Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An endophyte from salt-adapted Pokkali rice confers salt-tolerance to a salt-sensitive rice variety and targets a unique pattern of genes in its new host

Abstract

Endophytes, both of bacterial and fungal origin, are ubiquitously present in all plants. While their origin and evolution are enigmatic, there is burgeoning literature on their role in promoting growth and stress responses in their hosts. We demonstrate that a salt-tolerant endophyte isolated from salt-adapted Pokkali rice, a Fusarium sp., colonizes the salt-sensitive rice variety IR-64, promotes its growth under salt stress and confers salinity stress tolerance to its host. Physiological parameters, such as assimilation rate and chlorophyll stability index were higher in the colonized plants. Comparative transcriptome analysis revealed 1348 up-regulated and 1078 down-regulated genes in plants colonized by the endophyte. Analysis of the regulated genes by MapMan and interaction network programs showed that they are involved in both abiotic and biotic stress tolerance, and code for proteins involved in signal perception (leucine-rich repeat proteins, receptor-like kinases) and transduction (Ca2+ and calmodulin-binding proteins), transcription factors, secondary metabolism and oxidative stress scavenging. For nine genes, the data were validated by qPCR analysis in both roots and shoots. Taken together, these results show that salt-adapted Pokkali rice varieties are powerful sources for the identification of novel endophytes, which can be used to confer salinity tolerance to agriculturally important, but salt-sensitive rice varieties.

Introduction

Salinity stress is one of the most devastating abiotic stresses that affect growth, development and productivity of major crops. A soil is termed saline if its osmotic pressure is approximately 0.2 M Pa with an electrical conductivity of 4 dS/m or more (equivalent to ~40 mM NaCl)1,2. It is estimated that at least 50% of the arable land worldwide will be salt affected by the year 2050 and this is expected to further increase due to global climate change3. Rice (Oryza sativa L.), a major staple food crop, is one of the most salt-sensitive cereals4. In the Indo-Gangetic Basin in India, an estimated 45% loss in rice production was attributed to salinity stress alone5,6.

The responses of plants to salinity stress are often multi-faceted and complex. In the initial phase, salinity stress manifests itself as osmotic stress with reduction in water uptake by plants. This triggers a range of metabolic and molecular cascades such as inhibition of cell expansion, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic activity, abscisic acid (ABA)-mediated responses followed by stimulation of the SOD and peroxidase activities as well as accumulation of osmolytes like proline. The later phase of salinity stress leads to ionic stress, which is due to the alterations in the Na+/K+ and Na+/Ca2+ ratios because of the accumulation of both Na+ and Cl. This promotes the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells and leads to oxidative stress7.

In recent years, an increasing number of studies have focused on the role of endophytes in alleviating salinity stress in plants. Endophytes constitute an important component of the plant microbiome and comprise of both bacteria and fungi. Ubiquitously present in all plants, they do not cause disease symptoms in their hosts but often promote their performance such as growth and resistance, in particular under abiotic and biotic stresses. The endophytes are often adapted to extreme habitats and might have developed strategies to activate stress tolerance responses in their host plants in which they reside8,9.

One of the most widely studied root endophyte, Piriformospora indica, has been reported to promote growth in a number of plant systems under abiotic stresses including salinity stress10. In Arabidopsis, P. indica maintains the Na+ and K+ homeostasis under salt stress11. Two bacterial endophytes, Bacillus subtilis and Mesorhizobium ciceri, confer salt tolerance to chickpea by decreasing H2O2 concentrations and increasing proline content12. Pseudomonesa fluorescens and P. migulae ameliorate salinity stress in tomato plants by increasing the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase activity, the key enzyme for ethylene biosynthesis13. Asaf et al. (2018) demonstrated Aspergillus flavus CHS1-mediated salinity tolerance in Glycine max. L through the stimulation of the antioxidative system and endogenous hormone levels in the host14. In tomato, the endophyte, Trichoderma harzianum alters the expression level of 1243 genes in the roots15. Bajaj et al. (2018) showed that colonization of soybean plants by P. indica resulted in the stimulation of genes associated with the phenylpropanoid and lignin pathways, both of which are known to play an important role in oxidative stress tolerance16. However, the molecular mechanisms through which endophytes modulate these processes in their host are little understood17.

In this study, we examine the endophytic fungal assemblage of salt-adapted Pokkali land races and evaluate their ability to tolerate salinity stress. The Pokkali rice is a traditional salt-tolerant variety grown in parts of coastal Kerala, India, during the months of June to November. Because of the traditional practice, the variety has been conferred a Geographical Indicator (GI) tag18. One of the identified endophytic fungus, which was tolerant to high concentrations of salt, was transferred to the salt-sensitive rice variety IR-64. We demonstrate that the colonized IR-64 plants are not only morphometrically larger but also more tolerant to salt stress than the un-colonized control, and this is associated with an altered expression of a specific combination of genes. The results of these experiments are particularly novel and important because they not only open up exciting possibilities of using an endophytic route towards mitigating crop stress but also in understanding the underlying molecular basis of plant-endophyte interaction. The latter could inspire further studies into numerous plant-endophyte interactions reported in literature and seek if there is some commonalities to the way endophytes interact and lend habitat adapted symbiotic benefits to the plants.

Results

Isolation and characterization of fungal endophytes

Endophytes were isolated from 720 leaf and root segments as well as seeds from the salt-sensitive IR-64 variety and salt-tolerant Pokkali rice varieties. A total of 494 endophytic fungal isolates were obtained, 49.40% derived from the seeds, 29.95% from the roots and 20.65% from the shoots. The colonization frequency ranged from 46.6% to 96.6%, with the highest obtained in shoot segments of VTL-6 and the least in shoot tissue of VTL-4 (Supplementary file 1). Based on colony characteristics, the 494 isolates were categorized into 41 OTUs. Highest number of OTUs (11) was obtained for the variety IR-64 while the lowest number (5 OTUs) was obtained for VTL-6 (Supplementary file 1).

The homology search of the ITS region revealed that the majority of the OTUs belonged to Gibberella intermedia and Fusarium solani (12 OTUs and 7 OTUs, respectively) (Supplementary file 1). A few fungi, such as Botryosphaeria dothidea and Alternaria alternata, could only be isolated from salt-adapted Pokkali genotypes (Supplementary file 2).

Evaluation of the fungal isolates for salinity stress tolerance

Growth of most of the endophytic fungi decreased with increase in NaCl concentration in the medium. V-4J (Fusarium sp.) isolated from VTL-4 showed only 10% reduction in mycelial growth on media with 1 M NaCl. On the other hand, growth of Arthrinium sp. hyphae isolated from JBT 36/14 was completely inhibited on 1 M NaCl (Fig. 1A). These two isolates were used for further investigations and referred to as salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive endophytes, respectively. When exposed to media with 1.5 M and 2 M NaCl, the salt-sensitive Arthrinium sp. endophyte failed to grow, while the salt-tolerant Fusarium sp. endophyte grew even on 1.5 M and 2 M NaCl media (diameter of fungal hyphae on plates: 57.3 ± 0.6 mm on media without NaCl; 44.7 ± 0.3 mm on 1.5 M NaCl; 27.7 ± 0.3 mm on 2.0 M) (Fig. 1B, Supplementary file 3).

Figure 1
figure1

Mycelial growth: (A) Percent reduction in mycelial growth of 41 OTUs from salt adapted and sensitive genotypes subjected to 1 M NaCl. Arrow indicates highly salt tolerant OTUs. (V-4, V-6 and V-8 refer to isolates from Pokkali rice land races VTL-4, VTL-6 and VTL-8 respectively. IR refers to the isolates from IR-64 and JBT refers to isolate from JBT 36/14). (B) Mycelial growth of endophytic fungi, Fusarium sp., and Arthrinium sp. at different concentration of NaCl. Line over bars denote SD(±).

Fusarium sp. confers salinity tolerance to IR-64 seedlings

Seeds of the salt-sensitive IR-64 variety were treated with the Fusarium sp. endophyte and the performance of the seedlings analyzed on agar plates with and without NaCl. The fungus induced a significant increase in root and shoot growth in 10-day-old seedlings under salinity stress, when compared to seedlings which were grown without the endophyte. The growth-promoting effect was not detectable for seedlings, which were grown without salt stress (Fig. 2A), although root colonization was detectable under both conditions (Supplementary file 3). When colonized and uncolonized IR-64 plants were grown in the greenhouse, the fungus induced a significant increase in shoot growth under both salinity stress and control conditions (Fig. 2B,C). However the fungus did not significantly alter the root growth under both salinity and control condition (Fig. 2C). The mean tiller number of plants under salt stress increased from 3.5/plant in plants not treated with the endophyte compared to 10.5/plant in those treated with the endophyte (p < 0.05; Table 1). There was however, no significant difference in the tiller number per plant due to endophyte treatment under control, non-stress conditions (Table 1). The effect of the endophyte colonization on the total biomass of 50-day old plant was examined. Colonization significantly enhanced the biomass both under control and salt stress conditions (p < 0.05; Table 1). These results clearly indicate that Fusarium sp. promotes the performance of IR-64 plants, in particular, under salinity stress.

Figure 2
figure2

(A) Root and shoot growth of 10 day old IR-64 seedlings under different treatments (E−S−; E+S−; E−S+; E+S+ where E +/E−: Presence/absence of Fusarium sp. and S+/S−: Presence/absence of salinity stress (150 mM NaCl). (B) Phenotypic growth of 50 day old IR-64 plants as influenced by endophyte colonization under control (left) and under 4 ds/m stress (right). (C) Root and shoot growth of 50 day old IR-64 plants subjected to different treatments (E−S−; E+S−; E−S+; E+S+ where E+/E−: Presence/absence of Fusarium sp. and S+/S−: Presence/absence of salinity stress (4 ds/m). Line on bars indicates SEm (±). One-way ANOVA was done for root and shoot separately. Means with dissimilar letters are significant at P < 0.05 (Tukey).

Table 1 Growth, physiological and biochemical responses of IR-64 plants subjected to different treatments (E+/E−: Presence/absence of Fusarium sp.; S+/S−: Presence/absence of Salinity stress) (a50 day old plants; b10 day old seedlings). One-way ANOVA was done separately for E−S- and E+S− and for E−S+ and E+S+. Results are the mean of three replication ± SEm. Asteriks indicate significant difference between means within each of the above pairs of comparison at P < 0.05.

The effect of the fungus on the performance of the salt-exposed plants was further analyzed for physiological parameters describing the fitness of the plants. The endophyte-treated plants had significantly higher total chlorophyll content under both control and salt stress conditions (p < 0.05; Table 1). On the other hand, the net carbon assimilation rates were significantly higher in the colonized plants only under salinity stress (p < 0.05; Table 1). Colonization did not alter the stomatal conductance or transpiration rates of the plants in both control and salt stress conditions. Cell membrane stability (CMS), an index of membrane stability was significantly higher in plants colonized by the endophyte compared to plants not treated with the endophyte (Supplementary file 4). However, the chlorophyll stability index (CSI) remained unaltered by endophyte treatment. These results suggest that besides promotion of basic processes associated with growth and development, the fungus stabilizes the cell membrane under salinity stress, while gas exchange is not affected.

To examine the ionic burden of tissues, we examined the Na+/K+ ratio in plant tissues that were colonized versus those uncolonized by the endophyte. The endophyte-colonized plants had a significantly lower Na+/K+ ratio (2.9 ± 0.6) than the uncolonized control plants (5.8 ± 0.0) under salinity stress (Fig. 3). The decrease in ratio appears to be primarily driven by a reduced level of tissue Na+ in plants colonized by the endophyte compared to those uncolonized. Thus endophyte colonization directly helps in reducing the tissue Na+/K+ and hence the salt injury. This could indeed be an important mechanism in endophyte mediated mitigation of salt stress in plants.

Figure 3
figure3

Na+/K+ ratio of 10 day old IR-64 seedlings subjected to different treatments. Line over bars indicates SEm (±). Legend to X-axis is same as given in Fig. 2A.

Intriguingly, while the MDA content of tissue increased significantly, under both, control and salt stress condition, upon colonization by the endophyte, that for proline accumulation decreased upon colonization by the endophyte (Table 1). Finally, we examined the relative SOD activity in tissues of plants colonized and uncolonized by the endophyte. Under both control and salt stress conditions, endophyte did not significantly alter the SOD activity (Table 1).

Transcriptome sequencing, quality control and reference assembly

To further elucidate the effect of the fungus on the performance of the plants under salt stress, we compared expression profiles of colonized and uncolonized seedlings grown on salt media to identify genes which are targeted by the fungus. A total of 46.31 million reads (9.26 GB; E+S+) and 52.17 million reads (10.43 GB; E−S+) were generated and the raw reads were subjected to basic quality control using in-house Perl scripts and Picard tools v 1.115. The final set comprising of 42.23 million (E+S+) and 47.63 million (E−S+) reads with ≥ Q30 was used for assembly and analysis (Supplementary file 10). The high-quality reads from both treatments were reference-mapped to the Oryza sativa Nipponbare genome and 81.50% (E+S+) and 73.25% (E−S+) HQ reads were successfully aligned (Supplementary file 10).

Analysis of DGEs and GO enrichment analysis

In seedlings colonized by Fusarium sp. and grown under salinity stress, 1348 genes (≥1 log2FC) were up-regulated and 1078 genes (≤−1 log2FC) down-regulated compared to the uncolonized control (Supplementary files 5 and 9). The DGEs code for proteins involved in both abiotic and biotic stress tolerance such as ion transporters, dehydrogenases, oxidoreductases, as well as transcription factors such as WRKY, MYB, bHLH and bZIP known to be involved in salinity tolerance.

Among the DGEs, 112 up-regulated genes and 66 down-regulated genes could not be assigned to any known function and hence were classified as transcripts for proteins of unknown function (PUFs). Ten of the top, up- and down-regulated PUFs were computationally annotated for its putative function (Supplementary file 11). Other than the DGEs, a total of 3466 genes were exclusively expressed only in the endophyte enriched transcriptome and were mainly involved in the cell growth promotion and catalytic activity (Supplementary file 5). The results of GO enrichment analysis are shown in Fig. 4A. DGEs were enriched in categories such as transmembrane transport (GO: 0055085) and pyrophosphatase activity (GO: 0016462) (Fig. 4A, Supplementary file 6).

Figure 4
figure4

Gene enrichment analysis: (A) GO annotation of the significant DGEs. Biological process (green); Cellular component (pink) and Molecular function (blue) (Bubble size is directly proportional to number of genes under the GO term). (B) MapMan analysis: MapMan visualization of the DGEs involved in the stress response and (C) Ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation pathway as influenced by treatment with endophyte Fusarium sp. under salinity stress (Blue pixel: Upregulated genes; Red pixel: down regulated genes).

MapMan and interaction network analysis

The DGEs were assigned to rice MapMan classification, which covers 36 BINs and its subBINs19. The functional pathway classification of the DGEs showed that 576 deduced protein sequences mapped to the ‘overview of metabolism’, with 138 of them belonging to “secondary metabolism”, 203 to “lipid metabolism” and 32 to “redox metabolism” (Supplementary file 7). Further, under ‘overview of cell functions’, 889 deduced protein sequences mapped to the category “transcription regulation”, followed by 667 sequences to “signaling” and 511 to “protein degradation”(Supplementary file 7). Furthermore, stress-responsive transcription factors, such as bHLH, MYB, WRKY, and bZIP proteins, were enriched in the RNA preparation from salt-exposed and endophyte-colonized seedlings. Under the category ‘biotic and abiotic stress response’, the majority of the deduced protein sequences mapped to “signaling” (627 RNAs) and “ubiquitin mediated protein degradation” (511 RNAs) (Fig. 4B). Finally, 288 deduced protein sequences mapped to the category ‘proteosome function’, and within this category, 138 belonged to “ubiquitin E3 RING” and 67 to the “F-box” subgroups (Fig. 4C, Supplementary file 7).

To understand the functional relationships and identify major hubs between the proteins encoded by the DGEs, an interaction network analysis was conducted. Altogether, 225 transcripts were predicted to code for proteins that interact with each other. These sequences were further grouped based on their MapMan bins into 14 hubs. Four major hubs contain proteins for signaling through leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins, receptor-like kinases (RLKs), secondary metabolism and glutaredoxins. Minor hubs contained proteins involved in calcium signaling, ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation, development, ion channels and transferases (Fig. 5; Supplementary file 8). We also noted substantial crosstalk between the members of the protein groups. For instance, the LRR proteins and RLKs interacted with proteins involved in ion transport and Ca2+ signaling, or with F-box proteins of the ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation machinery (Fig. 5, Supplementary file 8). Enzymes involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway are predicted to interact also with those involved in the isoprenoid pathway (Fig. 5).

Figure 5
figure5

Cytoscape visualization of interaction analysis of the DGEs identified between the two transcriptome libraries: E−S+ and E+S+ (where E: Fusarium sp.; S: Salinity stress (150 mM NaCl); +/−: Presence/absence). The clusters have been grouped based on their function and the size indicates the number of genes. The nodes indicate the interaction between the hubs.

Validation of expression patterns by qPCR analysis

In order to validate the transcriptome data, fifteen genes were chosen (Supplementary file 12). Nine genes which qualified the preliminary screening were further chosen for the qPCR analysis. The analysis was carried out for the four treatments (E−S− (control), E+S−, E+S+, E+S−) on shoot and root tissues separately. The transcript levels of the selected genes were significantly higher in the E+S+ samples compared to the control, in both root and shoot tissues (Figs. 4B and 6).

Figure 6
figure6

Validation of nine selected DGEs by qPCR. Gene expression levels at E+S−, E+S+ and E−S+ of shoot and root were compared to E−S− and UBQ10 (Endogenous gene) of shoot and root respectively. Black bars represent shoot and white bars represent root. Errors bars indicate mean ± standard error obtained from biological replicates.

Interestingly, the transcript levels for OsIFR, OsWRKY1, OsCAM, OsbHLH and OsORD were down-regulated in the roots of seedlings exposed to the E+S− and E−S− treatments, but up-regulated in roots under salinity stress and the presence of Fusarium sp. (E+S+). Also, transcripts for OsNa2+Sym were only detectable in samples exposed to salinity stress and the endophyte in both shoots and roots (Fig. 6). The qPCR data and the corresponding RNA seq data were significantly positively correlated (r = 0.49, p < 0.05).

Discussion

It is now becoming abundantly clear that endophytes can effectively modulate plant responses to abiotic stresses and thereby help mitigate the adverse consequences of the stress. A recent meta-analysis conducted using 94 endophyte strains and 42 host plant species from the literature clearly indicates that endophytes promote growth of plants subjected to drought, salinity and nitrogen deficient stresses20. In fact if optimized, endophytes could become a potential alternative route towards improving crop performance against abiotic stresses. Set against this background, the results of our study, for the first time demonstrate the successful transfer of a salt tolerant endophyte, from the salt adapted rice, Pokkali, to a salt sensitive rice variety, IR-64 and further on, making the latter salt tolerant.

There has been considerable interest in Pokkali rice and the mechanism underlying its salt tolerance. Li et al.21 showed that in contrast to the widely grown, but salt-sensitive rice variety IR-29, genes responsible for cell wall integrity, detoxifying ROS and photosynthesis are highly expressed in the salt-tolerant Pokkali rice. Novel rhizosphere-associated bacteria22,23,24 such as Sphingomonas pokkali25 have been shown to be associated with adaptation of the Pokkali varieties to the brackish rhizospheric environment. We show that the Pokkali races harbor a diversity of endophytic fungi, some of which are extremely saline tolerant. One of the isolates, Fusarium sp. is able to thrive even at 2.0 and 2.5 M NaCl. While halophilic fungi have been reported earlier, there are only a few reports on endophytic fungi which are tolerant to such high salt concentrations26,27,28,29. Besides serving as interesting genetic resources, they could potentially be used in ameliorating salinity stress in non-host plants, as demonstrated in the present study.

Pokkali endophyte promotes growth of the salt sensitive rice variety, IR-64 under salinity stress

A number of plant growth promoting endophytes have been shown to reduce salt stress in a range of plants including wheat, rice, ryegrass, Arabidopsis and poplar30,31,32,33,34,35,36. Our results show that the salt-tolerant endophyte Fusarium sp. from Pokkali rice successfully colonizes the salt-sensitive variety IR-64 variety and confers salt stress tolerance to the new host. Under salinity stress, the endophyte promotes root and shoot growth of the plants. The tiller number and biomass also increased under salinity stress in the presence of the endophyte. Better performance of the colonized and salt-stress exposed plants was not only evident from higher net assimilation rates and chlorophyll content, but also from a lower Na+/K+ ratio. Similar results were recently shown by Afridi et al.30 for wheat and Lanza et al.34 for Arabidopsis. The authors characterized two transporters involved in Na+/K+ efflux, SiENA1 and SiENA5, and showed that their expression is induced upon exposure to salinity as well as colonization by an endophytic fungus. Consequently, several key stress responses as well as mitigation effects were lowered due to diminished osmotic stress, higher chlorophyll levels and cell membrane stability index, as well as lower proline concentrations. Also Kasotia et al.37 reported reduced Na+/K+ ratios in soybean plants inoculated with an Pseudomonas koreensis strain and Abdelaziz et al.38 showed similar effects for Arabidopsis seedlings inoculated with P. indica.

Differential gene expression in the rice variety IR-64 on colonization by Pokkali endophyte

The expression profiles demonstrate that genes related to abiotic and biotic stress tolerance were upregulated under salinity stress in IR-64 plants colonized by the Pokkali endophyte. The upregulated genes include glycosyl hydrolase/chitinases known to act as defense compounds against fungal infestation, ion- and antiporters, dehydrogenases, oxidoreductases, and salinity tolerance-related transcription factors. While some of the genes have been well characterized in other beneficial symbioses39,40,41, early signaling events in mutualistic associations resulting in stress-tolerance responses are not well understood30,34,36.

Basically, plant responses to abiotic stresses can be classified into four discrete stages: signal perception, signal transduction, activation of stress-responsive genes, and activation of physiological and metabolic responses42,43. Abiotic signal perception, such as salt stress, largely occurs at the cell wall, which activates intracellular signaling including calcium ions, sugars, ROS and phosphorylation events, followed by downstream responses42,44,45. In one of the comparative transcriptome studies, involving a transgenic ‘Khao Dawk Mali 105’ rice over-expressing OsCam1–1, it was demonstrated that the overexpression altered the expression of several genes involved in cellular processes under salt stress, such as signaling, lipid, carbohydrate, secondary metabolism, photosynthesis and others46. In the present study, we found that the Pokkali endophyte triggered the expression of Ca2+ ion signaling which further enhanced the expression of downstream stream response genes. These were reflected in the DGEs and qPCR data which uncovered genes involved in many of these processes (Supplementary file 5; Figs. 2, 7, Table 1).

Figure 7
figure7

Schematic representation of possible signaling cascades induced by Pokkali endophyte, Fusarium sp. in IR-64 plants subjected to salinity stress.

The interaction network analysis of the proteins encoded by the DGEs identified components involved in signaling through LRR proteins and receptor kinases that play a major role in external signal perception. Their specificity in salt stress tolerance responses need to be elucidated although it has been shown that they are involved in various environmental stress responses47. In a study on sorghum, it was demonstrated that the receptor kinases genes were upregulated under salt stress48. Also transgenic plants overexpressing a GbRLK gene modulated the expression of genes implicated to have roles in both, biotic and abiotic stresses49,50.

The qPCR analyses showed that genes involved in calcium signaling and transport were highly up regulated by the Pokkali endophyte in both, roots and shoots. Ca2+ and calmodulin activate cascades of NaCl – inducible genes, which in turn bind to the E-box element (CANNTG) in the promoter regions of several salt stress-responsive genes or activate R2R3-type MYB2 transcription factors of salt stress-responsive genes51. In a study involving different rice varieties under salt stress, it was demonstrated that Ca2+ plays an important role in root to shoot signaling leading to the exclusion of sodium from the shoots52. A number of candidate genes for this scenario are given in Supplementary file 5. A WRKY transcription factor was found to be up-regulated in IR-64 plants colonized by the Pokkali endophyte (Supplementary file 5; Fig. 6). In poplar, Shen et al.53 demonstrated that over-expression of PeWRKY1 lead to enhanced salinity tolerance and better root growth, photosynthesis, survival rates under stress, and ion fluxes.

Besides specific salt stress-responsive transcription factors (e.g. Todaka et al.54), genes for ‘ubiquitin mediated protein degradation’ were also induced by endophyte colonization. The ubiquitin–proteasome system mediates protein degradation, but also modulates the localization, activity and stability of proteins and is an important stress regulator since it functions across numerous signaling pathways55. The identified F-box genes are part of a large gene family in plants and are involved in degradation of cellular proteins through ubiquitin-mediated degradation. A recent study revealed that over-expression of a wheat F-box gene induces salinity tolerance in transgenic tobacco56.

The low Na+/K+ ratio in plants treated with the endophyte (Fig. 3) involves ion transporters, though as yet, we do not know which of the identified transporters are directly involved in the salt tolerance response. Comparison of our data with those obtained for halophytic turf grass, Sporobolus virginicus57, might help to identify crucial genes involved in the process.

Many of the upregulated genes also code for enzymes involved in secondary metabolism. While they are believed to be associated with biotic stresses, they are also expressed in response to abiotic stresses16,17, as shown in the transcriptome analysis by Chandran et al.58 for a japonica rice variety under salinity stress. Glycosylated flavonoids, hydroxycinnamic acids and chlorogenic acid are involved in antioxidative activity and induced in plants following endophyte colonization59. Another major hub unraveled by the interaction network was the antioxidants ‘glutaredoxins’. In rice, the glutaredoxin 20 functioned as a positive regulator in tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses60.

In summary, our study demonstrates that a salt tolerant endophyte, Fusarium sp., from the salt-adapted Pokkali rice, can be successfully transferred to the cultivated salt-sensitive rice variety, IR-64 to confer salt tolerance. The agricultural importance of this finding will stimulate future investigations on the molecular basis of this beneficial symbiotic interaction as also allowing for developing applications in real world agricultural situations.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

Seeds of salt-adapted Pokkali rice (Oryza sativa L.) land races, namely, VTL-4, VTL-6 and VTL-861 were obtained from the Rice Research Station, Vytilla, Kerala Agricultural University, Kerala, India (9.977920° N–76.319530°E) and salt-sensitive varieties (IR-64 and JBT 36/14)62 from the Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, India (12.946550°N–77.509850°E).

Isolation of endophytic fungi

Endophytic fungi were isolated from the three Pokkali varieties and the salt sensitive rice varieties, IR-64 and JBT 36/14. Pre-germinated seeds of these varieties were raised in plastic pots measuring 14 ×14 ×16 cm containing medium “red loam soil + farm yard manure”. In each pot, six seedlings were raised. The pots were regularly watered. Twenty-five days after planting, explants from roots, shoots and seeds were used for isolation of endophytic fungi. The explants (1 cm long) were surface-sterilized as described by Arnold et al.63. The tissues were blot-dried and transferred to Petri plates containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for 10 days under 12 hour photoperiod for emergence of endophytic fungi64. Imprints of sterilized cut segments were examined on PDA plates for the effectiveness of surface sterilization procedure65. The frequency of colonization by endophytic fungi was determined as described previously66. Fungi that emerged from the cut ends of the tissue were sub-cultured onto fresh PDA plates to obtain pure cultures. The purified isolates were cultured on PDA slants and stored at 4 °C.Voucher numbers were assigned to each of the isolates and deposited in the School of Ecology and Conservation Lab, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, India.

Morphological and molecular characterization of fungal endophytes

The purified endophytic fungal isolates were classified into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on the culture characteristics and morphology of reproductive structures/spores/conidia67,68,69,70,71,72.

For the molecular characterization, genomic DNA was extracted from the fungal mycelium using the cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method73. The universal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) primers, ITS1 and ITS474 were used to amplify fungal ITS regions (ITS1-5.8S- ITS2). Amplified products were quantified and sequenced by Shrimpex Biosciences, Chennai, India. Further, the obtained sequences were homology-searched using NCBI BLAST program to confirm the obtained sequence as ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; default parameters). The identification of the endophyte was ascertained based on maximum query coverage and score in the BLAST results75.

Evaluation of endophytic fungal isolates for salinity stress tolerance

Five-day-old test fungal isolates (culture disc of 5 mm diameter) were placed aseptically on PDA plates containing different NaCl concentrations (200 mM, 400 mM, 600 mM, 800 mM and 1000 mM) and control (without NaCl) in triplicate. The plates were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for 5 day under 12-hour photoperiod. Mycelial growth was recorded on the 5th day after inoculation. Percent reduction in mycelial growth (measured in mm) over the respective controls was calculated following Bekker et al.76. The fungal endophytes that showed little reduction (ranging from 0 to 20 per cent) in 1 M NaCl were further evaluated for their tolerance at 1.5 M and 2 M NaCl. Based on the above screening protocol, we identified one endophytic fungus, Fusarium sp (GenBank Acc No. MN170565) obtained from the Pokkali variety VTL-4, as salt tolerant (Fig. 1A,B). We conducted all further experiments using this endophyte.

Evaluation of the endophyte, Fusarium sp (GenBank Acc No. MN170565), for its ability to impart salinity tolerance to the salt sensitive rice variety, IR-64

The endophyte Fusarium sp. (GenBank Acc No. MN170565) was evaluated for its ability to impart salinity tolerance to a salt-sensitive rice variety IR-64. The seeds of IR-64 were surface-sterilized according to Arnold et al.63 and germinated for 48 hours. Five-day-old fungal colony cultures were used for inoculum preparation by washing the mycelial mat with sterile distilled water. Pre-germinated seeds were treated with the mycelia suspension (2 ×106 cfu/ml) for 3 hours along with control (treated with sterile distilled water). The seedlings were then transferred to moistened germination sheet and paper towels9. One set of the paper towels was treated with 150 mM NaCl and incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 7 days. Another set was treated with sterile distilled water and maintained as control. The colonization ability of Fusarium sp. was determined in 10-day-old seedlings by re-isolation of the endophyte following the method described above. The tissue generated in the experiment was used to assess the morphological, biochemical and molecular parameters of the host plant.

To further evaluate the ability of Fusarium sp. to confer salt tolerance to IR-64, pot experiments were carried out in the greenhouse using non-autoclaved soil. Ten-day-old IR-64 seedlings (pre-treated with Fusarium sp. or non-treated) were transferred to plastic pots (14 ×14 ×16 cm) and grown in a potting medium (red loam soil + farm yard manure). The experiment was carried out in three biological replications. In each pot, six seedlings were transplanted and then subjected to salinity stress (4 ds/m) for fifty days77. The composition of salts used for imposing salinity stress (4 ds/m) was 1463 mg/l of calcium chloride dehydrate (CaCl2.2H2O), 459 mg/l of sodium chloride (NaCl), 381 mg/l of magnesium sulphate (MgS04.7H20), 1849 mg/l of magnesium chloride, hexahydrate (MgCl2.6H20). Control sets of rice seedlings were irrigated with sterile water.

Plant growth and tiller number

Several growth parameters were recorded on both the 10-day old seedlings (raised on paper towels) and 50-day old plants raised in plastic pots for the four treatments E+S−; E−/S−; E+S+ and E−/S+, where E+/E− refers to presence/absence of endophyte and S+/S− refers to presence /absence of salinity stress. Growth, as well as root and shoot lengths were recorded for 10-day old seedlings. Plant height, tiller number and total biomass were recorded for 50-day old plants.

Gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll content, chlorophyll stability index, cell membrane stability and Na+/K+ ratio

Carbon assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (gs) and rate of transpiration (T) were recorded in the flag leaf of 50-day old IR-64 plants exposed to the four treatments (E−S−; E+/S−; E+S+; E−/S+) using an Infrared Gas analyzer-IRGA (LiCOR C6400, Inc. Lincoln, Nebraska, USA).

The total chlorophyll content, chlorophyll stability index (CSI) and cell membrane stability (CMS) was estimated in 10-day old IR-64 seedlings. Chlorophyll was extracted and determined using the UV visible spectrophotometer from Shimadzu (Japan) at 663 and 645 nm according to Hiscox and Israelstam78 and the amounts of chlorophyll a and b were calculated following Arnon79. The CSI was calculated using the formula: CSI = 100-CSI%, where CSI% is percent reduction of chlorophyll under salinity stress over that of the non-stress-exposed control.

The cell membrane stability (CMS) test was carried out according to the method described by Blum and Ebercon80. The initial (T1) and final electrolyte leakage (T2) after incubating the tissues in boiling water for 30 mins was determined as described by Tripathy and co-workers81 using a conductivity meter, EC-TDS (Elico-CM183). The CMS was calculated as described in Blum and Ebercon80.

The Na+ and K+ contents were analyzed following wet digestion with diacid (nitric acid: per chloric acid) (10:4 v/v) as outlined by US Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954)40, using an Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrophotometer (ICP-OES, Thermo Scientific Inc, USA). Three replicates were maintained for all the experiments described above.

Superoxide dismutase activity, malondialdehyde and proline content

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline content were estimated in the 10-day old IR-64 seedling for the four treatments. SOD activity was measured as described previously at 560 nm based on the reduction of nitro-blue tetrazolium (NBT)82. One unit of SOD activity was expressed as the amount of enzyme utilized to inhibit 50% of NBT reduction. The MDA content was measured by the thiobarbutaric acid (TBA) method83. The proline content was determined by the acid ninhydrin method84 and the amount in the tissue calculated as described by Khaliel et al.85.

Molecular characterization

RNA extraction, library preparation and Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing

The root and shoot tissues of 10-day old IR-64 seedlings (E−S+ and E+S+) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to obtain fine powder. The RNA was extracted using RNAisoPlus following the manufacturer’s protocol (Takara). Equal amounts of RNA from root and shoot were pooled from 3 independent experiments, each of which consisted of RNA from 75 seedlings, for the library preparation. The messenger RNA isolation with polyA selection and subsequent library construction with the TruSeq RNA sample preparation protocol from Illumina (San Diego, CA) was carried out. Paired end (PE) sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq. 2500 sequencing platform (SciGenom Labs Pvt Ltd, Cochin, Kerala, India). The raw data has been deposited at NCBI (PRJNA511618 and PRJNA511516).

Reference assembly and DGE analyses

The high quality Paired End reads from E−S+ and E+S+ treatments were aligned independently to the Oryza sativa Nipponbare genome (rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/pub/data/Eukaryotic_Projects/o_sativa/annotation_dbs/pseudomolecules/version_7.0/all.dir) using the software TopHat v 2.1.086. The bam file generated was further used to obtain the readCount file using the featureCount program (http://subread.sourceforge.net)87. Filtering and normalization of the reads within and between the treatments were performed using the “cpm” and “calcNormFactors” functions of the EdgeR software. Further, biological coefficient of variation (BCV) was calculated using the “estimateGLMCommonDisp” function. Finally, differential expression p-values were computed using the readCount files of the two treatments using the EdgeR “ExactTest” method (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/edgeR.html)88 which can handle data with small sample size89. The “ExactTest” method is the quantile-adjusted conditional maximum likelihood (qCML) method, which is applicable for single factor analysis. It also has been shown to have a strong parallel with the Fisher’s exact test88. Thus, edgeR’s “Exact Test” method gives more stable and biologically meaningful gene rankings, especially when dealing with pooled samples, as had been conducted in our study. The volcano plot was drawn in R. The analysis revealed that there were many genes for proteins of unknown functions (PUFs). The top 10 up- and down-regulated genes were annotated for its putative functions using the web server tool PUFAS (http://caps.ncbs.res.in/pufas/)90.

Gene ontology enrichment and mapMan analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was performed on DGEs (≥1 log2FC and ≤−1 log2FC) using the online tool AgriGO v 2.0 (systemsbiology.cau.edu.cn/agriGOv2/)91. The GO terms were visualized using the R package GOPlot92.

The MapMan program v 3.5.1 was used for the pathway analysis (https://mapman.gabipd.org/home)93. The pathway mapping of Oryza sativa Nipponbare (Osa_MSU_v7) were downloaded from the MapMan store (https://mapman.gabipd.org/mapmanstore). The non-redundant genes from edgeR (≥1 log2FC and ≤−1 log2FC) were then classified into MapMan BINs, and their annotated functions were visualized using the Osa_MSU_v7 pathway annotation database of the MapMan program.

Interaction network of the proteins encoded by the DGEs

To determine the interactions of proteins from the DGEs (≥1 log2FC and ≤−1 log2FC), Protein Protein Interaction (PPI) analysis was performed using the online tool STRING (http://string-db.org)94. The PPI network of all proteins of the DGEs was extracted from the whole interaction network and reconstructed using Cytoscape v 3.6.195. The raw network was clustered using the “MCL cluster” algorithm under the cluster maker section. The clustered networks were further annotated using the Auto annotate option using the MapMan bin names. The nodes were color-coded according to their log2FC values. Finally, all the edges were bundled using the “bundle edge” option.

Validation by qPCR analysis

Root and shoot tissues of 10-day old IR-64 seedlings exposed to one of the four treatments (E−S−; E+S−; E−S+; E+S+) were used for qPCR validation in three biological replications. The RNA was extracted using RNAisoPlus following the manufacturer’s protocol (Takara). The quality of the RNA was analyzed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and integrity was checked using agarose gel electrophoresis. Further, DNase treatment (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA, AM-1907) and cDNA synthesis (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, #K1621) was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A total of fifteen genes were chosen based on the bioinformatic analysis of the transcriptome data. Based on the preliminary screening standard (slope −3.3; efficiency 100% ± 4) nine genes were chosen for relative quantification. The reactions were performed in 96 well plates in 20 µl containing 10 µl KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Master Mix (Kapa Biosystems), 3 pmolml−1forward primer, 3 pmolml−1reverse primer, 4 µl nuclease-free water and 2 µl cDNA (1: 5 diluted) in an ABI Quant Studio 7 Flex (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Thermal cycling conditions were 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 55–59 °C (depending on the primer combinations) for 40 s, and 72 °C for 35 s followed by dissociation curve. The control gene used in the study was OsUBQ1096. The relative expression was calculated using the equation 2−ΔΔCT, where −ΔΔCT = ΔCT − Ct of the control (E−S−); ΔCT = (Ct of the target gene − Ct of the control gene). The list of primers used for amplification is presented in Supplementary file 12.

Data availability

The pooled transcriptome data of IR-64 seedlings under the treatments: E−S+ and E+S+ used in the present study has been submitted to NCBI (SRA) with the accession number PRJNA511618 and PRJNA511516 respectively.

References

  1. 1.

    Ghosh, B., Md, N. A. & Gantait, S. Response of rice under salinity stress: a review update. (Rice res: open access, 2016).

  2. 2.

    Acosta-Motos, J. R. et al. Plant Responses to Salt Stress: Adaptive Mechanisms. Agron. 7, 18 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jamil, M. et al. Effect of salinity on physiological and biochemical characteristics of different varieties of rice. Pak. J. Bot. 44 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO (2017).

  5. 5.

    Wicke, B. et al. The global technical and economic potential of bioenergy from salt-affected soils. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 2669–2681 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Al-Tamimi, N. et al. Salinity tolerance loci revealed in rice using high-throughput non-invasive phenotyping. Nat. Commun 7 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Wang, J. et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals molecular response to salinity stress of salt-tolerant and sensitive genotypes of indica rice at seedling stage. Sci. Rep. 8, 2085 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rodriguez, R. J. et al. Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis. ISME J. 2, 404 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sangamesh, M. B. et al. Thermotolerance of fungal endophytes isolated from plants adapted to the Thar Desert, India. Symbiosis 75, 135–147 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Varma, A., Bakshi, M., Lou, B., Hartmann, A. & Oelmueller, R. Piriformospora indica: a novel plant growth-promoting mycorrhizal fungus. Agric. Res. 1, 117–131 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Arshad, M., Gruber, M. Y., Wall, K. & Hannoufa, A. An insight into microRNA156 role in salinity stress responses of alfalfa. Front. Plant Sci 8 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Egamberdieva, D., Wirth, S. J., Shurigin, V. V., Hashem, A. & Abd_Allah, E. F. Endophytic bacteria improve plant growth, symbiotic performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and induce suppression of root rot caused by Fusarium solani under salt stress. Front. Microbiol 8 (2017).

  13. 13.

    Ali, S., Charles, T. C. & Glick, B. R. Amelioration of high salinity stress damage by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes that contain ACC deaminase. Plant Physiol Biochem 80 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Asaf, S. et al. Salt tolerance of Glycine max. L induced by endophytic fungus Aspergillus flavus CSH1, via regulating its endogenous hormones and antioxidative system. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 128, 13–23 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    De Palma, M. et al. Transcriptome reprogramming, epigenetic modifications and alternative splicing orchestrate the tomato root response to the beneficial fungus Trichoderma harzianum. Horticulture Res. 6, 1 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bajaj, R. et al. Transcriptional responses of soybean roots to colonization with the root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reveals altered phenylpropanoid and secondary metabolism. Sci. Rep. 8, 10227 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Subudhi, E., Sahoo, R. K., Dey, S., Das, A. & Sahoo, K. Unraveling plant-endophyte interactions: an omics insight. Endophytes and Secondary Metabolites 1–19 (2018).

  18. 18.

    Pavithran, K. & B. Pokkali Rice Production under Geographical Indication Protection: The Attitude of Farmers. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 19 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Yoo, Y.-H. et al. OsPhyB-mediating novel regulatory pathway for drought tolerance in rice root identified by a global RNA-Seq transcriptome analysis of rice genes in response to water deficiencies. Front. plant. Sci. 8, 580 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rho, H. et al. Do endophytes promote growth of host plants under stress? A meta-analysis on plant stress mitigation by endophytes. Microb. Ecol. 75, 407–418 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li, Y.-F. et al. Comparative transcriptome and translatome analysis in contrasting rice genotypes reveals differential mRNA translation in salt-tolerant Pokkali under salt stress. BMC genomics 19, 935 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Krishnan, R., Lang, E., Midha, S., Patil, P. B. & Rameshkumar, N. Isolation and characterization of a novel 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase producing plant growth promoting marine Gammaproteobacteria from crops grown in brackish environments. Proposal for Pokkaliibacter plantistimulans gen. nov., sp. nov., Balneatrichaceae fam. nov. in the order Oceanospirillales and an emended description of the genus Balneatrix. Syst. Appl. microbiology 41, 570–580 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Krishnan, R. et al. Novosphingobium pokkalii sp nov, a novel rhizosphere-associated bacterium with plant beneficial properties isolated from saline-tolerant pokkali rice. Res. microbiology 168, 113–121 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Krishnan, R. et al. Arthrobacter pokkalii sp nov, a novel plant associated actinobacterium with plant beneficial properties, isolated from saline tolerant pokkali rice, Kerala, India. PLoS one 11, e0150322 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Menon, R. R. et al. Sphingomonas pokkalii sp. nov., a novel plant associated rhizobacterium isolated from a saline tolerant pokkali rice and its draft genome analysis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 42(3), 334–342 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ruppel, S., Franken, P. & Witzel, K. Properties of the halophyte microbiome and their implications for plant salt tolerance. Funct. Plant. Biol. 40, 940–951 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Azad, K. & Kaminskyj, S. A fungal endophyte strategy for mitigating the effect of salt and drought stress on plant growth. Symbiosis 68, 1–3 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Liu, K. H. et al. Morphological and transcriptomic analysis reveals the osmoadaptive response of endophytic fungus Aspergillus montevidensis ZYD4 to high salt stress. Front 8, (2017).

  29. 29.

    Dastogeer, K. M., Li, H., Sivasithamparam, K. & Wylie, S. J. In vitro salt and thermal tolerance of fungal endophytes of Nicotiana spp. growing in arid regions of north-western Australia. Arch Phytopathology Plant Protect 51(11–12) (2018).

  30. 30.

    Afridi, M. S. et al. Induction of tolerance to salinity in wheat genotypes by plant growth promoting endophytes: Involvement of ACC deaminase and antioxidant enzymes. Plant Physiol Biochem, 139 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bal, H. B., Das, S., Dangar, T. K. & Adhya, T. K. ACC deaminase and IAA producing growth promoting bacteria from the rhizosphere soil of tropical rice plants. J. Basic Microbial, 53–12 (2013).

  32. 32.

    Chakraborty, U., Chakraborty, B. N., Chakraborty, A. P. & Dey, P. L. Water stress amelioration and plant growth promotion in wheat plants by osmotic stress tolerant bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29, 5 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kang, S. M. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria reduce adverse effects of salinity and osmotic stress by regulating phytohormones and antioxidants in Cucumis sativus. J. Plant. Interact. 9, 1 (2014).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lanza, M., Haro, R., Conchillo, L. B. & Benito, B. The endophyte Serendipita indica reduces the sodium content of Arabidopsis plants exposed to salt stress: fungal ENA ATPases are expressed and regulated at high pH and during plant co-cultivation in salinity. Environmental microbiology (2019).

  35. 35.

    Pan, X., Qin, Y. & Yuan, Z. Potential of a halophyte-associated endophytic fungus for sustaining Chinese white poplar growth under salinity. Symbiosis 76, 109–116 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Jan, F. G. et al. An endophytic isolate of the fungus Yarrowia lipolytica produces metabolites that ameliorate the negative impact of salt stress on the physiology of maize. BMC microbiol, 19(1) (2019).

  37. 37.

    Kasotia, A., Varma, A. & Choudhary, D. K. Pseudomonas-mediated mitigation of salt stress and growth promotion in Glycine max. Agric. Res 4 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Abdelaziz, M. E., Kim, D., Ali, S., Fedoroff, N. V. & Al-Babili, S. The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica enhances Arabidopsis thaliana growth and modulates Na+/K+ homeostasis under salt stress conditions. In Plant Sci 107–115 (Academic Press, 2017).

  39. 39.

    Li, P. et al. The developmental dynamics of the maize leaf transcriptome. Nat. Genet. 42, 1060 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wang, J. et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals molecular response to salinity stress of salt-tolerant and sensitive genotypes of indica rice at seedling stage. Scientific reports, 8(1) (2018).

  41. 41.

    Yu, B. et al. Regulation of ferredoxin-NADP+ oxidoreductase to cyclic electron transport in high salinity stressed Pyropia yezoensis. Frontiers in plant science, 9 (2018).

  42. 42.

    Wang, H., Wang, H., Shao, H. & Tang, X. Recent advances in utilizing transcription factors to improve plant abiotic stress tolerance by transgenic technology. Front. plant. Sci. 7, 67 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Pérez-Clemente, R. M. et al. Biotechnological approaches to study plant responses to stress. BioMed research international 2013 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Huang, G. T. et al. Signal transduction during cold, salt, and drought stresses in plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Golldack, D., Lüking, I. & Yang, O. Plant tolerance to drought and salinity: stress regulating transcription factors and their functional significance in the cellular transcriptional network. Plant cell rep. 30(8) (2011).

  46. 46.

    Yuenyong, W., Chinpongpanich, A., Comai, L., Chadchawan, S. & Buaboocha, T. Downstream components of the calmodulin signaling pathway in the rice salt stress response revealed by transcriptome profiling and target identification. BMC Plant. Biol. 18, 1–23 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ye, Y. et al. The role of receptor-like protein kinases (RLKs) in abiotic stress response in plants. Plant. Cell rep. 36(2), 235–242 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cui, J. et al. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Seedling Stage of Two Sorghum Cultivars Under Salt Stress. J. Plant. Growth Regul. 37, 986–998 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Nejat, N. & Mantri, N. Plant immune system: crosstalk between responses to biotic and abiotic stresses the missing link in understanding plant defence. Signal 2, O2 (2017).

  50. 50.

    Jun, Z. et al. Overexpression of GbRLK, a putative receptor-like kinase gene, improved cotton tolerance to Verticillium wilt. Sci. Rep. 5, 15048 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Reddy, A. S., Ali, G. S., Celesnik, H. & Day, I. S. Coping with stresses: roles of calcium-and calcium/calmodulin-regulated gene expression. Plant. Cell 23, 2010–2032 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Formentin, E. et al. Transcriptome and Cell Physiological Analyses in Different Rice Cultivars Provide New Insights Into Adaptive and Salinity Stress Responses. Front. Plant Sci. 9 (2018).

  53. 53.

    Shen, Z. et al. Populus euphratica HSF binds the promoter of WRKY1 to enhance salt tolerance. Plant. Sci. 235, 89–100 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Todaka, D., Shinozaki, K. & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Recent advances in the dissection of drought-stress regulatory networks and strategies for development of drought-tolerant transgenic rice plants. Front. plant. Sci. 6, 84 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zhang, Z., Li, J., Liu, H., Chong, K. & Xu, Y. Roles of ubiquitination-mediated protein degradation in plant responses to abiotic stresses. Environ. Exp. Botany 114, 92–103 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Zhao, Z., Zhang, G., Zhou, S., Ren, Y. & Wang, W. The improvement of salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco by overexpression of wheat F-box gene TaFBA1. Plant Sci. 259 (2017).

  57. 57.

    Yamamoto, N. et al. Comprehensive analysis of transcriptome response to salinity stress in the halophytic turf grass Sporobolus virginicus. Front. plant. Sci. 6, 241 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Chandran, A. K. N. et al. Transcriptome analysis of rice-seedling roots under soil–salt stress using RNA-Seq method. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. (2019).

  59. 59.

    Ludwig-Müller, J. Plants and endophytes: equal partners in secondary metabolite production? Biotechnol. Lett. 37, 1325–1334 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Ning, X. et al. A rice CPYC-type glutaredoxin OsGRX20 in protection against bacterial blight, methyl viologen and salt stresses. Front. plant. Sci. 9, 111 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Barna, G. & Toth, T. Soil salinity management in agriculture: Technological advances and applications In: SK Gupta and Megh R. Goyal, Waretown eds. Innovations in biological engineering. (NJ: Apple Academic Press, 454, 2017).

  62. 62.

    Lafitte, H. R., Yongsheng, G., Yan, S. & Li, Z. K. Whole plant responses, key processes, and adaptation to drought stress: the case of rice. J. Exp. botany 58, 169–175 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Arnold, A. E., Maynard, Z., Gilbert, G. S., Coley, P. D. & Kursar, T. A. Are tropical fungal endophytes hyperdiverse? Ecol. Lett 3 (2000).

  64. 64.

    Suryanarayanan, T. S. Light-incubation: a neglected procedure in mycology. Mycologist 6, 144 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Schulz, B. Technische U. B., Guske, S., Dammann, U. & Boyle, C. Endophyte-host interactions. II. Defining symbiosis of the endophyte-host interaction. Symbiosis, Philadelphia, Pa. (USA) (1998).

  66. 66.

    Potshangbam, M., Devi, S. I., Sahoo, D. & Strobel, G. A. Functional characterization of endophytic fungal community associated with Oryza sativa L. and Zea mays L. Front. microbiology 8, 325 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Von Von Arx, J. A. The genus of fungi sporulating in pure culture. Ed. (Cramer (Vaduz)) No. Ed. 3, 1981).

  68. 68.

    Barnett, H. L. & Hunter, B. B. (1972).

  69. 69.

    Domsch, K. H. & Gams, W. Fungi in agricultural soils. Fungi in agricultural soils. (1972).

  70. 70.

    Domsch, K. H., Gams, W. & Anderson, T. H. Compendium of soil fungi. Volume 1. (Academic Press (London) Ltd, 1980).

  71. 71.

    Ellis, M. B. In More dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Surrey. Common wealth (Mycological Institute, 1976).

  72. 72.

    Sutton, B. C. The Coelomycetes. Fungi imperfecti with pycnidia, acervuli and stromata. (Commonwealth Mycological Institute., 1980).

  73. 73.

    Rogers, S. O. & Bendich, A. J. Extraction of total cellular DNA from plants, algae and fungi. in Plant molecular biology manual 183–190 (Springer, 1994).

  74. 74.

    White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide methods Appl. 18, 315–322 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Soujanya, K. N. et al. Camptothecin-producing endophytic bacteria from Pyrenacantha volubilis Hook.(Icacinaceae): A possible role of a plasmid in the production of camptothecin. Phytomedicine 36, 160–167 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Bekker, T. F., Kaiser, C., vd Merwe, R. & Labuschagne, N. In-vitro inhibition of mycelial growth of several phytopathogenic fungi by soluble potassium silicate. (S Afr J Plant Soil, 23(3, 2006).

  77. 77.

    Tomar, O. S., Minhas, P. S. & Dagar, J. C. Isabgol (Plantago Ovata Forsk): A Potential Crop For Saline Irrigation And Moderate Alkali Soils. (2005).

  78. 78.

    Hiscox, J. D. & Israelstam, G. F. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can. J. Bot. 57, 12 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Arnon, D. I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant. Physiol. 24, 1 (1949).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Blum, A. & Ebercon, A. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat 1. Crop. Sci. 21(1), 43–47 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Tripathy, J. N., Zhang, J., Robin, S., Nguyen, T. T. & Nguyen, H. T. QTLs for cell-membrane stability mapped in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought stress. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100, 1197–1202 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Beyer, W. F. Jr. & Fridovich, I. Assaying for superoxide dismutase activity: some large consequences of minor changes in conditions. Anal. Biochem. 161, 559–566 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Yagi, K. Simple assay for the level of total lipid peroxides in serum or plasma. in Free radical and antioxidant protocols 101–106 (Springer, 1998).

  84. 84.

    Chinard, F. P. Photometric estimation of proline and ornithine. J. Biol. Chem 199 (1952).

  85. 85.

    Khaliel, A. S., Shine, K. & Vijayakumar, K. Salt tolerance and mycorrhization of Bacopa monneiri grown under sodium chloride saline conditions. Afr. J. Microbiology Res. 5, 2034–2040 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinforma. 25, 1105–1111 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinforma. 30, 923–930 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. Edger: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinforma. 26, 139–140 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Lamarre, S. et al. Optimization of an RNA-Seq differential gene expression analysis depending on biological replicate number and library size. Front. plant. Sci. 9, 108 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Dhanyalakshmi, K. H. et al. An approach to function annotation for Proteins of Unknown Function (PUFs) in the transcriptome of Indian mulberry. PloS one, 11(3) (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Du, Z., Zhou, X., Ling, Y., Zhang, Z. & Su, Z. agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic acids Res. 38, W64–W70 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Walter, W., Sánchez-Cabo, F. & Ricote, M. GOplot: an R package for visually combining expression data with functional analysis. Bioinforma. 31, 2912–2914 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Thimm, O. et al. MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant. J. 37, 914–939 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v10: protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic acids Res. 43, D447–D452 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Jain, M., Nijhawan, A., Tyagi, A. K. & Khurana, J. P. Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 345 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Rice Research Station, Vytilla, Kerala Agricultural University, Kerala, India for access to the Pokkali land races. The work was supported by grants from the Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi project on “Chemical Ecology of the North East Region (NER) of India: A collaborative programme Linking NER and Bangalore Researchers” (DBT-NER/Agri/24/2013). RUS was supported by an ICAR Emeritus Scientist Grant F. No. 9 (16)/2018-ES-HRD.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.U.S. proposed, initiated and led the project, interpreted scientific information and participated in manuscript preparation. J. and M.M.V. carried out the isolation of the endophytes and its characterization from the salt adapted Pokkali rice. P.D. evaluated the salinity tolerance of IR-64 in presence of Pokkali endophyte. K.N.N. and P.D. contributed to the gas exchange measurements. M.H.S. carried out transcriptome analysis, qPCR analysis, drafted the MS and interpreted the results. K.V.R., S.J., K.N.N., R.O. and G.R. contributed in interpretation and drafting of the MS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Uma Shaanker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sampangi-Ramaiah, M.H., Jagadheesh, Dey, P. et al. An endophyte from salt-adapted Pokkali rice confers salt-tolerance to a salt-sensitive rice variety and targets a unique pattern of genes in its new host. Sci Rep 10, 3237 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59998-x

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links