Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Founder BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 pathogenic variants in French-Canadian breast cancer cases and controls

Abstract

Inherited germline pathogenic variants are responsible for ~5% of breast cancer globally. Through rapid expansion and isolation since immigration in the early 17th century, French Canadians are a relatively genetically homogenous founder population and therefore represent a unique demographic for genetic contributions to disease. To date, twenty variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 that predispose families to breast and ovarian cancer have been identified as recurring in the French-Canadian founder population. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and validity of targeted genetic testing for these variants in Montreal French Canadians. A total of 555 breast cancer cases unselected for family history or age of diagnosis were genotyped, along with 1940 controls without a personal or family history of cancer. A Sequenom genotyping assay identified a pathogenic variant in 0.2% (5 of 1940) of cancer-free controls, and 3.8% (21/555) of breast cancer cases. Almost 10% (12/113) of early onset cases were heterozygous for founder BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant. Of twenty variants tested, only seven were identified in this study. The option of providing this test as population-based screening is discussed.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer worldwide (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) and the second leading cause of death by cancer in women1. A strong family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, as well as a personal history of early-onset or bilateral breast cancer, are suggestive of a heterozygous germline variant in a high-risk breast cancer susceptibility gene. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the canonical genes in this family2, and the risks for breast cancer to age 80 among female BRCA1 or BRCA2 heterozygotes is 72% and 69%, respectively3. Partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) is essential to homologous recombination repair in response to double-stranded breaks in DNA4 and is a more recently identified breast cancer predisposing gene. Average cumulative risk of developing breast cancer with a pathogenic germline PALB2 mutation is approximately 35% by age 70, and risk is higher in women with a family history of breast cancer (58%)5.

French Canadians descended from French settlers to Canada in the 17th century. Since then, settlers from countries other than France have immigrated to Canada, but early French founders contribute more to the present genetic landscape6. Variants more prevalent in the French-Canadian population have been identified in established breast cancer predisposition genes BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB27,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. For many years, genetic testing for recurrent pathogenic variants (Table 1) was routinely offered to Montreal French Canadian women with or at high risk for breast cancer via McGill University cancer genetics clinics. This approach was recently replaced with more broad-based panel testing in keeping with global trends.

Table 1 Twenty likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 in French Canadians that predispose to breast and ovarian cancer.

Full gene panel screening of all known breast cancer susceptibility genes is an effective way to identify gene variants in populations where a large number of different and rare mutations exist, many often unique to a single family. However, in founder populations such as French Canadians, a de novo mutation or a mutation present in a founding member can become widespread in later generations, contributing significantly to the overall disease burden. Genetic testing focused on founder variants can be a cost-effective and sensitive assay for high-risk French-Canadian breast cancer patients in Quebec7.

Founder variants were previously screened in a series of 192 Montreal French Canadian breast cancer cases unselected for age of diagnosis or family history of cancer. Only three of seven variants tested were identified in the series15. Additional subsets of these variants were also genotyped in highly selected French-Canadian breast cancer cases9,10. Therefore, there has not been a comprehensive genotyping study for all twenty variants in a large series of Montreal breast cancer cases.

Here we present the population frequency of 20 variants in Montreal French Canadian invasive breast cancer cases unselected for family history or clinicopathological features, as well as in a cohort of French-Canadian cancer-free controls. Understanding the contribution of specific founder variants to breast cancer risk in such a population will help to assess the feasibility of conducting population-wide genetic testing for variants that are over-represented in this population.

Results

A total of 26 heterozygotes were identified: five heterozygotes among controls (5/1940, 0.26%), and 21 in cases (21/555, 3.78%). Of the five heterozygotes in controls, two carry a pathogenic variant in BRCA1, and three carry different pathogenic variants in BRCA2. All heterozygotes identified in cancer-free controls were men. In breast cancer cases, four BRCA1 heterozygotes and 17 BRCA2 heterozygotes were identified. There were no heterozygotes of the PALB2 c.2323 C > T variant in our cases or controls. There were no cases or controls that were heterozygotes for more than one variant. Three variants were significantly associated with breast cancer: BRCA2 c.3170_3174delAGAAA (p.Lys1057ThrfsTer8), c.3545_3546delTT (p.Phe1182Ter), and c.8537_8538delAG (p.Glu2846GlyfsTer22). Thirteen variants were not observed in any samples tested (Table 2).

Table 2 Germline heterozygous variants identified in cases and controls.

The mean age of first invasive breast cancer diagnosis in BRCA1/2 heterozygotes (43.6 years) was significantly younger than that of wild-types (53.0 years, p < 0.001). BRCA1 and BRCA2 heterozygotes had a mean age of diagnosis of 39.3 and 44.0, respectively (p = 0.344). When examining early-onset breast cancer cases, 12/21 (57.1%) of heterozygotes were diagnosed at 45 years or younger, compared with 113 of 534 (21.1%) in wild-types (p < 0.001). BRCA1/2 heterozygotes were more than twice as likely to have a family history of cancer (12/21, 57.1%) than wild-types (134/534, 25.1%) (Table S1). 17 of 21 cases (81.0%) heterozygous for a variant had either a family history of any cancer or an early (<45 years) onset of disease. 12 of 113 (9.38%) of all early-onset cases carried a heterozygous variant in one of the 20 variants genotyped. Of the 28 cases who were diagnosed under 45 and had a reported family history of cancer, seven (25%) were heterozygous for a pathogenic founder variant.

Eleven of the BRCA1/2 heterozygotes had other cancer diagnoses in their lifetime (Table S2). Seven had an asynchronous primary breast cancer: six contralateral and one ipsilateral. Two BRCA2 heterozygotes had bilateral synchronous breast cancers. Three of the four cases also diagnosed with ovarian cancer in cases were BRCA1/2 heterozygotes: one BRCA1 and two BRCA2 heterozygotes. Two heterozygotes were diagnosed with other cancers, in the uterus and adrenal gland. With the exception of the uterus cancer diagnosis, all secondary cancer diagnoses were subsequent to the heterozygote’s first invasive breast cancer.

Discussion

Genotyping BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 French-Canadian breast cancer variants identified a pathogenic variant in 3.8% (21/555) of breast cancer cases unselected for age or family history and 0.2% (5/1940) of cancer-free controls. Our previous, smaller study of a series of breast cancer cases found 3.1% of French-Canadians cases had one of seven previously reported founder variants15, comparable to this study. Increasing the number of variants genotyped to twenty therefore did not increase sensitivity in this project.

Similar genotyping approaches have been taken in founder populations other than French Canadians. For instance, 7.1% of unselected Polish breast cancer cases carried one of five known founder variants in BRCA116. In a study of 236 Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer, one of three founder BRCA1/BRCA2 variants was found in 25% of early-onset breast cancer cases (diagnosed under 45 years of age) and 18.5% of women diagnosed after 45 years of age17. Another study of 412 Ashkenazi Jewish women found 12% of breast cancers can be attributed to one of these three founder variants18. Further, 88 of 847 unselected Icelandic breast cancer cases (10.4%) carry a known founder variant19 (BRCA2 NM 000059.3: c.771_775delTCAAA; Table S3). Unselected French Canadian cases therefore have a lower prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in comparison to other founder populations, likely due to multiple founder effects contributing to a founder population more heterogenous than others20. BRCA1/2 frequencies in French Canadians appear, however, to be higher than in outbred populations: Genotyping of 1220 breast cancer cases unselected for family history, age, or ethnicity found 0.7% and 1.3% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant heterozygotes, respectively21.

