Mixtures of prion substrains in natural scrapie cases revealed by ovinised murine models


Phenotypic variability in prion diseases, such as scrapie, is associated to the existence of prion strains, which are different pathogenic prion protein (PrPSc) conformations with distinct pathobiological properties. To faithfully study scrapie strain variability in natural sheep isolates, transgenic mice expressing sheep cellular prion protein (PrPC) are used. In this study, we used two of such models to bioassay 20 scrapie isolates from the Spain-France-Andorra transboundary territory. Animals were intracerebrally inoculated and survival periods, proteinase K-resistant PrP (PrPres) banding patterns, lesion profiles and PrPSc distribution were studied. Inocula showed a remarkable homogeneity on banding patterns, all of them but one showing 19-kDa PrPres. However, a number of isolates caused accumulation of 21-kDa PrPres in TgShp XI. A different subgroup of isolates caused long survival periods and presence of 21-kDa PrPres in Tg338 mice. It seemed that one major 19-kDa prion isoform and two distinct 21-kDa variants coexisted in source inocula, and that they could be separated by bioassay in each transgenic model. The reason why each model favours a specific component of the mixture is unknown, although PrPC expression level may play a role. Our results indicate that coinfection with more than one substrain is more frequent than infection with a single component.


Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), also known as prion diseases, are a group of rare, fatal and progressive neurodegenerative disorders that affect both animals and human beings. TSEs are caused by non-conventional etiologic agents called prions. According to the widely accepted prion hypothesis1, prions consist exclusively of a pathogenic protein conformer, termed PrPSc, that derives from the physiological, host-encoded cellular prion protein (PrPC)1,2,3 via a post-translational conformational change that is triggered by PrPSc itself in a feed-back manner4. PrPSc accumulates in nervous tissue5 and through a yet unclarified mechanism gives rise to neuronal death, neuron loss and vacuolization6,7, together with astrogliosis, microgliosis8,9,10 and other neuroinflammatory phenomena11. This progressive degeneration of the central nervous system manifests as a set of neurological signs appearing after long incubation periods.

Although, according to the protein-only model1, the agent responsible for these disorders lacks nucleic acids, the existence of several phenotypic variants has been proved for different TSEs. This was first described for scrapie when two different clinical syndromes were observed in scrapie-infected goats, which were reproducible by intracerebral inoculation12. Prion variants associated to these different phenotypes were termed “strains”, by analogy with other infectious agents. Further demonstration of the existence of scrapie strains was addressed by studies in wild type mice13,14, which also established a methodology to discriminate them according to survival periods and lesion profiles15,16,17.

Other typing approaches based on the assessment of PrPSc distribution18 or the molecular characterization of the prion protein have been successfully employed to discriminate between BSE and scrapie19 and among scrapie strains18,20,21.

The existence of prion strains can be accommodated within the protein-only hypothesis through the notion that the abnormal conformation of PrPSc is not unique. In this model, prion strains are encoded in the conformation of PrPSc molecules, which can adopt several folding states that are associated to different pathological features22,23,24. Within this framework, the conformational selection model25 proposes that a given amino acid sequence for PrPC allows a limited portfolio of conformations, and thus only a number of prion strains will induce its misfolding while others will not be able to template its conversion into a disease-associated conformation. As a consequence, the degree of overlapping between the Prnp gene sequence of host and donor influences the capability of an isolate to transmit the disease, which provides a molecular explanation for the transmission barrier phenomenon.

The use of wild-type mouse lines expressing different alleles of the murine Prnp gene allowed the differentiation of at least 20 scrapie strains14. However, wild type mice-based typing methodologies may not be reliable since many scrapie isolates cannot transmit to these models, including isolates of classical scrapie26,27, unconventional scrapie isolates such as CH164128 and atypical scrapie29,30. When transmission to wild-type mice is achieved, survival periods tend to be very prolonged and highly variable26. This phenomenon is known as transmission barrier31,32 and was also observed in experimental transmissions of other TSEs to rodent models33. Differences in PrPC amino acid sequence between donor and host, both on interspecies and intra-species transmission experiments, are frequently acknowledged as the main molecular determinant of transmission barriers, and are also responsible for subclinical infections34. Moreover, according to the conformational selection model25, heterotypic interaction between PrPSc and PrPC can favour the propagation of PrPSc conformers present in small quantities25,33, sometimes referred to as “substrains”, and also components or “quasi-species”35. Consequently, studying scrapie strain variability by means of bioassay in a model expressing a non-ovine PrPC may alter the original portfolio of prion variants to the point that it keeps little if any resemblance with the original sheep scrapie strain range.

In this line, the use of homologous murine models, i.e. mice expressing ovine PrPC on a murine Prnp-/- background, may be crucial to faithfully recapitulate the actual variability of scrapie prion strains present in sheep populations. To this end, several distinct transgenic mouse lines, carrying different alleles (A136R154Q171, V136R154Q171) of the ovine Prnp gene, have been created36. These ovinised models show enhanced susceptibility to direct sheep scrapie infection37 and have proven useful in studies seeking to characterize field sheep scrapie isolates20,21,26,27,38,39,40. In this study, we used two of such models, the TgShp XI line (expressing ovine ARQ PrPC)41 and the Tg338 line (expressing ovine VRQ PrPC)42 to study the variability of prion strains and substrains present in the tissues of ten naturally scrapie-infected sheep coming from different outbreaks of the disease within the Spain-France-Andorra transboundary territory.

Scrapie is present as an enzootic disease in small ruminant populations in most European countries, with a prevalence of 7.84 cases per 1000 tested animals in Spain (year 2017)43 and 3.92 cases per 1000 tested animals in France (2002–2007)44,45. Therefore, its economic and sanitary impact is meaningful. Characterizing and holding control of the variety of enzootic scrapie strains present in the small ruminant population through the Spain-France-Andorra transboundary territories is crucial for scrapie control and eradication purposes and for public health.


Biochemical characterization of nervous and lymphoid tissue sheep scrapie field isolates discloses different biochemical patterns

Ten naturally scrapie-infected sheep were used for this study; six of them were at the terminal stage of the disease while four were in a preclinical / early clinical phase. With the aim of including as many different scrapie strains as possible, the selection was done according to two criteria: (a) animals coming from geographically distant scrapie outbreaks (Supplementary Fig. S1), and (b) animals presenting distinct clinical signs. Clinical stage, clinical signs, genotype, date of sacrifice, age at sacrifice and flock of origin of sheep are indicated in Table 1. Both nervous (medulla oblongata) and lymphoid tissues (mesenteric lymph node) of sheep were subjected to biochemical analyses prior to bioassay.

Table 1 Clinical stage, clinical signs, genotype, date and age at sacrifice and flock of origin of sheep included in the study, and references of the inocula prepared from their tissues.

Medulla oblongata of sheep #1 to #7 and sheep #9 were positive on Western blot for PrPres and showed a banding pattern with the non-glycosylated (NG) bands at around 19 kDa and predominance of diglycosylated (DG) species (Fig. 1A). These features resemble those of the experimental isolate CH164146, natural CH1641-like isolates from field cases47,48 and other natural sources found in the Spain-France-Andorra transboundary territories49.

Figure 1

Western blot of inocula sourced from sheep tissues. (A) Inocula from medulla oblongata; (B) inocula from mesenteric lymph node. Note that all but one samples had banding patterns with the non-glycosylated (NG) band at 19 kDa. M: molecular weight marker; kDa: kilodaltons. Notice that cropped images are presented here; for the full image, see Supplementary Figure S3.

In contrast, medulla oblongata of sheep #8 and #10 were negative on Western blot (Fig. 1A). Since this is likely to be associated with reduced infective titres, they were not used in bioassay.

The presence of PrPres in the lymphoreticular system was demonstrated by Western blot of mesenteric lymph nodes from all sheep (Fig. 1B). All but one showed banding patterns with the NG band at around 19 kDa. In contrast, inocula 7 L showed a different biochemical profile characterized by a NG band with higher weight (~21 kDa), suggesting the presence of a different PrPSc conformer. 21-kDa PrPres banding patterns have been commonly observed in the most widely used types of experimental scrapie, including SSBP/1 and Dawson isolates33,46,50,51, and in several natural scrapie cases49.

The presence of different biochemical signatures among our isolates suggests some degree of variability in the prion agent they bear. However, to accurately assess the actual range of prion variants present in our inocula, the disease phenotype in mice needs to be analysed. For that, sheep tissues were used to prepare nervous (N) and lymphoid (L) tissue-derived inocula. Two passages of these inocula were performed in each of the following transgenic lines: TgShp XI mice, which express ovine ARQ PrPC with expression levels of between 4 and 8-fold compared to that of sheep brain41, and Tg338 mice, which express ovine VRQ PrPC with expression levels of approximately 8-fold those of sheep brain37.

Bioassay in sheep PrPC-expressing transgenic mice suggest the presence of more than one prion variant

Survival periods and attack rates of first and second-passage TgShp XI and Tg338 mice and banding patterns of second-passage spinal cord pools are presented in Table 2. Banding patterns on first passage were coherent with those of second passage.

Table 2 Banding patterns of source sheep tissues and survival periods, attack rates and banding patterns of experimentally challenged first and second-passage TgShp XI and Tg338 mice.

A majority of brain-derived inocula (1 N, 2 N, 6 N, 7 N and 9 N) produced clinical disease with accumulation of 19-kDa PrPres in spinal cord of both TgShp XI and Tg338 mice (Figs. 2A and 3A). Survival periods ranged from 196 to 381 dpi on first passage and from 183 to 239 dpi on second passage TgShp XI mice. Tg338 mice succumbed to disease showing survival periods between 150 and 590 dpi in first passage and 175–200 dpi on second passage. Preclinical and early clinical sheep-sourced inocula caused longer survival periods than those sourced from terminal sheep on first passage; however, this difference was reduced on second passage.

Figure 2

Western blot of spinal cord homogenates from second-passage TgShp XI mice experimentally challenged with (A) sheep brain-derived isolates and (B) sheep lymph node-derived isolates. Note that most samples had banding patterns with the non-glycosylated (NG) band at 19 kDa, while those of inocula 3 N, 4 N, 5 N and 7 L were at 21 kDa. M: molecular weight marker; kDa: kilodaltons. Notice that cropped images are presented here; for the full image, see Supplementary Figure S3.

Figure 3

Western blot of spinal cord homogenates from second-passage Tg338 mice experimentally challenged with (A) sheep brain-derived isolates and (B) sheep lymph node-derived isolates. Note that 13/18 samples were clearly positive with non-glycosylated bands at 19 kDa. 5/18 samples differed from this, either being negative (4 L and 5 L) or having NG bands at 21 kDa (2 L, 6 L and 8 L). M: molecular weight marker; kDa: kilodaltons. Notice that cropped images are presented here; for the full image, see Supplementary Figure S3.

The rest of brain-derived inocula (3 N, 4 N and 5 N) behaved similarly to the former in Tg338, which showed 19-kDa banding patterns (Fig. 3A) and survival times between 313 and 327 dpi that shortened to 163–199 dpi on second passage, suggesting the propagation of the same prion variant. In TgShp XI, these isolates caused similar or subtly longer survival periods in first (235–305 dpi) and second passage (240–312 dpi). However, the biochemical profile in these mice was characterized by an unglycosylated band at 21-kDa (Fig. 2A). This suggests the presence of minor quantities of a 21-kDa prion conformer, undetectable in the original isolates, that is preferentially amplified by the TgShp XI line.

Regarding lymph node-derived inocula, all but one had a single pattern of transmission to TgShp XI mice characterized by long survival periods on first passage (314–510 dpi) that shortened to 163–330 dpi on second passage, and accumulation of 19-kDa PrPres in their spinal cord (Fig. 2B). In contrast, inoculum 7 L transmitted with similar survival periods (241 dpi on second passage) but, alternatively, triggered 21-kDa PrPres deposition in mice (Fig. 2B), mirroring that of the original isolate (Fig. 1B). Long survival periods on first passage reflect low infectivity titres in lymph node-derived isolates, while on second passage remarkable reductions were observed.

Five of these inocula (1 L, 3 L, 7 L, 9 L and 10 L) transmitted to Tg338 with second-passage survival periods ranging from 163 to 249 dpi. Presence of 19-kDa PrPres was noted in spinal cords of both passages (Fig. 3B), even in the case of inoculum 7 L. The characteristics of these isolates in Tg338 agreed with those of brain-sourced isolates, suggesting that they contain the same type of agent.

In contrast, the other five isolates (2 L, 4 L, 5 L, 6 L and 8 L) transmitted to Tg338 showing unusual transmission characteristics. Longer survival periods were observed in first passage (419–644 dpi), which experienced no reduction or even considerable lengthening on second passage (481–646 dpi). In a number of occasions, even the attack rate was reduced in the second passage, suggesting limited accumulation of infectivity in the spinal cord of first-passage animals. Supporting this notion, Tg338 mice from both first and second passages accumulated reduced quantities of PrPres in spinal cord as demonstrated by the negative results on Western blot of spinal cord homogenates from animals infected with inocula 4 L and 5 L (Fig. 3B). Surprisingly, in the rest of cases (inocula 2 L, 6 L and 8 L), animals accumulated a PrPres with a 21-kDa banding pattern (Fig. 3B), which provides further evidence for the propagation of a different conformer in this mice.

According to transmission patterns and biochemical signatures of the accumulated PrPres, the presence of three PrPSc variants can be envisioned: (i) a 19-kDa variant, present as the major component of the majority of sheep-sourced inocula, which we termed “19K”; (ii) a 21-kDa conformer that appears as the major isoform in inoculum 7 L and as a minor component in other three isolates, and that causes disease in TgShp XI with transmission patterns similar to the 19-kDa variant, hereafter termed “21K-TgShp XI”; and (iii) a 21-kDa conformer, different from the former, that seems to block the propagation of the 19-kDa major component exclusively in Tg338 mice, triggering reduced PrPSc accumulation in spinal cord and protracting clinical disease, and termed “21K-Tg338”.

Mice brains show distinct histopathological hallmarks

The characteristics of spongiform change in both transgenic models were fairly similar. Medulla oblongata, ventral mesencephalon and zona incerta and ventrolateral nuclei of diencephalon showed invariably the most severe spongiosis. In sharp contrast, vacuoles in cerebellar cortex were usually absent or very scarce. Cortex of superior colliculus and central regions of thalamus suffered a milder vacuolization. In hypothalamus, striatum and septal nuclei, the degree of spongiosis was highly variable among infected mice groups. Finally, frontal and temporo-parietal cortices and hippocampal formation were poorly affected.

Lesion profiles were drawn for each inoculum and murine line. In most cases, curves fitted to a general profile characterized by high scores at brainstem and subcortical structures, moderate scores in cerebral cortices and hippocampus, and low scores in cerebellar cortex. However, a number of isolates triggered lesion profiles with significantly lower vacuolization severity in all areas.

Both 19K substrain (Fig. 4A) and 21K-TgShp XI substrain-containing inocula (Fig. 4B) caused in TgShp XI mice similarly shaped lesion profiles (Fig. 4C), most of them characterized by peaks at medulla oblongata, mesencephalon and thalamus.

Figure 4

Lesion profiles of second-passage TgShp XI mice. Both inocula associated to the 19K phenotype (A) and inocula associated to the 21K-TgShp XI phenotype (B) provoked similarly shaped lesion profiles in TgShp XI mice (C), most of them characterized by peak scores at mesencephalon and thalamus. The brains of all mice dying after the onset of clinical signs in each challenged group were analyzed to plot lesions profiles (usually 6 and never less than 3 animals per group). Mobl: medulla oblongata, Cb: cerebellar cortex, Mes: mesencephalon, Hy: hypothalamus, Th: thalamus, Hp: hippocampus, Sn: septal nuclei, Tc: cortex at the level of thalamus, Fc: frontal cortex. Error bars represent SEM.

In contrast, inocula bearing the 19K substrain (Fig. 5A) and the 21K-Tg338 substrain (Fig. 5B) showed differences in the lesion profiles they triggered in Tg338 mice. The later were characterized by flatter curves, with less evident peaks, and that, on average, were lower than those caused by the other group of isolates (Fig. 5C). This finding reinforces the idea that these inocula contain a different type of prion.

Figure 5

Lesion profiles of second-passage Tg338 mice. Inocula associated to the 19K phenotype provoked similar lesion profiles in Tg338 mice, mostly characterized by peaks at medulla oblongata and thalamus (A). However, isolates linked to the 21K-Tg338 phenotype triggered lower and flatter profiles (B,C). The brains of all mice dying after the onset of clinical signs in each challenged group were analyzed to plot lesions profiles (usually 6 and never less than 3 animals per group). Mobl: medulla oblongata, Cb: cerebellar cortex, Mes: mesencephalon, Hy: hypothalamus, Th: thalamus, Hp: hippocampus, Sn: septal nuclei, Tc: cortex at the level of thalamus, Fc: frontal cortex. Error bars represent SEM.

PrPSc distribution was assessed using PET-blot. TgShp XI mice showed in general lower staining intensity in comparison with Tg338 mice. Two trends of PrPSc deposition could be differentiated. The first was a generalized, widespread low-intensity immunostaining (Fig. 6A,B,C), which correlated with synaptic deposits in IHC and was more intense in medulla oblongata, deep cerebellar nuclei, mesencephalon, medial and lateral nuclei and zona incerta of thalamus, hypothalamus and septal area. The second pattern consisted of localized high-intensity, plaque-like deposits, which were found frequently associated to the alveus of hippocampus (Fig. 6B,D) and subependymal areas at the level of 3rd and 4th ventricles (Fig. 6D), and correlated with coarse particulate/coalescing deposits in IHC (Fig. 6E).

Figure 6

PrPSc distribution in representative brain sections from TgShp XI mice infected with inocula 2 N (A), 3 N (B), 7 L (C) and 8 L (D). Two different trends of PrPSc accumulation were observed on PET-blots: a generalized low-intensity immunostaining (A,B,C), and a localized high-intensity pattern, usually associated with the alveus of hippocampus (B, D, arrowheads), and subependymal areas (D, arrowheads), and which correlated with coarse/coalescing plaque-like deposits on immunostochemistry (E).

PrPSc deposits in the brains of Tg338 mice were mostly of the generalized or synaptic type. The distribution pattern was characterized by high staining intensities of brainstem and subcortical areas. Medulla oblongata and deep cerebellar nuclei, mesencephalon, medial and dorsal nuclei of thalamus and zona incerta, and hypothalamus were the most affected zones (Fig. 7). A correlation between the distribution of spongiform lesions and PrPSc deposits was observed in both TgShp XI and Tg338 mice, as seen by the overlapping of the curves and by the positive and statistically significant Spearman’s correlation coefficients (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Figure 7

PrPSc distribution in representative brain sections from Tg338 mice infected with inocula 1 L (A), 3 L (B), 7 L (C) and 8 L (D,E). A general pattern arose in all examined brain samples consisting of intense staining of brainstem and subcortical areas. Additionally, conspicuous immunostaining was observed in specific structures, including the cingulate gyrus (A,B,E; thick orange arrows), habenular nuclei (A,C; red arrowheads), and the stratum lacunosum-moleculare and the alveus of hippocampus (B,E; thin green arrows). High-intensity staining of the medial amygdaloid nuclei (D,E; blue triangles) was observed in a subset of samples obtained from animals challenged with isolates causing prolonged survival periods and low vacuolization scores.

In addition, mild to intense staining was observed in specific structures, including the cingulate gyrus (Fig. 7A,B,E), the habenular nuclei (Fig. 7A,C), and the stratum lacunosum-moleculare and the alveus of hippocampus (Fig. 7B,E). Finally, intense immunostaining of medial amygdaloid nuclei (Fig. 7D,E) was observed exclusively in Tg338 inoculated with isolates 6 L and 8 L, which were associated to long survival periods and low average spongiosis.

These same inocula (6 L and 8 L) led to the formation of amyloid plaques in the brain of second-passage Tg338 mice. These plaques were visible on PET-blot as granular plaque-like depositions at the level of thalamus and mesencephalon (Fig. 7D,E), and in haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides (Fig. 8A,D,G,J). They were congophilic, which demonstrate their amyloid nature (Fig. 8C,F,I,L), and positive to immunohistochemistry with anti-PrP antibody SAF84 (Fig. 8B,E,H,K). Plaques were usually multicentric or amorphous and were found mostly in a perivascular location and lying beneath the pia mater of frontal, parietal and piriform cortices and cortex of the superior colliculus. In a number of animals, unicentric and occasionally florid plaques were found in the deep layers of medulla oblongata, mesencephalon, hypothalamus and thalamus. Interestingly, this phenotypic feature was not observed in TgShp XI mice.

Figure 8

Unicentric (A to C), florid (D to F) and amorphous perivascular plaques (G to L) in brain of second-passage Tg338 mice infected with inocula 6 L and 8 L. Haematoxilin-eosin staining (A,D,G,J), immunohistochemistry with anti-PrP mAb SAF84 (B,E,H,K) and Congo red staining that proves the amyloid nature of the plaques (C,F,I,L).


There is a wide basis of evidence that the characterization of scrapie strains based on data recorded directly from the ovine host is a difficult task52,53. Differences in clinical signs of sheep or in lesion profiles and distribution of PrPSc deposits in their brains may not reflect the presence of different strains, since several uncontrolled factors are known to contribute to this heterogeneity, including age of infection, breed, intercurrent diseases and effects of currently unidentified genes. This problem has been routinely circumvented by bioassaying the isolates in genetically stable rodent models. The advent of transgenic murine lines expressing homologous PrPC has allowed shedding light on the actual variability of scrapie prion strains, avoiding confounding effects exerted by strain selection/mutation phenomena in wild-type mice20,26,38,39,40,54.

In our experiment, sheep brains showed a remarkable homogeneity in banding patterns, all of them possessing non-glycosylated (NG) bands with molecular weights of around 19 kDa and a predominance of the diglycosylated (DG) species. This biochemical signature has been linked to the CH1641 isolates, but also to other unconventional isolates found in the field47,48,49. On the other hand, PrPres in isolates prepared from mesenteric lymph nodes reproduced the same pattern in almost all cases; the only exception was isolate 7 L, whose NG band had a molecular weight of 21 kDa.

Concerning transmission properties, most isolates showed survival periods always shorter than 330 dpi on second passage. In contrast, a number of inocula (2 L, 4 L, 5 L, 6 L and 8 L) triggered very protracted survival periods (longer than 481 dpi) and absence of evident reductions on second passage in the Tg388 line. Regardless of whether this difference was caused by reduced accumulation of infectivity in spinal cord of first-passage mice or because they have intrinsically longer survival periods, it suggests the existence of a different strain in this group of samples.

Regarding banding patterns, non-equivalent results were found between TgShp XI and Tg338 lines. TgShp XI mice accumulated high (21-kDa) PrPres in spinal cord after the inoculation of isolates 3 N, 4 N, 5 N and 7 L, although only one of these (inoculum 7 L) displayed this high-molecular weight banding pattern. The prion variant propagated in these cases has been termed “21K-TgShp XI” and did not correlate with other differential phenotypic features such as lesion profiles, vacuolization scores, or PrPSc distribution patterns.

Another group of isolates (2 L, 4 L, 5 L, 6 L and 8 L) triggered no accumulation or accumulation of a 21-kDa isoform exclusively in Tg338 mice. Notably, these same isolates caused long survival periods, milder spongiosis, flatter lesion profiles, characteristic immunostaining of lateral amygdaloid nuclei and, in a number of cases, presence of PrP amyloid plaques in Tg338 mice. The combination of these differential features allows proposing that a distinct prion conformer, here referred to as “21K-Tg338”, has been propagated in these cases. Upon comparison with other studies, the behaviour of this prion variant resembled that of the scrapie source that caused several outbreaks in Italy in the 90 s following an iatrogenic infection with a vaccine against Mycoplasma agalactiae55,56,57,58, including the accumulation of PrP plaques with a distribution similar to what we observed58. In other study, an isolate coded MF17, whose properties resemble those of Italian scrapie (O. Andréoletti, unpublished observations), demonstrated zoonotic potential as it was able to infect transgenic mice expressing human PrPC43. Studies are underway to determine if the coincidence of phenotypic traits is enough to endorse our inocula with zoonotic capability.

In the rest of cases, a 19-kDa conformer, likely corresponding to the one predominating in most of the original sheep isolates, was propagated and termed “19K”. Importantly, both murine lines were able to propagate this conformer. The phenotype associated to this form of the agent resembled that of CH1641-like isolates46,47,59,60. CH1641 scrapie is associated with a PrPres banding pattern with low (19–20 kDa) NG species and possesses distinctive biological properties. In natural cases, it causes longer incubation periods in sheep with the s7 allele of the Sip (Prnp) gene and shorter in sheep with the p7 allele, contrary to the more common scrapie sources studied, including SSBP/128. Contrary to other classical scrapie sources, the original, prototypic CH1641 source does not transmit to wild type mice28. However, it does transmit without apparent difficulties to transgenic mice expressing ovine PrPC, which replicate the PrPres banding pattern of the source inocula47, in agreement with our own results. Due to its biochemical features, these isolates were suspected to contain BSE infectivity46, although this was later discarded. To date, this type of scrapie has not been attributed a zoonotic potential49 (O. Andréoletti, unpublished observations).

All studied isolates seemed to contain the “19K” component, since in all cases at least one of the transgenic lines reproduced the phenotype associated to this isoform. However, TgShp XI propagated the “21K-TgShp XI” component when a number of brain-derived isolates and one lymph node-derived isolate were used. The fact that not all isolates induced the propagation of this variant indicates that the “21K-TgShp XI” component pre-existed in these inocula and was not generated de novo. The reason why Tg338 mice were unresponsive to the presence of “21K-TgShp XI” prions and manifested solely the phenotype associated to the major “19 K” component remains unresolved. The possibilities are that it is caused by the PrPC amino acid mismatch between sheep (ARQ PrPC) and Tg338 mice (VRQ PrPC) or by differences in PrPC expression levels, as recently proposed61, and discussed below.

In contrast, half of the lymph node-derived inocula provoked in Tg338 mice a characteristic phenotype that was associated with the propagation of the “21K-Tg338” isoform, which probably pre-existed in these inocula as a minor component. This conformer is somehow able to intercept the propagation of the major “19K” component exclusively in Tg338 mice, strongly protracting survival periods and triggering less severe neuropathology. This interception may be mediated by the formation of PrP amyloid plaques, as observed in previous studies with the Italian isolate58 and in this study for inocula 6 L and 8 L. According to some authors, amyloidogenesis may comprise a defensive system by means of which toxic small PrP oligomers25,34,62 are sequestered into bigger structures, thus delaying or restraining the neurotoxicity caused by prion progression63,64,65.

Although the conclusion is that there is an intrinsic variability of prion agents in natural scrapie cases that can be resolved by means of bioassay, the mechanisms though which each transgenic murine line selectively propagates distinct conformers are far from clear. In this line, a recent study has described how high-level expression of ovine PrPC favours the selection of minor components in a mixture of prion quasi-species, and moreover, triggers the de novo generation of new, favoured conformers61. Whether such a mechanism may participate in the divergence observed in our study needs to be evaluated. A possibility is that the ability of each transgenic line to amplify distinct prion conformers is due to their different rates of PrPC expression (4–8-fold vs. 8-fold), rather than, or in combination with, differences in the sequence of the PrPC they bear.

Interestingly, the “21K-Tg338” component was only found in lymphoid tissues from sheep. It is widely accepted that, upon natural, oral infection in sheep, prions invade the gut-associated lymphoid tissue and progressively extend to the rest of the lymphoreticular system (LRS)66,67. During this process, the LRS may favour the propagation of specific prion conformers, different from the isoforms that later invade the nervous system. This phenomenon has been observed in ovinised mice whose brain and spleen accumulated PrPSc with differential banding patterns and biological properties68. This situation is reminiscent of the case of humanised transgenic mice inoculated with variant CJD (vCJD) prions that developed a disease phenotype compatible with sporadic CJD (sCJD), but still accumulated vCJD PrPSc in their spleens69.

Nevertheless, the reasons why brain and lymphoid organs propagate distinct prion conformers have not been clarified. It has been proposed that differences in the glycosylation of the PrPC between these two tissues may be involved in the selection of PrPSc isoforms with specific glycoform ratios70. In addition, the aforementioned study by Le Dur et al. suggests an alternative mechanism based on differences in PrPC expression level61.

In any case, our results indicate that in natural scrapie cases, sheep can be infected with more than one strain. These distinct variants of the agent can be present in different organs (we assessed nervous and lymphoid tissues), or even coexist in the nervous system as prion mixtures with a dominant conformer and one or more subdominant isoforms, which can be detected by bioassay in sensitive rodent models or other in vitro techniques. In fact, according to our results, the coinfection seems to be more frequent that the infection with a single strain.

The notion that natural scrapie cases may be caused by mixtures of substrains is not new. There are many precedents in the literature: (i) when a methodology that separate short and long-incubation period strains was employed, natural scrapie isolates were found to contain a mixture of strains that could be isolated in different lines of wild type mice54. (ii) When several wild-type and transgenic lines were used in a bioassay to investigate a number of scrapie isolates suspected to contain BSE infectivity, different results with lines TgShp XI and Tg338 were obtained, which suggest that different strains existed in the isolates that each mouse line propagated selectively71. (iii) When CH1641-like scrapie isolates were inoculated in wild-type mice, transmission was achieved in disagreement with previous reports, although glycosylation profiles and histopathological features changed. These results were compatible with a selection of a minor component that was able to replicate in wild-type mice, in contrast with the CH1641 experimental isolate72. (iv) Other authors73 also worked with CH1641-like isolates and found them to be comprised of an ensemble of different conformers than could be differentiated by the use of Western blot and separately propagated in distinct sheep breeds and murine lines. All these results are in agreement with ours and drag the risk of sheep getting infected with multiple scrapie strains into the spotlight.

This situation is somehow similar to some cases of sporadic CJD (sCJD) in humans, which were shown to possess a mixture of high and low-molecular weight conformers in their brains or in different parts of their brains74. Even in variant CJD (vCJD) cases, 21-kDa PrPSc conformers have been occasionally found75, which raises doubts about the current classification of human prion strains and the actual responsible of each type of clinical profile.

Characterization and monitoring of prion strains in small ruminant populations in Europe is crucial for control and eradication purposes. Shedding light on the actual variability of scrapie prions and its implications for inter-species transmission and, particularly, on the zoonotic potential of scrapie field isolates is necessary to update communitarian public health policies and to prevent a putative reemergence of prion diseases as a public hazard.



The diagnosis of scrapie in terminally-affected sheep was stablished using standardized clinical examination. In contrast, preclinical and early clinical animals were identified in vivo thought rectal biopsy and immunohistochemical detection of PrPSc on rectal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue using monoclonal anti-PrP antibody L42 (R-Biopharm), as described elsewhere76.

Animals were sacrificed by intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital followed by necropsy and systematic sampling. Samples from brain and mesenteric lymph nodes were divided into two halves; one half was fixed in a solution of 10% formalin for further histological studies, while the other was immediately immerged in liquid nitrogen and later conserved at −80 °C for biochemical analyses and the preparation of inocula.

After sacrifice, the presence of PrPSc was confirmed for both the terminal and the preclinical/early clinical group in both nervous and lymphoid tissues using immunohistochemistry with monoclonal anti-PrP antibody L42 (R-Biopharm), whose epitope spans amino acids 145–163 of ovine PrP. Additionally, the Prnp genotype was determined through sequencing of genomic DNA obtained from whole blood samples.


First-passage inocula were prepared from nervous (N) and lymphoid tissues (L) of the aforementioned sheep. Inocula 1 N to 10 N corresponded to inocula prepared from medulla oblongata (obex), while inocula 1 L to 10 L were those prepared from mesenteric lymph nodes of the animals. Inocula 1 N to 6 N and 1 L to 6 L derived from tissues of terminal sheep, while inocula 7 N to 10 N and 7 L to 10 L sourced from preclinical / early clinical sheep. Second-passage inocula were prepared from pools of spinal cords harvested from diseased first-passage mice. All inocula consisted of 10% (w/v) tissue homogenates in physiological saline and were subjected to microbiological analysis to ensure sterility prior to intracerebral inoculation.


TgShp XI mice express ovine ARQ PrPC with expression levels of between 4 and 8-fold compared to that of sheep brain41. These animals were kindly provided by M. Groschup (Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany) and were brought to our facilities to be inoculated after the appropriate adaptation period.

The transgenic murine line Tg338 was developed by H. Laude and J.L. Vilotte (INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France)42 and is homozygous for the ovine Prnp gene, VRQ allele, expressing ovine VRQ PrPC under the control of the ovine PrP promoter37. The level of expression of this line is approximately 8-fold that of sheep brain. This line was provided by O. Andréoletti (ENVT-INRA, Toulouse, France) and was maintained and bred in our facilities.

All experimental procedures in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Testing of the University of Zaragoza (permit number PI19/14) and performed in accordance with the recommendations for the care and use of experimental animals and in agreement with Spanish law (RD 1201/05).

Intracerebral inoculation

A dose of 20 µl/animal of each inoculum was administered by the intracerebral route to groups of six mice using a precision syringe and under general anaesthesia. Animals were provided adequate analgesia after the procedure, consisting of buprenorphine at a dose of 0.01 mg/kg bodyweight by the subcutaneous route, and were caged together.


Animals were monitored three times per week for clinical signs of prion disease. When the end point criteria were met, animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation under heavy anaesthesia. Brain and spinal cord were harvested and stored in a 10% formalin solution and at −80 °C for histopathological and biochemical analyses, respectively.

Western blotting

Western blotting was performed following a protocol based on TeSeE Western Blot kit (Bio-Rad). Briefly, medulla oblongata and mesenteric lymph node samples from sheep and spinal cord pools from diseased mice were thawed and homogenised in a detergent-containing solution. A volume of 200 µl was submitted to proteinase K digestion for 10 min, which was stopped using a β-mercaptoethanol-containing stop buffer, followed by concentration, clarification and resuspension of the remaining PrPres in 30 µl of Laemli loading buffer. It was then subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis using commercial 12% Bis-Tris gels (Bio-Rad), followed by transference to a PVDF membrane with 0.20-µm pore diameter (Bio-Rad). Immunoblot was performed by sequentially immerging the membrane in a blocking solution (0.2% BSA in PBS+Tween 0.1%), primary anti-PrP antibody Sha31 (whose epitope spans amino acids 148–155) diluted 1:8,000 in PBS+Tween 0.1%, and HRP-conjugated secondary antibody diluted 1:5,000 in PBS+Tween 0.1%. Finally, membranes were developed by incubation with a luminol-based substrate (SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate).

Tissue processing

Brain and lymph node samples from sheep and brains from diseased mice were fixed in a 10% formalin solution for at least 48 hours before being processed. Mouse brains were trimmed in four sections following Fraser and Dickinson’s protocol15, while sheep tissues were processed as usual18. Tissues were then embedded in paraffin wax and mounted in histological cassettes. Four µm-thick sections were obtained using a microtome and mounted on glass slides for subsequent histological procedures.

Haematoxylin and eosin staining

Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the sections was performed following a standard protocol. Briefly, dewaxing and rehydration was performed by sequentially passaging the preparations in xylene and graded alcohols, followed by incubation in a haematoxylin solution. After rinsing with tap water, preparations were subjected to incubation in acid alcohol (1% acetic acid in a 70% ethanol solution), followed by immersion in an eosin solution. Finally, preparations were dehydrated and mounted prior to visualization under light microscope.


Immunohistochemistry was applied to brain and lymph node samples from sheep and brain sections from mice. After dewaxing and rehydration, three different pre-treatments for antigen retrieval were performed sequentially: immersion in 98% formic acid for 15 min, treatment with 4 µg/ml proteinase K for 15 min at 37 °C, and hydrated autoclaving in citrate buffer at 96 °C for 20 min. Following antigen retrieval, endogen peroxidase activity was blocked using a commercial blocking solution, followed by 1-hour incubation with primary anti-PrP antibody L42 (1:500, R.Biopharm) for sheep tissues or 6H4 (epitope aa 147–155, 1:100, Prionics) and SAF84 (epitope aa 160–170, 1:1,000, SPI-Bio) for mice brains. The EnVision+ System (Agilent Dako) was used as the secondary antibody, and the DAB + System (Agilent Dako), based on the use of 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) as chromogen, was employed for development.

Paraffin-embedded tissue-blot (PET-blot)

PET-blot was performed as described elsewhere77 on mice brain samples. Briefly, 4-µm paraffin-embedded brain sections were collected onto a nitrocellulose membrane and dried at 37 °C for 24 hours. Membranes were then subjected to dewaxing and rehydration and incubated for 2 hours in a solution of proteinase K (250 µg/ml) at 56 °C to completely digest PrPC. Denaturation of the remaining PrPres was achieved by incubating the membranes in a solution of guanidine thiocyanate 3 M. After blocking the membrane with 0.2% BSA to avoid cross-reactivity, detection was carried out through sequential incubation with the anti-PrP antibody Sha31 (1:8,000, SPI-Bio) and a secondary alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated antibody (1:500, Agilent Dako), followed by development with NBT/BCIP (Thermo Scientific). Membranes were then washed and dried for 24 hours at room temperature.

Lesion and PrPSc distribution profiling

H&E-stained and PET-blotted brain samples from second-passage animals were inspected and spongiosis and PrPSc accumulation were was measured in nine pre-determined grey matter areas following a standardized protocol15. The areas were: (1) dorsal nuclei of medulla oblongata, (2) cerebellar cortex, (3) superior colliculus of the mesencephalon, (4) hypothalamus, (5) thalamus, (6) hippocampus, (7) lateral septal nuclei, (8) cerebral cortex at the level of the thalamus and (9) frontal cortex. Semiquantitative scores from 0 (absence of vacuolization or PrPSc accumulation) to 5 (very abundant and confluent vacuoles or PrPSc deposits) were given to each area. Mean values at each area were plotted to trace the curves for each inoculum. Visual comparison was performed between curves corresponding to each inocula, as well as between lesion profiles and or PrPSc distribution curves. In addition, the statistical correlation between both parameters was computed through the Spearman’s correlation coefficient for each transgenic line. The software used was GraphPad Prism 5.


  1. 1.

    Prusiner, S. B. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 216, 136–144 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Oesch, B. et al. A cellular gene encodes scrapie PrP 27-30 protein. Cell 40, 735–746 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stahl, N., Borchelt, D. R., Hsiao, K. & Prusiner, S. B. Scrapie prion protein contains a phosphatidylinositol glycolipid. Cell 51, 229–240 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Prusiner, S. B. Molecular biology of prion diseases. Science 252, 1515–1522 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Prusiner, S. B. Prions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13363–13383 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wood, J. L., McGill, I. S., Done, S. H. & Bradley, R. Neuropathology of scrapie: a study of the distribution patterns of brain lesions in 222 cases of natural scrapie in sheep, 1982-1991. Vet. Rec. 140, 167–174 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ligios, C., Jeffrey, M., Ryder, S. J., Bellworthy, S. J. & Simmons, M. M. Distinction of scrapie phenotypes in sheep by lesion profiling. J. Comp. Pathol. 127, 45–57 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lazarini, F., Boussin, F., Deslys, J. P., Tardy, M. & Dormont, D. Astrocyte gene expression in experimental mouse scrapie. J. Comp. Pathol. 111, 87–98 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rezaie, P. & Lantos, P. L. Microglia and the pathogenesis of spongiform encephalopathies. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 35, 55–72 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Titeux, M. et al. Differences in the activation of the GFAP gene promoter by prion and viral infections. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 109, 119–127 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Budka, H. et al. Neuropathological diagnostic criteria for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and other human spongiform encephalopathies (prion diseases). Brain Pathol. 5, 459–466 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pattison, I. H. & Millson, G. C. Scrapie produced experimentally in goats with special reference to the clinical syndrome. J. Comp. Pathol. 71, 101–109 (1961).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zlotnik, I. & Rennie, J. C. Further observations on the experimental transmission of scrapie from sheep and goats to laboratory mice. J. Comp. Pathol. 73, 150–162 (1963).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bruce, M. E. Scrapie strain variation and mutation. Br. Med. Bull. 49, 822–838 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fraser, H. & Dickinson, A. G. The sequential development of the brain lesion of scrapie in three strains of mice. J. Comp. Pathol. 78, 301–311 (1968).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dickinson, A. G. & Meikle, V. M. Host-genotype and agent effects in scrapie incubation: change in allelic interaction with different strains of agent. Mol. Gen. Genet. 112, 73–79 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fraser, H. & Dickinson, A. G. Scrapie in mice. Agent-strain differences in the distribution and intensity of grey matter vacuolation. J. Comp. Pathol. 83, 29–40 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gonzalez, L. et al. Effects of agent strain and host genotype on PrP accumulation in the brain of sheep naturally and experimentally affected with scrapie. J. Comp. Pathol. 126, 17–29 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gonzalez, L., Martin, S. & Jeffrey, M. Distinct profiles of PrP(d) immunoreactivity in the brain of scrapie- and BSE-infected sheep: implications for differential cell targeting and PrP processing. J. Gen. Virol. 84, 1339–1350 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Thackray, A. M., Hopkins, L., Spiropoulos, J. & Bujdoso, R. Molecular and transmission characteristics of primary-passaged ovine scrapie isolates in conventional and ovine PrP transgenic mice. J. Virol. 82, 11197–11207 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Thackray, A. M., Hopkins, L., Lockey, R., Spiropoulos, J. & Bujdoso, R. Emergence of multiple prion strains from single isolates of ovine scrapie. J. Gen. Virol. 92, 1482–1491 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bessen, R. A. & Marsh, R. F. Identification of two biologically distinct strains of transmissible mink encephalopathy in hamsters. J. Gen. Virol. 73(Pt 2), 329–334 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bessen, R. A. & Marsh, R. F. Distinct PrP properties suggest the molecular basis of strain variation in transmissible mink encephalopathy. J. Virol. 68, 7859–7868 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Telling, G. C. et al. Evidence for the conformation of the pathologic isoform of the prion protein enciphering and propagating prion diversity. Science 274, 2079–2082 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Collinge, J. & Clarke, A. R. A general model of prion strains and their pathogenicity. Science 318, 930–936 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bruce, M. E. et al. Strain characterization of natural sheep scrapie and comparison with BSE. J. Gen. Virol. 83, 695–704 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Thackray, A. M., Hopkins, L., Lockey, R., Spiropoulos, J. & Bujdoso, R. Propagation of ovine prions from “poor” transmitter scrapie isolates in ovine PrP transgenic mice. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 92, 167–174 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Foster, J. D. & Dickinson, A. G. The unusual properties of CH1641, a sheep-passaged isolate of scrapie. Vet. Rec. 123, 5–8 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Le Dur, A. et al. A newly identified type of scrapie agent can naturally infect sheep with resistant PrP genotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16031–16036 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Benestad, S. L., Arsac, J. N., Goldmann, W. & Noremark, M. Atypical/Nor98 scrapie: properties of the agent, genetics, and epidemiology. Vet. Res. 39, 19 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Priola, S. A. Prion protein and species barriers in the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 53, 27–33 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Scott, M. R., Peretz, D., Nguyen, H. O., Dearmond, S. J. & Prusiner, S. B. Transmission barriers for bovine, ovine, and human prions in transgenic mice. J. Virol. 79, 5259–5271 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Beringue, V., Vilotte, J. L. & Laude, H. Prion agent diversity and species barrier. Vet. Res. 39, 47 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hill, A. F. & Collinge, J. Subclinical prion infection. Trends Microbiol. 11, 578–584 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Li, J., Browning, S., Mahal, S. P., Oelschlegel, A. M. & Weissmann, C. Darwinian evolution of prions in cell culture. Science 327, 869–872 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Groschup, M. H. & Buschmann, A. Rodent models for prion diseases. Vet. Res. 39, 32 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vilotte, J. L. et al. Markedly increased susceptibility to natural sheep scrapie of transgenic mice expressing ovine prp. J. Virol. 75, 5977–5984 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bencsik, A. et al. Scrapie strain transmission studies in ovine PrP transgenic mice reveal dissimilar susceptibility. Histochem. Cell Biol. 127, 531–539 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Groschup, M. H. et al. Classic scrapie in sheep with the ARR/ARR prion genotype in Germany and France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13, 1201–1207 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Griffiths, P. C. et al. Characterization of atypical scrapie cases from Great Britain in transgenic ovine PrP mice. J. Gen. Virol. 91, 2132–2138 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kupfer, L., Eiden, M., Buschmann, A. & Groschup, M. H. Amino acid sequence and prion strain specific effects on the in vitro and in vivo convertibility of ovine/murine and bovine/murine prion protein chimeras. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1772, 704–713 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Laude, H. et al. New in vivo and ex vivo models for the experimental study of sheep scrapie: development and perspectives. C. R. Biol. 325, 49–57 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. Informe epidemiológico sobre las Encefalopatías Espongiformes Transmisibles en España. Año. Available in, https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ganaderia/temas/sanidad-animal-higiene-ganadera/informeepidemiologicoeetsespana2017_tcm30-449969.pdf (2017).

  44. 44.

    Fediaevsky, A. et al. A descriptive study of the prevalence of atypical and classical scrapie in sheep in 20 European countries. BMC Vet. Res. 4, 19-6148-4-19 (2008).

  45. 45.

    Fediaevsky, A. et al. The prevalence of atypical scrapie in sheep from positive flocks is not higher than in the general sheep population in 11 European countries. BMC Vet. Res. 6, 9-6148-6-9 (2010).

  46. 46.

    Hope, J. et al. Molecular analysis of ovine prion protein identifies similarities between BSE and an experimental isolate of natural scrapie, CH1641. J. Gen. Virol. 80(Pt 1), 1–4 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Baron, T. & Biacabe, A. G. Molecular behaviors of “CH1641-like” sheep scrapie isolates in ovine transgenic mice (TgOvPrP4). J. Virol. 81, 7230–7237 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bencsik, A. & Baron, T. Histopathological studies of “CH1641-like” scrapie sources versus classical scrapie and BSE transmitted to ovine transgenic mice (TgOvPrP4). PLoS One 6, e22105 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Cassard, H. et al. Evidence for zoonotic potential of ovine scrapie prions. Nat. Commun. 5, 5821 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hill, A. F. et al. Molecular screening of sheep for bovine spongiform encephalopathy. Neurosci. Lett. 255, 159–162 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Thorne, L. et al. In vitro amplification of ovine prions from scrapie-infected sheep from Great Britain reveals distinct patterns of propagation. BMC Vet. Res. 8, 223-6148-8-223 (2012).

  52. 52.

    Jeffrey, M., Martin, S. & Gonzalez, L. Cell-associated variants of disease-specific prion protein immunolabelling are found in different sources of sheep transmissible spongiform encephalopathy. J. Gen. Virol. 84, 1033–1045 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Jeffrey, M. et al. Ovine infection with the agents of scrapie (CH1641 isolate) and bovine spongiform encephalopathy: immunochemical similarities can be resolved by immunohistochemistry. J. Comp. Pathol. 134, 17–29 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Thackray, A. M., Lockey, R., Beck, K. E., Spiropoulos, J. & Bujdoso, R. Evidence for co-infection of ovine prion strains in classical scrapie isolates. J. Comp. Pathol. 147, 316–329 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Agrimi, U., Ru, G., Cardone, F., Pocchiari, M. & Caramelli, M. Epidemic of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy in sheep and goats in Italy. Lancet 353, 560–561 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Caramelli, M. et al. Evidence for the transmission of scrapie to sheep and goats from a vaccine against Mycoplasma agalactiae. Vet. Rec. 148, 531–536 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zanusso, G. et al. Molecular analysis of iatrogenic scrapie in Italy. J. Gen. Virol. 84, 1047–1052 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Beringue, V. et al. Isolation from cattle of a prion strain distinct from that causing bovine spongiform encephalopathy. PLoS Pathog. 2, e112 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Gonzalez, L. et al. Stability of murine scrapie strain 87V after passage in sheep and comparison with the CH1641 ovine strain. J. Gen. Virol. 96, 3703–3714 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Simmons, M. M. et al. Phenotype shift from atypical scrapie to CH1641 following experimental transmission in sheep. PLoS One 10, e0117063 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Le Dur, A. et al. Divergent prion strain evolution driven by PrP(C) expression level in transgenic mice. Nat. Commun. 8, 14170 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hill, A. F. et al. Species-barrier-independent prion replication in apparently resistant species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10248–10253 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Chesebro, B. et al. Anchorless prion protein results in infectious amyloid disease without clinical scrapie. Science 308, 1435–1439 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Piccardo, P., Manson, J. C., King, D., Ghetti, B. & Barron, R. M. Accumulation of prion protein in the brain that is not associated with transmissible disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4712–4717 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Tuzi, N. L. et al. Host PrP glycosylation: a major factor determining the outcome of prion infection. PLoS Biol. 6, e100 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Andreoletti, O. et al. Early accumulation of PrP(Sc) in gut-associated lymphoid and nervous tissues of susceptible sheep from a Romanov flock with natural scrapie. J. Gen. Virol. 81, 3115–3126 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Heggebo, R. et al. Distribution of prion protein in the ileal Peyer’s patch of scrapie-free lambs and lambs naturally and experimentally exposed to the scrapie agent. J. Gen. Virol. 81, 2327–2337 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Beringue, V. et al. Facilitated cross-species transmission of prions in extraneural tissue. Science 335, 472–475 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Beringue, V. et al. Prominent and persistent extraneural infection in human PrP transgenic mice infected with variant CJD. PLoS One 3, e1419 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Katorcha, E., Makarava, N., Savtchenko, R., D’Azzo, A. & Baskakov, I. V. Sialylation of prion protein controls the rate of prion amplification, the cross-species barrier, the ratio of PrPSc glycoform and prion infectivity. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004366 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Beck, K. E. et al. Use of murine bioassay to resolve ovine transmissible spongiform encephalopathy cases showing a bovine spongiform encephalopathy molecular profile. Brain Pathol. 22, 265–279 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Vulin, J. et al. Selection of distinct strain phenotypes in mice infected by ovine natural scrapie isolates similar to CH1641 experimental scrapie. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 71, 140–147 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Yokoyama, T. et al. Intraspecies prion transmission results in selection of sheep scrapie strains. PLoS One 5, e15450 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Polymenidou, M. et al. Coexistence of multiple PrPSc types in individuals with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet Neurol. 4, 805–814 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Yull, H. M. et al. Detection of type 1 prion protein in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Am. J. Pathol. 168, 151–157 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Monleon, E. et al. An assessment of the efficiency of PrPsc detection in rectal mucosa and third-eyelid biopsies from animals infected with scrapie. Vet. Microbiol. 147, 237–243 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Schulz-Schaeffer, W. J. et al. The paraffin-embedded tissue blot detects PrP(Sc) early in the incubation time in prion diseases. Am. J. Pathol. 156, 51–56 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by grants from the “Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte” (FPU 14/04348) and the “Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad” of the Spanish Government (AGL2015–65560-R), and from the Spain-France-Andorra Cooperation Program (POCTEFA), co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (EFA 148/16 REDPRION). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information




R.B., J.J.B. and O.A. designed the study. T.B., H.F., J.S., A.O. and B.M. conducted the experiments. T.B., H.F., J.S. and R.B. analysed the results. T.B. and R.B. wrote the manuscript. T.B., H.F., A.O., J.S., E.V., V.B., J.M.T., M.G., O.A., J.J.B. and R.B. reviewed the results and the discussion and commented on the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Bolea.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barrio, T., Filali, H., Otero, A. et al. Mixtures of prion substrains in natural scrapie cases revealed by ovinised murine models. Sci Rep 10, 5042 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61977-1

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing