Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26623-x, published online 31 May 2018

This Article contains typographical errors.

In the Discussion section,

“The sequencing data were considered of high quality (i.e. the average probability of a wrong base call is less than one in 16,000).”

should read:

“The sequencing data were considered of high quality (i.e. the average probability of a wrong base call is less than one in 6,250).”

In the Acknowledgements section,

“Vicent Wen, PhD”

should read:

“Vicent Wen, MSc”