This study found a 0.2% allele frequency for BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 founder variants in controls with no personal or family history of cancer. Notably, all five control individuals found to be heterozygotes were men (5/971, 0.5%). No cancer-free women were identified as heterozygotes (of 969), confirming the high penetrance of these variants. FLOSSIES is a large-scale sequencing project of 9884 European and African American women above age 70 with no personal history of cancer (www.whi.color.com). A search of likely pathogenic variants in FLOSSIES (frameshift, nonsense, and splice site variations) results in approximate allele frequencies of 0.03%, 0.13%, and 0.07% in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2, respectively.

This study found no heterozygotes for PALB2 c.2323 C > T. This was striking, as a previous study identified this variant in 0.6% (2/356) of French-Canadian early onset or familial breast cancer cases, though it was not identified in 6440 newborn controls from the Quebec City region14. The variant was identified twice more when screened for in 71 hereditary breast or breast/ovarian cancer families, indicating its association with breast cancer in French Canadians22. Another genotyping study found 0.7% of early-onset (diagnosed younger than 50 years of age) French Canadian breast cancer cases were heterozygous for this variant23. Our study was the first to genotype the variant in unselected breast cancer cases, with few early onset or familial cases, which likely accounts for the lower prevalence in this case series. PALB2 is a rare, moderate to high penetrance gene24. The lifetime risk varies by family history25. Current guidelines suggest annual mammograms for patients with PALB2 variants, with insufficient evidence to recommend risk-reducing mastectomy26. Moreover, as we did not observe this variant in any subjects in this study (reinforcing its rarity in Montreal French Canadians), screening for this variant in the French-Canadian population is not currently recommended.

Of all variants tested, only seven were identified in this case series. Notably, only BRCA2 variants significantly associated with affected status. One study of early-onset breast cancer cases and newborn controls in Quebec found that majority of heterozygotes identified harboured a BRCA2 founder variant rather than BRCA123. Among newborns, similar variant frequencies were found in both BRCA1 and BRCA2, comparable to control frequencies seen in this study. A similar pattern of only BRCA2 variants was seen in 127 French Canadian breast cancer cases unselected for age or family history15. There is some evidence to suggest BRCA2 variants may also be more prevalent in breast cancer cases outside of the French-Canadian population18. Taken together, it is presumed that the prevalence of pathogenic founder BRCA2 variants is higher than that of BRCA1 variants in French Canadians of Quebec.

Earlier age of cancer onset typically associates with genetic predisposition to breast cancer. Genotyping 20 previously reported variants in this French-Canadian series identified 12 among 125 breast cancer cases diagnosed younger than 45 years of age. Therefore, variant-specific testing was able to identify pathogenic variants in 9.6% of unselected breast cancer cases in Montreal French Canadians. This is consistent with our previous study, which found that testing for known founder variants in unselected French-Canadian cases was able to identify 13% of unselected breast cancer cases diagnosed between 25 and 4023. In another study genotyping only early-onset French Canadian cases, an identical percentage (13%; 8 of 61) diagnosed under 40 were found to have pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA29.

Our study identified heterozygotes for seven pathogenic variants that accounted for approximately 10% of early onset cases, and as high as 25% of early onset cases with a self-reported family history of cancer. The women with a founder variant in their germline likely were not tested previously and may not be aware of their elevated risk of breast cancer. With this knowledge, family members could be screened and heterozygous women would have the option to take preventive measures for breast cancer. Prophylactic mastectomies are likely effective in reducing breast cancer incidence27, but this is dependent on patients opting to undergo the surgery. In a recent study looking at 128 breast cancer patients in Korea with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers, only 8 chose to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomies28.Among French-Canadians of Quebec who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants, preventive options including bilateral prophylactic mastectomies are less popular than in other regions of Canada29, with only 8% of Quebec women heterozygous for a pathogenic variant opting for the surgery compared to 22–46% in other regions of Canada. Despite this, population-wide genetic screening could identify up to 10% of early-onset cases prior to a diagnosis. This would provide more options for these women as well as potentially increasing awareness of these options in the general population and improving the acceptability of such preventive intervention measures among Quebec women.

Population-based screening for cancer predisposition has previously been tested in founder populations such as Ashkenazi Jews and Poles. Testing for two to three founder variants in each population served as a cost-effective method in each case to screen large cohorts of individuals and was able to identify up to 4.5% of individuals as BRCA1 or BRCA2 heterozygotes. Notably, many of these heterozygotes would not have been identified following government-suggested guidelines for genetic testing (such as the NCCN in the United States). Large-scale genotyping of founder variants in the French-Canadian population may therefore be a feasible choice that would be more effective in identifying heterozygotes than the current standard of evaluating family history alone30.

Health economic analyses of population-wide genetic screening found screening for founder variants is likely affordable for some healthcare systems30. Preventive strategies such as prophylactic mastectomies and salpingo-oophorectomies of known heterozygotes are also more cost-effective than typical MRI-based screening. Psychological impact is also a factor to be considered: Are patients relieved or worried when receiving a positive test result for pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants? One study found that the psychological burden associated with population-based screening (i.e. depression, anxiety, distress) is not significantly different from that of standard family-based screening31. Another study found that Black women with breast cancer will only choose to have BRCA1/2 testing if the test is both necessary and affordable32. More work is needed to examine the accessibility and affordability of population-based screening.

In our study, one in 10 early-onset cases was heterozygous for one of seven founder variants. Providing population-wide screening to French Canadians would be feasible, and these numbers suggest the impact on breast cancer incidence would be positive, though economic costs and psychological outcomes would need to be evaluated.

Methods

Study subjects

DNA from peripheral blood of 588 breast cancer cases and 2,000 cancer-free controls were studied (Table 2). Breast cancer cases were ascertained between years 2000 and 2016 from the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada via a Cancer Research Network (RRCancer, http://rrcancer.ca/en/home/) solid tumor breast cancer biobank. Eligible breast cancer cases included women with a surgically-resectable invasive breast cancer diagnosis at under 70 years of age and French-Canadian descent (as determined by a review of family names; Table 3). Information regarding prior and subsequent cancer diagnoses, hormone receptor status, axillary lymph node status, grades, tumour size, and morphologies was collected for most breast cancer diagnoses, where possible. Family history of cancer in any relatives was self-reported.

Table 3 Filtering process for genotyped samples.

Cancer-free controls included 1,000 women and 1,000 men aged 40 to 70 that were ascertained between 2009 and 2015 through the CARTaGENE biobank33 (https://www.cartagene.qc.ca/en/home). Controls were French Canadian as determined by French first language, Canadian origin of all four grandparents and a city of birth within Quebec. Participants reported no personal history of cancer and no cancer in any first-degree relatives. Controls for this study were restricted to individuals recruited within the greater Montreal area (Table 4).

Table 4 Summary of cases and controls series for French-Canadian BRCA1/2/PALB2 genotyping.

All case and control samples were collected through informed consent approved by institutional review boards (McGill University Institutional Review Board, study A08-M61-098). Methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 genotyping

Twenty previously reported7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 SNP/indel pathogenic variants were genotyped in breast cancer cases and cancer-free controls. These included 11 BRCA1 variants, 8 BRCA2 variants, and 1 PALB2 variant. DNA samples were subjected to whole genome amplification using the Qiagen REPLI-g Mini Kit according to manufacturer’s instructions. Genotyping was performed using the Sequenom iPLEX Gold Genotyping Technology34 with at least 600 ng of whole-genome-amplified DNA per sample through the McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre. Exactly 346 samples failed the Sequenom assay for PALB2 c.2323 C > T (p.Gln775Ter) only. To resolve this deficiency, genotyping was complemented by a PALB2 exon 5 high resolution melting assay for the variant, as previously described35. Genotyping failed for 90 samples at all loci (30 cases, 60 controls); these samples were removed from the analysis.

Validation of heterozygotes

Select germline heterozygotes were confirmed by amplifying the region of interest by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by Sanger sequencing. PCR reactions were performed in 25 uL volumes containing 20 ng genomic DNA; 10 x PCR buffer with 15 mM magnesium chloride (Qiagen); 100 uM of each dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP; 25–35 nmoles of each primer used in Sequenom genotyping; and 2.5 units/uL HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (Qiagen). Reactions were amplified in a Bio Rad DNAEngine® Peltier Thermal Cycler for 35 cycles at 95 °C for 30 seconds, 60 °C for 30 seconds, and 72 °C for 30 seconds, followed by 72 °C for 3 minutes. PCR products were diluted 2X with formamide and bromophenol blue loading buffer, then loaded on a 1.5% agarose gel with RedSafe Nucleic Acid Staining Solution. PCR products were then Sanger sequenced through the McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre with the forward primers used in Sequenom genotyping.

Statistical analysis

All comparisons related to breast cancer cases are based on the first invasive breast cancer diagnosis for each patient. Comparisons of proportions were conducted using Fisher’s Exact Test, using p < 0.05 as a significance cut-off. Comparisons of means were conducted using a two-tailed T-test, using p < 0.05 as a significance cut-off. All statistical analyses were conducted in RStudio Version 1.1383.

Financial support

This study was supported by a grant from the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation (QBCF) to WDF. SB received personal financial support from a Canadian Institute for Health Research CGS-M grant and a Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Masters Studentship Award.

References

  1. 1.

    Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2017., (Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2017).

  2. 2.

    Narod, S. A. & Foulkes, W. D. BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 4, 665–676, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1431 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kuchenbaecker, K. B. et al. Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. JAMA 317, 2402–2416, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7112 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nielsen, F. C., van Overeem Hansen, T. & Sorensen, C. S. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes in confined pathways. Nat Rev Cancer 16, 599–612, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.72 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Antoniou, A. C. et al. Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. N Engl J Med 371, 497–506, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1400382 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gauvin, H. et al. Genome-wide patterns of identity-by-descent sharing in the French Canadian founder population. Eur J Hum Genet 22, 814–821, https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.227 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Simard, J. et al. Evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence, risk prediction models and a multistep testing approach in French-Canadian families with high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. J Med Genet 44, 107–121, https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2006.044388 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tonin, P. N. et al. Founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in French Canadian breast and ovarian cancer families. Am J Hum Genet 63, 1341–1351, https://doi.org/10.1086/302099 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tonin, P. N. et al. Founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in early-onset French Canadian breast cancer cases unselected for family history. Int J Cancer 95, 189–193, 10.1002/1097-0215(20010520)95:3<189::aid-ijc1032>3.0.co;2-n (2001).

  10. 10.

    Oros, K. K. et al. Significant proportion of breast and/or ovarian cancer families of French Canadian descent harbor 1 of 5 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Int J Cancer 112, 411–419, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20406 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Oros, K. K. et al. Haplotype analysis suggest common founders in carriers of the recurrent BRCA2 mutation, 3398delAAAAG, in French Canadian hereditary breast and/ovarian cancer families. BMC Med Genet 7, 23, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-7-23 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cavallone, L. et al. Comprehensive BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation analyses and review of French Canadian families with at least three cases of breast cancer. Fam Cancer 9, 507–517, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-010-9372-3 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cote, S. et al. The BRCA2 c.9004G>A (E2002K) [corrected] variant is likely pathogenic and recurs in breast and/or ovarian cancer families of French Canadian descent. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131, 333–340, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1796-4 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Foulkes, W. D. et al. Identification of a novel truncating PALB2 mutation and analysis of its contribution to early-onset breast cancer in French-Canadian women. Breast Cancer Res 9, R83, https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1828 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chappuis, P. O. et al. Prevalence of founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in unselected French Canadian women with breast cancer. Clin Genet 59, 418–423, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.590606.x (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Szwiec, M. et al. Recurrent mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Poland: an update. Clin Genet 87, 288–292, https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12360 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Robson, M. et al. Prevalence of recurring BRCA mutations among Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer. Genet Test 1, 47–51, https://doi.org/10.1089/gte.1997.1.47 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Warner, E. et al. Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in unselected Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91, 1241–1247, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.14.1241 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tryggvadottir, L. et al. Population-based study of changing breast cancer risk in Icelandic BRCA2 mutation carriers, 1920-2000. J Natl Cancer Inst 98, 116–122, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj012 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bherer, C. et al. Admixed ancestry and stratification of Quebec regional populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 144, 432–441, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21424 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group. Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of breast cancer cases. Br J Cancer 83, 1301–1308, https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1407 (2000).

  22. 22.

    Tischkowitz, M. et al. Contribution of the PALB2 c.2323C>T [p.Q775X] founder mutation in well-defined breast and/or ovarian cancer families and unselected ovarian cancer cases of French Canadian descent. BMC Med Genet 14, 5, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-14-5 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ghadirian, P. et al. The contribution of founder mutations to early-onset breast cancer in French-Canadian women. Clin Genet 76, 421–426, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01277.x (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nielsen, S. M. et al. Genetic Testing and Clinical Management Practices for Variants in Non-BRCA1/2 Breast (and Breast/Ovarian) Cancer Susceptibility Genes: An International Survey by the Evidence-Based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) Clinical Working Group. JCO Precis Oncol 2, https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00091 (2018).

  25. 25.

    Antoniou, A. C., Foulkes, W. D. & Tischkowitz, M. Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. N Engl J Med 371, 1651–1652, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1410673 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2019).

  27. 27.

    Alaofi, R. K., Nassif, M. O. & Al-Hajeili, M. R. Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer: Review of the literature. Avicenna J Med 8, 67–77, https://doi.org/10.4103/ajm.AJM_21_18 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jeon, H. J. et al. Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate according to clinicopathologic and socioeconomic status. Ann Surg Treat Res 97, 113–118, https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2019.97.3.113 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Metcalfe, K. A. et al. Variation in rates of uptake of preventive options by Canadian women carrying the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genetic mutation. Open Med 1, e92–98 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Foulkes, W. D., Knoppers, B. M. & Turnbull, C. Population genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: founder mutations to genomes. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13, 41–54, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.173 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Manchanda, R. et al. Population testing for cancer predisposing BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi-Jewish community: a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 107, 379, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju379 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jones, T., McCarthy, A. M., Kim, Y. & Armstrong, K. Predictors of BRCA1/2 genetic testing among Black women with breast cancer: a population-based study. Cancer Med 6, 1787–1798, https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1120 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Awadalla, P. et al. Cohort profile of the CARTaGENE study: Quebec’s population-based biobank for public health and personalized genomics. Int J Epidemiol 42, 1285–1299, https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys160 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gabriel, S., Ziaugra, L. & Tabbaa, D. SNP genotyping using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Curr Protoc Hum Genet Chapter 2(Unit 2), 12, https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142905.hg0212s60 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tischkowitz, M. D. et al. Analysis of the gene coding for the BRCA2-interacting protein PALB2 in familial and sporadic pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 137, 1183–1186, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.055 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Rosalie Frechette at the McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre for design of the Sequenom assay. AMMM is a researcher of the CRCHUM/ICM, which receive support from the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS). Tissue banking was supported by the Banque de tissus et de données of the Réseau de recherche sur le cancer of the FRQS affiliated with the Canadian Tumor Repository Network (CTRNet).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.B., N.H. and W.D.F. conceived and designed the study. N.H. coordinated data collection. Samples and datasets from the RR Cancer biobank were provided by MdeL and A.M.M.M. R.L. and S.L. managed the breast cancer biobank. S.B. conducted data and statistical analysis. S.B., N.H., and W.D.F. wrote the article. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William D. Foulkes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Behl, S., Hamel, N., de Ladurantaye, M. et al. Founder BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 pathogenic variants in French-Canadian breast cancer cases and controls. Sci Rep 10, 6491 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63100-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63100-w

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing