of colored aqueous solution was recorded at 530 nm. Further, the amount of superoxide radicals was determined by the standard curve prepared with sodium nitrite. The quantity of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was measured by the protocol given by Velikova et al.38. Similarly the standard curve made with a solution of H2O2 was used to estimate the amount of peroxide radicals in each sample. The lipid peroxidation (LPO) malondialdehyde (MDA) content was determined as explained by Heath and Packer39.
Histochemical and cell viability analyses
In vivo localizations of O2 – radical, H2O2, LPO and membrane disruption (MD) was carried out by nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT), 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB), Schiff’s reagent and Evans blue respectively as given by Castro-Mercado et al.40, Thordal-Christensen et al.41, Pompella et al.42 and Schutzendübel et al.43. Stained leaves were photographed with a Nikon camera, while stained roots were photographed with an Olympus compound dark-field microscope using a digital camera.
Nitric oxide (NO) was detected using the fluorescent dye 4,5-diaminofluorescein diacetate (DAF-2DA), as explained by Xie et al.44 using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX51, Japan).
Pozarowski and Darzynkiewicz45 method was used for preparation of plant samples for the cell viability analysis. Briefly leaves were homogenized in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and centrifuged. 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer saline was added to the pellet so as to completely dissolve the pellet containing 106cells. After fixing in 70% ethanol these cells were kept for incubation at 4 °C for 30 min. Further, cells were washed with 1X phosphate buffer saline and kept for centrifugation at 1200 rpm for 15 min. Supernatant was discarded and the pellet was re-suspended in 200 mL PBS, stained and observed as per the method described in Vishwakarma et al.46.
Measurement of enzymes of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle
Enzyme extract for ascorbate peroxidase (APX) glutathione reductase (GR) monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) were prepared as described in Singh et al.47. The amount of these enzymes was calculated using UV-visible spectrophotometer (Systronics Model 119, India) at room temperature.
The procedure described by Nakano and Asada48,49 was used to quantify APX activity in each sample. One unit (U) of enzyme activity is defined as 1 nmol ascorbate oxidized min−1. Schaedle and Bassham4 gave the protocol to determine GR activity in different treatments. One unit (U) of enzyme activity is defined as 1 nmol NADPH oxidized min−1. MDHAR and DHAR activity was measured as per the method of Hossain et al.50 and Nakano and Asada48 respectively. Subsequently, one unit (U) of enzyme activity for MDHAR is defined as 1 nmol NADPH oxidized min−1. One unit (U) of enzyme activity for DHAR is defined as 1 nmol DHA reduced min−1. The detailed procedures for these enzymes are given in Singh et al.47.
Determination of reduced ascorbate (AsA), dehydroascorbate (DHA), reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG)
AsA, DHA, GSH and GSSG were measured as per the procedures of Gossett et al.51 and Brehe and Burch52, respectively, given in detail by Singh et al.47.
Gene expression analyses
Liquid nitrogen was used to grind frozen plant tissue (approx. 100 mg) samples in a pre chilled mortar with a pestle. RNA was extracted from the plant tissues according to the procedure given by SpectrumTM plant total RNA Isolation kit (Sigma Life Sciences). The RNA concentration and purity were measured with the Nano drop and the ratio of 260/280 (1.8–2) was maintained. 1 μg of total RNA was used for the synthesis of cDNA using Quanti Tect Reverse Transcription Kit (QIAGEN). PCR conditions and primer details for quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) are given in Table S1. The synthesized cDNA was stored at −20 °C. The gene expression analysis was performed with the Step One Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems), using the SYBR green dye. The reference gene used for analysis was β-actin (housekeeping gene). The result analysis for relative gene expression levels was performed by the standard 2−ΔΔCT method of Livak and Schmittgen53. All treatments were analysed in triplicates for the housekeeping gene and all the genes of interest.
Measurement of proline & its metabolising enzymes
Free proline amount in leaves and roots was estimated as per the method of Bates et al.54. Toluene was taken as blank and the absorbance of the samples was measured at 520 nm. A standard curve was plotted to determine the amount of proline in each treatment. The activities of proline dehydrogenase (PDH) and Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) in rice seedlings were measured as NADH formation and NADPH oxidation according to the methods of Reno and Splittstoesser55 and Garcia-Rios et al.56, respectively. The procedures are described in detail in Singh et al.57.
Estimation of mineral contents
Determination of macronutrients (Mg, P, K,S,Na and Ca) and micronutrient (Fe), and Si in control and treated seedlings was carried out essentially as previously described in Tripathi et al.33 using an atomic absorption spectrometer.
Statistical analysis
Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) was used to measure the significance of differences between the control and the treatment mean values at p < 0.05 significance level. The values presented are the means of three independent experiments (n = 3).
Results
Si improves growth, protein and pigments under Buta toxicity
The growth of rice seedlings was significantly decreased by Buta. The decline in growth was 19% in shoot and 26% in root fresh weight, respectively as compared to the control. Similarly, shoot and root dry weight and length were also decreased by Buta. Inhibition in root growth was more under Buta treatment than other growth parameters. On the other hand, supplementation of Si ameliorated Buta-caused reduced growth, as the fresh weight of the shoot and root was comparable to the control (Table 1).
The protein content in the shoots and roots also decreased by 21 and 12%, respectively. However, Si supplementation alleviated Buta-induced decrease in protein content in both the shoots and roots which showed a reduction of only 7 and 11%, respectively (Table 1).
Similarly to growth and protein content, photosynthetic pigments were also decreased by Buta. The results reveal that Buta decreased total chlorophylls by 21% and carotenoids by 8%. In contrast to this, Si supplementation alleviated the decline in pigment contents and showed a reduction of only 2% in total chlorophylls, while the carotenoids content was comparable to the control (Table 1).
Si improves PSII photochemistry measured as chlorophyll a fluorescence under Buta toxicity
The results show that Phi_P0, Phi_E0, Psi_0, ABS/RC, TE0/RC and ET0/RC were adversely affected by Buta, while under similar treatment DI0/RC increased (Fig. 1). The PIABS, that indicates vitality of sample, was also severely affected by Buta. In contrast to this, Si supplementation ameliorated the toxic effect of Buta on PSII photochemistry. These results indicate that Si has a protective impact for PSII photochemistry under Buta toxicity.
Si causes adaptive changes in leaf and root anatomy under Buta toxicity
Buta treatment adversely affected leaf and root anatomy in rice seedlings. Rice seedlings treated with Buta showed reduced leaf thickness of midrib and blade, root diameter, endodermis thickness, size of vascular bundle i.e. xylem and phloem cells (Fig. 2A,B; Tables 2 and 3). The decrease in size of root cells including parenchymatous cells of cortex, xylem, phloem and endodermis thickness ultimately resulted in the reduction of root diameter. Besides this, stomatal length and width were also reduced by Buta, while their numbers were statistically unaffected (Table 2). However, Si application together with Buta improved the anatomical characteristics and restored the size of cells in both leaves and roots. Si addition, together with Buta, showed peculiar modifications in leaf and roots, such as increase in the thickness of leaf midrib and leaf blade, root diameter and endodermis width which might have presented barriers against Buta uptake; hence, the amelioration of Buta toxicity by Si addition was an obvious result (Tables 1–3).
Regulation of NO accumulation and cell viability (or cell death) by Si under Buta toxicity
Buta treatment reduced NO accumulation in roots of rice seedlings (Fig. 2C). However, after Si supplementation together with Buta, the accumulation of NO was higher even compared to that of the control, as indicated by the greater NO fluorescence under Si+Buta combination (Fig. 2C). It indicates that NO might have a positive role in Si-mediated amelioration of Buta toxicity. NO accumulation was also stimulated by Si alone.
The results of cell viability or cell death showed that, under Buta treatment, the number of viable cells was lower, while Si addition with Buta increased cell viability (Fig. 2D). These results clearly indicate that Si protects rice seedlings against Buta toxicity.
Si lowers oxidative stress biomarkers: ROS accumulation nunder Buta toxicity
Oxidative stress markers were measured in the different conditions analysed: superoxide radical (SOR, O2•−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and MDA contents in shoot and root of rice seedlings are presented in Fig. 3. Buta increased (p < 0.05) O2•− by 53 and 63% in shoots and roots, respectively with respect to the control. Similarly, H2O2 increased by 52% in shoots and 76% in roots compared to the control. Si supplementation significantly (p < 0.05) decreased O2•− and H2O2 contents under Buta toxicity (Fig. 3). Under Buta toxicity, the accumulation of ROS significantly (p < 0.05) accelerated lipid peroxidation (MDA formation) as the value increased by 34 and 36% in shoots and roots, respectively, as compared to the control (Fig. 3). In contrast to this, Si supplementation significantly (p < 0.05) lowered MDA content as compared to the amount recorded under Buta toxicity alone (Fig. 3).
In vivo localizations of O2•–, H2O2, lipid peroxidation (LPO) and membrane damage (MD) are shown in Fig. 4. The results showed that Buta accelerated ROS accumulation which resulted in significant amount of LPO and MD in rice seedlings. However, under Si+Buta combination, ROS accumulation, LPO and MD were noticeably decreased. These results indicate that Si addition regulates ROS accumulation, LPO and MD in rice seedlings under Buta toxicity; less oxidative stress, hence better growth, was noticed under Si+Buta combination, as compared to Buta treatment alone.
Regulation of influx and efflux channel and Si transporter genes of Si by the addition of Si under Buta toxicity
The results relative to the expression of the genes encoding the Si channel and transporter genes- Lsi1 and Lsi2, are shown in Fig. 5. The gene coding for the Si channel (Lsi1) and efflux transporter (Lsi2) though stimulated by Buta (79 and 24%, respectively), were greatly enhanced by the addition of Si under Buta toxicity. Under Si+Buta combination, the relative expression of Lsi1 and Lsi2 was enhanced by 379 and 193%, respectively. Si alone also stimulated the expression of Lsi1 and Lsi2 (139 and 78%, respectively) and even more than Buta treatment alone (Fig. 5). These results indicate that the enhanced expression of Si channel and transporter genes by the addition of Si is needed in order to restrict Buta entry, as supported by our Si accumulation data.
Si improves the activity of enzymes of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle under Buta toxicity
The results relative to the enzymes of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle are shown in Table 4. Buta treatment inhibited APX, GR, MDHAR and DHAR activity in shoot and root by 50 and 52%, 38 and 35%, 40 and 40% and 23 and 18%, respectively in comparison to the control. However, Si treatment alone stimulated APX, GR, MDHAR and DHAR activity in shoots and roots by 0 and 8%, 18 and 5%, 10 and 24% and 14 and 22%, respectively as compared to the control. Additionally, when Si was supplemented with Buta, it significantly (p < 0.05) further stimulated the activity of APX, GR, MDHAR and DHAR, even in comparison to their respective controls (Table 4).
Si regulation of genes coding for ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzymes under Buta toxicity
The results relative to the transcript accumulation of OsAPX, OsMDHAR, OsDHAR and OsGR are provided in Fig. 6. In contrast to the activities of APX, MDHAR, DHAR and GR, the expression of OsAPX, OsGR and OsDHAR genes was stimulated by Buta, while the expression of OsMDHAR (by 34%) was drastically decreased. However, Si addition together with Buta greatly increased the expression of OsAPX, OsGR, OsMDHAR and OsDHAR genes by 207, 185, 311 and 719%, respectively (Fig. 6). Si alone also had a stimulatory effect on the expression of these genes (Fig. 6).
Si maintains the redox status of ascorbate and glutathione: reduced ascorbate (AsA), dehydroascorbate (DHA), reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) under Buta toxicity
The results relating to the redox status of AsA and GSH are shown in Table 5. Buta significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the levels of AsA and GSH which results into a decline in ratios of AsA/DHA and GSH/GSSG. Under Buta treatment, ratios of AsA/DHA and GSH/GSSG in shoots and roots were 6.29 and 4.77 and 6.31 and 6.09, respectively. However, the addition of Si with Buta improved AsA and GSH which results into higher ratios of AsA/DHA and GSH/GSSG as they were 9.80 and 7.97 and 11.07 and 9.90 in shoots and roots, respectively. These results indicate that under Buta toxicity, the addition of Si re-establishes the redox status of AsA and GSH and hence protects the cell against oxidative stress.
Si regulates proline metabolism under Buta toxicity
The results show that in leaves and roots free proline accumulation (85 and 111%, respectively) and activity of P5CS enzyme (by 75 and 227%, respectively) was stimulated by Buta, while Si addition caused lowering in these physiological parameters (Fig. 7). The activity of proline catabolic enzymes i.e. PDH significantly decreased by Buta in leaves and roots (18 and 21%, respectively), while under combination of Si, its activity was comparable to the respective controls (Fig. 7).
Si regulates accumulation of mineral contents under Buta toxicity
The mineral content of rice seedlings is presented in Table 6. Data relative to Si accumulation indicates that Buta decreased its content in shoots, while its accumulation was stimulated (12%) in roots in comparison to the control (Table 6). However, Si addition together with Buta greatly stimulated its accumulation in shoots and roots. Buta decreased the contents of macronutrients (Mg, P, K, S, and Ca) and micronutrient (Fe) in both shoots and roots and this effect was greater for S and Mg, while Na content increased. However, Si supplementation together with Buta stimulated the accumulation of Mg, P, K, S, Ca and Fe even over the value of control. Si alone also had a stimulatory impact on the accumulation of nutrients. But in the case Na accumulation, Si did not have significant impact. These results indicate that under Buta toxicity, the addition of Si positively regulated the accumulation of the studied nutrients (Table 6).
Discussion
The use of herbicides like Buta has been shown to adversely affect crop growth3,9,10,11. Consistent with these studies, Buta treatment decreased the growth of rice seedlings (Table 1). The decline in growth is linked with Buta-induced alterations in PS II photochemistry, decreased cell viability (Figs. 1 and 3D), and down-regulation of NO accumulation (Fig. 3C) and the ascorbate-glutathione cycle (Tables 4 and 5). Buta triggers the excessive accumulation of ROS, which cumulatively affected anatomy (Tables 2–3, Fig. 2A,B) and physiology of rice seedlings (Table 1). Between shoots and roots, Buta treatment more severely affected root growth parameters (Table 1). Similar to our results, Wang et al.3 observed more sensitivity in roots than shoots to Buta in Italian ryegrass. Although the Si-mediated alleviation of abiotic stress is well studied28,29,30,31,32, its role in the regulation of herbicide toxicity like Buta is not yet known. We noticed that supplementation of Si decreased the level of ROS and cell death (Figs. 3, 4 and 2D), up-regulated the ascorbate-glutathione cycle, as well as the expression of their associated genes (Tables 4 and 5), thereby favoring adaptive changes in anatomical characteristics (Fig. 2A,B; Tables 2 and 3) which resulted in a better growth of rice seedlings under Buta toxicity. Further, the results showed that Si addition together with Buta greatly increased Si accumulation (Table 6) and the expression of the Si channel and transporter genes, Lsi1 and Lsi2, in roots (Fig. 5). These data can be considered as an adaptive strategy resulting in the formation of a barrier to Buta uptake as reported in the case of toxic metal uptake28,32. Considering the role of NO in the regulation of Si-mediated amelioration of Buta toxicity, it was found that NO fluorescence (Fig. 2C) was greater in Si+Buta combination than the control and Si alone-treated seedlings. However, NO fluorescence (Fig. 2C) was lowered by Buta. This finding indicates that the endogenous level of NO decreased by Buta which coincides with the reduced growth of rice, while Si addition stimulated its level which results in the improved growth of rice seedlings. The observed data thus confirm our hypothesis that NO had a positive role in Si-mediated amelioration of Buta toxicity in rice seedlings.
Although few studies investigated the role of NO in regulating pesticide stress in photosynthetic organisms58,59, in this study we report for the first time the interaction of Si and NO and its probable role in the alleviation of Buta toxicity. Induction of Si-mediated NO may be one of the mechanisms reducing Buta toxicity in rice seedlings.
The photochemistry of PSII is a reflection of photosynthetic efficiency. To verify it, the fast chlorophyll a fluorescence signals were detected under Buta toxicity (Fig. 1). In the present study, rice seedlings showed decreased values of Phi_P0, Phi_E0, Psi_0, ABS/RC, TE0/RC, ET0/RC and PIABS under Buta toxicity, while DI0/RC showed increment. Decrease in flux ratios, energy flux parameters (except DI0/RC) and PIABS after treatment with Buta indicated alterations in the photochemistry of PS II. These changes resulted into a significant decrease in PIABS. Similarly to our results, Pan et al.60 reported that an increase in Buta concentration resulted in a decrease in Phi_P0, Phi_E0, Psi_0 and PIABS and an increase in DI0/RC. Recently, alterations in chlorophyll a fluorescence were also noticed in herbicide-challenged plants16,17. However, Si supplementation improved the values of flux ratios, energy fluxes and PIABS with respect to the control due to improvement in photosynthetic pigments (Table 1), which likely improved the proper function of the photosynthetic machinery, as well as the photochemical reaction center (Fig. 1). Similarly, Tripathi et al.61 reported that Si addition significantly ameliorated the toxic effects of Cr(VI) on chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters. These results suggest Si can protect rice seedlings against Buta toxicity too by protecting PSII photochemistry.
The anatomy of leaf and root shows contrasting characters under different treatments of Si and Buta. Buta toxicity decreased leaf thickness of midrib and blade, the size of the vascular bundle and xylem and phloem cells (Fig. 2 A, B and Tables 2 and 3). Furthermore, under Buta toxicity, a reduction in the size of stomata can lead to more negative impact on transpiration, photosynthesis and gas exchange62. Therefore, smaller stomata size would be less efficient in transpiration and gas exchange. Hence, reduction in the photosynthetic pigments (Table 1) along with a reduced size of the stomatal apparatus (Table 2) could have negative impact on PS II photochemistry, which eventually affects biomass accumulation in rice seedlings (Fig. 1). Further, Buta declined the size of root cells such as parenchyma of cortex, xylem and phloem which ultimately resulted in a reduction of the root diameter (Table 3). A marked decrease in cell size might be a result of a decrease in the elasticity of the cell wall as previously demonstrated63,64. The reduction in diameter of meta-xylem vessels was also remarkable as it is one of the factors affecting the capacity of transporting nutrients65.Therefore, movement of water and minerals from root to shoot through the xylem might be diminished. This is in agreement with the observed decrease in stomatal size under Buta toxicity (Table 2). Limitations in water supply (leading to stomatal closure) and stomatal size might restrict gas exchange and photosynthesis66, which led to reduced accumulation of biomass (Table 1). In contrast to this, Si has been reported to maintain the internal structures of plants under different stress conditions23,33,67,68. Fleck et al.69 reported that Si enhanced suberization and lignification in roots of rice. Similarly, Schoelynck et al.70 also suggested that Si is correlated with lignification in macrophytes, as well as with cellulose content. The results of this study showed that Si supplementation protects leaf and root internal structures under Buta, with the effect being evident in the case of the thickness of leaf midrib and leaf blade, vascular bundles, root diameter, endodermis width and stomatal size (Tables 2 and 3). These anatomical differences result in the formation of barriers to reduce Buta uptake and, ultimately, result in Buta toxicity mitigation.
One of the common responses of plants to stress is the over production of ROS. These ROS act either as signaling or damaging molecules depending on their concentrations inside the cell, regulated by intricate antioxidant defense system71,72. Buta significantly increased H2O2 and O2•− contents in rice seedlings, which resulted into a significant increase in MDA content (Figs. 3 and 4). The higher MDA indicates that Buta caused significant cell damage in rice seedlings as indicated by a lower cell viability (Fig. 2D), which coincides with retardation in growth (Table 1). Similarly to this, Wang et al.3 have also observed higher H2O2 and MDA level in Italian ryegrass in response to Buta. On the other hand, supplementation of Si with Buta reduced H2O2 and O2•− and MDA which coincided with greater cell viability, indicating that Si protects rice seedlings against oxidative stress under Buta toxicity (Figs. 3 and 2D).
Under normal physiological conditions, the level of ROS is strictly controlled by the antioxidant defense system comprising various enzymes like superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidases, etc. and non-enzymatic antioxidants like ascorbate, glutathione, proline, non-protein thiols etc47,73,74,75. The ascorbate-glutathione cycle is of prime importance in regulating H2O2 level in the cytosol, as well as in the chloroplast under stress and normal conditions76. This cycle consists of four enzymes i.e. APX, GR, MDHAR and DHAR and two metabolites (ascorbate and glutathione), which act in a coordinated manner in order to metabolize H2O2 and decide its fate, i.e. whether it will act as a signaling or damaging molecule. Besides its role in controlling H2O2 level, this cycle also maintains the redox buffer of the cell by regulating the level of glutathione and ascorbate and their redox ratios, which help in sensing and signaling of stress in order to modulate cellular compartment specific changes by altering the expression of metabolism- and stress-related genes76,77,78,79,80. Our results show that Buta stress significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited the activities of APX, GR, MDHAR and DHAR and the amount of ascorbate and glutathione which resulted into a great decline in ratios of AsA/DHA and GSH/GSSG (Tables 4 and 5). Reduced activities of the AsA-GSH cycle may be linked with Buta-induced toxicity in rice seedlings due to a reduced availability of the redox buffers like ascorbate and glutathione (Fig. 7) controlling ROS level (Figs. 3A-C and 4). This is supported by the increased lipid damage and lower cell viability detected (Fig. 3 and Fig. 2D). In contrast to the activities, the expression of OsAPX, OsGR, and OsDHAR was stimulated by Buta (Fig. 6), but that of OsMDHAR decreased. These results suggest that, under Buta stress, translation of mRNAs of OsAPX, OsGR and OsDHAR may be reduced, as indicated by their significant inhibited activities (Table 4). In contrast to our results, stimulation in activities of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzymes and transcripts of antioxidants were reported in earlier studies74,75,79. However, Si supplementation together with Buta maintains the activities of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle and also stimulates the relative expression of its associated genes (Fig. 6 and Table 4). This results into higher redox couples of ascorbate and glutathione in rice seedlings (Table 5). Under Si supplementation, the increased activities of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle and higher redox couple of ascorbate and glutathione, together with higher NO levels (Fig. 2C), suggest that these modifications regulate of Buta-mediated oxidative stress. Most notably, NO plays the role of signaling molecule in inducing antioxidant defense system, as reported in earlier studies77,81.
Proline metabolism has a regulatory function in the homeostasis of oxidation and reduction processes which govern survival of plants under changing environmental conditions82. The results show that Buta enhanced the accumulation of free proline and the activity of P5CS, while the addition of Si reversed these effects (Fig. 7). Further, the activity of PDH was lower under Buta toxicity, while in the case of Si+Buta combination it was comparable to the control. These results imply that, under Buta toxicity, the increased accumulation of free proline is needed in order to counterbalance the adverse impact of Buta on rice seedlings, as indicated by the up-regulation in the activity of P5CS and down-regulation of PDH.
Being crucial for enzymes, vitamins, pigments and other biomolecules, mineral nutrients play a vital role in the growth and development of plants and provide biochemical and mechanical strengths by maintaining the structural integrity of the cell23,33. Buta treatment decreased the accumulation of mineral elements (Mg, S, P, K, Ca and Fe), except Na (Table 6). However, Si addition maintained the levels of Mg, P, S, K, Ca and Fe, which were higher than their respective control under Buta toxicity (Table 6). These results imply that Si positively regulated nutrient levels under Buta toxicity to maintain the structural and functional integrity of the cell. The increased accumulation of nutrients under Si supplementation is justifiable, as the size of cells and diameter of roots increased under Si treatments and this may help in their absorption (Table 6). Since the Si-mediated up-regulation of nutrients’ uptake is accompanied by a higher level of NO, it can be assumed that NO might be involved in the regulation of their uptake in rice seedlings under Buta toxicity, as reported in earlier studies where NO was found to positively regulate the uptake of certain nutrients83,84.
Conclusions
Herein, we reported for the first time that Si supplementation alleviated Buta toxicity in rice seedlings. Si-mediated alleviation of Buta toxicity was due to adaptive changes in leaf and root anatomical characteristics, up-regulation of Si channel and efflux transporter genes and the ascorbate-glutathione cycle. These changes reduced oxidative stress and impacted nutrient regulation. In Si-mediated amelioration of Buta toxicity, NO has a role in promoting the above-mentioned favorable changes in rice seedlings. These results are valuable from an agronomical point of view, as they will inspire the use of sustainable agricultural practices relying on Si fertilization to sustain crop productivity at herbicide-polluted sites, and thus, this study can open newer avenues for research in this direction.
References
Ateeq, B., Abul, F. M., Ali, M. N. & Ahmad, W. Induction of micronuclei and erythrocyte alterations in the catfish Clarias batrachus by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and butachlor. Mutat. Res. 518, 135–144 (2002).
Varshney, S., Hayat, S., Alyemeni, M. N. & Ahmad, A. Effects of herbicide applications in wheat fields. Is phytohormones application a remedy? Plant Signaling & Behavior 7, 570–575 (2012).
Wang, S., Li, H. & Lin, C. Physiological, biochemical and growth responses of Italian ryegrass to butachlor exposure. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 106, 21–27 (2013).
Huarong, G., Licheng, Y., Shicui, Z. & Wenrong, F. The toxic mechanism of high lethality of herbicide butachlor in marine flatfish flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. J. Ocean Univ. China 9(3), 257–264 (2010).
Verma, J. P., Jaiswal, D. K. & Sagar, R. Pesticide relevance and their microbial degradation: a-state-of-art. Rev. Environ Sci. Biotechnol. 13(4), 429–466 (2014).
Chang, S.-S., Ashton, F. M. & Bayer, D. E. Butachlor influence on selected metabolic processes of plant cells and tissues. J. Plant Growth Regul. 4, 1–9 (1985).
Kearney, P. C. & Kaufman, D. D. Herbicides: Chemistry, degradation and mode of action Acta Physiol. Plant 24, 97–113 (1988).
Böger, P., Matthes, B. & Schmalfuß, J. Towards the primary target of chloroacetamides: new findings pave the way. Pest. Manag. Sci. 56, 497–508 (2000).
Alla, M. M. N., Badawi, A. M., Hassan, N. M., El-Bastawisy, Z. M. & Badran, E. G. Effect of metribuzin, butachlor and chlorimuron-ethyl on amino acid and protein formation in wheat and maize seedlings. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 90, 8–18 (2008).
Sun, C. et al. Two novel herbicide candidates affect Arabidopsis thaliana growth by inhibiting nitrogen and phosphate absorption. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 123, 1–8 (2015).
Felisbino, K., Santos-Filho, R. & Piancini, L. D. S. Mesotrione herbicide does not cause genotoxicity, but modulates the genotoxic effects of Atrazine when assessed in mixture using a plant test system (Allium cepa). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 150, 83–88 (2018).
García-Garijo, A., Tejera, N. A., Lluch, C. & Palma, F. Metabolic responses in root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris and Vicia sativa exposed to the imazamox herbicide. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 111, 19–23 (2014).
Gomes, M. P. et al. Differential effects of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) on photosynthesis and chlorophyll metabolism in willow plants. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 130, 65–70 (2016).
Parka, J. et al. Biochemical and physiological mode of action of tiafenacil, a new protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase-inhibiting herbicide. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.08.010 (2018).
Kopsell, D. A. et al. Leaf tissue pigments and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters vary among sweet corn genotypes of differential herbicide sensitivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 99, 194–199 (2011).
Dayan, F. E., de, M. & Zaccaro, M. L. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a marker for herbicide mechanisms of action. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 102, 189–197 (2012).
Shang, Y. et al. New evidence for primordial action site of Fluazifop-P-butyl on Acanthospermum hispidum seedlings: From the effects on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and histological observation. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 142, 170–175 (2017).
Basantani, M., Srivastava, A. & Sen, S. Elevated antioxidant response and induction of tau-class glutathione S-transferase after glyphosate treatment in Vigna radiata (L.)Wilczek. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 99, 111–117 (2011).
Xu, L. et al. Synergism of herbicide toxicity by 5-aminolevulinic acid is related to physiological and ultra-structural disorders in crick weed (Malachium aquaticum L.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 125, 53–61 (2015).
Jiang, Z. et al. Enzymatic antioxidant defense in resistant plant: Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum during long-term atrazine exposure. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 133, 59–66 (2016).
Burns, E. E., Keith, B. K., Refai, M. Y., Bothner, B. & Dyer, W. E. Proteomic and biochemical assays of glutathione-related proteins in susceptible and multiple herbicide resistant Avena fatua L. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 140, 69–78 (2017).
Wang, J., Zhong, X., Li, F. & Shi, Z. Effects of nicosulfuron on growth, oxidative damage, and the ascorbate-glutathione pathway in paired nearly isogenic lines of waxy maize (Zea mays L.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 145, 108–117 (2018).
Tripathi, D. K., Singh, V. P., Kumar, D. & Chauhan, D. K. Impact of exogenous silicon addition on chromium uptake, growth, mineral elements, oxidative stress, antioxidant capacity, and leaf and root structures in rice seedlings exposed to hexavalent chromium. Acta Physiol. Plant 34, 279–289 (2012a).
Epstein, E. Silicon. Annual review of plant biology. 50(1), 641–664 (1999).
Marschner, H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. (Academic Press, London, 1995).
Moussa, H. RInfluence of exogenous application of silicon on physiological response of salt-stressed maize (Zea mays L.). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 8, 293–297 (2006).
Ali, S. et al. The influence of silicon on barley growth, photosynthesis and ultra-structure under chromium stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 89, 66–72 (2013).
Tripathi, D. K. et al. Silicon nanoparticles more efficiently alleviate arsenate toxicity than silicon in maize cultiver and hybrid differing in arsenate tolerance. Front. Environ. Sci. 4, 46 (2016).
Zhu, Z., Wei, G., Li, J., Qian, Q. & Yu, J. Silicon alleviates salt stress and increases antioxidant enzymes activity in leaves of salt stressed cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Sci. 167, 527–533 (2004).
Song, A. et al. Silicon-enhanced resistance to cadmium toxicity in Brassica chinensis L. is attributed to Si-suppressed cadmium uptake and transport and Si-enhanced antioxidant defense capacity. J. Hazard. Mater. 172, 74–83 (2009).
Shen, X. F. et al. Silicon effects on photosynthesis and antioxidant parameters of soybean seedlings under drought and ultraviolet-B radiation. J. Plant Physiol. 167, 1248–1252 (2010).
Liu, J., Zhang, H., Zhanga, Y. & Chai, T. Silicon attenuates cadmium toxicity in Solanum nigrum L. by reducing cadmium uptake and oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 68, 1–7 (2013).
Tripathi, D. K., Singh, V. P., Kumar, D. & Chauhan, D. K. Rice seedlings under cadmium stress: effect of silicon on growth, cadmium uptake, oxidative stress, antioxidant capacity and root and leaf structures. Chem. Ecol. 28, 281–291 (2012).
Lichtenthaler, H. K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids pigments of photosynthetic membranes. Methods Enzymol. 148, 350–382 (1987).
Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254 (1976).
Strasser, R. J., Srivastava, A., Tsimilli-Michael, M. The fluorescence transient asa tool to characterise and screen photosynthetic samples. In: Yunus, M., Pathre, U., Mohanty, P. (Eds.), Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanisms, Regulation and Adaptation. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 445-483(2000).
Elstner, E. F. & Heupel, A. Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxyl ammonium chloride: a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Anal. Biochem. 70, 616–20 (1976).
Velikova, V., Yordanov, I. & Edreva, A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant system in acid rain treated bean plants. Plant. Sci. 151, 59–66 (2000).
Heath, R. L. & Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 125, 189–198 (1968).
Castro-Mercado, E., Martinez-Diaz, Y., Roman-Tehandon, N. & Garcia-Pineda, E. Biochemical analysis of reactive oxygen species production and antioxidative responses in unripe avocado (Persea americana Mill var Hass) fruits in response to wounding. Protoplasma 235, 67–76 (2009).
Thordal-Christensen, H., Zhang, Z., Wei, Y. & Collinge, D. B. Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants: H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hyper sensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant J. 11, 1187–1194 (1997).
Pompella, A., Maellaro, E., Casini, A. F. & Comporti, M. Histochemical detection of lipid peroxidation in the liver of bromobenzene-poisoned mice. Am. J. Pathol. 129, 295–301 (1987).
Schutzendubel, A. et al. Cadmium-induced changes in antioxidative systems, hydrogen peroxide content and differentiation in scot pine (Pinus sylvestris) roots. Plant Physiol. 127, 887–892 (2001).
Xie, Y. et al. Roles of NIA/NR/NOA1-dependent nitric oxide production and HY1 expression in the modulation of Arabidopsis salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 3045–60 (2013).
Pozarowski, P. & Darzynkiewicz, Z. Analysis of cell cycle by flowcytometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 281, 301–311, https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-811-0:301 (2004).
Vishwakarma, K. et al. Differential phytotoxic impact of plant mediated silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and silver nitrate (AgNO3) on Brassica sp. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1501, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01501 (2017).
Singh, V. P., Singh, S., Kumar, J. & Prasad, S. M. Hydrogen sulfide alleviates toxic effects of arsenate in pea seed lings through up-regulation of the ascorbate–glutathione cycle: Possible involvement of nitric oxide. J. Plant Physiol. 181, 20–29 (2015).
Nakano, Y. & Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate specific peroxidasein spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 22, 867–880 (1981).
Schaedle, M. & Bassham, J. A. Chloroplast glutathione reductase. Plant Physiol. 59, 1011–1022 (1977).
Hossain, M. A., Nakano, Y. & Asada, K. Monodehydro ascorbate reductase in spinach chloroplasts and its participation in regeneration of ascorbate for scavenging hydrogen peroxide. Plant Cell Physiol. 25, 385–395 (1984).
Gossett, D. R., Millhollon, E. P. & Cran, L. M. Antioxidant response to NaCl stress in salt-sensitive cultivars of cotton. Crop Sci. 34, 706–714 (1994).
Brehe, J. E. & Burch, H. B. Enzymatic assay for glutathione. Anal. Biochem. 74, 189–197 (1976).
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. & Teare, I. D. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soi. l39, 205–208 (1973).
Reno, A. B. & Splittstoesser, W. C. Proline dehydrogenase and pyrroline-5-car- boxylate reductase from pumkin cotyledons. Phytochemistry. 14, 657–661 (1975).
Garcia-Rios, M. et al. Cloning of a polycistronic cDNA from tomato encoding 7-glutamyl kinase and 7-glutamyl phosphate reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8249–8254 (1997).
Singh, M., Singh, V. P., Dubey, G. & Prasad, S. M. Exogenous proline application ameliorates toxic effects of arsenate in Solanum melongena L. seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 117, 164–173 (2015b).
Qian, H. et al. The effect of exogenous nitric oxide on alleviating herbicide damage in Chlorella vulgaris. Aquat. Toxicol. 92, 250–257 (2009).
Singh, H., Singh, N. B., Singh, A., Hussain, I. & Yadav, V. Physiological and biochemical roles of nitric oxide against toxicity produced by glyphosate herbicide in Pisum sativum. Russian J Plant Physiol. 64, 518–524 (2017).
Pan, H., Li, X., Xu, X. & Gao, S. Phytotoxicity of four herbicides on Ceratophyllum demersum, Vallisneria natans and Elodea nuttallii. J. Environ. Sci. 21(3), 307–312 (2009).
Tripathi, D. K. et al. Silicon-mediated alleviation of Cr (VI) toxicity in wheat seedlings as evidenced by chlorophyll florescence, laser induced breakdown spectroscopy and anatomical changes. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 113, 133–144 (2015).
Kasim, W. A.The correlation between physiological and structural alterations induced by copper and cadmium stress in broad beans (Vicia faba L.). Egypt. J. Biol. 7, 20–32 (2005).
Sieghardt, V. H. Eineanatomisch-histocenische Studiezur Bleiverteilung in Primarwurzeln von Pisum sativum L. Mikroskopie (Wien). 41, 125–133 (1984).
Barceló, J., Poschenrieder, C., Andreu, I. & Gunse, B. Cadmium induced decrease of water stress resistance in bush bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Contender). I. Effects of Cd on water potential, relative water content and cell wall elasticity. J. Plant Physiol. 125, 17–25 (1986).
Poschenrieder, C., Barcelo, J. Water relation in heavy metal stressed plants. In: Prasad, M.N.V., Hagemeyer, J. (Eds.), Heavy Metal Stress in Plants: from Molecules to Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin. 207–229(1999).
Mediavilla, S., Santiago, H. & Escudero, A. Stomatal and mesophyll limitations to photosynthesis in one evergreen and one deciduous Mediterranean oak species. Photosynthetica. 40(4), 553–559 (2002).
Singh, V. P., Tripathi, D. K., Kumar, D. & Chauhan, D. K. Influence of exogenous silicon addition on aluminium tolerance in rice seedlings. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 144, 1260–1274 (2011).
Tripathi, D. K., Singh, V. P., Kumar, D. & Chauhan, D. K. Impact of exogenous silicon addition on chromium uptake, growth, mineral elements, oxidative stress, antioxidant capacity, and leaf and root structures in rice seedlings exposed to hexavalent chromium. Acta Physiol. Plant. 34, 279–289 (2012).
Fleck, A. T. et al. Silicon enhances suberinization and lignification in roots of rice (Oryza sativa). J. Exp. Bot. 62, 2001–2011 (2011).
Schoelynck, J. et al. Silica uptake in aquatic and wetland macrophytes: a strategic choice between silica, lignin and cellulose? New Phytol. 186, 385–391 (2010).
Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 405–410 (2002).
Singh, R. et al. Reactive oxygen species (ROS): Beneficial companions of plants’ developmental processes. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1299, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01299 (2016).
Singh, V. P., Srivastava, P. K. & Prasad, S. M.Nitric oxide alleviates arsenic-induced toxic effects in ridged Luffa seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 71, 155–63 (2013).
Mostofa, M. G., Hossain, M. A., Fujita, M. & Tran, L. S. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms associated with trehalose-induced copper-stress tolerance in rice. Sci. Rep. 5, 11433, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11433 (2015).
Zhao, D. et al. Ameliorative effects of melatonin on dark-induced leaf senescence in gardenia (Gardenia jasminoides Ellis): leaf morphology, anatomy, physiology and transcriptome. Sci. Rep. 7, 10423, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10799-9 (2017).
Foyer, C. H. & Noctor, G. Ascorbate and glutathione. The heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiol. 155, 2–8 (2011).
Rodrìguez-Serrano, M., Romero-Puertas, M. C., Pazminõ, D. M., Testillano, P. S. & Risuenõ, M. C. delRıò, L. A., et al. Cellular response of pea plants to cadmium toxicity: crosstalk between reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and calcium. Plant Physiol. 150, 229–243 (2009).
Arias-Baldrich, C. et al. Enzymatic activity, gene expression and posttranslational modifications of photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylasein ammonium-stressed sorghum plants. J. Plant Physiol. 214, 39–47 (2017).
Irani, S. & Todd, C. D. Exogenous allantoin increases Arabidopsis seedlings tolerance to NaCl stress and regulates expression of oxidative stress response genes. J. Plant Physiol. 221, 43–50 (2018).
Wang, J., Lu, Y. & Shen, G. Combined effects of cadmium and butachlor on soil enzyme activities and microbial community structure. Environ. Geol. 51, 1221–1228 (2007).
Liu, S. et al. Signalling cross-talk between nitric oxide and active oxygen in Trifolium repens L. plants responses to cadmium stress. Environ. Pollut. 239, 53–68 (2018).
Liang, X., Zhang, L., Natarajan, S. K. & Becker, D. F. Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 19, 998–1011 (2013).
Sun, H. et al. Nitric oxide generated by nitrate reductase increases nitrogen uptake capacity by inducing lateral root formation and inorganic nitrogen uptake under partial nitrate nutrition in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 2449–2459 (2015).
Balotf, S. et al. How exogenous nitric oxide regulates nitrogen assimilation in wheat seedlings under different nitrogen sources and levels. PLoS ONE 13(1), e0190269, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190269 (2018).
Acknowledgements
Dr. Durgesh Kumar Tripathi is thankful to UGC for providing Dr. DS-Kothari with a Post doctoral fellowship. Dr. Vijay Pratap Singh is thankful to the Department of Biotechnology (file no. BT/PR12980/BPA/118/80/2015), New Delhi, for providing financial assistance to carry out this research. The Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi is greatly acknowledged for providing research facilities in the Department of Botany, University of Allahabad under the DST-FIST programme. Authors are also thankful to the head of the Botany Department, University of Allahabad, Allahabad and Director, MNNIT, Allahabad for providing the necessary research facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.K.T. and S.S. designed the experimntal set-up. S.S., B.K.K., R.K.V., M.S., S.B. and D.K.T. performed the experiment and analyze the data. D.K.T. and V.P.S. wrote the manuscript. D.K.C., S.M.P., S. Sharma, N.K.D., S. Sahi, N.R., V.P.S., G.G. and D.K.T. critically read and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tripthi, D.K., Varma, R.K., Singh, S. et al. Silicon tackles butachlor toxicity in rice seedlings by regulating anatomical characteristics, ascorbate-glutathione cycle, proline metabolism and levels of nutrients. Sci Rep 10, 14078 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65124-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65124-8
This article is cited by
-
Exploiting the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in reducing heavy metal toxicity of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2024)
-
Efficacy of Silicon in Mitigating the Combined Phytotoxic Effects of Salt and Insecticide in Solanum lycopersicum L
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition (2023)
-
Residue and soil dissipation kinetics of chloroacetanilide herbicides on rice (Oryzae sativa L.) and assessing the impact on soil microbial parameters and enzyme activity
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (2023)
-
Metal tolerance and Cd phytoremoval ability in Pisum sativum grown in spiked nutrient solution
Journal of Plant Research (2023)
-
Physiological and molecular insights into the role of silicon in improving plant performance under abiotic stresses
Plant and Soil (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.