Introduction

Stroke-associated infection (SAI)1, also known as post-stroke infection, is defined as the absence of signs of infection at stroke and during infection latency, followed by infection within the first week after stroke2. SAIs, such as pulmonary and urinary tract infections, are important complications of acute stroke. They complicate the disease and can worsen prognosis3,4. In the clinical treatment of this type of patients, the use of antibiotics is extremely common, but adverse reactions5 and antibiotic abuse can damage important organs and give rise to resistance, making treatment more difficult6. Therefore, evaluation of antibiotic use is particularly important.

Antibiotic use density (AUD) is a group- or population-level index that refers to the ratio of antibiotic consumption to the number of days that patients are hospitalized7. AUD is often used in clinical economics8. We propose here the concept of personal AUD (PAUD) to assess antibiotic use at the individual level. PAUD may better capture patients’ use of antibiotics during hospitalization and the daily antibiotic load. It may be useful for evaluation of personal antibiotic use.

Intracerebral hemorrhage is associated with higher mortality than other types of stroke9 as well as higher incidence of SAI10 and more common antibiotic use11. The potential relationship between the use of antibiotics and prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage patients with SAI is unclear. The purpose of the present study was to examine the potential association between PAUD and prognosis in intracerebral hemorrhage patients with SAI.

Methods

Patients

We continuously collected data on patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who were admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to September 2017. All patients were diagnosed according to the AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage12. Patients were excluded if they had (1) recurrent cerebral hemorrhage; (2) anticoagulant drug-related cerebral hemorrhage; (3) patients who were bedridden during the last three months, regardless of reason; (4) history of mental illness.

The excluded conditions in patients with infection were that (1) infection occurs one week after stroke (n = 9); (2) confirmed infection before admission (n = 5); (3) severe hepatic/renal insufficiency (n = 3); (4) abandon treatment within 48 hours (n = 2).

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Board of Jiading District Central Hospital (2017-ZD-03). Written informed consent was waived by the Ethics Review Board due to the retrospective nature of the study. Patient data were anonymized. The procedures followed were in accordance with the standards of the ethics committee of Jiading District Central Hospital and with the Declaration of Helsinki (1975, revised 2013).

Diagnostic criteria

SAI was defined as infection occurring during the first week after stroke2. Stroke-associated pneumonia was defined as the presence of relevant clinical signs and/or symptoms (such as cough and sputum, unilateral inhalation moist rale, and bronchial breath sound), together with at least one of the following auxiliary examination results: leukocytosis, fever or positive chest X-ray13. Stroke-associated urinary tract infection was defined as the existence of relevant clinical symptoms and/or signs (such as difficulty in urination and frequent urination) combined with positive microbial culture results or fever (≥37.5 °C), or negative microbial culture results with leukocytosis (>11 × 109/L)13.

Data collection

We retrospectively analyzed general demographic data (including gender, age), past medical history [including hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)], hematoma site (above or under the curtain), hematoma volume, rate of combined intraventricular hemorrhage and length of stay. Also recorded were the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, as well as infection-related laboratory parameters before antibiotic use, including white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). The intracerebral hemorrhage scale (ICH) score14 was calculated and recorded according to each patient’s admission status and cranial computed tomography.

Group definitions

The used antibiotics were included Cephalosporins (Cefuroxime, Ceftazidime and Cefepime), Carbapenems (Imipenem and Cilastatin Sodium, Meropenem), Quinolones (Levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin), Azithromycin, Piperacillin and tazobactam sodium and Amikacin. PAUD was defined as cumulative personal defined daily dose (DDD)15 divided by the hospital stay (in days). In other words, PAUD = Individual antimicrobial consumption during patient hospitalization/Length of stay. The individual antimicrobial consumption during patient hospitalization = ((antibiotic A) specifications * daily administration frequency * Duration of antibiotic use)/the standard DDD of (antibiotic A) + ((antibiotic B) specifications * daily administration frequency *Duration of antibiotic use)/the standard DDD of (antibiotic B) + …. The standard DDD of antibiotics were confirmed on the website of World Health Organization (WHO). The website is https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index. Patients were divided into a survival group (n = 111) and death group (n = 51). Patients were also divided according to PAUD tertiles into a low PAUD group (<0.38, n = 53), intermediate PAUD group (0.38–0.75, n = 55) and high PAUD group ≥0.75, n = 54).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Normally distributed data were expressed as mean ± SD and compared between groups using Student’s t test. Non-normally distributed data were expressed as median (interquartile range, IQR) and compared between groups using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Numerical data were expressed as frequencies and compared between groups using the χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out, and survival was counted from the date of admission until all-cause death during hospitalization. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Spearman correlation was used to analyze relationships between PAUD and other variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General patient characteristics

We continuously collected data on 570 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage from January 2015 to September 2017. The in-hospital mortality rate was 15.6% (89/570) and the SAI rate was 28.4% (162/570). Subsequent analysis was performed only on the 162 cases with SAI (Fig. 1), of whom 111 (68.5%) were men. Mean age was 66.6 ± 15.2 years. Of all 162 patients, 50 were admitted to the ICU, accounting for 30.9%. The most frequent infection was pneumonia [83.9% (136/162)]. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among intracerebral hemorrhage patients with SAI [31.5% (51/162)] than among all 570 patients examined during the study period [15.6% (89/570), P < 0.001].

Figure 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of patients in the study.

Comparison of clinical factors and outcomes among patients stratified by prognosis or PAUD

The death group showed significantly higher values than the survival group for the following clinical indices: ICH volume [43.3 (23.8, 68.4) vs. 17.9 (7.15, 41.1), P < 0.001], NIHSS score [22 (17, 25) vs. 11 (4, 18), P < 0.001], ICH score [3 (2, 4) vs. 1 (1, 2), P < 0.001], WBC [13.9 (10.8, 16.8) vs. 9.6 (7.2, 13.1), P < 0.001], NLR [15.1 (4.6, 20.2) vs. 8.5 (4.5, 13.8), P = 0.013], the rate of ICU admitted (43.1% vs. 25.2%, P = 0.022) and PAUD [0.83 (0.33, 1.12) vs. 0.47 (0.26, 0.73), P = 0.001]. Conversely, the death group showed significantly lower values on the following clinical indices: GCS score [5 (3, 12) vs. 14 (8, 15), P < 0.001], personal accumulated consumption of antibiotics in DDDs [2.4 (1.0, 5.9) vs. 11.7 (6.0, 17.5), P < 0.001], the time of infections start (2.8 ± 1.8 vs. 4.1 ± 1.7, P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay [6 (4, 17) vs. 25 (18, 32), P < 0.001]. The death and survival groups did not differ significantly in other factors (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients who survived or died in hospital.

In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the low PAUD group (24.5%) and intermediate PAUD group (14.6%) than in the high PAUD group (55.6%; P < 0.001; Fig. 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Correlation between in-hospital mortality and PAUD in patients stratified by PAUD tertile (low, intermediate, high). PAUD values in each group are shown below the name of each group.

Risk factors for in-hospital death

Multivariate Cox regression was conducted with adjustment for sex, age, WBC, ICH volume, infratentorial, concurrent ventricular hemorrhage and GCS score. The results identified three risk factors for in-hospital death (Model 1, Table 2): PAUD (OR 2.396, 95% CI 1.412–4.067, P = 0.001), NIHSS score (OR 1.012, 95% CI 1.067–1.139, P < 0.001) and NLR (OR 1.040, 95% CI 1.006–1.074, P = 0.021). Risk of in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the low PAUD group than in the high PAUD group (OR 0.451, 95% CI 0.222–0.913, P = 0.027), and it was lower in the intermediate PAUD group than in the high PAUD group (OR 0.211, 95% CI 0.090–0.493, P < 0.001; Model 2, Table 2). After adjustment for sex, age, WBC and ICH score, Model 3 identified three independent risk factors of in-hospital mortality: PAUD (OR 2.952, 95% CI 1.711–5.094, P < 0.001), NIHSS score (OR 1.095, 95% CI 1.057–1.134, P < 0.001) and NLR (OR 1.038, 95% CI 1.004–1.074, P = 0.027; Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariate Cox regression to identify potential factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

PAUD tertile and survival

Cumulative in-hospital survival was significantly higher in the low and intermediate PAUD groups than in the high PAUD group (log rank test, P < 0.001; Fig. 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curve showing in-hospital mortality in patients stratified by PAUD tertiles.

PAUD and clinical factors or prognosis

Spearman correlation analysis showed that PAUD correlated positively with NIHSS score (r = 0.216, P = 0.006) and in-hospital mortality (r = 0.268, P = 0.001; Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation of PAUD with clinical features in patients.

Discussion

This is the first study to propose the concept of PAUD and to use it to evaluate clinical prognosis. In this study, the incidence of SAI, due mainly to pulmonary infection, was relatively high among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Among these patients, SAI was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Our results suggests that PAUD is closely related to in-hospital prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage patients with SAI. Higher PAUD may be associated with greater risk of death.

Our study suggests that the incidence of SAI is nearly 30% among intracerebral hemorrhage patients, and that mortality is as high as 31.5% among such patients. These results are consistent with previous work16,17. Unfortunately, prophylactic use of antibiotics by patients with stroke does not appear to reduce occurrence of SAI18. This highlights the need to evaluate the use of antibiotics among such patients.

AUD, widely used in management and research fields, can be used to compare antibiotic use across time periods and geographic regions and thereby guide strategies for rational, cost-effective antibiotic use19,20,21. However, AUD looks at aggregate antibiotic use by populations, which can mask clinically important differences among patients and limit our ability to assess safety and efficacy of specific dosing regimens of specific antimicrobial agents. Therefore, the present study proposes the concept of PAUD. Our study explored the relationship between PAUD and prognosis in intracerebral hemorrhage patients with SAI, in order to provide new approaches to evaluate antibiotic use in this vulnerable patient group.

For these patients in our study, in-hospital mortality was associated with significantly lower individual cumulative DDD and shorter length of stay, as well as higher bleeding volume, rate of combined intraventricular hemorrhage and lower GCS scores. These results likely reflect the fact that in-hospital mortality shortens the length of stay, which in turn reduces the individual cumulative DDD. However, at the same time, in-hospital mortality was associated with significantly higher PAUD. In other words, although the patients who died were hospitalized for shorter periods than those who survived, they had a much higher daily average cumulative personal defined daily dose. This result suggests that antibiotic use may be related to prognosis. Indeed, we found PAUD to be an independent risk factor of in-hospital death among these patients. For each unit increase in PAUD, risk of death increased 1.4-fold.

Patients with SAI may require a different approach to antibiotic use than other patients with infectious diseases. The broad-spectrum combination therapies typically applied to patients with infectious diseases, especially critically ill patients, may damage the normal microbial flora in patients with SAI, compromising their ability to combat infection and thereby increasing risk of mortality22. In addition, intracerebral hemorrhage patients with SAI have a neurological deficit not found in patients with primary infectious diseases. This may call for adjustment of the types and amounts of antibiotics to optimize therapy to individual patients and ensure rational antibiotic use.

In the present study, we found NLR to be associated with poor short-term survival, confirming previous results from our research group23,24,25. We found that NIHSS score was an independent risk factor of death, and that it correlated positively with PAUD. This indicates that the severity of neurological deficits is closely related to the use of antibiotics: the loss of swallowing function26, hypostatic pneumonia caused by impairment of physical activity, and aspiration or reflux caused by disturbance of consciousness27 may lead to infection, in turn increasing PAUD. Our findings support previous results linking NIHSS score to the developed infection of patients with stroke28, which may help explain the observed association between high PAUD and in-hospital mortality. However, we did not observe an association of hematoma volume or GCS score with PAUD, although both factors are closely related to the occurrence of SAI after intracerebral hemorrhage29,30,31. It may be that the NIHSS score more comprehensively reflects neurological impairment due to hematoma volume and impaired consciousness captured in the GCS score. In any event, our findings and the literature highlight the need for clinicians to pay sufficient attention to patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, regardless of the severity of their neurological deficits, including timely assessment of swallowing function32, retention of the gastric tube33 and effective counseling and other interventions to help patient’s family members prevent SAI. At the same time, risks and benefits of antibiotic use should be weighed carefully34.

Our study has some limitations. First, it involved a single center with a relatively small number of cases, and there may have been a bias toward patients with less severe disease, since seriously ill patients at our hospital are often transferred to larger, better-equipped hospitals. The retrospective nature of our study means that we cannot draw conclusions about causal relationships linking PAUD with other factors or prognosis. Finally, The DDD value, established by WHO, is an artificial value. It is mainly used for the comprehensive evaluation of antibacterial drugs. The guiding significance of PAUD for individual treatment plans needs to be further explored.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that PAUD is closely related to the prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage patients with SAI. Clinical application of antibiotics in SAI patients should be considered carefully to avoid an increase in risk of in-hospital mortality. Our findings should be verified and extended in large, prospective studies.