Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Large-scale acoustic-driven neuronal patterning and directed outgrowth

Abstract

Acoustic manipulation is an emerging non-invasive method enabling precise spatial control of cells in their native environment. Applying this method for organizing neurons is invaluable for neural tissue engineering applications. Here, we used surface and bulk standing acoustic waves for large-scale patterning of Dorsal Root Ganglia neurons and PC12 cells forming neuronal cluster networks, organized biomimetically. We showed that by changing parameters such as voltage intensity or cell concentration we were able to affect cluster properties. We examined the effects of acoustic arrangement on cells atop 3D hydrogels for up to 6 days and showed that assembled cells spontaneously grew branches in a directed manner towards adjacent clusters, infiltrating the matrix. These findings have great relevance for tissue engineering applications as well as for mimicking architectures and properties of native tissues.

Introduction

The architecture of the brain and the nervous system is very complex, yet it is well organized1,2. High-level architectures can be found in the spinal cord3,4, retina5,6, six-layered cortex7, hippocampus8,9, cerebellum10, and many other neuronal sub-regions. Between these organized sub-regions, specific neuronal networks, consisting of myriad neurons, work together to transfer and process information efficiently and to perform specific tasks that later are translated into various behaviors2,11,12. Hence, the ability to artificially organize and pattern neurons at specific spatial positions in order to mimic different architectures and properties of neural networks is of great importance. In various fields in neuroscience research such as neural tissue engineering and regenerative medicine13,14,15,16, brain-machine interface17,18,19, developmental neuroscience20, and neuropharmacology21,22 such controlling ability may be crucial.

Indeed, in neural tissue engineering, much effort has been devoted to artificially mimic the highly organized architectures and properties of native tissues. Tang-Schomer and colleagues engineered functional brain-like cortical tissue by assembling donut-shaped layers. Their work offers a model with physiologically relevant features for assessing different brain disorders23. Qian and colleagues have generated forebrain-, midbrain-, and hypothalamic-specific organoids from human-induced pluripotent stem cells, which were able to recapitulate the key features of these brain regions24. Current methods for arranging specific cells include selective surface modifications25,26, direct bioprinting27,28, specific micromolding29,30, and the use of different forces such as optical31, magnetic32, and fluidic forces33. Although these methods allow successful cell patterning, each technique has its own limitations. For example, bioprinting is costly and time consuming because it is applied sequentially, and its implementation in vivo is limited. In addition, parameters such as shear stress on cells, the material’s viscosity, and different droplet sizes can dramatically affect the final result34. Magnetic35,36 manipulations require introducing non-organic material or other labeling materials that may affect typical cell functioning37,38. Optical manipulations are used mainly for single-cell trapping and require high-intensity energy levels. Finally, surface modifications and micromolding are inflexible, requiring a pre-fabrication step.

Acoustic manipulation is an emerging remote, non-invasive, and bio-compatible method39,40,41. In its simplest form, standing acoustic waves are generated when two waves with the same frequency travel in opposite directions. Suspended particles experience hydrodynamic forces, which drive them to specific locations. Particles denser and less compressible than the surrounding medium (thus having what is termed a positive acoustic contrast factor)42 will be directed towards the nodal areas of the standing acoustic wave. This method was used to form various microstructures43 and to study particle-particle interactions and coalescence phenomena44. Since cells usually have a positive acoustic contrast factor in their native environment45, acoustic manipulation could be applied on cells without any labeling or surface modifications that may harm the cells. Furthermore, the power density (several orders of magnitude lower than the optical counterparts) and the frequency range used is considered safe and the cells maintain their viability46. Finally, since this method can be scaled up and performed inside closed systems, one can envision applying this concept in vivo.

In the last two decades, researchers have examined the ability of acoustic standing waves to control the spatial distribution of different cells for various applications in a 2D and 3D manner46,47,48,49,50. Despite the advantages of using standing acoustic waves for arranging elements, only a few studies have been conducted using this method for organizing neuronal or neuron-like cells51,52,53,54. Bouyer and co-authors organized multi-layered 3D constructs of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) derived from human embryonic stem cells within a fibrin hydrogel. Recently, Cheng et al. have demonstrated a similar patterning method for PC12 neuron-like cells, where they organized the cells within gelatin-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid (Gtn-HPA) hydrogel, using a glass reflector, to achieve 3D shaping54. Gesellchen et al. organized acoustically Schwann cells as a template for neurons. Brugger and colleagues have demonstrated long-term manipulation for small-scale patterning (230 cells/mm2). They applied the acoustic stimulation for up to 11 hr continuously, affecting both the location and growth53. During network formation, neurons transmit information over long distances via their axonal trees. Neuronal processes are elongated in response to orchestrated chemical and physical signals from their environment55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64. Therefore, network patterning and neuronal clustering influence their interconnections, activity, and growth patterns65,66,67.

Here we used acoustic waves for large-scale neuronal patterning, and for examining the effect on neurite outgrowth directionality. Two populations of cells were examined: the neuron-like PC12 cells and primary Dorsal Root Ganglia (DRG) neurons. PC12 cells are a commonly used, cost effective neuronal model. Using these cells as a model system allowed us to calibrate and find the ideal parameters for the acoustic manipulation. DRG neurons are primary neurons, especially most relevant to neuronal regeneration platform development and demonstrate extensive axonal growth. We applied two types of standing waves: surface acoustic waves (SAWs) and bulk acoustic waves (BAWs), demonstrating two different types of cell patterning. Acoustic pressure fields generated by SAWs arranged the cells in string shape as parallel lines while the acoustic pressure fields generated by BAWs arranged the cells in concentric patterns, both with a controllable number of embedded cells per cluster. Moreover, we could affect the neuronal growth by manipulating the cell arrangement. We have shown that the assembled lines of cells spontaneously grew their branches out of their clusters towards adjacent clusters after several days of growth. This large-scale neuronal patterning and growth manipulation via acoustic waves, which can be applied remotely, opens up new possibilities for complex cell arrangement with great potential for neuroengineering and neurotherapeutic applications post trauma.

Results and Discussion

Cell arrangement using standing SAWs

To pattern neuronal cells with SAWs, we loaded PC12 cells into a micro-channel (shown in Supplementary Fig. S1) that was placed on top of a pair of interdigital transducers (IDTs), as described in the Experimental section. Standing SAWs formed because of the interference pattern produced by the two identical acoustic waves generated by the two IDTs traveling in opposite directions. The acoustic field generated by the standing SAWs acts to move cells towards defined locations, namely, the pressure nodes, thus forming parallel lines of cells with a distance of half the wavelength of the acoustic wave between adjacent lines44 (Supplementary Video SV1 in the Supporting Information). Figure 1A illustrates the experimental process: the setup before cell loading (left panel), after cell loading (middle panel), and after applying the AC signal that generates the SAWs (right panel). Figure 1B presents the patterned cells that were organized as parallel lines after applying a 19.4 MHz radio-frequency signal. We studied how combining different channel heights (ranging from 100 µm to 500 µm) with different applied voltage intensities (ranging from 3 Vpp to 20 Vpp) affects the resulting patterned lines. It can be seen that different channel heights led to different cluster widths. Applying identical voltage intensities (20 Vpp) resulted in much thinner clusters (a width of 1–2 cells) for the 100 µm-high channels compared with the 200 µm-high channels (width of ~10 cells). For 300 µm–500 µm channels, acoustic streaming was generated routinely throughout the entire examined voltage range. This streaming resulted in disassembly of the cells, which started to reassemble as lines.

Figure 1
figure 1

(A) Schematic overview of the standing SAW system. Standing SAWs were generated by applying voltage on a series of interdigital transducers (IDTs) that were patterned on a piezoelectric substrate (lithium niobate). The cells are loaded into a 100–200 µm high micro-channel built on the bottom of a glass petri dish. Following the standing SAW activation, the cells align in parallel lines along the pressure nodes. (B) Microscope images of patterned cells in channels at different heights, demonstrating the ability to control the thickness of the generated lines. Scale bar = 50 µm. (C) Dynamics of the formation of lines for a 200 µm high micro-channel at 10 Vpp. Microscopic images and spatial distribution analysis of cells, demonstrating the fast assembly process. Scale bar = 100 µm. The formation dynamics of one line (yellow dotted rectangle) can be seen in the inset on the right. Scale bar = 60 µm.

We found that the applied voltage intensity modulates the line formation dynamics. For the 100 µm and 200 µm height channels, arrangement started slowly at 10 Vpp and became faster as voltage values increased. An example of the assembly procedure’s dynamics for a 200 µm height channel and an intensity of 10 Vpp is shown in Fig. 1C (and Supplementary Video SV1 in the Supporting Information). The spatial distribution of the cells before applying the standing SAWs is homogeneous (Fig. 1C left panel). Once the standing SAWs are applied, the cells respond immediately and move towards the acoustic nodes, thus forming parallel lines (Fig. 1C middle panel). After 25 s the cells cluster as long and dense lines (Fig. 1C right panel and enlarged inset). The increase in the number of cells in the observed area is due to acoustic streaming that directs cells from the surrounding area towards the acoustic nodes.

The standing SAW device shown above is based on a flow of cells through a micro channel open on both sides. This open channel approach is subjected to streaming after turning off the acoustic waves, thus limiting the ability of the cells to stably adhere to the bottom surface. We have found that cells that adhered to the surface, after turning off the SAWs, started to grow, and assumed a normal growth pattern with multiple branches (Supplementary Fig. S2). This observation demonstrates that applying standing SAWs do not compromise the cells’ viability, as was also previously shown for other cell types49,53,68.

Large-scale cell arrangement using standing BAWs

SAW devices are fabricated in-house and can be tailor made for specific cell spacing. SAWs arrangement can reach resolutions of even a few microns, and therefore this method is preferred when there is a need for high-resolution cell patterning. However, these devices require several steps of lithographic processing which makes them costly in terms of time and labor. They are applicable for arrangement of only thin layers of cells. Additionally, they are rather delicate and prone to scratching of the IDTs and breaking of the piezoelectric substrate.

A second acoustic approach we have developed for organizing neuronal cells is based on bulk acoustic waves (BAWs) that allow large scale arrangements in a 3D environment. BAW devices are commercially available, more robust, less expensive, and easier to use compared to SAW devices. In this scheme we used a lead-zirconate-titanate (PZT) piezoelectric radial transducer (22 mm inner diameter) that also served as a reservoir for cells placed at the center of a standard polystyrene petri dish (Fig. 2). To identify the resonance frequency of the transducer, we assembled 2 µm polystyrene (PS) beads in water. We found that applying a frequency of 1.14 MHz led to a rapid formation of well-defined concentric circles of beads (Fig. 2C) with a spacing of about half the applied wavelength following the work of Raeymaekers et al.69. We examined the effect of different voltage intensities on the widths of the formed circles as a function of time (Supplementary Fig. S3). We found considerable differences between the examined intensity values for activation times less than 5 min (higher intensities led to thinner rings). Since the total number of particles is constant in all cases, thinner rings are associated with denser areas. For activation times longer than 5 min, there was no substantial difference in circle width for various intensities. We also noticed that using 10 Vpp gave the maximal dynamic range (see Supplementary Fig. S3) which allows maximum control over density.

Figure 2
figure 2

(A) Schematic overview of the standing BAW system generated by a radial piezoelectric transducer. Following cell arrangement and attachment to the surface, the piezoelectric transducer was detached, and cells were left to grow branches for several days in an incubator. (B) Image of the piezoelectric resonator on a petri dish stabilized with agarose gel used in the experimental setup. (C) Image of the directed assembly of particles with 1.14 MHz at 10 Vpp. (D) Width (of the fourth ring from the center) as a function of time for various applied voltages using PC12 cells (1 × 106 cells/ml). Each data point represents an average of six individual measurements. (E) Dynamics of BAWs cells arrangement at an intensity of 10 Vpp. Microscopic images along time demonstrating the assembly process. Scale bar = 200 µm.

Following the 2 µm polystyrene (PS) beads analysis, we quantitatively analyzed the relation between different voltage intensities (ranging from 5 Vpp to 20 Vpp) to cell arrangement (Fig. 2D). It can be seen that different intensities influenced the onset of the circle formation, with higher voltage intensities leading to faster cell clustering. We note that after nearly 120 sec all cell clusters reached their final width. Figure 2E demonstrates the assembly process dynamics for a 10 Vpp intensity.

Based on the quantitatively analysis of the PS beads and the PC12 cells, we have continued our experiments with an intensity of 10 Vpp. To organize cells, the radial resonator was loaded with PC12 cells, as described schematically in Fig. 2, followed by activation of BAWs (1.14 MHz, 10 Vpp).

To examine the effect of cell density on circle formation, several concentrations of PC12 cells were loaded into the acoustic reservoir and were subjected to BAWs. The concentrations examined were 1 × 105, 2.5 × 105, and 1 × 106 cells/ml. The cells were subjected to the acoustic field for 10 min (Fig. 3). Clear concentric circles were always observed. As expected, it can be seen that the width of the rings increase with higher cell concentration.

Figure 3
figure 3

Bright-field microscopic images of acoustically assembled PC12 cells with BAWs at different concentrations: (A) 100 K cells/ml, (B) 250 K cells/ml, and (C) 1 M cells/ml. The images demonstrate that the width of the rings increases with higher cell concentration. Scale bar = 200 µm.

To conclude, the acoustic field generated by the piezoelectric resonator acts by moving cells towards defined locations (nodal areas), thus forming concentric circles. We found that the optimal conditions for the PS beads (2 µm) were also effective for organizing PC12 cells (10–12 µm)70, although the size varied. This is in accordance with previous studies that have demonstrated acoustic manipulations of different sizes of beads (from 8 µm to 202 µm) followed by manipulation of cells52. The distance between adjacent assemblies was always identical for a given frequency. Our formed concentric patterns resemble natural organization in the nervous system. Specifically, it may mimic brain areas such as the pyramidal layers in CA1 to CA3 in the hippocampus71,72 or the Purkinje layer in the cerebral cortex73. In the brain, neuronal densities vary across and within cortical areas74,75,76, presumably due to different information-processing demands. Therefore, our findings regarding the ability to control cells density by using different cell concentrations and voltage intensities may allow fitting the assembled pattern to the physical properties of the desired tissue. In future applications this method can be expanded, For example, by using holographic acoustic tweezers77, 3D complex brain-like organoids can be formed78,79.

Directed branches’ outgrowth on top of a 3D collagen hydrogel following acoustic manipulation

To study the effect of BAWs on cell growth, two model systems were studied: differentiated PC12 cells and primary dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. We kept the BAWs active for 30 min to allow the cells to settle on top of the gel substrate. Then, the tube was removed and the cells were kept up to a week in the incubator.

After demonstrating successful acoustic arrangement of the cells, we examined how this arrangement affects neuronal branching tree growth. We used the BAW setup to arrange primary DRG neurons on top of a solidified 3D collagen hydrogel scaffold (Fig. 4A). The collagen gel solution was poured into the piezoelectric reservoir and allowed to solidify (>45 min) prior to the acoustic manipulation. Then, after the gel solidified, the DRG neurons in the medium were added to the piezoelectric radial resonator and the BAWs were applied. The acoustic waves remained active for 30 min to maintain the cell arrangement until the cells descended onto the solidified gel due to gravitation (Fig. 4B). To trace neuronal growth, neurons were immunostained for neurofilaments (NF) and imaged by confocal microscopy. Figure 4C shows neurite outgrowth of DRG neurons two days after plating. It can be seen that neurons grew their neurites in a relatively directed manner towards neighboring clusters. Z-stack images of the neurons revealed that while growing towards neighboring clusters the branches infiltrated into the gel matrix (Supplementary Video SV2). To evaluate the neurite outgrowth directionality, we arranged and grew differentiated neuron-like PC12 cells on the gel for six days. To image the complete rings with high resolution that would later allow measuring the directionality of the neuronal growth, we imaged small areas at high resolution and then stitched them together (Supplementary Fig. S6). Figure 4D shows extensive neurite outgrowth similar to our previous findings for DRG neurons.

Figure 4
figure 4

Directed neurite outgrowth of cells on top of a 3D collagen hydrogel. (A) Image of the 3D collagen hydrogel after acoustic manipulation of cells, after removing the piezoelectric radial resonator. (B) Bright-field microscopic image of DRG neuron arrangement with BAWs on top of the 3D collagen hydrogel. Scale bar = 500 µm. (C) Confocal microscopic image demonstrating directed neuronal growth of DRG neurons after two days. (D) Fluorescence microscopic images of two adjacent patterned rings from PC12 cells, six days after the BAWs arrangement. Insets I & II show that cells exhibit massive directed growth from one patterned ring to the other. Scale bar = 300 µm.

To quantify the directionality of the branches, we analyzed their orientation at various regions along the concentric rings. We aligned all measured stripes prior to the directionality analysis. Figure 5A shows six independent segments of such an alignment. Figure 5B shows the stages of the alignment and tracing processes that include the following: (1) the examined area prior to image processing, (2) an automated selection of body cells (yellow), (3) automated ellipse fitting (yellow), (4) a rotated image by aligning the ellipse to a predetermined orientation, (5) neurite tracing (pink) using the semi-automated Simple Neurite Tracer plugin, (6) an image of only labeled neurites.

Figure 5
figure 5

Branches extraction from cell segments created by BAWs for directionality analysis (A) Fluorescence micrographs of six different cell segments after alignment. (B) Stages of the alignment and tracing processes: (1) the area prior to image processing, (2) an automated selection of body cells (yellow), (3) automated ellipse fitting (yellow), (4) a rotated image by aligning the ellipse to a predetermined orientation, (5) neurite tracing (pink) by using the semi-automated Simple Neurite Tracer plugin, (6) an image of only-labeled neurites.

The processed images revealed that the patterned cells exhibit substantial directed outgrowth. Each processed image was then analyzed for directionality. The directionality histograms (Fig. 6) show a single dominant peak for 5 of the 6 analyzed segments. A peak in the histogram represents a preferred orientation and its position describe the angle of the directionality in respect to the aligned stripe, where 0° is east (perpendicular) and the angles are counterclockwise. It can be seen that the preferred branches outgrowth direction may be different from stripe to stripe. This might be due to the different spatial location of each stripe in the circle and the fact that each stripe may receive different cues from other nearby cell clusters. Since the directionality of neuronal outgrowth is strongly affected by the ability of the growth cone at the tip of the growing process to measure chemical cues80,81,82, our observation suggests that the directionality is governed by chemical signals released by neighboring clusters. Physical environmental cues60,61,64 such as the orientation of fibers in the gel, can also affect neuronal outgrowth62,63. However, to prevent any directionality of the gel fibers, which may affect the neuronal growth, we applied the BAWs only after the gel had been solidified and we have not found any preferred orientation. Applying the BAWs during the gelation process has led to a swirling vortex-like pattern along the hydrogel fibers (Supplementary Fig. S5) and was therefore avoided.

Figure 6
figure 6

Angular orientation histograms of the BAWs patterned cell segments showing the preferred neurite orientations for five of the six segments.

The ability to pattern neurons on hydrogel matrices at large scales and control the direction of neural outgrowth, without the need for preliminary physical or chemical modifications, points out the potential use of this method to reconstruct specific structures for various uses ranging from basic research to neuronal tissue engineering applications.

Conclusion

We have used acoustic waves to organize neurons into clusters forming networks without the need for pre-patterned physical or chemical cues. We used two in vitro cellular models: (1) PC12 cells, differentiated and non-differentiated, and (2) primary DRG neurons exhibiting high cell viability following the manipulation. By applying two types of acoustic waves, we could organize line clusters and concentric clusters in a highly controlled manner. By changing the acoustic application time, voltage intensity, cell density, and chip structure, we could modify the cluster patterns. Moreover, the cell body’s organization also affected the outgrowth directionality, showing a tendency to elaborate branches to adjacent clusters. In addition to the resulting cell patterns, the two standing SAW and BAW devices are different in their application method and ease of use. Thus, the device of choice should be based on one’s needs and the required scale of organization. For example, if one has to precisely place individual cells on electrical components for brain-machine interface studies then using SAW devices would be the preferred choice. On the other hand, rapidly building artificial constructs of cells with hydrogel that mimic specific brain areas such as the pyramidal layers of CA1 and CA3 in the hippocampus, Purkinje layer in the cerebral cortex, or to create improved tissue engineered grafts to treat peripheral nerve injuries, would require usage of BAW devices. Owing to the remote manner of its acoustic wave application, this method can be potentially used to manipulate cells also in vivo, which opens up new possibilities for nervous system therapeutics.

Methods

Standing SAW device fabrication and operation

A 128° Y-rotated, X-propagating, single-crystal lithium niobate 3-inch wafer was used as substrate for the standing SAW device. Pairs of interdigital transducers (IDTs) opposite to each other were fabricated on the surface of the LiNbO383,84 using standard soft photolithography procedures (see Supplementary Fig. S1). In brief, a layer of photoresist (thickness 1.4 µm, AZ 5214 E, MicroChem) was spin-coated, irradiated by a UV light source through a chrome mask, and subsequently developed with a photoresist developer (AZ 351B, MicroChem). Next, 5 nm chromium (adhesion layer), followed by 100 nm of gold, was evaporated by an electron beam evaporator (Bestec), and a lift-off process was used to remove the photoresist. The center-to-center distance between the electrodes of the IDTs was 103 μm. The LiNbO3 wafer was then cut into separate devices that were attached to electric boards. Wires were soldered from the IDTs to BNC connectors. A radio-frequency signal was generated by an arbitrary function generator (Siglent SDG 5162). The selected frequency was found by applying a signal to one IDT while the other was connected to an oscilloscope (SDS1152CML, Siglent). The maximum electrical intensity (indicating the maximal acoustic field) was found to be at 19.4 MHz.

SAW device and micro-channel integration

Preparing a micro-channel (illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S1) involved using a UV curable biocompatible adhesive (NOA 60, Norland Optical Adhesives) to attach two glass spacers (~100 µm thick) in parallel, to the surface of a glass petri dish (0.17 mm glass thickness, FluoroDish, World Precision Instruments, FL, USA). A glass cover slip (~100 µm) was then adhered on top of the spacers, thus forming a micro-channel. Various micro-channel heights (100–500 µm) were achieved by stacking several spacers. Micro-channels were sterilized by 70% ethanol rinsing followed by 45 min UV light sterilization in a laminar flow hood. The micro-channels were then coated with a type-I collagen to facilitate cell attachment. The micro-channels were placed on top of the standing SAW device with silicon oil (IMMOIL-F30CC, Olympus) used for acoustic coupling. While the SAW devices are reusable, in order to prevent contamination the glass micro-channels are disposable and each micro-channel was used only once.

Standing BAW preparation and operation

A type-II (lead zirconate titanate, PZT) acoustic radial resonator (inner diameter 22 mm, outer diameter 26 mm, length 20 mm) with a center resonance frequency of 1.1 ± 0.1 MHz was purchased from APC International. To prevent toxicity from the metallic coating of the resonator, it was dip-coated in a Sylgard TM184 silicon elastomer base and curing agent (Dow Corning) mixed at a 10:1 weight ratio. Curing was performed at 80 °C for two hours. The coating (polydimethylsiloxane, PDMS) thickness was found to be ~70 µm. For sterilization, the coated resonator was rinsed with 70% ethanol and placed in a laminar flow hood with UV light for additional 45 min. BAWs experiments conducted inside a sterile CO2 incubator. PC12 cells were plated in the resonator and kept in the incubator for 7 days for viability evaluation (Fig. S4). The resonator was driven by a Siglent SDG 5162 function generator. To fixate the resonator, the device was surrounded by an agarose gel (5%, HydraGene) that was poured around it. The BAW devices are reusable and were sterilized between usages.

Collagen gel preparation

The following mixture was prepared under sterile conditions in a laminar flow hood. A microfuge tube is held on ice during the entire procedure to prevent initiation of gelation. A sterile Collagen (type-I rat tail extract, in 0.02 M acetic acid, an initial concentration of 3.35–4 mg/mL, BD-Bioscience, Bedford, MA, USA) was added to the cold microfuge tube and diluted by addition of 10X DMEM (Sigma Aldrich Co, Stienhiem, Germany) and 7.5% sodium carbonate (both filter sterilized). Phenol red in the DMEM indicates the physiological pH. The collagen concentration is then brought to a final concentration of 3 mg/mL according to the initial collagen batch and the 10X DMEM is then brought to a final concentration of 1X. Gentle pipetting is initiated after adding each material, making sure not to introduce bubbles into the tube. Next, 1 ml from the final gel solution is poured into the piezoelectric tube and is left to solidify for 45 min before initiating the acoustic manipulation.

Mouse dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neuronal culture

DRG neurons were isolated from 7-week-old C57bl mice. The procedure was conducted in accordance with animal care and protection regulations. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Bar Ilan Ethics Committee (approval number: 24042015). DRGs were dissected from three mice. Surrounding connective tissues were carefully removed and ganglia were dissociated for 20 min at 37 °C with 1000 U of papain, followed by 20 min in 10 mg/mL collagenase solution, and 12 mg/mL dispase-II at 37 °C. Next, the ganglia were triturated in HBSS, 10 mM Glucose, and 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.35) by repeated passage through a constricted Pasteur pipette. Neurons were recovered through 20% percoll in L-15 medium. Neurons were counted and 5 × 105 cells were suspended in 1 ml of F-12 antibiotic-free medium, supplemented with 10% FBS, and were loaded on top of the solidified collagen gel for BAW manipulation. Neuronal cultures were developed for two days, and then cultures were fixed and stained.

PC12 neuron-like cell culture

PC12 cells were grown in suspension in a RPMI medium supplemented with 10% horse serum (HS), 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and 0.2% amphotericin, in a humidified incubator at 37 °C containing 5% CO2. For cell patterning, the cells were suspended in serum-reduced media (1% HS). For the standing SAWs manipulation, up to 30 µl of cell-containing medium (1 × 104 to 12 × 104 cells/100 µl) were loaded into the channel that was built on top of a collagen type l-coated glass-bottomed petri dish. For the BAWs manipulation, 1 ml of cell-containing medium (1 × 105 to 1 × 106 cells/ml) was loaded on top of the solid collagen gel. To induce PC12 differentiation, 24 hr after cell patterning Murine β-NGF (Peprotech, Israel) was added to the medium at a final concentration of 50 ng/mL. Every two days, fresh medium containing Murine β-NGF was added to the cells.

Immunofluorescence staining

The medium was removed from the in-vitro-cultured collagen gels and each gel culture was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature (RT). Next, the gel cultures were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS (PBT) for 10 min. Then, cells were incubated in a blocking solution (containing 1% BSA and 1% NGS in 0.2% PBT) for 45 min at RT. Next, DRG neurons were incubated with mouse anti-neurofilament H (NF-H) for 1.5 hr at RT, and PC12 cells were incubated with a rabbit antibody to α-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) for 1.5 hr at RT. The cultures were rinsed 3 times with PBS and incubated for 45 min at RT with Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated Donkey anti-mouse IgG H&L for DRG neurons, or with Cy2-conjugated AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Rabbit secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) for PC12 cells. Following incubation, the cultures were rinsed with PBS. Fluorescence images were acquired by using either a Leica SP8 scanning confocal microscope, driven by LasX software, or Leica DMI8 wide-field microscope. Images from the wide-field microscope were tiled and stitched using the LasX acquisition software.

Analysis

Neurite directionality was analyzed using Fiji - ImageJ software. First, images containing independent stripes for analysis were randomly selected from different rings. Each image captures an area of 1.5 × 1.5 cm, and contained only one continuous defined stripe. To semi-automatically select the patterned cell bodies, we used the ‘Versatile Wand Tool’ plugin. Following selection, we automatically fit ellipses. The major axes of the ellipses were then rotated to the same orientation. Next, by using the ‘Simple Neurite Tracer’ plugin, we semi-automatically traced all the neurites that projected from the cell bodies. Then, we used a thresholding technique to separate the labeled neurites from the rest of the image. For neurite directionality analysis, we used the ‘Directionality’ plugin. Angles are reported in their common mathematical way. 0° is the east direction and the orientation is counterclockwise.

References

  1. 1.

    Conturo, T. E. et al. Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 10422–10427 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zingg, B. et al. Neural networks of the mouse neocortex. Cell 156, 1096–1111 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rexed, B. A cytoarchitectonic atlas of the spinal coed in the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 100, 297–379 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Watson, C., Sengul, G., Tanaka, I., Rusznak, Z. & Tokuno, H. The spinal cord of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Neurosci. Res. 93, 164–175 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hildebrand, G. D. & Fielder, A. R. Anatomy and physiology of the retina. In Pediatric Retina 39–65, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12041-1_2 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Wang, J. et al. Anatomy and spatial organization of Müller glia in mouse retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 525, 1759–1777 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Merrill, D. A., Roberts, J. A. & Tuszynski, M. H. Conservation of neuron number and size in entorhinal cortex layers II, III, and V/VI of aged primates. J. Comp. Neurol. 422, 396–401 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Livet, J. et al. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature 450, 56–62 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Weissman, T. A., Sanes, J. R., Lichtman, J. W. & Livet, J. Generating and imaging multicolor Brainbow mice. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 6, 763–769 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ruigrok, T. J. H., Sillitoe, R. V. & Voogd, J. Cerebellum and Cerebellar Connections. In The Rat Nervous System: Fourth Edition 133–205, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374245-2.00009-7 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Ayali, A. et al. Contextual regularity and complexity of neuronal activity: From stand-alone cultures to task-performing animals. Complexity 9, 25–32 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sigman, M., Jobert, A., LeBihan, D. & Dehaene, S. Parsing a sequence of brain activations at psychological times using fMRI. Neuroimage 35, 655–668 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kato-Negishi, M., Tsuda, Y., Onoe, H. & Takeuchi, S. A neurospheroid network-stamping method for neural transplantation to the brain. Biomaterials 31, 8939–8945 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Odawara, A., Gotoh, M. & Suzuki, I. A three-dimensional neuronal culture technique that controls the direction of neurite elongation and the position of soma to mimic the layered structure of the brain. RSC Adv. 3, 23620–23630 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nagamine, K. et al. Portable Micropatterns of Neuronal Cells Supported by Thin Hydrogel Films. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 1, 329–334 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Takahashi, H., Itoga, K., Shimizu, T., Yamato, M. & Okano, T. Human Neural Tissue Construct Fabrication Based on Scaffold-Free Tissue Engineering. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5, 1931–1938 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sorkin, R. et al. Compact self-wiring in cultured neural networks. J. Neural Eng. 3, 95–101 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Marconi, E. et al. Emergent functional properties of neuronal networks with controlled topology. PLoS One 7 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Yoshida, S., Kato-Negishi, M. & Takeuchi, S. Assembly and connection of micropatterned single neurons for neuronal network formation. Micromachines 9 (2018).

  20. 20.

    Suzuki, I. K. & Vanderhaeghen, P. Is this a brain which I see before me? Modeling human neural development with pluripotent stem cells. Development 142, 3138–3150 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Frimat, J. P. et al. The network formation assay: A spatially standardized neurite outgrowth analytical display for neurotoxicity screening. Lab Chip 10, 701–709 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hardelauf, H. et al. High fidelity neuronal networks formed by plasma masking with a bilayer membrane: Analysis of neurodegenerative and neuroprotective processes. Lab Chip 11, 2763–2771 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tang-Schomer, M. D. et al. Bioengineered functional brain-like cortical tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 13811–13816 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Qian, X. et al. Brain-Region-Specific Organoids Using Mini-bioreactors for Modeling ZIKV Exposure. Cell 165, 1238–1254 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ku, S. H., Lee, J. S. & Park, C. B. Spatial control of cell adhesion and patterning through mussel-inspired surface modification by polydopamine. Langmuir 26, 15104–15108 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hou, J. et al. Guided protein/cell patterning on superhydrophilic polymer brushes functionalized with mussel-inspired polydopamine coatings. Chem. Commun. 53, 6708–6711 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wüst, S., Müller, R. & Hofmann, S. Controlled Positioning of Cells in Biomaterials—Approaches Towards 3D Tissue Printing. J. Funct. Biomater. 2, 119–154 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Xu, T. et al. Complex heterogeneous tissue constructs containing multiple cell types prepared by inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials 34, 130–139 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yeh, J. et al. Micromolding of shape-controlled, harvestable cell-laden hydrogels. Biomaterials 27, 5391–5398 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kang, G., Lee, J. H., Lee, C. S. & Nam, Y. Agarose microwell based neuronal micro-circuit arrays on microelectrode arrays for high throughput drug testing. Lab Chip 9, 3236–3242 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J. M. & Yamane, T. Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams. Nature 330, 769–771 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Alon, N. et al. Magnetic micro-device for manipulating PC12 cell migration and organization. Lab Chip 15, 2030–2036 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Liu, Y. et al. Time Sequential Single-Cell Patterning with High Efficiency and High Density. Sensors (Basel). 18, 1–12 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bishop, E. S. et al. 3-D bioprinting technologies in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Current and future trends. Genes and Diseases 4, 185–195 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Alon, N. et al. Magnetic micro-device for manipulating neuronal migration and growth. Lab Chip 15, 2030–2036 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Marcus, M. et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles for neuronal cell applications: uptake study and magnetic manipulations. J. Nanobiotechnology 14, 37 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ayano, S., Wakamoto, Y., Yamashita, S. & Yasuda, K. Quantitative measurement of damage caused by 1064-nm wavelength optical trapping of Escherichia coli cells using on-chip single cell cultivation system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 350, 678–684 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Fadeel, B. & Garcia-Bennett, A. E. Better safe than sorry: Understanding the toxicological properties of inorganic nanoparticles manufactured for biomedical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 62, 362–374 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Doinikov, A. A. Acoustic Radiation Pressure on a Compressible Sphere in a Viscous Fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 267, 1–22 (1994).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Genchi, G. G. et al. P(VDF-TrFE)/BaTiO3 Nanoparticle Composite Films Mediate Piezoelectric Stimulation and Promote Differentiation of SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater., https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600245 (2016).

  41. 41.

    Hoop, M. et al. Ultrasound-mediated piezoelectric differentiation of neuron-like PC12 cells on PVDF membranes. Sci. Rep., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03992-3 (2017).

  42. 42.

    Yosioka, K. & Kawasima, Y. Acoustic radiation pressure on a compressible sphere. Acta Acust. united with Acust. 5(3), 167–173 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Piperno, S., Sazan, H. & Shpaisman, H. Simultaneous polymerization and patterning: A one step acoustic directed assembly method. Polymer (Guildf). 173, 20–26 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ding, X. et al. Surface acoustic wave microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 13, 3626–3649 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Karthick, S., Pradeep, P. N., Kanchana, P. & Sen, A. K. Acoustic impedance-based size-independent isolation of circulating tumour cells from blood using acoustophoresis. Lab Chip 18, 3802–3813 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Guo, F. et al. Three-dimensional manipulation of single cells using surface acoustic waves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 1522–1527 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lata, J. P. et al. Surface Acoustic Waves Grant Superior Spatial Control of Cells Embedded in Hydrogel Fibers. Adv. Mater. 28, 8632–8638 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ding, X. et al. On-chip manipulation of single microparticles, cells, and organisms using surface acoustic waves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 11105–11109 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Nama, N. et al. Controlling cell–cell interactions using surface acoustic waves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 43–48 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ren, L. et al. A high-throughput standing surface acoustic wave (SSAW)- based cell sorter. Lab Chip 15, 3870–3879 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gesellchen, F., Bernassau, A. L., Déjardin, T., Cumming, D. R. S. & Riehle, M. O. Cell patterning with a heptagon acoustic tweezer-application in neurite guidance. Lab Chip 14, 2266–2275 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bouyer, C. et al. A Bio-Acoustic Levitational (BAL) Assembly Method for Engineering of Multilayered, 3D Brain-Like Constructs, Using Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Neuro-Progenitors. Adv. Mater. 28, 161–167 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Brugger, M. S. et al. Orchestrating cells on a chip: Employing surface acoustic waves towards the formation of neural networks. Phys. Rev. E 98 (2018).

  54. 54.

    Cheng, K. W. et al. Fast three-dimensional micropatterning of PC12 cells in rapidly crosslinked hydrogel scaffolds using ultrasonic standing waves. Biofabrication, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab4cca (2019).

  55. 55.

    Miller, C., Jeftinija, S. & Mallapragada, S. Synergistic effects of physical and chemical guidance cues on neurite alignment and outgrowth on biodegradable polymer substrates. Tissue Eng. 8, 367–378 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Rosoff, W. J. et al. A new chemotaxis assay shows the extreme sensitivity of axons to molecular gradients. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 678–682 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Li, G. N., Liu, J. & Hoffman-Kim, D. Multi-molecular gradients of permissive and inhibitory cues direct neurite outgrowth. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 36, 889–904 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lee, W., Frank, C. W. & Park, J. Directed axonal outgrowth using a propagating gradient of IGF-1. Adv. Mater. 26, 4936–4940 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Giger, R. J., Hollis, E. R. & Tuszynski, M. H. Guidance molecules in axon regeneration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a001867 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Baranes, K., Kollmar, D., Chejanovsky, N., Sharoni, A. & Shefi, O. Interactions of neurons with topographic nano cues affect branching morphology mimicking neuron-neuron interactions. J. Mol. Histol. 43, 437–447 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Baranes, K., Chejanovsky, N., Alon, N., Sharoni, A. & Shefi, O. Topographic cues of nano-scale height direct neuronal growth pattern. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109, 1791–7 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Chaubaroux, C. et al. Cell Alignment Driven by Mechanically Induced Collagen Fiber Alignment in Collagen/Alginate Coatings. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 21, 881–888 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Antman-Passig, M. & Shefi, O. Remote Magnetic Orientation of 3D Collagen Hydrogels for Directed Neuronal Regeneration. Nano Lett. 16, 2567–2573 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Marcus, M. et al. Interactions of Neurons with Physical Environments. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6 (2017).

  65. 65.

    Ivenshitz, M. & Segal, M. Neuronal Density Determines Network Connectivity and Spontaneous Activity in Cultured Hippocampus. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 1052–1060 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Li, W. et al. NeuroArray: A universal interface for patterning and interrogating neural circuitry with single cell resolution. Sci. Rep. 4 (2014).

  67. 67.

    Gladkov, A. et al. Design of Cultured Neuron Networks in vitro with Predefined Connectivity Using Asymmetric Microfluidic Channels. Sci. Rep. 7 (2017).

  68. 68.

    Naseer, S. M. et al. Surface acoustic waves induced micropatterning of cells in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biofabrication 9 (2017).

  69. 69.

    Raeymaekers, B., Pantea, C. & Sinha, D. N. Manipulation of diamond nanoparticles using bulk acoustic waves. J. Appl. Phys. 109 (2011).

  70. 70.

    Sagi, Y., Basser, P. & Assaf, Y. Estimation of Cell Size Using the Composite Hindered and Restricted Model of Diffusion. Proc. 17th Sci. Meet. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. Honolulu, 1390 (2009).

  71. 71.

    Ponnio, T. & Conneely, O. M. nor-1 Regulates Hippocampal Axon Guidance, Pyramidal Cell Survival, and Seizure Susceptibility. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 9070–9078 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Thompson, C. L. et al. Genomic Anatomy of the Hippocampus. Neuron 60, 1010–1021 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Girard, M. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and Purkinje cell loss in autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 1661–1666 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Collins, C. E., Airey, D. C., Young, N. A., Leitch, D. B. & Kaas, J. H. Neuron densities vary across and within cortical areas in primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 15927–15932 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Collins, C. E. Variability in neuron densities across the cortical sheet in primates. In Brain, Behavior and Evolution 78, 37–50 (2011).

  76. 76.

    Young, N. A., Collins, C. E. & Kaas, J. H. Cell and neuron densities in the primary motor cortex of primates. Front. Neural Circuits 7 (2013).

  77. 77.

    Sinclair, G. et al. Assembly of 3-dimensional structures using programmable holographic optical tweezers. Opt. Express 12, 5475 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Kirkham, G. R. et al. Precision assembly of complex cellular microenvironments using holographic optical tweezers. Sci. Rep. 5 (2015).

  79. 79.

    Marzo, A. & Drinkwater, B. W. Holographic acoustic tweezers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 84–89 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Huber, A. B., Kolodkin, A. L., Ginty, D. D. & Cloutier, J.-F. Signaling at the Growth Cone: Ligand-Receptor Complexes and the Control of Axon Growth and Guidance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 26, 509–563 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    von Philipsborn, A. C. Growth cone navigation in substrate-bound ephrin gradients. Development 133, 2487–2495 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Wen, Z. & Zheng, J. Q. Directional guidance of nerve growth cones. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16, 52–58 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Tanaka, S., Park, K. & Esashi, M. Lithium-niobate-based surface acoustic wave oscillator directly integrated with CMOS sustaining amplifier. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 59, 1800–1805 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Sazan, H., Piperno, S., Layani, M., Magdassi, S. & Shpaisman, H. Directed assembly of nanoparticles into continuous microstructures by standing surface acoustic waves. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 536, 701–709 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

H. Shpaisman would like to acknowledge the partial support of the Israel Science foundation (ISF) through grant #952/19.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.C. and H.Saz. conceived and designed the study, performed the surface acoustic wave and bulk acoustic wave experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. A.K. calibrated the bulk acoustic wave apparatus and assisted in performing the bulk acoustic wave experiments. H.Sch. performed the DRG neurons cell cultures. S.P. assisted in developing the surface acoustic wave apparatus. H.Shp. and O.S. mentored the study, interpreted the results, reviewed, and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hagay Shpaisman or Orit Shefi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, S., Sazan, H., Kenigsberg, A. et al. Large-scale acoustic-driven neuronal patterning and directed outgrowth. Sci Rep 10, 4932 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60748-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60748-2

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing