Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Sucrose promotes caries progression by disrupting the microecological balance in oral biofilms: an in vitro study

Abstract

Sucrose has long been regarded as the most cariogenic carbohydrate. However, why sucrose causes severer dental caries than other sugars is largely unknown. Considering that caries is a polymicrobial infection resulting from dysbiosis of oral biofilms, we hypothesized that sucrose can introduce a microbiota imbalance favoring caries to a greater degree than other sugars. To test this hypothesis, an in vitro saliva-derived multispecies biofilm model was established, and by comparing caries lesions on enamel blocks cocultured with biofilms treated with sucrose, glucose and lactose, we confirmed that this model can reproduce the in vivo finding that sucrose has the strongest cariogenic potential. In parallel, compared to a control treatment, sucrose treatment led to significant changes within the microbial structure and assembly of oral microflora, while no significant difference was detected between the lactose/glucose treatment group and the control. Specifically, sucrose supplementation disrupted the homeostasis between acid-producing and alkali-producing bacteria. Consistent with microbial dysbiosis, we observed the most significant disequilibrium between acid and alkali metabolism in sucrose-treated biofilms. Taken together, our data indicate that the cariogenicity of sugars is closely related to their ability to regulate the oral microecology. These findings advance our understanding of caries etiology from an ecological perspective.

Introduction

Dental caries, one of the most prevalent diseases occurring on tooth hard tissues, is driven by a disequilibrium in the oral microbial community that is termed dental biofilm1,2,3. Dental biofilm is a highly organized polymicrobial structure on tooth surfaces4 and is enmeshed in an extracellular matrix whose major component is extracellular exopolysaccharides (EPS)5. By metabolizing dietary fermentable carbohydrates, microorganisms within the dental biofilm generate organic acids (e.g., lactic acid). When acid production exceeds the neutralizing capacity of both alkali-producing bacteria and saliva, the low pH caused by acid accumulation within the dental biofilm initiates demineralization of tooth hard tissues4,6,7,8,9,10,11. Meanwhile, the acidic environment favors the growth of acidic/aciduric species but not alkali-producing bacteria, which in return prompts the progression of dental caries and the formation of tooth cavities2,7,10,11.

There is a consensus that carbohydrates, especially dietary sugars, determine whether caries develops or not12. Three variables of sugar consumption, the amount, frequency and sugar type, are closely related to caries progression13,14, as studies showed that individuals frequently taking large amounts of specific sugars experienced greater caries severity relative to those with a lower intake15,16. In addition to serving as bacterial metabolism substrates for energy production, sugars also affect the formation and properties of dental biofilms. For example, oral bacteria use sugars to synthesize EPS17, while EPS enhance the adherence of biofilm to tooth surfaces18,19, mediate biofilm three-dimensional organization and structural integrity12, and increase biofilm porosity, thereby facilitating the diffusion of sugars into the inner layer of biofilms20. EPS also help build a protective microenvironment for residing bacteria by retarding the diffusion of antimicrobial molecules21 and act as an extracellular energy source supporting the survival of microorganisms within the biofilm21,22.

Previous studies indicated that the cariogenicities of different sugars were distinct23. Among the kinds of dietary sugars, sucrose (C12H22O11) has long been regarded as an “arch criminal” of dental caries24. Some early animal studies showed that when animals were fed different sugars at the same concentration, sucrose treatment produced more severe caries lesions than glucose (C6H12O6), fructose (C6H12O6), maize starch ((C6H10O5)n) and amylopectin ((C6H10O5)n)23,25,26,27. Further mechanistic exploration revealed that the prominent cariogenicity of sucrose compared to that of other sugars was partly because this disaccharide was the sole substrate for the synthesis of water-insoluble glucans (the major unit of EPS)12,17. Moreover, compared to biofilms formed in the presence of glucose and fructose, biofilms formed in the presence of sucrose had lower concentrations of Ca, P and F28, all of which act as mineral reservoirs to prevent demineralization of tooth hard tissues.

Considering that caries is driven by ecological dysbiosis of oral commensal bacteria, some pioneering studies have focused on microbial changes after sucrose supplementation, trying to provide new clues to understand the cariogenicity of sucrose, and they observed some ecological responses in the oral microbial community after sucrose supplementation. For example, Minah et al. found that exposure to high concentrations of sucrose (i.e., 10%) stimulated the succession of Veillonella spp., Lactobacillus spp., Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus mutans and decreased the levels of Streptococcus sanguinis, Neisseria spp., and gram-negative anaerobic rods29. Another study showed that a sucrose-enriched diet caused an inverse relationship between S. sanguinis (a caries-preventing bacteria) and S. mutans (a cariogenic bacteria) abundances30. However, these studies analyzed only specific/individual species and failed to define the entire oral microbial community shift after sucrose treatment. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, it remains unclear until now whether the ecological stress imposed by sucrose is greater than that imposed by other sugars.

Therefore, in the present study, we hypothesized that the cariogenicity of sucrose is highly associated with its ability to regulate the oral microecology. To test this hypothesis, we established an in vitro saliva-derived multispecies biofilm model, profiled and compared the microbial structure and composition between biofilms exposed to sucrose and two other dietary sugars (i.e., glucose and lactose). By doing so, we aimed to provide new insights from an ecological perspective to understand the cariogenicity of sucrose and caries etiology.

Results

Sucrose is a more cariogenic dietary sugar than glucose and lactose

To test our assumption that the cariogenicity of sucrose is dependent on its microecology regulation, we first established an in vitro saliva-derived multispecies biofilm model (Fig. 1) and tested whether this model could reproduce the in vivo finding that sucrose is the most cariogenic dietary sugar12,28,31,32,33. After 3 days of dietary sugar treatment, enamel blocks cocultured with sugar-treated biofilms showed obviously enhanced demineralization compared to blocks from the SHI medium group (Fig. 2). Specifically, sucrose, lactose and glucose significantly increased the demineralized lesion depth and mineral loss of the tooth enamel; however, sucrose showed the strongest demineralization-promoting effect when applied to saliva-derived multispecies biofilms (Fig. 2b,c). Although the lesion depth caused by sucrose, glucose and lactose was similar, the mineral loss caused by sucrose supplementation was significantly higher than that caused by glucose and lactose (Fig. 2b,c).

Figure 1
figure1

Biofilm preparation and treatment regimen. The saliva inoculum was inoculated in 1.5 ml of SHI medium and cultured without disturbance during the first 24 h to form an initial biofilm community on the enamel block surface. Starting at 72 h, the biofilms were transferred to SHI medium containing different dietary sugars (i.e., 2% sucrose, 2% lactose and 2% glucose) to simulate cariogenic challenges until the endpoint (144 h). The culture medium was changed every 24 h until the end of the experimental period. The control group was saliva derived biofilm cultured with SHI medium only.

Figure 2
figure2

Sucrose-treated biofilms exhibit the most significant demineralization effect on enamel blocks. (a) Representative transverse microradiography images of enamel blocks from sucrose, lactose and glucose treated groups at 144 h. Quantification of lesion depth (b) and mineral loss (c) of enamel blocks at the endpoint. All results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 5; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant).

Sucrose but not glucose or lactose influences the microbial structure and assembly of the oral microbiota

The genomic DNA of biofilms was isolated and sequenced to investigate the microbiome shift introduced by sugar supplementation. After preprocessing and filtering, the average amplicon length of the remaining high-quality reads was 518 bp. These reads were assigned to 22 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% similarity. Microbial richness as revealed by OTU number showed no statistically significant differences among groups (p > 0.05, Fig. 3a). Venn diagram analysis showed that 18 out of 22 OTUs were shared by all groups and that there was no sugar-specific OTU that was exclusively detected in one group (Fig. 3b). By applying weighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on the Bray-Curtis distance (Fig. 3c) and dissimilarity tests, including Adonis and ANOSIM, we found that the overall microbial structure of sucrose-treated biofilms was significantly different from that of biofilms of the control group (Adonis: R2 = 0.47, p = 0.006; Adonis: R2 = 0.825, p = 0.005). However, both weighted PCoA and dissimilarity tests detected no significant differences in the microbial community structure between the lactose/glucose treatment group and the SHI medium control (Fig. 3d,e). Ecological network analyses at the OTU level were also constructed to better show how microbial community assembly changed after sucrose, glucose and lactose treatments. Although the networks of all sugar treated groups contained 15 nodes (16 nodes in SHI medium group), and all networks were dominated by OTUs belonging to Firmicutes, there were more intermodular connections in the network of the sucrose group than in the that of either the glucose or lactose group. More importantly, the antagonistic relationship indicated by the green line between OTUs in the sucrose group was totally lost (Fig. 3f).

Figure 3
figure3

Sucrose influences the microbial structure and assembly of the oral microecology. (a) The microbial richness as revealed by OTU number. (b) Venn diagram showing shared OTUs among biofilms treated without/with sucrose, lactose and glucose. (c–e) The PCoA and dissimilarity analysis (including Adonis and ANOSIM) of polymicrobial oral biofilm among groups. Each dot stands for a biofilm sample. (f) Network inferences of microbial relationships in biofilms without/with sucrose, lactose or glucose treatment. Each node represents an OTU, and each edge represents a significant pairwise association. Red lines indicate synergistic relationships while green lines represent antagonistic relationships (n ≥ 4; ns, not significant; OTU, operational taxonomic unit; PCoA, principal coordinates analysis).

Sucrose introduces the most severe homeostasis disruption between acid-producing and alkali-producing bacteria

From the sequencing data, we pinpointed the genera that were distributed differently between dietary sugar-treated biofilms and the control biofilm. The distributions of 4 genera were disturbed by sucrose, while only 2 genera showed different distribution patterns between glucose-treated biofilms and the control biofilm (Fig. 4a). Lactose imposed the least pressure on the microbial community, as only 1 genus demonstrated a change in relative abundance (Fig. 4a). Among the 4 genera (Atopobium, Granulicatella, Gemella and Veillonella) that showed different relative abundances between the sucrose group and the control, Veillonella is of particular interest because species belonging to this genus can metabolize lactic acid produced by cariogenic bacteria by converting lactic acid to acetic acid and propionic acid, which are less acidic34,35,36. The genus Veillonella changed its distribution in only sucrose-treated biofilms (Fig. 4a). The distributions of species belonging to Veillonella were further compared, and we found that the relative abundance of Veillonella atypica and an uncultured Veillonella spp. significantly decreased in the sucrose-treated group based on sequencing data (Fig. 4b,c). The different distribution pattern of another Veillonella species, that is, V. parvula, was also confirmed by qPCR since we did not detect this species from the sequencing data, possibly due to low abundance, and the colonization of V. parvula showed a similar tendency as other Veillonella species (Fig. 4d). Although the bacterial load of V. parvula in the glucose-treated biofilms also decreased compared to that of the control biofilm, it decreased less than that of the sucrose group.

Figure 4
figure4

Sucrose significantly decreases the level of bacteria contributing to acid reduction. (a) Taxa distribution at the genus level. Only genera showed significantly different distribution were included. (b,c) Different distributed Veillonella species among samples. Each column stands for one sample. (d) qPCR quantification of V. parvula in saliva derived biofilm without or with sucrose/lactose/glucose treatment. Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation (n ≥ 4; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant; V. p = V. parvula).

We further quantified the acid-producing bacteria S. mutans and alkali-producing bacteria, including S. sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii, within the biofilms using qPCR to determine the homeostasis disruption between acid-producing and alkali-producing bacteria. Sucrose exposure increased the concentrations of S. mutans and S. gordonii but slightly decreased the concentration of S. sanguinis. Biofilms receiving glucose treatment also had higher concentrations of S. mutans and S. gordonii than the control biofilm, whereas the concentration of S. sanguinis was unaffected. Interestingly, lactose had a contrasting effect to glucose, as the levels of S. mutans and S. gordonii were unchanged; however, the level of S. sanguinis decreased (Fig. 5a–c). Since the S. mutans/S. sanguinis or S. mutans/S. gordonii ratio is believed to be more closely correlated with dental caries than the load of single acid-producing or alkali-producing bacteria37,38,39,40, we further compared these ratios (summarized in Fig. 5d,e). Although both sucrose and glucose treatments increased the ratio of acid-producing/alkali-producing bacteria, the S. mutans/S. sanguinis and S. mutans/S. gordonii ratios within sucrose-treated biofilms were higher than those within the glucose-treated biofilms. In addition, no significant difference was observed between lactose-treated biofilms and the control group biofilm (Fig. 5d,e).

Figure 5
figure5

Sugar disrupts the equilibrium between acid- and alkali-producing bacteria. qPCR quantification of S. mutans (a), S. sanguinis (b), S. gordonii (c), and the ratios of S. mutans/S. sanguinis (d) and S. mutans/S. gordonii (e) in biofilm treated without or with sucrose/lactose/glucose. Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation. (n = 5; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant; S. m = S. mutans; S. s = S. sanguinis; S. g = S. gordonii).

Dysbiosis of acid-producing and alkali-producing bacteria results in disequilibrium between acid and alkali metabolism, directly contributing to caries progression

The dysbiosis between acid-producing and alkali-producing bacteria raised the question of whether the acid and alkali metabolism of oral biofilms could be changed more significantly by sucrose than by other sugars. By quantifying the lactic acid and ammonia generation of biofilms receiving different sugar treatments, we found that the most significant disequilibrium between acid and alkali production was observed in sucrose-treated biofilms. The pH of the control group decreased to plateau at approximately 4.18; however, the pH values continuously decreased to 4.15 in the lactose group, 4.08 in the glucose group and 4.05 in the sucrose group (Fig. 6a). A similar trend was detected in lactic acid production on the 6th day, as sucrose significantly enhanced the lactic acid production of the saliva-derived biofilm, while glucose and lactose did not (Fig. 6b). In addition, NH3 production was significantly suppressed by sucrose and to a lesser degree by glucose. However, no difference was observed in the lactose treatment group compared to the control (Fig. 6c).

Figure 6
figure6

Sugar exposure increases the cariogenicity of saliva-derived biofilms. (a) Dynamic pH values of spent media for 6 days and (b) lactic acid production in the end of 6th day. (c) Dynamic NH3 production of spent media for 6 days. All results are presented as mean ± standard deviation, each group was compared with the control group, saliva derived biofilm cultured with SHI medium, at the corresponding time point (n = 5; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant).

Discussion

Sucrose has long been considered the most cariogenic carbohydrate. In past decades, numerous studies have been carried out to understand the cariogenicity of sucrose, and these studies mainly focused on the effects of sucrose on the biochemical and physiological characteristics of dental biofilms favoring caries initiation and progression12,28,31,32,33. According to the ecological plaque hypothesis, caries results from an unfavorable shift in the resident oral microbial community (that is, a dysbiotic oral ecosystem) driven by environmental factors2. However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have attempted to understand the microecological regulatory effects of sucrose on dental biofilms, and it is still unknown whether the prominent cariogenicity of sucrose is due to this macromolecule imposing higher ecological pressure on oral biofilms than other dietary sugars.

In the present study, we used the human salivary microbiome of healthy donors and SHI medium to prepare an in vitro multispecies biofilm model to test whether sucrose can introduce microecology imbalance favoring caries progression to a greater degree than the other sugars. Although this in vitro biofilm model system has been proven to maintain a highly reproducible species and metabolic diversity approaching that of the human oral microbiome41,42, we admitted that there is still some difference between our biofilm model and the in vivo dental biofilm because the diversity of the salivary microbiome may be reduced during centrifugation and some of the salivary bacteria are uncultivable even in SHI medium. The saliva-derived biofilm was cultured with SHI medium for 3 days, and then different sugars at the same concentration (2%) were added into the SHI medium to simulate the ecological challenges that the oral microbial community of healthy individuals faces. We noticed that, demineralization can be also detected in the control group (SHI medium alone), probably due to the fact that SHI medium contained 0.5% sucrose (which is an important ingredient to achieve a better recovery of the streptococci from the salivary samples)41, and that the biofilms were cultured in a closed system (i.e., a 24-well plate) which did not allow transfer of acid generated by bacteria through sugar metabolization out of the system. Nonetheless, we found that, all dietary sugars we supplemented into SHI medium enhanced the demineralization of the tooth enamel in comparison to SHI medium alone, among which sucrose caused the greatest demineralization lesion depth and most obvious mineral loss on enamel blocks, followed by glucose and then lactose. This result was consistent with the data of previous in vivo animal studies and epidemiologic studies28,43,44 showing that consumption of sucrose strongly influenced the incidence of dental caries and suggested that the microbiota changes we observed in the in vitro biofilm model here provided us with the chance to understand what happened in vivo. There seemed to be no linear dose–response relationship between sucrose supplementation and demineralization, as when 4 times more sucrose was added to the SHI medium than it was present in the control, only approximately 50% additional demineralization occurred. Potential reasons included, first, sugars were supplemented into SHI medium with high dosage. Since SHI medium contains 0.5% sucrose, the extra added sugars cannot be metabolized completely by bacteria. Therefore, we did not detect linear dose/response relationship between sucrose supplementation and demineralization. Second, previously published epidemiological data showed that neither a linear nor a log-linear relationship existed between sugar consumption and caries45,46. In that case, this finding from our in vitro experiment reflected what happened in vivo. Only a pooled salivary microbiome from healthy subjects was used to prepare biofilms in this study, and further studies using the salivary microflora from both healthy and caries-active subjects to establish an in vitro multispecies model and to compare whether cariogenic and noncariogenic dental biofilms have similar ecological responses to sugar challenge will be helpful for us to gain additional information about the etiology of caries.

To comprehensively understand the impact of different dietary sugars on the oral microecology, we profiled taxa within biofilms by using 16 S rRNA sequencing. Interestingly, no difference was detected in the microbial richness (represented by the number of OTUs) between sugar-treated groups and the control group, and we did not find sugar-specific OTUs, suggesting that if microbial structure shifts occurred after sugar exposure, they mainly resulted from the changed microbial relative abundances. Previously published in vivo data also showed that sugars mainly influence the microbial relative abundance but not the presence of the microflora, which is highly consistent with our findings and the ecological plaque hypothesis emphasizing the synergy of multiple bacterial species in the development of caries47,48,49,50. Therefore, we used weighted PCoA instead of unweighted PCoA analysis to compare the overall microbial structure between groups. As we expected, sucrose was the only tested sugar that significantly reshaped the overall microbial structure of oral biofilms. Ecological network analysis, a system-level method to identify species interactions within an ecosystem that cannot be directly observed51, further showed that sucrose-treated biofilms had no subnetworks, but there were more inter-modular connections in the sucrose network than in the glucose/lactose/control networks. Since the modules in the ecological networks could be regarded as putative microbial ecological niches or subcommunities52, the ecological network analysis suggested that sucrose treatment strengthened relationships between different oral bacterial community “niches”. In addition, the interspecies antagonism and synergy among microbiota within a microecological region is among the major mechanisms maintaining microbial homeostasis in dental biofilms7. Through ecological network analysis, we also found that the antagonistic relationships, which could be detected in the glucose/lactose/control groups, were absent from the microbial network of sucrose-treated biofilms, suggesting that sucrose influenced the interspecies interactions within the biofilms.

To look closely at how the microbial distribution was changed, we pinpointed the differently distributed microbiota between biofilms treated with sugars and the control. Again, we found that sucrose imposed the highest pressure on microbial taxa distribution. Some of the genera whose relative abundance was increased by sugar treatment in the present study, particularly Gemella and Granulicatella, were reported to be dominant in the saliva and dental biofilms of caries-active subjects50,53,54. Interestingly, Veillonella, one of the most prevalent genera in the human oral cavity50,55, showed lower relative abundance in only the sucrose-treated biofilms in comparison to the control, and the relative abundance of all species belonging to this genus detected in this study was significantly decreased by sucrose treatment. It was reported that the load of Veillonella in the caries-active adult population is lower than that of caries-free adults29,53,54,56,57 and that Veillonella reduces the risk of caries by converting lactate to less-acidic acids34,35,58. These data suggest that sucrose is more efficient at reducing the level of bacteria contributing to acid reduction within biofilms than glucose and lactose are. Considering that some species with very low abundance are hard to capture by 16 S rRNA sequencing, we further used qPCR to test the distribution of some well-known bacteria highly associated with caries (including the acid-producing species S. mutans and the alkali-producing species S. sanguinis and S. gordonii) within the biofilms to assess the homeostasis disruption between acid-producing and alkali-producing bacteria, as the enrichment of acidogenic pathogens and depletion of alkali-generating commensal residents within the biofilm is the core of dental caries pathogenesis7,8,9. We found that sucrose changed not only the bacterial load of all three species but also the ratio between acid-producing and alkali-producing bacteria. Sucrose enhanced both S. mutans/S. sanguinis and S. mutans/S. gordonii ratios, breaking the balance between acid-producing and alkali-producing bacteria within biofilms. Parallel to the dysbiosis between acid-producing and alkali-producing bacteria, the most significant disequilibrium between acid and alkali metabolism was detected in the sucrose group, as enhanced lactic acid production and suppressed ammonia production, which contributes to an environment with low pH that directly contributes to caries progression, were observed.

Taken together, our data demonstrated that the potential of sucrose in promoting the cariogenicity of oral biofilms was attributed to its ability to influence the microbial structure and assembly of the oral microecology and to disrupt the homeostasis between acid-producing and alkali-producing bacteria. These findings advance our knowledge of the mechanisms by which sucrose promotes dental caries formation from an ecological perspective.

Materials and Methods

Saliva collection

The present study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University (WCHSIRB-D-2017-095). Written informed consent was obtained according to the Ethical Guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (2014) before sampling59. Dental examination was carried out by one experienced dentist, and all enrolled volunteers (n = 10, aged 25~30) had no clinical symptoms of either oral or systematic diseases. Exclusion criteria also included body mass index ≥35 or ≤18, blood pressure >160/100 mmHg, oral temperature >37.8 °C, pulse >100 times/min, systemic medicine use in the last six months, local oral medicine use or treatment within 7 days, irregular eating within 3 months, and pregnant and lactating women. Subjects were asked to refrain from any food or drink 2 h before donating saliva. Approximately 5 ml of spontaneous, unstimulated whole saliva was expectorated into a sterile 15 ml cryogenic vial. Saliva samples were pooled together and then centrifuged at 2600 g for 10 min to spin down large debris and eukaryotic cells. The supernatant, referred to as pooled saliva, was diluted in sterile glycerol (final concentration of 25%), aliquoted and stored at −80 °C41,42. Some of the pooled saliva was further filtered using 0.22 μm filters. Filtered cell-free saliva was used to coat enamel blocks before growing in vitro multispecies biofilms41,42.

Enamel block preparation

Molars were collected from patients who underwent third molar extraction surgery in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University. Written informed consent was obtained before molar collection. Dental examination was carried out by one experienced dentist, and twenty-five molars without white spots, cracks or other defects were collected and stored with 0.05% thymol solution at 4 °C. Crowns were separated from roots and then cut into four sections (5 mm × 5 mm × 3 mm). The enamels were embedded in polymethylmethacrylate and then polished with water poor SiC abrasive papers (800~2400 grit; Struers, Struers Co., Ltd., Copenhagen, Denmark). The surface microhardness (SMH) of the sound enamel was determined with a microhardness tester (Duramin-1/−2; Struers), and five indentations spaced 100 μm apart were made on every exposed enamel surface at a 200 g load for 15 s. Enamel blocks with SMH between 320 and 400 Knoop hardness were selected for further study. After microhardness testing, the surfaces were slightly polished again. Each enamel surface was painted with two layers of acid-resistant varnish, leaving a 4 mm × 3 mm window. After ultrasonic cleaning in a deionized water bath for 10 min, the enamel blocks were sterilized in an ethylene oxide sterilizer.

SHI medium preparation

To support the growth of different subpopulations within the pooled saliva, we prepared SHI medium and used it to culture biofilms. The composition of SHI medium was 10 g/l proteose peptone (Difco, Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA), 5.0 g/l trypticase peptone (Difco), 5.0 g/l yeast extract (Difco), 2.5 g/l mucin (type III, porcine, gastric; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10 mg/l N-acetyl muramic acid (NAM, Sigma-Aldrich), 5% sheep blood, 2.5 g/l KCl, 5.0 g/L sucrose, 5.0 mg/l hemin, 1.0 mg/l vitamin K, 0.06 g/l urea and 0.174 g/l arginine41.

In vitro saliva-derived multispecies biofilm culturing

Enamel blocks were put into 24-well plates, and 200 μl of filtered cell-free saliva was added to each well, allowing attached pellicle growth, and incubated at 37 °C with the lid open for 1 h to dry the saliva coating. The plates were then sterilized under UV light for 1 h before adding SHI medium (1.5 ml per well) and pooled saliva (30 μl per well). The plates were incubated at 37 °C without disturbance for the first 24 h under anaerobic conditions to allow initial biofilm formation. After 24 h, the culture medium was changed daily.

Dietary sugar treatment

Starting at 72 h, the biofilms were transferred to SHI medium containing different dietary sugars (i.e., 2% sucrose, 2% glucose and 2% lactose) to simulate a cariogenic challenge until the endpoint (144 h). Figure 1 gives a brief introduction to the experimental design.

Acid and alkali production measurement

The pH value of spent medium was measured with a pH meter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the NH3 level in the medium was determined with an ammonia assay kit (Jiancheng, Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). To measure the production of lactic acid in the 144 h biofilms, samples were rinsed in cysteine peptone water first and then transferred into new plates. Buffered peptone water (BPW) with 0.2% sucrose was added into each well and anaerobically incubated at 37 °C for 3 h. Lactic acid was determined by an enzymatic method as described before60. Briefly, the BPW solution absorbance was measured at 340 nm, and the lactic acid content was calculated based on a standard curve. The data are reported as the mean of 5 separate tests.

Caries lesion depth and mineral loss assay

The caries lesion depth and mineral loss were measured by transversal microradiography (TMR). After removing the biofilms on the surface, enamel blocks were ultrasonically cleaned for 10 min. Then, blocks were cut into sections approximately 300 μm thick vertically to a window on the surface. Sections were then polished to a thickness of 100 μm. The polished slices were then fixed on a TMR sample holder with an aluminum calibration step wedge serving as a standard curve and microradiographed using a monochromatic CuK X-ray source (Philips, VitalAir/Comcare, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) at 20 kV and 20 mA for 30 s. The lesion depth and mineral loss at the selected area were analyzed by imaging software (Transversal Microradiography Software 2006, Inspektor Research Systems BV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Five TMR traces were measured on each slice. Mineral loss of the lesions was calculated by a computer program using a step wedge scale to compare the lesion to sound tissue. The lesion depth was defined as the length from the enamel surface to the point where the mineral content reached 95% of that of sound enamel. The data are reported as the mean of 5 separate tests, and representative pictures are shown.

DNA extraction and 16 S rRNA sequencing

The biofilms were scraped with a sterile knife from enamel blocks into 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then sonicated. Genomic DNA was isolated using a QIAamp DNA micro kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the instructions but with additional lysozyme treatment (3 mg/ml, 1.5 h). The DNA quality was evaluated with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequencing of the 16S rRNA amplicon (V1-V3 region) was performed using a MiSeq300PE (Illumina MiSeq System) at Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co.,Ltd (Shanghai, China). The primers used in the present study were 27 F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 533 R (5′-TTACCGCGGCTGCTGGCAC-3′).

Bioinformatic analysis of sequencing data

The sequences were clustered into 22 OTUs at the 97% similarity level. Bioinformatics was performed by mothur and QIIME 2.0 software, including quality control of raw data and taxonomic annotation according to the Silva database. The data were further analyzed as follows: (1) The microbial richness revealed by OTU number was analyzed with one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s t test to compare the means of all other groups with that of the control group. (2) A Venn diagram was constructed to compare the shared and different OTUs among groups. (3) Weighted PCoA and dissimilarity tests, including Adonis and ANOSIM, were used to examine the community differences between groups. (4) Microbe-microbe networks were constructed by the MENA pipeline. A Pearson correlation cutoff of 0.7 was determined using the random matrix theory approach by observing the transition point of the nearest-neighbor spacing distribution of eigenvalues from a Gaussian to a Poisson distribution, two universally extreme distributions. Then, Cytoscape 3.2.0 was performed with a force-directed algorithm to visualize networks and compute network topological parameters with NetworkAnalyzer47. (5) The relative abundances of bacterial taxa at the genus and species levels were calculated. The relative abundance difference between groups was compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test at both the genus and species levels.

Microbial quantification by qPCR

S. mutans, S. sanguinis, S. gordonii and V. parvula were quantified using qPCR with standard curves as previously described10,61. Primers were chosen based on the bacterial 16 S rRNA sequences (Table 1). qPCR amplification was performed on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The reaction mixture (20 μl) contained 10 μl of 2 × SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa, Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), 2 μl of template DNA, 0.8 μl of forward and reverse primers (10 mM each), 0.4 μl of ROX Reference Dye II and 6 μl of PCR-grade water. Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 34 s. An additional step, 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min and 95 °C for 15 s, was performed to establish a melting curve. Threshold cycle values (CT) were determined, and the copy number was calculated based on the standard curve (log copies/μl versus CT values). Each sample was examined in triplicate. The data are reported as the mean of 5 separate tests.

Table 1 Oligonucleotide primers used in qPCR for microbial quantification.

Statistical analysis

Data other than those obtained from microbiome sequencing were compared with SPSS (version 16.0 for Windows). Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test to compare means of each group, and Dunnett’s t test to compare the mean of all other groups with the control group. The difference was statistically significant if the 2-tailed p value < 0.05.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The 16 S rRNA sequencing raw data have been deposited in the public database Sequence Read Archive (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra) under accession number PRJNA550154.

References

  1. 1.

    Selwitz, R. H., Ismail, A. I. & Pitts, N. B. Dental caries. The Lancet. 369, 51–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60031-2 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Takahashi, N. & Nyvad, B. The Role of Bacteria in the Caries Process. J. Dent. Res. 90, 294–303, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510379602 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pitts, N. B. et al. Dental caries. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 3, 17030, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.30 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Xu, X. et al. Meeting report: a close look at oral biofilms and microbiomes. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 10, 28, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-018-0030-1 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Koo, H., Falsetta, M. L. & Klein, M. I. The exopolysaccharide matrix: a virulence determinant of cariogenic biofilm. J. Dent. Res. 92, 1065–1073, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513504218 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fontana, M., Young, D. A., Wolff, M. S., Pitts, N. B. & Longbottom, C. Defining Dental Caries for 2010 and Beyond. Dent. Clin. North Am. 54, 423–440, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.007 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Marsh, P. D. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv. Dent. Res. 8, 263–271, https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374940080022001 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hoare, A., Marsh, P. D., Diaz, P. I. Ecological Therapeutic Opportunities for Oral Diseases. Microbiol. Spectr. 5; https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.BAD-0006-2016 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Kleinberg, I. A mixed-bacteria ecological approach to understanding the role of the oral bacteria in dental caries causation: an alternative to Streptococcus mutans and the specific-plaque hypothesis. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 13, 108–125, https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130201300202 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Marsh, P. D. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community - implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health. 6 Suppl 1, S14, https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S14 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Marsh, P. D. Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology. 149, 279–294, https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26082-0 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zero, D. T. Sugars - the arch criminal? Caries Res. 38, 277–285, https://doi.org/10.1159/000077767 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Holloway, P. J. & Moore, W. J. The role of sugar in the aetiology of dental caries. J. Dent. 11, 189–190, https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(83)90182-3 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Head, D. A., Devine, D. & Marsh, P. D. In silico modelling to differentiate the contribution of sugar frequency versus total amount in driving biofilm dysbiosis in dental caries. Sci. Rep. 7, 17413, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17660-z (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Palacios, C. et al. Association between Type, Amount, and Pattern of Carbohydrate Consumption with Dental Caries in 12-Year-Olds in Puerto Rico. Caries Res. 50, 560–570, https://doi.org/10.1159/000450655 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Olczak-Kowalczyk, D., Turska, A., Gozdowski, D. & Kaczmarek, U. Dental caries level and sugar consumption in 12-year-old children from Poland. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 25, 545–550, https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/61615 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Leme, A. F. P., Koo, H., Bellato, C. M., Bedi, G. & Cury, J. A. The Role of Sucrose in Cariogenic Dental Biofilm Formation—New Insight. J. Dent. Res. 85, 878–887, https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501002 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rolla, G., Scheie, A. A. & Ciardi, J. E. Role of sucrose in plaque formation. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 93, 105–111, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1985.tb01317.x (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Schilling, K. M. & Bowen, W. H. Glucans synthesized in situ in experimental salivary pellicle function as specific binding sites for Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun. 60, 284–295 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dibdin, G. H. & Shellis, R. P. Physical and Biochemical Studies of Streptococcus mutans Sediments Suggest New Factors Linking the Cariogenicity of Plaque with its Extracellular Polysaccharide Content. J. Dent. Res. 67, 890–895, https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670060101 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Liu, Y., Ren, Z., Hwang, G. & Koo, H. Therapeutic Strategies Targeting Cariogenic Biofilm Microenvironment. Adv. Dent. Res. 29, 86–92, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517736497 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Reese, S. & Guggenheim, B. A novel TEM contrasting technique for extracellular polysaccharides in in vitro biofilms. Microsc. Res. Tech. 70, 816–822, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20471 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Horton, W. A., Jacob, A. E., Green, R. M., Hillier, V. F. & Drucker, D. B. The cariogenicity of sucrose, glucose and maize starch in gnotobiotic rats mono-infected with strains of the bacteria Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus salivarius and Streptococcus milleri. Arch. Oral Biol. 30, 777–780, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(85)90131-1 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Newbrun, E. Sucrose, the arch criminal of dental caries. ASDC J. Dent. Child. 36, 239–248 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Grenby, T. H. & Hutchinson, J. B. The effects of diets containing sucrose, glucose or fructose on experimental dental caries in two strains of rats. Arch. Oral Biol. 14, 373–380, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(69)90091-0 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Birkhed, D., Topitsoglou, V., Edwardsson, S. & Frostell, G. Cariogenicity of invert sugar in long-term rat experiments. Caries Res. 15, 302–307, https://doi.org/10.1159/000260530 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Birkhed, D., Frostell, G. & Lamm, C. J. Cariogenicity of Glucose, Sucrose and Amylopectin in Rats and Hamsters Infected and Noninfected with Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res. 14, 441–447, https://doi.org/10.1159/000260488 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cury, J. A., Rebelo, M. A., Del Bel Cury, A. A., Derbyshire, M. T. & Tabchoury, C. P. Biochemical composition and cariogenicity of dental plaque formed in the presence of sucrose or glucose and fructose. Caries Res. 34, 491–497, https://doi.org/10.1159/000016629 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Minah, G. E., Lovekin, G. B. & Finney, J. P. Sucrose-induced ecological response of experimental dental plaques from caries-free and caries-susceptible Human volunteers. Infect. Immun. 34, 662–675 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Staat, R. H., Gawronski, T. H., Cressey, D. E., Harris, R. S. & Folke, L. E. A. Effects of Dietary Sucrose Levels on the Quantity and Microbial Composition of Human Dental Plaque. J. Dent. Res. 54, 872–880, https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345750540042801 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cury, J. A., Rebello, M. A. & Del Bel Cury, A. A. In situ relationship between sucrose exposure and the composition of dental plaque. Caries Res. 31, 356–360, https://doi.org/10.1159/000262418 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cury, J. A., Francisco, S. B., Del Bel Cury, A. A. & Tabchoury, C. P. In situ study of sucrose exposure, mutans streptococci in dental plaque and dental caries. Braz. Dent. J. 12, 101–104 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Nobre dos Santos, M., Melo dos Santos, L., Francisco, S. B. & Cury, J. A. Relationship among dental plaque composition, daily sugar exposure and caries in the primary dentition. Caries Res. 36, 347–352, https://doi.org/10.1159/000065959 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    van der Hoeven, J. S., Toorop, A. I. & Mikx, F. H. M. Symbiotic Relationship of Veillonella alcalescens and Streptococcus mutans in Dental Plaque in Gnotobiotic Rats. Caries Res. 12, 142–147, https://doi.org/10.1159/000260324 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mikx, F. H. M. & van der Hoeven, J. S. Symbiosis of Streptococcus mutans and Veillonella alcalescens in mixed continuous cultures. Arch. Oral Biol. 20, 407–410, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(75)90224-1 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kolenbrander, P. The Genus Veillonella. 1022–1040; https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30744-3_36 (2006).

  37. 37.

    Becker, M. R. et al. Molecular analysis of bacterial species associated with childhood caries. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 1001–1009, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.40.3.1001-1009.2002 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zheng, X. et al. Involvement of gshAB in the interspecies competition within oral biofilm. J. Dent. Res. 92, 819–824, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513498598 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mitrakul, K., Vongsawan, K., Sriutai, A. & Thosathan, W. Association between S. mutans and S. sanguinis in Severe Early childhood Caries and Caries-Free Children A Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 40, 281–289, https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-40.4.281 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Loesche, W. J., Rowan, J., Straffon, L. H. & Loos, P. J. Association of Streptococcus mutants with human dental decay. Infect. Immun. 11, 1252–1260 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tian, Y. et al. Using DGGE profiling to develop a novel culture medium suitable for oral microbial communities. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 25, 357–367, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1014.2010.00585.x (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Edlund, A. et al. An in vitro biofilm model system maintaining a highly reproducible species and metabolic diversity approaching that of the human oral microbiome. Microbiome. 1, 25, https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-1-25 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Frostell, G., Keyes, P. H. & Larson, R. H. Effect of Various Sugars and Sugar Substitutes on Dental Caries in Hamsters and Rats. J. Nutr. 93, 65–76, https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/93.1.65 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Campbell, R. G. & Zinner, D. D. Effect of Certain Dietary Sugars on Hamster Caries. J. Nutr. 100, 11–20, https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/100.1.11 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sheiham, A. Sugars and Dental Decay. The Lancet. 321, 282–284, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91696-3 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    van Loveren, C. Sugar Restriction for Caries Prevention: Amount and Frequency. Which Is More Important? Caries Res. 53, 168–175, https://doi.org/10.1159/000489571 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    He, J. et al. Taxonomic and Functional Analyses of the Supragingival Microbiome from Caries-Affected and Caries-Free Hosts. Microb. Ecol. 75, 543–554, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-1056-1 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ling, Z. et al. Analysis of oral microbiota in children with dental caries by PCR-DGGE and barcoded pyrosequencing. Microb. Ecol. 60, 677–690, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9712-8 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Xu, L. et al. Dynamic Alterations in Salivary Microbiota Related to Dental Caries and Age in Preschool Children With Deciduous Dentition: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study. Front. Physiol. 9, 342, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00342 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Simón-Soro, A. & Mira, A. Solving the etiology of dental caries. Trends Microbiol. 23, 76–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2014.10.010 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Fath, B. D., Scharler, U. M., Ulanowicz, R. E. & Hannon, B. Ecological network analysis: network construction. Ecol. Modell. 208, 49–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.029 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Zhou, J. et al. Functional Molecular Ecological Networks. mBio. 1; https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00169-10 (2010).

  53. 53.

    Johansson, I., Witkowska, E., Kaveh, B., Lif Holgerson, P. & Tanner, A. C. R. The Microbiome in Populations with a Low and High Prevalence of Caries. J. Dent. Res. 95, 80–86, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515609554 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Li, Y. et al. Oral microbial community typing of caries and pigment in primary dentition. BMC Genomics. 17, 558, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2891-z (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Costalonga, M. & Herzberg, M. C. The oral microbiome and the immunobiology of periodontal disease and caries. Immunol. Lett. 162, 22–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2014.08.017 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ellen, R. P., Banting, D. W. & Fillery, E. D. Longitudinal microbiological investigation of a hospitalized population of older adults with a high root surface caries risk. J. Dent. Res. 64, 1377–1381, https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640121001 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Loesche, W. J., Eklund, S., Earnest, R. & Burt, B. Longitudinal investigation of bacteriology of human fissure decay: epidemiological studies in molars shortly after eruption. Infect. Immun. 46, 765–772 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Mikx, F. H. M., van der Hoeven, J. S., König, K. G., Plasschaert, A. J. M. & Guggenheim, B. Establishment of Defined Microbial Ecosystems in Germ-Free Rats. Caries Res. 6, 211–223, https://doi.org/10.1159/000259801 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Association, G. AotW. M. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 81, 14 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    van Loveren, C., Buijs, J. F. & ten Cate, J. M. The effect of triclosan toothpaste on enamel demineralization in a bacterial demineralization model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45, 153–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/45.2.153 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ahn, S. J., Lemos, J. A. & Burne, R. A. Role of HtrA in growth and competence of Streptococcus mutans UA159. J. Bacteriol. 187, 3028–3038, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.9.3028-3038.2005 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Tsang, P., Merritt, J., Shi, W. & Qi, F. IrvA-dependent and IrvA-independent pathways for mutacin gene regulation in Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 261, 231–234, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00351.x (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Zhou, Y. et al. Differential Utilization of Basic Proline-Rich Glycoproteins during Growth of Oral Bacteria in Saliva. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 5249–5258, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01111-16 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Price, R. R., Viscount, H. B., Stanley, M. C. & Leung, K. P. Targeted profiling of oral bacteria in human saliva andin vitrobiofilms with quantitative real-time PCR. Biofouling. 23, 203–213, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010701251169 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 81600874, 81771099, 81670978, and 81870754], a research grant from the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province [grant number 2018SZ0121], and the Fund for Young Scholars of Sichuan University [grant number 2016SCU11041]. Dr. He would also like to thank her son, Zhiqian Li, for his encouragement and supporting all the time.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Qian Du: performed the majority of the experiments, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript; Min Fu: performed the majority of the experiments, analyzed the data, writing-review and editing; Yuan Zhou, Yangpei Cao, Tingwei Guo, Zhou Zhou: helped the bioinformatics on 16 S rRNA sequencing data and provided suggestions for the project; Mingyun Li, Xian Peng, Xin Zheng, Yan Li: helped to design the study and draft the manuscript, provided suggestions for the project and critically reviewed the manuscript; Xin Xu: funding acquisition, writing-review and editing; Jinzhi He, Xuedong Zhou: conceptualization, writing-review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jinzhi He or Xuedong Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, Q., Fu, M., Zhou, Y. et al. Sucrose promotes caries progression by disrupting the microecological balance in oral biofilms: an in vitro study. Sci Rep 10, 2961 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59733-6

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing