Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# 3D Printing of Inertial Microfluidic Devices

## Abstract

Inertial microfluidics has been broadly investigated, resulting in the development of various applications, mainly for particle or cell separation. Lateral migrations of these particles within a microchannel strictly depend on the channel design and its cross-section. Nonetheless, the fabrication of these microchannels is a continuous challenging issue for the microfluidic community, where the most studied channel cross-sections are limited to only rectangular and more recently trapezoidal microchannels. As a result, a huge amount of potential remains intact for other geometries with cross-sections difficult to fabricate with standard microfabrication techniques. In this study, by leveraging on benefits of additive manufacturing, we have proposed a new method for the fabrication of inertial microfluidic devices. In our proposed workflow, parts are first printed via a high-resolution DLP/SLA 3D printer and then bonded to a transparent PMMA sheet using a double-coated pressure-sensitive adhesive tape. Using this method, we have fabricated and tested a plethora of existing inertial microfluidic devices, whether in a single or multiplexed manner, such as straight, spiral, serpentine, curvilinear, and contraction-expansion arrays. Our characterizations using both particles and cells revealed that the produced chips could withstand a pressure up to 150 psi with minimum interference of the tape to the total functionality of the device and viability of cells. As a showcase of the versatility of our method, we have proposed a new spiral microchannel with right-angled triangular cross-section which is technically impossible to fabricate using the standard lithography. We are of the opinion that the method proposed in this study will open the door for more complex geometries with the bespoke passive internal flow. Furthermore, the proposed fabrication workflow can be adopted at the production level, enabling large-scale manufacturing of inertial microfluidic devices.

## Introduction

Continuous separation of particles and cells is required for a wide variety of applications that include mineral processing, chemical syntheses, environmental assessments, and biological assays1. A number of conventional methods exist for this purpose; however, they have several drawbacks. Membrane filtration-based techniques, while efficient and simple, are limited by filter fouling and clogging. Centrifugation methods are also plagued by problems of particle adhesion and clogging, along with their high cost and inability for continuous processing. Likewise, techniques based on sedimentation are prone to particle adhesion and slower processing time, which increases the non-viability of cells in biological applications. Also, methods based on magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) are proven to be low throughput and expensive2,3,4.

With the evolution of microfabrication and rapid prototyping techniques, microfluidic technology has emerged as an alternative to improve upon conventional separation techniques5,6. These microfluidic techniques are grounded on the unique characteristics of microscale flow phenomena and have recently gained prominence as efficient tools for the control and focusing of microbeads. Amongst existing microfluidic systems, inertial microfluidics has experienced massive growth in many applications ranging from cell separation7,8, cytometry9,10, multiplexed bio-assays11,12, and also fluid mixing13. Despite great advantages of inertial microfluidics, the commercial impact and scalability of this technology have been restricted due to fabrication issues.

As a passive technique, inertial microfluidic systems manipulate cells and particles by taking the advantage of hydrodynamic forces in microchannels with a variety of cross-sections. To date, several microchannels (i.e., straight, spiral, and serpentine) with different cross-sections (i.e., square, rectangular, triangular, trapezoidal, and circular) have been proposed to enhance particle sorting by optimizing the synergetic effects of inertial and Dean drag forces14,15,16,17,18. These devices are mainly fabricated by casting PDMS on a master mold, which is made by either standard microfabrication techniques (i.e., silicon etching or SU8 lithography) or using conventional micromilling on an aluminum or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) sheets19,20,21. While this approach has been the workhorse behind the development of majority of these devices, the inability to build non-orthogonal and non-planar structures, cost, and labor intensiveness of the process have hampered its widespread applications and commercialization22,23.

Besides the aforementioned approach, other groups attempted to develop alternative strategies for the fabrication of inertial microfluidic devices. For instance, several groups reported the usage of femtosecond laser irradiation and CO2 laser ablation techniques to produce straight and spiral shape microchannels inside a glass or PMMA24,25,26,27,28. Despite the simple fabrication process, the complexity of building non-rectangular cross-sections, poor surface finish, and lengthy etching steps are making them less user-friendly. Some groups also proposed the utilization of metal micro-wires or a sacrificial template in conjunction with softlithography to produce inertial microfluidic devices29,30,31. In spite of the simplicity of this method in the fabrication of circular channels, PDMS rupture or distortion and the presence of residuals in microchannels during the template removal restrict its utility. Recently, the fabrication of PMMA microchannels using hot embossing technique has also been reported. While this method is attractive for rapid prototyping and high volume production of microfluidic systems with microscale features, the necessity of using sophisticated equipment limits its widespread usage32,33.

Recently, additive manufacturing has emerged as a powerful platform to fabricate 3D functional microfluidic systems from a variety of polymeric materials34. This outstanding technology enables investigators to build microstructures with complex shapes and geometries in a short time35,36. Benefiting from the stereolithography apparatus (SLA) technique37, Lee et al. directly fabricated a 3D helical trapezoidal microchannel to separate E. coli bacteria using magnetic nanoparticle clusters38. However, due to the poor transparency of the fabricated channel, imaging (whether fluorescent or bright field) was not feasible through the channel. Besides, to remove residuals from channels, the channel width is in the order of millimeter-sized dimensions, which is not suitable for most of the inertial microfluidic applications where small cells or particles are of interest. More lately, 3D printing of sacrificial molds combined with softlithography has gained significant attention due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness39. Gaining the efficiency of the fused deposition modeling (FDM) printer, Tang and colleagues40 fabricated various microchannels with unconventional cross-sections to study the effect of geometry on elasto-inertial focusing. While this approach is suitable to fabricate microchannels with different cross-sections, the resolution of printed parts is not high enough due to inherent limitations of FDM printing. Although direct fabrication of microchannels using SLA and digital light processing (DLP) method is a suitable candidate, inertial microfluidic devices often operate in channels in the order of micrometer (e.g., rectangular with 200 µm width and 40 µm height) where removing resin residuals from the channel is a challenging issue41.

To address these inadequacies, we have developed a robust protocol for large-scale manufacturing of inertial microfluidic systems. Thanks to the capabilities of DLP and SLA 3D printing42,43, we have printed a wide range of microchannels with different geometries, capable of performing particle and cell focusing for various Reynolds numbers (Re). The approach makes the use of a double-coated pressure-sensitive adhesive tape that perfectly binds open 3D-printed microchannels with optically transparent acrylic sheets, producing a leakage-free interface for inertial microfluidic applications. The bonding strength is quantified, and the compatibility of the concept for the fabrication of new generation of inertial microfluidic devices is evaluated using cells and particles.

## Results and discussion

### Fabrication and characterization of 3D-printed channels

Softlithography using PDMS and a master mold is a frequently used method for the fabrication of microfluidic systems. This strategy has several advantages; for instance, PDMS is biocompatible, optically transparent, and gas permeable, which makes it suitable for a myriad of biological applications44. Also, 3D printing of PDMS has been reported using stereolithography approach45. However, certain drawbacks such as lack of chemical stability, deformation under pressure, and adsorption of small hydrophobic molecules have hindered its industrial-scale utilization. Moreover, the manual molding, cleaning, and bonding process complicate the mass production.

Although theoretically straightforward, scaling up of PDMS-made microchannels for commercialization application in inertial flows is challenging since these devices are flexible and prone to rupture or collapse at high flow rates. In addition, inflation and hysteresis feature of PDMS create a big question mark regarding the exact focusing position of particles. This becomes more serious in CFD modeling where the “fixed wall boundary condition” is not truly correct in inertial regimes within PDMS-made microchannels. It is not surprising that the results of numerical simulations must be validated with hard chips rather than soft (PDMS-made) microchannels. Apart from these issues, the inherent limitations in the standard microfabrication and softlithography techniquesmake researchers unable to explore particle migration in unconventional cross-sections (e.g., right-angled triangular or hexagonal). For instance, particle focusing within a triangular curved microchannel has never been explored due to the fabrication difficulty. As such, there is a great need to develop standardized protocols for the fabrication of inertial microfluidic devices to facilitate ground-breaking research, while enabling quick translation into commercial products.

In this study, we have proposed a novel approach for the fabrication of inertial microfluidic devices based on the 3D printing method. Figure 1 demonstrates an overview of the fabrication process. Gaining the efficiency of a high-resolution 3D printer, the desired microchannel is printed while its face (where the design pattern exists) is outer, and the base is attached to the build plate (Fig. 1AI). This method is particularly significant since the change of cross-sections in inertial microfluidics is of great interest. However, the printing parameters need to be optimized for the fabrication of a channel with proper and accurate dimensions. The slice thickness in Z direction, curing time of each layer, and total thickness of the part are the most critical factors to have a high-quality channel with a great surface finish. Various cross-sections, ranging from right-angled or isosceles triangular to hexagonal, were fabricated and the best optimized parameters were identified (Fig. S1). To complete the fluidic network, 3D-printed inertial microchannels need to be bonded to a substrate with enough optical transparency and rigidity for subsequent testing. In this work, a variety of scenarios has been evaluated, and upon extensive evaluations and characterizations, permanent bonding of 3D-printed channels to a PMMA sheet via a double-coated adhesive tape was selected as the most promising and reproducible method. A transparent double-coated pressure-sensitive adhesive tape (ARcare, Adhesive Research) having 25.4 µm clear polyester film coated with AS-110 acrylic medical grade adhesive was cut with a similar size of PMMA sheet (Fig. 1AII). After the attachment of one side of the tape to the PMMA sheet, the 3D-printed inertial part was manually placed over the other side of the tape and pressed with a tweezer until no bubble was observed at the interface (Fig. S2).

An important feature of PDMS is its optical transparency, which makes it suitable for a broad range of microscopic applications. Given the fact that commercial DLP/SLA resins are not typically transparent, the attachment of 3D-printed microchannels to PMMA sheets provides enough transparency for the optical and fluorescent microscopy (Fig. 1AIII). What makes this approach attractive for a wide range of communities (e.g., biologists and chemists) is its user-friendliness for people without prior knowledge about microfabrication and softlithography. The entire process from CAD drawing to printing and then testing takes less than 2 hours, portraying the versatility of this method for inertial microfluidic research. More importantly, devices made using this technique are not prone to the deformation and leakage compared to the PDMS-made devices, making them suitable to study new physics, especially at high Re. Furthermore, by considering the fabrication cost, time, and efforts of a complicated inertial microfluidic device, our suggested method is rapid and utilizes a low-cost raw material which are valuable features, especially in areas where resources are limited. Figure 1B,C depict a final device fabricated using this technique. The internal channels are filled with red food color for the sake of illustration.

In order to investigate the bonding quality, a straight microchannel with dimensions of 50 µm height, 200 µm width, and 4 cm length was fabricated and tested accordingly. We have monitored the device performance for the appearance and growth of Saffman-Taylor fingers until it becomes stable, called “inflation stability” (Fig. 2A). The results are presented in a 2D diagram to identify the channel behavior at a given pressure, as shown in Fig. 2C. Our results revealed that the holding strength of double-coated adhesive tape was able to achieve a leak-proof interface between the 3D-printed part and PMMA sheet, not only at typical operating pressure reported in literature46, but also more than the capability of PDMS-made channels in withstanding high flow rate conditions. Shear rate distribution across a line parallel to the channel width was also evaluated, and as Fig. 2B revealed, increasing the flow rate leads to imposing more shear forces at the edges of the channels. The more the flow rate, the larger the appearance of Saffman-Taylor fingers (insets of Fig. 2B). The green area in Fig. 2C shows the safe zone for performing inertial microfluidic experiments where no Saffman-Taylor fingers appear during the operation. We have found that at pressures more than 82.6 psi, Saffman-Taylor fingers begin to appear; however, this does not impose any detrimental effect on the device performance (i.e., no leakage or bonding collapse). Also, we did not observe any delamination or deformation in channels after consecutive runs at high pressures (i.e., 120 psi), all of which are common in PDMS-based inertial microfluidic devices (see Figs. S3 and S4 for the pressure drop, velocity profile inside the microchannels for a wide range of operating flow rates).

The surface characteristic of the double-coated adhesive tape was also investigated using a profilometer. As Fig. 3 illustrates, the roughness of the tape is homogenous and is in the submicron range. The values of Ra and Sa were about 250 and 240 nm, respectively. Also, the roughness of the 3D printed parts was evaluated and value of Sa was less than 300 nm. These nanometric rugosities indicate that the roughness of tape does not have any effect on the flow profile and particle focusing. Although optically transparent, the optical characteristics of the PMMA sheet (2-mm-thick) and adhesive tape were evaluated to identify the possibility of accurate fluorescence imaging47. Hence, the UV-visible absorbance spectra for a wide range of wavelengths (i.e., from 200 to 1100 nm) were recorded via a spectrophotometer (Cary 60 VU-Vis spectrophotometer, Agilent Technologies). Figure 3B,C reveal that the light loss is negligible for both PMMA and adhesive tape within the visible spectrum, resulting in no trace of autofluorescence residual.

### Straight microchannel

Straight microchannels with rectangular or square cross-sections are arguably the most widely used inertial microfluidic systems. Thanks to their ease of fabrication and the ability for parallelization, a myriad of applications have been developed using these platforms over the past decade48. The required channel length for inertial particle migration to the equilibrium positions is $${L}_{f}=\pi \mu {H}^{2}/\rho {U}_{m}{\alpha }^{2}{f}_{L}$$ where fL is estimated in the range of 0.02 to 0.05 for (H/W) from 2 to 0.5, and the corresponding flow rate for inertial migration is calculated as $$Q\approx 2\pi \mu W{H}^{3}/3\rho L{\alpha }^{2}{f}_{L}$$48. Channel Re (Re = ρUD/μ) and particle Reynolds number $$(R{e}_{p}=Re\frac{{\alpha }^{2}}{{H}^{2}})$$ are two dimensionless numbers for the characterization of particle migration in a straight microchannel. When particle Re is much smaller than 1, viscous drag becomes dominant, and particles follow the streamline. Increasing particle Re augments inertial forces, causing inertial particle migration become obvious in the microchannel49,50.

Particle migration within a straight channel strictly depends on its cross-section. In square straight microchannels (with an aspect ratio (AR) (width/height) of 1), particles migrate to four equilibrium positions located at the center of each wall. Changing the cross-section to rectangular disturbs this focusing pattern where in a rectangular straight microchannel with AR of 0.5, focusing positions reduce to two near the center of long walls51. This behavior was explained by Zhou and Papautsky where they identified two-stage particle migration in rectangular straight microchannels21. Further increase in the AR results in the more unpredicted focusing behavior of particles. Generally, in channels with high AR, stable focusing positions are reduced. However, by exceeding Re from a critical value, the number of stable equilibrium positions increases which is a function of particle size, channel dimensions, and Re. Based on reported experimental results, $$R{e}_{c}=697{(AR/\kappa )}^{-0.79}\,(4.5\le AR/\kappa \le 60,\,5\le Re\le 660)$$ was identified52. The abovementioned results elucidate that particle focusing is strongly affected by channel cross-section. However, due to the fabrication limitations, dependency of various cross-sections to channel geometries was not systematically investigated. Recently, triangular and semi-circular cross-sections were fabricated using Si anisotropic etching with potassium hydroxide53, a brass for mold fabrication54, FDM for creation of sacrificial mold40, or unconventional micromilling14. However, critical fabrication limitations do not allow for further investigation on the dependency of triangular angle or type (e.g., right-angled triangular) on focusing patterns of the particles. Here, as a showcase, a straight microchannel with rectangular cross-section and AR of 4 (all channel dimensions are provided in Section S3 and Tables S1–5) was fabricated, and the results are illustrated in Fig. 4A. As the results indicate, for low Re (Fig. 4AI), 20 µm particles focus at the center of long walls of the channel cross-sections, shown previously in PDMS-made microchannels. Nonetheless, the focusing pattern for particles at higher Re does not obey a specific role. As clearly can be seen, increasing flow rates leads to generation of additional focusing positions within the microchannels where side walls are also added to the equilibrium positions of particles (Fig. 4AII–IV). Furthermore, lateral migration of MDA-MB-231 and DU-145 cells at low flow rates (10~20 ml/hr) (Fig. 4BI–III) illustrates their single-line focusing within the rectangular straight microchannel, which is promising for flow cytometry applications. Moreover, to showcase the versatility of the proposed method, a triangular straight microchannel was fabricated and the results are shown in Fig. 4D. The results are completely in line with those reported in the literature where 10 µm particles and cells occupy one lateral position in the channel for low flow rates (Fig. 4DI,II). For high flow rates, this equilibrium position increases to three points which are captured using MDA-MB-231 cancer cells inside the channel (Fig. 4DIII)14,53,55. Surface profilometry of the channel cross sections (rectangular and triangular) (Fig. 4C,E) confirms the accuracy of the method for the fabrication of various cross-sections.

### Sinusoidal and serpentine microchannel

Inertial microfluidics in sinusoidal (curvilinear) microchannel has gained traction due to its improved focusing performance, the ability of massive parallelization, and small footprint. In the sinusoidal microchannel, the curvature direction changes in each loop, resulting in an intricate phenomenon that help in particle focusing. Indeed, by alternating the curvatures, the direction of Dean flows changes, and secondary flows may not reach a steady-state condition. This design was firstly developed by Di Carlo in 2007 and its capability in wide ranges of Dean number $$(De=Re\sqrt{{D}_{h}/2R}$$, where Re is channel Re, Dh is characteristic length of channel, and R is the radius of channel curvature) was evaluated56. By assuming that Dean drag forces were balanced with shear gradient lift forces, his team proposed the ratio of inertial lift forces to Dean drag forces as $${F}_{L}/{F}_{D}=2r{a}^{2}/{D}_{h}^{3}$$ (where r is radius of channel and a is particle diameter). Generally, if FL/FD 1, secondary flows do not affect particles, and if FL/FD 1, particles are entirely affected by secondary flows57. The application of this microchannel was even expanded where it was used for high-throughput separation of micron and sub-micron bioparticles (cyanobacteria)58 and a microfluidic concentrator for harvesting of cyanobacteria59. In addition, in a comprehensive study, the design principle of curvilinear microchannels was investigated, and a map for various focusing phenomena was provided, based on $${F}_{L}/{F}_{D} \sim (R{e}^{2}/D{e}^{2}){(a/{D}_{h})}^{3}{f}_{L}$$ where fL was approximated by Zhou and Papautsky21 as fL ~ 1/Re(Dh/a)260. The dependency of curvature angle61 and various cell lines62 on the focusing positions was also evaluated. In order to showcase the adaptability of our method for fabrication of various inertial microfluidic devices, a curvilinear microchannel with rectangular cross-section (Fig. 5A) was designed, fabricated, and evaluated. Figure 5B reveals that 15 µm particles first occupied two focusing positions and by increasing the flow rate, it reduced to a single focusing line across the channel (e.g., at 5th loop for flow rate of 900 µl/min (Fig. 5C)) which is consistent with the previously reported results60.

By altering the design of curvilinear to straight, serpentine microchannel with a square-wave pattern is created. This channel proves to have unique features for size-based particle focusing. Generally, particle focusing achieves when a/Dh > 0.07 and Rp ~ 1. However, additional secondary flows in serpentine microchannel lead to focusing of particles with smaller diameters compared to those calculated by the above formula. These devices can benefit from parallelization along their vertical direction, thereby increasing their throughput. Three focusing patterns can be identified by increasing the input flow rate, i.e., two-sided focusing, transition focusing, and central single-line focusing. If inertial effects dominate the secondary flows, particles occupy two lines near the walls. In contrast, dominance of secondary flows results in a single-line focusing at channel center. If these two effects have the same order, particles focus as a wide streak. Gaining the efficiency of two-sided focusing for small particles and central focusing for big ones give us the opportunity of size-based particle separation. Based on the literature, a serpentine microchannel with cross-section of 40 × 200 µm (H × W) and 15 loops was fabricated and used to showcase the focusing of 10 µm particles (Fig. 5D).

In a straight channel with 40 × 200 µm (H × W) cross-section, a/Dh for 10 µm is 0.056, which is less than the focusing criteria (0.07); theoreically, these particles cannot focus in a straight microchannel. However, in the serpentine microchannel with the aid of secondary flows, 10 µm particles can efficiently be focused. Figure 5E elucidates that 10 µm particles at flow rate of 0.7 ml/min can be focused at the center of channel at the 10th loop and occupy central equilibrium position at the outlet, which is consistent with the insets as normalized intensity profile of the particles (Fig. 5F). More importantly, the performance of device was tested with MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 5G,H), and the results are consistent with those reported in the literature63. The surface profilometry of the channel cross-section is also provided in Fig. 5I, indicating the high-accuracy of the proposed method for fabrication of inertial microfluidic devices.

### Spiral microchannel

Spiral defines as a curve winding around a center point with continuous decreasing or increasing manner. When flow passes the curvature, velocity mismatch occurs in the curve section of the channel, resulting in the generation of secondary flows. In inertial microfluidics, spiral microchannel has progressed significantly, and nowadays, most of the particle/cell separations are performed using these microchannels64. De is used for the characterization of secondary flows within the channel. Intuitively, smaller channel curvature or larger channel size or Re leads to higher De, thereby imposing stronger secondary flows within the channel. For a given De, average transverse Dean velocity (UDe = 1.84 × 10−4 De1.63) and Dean drag force $$({F}_{D}=3\pi \mu {U}_{De}\alpha =5.4\times {10}^{-4}\pi \mu D{e}^{1.63}\alpha )$$ can be identified. However, the exact behavior of particle migration at the downstream of the fluid was not thoroughly investigated, and all results are based on experimental data. The most appealing feature of spiral inertial microfluidics is its high-throughput where 2100 particles per second can be processed9. Particle sorting is one of the most significant applications of spiral microfluidics. Previously, the potential of a rectangular spiral microchannel for continuous and simultaneous isolation of 10, 15, and 20 µm based on softlithography was investigated (Fig. 6AI)65. Dean flow dynamics for a low-aspect-ratio rectangular spiral microchannel was also thoroughly explored66. Beyond a simple rectangular spiral microchannel, various geometry modifications for regulation of Dean forces and performance enhancement of the device have been proposed. Benefitting from micromilling (Fig. 6AII), trapezoidal spiral microchannels illustrate promising results in redistribution of lateral focusing positions of particles appropriate for size-based particle separation. In these channels, smaller particles focus along the outer wall, whereas larger ones migrate toward the inner wall67. This superior advantage has been widely investigated by our group, among other groups, for circulating tumor cell (CTC) and circulating fetal trophoblasts (CFT) isolation19,68, blood plasma separation69, isolation of microcarriers from mesenchymal stem cells70,71, microalgae separation72, and synchronizing C. elegans73. Also, multiplexing using stack of attached PDMS layers to boost the throughput is illustrated previously69,74. However, most of the aforementioned applications are just doable by utilizing cleanroom facilities or employing conventional micromachining (e.g., metal machining or laser cutting) for the fabrication of microchannel. Besides, micromachining has its own limitations such as inability to make sharp corners or difficulty in making spiral loops close to each other. These challenges highlight an unmet need for the fabrication of spiral microchannels using a versatile method which is robust and can surmount aforementioned issues.

As a showcase of the versatility of our proposed method, we have fabricated a spiral microchannel with trapezoidal cross-section with a width of 600 µm and heights of 80 and 130 µm. These results are then put aside a PDMS chip with similar dimensions, and the data is provided in ESI (Fig. S5). Despite all progress in spiral inertial microfluidics, there is not any report of a spiral with cross-sections rather than rectangular or trapezoidal. In other words, a huge amount of potential remains intact to study spiral microchannels with different cross-sections such as triangular (Fig. 6AIII). For this aim, for the first time, we have fabricated a spiral microchannel with right-angled triangular cross-section (as schematically shown in Fig. 6B) where the width and height are 600 and 210 µm, respectively. As the results are illustrated in Fig. 6C, there is a tight band focusing for particles larger than 10 µm, which is suitable for high throughput flow cytometry applications where single line focusing is desired. Also, we observed double-band focusing behavior for 20 µm particles at flow rate of ≥4 ml/min. The dimensions (Fig. 6D) and channel cross-section (Fig. 6E) show the accuracy of the proposed method the for fabrication of right-angled triangular spiral microchannel (check Fig. S6 for contraction-expansion array microchannel results). These results illustrate the flexibility of this method where a complex cross-section can be fabricated in less than two hours with high robustness and stability. Our results hold promise for leveraging the potential of additive manufacturing for the fabrication of inertial microfluidic devices, which is more challenging using conventional microfabrication methods (see Section S6 for multiplexing of 3D printed inertial microfluidic devices).

### Cellular studies

PDMS-made inertial microfluidic devices have been widely used for the cell separation using biological samples such as blood and urine. While PDMS is proven to be a biocompatible material with minimum side effects on cells, we have tested the 3D printed devices using DU145 cells, assessing their viability and functionality post-separation. The collected cells from the device outlet were cultured back into a petri dish for 5 days, showing similar morphological features to the control group as shown in Fig. 7A,B. The flow cytometry tests (Fig. 7C) showed that the viability of the cells was not compromised during the operation using 3D printed devices. The real-time PCR analysis was utilised to assess the expression of genes related to the general activities and stress responses in both treated and untreated cells (Fig. 7D). The similar expression level of GAPDH and CDKN2A confirmed that neither cellular metabolism nor cell cycle progression were affected after processing through the microchannels. Also, there are no significant changes in the expression of TXNIP and MAPK14, which are two well-known regulators of cellular stress. In all, the 3D-printed inertial microfluidic device does not alter the cell activity and is safe to be used in biological assays.

## Conclusion

In this study, we have showcased a robust and versatile workflow for the manufacturing of inertial microfluidic devices for both laboratory experiments and industrial applications. The proposed method involves 3D-direct printing of a channel with the desired structure and geometry via a high-resolution DLP/SLA 3D printer. Our approach relies on the bonding of 3D-printed devices (i.e., with high-quality surface finish) to a transparent PMMA sheet via a double-coated pressure-sensitive adhesive tape. Given the great transparency of PMMA layer, these devices can be utilised in bright field, phase contrast, fluorescent, or high-speed microscopy. The bonding quality was evaluated by Saffman-Taylor finger criterion, and the results showed that the device is capable of withstanding pressure as high as 150 psi (nearly triple of the value reported for PDMS). The versatility of this method allowed us to fabricate and evaluate a plethora of existing inertial microfluidic devices as exemplified for fabrication of straight, spiral, serpentine, curvilinear, and contraction-expansion arrays microchannels. The total time frame, from designing a part to starting an experiment, takes less than two hours, allowing multiple experiments in a single day. Also, for the first time, we have fabricated and examined a new inertial microfluidic device, i.e., spiral microchannel with right-angled triangular cross-section which is theoretically impossible to fabricate using photolithography. We believe that the proposed workflow will provide inertial microfluidic devices within the reach of any research groups involving in particle/cell manipulation without strong microfabrication background.

## Materials and methods

### Fabrication method

In this study, inertial microfluidic devices were fabricated using a high-resolution DLP/SLA 3D printer (Ultra 50, Miicraft, Hsinchu, Taiwan) featuring 30 µm XY resolution and 32 × 57 × 120 mm3 printing area. The desired inertial microfluidic device is first drafted using a commercial CAD drawing software (SolidWorks 2016) and then translated into STL format, a suitable file for 3D printer language. The file is then sliced in Z direction using the Miicraft software (Version 4.01, Miicraft). The slicing in Z direction (slice thickness) can be adjusted from 5 to 200 µm with an increment of 5 µm. The slicing option is related to the complexity of the geometry. In geometries with ramp or step, the slice thickness should be small, whereas for planar or orthogonal structures, higher slice thickness is suitable. The detailed dependencies of printing parameters are provided in electronic supplementary information (ESI) (Section S1 and Fig. S1). The sliced file is then sent to the 3D printer with UV wavelength of 358–405 nm. The UV light is projected from the bottom of the resin bath (filled with BV-007 resin) and passes through a transparent Teflon film. BV-007 is an acrylate-based resin containing 80–95% acrylate components and 10–15% photoinitiator and additives. Once the UV light cures one layer, the Z-stepper motor moves one slice upward, and the next layer starts to be polymerized. This process continues until the part is printed, successfully. When the part is removed from the picker, it should be rinsed and washed with isopropanol, thoroughly and air-dried by an air nozzle. Afterward, the microchannel is exposed to a UV light with 405 ± 5 nm wavelength within a curing chamber for post curing process. One superior advantage of this method compared to the softlithography is that it does not require punching the holes for inlets and outlets since those are printed as a one-body part by the 3D printer. Eventually, tubes (Tygon tubing, inner diameter: 0.020″, outer diameter: 0.060″) were connected to the microchannel by a tweezer.

Fluorescent microbeads (Fluoresbrite Microspheres, Polysciences Inc, Singapore) with 0.01% volume fraction and various diameters were added to the MACS buffer. The primary usage of MACS buffer is to prevent nonspecific adhesion of microbeads to the tubing of the microchannel. The distribution of particles is illustrated using standard deviation, minimum, or maximum light intensity plots, as reported previously54.

### Bonding quality test

Inertial devices are operated at high flow rates; hence, the bonding technique must provide enough strength to prevent leakage from the interface. To evaluate the bonding quality of our proposed technique, a simple 3D-printed straight channel featuring 50 µm height, 200 µm width, and 4 cm length was bonded to a 2-mm-thick PMMA layer. A high-pressure syringe pump (Chemyx Fusion 4000, Chemyx, TX, USA) was used to inject fluids inside the channel from a small syringe (6 ml). Increasing the flow rate leads to the generation of Saffman-Taylor fingers around the inlet, in which the most pressure in the channel present (Section S2). Saffman-Taylor fingers are generated by the movement of a viscous fluid within a porous material75,76. As the bonded adhesive tape forms a porous zone between the connecting parts, this theory is applicable for the bonding evaluation. An increase in the applied pressure leads to developments of the Saffman-Taylor fingers until the bonding fails. A CCD camera (DP80, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) mounted on an inverted microscope (IX73, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used for monitoring the bonding integrity. All recorded data were obtained immediately after the bonding of the 3D-printed channels to a PMMA sheet.

### Surface characterization

For the surface characterization of double-coated adhesive tape, a 3D laser microscope (Olympus LEXT OLS5000) was used, and an LMPLFLN 20x LEXT objective lens (Olympus) was selected. Arithmetic mean deviation (Ra), the arithmetic mean of absolute ordinate Z (x, y) documented across a line, and arithmetical mean height (Sa), the arithmetic mean of the absolute ordinate Z (x, y) recorded across a region were chosen to evaluate the surface characterization of the tape.

### Cell culture, harvesting, and device operation

DU145 cells (human prostate cancer cell line) were cultured and expanded under standard culture condition (37 °C and 5% CO2) using Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI, ThermoFisher) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and 1% Penicillin Streptomycin (Pen/Strp, Gibco). Cells were harvested when the flask was 80% confluence. To obtain a homogenous cell suspension without cell clumps, a sufficient volume of TryplE (Gibco) was added to cover the whole flask, and the flask was incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. The cells were then collected in a 15 ml falcon tube and counted with a hemocytometer. TryplE was then replaced with phosphate buffer saline (PBS, Gibco), and cells were diluted to 106 cells/ml concentration by PBS. Afterward, cells were introduced to 3D-printed microchannels (straight rectangular microchannel with a length of 4 cm, width of 200 µm, and height of 50 µm) at the flow rate of 0.3 ml/min. A group of untested cells was kept as control.

### Morphological analysis and cell viability assay

In order to evaluate the viability of cells after passing through the channels, a live-dead assay was performed using Live and Dead Cell Assay kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) after the test. One group of collected DU145 cell suspension was diluted to 5 × 105 cell/ml and incubated with the staining solution for 10 min under room temperature, based on the kit manufacturer’s instruction. Then, the stained cells were processed through flow cytometry (Olympus CKX53, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed by CytExpert software (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Live and dead cells were detected by green (λ excite/emit = 488/515 nm) and red (λ excite/emit = 488/617 nm) fluorescent, respectively. Another group of DU145 cells was cultured in a culture flask and stained by live and dead staining after 24 hours without detaching by TryplE. Fluorescent microscopic imaging was taken for adhered cells to identify live cells (with green cytoplasm) from dead ones (with red nucleus) (Fig. S8). The morphology of the attached cells was monitored under an inverted microscope for up to five days. Furthermore, the morphological features of both test and control groups were visualized by fluorescence staining of cytoskeleton after three days. The F-actin filaments were fixed and permeabilized by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma) and 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma) and then labeled by Phalloidin- FITC (Sigma).

### Real-time PCR analysis

The effect of shear stress on the expression of genes related to proliferation and survival was measured by real-time PCR (BioRad CFX 96 thermocycler). Briefly, the processed cells were reseeded on a culture dish and kept under standard culture conditions for one day. Next, total RNA of cells were extracted by using PureLink RNA Mini Kit (ThermoFisher), and cDNA was synthesized by applying Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (ThermoFisher). Real-time PCR was performed using specific TaqMan primer sets and TaqMan PCR Master Mix (ThermoFisher) with following cyclic conditions: 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 10 s.

## References

1. 1.

Beech, J. Microfluidics Separation and Analysis of Biological Particles. (Lund University, 2011).

2. 2.

Kersaudy-Kerhoas, M., Dhariwal, R. & Desmulliez, M. Recent advances in microparticle continuous separation. IET Nanobiotechnology 2, 1–13 (2008).

3. 3.

Bhagat, A. A. S. et al. Microfluidics for cell separation. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 48, 999–1014 (2010).

4. 4.

Ebrahimi Warkiani, M., Lou, C.-P. & Gong, H.-Q. Fabrication of multi-layer polymeric micro-sieve having narrow slot pores with conventional ultraviolet-lithography and micro-fabrication techniques. Biomicrofluidics 5, 036504 (2011).

5. 5.

Gossett, D. R. et al. Label-free cell separation and sorting in microfluidic systems. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 397, 3249–3267 (2010).

6. 6.

Au, A. K., Bhattacharjee, N., Horowitz, L. F., Chang, T. C. & Folch, A. 3D-printed microfluidic automation. Lab on a chip 15, 1934–1941 (2015).

7. 7.

Condina, M. R. et al. Rapid separation and identification of beer spoilage bacteria by inertial microfluidics and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Lab on a Chip (2019).

8. 8.

Kulasinghe, A. et al. Enrichment of circulating head and neck tumour cells using spiral microfluidic technology. Scientific Reports 7, 42517 (2017).

9. 9.

Bhagat, A. A. S., Kuntaegowdanahalli, S. S., Kaval, N., Seliskar, C. J. & Papautsky, I. Inertial microfluidics for sheath-less high-throughput flow cytometry. Biomedical Microdevices 12, 187–195 (2010).

10. 10.

Petchakup, C., Tay, H. M., Li, K. H. H. & Hou, H. W. Integrated inertial-impedance cytometry for rapid label-free leukocyte isolation and profiling of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Lab on a Chip 19, 1736–1746 (2019).

11. 11.

Warkiani, M. E. et al. An ultra-high-throughput spiral microfluidic biochip for the enrichment of circulating tumor cells. Analyst 139, 3245–3255 (2014).

12. 12.

Sarkar, A., Hou, H. W., Mahan, A. E., Han, J. & Alter, G. Multiplexed Affinity-Based Separation of Proteins and Cells Using Inertial Microfluidics. Scientific Reports 6, 23589, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23589 https://www.nature.com/articles/srep23589#supplementary-information (2016).

13. 13.

Bazaz, S. R. et al. A hybrid micromixer with planar mixing units. RSC Advances 8, 33103–33120 (2018).

14. 14.

Mukherjee, P., Wang, X., Zhou, J. & Papautsky, I. Single stream inertial focusing in low aspect-ratio triangular microchannels. Lab on a Chip 19, 147–157 (2019).

15. 15.

Hou, H. W. et al. Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces. Scientific Reports 3, 1259 (2013).

16. 16.

Lee, M. G., Shin, J. H., Bae, C. Y., Choi, S. & Park, J.-K. Label-free cancer cell separation from human whole blood using inertial microfluidics at low shear stress. Analytical Chemistry 85, 6213–6218 (2013).

17. 17.

Wu, L., Guan, G., Hou, H. W., Bhagat, A. A. S. & Han, J. Separation of leukocytes from blood using spiral channel with trapezoid cross-section. Analytical Chemistry 84, 9324–9331 (2012).

18. 18.

Aya-Bonilla, C. A. et al. Isolation and detection of circulating tumour cells from metastatic melanoma patients using a slanted spiral microfluidic device. Oncotarget 8, 67355 (2017).

19. 19.

Hou, H. W. et al. Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forces. Scientific Reports 3 (2013).

20. 20.

Warkiani, M. E. et al. Slanted spiral microfluidics for the ultra-fast, label-free isolation of circulating tumor cells. Lab on a Chip 14, 128–137 (2014).

21. 21.

Zhou, J. & Papautsky, I. Fundamentals of inertial focusing in microchannels. Lab on a Chip 13, 1121–1132 (2013).

22. 22.

Park, J. Y., Hwang, C. M. & Lee, S.-H. Ice-lithographic fabrication of concave microwells and a microfluidic network. Biomedical Microdevices 11, 129–133, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-008-9216-1 (2009).

23. 23.

Razavi Bazaz, S. et al. Rapid Softlithography Using 3D‐Printed Molds. Advanced Materials Technologies, 1900425 (2019).

24. 24.

Liao, Y. et al. Three-dimensional microfluidic channel with arbitrary length and configuration fabricated inside glass by femtosecond laser direct writing. Optics Letters 35, 3225–3227, https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.003225 (2010).

25. 25.

Al-Halhouli, A. A., Al-Faqheri, W., Alhamarneh, B., Hecht, L. & Dietzel, A. Spiral Microchannels with Trapezoidal Cross Section Fabricated by Femtosecond Laser Ablation in Glass for the Inertial Separation of Microparticles. Micromachines 9, 171 (2018).

26. 26.

Miller, B., Jimenez, M. & Bridle, H. Cascading and Parallelising Curvilinear Inertial Focusing Systems for High Volume, Wide Size Distribution, Separation and Concentration of Particles. Scientific Reports 6, 36386, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36386 https://www.nature.com/articles/srep36386#supplementary-information (2016).

27. 27.

Paiè, P., Bragheri, F., Di Carlo, D. & Osellame, R. Particle focusing by 3D inertial microfluidics. Microsystems &Amp; Nanoengineering 3, 17027, https://doi.org/10.1038/micronano.2017.27 https://www.nature.com/articles/micronano201727#supplementary-information (2017).

28. 28.

Chung, C.-K., Long, H. & Lai, C. Microfluidic chip using foil-assisted CO2 laser ablation for suspended particle separation. Micro & Nano Letters 10, 500–503 (2015).

29. 29.

Verma, M. K., Majumder, A. & Ghatak, A. Embedded template-assisted fabrication of complex microchannels in PDMS and design of a microfluidic adhesive. Langmuir 22, 10291–10295, https://doi.org/10.1021/la062516n (2006).

30. 30.

Song, S.-H. et al. A rapid and simple fabrication method for 3-dimensional circular microfluidic channel using metal wire removal process. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 9, 533–540 (2010).

31. 31.

Xiang, N., Dai, Q., Han, Y. & Ni, Z. Circular-channel particle focuser utilizing viscoelastic focusing. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 23, 16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-018-2184-8 (2019).

32. 32.

He, Y., Wu, W., Zhang, T. & Fu, J. Micro structure fabrication with a simplified hot embossing method. RSC Advances 5, 39138–39144, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra01410g (2015).

33. 33.

Wang, X., Liedert, C., Liedert, R. & Papautsky, I. A disposable, roll-to-roll hot-embossed inertial microfluidic device for size-based sorting of microbeads and cells. Lab Chip 16, 1821–1830, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc00215c (2016).

34. 34.

Naderi, A., Bhattacharjee, N. & Folch, A. Digital Manufacturing for Microfluidics. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 21, 325–364 (2019).

35. 35.

Shallan, A. I., Smejkal, P., Corban, M., Guijt, R. M. & Breadmore, M. C. Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes. Analytical Chemistry 86, 3124–3130 (2014).

36. 36.

Bhattacharjee, N., Urrios, A., Kang, S. & Folch, A. The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 16, 1720–1742 (2016).

37. 37.

Au, A. K., Lee, W. & Folch, A. Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices. Lab on a Chip 14, 1294–1301, https://doi.org/10.1039/C3LC51360B (2014).

38. 38.

Lee, W. et al. 3D-printed microfluidic device for the detection of pathogenic bacteria using size-based separation in helical channel with trapezoid cross-section. Scientific Reports 5, 7717 (2015).

39. 39.

Raoufi, M. A. et al. Fabrication of unconventional inertial microfluidic channels using wax 3D printing. Soft Matter 16, 2448-2459, https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SM02067E (2020).

40. 40.

Tang, W. et al. Elasto-inertial particle focusing in 3D-printed microchannels with unconventional cross sections. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 23, 42 (2019).

41. 41.

Beauchamp, M. J., Nordin, G. P. & Woolley, A. T. Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 409, 4311–4319 (2017).

42. 42.

Gong, H., Bickham, B. P., Woolley, A. T. & Nordin, G. P. Custom 3D printer and resin for 18 μm × 20 μm microfluidic flow channels. Lab on a Chip 17, 2899–2909 (2017).

43. 43.

Kuo, A. P. et al. High‐Precision Stereolithography of Biomicrofluidic Devices. Advanced Materials Technologies 4, 1800395 (2019).

44. 44.

Qin, D., Xia, Y. & Whitesides, G. M. Soft lithography for micro-and nanoscale patterning. Nature Protocols 5, 491 (2010).

45. 45.

Bhattacharjee, N., Parra‐Cabrera, C., Kim, Y. T., Kuo, A. P. & Folch, A. Desktop‐Stereolithography 3D‐Printing of a Poly (dimethylsiloxane)‐Based Material with Sylgard‐184 Properties. Advanced Materials 30, 1800001 (2018).

46. 46.

Sollier, E., Murray, C., Maoddi, P. & Di Carlo, D. Rapid prototyping polymers for microfluidic devices and high pressure injections. Lab on a Chip 11, 3752–3765 (2011).

47. 47.

Serra, M. et al. A simple and low-cost chip bonding solution for high pressure, high temperature and biological applications. Lab on a Chip 17, 629–634 (2017).

48. 48.

Di Carlo, D. Inertial microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 9, 3038–3046 (2009).

49. 49.

Zhang, J. et al. Fundamentals and applications of inertial microfluidics: a review. Lab on a Chip 16, 10–34 (2016).

50. 50.

Raoufi, M. A. et al. Experimental and numerical study of elasto-inertial focusing in straight channels. Biomicrofluidics 13, 034103 (2019).

51. 51.

Razavi Bazaz, S. et al. Computational Inertial Microfluidics: A Review. Lab on a Chip 20, 1023-1048, https://doi.org/10.1039/C9LC01022J (2020).

52. 52.

Liu, C., Hu, G., Jiang, X. & Sun, J. Inertial focusing of spherical particles in rectangular microchannels over a wide range of Reynolds numbers. Lab on a Chip 15, 1168–1177, https://doi.org/10.1039/C4LC01216J (2015).

53. 53.

Kim, J. et al. Inertial focusing in non-rectangular cross-section microchannels and manipulation of accessible focusing positions. Lab on a Chip 16, 992–1001, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc01100k (2016).

54. 54.

Kim, J. A., Lee, J. R., Je, T. J., Jeon, E. C. & Lee, W. Size-Dependent Inertial Focusing Position Shift and Particle Separations in Triangular Microchannels. Analytical Chemistry 90, 1827–1835, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03851 (2018).

55. 55.

Mashhadian, A. & Shamloo, A. Inertial microfluidics: A method for fast prediction of focusing pattern of particles in the cross section of the channel. Analytica Chimica Acta 1083, 137–149 (2019).

56. 56.

Di Carlo, D., Irimia, D., Tompkins, R. G. & Toner, M. Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 18892–18897 (2007).

57. 57.

Gossett, D. R. & Carlo, D. D. Particle focusing mechanisms in curving confined flows. Analytical Chemistry 81, 8459–8465 (2009).

58. 58.

Wang, L. & Dandy, D. S. High‐Throughput Inertial Focusing of Micrometer‐and Sub‐Micrometer‐Sized Particles Separation. Advanced Science 4, 1700153 (2017).

59. 59.

Wang, L. & Dandy, D. S. A microfluidic concentrator for cyanobacteria harvesting. Algal Research 26, 481–489 (2017).

60. 60.

Zhang, J. et al. Fundamentals of differential particle inertial focusing in symmetric sinusoidal microchannels. Analytical Chemistry 91, 4077–4084 (2019).

61. 61.

Özbey, A., Karimzadehkhouei, M., Bayrak, Ö. & Koşar, A. Inertial focusing of microparticles in curvilinear microchannels with different curvature angles. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 22, 62 (2018).

62. 62.

Ozbey, A. et al. Inertial focusing of Cancer Cell Lines in Curvilinear Microchannels. Micro and Nano Engineering (2019).

63. 63.

Zhang, J., Li, W., Li, M., Alici, G. & Nguyen, N.-T. Particle inertial focusing and its mechanism in a serpentine microchannel. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 17, 305–316, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-013-1306-6 (2014).

64. 64.

Gou, Y., Jia, Y., Wang, P. & Sun, C. Progress of inertial microfluidics in principle and application. Sensors 18, 1762 (2018).

65. 65.

Bhagat, A. A. S., Kuntaegowdanahalli, S. S. & Papautsky, I. Inertial microfluidics for continuous particle filtration and extraction. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 7, 217–226, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-008-0377-2 (2009).

66. 66.

Nivedita, N., Ligrani, P. & Papautsky, I. Dean flow dynamics in low-aspect ratio spiral microchannels. Scientific Reports 7, 44072 (2017).

67. 67.

Guan, G. et al. Spiral microchannel with rectangular and trapezoidal cross-sections for size based particle separation. Scientific Reports 3, 1475 (2013).

68. 68.

Winter, M. et al. Isolation of circulating fetal trophoblasts using inertial microfluidics for noninvasive prenatal testing. Advanced Materials Technologies 3, 1800066 (2018).

69. 69.

Rafeie, M., Zhang, J., Asadnia, M., Li, W. & Warkiani, M. E. Multiplexing slanted spiral microchannels for ultra-fast blood plasma separation. Lab on a Chip 16, 2791–2802 (2016).

70. 70.

Moloudi, R. et al. Scaled‐up Inertial Microfluidics: Retention System for Microcarrier‐based Suspension Cultures. Biotechnology Journal, 1800674 (2019).

71. 71.

Moloudi, R. et al. Inertial-based filtration method for removal of microcarriers from mesenchymal stem cell suspensions. Scientific Reports 8, 12481 (2018).

72. 72.

Syed, M. S. et al. Selective separation of microalgae cells using inertial microfluidics. Bioresource Technology 252, 91–99 (2018).

73. 73.

Sofela, S. et al. High-throughput sorting of eggs for synchronization of C. elegans in a microfluidic spiral chip. Lab on a Chip 18, 679–687 (2018).

74. 74.

Warkiani, M. E., Tay, A. K. P., Guan, G. & Han, J. Membrane-less microfiltration using inertial microfluidics. Scientific Reports 5, 11018 (2015).

75. 75.

Thompson, C. S. & Abate, A. R. Adhesive-based bonding technique for PDMS microfluidic devices. Lab on a Chip 13, 632–635 (2013).

76. 76.

Saffman, P. G. & Taylor, G. I. The penetration of a fluid into a porous medium or Hele-Shaw cell containing a more viscous liquid. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 245, 312–329 (1958).

77. 77.

Kuntaegowdanahalli, S. S., Bhagat, A. A. S., Kumar, G. & Papautsky, I. Inertial microfluidics for continuous particle separation in spiral microchannels. Lab on a Chip 9, 2973–2980 (2009).

## Acknowledgements

M.E.W. would like to acknowledge the support of the Australian Research Council through Discovery Project Grants (DP170103704 and DP180103003) and the National Health and Medical Research Council through the Career Development Fellowship (APP1143377).

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

M.E.W. designed the research. S.R.B., O.R. and M.A.R. performed the experiments. F.E. conducted cell-based experiments. S.R.B., O.R. and M.E.W. analyzed the data. S.R.B. wrote the manuscript and draw all figures. M.E.W., D.J. and M.A. commented on the manuscript. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Razavi Bazaz, S., Rouhi, O., Raoufi, M.A. et al. 3D Printing of Inertial Microfluidic Devices. Sci Rep 10, 5929 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62569-9

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Additive Manufacturing of Metal Micro-ring and Tube by Laser-Assisted Electrophoretic Deposition with Laguerre–Gaussian Beam

• Kenta Nakazawa
• , Syunya Ozawa
•  & Futoshi Iwata

Nanomanufacturing and Metrology (2021)

• ### A 3D-printed microfluidic platform for simulating the effects of CPAP on the nasal epithelium

• Jesus Shrestha
• , Sean Thomas Ryan
• , Oliver Mills
• , Sareh Zhand
• , Philip Michael Hansbro
•  & Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani

Biofabrication (2021)

• ### Rapid and simple pressure-sensitive adhesive microdevice fabrication for sequence-specific capture and fluorescence detection of sepsis-related bacterial plasmid gene sequences

• Yesman Akuoko
• , Robert L. Hanson
• , David H. Harris
• , Jacob B. Nielsen
• , Elaine Lazalde

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2021)

• ### Microfluidic chip fabrication and performance analysis of 3D printed material for use in microfluidic nucleic acid amplification applications

• Charalampos Tzivelekis
• , Matthew P Selby
• , Albert Batet
•  & Kenny Dalgarno

Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering (2021)

• ### Prospects for Additive Manufacturing in Contact Lens Devices

• , Mohamed Elsherif
• , Israr Muhammad Gulzar Ahmed
• , Ahmed Salih
• , Dennyson Savariraj Antonysamy
• , Ali K. Yetisen
• , Seongjun Park
•  & Haider Butt