Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39251-w, published online 27 February 2019
This Article contains errors in the Results section, where:
“After model averaging, we found strong support for an effect of individual behaviour on site fidelity of rural birds and of conspecific density on site fidelity of urban and rural ones (Table 2 and Fig. 2), shyer rural individuals and birds breeding at higher conspecific densities having a higher probability of changing their breeding sites between successive years than their counterparts (R2 = 0.16). Habitat, and breeding success and productivity in the previous year received strong support to explain variability in the dispersal distance of all individuals (R2 = 0.46), urban birds, and individuals breeding successfully or having more chicks moving less than rural, and unsuccessful owls (Table 2 and Fig. 2).”
should read:
“After model averaging, we found strong support for an effect of individual behaviour on site fidelity of rural birds and of conspecific density on site fidelity of urban and rural ones (Table 2 and Fig. 2), shyer rural individuals and urban birds breeding at higher conspecific densities having a higher probability of changing their breeding sites between successive years than their counterparts (R2 = 0.16). Habitat, and breeding success and productivity in the previous year received strong support to explain variability in the dispersal distance of all individuals (R2 = 0.46), urban birds, and individuals breeding successfully or having more chicks moving less than rural, and unsuccessful owls (Table 2).”
Additionally, there is an error in the Legend of Figure 1, where:
“(a) Proportion of burrowing owls showing site fidelity (1) or changing their breeding sites between successive years (0) in rural (grey bars) and urban (black bars) habitats. (b) For individuals changing their breeding sites, the accumulated proportion of dispersing urban (grey line) and rural (black line) individuals as a funciton of distance is also shown. The maximum dispersal distance observed is indicated by a point (grey and black, for urban and rural birds respectively). Vertical dashed lines show mean distances for urban (grey line) and rural (black line) birds.”
should read:
“(a) Proportion of burrowing owls showing site fidelity (1) or changing their breeding sites between successive years (0) in rural (grey bars) and urban (black bars) habitats. (b) For individuals changing their breeding sites, the accumulated proportion of dispersing urban (black line) and rural (grey line) individuals as a function of distance is also shown. The maximum dispersal distance observed is indicated by a point (black and grey, for urban and rural birds respectively). Vertical dashed lines show mean distances for urban (black line) and rural (grey line) birds.”
and in the Legend of Figure 2, where:
“(a) Factors affecting site fidelity among rural and urban burrowing owls (estimate ± 95% CI). Site fidelity was negatively related to individual behaviour (measured as flight initiation distances, FID) among rural individuals (b) while it was negatively related to conspecific density (measured as aggregation) among urban ones. (c) Lines (black: rural, grey: urban) show the probability of remaining in the same breeding site for individuals with different FID and living at different conspecific densities. Dots (black: rural, white: urban) show predicted values.”
should read
“(a) Factors affecting site fidelity among rural and urban burrowing owls (estimate ± 95% CI) (based on SP2). Site fidelity was negatively related to individual behaviour (measured as flight initiation distances, FID) among rural individuals (b) while it was negatively related to conspecific density (measured as aggregation) among urban ones. (c) Lines (black: urban, grey: rural) show the probability of remaining in the same breeding site for individuals with different FID and living at different conspecific densities. Dots (black: urban, white: rural) show predicted values.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Luna, Á., Palma, A., Sanz-Aguilar, A. et al. Author Correction: Personality-dependent breeding dispersal in rural but not urban burrowing owls. Sci Rep 10, 1729 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58513-6
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58513-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.