Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

New Dromaeosaurid Dinosaur (Theropoda, Dromaeosauridae) from New Mexico and Biodiversity of Dromaeosaurids at the end of the Cretaceous


Dromaeosaurids (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae), a group of dynamic, swift predators, have a sparse fossil record, particularly at the time of their extinction near the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Here we report on a new dromaeosaurid, Dineobellator notohesperus, gen. and sp. nov., consisting of a partial skeleton from the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of New Mexico, the first diagnostic dromaeosaurid to be recovered from the latest Cretaceous of the southern United States (southern Laramidia). The holotype includes elements of the skull, axial, and appendicular skeleton. The specimen reveals a host of morphologies that shed light on new behavioral attributes for these feathered dinosaurs. Unique features on its forelimbs suggest greater strength capabilities in flexion than the normal dromaeosaurid condition, in conjunction with a relatively tighter grip strength in the manual claws. Aspects of the caudal vertebrae suggest greater movement near the tail base, aiding in agility and predation. Phylogenetic analysis places Dineobellator within Velociraptorinae. Its phylogenetic position, along with that of other Maastrichtian taxa (Acheroraptor and Dakotaraptor), suggests dromaeosaurids were still diversifying at the end of the Cretaceous. Furthermore, its recovery as a second North American Maastrichtian velociraptorine suggests vicariance of North American velociraptorines after a dispersal event during the Campanian-Maastrichtian from Asia. Features of Dineobellator also imply that dromaeosaurids were active predators that occupied discrete ecological niches while living in the shadow of Tyrannosaurus rex, until the end of the dinosaurs’ reign.


Dromaeosaurids (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) have been found in North America from the Early to Late Cretaceous, from as far west as Alaska to as far east as Maryland1,2,3. However, their fossil record is very poor near the time of their extinction prior to the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary in North America. Additional taxa have been named from the Early Cretaceous, including Yurgovuchia doellingi4, Utahraptor ostrommayorum5 and Deinonychus antirrhopus6,7. Several taxa are known from the Late Cretaceous, but almost all are from the Campanian1,3,8,9,10,11,12. Recently, two taxa (Acheroraptor temertyorum and Dakotaraptor steini) were named from the upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation, but, aside from these two skeletal fossil specimens, non-tooth material of Maastrichtian taxa is rare3,13,14. Although isolated dromaeosaurid teeth are somewhat common in Campanian age strata of North America, these teeth reveal little ecological information about this group.

Here we report on a new dromaeosaurid dinosaur, Dineobellator notohesperus, gen. and sp. nov., discovered in 2008, and briefly mentioned by Jasinski et al.15, from the Naashoibito Member (Ojo Alamo Formation), San Juan Basin, New Mexico. The holotype specimen, SMP VP-2430 (Vertebrate Paleontology Collection, State Museum of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA), consists of at least 20 identifiable skeletal elements, including parts of the skull, fore- and hindlimbs, and axial skeleton. These skeletal remains are complete enough to compare to other known dromaeosaurids, assess its phylogenetic position, and infer additional aspects of their life history and predatory behavior. This specimen constitutes the first significant skeletal remains of a Maastrichtian dromaeosaurid from south of North American 43rd latitude (South Dakota) in North America.

Systematic paleontology

Dinosauria Owen, 1842; Theropoda Marsh, 1881; Coelurosauria Huene, 1914; Dromaeosauridae Matthew and Brown, 1922; Dineobellator notohesperus gen. et sp. nov.


The generic name is derived from Diné, the Navajo word in reference to the people of the Navajo Nation, and the Latin suffix bellator, meaning warrior. The specific epithet noto is from the Greek, meaning southern, or south; and the Greek hesper meaning western, in reference to the American Southwest. Additionally, Hesperus refers to a Greek god, namely the personification of the evening star and, by extension, “western.” Pronounced “dih NAY oh - BELL a tor” “Noh toh – hes per us.”


SMP VP-2430 is a disarticulated, associated individual consisting of a rostromedial portion of right premaxilla, left maxilla fragment, ?maxillary tooth, dorsolateral process of left lacrimal, left ?nasal fragment, incomplete right jugal, incomplete right basipterygoid, incomplete occipital condyle, isolated prezygopophyses, isolated vertebral processes, caudal vertebra 1, middle caudal vertebra, four fused distal caudal vertebrae, several vertebral fragments, nearly complete rib and rib fragments, nearly complete right humerus, nearly complete right ulna, incomplete right metacarpal III, nearly complete right manual ungual II, incomplete right femur, incomplete right metatarsals I, II and III, incomplete left ?astragalus, nearly complete right pedal ungual III, and various other cranial and post-cranial bone fragments (Figs. 12). Portions of the specimen were first found and collected by Robert M. Sullivan, Steven E. Jasinski, and James Nikas in 2008, and more material was subsequently collected from the same individual by Sullivan and Jasinski in 2009 and Jasinski in 2015 and 2016.

Figure 1

Selected elements and features of the holotype of Dineobellator notohesperus (SMP VP-2430), gen. et sp. nov., including: right humerus, posterior (A) view; right ulna, medial (B) view; close up of ulna showing feathers where ulnar papillae are located along the ulnar ridge, feathers used are from Megascops kennicottii (C); middle caudal vertebra (D,E), distal (D) and (E) lateroventral (E) views, with red highlighting circular indent on centrum surface; tooth, lateral (F) view; magnification of distal basal denticles (G); anterior caudal vertebra 1, right lateral (H) view; right manual ungual II (IL), lateral (I) view, silhouette of transverse plane of right manual ungual II near distal end (J), medial (K) view, and with area shown in dashed box in K highlighting abnormal oblong concavity in red (L); right pedal ungual III, partially reconstructed, lateral (M) view. Abbreviations: cc, central concavity; dc, deltopectoral crest; eg, digital extensor groove; ft, flexor tubercle; ld, latissimus dorsi scar; lg, lateral groove; mc, medial crest; mg, medial groove; na, neural arch; ns, neural spine; op, olecranon process; tp, transverse process. Scale bars, 1 cm for (AE) and (HM), 1 mm for (F,G). (L) not to scale.

Type locality and horizon

The type locality, SMP 410b, Bisti/De-na-zin Wilderness, New Mexico. Precise locality information is on file at the State Museum of Pennsylvania, Section of Paleontology and Geology, and is available to qualified researchers. The holotype (SMP VP-2430) was collected within a few meters above the base of the Naashoibito Member (Ojo Alamo Formation) in relatively poorly consolidated sandstone. 40Ar/39Ar dates acquired from detrital sanidines give a maximum depositional age for the Naashoibito Member at 66.5 ± 0.2 Ma (upper Maastrichtian)16,17,18,19,20. Biostratigraphy, however, seems to suggest an early late Maastrichtian age, approximately 70.0–68.0 Ma21.


A mid-sized dromaeosaurid theropod that differs from other eudromaeosaurs by the following characters: offset of lateral grooves on manual ungual; distinct and conspicuous dorsomedial groove proximally dorsal to the articular surface on the manual ungual; sharp angle of distal deltopectoral crest of the humerus; opisthocoelous proximal caudal vertebrae; short and robust neural spines on proximal caudal vertebrae; gracile and subrectangular transverse processes on proximal caudal vertebrae; proximal caudal vertebrae with curved ventral surface and oval to subrectangular cranial and caudal centrum surfaces; distinct round concavities on cranial and caudal centrum surfaces in mid-caudal vertebrae; enlarged flexor tubercles on manual ungual II and pedal ungual III; and secondary lateral grooves ventral on pedal unguals.


The type specimen of Dineobellator notohesperus (SMP VP-2430) is an animal similar in size to Velociraptor and Saurornitholestes based on the similar sizes of comparable elements. A few small fragments of SMP VP-2430 are from the skull of Dineobellator notohesperus. A rostromedial portion of the right premaxilla is preserved without teeth, but with portions of two alveoli. The alveoli are relatively inconspicuous (see SI Tables 12 for all measurements) and closely spaced. A subrectangular fragment of the left maxilla is preserved with two partial alveoli. The dorsolateral process of the left lacrimal is subtriangular with a rounded point laterally, a conspicuous lacrimal fenestra, and is similar to those in other dromaeosaurids see refs. 22,23 (Fig. 2G). Another subrectangular fragment, this one of the left nasal, has an enlarged medial sutural surface and a flat dorsal surface. A flat, trapezoidal portion of the right jugal is slightly curved laterally toward its rostral and caudal ends, suggesting a relatively deep jugal (Fig. 2H). The braincase is incomplete with only the condylar portion of the basioccipital preserved. The caudal portion of the braincase is subcircular and obliquely twisted. The right basipterygoid process of the basisphenoid is prominent medially and externally, directed caudodorsally, and possesses a thin canal internally, inferred to represent a neurovascular groove, as for the palatine ramus of the facial nerve + palatine artery (Fig. 2F). The right basal tuber is robust but incomplete medially. Its rostral edge is directed rostrolaterally with a deep U-shaped notch between the processes. Portions of the carotid canal are present on the medial edge of the basipterygoid recess and run rostrocaudally. Ventrally, the ovoid opening for the carotid canal is 6.5 mm long.

Figure 2

Skeletal reconstruction of Dineobellator notohesperus gen. et sp. nov., SMP VP-2430, with known elements colored in white. Figured bones are as follows: fused distal caudal vertebra (A); middle caudal vertebra (B); caudal vertebra 1 (C); right femur (D); rib (E); right basipterygoid (F); left lacrimal (reversed) (G); right jugal (H); right humerus (I); right ulna (J); right metacarpal III (K); right manual ungual II (L); right metatarsal II (M); right metatarsal III. (N) Individual scale bars, 2 cm. Skeletal drawing based off work of Scott Hartman.


A gracile, ziphodont,?maxillary tooth measures 12.0 mm in apical length (referring to the total height of the tooth including the preserved root), with a crown height of 11.3 mm (Fig. 1F). There are approximately 18–20 denticles per 5 mm (3.7 to 4.3 denticles per mm) on the distal carina (distal basal denticles) (Fig. 1G), and no denticles on the mesial carina. The angle between the lines of 10% and 90% of the length of the exposed denticles see ref. 24 normally falls between 86°–95° for well-preserved denticles, with most falling just under 90°. The denticles are nearly rounded with no indication of a hook and are short. A wear facet on the distal end of the mesial edge of the tooth measures 6.7 mm along the curvature. The tooth curves (concave) caudally and would be perpendicular to the alveolar margin (not strongly raked [including caudally] in the alveolus).


Several vertebrae and vertebral fragments are preserved in SMP VP-2430, including a nearly complete proximal caudal vertebra, the first postsacral vertebra (Figs. 1H, 2C). Its neural arch and spine are robust but short. The cranial and caudal faces of the centrum are subrectangular, and wider than tall. While the cranial surface is flat, the caudal is concave, making it opisthocoelous. The transverse processes project laterally, and are subrectangular, short, and gracile. The ventral surface is distinctly downcurved toward the caudal end. Another nearly complete vertebra represents an amphicoelous caudal vertebra approximately midway through the caudal series (~#8–~#12) (Figs. 1D,E, 2B). The cranial and caudal centrum surfaces are subrectangular to subtrapezoidal with well-defined and conspicuous circular indentations on both the cranial and caudal ends. These concavities of the centrum are symmetrical and both lie near the center of the centrum on their respective surfaces. A limited series of fused caudal vertebrae is preserved in SMP VP-2430 representing portions of at least four caudal vertebrae (Fig. 2A). These are not distal caudal vertebrae and, therefore, not representative of a pygostyle. Two of the vertebrae are complete, having lengths of 4.1 mm and 5.1 mm, respectively. Several fragmentary bones are identified as parts of ribs. One represents a nearly complete left dorsal rib that exhibits some taphonomic distortion distally and a long, thin depression laterally (Fig. 2E). The bone has an irregular surface in places, mostly proximally, with areas of slight expansion or depression along the rib shaft. This irregular morphology suggests bone remodeling and therefore is likely pathologic.


The nearly complete right humerus measures 186 mm, with an estimated total length of 215 mm (Figs. 1A, 2I). The proximal portion is thin and gracile with the proximal edge mostly flat with a slight bend medially versus sigmoidal in other dromaeosaurid humeri. The deltopectoral crest is thinner and more gracile than the shaft, projects cranially, lies approximately perpendicular to the long axis of the humeral head, and is approximately 31% the total length of the humerus. The distal edge of the crest forms a sharp, acute angle with the shaft of the humerus. Distally, the shaft is sub-round to oval and hollow in cross-section at the broken distal end. The incomplete right ulna is a long, thin, bowed bone with the preserved portion having a length of 101 mm, yielding a total estimated length of 140 mm (Figs. 1B, 2J). It has a shallow trochlear notch proximally and an inconspicuous, transversely broad, subtriangular olecranon process. At least six protuberances, identified as ulnar papillae or quill knobs, lie along the ventral ulnar ridge (Fig. 1C), which suggests a total estimate of 12–14 secondary remiges. The right incomplete metacarpal III is slightly ventrally-curved and tapers distally (Fig. 2K). On the proximal surface, the dorsal portion of the bone is wider than the ventral portion, giving it a generalized backwards-“P” shape.


The incomplete right femur is robust, with a preserved length of 69 mm, and a rough estimate of a total length of 275 mm (Fig. 2D). The preserved portion of the femoral head suggests the shaft is twisted as in other dromaeosaurid femora. Right metatarsal I is slightly twisted about its shaft and is missing part of its proximal end. There is a relatively large foramen at its distal end with a pronounced, rounded rim. Right metatarsal II, represented by the proximal (Fig. 2M) and distal portions, is thin and gracile. Proximally, the bone is subtriangular, with a distinct groove from the proximal edge that runs halfway down the preserved proximal portion. The distal portion is also subtriangular and flares out to the condyles. The right metatarsal III is thinner proximally and extends toward the distally preserved surface (Fig. 2N).


A nearly complete right manual ungual II, missing only the tip, measures 45.6 mm long from the ventral edge of the articular surface to the preserved distal end. The complete ungual would have a total length of approximately 50 mm (Figs. 1I–L, 2L). It has a pronounced flexor tubercle along its proximoventral edge, and a significant arched profile, with the dorsal surface approximately 114 ° in relation to the articulation surface. A lateral groove (or depression) runs along its length toward the distal tip. This groove lies between the articular surface and flexor tubercle and extends the length of the claw toward the dorsal surface distally. A similar groove is present medially. The two grooves are offset as the medial groove does not converge with the dorsal surface, unlike the lateral groove. On the medial surface near the proximal end of the groove lies a prominent gouge mark (Fig. 1L). This mark, or furrow, extends proximoventrally and terminates in a prominent, but small, depression close to the dorsal edge. The gouge has an approximate width of 3 mm and extends for a length of 9 mm. This feature does not exhibit any abnormal morphology, suggesting it is not due to an infection or pathology associated with the keratinous sheath. Its presence on only one side of the element suggests it is not diagenetic. The flexor tubercle is large (93% of the size of the articular surface) and perpendicular to the articular surface. Dorsally adjacent to the articular surface is a ridge extending to the middle of the ungual, with grooves on both sides. On its proximodorsal surface is a faint, slight lip. Directly ventral to the articular surface is another slight lip, or ridge, that comes to two lateral points or projections. Proximal and distal portions of right pedal ungual III are preserved, with only a small, middle portion missing (Fig. 1M). The proximal fragment is 13.2 mm long (proximodistally) and the distal fragment is 32.0 mm long, with a total estimated length of 55 mm. The flexor tubercle is significantly smaller and less pronounced than that of the manual ungual II, but relatively large compared to other pedal unguals, with the tubercle 67% the length of the articular surface. There is a slight concave curvature below the articular surface, with the flexor tubercle perpendicular to the articular surface. Grooves are present on both the lateral and medial surfaces of the claw and are offset from each other, like those of the manual ungual. The lateral groove encroaches toward the dorsal surface as it extends distally, while the medial one does not, as in manual ungual II. There is a second, less conspicuous depression, or groove, ventral to the main one on both the lateral and medial surfaces. The pedal claw is thinner in profile than the manus claw and lacks a pronounced curvature.


The distinct offset nature of the longitudinal grooves of the manual ungual are often found on the pedal unguals of several dromaeosaurid taxa and are barely offset in the manual ungual in one other taxon (Boreonykus certekorum), but not in other dromaeosaurids. The distinct dorsomedial groove proximally near the articulation surface is not seen in other dromaeosaurid taxa. The flattened proximal edge of the humerus of Dineobellator is distinct from the sigmoidal shape in other dromaeosaurids (e.g., Saurornitholestes, Bambiraptor, Deinonychus). The sharp, acutely angled curvature of the distal portion of the deltopectoral crest is unique among dromaeosaurids, although it is less smooth in Deinonychus (AMNH 3015, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA). The deltopectoral crest is relatively larger in Dineobellator [estimated 31% of total humeral length in Dineobellator compared to other dromaeosaurids with preserved humeri (e.g., 20.5% in Bambiraptor feinborgorum, 23.5% in Dakotaraptor steini, 25% in Saurornitholestes langstoni, and 28% in Deinonychus antirrhopus)]. In other dromaeosaurids, proximal caudal vertebrae are acoelous or amphiplatyan. The opisthocoelous proximal caudal vertebrae of Dineobellator are unknown in other dromaeosaurids, although they have been found in the caenagnathid theropod Gigantoraptor erlianensis25. The ventral surface of the proximal caudal is curved ventrally, while those of other dromaeosaurids (e.g., Deinonychus) are angled, but not curved, in lateral view. The transverse processes of the proximal caudal vertebra I is subrectangular, distinct from Deinonychus where they are subtriangular and Velociraptor where they are enlarged and fan out distally. The centrum surfaces, particularly on the posterior (=caudal) end, are distinctly oval to subrectangular in Dineobellator rather than rounded as in other dromaeosaurids. The subcircular concavities on the cranial and caudal surfaces of the centra of the mid-caudal vertebrae are symmetrical and not seen in other dromaeosaurid caudal vertebrae. While the flexor tubercle is smaller in the pedal ungual than in the manual ungual, it is still enlarged compared to those of other dromaeosaurid taxa (e.g., Bambiraptor, Deinonychus, Utahraptor), and most similar in relative size to Dakotaraptor pedal unguals. Additionally, the smaller secondary grooves ventral to the main lateral grooves on the pedal ungual are unique among dromaeosaurids. While the late Campanian Saurornitholestes sullivani (holotype frontal SMP VP-1270) is from the older Kirtland Formation (De-na-zin Member) of the San Juan Basin11,26,27,28, it lacks corresponding elements that would permit comparison. However, isolated dromaeosaurid teeth from the De-na-zin Member have been collected (SMP VP-1901), and these differ from those of Dineobellator. Teeth of S. sullivani are gently curved, have slightly apically hooked denticles, less dense denticles (14–15 denticles per 5 mm compared to 18–20 in Dineobellator), and possess mesial denticles. It is also noted that one of the diagnostic features of S. langstoni are distal denticles that are strongly hooked apically22. Additionally, the maxillary and dentary teeth of S. langstoni are vertical and perpendicular to the alveolar margin and possess mesial carinae (although these tend to be mainly or completely proximal on the teeth) that are distinctly smaller than distal carinae.

Phylogenetic analysis

The first of the two phylogenetic analyses resulted in a strict consensus tree that recovered Eudromaeosauria with several previously identified clades within, including Saurornitholestinae, Dromaeosaurinae, and Velociraptorinae (Fig. 3). Derived within Eudromaeosauria is Velociraptorinae with a mix of Campanian taxa from Asia and Maastrichtian taxa from North America, including Dineobellator notohesperus. Sister to Velociraptorinae lies a clade with the large-bodied taxa Achillobator and Utahraptor (and Adasaurus), with Deinonychus antirrhopus as the sister taxon to these groups. Moving further down the tree is Dromaeosaurinae, recovered as a mainly North American clade, although it includes the Baynshire dromaeosaurid as well. Saurornitholestinae was recovered as the basal-most subfamily, with Bambiraptor feinbergi as the sister taxon to Eudromaeosauria. Tianyuraptor + Zhenyuanlong are found to be sister to Bambiraptor + Eudromaeosauria. In addition to the Eudromaeosauria + Bambiraptor + (Tianyuraptor + Zhenyuanlong) clade, Dromaeosauridae includes an unresolved, polytomic Microraptorinae + a mostly unresolved Unenlagiinae + Halszkaraptorinae + Mahakala. Previously recovered clades include the mainly Asian Microraptorinae with Hesperonychus as the sister taxon to the polytomic Asian microraptorines and the Gondwanan Unenlagiinae with Rahonavis from Madagascar as sister to South American dromaeosaurids. Similar to Currie and Evans26, Haszkaraptorinae was recovered as Halszkraptor + Hulsanpes, with Mahakala recovered outside this clade, contra Cau et al.29. As found in several previous studies, Acheroraptor was recovered basally in the mostly Asian Velociraptorinae13,26,30. Dineobellator represents the second North American member of this clade, and a more derived member than Acheroraptor as Dineobellator is the sister taxon to Tsaagan mangas + Linheraptor exquisitus. Dineobellator notohesperus was also run through an established theropod dataset (Theropod Working Group dataset) to further gather insight into its phylogenetic placement. While many theropod groups had higher resolution, intrafamilial relationships of the Dromaeosauridae were poorly resolved, resulting in Dineobellator notohesperus forming part of a large polytomy with other dromaeosaurids. While this helps confirm the dromaeosaurid affinities of Dineobellator, it does not provide further information on its relationships within Dromaeosauridae. The strict consensus majority rule tree for this dataset can be found with the Supplemental Information.

Figure 3

Time-calibrated phylogeny of dromaeosaurid relationships illustrating the major relationships within the family including their paleobiogeography. Strict consensus phylogenetic tree resulting in 32 most parsimonious trees, each with a tree length of 416 steps, a Consistency Index of 0.466, and a Retention Index of 0.640. Archaeopteryx is the outgroup. Temporal positions and biogeographic locations of dromaeosaurid taxa are provided. Silhouettes are taken from and are freely available for reuse under a Public Domain or Creative Commons license (, see SI for more information about individual silhouettes. Credits for silhouettes and references for temporal positions and biogeographic locations provided in SI.


Dineobellator notohesperus represents the most complete theropod skeleton recovered from the late Maastrichtian Naashoibito Member and one of the most complete dromaeosaurids from the Maastrichtian of North America. Dineobellator co-existed with numerous other theropods, including caenagnathids, ornithomimids, troodontids, and tyrannosaurids15,31,32,33. The presence of Dineobellator suggests that dromaeosaurid dinosaurs continued to diversify into the late Maastrichtian. Because these taxa do not form a monophyletic clade, multiple lineages of dromaeosaurids are inferred to have been present during Campanian and Maastrichtian time, including at least two in the northern and one in the southern reaches of Laramidia. These lineages followed distinct evolutionary paths, while presumably filling similar ecological niches in their respective ecosystems. Our phylogenetic analysis suggests potentially at least four lineages during the Campanian, and at least two to three remaining into the Maastrichtian in North America. The recovery of Dineobellator as a second Maastrichtian North American velociraptorine further suggests vicariance in this group after a dispersal from Asian ancestors.

For nearly a century, since the recognition of the early late Campanian Dromaeosaurus albertensis, only indeterminate teeth and fragmentary dromaeosaurid remains had been recovered from Maastrichtian age strata in North America12. However, recently, Evans et al.13 reported on the first diagnostic late Maastrichtian North American dromaeosaurid, Acheroraptor temertyorum, consisting of a nearly complete right maxilla and potentially associated, nearly complete left dentary from the Hell Creek Formation of Montana. Soon after, a second dromaeosaurid, Dakotaraptor steini, was named by DePalma et al.14 from the Hell Creek Formation of South Dakota based on material from a larger individual and represented by portions of the fore- and hindlimbs and axial skeleton. It is noted that Dakotaraptor is likely a chimera and portions of the described skeleton have already been shown to not represent a dromaeosaurid, namely with the “furcula” reidentified as part of a turtle plastron see ref. 34. Dineobellator notohesperus represents the first diagnostic dromaeosaurid known from the Maastrichtian of southern North America, and only the third late Maastrichtian dromaeosaurid known from North America.

Inferred behavior

Some aspects of the paleobiology of Dineobellator, including its inferred behavior, can be hypothesized based on morphological evidence. The deltopectoral crest of the humerus is the attachment site for several muscles in the forelimb see ref. 35. The m. brachialis, which originates on the distal edge of the deltopectoral crest35, would aid in the flexion of the forearm in Dineobellator. Enlarging the distal portion of the crest would result in the enlargement of the origin of this muscle. The change in the angle of the distal portion of the deltopectoral crest may have also allowed for the origin of the m. brachialis to shift, creating a more parallel orientation for the muscle in relation to the long axis of the radius and ulna. This orientation could have resulted in lower muscular forces necessary for flexion of the forearm, and similar or larger muscle sizes based on the enlarged deltopectoral crest could have provided greater strength capabilities of this movement. The enlarged dorsomedial groove on the manual ungual suggests larger digital extensors (m. extensor digitorum brevis). This could be counteracted by tighter grip strength of the manus, as evidenced by the enlarged flexor tubercle on the manual ungual relative to other dromaeosaurids (flexor tubercle approximately 93% height of articular surface in Dineobellator), including those of Microraptor (56%), Bambiraptor (55%), Deinonychus (55%), Boreonykus (60%), and Velociraptor mongoliensis (77%). This tighter grip strength is also seen in the hindfeet relative to other eudromaeosaurs (67% in Dineobellator, 50% in Dakotaraptor, 40% in Utahraptor, 36% in Deinonychus, 30% in Dromaeosaurus, 22% in Boreonykus, 20% in Velociraptor mongoliensis, and 17% in Bambiraptor).

The possession of opisthocoelous proximal caudal vertebrae may have allowed more mobility and range of movement near the base, while keeping the rest of the tail stiff could allow it to act as a rudder or counterweight e.g.,36,37,38,39. This may have increased the agility of Dineobellator and thus may have implications for its predatory behavior, particularly with respect to the pursuit of prey.

A gouge and depression on the manual ungual are inferred to be the result of an external force from a single event. These features are only present on the medial side of the ungual suggesting it is not due to postmortem deformation. They do not appear to be the result of an infection or disease causing a pathology. The absence of remodeling or retexturing of the bone suggests external trauma caused these features, and that the inflicted trauma that resulted in these marks occurred close to, or at, the time of death. The size of this groove is consistent with the morphology of the ungual of an animal of similar size to SMP VP-2430 (Fig. 1L). We speculate an altercation with another Dineobellator or other predatory theropod resulted in these marks. Additionally, there is a deformed and remodeled rib, suggesting a break that healed, indicating that the animal survived for a while after suffering the injury e.g.,40,41,42,43. More evidence is needed to confirm or refute these features as pathologic features.


Several dromaeosaurid taxa have been found to possess feathers, or feather-like structures, such as the Barremian–early Aptian Changyuraptor44, the Aptian Sinornithosaurus45,46, Zhenyuanlong47, and Wulong48, and the Albian Microraptor49,50,51. Some of these also possess feathers on their hindlimbs and most are confined to smaller body sizes and classified within Microraptorinae, although Zhenyuanlong is larger than the others and has recently been recovered as the sister taxon to Microraptorinae + Eudromaeosauria29. In addition to exceptional preservation leading to the discovery of feathers in theropods, some taxa have been found with structures similar to the quill knobs (or ulnar papillae) in extant birds. Among these taxa are the Campanian Asian velociraptorine Velociraptor mongoliensis52 and the Maastrichtian North American dromaeosaurine Dakotaraptor14. The discovery of ulnar papillae in Dineobellator adds a third member of Eudromaeosauria to this group (Fig. 1C). With approximately 12–14 secondary feathers, based on the number of quill knobs, Dineobellator is similar to that of V. mongoliensis having 14 secondaries52 and lies between the estimates for the Maastrichtian Rahonavis (10 secondaries53), the Tithonian Archaeopteryx (12 or more secondaries54) and the Albian Microraptor (18 secondaries50). The presence of quill knobs in Dineobellator provides further evidence for feathers throughout Dromaeosauridae, which have been documented in the three major clades, and from the Barremian through the Maastrichtian. It seems likely that feathers were present in the earliest dromaeosaurids, and potentially all members thereafter, based on the widespread occurrence of quill knobs and feathers in microraptorines. Their presence in non-volant dromaeosaurids of varying sizes further supports the notion that these feathers did not evolve exclusively for flight. While there have been suggestions of the winged forelimbs being used for stabilization during predatory attack55, this would have been less important for larger-bodied taxa such as Dakotaraptor. It has been shown that coloration and patterns highly discernible within taxa may not have the same effect on prey e.g.56. This implies that feathers can act as bright markers, species-recognition markers, and/or sexual display features without being visual signals that call attention of predators or prey. Modern raptorial birds show that color patterns can still be intricate and serve to both camouflage the predator and be part of the sexual selection process e.g.57,58,59, and similar feather styles may have been present in dromaeosaurids.

Dromaeosauridae hiatus in North America

While North American dromaeosaurids are known from the Barremian by multiple taxa (Yurgovuchia and Utahraptor)4,5, following Deinonychus in the early Albian6,7 there is a significant hiatus in their fossil record (Fig. 3). This hiatus (or gap) lasts until the middle to late Campanian with the appearance of Dromaeosaurus1,2,3,23. This approximately 30-million-year hiatus may be due, in part, to bias (e.g., preservational, collecting, sampling) against small and rarer taxa, making it difficult to determine if their absence is real or an artefact of the fossil record12,60. Any dromaeosaurids from this hiatus would be of extreme importance in understanding their evolution.

Phylogenetic relationships

While Gondwanan dromaeosaurids are recovered as a monophyletic group, Laurasian dromaeosaurids are recovered in several different clades and most clades have both Asian and North American members (Fig. 3). Dineobellator and Acheroraptor are members of the mostly Asian Velociraptorinae. Dromaeosaurinae has Asian and North American members. DePalma et al.14. found that large-bodied dromaeosaurid taxa formed a monophyletic clade. However, our analysis suggests large-bodied taxa (e.g., Deinonychus, Utahraptor, Achillobator, Dakotaraptor) are represented in several clades of eudromaeosaurs, although Utahraptor and Achillobator are sister taxa in a small clade. The basal position of Dakotaraptor in Dromaeosaurinae suggests small-bodied size may be a derived trait in this group. The two upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation taxa (Dakotaraptor and Acheroraptor) are found within the two distinct subfamilies of eudromaeosaurs. However, it is noted that the likely chimeric status of Dakotaraptor likely leads, at least partially, to the more basal position among dromaeosaurids in the phylogenetic analysis. The presence of Campanian velociraptorines in Asia and Maastrichtian velociraptorines in North America also suggests migration between Asia and North America sometime before the Maastrichtian. The phylogenetic analysis further suggests there were multiple lineages of dromaeosaurids in North America during Campanian and Maastrichtian time, including two in the northern and at least one in the southern portions of Laramidia (present day southwestern North America). Dineobellator, recovered as a velociraptorine, also suggests vicariance in late Maastrichtian North American dromaeosaurids, with different taxa in the northern and southern United States. Close morphological relationships between Asian and San Juan Basin taxa has previously been noted for ankylosaurids61 and pachycephalosaurids62,63,64,65. This suggests movement of dinosaur species, with vicariance occurring between biogeographical regions. These latest dromaeosaurid lineages followed distinct evolutionary paths, while presumably filling similar ecological niches in their respective ecosystems. New discoveries of dromaeosaurids during the Late Cretaceous will provide further clarity as to whether distinct lineages lived throughout this time. Our analysis suggests multiple faunal interchanges and migrations between Asia and North America in the Late Cretaceous, with potential vicariance occurring into the very end of the Cretaceous in dromaeosaurids, particularly in North America.


Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic analyses were run on two datasets used to explore relationships of the Dromaeosauridae and Theropoda. The first phylogenetic analysis used 38 operational taxonomic units (34 ingroup OTUs) and 180 characters. These data were based on the study of Currie and Evans22, which was, in turn, based on the studies of Bell and Currie30, Evans et al.13, and Longrich and Currie10. Data were run with TNT version 1.566. This analysis resulted in 32 most parsimonious trees, each with a tree length of 416 steps, a Consistency Index of 0.466, and a Retention Index of 0.640 (Fig. 3). The Theropod Working Group dataset was also used, mainly from Brusatte et al.67 and recently updated by Cau et al.29,68. This analysis includes 157 OTUs and 860 characters. It was also run in TNT version 1.566 and resulted in 11,590 most parsimonious trees, each with a tree length of 3317 steps, a Consistency Index of 0.328, and a Retention Index of 0.7612. Both datasets were subjected to a New Technology search (with default parameters for sectorial search, ratchet, tree drift, and tree fusion). While many theropod groups had higher resolution in the second phylogenetic analysis, intrafamilial relationships of Dromaeosauridae were poorly resolved. The strict consensus majority rule tree for this dataset can be found with the Supplemental Information.

Nomenclatural acts

This published work and its nomenclatural acts have been registered in ZooBank which is a proposed online registration system for the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (IZCN). The LSID (Life science identifiers) for this publication is The associated information can also be viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix “”.


  1. 1.

    Matthew, W. D. & Brown, B. The family Deinodontidae, with notice of a new genus from the Cretaceous of Alberta. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 46, 367–385 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Turner, A. H., Makovicky, P. J. & Norell, M. A. A review of dromaeosaurid systematics and Paravian phylogeny. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 371, 1–206 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jasinski, S. E. & Dodson, P. Biostratigraphy, paleobiogeography, and evolution of dromaeosaurids (Dinosauria: Dromaeosauridae) in North America. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog. 47, 565 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Senter, P., Kirkland, J. I., DeBlieux, D. D., Madsen, S. & Toth, N. New dromaeosaurids (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Utah, and the evolution of the dromaeosaurid tail. PLoS One 7, e36790 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kirkland, J. I., Burge, D. & Gaston, R. A large dromaeosaur (Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of eastern Utah. Hunteria 2, 1–16 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ostrom, J. H. Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus, an unusual theropod from the Lower Cretaceous of Montana. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull. 30, 1–165 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brinkman, D. L., Cifelli, R. L. & Czaplewski, N. J. First occurrence of Deinonychus antirrhopus (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Antlers Formation (Lower Cretaceous: Aptian–Albian) of Oklahoma. Okla. Geol. Surv. Bull. 146, 1–27 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sues, H.-D. A new small theropod dinosaur from the Judith River Formation (Campanian) of Alberta, Canada. Zool. J. Linn. Soc-Lond 62, 381–400 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Currie, P. J. & Varricchio, D. D. A new dromaeosaurid from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Alberta, Canada Feathered Dragons, [Currie, P. J., Koppelhus, E. B., Shugar, M. A. & Wright, J. L. (eds.)] [112–132] (Indiana University Press, 2004).

  10. 10.

    Longrich, N. R. & Currie, P. J. A microraptorine (Dinosauria–Dromaeosauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of North America. PNAS 106, 5002–5007 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jasinski, S. E. A new dromaeosaurid (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of New Mexico. N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 67, 79–87 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jasinski, S. E., Sullivan, R. M. & Dodson, P. Late Cretaceous dromaeosaurid theropod dinosaurs (Dinosauria: Dromaeosauridae) from southern Laramidia and implications for dinosaur faunal provinciality in North America. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. Prog. Abstr. 35(Supp), 150A (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Evans, D. C., Larson, D. W. & Currie, P. J. A new dromaeosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) with Asian affinities from the latest Cretaceous of North America. Naturwissenschaften 100, 1041–1049 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    DePalma, R. A., Burnham, D. A., Martin, L. D., Larson, P. L. & Bakker, R. T. The first giant raptor (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Hell Creek Formation. Paleontol. Contrib. 14, 1–16 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jasinski, S. E., Sullivan, R. M. & Lucas, S. G. Taxonomic composition of the Alamo Wash local fauna from the Upper Cretaceous Ojo Alamo Formation (Naashoibito Member), San Juan Basin, New Mexico. N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 53, 16–271 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Heizler, M. T. et al. 40Ar/39Ar Chronostratigraphy of Cretaceous and Paleocene strata in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico: Accuracy limitations of high precision measurements. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog. 45, 289 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mason, I. P., Heizler, M. T. & Williamson, T. E. 40Ar/39Ar sanidine chronostratigraphy of K-Pg boundary sediments of the San Juan Basin, NM. N. Mex. Geol. 35, 42–43 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Peppe, D. et al. New age constraints on Late Cretaceous through early Paleocene age rocks in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog. 45, 290 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Williamson, T. E. & Brusatte, S. L. Small theropod teeth from the Late Cretaceous of the San Juan Basin, northwestern New Mexico and their implications for understanding latest Cretaceous dinosaur evolution. PLoS One 9, e93190 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Greene, S., Heaman, L. M., DuFrane, S. A., Williamson, T. & Currie, P. J. Introducing a geochemical screen to identify geologically meaningful U-Pb dates in fossil teeth. Chem. Geol. 493, 1–15 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fowler, D. W. Revised geochronology, correlation, and dinosaur stratigraphic ranges of the Santonian-Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) formations of the Western Interior of North America. PLoS One 12, e0188426 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Currie, P. J. & Evans D. C. Cranial anatomy of new specimens of Saurornitholestes langstoni (Dinosauria, Theropoda, Dromaeosauridae) from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Campanian) of Alberta. The Anatomical Record, (2019).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Currie, P. J. New information on the anatomy and relationships of Dromaeosaurus albertensis (Dinosauria: Theropoda). J. Vert. Paleontol. 15, 576–591 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Larson, D. W. Diversity and variation of theropod dinosaur teeth from the uppermost Santonian Milk River Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Alberta: a quantitative method supporting identification of the oldest dinosaur tooth assemblage in Canada. Can. J. Earth Sci. 45, 1455–1468 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Xu, X., Tan, Q., Wang, J., Zhao, X. & Tan, L. A gigantic bird-like dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of China. Nat. 447, 844–847 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sullivan, R. M. & Lucas, S. G. First occurrence of Saurornitholestes (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous of New Mexico. N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 35, 105–108 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sullivan, R. M. Saurornitholestes robustus, n. sp. (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous Kirtland Formation (De-na-zin Member), San Juan Basin. N. Mexico. N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 35, 253–256 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Evans, D. C., Larson, D. W., Cullen, T. M. & Sullivan, R. M. “Saurornitholestesrobustus is a troodontid (Dinosauria: Theropoda). Can. J. Earth Sci. 51, 730–734 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cau, A. et al. Synchrotron scanning reveals amphibious ecomorphology in a new clade of bird-like dinosaurs. Nat. 552, 395–399 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bell, P. R. & Currie, P. J. A high-latitude dromaeosaurid, Boreonykus certekorum, gen. et sp. nov. (Theropoda), from the upper Campanian Wapiti Formation, west-central Alberta. J. Vert. Paleontol. 36, e1034359 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lehman, T. M. The Alamo Wash local fauna: A new look at the old Ojo Alamo fauna Advances in San Juan Basin Paleontology [Lucas, S. G., Rigby, J. K., Jr. & Kues, B. S. (eds.)] [189–221] (University of New Mexico Press, 1981).

  32. 32.

    Jasinski, S. E. et al. Theropods (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the San Juan Basin, New Mexico, and implications for Late Cretaceous theropod faunas of Laramidia. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. Prog. Abstr. 36(Supp), 161A (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sullivan, R. M., Jasinski, S. E. & van Tomme, M. P. A. A new caenagnathid Ojoraptorsaurus boerei, new gen., new sp. (Dinosauria, Oviraptorosauria) from the Upper Cretaceous Ojo Alamo Formation (Naashoibito Member), San Juan Basin, New Mexico. N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 53, 418–428 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Arbour, V. M., Zanno, L. E., Larson, D. W., Evans, D. C. & Sues, H.-D. The furculae of the dromaeosaurid dinosaur Dakotaraptor steini are trionychid turtle entoplastra. PeerJ 4, e1691 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Burch, S. H. Complete forelimb myology of the basal theropod dinosaur Tawa hallae based on a novel robust muscle reconstruction method. J. Anat. 225, 271–297 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Eaton, R. L. An experimental study of predatory and feeding behavior in the cheetah. Z. Tierpsychol. 31, 270–280 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Thompson, S. Built for Speed: The Extraordinary, Enigmatic Cheetah (Lerner Publishing Group, 1998).

  38. 38.

    Patel, A. & Braae, M. Rapid turning at high-speed: Inspirations from the cheetah’s tail IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Piscataway: IEEE, 5506–5511 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Patel, A., Boje, E., Fisher, C., Louis, L. & Lane, E. Quasi-steady state aerodynamics of the cheetah tail. Biol. Open. 2016, 1072–1076 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tanke, D. H. & Currie, P. J. Head-biting behavior in theropod dinosaurs: paleopathological evidence. Gaia 15, 167–184 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sullivan, R. M., Tanke, D. H. & Rothschild, B. M. An impact fracture in an ornithomimid (Ornithimimosauria: Dinosauria) metatarsal from the Upper Cretaceous (late Campanian) of New Mexico. N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 17, 109–111 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sullivan, R. M., Lucas, S. G., Jasinski, S. E. & Tanke, D. H. An unusual sacral neural spine osteopathy of a chasmosaurine (Dinosauria: Ceratopsidae) from the Upper Cretaceous Kirtland Formation (Hunter Wash Member), San Juan Basin, New Mexico. N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 53, 484–488 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Robinson, R. F., Jasinski, S. E. & Sullivan, R. M. Theropod bite marks on dinosaur bones: indications of a scavenger, predator or both?; and their taphonomic implications. N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 68, 275–282 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Han, G. et al. A new raptorial dinosaur, with exceptionally long feathering provides insights into dromaeosaurid flight performance. Nat. Commun. 5, 4382 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Xu, X., Wang, X.-L. & Wu, X.-C. A dromaeosaur dinosaur with filamentous integument from the Yixian Formation of China. Nat. 401, 262–266 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Liu, J., Ji, S., Tang, F. & Gao, C. A new species of dromaeosaurids [sic] from the Yixian Formation of western Liaoning. Geol. Bull. China 23, 778–783 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lü, J. & Brusatte, S. L. A large, short-armed, winged dromaeosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Early Cretaceous of China and its implications for feather evolution. Sci. Rep. 5, 11775 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Poust, A. W., Gao, C., Varricchio, D. V., Wu, J & Zhang, F. A new microraptorine theropod from the Jehol Biota and growth in early dromaeosaurids. The Anatomical Record, (2020).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Xu, X., Zhou, Z. & Wang, X. The smallest known non-avian theropod dinosaur. Nat. 408, 705–707 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Xu, X. et al. Four-winged dinosaurs from China. Nat. 421, 3335–340 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gong, E.-P., Martin, L. D., Burnham, D. A., Falk, A. R. & Hou, L. H. A new species of Microraptor from the Jehol Biota of northeastern China. Palaeoworld 21, 81–91 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Turner, A. H., Makovicky, P. J. & Norell, M. A. Feather quill knobs in the dinosaur Velociraptor. Sci. 317, 1721 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Forster, C. A., Sampson, S. D., Chiappe, L. M. & Krause, D. W. The theropod ancestry of birds: new evidence from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Sci. 279, 1915–1919 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Elzanowski, A. Archaeopterygidae (Upper Jurassic of Germany) Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs, eds. [Chiappe, L. M. & Witmer, L. M. (eds.)] [129–159] (University of California Press, 2002).

  55. 55.

    Fowler, D. W., Freedman, E. A., Scannella, J. B. & Kambic, R. E. The predatory ecology of Deinonychus and the origin of flapping in birds. PLoS One 6, e28964 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Outamuro, D., Söderquist, L., Johansson, F., Ödeen, A. & Nordström, K. The price of looking sexy: visual ecology of a three-level predator–prey system. Funct. Ecol. 31, 707–718 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Holt, D. W., Kline, R. & Sullivan-Holt, L. A description of “tufts” and concealing posture in northern pygmy-owls. J. Raptor Res. 24, 59–63 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Snyder, N. & Snyder, H. Raptors of North America: Natural History and Conservation (Voyageur Press, 2006).

  59. 59.

    Hill, G. E. & McGraw, K. J. Bird Coloration, Volume 2: Function and Evolution (Harvard University Press, 2006).

  60. 60.

    Lucas, S. G., Sullivan, R. M., Lichtig, A. J., Dalman, S. G. & Jasinski, S. E. Late Cretaceous dinosaur biogeography and endemism in the Western Interior Basin, North America: A critical re-evaluation. N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 71, 195–213 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sullivan, R. M. Nodocephalosaurus kirtlandensis, gen. et sp. nov., a new ankylosaurid dinosaur (Ornithischia: Ankylosauria) from the Upper Cretaceous Kirtland Formation (Upper Campanian), San Juan Basin, New Mexico. J. Vert. Paleontol. 19, 126–139 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Sullivan, R. M. Revision of the dinosaur Stegoceras Lambe (Ornithischia, Pachycephalosauridae). J. Vert. Paleontol. 23, 181–207 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Sullivan, R. M. A taxonomic review of the Pachycephalosauridae (Dinosauria, Ornithischia). N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 35, 347–365 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Jasinski, S. E. & Sullivan, R. M. Re-evaluation of pachycephalosaurids from the Fruitland-Kirtland transition (Kirtlandian, late Campanian), San Juan Basin, New Mexico, with a description of a new species of Stegoceras and a reassessment of Texacephale langstoni. N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 53, 202–215 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Jasinski, S. E. & Sullivan, R. M. The validity of the Late Cretaceous pachycephalosaurid Stegoceras novomexicanum (Dinosauria: Pachycephalosauridae). N. Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 74, 107–115 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Goloboff, P. A. & Catalano, S. A. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32, 221–238 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Brusatte, S. L., Lloyd, G. T., Wang, S. C. & Norell, M. A. Gradual assembly of avian body plan culminated in rapid rates of evolution across the dinosaur-bird transition. Curr. Biol. 24, 2386–2392 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Cau, A., Brougham, T. & Naish, D. The phylogenetic affinities of the bizarre Late Cretaceous Romanian theropod Balaur bondoc (Dinosauria, Maniraptora): dromaeosaurid or flightless bird? PeerJ 3, e1032 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank many colleagues for discussion on dromaeosaurids, including Stephen Brusatte, Phil Currie, David Evans, Denver Fowler, Derek Larson, Mark Norell, and David Varricchio. Thanks also go to those who we had discussions with on San Juan Basin stratigraphy and fossils, including Sebastian Dalman, Spencer Lucas, and Thomas Williamson. Bruce Rothschild provided help with interpreting pathologies. S.E.J. was supported by the Geo. L. Harrison and Benjamin Franklin fellowships. Research was also partially funded by the Walker Endowment Research Grant and the University of Pennsylvania Paleontology Research Grant. Joan Buccilli and Robert Giegengack offered immense support throughout the project. Phylopics was used for a majority of the silhouettes used in the phylogenetic reconstruction in Figure 3, and the artists whose work these represent are gratefully acknowledged, including Danny Cicchetti, Scott Hartman, T. Michael Keesey, Matthew Martyniuk, Brad McFeeters, and Emily Willoughby. SMP VP-2430 was collected under BLM Paleontological Resource Permit NM07-001S with help from the Bureau of Land Management, Phil Gensler, and Sherrie Landon. James Nikas helped in the initial collection of the specimen. Sergey Krasovskiy and Mary P. Williams produced artwork as life reconstructions of Dineobellator notohesperus, and they are gratefully thanked for helping to bring this animal to life. R.M.S. led the fieldwork that recovered the first elements of the type specimen. Nicholas Minter helped as the editor and the manuscript was improved by comments from two anonymous reviewers.

Author information




S.E.J. led the writing of the main manuscript text, the supplemental text, prepared the figures, and performed the phylogenetic analyses. S.E.J., R.M.S. and P.D. wrote and reviewed the manuscript and edited drafts.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven E. Jasinski.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jasinski, S.E., Sullivan, R.M. & Dodson, P. New Dromaeosaurid Dinosaur (Theropoda, Dromaeosauridae) from New Mexico and Biodiversity of Dromaeosaurids at the end of the Cretaceous. Sci Rep 10, 5105 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing